November 8, 2024 • 39 mins
The guys discuss the problem that 65 Million Americans voted for The Machine
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Well, we're going to be talking about this one for
a long, long long time, aren't we, folks. General good day.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
The new day is done.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
We've got a little bit. I don't know about you,
but the way I've processed everything the last few days
is I've kind of stayed away from the news. I've
stayed away from news as much as I can. I'm
really kind of sick, and most of us should be
sick of all the politics and campaign stuff. So it's
okay to take a day or two or few days
(00:31):
off a little, a little embargo tech detalks. However, it
doesn't stop my friends from sending the memes on all
the text threads. It is just a florry, just a
flurry of.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
The phenomenal memes.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
The John Wick and the squirrel, so many great memes.
Speaker 2 (00:49):
You killed John Wicks, squirrel.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
We are going to be talking about this one for
a long long time. Kamala had a bigger, crowded or
concession speech than any rally. Light late was she late,
likely hungover?
Speaker 2 (01:02):
And no celebrities there too.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
I want to I do want to go back and look,
did she win states? Only states that don't require voter
ID the look I want to look at these states
that she did win and how many of them don't
require voter ID. We'll get that answer back maybe our
next show. Other question, how did Biden get eighty one
(01:26):
million votes? How to get fifteen million more than she
did in this election?
Speaker 2 (01:32):
Interesting?
Speaker 1 (01:35):
And the other thing that that's crystallizing. There are no
blue states, just twenty big cities.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
That's true. That's true. You look at even New York.
In California, it's land area, it's ninety five percent red.
Speaker 1 (01:50):
We don't have blue states. We have twenty big cities.
And we as American people. And I've made no bones
about this. I've voted for Democrats and Republicans. I consider
myself to be independent, more libertarian and conservative than any
(02:11):
party ideology.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
I just.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
I've still am surprised that the other side is surprised.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
I'm pleasantly surprised that they're surprised.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
Yeah, so what has surprised me, What has surprised me
is the electoral map. You look at it and you
see twenty big cities in a red country. Number two.
If you just put that map up, the final electoral
(02:47):
map up in the electoral college, and you say, what
does that represent you don't define it, label it. You go, well,
it looks like there's been something hitting America, crossing the oceans.
You know, if you look at the eastern seaboard.
Speaker 2 (03:04):
Up, it looks like a meteor strike, like a several
a meteor storm hit and there's about twenty meteors that
hit all over the United States.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Now I'm not talking about the cities now, I'm just saying,
if you look at the Electoral College oh map, you've
got blue all on the left coast, right on fifty
sixty percent of the east coast, and some blue streaks
up from the southern border New Mexico, Colorado. And you say,
what do you think that map represents? I'd say, I
(03:35):
don't know. Like looks like there's some sort of invasion
of species of you know, is that like a some
sort of virus that came in on the coast and
came up through the southern border.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Like a marine invader.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
It looks like that.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
And if the in fact, if the country was ever
going to be assaulted by a kinetic war in addition
to the ICBMs, you would see the coasts take the
brunt and the southern border.
Speaker 2 (04:06):
Well not the southeastern part of the coast because all
those fellows are armed down.
Speaker 1 (04:09):
There, Well you would that's where the invasions would be.
So it appears if it looks like an invasion map.
It looks like an invasion map. It also looks like
the rest of the country the interior is under siege.
Under siege defines siege.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
That's when you are having a military action against a
defensible position and you're surrounding it and trying to starve
them out.
Speaker 1 (04:39):
Looks like a siege.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
In some ways.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
Yes, it's a concern. I'm just you know, these are
just things that I've digesting, or.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
We could be besieging them. Frankly, you know we've driven
them all the way to the coast.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
I don't, but I thought about that general looks it
didn't originate in the center and spread out like Americanism did.
An Americanism, the American exceptionalism. If you looked at the
map there, you're going to see it spread from the
basically from the heartland the frontiers historically.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
You're absolutely correct. I'm just saying what it could look like.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
I think it appears as though we it's an invasion,
and it appears as though the red interior is in
a state of siege, and there are no blue states,
just twenty big cities. Now, no president, we now have learned,
(05:38):
has won a second term in office after an intervening term. Correctland, Yeah,
I don't think. We don't think we ever talked about
Grover Cleveland on the show and any of our history stuff.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
I've heard a lot of people say he'll be the
second non conservative, non consecutive president.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
I will say this general in thirty years of trying
cases to juries, those twelve people get it right well
over ninety percent of the time two sides presenting their
arguments to the jury. But here's what makes a jury
different than say a twelve person committee. They are instructed
by the judge to treat their deliberations and decision as
(06:18):
if it was buying a home or who to marry.
The phrase we use is the most important of your
personal affairs. That's what makes twelve people go from being
a committee to a jury in a criminal case. And
they're instructed by the judge very specifically to follow the
(06:43):
evidence that was presented. What the jury doesn't see are
the evidentiary safeguards that keep highly prejudicial material away.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
From them and unreliable material and unreliable.
Speaker 1 (06:56):
Those are the rules of evidence. Those are the filters.
And the rules of evidence are beautiful they you know,
they except for when they cut against you. But the
rules of evidence have been honed and honed and honed
over centuries to keep highly prejudicial information away from a jury,
inflammatory emotion matter away from a jury, nonprobe, and of
(07:17):
irrelevant hearsay, depending on your judge, yeah, hearsay, which is
inherently unreliable.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
Of course. The new rule is, if the prosecutor wants
it in, it comes in.
Speaker 1 (07:30):
What we lack in America right now. The American people
acted as a jury, and they treated this election as
though it was of the most important of their personal affairs,
because it is, and it was, and it absolutely was.
What we missed and that we need or to get
(07:51):
back to, is we need the rules of evidence to
something along the lines of the rules of evidence, to
call out the bs, to keep the bs out, the lies,
the highly prejudicial stuff, the fake stuff, because that fake stuff.
If the press, which should act like the judge and
(08:14):
an arbiter of what's relevant and probative and real and truthful,
a press that does its job, the institution of a
free press that does its job is like a judge
keeping out irrelevant evidence or irrelevant matter, but also calling
(08:36):
out the bs. That's the cross examination piece. We don't
have that with our press. Our press is not calling
out the lies. Our press is not interested in the
truth as much as they are in clicks, and so
(08:57):
our jury can be easily swayed if the jury can
be easily swayed if you have a judge that interprets
the rules of evidence in favor of the other side.
And that's what the press is done. But the American
people figured it out. We still need to get the
institution of the press back. We need to root out
(09:22):
you really need to root out. And this is tough
for me to say as a constitutional conservative, but we
really need to call out the people that enabled the lies.
Speaker 2 (09:31):
Well, expose them, but then move on and the press.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
And to prosecute the press. You don't prosecute exactress, but
you absolutely prosecute government officials and government bureaucrats and other
adults in the room who know better that knowingly conspired
against the American people to lie, cheat, and steal the
(09:58):
ten sixteen likely real one. In twenty and no efforts
to get to the bottom of it in the last
four years. Hey, I'm Attorney Brad Koffel. That is Attorney
Eric Wilson Snarkmaster General. You're listening to for the defense
of the American people, and we certainly want to think
(10:20):
and acknowledge children Automotive group there in Delaware for your
Chevy GMC products, fantastic American made products, and fantastic family.
One store, family runs it, that's been in the family
for a couple several generations. Now they are easy to
get to. Two seventy to three point fifteen. I'm sorry,
(10:43):
twenty three. Either way you go to either way, go
north are obviously come down south on twenty three and
catch them. They're in southern Delaware County, beautiful place of
Ryan Gil and his dad are running that place, and
they've got fantastic team and a lot of the folks
down in the mechanics in their long time, so good
folks starting to get to know them. General, what made
(11:05):
twenty twenty four election different than twenty twenty which we
were told is the most important in twenty sixteen was
the most important, and so on. What made this one different?
Speaker 2 (11:15):
It's anchored in what you were just saying before the
break about the mainstream media and how we need to
do something about how leftists they've all become. Well we have.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
I'm gonna say I'm not just sarying they're leftists. We
can deal with honest political dialogue, we can debate honest discourse.
But the fourth estate's not doing.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
Its job because they're leftists. They're not They're supposed to
be there to present what they believe is the truth,
and instead they're presenting what they believe is in doctrination
and what's best for everybody, And they are going to
censor stories that don't match up with Kamala Harris or
whoever is running for the left's positions, and they're going
(12:03):
to keep that information from coming out, just like they
did the Hunter laptop before twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
I don't know if that's leftist. I think the right
can be accused of that as well. I think it's
more of you're in power, you want to stand power,
and once you're once you're a news outlet and you've
got your deep connections to the new administration, and you know,
there's a sense of pride having those deeply placed sources.
Whether it's a Democrat in the White House, Democrats hold
(12:31):
in Congress or vice versa. It's people that want to
you need to stay relevant and you want to stay
in power. What happens to MSNBC, You know they're actually
with Trump in I don't know, I don't do better.
I get finished good. I don't mean interrupt you.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
No, that's fine. People have made the decision that the CBS,
NBC and ABC Evening News at six thirty Troika is
no longer a viable place used to get accurate media.
And they have gone on. They've moved on. They haven't
tried to sanction them, they haven't tried to boycott them.
(13:08):
They've just changed the channel and they've gone to the internet.
They've gone to Twitter. Now. In twenty twenty, Twitter was
owned by that Jack Smith guy or whatever his name was,
the founder and he's a prosecutor. And you're right, I
forget what his name was. Dorsey. Yeah, Dorsey was owned
by Dorsey and they were famous for shut they shut
(13:31):
down President Trump's account. But now we have a new
person involved who wants to use Twitter as a free
speech platform. And now we have that's where a lot
of people get their news. They get their news from
content creators on the Internet who are there and will
(13:52):
present accurate information to them, and that's where they get
their news. They can't censor the stories anymore.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
My concern is that highly educated, highly educated men and
women and folks who maybe didn't go to college but
have high degrees of common sense are combination of both.
You don't need to go to college or have a
(14:19):
law degree to know when something is unconstitutional. The definition
of constitutionality that I would teach good law school students
is is that fundamentally fair when you have, when you
when you My concern is general, and it's a bigger
concern today than it was before the election. There are
(14:40):
men and women who should know better with the censorship
of a sitting president on a social media platform, who
didn't get it, who didn't get it. I understand, I understand,
I do understand the people that loathe Donald Trump, and
certainly only the cultural issues that are that were made high,
(15:06):
that were made relevant in the political sphere that really
aren't relevant tony ninety five percent of Americans. My concern
is when people who should know better, tolerated, didn't speak out,
or worse, laughed about enabled the press silencing citizens.
Speaker 2 (15:28):
And expecting us to believe all this. There's a line
from the Clint Eastwood film The Outlaw Josie Wales when
the actor John Vernon says, Senator, don't piss down my
back and tell me it's raining. And we can clearly
see that when when word Salad Harris comes out and
talks about how her campaign is based about joy, people
(15:51):
just turn that off.
Speaker 1 (15:53):
Number Another thing I want to link up to the
failure of the press and the people who should know better,
who continue to listen to the same media outlets is
once the Russia collusion hoax was exposed, they still didn't care.
They still didn't I say they. I don't mean the
(16:16):
press anymore. I'm saying the people. The people.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
But there's a lot of people who still don't know
that's a hoax. They've never even heard it question because
all they do is watch their television on certain select outlets.
If you go to MSNBC, they'll never tell you that
that was found to be a hoax. The fine people
of Charlottesville hoax, the inject bleach into your body hoax,
(16:40):
all of these hoaxes. Most most Democrats don't know that
those are hoaxes, proven hoaxes.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
I disagree. I think, I disagree general, I think enough.
I think enough Liberals Democrats understand that Donald Trump was framed,
set up, uh, the FBI was all over him, and
during the transition Flynn got taken down. The weaponization of
(17:08):
the Department of Justice for political prosecution, law professor had
alarming but still no outcry.
Speaker 2 (17:17):
Oh, there was an outcry among us.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
No from the people who should know better, the people
that live in these twenty big cities.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
It doesn't fit their worldview.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
They didn't care because it was Donald Trump. They didn't
care about stepping on the First Amendment, about deplatforming as
a sitting president. They didn't care about the fact that
the Russia collusion was a total crime committed on a court,
(17:46):
a court and Congress and the people.
Speaker 2 (17:49):
As long as it's against their enemies.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
Those people in those twenty big cities don't care about that.
They didn't care that COVID was extended for male in balance.
They didn't care that we stepped into an abyss of
horrible uncertainty of the electoral process. That's what these people
(18:11):
are still around. Yes, and they're in these big cities
and these big cities are growing. They don't care. And
my and my real concern is it's not just Donald Trump.
They're worried about getting in the power. They're gonna they're
gonna continue to do the same thing. They just don't care.
These are foundational American principles that make us the last
(18:37):
free land mass, and those principles are in their way.
It's alarming to me, It really is alarming to me.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
And we're told that instead we need to be focusing
on transgender rights. Okay, that's a conversation that that is
a long conversation from America. For my lgbt Q friends
and family, that is a conversation that needs to that
it will happen, But that's a long conversation. You got
(19:10):
a long way to get a lot of America around
on that and also with gender, that's a long conversation.
History may make history, who knows where this goes. But
that's not something that you just flip a switch, which
you did. They just flipped a switch on us. Just
some things that are just the things that have happened
over the last five, six, seven years should shock the
(19:34):
conscience of every American and and we we still don't
have enough Americans who understand what's happening to them in
our country. All right, we're back.
Speaker 2 (19:55):
General.
Speaker 1 (19:56):
It feels like we're one miscalculation away from a full scale,
full skill world in the Rain.
Speaker 2 (20:02):
I doubt it now because I think nobody, even the
Biden administration.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
Pardon me, pardon me, I forgot my my product of that.
Had Kamala and Wall, had Harris Walls won, it would
would we not feel like we're one miscalculation away from
a full scale, full scale war.
Speaker 2 (20:20):
No, we're one calculation away. It wouldn't be a miscalculation.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
Another four years of this border policy had Harris Waltz won,
and the electoral map wouldn't be able to save us.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
That's very true. Think about that, and that was the goal,
wasn't it.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
Think about that, another four years of this border policy
and the electoral map probably wouldn't be able to save us.
Another four years of Biden, Harris Wall's, Obama Pelosi, whatever
trends of government handouts and the ability to actually save
(20:58):
money disappears. It's the disappearing. It's disappeared for a lot
of working Americans already. But another four years of that policy,
those policies, and we end up with an eventual junk
bond status of the nation's bonds. The moment that happens,
literally some algorithm that's set up to trigger a massive
(21:21):
sell off of American bonds in Asia overnight, then Europe,
and by the time we wake up on the East Coast,
it's a total fire sale. It would happen that quickly.
These are very real, existential concerns that I'm afraid millions
of Americans who didn't vote for Trump or didn't vote
at all, you're risking. And for the millions that voted
(21:42):
Democrat other than TDS, it was very real, very personal
concerns and legitimate concerns. I should add legitimate concerns. State
laws banning consensual homosexual sex were not found unconstitutional until
two thousand and three.
Speaker 2 (22:00):
But they have been unconstitutional ever since.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
But lg that community that makes up a large, a
growing percentage of the American population, and I don't think
that most of most Americans are certainly don't have issues
with LGBA.
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Bowers versus Hardwick was decided long before two thousand and three.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
Two thousand and three, I'll get to you on the case,
but I'm talking about the last sodomy law.
Speaker 2 (22:32):
No, the Georgia asadomy laws were found to be unconstitutional
and Bowers versus Hardwick, which I believe was in an
early nineteen eighties case. I read it in law school
when I was in That was ninety three for me.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
Yeah, I'm gonna look this case up in a second
in two thousand, but I know we had. I was
shocked when I looked at the state laws that were
still in the books that were declared unconstitutional until very recently.
For instance, same sex marriage bands were not declared unconstitutional
until twenty fifteen, and that was a five to four decision. Okay,
(23:06):
the LGB Hilbertfeld decision. Yeah, the queer community. I think
that's what they prefer to be called the queer community.
The LGB community has legitimate concerns. Okay, do you agree
with it or not?
Speaker 2 (23:21):
They do, right, I think they're imagined.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
But dude, up until twenty fifteen, there were states that
banned same sex marriage. That was nine years ago.
Speaker 2 (23:33):
And now we have a leader that is in favor
of same sex marriage. When Barack Obama was elected, he
was against same sex marriage. When Donald Trump was elected,
he was four.
Speaker 1 (23:44):
It and the biggest issue right now, laws restricting a
woman's right to choose whether to carry pregnancy to full
term are now open with the reversal Roe v.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Wade.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
So the cultural issues that were driving the emotions of
the Democrats and the mood of the country, the LGB
community and abortion are legitimate concerns.
Speaker 2 (24:11):
I would take a different view of that because now
that it's been left to the states, a lot of
this fear mongering about how they're going to make abortion illegal.
People say, well, they've gotten rid of Roe versus Wade.
But this is strange. I'm here in California and I
can still get an abortion. This is strange. I'm here
in Ohio.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
I can still get concerns. I'm telling you. The very
first word I heard twenty was from my twenty five
year old daughter. It was a lesbian who lives in Utah.
Very happy, loving, strange to be living in Utah right,
very concerned. Dad, what does this mean for the queer community?
Speaker 2 (24:52):
And I would tell her it means we're going to
leave you alone.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
And I texted Bernie and I said, Bernie, what do
I tell my daughter? He says, tell her that we're
going to make sure that every American's taken care of.
We're not taking away any rights from the queer community,
or from women, or from minorities. So these are real.
(25:22):
The Republican Party is going to have to figure out
how to keep their state legislatures moderated. I just don't.
My concern is that the Republican Party, when they have
both houses and their states, are going to start passing
more controversial cultural laws that offend the libertarian in me
(25:48):
and most and many many millions of Americans. And the
Republican Party already has one albatross around its neck, and
that's abortion. It's kind of moving away from that. But
they will be fine. The left, the far left, we'll
be finding other cultural political issues to hang around the
Republican's neck. If they're smart, which they are, and they're savvy,
(26:13):
which they are, they're going to figure it out. And
if I was them, I would be figuring out a
way to get legislation passed in Mississippi and being, you know,
something attacking same sex marriage again and see if there's
another way they can get that shimmyed up to the
Supreme Court to hang that around the neck of the
(26:34):
of the Republican Party or the Republican Party needs to
be more clearly defined these cultural issues and let the
other side no, look, we're not rolling back any rights. Okay,
we're not. No, there's not on the platform. No one's
asking for that. But the Democrat Party did get hijacked
(26:59):
by the juice box mafia. These twenty major cities in
the United States, young, highly educated, big city board rich
twenty and thirty somethings who have the luxury of time
and technology to pump their issues into mainstream America. Cultural
issues that are either irrelevant right now because we're on
(27:19):
the brink of World War III, we have real inflation
that is going to continue to grow, but cultural issues
that are either politically irrelevant right now or repugnant to
the rest of America. The Me Too movement led to
cancel culture, the BLM reignited the racial debates. DEI led
(27:40):
to guaranteed equity instead of guaranteed equality, and the trans
rights community, well, that's when it's still hard for nine
out of ten of Americans to understand, if not more,
that was just too much too soon for historically very
conservative America.
Speaker 2 (27:56):
The trans rights community views it as their rights to
dress up in women's clothing and then go to elementary
schools and read stories to children. That isn't right.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
I'm not debating, I'm not taking a side. I'm just
I'm alerting the Republican Party that the weaknesses of the
party are going to be exposed, and it's the cultural
issues that are going to watch, the new cultural issues
(28:27):
that get pumped into the atmosphere by the juice box mafia.
Harris didn't lose the election because her campaign was mismanaged.
It was the first opportunity for the American people to
speak in four years. That's what I think. I think
the jury had its mind made up in twenty twenty two,
(28:49):
certainly twenty twenty three, but they didn't get the case
until November five.
Speaker 2 (28:54):
That's exactly right. This was not a miscalculation on the
part of the Kamala mafia. This is a fundamental rejection.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
I want to at the end of the next segment,
I want to play a fun, little exercise game. It
might be fun for us and nobody else.
Speaker 2 (29:12):
I can always use exercise.
Speaker 1 (29:13):
What if Donald Trump lost Farren Square in twenty twenty
What if he'd not lost, Rather, what if he'd not
lost and he won in twenty twenty, we would have
a Republican in the White House in twenty twenty. Let's
(29:33):
talk about what that twenty twenty four looks like. We
all talking about it got stolen. Well, let's talk about
what if he'd won.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
Where would we be? Right now?
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Right, final segment. And if you or a family member
loved one have an unwanted government intrusion in the form
of a search warrant or rest warrant someone's under investigation,
you get arrested. O case too big, note, case too small?
That general and I we are for rent the.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
Law mules, rented law mules.
Speaker 1 (30:04):
How's your law mule? Is it watered up? Ready to go?
Speaker 2 (30:08):
He likes to be called a burrow.
Speaker 1 (30:10):
Now mine's an ass. He had a spring and his
step the last few days. We will go to any
of the county courthouses. There's seventy three, will go to fifteen.
Speaker 2 (30:20):
We won't.
Speaker 1 (30:21):
Now, mule don't like people laughing at him, and well done.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
He gets the crazy idea. You're laughing at him.
Speaker 1 (30:27):
All right, So let's assume let's just give the Republicans
what they wanted, which was Trump one in twenty twenty.
Now it's twenty twenty four. Trump is not running. Of course,
he's turned out who's running for the Republicans and Democrats
in twenty twenty four? Had Trump won, had Trump one,
(30:51):
who do you think would have been at the top
of the ticket in twenty twenty four for both parties?
Speaker 2 (30:58):
Go let me preface this. I do think that the
twenty twenty election that was stolen from Trump, and I
thank god it was because it exposed so many rhino Republicans.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
I maintimes for a reason. I tell my kids this
all the time.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
Yes, and you know who would have been running. It
would have been Mike Pence, one of the world's biggest rhinos.
He had not yet been exposed as a rhino.
Speaker 1 (31:18):
Well, whoa, whoa, Okay, go ahead, oh here you go.
But I disagreed to Mike. Mike Pence had enough political
capital to make it to twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2 (31:25):
Well he would have. He would have even had to
expend any but he wasn't yet exposed as a rhino.
He was the natural choice because he would have been
the successor to Trump. Everyone would have thought that he
agreed with Trump everything. Everybody would have thought that we
would not be going back to business as usual. It
would have been business as usual again, and all of
(31:48):
the Trump people had been gone, and now Trump has
had his eyes open, we would not have seen the
legal political warfare that everybody. If you'd have told somebody
in twenty that President Trump was going to be prosecuted
for all these cases, you would have said tenfoil hat stuff.
But no, now we see, and none of those prosecutions
(32:09):
happened until he announced his candidacy for twenty twenty four.
By the way, I agree, one of the best things
that could have happened to us.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
Was to have been cheated in twenty t Oh no,
let's just let's look at ye. Let me let me
add on that. General, that's a great point. Had they
not put the country through two bogus impeach it impeachments
Rated mar A Lago prosecuted him in Fulton County for
conduct that occurred while he was president, rigged what two
cases against him in New York rolled out a welcome
Matt for a would be assassin and butler pah and in.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
The Trump International Golf course.
Speaker 1 (32:41):
Yeah uh so, yeah, yeah, that none of that would.
Speaker 2 (32:45):
Happen, and it's all been exposed.
Speaker 1 (32:47):
So you now think that Pence. Had Trump won in
twenty twenty, you think the Republicans would have been able
to the Republican candidate would have been Mike Pence.
Speaker 2 (32:57):
He would have wanted back to the Arty.
Speaker 1 (32:59):
Okay, okay, I disagree, but I'll give you my thought.
Speaker 2 (33:03):
Next.
Speaker 1 (33:03):
Who would be at the top of the Democrat ticket.
Speaker 2 (33:06):
It would still have been Kamala Harris because Biden would
not have stepped down. And if Pence had debated him, well,
I guess no, it wouldn't be Biden. I'm sorry, because
would have been Yeah, that that's a good question. Probably
knew some maybe probably knew some.
Speaker 1 (33:25):
Yeah, assuming Donald Trump won twenty twenty and he's in
the office now, Number one, would we have a Republican
in the White House in twenty twenty four? History says no, we.
Speaker 2 (33:40):
Would have had a Republican in name only. Yet if
this would have been this would have been George Herbert
Walker Bush. All again, we had Reagan from eighty eighty eight,
and then we would have had the downfall, which with
the Rhino.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
I think that the I think the Republican ticket would
have had Ronda Santis at the top. I think what
we saw with the hurricanes. America saw some leadership there,
kind of George W. Style. I think Ron DeSantis would
(34:15):
have made it through the primaries and been on top,
and I think Gavin Newsom would have been the Democrat.
So if it's to Santus Newsom in twenty twenty four,
that would have been interesting. But to say that the
Republicans were going to have be in power from twenty sixteen,
(34:39):
when sixteen, when twenty when twenty twenty four, that's a
tall order here in modern day of politics, that's a
tall order. But you know, we as we said, I don't
think happens for a reason. I can't think of any
candidate who was going to beat Trump in twenty twenty
(35:00):
four other than Barack and he was turned out. So general,
let's go back to where we started on this. We
still have a large chunk of the American population that
should know better, that was refusing to acknowledge the steals,
(35:24):
the attempted steals in sixteen, the Steel of twenty, the
phony impeachments, the infringement of the First Amendment, censorship, deep platforming.
They're refusing to acknowledge that that's my beef, and that's
the beef I have with people who I don't care
(35:46):
if you've voted who you've voted for. My point is,
if you know better and you don't speak up, you're
you're a bigger problem than the actual people perpetrating the crimes,
because the crimes can only be committed if the people
(36:09):
don't speak out. They are in tregues respect, want account of,
want prosecution, investigation, and prosecution.
Speaker 2 (36:17):
They are trees who have made a deal with the
lumberjack to be the last one chopped down. That's what
they are.
Speaker 1 (36:27):
It's it's a big deal. This is a big deal.
And this is where my brain gets stuck. Uh and
and really I lost my mind during COVID with the
mask mandate, which turns out the same people, it's the
same people were lined up against with the mass mandates, Like,
oh my god, are you kidding me? Now? You you
(36:49):
you still think that Trump was a Russian spy? You
still think that phone call was impeachable? You really think
that what Donald Trump said in DC on January sixth
led to a real political insurrection revolution as opposed to
(37:13):
expanded and ill advised, somewhat illegal criminal trespass.
Speaker 2 (37:19):
An unarmed insurrection.
Speaker 1 (37:21):
And you don't care about the censorship. And now these masks.
You all know these sittings are silly because you don't
wear them unless you're outside in public, but you still
don't say anything. Those are the same people that were
stuck with I don't know how we reach them.
Speaker 2 (37:43):
Do we need to?
Speaker 1 (37:45):
Yes, because these, as I said, this is a red
country with twenty growing cities, and it's these twenty major
cities that are very well could have swallowed the electoral
college map.
Speaker 2 (38:00):
Yes, but you're never going to convince a con man
that he's trying to conu.
Speaker 1 (38:05):
Well, thank god, there were enough men and women awake
who don't traditionally vote Republican, Black men, Hispanic men, Hispanic women,
and your blue collar rank and file, they're awake. Can
(38:26):
you know who they are? Those are your common sense Americans?
And you know who I want in America? I want more.
I want more. Give me more immigrants from countries that
love America.
Speaker 2 (38:45):
And who are running from socialism.
Speaker 1 (38:46):
Yeah, give us those people. Our country was built on
the backs of these people, Scotch, Irish, Eastern European, Mediterranean,
the North Atlantic regions. Now we're getting more, you know,
Latin America. Uh, the folks from the African nations. They
(39:11):
need to they need to up their game here a
little bit. You're gonna if you're Muslim in America, you're
gonna have to up your game a little bit for
for some cultural assimilation into America. We're not asking you
to disrupt from your religious uh cloning. But we we
really we we we we want to embrace you, want
(39:32):
to embrace your community, you want to take care of you.
That's America. But you're gonna have to step up your
game here a little bit and show that you are
with us, because there are a lot of people that
look like me and you that ain't
Well, we're going to be talking about this one for
a long, long long time, aren't we, folks. General good day.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
The new day is done.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
We've got a little bit. I don't know about you,
but the way I've processed everything the last few days
is I've kind of stayed away from the news. I've
stayed away from news as much as I can. I'm
really kind of sick, and most of us should be
sick of all the politics and campaign stuff. So it's
okay to take a day or two or few days
(00:31):
off a little, a little embargo tech detalks. However, it
doesn't stop my friends from sending the memes on all
the text threads. It is just a florry, just a
flurry of.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
The phenomenal memes.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
The John Wick and the squirrel, so many great memes.
Speaker 2 (00:49):
You killed John Wicks, squirrel.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
We are going to be talking about this one for
a long long time. Kamala had a bigger, crowded or
concession speech than any rally. Light late was she late,
likely hungover?
Speaker 2 (01:02):
And no celebrities there too.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
I want to I do want to go back and look,
did she win states? Only states that don't require voter
ID the look I want to look at these states
that she did win and how many of them don't
require voter ID. We'll get that answer back maybe our
next show. Other question, how did Biden get eighty one
(01:26):
million votes? How to get fifteen million more than she
did in this election?
Speaker 2 (01:32):
Interesting?
Speaker 1 (01:35):
And the other thing that that's crystallizing. There are no
blue states, just twenty big cities.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
That's true. That's true. You look at even New York.
In California, it's land area, it's ninety five percent red.
Speaker 1 (01:50):
We don't have blue states. We have twenty big cities.
And we as American people. And I've made no bones
about this. I've voted for Democrats and Republicans. I consider
myself to be independent, more libertarian and conservative than any
(02:11):
party ideology.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
I just.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
I've still am surprised that the other side is surprised.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
I'm pleasantly surprised that they're surprised.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
Yeah, so what has surprised me, What has surprised me
is the electoral map. You look at it and you
see twenty big cities in a red country. Number two.
If you just put that map up, the final electoral
(02:47):
map up in the electoral college, and you say, what
does that represent you don't define it, label it. You go, well,
it looks like there's been something hitting America, crossing the oceans.
You know, if you look at the eastern seaboard.
Speaker 2 (03:04):
Up, it looks like a meteor strike, like a several
a meteor storm hit and there's about twenty meteors that
hit all over the United States.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Now I'm not talking about the cities now, I'm just saying,
if you look at the Electoral College oh map, you've
got blue all on the left coast, right on fifty
sixty percent of the east coast, and some blue streaks
up from the southern border New Mexico, Colorado. And you say,
what do you think that map represents? I'd say, I
(03:35):
don't know. Like looks like there's some sort of invasion
of species of you know, is that like a some
sort of virus that came in on the coast and
came up through the southern border.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Like a marine invader.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
It looks like that.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
And if the in fact, if the country was ever
going to be assaulted by a kinetic war in addition
to the ICBMs, you would see the coasts take the
brunt and the southern border.
Speaker 2 (04:06):
Well not the southeastern part of the coast because all
those fellows are armed down.
Speaker 1 (04:09):
There, Well you would that's where the invasions would be.
So it appears if it looks like an invasion map.
It looks like an invasion map. It also looks like
the rest of the country the interior is under siege.
Under siege defines siege.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
That's when you are having a military action against a
defensible position and you're surrounding it and trying to starve
them out.
Speaker 1 (04:39):
Looks like a siege.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
In some ways.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
Yes, it's a concern. I'm just you know, these are
just things that I've digesting, or.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
We could be besieging them. Frankly, you know we've driven
them all the way to the coast.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
I don't, but I thought about that general looks it
didn't originate in the center and spread out like Americanism did.
An Americanism, the American exceptionalism. If you looked at the
map there, you're going to see it spread from the
basically from the heartland the frontiers historically.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
You're absolutely correct. I'm just saying what it could look like.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
I think it appears as though we it's an invasion,
and it appears as though the red interior is in
a state of siege, and there are no blue states,
just twenty big cities. Now, no president, we now have learned,
(05:38):
has won a second term in office after an intervening term. Correctland, Yeah,
I don't think. We don't think we ever talked about
Grover Cleveland on the show and any of our history stuff.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
I've heard a lot of people say he'll be the
second non conservative, non consecutive president.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
I will say this general in thirty years of trying
cases to juries, those twelve people get it right well
over ninety percent of the time two sides presenting their
arguments to the jury. But here's what makes a jury
different than say a twelve person committee. They are instructed
by the judge to treat their deliberations and decision as
(06:18):
if it was buying a home or who to marry.
The phrase we use is the most important of your
personal affairs. That's what makes twelve people go from being
a committee to a jury in a criminal case. And
they're instructed by the judge very specifically to follow the
(06:43):
evidence that was presented. What the jury doesn't see are
the evidentiary safeguards that keep highly prejudicial material away.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
From them and unreliable material and unreliable.
Speaker 1 (06:56):
Those are the rules of evidence. Those are the filters.
And the rules of evidence are beautiful they you know,
they except for when they cut against you. But the
rules of evidence have been honed and honed and honed
over centuries to keep highly prejudicial information away from a jury,
inflammatory emotion matter away from a jury, nonprobe, and of
(07:17):
irrelevant hearsay, depending on your judge, yeah, hearsay, which is
inherently unreliable.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
Of course. The new rule is, if the prosecutor wants
it in, it comes in.
Speaker 1 (07:30):
What we lack in America right now. The American people
acted as a jury, and they treated this election as
though it was of the most important of their personal affairs,
because it is, and it was, and it absolutely was.
What we missed and that we need or to get
(07:51):
back to, is we need the rules of evidence to
something along the lines of the rules of evidence, to
call out the bs, to keep the bs out, the lies,
the highly prejudicial stuff, the fake stuff, because that fake stuff.
If the press, which should act like the judge and
(08:14):
an arbiter of what's relevant and probative and real and truthful,
a press that does its job, the institution of a
free press that does its job is like a judge
keeping out irrelevant evidence or irrelevant matter, but also calling
(08:36):
out the bs. That's the cross examination piece. We don't
have that with our press. Our press is not calling
out the lies. Our press is not interested in the
truth as much as they are in clicks, and so
(08:57):
our jury can be easily swayed if the jury can
be easily swayed if you have a judge that interprets
the rules of evidence in favor of the other side.
And that's what the press is done. But the American
people figured it out. We still need to get the
institution of the press back. We need to root out
(09:22):
you really need to root out. And this is tough
for me to say as a constitutional conservative, but we
really need to call out the people that enabled the lies.
Speaker 2 (09:31):
Well, expose them, but then move on and the press.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
And to prosecute the press. You don't prosecute exactress, but
you absolutely prosecute government officials and government bureaucrats and other
adults in the room who know better that knowingly conspired
against the American people to lie, cheat, and steal the
(09:58):
ten sixteen likely real one. In twenty and no efforts
to get to the bottom of it in the last
four years. Hey, I'm Attorney Brad Koffel. That is Attorney
Eric Wilson Snarkmaster General. You're listening to for the defense
of the American people, and we certainly want to think
(10:20):
and acknowledge children Automotive group there in Delaware for your
Chevy GMC products, fantastic American made products, and fantastic family.
One store, family runs it, that's been in the family
for a couple several generations. Now they are easy to
get to. Two seventy to three point fifteen. I'm sorry,
(10:43):
twenty three. Either way you go to either way, go
north are obviously come down south on twenty three and
catch them. They're in southern Delaware County, beautiful place of
Ryan Gil and his dad are running that place, and
they've got fantastic team and a lot of the folks
down in the mechanics in their long time, so good
folks starting to get to know them. General, what made
(11:05):
twenty twenty four election different than twenty twenty which we
were told is the most important in twenty sixteen was
the most important, and so on. What made this one different?
Speaker 2 (11:15):
It's anchored in what you were just saying before the
break about the mainstream media and how we need to
do something about how leftists they've all become. Well we have.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
I'm gonna say I'm not just sarying they're leftists. We
can deal with honest political dialogue, we can debate honest discourse.
But the fourth estate's not doing.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
Its job because they're leftists. They're not They're supposed to
be there to present what they believe is the truth,
and instead they're presenting what they believe is in doctrination
and what's best for everybody, And they are going to
censor stories that don't match up with Kamala Harris or
whoever is running for the left's positions, and they're going
(12:03):
to keep that information from coming out, just like they
did the Hunter laptop before twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
I don't know if that's leftist. I think the right
can be accused of that as well. I think it's
more of you're in power, you want to stand power,
and once you're once you're a news outlet and you've
got your deep connections to the new administration, and you know,
there's a sense of pride having those deeply placed sources.
Whether it's a Democrat in the White House, Democrats hold
(12:31):
in Congress or vice versa. It's people that want to
you need to stay relevant and you want to stay
in power. What happens to MSNBC, You know they're actually
with Trump in I don't know, I don't do better.
I get finished good. I don't mean interrupt you.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
No, that's fine. People have made the decision that the CBS,
NBC and ABC Evening News at six thirty Troika is
no longer a viable place used to get accurate media.
And they have gone on. They've moved on. They haven't
tried to sanction them, they haven't tried to boycott them.
(13:08):
They've just changed the channel and they've gone to the internet.
They've gone to Twitter. Now. In twenty twenty, Twitter was
owned by that Jack Smith guy or whatever his name was,
the founder and he's a prosecutor. And you're right, I
forget what his name was. Dorsey. Yeah, Dorsey was owned
by Dorsey and they were famous for shut they shut
(13:31):
down President Trump's account. But now we have a new
person involved who wants to use Twitter as a free
speech platform. And now we have that's where a lot
of people get their news. They get their news from
content creators on the Internet who are there and will
(13:52):
present accurate information to them, and that's where they get
their news. They can't censor the stories anymore.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
My concern is that highly educated, highly educated men and
women and folks who maybe didn't go to college but
have high degrees of common sense are combination of both.
You don't need to go to college or have a
(14:19):
law degree to know when something is unconstitutional. The definition
of constitutionality that I would teach good law school students
is is that fundamentally fair when you have, when you
when you My concern is general, and it's a bigger
concern today than it was before the election. There are
(14:40):
men and women who should know better with the censorship
of a sitting president on a social media platform, who
didn't get it, who didn't get it. I understand, I understand,
I do understand the people that loathe Donald Trump, and
certainly only the cultural issues that are that were made high,
(15:06):
that were made relevant in the political sphere that really
aren't relevant tony ninety five percent of Americans. My concern
is when people who should know better, tolerated, didn't speak out,
or worse, laughed about enabled the press silencing citizens.
Speaker 2 (15:28):
And expecting us to believe all this. There's a line
from the Clint Eastwood film The Outlaw Josie Wales when
the actor John Vernon says, Senator, don't piss down my
back and tell me it's raining. And we can clearly
see that when when word Salad Harris comes out and
talks about how her campaign is based about joy, people
(15:51):
just turn that off.
Speaker 1 (15:53):
Number Another thing I want to link up to the
failure of the press and the people who should know better,
who continue to listen to the same media outlets is
once the Russia collusion hoax was exposed, they still didn't care.
They still didn't I say they. I don't mean the
(16:16):
press anymore. I'm saying the people. The people.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
But there's a lot of people who still don't know
that's a hoax. They've never even heard it question because
all they do is watch their television on certain select outlets.
If you go to MSNBC, they'll never tell you that
that was found to be a hoax. The fine people
of Charlottesville hoax, the inject bleach into your body hoax,
(16:40):
all of these hoaxes. Most most Democrats don't know that
those are hoaxes, proven hoaxes.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
I disagree. I think, I disagree general, I think enough.
I think enough Liberals Democrats understand that Donald Trump was framed,
set up, uh, the FBI was all over him, and
during the transition Flynn got taken down. The weaponization of
(17:08):
the Department of Justice for political prosecution, law professor had
alarming but still no outcry.
Speaker 2 (17:17):
Oh, there was an outcry among us.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
No from the people who should know better, the people
that live in these twenty big cities.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
It doesn't fit their worldview.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
They didn't care because it was Donald Trump. They didn't
care about stepping on the First Amendment, about deplatforming as
a sitting president. They didn't care about the fact that
the Russia collusion was a total crime committed on a court,
(17:46):
a court and Congress and the people.
Speaker 2 (17:49):
As long as it's against their enemies.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
Those people in those twenty big cities don't care about that.
They didn't care that COVID was extended for male in balance.
They didn't care that we stepped into an abyss of
horrible uncertainty of the electoral process. That's what these people
(18:11):
are still around. Yes, and they're in these big cities
and these big cities are growing. They don't care. And
my and my real concern is it's not just Donald Trump.
They're worried about getting in the power. They're gonna they're
gonna continue to do the same thing. They just don't care.
These are foundational American principles that make us the last
(18:37):
free land mass, and those principles are in their way.
It's alarming to me, It really is alarming to me.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
And we're told that instead we need to be focusing
on transgender rights. Okay, that's a conversation that that is
a long conversation from America. For my lgbt Q friends
and family, that is a conversation that needs to that
it will happen, But that's a long conversation. You got
(19:10):
a long way to get a lot of America around
on that and also with gender, that's a long conversation.
History may make history, who knows where this goes. But
that's not something that you just flip a switch, which
you did. They just flipped a switch on us. Just
some things that are just the things that have happened
over the last five, six, seven years should shock the
(19:34):
conscience of every American and and we we still don't
have enough Americans who understand what's happening to them in
our country. All right, we're back.
Speaker 2 (19:55):
General.
Speaker 1 (19:56):
It feels like we're one miscalculation away from a full scale,
full skill world in the Rain.
Speaker 2 (20:02):
I doubt it now because I think nobody, even the
Biden administration.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
Pardon me, pardon me, I forgot my my product of that.
Had Kamala and Wall, had Harris Walls won, it would
would we not feel like we're one miscalculation away from
a full scale, full scale war.
Speaker 2 (20:20):
No, we're one calculation away. It wouldn't be a miscalculation.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
Another four years of this border policy had Harris Waltz won,
and the electoral map wouldn't be able to save us.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
That's very true. Think about that, and that was the goal,
wasn't it.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
Think about that, another four years of this border policy
and the electoral map probably wouldn't be able to save us.
Another four years of Biden, Harris Wall's, Obama Pelosi, whatever
trends of government handouts and the ability to actually save
(20:58):
money disappears. It's the disappearing. It's disappeared for a lot
of working Americans already. But another four years of that policy,
those policies, and we end up with an eventual junk
bond status of the nation's bonds. The moment that happens,
literally some algorithm that's set up to trigger a massive
(21:21):
sell off of American bonds in Asia overnight, then Europe,
and by the time we wake up on the East Coast,
it's a total fire sale. It would happen that quickly.
These are very real, existential concerns that I'm afraid millions
of Americans who didn't vote for Trump or didn't vote
at all, you're risking. And for the millions that voted
(21:42):
Democrat other than TDS, it was very real, very personal
concerns and legitimate concerns. I should add legitimate concerns. State
laws banning consensual homosexual sex were not found unconstitutional until
two thousand and three.
Speaker 2 (22:00):
But they have been unconstitutional ever since.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
But lg that community that makes up a large, a
growing percentage of the American population, and I don't think
that most of most Americans are certainly don't have issues
with LGBA.
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Bowers versus Hardwick was decided long before two thousand and three.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
Two thousand and three, I'll get to you on the case,
but I'm talking about the last sodomy law.
Speaker 2 (22:32):
No, the Georgia asadomy laws were found to be unconstitutional
and Bowers versus Hardwick, which I believe was in an
early nineteen eighties case. I read it in law school
when I was in That was ninety three for me.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
Yeah, I'm gonna look this case up in a second
in two thousand, but I know we had. I was
shocked when I looked at the state laws that were
still in the books that were declared unconstitutional until very recently.
For instance, same sex marriage bands were not declared unconstitutional
until twenty fifteen, and that was a five to four decision. Okay,
(23:06):
the LGB Hilbertfeld decision. Yeah, the queer community. I think
that's what they prefer to be called the queer community.
The LGB community has legitimate concerns. Okay, do you agree
with it or not?
Speaker 2 (23:21):
They do, right, I think they're imagined.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
But dude, up until twenty fifteen, there were states that
banned same sex marriage. That was nine years ago.
Speaker 2 (23:33):
And now we have a leader that is in favor
of same sex marriage. When Barack Obama was elected, he
was against same sex marriage. When Donald Trump was elected,
he was four.
Speaker 1 (23:44):
It and the biggest issue right now, laws restricting a
woman's right to choose whether to carry pregnancy to full
term are now open with the reversal Roe v.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Wade.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
So the cultural issues that were driving the emotions of
the Democrats and the mood of the country, the LGB
community and abortion are legitimate concerns.
Speaker 2 (24:11):
I would take a different view of that because now
that it's been left to the states, a lot of
this fear mongering about how they're going to make abortion illegal.
People say, well, they've gotten rid of Roe versus Wade.
But this is strange. I'm here in California and I
can still get an abortion. This is strange. I'm here
in Ohio.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
I can still get concerns. I'm telling you. The very
first word I heard twenty was from my twenty five
year old daughter. It was a lesbian who lives in Utah.
Very happy, loving, strange to be living in Utah right,
very concerned. Dad, what does this mean for the queer community?
Speaker 2 (24:52):
And I would tell her it means we're going to
leave you alone.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
And I texted Bernie and I said, Bernie, what do
I tell my daughter? He says, tell her that we're
going to make sure that every American's taken care of.
We're not taking away any rights from the queer community,
or from women, or from minorities. So these are real.
(25:22):
The Republican Party is going to have to figure out
how to keep their state legislatures moderated. I just don't.
My concern is that the Republican Party, when they have
both houses and their states, are going to start passing
more controversial cultural laws that offend the libertarian in me
(25:48):
and most and many many millions of Americans. And the
Republican Party already has one albatross around its neck, and
that's abortion. It's kind of moving away from that. But
they will be fine. The left, the far left, we'll
be finding other cultural political issues to hang around the
Republican's neck. If they're smart, which they are, and they're savvy,
(26:13):
which they are, they're going to figure it out. And
if I was them, I would be figuring out a
way to get legislation passed in Mississippi and being, you know,
something attacking same sex marriage again and see if there's
another way they can get that shimmyed up to the
Supreme Court to hang that around the neck of the
(26:34):
of the Republican Party or the Republican Party needs to
be more clearly defined these cultural issues and let the
other side no, look, we're not rolling back any rights. Okay,
we're not. No, there's not on the platform. No one's
asking for that. But the Democrat Party did get hijacked
(26:59):
by the juice box mafia. These twenty major cities in
the United States, young, highly educated, big city board rich
twenty and thirty somethings who have the luxury of time
and technology to pump their issues into mainstream America. Cultural
issues that are either irrelevant right now because we're on
(27:19):
the brink of World War III, we have real inflation
that is going to continue to grow, but cultural issues
that are either politically irrelevant right now or repugnant to
the rest of America. The Me Too movement led to
cancel culture, the BLM reignited the racial debates. DEI led
(27:40):
to guaranteed equity instead of guaranteed equality, and the trans
rights community, well, that's when it's still hard for nine
out of ten of Americans to understand, if not more,
that was just too much too soon for historically very
conservative America.
Speaker 2 (27:56):
The trans rights community views it as their rights to
dress up in women's clothing and then go to elementary
schools and read stories to children. That isn't right.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
I'm not debating, I'm not taking a side. I'm just
I'm alerting the Republican Party that the weaknesses of the
party are going to be exposed, and it's the cultural
issues that are going to watch, the new cultural issues
(28:27):
that get pumped into the atmosphere by the juice box mafia.
Harris didn't lose the election because her campaign was mismanaged.
It was the first opportunity for the American people to
speak in four years. That's what I think. I think
the jury had its mind made up in twenty twenty two,
(28:49):
certainly twenty twenty three, but they didn't get the case
until November five.
Speaker 2 (28:54):
That's exactly right. This was not a miscalculation on the
part of the Kamala mafia. This is a fundamental rejection.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
I want to at the end of the next segment,
I want to play a fun, little exercise game. It
might be fun for us and nobody else.
Speaker 2 (29:12):
I can always use exercise.
Speaker 1 (29:13):
What if Donald Trump lost Farren Square in twenty twenty
What if he'd not lost, Rather, what if he'd not
lost and he won in twenty twenty, we would have
a Republican in the White House in twenty twenty. Let's
(29:33):
talk about what that twenty twenty four looks like. We
all talking about it got stolen. Well, let's talk about
what if he'd won.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
Where would we be? Right now?
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Right, final segment. And if you or a family member
loved one have an unwanted government intrusion in the form
of a search warrant or rest warrant someone's under investigation,
you get arrested. O case too big, note, case too small?
That general and I we are for rent the.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
Law mules, rented law mules.
Speaker 1 (30:04):
How's your law mule? Is it watered up? Ready to go?
Speaker 2 (30:08):
He likes to be called a burrow.
Speaker 1 (30:10):
Now mine's an ass. He had a spring and his
step the last few days. We will go to any
of the county courthouses. There's seventy three, will go to fifteen.
Speaker 2 (30:20):
We won't.
Speaker 1 (30:21):
Now, mule don't like people laughing at him, and well done.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
He gets the crazy idea. You're laughing at him.
Speaker 1 (30:27):
All right, So let's assume let's just give the Republicans
what they wanted, which was Trump one in twenty twenty.
Now it's twenty twenty four. Trump is not running. Of course,
he's turned out who's running for the Republicans and Democrats
in twenty twenty four? Had Trump won, had Trump one,
(30:51):
who do you think would have been at the top
of the ticket in twenty twenty four for both parties?
Speaker 2 (30:58):
Go let me preface this. I do think that the
twenty twenty election that was stolen from Trump, and I
thank god it was because it exposed so many rhino Republicans.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
I maintimes for a reason. I tell my kids this
all the time.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
Yes, and you know who would have been running. It
would have been Mike Pence, one of the world's biggest rhinos.
He had not yet been exposed as a rhino.
Speaker 1 (31:18):
Well, whoa, whoa, Okay, go ahead, oh here you go.
But I disagreed to Mike. Mike Pence had enough political
capital to make it to twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2 (31:25):
Well he would have. He would have even had to
expend any but he wasn't yet exposed as a rhino.
He was the natural choice because he would have been
the successor to Trump. Everyone would have thought that he
agreed with Trump everything. Everybody would have thought that we
would not be going back to business as usual. It
would have been business as usual again, and all of
(31:48):
the Trump people had been gone, and now Trump has
had his eyes open, we would not have seen the
legal political warfare that everybody. If you'd have told somebody
in twenty that President Trump was going to be prosecuted
for all these cases, you would have said tenfoil hat stuff.
But no, now we see, and none of those prosecutions
(32:09):
happened until he announced his candidacy for twenty twenty four.
By the way, I agree, one of the best things
that could have happened to us.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
Was to have been cheated in twenty t Oh no,
let's just let's look at ye. Let me let me
add on that. General, that's a great point. Had they
not put the country through two bogus impeach it impeachments
Rated mar A Lago prosecuted him in Fulton County for
conduct that occurred while he was president, rigged what two
cases against him in New York rolled out a welcome
Matt for a would be assassin and butler pah and in.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
The Trump International Golf course.
Speaker 1 (32:41):
Yeah uh so, yeah, yeah, that none of that would.
Speaker 2 (32:45):
Happen, and it's all been exposed.
Speaker 1 (32:47):
So you now think that Pence. Had Trump won in
twenty twenty, you think the Republicans would have been able
to the Republican candidate would have been Mike Pence.
Speaker 2 (32:57):
He would have wanted back to the Arty.
Speaker 1 (32:59):
Okay, okay, I disagree, but I'll give you my thought.
Speaker 2 (33:03):
Next.
Speaker 1 (33:03):
Who would be at the top of the Democrat ticket.
Speaker 2 (33:06):
It would still have been Kamala Harris because Biden would
not have stepped down. And if Pence had debated him, well,
I guess no, it wouldn't be Biden. I'm sorry, because
would have been Yeah, that that's a good question. Probably
knew some maybe probably knew some.
Speaker 1 (33:25):
Yeah, assuming Donald Trump won twenty twenty and he's in
the office now, Number one, would we have a Republican
in the White House in twenty twenty four? History says no, we.
Speaker 2 (33:40):
Would have had a Republican in name only. Yet if
this would have been this would have been George Herbert
Walker Bush. All again, we had Reagan from eighty eighty eight,
and then we would have had the downfall, which with
the Rhino.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
I think that the I think the Republican ticket would
have had Ronda Santis at the top. I think what
we saw with the hurricanes. America saw some leadership there,
kind of George W. Style. I think Ron DeSantis would
(34:15):
have made it through the primaries and been on top,
and I think Gavin Newsom would have been the Democrat.
So if it's to Santus Newsom in twenty twenty four,
that would have been interesting. But to say that the
Republicans were going to have be in power from twenty sixteen,
(34:39):
when sixteen, when twenty when twenty twenty four, that's a
tall order here in modern day of politics, that's a
tall order. But you know, we as we said, I don't
think happens for a reason. I can't think of any
candidate who was going to beat Trump in twenty twenty
(35:00):
four other than Barack and he was turned out. So general,
let's go back to where we started on this. We
still have a large chunk of the American population that
should know better, that was refusing to acknowledge the steals,
(35:24):
the attempted steals in sixteen, the Steel of twenty, the
phony impeachments, the infringement of the First Amendment, censorship, deep platforming.
They're refusing to acknowledge that that's my beef, and that's
the beef I have with people who I don't care
(35:46):
if you've voted who you've voted for. My point is,
if you know better and you don't speak up, you're
you're a bigger problem than the actual people perpetrating the crimes,
because the crimes can only be committed if the people
(36:09):
don't speak out. They are in tregues respect, want account of,
want prosecution, investigation, and prosecution.
Speaker 2 (36:17):
They are trees who have made a deal with the
lumberjack to be the last one chopped down. That's what
they are.
Speaker 1 (36:27):
It's it's a big deal. This is a big deal.
And this is where my brain gets stuck. Uh and
and really I lost my mind during COVID with the
mask mandate, which turns out the same people, it's the
same people were lined up against with the mass mandates, Like,
oh my god, are you kidding me? Now? You you
(36:49):
you still think that Trump was a Russian spy? You
still think that phone call was impeachable? You really think
that what Donald Trump said in DC on January sixth
led to a real political insurrection revolution as opposed to
(37:13):
expanded and ill advised, somewhat illegal criminal trespass.
Speaker 2 (37:19):
An unarmed insurrection.
Speaker 1 (37:21):
And you don't care about the censorship. And now these masks.
You all know these sittings are silly because you don't
wear them unless you're outside in public, but you still
don't say anything. Those are the same people that were
stuck with I don't know how we reach them.
Speaker 2 (37:43):
Do we need to?
Speaker 1 (37:45):
Yes, because these, as I said, this is a red
country with twenty growing cities, and it's these twenty major
cities that are very well could have swallowed the electoral
college map.
Speaker 2 (38:00):
Yes, but you're never going to convince a con man
that he's trying to conu.
Speaker 1 (38:05):
Well, thank god, there were enough men and women awake
who don't traditionally vote Republican, Black men, Hispanic men, Hispanic women,
and your blue collar rank and file, they're awake. Can
(38:26):
you know who they are? Those are your common sense Americans?
And you know who I want in America? I want more.
I want more. Give me more immigrants from countries that
love America.
Speaker 2 (38:45):
And who are running from socialism.
Speaker 1 (38:46):
Yeah, give us those people. Our country was built on
the backs of these people, Scotch, Irish, Eastern European, Mediterranean,
the North Atlantic regions. Now we're getting more, you know,
Latin America. Uh, the folks from the African nations. They
(39:11):
need to they need to up their game here a
little bit. You're gonna if you're Muslim in America, you're
gonna have to up your game a little bit for
for some cultural assimilation into America. We're not asking you
to disrupt from your religious uh cloning. But we we
really we we we we want to embrace you, want
(39:32):
to embrace your community, you want to take care of you.
That's America. But you're gonna have to step up your
game here a little bit and show that you are
with us, because there are a lot of people that
look like me and you that ain't
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com