Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dank Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. I don't think
we've ever seen anything like this before. Right, have you
been watching what's been going on today? I assume you have,
(00:20):
because you listen to a show like this. It's just
it's led me to some conclusions about where we're at
as a country, which are along the lines of what
we've been talking about, but a step further, and it's
a very stark, disturbing realization. But as we dig deeper
into what's happened over the last forty eight hours and
then combine it with what we've seen from the left
(00:41):
in the past, it's just led me to this inescapable
conclusion that there are many in power on the left.
I'm not talking about your typical Democrat, your typical Democrat voter,
not talking about those people. There are many in power
on the left who are simply immoral. They are absolutely immoral,
and what that means for the future of this nation
(01:05):
is so stark. I mean, what it means clearly is
that unless they are defeated through the electoral process at
the ballot box, this nation is doomed to go to
a very very awful place. And I just think that's
the reality.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Now.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
The good news is the founders and all those men
and women who sacrificed and fought and died for our
freedom have given us the opportunity to save the country.
My point today is that it is there's less time
than I thought we had, and if we lose, if
we lose at the ballot box, it's going to it's
(01:42):
going to go south, so much quicker than I thought
it would go south. Obviously, we all knew the stakes
were high. We all knew that democracy was saved in
sixteen by the people who elected Donald Trump, and save
the US Supreme Court is, you know, an actual interpretive
body rather than making it a legislative body. We all
knew that. But when you see what's unfolded in this
(02:03):
campaign and their willingness to just flat out lie, and
we knew it from the Russia hoax, right, we knew
it from the Russia hoax. But you combine their willingness
to do one of the most immoral things any human
on the face of the earth can do, which is
to misuse the criminal justice system to wrongly charge and
convict somebody and jail them so they can't beat you
(02:24):
at the ballot box. That's about as immoral as it gets.
And then you combine it with these last forty eight
hours the flat out lies about Trump, including this business
with Liz Cheney today. Yeah, the stakes truly could not
be higher. Eight five five for zero five two five
to five the number. Glad you're here. My plan for
today had ben and it will continue to be to
(02:46):
talk about this mountain of data and other evidence and
common sense that suggests Trump is going to win the election.
And I will still get there. I didn't mean for
this show to be so serious, but but again, when
you look at what's happened today. So let's start with
the sound I'm sure you've heard before or you've heard
snippets of, and you've heard discussed on the news, etc.
(03:08):
And we'll get to all those other issues as to whether,
like the people who are going to decide this election
are even paying attention to any of this. And I
think it's more likely the answers no but if they are,
who's this going to hurt and who's it going to help.
So here's what President Trump actually said.
Speaker 3 (03:26):
But his daughter is.
Speaker 4 (03:27):
A very dumb individual, very dumb.
Speaker 3 (03:31):
She's a radical warhawk.
Speaker 4 (03:33):
Let's put her with a rifle, standing there with nine
barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's see how she feels
about it. You know, when the guns are trained on
her face.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
You know, there are warhawks when.
Speaker 4 (03:45):
They're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee,
will let's send let's send ten thousand troops right.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
Into the mouth of the enemy.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
Clearly talking about and he's right, how many people out
there are just willing to send a people's children, you know,
into war to face all those barrels of all those
guns aimed at them. Clearly what he's talking about. And
now you see the media's all and Kamala Harris, who
obviously at this point I think she is fundamentally dishonest,
(04:17):
and I think that she takes positions which are grossly,
flagrantly immoral, and so nothing she would do would be
a surprise to me. But you see now the media
falsely portraying this as Trump calling for guns to be
aimed at Cheney, etc. It's just a depth of kind
(04:38):
of moral depravity that we're seeing. And I'm talking about
not just this one example, but just across the board
from the left, starting with the Russia hoax, the false
allegation that he'd been treasonous, and then extending into the
law fair because when you stop and think about it,
falsely charging somebody with crimes, politically motivated criminal charges which
(05:00):
are intended to convict that person, label them a felon,
hopefully jail them in the interest of stopping them from
beating you at the polls. That that is a form
of political assassination, not physical assassination. That's a whole different
type of assassination. But when a political party reaches a
point again I'm not talking about your typical Democrat where
(05:22):
it is willing to do that to their opponent at
that point that they've reached the absolute bottom morally. Listen,
I don't think the left was behind the assassination attempts,
the ones involving bullets, the political assassination attempt multiple involving
misusing the criminal justice system to destroy a political opponent
(05:44):
you can't beat at the polls. Yeah, that that reaches
an absolute depth of moral depravity. And that's what we
have right now, not in your typical Democrat, but in
many who hold power and hold influence over the modern
Democratic party. The stakes are that high. Eight five five
for zero five eight two five five the number. But
(06:04):
here's a question for you, and I have a lot
of questions for you today, Dinah gets your take. I
think about these things a lot. But this whole lie
about Trump and Cheney, who is it going to help
and who is it going to hurt at the polls?
Or is it going to be a complete non factor.
I've got my own theory, but would love to hear
from you on this eight f five for zero five
(06:26):
eight two five five. And then we are going to
be following up on the scandal. And it is an
absolute scandal of historic proportions in the Colorado Secretary of
State's office. And when I say scandal, I'm not referring
to the release of the six hundred passwords onto a website,
very significant passwords. We have to wait and get the
(06:47):
full facts, full investigation to find out if and I underline,
if there was criminal intent. The full story I'm talking
about the decision according to published reports. The decision by
the Secretary of State not to tell the clerks after
she knew that it happened, scandal is an understatement for that,
Dan and Boulder, you're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 5 (07:06):
Welcome, Hey, Dan, thanks for taking my car. I just
had a quick question around the potential election results. Yes, sir,
and I'll take my response off the air. But first,
if Trump loses and they in the States come out
and the election shows he did, will you personally accept
(07:26):
that result? And secondly, if Trump loses and he refuses
to accept the results, will you personally still accept the results?
And I'll take my answer off.
Speaker 1 (07:38):
Oh, Dan, can you repeat the first question again? I
want to make sure I have it right. What was
the first question?
Speaker 5 (07:42):
Will you personally accept the results? If Trump loses?
Speaker 1 (07:49):
Well, doesn't that depend on whether the process was honest
and accurate?
Speaker 5 (07:58):
Well, assuming the States, I mean, we can obviously dispute
anything in the world and make those claims, but you know,
when it's all said and done, if the States submit
their election results and he loses, and I was wondering
if he will accept those state results, I guess And Dan.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
And let's focus on that one for a second, because
it's a very fair question for you to ask, and
it raises a really important point, and that is this,
I think what the left is trying to do is
to bully and censor and intimidate to the point where
nobody on the right can ever again question whether an
(08:42):
election was fairly conducted for fear of being branded some
kind of election deniers. So I think the left, I'm
not saying you, is engaged in that kind of censorship
so that the left will be more free to do
things like we saw in Virginia. You saw that, Dan,
where the Biden administration went all the way to the
Supreme Court to try to force Virginia to keep people
(09:04):
on the voting rolls who had already admitted they were
not legally eligible to vote. So, yeah, I am not
going to give into that kind of intimidation and bullying.
What I am going to do is what I've always
done and I did in twenty twenty, which is I'm
going to follow the facts. And in twenty twenty, there
were many fair questions about how much fraud there was,
(09:28):
and many Americans right now believe that that election was stolen.
I follow the evidence. Let me just finish this thought, Dan,
I put them on hold so I could finish the thought.
I followed the evidence, and what I said on air,
which was not very popular, was I had not seen
enough evidence that there was enough fraud to change the outcome.
(09:49):
So therefore I accept Joe Biden as the duly elected president.
But I will follow the evidence. I will not give
in to bullying from the left to concede in advance
that the election in every state has been honestly carried out.
If the facts in the evidence show that, fine, I'll
be the first to say it. But I'm not going
to give them a pass in advance. On potential violations
(10:12):
of election law. Trump just won in the key battleground
state of Pennsylvania. He won in court because the law
was being violated quite obviously to try to limit the
votes he got. He won that case. So, Dan, do
you really want me to commit? Do you really want
me to commit in advance, Dan, and give us your
(10:32):
answer on the other side, Do you really want me
to commit in advance to saying that, oh, yeah, there
was no violation of election law when we've just seen
the US Supreme Court overturned the Biden administrations play in
Virginia and to court in Pennsylvania rule in Trump's favor
on law violations that we're going to hurt him. You're
on the Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 6 (10:55):
And now back to the Dankaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
Julia Roberts voice in an ad for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 7 (11:05):
You're current, honey, in the one place in America where
women still have a right to choose. You can vote
any way you want and no one will ever know.
Speaker 1 (11:21):
Did you make the right joy share in Honey.
Speaker 7 (11:24):
Remember what happens in the booth stays in the booth.
Bothe Harris well vote coming good is responsible for the
contents of this app.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
I think they're doing. The Harris campaign is doing so
many things that are backfiring on them, and they all
come back to this common origin, which is they're elitist.
They're arrogant elitist who don't understand us. They look down
on us, they think we're idiots. They think anybody who
believes in God is some kind of simpleton numskull, and
(11:54):
that anybody who would vote Republican, etc. Etc. We're just
some kind of moron. And my goodness, women who would
marry a Republican man or stay with the Republican man.
They must be total zeros. So more of this, please,
more of what you're doing here, please, Kamala Harris and
the left and all this other stuff over the last
(12:15):
few days, because you're just hurting yourself. And this add
by the way, if you haven't seen it, the visuals
are they had some stereotypical in their mind. Trump voters
to guys and their wives go to the polling place
and then they separate, and then the wives wink at
each other and vote for Kamala Harris. So you know,
(12:35):
this whole assumption that oh, yeah, no, that the woman
would never vote for who she really wanted to because
she's afraid of her husband. But look, you really don't
have to tell your husband. It is such a demeaning view.
But obviously it's such a demeaning view of women, certainly
of conservative women. So how the Heros campaign thinks that's
(12:56):
going to help them, Yeah, good luck with that eight
five five five two five five, Just like good luck
with the lies they're telling today about Trump saying that
he wanted guns pointed at Liz Cheney. You know, good
luck with those lies. Because if the Harris campaign, if
they think the key to victory right now is more Cheney,
(13:16):
linking themselves closer to Cheney. Then let him keep thinking that.
Let him keep thinking that, because you look at the poling.
You look at the poling. And one of the big
advantages President Trump has it doesn't get talked about a lot,
is is President Trump when it comes to Ukraine, because
he wants peace. He doesn't want open ended war. He
doesn't want an open ended commitment to war. So if
(13:38):
the Harris campaign wants to bet at all in the
last few days on a hawkish image, go for it.
Because there's not one sane person in America who thinks
the enemy is going to view Kamala Harris as strong,
Not one sane person in America. And every scene on
his person in America knows the enemy will view Donald
Trump as strong, and that will deter that will turbar
(14:01):
peace through strength. And you know what, it's not a theory.
He had those four years and this is what Theirs
campaign wants to ignore but can't get away from. He
had those four years, America experienced it. They don't have
to guess what he does in office. And those four
years were a lot better than these last four years
even with COVID. Stephen and Henderson Nevada. You're on the
(14:22):
dan kaplis. You'll welcome Stephen, Thank you, daand.
Speaker 8 (14:26):
I appreciate me on. I was at the Trump rally
yesterday and it is just a great day. It was
just in fact, I hated four to end. But the
least I called is that all these lives that have
been talked about Donald Trump and what he's done or
(14:47):
what he plans to do, that he's a fella and everything,
what would be the best way to get rid of
these zations? Because I have friends that I've worked with
back in North Carolina that he just goes crazy when
(15:09):
he hears about Trump. Is, you know, a fella and
he's done this back and all kinds of things, and
everything seems to be just just a lie.
Speaker 1 (15:19):
Right, But your friend's buying the lie? Is your concern?
Speaker 8 (15:22):
Yes, buying the line, and he keeps fomenting the lie,
you know, right. So I don't know how to I'd
like to get a list of all the hoaxes that
have been proven right and put them on a on
an ad saying here lies that have been disproven right.
President Trump's been in office.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
And I'm so glad you made this call, Stephen, because
I do think we all have a responsibility just in
our own lives when we have a chance. It could
just be one voter there, but that one vote, you know,
combined with a lot of other people turning one vote,
could really matter. So I think the overall approaches Listen,
if it's that individual friend and that individual issue, you know,
(16:06):
then I think it's a matter of just pulling together
the information, and there's a lot of it out there
to show what's really behind all of this and why
it's a scam and why it's likely to be overturned
on appeal. But more broadly, what I'd say, Stephen, More broadly,
what I'd say is that first, I think we have
to be realistic about the fact that we cannot convince
(16:27):
everyone of the truth. But in general, I think what
we need to keep coming back to is well stating
that they believe something that's proven false, is just making
the point that we don't have to guess at what
he's like in office. You know, we saw it and
it was better for you. Let's say your friend's name
is Bob. Bob, it was better for you. It was
(16:48):
better for your kids and then just go through those
points because that's something your friend lived and experienced and
he'll have to agree with.
Speaker 8 (16:59):
Yeah. I went to the Jimmy Carter Thames two and
saw the same thing. In fact, it was probably worse
because interest rates on housing. Yeah, that was I had
to buy.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
Yeah, that was my first vote. Who was your first
presidential vote?
Speaker 8 (17:24):
Actually it was the one before the former.
Speaker 1 (17:30):
Michigan Yeah, my first vix Yeah, Gerald Ford, my my
first presidential vote. My first presidential vote was Jimmy Carter
le start their dad.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
I was a student.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
It hit that, Well, I'm an Hones's guy. I was
a CU student. I was eighteen years old. I had
my green shirt that had the white Jimmy big smile.
That's all it had on the shirt that was the
Jimmy Carter shirt, and I proudly voted for Jimmy Carter.
Hard to believe.
Speaker 8 (18:01):
Well, uh yeah, well I'm sure a couple of years
back to that.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
Yeah yeah, oh yeah, yeah, no, you're right, you're right.
But hey, Steve, really appreciate the call. Thank you for that,
and thank you. I'm so impressed that you're sitting there
thinking about, Hey, how do I change my friend's mind,
particularly friends in swing states, because I do think, and
it's not too late, right, every vote counts. I do
(18:26):
think that's what it's going to take. And I think
a lot of people have been doing that. Good on you, Steve,
you're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6 (18:39):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 4 (18:42):
Janie was so he said, I really want to thank you.
He said, Now, I'm so glad that I actually endorsed you.
It's amazing, but that you would do this. And I
didn't speak to him about it, but then, you know,
go a couple of years forward ago now, and I
don't blame him for sticking with his daughter, but his
(19:03):
daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb.
Speaker 3 (19:08):
She's a radical warhawk.
Speaker 4 (19:10):
Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine
barrel shooting at her.
Speaker 3 (19:14):
Okay, let's see how she feels about it.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Clearly Trump is referring to putting her into war. And
Trump says she's so quick to send other people's children
and spouses to war. That's clearly what he's saying. So
this is one of the most despicable lies that we've
seen from the left. And obviously we've seen some whoppers,
(19:37):
right starting with the Russia hoax. This law fair by
the way, Ryan, And this is one of the questions
I have for folks today, one of the fun questions
eight five to five four zero five eight two five
five text dam five seven seven three nine. Why are
we hearing anything about Donald Trump convicted felon quote unquote interesting?
Where has all of that gone? From what we can
(20:01):
see right now? There's nothing out there, and there's a
little something somewhere, I'm sure in a channel, but there's
no real effort from Harris to raise that, to hammer
on that, to hit on that. Why not? They must
know it.
Speaker 9 (20:14):
It is not working, It is not polling well, it
is not bullying her candidacy.
Speaker 1 (20:20):
What we see her focusing on Dan largely.
Speaker 9 (20:22):
And she tried to spin another Donald Trump comment into
this about him wanting to protect women. She's trying to
spin that into an abortion argument, and that's where a
lot of her focus has been on protecting the rights
of women to control their own bodies. That seems to
be the message that they're harping on here down the line.
Speaker 1 (20:38):
Yeah, but they're not hitting on convicted, not at all.
I think it just proves what we said at the time.
What we said at the time of that bogus conviction
was that first of all, Americans could see what was happening,
could see it was banana republic stuff only brought because
he was a political opponent, should have never been in court,
and that a lot of Americans who didn't like Trump
(21:00):
would vote for him just because they don't want to
be a banana republic. So and then I think you've
seen other pluses for Trump in this. So, yeah, they're
not talking about that at all, now are they. Here's
Jim Acosta.
Speaker 10 (21:12):
I mean, you and I both know at Lance. You
know this doing things happened late in the camp. I
mean I covered the two thousand and four presidential campaign.
I covered John Carry and there was an Osama bin
Laden video that came out the weekend before the election,
and there was a lot of analysis that said that
that move votes at the very end.
Speaker 1 (21:28):
So Donald Trump.
Speaker 10 (21:29):
Talking about executing Liz Cheney, and let's just be clear,
when you talk about nine barrels, I'm sorry for all
the folks out there who want to dance on the.
Speaker 6 (21:38):
Head of a pen.
Speaker 10 (21:39):
That is what he is talking about, an execution fantasy.
Speaker 1 (21:41):
But you know what, President Trump, I make this offer
right now, and I don't make it lightly because not
to be a jerk, but my time is very valuable.
I will represent you for free in a defamation action
against Jim Acosta and CNN. I will do it for
it's free, that is liable, that is actionable defamation. I
(22:06):
don't think. I don't think a Costa is going to
be able to hide behind opinion on that. So we'll see.
Please President Trump take me up on that. And I understand. Listen,
I understand that the New York Times standard when it
comes to defamation of a public figure is a high standard.
But it's still a standard. It's not as if there's
no standard. And President Trump, please take me up on that.
(22:28):
Jim Acosta needs to be sued for that.
Speaker 10 (22:31):
Karen, your thoughts on how this could move the rays,
But what it shows you on the part of Acosta
is he's freaking.
Speaker 1 (22:39):
It shows you real desperation. I understand CNN's putting out
some poles now that shows Harris up fifty in this
swing state and that swinging. Yeah, I exaggerate, but they're
putting out polls that shows Harris with healthy leads in
some of the swing states. There are a whole lot
of other poles out there, far more historically reliable than
CNN that show that is not the case. I think
(22:59):
they're free. They are freaking out because it's this close
now and there is a very real chance that Donald
Trump is going to get that second term. And that's
how you end up with a guy like Acosta engaging
in that kind of defamation. One quick question here on
the name take me up.
Speaker 3 (23:17):
I think you should.
Speaker 9 (23:18):
That's a tremendous offer, cause, like you said, you don't
make it lightly and you don't make them off. But
the numbers here, Dan, if you had to bet, and
this is just for the sake of conversation, but where
they stand right now, Let's just say these swing states
where on real clear politics the ruling average has Harris
plus zero point three in Wisconsin, Trump plus zero point
(23:38):
three in Pennsylvania, Harris plus zero point eight in Michigan,
and Trump plus zero point nine in Nevada. Let's just
take those were all within not only the margin of air,
but within one point.
Speaker 6 (23:50):
What are the odds of one of the.
Speaker 9 (23:51):
Three following scenarios, which would you bet on that they
all trend and skewing Trump's favor on election night, that
they stay right where they are and they're exactly accurate
this youw and Harris is favor, they go in her
direction on election night.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Overall, I think they're going to fall in Trump's favor
a great and overall, I think Trump is going to
win and win big. That's my personal belief. And we
can get into the reasons why, but it goes far
beyond the polling. It comes back to the fundamentals. It
comes back to what I started with the day that
Biden was deposed and Harris installed, and that is America
(24:28):
is not going to elect a far left San Francisco radical.
Then you get to Kamala Harris herself and all of
her obvious fatal flaws, and I believe we're going to
see a rejection of Kamala Harris. We're going to see
a rejection of Kamala Harris. And then you get to
other fundamentals. Ryan, We've never had this before. We've never
(24:49):
had a candidate who didn't get a single vote in
the primaries parachuting late. And that's another reason I believe
she's going to lose. Because you don't have the credibility,
you don't have the connection with the American people that
comes from winning a contested primary, and then you're going
to have You're going to have a resentment vote. You're
(25:11):
going to have a resentment vote on the part. And
I think primarily older people who are Biden's supporters are
leaning toward Biden, who are going to resent the way
that he was overthrown in this undemocratic coup, and you're
going to have that working against her. I think there
are so many factors before you even get to the
positives about President Trump. You have Harris. If the Democrats
(25:35):
had been smart and it picked somebody other than Harris
who could have distanced themselves from this administration, right, But
they didn't. You know, Biden's stuck them with Harris because
he wants her to lose, because he wants the people
who humiliated him to fail. So they're stuck with the
candidate who is as closely tied as they can be
to an administration that the American people do not approve
(25:59):
of percent the American people like the direction the country's going,
and they had to pick the one candidate who could
not separate from Biden. So I could go on with
ten or fifteen others. But for all these reasons, Ryan,
I believe Trump's going to win, and he's going to
win comfortably. If he does lose, which is possible, it's
possible there could be, you know, enough of the American
(26:20):
people could say just don't like him personally, not willing
to go there, and then vote against their own self
interest that could happen. If he loses, I think it
will be a very close loss. And if he wins,
as I expect him to do, I think you're going
to see America speak very loudly on that. One other thing, Ryan,
And I think if you had to list out the
(26:41):
fundamentals that most favor Trump and people talk about, you know,
the stealth vote, I think the the sleeper issue of
this cycle by far, and it's going to help offset
the abortion vote. In the Democrats. Favor is men in
(27:02):
women's locker rooms, men in women's sports, boys in girls'
locker rooms, boys in girls' sports. I think you're going
to have enough women who would normally vote against Trump
and maybe be inclined to vote against Trump on the
abortion issue. And I'm talking particularly about moms and suburban moms.
You're going to have enough of those women either shift
(27:24):
to Trump or stay home and not support Harris because
of this bizarre, illogical, flat out dangerous commitment to allowing
biological men into girls' bathrooms and showers and sports. I
think that is going to be the sleeper issue of
(27:45):
this cycle and is going to help push this to
Trump in a way that many don't see coming eight
five five for zero five A two five five. Thanks
for asking, and when we come back, find out where
Ryan's final predictions are and hopeful full of years eight
five four zero five eight two five five. Why do
you think we haven't heard anything from the left lately
(28:06):
on Trump convicted felon You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 6 (28:13):
And now back to the Dan Tapla Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
I was talking earlier about how my first boat at
age eighteen was for Jimmy Carter. I was a student,
maybe a sophomore up at CU and this guy's dad.
I had a picture, a drawing of this guy's dad
on the wall of my room. I think for all
four years of college or however many years was.
Speaker 11 (28:38):
I smell a landslide on Tuesday.
Speaker 3 (28:49):
Oh, I've been.
Speaker 11 (28:50):
On the road for nineteen months now.
Speaker 12 (28:53):
And a little over, a little, a little over, thank.
Speaker 11 (29:11):
You, thank you Magot.
Speaker 1 (29:16):
Obviously RFK Junior. And then interesting text, Dan, I'm with you.
I think Trump will win. I've never seen so many
Colorados publicly supporting Trump in the neighborhood, shopping stores and online.
It's not socially forbidden anymore. Interesting point, Let's go to
the phone lines. Let's start in four counts. Can I
even imagine how pretty that is today? Joby, you're on
(29:37):
the Dan Capitis.
Speaker 8 (29:38):
You're welcome, Thanks, good job, Yes, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
Hi, Joby. Yeah, we're on a seven second delay, So
if you could, in case I say anything forbidden by law,
can you turn that down a little bit in the background.
Speaker 2 (29:56):
There we go. My question was My question was, is
that Donald Trump wins, the vice president has to certify.
Speaker 5 (30:05):
The electoral votes?
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Correct?
Speaker 1 (30:07):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (30:09):
Is there any chase she would not do that?
Speaker 1 (30:11):
No, my opinion obviously, Yeah, Yeah, that was my quest. Yeah,
because because in the end, Joby, there's not going to
be any evidence, there's not going to be any evidence
that somehow there was anything illegal done to try to
help Trump write, anything illegal done in his favor. It's
(30:35):
just hard to imagine there'd be any evidence of that
anywhere A because it's it's almost certain not to happen, right,
So yeah, appreciate, appreciate the question. Whereas we had any
McCarthy on a couple of days ago, the Biden administration,
they're not even trying to hide it anymore that they
(30:55):
went all the way to the Supreme Court to try
to force Virginia to keep on their voting roles. People
who have admitted to the State of Virginia that they
cannot legally vote at These are the same people who
have opened up the southern border and allowed all these
people in. So you can't blame folks for being concerned
when it comes to the left. I don't think there's
(31:17):
any factual basis for being concerned when it comes to
the right, not on any kind of broad basis. Mark
and Florence, you're on the dan Caplis show.
Speaker 6 (31:26):
Welcome.
Speaker 8 (31:27):
Oh howdy. I know everybody's tired of hearing about election denial.
This is not the election denial. A friend of mine says, Oh.
Speaker 2 (31:34):
Look, Jurney. General Barr said, there's not enough election fraud
to overturn the election.
Speaker 8 (31:41):
But how much election fraud do you want to have
in local.
Speaker 2 (31:45):
Elections, A little dab of election fraud can tip the election.
Speaker 1 (31:50):
Well, it's also a cancer that grows. Once you accept
anything less than perfection, it's just going to grow. That's
why I'm with you. Hey, I have not seen evidence
of a enough election fraud and twenty to change the outcome.
And I've said that repeatedly. But if there's one thing
in life we have to have zero tolerance for, it's
any level of election fraud. It needs to be a bipartisan,
(32:12):
full throated, ferocious commitment, and I don't think we have
that from the Democrats, right, Bingo And yeah, thanks, Mark,
appreciate the call. Bingo, Amigo, haven't heard that one on
the show before.
Speaker 8 (32:26):
I like it.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
Jim in Denver, you're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 2 (32:29):
Welcome, Hi, Dan. Our conversation got and prematurely.
Speaker 8 (32:35):
Yesterday, and you wanted me to call back.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
Yes, thank you.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
I do want to thank you for giving me the
time and space to make my points. Yeah, and I
am very concerned. I hear Trump repeating the same rhetoric
that motivated a violent attack last year, and when he
says the only way I can lose this election is
(32:59):
if the dem crads cheat and steal another one. I
just think that's really dangerous and reckless.
Speaker 1 (33:07):
Do you think he believes it. Let's start with that, Jim, Yeah,
I think he does.
Speaker 6 (33:16):
Yeah, I do too.
Speaker 1 (33:17):
I think President Trump believes that to his course. So
we'll start with that, and then we go to the
next point, my friend, which is when we see some
of the things that have been happening. For example, Trump
just won in Pennsylvania. The judge ruled Trump, You're right,
they illegally shut down this polling place in this area
(33:37):
where you have a lot of support. So Trump won
that case. Something illegal was being done to try to
hurt him at the polls. And then Virginia, he won
in Virginia in the US Supreme Court because of Biden
administration wanted all these people who admit they can't legally
vote to stay on voting rolls, So can you blame
them for being suspicious?
Speaker 2 (34:00):
But Dan, I did hear. I'm not an expert on
what happened in Virginia, but I just heard in passing
that Virginia had a law that you couldn't kick anyone
off the rolls within ninety days before an election, and
that this that the lower courts upheld you know, that restriction,
(34:21):
and that was only when it got appealed. So I mean,
this is a you know, courts do disagree about this,
so certainly it's.
Speaker 1 (34:31):
You know, but in that example, Jim, which is a
really big deal, right, In that example, no, the US
Supreme Court said no, under that Virginia law, under these circumstances,
you could kick people off. But that aside, why do
you think the Biden administration was so insistent that all
these people who admit it they were here illegally and
(34:53):
not eligible to vote, should be able to vote.
Speaker 2 (34:57):
I think it was the scarier principle that's say, an
election that's being administered by Republicans and Republicans state.
Speaker 1 (35:07):
You're welcome to hang on. I'd love to finish the conversation.
You're on the Dancapra Show.