July 1, 2025 • 24 mins
ICYMI: ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – A look ‘Beyond the Box Score’ with regular guest contributor Jackie Rae; host of ‘The Jackie Rae Show,’ weighing in on Dawn Staley being considered for the New York Knicks next Head Coaching AND the Detroit Pistons' Malik Beasley being investigated for allegations of gambling…PLUS – Jackie joins the conversation regarding “women, dating short men” - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app & YouTube @MrMoKelly
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (00:06):
Later with Mo Kelly.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Let's go Beyond the box Score with Jackie Ray, Jackie
Ray good even, let's jump right into this. I reached
out to you over the weekend because I saw a
rumor which popped up on social media, and it was
that Dawn Staley, who is presently the coach of the
three time in Citua champion South Carolina Gamecocks women and
(00:28):
also a member of the Nasmith Basketball Hall of Fame,
also a member of the FOEBA Basketball Hall of Fame,
three time Olympic gold medalist player, also Olympic gold medalist,
coach of the twenty twenty Olympics.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
Down Staley, just for contest?
Speaker 5 (00:45):
Come on now.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
She has been contacted by the New York Knicks. I
can't say whether she's the front Raider runner, but it
has been confirmed that there is an actual conversation and
if it were to proceed, she could be and would
be the first female head coach of an NBA team.
What did you think about it when we first started
seeing this information.
Speaker 4 (01:08):
When I first started seeing it, I definitely believed it
was true. Just because of her caliber, who she is,
the way that she can motivate both men and women.
We've seen that her resume in that area is flawless.
But I automatically said it's a no go for her.
And the reason why I said that is because she
really has a passion for shaping young women for the
next level of their career and life. So it's not
(01:30):
just shaping them for the WNBA.
Speaker 5 (01:32):
That's great.
Speaker 4 (01:32):
Obviously, she's shaping champions. I mean every time somebody wins
a champion in the WNBA, don Staley's right there, you know,
look at my protege, so I think, but it's more
than that for her. For her, it really is preparing
young women for the next level, even if that doesn't
mean basketball, and.
Speaker 5 (01:48):
That's a true passion for her. It warms her heart.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
You can see it on her face every time she
talks about one of the students that came through her program.
Speaker 5 (01:55):
So I just don't know.
Speaker 4 (01:57):
Now, Look, Money talks to Boloney walks though, right, I
don't know what we're talking about financially.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Let me give you some context. Give it her resume,
which I read off intentionally. JJ Reddick, who is in
the number two market rookie coach no experience Lakers gets
eight million a year. Presently, Don Staley gets four million
a year as coach of the game Cocks.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
So I don't know if.
Speaker 5 (02:22):
It's to make more than JJ she should.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
But you know, don't want to get ahead of ourselves.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
But she would stand and make at least probably double
what she's making right now. And maybe after a certain point,
could she conceivably have a conversation with herself and say,
you know.
Speaker 3 (02:37):
What I've done all I can do on this level.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
We talk about it with men all the time, who
like a coach Skrzyzewski or someone who's done so much
in college ball, there may be that pull to go
to the next level.
Speaker 4 (02:51):
That's a little different though, because when you're talking about
NC double A men's sports, where there it's basketball or football.
NC DOUBLEA men's sports have long stay alumni fan base,
so that is solidified. So if you succeed there, you
definitely should be able to succeed at the next level.
Right now, NCAA women's game is feeding the WNBA, so
(03:12):
she still has work to do to help build the WNBA.
If she wants to look at it now, look at
it like that. But on the flip side, she might say,
you know, there has to be a first at some point.
It is it is not unusual for men to coach
in the WNBA, which is right, which is very very
odd to me that we have more men than women
right now.
Speaker 5 (03:29):
But it's fine.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
But at some point somebody has to be the one
that cracks that glass ceiling.
Speaker 5 (03:34):
So why not be the best to ever do it?
Speaker 2 (03:36):
And we know that there have been female coaches in
the NBA, like Becky Hammond, right, but never a head coach.
I thought it was going to be Becky Hammon too,
but she decided to go to the WNBA after coaching
as an assistant under Great Popovich.
Speaker 5 (03:52):
Right, but respectfully, and I love Becky.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
Her contract is a problem because for her to make
exponentially more than every single play, you know, the highest
salary for players, what two hundred fifty thousand dollars if
you're lucky, if you're lucky, and you know, for her
to be making millions and the players and the w
still don't have revenue sharing and things of that nature.
There's not extra roster spots, so they're not having to
kill themselves playing this game. So while I appreciate it,
(04:18):
Becky saying no, I want to play. I want to
coach in the W Like, don't play us, you know
what I mean, Like you're still getting If you really
wanted to impact the league in that way, it would
have been a more yes, I'm gonna do this, but
you know, you would have to address that elephant in
the room. So for don Staley, if she is going
to go somewhere, I do think she'll go to the
(04:39):
NBA because I think with her understanding and her players
talk to her, they confide in her.
Speaker 5 (04:44):
She's like a godmom to a lot of them.
Speaker 4 (04:46):
I don't think she would take a million dollar whatever salary,
even if it was. She makes four million right now,
so if she made five or six million in the
W I don't think she would take it because I
think it would be a conviction for her. So if
she is going to leave, it would be to the NBA.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
And I'm also hearing that the Knicks are speaking to
They've had two interviews from what I understand and read
with former Lakers coach Mike Brown former Cavaliers Mike Brown,
I would not if I I don't because I don't
think he's a talking about Don Staley, I don't think
he's a leader of men. I don't know if people
(05:21):
I agree with that for him. I think they would
play for Don Steely. I really do.
Speaker 4 (05:25):
Yeah, I agree with that because the way that she's
able to speak, she has this uncanny ability, like I've
seen her talk to to a multitude of different players.
She has an uncanny ability to just meet you where
you are, wherever, whatever that might be. Where you are
is going to be different than where I am. And
she's really good at that. And I think that the
question that's always going to come up when you're talking
about a woman coaching the men's game is can they
(05:47):
respect her?
Speaker 3 (05:50):
That's why I read off that resume.
Speaker 5 (05:51):
Exactly, if you don't respect her, then.
Speaker 4 (05:53):
You don't respect the game, because she has set her
name in stone in this game.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
I don't know if there I don't know if there's
anybody I'm being serious who has that resime right, Feeble
Hall of Fame, Nasmith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, three
gold medals as a player, gold medal as a coach.
Speaker 4 (06:14):
I don't know, right, And then you have to talk
about the intangibles. One of the things that comes in
women's sports a lot more often than comes in men's sports.
Is we have the social challenges with the set. In
social media, we battle the transgender conversation, and she has
handled all of those with grace and style. So if
they come up in the NBA, she can definitely lead
them in a way that they wouldn't be led by
(06:34):
anyone else. And she fits in New York specific man,
listen New York with love. She wouldn't pay nary a bill. Ever,
she'd be walking down the street. Can you get in
my car?
Speaker 2 (06:45):
Let me put it in another way for those who
don't know Don Staley, she's already a living legend. She
is and have a living legend in the number one
media market in a legendary city with a legendary franchise.
It fits in so many ways. But to your point,
I don't know she wants that.
Speaker 5 (07:01):
Yeah, I don't know if she wants.
Speaker 4 (07:02):
And when you talk about the Knicks specifically, because you
know it was this is supposed to be the next
year supposed to be and it wasn't, and then if
she comes in do they blame her? Well, the bar
is going to be set high regardless, right right, I
mean if she if she makes the move. I don't
think she'll make it, But if she makes the move, listen,
I'm going to New York for the first game.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
It would be one of the biggest things in the
history of sports.
Speaker 5 (07:27):
I would be there front row.
Speaker 2 (07:28):
When we come back. We have to talk about something
which should surprise nobody. There's another NBA player. Let me
just say, a professional sports figure who might be in
trouble for gambling.
Speaker 5 (07:40):
Oh shocker.
Speaker 3 (07:41):
Who could have seen that? Who could have predicted that?
Jackie Raise, other than I know that's coming up next.
If I am six forty life everywhere in my Heart radio.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
App, you're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand
from KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
Six forty Later with mo Kelly. As we continue to
go beyond the box Score with Jackie Ray and Jackie Ray.
I can't speak for other talk shows, but I know
that this particular talk show was on the story of
sports and gambling and the inevitability of it long before
probably anybody in the country. Yep, And we said that.
(08:23):
We started obviously with the Otani controversy and his interpreter.
I'm not trying to impugne anyone's integrity. Wait wait, but
we said that this is one of many across sports,
because it's everywhere now and we've been proven right along
the way. Now we have the Detroit Pistons Malik Beasley
(08:44):
reportedly being investigated by the FEDS allegations of gambling. A
prominent US sports book noticed unusual betting activity on prop
bets for Beesley. If you don't know, prop bet is
like those weird promotional best off. We bet that Mark
Beasley will Malik Bisley will get six rebounds this game,
(09:04):
or who will play twenty five minutes so you get
three points?
Speaker 4 (09:07):
As in PubL it's like we'll have a streaker right
at halftime.
Speaker 3 (09:10):
That's a prop bet.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
And they noticed unusual betting on prop bets beginning in
January of last year, twenty twenty four. And this is
according to ESPN gambling reporter David Perdue. Beasley was playing
his loan season with the Bucks at that point. He
started seventy seven games, scoring eleven point three points and
shooting forty one percent on threes. Here's the thing. If
(09:32):
they noticed it back in January of twenty twenty four,
it is likely to me that there was a pattern
that they noticed beyond January twenty twenty four in building
this case. Now, he hasn't been charged with anything, but
he is known to be under investigation, and I think, yes,
(09:53):
this is what his lawyer said.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
Quote, an investigation is not a charge.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
Malik is afforded the same right of the presumption of
it since as anyone else under the US Constitution. As
of now, he has not been charged with anything close quote.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Yeah, but for him to know.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
That he is under investigation usually and I just say
this as someone who sat on a federal grand jury,
so I know how the investigations go. As far as
there's investigative and there's accusatory. Investigative ones go over the
portion of weeks or months. Accusatory is just a one
day thing when you have these investigative grand juries. And
(10:32):
I have to believe it's at a grand jury point
at this point, there present any evidence to the grand
jury what they know?
Speaker 5 (10:39):
That says to me they got something.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
They already have him and they just haven't actually gone
for the true bill the indictment.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
What would you what would you ascertain from this investigation
so far?
Speaker 4 (10:54):
So I'm right there with you. You don't even mention this,
This isn't even a talking point. If you don't, you
haven't dited all the eye and cross all the tea's.
They have what they need to have. If they wanted
to drop an indictment today, they could could be other
people involved. But you know, in my heart of hearts,
and I've said this about this topic from day one,
the relationship between professional sports and gambling is way too tight.
(11:18):
It just you know, and trastics and yeah, like I'll
go to what's the last game. Yeah, I've been to
I want to say, an NBA game and seen FanDuel
on the court or Draft Kings, you know what I mean.
And so there's a relationship there so much so that
I really just don't care because I think it's so
(11:40):
hypocritical for you to say, we're gonna partner with we
are you can't player, but us big establishment, we're gonna
partner with this gambling thing over here. Not so much
so that we're going to put their paraphernalia on our
floor and we're gonna tell our fans you should gamble
but not you player.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Well, one step further, it also be able to use
the names and likes the players.
Speaker 4 (12:01):
Yes, and I've seen that in the commercial. So for me,
it's it's very very hypocritical because you can't how do
you draw that line? You literally you're drawing a line
in quicksand at this point, because you're saying do as
I say, not do as I do. That doesn't work
on kids. It's definitely not going to work on grown men.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
And I understand the distinction being made worth like the
league making money is one thing. The players making money
and then impugning the integrity of the game is something else.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
I get.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
And the argument is, well, you really can't have it
both ways. If you don't want gambling in your sport,
then you have to make sure it's not in your.
Speaker 4 (12:36):
Sport one percent, which means you sever this relationship because
the only way that you can really come down on
a player for gambling is if you don't take part
in it. You can't say do as I say. Again,
because it's very hypocritical. So now when you're telling and
now there's endorsement deals, you know, with certain people, so
you're literally telling the players, hey, we're bringing this this
(12:57):
entity in so we can make money. You can make money.
Let's build a partnership. I've been in partnerships that I've
also supported that other partner, and that might mean purchasing
something that they have distributed.
Speaker 5 (13:09):
That's just how it goes.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
It might be I don't know how the collective bargaining
agreement reads. It may be something where you have, like
you have a set aside or a carve out for
merchandise or apparel which is sold. They get a piece
of that, right, maybe they get a piece of the
gambling as well. But it's too easy for a middle
tier player to make money off these prop bets, because
(13:30):
we've heard about this before. Where they don't have to
throw a game or do something which is above the radar,
but they can do something where, okay, the over underar
is three points for me tonight, so let me just
make sure I get hurt or I have to sit
out the second half.
Speaker 4 (13:47):
Right, They could do something like that, or they could
just make it. If it's if this is a person
who doesn't typically shoot threes, let me just shoot if
the percentages, so and so will shoot and make blah
blah blah threes, whether I make it or not, nobody
really afects me to shoot threes if I'm not a
good three point shooter. So if I suddenly start shooting
threes and I catch on fire when I've made this bet,
that's a win win. That's one of those things where
(14:08):
you can kind of get away with People are gonna
be like, oh my gosh, Yeah, it's such an amazing night. No,
they were gambling, but it's just too thin of a line.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
JB.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
Martinez in the chat says, the players already make millions,
way more than the average fan will ever make. Might
as well let the fans have some fun gambling.
Speaker 3 (14:27):
How would you respond?
Speaker 4 (14:28):
I think money creps absolutely, and I think once you
get a taste of money and you can figure out
a way to get money easily. To say that, oh,
they shouldn't do that because they make so much money.
I have never met a person who makes so much
money and didn't want more.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
Well, there are two things. I think they are two
parts of this.
Speaker 2 (14:46):
He's saying that the average fan will won't make the
type of NBA money that the players make, so let
the fans have some fun. I say, when when you
introduce gambling into the sport, and there are too many
ways that players can excuse me, fans can reach players
can reach time about that?
Speaker 3 (15:04):
Yeah, who can reach members?
Speaker 2 (15:05):
Of the organization and get inside information or somehow create
a cooperative agreement. All I'm saying is this is another
example of the story can only in one way. Yeah,
with the scandal, which is going to impact the integrity
or the perception of the sport forever.
Speaker 4 (15:20):
Yeah, and to your point, you know, never think that
a player is untouchable. I cover the WNBA next season.
I'm going to cover the Clippers as well. If I
have rapport with a player and you say, hey, Jackie,
do you think you can you know, nudge nudge, hint, hint,
winky winky.
Speaker 5 (15:36):
Everyone's accessible. This is, you know, just a thing or not.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
Was a beat writer for the Clippers. You may just
be in the locker room know some insider information. It's oh,
by the way, yeah he's not playing tonight.
Speaker 4 (15:49):
Or they might see Sometimes they don't tell you. They
might limit a player's minutes, and they don't tell you
that because they don't want the They're like, this is
an injury that we don't really know what it is.
Speaker 5 (15:58):
We might have to limit there.
Speaker 2 (15:59):
But I've learned some things just by being in the
locker room before and after that game.
Speaker 4 (16:04):
They don't let us in the locker room anymore. They
don't know, no, at least not in the W. We
used to go in the locker room in the W
they don't ever since COVID, they don't let us in
the locker room anymore.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
That makes sense.
Speaker 5 (16:15):
So I don't know if it's like that in the NBA,
but they don't.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
It probably is because they don't want to be responsible
for you getting.
Speaker 4 (16:20):
Somewhere right right, So, because that's that was the best
ear hustling place on the planet.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
You hear some stuff that, you see some stuff. This
is very valuable in this daid age. But I think
it's just a matter of time until we have another
major gambling controversy in a major sport.
Speaker 4 (16:40):
But I think, to say face the best way to
really be able to bring the hammer down morally on
a player, you have to sever these ties with the
gambling institutions.
Speaker 5 (16:49):
Will what happens that.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
I was gonna say, that's not gonna happen. It's much
money involved now, but it should it's later. With mo
Kelly always good to see you, great to see you too, well.
I see you Friday Chateau la moment.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
I shall be that I will not be making any
dishes though okay, well, will you be I will bring Okay,
sounds good.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
We're live everywhere on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI Am sixty.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Kelly six Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. And before
Jaguary could run out the studio, I said, Jackie, Jackie,
do not leave. Do not leave, because we need your
expertise on this Tender dating app, very popular dating app.
Speaker 3 (17:38):
I don't know person.
Speaker 2 (17:38):
I've never been on Tender and that's also something I
need Jackuarray to help me with. Tender is testing a
height filter. It's a new feature that allows people who
pay for the app to filter potential matches based on
height and short Men around the world are up in
arms about this controversial new feature. Literally, okay, up, okay,
(18:00):
jack you Ray, how tall are you?
Speaker 5 (18:01):
Five eleven? I would pay the money for this. I
would pay.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
I'm not I'm not five eleven. Mark are you five eleven?
I'm six even?
Speaker 5 (18:12):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (18:15):
Stephen are you five eleven?
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (18:16):
I am Okay, good answer. I don't know is that
are you really you seem taller than five eleven? No?
Speaker 5 (18:25):
I think you are just not five eleven.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
Okay, here we see problem. We're gonna take this to
the hallway. Were gonna tell you the best. We're taking
it the hallway and then we can all line each
other up. Okay, okay, look, I'm not five eleven. Let
me just say that. And I'm getting shorter by the
day because you get older, your spine gets compacted.
Speaker 3 (18:42):
You get older. You ever see like your grandparents and
they're like three foot two. I'm on my way down.
You're supposed to be taller in the morning, so measure
your say that.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
A lot of things supposed to happen, and I'm just
trying to squeeze out nextra half an inch or so.
Speaker 3 (18:56):
Go for the morning.
Speaker 5 (18:58):
There's a lot you can do it there.
Speaker 3 (19:01):
Yeah, just yeah, I'm just gonna keep on moving forward.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
But Jackie, right, speaking of tender you use you've used
tender before, right, yes, I have one time? How do
you go about matching with someone? What is something that
you're looking for.
Speaker 4 (19:15):
So specifically on tender or just dating apps in general,
because I've only used tender like once, Okay, specifically in general,
I'm looking for somebody who's checked off relationship. I am
looking for some So I typically do skip over men
who don't list their height, but I am looking for
somebody at least at least five to ten. You don't
have to be taller than me, but you have to
be at least five to ten. Five nine is probably
(19:37):
the shortest I would go.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Would you say that that's a general rule for women
in your height range?
Speaker 5 (19:43):
I think it is. Well, let me say this, Okay,
now we're getting in the weeds of it.
Speaker 4 (19:46):
I think it's it's a typical thing for women in
my height range and who have the professional drive that
I have, because when you're constantly in a world where
you're dominating, dominating, dominating, sometimes it's hard to turn that off.
Speaker 5 (19:58):
And visuals help you turn that off.
Speaker 4 (20:01):
If I if I walk in and I have to
lean down and be like, hey, honey, I'm not turning
it like that.
Speaker 3 (20:08):
You should have seen that on YouTube your childhood.
Speaker 5 (20:12):
How you dealing, buddy?
Speaker 2 (20:13):
Okay, so you're six one six two in heels. Yes,
what's the tallest you've dated? Six'?
Speaker 5 (20:19):
Eight that was.
Speaker 2 (20:20):
Fantastic evidently not you didn't end up with it, facts
but like.
Speaker 4 (20:24):
The pictures and WHAT i saw in my head happening were,
good and THAT'S i probably stayed in that situation a
little longer THAN i should, have just because of how
good we look.
Speaker 2 (20:32):
Together all, right let me get a little bit deeper in,
this and we're talking about tender AND i think people
are honest in what they want right lie about who
they are.
Speaker 3 (20:41):
Exactly so when you're.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
Honest in what you, want if we were to generalize for,
women what is it about? Heights is it about the
visual aesthetic or is it about the feeling of?
Speaker 3 (20:54):
Protection what is?
Speaker 4 (20:55):
It it's, Both it's it's the visual. Aesthetic you, know
when you're thinking about future, pictures you just want to
be that statue esque. Couple you don't want to you
don't WANT i dated a guy one time that was five,
seven AND i couldn't do it BECAUSE i felt LIKE
i was holding the hand of a child the whole.
Time so just, MENTALLY i, Know i'm just being real
sight to be, Real that's Why i'm SO i just
couldn't mentally do it BECAUSE i, mean and then there
(21:17):
were times when he'd be LIKE i think you should
And i'd be, like, okay But i'm, Not and like
there was there was just a level in me AND
i could be a me. Thing and, AGAIN i think
some of that was Because i'm so used to like
being in a space WHERE i have to be to,
Dominate and the only Time i'm able to turn that
off is WHEN i do feel safe with. Somebody and
part of me feeling safe with you is a man
is feeling that you can protect. Me IF i feel
(21:39):
LIKE i got to scoop you up and run out the,
DOOR i don't think you can portag.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
ME i got to ask, you is the other woman
in this? Conversation have you ever used TENDER.
Speaker 5 (21:51):
I have in? College, okay.
Speaker 3 (21:55):
You're honest in what you're looking. For what were you
looking for.
Speaker 4 (22:00):
At that? TIME i was just looking for casual. RELATIONSHIPS
i didn't really too much pay attention with, height BUT
i did have a moment WHILE i WAS i don't
want TO i don't want to say obsessed with short,
dudes BUT i had a little thing for short.
Speaker 5 (22:12):
Dudes it does broaden your, horizons.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
All. Right let me just ask you, this no. Specifics
the tallest.
Speaker 4 (22:25):
Man that you've dated maybe like six. Two how tall are?
You i'm only five four? Girl some short to?
Speaker 3 (22:33):
You?
Speaker 4 (22:33):
THEN i mean, YOU i would, say probably LIKE i
don't even know Because i'm five, too so you can't
be too too, short like you could come up to my.
Chin but that's about, it because if you're below five,
too then you're representing the Lollipop.
Speaker 5 (22:46):
Guild but, yeah because dudes were very.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
Attractive chat chat is like all depressed, themselves but we're
still going with short.
Speaker 3 (23:01):
King is?
Speaker 1 (23:02):
That?
Speaker 4 (23:02):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (23:03):
Yes, yes, Yes and shout out To Mark Island Music Randy,
newman short. People that's a great. Song that's a great.
Song it's fun in, fact.
Speaker 5 (23:11):
What people got?
Speaker 4 (23:12):
That?
Speaker 3 (23:13):
Yes pull that up if.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
You, Can Stefan, Yeah Randy. Newman it's actually the First
Randy newman SONG i ever learned or even knew, about
was earlier on in his.
Speaker 5 (23:22):
Career, yeah but love should.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
Transcend Tyler triplett says in a, Chat i'm six, five
never had to.
Speaker 5 (23:28):
Worry hey, Boom he's, like, WHAT i don't even know
what y'all talking?
Speaker 3 (23:30):
About?
Speaker 5 (23:31):
This For i'm.
Speaker 4 (23:31):
Good let's Ask, tyler, though if you met a W
nba woman who was six, eight would you date?
Speaker 2 (23:38):
Her Tyler Britney grinder sixth, eight she's sixty, nine six,
nine who's six a who's.
Speaker 5 (23:43):
Closest isn't Isn't britney six nine or is she six?
Speaker 2 (23:46):
Eight she's, yeah but she's got six six. Seven But
britney's not looking for a.
Speaker 5 (23:51):
Dude she's definitely not.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
So.
Speaker 3 (24:09):
Big big lives on as a little fief well on
a nasty little feet.
Speaker 4 (24:20):
Shot shot.
Speaker 2 (24:28):
Shot Can IF i am six, Forty we're getting ready
to take it to the hallway and continue this discussion
with a lot of people who are under six feet.
Speaker 5 (24:37):
A lot and one that claims to be five. Eleven
were about to find.
Speaker 3 (24:40):
Out, okay IF i am six, forty well live everywhere
to our heart radio.
Speaker 1 (24:43):
App you're listening To later With Moe kelly on demand
from KF I am six forty
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (00:06):
Later with Mo Kelly.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Let's go Beyond the box Score with Jackie Ray, Jackie
Ray good even, let's jump right into this. I reached
out to you over the weekend because I saw a
rumor which popped up on social media, and it was
that Dawn Staley, who is presently the coach of the
three time in Citua champion South Carolina Gamecocks women and
(00:28):
also a member of the Nasmith Basketball Hall of Fame,
also a member of the FOEBA Basketball Hall of Fame,
three time Olympic gold medalist player, also Olympic gold medalist,
coach of the twenty twenty Olympics.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
Down Staley, just for contest?
Speaker 5 (00:45):
Come on now.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
She has been contacted by the New York Knicks. I
can't say whether she's the front Raider runner, but it
has been confirmed that there is an actual conversation and
if it were to proceed, she could be and would
be the first female head coach of an NBA team.
What did you think about it when we first started
seeing this information.
Speaker 4 (01:08):
When I first started seeing it, I definitely believed it
was true. Just because of her caliber, who she is,
the way that she can motivate both men and women.
We've seen that her resume in that area is flawless.
But I automatically said it's a no go for her.
And the reason why I said that is because she
really has a passion for shaping young women for the
next level of their career and life. So it's not
(01:30):
just shaping them for the WNBA.
Speaker 5 (01:32):
That's great.
Speaker 4 (01:32):
Obviously, she's shaping champions. I mean every time somebody wins
a champion in the WNBA, don Staley's right there, you know,
look at my protege, so I think, but it's more
than that for her. For her, it really is preparing
young women for the next level, even if that doesn't
mean basketball, and.
Speaker 5 (01:48):
That's a true passion for her. It warms her heart.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
You can see it on her face every time she
talks about one of the students that came through her program.
Speaker 5 (01:55):
So I just don't know.
Speaker 4 (01:57):
Now, Look, Money talks to Boloney walks though, right, I
don't know what we're talking about financially.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Let me give you some context. Give it her resume,
which I read off intentionally. JJ Reddick, who is in
the number two market rookie coach no experience Lakers gets
eight million a year. Presently, Don Staley gets four million
a year as coach of the game Cocks.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
So I don't know if.
Speaker 5 (02:22):
It's to make more than JJ she should.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
But you know, don't want to get ahead of ourselves.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
But she would stand and make at least probably double
what she's making right now. And maybe after a certain point,
could she conceivably have a conversation with herself and say,
you know.
Speaker 3 (02:37):
What I've done all I can do on this level.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
We talk about it with men all the time, who
like a coach Skrzyzewski or someone who's done so much
in college ball, there may be that pull to go
to the next level.
Speaker 4 (02:51):
That's a little different though, because when you're talking about
NC double A men's sports, where there it's basketball or football.
NC DOUBLEA men's sports have long stay alumni fan base,
so that is solidified. So if you succeed there, you
definitely should be able to succeed at the next level.
Right now, NCAA women's game is feeding the WNBA, so
(03:12):
she still has work to do to help build the WNBA.
If she wants to look at it now, look at
it like that. But on the flip side, she might say,
you know, there has to be a first at some point.
It is it is not unusual for men to coach
in the WNBA, which is right, which is very very
odd to me that we have more men than women
right now.
Speaker 5 (03:29):
But it's fine.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
But at some point somebody has to be the one
that cracks that glass ceiling.
Speaker 5 (03:34):
So why not be the best to ever do it?
Speaker 2 (03:36):
And we know that there have been female coaches in
the NBA, like Becky Hammond, right, but never a head coach.
I thought it was going to be Becky Hammon too,
but she decided to go to the WNBA after coaching
as an assistant under Great Popovich.
Speaker 5 (03:52):
Right, but respectfully, and I love Becky.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
Her contract is a problem because for her to make
exponentially more than every single play, you know, the highest
salary for players, what two hundred fifty thousand dollars if
you're lucky, if you're lucky, and you know, for her
to be making millions and the players and the w
still don't have revenue sharing and things of that nature.
There's not extra roster spots, so they're not having to
kill themselves playing this game. So while I appreciate it,
(04:18):
Becky saying no, I want to play. I want to
coach in the W Like, don't play us, you know
what I mean, Like you're still getting If you really
wanted to impact the league in that way, it would
have been a more yes, I'm gonna do this, but
you know, you would have to address that elephant in
the room. So for don Staley, if she is going
to go somewhere, I do think she'll go to the
(04:39):
NBA because I think with her understanding and her players
talk to her, they confide in her.
Speaker 5 (04:44):
She's like a godmom to a lot of them.
Speaker 4 (04:46):
I don't think she would take a million dollar whatever salary,
even if it was. She makes four million right now,
so if she made five or six million in the
W I don't think she would take it because I
think it would be a conviction for her. So if
she is going to leave, it would be to the NBA.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
And I'm also hearing that the Knicks are speaking to
They've had two interviews from what I understand and read
with former Lakers coach Mike Brown former Cavaliers Mike Brown,
I would not if I I don't because I don't
think he's a talking about Don Staley, I don't think
he's a leader of men. I don't know if people
(05:21):
I agree with that for him. I think they would
play for Don Steely. I really do.
Speaker 4 (05:25):
Yeah, I agree with that because the way that she's
able to speak, she has this uncanny ability, like I've
seen her talk to to a multitude of different players.
She has an uncanny ability to just meet you where
you are, wherever, whatever that might be. Where you are
is going to be different than where I am. And
she's really good at that. And I think that the
question that's always going to come up when you're talking
about a woman coaching the men's game is can they
(05:47):
respect her?
Speaker 3 (05:50):
That's why I read off that resume.
Speaker 5 (05:51):
Exactly, if you don't respect her, then.
Speaker 4 (05:53):
You don't respect the game, because she has set her
name in stone in this game.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
I don't know if there I don't know if there's
anybody I'm being serious who has that resime right, Feeble
Hall of Fame, Nasmith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, three
gold medals as a player, gold medal as a coach.
Speaker 4 (06:14):
I don't know, right, And then you have to talk
about the intangibles. One of the things that comes in
women's sports a lot more often than comes in men's sports.
Is we have the social challenges with the set. In
social media, we battle the transgender conversation, and she has
handled all of those with grace and style. So if
they come up in the NBA, she can definitely lead
them in a way that they wouldn't be led by
(06:34):
anyone else. And she fits in New York specific man,
listen New York with love. She wouldn't pay nary a bill. Ever,
she'd be walking down the street. Can you get in
my car?
Speaker 2 (06:45):
Let me put it in another way for those who
don't know Don Staley, she's already a living legend. She
is and have a living legend in the number one
media market in a legendary city with a legendary franchise.
It fits in so many ways. But to your point,
I don't know she wants that.
Speaker 5 (07:01):
Yeah, I don't know if she wants.
Speaker 4 (07:02):
And when you talk about the Knicks specifically, because you
know it was this is supposed to be the next
year supposed to be and it wasn't, and then if
she comes in do they blame her? Well, the bar
is going to be set high regardless, right right, I
mean if she if she makes the move. I don't
think she'll make it, But if she makes the move, listen,
I'm going to New York for the first game.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
It would be one of the biggest things in the
history of sports.
Speaker 5 (07:27):
I would be there front row.
Speaker 2 (07:28):
When we come back. We have to talk about something
which should surprise nobody. There's another NBA player. Let me
just say, a professional sports figure who might be in
trouble for gambling.
Speaker 5 (07:40):
Oh shocker.
Speaker 3 (07:41):
Who could have seen that? Who could have predicted that?
Jackie Raise, other than I know that's coming up next.
If I am six forty life everywhere in my Heart radio.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
App, you're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand
from KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
Six forty Later with mo Kelly. As we continue to
go beyond the box Score with Jackie Ray and Jackie Ray.
I can't speak for other talk shows, but I know
that this particular talk show was on the story of
sports and gambling and the inevitability of it long before
probably anybody in the country. Yep, And we said that.
(08:23):
We started obviously with the Otani controversy and his interpreter.
I'm not trying to impugne anyone's integrity. Wait wait, but
we said that this is one of many across sports,
because it's everywhere now and we've been proven right along
the way. Now we have the Detroit Pistons Malik Beasley
(08:44):
reportedly being investigated by the FEDS allegations of gambling. A
prominent US sports book noticed unusual betting activity on prop
bets for Beesley. If you don't know, prop bet is
like those weird promotional best off. We bet that Mark
Beasley will Malik Bisley will get six rebounds this game,
(09:04):
or who will play twenty five minutes so you get
three points?
Speaker 4 (09:07):
As in PubL it's like we'll have a streaker right
at halftime.
Speaker 3 (09:10):
That's a prop bet.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
And they noticed unusual betting on prop bets beginning in
January of last year, twenty twenty four. And this is
according to ESPN gambling reporter David Perdue. Beasley was playing
his loan season with the Bucks at that point. He
started seventy seven games, scoring eleven point three points and
shooting forty one percent on threes. Here's the thing. If
(09:32):
they noticed it back in January of twenty twenty four,
it is likely to me that there was a pattern
that they noticed beyond January twenty twenty four in building
this case. Now, he hasn't been charged with anything, but
he is known to be under investigation, and I think, yes,
(09:53):
this is what his lawyer said.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
Quote, an investigation is not a charge.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
Malik is afforded the same right of the presumption of
it since as anyone else under the US Constitution. As
of now, he has not been charged with anything close quote.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Yeah, but for him to know.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
That he is under investigation usually and I just say
this as someone who sat on a federal grand jury,
so I know how the investigations go. As far as
there's investigative and there's accusatory. Investigative ones go over the
portion of weeks or months. Accusatory is just a one
day thing when you have these investigative grand juries. And
(10:32):
I have to believe it's at a grand jury point
at this point, there present any evidence to the grand
jury what they know?
Speaker 5 (10:39):
That says to me they got something.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
They already have him and they just haven't actually gone
for the true bill the indictment.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
What would you what would you ascertain from this investigation
so far?
Speaker 4 (10:54):
So I'm right there with you. You don't even mention this,
This isn't even a talking point. If you don't, you
haven't dited all the eye and cross all the tea's.
They have what they need to have. If they wanted
to drop an indictment today, they could could be other
people involved. But you know, in my heart of hearts,
and I've said this about this topic from day one,
the relationship between professional sports and gambling is way too tight.
(11:18):
It just you know, and trastics and yeah, like I'll
go to what's the last game. Yeah, I've been to
I want to say, an NBA game and seen FanDuel
on the court or Draft Kings, you know what I mean.
And so there's a relationship there so much so that
I really just don't care because I think it's so
(11:40):
hypocritical for you to say, we're gonna partner with we
are you can't player, but us big establishment, we're gonna
partner with this gambling thing over here. Not so much
so that we're going to put their paraphernalia on our
floor and we're gonna tell our fans you should gamble
but not you player.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Well, one step further, it also be able to use
the names and likes the players.
Speaker 4 (12:01):
Yes, and I've seen that in the commercial. So for me,
it's it's very very hypocritical because you can't how do
you draw that line? You literally you're drawing a line
in quicksand at this point, because you're saying do as
I say, not do as I do. That doesn't work
on kids. It's definitely not going to work on grown men.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
And I understand the distinction being made worth like the
league making money is one thing. The players making money
and then impugning the integrity of the game is something else.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
I get.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
And the argument is, well, you really can't have it
both ways. If you don't want gambling in your sport,
then you have to make sure it's not in your.
Speaker 4 (12:36):
Sport one percent, which means you sever this relationship because
the only way that you can really come down on
a player for gambling is if you don't take part
in it. You can't say do as I say. Again,
because it's very hypocritical. So now when you're telling and
now there's endorsement deals, you know, with certain people, so
you're literally telling the players, hey, we're bringing this this
(12:57):
entity in so we can make money. You can make money.
Let's build a partnership. I've been in partnerships that I've
also supported that other partner, and that might mean purchasing
something that they have distributed.
Speaker 5 (13:09):
That's just how it goes.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
It might be I don't know how the collective bargaining
agreement reads. It may be something where you have, like
you have a set aside or a carve out for
merchandise or apparel which is sold. They get a piece
of that, right, maybe they get a piece of the
gambling as well. But it's too easy for a middle
tier player to make money off these prop bets, because
(13:30):
we've heard about this before. Where they don't have to
throw a game or do something which is above the radar,
but they can do something where, okay, the over underar
is three points for me tonight, so let me just
make sure I get hurt or I have to sit
out the second half.
Speaker 4 (13:47):
Right, They could do something like that, or they could
just make it. If it's if this is a person
who doesn't typically shoot threes, let me just shoot if
the percentages, so and so will shoot and make blah
blah blah threes, whether I make it or not, nobody
really afects me to shoot threes if I'm not a
good three point shooter. So if I suddenly start shooting
threes and I catch on fire when I've made this bet,
that's a win win. That's one of those things where
(14:08):
you can kind of get away with People are gonna
be like, oh my gosh, Yeah, it's such an amazing night. No,
they were gambling, but it's just too thin of a line.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
JB.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
Martinez in the chat says, the players already make millions,
way more than the average fan will ever make. Might
as well let the fans have some fun gambling.
Speaker 3 (14:27):
How would you respond?
Speaker 4 (14:28):
I think money creps absolutely, and I think once you
get a taste of money and you can figure out
a way to get money easily. To say that, oh,
they shouldn't do that because they make so much money.
I have never met a person who makes so much
money and didn't want more.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
Well, there are two things. I think they are two
parts of this.
Speaker 2 (14:46):
He's saying that the average fan will won't make the
type of NBA money that the players make, so let
the fans have some fun. I say, when when you
introduce gambling into the sport, and there are too many
ways that players can excuse me, fans can reach players
can reach time about that?
Speaker 3 (15:04):
Yeah, who can reach members?
Speaker 2 (15:05):
Of the organization and get inside information or somehow create
a cooperative agreement. All I'm saying is this is another
example of the story can only in one way. Yeah,
with the scandal, which is going to impact the integrity
or the perception of the sport forever.
Speaker 4 (15:20):
Yeah, and to your point, you know, never think that
a player is untouchable. I cover the WNBA next season.
I'm going to cover the Clippers as well. If I
have rapport with a player and you say, hey, Jackie,
do you think you can you know, nudge nudge, hint, hint,
winky winky.
Speaker 5 (15:36):
Everyone's accessible. This is, you know, just a thing or not.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
Was a beat writer for the Clippers. You may just
be in the locker room know some insider information. It's oh,
by the way, yeah he's not playing tonight.
Speaker 4 (15:49):
Or they might see Sometimes they don't tell you. They
might limit a player's minutes, and they don't tell you
that because they don't want the They're like, this is
an injury that we don't really know what it is.
Speaker 5 (15:58):
We might have to limit there.
Speaker 2 (15:59):
But I've learned some things just by being in the
locker room before and after that game.
Speaker 4 (16:04):
They don't let us in the locker room anymore. They
don't know, no, at least not in the W. We
used to go in the locker room in the W
they don't ever since COVID, they don't let us in
the locker room anymore.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
That makes sense.
Speaker 5 (16:15):
So I don't know if it's like that in the NBA,
but they don't.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
It probably is because they don't want to be responsible
for you getting.
Speaker 4 (16:20):
Somewhere right right, So, because that's that was the best
ear hustling place on the planet.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
You hear some stuff that, you see some stuff. This
is very valuable in this daid age. But I think
it's just a matter of time until we have another
major gambling controversy in a major sport.
Speaker 4 (16:40):
But I think, to say face the best way to
really be able to bring the hammer down morally on
a player, you have to sever these ties with the
gambling institutions.
Speaker 5 (16:49):
Will what happens that.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
I was gonna say, that's not gonna happen. It's much
money involved now, but it should it's later. With mo
Kelly always good to see you, great to see you too, well.
I see you Friday Chateau la moment.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
I shall be that I will not be making any
dishes though okay, well, will you be I will bring Okay,
sounds good.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
We're live everywhere on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI Am sixty.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Kelly six Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. And before
Jaguary could run out the studio, I said, Jackie, Jackie,
do not leave. Do not leave, because we need your
expertise on this Tender dating app, very popular dating app.
Speaker 3 (17:38):
I don't know person.
Speaker 2 (17:38):
I've never been on Tender and that's also something I
need Jackuarray to help me with. Tender is testing a
height filter. It's a new feature that allows people who
pay for the app to filter potential matches based on
height and short Men around the world are up in
arms about this controversial new feature. Literally, okay, up, okay,
(18:00):
jack you Ray, how tall are you?
Speaker 5 (18:01):
Five eleven? I would pay the money for this. I
would pay.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
I'm not I'm not five eleven. Mark are you five eleven?
I'm six even?
Speaker 5 (18:12):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (18:15):
Stephen are you five eleven?
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (18:16):
I am Okay, good answer. I don't know is that
are you really you seem taller than five eleven? No?
Speaker 5 (18:25):
I think you are just not five eleven.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
Okay, here we see problem. We're gonna take this to
the hallway. Were gonna tell you the best. We're taking
it the hallway and then we can all line each
other up. Okay, okay, look, I'm not five eleven. Let
me just say that. And I'm getting shorter by the
day because you get older, your spine gets compacted.
Speaker 3 (18:42):
You get older. You ever see like your grandparents and
they're like three foot two. I'm on my way down.
You're supposed to be taller in the morning, so measure
your say that.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
A lot of things supposed to happen, and I'm just
trying to squeeze out nextra half an inch or so.
Speaker 3 (18:56):
Go for the morning.
Speaker 5 (18:58):
There's a lot you can do it there.
Speaker 3 (19:01):
Yeah, just yeah, I'm just gonna keep on moving forward.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
But Jackie, right, speaking of tender you use you've used
tender before, right, yes, I have one time? How do
you go about matching with someone? What is something that
you're looking for.
Speaker 4 (19:15):
So specifically on tender or just dating apps in general,
because I've only used tender like once, Okay, specifically in general,
I'm looking for somebody who's checked off relationship. I am
looking for some So I typically do skip over men
who don't list their height, but I am looking for
somebody at least at least five to ten. You don't
have to be taller than me, but you have to
be at least five to ten. Five nine is probably
(19:37):
the shortest I would go.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Would you say that that's a general rule for women
in your height range?
Speaker 5 (19:43):
I think it is. Well, let me say this, Okay,
now we're getting in the weeds of it.
Speaker 4 (19:46):
I think it's it's a typical thing for women in
my height range and who have the professional drive that
I have, because when you're constantly in a world where
you're dominating, dominating, dominating, sometimes it's hard to turn that off.
Speaker 5 (19:58):
And visuals help you turn that off.
Speaker 4 (20:01):
If I if I walk in and I have to
lean down and be like, hey, honey, I'm not turning
it like that.
Speaker 3 (20:08):
You should have seen that on YouTube your childhood.
Speaker 5 (20:12):
How you dealing, buddy?
Speaker 2 (20:13):
Okay, so you're six one six two in heels. Yes,
what's the tallest you've dated? Six'?
Speaker 5 (20:19):
Eight that was.
Speaker 2 (20:20):
Fantastic evidently not you didn't end up with it, facts
but like.
Speaker 4 (20:24):
The pictures and WHAT i saw in my head happening were,
good and THAT'S i probably stayed in that situation a
little longer THAN i should, have just because of how
good we look.
Speaker 2 (20:32):
Together all, right let me get a little bit deeper in,
this and we're talking about tender AND i think people
are honest in what they want right lie about who
they are.
Speaker 3 (20:41):
Exactly so when you're.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
Honest in what you, want if we were to generalize for,
women what is it about? Heights is it about the
visual aesthetic or is it about the feeling of?
Speaker 3 (20:54):
Protection what is?
Speaker 4 (20:55):
It it's, Both it's it's the visual. Aesthetic you, know
when you're thinking about future, pictures you just want to
be that statue esque. Couple you don't want to you
don't WANT i dated a guy one time that was five,
seven AND i couldn't do it BECAUSE i felt LIKE
i was holding the hand of a child the whole.
Time so just, MENTALLY i, Know i'm just being real
sight to be, Real that's Why i'm SO i just
couldn't mentally do it BECAUSE i, mean and then there
(21:17):
were times when he'd be LIKE i think you should
And i'd be, like, okay But i'm, Not and like
there was there was just a level in me AND
i could be a me. Thing and, AGAIN i think
some of that was Because i'm so used to like
being in a space WHERE i have to be to,
Dominate and the only Time i'm able to turn that
off is WHEN i do feel safe with. Somebody and
part of me feeling safe with you is a man
is feeling that you can protect. Me IF i feel
(21:39):
LIKE i got to scoop you up and run out the,
DOOR i don't think you can portag.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
ME i got to ask, you is the other woman
in this? Conversation have you ever used TENDER.
Speaker 5 (21:51):
I have in? College, okay.
Speaker 3 (21:55):
You're honest in what you're looking. For what were you
looking for.
Speaker 4 (22:00):
At that? TIME i was just looking for casual. RELATIONSHIPS
i didn't really too much pay attention with, height BUT
i did have a moment WHILE i WAS i don't
want TO i don't want to say obsessed with short,
dudes BUT i had a little thing for short.
Speaker 5 (22:12):
Dudes it does broaden your, horizons.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
All. Right let me just ask you, this no. Specifics
the tallest.
Speaker 4 (22:25):
Man that you've dated maybe like six. Two how tall are?
You i'm only five four? Girl some short to?
Speaker 3 (22:33):
You?
Speaker 4 (22:33):
THEN i mean, YOU i would, say probably LIKE i
don't even know Because i'm five, too so you can't
be too too, short like you could come up to my.
Chin but that's about, it because if you're below five,
too then you're representing the Lollipop.
Speaker 5 (22:46):
Guild but, yeah because dudes were very.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
Attractive chat chat is like all depressed, themselves but we're
still going with short.
Speaker 3 (23:01):
King is?
Speaker 1 (23:02):
That?
Speaker 4 (23:02):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (23:03):
Yes, yes, Yes and shout out To Mark Island Music Randy,
newman short. People that's a great. Song that's a great.
Song it's fun in, fact.
Speaker 5 (23:11):
What people got?
Speaker 4 (23:12):
That?
Speaker 3 (23:13):
Yes pull that up if.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
You, Can Stefan, Yeah Randy. Newman it's actually the First
Randy newman SONG i ever learned or even knew, about
was earlier on in his.
Speaker 5 (23:22):
Career, yeah but love should.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
Transcend Tyler triplett says in a, Chat i'm six, five
never had to.
Speaker 5 (23:28):
Worry hey, Boom he's, like, WHAT i don't even know
what y'all talking?
Speaker 3 (23:30):
About?
Speaker 5 (23:31):
This For i'm.
Speaker 4 (23:31):
Good let's Ask, tyler, though if you met a W
nba woman who was six, eight would you date?
Speaker 2 (23:38):
Her Tyler Britney grinder sixth, eight she's sixty, nine six,
nine who's six a who's.
Speaker 5 (23:43):
Closest isn't Isn't britney six nine or is she six?
Speaker 2 (23:46):
Eight she's, yeah but she's got six six. Seven But
britney's not looking for a.
Speaker 5 (23:51):
Dude she's definitely not.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
So.
Speaker 3 (24:09):
Big big lives on as a little fief well on
a nasty little feet.
Speaker 4 (24:20):
Shot shot.
Speaker 2 (24:28):
Shot Can IF i am six, Forty we're getting ready
to take it to the hallway and continue this discussion
with a lot of people who are under six feet.
Speaker 5 (24:37):
A lot and one that claims to be five. Eleven
were about to find.
Speaker 3 (24:40):
Out, okay IF i am six, forty well live everywhere
to our heart radio.
Speaker 1 (24:43):
App you're listening To later With Moe kelly on demand
from KF I am six forty
Popular Podcasts
United States of Kennedy
United States of Kennedy is a podcast about our cultural fascination with the Kennedy dynasty. Every week, hosts Lyra Smith and George Civeris go into one aspect of the Kennedy story.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com