August 15, 2025 • 28 mins
Following the conclusion of a press conference held by President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in the aftermath of their historic summit in Alaska, Dan and Ryan ask listeners for their thoughts.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, So, what's
your take on what just happened? This is fascinating to me.
There was much less in that announcement than I expected.
(00:23):
But my best guess is that where we're at is
that there have been some meaningful agreements reached, but President
Trump needs to first discuss it with President Zelenski, with NATO,
et cetera, just as part of the protocol, just to
maximize the chance that there's buy in for the agreements
(00:44):
reached today. That's my take. What's yours? Three all three
seven to one three A two five five the number
text d A N five seven seven three nine. Now,
the President's going to be on with Sean Hannity at
eight o'clock Mountains, So my guess is we'll learn a
bit more then, at least some hints. What do you think? Right? Well?
Speaker 2 (01:03):
What really stood out to me? And I got in
your ear and said, wow, was Vladimir Putin coming?
Speaker 3 (01:07):
Right?
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Out and saying that, yes, he agrees, if President Trump
had been in office rather than Joe Biden, there would
not have been a war in Ukraine. And I found
that fascinating, and I'm wondering what your thoughts are on then.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
Yeah, you know, my thought is, hey, Putin's evil. He
started this. He has raped and pillaged a nation that
he invaded. So I don't put any stock in that
or anything else he says. I think that, you know,
first of all, I think it's true, right, I mean,
and we've said it all along. If Trump had been
(01:41):
in office at the time, there would not have been
an invasion, just like there wasn't an invasion during Trump's
first term. But the way Putin tried to play that,
you know, by suggesting that Trump would have given Putin
what he needed with regard to Ukraine, Yeah, I think
just kind of another slimy moved from Putin. I think
the reason that Putin wouldn't have gone in if Trump
(02:03):
was in office was the same reason he didn't in
this during the sixteen term, right, because Trump is strong
and he's not willing to take the risk. With Trump,
so I think they reached some kind of significant agreement today.
But but Trump has to make sure to get buy
in from the folks he needs buy in from before
(02:25):
it's announced.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Also, Dan, what would what did you think towards the
end there, Leoniman Putin chimed in and said he wanted
on a summit in Moscow, and then Trump's.
Speaker 4 (02:33):
Like, oh, they're gonna get mad at me for that one. Like,
what did you make of it?
Speaker 1 (02:37):
Yeah? I think it was face saving, you know, because
Putin traveled to the US for this one, right, Okay, yeap,
what do you think?
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Well, I think what you saw, what you heard if
you were just listening with the sounds that we provided
for you, was a person who respects the strength of
Donald Trump. Whether it was him just putting words out
there that no, oh, there would not have been a
war in Ukraine if Trump were president, I don't think
that's just him genuflecting.
Speaker 4 (03:04):
I don't think Putin's like that.
Speaker 1 (03:06):
I think he.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
Does respond to and respect the strength of Donald Trump.
The fact that he wanted to have a summit in Moscow.
I think what this does, and a lot of people
out there that are critics of Trump would say this
is it puts Putin on the same stage with Trump.
It gives him that standing that he was not going
to get with Joe Biden. And you might say, well,
that's a good thing for Joe Biden, but it's not.
(03:27):
Because we were at an impass. Unless this war was
going to end with Ukraine being victorious somehow expelling Russia
out of Ukraine, which was not a realistic goal or option,
there needed to be some kind of compromise like hopefully
we're working toward here that Putin views this. As you know,
I have a fair shot with Trump. I respect him,
I think he respects me. And the next step, if
(03:50):
this is going to be a successful summit here in Alaska,
Dan would be what Donald Trump just said, He's going
to call the leaders of NATO, He's going to call
the leaders of Europe, and then of course Zolensky, and
if he can get Putin and Zelensky in the same
room with him as an arbiter, I believe that he
can get this done.
Speaker 4 (04:06):
I have that faith.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
And he's done it. He's shown us that he can
do it. He's done it already in his second term.
He said, I think it's stopping six different conflicts, and
he's right.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
That did happen well.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
And it's a practical matter. I mean, you know, President
Trump will need buy in from NATO and the European capitals,
right because it the only kind of leverage excuse me
on President Zelensky at this point, you know, to do
a deal that involves giving up territory will be if
the European capitals want the deal, because obviously Ukraine is
(04:40):
completely dependent on financially on the US and the European capitals.
So I think that's the phase we're in now. Yeah, Okay,
we're gonna take a break to make up for that
time we lost when we stayed with that presser. Back
soon you're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4 (04:58):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
I'm glad you're with us. Fascinating afternoon. I expected more
in terms of a concrete announcement after this meeting today,
because it's rational to think that Trump's not going to
President Trump's not going to make that trip without an
agreement in hand, and I think there was one and
it was confirmed today, but that it's just not going
(05:22):
to be announced until you know, not just the courtesies
but the practicalities of getting sign off from President Zelensky
and NATO and European capitals is addressed. And that makes sense, right.
I mean, as you know from your own life, it
doesn't matter whether we're talking about an international treaty or
(05:43):
we're talking about anything of importance to you. For all
of us as humans, you know, respect is critical. And
in a situation like this, with the horror that's been
inflicted on Ukraine by Putin, you know that respect to
Zelenski and Ukraine and to NATO and to the European capitals,
(06:04):
which didn't not do what they should have, which was
to make it clear they'd put boots on the ground
if necessary, but they did spend a lot of money
in Ukraine. Yeah, I think that as a practical matter
that that respect, those conversations are critical now before the
deal is announced. I do think that we'll probably start
to get a pretty good understanding, probably starting with brebident
(06:27):
Trump's you know, interview with Sean Hannity in about an
hour hour and a half, you know, as to at
least a sense of what was agreed to. Is it
a cease fire, is it a you know, three or
four way meeting, But I think something significant was agreed to.
Love to get your take three out three seven one
(06:48):
three A two five five text d A N five
seven seven three nine. Ryan texters Dan, it's Vladimir, not Vladimir,
that's Putin. I'm sorry if I misspoke. God has not
finished with me yet, Dan. I don't know why anybody
thought a peace steel would come out of this without
Zelenski there and not a peace steal, clearly, but but
(07:12):
I thought there was a good chance that a cease
fire would come out of this today, and in fact
that maybe what was agreed to. I have to believe
it's something more significant than just an agreement to have
a direct meeting with Selenski. But we'll find out together.
Texter to Dan five seven seven three nine. Dan. Putin
(07:34):
knows Trump is a sucker for sucking up. That's why
he said that. It's interesting because you know, that's, of
course the party line mouthed by most of the US media.
But does anybody really think President Trump would have accomplished
everything that he's accomplished and would have been able to
overcome everything that's been thrown at him if he was
(07:57):
the buffoon the left makes him out to be a
chance in the world. He's the opposite of that, which
is why he's been able to have this success. Dan
Trump has to lick Putin's boots by talking about the
Russia hoax. Gag, oh, man, I excuse me, frog in
my throat? Where do you think that expression ever came from? Ryan?
Frog in my throat? That one has never made any
(08:20):
sense to me. Does someone actually have a frog in
their throat?
Speaker 4 (08:24):
Maybe because of me? Your voice sound like a frog.
Speaker 1 (08:27):
Hmm, boy, that's that's a good guess. I'm gonna look
that up in this next break. But no, Trump talked
about the Russia hoax because it's true. It's true. I mean,
think about it. Think about all the harm done starting
with to Trump himself, and no American deserves that, let
alone an American president. But all the harm done to
this country by that that Russia hoax, by that coup attempt,
(08:51):
because it did interfere with normal relations with an important
nation led by an evil man in Putin, but an
important nation and the global order. And so this big
lie that the Democrats and their media allies told interfered
with that relationship, to the detriment of this nation and
to the world. And so no, it's an absolute crime.
(09:13):
What happened there with the rush, oaks and trump I
think was was bold and gutsy and appropriate to bring
it up today. Three O three seven one three A
two five five the number text d A N five
seven seven three nine, So another.
Speaker 5 (09:28):
Text, Hello, mission to speak?
Speaker 1 (09:32):
Why would you need permission? I always makes every day wonderful?
Speaker 5 (09:36):
One I always ask you, I did I did find the.
Speaker 1 (09:43):
Frog in your throat? Reference? Oh yeah, yeah, what is it?
Speaker 2 (09:46):
This?
Speaker 5 (09:47):
George refers to having an irritation in the throat that
temporarily affects your ability to speak. For example, if your
voice goes key while giving a present hitchen or speech,
you might apologize by saying, I've got a frog in life.
Speaker 1 (10:10):
So it's it's Ryan's theory that because it makes me
sound like a frog, that's that's where the same came.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
Was a lot shorter version, though that took less time.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
I thought, some poor guy at a frog. And so
because I know in some countries they like eat frogs
or eat frog legs, have you had them? Then probably
start gagging? Have you had frog legs?
Speaker 2 (10:29):
That?
Speaker 1 (10:30):
There are so many things I would never eat. And
that's that's maybe second after duck.
Speaker 5 (10:35):
You would duck they're very gummy.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Rabbit. Oh yeah, No duck. I don't care how good
they taste. There are plenty of things that probably taste
real good that I'm not eating.
Speaker 4 (10:46):
No peaking duck, No duck, all orange.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
No, not a dog. I think I like looking at ducks.
Duck is like eating dog or cat.
Speaker 4 (10:56):
How is that any different than eating chicken or turkey.
Speaker 1 (10:59):
I don't like looking at chickens. Now turkey I don't
like anyway, but I do. I mean, as you know,
I'm up in the cabinetry for trial, and we got
a whole flock of turkey's. I don't know how many
babies they have at one time, but I'm thinking five
or ten are following this Mama turkey around.
Speaker 4 (11:16):
What about pheasant? Would you eat that?
Speaker 1 (11:20):
M good question? Yeah, I don't have the like the
knee jerk reaction against it I do with duck.
Speaker 5 (11:27):
Not good, it's not good.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
I'm hungry enough. I'll eat them all at the same time.
Not good.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
She's wrong, it's good.
Speaker 5 (11:33):
It's not good either. Which's pigeon?
Speaker 1 (11:36):
Oh, pigeon, No pigeon, who's a pigeon?
Speaker 5 (11:39):
That's called squad. I'm sorry, but you'll eat a freaking
deer that's killed on a highway Venison.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Hmm. A buddy was telling me yesterday. I think it's
in Alaska where you get permitsu. You're getting a lottery
to eat moose meat for the moose that unfortunately get
killed on the highway. Oh okay, yeah, I had elcount.
Speaker 4 (12:02):
I think I've had moose.
Speaker 1 (12:04):
How odd is it? And I think that's probably why
the lottery because moose meat has to be pretty rare.
I guess how odd is it that we had that
moose out on Sea four seventy and it killed that woman? Oh?
How do you get a moose on Sea four seventy
like at Quebec and that's Park Metals Mall area if
people are wondering. So anyway, hey, welcome back, and if
(12:25):
you just joined us, thank you. We'll recap what happened today.
I called a joint presser, but they never took any questions.
President Trump, President Putin, gets your take on what you
think happened. Where it's going to leave three oh three
seven one three eight two five five text d A
N five seven seven three nine. You're on the Dan
Kapla show on magazine.
Speaker 4 (12:51):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (12:54):
Oh yeah, yeah, can you not hear me back there?
Oh okay, good? Yeah. I wonder what that glitch us.
But I was just complimenting Ryan on that bump. I
love that, and it feels right for this historic kind
of odd afternoon right where there's obviously an agreement between
President Trump and Putin but not being announced yet for
(13:18):
the understandable reason that I have to get signed off
from President Selensky, NATO European capitals that led to this
joint press there where no questions were taken, etc. So
my guess is President Trump went in to today hoping
for something more today, something more that they could announce.
(13:40):
But I'm glad he went and I have no doubt
this will move the ball forward, and with so many
human lives being lost every week, I'm glad that Trump
is taking the initiative. So I'm sure by the time
we get to together Monday, we're going to know a
lot more right now, just by the nature of it,
because now there are going to be so many people consulted,
(14:02):
and all those people have staffs, and they're just going
to be leaks all over the place. So long before Monday,
I think we're going to know what it was that
at least President Trump and Putin agreed to today three
oh three seven one three A two five five text,
D AN five seven, seventh through nine. Also, please mark
this on your calendar. Monday at four thirty six, Jill
(14:23):
OsO will join us. She's the contributor, one of the
three to Do Better Denver. This tremendous account on acts.
I hope that you follow it, get your friends to
follow it, and it it's a crowdsourcing of reporting about
the failures of the Johnston administration in Denver, about more
broadly Decaine Denver, and it's the kind of information that
(14:47):
you're just not likely to see often on the evening news.
But people know it's true. People know that's what's happening
in Denver because of these lefty policies, and so do
Better Denver coming under fire from the left. This piece
and the Denver Post we've talked about at length. You
know where they went after Jill Olsa just a private mom,
a housewife, just private person who's submitting information, and they
(15:10):
go after her and they make her name public and
everything else. I think the post trying to intimidate people
out of supporting Do Better Denver because Do Better Denver
is exposing the failures of the Johnston administration and the left.
So Jill will join us Monday at four thirty six.
I think you're going to find enough. Talked to her
off air at lengths. I think you're going to find
(15:31):
her very impressive and the additional information she has really important.
So Monday at four thirty six. Brian other reflections as
time passes this afternoon.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Well, I think Warren and Colorado Springs may have some
as well. And he's on the line right now.
Speaker 1 (15:49):
Well you remember Warren, don't you? Very very nice guy.
But we'll find out. But I think Warren, in my view,
is to support of Russia in this conflict. But Warren
am I thinking of the right? Warren?
Speaker 3 (16:05):
Yeah, this is me is one.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
Okay, okay, welcome back.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
Yeah. Do you know who George Cannon was, No, George
tennon kNN the politician. No, Well, he was the guy
that was in the American politics for about forty years.
He's the one that came up with the idea of
containing the communist Russia, the containment policy, and he was
quite popular and well known individual. He was one of
(16:30):
a group of fifty prominent US foreign policy experts. He
was one of them. The rote letrics for President Clinton
expressed his strong concerns about NATO's esport's expansion. Him and
the forty nine others wrote the Center. They argued that
such expansion would be a strategic error, potentially damage in
relations with Russia and destabilizing the European security order. But
(16:52):
were they right or were they wrong?
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Well, it doesn't justify an invasion. That's where you and
I always disagree. Listen your argument, Warren, as I understand
it is that Russia has security concerns. With Ukraine becoming,
you know, more connected to the West, possible NATO member,
that Russia has security concerns. Okay, I get that. I'm
(17:17):
not trying to dismiss that. But the answer is not
rape and mass murder.
Speaker 3 (17:23):
Well, that's another thing about this mass murder thing. I've
been hearing some other great people that are on you know,
the internet, stuff. They talk about tod and I used
to kill twelve or thirteen thousand Ukrainan civilians, and that's
a terrible, terrible thing. I agree to the terrible terrible thing.
But in three and a half years he was possible
for killing twelve to thirteen thousand civilians. Trusted military FDRs
(17:49):
lead Arab and LeMay. In one night March ninth, nineteen
forty five, about three hundred and twenty nine dropped about
two thousand tons of centiaries on Tokyo and killed the
possionally one hundred people in one night. I think Puttin
in three and a half hear is of twelve thousand civilians.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
I boy, Warren't, I'm so surprised to hear this from you,
because this this comparison is fatally flawed to begin with.
First of all, Putins is the opposite of a just cause.
Putin's is not a just war. Putins is an evil
mass rape, mass murder of Ukraine. You know, with the US,
(18:30):
the US was fighting a just cause. Now I'm not
saying I agree with everything that was done in the
course of the war, but the US what was was
fighting evil in its raws form, evil that was a
killing machine, and the US was trying to save lives
on behalf of a just cause.
Speaker 3 (18:49):
Putin the opposite that I agree with.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
So why why would you even go down that road?
Speaker 3 (18:56):
Well, several less talk about civilians being killed war that
the war going on. People get right, But there's always
has been that way, always will be that one.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
What Warren, The question is, are you on the just
side of the cause of the evil side of the cause.
Say there's a school shooting. Okay, you got a school
shooter in there. Well listen, you go in, law enforcement
goes in there, and they have to stop that shooter.
You know if if some rounds you know, miss the
target and and god forbid, a student gets killed. Well
(19:27):
we'll listen, Okay, that that death is on evil's head.
Whereas in that school shooting scenario, evil shooting people. No, no,
you can't compare evil to good when it comes to
innocent victims.
Speaker 3 (19:41):
Well what about when? What about when the Russians put
missles in Cube? But I was twenty two years old
at the time, and damn knew what the nuclear war
over that?
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Man? Right? Yeah, what about it? I mean, putting.
Speaker 3 (19:52):
Missiles right next to the United States coast? And would
how would the American government to it? If Warsaw packed
forty years ago was on the California Arizona, New Medical
Texas border, would we go? But this we would?
Speaker 1 (20:05):
Warren? This makes my point. The US obviously had a
profound security concern there and it needed to be acted upon.
But the response of the US was not to go
rape and pillage and murder mass numbers of people in Russia.
You know, Russia its security concerns, you know, could be
(20:26):
addressed in lots of other ways short of mass murder.
Speaker 3 (20:31):
Yeah, I agree, but we they Russia's complained from two
eight all of this, so what too? So women complained
that we shoved it down their throat. They were weak.
Speaker 1 (20:42):
People complain about their neighbors loud music all the time
and throwing up on their driveway and coming home drunk
and banging on their windows, and they don't go over
there and rape and murder them.
Speaker 3 (20:53):
Okay a lot, Just say one more thing, I'll get
off the air. I believe, I really believe that there's
people in Washington, the military industrial complex that knew the
Russians would react this way if we pushed nail back there.
They wanted it to happen because the military industrial complex
has made billions that money by weapons permit, and that's
the best way to do is to have a book
(21:14):
man on the other side of the world that we've
got to face.
Speaker 1 (21:17):
Yeah, I don't agree that, my friend. I think when
you look at what happened there, right, it is natural.
It's it's the natural evolution of humanity that they would
want to align with the West, align with freedom, align
with progress, and that is a threat to Evil Putin
and to Evil Putin's cronies. So no, I don't think
(21:38):
it was anything like that. I think it was the
national upward evolution of man that evil wanted to stop.
But I appreciate the call, my friend. It's always spirited, well,
always spirit.
Speaker 3 (21:52):
See what happens this meaning tonight. I haven't heard the latest.
I don't know. Yeah, yeah, decided.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
It sounds like and I've got hit this break, my friend.
And it sounds like they reached a deal that they
can't announce until they get buy in from President Zelensky
and European capitals. So more suspense. Hey, thank you, Warren.
You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4 (22:14):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Wow, what a day, What a day? I can't remember
anything like this, where, Okay, you have these two very
powerful presidents meet one good one evil Putent just Satan
on earth, right, and then you apparently have at least
one or more agreements reached which cannot be announced because understandably,
(22:38):
you know, there has to be the courtesy, the respect,
and hopefully the agreement of a President Selensky and NATO,
European capitals, et cetera. So just such an odd series
of events, but you know what I mean, that's what
comes with boldness, and you know, the future belongs to
(23:00):
the bold right. And President Trump's gotten to where he's
gotten because he's a risk taker, he's bold, he's a fighter,
and so it's not always going to be neat and
clean and pretty and like a Netflix series where it
all gets wrapped up in this episode in an hour.
But he's a disruptor. He's somebody who makes things happen.
(23:21):
So you know, I appreciate that and I respect it,
and I expected more in terms of the announcement today.
So I'm a little disappointed, But I don't put that
on President Trump. I just on the nature of the enemy,
which is putin I mean, he's the enemy of everybody,
he's the enemy of humankind, and Trump, I think, is
doing the very best job possible trying to mitigate that
(23:45):
harm and turn it into as much of a positive
as possible. Because I don't think there's any doubt right
that the more economic tie there is between the US
and Russia, you know, the sooner sooner that evil like
Putin will be gone and Russia can advance into a
free nation. So I'm not saying it's going to happen overnight,
(24:07):
but I respect Trump for the approach he takes and
being willing to take these risks. Three or three seven
one three eight two five five texts da N five
seven seven three nine A text or Dan, it's Friday.
Let's remind the red light runners we got their license plate,
you know, another good chance to just remind myself and
everybody else, don't go when the light turns green. You know,
(24:29):
there are so many people running red lights these days,
so many on drugs, so so many drunk, so many
just you know, I think it's a video game, right,
and they believe there's no enforcement that you just can't
go when it turns green anymore. You got to look
both ways? Do you do that? Ryan?
Speaker 4 (24:47):
Do I do?
Speaker 1 (24:47):
What? Do you look both ways when the light turns green?
Speaker 2 (24:50):
I take the Dan Kaplis advice to heart and absolutely
because I've seen it so many times as you have
and so many of our listeners had like green doesn't
mean green for us and read he definitely doesn't mean
red for the cross traffic.
Speaker 4 (25:03):
You know, you got a.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
Way to put it, got a way good way to
put it, and you know it's just getting worse. And
when does it turn around that well, it doesn't turn
around until the lefties are thrown out of office, because
it's the lefties undermining law enforcement, you know, combined with
you know, legalized drugs and everything else. That's just making
(25:24):
a thunderdome out there. But you know, we we've been
obviously focused on this historic meeting today and questions about
the aftermath, so we didn't get a chance to get
to a lot of these texts on kind of the
floating issue today, which is what's the most valuable thing
that you ever lost that someone returned to you, or
(25:45):
that you returned to someone else if they lost it.
And that spins off a story, a really neat story
about a Ford autoworker who dropped his wallet apparently in
the engine of a Ford focus like seven years ago,
and it just got return to him. We did have
a guy who said he had four thousand in cash
returned to him in Walmart. I'd love to him call
(26:09):
the show. I'm just trying to understand how do you
put four thousand in cash in a wallet? By the way,
I haven't had a wallet now for six years. Maybe
you know, I just have everything in the back of
my phone. How many people do you think have wallets anymore?
The back of your phone? Wow?
Speaker 4 (26:23):
Oh yeah, you don't carry a lot of cash obviously.
Speaker 1 (26:26):
Then no, no, I've got you know. I mean, when
you need cash, et cetera, I'll find a place to
you know, to stuff it. But we're not talking cash
like that, right, But no, you don't have that kind
of phone case that has a little wallet thinging back. Yeah,
but it sounds like a good idea. That's been a
game changer for me. Yeah, because it's all just right
there together, Okay, and I can stick you know, three
(26:48):
credit cards or this idea or that key card or
whatever in there, and it's life changing.
Speaker 5 (26:53):
So I'm going to do this really quick on your
thing about what somebody loss. My dad when he first
got married to my mom, before they even had Wendy,
my sister, he dropped his ring. They were living in
San Diego at the time, at Mission Bay, and he
(27:16):
felt terrible about it. And it was twenty four hours later.
He went out with a friend of his that he
was there with that day and they kind of figured
out where they were around the beach, and my father
dug a hole in the sand and found the ring.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
No. No, that's just a god thing right there, right true. Yeah,
that's Guardian Angels stuff right there. That's a cool story.
That's a nice way to end the week. Next week, Hey, Jill,
also four thirty six on Monday, I'm looking forward to that.
Just you know, she was so impressive on the phone,
and you know, she's a mom and a housewife, and
(27:55):
she's contributing to her community by doing these public records
request and contributing to do better Denver. I hope everybody
follows that account. And then all of a sudden that
the Denver Post insists on making her name public and
the names of a couple of other women, private people
just contributing to do better Denver, and I just think
(28:16):
it's one of the worst things I've seen in journalism,
and so really look forward to having Jellosa join us
Monday at four thirty six, and hope you have a
great weekend. Please be safe, love to have You're back
here Monday. We'll know much more than by about the
agreements that were reached today but not yet announced, so
we'll dive into those as well. Ryan, you're the best,
(28:37):
Kelly human Sunshine. Have a great weekend. Catching Monday on
The Dan Kapla Show
This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, So, what's
your take on what just happened? This is fascinating to me.
There was much less in that announcement than I expected.
(00:23):
But my best guess is that where we're at is
that there have been some meaningful agreements reached, but President
Trump needs to first discuss it with President Zelenski, with NATO,
et cetera, just as part of the protocol, just to
maximize the chance that there's buy in for the agreements
(00:44):
reached today. That's my take. What's yours? Three all three
seven to one three A two five five the number
text d A N five seven seven three nine. Now,
the President's going to be on with Sean Hannity at
eight o'clock Mountains, So my guess is we'll learn a
bit more then, at least some hints. What do you think? Right? Well?
Speaker 2 (01:03):
What really stood out to me? And I got in
your ear and said, wow, was Vladimir Putin coming?
Speaker 3 (01:07):
Right?
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Out and saying that, yes, he agrees, if President Trump
had been in office rather than Joe Biden, there would
not have been a war in Ukraine. And I found
that fascinating, and I'm wondering what your thoughts are on then.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
Yeah, you know, my thought is, hey, Putin's evil. He
started this. He has raped and pillaged a nation that
he invaded. So I don't put any stock in that
or anything else he says. I think that, you know,
first of all, I think it's true, right, I mean,
and we've said it all along. If Trump had been
(01:41):
in office at the time, there would not have been
an invasion, just like there wasn't an invasion during Trump's
first term. But the way Putin tried to play that,
you know, by suggesting that Trump would have given Putin
what he needed with regard to Ukraine, Yeah, I think
just kind of another slimy moved from Putin. I think
the reason that Putin wouldn't have gone in if Trump
(02:03):
was in office was the same reason he didn't in
this during the sixteen term, right, because Trump is strong
and he's not willing to take the risk. With Trump,
so I think they reached some kind of significant agreement today.
But but Trump has to make sure to get buy
in from the folks he needs buy in from before
(02:25):
it's announced.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Also, Dan, what would what did you think towards the
end there, Leoniman Putin chimed in and said he wanted
on a summit in Moscow, and then Trump's.
Speaker 4 (02:33):
Like, oh, they're gonna get mad at me for that one. Like,
what did you make of it?
Speaker 1 (02:37):
Yeah? I think it was face saving, you know, because
Putin traveled to the US for this one, right, Okay, yeap,
what do you think?
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Well, I think what you saw, what you heard if
you were just listening with the sounds that we provided
for you, was a person who respects the strength of
Donald Trump. Whether it was him just putting words out
there that no, oh, there would not have been a
war in Ukraine if Trump were president, I don't think
that's just him genuflecting.
Speaker 4 (03:04):
I don't think Putin's like that.
Speaker 1 (03:06):
I think he.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
Does respond to and respect the strength of Donald Trump.
The fact that he wanted to have a summit in Moscow.
I think what this does, and a lot of people
out there that are critics of Trump would say this
is it puts Putin on the same stage with Trump.
It gives him that standing that he was not going
to get with Joe Biden. And you might say, well,
that's a good thing for Joe Biden, but it's not.
(03:27):
Because we were at an impass. Unless this war was
going to end with Ukraine being victorious somehow expelling Russia
out of Ukraine, which was not a realistic goal or option,
there needed to be some kind of compromise like hopefully
we're working toward here that Putin views this. As you know,
I have a fair shot with Trump. I respect him,
I think he respects me. And the next step, if
(03:50):
this is going to be a successful summit here in Alaska,
Dan would be what Donald Trump just said, He's going
to call the leaders of NATO, He's going to call
the leaders of Europe, and then of course Zolensky, and
if he can get Putin and Zelensky in the same
room with him as an arbiter, I believe that he
can get this done.
Speaker 4 (04:06):
I have that faith.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
And he's done it. He's shown us that he can
do it. He's done it already in his second term.
He said, I think it's stopping six different conflicts, and
he's right.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
That did happen well.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
And it's a practical matter. I mean, you know, President
Trump will need buy in from NATO and the European capitals,
right because it the only kind of leverage excuse me
on President Zelensky at this point, you know, to do
a deal that involves giving up territory will be if
the European capitals want the deal, because obviously Ukraine is
(04:40):
completely dependent on financially on the US and the European capitals.
So I think that's the phase we're in now. Yeah, Okay,
we're gonna take a break to make up for that
time we lost when we stayed with that presser. Back
soon you're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4 (04:58):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
I'm glad you're with us. Fascinating afternoon. I expected more
in terms of a concrete announcement after this meeting today,
because it's rational to think that Trump's not going to
President Trump's not going to make that trip without an
agreement in hand, and I think there was one and
it was confirmed today, but that it's just not going
(05:22):
to be announced until you know, not just the courtesies
but the practicalities of getting sign off from President Zelensky
and NATO and European capitals is addressed. And that makes sense, right.
I mean, as you know from your own life, it
doesn't matter whether we're talking about an international treaty or
(05:43):
we're talking about anything of importance to you. For all
of us as humans, you know, respect is critical. And
in a situation like this, with the horror that's been
inflicted on Ukraine by Putin, you know that respect to
Zelenski and Ukraine and to NATO and to the European capitals,
(06:04):
which didn't not do what they should have, which was
to make it clear they'd put boots on the ground
if necessary, but they did spend a lot of money
in Ukraine. Yeah, I think that as a practical matter
that that respect, those conversations are critical now before the
deal is announced. I do think that we'll probably start
to get a pretty good understanding, probably starting with brebident
(06:27):
Trump's you know, interview with Sean Hannity in about an
hour hour and a half, you know, as to at
least a sense of what was agreed to. Is it
a cease fire, is it a you know, three or
four way meeting, But I think something significant was agreed to.
Love to get your take three out three seven one
(06:48):
three A two five five text d A N five
seven seven three nine. Ryan texters Dan, it's Vladimir, not Vladimir,
that's Putin. I'm sorry if I misspoke. God has not
finished with me yet, Dan. I don't know why anybody
thought a peace steel would come out of this without
Zelenski there and not a peace steal, clearly, but but
(07:12):
I thought there was a good chance that a cease
fire would come out of this today, and in fact
that maybe what was agreed to. I have to believe
it's something more significant than just an agreement to have
a direct meeting with Selenski. But we'll find out together.
Texter to Dan five seven seven three nine. Dan. Putin
(07:34):
knows Trump is a sucker for sucking up. That's why
he said that. It's interesting because you know, that's, of
course the party line mouthed by most of the US media.
But does anybody really think President Trump would have accomplished
everything that he's accomplished and would have been able to
overcome everything that's been thrown at him if he was
(07:57):
the buffoon the left makes him out to be a
chance in the world. He's the opposite of that, which
is why he's been able to have this success. Dan
Trump has to lick Putin's boots by talking about the
Russia hoax. Gag, oh, man, I excuse me, frog in
my throat? Where do you think that expression ever came from? Ryan?
Frog in my throat? That one has never made any
(08:20):
sense to me. Does someone actually have a frog in
their throat?
Speaker 4 (08:24):
Maybe because of me? Your voice sound like a frog.
Speaker 1 (08:27):
Hmm, boy, that's that's a good guess. I'm gonna look
that up in this next break. But no, Trump talked
about the Russia hoax because it's true. It's true. I mean,
think about it. Think about all the harm done starting
with to Trump himself, and no American deserves that, let
alone an American president. But all the harm done to
this country by that that Russia hoax, by that coup attempt,
(08:51):
because it did interfere with normal relations with an important
nation led by an evil man in Putin, but an
important nation and the global order. And so this big
lie that the Democrats and their media allies told interfered
with that relationship, to the detriment of this nation and
to the world. And so no, it's an absolute crime.
(09:13):
What happened there with the rush, oaks and trump I
think was was bold and gutsy and appropriate to bring
it up today. Three O three seven one three A
two five five the number text d A N five
seven seven three nine, So another.
Speaker 5 (09:28):
Text, Hello, mission to speak?
Speaker 1 (09:32):
Why would you need permission? I always makes every day wonderful?
Speaker 5 (09:36):
One I always ask you, I did I did find the.
Speaker 1 (09:43):
Frog in your throat? Reference? Oh yeah, yeah, what is it?
Speaker 2 (09:46):
This?
Speaker 5 (09:47):
George refers to having an irritation in the throat that
temporarily affects your ability to speak. For example, if your
voice goes key while giving a present hitchen or speech,
you might apologize by saying, I've got a frog in life.
Speaker 1 (10:10):
So it's it's Ryan's theory that because it makes me
sound like a frog, that's that's where the same came.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
Was a lot shorter version, though that took less time.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
I thought, some poor guy at a frog. And so
because I know in some countries they like eat frogs
or eat frog legs, have you had them? Then probably
start gagging? Have you had frog legs?
Speaker 2 (10:29):
That?
Speaker 1 (10:30):
There are so many things I would never eat. And
that's that's maybe second after duck.
Speaker 5 (10:35):
You would duck they're very gummy.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Rabbit. Oh yeah, No duck. I don't care how good
they taste. There are plenty of things that probably taste
real good that I'm not eating.
Speaker 4 (10:46):
No peaking duck, No duck, all orange.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
No, not a dog. I think I like looking at ducks.
Duck is like eating dog or cat.
Speaker 4 (10:56):
How is that any different than eating chicken or turkey.
Speaker 1 (10:59):
I don't like looking at chickens. Now turkey I don't
like anyway, but I do. I mean, as you know,
I'm up in the cabinetry for trial, and we got
a whole flock of turkey's. I don't know how many
babies they have at one time, but I'm thinking five
or ten are following this Mama turkey around.
Speaker 4 (11:16):
What about pheasant? Would you eat that?
Speaker 1 (11:20):
M good question? Yeah, I don't have the like the
knee jerk reaction against it I do with duck.
Speaker 5 (11:27):
Not good, it's not good.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
I'm hungry enough. I'll eat them all at the same time.
Not good.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
She's wrong, it's good.
Speaker 5 (11:33):
It's not good either. Which's pigeon?
Speaker 1 (11:36):
Oh, pigeon, No pigeon, who's a pigeon?
Speaker 5 (11:39):
That's called squad. I'm sorry, but you'll eat a freaking
deer that's killed on a highway Venison.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Hmm. A buddy was telling me yesterday. I think it's
in Alaska where you get permitsu. You're getting a lottery
to eat moose meat for the moose that unfortunately get
killed on the highway. Oh okay, yeah, I had elcount.
Speaker 4 (12:02):
I think I've had moose.
Speaker 1 (12:04):
How odd is it? And I think that's probably why
the lottery because moose meat has to be pretty rare.
I guess how odd is it that we had that
moose out on Sea four seventy and it killed that woman? Oh?
How do you get a moose on Sea four seventy
like at Quebec and that's Park Metals Mall area if
people are wondering. So anyway, hey, welcome back, and if
(12:25):
you just joined us, thank you. We'll recap what happened today.
I called a joint presser, but they never took any questions.
President Trump, President Putin, gets your take on what you
think happened. Where it's going to leave three oh three
seven one three eight two five five text d A
N five seven seven three nine. You're on the Dan
Kapla show on magazine.
Speaker 4 (12:51):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (12:54):
Oh yeah, yeah, can you not hear me back there?
Oh okay, good? Yeah. I wonder what that glitch us.
But I was just complimenting Ryan on that bump. I
love that, and it feels right for this historic kind
of odd afternoon right where there's obviously an agreement between
President Trump and Putin but not being announced yet for
(13:18):
the understandable reason that I have to get signed off
from President Selensky, NATO European capitals that led to this
joint press there where no questions were taken, etc. So
my guess is President Trump went in to today hoping
for something more today, something more that they could announce.
(13:40):
But I'm glad he went and I have no doubt
this will move the ball forward, and with so many
human lives being lost every week, I'm glad that Trump
is taking the initiative. So I'm sure by the time
we get to together Monday, we're going to know a
lot more right now, just by the nature of it,
because now there are going to be so many people consulted,
(14:02):
and all those people have staffs, and they're just going
to be leaks all over the place. So long before Monday,
I think we're going to know what it was that
at least President Trump and Putin agreed to today three
oh three seven one three A two five five text,
D AN five seven, seventh through nine. Also, please mark
this on your calendar. Monday at four thirty six, Jill
(14:23):
OsO will join us. She's the contributor, one of the
three to Do Better Denver. This tremendous account on acts.
I hope that you follow it, get your friends to
follow it, and it it's a crowdsourcing of reporting about
the failures of the Johnston administration in Denver, about more
broadly Decaine Denver, and it's the kind of information that
(14:47):
you're just not likely to see often on the evening news.
But people know it's true. People know that's what's happening
in Denver because of these lefty policies, and so do
Better Denver coming under fire from the left. This piece
and the Denver Post we've talked about at length. You
know where they went after Jill Olsa just a private mom,
a housewife, just private person who's submitting information, and they
(15:10):
go after her and they make her name public and
everything else. I think the post trying to intimidate people
out of supporting Do Better Denver because Do Better Denver
is exposing the failures of the Johnston administration and the left.
So Jill will join us Monday at four thirty six.
I think you're going to find enough. Talked to her
off air at lengths. I think you're going to find
(15:31):
her very impressive and the additional information she has really important.
So Monday at four thirty six. Brian other reflections as
time passes this afternoon.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Well, I think Warren and Colorado Springs may have some
as well. And he's on the line right now.
Speaker 1 (15:49):
Well you remember Warren, don't you? Very very nice guy.
But we'll find out. But I think Warren, in my view,
is to support of Russia in this conflict. But Warren
am I thinking of the right? Warren?
Speaker 3 (16:05):
Yeah, this is me is one.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
Okay, okay, welcome back.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
Yeah. Do you know who George Cannon was, No, George
tennon kNN the politician. No, Well, he was the guy
that was in the American politics for about forty years.
He's the one that came up with the idea of
containing the communist Russia, the containment policy, and he was
quite popular and well known individual. He was one of
(16:30):
a group of fifty prominent US foreign policy experts. He
was one of them. The rote letrics for President Clinton
expressed his strong concerns about NATO's esport's expansion. Him and
the forty nine others wrote the Center. They argued that
such expansion would be a strategic error, potentially damage in
relations with Russia and destabilizing the European security order. But
(16:52):
were they right or were they wrong?
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Well, it doesn't justify an invasion. That's where you and
I always disagree. Listen your argument, Warren, as I understand
it is that Russia has security concerns. With Ukraine becoming,
you know, more connected to the West, possible NATO member,
that Russia has security concerns. Okay, I get that. I'm
(17:17):
not trying to dismiss that. But the answer is not
rape and mass murder.
Speaker 3 (17:23):
Well, that's another thing about this mass murder thing. I've
been hearing some other great people that are on you know,
the internet, stuff. They talk about tod and I used
to kill twelve or thirteen thousand Ukrainan civilians, and that's
a terrible, terrible thing. I agree to the terrible terrible thing.
But in three and a half years he was possible
for killing twelve to thirteen thousand civilians. Trusted military FDRs
(17:49):
lead Arab and LeMay. In one night March ninth, nineteen
forty five, about three hundred and twenty nine dropped about
two thousand tons of centiaries on Tokyo and killed the
possionally one hundred people in one night. I think Puttin
in three and a half hear is of twelve thousand civilians.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
I boy, Warren't, I'm so surprised to hear this from you,
because this this comparison is fatally flawed to begin with.
First of all, Putins is the opposite of a just cause.
Putin's is not a just war. Putins is an evil
mass rape, mass murder of Ukraine. You know, with the US,
(18:30):
the US was fighting a just cause. Now I'm not
saying I agree with everything that was done in the
course of the war, but the US what was was
fighting evil in its raws form, evil that was a
killing machine, and the US was trying to save lives
on behalf of a just cause.
Speaker 3 (18:49):
Putin the opposite that I agree with.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
So why why would you even go down that road?
Speaker 3 (18:56):
Well, several less talk about civilians being killed war that
the war going on. People get right, But there's always
has been that way, always will be that one.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
What Warren, The question is, are you on the just
side of the cause of the evil side of the cause.
Say there's a school shooting. Okay, you got a school
shooter in there. Well listen, you go in, law enforcement
goes in there, and they have to stop that shooter.
You know if if some rounds you know, miss the
target and and god forbid, a student gets killed. Well
(19:27):
we'll listen, Okay, that that death is on evil's head.
Whereas in that school shooting scenario, evil shooting people. No, no,
you can't compare evil to good when it comes to
innocent victims.
Speaker 3 (19:41):
Well what about when? What about when the Russians put
missles in Cube? But I was twenty two years old
at the time, and damn knew what the nuclear war
over that?
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Man? Right? Yeah, what about it? I mean, putting.
Speaker 3 (19:52):
Missiles right next to the United States coast? And would
how would the American government to it? If Warsaw packed
forty years ago was on the California Arizona, New Medical
Texas border, would we go? But this we would?
Speaker 1 (20:05):
Warren? This makes my point. The US obviously had a
profound security concern there and it needed to be acted upon.
But the response of the US was not to go
rape and pillage and murder mass numbers of people in Russia.
You know, Russia its security concerns, you know, could be
(20:26):
addressed in lots of other ways short of mass murder.
Speaker 3 (20:31):
Yeah, I agree, but we they Russia's complained from two
eight all of this, so what too? So women complained
that we shoved it down their throat. They were weak.
Speaker 1 (20:42):
People complain about their neighbors loud music all the time
and throwing up on their driveway and coming home drunk
and banging on their windows, and they don't go over
there and rape and murder them.
Speaker 3 (20:53):
Okay a lot, Just say one more thing, I'll get
off the air. I believe, I really believe that there's
people in Washington, the military industrial complex that knew the
Russians would react this way if we pushed nail back there.
They wanted it to happen because the military industrial complex
has made billions that money by weapons permit, and that's
the best way to do is to have a book
(21:14):
man on the other side of the world that we've
got to face.
Speaker 1 (21:17):
Yeah, I don't agree that, my friend. I think when
you look at what happened there, right, it is natural.
It's it's the natural evolution of humanity that they would
want to align with the West, align with freedom, align
with progress, and that is a threat to Evil Putin
and to Evil Putin's cronies. So no, I don't think
(21:38):
it was anything like that. I think it was the
national upward evolution of man that evil wanted to stop.
But I appreciate the call, my friend. It's always spirited, well,
always spirit.
Speaker 3 (21:52):
See what happens this meaning tonight. I haven't heard the latest.
I don't know. Yeah, yeah, decided.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
It sounds like and I've got hit this break, my friend.
And it sounds like they reached a deal that they
can't announce until they get buy in from President Zelensky
and European capitals. So more suspense. Hey, thank you, Warren.
You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4 (22:14):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Wow, what a day, What a day? I can't remember
anything like this, where, Okay, you have these two very
powerful presidents meet one good one evil Putent just Satan
on earth, right, and then you apparently have at least
one or more agreements reached which cannot be announced because understandably,
(22:38):
you know, there has to be the courtesy, the respect,
and hopefully the agreement of a President Selensky and NATO,
European capitals, et cetera. So just such an odd series
of events, but you know what I mean, that's what
comes with boldness, and you know, the future belongs to
(23:00):
the bold right. And President Trump's gotten to where he's
gotten because he's a risk taker, he's bold, he's a fighter,
and so it's not always going to be neat and
clean and pretty and like a Netflix series where it
all gets wrapped up in this episode in an hour.
But he's a disruptor. He's somebody who makes things happen.
(23:21):
So you know, I appreciate that and I respect it,
and I expected more in terms of the announcement today.
So I'm a little disappointed, But I don't put that
on President Trump. I just on the nature of the enemy,
which is putin I mean, he's the enemy of everybody,
he's the enemy of humankind, and Trump, I think, is
doing the very best job possible trying to mitigate that
(23:45):
harm and turn it into as much of a positive
as possible. Because I don't think there's any doubt right
that the more economic tie there is between the US
and Russia, you know, the sooner sooner that evil like
Putin will be gone and Russia can advance into a
free nation. So I'm not saying it's going to happen overnight,
(24:07):
but I respect Trump for the approach he takes and
being willing to take these risks. Three or three seven
one three eight two five five texts da N five
seven seven three nine A text or Dan, it's Friday.
Let's remind the red light runners we got their license plate,
you know, another good chance to just remind myself and
everybody else, don't go when the light turns green. You know,
(24:29):
there are so many people running red lights these days,
so many on drugs, so so many drunk, so many
just you know, I think it's a video game, right,
and they believe there's no enforcement that you just can't
go when it turns green anymore. You got to look
both ways? Do you do that? Ryan?
Speaker 4 (24:47):
Do I do?
Speaker 1 (24:47):
What? Do you look both ways when the light turns green?
Speaker 2 (24:50):
I take the Dan Kaplis advice to heart and absolutely
because I've seen it so many times as you have
and so many of our listeners had like green doesn't
mean green for us and read he definitely doesn't mean
red for the cross traffic.
Speaker 4 (25:03):
You know, you got a.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
Way to put it, got a way good way to
put it, and you know it's just getting worse. And
when does it turn around that well, it doesn't turn
around until the lefties are thrown out of office, because
it's the lefties undermining law enforcement, you know, combined with
you know, legalized drugs and everything else. That's just making
(25:24):
a thunderdome out there. But you know, we we've been
obviously focused on this historic meeting today and questions about
the aftermath, so we didn't get a chance to get
to a lot of these texts on kind of the
floating issue today, which is what's the most valuable thing
that you ever lost that someone returned to you, or
(25:45):
that you returned to someone else if they lost it.
And that spins off a story, a really neat story
about a Ford autoworker who dropped his wallet apparently in
the engine of a Ford focus like seven years ago,
and it just got return to him. We did have
a guy who said he had four thousand in cash
returned to him in Walmart. I'd love to him call
(26:09):
the show. I'm just trying to understand how do you
put four thousand in cash in a wallet? By the way,
I haven't had a wallet now for six years. Maybe
you know, I just have everything in the back of
my phone. How many people do you think have wallets anymore?
The back of your phone? Wow?
Speaker 4 (26:23):
Oh yeah, you don't carry a lot of cash obviously.
Speaker 1 (26:26):
Then no, no, I've got you know. I mean, when
you need cash, et cetera, I'll find a place to
you know, to stuff it. But we're not talking cash
like that, right, But no, you don't have that kind
of phone case that has a little wallet thinging back. Yeah,
but it sounds like a good idea. That's been a
game changer for me. Yeah, because it's all just right
there together, Okay, and I can stick you know, three
(26:48):
credit cards or this idea or that key card or
whatever in there, and it's life changing.
Speaker 5 (26:53):
So I'm going to do this really quick on your
thing about what somebody loss. My dad when he first
got married to my mom, before they even had Wendy,
my sister, he dropped his ring. They were living in
San Diego at the time, at Mission Bay, and he
(27:16):
felt terrible about it. And it was twenty four hours later.
He went out with a friend of his that he
was there with that day and they kind of figured
out where they were around the beach, and my father
dug a hole in the sand and found the ring.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
No. No, that's just a god thing right there, right true. Yeah,
that's Guardian Angels stuff right there. That's a cool story.
That's a nice way to end the week. Next week, Hey, Jill,
also four thirty six on Monday, I'm looking forward to that.
Just you know, she was so impressive on the phone,
and you know, she's a mom and a housewife, and
(27:55):
she's contributing to her community by doing these public records
request and contributing to do better Denver. I hope everybody
follows that account. And then all of a sudden that
the Denver Post insists on making her name public and
the names of a couple of other women, private people
just contributing to do better Denver, and I just think
(28:16):
it's one of the worst things I've seen in journalism,
and so really look forward to having Jellosa join us
Monday at four thirty six, and hope you have a
great weekend. Please be safe, love to have You're back
here Monday. We'll know much more than by about the
agreements that were reached today but not yet announced, so
we'll dive into those as well. Ryan, you're the best,
(28:37):
Kelly human Sunshine. Have a great weekend. Catching Monday on
The Dan Kapla Show
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Law & Order: Criminal Justice System - Season 1 & Season 2
Season Two Out Now! Law & Order: Criminal Justice System tells the real stories behind the landmark cases that have shaped how the most dangerous and influential criminals in America are prosecuted. In its second season, the series tackles the threat of terrorism in the United States. From the rise of extremist political groups in the 60s to domestic lone wolves in the modern day, we explore how organizations like the FBI and Joint Terrorism Take Force have evolved to fight back against a multitude of terrorist threats.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com