June 26, 2025 • 38 mins
Brad and Campy discuss the unusual ascension of Bill Clinton and noe the Muslim Socialists. How do We The People Respond?
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
The general's out and can't be sitting in, can't be
pins for stepping in.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
It's a pleasure as always.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
Nice to see you. Hey. Those of us who voted
for Boss Pro in nineteen ninety two and nineteen ninety six,
we kind of knew. And this shows for those of
us that were thinking this way, we saw some things
happening in the early nineties that came have come true.
And that's what I want to focus on today, CAMPI
and I want to I want to share our what
(00:32):
is it when voices like Ross Pro who are saying
this giant sucking sound or jobs leaving America and we
were pushed into a nineteen ninety two election with a
basically unknown Bill Clinton who wound up winning. Yeah, I
want to talk a little bit about the behind the scenes,
(00:55):
the planning, ok that gets somebody like Bill Clinton into
the White House. But before we go into that, I
do want to talk about how Hollywood tends to prognosticate,
how Hollywood tends to get some things right and advance.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
They're very good at foreshadowing.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
Yeah, And we were just before went on the air,
we were just talking about the fiction of the show
twenty four. Someone thought up the concept what if there
was a terrorist plot in the heartland in the United
States and we needed to break laws and bend the
(01:33):
constitution to stimy it. And it became a hugely popular show.
Yes you watched it. Oh, I was addicted. Yes, loved
it and in it. Counter Terrorism Unit CTU, the first
show aired, win relative to nine to eleven.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
About them a less than a month after correct, isn't
that amazing?
Speaker 3 (01:55):
It's shocking, which means they were taping and filming and
getting ready before.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
He had the idea that this is realistic enough, and
in fact it was so realistic they actually did the show.
Twenty four episodes represented one hour in real time. What
was the What was Jack Bauer's He.
Speaker 3 (02:13):
Would say, the following takes place between twelve am and
one am of benccar in real time.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
That's right, well done, thank you.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
So I look at this and I then fast forward
to the bombings of Iran. Okay, does this sound at
all like Top Gun? Maverick?
Speaker 2 (02:37):
Oh, yeah, a little bit.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
You're talking about the where they had the mission to
get the underground bunker.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
Absolutely, Maverick, Right, So, Maverick, Tom Cruise is a test
pilot right here so now he's back there, he's teaching.
It's thirty years later, and now the mission it's not Now,
this isn't Jack Bauer chasing Middle Eastern terrorists around the Heartland,
(03:03):
which became very realistic. Sure, and then top Gun Maverick
is the mission involves destroying a heavily fortified uranium enrichment
facility in an unknown enemy territory a rogue nation and
a narrow cannon canyon with anti aircraft systems and fifth
(03:30):
generation fighters and it has to be a miraculous attack
for it to no air road room for air And
I'm pretty sure that's what happened last weekend.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
Almost dead on, with the exception of it being stealth
bombers substitute for the fighter jets.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
No, no, the fifth generation fighters or what Iran has.
They have our old F fourteens Clinton sold them, are
F fourteens. They have not received any aircraft from well
United States.
Speaker 3 (03:58):
Those are the life I mean in real life are
stealth bombers were over there. I understand what you're talking
about with the fifth generation fighters and the F fourteens
that that also really took place, like you mentioned, Yeah,
I was, but I reverted back to the movie.
Speaker 1 (04:10):
But someone was thinking, I wonder, you know, it's this realistic.
It's fiction, but this realistic. So when you start to
look at very popular cultural pop shows or movies, let's
go back to the show Yellowstone, another huge favorite of America. Yes,
(04:30):
what's this story of Yellowstone? The story of Yellowstone is
we were here, our family has the land, and then
we're going to do everything you can to keep the
coastal elites from coming in and turning it into some
sort of cosmopolitan area.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
Yeah, corporation's taking over, and who's losing. The Yellowstone ranch
would have been in the generations for what two hundred years?
Speaker 1 (05:00):
But of course you've got the indigenous tribe right there saying, hey,
hold on hypocrite. So we see Hollywood thinking ahead on
what could be very relevant in the very near future.
So I want to keep an eye on what is
coming out in movies, not necessarily books, but definitely movies
(05:21):
and TV shows because they can be quite prescient. And
I look at and this is going to dovetail into
Bill Clinton, because I built I do believe Bill Clinton
was a central casting crew of very very wealthy probably Americans,
probably some all system foreign money that wanted to bust
(05:45):
up the East Coast establishment, the Reagan Bush dynasty. And
I think when we look at, for instance, Yellowstone and
it hits that tension between MAGA and the coastal elite.
You look at twenty four and it hits that tension
between Judeo Christian America and Muslim radical Islam jihad. You
(06:12):
look at Top Gun, Maverick, and we now have rogue
terrorist nations with nukes, or we have to get them
on the five yard line of getting nukes, and we
need to take them out. So Top Gun, out of
all the premises that they could have done for the
remake the part two of one of the most storied
(06:34):
movies in modern history, they picked this story. Do you
think do you think that there is If Hollywood is
thinking this way, wouldn't it make sense that those with
political power, those with financial power would also start thinking,
kind of in a fictional daydream way, what if? And
(06:56):
then enough of them get together and go, you know what,
that's not a bad idea. Yeah, And this is where
Bill Clinton comes in. I think this is extremely important.
You look at the run Republicans had on the presidency
for thirty four years. There was a Republican in the
White House save four years for Jimmy Carter. The Democrats
were out in the wilderness like they are right now,
(07:17):
way out in the wilderness. Actually where they are right
now is much further out in the wilderness.
Speaker 3 (07:22):
Yeah, they certainly lack any type of strong leadership at
this point. They need to get that fixed if they
want to do anything from a democratic perspective.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
So they start to think, what do we need. We
need a plan, and then we need messaging, and we
need some candidates, and then we're going to find We're
going to put these candidates in an octagon primaries and
we're going to see how they do. And I want
to go back to nineteen ninety two and between the
(07:51):
years nineteen eighty five and nineteen ninety two, what the
Democrat Party did to get itself in position to get
a little southern boy named Bill Clinton from Arkansas into
the White House. We have to identify this pattern, because
this pattern just landed a socialist in New York City.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
It did.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
Yeah, so we need to talk about this. I think
it's very important the American people start picking up on patterns,
and it's not always that it might start off with
the best intentions for America. But once you open certain doors,
you start to let in some really bad things. And
I'm concerned that in the early nineties, when we opened
(08:37):
up the door in nineteen ninety two to this young
Bill Clinton and the dramatic pivot and foreign policy and
domestic policy and globalism, and you look behind the scenes
and the relationships with some big power brokers and money
and money, huge money, billionaire money, you start to see
(09:00):
that we are now reaping what was sown. We need
to be very careful about the seeds that are put
into the soil here in America. And this is going
to come butting up right against the First Amendment. What
do we do as Americans when someone says, you're saying
you don't want to let new ideas into our country.
(09:21):
We're fine with that, but we need to address the
protective minds of the youth, because they're the ones that
are voting for this stuff. All right, CAMPI and I
are back. General is off. This week we're talking about
when fiction, Hollywood fiction proves to be purely accurate to
(09:48):
very near future historical events. We're talking about nine to
eleven and within a month the show twenty four Drop. Yeah,
we look at then we talked about Top Gun Maverick
and the bombing of a of a of a buried
uranium enrichment facility and some rogue nation looks a lot
(10:10):
like Iran. Iran, and uh, it's almost as though we're
getting conditioned in advance. That's a little tenfold Hattish. I
get it, But I don't believe completely in coincidences.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
I don't think you're necessarily out of line. There.
Speaker 3 (10:24):
Think about a couple of the movies that have dealt
with how about.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Outbreak, but it's about a worldwide pandemic.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
There's been two movies since Yeah, I think that happened
before the twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
Yeah, there are some that are there that are general
what if there's a pandemic, But then you can get
into some really specifics and you're like, holy cow, they
they nailed that one. So you know, you you can
go all the way back to you can go back
into the sci fi. I'm not even talking sci fi, sure,
(10:54):
I'm talking about more mainstream pop culture that kind of
predicts or it's very very reasonable to say this could happen.
And that's where I think with Top Gun Maverick, which
came out in twenty twenty two, maybe twenty.
Speaker 2 (11:14):
Five, yet twenty twenty two, and it's just.
Speaker 1 (11:17):
Eerily similar to what happened with our bombing, and ran
as though, what if we have to what if? What's
it look like if we've got to bomb a foreign nation,
a sovereign that didn't that ostensibly has not presented an
immediate direct threat to the United States. Yet we go
(11:39):
in under this new doctrine of preemptive bombing, and we're
all rooting for MAV right, I mean, we're all, of course,
we're not even considering, well, this is a sovereign nation,
they have their natural rights to self defense. We kind
of blow right by that stuff right now. Am I
saying the Pentagon got in bed with Tom Cruise in
(12:01):
Hollywood to get us ready for bombing Rand's nuclear facilities. No,
if someone said, hey, they got access to a lot
of information and intel and access to military established military bases,
in military equipment, with the approval of the same military
people that we're going to be pulling, you know, putting
(12:21):
the planning together, I'd say, yeah, that kind of makes sense.
So I think it's important that we pay attention to
fiction because a lot of times, fiction is not as
much fiction as we think it is. Let's look at,
for instance, what's happened in New York City. Who would
have thought that within one generation a young Muslim socialist
(12:44):
would be on deck to be the mayor of New
York City, the city that was struck too light of
a word by a radical branch of the Muslim faith.
And the people voted this. Who voted for this, the
young generation voted for this, The younger people that moved
to Paris, the young internationalists that moved to London, the
(13:08):
young internationalists, or the young Americans that are believe everything
that they're being told is anti America, anti white, anti patriarchy,
anti male. They go to Portland, They're in la They're
in San Francisco, They're in Minneapolis, They're in New York City,
(13:30):
They're in Columbus, Ohio. Columbus is in the bullpen warming up.
We will have this. It's already here at a state level.
But we need to decide as an American people, we now,
how much more proof do you need that the very
dangerous ideas of socialism are working in our big cities
(13:51):
and on the minds of our youth. Socialism's record is
a complete and total, deadly failure. They're not teaching this
in our schools. Socialism is like the opium of the
of the youth, of the idiots. It's just it sounds great.
It's a false prophet. And when the American cities built
(14:12):
by American capitalism are being dismantled by socialist immigrants who
want to replicate the same failed policies of their home
countries from which they ran, where is our response. How
far can the government go to shut those voices down?
I don't think you can do much under the First Amendment.
(14:34):
But they're getting to our youth. They're absolutely getting to
our youth. And I saw a quote. I think it
hits it on the head. Can't you tell me what
you think. Democracies fail when the people start voting for
a living instead of working for one.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
So say the quote to me, Democracies.
Speaker 1 (14:52):
Fail when the people start voting for a living instead
of working for one.
Speaker 3 (14:58):
It's an interesting comment. I happen to believe that in
small doses. And I don't know if this is going
to get me smacked around or not. You can't have
a total socialist government. You can have progressive ideas. I
believe in a small dose, can socialism work. It does
because the NFL is a socialist type of It's a
you know, I can turn the NFL off, you can,
(15:22):
but look at it right now, it's going worldwide. I'm
just saying it's a socialist type of organizations.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
Paris, So's London, So's Portland, So's La so San Francisco,
there's Minneapolis, there's New York City. Yep, all right, yep
the Democrats. The Democrats have been looking for new leadership. Yes,
they need new leadership. And so if you go back
to nineteen the mid eighties, when the Democrats were out
(15:50):
in the wilderness wondering when's Ronald Reagan ever going to leave?
When's Reaganism going to leave the minds of America? In
two enter Bill Clinton. What happened here? And this is
really what I want to focus on. So a generation later,
(16:11):
after the nineteen ninety two and nineteen ninety six elections,
the key politician who were the key politicians who are
able to make this work are not now just rich,
they're filthy wealthy. Let me say that again. The people
(16:33):
behind Clinton and I'll throw the bushes in there. But
the politicians that were there in ninety and the nineties
and the two thousands and the teens are no longer
just rich. They're filthy wealthy. Nancy's assets and PERFORMANCELI heard
(16:53):
haven't double checked it. I don't know where this comes
from that her portfolio is up sixty four percent in
the last year, beating the most aggressive hedge funds. I
don't understand where how hard it is for Americans to
figure out that we've been sold out. The Democrats in
the eighties were getting the breakspeat off of them. They
(17:17):
needed to abandon their old New dealers. They need to
get those old New deal Democrats out. They needed to
kind of push the Great Society playbook away. They needed
a young, dynamic candidate to challenge this East Coast dynasty,
the Reagan Bush dynasty. Even though Reagan California. The Democrats
(17:37):
were getting crushed in elections, they were getting crushed in ideas,
they were getting crushed in culture. They needed a post
Reagan Bush political landscape, just like the Democrats need a
post Trump thoroughbred. What's troubling for me is the next
Bill Clinton very well, maybe a Muslim socialist, and we've
(18:01):
already seen that the largest city in the United States.
We'll vote for that. And just as Reagan's presidency redefined
American conservatism, emphasizing deregulation, tax cuts, strong foreign policy, and
tradition and custom and culture, Bill Clinton came in with
(18:26):
Democrat socialism light and began unraveling a lot of the
old Democrat playbook. And we saw this in ninety two.
What was happening. The question, and we're going to hit
on the next segment, is who got Bill Clinton into
the big show and what did they get in return?
(18:52):
Welcome back, Campi's in for the general. We're talking about
how did America get to the point where awesome major
US cities have they've become untothered Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, La, Chicago,
New York. It wasn't this way twenty years ago. And
(19:17):
in order for it to be this way today, then
we have to look at when did the when when
did this virus? Or when did this When did the
door open to a lot of this stuff? And I
go back and forth. Was it Obama? Was it Clinton?
Was it the counterculture revolution in the late sixties early seventies.
(19:40):
I've studied them all three and I'm really now focused
on Clinton. The Democrats needed a They needed a whole
new playbook, and so they came up with a nineteen
eighty five something called the Democrat Leadership Council or Conference,
(20:00):
the d Triple C. The DLC Democratic Leadership Council is
founded in nineteen eighty five and it advocated a quote
third way approach. By nineteen ninety, the DLC had its
eye on a few young horses. Maybe you know these names,
some rising stars representing this new third way. Al Gore
(20:25):
was forty four years old at the time. Joe Biden
just turned fifty, John Kerrey just forty nine. Bill Clinton
in his forties, probably the youngest. I think he's the
youngest out of the bunch.
Speaker 2 (20:40):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
There was Bill Clinton and his chief strategist James Carvill.
And Carvel told Clinton, you've got to say, it's the
economy stupid, the new deal in great society. Redistribution has
gone too far. Americans are rejecting it. So now's our chance.
(21:01):
Bush forty one, with his goofy aloofness, blue blood East
Coast establishment, had votes siphoned away from him by Parrot.
I was one of them. Ross Prow was saying all
the right things. He was America first, Keep America first. Instead,
Bill Clinton gets in and America gets a hard shift
(21:24):
to the left economic globalism. It's like throwing the doors
open in our house for the ac to leave the
house and let the flies in. Let's talk real quick
about Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton's from one of the most
forgettable states in the Union, Arkansas. And I don't think
(21:46):
Arkansas has ever produced anything at a major federal level,
not that I.
Speaker 2 (21:50):
Can recall, up until Bill Clinton.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
No. Bill Clinton gets selected as one of just two
representatives from the state of Arkansas to represent a Boys' Nation,
which was a part of American Legion Boys Nation. They
would take two from each state for a week long
simulation of federal government where participants act as senators. They
(22:17):
learn about democracy and leadership. That's nineteen sixty three. Bill
Clinton's sixteen. He meets Jack Kennedy, shakes his hand. Picture
is out there. He ran in ninety two with that
picture front and center. After that, he graduates from high school.
He goes back to d C. Georgetown University sixty four
(22:37):
to sixty eight. He gets a degree in Foreign service.
He delivers the commencement address for Georgetown class President. He
goes to work for his state, Senator William Fulbright Fulbright Scholarship.
Guy Fulbright very important here, guys, Clinton's mentor. William Fulbright
(22:58):
was Chair of the Senate Foreign Relateations Committee from nineteen
fifty nine to nineteen seventy four. Senator Fulbright was the chair,
not on the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
the longest serving chair in its history. And Fulbright lost
his reelection in seventy four because he questioned Israel's influence
(23:23):
on US foreign policy, because you have the Arab Israeli
conflict going on, and he didn't say the right things,
and he got backlashed from the pro Israel lobbies. And
Fulbright lost in seventy four from significant out of state
funding tied to his Israel stance, is perceived anti Israel stance.
You can find the articles in New York Times nineteen
(23:43):
seventy four. It's out there. So Clinton, Fulbright's protege learns
the political cost of challenging pro Israel interest. So after
he graduates from Georgetown, he goes to Oxford as a
Rhodes scholar. We've done plenty of shows on Rhodes scholarships
and where that came from after his Rhodes scholarship, goes
to Yale Law School and then Georgetown Oxford Rhodes Scholar,
(24:07):
Yale Law What do you do with that? You do
the same thing, Barack Obama. Did you go back to
your town and get into the political machine. That's not
what I would have done with those credits, with those
bona fides. I'm going where I can make money on
Wall Street. I'm going where I can make money in
la I'm going where I can make money in Chicago.
Speaker 2 (24:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
Well, Bill Clinton, I'm sure was thinking the same thing.
Was he promised, you'll make even more than you can
possibly make on Wall Street if you follow this path.
Speaker 2 (24:38):
Do you think it just boils down the money, doesn't it?
Speaker 1 (24:41):
Always?
Speaker 2 (24:41):
Well, I'm an optimist.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
I don't from a capitalist standpoint, sure, but I mean
somebody says you could really change the face of the
way this nation is going.
Speaker 1 (24:50):
You think he was that much of a I don't
think Bill College. I think he had some ideology. I
think he had I think he was young, naive and
want to But at the end of the day, you
turned down all these lucrative offers, and Obama I had
to do the same thing, you've turned down all these
lucrative offers.
Speaker 3 (25:06):
I don't necessarily disagree with you. All I'm saying is
you mentioned at the start of the segment the fact
that former President Clinton met Jack Kennedy, you know, in
sixty three.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
I think that huture pressure is assassinated, and I think
that that was.
Speaker 1 (25:20):
A huge impression.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
And so yeah, that for sure.
Speaker 3 (25:22):
Could that be the beginning of his ideology that I
could be that guy? I mean, that takes quite an
ego to do that. I mean, you have to have
an ego to be the president or want to be
the president. So maybe that carried him. I'm not for
sure about the money, but it could have.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
Bill Clinton clearly is a very, very very intelligent man.
He's also a political pro no doubt he's right. He's
also made hundreds of millions of dollars correct and a
position federal government that's never paid over to fifty Yeah. Okay,
So what family is in Arkansas?
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Yami?
Speaker 1 (25:58):
What major US corporation is in Arkansas? Walmart?
Speaker 2 (26:02):
See that? I didn't know that. That's surprising.
Speaker 1 (26:05):
So Bill Clinton runs for Congress and loses, but it's
a statewide campaign down there in Arkansas, gets a lot
of FaceTime, a lot of earned media. Then he runs
for ag wins, then he becomes governor in eighty until
ninety ninety two. I don't think it's a stretch to
(26:28):
say that the Walton family found their globalist candidate and
Bill Clinton, and made sure that he kept going forward.
And by the way, did you know that Hillary was
on Walmart's board from nineteen eighty six to nineteen ninety two.
Hillary Clinton was on their board of directors and she
(26:50):
was a lawyer in the Rose Law firm. Rose Law
Firm is the Walton family's law firm. And the year
before Bill Clinton announced he's running for president in nineteen
ninety two, he's invited to the Builderberg conference in Germany
and nobody governor from a state no Europeans heard of
(27:11):
at a globalist summit. That's where the team owners in
front office managers picked their next political players. Apak is
there too. We're gonna hear a lot more about APAC,
the Arab the American Israel Political Action Committee. Yeah, and
Clint saw his mentor Fulbright get crushed in seventy four
(27:34):
for questioning Israel. He got the memo playball or get
benched and then he gets the sixty minutes puff piece
in nineteen ninety two January ninety two election year, not
just any show sixty minutes, not just any episode the
Sunday following the Super Bowl, fifty million people watching. Do
(27:56):
you think CBS just handed him that slot out of canon,
out of kindness.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
It's a good question.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
And as soon as Clinton gets in NAFTA, wto China
trade deals, American jobs, tanks, Walmart, and Chinese suppliers get rich,
we become NATO's laptop. We're bombing Serbia, We're bombing Israel's
and the means one more segment. We'll talk about this,
(28:26):
all right. I'm Attorney Brad Koffel, and the General's out
in with me. Is can't be. We of course, need
to thank our singular sponsor, chez Ron Automotive Group every week. Guys,
thank you again for sending me or emailing me your photos.
You're buying cars up at chez Ron. Please let them
know they are our sponsor of our show. That it's
(28:48):
extremely important to have this message on an AM radio
and a huge state of Ohio. And I think, not
think I know that once the vag Ramaswami becomes governor.
Our state's gonna explode. And he's talking no income tax,
(29:09):
he's talking reduced corporate taxes, he's talking deregulation. He taught,
he's saying all the right things because it's the economy stupid.
It's like Carville told Clinton in ninety two. Now in
New York City, you've got Zoran Mamdanni mam donni beats
Andrew Cuomo. Think about that. What we have as a
(29:30):
glimpse of the future the Democrat Party, just like nineteen
ninety one, ninety two, when you see January ninety two
and you just got done watching the Super Bowl and
they immediately go into an interview with Bill Clinton and
his wife talking about Jennifer Flowers. Where did he come from?
(29:51):
Where did Zoron Mamdani come from? You had a glimpse
of the Democrat Party in January ninety two and sixty. Men,
and it's and you see where that took American jobs.
You can see where that took American the world's policeman. Policeman.
(30:12):
We were the we were everywhere. We were making a
lot of money. Big tech explosion was doing it. That
was a lot of hype, sugar high. We have the
same thing. Now we're on a sugar high. We are
not an economically sound Our economy is not economically sound.
But now what we have is a glimpse of the
(30:33):
future the Democrat Party and they are Muslim and they
are socialist. Question for you can't be Do we sound
like the bigots of the eighteen hundreds and early nineteen
hundreds worried about the Catholics?
Speaker 2 (30:52):
Do we sound that way?
Speaker 1 (30:54):
Yep? Is history going to look back on us and
a man a man, you guys got it wrong with them.
Speaker 3 (30:59):
Boy, when I I guess if I looked at the
overall landscape of.
Speaker 1 (31:03):
This strictly religious, strictly religious, the Protestants, yes, then yes,
maybe a little bit. The Protestants specifically did not want
the Catholic Church here. It's a big reason why the
American was founded. Yeah, and the break in England from
the church. Sure have. Now we have a call for
(31:23):
prayer and Times Square. Now we have a call for
prayer in Central Park. We'll have calls for prayer and
the State House downtown. The American people need to decide
because we're the bosses. Yeah, is there a line on
what we're willing to tolerate? Is it anti American to
(31:49):
say you can only have a little bit of your religion,
but we don't want you running our civic institutions. We
don't want you running our government. We don't want your idea.
We're not even fans of your religion, but we really
don't like your ideas. And we don't know if you're
(32:09):
closeted radical. We don't know if you're a closeted radical.
What the Catholic Church didn't have. I don't believe we're
suicide bombers. I don't believe the Catholic Church had looking
they were looking for dirty bombs to wipe out Protestants.
How much of this are we willing to tolerate? Is
(32:32):
the Constitution the first Amendment of suicide pack The answers
now can't be you are tongue type.
Speaker 3 (32:39):
Now, it's sometimes tongue tired. It's just it's a very
I believe it's a sensitive topic. I don't care what
your religion is. When it comes to whether or not
it becomes a radical version of that religion, then it
gets dicey ideologies government wise. That be where we put
(33:00):
a stop to it, at least we try to in elections.
I believe it is anti American if you just say
because you believe a certain way religiously that.
Speaker 1 (33:12):
We don't like it, and I agree, I don't think
we're h I agree. And this is where the American moderates,
centrists conservatives need to be able to articulate their position.
You need to be able to thread this needle. We're
not opposing the content of your speech. No, okay, we're
(33:35):
not going to do that because we have better speech.
But it requires those of us with the better idea
to get out and be able to say it without
being shouted down. Tucker Carlson is getting shouted down because
the implication is that Tucker is pro Iran and he's questioning,
(33:59):
why are we bombing Roan? Steve Bannon is also being
hectored by the establishment neo cons as being an isolationist
and a buffoon. I personally align with Tucker and Steve
Bannon on almost everything. We have to be able to
thread this needle so that we don't come across as bigots, haters.
(34:25):
But we need to be able to say, look, here's
what happens when you young people are vote. We'll let
you vote right, you will vote, and if the majority
of the people or the plurality as the case in
New York City. They want a Muslim socialist, a devout
socialists to run to basically have a combination DMV run
(34:49):
grocery stores. They're going to vote for that. But now
we go back to the very beginning of the show,
and that is protecting the minds of the youth, the
youth who were behind Bernie Sanders and AOC, which will
be a presidential ticket. I predict the youth that voted
for socialism in New York City, Portland, the Minneapolis. A
(35:16):
lot of these voters are homegrown. They're not immigrants that
are bringing their form of politics here. They're not bringing
a better way to do things here. These are Americans
may not know better. That's my concern. And when this
reminds me when Reagan and sixty eight sent in the
guard at Berkeley over the anti war protests because Berkeley
(35:42):
wouldn't act like adults and do it themselves. There comes
a point in time when our leadership needs to be
able to say, now, we're not tolerating this question. Is
Trump's doing that now? And unapologetically I have a concern
(36:04):
on who's going to be able to keep that momentum going.
But then also in the Democrats, it appears as their
response is more of Bernie aoc mom Donnie Right and
their politics. Their ideas and the ideas that these young
people are voting for have failed everywhere they've been. The
(36:27):
reason the United States economy is nearly forty trillion in
debt is because of ideas like this.
Speaker 3 (36:37):
Well, that's why you have to have balance. I mean,
that's where we talk about checks and balances at the
state level. If you're going to be the mayor of
New York, if they want that, that's the state level, which,
if I'm not mistaken, is the conservative viewpoint that you
want to have. Let's, you know, we take care of
our own. We want to run our state. We you know,
we run our state. So when you get to the
(36:58):
national level, Brad, I don't I think you're going to
have enough voices. They're going to be able to allow
to speak their mind, as you mentioned earlier, from a
conservative standpoint, will they say, well, no, there's enough of
us that are not going to tolerate this. What I'd
like to see is a way for us to find balance.
I see the pendulum swinging too far one way and
then too far the other way. When there is potential
(37:20):
for this country to be it's always it's always going
to be a great country, but could always be better.
Speaker 1 (37:26):
But isn't this the experiment. Isn't this democracy in action?
As conversation at people listening to the show right now,
that people are actually interested in this content, this is
democracy in action. And I think it's an amazing time
to be alive and paying attention. But as my one
of my favorite historical figures Winston Churchill said, the young
(37:50):
they know not what they do, but must learn the
hard way. And I don't know, there's a lot of
lessons that that our young generations can't be taught, that
has to be learned. Unfortunately, their learning process is going
to hurt our country.
The general's out and can't be sitting in, can't be
pins for stepping in.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
It's a pleasure as always.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
Nice to see you. Hey. Those of us who voted
for Boss Pro in nineteen ninety two and nineteen ninety six,
we kind of knew. And this shows for those of
us that were thinking this way, we saw some things
happening in the early nineties that came have come true.
And that's what I want to focus on today, CAMPI
and I want to I want to share our what
(00:32):
is it when voices like Ross Pro who are saying
this giant sucking sound or jobs leaving America and we
were pushed into a nineteen ninety two election with a
basically unknown Bill Clinton who wound up winning. Yeah, I
want to talk a little bit about the behind the scenes,
(00:55):
the planning, ok that gets somebody like Bill Clinton into
the White House. But before we go into that, I
do want to talk about how Hollywood tends to prognosticate,
how Hollywood tends to get some things right and advance.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
They're very good at foreshadowing.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
Yeah, And we were just before went on the air,
we were just talking about the fiction of the show
twenty four. Someone thought up the concept what if there
was a terrorist plot in the heartland in the United
States and we needed to break laws and bend the
(01:33):
constitution to stimy it. And it became a hugely popular show.
Yes you watched it. Oh, I was addicted. Yes, loved
it and in it. Counter Terrorism Unit CTU, the first
show aired, win relative to nine to eleven.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
About them a less than a month after correct, isn't
that amazing?
Speaker 3 (01:55):
It's shocking, which means they were taping and filming and
getting ready before.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
He had the idea that this is realistic enough, and
in fact it was so realistic they actually did the show.
Twenty four episodes represented one hour in real time. What
was the What was Jack Bauer's He.
Speaker 3 (02:13):
Would say, the following takes place between twelve am and
one am of benccar in real time.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
That's right, well done, thank you.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
So I look at this and I then fast forward
to the bombings of Iran. Okay, does this sound at
all like Top Gun? Maverick?
Speaker 2 (02:37):
Oh, yeah, a little bit.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
You're talking about the where they had the mission to
get the underground bunker.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
Absolutely, Maverick, Right, So, Maverick, Tom Cruise is a test
pilot right here so now he's back there, he's teaching.
It's thirty years later, and now the mission it's not Now,
this isn't Jack Bauer chasing Middle Eastern terrorists around the Heartland,
(03:03):
which became very realistic. Sure, and then top Gun Maverick
is the mission involves destroying a heavily fortified uranium enrichment
facility in an unknown enemy territory a rogue nation and
a narrow cannon canyon with anti aircraft systems and fifth
(03:30):
generation fighters and it has to be a miraculous attack
for it to no air road room for air And
I'm pretty sure that's what happened last weekend.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
Almost dead on, with the exception of it being stealth
bombers substitute for the fighter jets.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
No, no, the fifth generation fighters or what Iran has.
They have our old F fourteens Clinton sold them, are
F fourteens. They have not received any aircraft from well
United States.
Speaker 3 (03:58):
Those are the life I mean in real life are
stealth bombers were over there. I understand what you're talking
about with the fifth generation fighters and the F fourteens
that that also really took place, like you mentioned, Yeah,
I was, but I reverted back to the movie.
Speaker 1 (04:10):
But someone was thinking, I wonder, you know, it's this realistic.
It's fiction, but this realistic. So when you start to
look at very popular cultural pop shows or movies, let's
go back to the show Yellowstone, another huge favorite of America. Yes,
(04:30):
what's this story of Yellowstone? The story of Yellowstone is
we were here, our family has the land, and then
we're going to do everything you can to keep the
coastal elites from coming in and turning it into some
sort of cosmopolitan area.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
Yeah, corporation's taking over, and who's losing. The Yellowstone ranch
would have been in the generations for what two hundred years?
Speaker 1 (05:00):
But of course you've got the indigenous tribe right there saying, hey,
hold on hypocrite. So we see Hollywood thinking ahead on
what could be very relevant in the very near future.
So I want to keep an eye on what is
coming out in movies, not necessarily books, but definitely movies
(05:21):
and TV shows because they can be quite prescient. And
I look at and this is going to dovetail into
Bill Clinton, because I built I do believe Bill Clinton
was a central casting crew of very very wealthy probably Americans,
probably some all system foreign money that wanted to bust
(05:45):
up the East Coast establishment, the Reagan Bush dynasty. And
I think when we look at, for instance, Yellowstone and
it hits that tension between MAGA and the coastal elite.
You look at twenty four and it hits that tension
between Judeo Christian America and Muslim radical Islam jihad. You
(06:12):
look at Top Gun, Maverick, and we now have rogue
terrorist nations with nukes, or we have to get them
on the five yard line of getting nukes, and we
need to take them out. So Top Gun, out of
all the premises that they could have done for the
remake the part two of one of the most storied
(06:34):
movies in modern history, they picked this story. Do you
think do you think that there is If Hollywood is
thinking this way, wouldn't it make sense that those with
political power, those with financial power would also start thinking,
kind of in a fictional daydream way, what if? And
(06:56):
then enough of them get together and go, you know what,
that's not a bad idea. Yeah, And this is where
Bill Clinton comes in. I think this is extremely important.
You look at the run Republicans had on the presidency
for thirty four years. There was a Republican in the
White House save four years for Jimmy Carter. The Democrats
were out in the wilderness like they are right now,
(07:17):
way out in the wilderness. Actually where they are right
now is much further out in the wilderness.
Speaker 3 (07:22):
Yeah, they certainly lack any type of strong leadership at
this point. They need to get that fixed if they
want to do anything from a democratic perspective.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
So they start to think, what do we need. We
need a plan, and then we need messaging, and we
need some candidates, and then we're going to find We're
going to put these candidates in an octagon primaries and
we're going to see how they do. And I want
to go back to nineteen ninety two and between the
(07:51):
years nineteen eighty five and nineteen ninety two, what the
Democrat Party did to get itself in position to get
a little southern boy named Bill Clinton from Arkansas into
the White House. We have to identify this pattern, because
this pattern just landed a socialist in New York City.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
It did.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
Yeah, so we need to talk about this. I think
it's very important the American people start picking up on patterns,
and it's not always that it might start off with
the best intentions for America. But once you open certain doors,
you start to let in some really bad things. And
I'm concerned that in the early nineties, when we opened
(08:37):
up the door in nineteen ninety two to this young
Bill Clinton and the dramatic pivot and foreign policy and
domestic policy and globalism, and you look behind the scenes
and the relationships with some big power brokers and money
and money, huge money, billionaire money, you start to see
(09:00):
that we are now reaping what was sown. We need
to be very careful about the seeds that are put
into the soil here in America. And this is going
to come butting up right against the First Amendment. What
do we do as Americans when someone says, you're saying
you don't want to let new ideas into our country.
(09:21):
We're fine with that, but we need to address the
protective minds of the youth, because they're the ones that
are voting for this stuff. All right, CAMPI and I
are back. General is off. This week we're talking about
when fiction, Hollywood fiction proves to be purely accurate to
(09:48):
very near future historical events. We're talking about nine to
eleven and within a month the show twenty four Drop. Yeah,
we look at then we talked about Top Gun Maverick
and the bombing of a of a of a buried
uranium enrichment facility and some rogue nation looks a lot
(10:10):
like Iran. Iran, and uh, it's almost as though we're
getting conditioned in advance. That's a little tenfold Hattish. I
get it, But I don't believe completely in coincidences.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
I don't think you're necessarily out of line. There.
Speaker 3 (10:24):
Think about a couple of the movies that have dealt
with how about.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Outbreak, but it's about a worldwide pandemic.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
There's been two movies since Yeah, I think that happened
before the twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
Yeah, there are some that are there that are general
what if there's a pandemic, But then you can get
into some really specifics and you're like, holy cow, they
they nailed that one. So you know, you you can
go all the way back to you can go back
into the sci fi. I'm not even talking sci fi, sure,
(10:54):
I'm talking about more mainstream pop culture that kind of
predicts or it's very very reasonable to say this could happen.
And that's where I think with Top Gun Maverick, which
came out in twenty twenty two, maybe twenty.
Speaker 2 (11:14):
Five, yet twenty twenty two, and it's just.
Speaker 1 (11:17):
Eerily similar to what happened with our bombing, and ran
as though, what if we have to what if? What's
it look like if we've got to bomb a foreign nation,
a sovereign that didn't that ostensibly has not presented an
immediate direct threat to the United States. Yet we go
(11:39):
in under this new doctrine of preemptive bombing, and we're
all rooting for MAV right, I mean, we're all, of course,
we're not even considering, well, this is a sovereign nation,
they have their natural rights to self defense. We kind
of blow right by that stuff right now. Am I
saying the Pentagon got in bed with Tom Cruise in
(12:01):
Hollywood to get us ready for bombing Rand's nuclear facilities. No,
if someone said, hey, they got access to a lot
of information and intel and access to military established military bases,
in military equipment, with the approval of the same military
people that we're going to be pulling, you know, putting
(12:21):
the planning together, I'd say, yeah, that kind of makes sense.
So I think it's important that we pay attention to
fiction because a lot of times, fiction is not as
much fiction as we think it is. Let's look at,
for instance, what's happened in New York City. Who would
have thought that within one generation a young Muslim socialist
(12:44):
would be on deck to be the mayor of New
York City, the city that was struck too light of
a word by a radical branch of the Muslim faith.
And the people voted this. Who voted for this, the
young generation voted for this, The younger people that moved
to Paris, the young internationalists that moved to London, the
(13:08):
young internationalists, or the young Americans that are believe everything
that they're being told is anti America, anti white, anti patriarchy,
anti male. They go to Portland, They're in la They're
in San Francisco, They're in Minneapolis, They're in New York City,
(13:30):
They're in Columbus, Ohio. Columbus is in the bullpen warming up.
We will have this. It's already here at a state level.
But we need to decide as an American people, we now,
how much more proof do you need that the very
dangerous ideas of socialism are working in our big cities
(13:51):
and on the minds of our youth. Socialism's record is
a complete and total, deadly failure. They're not teaching this
in our schools. Socialism is like the opium of the
of the youth, of the idiots. It's just it sounds great.
It's a false prophet. And when the American cities built
(14:12):
by American capitalism are being dismantled by socialist immigrants who
want to replicate the same failed policies of their home
countries from which they ran, where is our response. How
far can the government go to shut those voices down?
I don't think you can do much under the First Amendment.
(14:34):
But they're getting to our youth. They're absolutely getting to
our youth. And I saw a quote. I think it
hits it on the head. Can't you tell me what
you think. Democracies fail when the people start voting for
a living instead of working for one.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
So say the quote to me, Democracies.
Speaker 1 (14:52):
Fail when the people start voting for a living instead
of working for one.
Speaker 3 (14:58):
It's an interesting comment. I happen to believe that in
small doses. And I don't know if this is going
to get me smacked around or not. You can't have
a total socialist government. You can have progressive ideas. I
believe in a small dose, can socialism work. It does
because the NFL is a socialist type of It's a
you know, I can turn the NFL off, you can,
(15:22):
but look at it right now, it's going worldwide. I'm
just saying it's a socialist type of organizations.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
Paris, So's London, So's Portland, So's La so San Francisco,
there's Minneapolis, there's New York City. Yep, all right, yep
the Democrats. The Democrats have been looking for new leadership. Yes,
they need new leadership. And so if you go back
to nineteen the mid eighties, when the Democrats were out
(15:50):
in the wilderness wondering when's Ronald Reagan ever going to leave?
When's Reaganism going to leave the minds of America? In
two enter Bill Clinton. What happened here? And this is
really what I want to focus on. So a generation later,
(16:11):
after the nineteen ninety two and nineteen ninety six elections,
the key politician who were the key politicians who are
able to make this work are not now just rich,
they're filthy wealthy. Let me say that again. The people
(16:33):
behind Clinton and I'll throw the bushes in there. But
the politicians that were there in ninety and the nineties
and the two thousands and the teens are no longer
just rich. They're filthy wealthy. Nancy's assets and PERFORMANCELI heard
(16:53):
haven't double checked it. I don't know where this comes
from that her portfolio is up sixty four percent in
the last year, beating the most aggressive hedge funds. I
don't understand where how hard it is for Americans to
figure out that we've been sold out. The Democrats in
the eighties were getting the breakspeat off of them. They
(17:17):
needed to abandon their old New dealers. They need to
get those old New deal Democrats out. They needed to
kind of push the Great Society playbook away. They needed
a young, dynamic candidate to challenge this East Coast dynasty,
the Reagan Bush dynasty. Even though Reagan California. The Democrats
(17:37):
were getting crushed in elections, they were getting crushed in ideas,
they were getting crushed in culture. They needed a post
Reagan Bush political landscape, just like the Democrats need a
post Trump thoroughbred. What's troubling for me is the next
Bill Clinton very well, maybe a Muslim socialist, and we've
(18:01):
already seen that the largest city in the United States.
We'll vote for that. And just as Reagan's presidency redefined
American conservatism, emphasizing deregulation, tax cuts, strong foreign policy, and
tradition and custom and culture, Bill Clinton came in with
(18:26):
Democrat socialism light and began unraveling a lot of the
old Democrat playbook. And we saw this in ninety two.
What was happening. The question, and we're going to hit
on the next segment, is who got Bill Clinton into
the big show and what did they get in return?
(18:52):
Welcome back, Campi's in for the general. We're talking about
how did America get to the point where awesome major
US cities have they've become untothered Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, La, Chicago,
New York. It wasn't this way twenty years ago. And
(19:17):
in order for it to be this way today, then
we have to look at when did the when when
did this virus? Or when did this When did the
door open to a lot of this stuff? And I
go back and forth. Was it Obama? Was it Clinton?
Was it the counterculture revolution in the late sixties early seventies.
(19:40):
I've studied them all three and I'm really now focused
on Clinton. The Democrats needed a They needed a whole
new playbook, and so they came up with a nineteen
eighty five something called the Democrat Leadership Council or Conference,
(20:00):
the d Triple C. The DLC Democratic Leadership Council is
founded in nineteen eighty five and it advocated a quote
third way approach. By nineteen ninety, the DLC had its
eye on a few young horses. Maybe you know these names,
some rising stars representing this new third way. Al Gore
(20:25):
was forty four years old at the time. Joe Biden
just turned fifty, John Kerrey just forty nine. Bill Clinton
in his forties, probably the youngest. I think he's the
youngest out of the bunch.
Speaker 2 (20:40):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
There was Bill Clinton and his chief strategist James Carvill.
And Carvel told Clinton, you've got to say, it's the
economy stupid, the new deal in great society. Redistribution has
gone too far. Americans are rejecting it. So now's our chance.
(21:01):
Bush forty one, with his goofy aloofness, blue blood East
Coast establishment, had votes siphoned away from him by Parrot.
I was one of them. Ross Prow was saying all
the right things. He was America first, Keep America first. Instead,
Bill Clinton gets in and America gets a hard shift
(21:24):
to the left economic globalism. It's like throwing the doors
open in our house for the ac to leave the
house and let the flies in. Let's talk real quick
about Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton's from one of the most
forgettable states in the Union, Arkansas. And I don't think
(21:46):
Arkansas has ever produced anything at a major federal level,
not that I.
Speaker 2 (21:50):
Can recall, up until Bill Clinton.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
No. Bill Clinton gets selected as one of just two
representatives from the state of Arkansas to represent a Boys' Nation,
which was a part of American Legion Boys Nation. They
would take two from each state for a week long
simulation of federal government where participants act as senators. They
(22:17):
learn about democracy and leadership. That's nineteen sixty three. Bill
Clinton's sixteen. He meets Jack Kennedy, shakes his hand. Picture
is out there. He ran in ninety two with that
picture front and center. After that, he graduates from high school.
He goes back to d C. Georgetown University sixty four
(22:37):
to sixty eight. He gets a degree in Foreign service.
He delivers the commencement address for Georgetown class President. He
goes to work for his state, Senator William Fulbright Fulbright Scholarship.
Guy Fulbright very important here, guys, Clinton's mentor. William Fulbright
(22:58):
was Chair of the Senate Foreign Relateations Committee from nineteen
fifty nine to nineteen seventy four. Senator Fulbright was the chair,
not on the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
the longest serving chair in its history. And Fulbright lost
his reelection in seventy four because he questioned Israel's influence
(23:23):
on US foreign policy, because you have the Arab Israeli
conflict going on, and he didn't say the right things,
and he got backlashed from the pro Israel lobbies. And
Fulbright lost in seventy four from significant out of state
funding tied to his Israel stance, is perceived anti Israel stance.
You can find the articles in New York Times nineteen
(23:43):
seventy four. It's out there. So Clinton, Fulbright's protege learns
the political cost of challenging pro Israel interest. So after
he graduates from Georgetown, he goes to Oxford as a
Rhodes scholar. We've done plenty of shows on Rhodes scholarships
and where that came from after his Rhodes scholarship, goes
to Yale Law School and then Georgetown Oxford Rhodes Scholar,
(24:07):
Yale Law What do you do with that? You do
the same thing, Barack Obama. Did you go back to
your town and get into the political machine. That's not
what I would have done with those credits, with those
bona fides. I'm going where I can make money on
Wall Street. I'm going where I can make money in
la I'm going where I can make money in Chicago.
Speaker 2 (24:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
Well, Bill Clinton, I'm sure was thinking the same thing.
Was he promised, you'll make even more than you can
possibly make on Wall Street if you follow this path.
Speaker 2 (24:38):
Do you think it just boils down the money, doesn't it?
Speaker 1 (24:41):
Always?
Speaker 2 (24:41):
Well, I'm an optimist.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
I don't from a capitalist standpoint, sure, but I mean
somebody says you could really change the face of the
way this nation is going.
Speaker 1 (24:50):
You think he was that much of a I don't
think Bill College. I think he had some ideology. I
think he had I think he was young, naive and
want to But at the end of the day, you
turned down all these lucrative offers, and Obama I had
to do the same thing, you've turned down all these
lucrative offers.
Speaker 3 (25:06):
I don't necessarily disagree with you. All I'm saying is
you mentioned at the start of the segment the fact
that former President Clinton met Jack Kennedy, you know, in
sixty three.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
I think that huture pressure is assassinated, and I think
that that was.
Speaker 1 (25:20):
A huge impression.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
And so yeah, that for sure.
Speaker 3 (25:22):
Could that be the beginning of his ideology that I
could be that guy? I mean, that takes quite an
ego to do that. I mean, you have to have
an ego to be the president or want to be
the president. So maybe that carried him. I'm not for
sure about the money, but it could have.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
Bill Clinton clearly is a very, very very intelligent man.
He's also a political pro no doubt he's right. He's
also made hundreds of millions of dollars correct and a
position federal government that's never paid over to fifty Yeah. Okay,
So what family is in Arkansas?
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Yami?
Speaker 1 (25:58):
What major US corporation is in Arkansas? Walmart?
Speaker 2 (26:02):
See that? I didn't know that. That's surprising.
Speaker 1 (26:05):
So Bill Clinton runs for Congress and loses, but it's
a statewide campaign down there in Arkansas, gets a lot
of FaceTime, a lot of earned media. Then he runs
for ag wins, then he becomes governor in eighty until
ninety ninety two. I don't think it's a stretch to
(26:28):
say that the Walton family found their globalist candidate and
Bill Clinton, and made sure that he kept going forward.
And by the way, did you know that Hillary was
on Walmart's board from nineteen eighty six to nineteen ninety two.
Hillary Clinton was on their board of directors and she
(26:50):
was a lawyer in the Rose Law firm. Rose Law
Firm is the Walton family's law firm. And the year
before Bill Clinton announced he's running for president in nineteen
ninety two, he's invited to the Builderberg conference in Germany
and nobody governor from a state no Europeans heard of
(27:11):
at a globalist summit. That's where the team owners in
front office managers picked their next political players. Apak is
there too. We're gonna hear a lot more about APAC,
the Arab the American Israel Political Action Committee. Yeah, and
Clint saw his mentor Fulbright get crushed in seventy four
(27:34):
for questioning Israel. He got the memo playball or get
benched and then he gets the sixty minutes puff piece
in nineteen ninety two January ninety two election year, not
just any show sixty minutes, not just any episode the
Sunday following the Super Bowl, fifty million people watching. Do
(27:56):
you think CBS just handed him that slot out of canon,
out of kindness.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
It's a good question.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
And as soon as Clinton gets in NAFTA, wto China
trade deals, American jobs, tanks, Walmart, and Chinese suppliers get rich,
we become NATO's laptop. We're bombing Serbia, We're bombing Israel's
and the means one more segment. We'll talk about this,
(28:26):
all right. I'm Attorney Brad Koffel, and the General's out
in with me. Is can't be. We of course, need
to thank our singular sponsor, chez Ron Automotive Group every week. Guys,
thank you again for sending me or emailing me your photos.
You're buying cars up at chez Ron. Please let them
know they are our sponsor of our show. That it's
(28:48):
extremely important to have this message on an AM radio
and a huge state of Ohio. And I think, not
think I know that once the vag Ramaswami becomes governor.
Our state's gonna explode. And he's talking no income tax,
(29:09):
he's talking reduced corporate taxes, he's talking deregulation. He taught,
he's saying all the right things because it's the economy stupid.
It's like Carville told Clinton in ninety two. Now in
New York City, you've got Zoran Mamdanni mam donni beats
Andrew Cuomo. Think about that. What we have as a
(29:30):
glimpse of the future the Democrat Party, just like nineteen
ninety one, ninety two, when you see January ninety two
and you just got done watching the Super Bowl and
they immediately go into an interview with Bill Clinton and
his wife talking about Jennifer Flowers. Where did he come from?
(29:51):
Where did Zoron Mamdani come from? You had a glimpse
of the Democrat Party in January ninety two and sixty. Men,
and it's and you see where that took American jobs.
You can see where that took American the world's policeman. Policeman.
(30:12):
We were the we were everywhere. We were making a
lot of money. Big tech explosion was doing it. That
was a lot of hype, sugar high. We have the
same thing. Now we're on a sugar high. We are
not an economically sound Our economy is not economically sound.
But now what we have is a glimpse of the
(30:33):
future the Democrat Party and they are Muslim and they
are socialist. Question for you can't be Do we sound
like the bigots of the eighteen hundreds and early nineteen
hundreds worried about the Catholics?
Speaker 2 (30:52):
Do we sound that way?
Speaker 1 (30:54):
Yep? Is history going to look back on us and
a man a man, you guys got it wrong with them.
Speaker 3 (30:59):
Boy, when I I guess if I looked at the
overall landscape of.
Speaker 1 (31:03):
This strictly religious, strictly religious, the Protestants, yes, then yes,
maybe a little bit. The Protestants specifically did not want
the Catholic Church here. It's a big reason why the
American was founded. Yeah, and the break in England from
the church. Sure have. Now we have a call for
(31:23):
prayer and Times Square. Now we have a call for
prayer in Central Park. We'll have calls for prayer and
the State House downtown. The American people need to decide
because we're the bosses. Yeah, is there a line on
what we're willing to tolerate? Is it anti American to
(31:49):
say you can only have a little bit of your religion,
but we don't want you running our civic institutions. We
don't want you running our government. We don't want your idea.
We're not even fans of your religion, but we really
don't like your ideas. And we don't know if you're
(32:09):
closeted radical. We don't know if you're a closeted radical.
What the Catholic Church didn't have. I don't believe we're
suicide bombers. I don't believe the Catholic Church had looking
they were looking for dirty bombs to wipe out Protestants.
How much of this are we willing to tolerate? Is
(32:32):
the Constitution the first Amendment of suicide pack The answers
now can't be you are tongue type.
Speaker 3 (32:39):
Now, it's sometimes tongue tired. It's just it's a very
I believe it's a sensitive topic. I don't care what
your religion is. When it comes to whether or not
it becomes a radical version of that religion, then it
gets dicey ideologies government wise. That be where we put
(33:00):
a stop to it, at least we try to in elections.
I believe it is anti American if you just say
because you believe a certain way religiously that.
Speaker 1 (33:12):
We don't like it, and I agree, I don't think
we're h I agree. And this is where the American moderates,
centrists conservatives need to be able to articulate their position.
You need to be able to thread this needle. We're
not opposing the content of your speech. No, okay, we're
(33:35):
not going to do that because we have better speech.
But it requires those of us with the better idea
to get out and be able to say it without
being shouted down. Tucker Carlson is getting shouted down because
the implication is that Tucker is pro Iran and he's questioning,
(33:59):
why are we bombing Roan? Steve Bannon is also being
hectored by the establishment neo cons as being an isolationist
and a buffoon. I personally align with Tucker and Steve
Bannon on almost everything. We have to be able to
thread this needle so that we don't come across as bigots, haters.
(34:25):
But we need to be able to say, look, here's
what happens when you young people are vote. We'll let
you vote right, you will vote, and if the majority
of the people or the plurality as the case in
New York City. They want a Muslim socialist, a devout
socialists to run to basically have a combination DMV run
(34:49):
grocery stores. They're going to vote for that. But now
we go back to the very beginning of the show,
and that is protecting the minds of the youth, the
youth who were behind Bernie Sanders and AOC, which will
be a presidential ticket. I predict the youth that voted
for socialism in New York City, Portland, the Minneapolis. A
(35:16):
lot of these voters are homegrown. They're not immigrants that
are bringing their form of politics here. They're not bringing
a better way to do things here. These are Americans
may not know better. That's my concern. And when this
reminds me when Reagan and sixty eight sent in the
guard at Berkeley over the anti war protests because Berkeley
(35:42):
wouldn't act like adults and do it themselves. There comes
a point in time when our leadership needs to be
able to say, now, we're not tolerating this question. Is
Trump's doing that now? And unapologetically I have a concern
(36:04):
on who's going to be able to keep that momentum going.
But then also in the Democrats, it appears as their
response is more of Bernie aoc mom Donnie Right and
their politics. Their ideas and the ideas that these young
people are voting for have failed everywhere they've been. The
(36:27):
reason the United States economy is nearly forty trillion in
debt is because of ideas like this.
Speaker 3 (36:37):
Well, that's why you have to have balance. I mean,
that's where we talk about checks and balances at the
state level. If you're going to be the mayor of
New York, if they want that, that's the state level, which,
if I'm not mistaken, is the conservative viewpoint that you
want to have. Let's, you know, we take care of
our own. We want to run our state. We you know,
we run our state. So when you get to the
(36:58):
national level, Brad, I don't I think you're going to
have enough voices. They're going to be able to allow
to speak their mind, as you mentioned earlier, from a
conservative standpoint, will they say, well, no, there's enough of
us that are not going to tolerate this. What I'd
like to see is a way for us to find balance.
I see the pendulum swinging too far one way and
then too far the other way. When there is potential
(37:20):
for this country to be it's always it's always going
to be a great country, but could always be better.
Speaker 1 (37:26):
But isn't this the experiment. Isn't this democracy in action?
As conversation at people listening to the show right now,
that people are actually interested in this content, this is
democracy in action. And I think it's an amazing time
to be alive and paying attention. But as my one
of my favorite historical figures Winston Churchill said, the young
(37:50):
they know not what they do, but must learn the
hard way. And I don't know, there's a lot of
lessons that that our young generations can't be taught, that
has to be learned. Unfortunately, their learning process is going
to hurt our country.
Popular Podcasts
United States of Kennedy
United States of Kennedy is a podcast about our cultural fascination with the Kennedy dynasty. Every week, hosts Lyra Smith and George Civeris go into one aspect of the Kennedy story.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com