Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
What a great first hour that was. Glad you're here.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Three oh three seven one three eight two five five
the number text d A N five seven seven three nine. Hey,
we're we're talking about what you make of the quote
no king's protests over the weekend. What do you think
they're really all about? And we're fortunate to have Scott
call us. Scott had gone to one in Boulder and
very upset with President Trump, and so we were able.
(00:23):
I think we spent most of the hour with Scott
just drilling down and it ended up about where I
would have expected, which, as we now go to our
fiery lines and texts, is two important places. One is
is Scott and I have no doubt he's an intelligent guy,
et cetera, et cetera. But Scott is so upset with
President Trump. I think it interferes with brain function. And
(00:44):
he can repeat the top line talking points, but as
you get into the specifics, you know his argument's going
to fall apart like all of theirs are. And by
the way, the starting point from Scott is, oh no,
we're not saying he's a king right now, We're saying
he's a want to be king, Because obviously they can't
say he's a king now, or else they wouldn't be
allowed to have those protests.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
So very helpful.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
The other thing that Scott truly didn't see or understand,
and I don't fault them because a lot of people
don't see it yet, but remember you heard it here first,
and that is the sad reality that all the millions
and all the hours put into organizing this on Saturday
had nothing to do with influencing politics now in my opinion,
(01:26):
and in my opinion, what this had to do with
is putting the mechanics in place for future civil disobedience
on demand. I can't prove that, I can't state it
is fact. That's my opinion as to what this was
all about.
Speaker 1 (01:39):
And so I.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
Think that the big money far left sees it. You know,
they're losing, that the bubble's been burst and Americans can
now see the modern Democratic Party for what it is.
And so the Left's going to keep losing, not everywhere,
not all the time, but they're going to keep losing
a lot, and they're not going to be able to
control this country through typical political means. And so I
(02:04):
think that's what this weekend was about. Lots of good
people went out, well intentioned people who just don't like
President Trump. But the mechanism can quickly be turned into
something nefarious, civil disobedience on demand. That's going to be
the only way down the road the left's going to
have any real chance of influencing political events in this
(02:26):
country on any kind of widespread basis, because the way
it's trendy now, they're not going to be able to
do it at the polls. Let's go to Scott. You're
on the Dan Kaplis Show. What do you think of
my friend?
Speaker 3 (02:39):
Oh, I'd like to applaud you for one for your
patience with that gentleman, learn for it.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
Thanks.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
It's funny though, like how soon people forget about twenty
twenty when COVID was going on. What party was demanding
you take a vaccine?
Speaker 1 (02:55):
Yep?
Speaker 3 (02:56):
What party was demanding that you show a vaccine card?
What party was demanding you are masked? What party was
demanding you stand six feet apart?
Speaker 1 (03:04):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (03:04):
What party was demanding uh, close the school but keep
a punch shuffled? How was that not much more King
tire it dictator than anything that Trump is doing?
Speaker 4 (03:15):
Well?
Speaker 3 (03:18):
The one thing I wish you would have told him,
like you told others, is back it up, the packet up.
And you just knew he couldn't every opportunity and he
didn't do it well.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
In the end, Scott, he landed where you make your
winning argument when when I asked him give us an example,
and he did, and then was able to quickly show him, No,
he's the one the Left's the one who wanted to
be king right when he just came out and said, no,
states get to do what they want. Well, guess what.
That's the attitude of kings. That's that's tearing up our constitutions.
(03:48):
So no, you are one hundred percent on target, my friend. Now,
did you happen to go to any of these or
drive past any of these?
Speaker 3 (03:56):
I did not. It was at a waste of my
tying an interviewing effort.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
Oh yeah, I just happened to run into two of
them on the same trip. But thank you man, great
point that you make, really really great. Three oh three,
he said, one three eight two five five text d
A N five seven seventh three nine. I'll get back
to the lines. I want to mix in some text
for those who just joined us. Thank you, But yeah,
I was driving up to Kevin this weekend, and so
(04:20):
I first drove through a large gathering. Credit to them,
I mean, they're organizationally, they're good. And they were able
to get a ton of people out to university and
to rap a hole which is in a suburb, you know,
south of Denver, and you know, I can describe it
as law abiding. It had what appeared to be a
very high energy, cheerful kind of atmosphere. The signs, you know,
(04:43):
you could tell there were some professional signs, but I
don't read too much into that. Yeah, they did a
good job of getting people out. Then I get up
to the mountains and I'm up in Edwards and there's
a crowd about the same size, ton of people out
at an intersection up there, same kind of cheerful, positive attitude, etc. Now,
a friend of mine, David, just sent me a He
just sent me a video of a woman who a conservative,
(05:07):
wearing a Maga hat, who went into the crowd at
the one in Denver and there was some nasty, nasty
behavior going on in there at least when she was there,
very unfair to her.
Speaker 1 (05:18):
And so we're going to try to get her on
the show.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
Let's go to Danny Well, I want to get to
Danny in a second, got to get to some of
these texts. So Dan, speaking of getting used, Trump is
the biggest user. If you don't benefit him directly anymore,
he'll throw you out like garbage. And Dan, i've never
met him, I don't know. But even if that's true,
my response to that would be, wait a second. He's
(05:44):
present in the United States in one of the most
dangerous times in this nation's history. He's doing a phenomenal
job on all the issues that matter. I'm not going
to get hung up on some personality quirks. Dan, what
do you think of Trump posting the AI dump video?
Classy act by the US president?
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Huh?
Speaker 2 (06:03):
And I've got a few texts on this. If you
haven't seen it yet, you've got to see it. You
can find it on x And it's a video of
President Trump and a fighter jet flying over some of
these No Kings protests and dumping what I thought was
mud on the protesters. Other people I think interpreted as excrement,
(06:24):
but I thought it was hilarious. And here's why. Because
one of the reasons Trump's so great is he's not
your typical president. He's got a sense of humor. He's
able to take something like this and address it with humor. Now,
it was not a video of him like in a
video game, bombing people or shooting up people. He's dropping
(06:47):
mud on him. I'm glad we have a president with
a sense of humor. And the other thing is, come on,
we live in a different era in terms of communication
and persuasion. And the whole idea here is to keep
winning beyond Trump. And if you want to be reaching
young people, but people of any age, you got to
be creative. And so the visual messaging he was able
(07:09):
to do with that fighter jet dumping mud on the protesters,
that is absolute brilliance in terms of communication.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
And I want a brilliant president.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
Dan, while who I love your answer. That is the
reason I love your show. Dan, Thank you, Thank you, Texter.
Dan get rid of Scott an now or I'm hanging
up and I get that. Listen, you're on your way home.
You've probably worked hard all day. You don't want to
get home aggravated.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
I get that.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
A guy like Scott is very aggravating, right because he
doesn't know what he's talking about. When you get past
the bullet point top line and he doesn't want to listen.
But I think there's so much value in having the
back and forth. That's why I kept him. So let's
go to a Danny. You're on the Dan Kapla show. Welcome,
(07:58):
thank you, sure thing, my friend.
Speaker 1 (08:00):
What do you think of Well, I know you're not
happy with me, so thank you for calling.
Speaker 3 (08:05):
Grey that I'm not happy with you. I listened to
your show every day.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
You know.
Speaker 3 (08:10):
The thing is that with Scott, you know, you allow
him to speak for about I don't know, thirty forty
seconds or maybe I just caught the tail of the show,
but then you didn't allow him to finish make sure show,
so you have the right to do that. Well. I
don't like Trump. I do not like him as far
(08:34):
as being a king. I mean, there's so many things
that he's doing that are just against the rules, but
yet he continues to do him over and over and over.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
What do you seeing their, Danny? What are you seeing?
Speaker 4 (08:51):
Well?
Speaker 3 (08:51):
What I see? You know, for instance, just calling the
the president of Venezuela a drug dealer, I mean, come on,
he wouldn't be a president.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
If he was a drug dealer.
Speaker 3 (09:04):
Well, not what they do down there.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
Hey, can you do me a favorite, Danny?
Speaker 2 (09:08):
Do you can you join me on the other side
of this commercial break because I want to have this
back and forth since we disagree on Trump. Can you
do that?
Speaker 3 (09:18):
I probably can't. Yeah, I'll tell you what I can
call back tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
Yeah, yeah, please do that. But one quick thing before
you go. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
I think what happened here is I think you probably
came in on the tail end of Scott because I
had kept him Shannon, how many segments did we have Scott?
Speaker 1 (09:35):
Four segments?
Speaker 2 (09:38):
We didn't keep Jimmy Carter for four segments, so we
had Scott for four segments and you came in at.
Speaker 1 (09:44):
The very end where oh no, no, not at all.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
I Hey, listen, I understand a lot of people come
in and out of this show.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
We're grateful for that. But thank you, Danny. That's what happened.
And then.
Speaker 3 (09:57):
Just give me ten seconds.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Sure.
Speaker 3 (09:59):
October twenty first tomorrow. This book that's coming out by
Virginia Goffrey. It's going to tell a lot and everybody's
going to read it, and names are going to be exposed,
and everything's going to be out.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
There, and you're expecting this is the woman who said
she was sexually abused by Prince Andrew, that he raped
her as a minor, and reportedly, I don't know if
the reports are true, he ended up paying her millions.
So your thought is that he's that she is going
to say something damaging about Trump?
Speaker 1 (10:31):
Is that what you're expecting?
Speaker 4 (10:32):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (10:33):
Yeah, yeah, Well.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
Danny, can I ask you this?
Speaker 2 (10:37):
And I literally have twenty six seconds before this mandatory break,
but can't you be one hundred percent certain that if
there was anything connected to Epstein that would have destroyed Trump,
it would have been out there before election day.
Speaker 3 (10:51):
That's the power. That's where the king comes in. They're
not going to release it because Pam Bondi's in there,
Trump is in there.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
So you're saying before election day, Trump had the power
to prevent his enemies from publishing bad information about him.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
He had before, and Biden's friends or whatever, they were
all in there too, and that's why I wasn't release Yeah,
I couldn't tell you.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Yeah no, And the reason for that, Danny is there.
You can be sure, my friend, and please do call
us tomorrow. You can be sure that if there was
anything connected to Epstein that would have destroyed Trump, that
would have been out there before election date. That's one
of the things in life all of us can be
certain of.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
You're on the dan Kapla Shaw, Glad you're here. Lines
have been, like oj case fiery today.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
So I appreciate the opportunity to have this conversation with
so many people who disagree, and some great texts coming
in as well. I'll get to those shortly. Just a
quick summary. We're talking obviously about the quote no King's
protest over the weekend, and you know, we've had some
callers who are anti Trump, and it's just been a
(11:59):
great opportunity to dig in and show that I understand
that they're anti Trump and they have these strong negative feelings,
but when you get into the substance, it falls apart
for them. And so you know, that's been revealing, confirming.
But then the bigger issue, which is fascinating to me,
and i'd love your take, particularly if you think I'm wrong,
(12:21):
The bigger issue of why did they do this? Because
that the you know, appears to be the Soros backed
organization and others that put a lot of money into
the organizational part of this this weekend. Why did they
do it when there's no obvious political point. It's not
going to move the needle on anything. There's no upcoming election.
My theory can't prove it is fact right now, but
(12:42):
it's my theory is that they knew all that when
they put this together. This was about putting the mechanics
in place for civil disobedience on demand. Now, this weekend
was largely peaceful, in law abiding, but putting the mechanics
in place so when the Left needs some thing in
the future that's not peaceful and not law abiding, they
(13:04):
have the mechanics to pull that off. That's my own
personal belief as to why they poured so much into
this weekend. It doesn't mean the nice people who've called
the show, Scott who went there, what would intentionally go
anywhere to disobey the law, et cetera. But as I
told Scott during our conversation, he's the dry firewood Eventually
(13:24):
that eventually they're going to bring the flame throwers and
this is going to turn into civil disobedience on demand
when they need it, when the fire left needs it.
That's my personal belief. We'll find out together. I hope
I'm wrong. Eerie Mike kind enough to grace us today?
How you do an eerie?
Speaker 4 (13:43):
I'm fine, Lyle? How are you.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
Living the dream living? You can call me worse than Lyle?
Lyle's kind of nice, big one up.
Speaker 4 (13:52):
Hey, you know I perspective is a wonderful thing. I
don't think I've ever been a listener where there was
someone who had a different point of view than you.
I don't think I've ever listened to that. I've always
been a part of that. Being able to hear it
on the outside was very interesting to me. And I
(14:13):
figured it out. Why you infuriate me so bad sometimes
because you don't listen. You use a condescending, patronizing, a
seminan voice that is so irritating that gets people upset,
and you just and I think that's what happened with
Scott a little bit. He's gotta be some great points.
That's why you're not a judge, You're just an attorney,
(14:34):
because you didn't judge what he made some great points
that you didn't listen to. Yeah, and he actually he
actually made great points that you could not refute. You
changed the subject, let's get to those, and you just
walk over him like I'm doing to you right now.
Speaker 1 (14:48):
No, Let's get to those, Mike.
Speaker 2 (14:51):
Let's get to those, Mike, because when I tried to
get Scott into substance, he fell apart very quickly, as you.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Usually do, so we didn't. Let's get to those.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
Yeah, and that's hey, denials not just a river in
each over, denials, not just a river in Egypt. I
had him on for four segments, four segments in a
four segment hour. But let's get specific here, Mike. Let's
get specific. What was Scott right about? Was he right
about that point in the end where states get to
do whatever they want and the federal government can't do
or say anything about it?
Speaker 1 (15:20):
Was he right about that?
Speaker 4 (15:22):
Again, you're proving my point. You don't listen. His first
point was he's acting like a king, and that he's
letting criminals go broke the law who were through the
judicial system, were sentenced, and he says, it's okay.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
Okay, So let me let me ask you, my friend.
Let's let's start with that. You chose to avoid my question.
I understand because it's a sure user for you. So
we'll get back to that. But but let's do this.
Let's let's do what you do, Dan, which is tell
the truth, which is called call lefties out when they
say things that aren't true. Okay, So let's let's do
(15:58):
this at the risk of the sanity of our audience.
Let's go back to the starting point where I asked you, Okay,
was Scott right then when he said that states get
to do whatever they want and the federal government has
no say in that.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
So let's start there. Mike, was Scott right about that? No? Okay, great,
so we we agree he's wrung on that. Now.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
Is the pardon power, the power to pardon federal sentences
and commute federal sentences?
Speaker 1 (16:25):
Is that in our constitution? It is?
Speaker 2 (16:32):
Okay, so he was. He was acting constitutionally. You just
don't like it.
Speaker 4 (16:40):
No, here's the point, Dan. You you have this little
conspiracy theory that this thing that happened on Saturday is
you know, some setup for a future violent thing. Hey,
we're not part of the cult.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
Okay, Mike, you're not. You're not getting off that easy
and up put Mike makes me do this. He makes
me put him on hold each time he's busted, which
is on every issue. So let's get back to this one. Mike,
your evidence for your claim Trump wants to be a
king is pardoning J six protesters, Well, it's in the constitution, right,
he has the constitutional power to do it. And Mike,
(17:12):
by the way, you will agree that Trump won fairly.
He won a fair and legal election, correct, So he
got that power to pardon from the people of the
United States in a fairly decided election. Right, all right,
I get a claim victory right there? Did you get
(17:33):
that word, Shannon or Shannon is so good? Shannon Scott
by the glass, Mike, as you may have guessed by now,
responded with a profanity to my winning point, which I
think we can all see, is like the ultimate victory
for me.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
Sorry, Mike.
Speaker 2 (17:52):
You're on the Dan Capitli Show five thirty six on
this pretty afternoon.
Speaker 1 (17:55):
Glad you're here.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
I can't remember the last time I had this much
fun on a show. Three or three someone three A
two five five text d A N five seven seven
three nine. And we've been talking about the No Kings
protest and what's really going on there. Why did the
far left put so much money into all this when
there's obviously no immediate political impact. What's the real end game?
(18:18):
So I've been giving you my theory on that and
we've been very fortunate to have a one caller from Boulder,
very unhappy with President Trump. He and I have polar
opposite views of this presidency, but he was there and
he went out there to protest Trump. So we spend
four segments with Scott and we were able to drill
down to some really important things and including just further
(18:39):
proof that when you take these protesters past the bullet points,
they fall apart. You know, it's back it up or
pack it up, and they can't back it up. And
then we've had a series of callers who will further
proved that point. Some you know, real nice guys like Danny,
others you know, like Eerie Mike, in fact Eerie Mike himself.
But the common denominator is, you know that they have
(19:00):
this frustration with Trump, this intense frustration was with Trump,
which is very real to them. It's very sincere, but
it's it's very shallow, it's not well reasoned, and so
any opportunity we get to have the conversation is a
great opportunity and a great insight three h three seven
one three eight two five five text d an five
seven seven three nine And what does it mean to you, well,
(19:23):
what it means to you is that if the Republican Party,
if conservatives in general, you know, do their job right,
then then they should win for a long long time,
if not permanently, because the left at this point has
been exposed. They can't win the arguments, they can't win
on policy. All they're left with is this anger and
(19:46):
frustration and agitation. And so that leads to my point.
It's really a theory. I can't prove it factually, but
my point is to what last weekend was really all about.
And for the people who spent the millions and so
many hours to organize it so well, and they did
organize it very well, it wasn't about this weekend. It
wasn't about these really non violent, law abiding protests this weekend,
(20:11):
and it was great to see that. My theory is
that they were putting the mechanics in place for future
civil disobedience on demand because of the far left people
you know, who are really smart. They just don't want
the kind of country the Founders wanted, or you and
I want, but they're really smart people with a lot
(20:32):
of money. They see where this is headed. You know
that the left's not going to be able to win
and keep power at the voting booth, not nationally. So
I think they're putting in place the mechanism for civil
disobedience in the future, and that the well intentioned, law
abiding people like Scott who called this show, who was
out there this weekend, as I told him on air,
(20:53):
he's the dry firewood. And the day is going to
come as the Left continues to lose power where the
people organizing all this. Let's wait and see if all
of this days peaceful in the future, because my fear
is it won't and we'll find out together. But yeah,
the Left's not going to be able to keep power.
(21:14):
It's not going to be able to get power back,
not nationally, not consistently at the ballot box. So let's
hope that all of these crowds in the future stay peaceful,
in law abiding.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
I am not optimistic on that.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
Three O three se one three A two five five
text d A N five seven seven three nine. I
do want to get to some more of our textures.
We've had so many great texts today Before that, Hey,
give me just thirty seconds to make a really important
point about the Broncos. Okay, and that is yesterday It
was glorious, shocking, right. I didn't think there's any chance
(21:49):
they could pull off that comeback. But but the lesson
has to be learned from yesterday, or yesterday will be meaningless,
it'll be a waste. The lesson that has to be
learned is let Bob Bo, let bo Nicks play, Let
the offense play, Let them play free and loose as
they were allowed to play in the fourth quarter out
(22:09):
of desperation, and then this team will be what we
saw in the fourth quarter. Will they lose some games
because of stupid picks and things like that, Sure, that's
part of football. But the problem with this Bronco offense
up until the fourth quarter yesterday has been trying to
over control bow Nicks and over control the offense to
avoid mistakes. Excuse me, I know that was gross. It's
(22:34):
the same thing Dan Reeves did with John Elway.
Speaker 1 (22:37):
You can't do that.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
You gotta let them play and create and trust them
and be ready to lose some games over it. But
you're gonna win more games overall. That's what we saw
in the fourth quarter. Because is somebody going to try
to convince me or anybody else that the same quarterback
and the same offense that put zero points on the
board through three quarters and put thirty three the board
(23:00):
in the fourth quarter.
Speaker 1 (23:03):
Could not have scored more earlier.
Speaker 2 (23:05):
If they were allowed to play the way they were
allowed to play in the fourth quarter, of course they
would have. So that needs to be the lasting lesson. Hey,
we've got the best ownership in the NFL, got a
great head coach in so many ways. But a lot
of these head coaches, they they just try to over control.
And I hope that the Broncos learned the lesson from
(23:27):
yesterday and just let bo be bow three oh three
seven one three eight two five five text d A
N five seven seven three nine text or Dan Mike
has gotten it a little testosterone. I've never heard such
rattled ladies in my life. That's Mary from New York City.
Dan Mike's s word did come through on iHeartRadio. Is
that against the law? You're you're thinking you blocked it, Channing, No,
(23:52):
it did go through.
Speaker 3 (23:53):
Okay, Well I'm thinking I blocked it, but I see
that the equipment didn't work. So not blocking.
Speaker 1 (23:58):
Yeah, yeah, which not be Shannon's fault.
Speaker 3 (24:01):
Fault.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
All you can do in our system is the best
you can do to hit the dump button, right. I mean,
we're not sitting here expecting somebody is gonna blurt that
word out. But it was like a total victory, right
when when the best that the person you're debating can
do is shout out of profanity. At that point you
take the w Dan Eerie Mike summed it up beautifully.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
I agree with what he said.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
I hope you call the show my friend Dan, please
beat calor mic. I'm amazing these people believe in what
they believe in. Uh probably the most stupid uh educated
people in Colorado. More likely they are university professors. And
then it goes on from there. I think what's important
(24:45):
texture is to look beyond the stupid comments, right because
I've coined the word s'morns. You get so many smart
people saying very moronic things, particularly when it comes to
Donald Trump, and it just goes to the point that
hate interferes with brain function. Anger interferes with brain function,
(25:07):
and that's what we see when it comes to President Trump.
And then the glorious thing we saw in this last
election is that it ends up backfiring on the venom
spewers and it ended up benefiting Trump which is a
great lesson moving forward in this country, that that kind
of of tactic doesn't work. That kind of just spew
(25:30):
venom at the opponent is going to be rejected by
the American people.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
Dan Bs spelled.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Out, the whole word came through. Maybe it was only
Mike's bs. Dan remind callers that if they call you upset,
they're not going to.
Speaker 1 (25:48):
Win a debate.
Speaker 2 (25:51):
Dan oh, I love this one, Dan, Eerie, Mike is
a hostile witness. Thank you for that, because in court,
as you may know, if a whit and this turns hostile,
then you're allowed to ask leading questions even if you
called the witness, Dan, Trump's pardons are allowed by the
US Constitution.
Speaker 1 (26:08):
Thank you. Texture. I did make that point to Mike,
which is.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
When he just fell apart and screamed out BS. Except
it was the whole word because Steeves. I asked these
callers who hate Trump, Okay, what's your evidence he wants
to be a king? And the first guy said, well,
sending the National Guard del a in Chicago, And I said,
wait a second, that's allowed by the constitution.
Speaker 1 (26:31):
He said no, the states should get to do whatever
they want.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
So I made the point to him gently that well,
you're the one who wants to be king because you
want to tear up our constitution.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
Same thing with Mike.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
His number one, his number one exhibit against Trump is
the J six pardons. So I pointed out to Mike
they're allowed by the constitution and he won the election
fairly and squarely.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
And that's when Mike uttered out his profanity.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
Dan, there are no protests without algorithms amplified by the CIA.
Haven't seen any evidence, and I personally don't believe the
CIA had anything to do with this weekend. I think
you've got a lot of people on the left who
have a lot of money, and they're very good at organizing,
and they did a very very good job of.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Organizing this weekend.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
The point is that it was not intended to move
the needle politically or win any political points. So ask yourself,
why did they go to that trouble and then think
of my theory, not fact I can't prove it, but
my theory about what they're preparing for down the road. Damn,
thanks for letting me see. I'll left, just like Scott
can turn on a dime. I heard it. Not so
(27:35):
great pathology coming through his voice. So glad you're inside
a studio. Thank you, my friend Dan. These lip callers
are so off the rail they can't pick up facts.
They're delusional. They bring up things like stopping drop boats
from Venezuela.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Has something bad? Are you kidding me? That same caller
made the point.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
That that wait a second, evidence Trump's a king, as
he says, the president of Colombia is a drug dealer.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
A drug dealer can be president. And then he had
to go.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
And a friend of mine, David, made a great point that,
remember Manuel Noriego, David happened to be with the US
government at the time at that trial. So yeah, but
it just shows otherwise, smart people, some nice like that
caller was, some not so nice. Their brains stop functioning
(28:23):
when it comes to Donald Trump. And I don't think
you can blame Trump for that, because the reason their
brains aren't functioning is because they see it all slipping away.
They believe in this leftist approach to things, and they
can see Trump triumphing, and they can see America moving
decisively in the direction of Trump and the Republican parties.
(28:46):
So the technical term is they're losing it. You're on
the Dan Capla show, the so called No King's protest
and having caller after caller who is anti Trump, which
has really been fantastic, right because then we can just
expose what's really going on there, which is a lot
of anger but no substance. They can't back it up,
(29:07):
so they have to pack it up. But it's been very,
very fortunate to have those calls. Dan was Danny upset
when Biden snubbed his nose at Scotus and continued student
loan replacement the texture making the great point at all
of these no Kings people, they want a king, They
just wanted to be a leftist king. Dan, president of
Junezuela is a drug dealer stopping the.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
Drug running as president's job. You bet it is.
Speaker 3 (29:31):
Dan.
Speaker 2 (29:32):
Yes, I get you think Trump is all fun in games,
but I'd rather have a president at work than tweeting
jokes and silly memes. Can you even imagine the comments
if Biden posted the same Ai Joe AI video. Yeah,
the question would have been who really did it? Because
Biden didn't have that capacity. What he's talking about if
you haven't seen it, sorry to cough from the mic.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
Was this brilliant.
Speaker 2 (29:53):
Video that Trump had posted of Trump in a fighter
jet dropping mud all over these No King's protests. My
point was, you want a brilliant president. That was brilliant
because it's all about communication and persuasion, and that's how
you do it with an awful lot of people not
all in this era is you do it visually. You
(30:16):
do it through humor. Trump made a point there that
was so much more effective than if he tried to
do it a traditional way. So, Dan, you're defending a
president making a video where he literally trashes everyone that
doesn't like him. I can imagine your reaction if Obama
had done that. I doubt you say that was funny.
Wait a second, Barack Obama came out in so many
(30:37):
different ways and directly trashed the American people and America itself.
What Donald Trump did was humorous, and he was making
a political point in a visually appealing, humorous way. And
I do support it because I want Trump to win.
I want Trump to win politically. I want Trump to
(30:58):
win the midterms. Things like that they are effective and
they make the point, and you don't think an awful
lot of young people see that and they're just laughing
and they get the point that they wouldn't otherwise. Of
course I want to get to these calls, but our
lines are jam, let's go back there and try to
work people in, starting with Tim. You're on the Dan
Kaplis show.
Speaker 3 (31:17):
Welcome, Well Dan, this is Tim from up to Collins.
Speaker 1 (31:21):
Wonderful.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
You can equate these Kings protests to the gals that
stood on the street in front of Planned Parenthood. Oh yeah,
they just want to dominate, push everybody out because they
only want one point of view. And I know you've
said that before.
Speaker 2 (31:44):
And as like, Tim, you had this experience right where
you were out praying outside of plant Paranoid clinic. Are
you the same caller? And then you had these topless
women show up and they were trying to drown you out.
Speaker 3 (32:00):
Yeah, they're drowning everybody out.
Speaker 1 (32:02):
Everybody out.
Speaker 2 (32:03):
Yeah, but you're right, the same common denominator, which is
they've got to censor you because they can't win the argument.
Speaker 3 (32:11):
No. I mean, you know, we have how many pro
life hospitals in the state of Colorado?
Speaker 2 (32:21):
What, Tim, I a rhetorical question answer that, No.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
Well, I've never researched on you.
Speaker 3 (32:29):
I don't know it is Saint Anthony's still pro life Catholic?
You know, I don't think so well.
Speaker 2 (32:37):
But but Tim, can I ask you that because we're
doing the note Kings thing today and I'm happy to
talk about a different topic, but I would assume that.
Speaker 3 (32:44):
I'm trying to with this. Yeah, Okay, if we wanted
a pro life hospital, they would stomp all over it
at every hospital in the state of Colorado. Yeah, I'm
talking about U see help and whatever. Because of the
Obama administration, we have no pro life hospitals. They're doing
(33:07):
abortions that DG you see help and everything. We can't
get it.
Speaker 2 (33:14):
Tim, I've got to ask you this question, which is
off this topic. Are you saying that Catholic hospitals are
doing abortions because my understanding is they are not.
Speaker 3 (33:23):
No Catholic hospitals are not.
Speaker 1 (33:24):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (33:25):
I don't know if the archdiocese sold Saint Anthony's Yeah
to another institution or something like that, I don't know,
but they would be the only ones I know of
here in northern Colorado. We don't have anything.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
And getting back to the no Kings protest issue, Tim,
So your point is that if we did have what
you consider to be a truly pro life hospital, that
they would they would just what do what.
Speaker 3 (33:53):
To that they would squash it. They watched it all
out already.
Speaker 2 (33:58):
Yeah, yeah, Tim, appreciate the call. My friend wanted to
try to squeeze some people. And I agree with Tim
on this point for sure, that the left again, they
can't win. You heard it today, You heard it from
the people the left to call of the left who
called the show. They can't win the arguments on the
fact or reason, and so they just have to censor people.
Speaker 1 (34:17):
They have to shut people down, shout people down.
Speaker 2 (34:20):
In Trump's case, they had to try to put them
in jail because they knew they couldn't beat them at
the polls.
Speaker 1 (34:24):
Thank you, Shannon Scott. Please join us tomorrow
What a great first hour that was. Glad you're here.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Three oh three seven one three eight two five five
the number text d A N five seven seven three nine. Hey,
we're we're talking about what you make of the quote
no king's protests over the weekend. What do you think
they're really all about? And we're fortunate to have Scott
call us. Scott had gone to one in Boulder and
very upset with President Trump, and so we were able.
(00:23):
I think we spent most of the hour with Scott
just drilling down and it ended up about where I
would have expected, which, as we now go to our
fiery lines and texts, is two important places. One is
is Scott and I have no doubt he's an intelligent guy,
et cetera, et cetera. But Scott is so upset with
President Trump. I think it interferes with brain function. And
(00:44):
he can repeat the top line talking points, but as
you get into the specifics, you know his argument's going
to fall apart like all of theirs are. And by
the way, the starting point from Scott is, oh no,
we're not saying he's a king right now, We're saying
he's a want to be king, Because obviously they can't
say he's a king now, or else they wouldn't be
allowed to have those protests.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
So very helpful.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
The other thing that Scott truly didn't see or understand,
and I don't fault them because a lot of people
don't see it yet, but remember you heard it here first,
and that is the sad reality that all the millions
and all the hours put into organizing this on Saturday
had nothing to do with influencing politics now in my opinion,
(01:26):
and in my opinion, what this had to do with
is putting the mechanics in place for future civil disobedience
on demand. I can't prove that, I can't state it
is fact. That's my opinion as to what this was
all about.
Speaker 1 (01:39):
And so I.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
Think that the big money far left sees it. You know,
they're losing, that the bubble's been burst and Americans can
now see the modern Democratic Party for what it is.
And so the Left's going to keep losing, not everywhere,
not all the time, but they're going to keep losing
a lot, and they're not going to be able to
control this country through typical political means. And so I
(02:04):
think that's what this weekend was about. Lots of good
people went out, well intentioned people who just don't like
President Trump. But the mechanism can quickly be turned into
something nefarious, civil disobedience on demand. That's going to be
the only way down the road the left's going to
have any real chance of influencing political events in this
(02:26):
country on any kind of widespread basis, because the way
it's trendy now, they're not going to be able to
do it at the polls. Let's go to Scott. You're
on the Dan Kaplis Show. What do you think of
my friend?
Speaker 3 (02:39):
Oh, I'd like to applaud you for one for your
patience with that gentleman, learn for it.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
Thanks.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
It's funny though, like how soon people forget about twenty
twenty when COVID was going on. What party was demanding
you take a vaccine?
Speaker 1 (02:55):
Yep?
Speaker 3 (02:56):
What party was demanding that you show a vaccine card?
What party was demanding you are masked? What party was
demanding you stand six feet apart?
Speaker 1 (03:04):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (03:04):
What party was demanding uh, close the school but keep
a punch shuffled? How was that not much more King
tire it dictator than anything that Trump is doing?
Speaker 4 (03:15):
Well?
Speaker 3 (03:18):
The one thing I wish you would have told him,
like you told others, is back it up, the packet up.
And you just knew he couldn't every opportunity and he
didn't do it well.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
In the end, Scott, he landed where you make your
winning argument when when I asked him give us an example,
and he did, and then was able to quickly show him, No,
he's the one the Left's the one who wanted to
be king right when he just came out and said, no,
states get to do what they want. Well, guess what.
That's the attitude of kings. That's that's tearing up our constitutions.
(03:48):
So no, you are one hundred percent on target, my friend. Now,
did you happen to go to any of these or
drive past any of these?
Speaker 3 (03:56):
I did not. It was at a waste of my
tying an interviewing effort.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
Oh yeah, I just happened to run into two of
them on the same trip. But thank you man, great
point that you make, really really great. Three oh three,
he said, one three eight two five five text d
A N five seven seventh three nine. I'll get back
to the lines. I want to mix in some text
for those who just joined us. Thank you, But yeah,
I was driving up to Kevin this weekend, and so
(04:20):
I first drove through a large gathering. Credit to them,
I mean, they're organizationally, they're good. And they were able
to get a ton of people out to university and
to rap a hole which is in a suburb, you know,
south of Denver, and you know, I can describe it
as law abiding. It had what appeared to be a
very high energy, cheerful kind of atmosphere. The signs, you know,
(04:43):
you could tell there were some professional signs, but I
don't read too much into that. Yeah, they did a
good job of getting people out. Then I get up
to the mountains and I'm up in Edwards and there's
a crowd about the same size, ton of people out
at an intersection up there, same kind of cheerful, positive attitude, etc. Now,
a friend of mine, David, just sent me a He
just sent me a video of a woman who a conservative,
(05:07):
wearing a Maga hat, who went into the crowd at
the one in Denver and there was some nasty, nasty
behavior going on in there at least when she was there,
very unfair to her.
Speaker 1 (05:18):
And so we're going to try to get her on
the show.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
Let's go to Danny Well, I want to get to
Danny in a second, got to get to some of
these texts. So Dan, speaking of getting used, Trump is
the biggest user. If you don't benefit him directly anymore,
he'll throw you out like garbage. And Dan, i've never
met him, I don't know. But even if that's true,
my response to that would be, wait a second. He's
(05:44):
present in the United States in one of the most
dangerous times in this nation's history. He's doing a phenomenal
job on all the issues that matter. I'm not going
to get hung up on some personality quirks. Dan, what
do you think of Trump posting the AI dump video?
Classy act by the US president?
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Huh?
Speaker 2 (06:03):
And I've got a few texts on this. If you
haven't seen it yet, you've got to see it. You
can find it on x And it's a video of
President Trump and a fighter jet flying over some of
these No Kings protests and dumping what I thought was
mud on the protesters. Other people I think interpreted as excrement,
(06:24):
but I thought it was hilarious. And here's why. Because
one of the reasons Trump's so great is he's not
your typical president. He's got a sense of humor. He's
able to take something like this and address it with humor. Now,
it was not a video of him like in a
video game, bombing people or shooting up people. He's dropping
(06:47):
mud on him. I'm glad we have a president with
a sense of humor. And the other thing is, come on,
we live in a different era in terms of communication
and persuasion. And the whole idea here is to keep
winning beyond Trump. And if you want to be reaching
young people, but people of any age, you got to
be creative. And so the visual messaging he was able
(07:09):
to do with that fighter jet dumping mud on the protesters,
that is absolute brilliance in terms of communication.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
And I want a brilliant president.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
Dan, while who I love your answer. That is the
reason I love your show. Dan, Thank you, Thank you, Texter.
Dan get rid of Scott an now or I'm hanging
up and I get that. Listen, you're on your way home.
You've probably worked hard all day. You don't want to
get home aggravated.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
I get that.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
A guy like Scott is very aggravating, right because he
doesn't know what he's talking about. When you get past
the bullet point top line and he doesn't want to listen.
But I think there's so much value in having the
back and forth. That's why I kept him. So let's
go to a Danny. You're on the Dan Kapla show. Welcome,
(07:58):
thank you, sure thing, my friend.
Speaker 1 (08:00):
What do you think of Well, I know you're not
happy with me, so thank you for calling.
Speaker 3 (08:05):
Grey that I'm not happy with you. I listened to
your show every day.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
You know.
Speaker 3 (08:10):
The thing is that with Scott, you know, you allow
him to speak for about I don't know, thirty forty
seconds or maybe I just caught the tail of the show,
but then you didn't allow him to finish make sure show,
so you have the right to do that. Well. I
don't like Trump. I do not like him as far
(08:34):
as being a king. I mean, there's so many things
that he's doing that are just against the rules, but
yet he continues to do him over and over and over.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
What do you seeing their, Danny? What are you seeing?
Speaker 4 (08:51):
Well?
Speaker 3 (08:51):
What I see? You know, for instance, just calling the
the president of Venezuela a drug dealer, I mean, come on,
he wouldn't be a president.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
If he was a drug dealer.
Speaker 3 (09:04):
Well, not what they do down there.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
Hey, can you do me a favorite, Danny?
Speaker 2 (09:08):
Do you can you join me on the other side
of this commercial break because I want to have this
back and forth since we disagree on Trump. Can you
do that?
Speaker 3 (09:18):
I probably can't. Yeah, I'll tell you what I can
call back tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
Yeah, yeah, please do that. But one quick thing before
you go. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
I think what happened here is I think you probably
came in on the tail end of Scott because I
had kept him Shannon, how many segments did we have Scott?
Speaker 1 (09:35):
Four segments?
Speaker 2 (09:38):
We didn't keep Jimmy Carter for four segments, so we
had Scott for four segments and you came in at.
Speaker 1 (09:44):
The very end where oh no, no, not at all.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
I Hey, listen, I understand a lot of people come
in and out of this show.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
We're grateful for that. But thank you, Danny. That's what happened.
And then.
Speaker 3 (09:57):
Just give me ten seconds.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Sure.
Speaker 3 (09:59):
October twenty first tomorrow. This book that's coming out by
Virginia Goffrey. It's going to tell a lot and everybody's
going to read it, and names are going to be exposed,
and everything's going to be out.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
There, and you're expecting this is the woman who said
she was sexually abused by Prince Andrew, that he raped
her as a minor, and reportedly, I don't know if
the reports are true, he ended up paying her millions.
So your thought is that he's that she is going
to say something damaging about Trump?
Speaker 1 (10:31):
Is that what you're expecting?
Speaker 4 (10:32):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (10:33):
Yeah, yeah, Well.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
Danny, can I ask you this?
Speaker 2 (10:37):
And I literally have twenty six seconds before this mandatory break,
but can't you be one hundred percent certain that if
there was anything connected to Epstein that would have destroyed Trump,
it would have been out there before election day.
Speaker 3 (10:51):
That's the power. That's where the king comes in. They're
not going to release it because Pam Bondi's in there,
Trump is in there.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
So you're saying before election day, Trump had the power
to prevent his enemies from publishing bad information about him.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
He had before, and Biden's friends or whatever, they were
all in there too, and that's why I wasn't release Yeah,
I couldn't tell you.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Yeah no, And the reason for that, Danny is there.
You can be sure, my friend, and please do call
us tomorrow. You can be sure that if there was
anything connected to Epstein that would have destroyed Trump, that
would have been out there before election date. That's one
of the things in life all of us can be
certain of.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
You're on the dan Kapla Shaw, Glad you're here. Lines
have been, like oj case fiery today.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
So I appreciate the opportunity to have this conversation with
so many people who disagree, and some great texts coming
in as well. I'll get to those shortly. Just a
quick summary. We're talking obviously about the quote no King's
protest over the weekend, and you know, we've had some
callers who are anti Trump, and it's just been a
(11:59):
great opportunity to dig in and show that I understand
that they're anti Trump and they have these strong negative feelings,
but when you get into the substance, it falls apart
for them. And so you know, that's been revealing, confirming.
But then the bigger issue, which is fascinating to me,
and i'd love your take, particularly if you think I'm wrong,
(12:21):
The bigger issue of why did they do this? Because
that the you know, appears to be the Soros backed
organization and others that put a lot of money into
the organizational part of this this weekend. Why did they
do it when there's no obvious political point. It's not
going to move the needle on anything. There's no upcoming election.
My theory can't prove it is fact right now, but
(12:42):
it's my theory is that they knew all that when
they put this together. This was about putting the mechanics
in place for civil disobedience on demand. Now, this weekend
was largely peaceful, in law abiding, but putting the mechanics
in place so when the Left needs some thing in
the future that's not peaceful and not law abiding, they
(13:04):
have the mechanics to pull that off. That's my own
personal belief as to why they poured so much into
this weekend. It doesn't mean the nice people who've called
the show, Scott who went there, what would intentionally go
anywhere to disobey the law, et cetera. But as I
told Scott during our conversation, he's the dry firewood Eventually
(13:24):
that eventually they're going to bring the flame throwers and
this is going to turn into civil disobedience on demand
when they need it, when the fire left needs it.
That's my personal belief. We'll find out together. I hope
I'm wrong. Eerie Mike kind enough to grace us today?
How you do an eerie?
Speaker 4 (13:43):
I'm fine, Lyle? How are you.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
Living the dream living? You can call me worse than Lyle?
Lyle's kind of nice, big one up.
Speaker 4 (13:52):
Hey, you know I perspective is a wonderful thing. I
don't think I've ever been a listener where there was
someone who had a different point of view than you.
I don't think I've ever listened to that. I've always
been a part of that. Being able to hear it
on the outside was very interesting to me. And I
(14:13):
figured it out. Why you infuriate me so bad sometimes
because you don't listen. You use a condescending, patronizing, a
seminan voice that is so irritating that gets people upset,
and you just and I think that's what happened with
Scott a little bit. He's gotta be some great points.
That's why you're not a judge, You're just an attorney,
(14:34):
because you didn't judge what he made some great points
that you didn't listen to. Yeah, and he actually he
actually made great points that you could not refute. You
changed the subject, let's get to those, and you just
walk over him like I'm doing to you right now.
Speaker 1 (14:48):
No, Let's get to those, Mike.
Speaker 2 (14:51):
Let's get to those, Mike, because when I tried to
get Scott into substance, he fell apart very quickly, as you.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Usually do, so we didn't. Let's get to those.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
Yeah, and that's hey, denials not just a river in
each over, denials, not just a river in Egypt. I
had him on for four segments, four segments in a
four segment hour. But let's get specific here, Mike. Let's
get specific. What was Scott right about? Was he right
about that point in the end where states get to
do whatever they want and the federal government can't do
or say anything about it?
Speaker 1 (15:20):
Was he right about that?
Speaker 4 (15:22):
Again, you're proving my point. You don't listen. His first
point was he's acting like a king, and that he's
letting criminals go broke the law who were through the
judicial system, were sentenced, and he says, it's okay.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
Okay, So let me let me ask you, my friend.
Let's let's start with that. You chose to avoid my question.
I understand because it's a sure user for you. So
we'll get back to that. But but let's do this.
Let's let's do what you do, Dan, which is tell
the truth, which is called call lefties out when they
say things that aren't true. Okay, So let's let's do
(15:58):
this at the risk of the sanity of our audience.
Let's go back to the starting point where I asked you, Okay,
was Scott right then when he said that states get
to do whatever they want and the federal government has
no say in that.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
So let's start there. Mike, was Scott right about that? No? Okay, great,
so we we agree he's wrung on that. Now.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
Is the pardon power, the power to pardon federal sentences
and commute federal sentences?
Speaker 1 (16:25):
Is that in our constitution? It is?
Speaker 2 (16:32):
Okay, so he was. He was acting constitutionally. You just
don't like it.
Speaker 4 (16:40):
No, here's the point, Dan. You you have this little
conspiracy theory that this thing that happened on Saturday is
you know, some setup for a future violent thing. Hey,
we're not part of the cult.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
Okay, Mike, you're not. You're not getting off that easy
and up put Mike makes me do this. He makes
me put him on hold each time he's busted, which
is on every issue. So let's get back to this one. Mike,
your evidence for your claim Trump wants to be a
king is pardoning J six protesters, Well, it's in the constitution, right,
he has the constitutional power to do it. And Mike,
(17:12):
by the way, you will agree that Trump won fairly.
He won a fair and legal election, correct, So he
got that power to pardon from the people of the
United States in a fairly decided election. Right, all right,
I get a claim victory right there? Did you get
(17:33):
that word, Shannon or Shannon is so good? Shannon Scott
by the glass, Mike, as you may have guessed by now,
responded with a profanity to my winning point, which I
think we can all see, is like the ultimate victory
for me.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
Sorry, Mike.
Speaker 2 (17:52):
You're on the Dan Capitli Show five thirty six on
this pretty afternoon.
Speaker 1 (17:55):
Glad you're here.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
I can't remember the last time I had this much
fun on a show. Three or three someone three A
two five five text d A N five seven seven
three nine. And we've been talking about the No Kings
protest and what's really going on there. Why did the
far left put so much money into all this when
there's obviously no immediate political impact. What's the real end game?
(18:18):
So I've been giving you my theory on that and
we've been very fortunate to have a one caller from Boulder,
very unhappy with President Trump. He and I have polar
opposite views of this presidency, but he was there and
he went out there to protest Trump. So we spend
four segments with Scott and we were able to drill
down to some really important things and including just further
(18:39):
proof that when you take these protesters past the bullet points,
they fall apart. You know, it's back it up or
pack it up, and they can't back it up. And
then we've had a series of callers who will further
proved that point. Some you know, real nice guys like Danny,
others you know, like Eerie Mike, in fact Eerie Mike himself.
But the common denominator is, you know that they have
(19:00):
this frustration with Trump, this intense frustration was with Trump,
which is very real to them. It's very sincere, but
it's it's very shallow, it's not well reasoned, and so
any opportunity we get to have the conversation is a
great opportunity and a great insight three h three seven
one three eight two five five text d an five
seven seven three nine And what does it mean to you, well,
(19:23):
what it means to you is that if the Republican Party,
if conservatives in general, you know, do their job right,
then then they should win for a long long time,
if not permanently, because the left at this point has
been exposed. They can't win the arguments, they can't win
on policy. All they're left with is this anger and
(19:46):
frustration and agitation. And so that leads to my point.
It's really a theory. I can't prove it factually, but
my point is to what last weekend was really all about.
And for the people who spent the millions and so
many hours to organize it so well, and they did
organize it very well, it wasn't about this weekend. It
wasn't about these really non violent, law abiding protests this weekend,
(20:11):
and it was great to see that. My theory is
that they were putting the mechanics in place for future
civil disobedience on demand because of the far left people
you know, who are really smart. They just don't want
the kind of country the Founders wanted, or you and
I want, but they're really smart people with a lot
(20:32):
of money. They see where this is headed. You know
that the left's not going to be able to win
and keep power at the voting booth, not nationally. So
I think they're putting in place the mechanism for civil
disobedience in the future, and that the well intentioned, law
abiding people like Scott who called this show, who was
out there this weekend, as I told him on air,
(20:53):
he's the dry firewood. And the day is going to
come as the Left continues to lose power where the
people organizing all this. Let's wait and see if all
of this days peaceful in the future, because my fear
is it won't and we'll find out together. But yeah,
the Left's not going to be able to keep power.
(21:14):
It's not going to be able to get power back,
not nationally, not consistently at the ballot box. So let's
hope that all of these crowds in the future stay peaceful,
in law abiding.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
I am not optimistic on that.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
Three O three se one three A two five five
text d A N five seven seven three nine. I
do want to get to some more of our textures.
We've had so many great texts today Before that, Hey,
give me just thirty seconds to make a really important
point about the Broncos. Okay, and that is yesterday It
was glorious, shocking, right. I didn't think there's any chance
(21:49):
they could pull off that comeback. But but the lesson
has to be learned from yesterday, or yesterday will be meaningless,
it'll be a waste. The lesson that has to be
learned is let Bob Bo, let bo Nicks play, Let
the offense play, Let them play free and loose as
they were allowed to play in the fourth quarter out
(22:09):
of desperation, and then this team will be what we
saw in the fourth quarter. Will they lose some games
because of stupid picks and things like that, Sure, that's
part of football. But the problem with this Bronco offense
up until the fourth quarter yesterday has been trying to
over control bow Nicks and over control the offense to
avoid mistakes. Excuse me, I know that was gross. It's
(22:34):
the same thing Dan Reeves did with John Elway.
Speaker 1 (22:37):
You can't do that.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
You gotta let them play and create and trust them
and be ready to lose some games over it. But
you're gonna win more games overall. That's what we saw
in the fourth quarter. Because is somebody going to try
to convince me or anybody else that the same quarterback
and the same offense that put zero points on the
board through three quarters and put thirty three the board
(23:00):
in the fourth quarter.
Speaker 1 (23:03):
Could not have scored more earlier.
Speaker 2 (23:05):
If they were allowed to play the way they were
allowed to play in the fourth quarter, of course they
would have. So that needs to be the lasting lesson. Hey,
we've got the best ownership in the NFL, got a
great head coach in so many ways. But a lot
of these head coaches, they they just try to over control.
And I hope that the Broncos learned the lesson from
(23:27):
yesterday and just let bo be bow three oh three
seven one three eight two five five text d A
N five seven seven three nine text or Dan Mike
has gotten it a little testosterone. I've never heard such
rattled ladies in my life. That's Mary from New York City.
Dan Mike's s word did come through on iHeartRadio. Is
that against the law? You're you're thinking you blocked it, Channing, No,
(23:52):
it did go through.
Speaker 3 (23:53):
Okay, Well I'm thinking I blocked it, but I see
that the equipment didn't work. So not blocking.
Speaker 1 (23:58):
Yeah, yeah, which not be Shannon's fault.
Speaker 3 (24:01):
Fault.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
All you can do in our system is the best
you can do to hit the dump button, right. I mean,
we're not sitting here expecting somebody is gonna blurt that
word out. But it was like a total victory, right
when when the best that the person you're debating can
do is shout out of profanity. At that point you
take the w Dan Eerie Mike summed it up beautifully.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
I agree with what he said.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
I hope you call the show my friend Dan, please
beat calor mic. I'm amazing these people believe in what
they believe in. Uh probably the most stupid uh educated
people in Colorado. More likely they are university professors. And
then it goes on from there. I think what's important
(24:45):
texture is to look beyond the stupid comments, right because
I've coined the word s'morns. You get so many smart
people saying very moronic things, particularly when it comes to
Donald Trump, and it just goes to the point that
hate interferes with brain function. Anger interferes with brain function,
(25:07):
and that's what we see when it comes to President Trump.
And then the glorious thing we saw in this last
election is that it ends up backfiring on the venom
spewers and it ended up benefiting Trump which is a
great lesson moving forward in this country, that that kind
of of tactic doesn't work. That kind of just spew
(25:30):
venom at the opponent is going to be rejected by
the American people.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
Dan Bs spelled.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Out, the whole word came through. Maybe it was only
Mike's bs. Dan remind callers that if they call you upset,
they're not going to.
Speaker 1 (25:48):
Win a debate.
Speaker 2 (25:51):
Dan oh, I love this one, Dan, Eerie, Mike is
a hostile witness. Thank you for that, because in court,
as you may know, if a whit and this turns hostile,
then you're allowed to ask leading questions even if you
called the witness, Dan, Trump's pardons are allowed by the
US Constitution.
Speaker 1 (26:08):
Thank you. Texture. I did make that point to Mike,
which is.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
When he just fell apart and screamed out BS. Except
it was the whole word because Steeves. I asked these
callers who hate Trump, Okay, what's your evidence he wants
to be a king? And the first guy said, well,
sending the National Guard del a in Chicago, And I said,
wait a second, that's allowed by the constitution.
Speaker 1 (26:31):
He said no, the states should get to do whatever
they want.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
So I made the point to him gently that well,
you're the one who wants to be king because you
want to tear up our constitution.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
Same thing with Mike.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
His number one, his number one exhibit against Trump is
the J six pardons. So I pointed out to Mike
they're allowed by the constitution and he won the election
fairly and squarely.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
And that's when Mike uttered out his profanity.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
Dan, there are no protests without algorithms amplified by the CIA.
Haven't seen any evidence, and I personally don't believe the
CIA had anything to do with this weekend. I think
you've got a lot of people on the left who
have a lot of money, and they're very good at organizing,
and they did a very very good job of.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Organizing this weekend.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
The point is that it was not intended to move
the needle politically or win any political points. So ask yourself,
why did they go to that trouble and then think
of my theory, not fact I can't prove it, but
my theory about what they're preparing for down the road. Damn,
thanks for letting me see. I'll left, just like Scott
can turn on a dime. I heard it. Not so
(27:35):
great pathology coming through his voice. So glad you're inside
a studio. Thank you, my friend Dan. These lip callers
are so off the rail they can't pick up facts.
They're delusional. They bring up things like stopping drop boats
from Venezuela.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Has something bad? Are you kidding me? That same caller
made the point.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
That that wait a second, evidence Trump's a king, as
he says, the president of Colombia is a drug dealer.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
A drug dealer can be president. And then he had
to go.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
And a friend of mine, David, made a great point that,
remember Manuel Noriego, David happened to be with the US
government at the time at that trial. So yeah, but
it just shows otherwise, smart people, some nice like that
caller was, some not so nice. Their brains stop functioning
(28:23):
when it comes to Donald Trump. And I don't think
you can blame Trump for that, because the reason their
brains aren't functioning is because they see it all slipping away.
They believe in this leftist approach to things, and they
can see Trump triumphing, and they can see America moving
decisively in the direction of Trump and the Republican parties.
(28:46):
So the technical term is they're losing it. You're on
the Dan Capla show, the so called No King's protest
and having caller after caller who is anti Trump, which
has really been fantastic, right because then we can just
expose what's really going on there, which is a lot
of anger but no substance. They can't back it up,
(29:07):
so they have to pack it up. But it's been very,
very fortunate to have those calls. Dan was Danny upset
when Biden snubbed his nose at Scotus and continued student
loan replacement the texture making the great point at all
of these no Kings people, they want a king, They
just wanted to be a leftist king. Dan, president of
Junezuela is a drug dealer stopping the.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
Drug running as president's job. You bet it is.
Speaker 3 (29:31):
Dan.
Speaker 2 (29:32):
Yes, I get you think Trump is all fun in games,
but I'd rather have a president at work than tweeting
jokes and silly memes. Can you even imagine the comments
if Biden posted the same Ai Joe AI video. Yeah,
the question would have been who really did it? Because
Biden didn't have that capacity. What he's talking about if
you haven't seen it, sorry to cough from the mic.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
Was this brilliant.
Speaker 2 (29:53):
Video that Trump had posted of Trump in a fighter
jet dropping mud all over these No King's protests. My
point was, you want a brilliant president. That was brilliant
because it's all about communication and persuasion, and that's how
you do it with an awful lot of people not
all in this era is you do it visually. You
(30:16):
do it through humor. Trump made a point there that
was so much more effective than if he tried to
do it a traditional way. So, Dan, you're defending a
president making a video where he literally trashes everyone that
doesn't like him. I can imagine your reaction if Obama
had done that. I doubt you say that was funny.
Wait a second, Barack Obama came out in so many
(30:37):
different ways and directly trashed the American people and America itself.
What Donald Trump did was humorous, and he was making
a political point in a visually appealing, humorous way. And
I do support it because I want Trump to win.
I want Trump to win politically. I want Trump to
(30:58):
win the midterms. Things like that they are effective and
they make the point, and you don't think an awful
lot of young people see that and they're just laughing
and they get the point that they wouldn't otherwise. Of
course I want to get to these calls, but our
lines are jam, let's go back there and try to
work people in, starting with Tim. You're on the Dan
Kaplis show.
Speaker 3 (31:17):
Welcome, Well Dan, this is Tim from up to Collins.
Speaker 1 (31:21):
Wonderful.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
You can equate these Kings protests to the gals that
stood on the street in front of Planned Parenthood. Oh yeah,
they just want to dominate, push everybody out because they
only want one point of view. And I know you've
said that before.
Speaker 2 (31:44):
And as like, Tim, you had this experience right where
you were out praying outside of plant Paranoid clinic. Are
you the same caller? And then you had these topless
women show up and they were trying to drown you out.
Speaker 3 (32:00):
Yeah, they're drowning everybody out.
Speaker 1 (32:02):
Everybody out.
Speaker 2 (32:03):
Yeah, but you're right, the same common denominator, which is
they've got to censor you because they can't win the argument.
Speaker 3 (32:11):
No. I mean, you know, we have how many pro
life hospitals in the state of Colorado?
Speaker 2 (32:21):
What, Tim, I a rhetorical question answer that, No.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
Well, I've never researched on you.
Speaker 3 (32:29):
I don't know it is Saint Anthony's still pro life Catholic?
You know, I don't think so well.
Speaker 2 (32:37):
But but Tim, can I ask you that because we're
doing the note Kings thing today and I'm happy to
talk about a different topic, but I would assume that.
Speaker 3 (32:44):
I'm trying to with this. Yeah, Okay, if we wanted
a pro life hospital, they would stomp all over it
at every hospital in the state of Colorado. Yeah, I'm
talking about U see help and whatever. Because of the
Obama administration, we have no pro life hospitals. They're doing
(33:07):
abortions that DG you see help and everything. We can't
get it.
Speaker 2 (33:14):
Tim, I've got to ask you this question, which is
off this topic. Are you saying that Catholic hospitals are
doing abortions because my understanding is they are not.
Speaker 3 (33:23):
No Catholic hospitals are not.
Speaker 1 (33:24):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (33:25):
I don't know if the archdiocese sold Saint Anthony's Yeah
to another institution or something like that, I don't know,
but they would be the only ones I know of
here in northern Colorado. We don't have anything.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
And getting back to the no Kings protest issue, Tim,
So your point is that if we did have what
you consider to be a truly pro life hospital, that
they would they would just what do what.
Speaker 3 (33:53):
To that they would squash it. They watched it all
out already.
Speaker 2 (33:58):
Yeah, yeah, Tim, appreciate the call. My friend wanted to
try to squeeze some people. And I agree with Tim
on this point for sure, that the left again, they
can't win. You heard it today, You heard it from
the people the left to call of the left who
called the show. They can't win the arguments on the
fact or reason, and so they just have to censor people.
Speaker 1 (34:17):
They have to shut people down, shout people down.
Speaker 2 (34:20):
In Trump's case, they had to try to put them
in jail because they knew they couldn't beat them at
the polls.
Speaker 1 (34:24):
Thank you, Shannon Scott. Please join us tomorrow
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.