Bombshell Revelations: The Plot To Topple Trump

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Ko commits trees and doesn't get rid of the bag
that you put into a room to have burned, and
it's not burned. Go back to Joe Rogan a few
months ago, appiid director Cash Hotel on there said he
stumbled upon a room, never heard much more about it.
Well we do. Now there's gonna be a whole lot

(00:23):
more coming out. It's gonna be irrefutable evidence. And that's
what that is what's needed. We don't need any more
James Comer investigations into Hunter, Biden and Joe where they
don't lay it out on the table. And that's what
just happened today, which brings me to another big fat
question mark. I watched, I saw the video clip that's

(00:49):
in question. The New York Post reported federal investigators previously
concluded the pixelated blob was a corrections officer carrying linen
or inmate clothes. What are you talking about, Well, we
know be a director, Cash Metel, Deputy Director Bongino, Attorney
General Pam Bondi, President Trump. It's all dumb. We've looked

(01:09):
at it. Dan Bongino, deputy director said irrefutable. I've watched
the video. I've watched the evidence. I've seen all of that,
and he did not kill He did kill himself. Nobody
else killed him. He committed suicide Epstein in his jail cell.
In twenty nineteen, Forensic experts he spoke to The New

(01:30):
York Post part of the investigation into the jail video
now say it may have actually been a jumpsuit clad inmate.
If you're going to ask me, is that a corrections
officer or is that an inmate? Just based on what
my eyes saw, let's see, who would even ask if
that's a correction officer. They're an orange. The staircase right there,

(01:53):
you can barely see it, and to me, it's a
little more than a blob. It looks like what you're
catching is the left elbow and shoulder of someone in
an orange going up those stairs. Epstein cell was basically
entirely out of the camera's view. But they told us

(02:14):
this video would show anybody leaving or entering the area
where he was held. Had missing minutes. They're now talking
about that. They have the missing time. Okay, the orange shape,
what is that? It was reviewed by CBS News. It's
a shadowy object. I guess you could say, moving up

(02:35):
the stairs to Epstein cell block at ten forty the
night before he was found dangling with a bed sheet
from a in his cell ten forty that night. No,
that's just a guys, what are you thinking about. No,
that's just a corrections officer carrying carrying some bed sheets,

(02:55):
carrying some inmate clothing at ten forty at night. That's
all he's doing. Now, that looks like it inmate, that
looks like orange is the new black orange uniform? There
was a retired New York PD sergeant forensic video expert.
He told CBS, Yes, it's likely a person in an
orange uniform. Now, what I have not heard with all

(03:19):
this reporting where Epstein was being held in twenty nineteen,
did the inmates wear orange? That might be a question.
But it does show somebody going up those stairs. The
entrance to Epstein's cell is outside of the what you

(03:40):
can see on that camera. But the FBI, they told
us that these cameras capture anybody entering or exit in
the area where Epstein was held. Well, we can't see
a cell, so what are you seeing that you're telling
us come on the video forensic experts to say, there's

(04:01):
no way that somebody could get to that the stairs
up to his room without being seen as false. They
also said the footage released by the FBI didn't appear
to be raw to screen recording, and and we we
had it skipping ahead a minute. Let's go back a
month ago.

Speaker 2 (04:20):
Here and the minute missing from the video. We released
the video showing definitively the video was not conclusive, but
the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide.
And what was on that there was a minute that
was off the counter. And what we learned from euro of.

Speaker 3 (04:42):
Prisons was every year, every night they redo that videos
old from like nineteen ninety nine, so every night the
video is reset and every night should have the same
minute missing.

Speaker 2 (04:54):
So we're looking for that video to release that as well,
showing that a minute is missing every night.

Speaker 1 (04:59):
And that's that's it. That's it on Epstein, guy that
might have the black book, that could black male world leaders,
some of the wealthiest people in America, the most powerful people.
We're not gonna you know, he supposedly tried to kill
himself one other time. We're not gonna make sure we

(05:20):
got a dedicated camera on him, because you remember the
first time was that the guards fell asleep and the
cameras didn't work. Now we have a camera that that works,
but it's not really quite filming. And they tell us
that what they've shown us is just the evidence. Why
would you even question something like this? Well, what about

(05:42):
the missing minute? Did the orange blob? Did he go
up during that minute? Again, there was eleven hours of
footage released by the Justice Apartment and the FBI, And
you heard ag Bondi there again, that's from a month ago.
About the one minute jump in the in the time there. Well,
you got to understand this stuff was made in nineteen

(06:04):
ninety nine that caused the system to reset and miss
one minute each night. No, no, even in nineteen ninety nine,
we did not have prison recording things that just decided
to edit out a minute. That's not typical in surveillance systems,
even of nineteen ninety nine. They said. The file that

(06:29):
they released of the video was created on May twenty third.
Two separate videos did together slightly sped up, resulting in
a run time with ten hours and fifty three minutes
rather than the full eleven hours. So I guess now
we're up to seven minutes. That's not there. The pimp

(06:50):
of the Year for Epstein, Miss Maxwell, she wants immunity.
You want me to comply, you want your congressional subpoena,
You're gonna have to give me immunity. I guess the Virginia,
the one of the girls with Prince Andrew that Epstein
and Maxwell, you know, sex trafficked, and all her families

(07:10):
mad that President Trump said he Epstein took her, stole
her from the His comments like that that did that
kind of was a well, why didn't you call somebody
like stop talking, just stop talking about it? Well he
tried to. He tried to get everybody to stop talking
about And that's what I did not understand. Like, I
think that we have amnesia and we're not going to

(07:31):
remember out on the campaign, we have amnesia that that
wasn't on the list that Congresswoman Luna from Florida was
in charge of getting the facts out. Yes, JMK m
ok RFK nine to eleven, Bigfoot, yeah, and Epstein, lucknut monster.

(07:52):
It was all on there, but I remember Epstein being
on there. The pimp of the Year, Maxwell's going to
be subpoenaed August eleventh. It's going to take place in Tallahassee,
she's still serving twenty years in prison. The US District
Court Judge for Southern District of Florida deny the Trump
administration's request to unseal transcripts from the grand jury proceedings

(08:17):
investigations into Epstein. Now she's not going to get she's
not going to get a get out of jail free card.
I don't know. Her testimony might not even take place.
I don't know. You got James Kohmer in there his committee.
He said they're not going to grant her congressional immunity
in exchange for her for her testimony. You know who

(08:40):
they need to get in there? Amy Roebuck, ABC reporter
In twenty nineteen, she said, we had it all, and
I played this a few times years ago, and I
played it a few times over the last few weeks,
and I'm going to play it again. This is who
they need to call in. Her story got squashed by

(09:01):
ABC News high ups said Nope, not going to air it.
She said, we had it all. What does she have?
We should know I've had the story for three years.

Speaker 4 (09:12):
I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts. We would not
put it on the air. First of all, I was told,
who's Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This
is a stupid story. Then the Palace found out that
we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened
us a million different ways. We were so afraid we
wouldn't be able to interview Kate as will that that

(09:34):
also quashed the story. And then and then Alan Dershowitz
was also implicated it because of the planes. She told
me everything, she had, pictures, she had everything, She wasn't
hiding for twelve years. We convinced her to come out.
We convinced her to talk to us. It was unbelievable
what we had Clinton, We had everything. I tried for

(09:56):
three years to.

Speaker 5 (09:56):
Get it on to no avail, and now it's all
coming out and it's these new relev revelations and I
freaking had all of it. I was so pissed right now,
Like every day I get more and more pissed because
I'm just.

Speaker 4 (10:08):
Like, oh my god, we it was what we had
was unreal. Other women backing up, Hey yep. Brad Edwards,
the attorney three years ago, saying like, like we there
will come a day where we will realize Jeffrey Empsteen
was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known.
I had it all three years ago.

Speaker 1 (10:29):
Yeah, and he serviced the other pedophiles as well. And
I will not accept.

Speaker 6 (10:33):
Please, I think to see here, Please No.

Speaker 1 (10:39):
I think we should have listened and already have been questioning.
I guess with everything crazy and the tizzy, the election,
and the euphoria President Trump winning, surviving, the assassination attempt, fight, fight, fight,
Mike should have listened just a little bit closer to
how he respond to this question, because if we had

(11:03):
really listened to this, maybe we wouldn't be as surprised
right now.

Speaker 4 (11:07):
If you were president, would you declassify you can answer
yes or notice. Would you declassify the nine to eleven files?

Speaker 5 (11:14):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (11:14):
Would you declassify JFK files?

Speaker 7 (11:16):
Yeah?

Speaker 8 (11:17):
Would you did?

Speaker 4 (11:17):
I did a lot of it. Would you declassify the
Epstein files?

Speaker 6 (11:21):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (11:22):
Yeah, I would, all right, I guess I would.

Speaker 9 (11:24):
I think that's less so because you know, you don't
know if you don't want to affect people's lives of
its phony stuff in there, because there's a lot of
phony stuff with that whole world.

Speaker 4 (11:34):
But I think I would, or at least do you
think that would restore trust?

Speaker 6 (11:37):
Help restore trust?

Speaker 4 (11:38):
I don't know about Epstein so much as I do
the others.

Speaker 1 (11:41):
I don't know about Epstein so much as I do
the others. So why then, why wasn't it a big
breaking story. President Trump questions whether he'll investigate Epstein, said,
it's not as big a deal. I don't know. I
guess that would just kind of flew by us. But
when President Trump said, you know, very I don't know.
I don't want your support if you're going to keep

(12:01):
asking about this, that was kind of shocking.

Speaker 9 (12:03):
They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking.
They don't want well informed, well educated people capable of
critical thinking. They're I'm interested in that. That doesn't help them.
That's against the tread That's right.

Speaker 1 (12:17):
Come on, George, tell us about the big club, buddy.

Speaker 9 (12:20):
It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You
and I are not in the big club.

Speaker 6 (12:27):
This is the Trevor Jerry Show on The Valley's Power Talk.

Speaker 1 (12:32):
John Gerardi's going to join us here at the bottom
of the hour over the oldest baby ever born. I'm
just gonna leave it at that, The oldest baby ever born.
I got some true reservations about this and disagreement, says
Power Talk and CEO this sister California right till life.
John Girardi does as well. We'll talk to him at

(12:53):
the bottom of the hour. Did you see Maybe not
if you haven't been paying attention, but Senator prison Elizabeth Warren,
the Indian takes a fall. The fake Indian takes a fall.
She went down in the Senate. She leaned back. I
just thinking it was a stronger podium, but it was
just a table and bam, down goes war and down

(13:14):
goes war, isn't it well?

Speaker 5 (13:17):
Boy?

Speaker 1 (13:17):
Democrats and Republicans came to her hand, so you Senator
round Paul coming over real quick? Was that Ted Cruz there,
the first one. He's looking a little older these days.
He'd probably say the same about me. Is that beard?
I didn't recognize him as well, But yes, she took
a tumble. She's okay, she's fine. She had on her
tennis shoes. She looked all bouncy. She bounced right back.

(13:39):
I'm okay, I'm okay everybody. But then she walked out
and ripped on Trump about the economy.

Speaker 10 (13:44):
H Donald Trump, prost I thank you a lower costs
on day one.

Speaker 1 (13:49):
It's now six months.

Speaker 10 (13:50):
In his administration. The cost of groceries is up, the
cost of housing is up, the cost of student loans
is up. Out of the cost of utilities is up.
And I think we ought to be talking about that
with the American people. Republicans are too afraid to have
talent holes with their own constituents. So parents are going

(14:10):
to get out there and talk to the people. That's
how democracy works.

Speaker 1 (14:14):
That's how democracy works. He knows, fake liar, fake, fake fake.
I'd never heard of this ozembic face, Olympic face. I guess, uh,
cosmetic surgery is these dermatologists are making a whole lot

(14:35):
of money. What is ozimbic face. Well, you've probably seen
it before with somebody that might be forty to fifty six,
you know, not young with that. You know, skin that
just bounces right back kind of stuff. You' you ever
seenbody lose a whole lot of weight kind of the
jowls form and the sunken in face conform. But ozimpic

(14:57):
makes people lose weight. And now they're saying it creates
sagging skin and a hollowed out appearance. They said in
your mid forties and above, you start losing ten plus pounds,
you can get this kind of deflated look, they said.
People losing twenty thirty pounds are definitely going to have
the problem of the deflated look. I'll take it. Deflight me,

(15:20):
they said. The Sweman went on the gastric sleeve surgery
in twenty nineteen, but during COVID she gained forty pounds.
Remember I was tuning about that. Yeah, the COVID man
made lockdown weight gain time period she was prescribed what
gov She said. It was a miracle, she said, taking
her from one seventy to one to twenty five. But

(15:40):
now she says, I'm fifty five and I just look
so old my face and my neck said, it's all sagging.
I had only heard about Okay, they all blur to me.
All these drugs blurred me. You see them advertised. I'm

(16:02):
gonna say seventy five percent of them. I don't even
know what they're curing. I just see some middle aged
guy with a guitar and a gazebo at a park
and people singing around them, And I really don't know
what they're curing. I don't but with ozimpic I started
hearing about it when people started, you know, having bad
side effects, and I started hear, oh, that's a that's

(16:23):
a weight loss drug. That was initially I think clear
for diabetes, Yeah, diabetes, And then it came into this
and they said, the ozempic face, it's a decrease in
the fat that makes our faces plump. Said, nothing new.
Your body, they said, as an adult does not make
more fat cells. So when you gain weight, those fat cells, well,

(16:47):
as you lose weight, the fat cells are not multiplying
or decreasing, they're just getting bigger or smaller. So that's
how that works out. So that's how the face reacts
to weight loss. And if you're in your twenties and thirties,
it will bounce back due to GLP one. That's what
we're missing in as we age. GLP one, all right,

(17:11):
didn't we just used to call it getting older? Yeah,
now we got a face named for it. I'm looking
at these two guys's face here and I just feel
so sorry for this old baby that they're holding between them.
It was a gay couple. They went viral. They they
obtained a baby via surrogacy, which you would think two

(17:34):
males would have to do, and it was discovered one
of the guys as a convicted child sex offender. Logan
and Brandon put a video on social media kissing their
new baby. Each month as the baby grew, kept putting
it up, and some people started noticing the social media
and somebody said, let's go see who who Logan and

(17:55):
Brandon are. Brandon was arrested for soliciting sex from a
sixteen year old boy. He's a sex offender in the
state of Pennsylvania. Yeah, he was a chemistry teacher at
a school where he went after a kid. They did
a search, weren't He exchanged over twelve thousand text messages
with a kid, sexually explicit videos of the child on

(18:16):
his laptop and he was ordified the court to stay
away from kids. But he and his male partner guy there,
launched to go fundme to get a surrogate to have
a baby. Well, somebody looked it up and said, he's
a convicted sex offender. What's he doing with really somebody

(18:37):
else's baby. Pennsylvania State Police said no, the state does
not automatically forbid individuals convicted of sex crimes from gaining
custody or exercising parental rights. So the whole thing is says, hey,
you got to stay away from kids unless it's one
you're going to go out and buy. Man the fact

(19:02):
that an evil child sex offender is able to legally
purchase a baby, boy, Oh, I gotta say, the devil's
winning that one. Well for now he knows he's already lost.
But no, I would have if you'd asked me on
the street yesterday, I say it, i'llegal for a child
sex offender to buy a baby via surrogacy. I'd be like, yeah,

(19:26):
aren't they instructed to stay away from children? Of course
they probably can't go buy one.

Speaker 6 (19:31):
Is the Trevor Terry Show on the Valley's Power Talk.

Speaker 1 (19:35):
Need some help, buddy, Welcome to the show. He's the
executive director Central California Right to Life and of course
you'll hear him here in less than an hour and
a half, John, Welcome to the show.

Speaker 7 (19:45):
Man, good to beyond, Trevor, thanks for having me this.

Speaker 1 (19:48):
I called John this morning. I was gonna when I,
you know, go his area of expertise, which is many
things there. I said, Well we started talking, was like, man,
come on the show, let's talk about this. The world's
oldest baby was born from an embryo frozen in nineteen
ninety four. John, For those that don't understand in vitro fertilization,
take us back to the basics of this and then

(20:10):
we'll talk about this story here.

Speaker 7 (20:13):
Yeah. So in vitro fertilization, it's basically it's a process
where you're creating embryos in a lab in glass in vitro.
In vitro's a Latin phrase, it just means in glass
and basically bypassing normal human reproduction. So a lot of

(20:35):
people with infertility problems tend to take advantage of it,
and it's always had kind of these bioethical problems and
issues and concerns with it, one of the chief among
them being.

Speaker 1 (20:50):
To do the in.

Speaker 7 (20:51):
Vitro fertilization process. For every one baby who's actually able
to come to term, there's we don't know exactly, but
five to ten babies who are either going to be
indefinitely frozen or just destroyed.

Speaker 1 (21:08):
And you're calling them babies. People are going back up here,
explain this. Yeah, the sperm in the egg create the embryo.

Speaker 7 (21:17):
Yeah, so this is a sperm and an egg unite
to make an early stage human organism. So this is
a human being, a very early stage human being that's
just like you were or just like I was at
that same stage of development. So we have living human
organisms who are just put into cryo freeze for an

(21:42):
indefinite period of time until such point as either the
parents who created the embryo want to try to, you know,
put them into the mother's uterus and actually have them
come to term and be born, or just get rid
of them and stop paying for the freezer storage fees.

Speaker 1 (22:04):
Let me ask you, I have questions. I'm going to
interrupt you. Excuse me for interrupting you. But the egg Okay,
let's say that the woman can have a baby, but
the man has issues there. Would they use her egg
and then another sperm to create that or his or.

Speaker 7 (22:23):
Any any crisscross combination you want or can conceive of,
is doable any sperm with any egg. And what's happening
a lot lately is one of the really disturbing things
that's happening is the combination of in vitro fertilization plus surrogacy,

(22:47):
where basically surrogacy you're just hiring a woman renting her womb.
Basically to have her ges state the baby for nine months,
a baby over whom she will have no legal rights.
Gay couples are doing this all the time, and it's
kind of a very wild wild West, unregulated world where

(23:13):
couples who would never in a million years be approved
to do a normal adoption process are able to create
children who are not biologically their own and adopt them.
There's this big story in the news about this gay
these two gay men where one of the guys is

(23:36):
a registered sex offender, evicted of child sex crimes, and
they just adopted this, you know, beautiful baby boy.

Speaker 1 (23:44):
And I was just talking about that the story before
I went to break to bring you on, and I
would have thought it would be illegal if you're on
the child sex offender list, that you couldn't go buy
a baby.

Speaker 7 (23:55):
Well that and this is the problem is that NBAT
surrogacy especially is this kind of new development, and it's
sort of this wild wild West where it just hasn't
been really all of in vitro and surrogacy. It's far
less regulated in the United States than it is in
other countries, and so it's this kind of wild West

(24:18):
thing of even how do you deal with it's even
this discussion about when you're talking about frozen embryos, what
kind of body of American law do you use to
govern it? Are they property? Are they human beings that
use like child custody laws to sort of oversee I mean,

(24:40):
this particular story about that you were having me on
to discuss this was an embryo frozen in nineteen ninety four.
A woman and her husband, they got divorced. She got
custody for the embryos in the divorce custody or ownership
I'm not sure. I'm not sure if its property or children.

(25:03):
And then she allowed her embryo to be donated. So
it's this very There are all kinds of really serious
bioethics issues that are involved in vitro fertilization that I
think so many people just sort of bypass because the
public face of what they see is usually well, it's
a couple who has infertility issues and they were able

(25:25):
to have a baby through ibs. Oh, that's wonderful. But
there's a lot of very unsavory aspects to the whole industry,
both as far as the destruction and wastage and indefinite
freezing of embryos. And the way it allows people to
bypass the normal adoption process.

Speaker 1 (25:45):
Well, let's talk about the ethics of this. My guest
is John Girardi, Sinceral, California, Ride to Life and also
the host of his own show at six on Power
Talk Monday through Friday and Right to Life Saturday mornings
nine nine down. That was quite I was like, I
always try and remember exactly what it's on. But John,

(26:05):
I say many times this argument when it comes to
abortion and life, and I say, it really depends if
you believe there's a creator. Yes, A lot of people
go yes that, and that creator sent your soul. Do
you believe you have a soul? Yes? Well, okay, here's
the question. When's the soul sent? So I'm sitting here
thinking about this. I'm like, well, if you believe, okay,

(26:26):
let's just say you believe, we can't prove we don't.
But when the sperm and egg meat, we can prove
that's life. And what if the soul was sent, then
we're freezing souls?

Speaker 7 (26:36):
Yeah. Yeah. And it's this bizarre thing for Christians. I
think that they have this sort of I don't know
if it's cognitive dissonance or what's the right term for it,
but the same stage development embryo. Who if it's in
the womb of a woman considering abortion, Oh, that's a

(26:58):
life and we need to protect it. And yet Christian
support for in vitro fertilization is really really high, and
and that that same logic doesn't seem to get applied
to the you know, maybe the eight embryos that are wasted.

Speaker 1 (27:17):
Why why did they create so many? Why somebody needs nature?

Speaker 7 (27:22):
It's kind of the nature of the process. It's it's
kind of unfeasible to just create one and do one
shot the drugs that are needed for a woman to
take cause like hyper ovulation. So it's sort of it's
almost inherent to the process that you're going to be
creating more than you can possibly implant. Uh and and

(27:43):
it's sort of for ease of use of the practitioners.
There are some countries that have stricter controls over it,
like Poland for instance, UH has doesn't allow you to
create as many.

Speaker 9 (27:55):
Uh.

Speaker 7 (27:56):
The state of Louisiana actually has certain controls over IVF
to kind of limit that a little bit, but no
other state in America does. And so as a result,
just for ease of use. This is kind of the
standard practice in the IVF industry that they're you know,
they're just creating far more children than can possibly survive.

(28:17):
And even you've got people engaging in these like crassly
eugenic decisions with their embryos. Like there's this story about
Paris Hilton who conceived her children through IVF and throughout
I forget if she wanted a boy or she wanted
a girl, but she threw out like ten embryos or

(28:37):
something of the opposite sex from what she wanted, just
because well, I don't want those embryos, they're the wrong sex.

Speaker 1 (28:46):
And so I mean, John, and you say throw out,
do you literally mean they just throw them out?

Speaker 8 (28:54):
Yeah?

Speaker 7 (28:54):
Yeah, I mean that you either keep them in frozen
storage and keep paying the storage fee or you just don't,
and then that's it. They're just you know, discarded. So yeah,
and we're talking and again we are talking about living
human organisms, just at a very early stage. And I
do want to say, I mean, I have great empathy

(29:17):
for people who experience infertility desperately want to have a baby,
and who turned to this, Like I'm not judging their
motives or intentions or even their knowledge. But I think
I just have to call a space a spade and say,
I can't see how this process, when you're creating so

(29:38):
many more human lives than are ever feasibly going to
be implanted and come to term, I just can't see
how this process can be legitimate.

Speaker 1 (29:50):
I'll put you on a pop quiz here, do you
know when this technology? When did it enter our society?
When did I start hearing about this?

Speaker 7 (29:59):
I think it starts the game popularity is kind of
in the nineties. That's when a lot of these clinics started,
but I think the technology was kind of older than that.
I think they were starting to be able to do
some of this stuff in the seventies and eighties. The
nineties was really kind of winning.

Speaker 1 (30:15):
We've probably got some more prominence. Yeah, Nazi scientists in
the late forties that really started it when we pulled
them over here. Estimates. I hear estimates out there that
it's millions, and I've also read where it's possibly tens
of millions of these embryos frozen and stored around them.
Is it that high?

Speaker 7 (30:38):
This is one of the difficulties. So because the IVS
industry in America is so relatively unregulated, we really don't
have a great, a great handle on how many children
are you know, how many children are being frozen indefinitely.

(31:02):
It could be I mean, there's there's some thought that,
you know, the number of children either being frozen or
destroyed by IVF could be you know, it could be
more than the number of children killed via abortion every year.
I mean that that's what we're talking And there were

(31:23):
one point one million abortions in America in twenty twenty four,
So that's kind of the moral enormity of this. It's just,
you know, it's kind of a staggering amount, and it's
sort of it's almost a thing that warps my head
as a pro lifer that you know, I've been so

(31:44):
active against the abortion movement, Well, is this, you know,
is this worse? I mean that there are some people
who estimate it could be four million embryos created per year.

Speaker 1 (31:56):
And why do they make why do they make that
many more? Why do they make that many extra?

Speaker 7 (32:01):
Well, again, I think it's just because it's the odds
of success if you just create one embryo to get
it implanted is very very low, and so I think
the process just necessarily involves you create a bunch knowing
a bunch aren't going to work out. So yeah, I

(32:21):
mean there are some. I mean, the estimates are are
kind of wild for exactly how many, but it's got
to be an enormous number.

Speaker 1 (32:30):
So I'm just sitting here. I'm just sitting here thinking,
I don't know what God thinks about this. Maybe he
hits the emergency breaking goes, well, they're doing it in
the lab right now. I'm not sending a soul into
the Petrie dish. I'm just guessing that I'm in God.
But we don't know. And that's the thing. We got
to err on the side of safety. You know, when
Republicans jonggo, well I fifteen weeks, Morson needs to stop that. No,

(32:54):
six weeks. No, they're they're just picking numbers. What are
they nothing's based on this. Well, yeah, they don't know
when the soul comes down.

Speaker 9 (33:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (33:03):
Well, and and any line that you create other than
a live versus not alive involves arbitrary choice. And you're
you know, you can have an edge case of well,
this embryo is five weeks, and you know if six
weeks is your line, Okay, so five weeks and six days.

(33:25):
It has no value. Six weeks in one day, It's
got all the value in the world. It all involves,
and it involves a really ablest kind of conception where
you're sort of putting the value of human life on
a spectrum based on how much you can do. And
if that's what you're doing, who's to say that the

(33:47):
line is, you know, six weeks into pregnancy, why wouldn't
it be you know, one year post birth. That's the
line where Peter Singer draws it. The the it's the
print instant bioethicists who thinks it should be morally acceptable
for parents to euthanize their children within the first year

(34:10):
of their birth. And it's a thing that really fundamentally
screws with your understanding of human equality. If you say, well,
this group of living humans.

Speaker 6 (34:21):
Is not.

Speaker 7 (34:23):
Deserving of protection under law. This group of humans is.
And I think that has to apply to not just
adult outside the womb walking around human beings. I think
it has to be applied to humans inside the womb
as well.

Speaker 1 (34:38):
Well, you just remind me of the Virginia Governor Northrope
when he was interviewed. He said, well, the doctor and
the mom will make that decision when the baby's already
been born. I tell you, keep right, keep your kids
away from these people's house at trick or treating man
you don't want to be around.

Speaker 7 (34:53):
And it's just a further extension of it's basically the
dominant left leaning, you know, pro abortion sort of worldview
is these unborn children have value if the parents or
if the mother wants them. And it's kind of a
wild way of assigning human value to someone that it's extrinsic,

(35:18):
it's based on some other person wanting you. It's kind
of a very bleak thing, but that's how they're able
to justify, you know, the same obstetric surgeon one day
is performing in utero surgery on a fetus and the

(35:39):
next day is aborting another fetus at the same gestational age.
They sort of are able to say, well, this fetus,
because he's wanted, is properly a patient within the parameters
of my care. And the next day, this fetus, who

(36:00):
is not wanted by his mother is properly speaking, a
thing that I'm going to kill. So it's that to
assign human value on the basis of other people wanting you,
other people valuing you. That's kind of the route of
sort of this discussion about embryos within vitro. If they're wanted,

(36:24):
all there are precious embryo that we're holding on to.
But if they're not, we just won't pay for the
storage fees. And that's it.

Speaker 1 (36:31):
So you're saying a seven month pregnant woman could be
arrested by the police for snorting cocaine at a bus stop,
but could go right down the street take that bus
to have her baby killed. It's kind of where we are.

Speaker 7 (36:43):
That that is pretty much where we are.

Speaker 1 (36:46):
Well, John, you guys truly truly help pregnant women. If
there's anybody in that situation right now, there is help.
John give the website since A California Right to Life.

Speaker 9 (36:55):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (36:56):
Sure, you can go to rt LCC dot org to
learn more about right Life. And if you're pregnant, you
need to establish care. You got medical, you need manage medical,
you need help. Maybe you're not finding a lot of
doctors willing to take you. You can call our Obria Clinic,
the Obria Medical Clinics of Central California ob r i
A Fresno dot org.

Speaker 1 (37:18):
All right, yeah, we'll see you in about an hour. John,
Thank you, John Girardi.

Speaker 6 (37:21):
There.

Speaker 1 (37:21):
I know he's got a pregame ritual. We'll let him
get ready.

Speaker 6 (37:24):
This is the Trevor Carry Show on the Valley's Power.

Speaker 1 (37:28):
Talk millions, tens of millions around the world. Boy, God
has some patience with us, doesn't he. I would have
already just thrown down the biggest lightning bolt ever. My
patients would have run out well tonight. I guess a

(37:49):
lot of the big news is that Kamala Harris now
that she's not gonna be running, She's not gonna be
running for the governor. She doesn't want to live up
in Sacramento. You know, she's still it hadn't left her.
I bet you even dug at night. You can do it, baby,
you can do it. They'll love you. Next go around,
you get rid of that Joe Biden stink you had
on you gets you another one point three billion, more

(38:13):
than one hundred and seven days. Oh she's got a
book out about it. Oh, yes she does.

Speaker 8 (38:19):
Just over a year ago, I launched my campaign for
President of the United States, one hundred and seven days
traveling the country, fighting for our future, the shortest presidential
campaign in modern history.

Speaker 1 (38:32):
Yeah, it only took you one hundred and seven days
to lose the election, didn't it.

Speaker 8 (38:36):
It was intense, high stakes and deeply personal for me
and for so many of you. Since leaving office, I've
spent a lot of time reflecting on those days, I
bet you, talking with my team, my family, my friends,
and pulling.

Speaker 1 (38:52):
My thoughts away. He left your campaign in.

Speaker 8 (38:54):
Essence writing a journal that is this book one hundred
and seven days?

Speaker 1 (39:00):
Yes, and that going to be just lovely, isn't it?
Her team she had the highest turnover rate in like
DC administration history. They couldn't stand to work for that woman.

Speaker 8 (39:12):
With candor and reflection, I've written a behind the scenes
account that journey. I believe there's value in sharing what
I saw, what I learned, and what I know it
will take to move forward. In writing this book, one
truth kept coming back to me. Sometimes the fight takes

(39:33):
a while, but I remain full of hope and I
remain clear eyed. I will never stop fighting to make
our country reflect the very best of its ideals. Always
on behalf of the people. So thank you for being
in this fight with me, and I cannot wait for

(39:54):
you to read this, and I'll see you out there,
take care.

Speaker 1 (40:00):
Or boy flush that one. We're gonna talk with political
consultant Tae Cloud over jerry mandering. That sounds so like
medieval or something, didn't it. They were jerrymandering out there

Speaker 6 (40:16):
Assistant Trevor Jerry showing on the Valley's Power Talk