Congressman Tom McClintock on President Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill”

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Congress and Tom McClintock. Thank you for your time, sir.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
Oh, it's my pleasure, Trevor, thanks for having me.

Speaker 1 (00:04):
Hey, you almost you almost became Benjamin Franklin. There. I
tell you, when you retire from Congress, you can give
tours in Philadelphia.

Speaker 2 (00:12):
Well, that's one of my favorites because it simply speaks
to the fact that our system wasn't designed to make
perfect decisions. It was designed to make the most acceptable
decisions for the most people, and it does a pretty
good job of that.

Speaker 1 (00:26):
Well, explain here this Now we've heard from so much here.
That's why I like to come to you here and
thank you the big beautiful bill. Before we get into
some detail, really, please set it up for us. You
supported it, Explain the process and the intent.

Speaker 2 (00:41):
Well, the fine point of the matter is this. Without
this bill and average families, taxes are going to rise
twenty two percent next year in the fifth Congressional District.
But the Aversham's going to see an over two thousand
dollars increase in their tax bill. It'll be the biggest
tax increase in American history. And this big beautiful bill

(01:05):
stops that tax increase. It removes taxes on tips and
over time, it increases the standard deduction by two thousand dollars.

Speaker 1 (01:15):
Can I interrupt? Excuse me for interrupting. I don't like
to interrupt you, but I want to go back to
the twenty two percent for a moment. Does that mean
the expiration of the Trump tax cuts? Of that was
going to expire from twenty seventeen and everything was going
to go back up.

Speaker 2 (01:26):
That's exactly what will happen without this bill. This bill
stops that from happening and actually cuts taxes by removing
them from tips and over time, and as I said,
it increases the standard deduction by two thousand dollars.

Speaker 1 (01:42):
Well, let me ask you congressoon because I had a
listener email me, and I really didn't know how to
respond to this. They were talking about the tax exemptions
for tips, and they said, does that not violate the
basic tax principle of treating taxpayers equally? How would you
respond to that?

Speaker 2 (01:56):
Well? I responded by saying that it assures that working
families will be able to keep more of their money.

Speaker 1 (02:07):
But shouldn't that though, But that doesn't explain the fair
aspect of it treating them equally.

Speaker 2 (02:13):
Again, that's the difference between perfection and of what our
system can produce.

Speaker 1 (02:18):
So you said some people will be happy and some
people will be upset.

Speaker 2 (02:22):
Right, The perfect tax system would be, to my mind,
would be a flat rate tax where everybody pays exactly
the same percentage of their income. That would be the
ideal system. And if I could wave a magic wand
that's what we'd have. But you can't do that.

Speaker 1 (02:40):
Congressman McClintock, you've always been transparent throughout your representation there
in Congress. The four Republicans that voted to vote president
then against it, what's it like? Is it tough to
say no when the President of the United States from
your own party is calling for a yes vote? You know,
because they're to be times you might be middle of

(03:01):
the road or middle defense on something. What's that pressure like?

Speaker 2 (03:05):
Well, you know, I've been an outlier from time to
time with party votes, and in those occasions it's very
important to be sure you're right. And I don't think
that they could be sure they were right in that case.
And I think we're going to see a number of
them come over as the bill is taken up on

(03:25):
the House floor, because every Republican in both the House
and the Senate understands that this bill is absolutely essential
if we're going to revive the economy and fulfill the
promises on which this administration was elected. And I think

(03:45):
every Republican wants to see this administration succeed, wants to
see our economy revived, and wants to produce a the
days that many of us remember from the Reagan administration
was morning again in America. These are the same policies
that have revived our economy time and again, rolling back

(04:07):
the tax and regulatory burdens that have been crushing productivity.
And I think that when this bill passes, if we
can get all these policies in place by the summer
and they have a year to work by this time
next year, we're the only economic indicator that matters is

(04:28):
going to be off the charts. And that economic indicator
is how people answer this question next year. Are you
better off to day than you were two years ago?

Speaker 1 (04:38):
Congressman Tom mcclin talk, my guest, your statement that I
started the audio of the show where they're you said
you you shared the disappointment with that was that in
reference to not enough cuts in.

Speaker 2 (04:49):
This right exactly right. But as this does have a
lot of spending reductions in it, and I think that
they're you know, they're very sensible ones. Would I want
to see us further reduce our spending, absolutely, but this
does make a big step in the right direction.

Speaker 1 (05:10):
Well help me, maybe I'm naive to the ways of Washington,
and am I correct to question if we have the
White House to send at the House, why can't we
do those cuts? And also, you know, stop the expiration
of the taxes? Why why couldn't that.

Speaker 2 (05:24):
We're doing Quite again, we're doing quite a bit of
We're reducing the ten year spending by about one and
a half to two trillion dollars. This bill alone has
about a half a trillion dollars of recisions in it,
meaning we're clawing back money that Congress had previously appropriated.

(05:48):
We're basically rescinding those appropriations. So it does, it goes
quite a way. And don't forget it also expedites the
removal of illegal aliens, who costs American taxperty is about
one hundred and sixty billion dollars a year right now
to support that's the bill that Americans are paying for.
The eight million illegals that the Biden administration allowed into

(06:12):
the country. This completes the border wall. It strengthens the
border patrol so that we can defend our communities against
some of the most violent cartels on the planet that
we're allowed into our country. And it relates pressure on
medicaid by requiring able bodied adults to look for work.
And it's going to also open up America's vast energy resources.

(06:32):
It is one big, beautiful bill. Is a perfect no,
but it's a huge step in the right direction, all right.

Speaker 1 (06:39):
With our time that we still have Connerson, I want
to segue over to I know you're a congressional almost historian,
aren't you. I mean, you study history, you know it.
Do you think the Biden cancer our biggest cover up
in White House history? Do you agree with what a
lot are saying? And I kind of.

Speaker 2 (06:54):
Feel I don't know the answer to that question. I
do know that the cover up over his cognitive decline
clearly was the biggest scandal in American history.

Speaker 1 (07:07):
So we knew that. We knew that by watching him right,
by watching him and listening, we knew that that that
didn't feel like a shock to me. The cancer thing did, though,
we didn't know.

Speaker 2 (07:16):
That point taken of the uh. If if they knew
about this for years and covered it up, uh, that
simply adds to to to the guilt that they need
to answer for to the American people.

Speaker 1 (07:32):
All right, Congress, and I want to segue over to
judicial coups or you concerned about the srene Corps of
the United States and does the president have the authority
under the Constitution to deport.

Speaker 2 (07:44):
Oh? That's story. Did the direct answer your question is yes.
In fact, there about one point four million illegals in
this country who've already had their day in court, who've
been ordered deported. Uh, and to have thumb their nose
at that court order. That's a huge number. It's going

(08:05):
to not to mention the six hundred thousand plus illegals
on the non detained docket who have criminal convictions or
charges that are at loose in this country. But getting
back to your wider question of the I think the
Supreme Court is going to start reigning in these rogue judges.

(08:28):
In order for the Supreme Court to issue a ruling
that affects the entire country, you've got to get at
least five justices of the US Supreme Court to concur
and yet individual district court judges are asserting this authority
by themselves. This is an outrageous abuse of public trust
and judicial power, and I think it's opened up a

(08:51):
Pandora's box. The threatens the fundamental constitutional order.

Speaker 1 (08:56):
Let me ask you this. I'm sorry, go ahead.

Speaker 2 (08:58):
The fact. In fact, ninety two percent of the nationwide
injunctions blocking President Trump have been issued by district court
judges who have records of judicial activism appointed by Democrats.
That gravely undermines the public's confidence and the impartiality of
the judiciary. I think the Supreme Court is about to
take note of that, and I think we're going to

(09:20):
get a ruling, hopefully fairly soon, that restores the district
court judges to their proper role, and that is to
decide cases and controversies arising between individual parties within their
geographic federal district.

Speaker 1 (09:36):
Well, it's judicial coup. It upsets us all here, but
obviously seems to be legal. The Supreme Court hand't ruled yet,
but it's wrong to do. Have Republicans, is it discussed
if you've been tempted to use it against Democrat administrations.
I know some States sue the administration, and I know
some judge yes, go.

Speaker 2 (09:55):
Ahead, Yeah, judge Shoppee goes on on both sides. You're
absolutely right. The fifth district courts, a very fifth circuit courses,
is a very conservative court. When conservative groups want to
stop a policy by a democratic president, uh, they'll go
to those courts. The question is whether one individual, single

(10:19):
district court justice, a judge, can usurp the role that
is reserved for five a minimum five US Supreme Court justices.
And again, I think Supreme Court is about to rein
that power in the House has already done that. By
the way, we passed the No Rogue Judges Act, which
does exactly that. It says that a district court judge

(10:40):
has the authority to to settle a dispute between parties
within its own district. It cannot issue nationwide injunctions. And
I think the Supreme Court's about it to to to
restore those rules themselves.

Speaker 1 (10:54):
All right, Congressman, unless you've got anything else you want
to say to your constituents out there, I want to
thank you for your time. I'm on the show today.

Speaker 2 (11:01):
My pleasure, Trevor. Thank you for having me.

Speaker 1 (11:03):
Thank you, Keep fighting congresson Tom mcclintalk, ladies and gentlemen,
and we'll hear his speech here again.

Speaker 3 (11:08):
Are we to sacrifice all of that in the quixotic
quest for perfection? This is not the end of the
fiscal reforms necessary to restore our nation's solvency, but rather
the first step. The day after this bill becomes law,
we will begin to work on the twenty twenty sixth
budget deck and the next reconciliation bill that will offer
the next step toward enacting additional spending reforms. But if

(11:32):
we falter in taking this first step, we can't get
to the next one. We'll waste the summer squabbling and fuming,
to the delight of the Democrats and to the despair
of the American people.

Speaker 1 (11:46):
This is the trevortary show on the valleys of our talk.
I think we can kind of spread that technology out
around the country a little bit so that people that
work inside of prisons, correctional officers don't have to almost die.
One did. We'll talk about that in a minute. Remind
you about that. But two correctional officers are recovering after

(12:08):
being exposed to contaminated mail at a Mendota prison, all right,
in the age of email. I would rather keep them
safe and once a month we allow them into a
library if they've earned that privilege and they get to
check email. Nothing, no drugs, nothing can be sent in
via email. That's it email. You know what, they'll come

(12:29):
out and say, that's racist. How do you expect voters
of color to have ID and how do you expect
families of incarcerated members to have an email? I actually
I'm okay with no communication while in except if you've
earned a privilege, maybe you get some family visits. Not

(12:51):
sitting at the table with no hug egg. You know
you always should no touch egg from the guard right
now behind the glass thing with the phone. I really
I would like it to be more breaking up rock
and filling up holes, working hard, no TV, none of
that stuff. Do you think that I was reading where

(13:11):
two thirds of Texas prisons don't have air and now
they're talking about the prison rights and all this, and
I would think it would be something that make you
not want to go back in if it was one
hundred and thirteen in Corcoran and you're having a splash
toilet water on your pants and keep your legs cool.

(13:33):
Your shorts. Nothing I wanted to really be something people
don't want to go back to. I'm almost I have
no idea, but I would just think already, all California
prisons I have air conditioning. Probably doesn't work to the
best of all the time. I hope the correctional officers
got air. Okay, back to this story. They said two

(13:54):
officers were sorting mail to Federal correction Institution in Mendota.
It's starting not to feel good good. They were handling
incoming mail suspected of being contaminated with drugs. They were
taking the hospital for treatment. The Union sounding the alarm
on officers being exposed to contaminated male and demanding action.
And I take you back to twenty twenty four with

(14:14):
the Atwater officer Mark Fisher became sick and they took
him to the hospital and he died. He was weeks
away from retirement at the time. The Union is calling
for Congress to pass HR ten forty six, the Mark
Fisher Memorial entered Dixon a feednyl and postal Mail at
Federal Prison Act. It would require screening processes for mail

(14:37):
at all federal prisons. What do we pay for that?
A lot to have the Yes, it costs us. No,
that luxury is gone. You gave that up. Well, that's
the only thing that keeps them going. No, no, Well
to keep them going when they get out is having

(14:59):
it so bad they I don't want to go back.
We're gonna have attorney Roger Banaktar on next week about
the Diddy trial. Director Ry Nigel sent me a screenshot
he was on Fox News talking about it. We didn't
even talk about that after he sent it, but yeah,
now we're talking about Liva on the air here, So
he's going to come on and talk about again. Not

(15:20):
a whole lot that of details that can be given
with the FCC Obama shaped ecstasy pills we learned that
did he handed out at parties? Do you see those
pictures of us red Obama ecstasy pills, green Obama ecstasy
piers pills, various ones of the of his face. It's

(15:42):
not funny, But we're going to find anything funny in
the Diddy trial. It's going to be these ecstasy pills
with Obama's face on it. I'm sorry, I'm gonna go
ahead and do a little chuckle at that. I know
a lot of people were see we say force fed,
I want to keep with this trialless thing of your
own up. Adults, you can exit out the side. You can.

(16:05):
You can turn the lights on and go, I'm out
of here. Now they were psycho lot. Okay, then I
guess we'll get into he's a cult leader. I mean,
is that it's either that we're going to say that
or now you all were involved and if you're going
to be in trouble too, you were all taking part
of it. Did you know that something was happening to

(16:29):
fill in the blank, young Hollywood people filling the blank,
filling the blank, filling the blank, because we don't know
what all the blanks are. But there's a whole lot
of speculation out there, kind of obvious when you go
back and see some of the interviews, and the whole
thing is just well, in one side, it's glad that

(16:49):
the exposure is happening because I bet you anything, he
thought he'd get away with it for probably for Yeah,
that nobody had stopped him through that many decades, So
why would he be stopped. Well, we know that she
came forward, Cassie came forward with this, got the ball rolling.
He was arrested, No bail all But the thing about

(17:11):
it is if they got all this evidence to keep
him in and I'm talking about Sean Combs, he wasn't
a one man party. So if no more arrests come
from this, it'll be like, uh, well they're probably Epstein
and we'll move on just like everything else. All right.

(17:32):
Oh No, Epstein killed himself EPI director for TEL. Deputy
director Bongino told us that he killed himself now director
for Tel. During his confirmation hearings stated the same thing.
So it's not something brand new for this, but there was.
In the Manhattan Federal Court one of his one time

(17:54):
personal assistants, David James, talking about the ecstasy pills he
saw his boss take. He worked there from two thousand
and seven. In two thousand and ninety, he said he
helped set up his orgies. He said, even though the
pills were there with Obama, he was never seen at
any of the parties, but the people apparently loved honoring
him by eating pills shaped like his face before engaging

(18:16):
in various sultry activities, he said. Shawcombs received this drug
haul from a dealer named one Stop. He was asking
court how frequently he saw his boss take drugs. David
James responded, I'd say every day. They had a two

(18:36):
thousand and four interview up Shawn Combs was MTV microphone
and he's interviewing this guy running for the Senate and
it was Barack Obama. They both looked so young. But yeah,
that was very interesting to listen to Shawancombs talking to

(18:57):
a guy running for the Senate name Barack Obama. This
is the Trevor Jerry Show on the Valley's Power Talk.
Female cops played in the audio of that crazy dude
yelling Jesus stuff and got in there in the car
and got her gun, and she freaked out and started hyperventilating,
and other officers ran around and shot the guy. Male

(19:20):
officers did, I'm looking at another one here and again,
you can be smaller stature, but you got to be
able to take a dude down, you gotta know. And
what I'm about to watch right here, it's two female cops.
It's in the front of a grocery store, like right
where it's still inside, but they might have carts. They
got some water stacked up out front with the sliding
glass doors. Big tall dude, probably about six foot four

(19:47):
looks like a black female cop, a white female cop
trying to take down a six to four black dudes
got long dreads hat on here and let's go listen.
The bystander here, he wanted to help but didn't want
to get involved. Here they cannot take him down. Two girls,
one guy.

Speaker 4 (20:05):
Let's see.

Speaker 1 (20:06):
Oh he moved, He moved them everyone, but they can't.
He could get their gun any minute. They cannot. He's
standing straight up. They can't take it out. Here come
two male cops. Now two they're probably like five nine,
five ten, maybe they're but boy, look okay, one he's
on the ground two seconds bam, threw him down. I

(20:29):
see they okay, they're pulling his hands behind his back
and they got him cough. See that's what I'm I'm
talking about. These female officers were not able to do that.
It puts everybody in that store in jeopardy. Now I
would have loved to go you know what the other
day I've said about female cops. Look, I'm looking at
video right here, these two female cops. This guy's like

(20:51):
six foot four, and bam, they took him down in
three seconds. All right, I eat my words, but I
don't see those I see bys getting out of their
truck and running up off the freeway to help female
cops that can't take somebody down. I know it has
to be something that's talked about, but they can't say
anything about in the departments. If they were honest, you

(21:17):
would want that. I mean, it'd be like being a
running back and you're like, guys, I can't do my
job correctly because you got the female the guard and
the tackle over there there, they're one hundred and twenty
two pounds. I keep getting tackled in the backfield. No,
this is a physical job. That proof right there. All right,

(21:42):
enough of that, And if you're a female cop and
you could have taken them down, you got every right
to be a police officer. And if you can't take
somebody down, there's so many other jobs that are incorporated
in police departments and law enforcement and forensics and all
that kind of stuff. Want you to be involved, but
so sorry. When you're called for emergencies like that, you

(22:03):
need to be able to do what those two those
two men did. This man has approval has soared to
fifty five percent. Inside our advantage polls showed search fifty
five percent approve forty four percent disapprove. Yet, looking at
a president getting things done, talking up America, working around

(22:27):
the world for world peace, getting the peace, bringing back
the money, Let's hope it all works out. Looking like
it is, even they're all they're throwing out the IEDs
as well. Democrats in disarray? Have you has there ever
been a time in your adult life where you could
say the Democrat Party has been this much in disarray? Never? Never.

(22:53):
Jake Tapper's not helping any of it either. When The
Daily Show's making fun of Democrats, we got to laugh
along with him. This is funny.

Speaker 5 (23:03):
Don't news people have to tell you what they know
when they find it out, Isn't Isn't that the difference
between news and the secret you won't believe when we
found out. I know That's why I'm watching it breaking news,

(23:27):
you know, we.

Speaker 1 (23:31):
See that's funny, right, We'll laugh along with them here
on this and even laughs at how they make the pivot.
I always talk about that, Don't it like a horrible
story happens? So I'm like, how do I transition out
of that? That the pivot? How do we talk about
Isn't it so sad that Joe Biden, his family's going
through what every family goes through with cancer, and our

(23:54):
colleague Jake Taffer's book about why he was an idiot
in office?

Speaker 6 (23:59):
The pivot, how do you pivot from excitedly promoting your
anchor's book to somberly and respectfully promoting your anchor's book.

Speaker 4 (24:09):
Adam's health was very much in the news even before
the cancer diagnosis was announced on Sunday.

Speaker 7 (24:14):
That's because of a new book by seeing in Jake Tapper.

Speaker 8 (24:17):
This was already going to be a tough week, and
this makes it much harder. And that is a reference
to the fact that our colleague Jake Tapper and Alex
Thompson a book that's set to publish on Tuesday.

Speaker 1 (24:31):
I am laughing. The pivot continues.

Speaker 9 (24:35):
This very tough news, this very challenging news, and at
the same time, the backdrop of our calleingg Jake Tapper's
book with Alex Thompson coming out this week.

Speaker 1 (24:43):
It's so hard, it's such a.

Speaker 6 (24:46):
Difficult time, so unfathomable in terms of the pain this
family must be feeling. And yet if you act.

Speaker 1 (24:53):
Now, yeah, old ahead was there Brian Stelter, he know
him on seeing it yeah, he's the timing.

Speaker 9 (25:06):
No.

Speaker 10 (25:06):
Former President Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis is certainly dramatic, coming
on the eve of a blockbuster new book about his
health and his time in the White House. Go on,
I'm sure some observers will say that the reporting in
the book is even more important now.

Speaker 6 (25:23):
Yet nobody's saying that. No observers will say it's more
important now. Some observers might think, did these CNN people
work on commission?

Speaker 1 (25:37):
I say that's some good comedy right there. Jake Tapper,
though he's not holding back, he's going and making the
rounds and promoting his his book. He yeah, he could.
He could go back in and not say anything about
this and let the sales happen. All the pre orders
were already out. It's already I think a best seller.

(25:58):
I'm not gonna buy it. Might wait until I'm at
a yard sale and I see seventy five cents on it. Yeah,
and then I'll even be like I'll give you a quarter, Like, yeah, sure,
I'm going to wait till I spend a quarter on it.
But he came home making Kelly's show, Jake Tapper did,
and he had had to face a little heat and

(26:21):
she brought it. She asked Tapper to apologize for what
he said for this. Listen to what Laura Trump, and
you'll hear first and foremost.

Speaker 9 (26:31):
I had no idea that Joe Biden ever suffered from
a stutter. I think what we see on stage with
Joe Biden Jake is very clearly a cognitive decline. That's
what I'm referring to. It makes me uncomfortable.

Speaker 5 (26:43):
You are.

Speaker 9 (26:46):
Amazing trying to tell me that what I was suggesting.

Speaker 1 (26:49):
Was I think that you were mocking his stutter.

Speaker 11 (26:52):
I think you were mocking his stutter. And I think
you have absolutely no standing to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline.

Speaker 9 (26:57):
And it's very concerning to a lot of people that
this could be the leader of the free world. That
is all I'm saying. I genuinely sorry for Joe.

Speaker 1 (27:05):
I appreciate it.

Speaker 11 (27:06):
I'm sure it was from a place of concern. We
all believe that.

Speaker 1 (27:08):
Laura Trump, thank you so much.

Speaker 4 (27:10):
Do you want to apologize to Laura Trump?

Speaker 6 (27:12):
Now?

Speaker 1 (27:12):
Sure, I've already apologized to her.

Speaker 11 (27:15):
I called her months ago.

Speaker 1 (27:17):
And what did she say?

Speaker 11 (27:19):
I mean, I don't want to disclose the contents of
a private conversation. But I thought the conversation went well,
and she said she has said this publicly, so I
feel fine sharing it. She said that she would never
mock anybody stunter.

Speaker 1 (27:31):
Well what she was talking about, and you know it.
Go ahead, just keep going out looking like the fool
that you are, Megan Kelly. Let him know. This is
going to make you feel good to hear when.

Speaker 4 (27:42):
I watched that clip, and I'm giving voice to what
a lot of people watching the show are feeling. Jake,
I feel angry because she was right, and not only
did you not allow her to make her comments, but
you seem to try to humiliate her. You had a
hostility toward the position, but she was totally right, and
then you lecture her on how she was in no

(28:03):
position to diagnose cognitive decline, which you guys do at length,
including on page four of your book.

Speaker 1 (28:12):
Dam go ahead, Jake, make the rounds their mouth. Flapper tapper,
way to go, Megan Kelly pointed out to him, and
did it in a very fine fashion as well. I
don't know what's up with Congresswoman Nancy Mace. She's showing
naked pictures of herself displayed right there on the floor

(28:34):
of the house. Pictures of her naked weren't taken on
the floor of the house, or she It's not what
it sounds like, but it did happen. Naked pictures of
the congresswoman were displayed on the house floor. Okay, I'll
explain it all next. This is the Trevor Carry Show

(28:55):
on the Valleys Power Talk software firm in Charleston, South Carolina.
They got him get aged back in twenty twenty two.
This was three years after Nancy Mays divorced her second husband.
They bought a rather swink a four million dollar mansion together.
And I don't know if you remember this from a
year or two ago whatever, but Nancy Mace told a

(29:18):
congressional prayer breakfast, Hey, I turned down sex with Bryant
so I could come and join you here. Remember when
she stated that a conservative family values Republican party. A
lot of people don't know the background of her accusations.
She's tweeted about somebody showing her naked body. She broke
off the engagement with this man after she found him

(29:40):
playing the field on a dating app, and since then
she's accused him of being a pervert and and a rapist,
So I guess the guy had. There's some photos of
her out in Congressoman Nancy Mace showed them in Congress.
Blurry they were blowing? Was that a House Oversight Committee subcommittee?

Speaker 7 (30:03):
Here, this naked silhouette is my naked body. Starting on
November fifth, twenty twenty three, I discovered my former fiance,
Patrick Bryant, had filmed women without their knowledge, without their permission,
and without their consent. Behind me is a screenshot from
one of the videos I found of myself. The yellow circle.

(30:26):
This naked silhouette is my naked body. I didn't know
that I had been filmed. I didn't give my consent,
I didn't give my permission. And this particular video that
Patrick Bryant recorded of me on his secret camera he
saved for over three years without my knowledge.

Speaker 1 (30:48):
Now I guess what I'm wondering here. It looked like
it was the middle of the day, it was bright outside,
and it looked like it was the living room. The
blurry picture that I saw, you could not see her
her naked body, but did the Was this one of
these security cameras that automatically records any kind of motion
that goes on right or is it like spy cam

(31:10):
put back, you know, and if it's a security camera
that texts motion. I see him all the time in
my cop shows that I watch. Oh really, well, let's
go back. Did you know that you disengage the cameras
but it's still all downloaded to the clock or something
like that. They'll go back and show, you know, the
guy pull out the butcher knife in the kitchen. Now

(31:30):
I think that would be a big difference there was
he spying in doing it? Or did she know there's
security cameras and she's walking through the living room and naked.
She's pushing for a bill that's called the Sue Voyeurs
Act whiles civil lawsuit for non consensual new picks or videos.
Now I agree with that. I just don't know about
this this case right here. Was it meant to filmer

(31:52):
while she walked naked around the house. I don't know.

Speaker 7 (31:55):
I didn't pick this fight. I don't even want to
be here today and discuss this. This is a communication
I got from his attorney that I received the other day.
Because he's going to sue me for doing the right thing.
So I say, bring it on, brother, because there is

(32:16):
no defamation in the truth. And if you're going to
be the kind of moron and monster that sues his
own victims, may God help you.

Speaker 1 (32:26):
All right? Okay, probably not right what he did. But
I would think her constituents of South Carolina have so
much more going on in their life, Hurricane recovery, all
of this. It seems a little personal, doesn't it, does
it not? I don't know. It's like she's using her

(32:47):
her stand there that she has in Congress personally to
go after that. It seems like, I don't know. Yeah,
I don't want to have a bill where or I
do want to have the War Years bill where people
get caught. I heard some in your day. President Trump
signed something where it's illegal now to superimpose a face
over and some you know, like a porn or something

(33:07):
making it look like it's somebody. All these deep fakes
that AI can now do has changed everything. We used
to say, Hey, show me the video. I don't believe
you show me the video. Oh no, that's photoshopped. You know.
We used to say that for a long time. That's photoshop.
They added that into real video. Now we have no idea.

(33:28):
What's what we're gonna have to have a lot of
different laws put into effect right now. I actually had
there was a funny Trump thing going around and it
was uh, it was Ai and I had somebody texted him,
we would like wait to finally stand up, and I'm like,
I haven't yet said back, Hey, that's not real right

(33:51):
today in today's world, that you can grab somebody's voice
and I guess clone it or whatever, put it in
and you could have probably a phone conversation with somebody,
got enough sounds on there, hit the little buttons and
they Hey, it's me. I'm out send me somebody. I'm
in Nevada. What Yeah. Speaking of law changes in and out,

(34:16):
it's going to change their ingredients Rcae Junior Ya looking
at it, making a fact here. I had no idea
about the strawberry syrup and the pink lemonade and even
the ketchup in and out. What is wrong with all
this old artificial food coloring and their pink lemonade and
strawberry syrup and the ketchup has high fruit toast corn
syrup in it. So they said they're going to phase

(34:38):
out the food dies by the end of twenty twenty six,
so you'll be getting it crammed into you for the
next year and a half. This week, the FDA approved
the first three natural food color instead of going to
replace the petroleum based synthetic dies. They're going to be
phased out between twenty twenty six and twenty twenty eight.
Seems like it'd be more of a rush to it
to get it phase out of. But I guess you

(34:59):
gotta shipping supplies, maybe some of the factories and the
equipment it could change and all of that. They're gonna
use Galdra blue. That's one of the natural food colorants,
Butterfly p extract calcium phosphate HM twinkies with new butterfly

(35:22):
pea extract. They don't say that high fruits corn syrup though.
That's that's not been BAMA the government, but RFK Juniors
made his views on that corn syrup. He warned to
wean America off of it, the sweet corn byproduct. Hey,
a lot of US farmers are in on all of that.

(35:43):
They produce about ninety million acres of corn each year
and that's uses feed, grain or livestock. A policy that
banned corn syrup I wouldn't be too popular with ag
corn growers out there. I don't see. Maybe I don't
get enough off the beaten path enough, but corn. I
don't don't think we do a lot of corn here
do I'd have to ask, right, and Jay is there?

Speaker 2 (36:03):
Well?

Speaker 1 (36:03):
I know the President, state and all that that sweet corn,
but I don't know what percentage corn is

Speaker 2 (36:09):
Its insistent Trevor carry Show on The Valley's Power Talk