Dan Reacts To The Denver Post Pushing Weed-Infused Beverages

In the first hour of today's show, Dan Caplis reacts to the Denver Post article pushing THC-infused drinks.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Capless and welcome to today's online podcast edition
of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to give
us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
Oh what a beautiful day to fight. Glad you are here.

Speaker 1 (00:17):
Four oh six three h three seven one three eight
two five five The number text d A N five
seven seven three nine. If it sounds like I have drinking,
I have not been drinking.

Speaker 2 (00:28):
I bit my tongue. Do you ever bite your tongue?

Speaker 3 (00:33):
Biting your tongue or burning your tongue? Oh, don't even
talk about that, so I know.

Speaker 1 (00:37):
Yeah, so no, this I'm sure will pass in the
next year or two. But it is a bad feeling.
How does a human even do that? How do you
buy it?

Speaker 2 (00:46):
And then once you bite your tongue, once you bite
it like a hundred times, I've done that. I've bitten
my lip too. In that It's bad. I mean, what
are you doing? That's worse?

Speaker 1 (00:56):
Yeah, I mean it's like I'm not smart enough to
not bite my own tone.

Speaker 2 (01:00):
I know, how does that even happen? And then then
you know.

Speaker 1 (01:03):
I mean, obviously we're created in such a meticulous way.
If all of a sudden your tongue gets bigger, then
you're going to bite it all the time because it's
made to fit perfectly in there. So anyway, just wanted
full disclaimer.

Speaker 2 (01:16):
There you go.

Speaker 1 (01:17):
I've had two drinks all year, two beers. Did you
just have one one the night of the verdict?

Speaker 2 (01:24):
Yeah? No, but I haven't.

Speaker 1 (01:25):
No, so that would be almost a month ago now,
all right, So I just want people to know it's
not alcohol, and it's certainly not marijuana.

Speaker 2 (01:31):
We're going to be talking about that today. I've never
had it.

Speaker 1 (01:34):
No, how have people described it to you? The sensation
of well, the experience a full disclosure.

Speaker 2 (01:41):
I have tried it. No, you know it can count
on one cast in the interview process.

Speaker 3 (01:47):
Well I'm not just it now you're in test. But
I'm also tried. And this is the one that really
got me in a weird estate was the edibles, because
they're so inconsistent. To'll tell you it's a certain percentage,
and one gummy you'd be like, oh, that wasn't anything,
and another one you're like I am on another planet,

(02:07):
and it just hits you and you feel I don't
like how it makes me feel. My mom said the
same thing, and I feel the same way that she did.
It makes me feel like I've just been on a
roller coaster and I'm a little queasy, and I don't
like that, and I don't think I'll ever do it again.

Speaker 1 (02:20):
Now, we're not going down a hicken Looper road here, right.
I mean you didn't you didn't like do a bong
with your mom?

Speaker 2 (02:25):
No, no, no, no, I did not. If you're new
to the area.

Speaker 1 (02:29):
John Hickenlooper took his mom to see Deep Throat, and
I said, John Hickenlooper can't run for president.

Speaker 2 (02:34):
He did anyway, and then that blew up his campaign.

Speaker 3 (02:36):
I love how you called that out, and I thought
it was so bizarre at the time, I'm like, well,
maybe it won't come up. And then Dana Bash asked
them about it at town hall, and his candidacy was
over right, because you.

Speaker 1 (02:46):
Get out these Democrats get onto a little protective bubble
in Colorado, right, and then all of a sudden boom, Yeah, reality,
reality sucks if you're a Colorado Democrats once you leave
the bubble. But so you and your mom, no consume
separately many years apart. My mom, you know, in college
that would have been for her.

Speaker 3 (03:06):
Late sixties, early seventies, and that was that she didn't
like how it made her feel, and that was it.
She was one of those like you know, she wasn't
addicted to things, just SI didn't like it.

Speaker 2 (03:15):
I stopped. And this actually ties into a topic for today.

Speaker 1 (03:18):
We're going to talk about the Denver Post pushing people
to get stoned using these drinks that now I have
ten milligrams in marijuana. So why is the Post doing that.
We'll get to that in a second. But you know,
the funny thing is I was. I was at CU
Boulder in the mid seventies, started in seventy five, and
then graduated law there in eighty three. But anyway people
will ask say it was a seventies and Boulder and

(03:41):
all this and all that.

Speaker 2 (03:43):
Five years on that campus. I was on the five
year plan. I was busy.

Speaker 1 (03:46):
I was assumed body president two terms, all that good stuff,
but busy with other things. But ryan five years on
that campus and campaigning door to door because I would campaign.

Speaker 2 (03:57):
Door to door.

Speaker 1 (03:58):
I ran my freshman year, my sophomore year, our junior year.
I think my senior year, knocking on every dorm room door,
et cetera. How many times do you think I saw marijuana?
Saw or smelled saw? Five years find on your Boulder
campus in late seventies, right, knocking on every door running
for office? Uh huh, like every door. Yeah, that didn't

(04:20):
all open, but most of them did. Yeah, there's some stories.
Fifty of the time, five years, knocking on every door, Boulder, Colorado,
mid seventies, once, only one time.

Speaker 2 (04:33):
How often do you think I saw cocaine that one?
I don't know at all.

Speaker 1 (04:37):
Knocking on every door, Bolder, Colorado, mid seventies, how many times?

Speaker 2 (04:43):
None? None? Yeah, people can't believe it. That's the truth.
That was Boulderback. That was Boulder Back then. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (04:51):
I mean there was a lot of alcohol in all that.
But yeah, saw drugs once once. I wonder what if
you did that again?

Speaker 2 (04:57):
Now, Oh, that's a great question. Unintruded.

Speaker 1 (05:00):
Well, you know, with with quote legalization, Yeah, I have
no idea. I don't think i'd want to try.

Speaker 2 (05:05):
Dam Now, I.

Speaker 3 (05:08):
Don't know, Dan, if you ran for governor, I think
you would have the key smarts to go you know what,
I'm going to go? Where Republicans haven't gone you know
what I mean? Those votes? Yeah, exactly.

Speaker 2 (05:19):
And then the door to door stuff, Yeah that was huge.

Speaker 1 (05:23):
Everybody else are putting up posters everything else and just
knocking on every door.

Speaker 2 (05:26):
It's a good plan. Hey who are you? Man?

Speaker 4 (05:28):
Uh?

Speaker 2 (05:29):
That's cool? Okay. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (05:31):
And you know, as a guy who had just left
the seminary, it was a way to meet young ladies.

Speaker 2 (05:36):
It's your name, Don corplis what? But hey, they got
it right when they voted good.

Speaker 3 (05:43):
Does this include the naked gal you encountered on campus
that one time the first day?

Speaker 2 (05:48):
First? Did she vote for you? Email? I mean?

Speaker 1 (05:51):
Picture this guy gets out of the seminary. Okay, I've
been in the seminary four years. High school seminary. Doesn't
mean we didn't have any dates or anything. Sure we didn't. Okay,
but my first step onto the Boulder campus, I crossed Broadway.

Speaker 2 (06:05):
Take one step onto the campus. The first.

Speaker 1 (06:09):
Female college student I meet on campus has zero clothes,
none none.

Speaker 2 (06:14):
So was that God trying to tell you something? Or
was that the devil's temptation?

Speaker 1 (06:20):
M that's a deep question, my friend. I know there
was no real temptation there. I still thought at that point,
I would go back to the priest. Yeah, so there
was no temptation there.

Speaker 2 (06:29):
Maybe it was a test from God. No, I was.

Speaker 1 (06:32):
I was celibate through four years of college, see older
in the mid seventies. The problem is I was there
for five Wow, I just did the math, Dan, I
shouldn't have said that. Oh I'm dying over here. But

(06:54):
imagine that that's the first female you meet on campus.

Speaker 2 (06:57):
That's incredible. But people told me about Boulder. I'm sure they.

Speaker 1 (07:01):
Did, and I've I've got to tell you I I
loved every single day of it up there, grateful for
it every single day.

Speaker 2 (07:08):
You look around, you see the beauty, all that good stuff.

Speaker 1 (07:10):
Three h three seven one three eight two five five
texts d An five.

Speaker 2 (07:15):
Seven seven three nine. Yeah, lots to do today, I do.

Speaker 1 (07:20):
Yeah, we will get into I want to wait for
the start of the next segment because this setup takes
a minute or two and I don't want to chop
it up. But this business of the Post pushing these
marijuana infuse drinks now just globally.

Speaker 2 (07:34):
Why do you think the Post would do that?

Speaker 1 (07:37):
And then I'll get into the details of the story.
I mean, what do you think is going on there,
because like with alcohol, do you ever read a story
he in the Denver Post, for example, where they talk
about okay, such and such rum or whatever, and hey, it'll.

Speaker 2 (07:49):
Get you drunk so fast. Have you ever see anything
like that?

Speaker 3 (07:54):
So I've tried in this market. Of course, Kraft beer
is big as this. Marijuana and some of the craft
beer breweries have infused their beer with marijuana.

Speaker 2 (08:06):
What could go wrong?

Speaker 3 (08:06):
Well, I've tried a couple of them, Dan, and I
don't like them because what it reminds me of, flat
out It's like so most good bottled beers and brown
bottles because sunlight doesn't get in skunk it. That happens
in green bottles, and it happens even more in clear
bottles like Corona. That's why Corona's often served with the lines.
This tasted like a Corona in a clear bottle that

(08:29):
had been left out in the sun and skunked.

Speaker 2 (08:32):
And that was the purpose of the beer. And that's
what I tasted. And I didn't like it at all.

Speaker 1 (08:37):
No, I can't understand why. Yeah, but what about the
psychoactive effect.

Speaker 2 (08:42):
I don't think I had anything like that. I mean
the trunk part. No, because I didn't drink enough. I
didn't like it. Yeah, I had won? Am I undone? Yeah? Yeah?

Speaker 1 (08:50):
And when I say what could go wrong again, would
it bothered me? If rin shuling any adult whatever used marijuana?
This is that, of course, not what bothers me is
in Our society has adopted this delivery system that tells kids, hey,
this stuff's great. Right when you have more marijuana stores
and Starbucks and McDonald's combined, Yeah, you're just telling the kids, hey,
this stuff is great, and then you end up with

(09:12):
all the big problems we have now. But so we're
going to cover that much more ahead in the show
today as well. Three oh three sevene three eight two
five five the number text d A N five seven
seven three nine. Are we about to have another big
name entry into the governor's race on the GOP side.

Speaker 2 (09:30):
We'll talk about that as well. You're on the Dan
Kapla Show. And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Denver Post story.

Speaker 1 (09:44):
THHC infused beverages are easy to find in Colorado. Now
why do you even do that story?

Speaker 2 (09:49):
To begin with?

Speaker 1 (09:51):
THHC and fused beverages are a popular option for users
seeking a quick and refreshing high. Now, why is it
Denver Post doing this story? Do you read a story? Okay,
Bacardi is a quick and refreshing option for those seeking
to get drunk.

Speaker 2 (10:10):
You don't see that story.

Speaker 3 (10:12):
No, because the whole drinking to get drunk cons I mean,
you might as well get some malt liquor. I guess
stuff with the high. I p a kind of alcohol
by volume content. But I'm trying to think back, Dan, Now,
I didn't really ask, but the marijuana or hemp infused
whatever beer that I had, I don't know that it
had any THC necessarily.

Speaker 2 (10:34):
That wasn't sure.

Speaker 1 (10:35):
That's the critical distinct, right, because you're talking about like
in a bar, the hemp stuff right right? No, this
is thcres ten miligrams. And then listen to this the
Denver Post Denver Post to pumping this up. The store
also sells package drinks that combine THHC and caffeine, which
allows users to experience a high without the sleepy effect.

(10:59):
You know again, I see that art go well, you
know the cores will let you get drunk without having
to go to the bathroom. I mean, why is it
different for dope because much of the media hopes to
be making dope money.

Speaker 2 (11:12):
It's through advertising. I should clarify.

Speaker 3 (11:14):
The extreme version of what you just described is what
caused the death of John Belushi back in nineteen eighty two.
And there'd be a high ball, which you got this
extreme contrast between the high of say cocaine, which is
a stimulant and the depressant effect of alcohol, et cetera.
And that's kind of what they're selling, right, there is
a high ball, but in legal form I guess.

Speaker 1 (11:35):
Well, yeah, in the lower doses, well, caffeine instead of cocaine.
But again, just the whole principle. Yeah, we got all
this carnage out there, all the harms done the kids,
and have so many people in Colorado through legalized marijuana.
And the Post is running the story, Hey, no's here's
another way to get high.

Speaker 2 (11:53):
Yeah, you can just put it in your drink. Crazy.

Speaker 1 (11:56):
But again, and the other part is, and I'm not
putting this on the Post, but just the left in
general and left media in general. It's been page one
or two or three of the leftist playbook for a
long long time, is legalization of drugs. Because the more
drug depopulation is, the more dependent it's going to be
on government.

Speaker 2 (12:16):
It's that simple.

Speaker 1 (12:16):
Because drugs and particularly you know this high potency dope,
you know it's going to rob a lot of people
of their ambition, certainly kids, et cetera. Not everybody's going
to get addicted, but a certain percentage are going to
get addicted, particularly again with this Krakowana. They're out there
selling now, and you're just going to end up with
more people dependent on government, which is absolutely what the

(12:39):
modern Democratic Party depends on. They can't depend on people
choosing to vote Democrat because their ideas are so good,
because they aren't, they're awful. So they've got to get
people dependent on government and keep those who are dependent
on government dependent on government three at three someone three
eight two five five text d an five seven seven
three nine. And if anybody has any doubts, I mean,

(13:03):
look at every negative category of statistics that we keep.

Speaker 2 (13:07):
Now, what do you want to talk about. You want
to talk about crime, You want to talk about.

Speaker 1 (13:12):
Deaths on the roadway, You want to talk about teen suicides.
You talk about the most awful, horrific stuff you can
imagine in Colorado, and every category is worse, far worse
since legalization of marijuana, which all makes sense, right, because
that's why you don't have legalized drugs most places in

(13:32):
the world, because this is what happens. But yet Colorado
got suckered into it, and we'll get ourselves out of
it one of these days. I mentioned before the last
break that there's talk out there of another high profile
entry into the governor's race. Ryan during the break was saying,
whoa wait a second, and this may not be the
GOP primary, but talk of the Colorado Springs mayor m

(13:56):
Mobilatte entering the governor's race, And you're thinking, Ryan, if.

Speaker 2 (13:59):
You don't, it will be as an independent.

Speaker 3 (14:01):
That seems to be the path that he took to
successful ends in Colorado Springs.

Speaker 2 (14:07):
And it won him that race.

Speaker 3 (14:09):
I think he prides himself on being at least presents
himself as being a nonpartisan, independent minded.

Speaker 2 (14:16):
And he did a sit down an.

Speaker 3 (14:17):
Extended conversation with Wayne Loguson who's scheduled.

Speaker 2 (14:20):
To join us tomorrow to talk about under that with
some highlights.

Speaker 3 (14:23):
And then, as I told you before, the show, Yummy's
comms director reached out.

Speaker 2 (14:29):
And wants the mayor to come on with you.

Speaker 1 (14:30):
Oh and We've always had nice chats, but this we know.
If he chooses to run as an independent, your rationale
makes sense, but that will tell you he has no
intention of winning the race. So then the question would
be what other reason is he getting in? And there
can be other reasons could be impacting the race, could
impact the race. Who would he draw more votes from?

Speaker 2 (14:53):
The Democrat nominee or the Republican one? You should have
a talk show.

Speaker 1 (14:57):
It's a good question, Brian, actually have a great talk
show two to four Monday through Friday, sixth thirty KHW Denver,
I love that question. You can text us on that
da N five seven, seven thirty nine. Who would he
draw more from? And does that depend on who the
GOP nominee is? Because right now we've got nineteen different

(15:17):
people in the race, right and I think Barb Kirkmeyer
is generally regarded as a front runner, if not the
front runner Victor Marks. There's a lot of buzz about
I'm excited to talk to him. We keep trying to
get an interview. So yeah, it may depend on who
the GOP nominee is. On the dem side, Bennett, I

(15:38):
think he probably takes more away from Bennett because.

Speaker 2 (15:42):
The excitement factor.

Speaker 1 (15:44):
For Michael Bennett right is right up there with the
excitement factor at the Root Canal Factory. I mean, you
go in there because you feel you absolutely have to,
but nobody's excited about it.

Speaker 2 (15:57):
Why. I agree with you one hundred percent, And I
don't think people should.

Speaker 3 (16:00):
I don't want to scare Yummy mobilel Attie off the scent,
and if he runs, he runs would be I think
there are many disaffected, unaffiliated, maybe center left voters that
might never vote for a Republican, but Yummy would give
them a reason and an.

Speaker 2 (16:16):
Off ramp and a permission structure to go. You know what.

Speaker 3 (16:19):
I don't like Michael Bennett and I don't want to
vote for but I can't bring myself to vote for Republican.

Speaker 2 (16:23):
I'll vote for Yum.

Speaker 4 (16:24):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (16:24):
I think you would take far more from Bennett, which
would be a great thing. Michael Bennett would be a
terrible governor ideology aside okay, and obviously I think Bennett's
way wrong on ideology, Wiser's way wrong on ideology. Wiser
would be an infinitely better governor than Bennett simply because
he has skill set, accomplishments, et cetera. Like, I've dealt
with the Attorney General's Office a bunch on the civil

(16:46):
side lately, and I've been very impressed with the operation
of the Attorney General's office. Now, I disagree ideologically with
Wiser certainly, and that's why he would be a bad
governor in the end, but he would be infinitely better
than Bennett in terms of again just capacity, ability, organizationally, etc.

(17:08):
In my humble opinion. But yeah, good question, Ryan. I
think Yemmy would take so much more away from Bennett.
Interesting headline, dad charge with killing daughters, accused abuser running
for sheriff.

Speaker 2 (17:19):
So at least we know who's going to win that race.
Don't you think that guy wins with like ninety nine
percent of the vote?

Speaker 1 (17:26):
Oh?

Speaker 3 (17:26):
Absolutely, And that was a story that you had sent me,
and I can pull the audio from if you would
like during this break.

Speaker 1 (17:32):
No, it's just yeah, it's just obviously he's not in jail,
he wasn't convicted, et cetera. But getting back to Yemmy,
so yeah, get him on the show, look forward to it,
and Wayne loguson. He's always great with the Gazette, and
Wayne's going to be kind enough to join us tomorrow.

Speaker 2 (17:46):
And we'll hear some sound from that interview. So yeah, it'd.

Speaker 1 (17:50):
Be interesting to see if there are other kind of
unexpected twists and turns in the governor's race. I can't
remember a governor's race in my time on air that's
had less buzz less.

Speaker 2 (18:00):
Attention on either side. Yeah, don't you think it's.

Speaker 1 (18:03):
Because everybody's assuming at this point that Michael Bennett's going
to be the next governor. Nobody likes it outside the
Bennett family, nobody's happy about it. Everybody's just assuming that
and they may be assuming wrong.

Speaker 3 (18:15):
Well, that very much works against him because there is
no excitement and people are just going to assume, and
many people might not turn out to even vote for
him because they're just gonna stay he's gonna win, no
big deal.

Speaker 2 (18:24):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (18:25):
Yeah, And that recent Magellan poll showing approofal under forty
for Bennett, right, and he was a tick or to
above or below hicken Roopers. So yeah, just just very
low enthusiasm there. But the generic GOP candidate's still trailing.
But that doesn't mean the GOP candidate has to trail
trail three someone three eight two five five text d

(18:45):
A N five seven seven three nine. I want to
come back and talk about the Springs Airport fanning, the
Christy Nome video.

Speaker 2 (18:52):
Why you're on the Dan Kapitlo Show. You're listening to
the Dan Kaplis Show podcast. We're being tested right now.

Speaker 4 (19:07):
If you are a Hispanic man and you're you're frustrated
about inflation, and so you decided, ah, you know what,
all that rhetoric about Trump doesn't matter. I'm just mad
about inflation. And now you know your sons are being
stopped in LA because they look Latin, know, Well, that's
that's your That's a test.

Speaker 2 (19:29):
I think he's imbibing. You've talked openly about it. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (19:36):
No, it's fascinating to me to watch this, and it's
so encouraging, right. I just think there are so many
reasons to be beyond optimistic about the future. And one
is that obamasm is dead. I mean, that's that's pretty
clear at this point, right. It's just I'm not the
first person to say that, obviously, but it's it's dead.
And now, who who thought we this quickly would get

(19:57):
to the point where you've got Barack Obama's inclined to
try to get attention and relevancy hasn't quite hit the
Madonna Naked with Donkey stage yet, but you know.

Speaker 2 (20:08):
He's out there.

Speaker 1 (20:08):
He's doing these podcasts talking about his marriage and stuff
like that.

Speaker 2 (20:12):
It's fascinating to watch.

Speaker 1 (20:14):
But I've had the convers he's so radical without a
country right because without a cause right now, that the
radicalism of the current left in America is even further
left than he was. Right even though he had heart,
is much more radical than them. But he was like
eight on a scale of ten radicalism and currently now

(20:34):
they're an eleven.

Speaker 3 (20:35):
You've just made two points that I think go to
the heart of why he is missing the limelight. And
one he's been eclipsed, like you said, who is left
by the likes of AOC and other cults of personality
Zorn Mundani, the candidate for mayor in New York City.
But also I had this conversation with Steven L. Miller
Red Steeves on X Versus Media podcast hosts earlier today,

(20:57):
and that is he knows he's been shine by Donald
Trump himself. This World Peace Accord that Donald Trump is pursuing,
that he's done so much with the Abraham Accords and
then recently with the Peace deal in Gaza. It all
shines anything Barack Obama did on that world stage. And
I don't think Barack Obama likes that one bit.

Speaker 2 (21:16):
Oh no.

Speaker 1 (21:16):
And it's Barack lead from behind Obama, right, which means
let the enemy win.

Speaker 2 (21:21):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (21:22):
No, And it's a great thing to see, right, It's
it's a great thing to see because super skilled guy,
but horrible for this nation and horrible for just that
the view and vision and history of this nation that
that so many people across party line share, and so
just so great now to see him at this point. Now,

(21:43):
I hope he's happy and healthy and all that other
good stuff, but to see him kind of rejected from
multiple sides three oh three someone three eight two five
five texts dam five seven seven three nine And do
you want to get to that Christy Gnome sound that
I promoted and our very own Colorado Springs Airport rejecting
the Christineome video that Homeland Security has asked to be played.

Speaker 2 (22:08):
At TSA checkpoints.

Speaker 1 (22:09):
Now, Denver just doesn't have the video capability at the
TSA checkpoints, but we know Denver wouldn't have played it.
Here's a quick hit on that.

Speaker 5 (22:17):
Hi, I am Christine Home the United States Secretary of
Homeland Security. It is TSA's top priority to make sure
that you have the most pleasant and efficient airport experience
as possible while we keep you safe. However, Democrats in
Congress refuse to fund the federal government, and because of this,
many of our operations are impacted and most of our
TSA employees are working without pay. We will continue to

(22:40):
do all that we can to avoid delays that will
impact your travel, and our hope is that Democrats will
soon recognize the importance of opening the government.

Speaker 2 (22:49):
I'd like to hear from you.

Speaker 1 (22:50):
Do you think every airport should be airing that video
three oh three seven one three A two five five
text DN five seven seven three nine. I don't think
they should be airing that video. I don't think Christy
Nome or the administration ever thought they would air the video.
I think this is a brilliant play by Christy nom
and the administration to make this point blaming the Democrats

(23:15):
for the shutdown, which is perfectly true and legitimate, but
to make this point through mainstream media, I mean, the
coverage of this story. They're winning and I think it's
brilliant on the part of the administration and their message
is very true. I love it, but I don't think
any airport should play this video because it's openly political,

(23:36):
and the airport should not be openly political. When you're
walking through the airport, you're going through security, you're ready
to get on a plane. It should be everybody on
both sides of the aisle has my safety in mind,
and this is kind of a sacred safety oriented environment.
But I don't think they ever intended that this thing
would actually get played most places.

Speaker 2 (23:56):
Something like that.

Speaker 3 (23:57):
What I just heard, it is highly partisan in charge
getting its intended effect by what you just said, in
being played in the mainstream media and being talked about
on a show like this. But when I think about
that environment, I just recently traveled in a very jam
packed DIA on Columbus Day Monday, coming back from Detroit.
I remember when Alejandro Majorcis was in that role for

(24:18):
the Parliament of Homeland Security and there was a video
of him, and as much as I disliked him and
the policies of the Biden administration and thought he was
doing a terrible job and should be fired and all that,
he didn't say anything overtly political in the message. It
was there in a very kind of sterile environment you're traveling,
and it's exactly what you just said.

Speaker 1 (24:37):
No, so it what's amazing to me is we used
to have in our little league uniforms when I coached,
we had a patch on the sleeve that said think
to Win. And that was given to me by a
sealed Team six guy. He said it was their model
think to win. The irony here is the left, you know,
just believes they're so brilliant and everything else. They get

(24:58):
outsought by the Trump administration at every turn. It really
is the road runner and Wiley E.

Speaker 2 (25:05):
Coyote, right.

Speaker 1 (25:06):
I mean, in the end, voke just keeps falling on
the Democrats side. So of course you shouldn't play a
video like that at TSA checkpoints, But they are getting
far more meaningful exposure through the leftist media coverage.

Speaker 2 (25:19):
Beautiful thing.

Speaker 1 (25:21):
This is one of the texts of the year here
because it leads to a very important broader issue. Dan,
did you see how Obama was sitting during that podcast
with Mark Marin is a Mariner Marrin man, here's the
key point, tightly crossed legs. How many guys sit like that?
That is a very important topic to me, right, because

(25:41):
I have never understood and listen, I'm not criticizing you
personally if this is how you sit, but the way
I was raised, I have never ever understood why a
guy would sit with his legs tightly cross like that.
Guys are supposed to sit with their legs wide open, crossed.

Speaker 2 (26:00):
Yeah, one leg on top of the other. No. Guy.
You know women do and should sit like that, right,
but men should not.

Speaker 3 (26:09):
He also had his arms kind of crossed, either defiantly
or defensively protectively. It wasn't a winning posture like you
watch you compare contrast that Dan with Donald Trump and
how he presents himself. He was about and it went.

Speaker 1 (26:26):
Back to my question about him bibing, which is not
a pejorative. That's not a shot anymore when you're talking
about these places where it's legalized. I think it's a
fair question when somebody looks on But am I wrong
about that?

Speaker 2 (26:38):
Ryan?

Speaker 1 (26:38):
I mean, it's a Midwest thing, but we were absolutely raised.

Speaker 2 (26:42):
No man sits like that.

Speaker 3 (26:43):
No, No, it's you know, unbecome and do and it's
very appropriate, right, but no man should. I don't, So
I can't ask answer this great question from the texter,
why would he sit like that?

Speaker 2 (26:59):
Why would any guy I sit like that?

Speaker 1 (27:01):
Unlet's say, let's say they had a back injury or something.

Speaker 3 (27:03):
If you just looked at him in that podcast, the
video portion Mark Miron, he looked dan defeated. He looked withered.
He looked less than this great Obama, you know, the
hope and changing guy from back in two thousand and eight, Just.

Speaker 2 (27:17):
A withered version of that.

Speaker 1 (27:18):
He's shrinking before our eyes, right right. And politically that's
a good thing. Ideologically that's a good thing.

Speaker 2 (27:25):
Again. I wish him a happy and healthy life. But
he knows he's.

Speaker 1 (27:30):
Shrinking in terms of influence and that his ideology is shrinking.
So he's physically shrinking. And there is so much to that,
so many studies on that. You know, act the way
you want to feel. Say, when you're walking into a
big situation, do you have a physical routine.

Speaker 2 (27:48):
That you follow? Just a prime for that.

Speaker 3 (27:50):
I don't know that I consciously think about it, but
it's probably subconscious. Yeah, Oh wow, I think I don't
go in peacocking if that's what you're saying.

Speaker 2 (28:00):
I'm not saying peacocky.

Speaker 1 (28:01):
I'm just saying a conscious physical in addition to psychological
warm up preper team. I mean, certainly you have a
certainly you have your pump up tape right on the
way to I can't call it a tape anymore.

Speaker 2 (28:17):
But you list yeah, playlist yeah?

Speaker 1 (28:20):
Okay, Dan, Yes, every airport should be broadcasting that message.
Unfortunately most airports are running CNN News. Also to clarify
Barack Obama, he was the biggest divider in chief in
this country and he meant to be.

Speaker 2 (28:31):
He was pretty open about that, which was so sad.

Speaker 1 (28:33):
I remember sitting right here in this studio the day
after Obama one in two thousand and eight, and Craig
Silman and I were having the conversation and I was saying,
you know what, this is so bad for this country
policy wise, horrible things are about to happen.

Speaker 2 (28:52):
But there is one silver lining.

Speaker 1 (28:54):
This nation has elected an African American and so there's
a chance for a big step up in racial healing.
And then what do we get Barack Obama consciously trying
to divide this country.

Speaker 2 (29:08):
What a waste that was. You're on the Dankapla Show
and now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast. So weak.
It looks weak. It does.

Speaker 1 (29:23):
And I've found a great piece on this. It's on
the website Real Men, Real Style. How men should sit?
Should men sit with their knees open or closed? It's
a tremendous piece. I'll try to tweet this out, but
the bottom line is, you know what we've talked about here.
It has position one legs out front and knees together.

(29:46):
Now you've got to picture this. This isn't some guy
crossing his legs tightly.

Speaker 2 (29:53):
This is both feet on the ground.

Speaker 1 (29:56):
And then you know, while the feet are close together,
you know, the knees are probably two to ten inches apart,
and so hands on the knees. And it says, first
we've got the non crossed legs positions, and then it
says this position doesn't necessarily hide your manhood, but the
thighs are still put Okay, they're probably too much detailed there.

(30:19):
And then it just goes on to say that it's
a power position. Knees spread eleven to twenty four inches apart,
feet spread about the same distance.

Speaker 2 (30:30):
Now we're getting somewhere. It says when men sit.

Speaker 1 (30:33):
With their feet planet on the floor and their knees
eleven to twenty four inches apart.

Speaker 2 (30:36):
It exudes power. Not only is it more comfortable.

Speaker 1 (30:40):
More breathing room for growing area, but it also a
modern day marking your territory. This gives you a great
first impression. According to real men, real style, I could
see that. I don't think you see a lot of
guys sitting that way, but I could definitely see that.
And then of course get into what you most normally see,

(31:01):
which is, you know, just putting one ankle on top
of the other knee.

Speaker 3 (31:07):
When you watch President Trump when he's in you know,
the typical scenario with him and a world leader there
in the way that President Trump is sitting and presenting himself,
I don't even know that he does what you just described,
the foot up on the knee, I think, Jade Vance,
I've seen the vice president sit that way, but Trump's
always kind of leaning forward, ready to receive information.

Speaker 2 (31:26):
What you got, Let's go.

Speaker 3 (31:28):
And the thing about Trump is everything about his positioning
is alpha. Oh yeah, he you know, there's the famous scene.
It's hilarious where he pushes his way to the front
of all these world leaves. I gotta go to the front.
Or whenever you see a photo take out of him.
He's in the middle, he's in the center, and it's
almost like it's naturally happening.

Speaker 1 (31:44):
Yes, but but I you can be sure he's thought
about it over the years as well. Yep, right, because
I mean or piece through strength. He wants to project
strength and power.

Speaker 3 (31:53):
You did you see that recent handshake between him and
Emmanuel McCrone, for you know what happened in that one?
Mangled the poor guy. Yeah, and there was a joke
mean going around on X with X rays of obviously
hands that have been badly disfigured with bones dislocated. Oh,
that's what happened to Macrone there. And then Macrone didn't even.

Speaker 2 (32:12):
Tuck in his age. Yes, I remember that.

Speaker 3 (32:17):
But then he wasn't on stage with Trump and he's
looking around like all days for you to miss this
wouldn't have been one of them and making fun of
him not being.

Speaker 2 (32:25):
There, Yeah, miss Trump when he's gone.

Speaker 1 (32:27):
But that reference to mccrone's wife wasn't a pejorative that
there's video of her just.

Speaker 2 (32:32):
She pushed in her face. Yeah, as uh, oh, are
you serious?

Speaker 3 (32:39):
I'm assuming not no, no, no, nor vice versa.

Speaker 2 (32:43):
No no, no, no, no no.

Speaker 3 (32:46):
Would you imagine even no, no, no, So that's why
when you watch it, you're like, what the what's that?

Speaker 1 (32:51):
Yeah? No text, I do not understand, Dan, sexist, sexist, sexist.

Speaker 2 (32:57):
I don't get that.

Speaker 1 (32:57):
What what does that texture think is possibly sexist? Because
there's no debate. I mean, a woman sitting that way
is appropriate. I'm a normal and it makes perfect sense. Well,
there is a difference. I think God made us differently
and physically.

Speaker 2 (33:13):
If she's wearing a skirt hello.

Speaker 1 (33:15):
Of course, of course, but skirt or no skirt even,
it's just very appropriate, and we are made different, different,
and so a man needs just anatomically, a man needs
to sit differently.

Speaker 2 (33:29):
I can speak to that as well as you. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (33:31):
So I don't get that text unless there was some
anatomical abnormality there, Dan. Did you hear Jared Poulos talk
about how sacred life is when it refers to the
hostages in Israel and God's I wonder if he feels
the same way about children in the womb? Now a texture,
I would bet you everything I have that. Well, maybe

(33:53):
I should take that back because they're talking about Jared.
But the vast majority of these Democrats who are pro
abortion or right up to the moment of delivery, and
some beyond that. They know it's wrong. They know it's
a thousand percent wrong. They've always known it's wrong. They
see it the same way that you and I do
as pro lifers. They've just decided to make that trade

(34:15):
for their own power.

Speaker 2 (34:17):
Right.

Speaker 1 (34:17):
So, I think Jared Polis has always understood that abortion
is the intentional taking of an innocent human life, and
he's just willing to do that and support that in
order to get and keep power in the Democratic Party.
I mean, somebody would have to be you know, and
I'm talking now about these elected people in power who
think a lot about these issues everything else.

Speaker 2 (34:42):
Yeah, they wouldn't be.

Speaker 1 (34:45):
How should I put this on a family show? None
of these elected officials could lack the intellectual capacity that
they couldn't or they wouldn't be able to find the
little box to vote for themselves. Anybody, anybody smart enough
to find the little box to vote for themselves, is
going to understand that as a matter of medicine, you

(35:07):
don't need at this point philosophy, morality, religion. Just as
a matter of medicine, abortion is the intentional taking of
an innocent human life. They get that, they're just willing
to support it so they can get and keep power.
So Texter, I submit to you, he already knows that,
which makes it even worse. Right three at three someone

(35:28):
three eight two five five the number text d A
N five seven seven three nine.

Speaker 2 (35:31):
So much going to cover. One thing I want to
touch on quick when we get back is there's all
this consternation on.

Speaker 1 (35:37):
The left now over you know, Hamas, they have weapons,
they're executing people.

Speaker 2 (35:41):
The peace deals are really going to be a failure. No,
they planned for this. It's going to end well, not
for Amas.