How Will Gavin ‘Gov. Satan’ Newsom's Plan Minimize Your GOP Voice? Political Consultant Tal Cloud Explains

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
He's a political consultant on the show. Filled in on
the show, of course, tal Cloud, You've worked on many campaigns,
You've worked on actually drawing maps. Welcome to the show.

Speaker 2 (00:10):
Hey, Trevor.

Speaker 3 (00:10):
It's great to be with you, and it's always fun
to fill in for you when you're off gallivanting around
the country.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
Thanks for having me today.

Speaker 1 (00:16):
Indeed, hey, have you done any more of that this summer?
The video you sent me of you, what is it?
Lake surfing behind a boat on a surfboard.

Speaker 3 (00:24):
Well, I wakesurf as much as lake can wait. Yes, wakesurfing,
and yeah, it just you know, lots of hiking, lots
of good time. Just got done with my thirtieth anniversary
with my wife and we renewed our vows. So the
pretty special day. But on vacation, I was looking at
a lot of this redistricting stuff and it's pretty interesting.
I think it's just a wonderful opportunity for the Republicans

(00:45):
if the Democrats want to push this forward.

Speaker 1 (00:47):
Now, a great opportunity in Texas or in California.

Speaker 3 (00:52):
Well in California, because the districts in California are already
so jerrymandered that the reality is the republic Plicans, you know,
could could get caught doing terrible things and there's still
going to be a Republican district and the same thing
as the Democrats. The districts are so far left and
right by the way they wrote them, that there's only
a couple competitive districts in the state. I mean, you

(01:13):
look at the Vince Fong's district. It comes up from
Bakersfield and then it cuts across into Lamore and takes
literally every Republican between Viselli and Lamour, including in the stillerry,
so that they can get as many Democrats as in
the Valdeo district.

Speaker 2 (01:27):
So it's a horrible district.

Speaker 3 (01:29):
You got David Tangapaw's district, that Assembly district that is,
and they're not talking about Assembly, but we should be
talking about that. That I have a house and Sanger
and I have property in Mountain Ranch, California, and no
one knows where Mountain Ranch, California is, but they're in
the same district and three hundred miles apart.

Speaker 2 (01:44):
It's just it's these districts are.

Speaker 3 (01:45):
Horrible, and they the Republicans did a terrible job with
the redistricting four or five years ago, they outsourced it
to consultants. The Democrats did a much better job. And
I think given the state of play with the Democrats
right now and what people think of their policies, this
is a great opportunity for Republicans to draw a lot

(02:06):
of put a lot of sunshine on Democratic policies in California.

Speaker 1 (02:09):
Tell I'm going to ask you to explain this for
myself and others out there. We would think, you know,
districts might be square, little blocks that are the area
that you live in, a square area. Some of these ditchers,
like a you're talking about Congressman Fong, doesn't it even
touch Clovis at one point from bakers sild Clovis.

Speaker 3 (02:27):
It's Bakersfield, it's Clovis, it's portions of the mountains. It's
gerrymandered to take Democrats in saying or Democrats go to
the Costa district and saying the Republicans go to the
Pong district. And keep in mind when when they were
doing these districts, there was a lot of wokeness involved.
I was on many of the calls when Congressman Devin

(02:48):
Unas was still involved in the process before he resigned,
and you know, there was all, you know, areas of
interest and we have a gay community here, a black
community there, a brown community there. The Democrats played those
games and they literally micro targeted neighborhoods. And the people
that were on the Commission from the Republican side were
very weak and the Democrats on the Democratic side they

(03:08):
were very smart and strong. And that's what And the
Republican elected I'm talking about every single elected from Assembly,
the Senate, and the Congress were not involved in the process.

Speaker 1 (03:20):
Explain this process. Who maps it? Tal who who what
the California law? Who's in charge of mapping?

Speaker 2 (03:26):
The commission?

Speaker 3 (03:27):
The Commission maps it with consultants. The consultants are hired
from the parties. UH in Sacramento generally excuse left, which
is understandable. So they map a district and then there's
comments on a district.

Speaker 1 (03:40):
So the commission is under state control.

Speaker 3 (03:42):
The commission, right, and those are elected members. But and
they write the district. But let me just back up
so people understand this. What the what the Democrats are
trying to do right now is saying, Okay, if Texas
redistricts and gets five more seats, we're going to do
that in New York and California. New York and California
will and certainly California. I can't speak for New York.
They already have a super majority in both the House

(04:04):
and the Assembly. And we've constantly lost seats in the
Congress in California because of the redistricting, both in twenty
and ten. So the reality is, you know, it would
be really hard to make any districts that are worse
than they already are in the Congress, or they make
all the Republican districts literally eighty percent Republicans, and the

(04:25):
public's not going to vote for that, because what they're
talking about is this would have to go to not
have a court challenges. They have to put this on
the ballot. And the beauty for me, and I've talked
to some members of the Assembly and the Senate and
the House, the beauty is, you know, welcome in open arms.
Make members like Soria and others who are running, make

(04:47):
them defend their position of why they want a redistrict
in their seats or why they're only doing Congress go ahead.

Speaker 1 (04:55):
It's a great one. I don't mean to cut you
off there.

Speaker 3 (04:57):
I think it's just a great opportunity for Republicans to
sh a light at the Republican Party level as as
well as members on what the Democrats have done to
the state, and I at the end of the day,
I don't believe that the Democrats will have the courage
to go through with this because if the process starts
to play out, they're going to realize they're in deep
trouble on this issue.

Speaker 1 (05:16):
I guess political consultant tut Cloud, we're talking jerry mandering.
It is the remapping of districts. Normally, tell how often
are the maps redrawn.

Speaker 3 (05:26):
They're redrawn every ten years based on the census. We
lost a seat this last cycle. We probably should have
lost two more seats based on population exodus out of
California and gains and elsewhere. But the way they counted
because of the administration and who is doing the counting
at the time with the Democratic administration Washington, we didn't
lose the two more seats we should have lost. So

(05:49):
it's every ten years traditionally is how it's done.

Speaker 1 (05:51):
So traditionally it should have been twenty thirty that we
would redraw them again.

Speaker 3 (05:55):
Usually it's going to be the twenty twenty two elections
so you would have the census in twenty thirty. The
results at the end are, you know, thirty one. We
do redistricting in thirty one for new districts starting in
thirty two.

Speaker 1 (06:07):
Okay, so now what they want to do here in
California is put it to a vote. Let the people
decide if we should draw the maps early.

Speaker 2 (06:17):
There's two two.

Speaker 3 (06:18):
Bonta says, most likely the least chance of a court challenge.

Speaker 2 (06:22):
Would be the vote. Put it to a vote.

Speaker 3 (06:24):
The Assembly would vote to put it on the ballot,
which if with a super majority, they could put it
on the ballot, But then then the issue would have
to go on the ballot, and that's and it still
have to go through the commission. So then you would
have another commission. And you know, there's no guarantees that
we're going to have a poorer performance within the republican
size we did five years ago. We might have a

(06:44):
decent performance this cycle, because people have seen what's happened
with the fires in La, the homelessness, there's you know,
all the problems in California with Governor Gavin Newsom.

Speaker 1 (06:54):
In your memory, has there ever been a remapping halfway
through the traditional timeframe.

Speaker 3 (07:00):
Thirty forty years of politics. I've never seen it this way.
I mean, usually you set them, they go. You know,
no one's ever happy. But the old methods was much better.
Before the Citizen Redistrict Commission, It's and the open primaries.
I think ever since then, California leadership is shrunk, and
it's just we don't have the kind of leader we did.

(07:20):
I mean, you know, I rute the day that I'd
say this, but the days of Willie Brown, it's when
we had leadership in the state. It's been a long
time since we've had that kind of leadership.

Speaker 1 (07:28):
Love it or hate it, tell I would like for
you to listen to Governor Ron DeSantis what he had
to say here.

Speaker 4 (07:33):
This next census, whether they do it in mid decade,
which I know they've considered doing another census, because I
think you have to do it once every ten years.
It doesn't mean you can't do it more than every
ten years. Under the constitution, they should do it and
count people that are legally allowed to be here. How
many seats would California lose if you only counted lawful

(07:55):
people as citizens. They would lose a lot of seats
because they're a sanctuary.

Speaker 1 (08:00):
Yeah, and tal you remember if President Trump tried to
get the census where you could ask if you're a
citizen or not, because that affects representation in Congress, and
it's unfair to count illegals.

Speaker 3 (08:11):
Well, and that's the two seats I was talking about.
Had they not counted all the illegals, California would have
lost two seats, two more seats, so we lost three.
So and that was part of the administration that came
in from the Biden administration. You know, they set the
rules that way or allowed that to happen with the
Democratic administration here because they didn't want them to do those.

Speaker 2 (08:30):
Two seats because the two seats or three seats.

Speaker 3 (08:33):
Would have gone to Arizona, Texas, in Nevada and other
places that are growing. In the Tennessee, the are states
they're growing, not shrinking like California New York.

Speaker 1 (08:42):
Vice President Vance he posted the jerry mandering in California's outrageous.
Other fifty two congressional districts nine are Republican. That means
seventeen percent of their delegation is Republicans. When Republicans win
forty percent of the vote in the state. How can
this possibly be allowed? Well, I guess it's by mapping.

Speaker 3 (09:01):
Well, you think about Modesto, So Modesto at one point
had had you know, Congressman Jeff dNaM and others that
represented Modesto and then they went up towards Calaveris and Tuolomy.
Now what they've done is they've had they've got these
districts where they're they're city centric and then the mountains
are all you know, grouped together. As an example, Tom
McClintock goes from your you're you know, across the street,

(09:23):
literally across the street from your station, all the way
up to Lake Tahoe. I mean that is absolutely ridiculous
with all the and then you know it gets parts
of Madera, you know, a little bit of a little
bit of modesto suburbs and he goes all the way
to Lake Tahoe. I mean those aren't community vis interests
because people in Fresno don't go to Lake Tahoe. People
in Fresno go to Shaver. Now, you know, the representation

(09:46):
in downtown Fresno is one. And then you go, you
know further up, it's it's either you know, Vince Longer
or Tom McClintock, two more different Republicans. So the districts
are not contiguous like they used to be, and that
was the word they used to useiguous. So you had
commonality with this last census. We lost the commonality of

(10:06):
people of interest as it relates to communities. Now we
have I mean David Tangapaw. He touches Nevada, he touches
Death Valley, he touches Sanger, and he touches Mountain Ranch
and San Andreas, California, which you know, you tell me
how Death Valley, San Andreas and Sanger, oh, by the way,
and Fresno Clovis have anything in common.

Speaker 1 (10:28):
So I had the same congressman that some cat in
Lake Tahoo's looking across the lake at Nevada has.

Speaker 3 (10:35):
Correct, correct, And you know you got Jim Costa, now,
who's basically Fresno, you know, every poor area from Fresno
to Modesto. And then all the other Democrats hit all
the other little cities as you go north in the valley,
and then the Republicans are on the outskirts.

Speaker 1 (10:51):
Tall is that if voters approved this mid stream in
the decade here early, then it goes back to the
same exact commission and they redraw them.

Speaker 3 (11:02):
That's about the only way they could probably get away
without having a court challenge. So you'd have to have
a commission. You know, they'd go through that pon dog
and pony show, which is all it is. And then
you would have you know, groups of interests spending lots
of money on it. And I would hope that the
Republicans now in the state of California, maybe Rick Crusoe
and others, would get behind an effort to get it

(11:22):
done right and the elected members on all three branches House,
Assembly and Congress would get off their rear ends and
be involved in the process.

Speaker 1 (11:30):
How often does the commission membership change?

Speaker 3 (11:34):
It would be brand new. It'd have to be a
brand new commission. Yeah, so the last commission was disbanded
when it was over with. This commission would be brand
new and they go through the whole process. It's not
going to be easy. And again I think all this
is is window dressing right now. But if the Republicans
were smart, they would be begging for it.

Speaker 1 (11:51):
Well, I knew if I wanted to understand this better
and have listeners to the show understand it better, get
tle cloud on the phone and I understand it better.
We're done.

Speaker 2 (11:59):
Thank you appreciate it, buddy.

Speaker 1 (12:01):
Hey, yeah, I didn't mean to hang up that quick,
but I was just saying, thank you for making it
simple to understand. I said. It almost sounds like a
medieval term, doesn't it, jerry mandering?

Speaker 3 (12:11):
Well, you know, I am the King of Kee keeping
it simple stupid because I am a kiss kind of guy.

Speaker 1 (12:17):
Well, tal where I looked it up today. We're four
hundred and sixty days until election night, So I'll call
you in four hundred days and see if you're able
to join us. Now, it's now become a tradition in
the Valley having you a your election night.

Speaker 3 (12:31):
Sure n He's always fun hanging out with you.

Speaker 1 (12:34):
Four hundred and sixty days away toal Cloud. Thank you, sir,
Thanks buddy, God bless.

Speaker 5 (12:39):
This is the Trevor Jerry Show on the Valley's Power Talk.

Speaker 1 (12:45):
Had on the show Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco run
running on the Republican ticket to be governor of this state,
and he said something, we're talking about the natural resources
that we have here, We're talking about all the tariff
money that we're we're going to be making off our
energy here in America. And he said this on the
show yesterday. I think this is a pretty big campaign statement.

Speaker 6 (13:06):
I mean, I don't know, this is a broad statement.
Don't hold me to this, but.

Speaker 1 (13:10):
We're going to hold it.

Speaker 3 (13:11):
Likely could do away with all.

Speaker 6 (13:14):
Taxes and make it to where California is actually generating
money for its residents. We have that ability. We're just
choosing not to in the name of big government, in
the name of special interests, and that is what people
are tired of. That is what people are saying, Hey,
our government is failing us. Now we need a different direction.

(13:35):
That's the adrenaline boost and the momentum that we have
going in this campaign.

Speaker 1 (13:41):
You caught my attention. Californias might have to pay no
tax Come on, you're gonna have to come up with
a new language to say that in Nobody will understand
that no taxes because we're that rich. Well we're not.
We got a death what's newsome mon into He wants

(14:02):
to spend just two hundred and fifty million more dollars
for the Jerry Mandarin special election that we just spoke
to with tal Cloud there. Thank you tal for laying
and out force like that. According to Simonman Carl Demayo
Newlim it's going to cost two hundred and fifty million dollars.
That's just what we need right now. Gavin Perfect, Okay,

(14:28):
I did get a new number. Now, I guess it's
not as bad I was saying thirty I think I
was conflating yesterday thirty seven trillion with our national debt.
Our deficit in California they're saying now is only twelve billion. Negative. Boy,
we've had a lot of the uh, the maps rigged

(14:49):
in this state, as Towel's explaining how all the weird
map drawings and all of that. And you think about
how many illegal aliens are or encountered in the census,
About how many people you have that mean? Tell me
you know a representation you get in Congress again. Let

(15:09):
me play a governor Desanthus here, he's onto this.

Speaker 4 (15:12):
This next census, whether they do it in mid decade,
which I know they've considered doing another census, because I
think you have to do it once every ten years.
It doesn't mean you can't do it more than every
ten years. Under the constitution, they should do it and
count people that are legally allowed to be here. How
many seats would California lose if you only counted lawful

(15:34):
people as citizens, they would lose a lot of seats
because they're a sanctuary state.

Speaker 1 (15:39):
All right, Well, that's the governor of Florida talking. That's
not gonna affect California, but the President of the United
States could, And the governor of Florida is talking about
what the President of the United States could do for us.

Speaker 4 (15:51):
You know, we would stand to gain because we did
not spend money to try to try to count illegals,
because I don't think that that's constitutionally proper. That is
ultimately going to be resolved by the US Supreme Court,
because I do think the Trump administration is going to
put in for a census that is not going to
count foreign nationals, that is just going to count a

(16:14):
US citizen.

Speaker 1 (16:15):
We tried to get that last time. It makes no
sense to think about citizens representation in Congress. You're going
to count people that have broken our immigration laws in
so that you can get all those numbers correct. Now
the numbers are not correct. It makes you want to
drive your head through a concrete wall. Yeah, that's what

(16:36):
our founding fathers wanted, didn't they. We're crying out loud.
I think that's what the founding fathers intended.

Speaker 4 (16:46):
I mean, they never really contemplated that you'd have a
president that would intentionally allow all this people to come
in without rule of law. But nevertheless, that's what we
had to deal with for the past four years.

Speaker 1 (16:58):
Yeah, we need to get them out, and if they
go out on their own, then they can get back
in line and do it the right way. I just
wish right now. I know everything's going on. The Trump
administration is so busy, but it would be so nice
if they could, I don't know, come up with a
commercial that they could advertise across the country in different language. Oh,

(17:20):
they have this commercial I'm about to play you is
in multiple language on multiple platforms, being blasted, paid for
by the Department of Homeland Security.

Speaker 7 (17:32):
If you're an illegal alien living in the United States,
this runway is your future because one way or another,
you're getting on a plane home.

Speaker 5 (17:41):
But how you get there is up to you.

Speaker 7 (17:44):
I'm Christy dom, the United States Secretary of Homeland Security.
You can make it easy like others who've made the
right choice by downloading the CBP home app and safely
self deporting. They received financial assistance up to one thousand dollars,
a free flight home, and they have the chance to
come back to America legally, or your trip home can

(18:08):
be hard. We will find you.

Speaker 5 (18:10):
You will be fined thousands.

Speaker 7 (18:12):
Of dollars, detained and forcefully removed from our country. Leave
legally because you won't miss this flight, and it's your
last chance to get on board the right way. Under
President Trump's strong leadership, we followed a law and our
border is secure.

Speaker 1 (18:31):
Come tom off.

Speaker 5 (18:32):
This is the Trevor Charry Show on the Valley's Power Talk.

Speaker 1 (18:37):
That means twenty three days tomorrow, way from opening day
for the Bulldogs, gonna be going into Kansas. I think
twenty third of course, flagship station here, Power Talking. Hear
it all up and down the Valley and all the
iHeart stations and the iHeart radio app. So something tells
me we'll be talking to Paul Leffler here and probably

(18:59):
said in eight, nine, ten days that'd be a good time.
Get him in a couple of weeks before we go.
I can't leave. The season is kicking off. Wow, man,
it's gonna be cool soon.

Speaker 8 (19:11):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (19:12):
The Atlantic, they did a little profile on that crazy
congress woman from Texas, Jasmine Crocket. They said her phone's
lock screen is a photo of herself. Mine is my dad?
A picture of my dads Tennessee ringing the church bill
that my granddad rang, that my dad wrote a song

(19:35):
about daddy rang the church bill on a Sunday morning.
That's mine. What's your screen, sayer, what's your lock screen?
Of two attractive women? One of them is his friend?
All right, that's normal. It's not normal, I think to
have a photo of yourself. No. And also The Atlantic
said that Chasmine Crockett thought that she deserved to be

(19:57):
the top Democrat on oversight because she has the largest
social media following the dumbing down of America, has been
elected to the United States Congress. Well, the jeram annexes
out John Durham. His investigation into the Russia collision just

(20:18):
really gave us nothing, really, But now we're finding out.
Director of National Intelligence Tulca Gabbard has issued several documents
and yeah, there's a lot to review and digest as
twenty nine pages. But the kicker that I saw to
appears to be the George Soros Open Society Foundation. Soros's
involvement with this tied to this, indicating the FBI Obama.

(20:45):
Oh yeah, they had a role in spreading the old
Trump Russian narrative. But there is more. During the first
stage of the campaign, there wasn't a whole lot of
direct evidence, so to get it through the FBI, they
went to CrowdStrike. And I'm going to do an audio
search in my audio hoarding here. I know I talked

(21:06):
about CrowdStrike back in the day. That company, I remember
doing a few shows on that. With the information that
was going through, CrowdStrike was the one that put it
out to the US media. Another email stated that HRC
Hillary rod and Clinton approved the idea about Trump and
Russia hackers hampering US election. Actually it was Julie's idea.

(21:30):
That's what the documents said in the email. You know
they approved Julie's idea. Here's what the email stated. This
should distract people from her own missing email, especially if
the affair goes to the Olympic level. The point is
making the Russian play a US domestic issue. Say something again,

(21:50):
I'm reading for this email, say something like a critical
infrastructure threat for the election to feel manic. Since both
the president of the United States and the Vice President
have acknowledged the fact that the intelligence community would speed
up searching for evidence that is regrettably still unavailable. Look

(22:11):
at him planet at all. The president and Vice president
were Obama and Biden at that time, and wouldn't you
know it, two days after that email, crossfi hurricane started
opened up. Now, no, none of this really comes It's
a shock to people that have been following this along
for years now. I have to say it's rather gratifying

(22:32):
to play this for you right now.

Speaker 9 (22:34):
And the interesting thing here is, again I want to
point back to the documents we released, because people can
go and read for themselves. Go to ODNI dot gov.
There you can click through. You can read the documents
for themselves. This is not my view or my opinion
or my interpretation. Go and read the documents yourself. Look
at the emails that were sent from James Clapper's assistant

(22:57):
out to the intelligence community communicating that this assessment will
be created per the president's direction.

Speaker 1 (23:05):
YEAHI they knew Russia lies from the Clinton campaign and
they ignored it to cover it up. Clinton campaign coordinated
with fi Obama's FBI to leak it out to the press.
I don't understand the intelligence of the FBI. If they
placed thousands of documents and burn bags that were supposed

(23:29):
to be destroyed and then the new FBI director finds
them in a secret room at the FBI. Now I'm
not saying I don't believe that, but it just almost
seems too easy. Why would those have not been burned.
Why wouldn't you burn the evidence you're trying to take
down a sitting president of the United States. That's called treason.

(23:50):
They normally walk you up on a plank, kick that
chair out from underneath you, and the rope does the
job for treason. So you would think, maybe you might
if they made it all all the way to the
burn bag in the room where they who stopped it
from going, maybe somebody that did the right thing. Maybe not.
Everybody's corrupt. I'm not gonna take these out of the building,

(24:13):
but I'm not gonna burn them. Hey, Kobe, look a
squirrel where and then you go hide them in the room.
We do know from this release, Hillary approved of that
plan to come up with that idea of Trump with
Russia and get away from her private email server. The

(24:33):
DNI report from late twenty sixteen said Russia did not
favor Trump, did not work to elect Trump. That they
even held back information the Russians did that would have
hurt Hillary Rodham Clinton. So that right there tells me
they didn't want Trump being commander in chief. Let's don't

(24:54):
release this. We want her to win. It's kind of
like when the Allies the Americans world War two, found
out where Hitler was staying up in the mountains. They decided, now,
let's not bombit. He's making so many dumb decisions. Let's
let him live. Obama knew about the report because he
created it trying to tie Trump to Russia. John Brennan,

(25:17):
James Clapper. They came up with all the fake intelligence,
the Steel dossier that Hillary Clinton said, Hey, Bill, I
need you to write me a check. Let's just take
it out of the Clinton Foundation, right Yeah, had to
pay for that Steele dossier, the lie, even though there
were some honest Americans working for the CIA as analysts

(25:39):
that said, no, this is not trustworthy. This is untrustworthy. Man,
realize what's going on. To not become desensitized, don't let
the chaos make you not feel this in your soul,
that this is one of if not the biggest political
scandal and cover up in American history. We're getting some

(26:01):
full transparency here, though.

Speaker 9 (26:02):
Read the documents for yourself, and then you can see
as you go through the documents how in the months
leading up to the election, the intelligence community consistently assessed
that Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to
be able to influence or swing the election for Donald Trump.
And that's a critical statement there, because in the assessment

(26:26):
that President Obama ordered, and you'll again see in the
documents with great detail, how he wanted an assessment that
delivered intelligence that details how Moscow tried to help Trump
get elected.

Speaker 1 (26:42):
Not if, but how how What I want to ask,
are people not in jail yet if the CIA had
this information? Come on, Trevor, be obedient, Stop asking those
kind of questions.

Speaker 8 (26:56):
You know what they want. They want obedient workers, obedient workers,
people who are just smart enough to run the machines
and do the paperwork, and just dumb enough to passively
accept all these increasingly jobs with the lower pay, the
longer hours to reduce benefits the end of overtime.

Speaker 1 (27:15):
That Clinton campaign man was a downright dirty, nasty, devious
collection of individuals and No, Obama is not scandal free.
President absolutely not. Let's go back to twenty eighteen. Nancy
south Park Pelosi.

Speaker 10 (27:32):
Listen, week we saw cold hard evidence of the Trump campaign, indeed,
the Trump family eagerly intending to collude possibly with Russia.

Speaker 1 (27:44):
A cold evidence. What were you hanging out over at
Adams Shiff's house and he showed you some Where's that evidence? Nancy?
Where was that evidence?

Speaker 2 (27:53):
Well?

Speaker 1 (27:53):
Guess what some evidence is coming out on Nancy foul
fact Pelosi. President Trump even talking about it. Yeah, Nancy
stock tracking her gains top sixty five percent. Nancy Pelosi
and her husband Paul beat out several of the top
hedge funds. How does that happen? Insider trading? Oh, they

(28:19):
know a lot. They know what's happening before we know
it's happening. And Jake Moultflapper Tapper, he had Pelosi on
and I just came on here to talk about the
sixtieth anniversary. I don't know we're here or here, but
she got upset with the mouth flapper. How dare he
talk about her insider trading or the questioning about it?

Speaker 2 (28:40):
Huh?

Speaker 11 (28:40):
I might have to read that we're here to talk
about the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid. That's what I agreed
to come to talk. Yeah, but I want that means
in the election.

Speaker 1 (28:49):
Yeah, sounds like your aunt who's mad at you? Hi, kalk,
don't listen, doesn't it? It has that whole sound here.

Speaker 11 (29:00):
I might have to read that.

Speaker 1 (29:01):
Well, why do you have to read that? Huh hey?
But to his credit, the mouth lapper, mister Tapper didn't quit.
He went back to insider trading. I wanted to give
you a chances to respond. He accused you of insider trading.
What's your response to that?

Speaker 11 (29:14):
That's very ridiculous. In fact, I very much support the
stop the trading of members of Congress, not that I
think anybody's doing anything wrong. If they are, they are
prosecuted and they go to jail. But because of the
confidence and it stills in American people don't worry about this.
But I have no concern about the obvious investments. So

(29:39):
it had been made over time. I'm not into it,
my husband is. But it isn't anything to do with
anything insider.

Speaker 1 (29:46):
Okay, nothing to do with insider. And she voted to
have Congress not be able to invest while they're in
But she said, but nothing's going wrong, so why you know,
talking out of a boat the sides of her mouth.
She always does that. Listen to her say that about
how President Trump is always projecting, and then she lies

(30:10):
about the hammerman that attacked her husband. He wasn't a
Trump guy. No shame, that's already been snooked, disputed to
the end of the day.

Speaker 11 (30:22):
Time the president has his own exposure, so he's always projecting.
He's always projecting, and let's not give him any more
time on that.

Speaker 10 (30:29):
Please.

Speaker 11 (30:30):
We're going forward here, and I'm very proud of my family.
And while he might make fun of us, while somebody
inspired by him breaks into our home and hits my
husband in a deadly fashion, hits my husband over the head,
and he thinks that's a riot. I'd rather not go
into some of my other complaints about him right now,
rather to talk about the sixtieth anniversary.

Speaker 1 (30:52):
I've medicated just a rambling machine, a lying rambling machine.
You know. They have the no King rallies dethrown the Kings,
wanting to get rid of Trump. I saw this post
today and I printed it and I'm going to read
it No Kings. Well, they're talking about how long has

(31:13):
Democrat reign and government been dethroned? The king no term?
Chuck Grassley's been fifty years, Shoe Biden forty eight plus years,
Chuck Schumer forty four plus years. Well our runner forty years. Yeah, McConnell,
Nancy Pelosi thirty eight years. Bernie Sanders has been there
thirty four years. And in Trump two point zero he's

(31:36):
been there six months. But they're saying he's he's a king.

Speaker 5 (31:42):
Oh boy, this is the trebortary show. Condom Valley's power talk.

Speaker 1 (31:49):
I know we have some sharks out of here every
now and then, and I was thinking of that water,
the ocean up there. I remember with my nephew going
way out up there in Massachusetts and all of this
list to.

Speaker 12 (32:00):
Hear at home in the Northeast. Shark sidings keeping swimmers
out of the water on Long Island. Video showing multiple
spinner sharks close to shore near Flying Point Beach in
the Hamptons are potentially more dangerous. Bull shark spotted right
off of Fire Island.

Speaker 1 (32:13):
Sharks, tsunamis or earthquakes. Why I wonder why that tsunami
didn't didn't materialize. It seems like an earthquake at that
large that it would have created one. Well, I guess
they're all figuring that out. And once somebody smarter than
myself figures that out, I will try and find that
and report it to you. Of why, I'm glad it
didn't happen really much, all right, Onto my weird football story.

(32:36):
This is ESPN. Christian Wilkins was released by the Raiders,
they say, a source told ESPN because he kissed the
fellow player on the head and teammates took offense to it.
Incident happened inside a team meeting room. Source told ESPN
the interaction was just playful, but the other teammate didn't
see it that way. It's not known what the fellow

(32:58):
player did after that, but complaint was followed to human resources.
Raiders inclined to comment. He lost a bonus thirty million,
so he was released. Now, I know I have seen
I haven't done it, probably because I'm not tall enough

(33:18):
to do it. But you've seen like macho guys like
go over a bald headed guy and go love you
man on top of it. It doesn't mean a gay move,
but something was up with this. That's kind of strange, Okay,
to the good football thing Josh Allen, Buffalo Bills. Of
course we know he's from the Valley from Fireball he was.

(33:41):
A video was out of him meeting a bunch of fans,
shaking their hands, going down the line training camp, visiting
with you know, fans. But he came upon four members
of the military and he took his hat off, removed
his hat before shaking their hands. And see that stand
south these days. Took his ball camp off, shook their

(34:03):
hands as they were there to see him. But see, yes,
people always hear he was he was born and raised
in California. Well he must be one of them California crazies. No,
that you don't realize. Not everybody's leftists. Firepall the Valley

(34:23):
where people understand the importance of paying respect to the military.

Speaker 5 (34:28):
Assistant Trevor Tary show monda Valley's Power Talk