April 29, 2025 • 34 mins
ICYMI: Hour Two of ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – The return of ‘Beyond the Box Score’ with regular guest contributor Jackie Rae, host of ‘The Jackie Rae Show,’ weighing in on the latest in the Shannon Sharpe sexual assault allegations AND Philadelphia Eagles QB Jalen Hurts decision to skip the teams visit to the White House…PLUS – An in-depth look at debut of “sperm racing” in Los Angeles AND your Weekly Horoscope - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app & YouTube @MrMoKelly
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
It's Later with mo Kelly.
Speaker 3 (00:06):
We're alive everywhere in the iHeartRadio app and YouTube and
joining us now in the studio. We've missed her. She's
been gone away handling some family business. Jackie Ray, is
good to see you. Welcome back.
Speaker 4 (00:17):
It's good to be back. It's good to see you too.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
A lot has happened since you were gone. Yes, let's
bring up Jackuarray on the camera. Let's get into Shannon
Sharp if we must. When and I are both Shannon
Sharp fans of what he does. Yes, but there has
been something missing in my commentary about Shannon Sharp specifically.
I don't want to reduce you to this, but I
think it's essential to have this a female perspective on
(00:41):
Shannon Sharp, what he may have alleged, what has been
alleged that he has done, and how we should look
upon it.
Speaker 5 (00:51):
Well, Like you said, I am a Shannon Sharp fan. However,
I'm not a fan of men who act like Shannon Sharp,
if that makes more sense. I'm more a fan of
people who have a level of accountability, not I don't
want to call it toxic masculinity, as much as I
want to call it. There's a reason why men in
(01:14):
Shannon Sharp's age group go after women that are nineteen.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Speak on it. Let's don't run past that sunk.
Speaker 5 (01:22):
In my opinion, I think men who are in their fifties,
mid fifties, sixties, whatever, they go after young women who
are in their nineteen because they can legally do that.
So if they could legally get away with going younger,
they would go younger, which makes you a pedophile.
Speaker 4 (01:37):
Let's just call it what it is.
Speaker 5 (01:38):
And so for me, when you say stuff like you
don't like and then Shannon Sharp is on record saying this,
when you say stuff like, oh, these older women they
like to boast their independence where younger women don't. Well,
it's hard to boast independence when you live at home
with your parents. It's hard to boast independence when you're
still in college. What you're saying is is you want
somebody that you can manipulate financial and probably mentally, because
(02:02):
you can. And when we heard the recording of him
saying to her, she she doesn't want to go she
wants to go out because she doesn't want to get
choked out, and he says, well, who says I won't
choke you out in public? There's a reason why you
are dating a specific type of woman.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
She would.
Speaker 3 (02:17):
You're saying that he wouldn't be able to say that
to a forty five year old woman.
Speaker 5 (02:20):
He could, but it would probably come with some consequences.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
Uh huh.
Speaker 5 (02:24):
You know what I mean, because if you don't choke
me out in public, we might be tussling.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
So you know you are going to hit him as
hard as you can.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
Yes, So it's a different level of And you know
a lot of men say this that when women, you know,
boast their independence, it's saying they don't need a man.
I don't need a man who wants to choke me
out in public.
Speaker 4 (02:42):
There's a difference.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
Uh huh.
Speaker 5 (02:44):
And so I think Shannon Sharp has kind of centered
himself in this in this place where he feels like
he has to be the one who dominates the situation
in every aspect financially, physically, and the best way to
do that is with somebody. Because what kind of bills
could you have at nineteen so that he can't handle exactly, So,
when you're saying, oh, I can take care of this person, okay,
(03:06):
When you get a woman who's in her thirties and
you're talking about you can take care of her, that's
a bigger financial responsibility. So just say that you don't
want to have to be financially obligated to a woman
who is grown up and can take care of herself.
Speaker 6 (03:18):
Now, if you would say that, I would respect him
for it. Here's the next question. I believe that his
career and brand are circling the dream. I've listened very
closely to what Stephen A.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Smith, someone who brought him to ESPN, has been saying,
and he's been, in my estimation, creating daylight between him
and Shannon Sharp to not get any of the Shannon
Sharp stink on him. Where do you think this leads
regardless of the lawsuits?
Speaker 5 (03:46):
I mean, so Shannon kind of boasted when he had
I forget who it was on his show? Was it
Kat Williams that made him more money than he said
he had ever made before. So we've really kind of
dived into this Uncle Shayhay So he has a platform
beyond e ESPN.
Speaker 2 (04:01):
So and also Nightcap with.
Speaker 5 (04:04):
And that one's always fun because neither one of them
have a lick of sense on that show, so it's
fun to watch.
Speaker 4 (04:08):
It's very lighthearted.
Speaker 5 (04:10):
So I don't think you can really cancel him per se,
because I do think we've seen this with Deshaun Watson.
There is a group a demographic of people who will say,
Deshaun Watson Cleveland Browns who had a same attorney. By
the way, Tony Buzzby kind of brought those women about
to say that, you know, Deshaun Watson had sexually harassed them.
(04:30):
So there is going to be a demographic of people
that say, well, this is consensual, full stop, and there's
nothing to talk about. This woman is just trying to
get a financial payout. So I don't think that this
is going to ruin his career. It might ruin his
time with ESPN, but I don't think it ruins his career.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Does this make him unhirable by a network like the
NFL network or some other legitimate broadcasting or cable YEP outlet.
Speaker 5 (05:02):
That's a good question because every outlet is suffering in
some way. Every outlet is losing viewership in some way.
So then it becomes a question of do we get
an influx of viewers because we've presented this shock value.
So I think you just really have to kind of
read the room. If he beats the case, if he
doesn't settle, if he goes to court, that kind of thing,
(05:24):
would public perception change. I still think he has a shot.
Now it has changed my perception of him. But then
now we're having the debate with the R Kelly like,
can you still listen to his music but hate what
he did as a person, And so now you'll have
that debate. Can we still appreciate him to be a
great commentary he brings a lot of humor, or do
(05:44):
we just resign him to this moment in time? And
I don't think we would would ever do that with Shannon.
Speaker 3 (05:50):
We when I say we, the media has speculated on
other people, be it Ditty or Kelly, for any number
of reasons. I am going to intentionally speculate in the
sense of broaching a possibility which I've not heard elsewhere. Okay,
and I think it's fair to bring it up for
those who don't know. Shannon Sharp is an NFL Hall
of Famer. He is, he played a number of years
(06:11):
in the NFL. I'm from Denver, so we've big fans. Okay,
has there been any discussion to your knowledge of whether
there also might be a variable of CTE in this,
and I mentioned that if only because CTE has been
known to create violent impulses and a switch in a
(06:32):
person's personality where they can be cool one moment and
all of a sudden they can be almost murderous violent.
Speaker 5 (06:38):
Listen if there isn't, there's been no discussions of that
to my knowledge, but if I was his attorney, I
definitely would explore that, especially since you can't properly diagno
cte until death.
Speaker 4 (06:48):
So we do know that.
Speaker 5 (06:50):
You know, in the case of Junior, say how it
resulted in him taking his own site.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
That's right.
Speaker 5 (06:54):
So it does manifest itself in different ways. We've seen
people act violently, We've seen people go into great depressions.
There's no way to really know how someone's going to
react to that, And so if I was his attorney,
I would lean into that, and I would lean in
and say, you know what, he realizes now his behavior
was wrong. He's going to get the help that he
needs because that's what people really want. They want accountability,
(07:16):
So that's what I would lean into.
Speaker 3 (07:17):
It's kind of hard to say you want accountability, we're
up until this point you've been like, no, not only
he's has he denied everything, He's going to the offensive
to bash the character of the accuser releasing the text messages.
You know, it seems like I don't know if you
can put that toothpaste back.
Speaker 4 (07:35):
In the tooth. See.
Speaker 5 (07:37):
Now, I go both ways on that, because when you
when you've been accused of something, if you believe you're right. Now,
whether I believe he's right is irrelevant. But if he
believes he's right, he definitely should have released the text
messages because in his mind he feels that that's going
to prove his innocence.
Speaker 4 (07:52):
To me, it made him look far more guilty.
Speaker 3 (07:55):
Okay, let me jump in there. But in releasing those
text messages, which were very inflammatory, inflammatory, he also released
the name of the Jane Doe, which of who I'm
not repeating here.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Has he set himself up?
Speaker 3 (08:09):
I know we're not legal scholars, but I wonder I
would wonder whether he set himself up for a slam
dunk defamation case.
Speaker 5 (08:16):
Well, the best defense against defamation is the truth, and
so from everything we've seen, it was consensual.
Speaker 4 (08:24):
So we would have to start as he's as far
as what.
Speaker 5 (08:26):
He's saying, but even she has said, I've I read
a report the other day that said, yes, the relationship
was consensual. It's not that she's disputing that, she's disputing
the level of violence that happened to her.
Speaker 3 (08:39):
And also she's disputing, yes, the relationship was consensual, just
not every act within the relationship was consensual.
Speaker 5 (08:45):
Right, So it's that old saying she said yes one
hundred times. If she said no one time and you
acted on that anyway, then that's a problem. But then
it's always going to come down to where's the proof
in that. Did she go to the police immediately? Who
did she talk to about this? And that's when it
becomes he said, she said, And then it just becomes
impossible to approve.
Speaker 3 (09:03):
Until until other receipts may pop up because from what
we understand, they recorded a lot of stuff.
Speaker 5 (09:11):
Well, we we saw his Instagram live, so we know
he has no problems.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
Yeah, the camera being onned and his concept.
Speaker 5 (09:20):
Of of consent might be different than hers.
Speaker 4 (09:24):
Yes, and then why isn't there a discussion about that?
Speaker 2 (09:27):
Oh it's coming.
Speaker 5 (09:28):
No, I mean this and this is for the young
men out there. There should always be a constant conversation
about consent. Consent isn't a one time conversation. It is
an ongoing conversation.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
Throughout the act, throughout the relationship.
Speaker 3 (09:42):
Because just because she in this case says yes to
the act in a general sense, does I mean that
she approves everything that he wants to do during that act?
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Right?
Speaker 4 (09:53):
And don't don't try to flip me up. You know
what I'm saying.
Speaker 5 (09:55):
Don't try to switch me up. I don't try to
do any of that because if i've you don't know.
And that's but that's also what builds true intimacy is
being honest and open about your feelings the entire time.
And so for me, it very much gives that that
was not his intention in this relationship. His intention in
(10:16):
this relationship wasn't to build a true, honest and intimate relationship.
Speaker 4 (10:20):
It was to be what.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
It was He's about to power and dominant.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
Because he saw her in a specific light.
Speaker 5 (10:25):
And so that's that's the box he put her in,
and that's where he expected her to stay.
Speaker 4 (10:31):
But she isn't, and that's not what he was expecting.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
When we come back, we have to talk about Jalen Hurts,
the Superstar in Super Bowl MVP, quarterback of the Super
Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles. They visited the White House today.
We had talked about this months in advance. We knew
this just because the organization said we enthusiastically da da
d dada.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
But coming to the White House doesn't mean that everyone
was on board.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
Sheila Hurt said he had a scheduling conflict or something
like that. Yep, let's talk about that and the implicit
politics of any White House visit once again when we
come back.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
It's Later with mo Kelly.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
Jacku Ray joins me on YouTube and also the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
You're listening to Later with mo Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
Can mo Kelly.
Speaker 3 (11:16):
It's Later with mo Kelly alive everywhere on the iHeartRadio app,
and if you're in the chat with us on YouTube,
let's be clear. We can disagree, disagree, but we will
not be disrespectful to one another or even a guest
on this show, So let's keep it on topic. I
love the spirited nature of the chat, but sometimes some
people go too far. Jackie Ray, you've been joining us
(11:39):
as customary with Beyond the box Score. We had talked
about this subject in a general sense, about sports and
politics and the politics of visiting the White House. I
was of the opinion we need to dead that tradition
because we are not in a place where it can
be viewed through the lens of sports.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Celebration.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
We had Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley go golfing,
I think, with President Trump and fly back with him
on Air Force One.
Speaker 2 (12:09):
He received a lot of criticism for that.
Speaker 3 (12:12):
Jalen Hurts, the Super Bowl quarterback in MVP, did not
attend the White House celebration today. He was asked incessantly
in the weeks leading up to this are you going
to go? He didn't answer, and then he didn't show up.
The public reason he gave was a scheduling conflict or
something something something.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
Why are we still doing this?
Speaker 5 (12:34):
There's no logical reason why you still have teams come
to the White House. And I think it's funny that
there is a specific demographic of people who will be
up in arms that Jalen didn't go. But I would
bet my last dollar that those are the same people
that would say we need to keep politics out out
of sports. And so you're speaking with a double mind,
(12:56):
and you're a hypocrite flat out. And so if we're
going to keep politics out of sports, then guess what
you don't do. You don't go to the biggest political
office in the country, and because there is whether you
support that person or not, there is an image that
you do. And so, regardless of what people say, Jalen
did the right thing because the politics that are coming
(13:18):
from the White House are not in favor of or
in support of anyone who looks like Jalen and so
I think he did the right thing.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
What if Jalen Hurts were to say, look, I'm an
American too, there are some issues that I have with
this president, either personally or politically or his policy. How
do you think people would respond to him if he
just said, look, I don't want to get into the specifics,
but we have a level of disagreement and I don't
(13:46):
want to send them message.
Speaker 5 (13:47):
Then I think the hypocrites would come out in droves
and they would call him anti American, and they would
call him the place.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
I've already seen the message.
Speaker 4 (13:55):
So we know.
Speaker 5 (13:56):
So there was no win in this. There's no win
in saying, hey, I'm not against my colleagues who want
to go, but I'm not going because this man does
not align with my viewpoint. Then you're going to be
anti American and every other term they can think of.
There's no win in not supporting someone who the majority
of people who have leaned into for reasons that are
(14:17):
to me not logical. So when you have a group
of people that are operating without logic, then you can't
expect a logical response to a man who said, I'm
not going to win if I say something, so I'm
just not going to say anything.
Speaker 3 (14:28):
But here's the other side. I've said it before and
I need to reiterate it. If we say take the
politics out of sports, what is it? What is there
then to say when the president inserts himself into sports,
commenting on things that are going on in sports, and
that's separate and distinct from let's say, going to a
UFC bout going to NASCAR or showing up at the
(14:50):
Super Bowl. President Trump specifically has had things to say
about people in sports, issues in sports, and all also
had something to say about well halftime, right, super Well halftime?
Speaker 2 (15:03):
You know I don't.
Speaker 3 (15:05):
The only way you can get past this is to
just dead the tradition all together, and I think it
would be better for all involved, including President Trump, because
then we don't I get turned.
Speaker 5 (15:16):
If you exalt yourself as king and if you make
a fake Time magazine cover hailing yourself as king, do
you walk in logic or do you walk and make
believe you? And Alice is kicking it in Wonderland. That's
what we're dealing with right now. So to have a
level of expectation for him to operate with the same
(15:37):
standards that he is intentionally holding other people to is
never going to happen because it's not required of him
by his constituents and that's not how he sees himself.
Speaker 4 (15:46):
It's never going to happen.
Speaker 3 (15:47):
Okay, So let's then move forward with that assumption that
politics is going to remain in sports. But if it's
going to remain in sports, let's be clear that there
are two entities put the politics in the sports. We
just can't blame the athletes. We can't just say, hey,
we got to keep politics out of sports. Athletes should
have nothing to say about politics, and at the same
(16:10):
time disregard the president who was also making political statements
about sports.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
I just want it one way or the other.
Speaker 4 (16:18):
So I agree with that.
Speaker 5 (16:20):
However, this is always going to be the hill that
I'm going to die on. Politics affect people. Athletes are people.
It's going to be impossible to truly Now you can
have an atmosphere where you can set rules and say, hey,
we're not going to talk about politics while the season
is going on. You cannot publicly on social media or
anything like that support anything political, whether that's policies that
(16:42):
are being passed or politicians. You could do something like that,
but then you should also take the national anthem out
of every single game, which they probably should do anyway,
because for those of you who don't read and don't know,
the reason why the national anthem was inserted into sporting
events and the NFL specifically, was because there were low
recruitment efforts and they wanted to use the NFL, which
(17:03):
they felt was the biggest stage to boost recruitment into
military institutions. It had nothing to do with patriarchy. It
had everything to do within listening.
Speaker 3 (17:13):
Let me just tell you there was a big scandal
controversy what they call paid patriotism, where the federal government
was paying the NFL yes to have the flag of
the national anthem probably featured at every single game, especially
since nine to eleven to boost recruitment.
Speaker 5 (17:31):
Yeah, it's capital it's not patriotism, it's capitalism.
Speaker 4 (17:35):
So let's get it right.
Speaker 5 (17:36):
So while you're saying, oh, that's not patriarchy, then you
need to really call your congressman and say, hey, we
need to take this out of sports entirely, because you
cannot say that athletes should keep politics out of sports
when you are demanding and will name call and just
act a complete full when they don't go to the
White House, you're a hypocrite.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
It's later with Mo Kelly. She's Jackie Ray, Jackie Ray.
How can they contact you?
Speaker 4 (18:00):
I feel like some of y'all got something to say
to me, and.
Speaker 2 (18:02):
Trust me, well, they're chating.
Speaker 5 (18:04):
You're the only reason I'm not saying it back in
social media right now, on YouTube right now is because
we talking. But trust me, when I leave this room,
I'm gonna have this moment because my clapback game is strong.
But if you want to get at me, my at
is Jackie Ray, j A C K I E R
A E TV.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
I hope they're.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
Ready, because if you're not ready, it's gonna be painful
for you.
Speaker 2 (18:21):
I've seen it.
Speaker 4 (18:22):
Some of y'all need it, so it's good.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
It's good.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
CAFI.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
Mister Kelly, this is Later with Mo Kelly. We're live
everywhere in the iHeartRadio app and on YouTube. And let
me just tell you, the chat on YouTube is off
the chains and I'm trying to keep it under control.
But if you want to see the show, definitely go
to YouTube. If you want to experience the heat behind
(18:56):
the show, go to YouTube. Get in the chat. In
the chat, keep it respectful, not only to each other,
but to our guests, because our guests will be participating
in the chat. We can disagree, but we will not
be disrespectful. Do not say anything in the chat that
you would not say in person. I see some folks
there who don't want to post their real picture, but
(19:16):
all have all sorts of things to say they wouldn't
dare say in person. We don't do that here. Act
like you have some home training, or we'll just block you.
Let's talk about sperm racing. I know that's one hell
of a transition, but I just had to do it.
Sperm racing is here and it kicked off on Friday.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
It Downtown La. Mysterious white stuff.
Speaker 7 (19:41):
Oh whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, Here we go, whoa oh
slow down, all right, let's try that again.
Speaker 8 (19:52):
Mysterious white stuff shooting from a water gun made this
moment borderline raunchy and entertaining. Downtown LA's night scene exploding
Friday with an event billed as the.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
World's first sperm race. What do this for contestants? Caine?
Speaker 8 (20:12):
What?
Speaker 2 (20:12):
Wait?
Speaker 8 (20:12):
Wait?
Speaker 2 (20:12):
Wait what I did? What? I didn't hear? What he said?
Speaker 3 (20:16):
For contestants Caine, m oh, he meant showed up?
Speaker 2 (20:22):
They are right? I got at the content at the venue.
Yeah yeah, yeah, I misunderstood. For contestants, Caine.
Speaker 8 (20:28):
With the goal to win ten thousand dollars in bragging
rights for the strongest fastest semen.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
I would have build Olympics for spur.
Speaker 8 (20:35):
Eric Zoo was one of the sperm racing organizers, with
the help of wealthy investors, the seventeen year old Bay
Area high school student and entrepreneur launching this epic competition
to raise awareness on male fertility health.
Speaker 9 (20:47):
The general public doesn't talk about it, is it so taboo.
It's always been associated with adult entertainment or something that's degenerate.
What we want to do is we want to make
it more of like a sports or a different type
of entertainment, but more of like optimizing bile.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
The contenders who were hand wait, what was he talking about.
Speaker 10 (21:04):
I'm giving seventeen multimillionaire from the Bay Area.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
Evidently he's turned something into nothing. He birthed something out
of this.
Speaker 9 (21:12):
The general public doesn't talk about it because it's so taboo.
It's always been associated with adult entertainment or something that's degenerate.
What we want to do.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Those are the words out of his mouth. I don't
associate it with.
Speaker 9 (21:23):
With adult entertainment or something that's degenerate. What we want
to do is we want to make it more of
like a sports or a different type of entertainment, but
more of like optimizing biomarkers.
Speaker 8 (21:32):
The contenders, who were hand picked out of dozens of
young men, were given money each week to train their mind, bodies,
and diets ahead of the virals sold out marathon.
Speaker 9 (21:42):
When you really think about it, we all want our
own individual sperm races to get onto this planet. So
it's only fit that we make this a format that
we can all watch and enjoy.
Speaker 8 (21:50):
The competitors sperm put into a microscopic racetrack.
Speaker 3 (21:55):
And you can see the microscopic racetrack on our YouTube channel.
Speaker 10 (21:59):
From there, their their sperm, correct, that's what was in
the water.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
Gun No, no, no, not in the water. Gun no no, no, no,
that was never mine.
Speaker 11 (22:09):
Then they're off, the sperm literally captured on this screen,
swimming to the finish line.
Speaker 2 (22:17):
The winner celebrates while the loser gets slimed.
Speaker 8 (22:21):
But perhaps this was the matchup of the night male
students from USC and UCLA.
Speaker 2 (22:27):
In the end, the Trojan one. Oh I see what
he did.
Speaker 3 (22:31):
That Wow, the Trojan, but accept it, it's just USC
and UCLA.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
But no, he had to say Trojan.
Speaker 11 (22:39):
In the end, the Trojan one. The bruin got cream. Okay,
this was kla. You knew what he was saying there?
WHOA No, I was just really uncalled for.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
I mean I remember back in the nineteen seventies they
would have never done anything like that.
Speaker 8 (23:02):
Look, mass would you try answering the questions as I
asked him, as mister Manard will, But it does seem
that you've been asking a lot of very personal questions.
Speaker 4 (23:10):
That don't have a thing to do with my qualifications
for this job.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
You know what you got? Well, they would have never
done anything like that. No, no, no, they would never
do that. And where are we going? This is getting worse?
Where are we going?
Speaker 11 (23:32):
Whole?
Speaker 3 (23:34):
Why are people making Caddyshack and Mary Tyler Moore references?
Speaker 2 (23:38):
Stephen would? I don't get it. What what is the
connection you're trying to make here? Oh? Boy?
Speaker 7 (23:45):
Did the people behind this race issue a release? Hello,
Daniel is laughing his head off. He is losing it
out here. I don't know why he's done. Get the joke.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
It was a joke, Just serious journalistic question. I just
don't know what you're going for.
Speaker 10 (24:04):
How did these individuals show up? I mean, did they
have sweatpants? Did they have to stand behind like something
that blocks their lower extremities and they stripped down and
they enter the competition?
Speaker 2 (24:16):
I mean, how do how does this work? I'm talking?
Speaker 3 (24:23):
I don't I don't know the inner workings of this.
I don't know how it all is supposed to play out.
Did the event have any sponsors? Not Trojan? No, not
Trojan okay, because the Trojan never mind, I can't say that.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
I can't say that. I don't I don't know that
there's asking these questions. I don't know.
Speaker 10 (24:41):
There's a lotion sponsor, obviously, a tissue sponsor, obviously, Mark.
Speaker 2 (24:47):
Obviously this was a silly question. I mean, what else,
a ky sponsor? Obviously, I don't know.
Speaker 7 (24:53):
I want to know if the reporter on that story
got a raised or got fired, because it could have
gone either way.
Speaker 3 (25:02):
You're not funny, Stephan, No, you're not funny. Just because
some one laugh doesn't mean that you're funny. Well, you
guys are not funny. I just I just don't understand
why you think it's funny just making the sound effects.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
I don't know. I just don't know.
Speaker 3 (25:24):
We're trying to have a serious conversation about sperm racing,
and then.
Speaker 2 (25:27):
All of a sudden they're bruin, got cream.
Speaker 10 (25:30):
Just it was all downhill from there after that know
why that had to be included in the story.
Speaker 2 (25:37):
Now, I was watching this Friday night when it was live.
Speaker 7 (25:41):
Yeah, we had well this is a working newsroom, and
we had the news. We have the news on in
here twenty four to seven. But the anchors at the
desk seemed like they didn't quite know what to do
or say after the creamed line at the end, Well,
I mean a cigarette?
Speaker 2 (25:59):
Yeah, clean up? Have a cigarette? Oh yeah, let me
decide who's gonna grab a towel? Yeah, because no one
wants to sleep in nevermind? No, no, no, Can we
go to break now? Please? I think we should? Are
you sure? I Am six forty it's a Later with
mo Kelly.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
We're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app until we get suspended,
and we're on YouTube in perpetuity.
Speaker 1 (26:21):
You're listening to Later with mo Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six fortyf.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
Later with mo Kelly, We're live everywhere on the iHeartRadio
app and also YouTube.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
Make sure.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Oh my goodness, I wish you could see what's going
on in the chat. Y'all are crazy. In fact, y'all
are kind of funny. As a matter of fact, you
need to subscribe.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
It's free.
Speaker 3 (26:40):
It makes it easy to find the show the next night.
It's absolute hilarity in the chats. You guys are pretty
funny tonight. And it's a community. You'll see a lot
of the same people. They'll they'll sign on and say
hello to each other, and they'll say good night to
each other. Be a part of the Later with Mo
Kelly YouTube community. Watch the show live as it happens.
(27:03):
Comment as it happens. I am responding in the chat
as well. I'm trying to get Dwall in there, but
you know he's I don't chat. Okay, that's what I think.
Speaker 10 (27:13):
Someone someone may say something sideway.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
They will, and you know, you know I don't. I
don't play like that. And they're really good at a callback.
Speaker 3 (27:20):
So remember they are like, I'm sorry, Oh I forgot
we talked about They start pushing stories together, making jokes.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
Yes, let's get into the horoscope. Let's go aries.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
This week, you can expect a significant boost in income
thanks to positive planetary movements. Fresh job opportunities may arise,
and debts could be easier to manage.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Aries.
Speaker 3 (27:40):
Natives facing disputes might find favorable outcomes during negotiations. However,
caution is advised avoid taking unnecessary risks, especially on Saturday,
when emotional attractions might distract you from work responsibilities. Taurus,
you may encounter a slow start as the moon sits
in their twelve house, but improvements will be noticeable by tomorrow.
(28:04):
Business related travel could be profitable and permanent property investments
may yield gains. Legal matters should move in your favor midweek,
with strong family backing and the possibility of lucrative new deals. Gemini,
let's have it you Gemini entered the week on a
high with good chances to recover stuck money and stabilize earnings. Still,
(28:27):
midweek may bring potential conflicts, so it's best to avoid
unnecessary arguments.
Speaker 2 (28:32):
Mark unnecessary.
Speaker 7 (28:34):
They're all necessary, especially during late night outings.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
They're speaking to you.
Speaker 7 (28:41):
They don't know anything about me.
Speaker 3 (28:44):
Despite my minor dipson energy and rising expenses around Wednesday.
At Thursday and Friday, Saturday promises success in pending projects,
financial gains, and the possibility of a rewarding short trip.
Speaker 2 (28:57):
It's probably like sex or something like that. No unlikely.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
Callback cancer Cancer natives can look forward to peaceful family
matters early in the week, but should brace for hurdles
midweek with rising expenses and minor disputes. Fortunately, positivity returns
by Friday, bringing speedy tasks, completions and potential financial improvements
As the weekend rolls in the stars encourage you to
(29:23):
relax and cherish joyful family moments, particularly by Saturday evening
very accurate.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
In other words, live for the weekend. Yes, and I
have a car bill coming up. Prepare so yeah, Leo.
Speaker 3 (29:39):
Leo's will enjoy the favorable influence of a strong sun
and Mars pairing, boosting momentum in stall tasks and financial gains.
A growing social reputation and new travel opportunities could add
excitement to your week. Children's achievements might also be a
source of pride. However, caution is necessary by Saturday to
(29:59):
avoid unnecessary expenses and minor tensions at home or work.
Heaver goes your next Virgos may experience financial fluctuations at
the beginning of the week, including possible issues related to vehicles.
Disagreements could surface, but perseverance will lead to recognition in
your field. By Friday and Saturday, virgos can expect smoother routines,
(30:22):
family celebrations, rising income, and uplifting news from children.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
Libros, this is for you.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
You'll see a bright start with supportive family members and
rising income. Yet challenges could crop up from Tuesday evening
into midweek, including unexpected expenses and a slight dip in
external support. Thankfully, Friday and Saturday promise a return to
smooth sailing. You may host guests, meet influential figures, and
(30:52):
although a planned trip could be delayed, social connections will thrive.
Scorpio here go taalah Tuwala may feel pressure at the
start of the week, but reliefs set in by Tuesday evening.
Speaker 7 (31:06):
Is he entering that race? That's what I thought too.
We want your pressure relieved.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
Don't do it. Don't do it.
Speaker 3 (31:18):
Come on, don't do it, don't reach for it. Financial gain,
supportive children, favorable outcomes in travel, and strong luck aligned midweek. However,
the weekend may bring may bring increased spending like going
to a concert.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
Yes, minor disputes weekend.
Speaker 6 (31:37):
So.
Speaker 3 (31:38):
Potential issues with vehicles, so vigilance is essential.
Speaker 10 (31:42):
All that makes perfect sense. I mean, I got a
straight fifteen year old birthday happening this weekend. It's like already, yes,
right Thursday? No, No, the party starts actually Wednesday, So
I believe she was like four years old when I
met her. Yes, yes, Sagittary, it's me.
Speaker 3 (32:01):
I can expect an overall upbeat week with pending issues
resolving and fresh financial prospects.
Speaker 2 (32:07):
Emerging.
Speaker 3 (32:08):
Friendships and travel will feature prominently offering new opportunities for growth. However,
caution is required this Thursday to avoid hidden tensions stirred
by Mars.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
I need a release. Ending the week on a positive note.
Speaker 3 (32:23):
Sagittarians like me will enjoy festive events and warm family
interactions through a calm approach, though a calm approach is
recommended on Saturday evening so I won't party. Capricorn will
juggle high expenses early in the week, particularly concerning health,
but gains and property related matters are possible. Income flows
(32:43):
should improve from Tuesday onward, accompanied by progress on long
stalled projects. Aquarius y'all will benefit from favorable lunar energy,
leading to victories and disputes and profitable land related dealings. However,
early to midweek calls for caution as necessary spending and
minor setbacks may arise. Hard work will pay off by
(33:04):
Thursday and Friday, now clearing pending work. Anxiety could spike
slightly on Saturday, so a measured approach to workplace challenges
is recommended. And closing out what Pisces pisce pisce ins
are in for a fast paced week with quick task
completions and smooth progress in their professional plans.
Speaker 2 (33:25):
Quick completions, They're all part of the race.
Speaker 3 (33:28):
Mark quick thing is task completions, thank you, yes, quick.
Speaker 2 (33:35):
No no no quick.
Speaker 10 (33:37):
Task completions yes, absolutely.
Speaker 3 (33:41):
Profitable property dealings are likely, and networking opportunities could help
you achieve major career goals. Midweek could involve spending on
home related purchases, but maternal support will be a source
of strength. Minor family disagreements they might occur, yet. Saturday
promises smoother waters and renewed optimism. And there is your
(34:03):
horoscope for the week. It's lad with mo Kelly can if.
I am six forty. We are live everywhere in the
iHeartRadio app and YouTube, and it is still going down
in the chat they are discussing the horoscope right now
and it is It is high comedy. It is really
high comedy and it's not meant to be shared on air.
(34:23):
That's all I can say, can't. I am six forty.
We're live everywhere on the YouTube and the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (34:29):
We're watching everything so you can watch your sanity k s.
Speaker 2 (34:35):
I'm the KOST HD two Los Angeles, Orange County lives
everywhere on the iHeart Radio app.
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
It's Later with mo Kelly.
Speaker 3 (00:06):
We're alive everywhere in the iHeartRadio app and YouTube and
joining us now in the studio. We've missed her. She's
been gone away handling some family business. Jackie Ray, is
good to see you. Welcome back.
Speaker 4 (00:17):
It's good to be back. It's good to see you too.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
A lot has happened since you were gone. Yes, let's
bring up Jackuarray on the camera. Let's get into Shannon
Sharp if we must. When and I are both Shannon
Sharp fans of what he does. Yes, but there has
been something missing in my commentary about Shannon Sharp specifically.
I don't want to reduce you to this, but I
think it's essential to have this a female perspective on
(00:41):
Shannon Sharp, what he may have alleged, what has been
alleged that he has done, and how we should look
upon it.
Speaker 5 (00:51):
Well, Like you said, I am a Shannon Sharp fan. However,
I'm not a fan of men who act like Shannon Sharp,
if that makes more sense. I'm more a fan of
people who have a level of accountability, not I don't
want to call it toxic masculinity, as much as I
want to call it. There's a reason why men in
(01:14):
Shannon Sharp's age group go after women that are nineteen.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Speak on it. Let's don't run past that sunk.
Speaker 5 (01:22):
In my opinion, I think men who are in their fifties,
mid fifties, sixties, whatever, they go after young women who
are in their nineteen because they can legally do that.
So if they could legally get away with going younger,
they would go younger, which makes you a pedophile.
Speaker 4 (01:37):
Let's just call it what it is.
Speaker 5 (01:38):
And so for me, when you say stuff like you
don't like and then Shannon Sharp is on record saying this,
when you say stuff like, oh, these older women they
like to boast their independence where younger women don't. Well,
it's hard to boast independence when you live at home
with your parents. It's hard to boast independence when you're
still in college. What you're saying is is you want
somebody that you can manipulate financial and probably mentally, because
(02:02):
you can. And when we heard the recording of him
saying to her, she she doesn't want to go she
wants to go out because she doesn't want to get
choked out, and he says, well, who says I won't
choke you out in public? There's a reason why you
are dating a specific type of woman.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
She would.
Speaker 3 (02:17):
You're saying that he wouldn't be able to say that
to a forty five year old woman.
Speaker 5 (02:20):
He could, but it would probably come with some consequences.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
Uh huh.
Speaker 5 (02:24):
You know what I mean, because if you don't choke
me out in public, we might be tussling.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
So you know you are going to hit him as
hard as you can.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
Yes, So it's a different level of And you know
a lot of men say this that when women, you know,
boast their independence, it's saying they don't need a man.
I don't need a man who wants to choke me
out in public.
Speaker 4 (02:42):
There's a difference.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
Uh huh.
Speaker 5 (02:44):
And so I think Shannon Sharp has kind of centered
himself in this in this place where he feels like
he has to be the one who dominates the situation
in every aspect financially, physically, and the best way to
do that is with somebody. Because what kind of bills
could you have at nineteen so that he can't handle exactly, So,
when you're saying, oh, I can take care of this person, okay,
(03:06):
When you get a woman who's in her thirties and
you're talking about you can take care of her, that's
a bigger financial responsibility. So just say that you don't
want to have to be financially obligated to a woman
who is grown up and can take care of herself.
Speaker 6 (03:18):
Now, if you would say that, I would respect him
for it. Here's the next question. I believe that his
career and brand are circling the dream. I've listened very
closely to what Stephen A.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Smith, someone who brought him to ESPN, has been saying,
and he's been, in my estimation, creating daylight between him
and Shannon Sharp to not get any of the Shannon
Sharp stink on him. Where do you think this leads
regardless of the lawsuits?
Speaker 5 (03:46):
I mean, so Shannon kind of boasted when he had
I forget who it was on his show? Was it
Kat Williams that made him more money than he said
he had ever made before. So we've really kind of
dived into this Uncle Shayhay So he has a platform
beyond e ESPN.
Speaker 2 (04:01):
So and also Nightcap with.
Speaker 5 (04:04):
And that one's always fun because neither one of them
have a lick of sense on that show, so it's
fun to watch.
Speaker 4 (04:08):
It's very lighthearted.
Speaker 5 (04:10):
So I don't think you can really cancel him per se,
because I do think we've seen this with Deshaun Watson.
There is a group a demographic of people who will say,
Deshaun Watson Cleveland Browns who had a same attorney. By
the way, Tony Buzzby kind of brought those women about
to say that, you know, Deshaun Watson had sexually harassed them.
(04:30):
So there is going to be a demographic of people
that say, well, this is consensual, full stop, and there's
nothing to talk about. This woman is just trying to
get a financial payout. So I don't think that this
is going to ruin his career. It might ruin his
time with ESPN, but I don't think it ruins his career.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Does this make him unhirable by a network like the
NFL network or some other legitimate broadcasting or cable YEP outlet.
Speaker 5 (05:02):
That's a good question because every outlet is suffering in
some way. Every outlet is losing viewership in some way.
So then it becomes a question of do we get
an influx of viewers because we've presented this shock value.
So I think you just really have to kind of
read the room. If he beats the case, if he
doesn't settle, if he goes to court, that kind of thing,
(05:24):
would public perception change. I still think he has a shot.
Now it has changed my perception of him. But then
now we're having the debate with the R Kelly like,
can you still listen to his music but hate what
he did as a person, And so now you'll have
that debate. Can we still appreciate him to be a
great commentary he brings a lot of humor, or do
(05:44):
we just resign him to this moment in time? And
I don't think we would would ever do that with Shannon.
Speaker 3 (05:50):
We when I say we, the media has speculated on
other people, be it Ditty or Kelly, for any number
of reasons. I am going to intentionally speculate in the
sense of broaching a possibility which I've not heard elsewhere. Okay,
and I think it's fair to bring it up for
those who don't know. Shannon Sharp is an NFL Hall
of Famer. He is, he played a number of years
(06:11):
in the NFL. I'm from Denver, so we've big fans. Okay,
has there been any discussion to your knowledge of whether
there also might be a variable of CTE in this,
and I mentioned that if only because CTE has been
known to create violent impulses and a switch in a
(06:32):
person's personality where they can be cool one moment and
all of a sudden they can be almost murderous violent.
Speaker 5 (06:38):
Listen if there isn't, there's been no discussions of that
to my knowledge, but if I was his attorney, I
definitely would explore that, especially since you can't properly diagno
cte until death.
Speaker 4 (06:48):
So we do know that.
Speaker 5 (06:50):
You know, in the case of Junior, say how it
resulted in him taking his own site.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
That's right.
Speaker 5 (06:54):
So it does manifest itself in different ways. We've seen
people act violently, We've seen people go into great depressions.
There's no way to really know how someone's going to
react to that, And so if I was his attorney,
I would lean into that, and I would lean in
and say, you know what, he realizes now his behavior
was wrong. He's going to get the help that he
needs because that's what people really want. They want accountability,
(07:16):
So that's what I would lean into.
Speaker 3 (07:17):
It's kind of hard to say you want accountability, we're
up until this point you've been like, no, not only
he's has he denied everything, He's going to the offensive
to bash the character of the accuser releasing the text messages.
You know, it seems like I don't know if you
can put that toothpaste back.
Speaker 4 (07:35):
In the tooth. See.
Speaker 5 (07:37):
Now, I go both ways on that, because when you
when you've been accused of something, if you believe you're right. Now,
whether I believe he's right is irrelevant. But if he
believes he's right, he definitely should have released the text
messages because in his mind he feels that that's going
to prove his innocence.
Speaker 4 (07:52):
To me, it made him look far more guilty.
Speaker 3 (07:55):
Okay, let me jump in there. But in releasing those
text messages, which were very inflammatory, inflammatory, he also released
the name of the Jane Doe, which of who I'm
not repeating here.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Has he set himself up?
Speaker 3 (08:09):
I know we're not legal scholars, but I wonder I
would wonder whether he set himself up for a slam
dunk defamation case.
Speaker 5 (08:16):
Well, the best defense against defamation is the truth, and
so from everything we've seen, it was consensual.
Speaker 4 (08:24):
So we would have to start as he's as far
as what.
Speaker 5 (08:26):
He's saying, but even she has said, I've I read
a report the other day that said, yes, the relationship
was consensual. It's not that she's disputing that, she's disputing
the level of violence that happened to her.
Speaker 3 (08:39):
And also she's disputing, yes, the relationship was consensual, just
not every act within the relationship was consensual.
Speaker 5 (08:45):
Right, So it's that old saying she said yes one
hundred times. If she said no one time and you
acted on that anyway, then that's a problem. But then
it's always going to come down to where's the proof
in that. Did she go to the police immediately? Who
did she talk to about this? And that's when it
becomes he said, she said, And then it just becomes
impossible to approve.
Speaker 3 (09:03):
Until until other receipts may pop up because from what
we understand, they recorded a lot of stuff.
Speaker 5 (09:11):
Well, we we saw his Instagram live, so we know
he has no problems.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
Yeah, the camera being onned and his concept.
Speaker 5 (09:20):
Of of consent might be different than hers.
Speaker 4 (09:24):
Yes, and then why isn't there a discussion about that?
Speaker 2 (09:27):
Oh it's coming.
Speaker 5 (09:28):
No, I mean this and this is for the young
men out there. There should always be a constant conversation
about consent. Consent isn't a one time conversation. It is
an ongoing conversation.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
Throughout the act, throughout the relationship.
Speaker 3 (09:42):
Because just because she in this case says yes to
the act in a general sense, does I mean that
she approves everything that he wants to do during that act?
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Right?
Speaker 4 (09:53):
And don't don't try to flip me up. You know
what I'm saying.
Speaker 5 (09:55):
Don't try to switch me up. I don't try to
do any of that because if i've you don't know.
And that's but that's also what builds true intimacy is
being honest and open about your feelings the entire time.
And so for me, it very much gives that that
was not his intention in this relationship. His intention in
(10:16):
this relationship wasn't to build a true, honest and intimate relationship.
Speaker 4 (10:20):
It was to be what.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
It was He's about to power and dominant.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
Because he saw her in a specific light.
Speaker 5 (10:25):
And so that's that's the box he put her in,
and that's where he expected her to stay.
Speaker 4 (10:31):
But she isn't, and that's not what he was expecting.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
When we come back, we have to talk about Jalen Hurts,
the Superstar in Super Bowl MVP, quarterback of the Super
Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles. They visited the White House today.
We had talked about this months in advance. We knew
this just because the organization said we enthusiastically da da
d dada.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
But coming to the White House doesn't mean that everyone
was on board.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
Sheila Hurt said he had a scheduling conflict or something
like that. Yep, let's talk about that and the implicit
politics of any White House visit once again when we
come back.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
It's Later with mo Kelly.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
Jacku Ray joins me on YouTube and also the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
You're listening to Later with mo Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
Can mo Kelly.
Speaker 3 (11:16):
It's Later with mo Kelly alive everywhere on the iHeartRadio app,
and if you're in the chat with us on YouTube,
let's be clear. We can disagree, disagree, but we will
not be disrespectful to one another or even a guest
on this show, So let's keep it on topic. I
love the spirited nature of the chat, but sometimes some
people go too far. Jackie Ray, you've been joining us
(11:39):
as customary with Beyond the box Score. We had talked
about this subject in a general sense, about sports and
politics and the politics of visiting the White House. I
was of the opinion we need to dead that tradition
because we are not in a place where it can
be viewed through the lens of sports.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Celebration.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
We had Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley go golfing,
I think, with President Trump and fly back with him
on Air Force One.
Speaker 2 (12:09):
He received a lot of criticism for that.
Speaker 3 (12:12):
Jalen Hurts, the Super Bowl quarterback in MVP, did not
attend the White House celebration today. He was asked incessantly
in the weeks leading up to this are you going
to go? He didn't answer, and then he didn't show up.
The public reason he gave was a scheduling conflict or
something something something.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
Why are we still doing this?
Speaker 5 (12:34):
There's no logical reason why you still have teams come
to the White House. And I think it's funny that
there is a specific demographic of people who will be
up in arms that Jalen didn't go. But I would
bet my last dollar that those are the same people
that would say we need to keep politics out out
of sports. And so you're speaking with a double mind,
(12:56):
and you're a hypocrite flat out. And so if we're
going to keep politics out of sports, then guess what
you don't do. You don't go to the biggest political
office in the country, and because there is whether you
support that person or not, there is an image that
you do. And so, regardless of what people say, Jalen
did the right thing because the politics that are coming
(13:18):
from the White House are not in favor of or
in support of anyone who looks like Jalen and so
I think he did the right thing.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
What if Jalen Hurts were to say, look, I'm an
American too, there are some issues that I have with
this president, either personally or politically or his policy. How
do you think people would respond to him if he
just said, look, I don't want to get into the specifics,
but we have a level of disagreement and I don't
(13:46):
want to send them message.
Speaker 5 (13:47):
Then I think the hypocrites would come out in droves
and they would call him anti American, and they would
call him the place.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
I've already seen the message.
Speaker 4 (13:55):
So we know.
Speaker 5 (13:56):
So there was no win in this. There's no win
in saying, hey, I'm not against my colleagues who want
to go, but I'm not going because this man does
not align with my viewpoint. Then you're going to be
anti American and every other term they can think of.
There's no win in not supporting someone who the majority
of people who have leaned into for reasons that are
(14:17):
to me not logical. So when you have a group
of people that are operating without logic, then you can't
expect a logical response to a man who said, I'm
not going to win if I say something, so I'm
just not going to say anything.
Speaker 3 (14:28):
But here's the other side. I've said it before and
I need to reiterate it. If we say take the
politics out of sports, what is it? What is there
then to say when the president inserts himself into sports,
commenting on things that are going on in sports, and
that's separate and distinct from let's say, going to a
UFC bout going to NASCAR or showing up at the
(14:50):
Super Bowl. President Trump specifically has had things to say
about people in sports, issues in sports, and all also
had something to say about well halftime, right, super Well halftime?
Speaker 2 (15:03):
You know I don't.
Speaker 3 (15:05):
The only way you can get past this is to
just dead the tradition all together, and I think it
would be better for all involved, including President Trump, because
then we don't I get turned.
Speaker 5 (15:16):
If you exalt yourself as king and if you make
a fake Time magazine cover hailing yourself as king, do
you walk in logic or do you walk and make
believe you? And Alice is kicking it in Wonderland. That's
what we're dealing with right now. So to have a
level of expectation for him to operate with the same
(15:37):
standards that he is intentionally holding other people to is
never going to happen because it's not required of him
by his constituents and that's not how he sees himself.
Speaker 4 (15:46):
It's never going to happen.
Speaker 3 (15:47):
Okay, So let's then move forward with that assumption that
politics is going to remain in sports. But if it's
going to remain in sports, let's be clear that there
are two entities put the politics in the sports. We
just can't blame the athletes. We can't just say, hey,
we got to keep politics out of sports. Athletes should
have nothing to say about politics, and at the same
(16:10):
time disregard the president who was also making political statements
about sports.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
I just want it one way or the other.
Speaker 4 (16:18):
So I agree with that.
Speaker 5 (16:20):
However, this is always going to be the hill that
I'm going to die on. Politics affect people. Athletes are people.
It's going to be impossible to truly Now you can
have an atmosphere where you can set rules and say, hey,
we're not going to talk about politics while the season
is going on. You cannot publicly on social media or
anything like that support anything political, whether that's policies that
(16:42):
are being passed or politicians. You could do something like that,
but then you should also take the national anthem out
of every single game, which they probably should do anyway,
because for those of you who don't read and don't know,
the reason why the national anthem was inserted into sporting
events and the NFL specifically, was because there were low
recruitment efforts and they wanted to use the NFL, which
(17:03):
they felt was the biggest stage to boost recruitment into
military institutions. It had nothing to do with patriarchy. It
had everything to do within listening.
Speaker 3 (17:13):
Let me just tell you there was a big scandal
controversy what they call paid patriotism, where the federal government
was paying the NFL yes to have the flag of
the national anthem probably featured at every single game, especially
since nine to eleven to boost recruitment.
Speaker 5 (17:31):
Yeah, it's capital it's not patriotism, it's capitalism.
Speaker 4 (17:35):
So let's get it right.
Speaker 5 (17:36):
So while you're saying, oh, that's not patriarchy, then you
need to really call your congressman and say, hey, we
need to take this out of sports entirely, because you
cannot say that athletes should keep politics out of sports
when you are demanding and will name call and just
act a complete full when they don't go to the
White House, you're a hypocrite.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
It's later with Mo Kelly. She's Jackie Ray, Jackie Ray.
How can they contact you?
Speaker 4 (18:00):
I feel like some of y'all got something to say
to me, and.
Speaker 2 (18:02):
Trust me, well, they're chating.
Speaker 5 (18:04):
You're the only reason I'm not saying it back in
social media right now, on YouTube right now is because
we talking. But trust me, when I leave this room,
I'm gonna have this moment because my clapback game is strong.
But if you want to get at me, my at
is Jackie Ray, j A C K I E R
A E TV.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
I hope they're.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
Ready, because if you're not ready, it's gonna be painful
for you.
Speaker 2 (18:21):
I've seen it.
Speaker 4 (18:22):
Some of y'all need it, so it's good.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
It's good.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
CAFI.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
Mister Kelly, this is Later with Mo Kelly. We're live
everywhere in the iHeartRadio app and on YouTube. And let
me just tell you, the chat on YouTube is off
the chains and I'm trying to keep it under control.
But if you want to see the show, definitely go
to YouTube. If you want to experience the heat behind
(18:56):
the show, go to YouTube. Get in the chat. In
the chat, keep it respectful, not only to each other,
but to our guests, because our guests will be participating
in the chat. We can disagree, but we will not
be disrespectful. Do not say anything in the chat that
you would not say in person. I see some folks
there who don't want to post their real picture, but
(19:16):
all have all sorts of things to say they wouldn't
dare say in person. We don't do that here. Act
like you have some home training, or we'll just block you.
Let's talk about sperm racing. I know that's one hell
of a transition, but I just had to do it.
Sperm racing is here and it kicked off on Friday.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
It Downtown La. Mysterious white stuff.
Speaker 7 (19:41):
Oh whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, Here we go, whoa oh
slow down, all right, let's try that again.
Speaker 8 (19:52):
Mysterious white stuff shooting from a water gun made this
moment borderline raunchy and entertaining. Downtown LA's night scene exploding
Friday with an event billed as the.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
World's first sperm race. What do this for contestants? Caine?
Speaker 8 (20:12):
What?
Speaker 2 (20:12):
Wait?
Speaker 8 (20:12):
Wait?
Speaker 2 (20:12):
Wait what I did? What? I didn't hear? What he said?
Speaker 3 (20:16):
For contestants Caine, m oh, he meant showed up?
Speaker 2 (20:22):
They are right? I got at the content at the venue.
Yeah yeah, yeah, I misunderstood. For contestants, Caine.
Speaker 8 (20:28):
With the goal to win ten thousand dollars in bragging
rights for the strongest fastest semen.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
I would have build Olympics for spur.
Speaker 8 (20:35):
Eric Zoo was one of the sperm racing organizers, with
the help of wealthy investors, the seventeen year old Bay
Area high school student and entrepreneur launching this epic competition
to raise awareness on male fertility health.
Speaker 9 (20:47):
The general public doesn't talk about it, is it so taboo.
It's always been associated with adult entertainment or something that's degenerate.
What we want to do is we want to make
it more of like a sports or a different type
of entertainment, but more of like optimizing bile.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
The contenders who were hand wait, what was he talking about.
Speaker 10 (21:04):
I'm giving seventeen multimillionaire from the Bay Area.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
Evidently he's turned something into nothing. He birthed something out
of this.
Speaker 9 (21:12):
The general public doesn't talk about it because it's so taboo.
It's always been associated with adult entertainment or something that's degenerate.
What we want to do.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Those are the words out of his mouth. I don't
associate it with.
Speaker 9 (21:23):
With adult entertainment or something that's degenerate. What we want
to do is we want to make it more of
like a sports or a different type of entertainment, but
more of like optimizing biomarkers.
Speaker 8 (21:32):
The contenders, who were hand picked out of dozens of
young men, were given money each week to train their mind, bodies,
and diets ahead of the virals sold out marathon.
Speaker 9 (21:42):
When you really think about it, we all want our
own individual sperm races to get onto this planet. So
it's only fit that we make this a format that
we can all watch and enjoy.
Speaker 8 (21:50):
The competitors sperm put into a microscopic racetrack.
Speaker 3 (21:55):
And you can see the microscopic racetrack on our YouTube channel.
Speaker 10 (21:59):
From there, their their sperm, correct, that's what was in
the water.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
Gun No, no, no, not in the water. Gun no no, no, no,
that was never mine.
Speaker 11 (22:09):
Then they're off, the sperm literally captured on this screen,
swimming to the finish line.
Speaker 2 (22:17):
The winner celebrates while the loser gets slimed.
Speaker 8 (22:21):
But perhaps this was the matchup of the night male
students from USC and UCLA.
Speaker 2 (22:27):
In the end, the Trojan one. Oh I see what
he did.
Speaker 3 (22:31):
That Wow, the Trojan, but accept it, it's just USC
and UCLA.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
But no, he had to say Trojan.
Speaker 11 (22:39):
In the end, the Trojan one. The bruin got cream. Okay,
this was kla. You knew what he was saying there?
WHOA No, I was just really uncalled for.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
I mean I remember back in the nineteen seventies they
would have never done anything like that.
Speaker 8 (23:02):
Look, mass would you try answering the questions as I
asked him, as mister Manard will, But it does seem
that you've been asking a lot of very personal questions.
Speaker 4 (23:10):
That don't have a thing to do with my qualifications
for this job.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
You know what you got? Well, they would have never
done anything like that. No, no, no, they would never
do that. And where are we going? This is getting worse?
Where are we going?
Speaker 11 (23:32):
Whole?
Speaker 3 (23:34):
Why are people making Caddyshack and Mary Tyler Moore references?
Speaker 2 (23:38):
Stephen would? I don't get it. What what is the
connection you're trying to make here? Oh? Boy?
Speaker 7 (23:45):
Did the people behind this race issue a release? Hello,
Daniel is laughing his head off. He is losing it
out here. I don't know why he's done. Get the joke.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
It was a joke, Just serious journalistic question. I just
don't know what you're going for.
Speaker 10 (24:04):
How did these individuals show up? I mean, did they
have sweatpants? Did they have to stand behind like something
that blocks their lower extremities and they stripped down and
they enter the competition?
Speaker 2 (24:16):
I mean, how do how does this work? I'm talking?
Speaker 3 (24:23):
I don't I don't know the inner workings of this.
I don't know how it all is supposed to play out.
Did the event have any sponsors? Not Trojan? No, not
Trojan okay, because the Trojan never mind, I can't say that.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
I can't say that. I don't I don't know that
there's asking these questions. I don't know.
Speaker 10 (24:41):
There's a lotion sponsor, obviously, a tissue sponsor, obviously, Mark.
Speaker 2 (24:47):
Obviously this was a silly question. I mean, what else,
a ky sponsor? Obviously, I don't know.
Speaker 7 (24:53):
I want to know if the reporter on that story
got a raised or got fired, because it could have
gone either way.
Speaker 3 (25:02):
You're not funny, Stephan, No, you're not funny. Just because
some one laugh doesn't mean that you're funny. Well, you
guys are not funny. I just I just don't understand
why you think it's funny just making the sound effects.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
I don't know. I just don't know.
Speaker 3 (25:24):
We're trying to have a serious conversation about sperm racing,
and then.
Speaker 2 (25:27):
All of a sudden they're bruin, got cream.
Speaker 10 (25:30):
Just it was all downhill from there after that know
why that had to be included in the story.
Speaker 2 (25:37):
Now, I was watching this Friday night when it was live.
Speaker 7 (25:41):
Yeah, we had well this is a working newsroom, and
we had the news. We have the news on in
here twenty four to seven. But the anchors at the
desk seemed like they didn't quite know what to do
or say after the creamed line at the end, Well,
I mean a cigarette?
Speaker 2 (25:59):
Yeah, clean up? Have a cigarette? Oh yeah, let me
decide who's gonna grab a towel? Yeah, because no one
wants to sleep in nevermind? No, no, no, Can we
go to break now? Please? I think we should? Are
you sure? I Am six forty it's a Later with
mo Kelly.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
We're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app until we get suspended,
and we're on YouTube in perpetuity.
Speaker 1 (26:21):
You're listening to Later with mo Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six fortyf.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
Later with mo Kelly, We're live everywhere on the iHeartRadio
app and also YouTube.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
Make sure.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Oh my goodness, I wish you could see what's going
on in the chat. Y'all are crazy. In fact, y'all
are kind of funny. As a matter of fact, you
need to subscribe.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
It's free.
Speaker 3 (26:40):
It makes it easy to find the show the next night.
It's absolute hilarity in the chats. You guys are pretty
funny tonight. And it's a community. You'll see a lot
of the same people. They'll they'll sign on and say
hello to each other, and they'll say good night to
each other. Be a part of the Later with Mo
Kelly YouTube community. Watch the show live as it happens.
(27:03):
Comment as it happens. I am responding in the chat
as well. I'm trying to get Dwall in there, but
you know he's I don't chat. Okay, that's what I think.
Speaker 10 (27:13):
Someone someone may say something sideway.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
They will, and you know, you know I don't. I
don't play like that. And they're really good at a callback.
Speaker 3 (27:20):
So remember they are like, I'm sorry, Oh I forgot
we talked about They start pushing stories together, making jokes.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
Yes, let's get into the horoscope. Let's go aries.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
This week, you can expect a significant boost in income
thanks to positive planetary movements. Fresh job opportunities may arise,
and debts could be easier to manage.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Aries.
Speaker 3 (27:40):
Natives facing disputes might find favorable outcomes during negotiations. However,
caution is advised avoid taking unnecessary risks, especially on Saturday,
when emotional attractions might distract you from work responsibilities. Taurus,
you may encounter a slow start as the moon sits
in their twelve house, but improvements will be noticeable by tomorrow.
(28:04):
Business related travel could be profitable and permanent property investments
may yield gains. Legal matters should move in your favor midweek,
with strong family backing and the possibility of lucrative new deals. Gemini,
let's have it you Gemini entered the week on a
high with good chances to recover stuck money and stabilize earnings. Still,
(28:27):
midweek may bring potential conflicts, so it's best to avoid
unnecessary arguments.
Speaker 2 (28:32):
Mark unnecessary.
Speaker 7 (28:34):
They're all necessary, especially during late night outings.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
They're speaking to you.
Speaker 7 (28:41):
They don't know anything about me.
Speaker 3 (28:44):
Despite my minor dipson energy and rising expenses around Wednesday.
At Thursday and Friday, Saturday promises success in pending projects,
financial gains, and the possibility of a rewarding short trip.
Speaker 2 (28:57):
It's probably like sex or something like that. No unlikely.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
Callback cancer Cancer natives can look forward to peaceful family
matters early in the week, but should brace for hurdles
midweek with rising expenses and minor disputes. Fortunately, positivity returns
by Friday, bringing speedy tasks, completions and potential financial improvements
As the weekend rolls in the stars encourage you to
(29:23):
relax and cherish joyful family moments, particularly by Saturday evening
very accurate.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
In other words, live for the weekend. Yes, and I
have a car bill coming up. Prepare so yeah, Leo.
Speaker 3 (29:39):
Leo's will enjoy the favorable influence of a strong sun
and Mars pairing, boosting momentum in stall tasks and financial gains.
A growing social reputation and new travel opportunities could add
excitement to your week. Children's achievements might also be a
source of pride. However, caution is necessary by Saturday to
(29:59):
avoid unnecessary expenses and minor tensions at home or work.
Heaver goes your next Virgos may experience financial fluctuations at
the beginning of the week, including possible issues related to vehicles.
Disagreements could surface, but perseverance will lead to recognition in
your field. By Friday and Saturday, virgos can expect smoother routines,
(30:22):
family celebrations, rising income, and uplifting news from children.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
Libros, this is for you.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
You'll see a bright start with supportive family members and
rising income. Yet challenges could crop up from Tuesday evening
into midweek, including unexpected expenses and a slight dip in
external support. Thankfully, Friday and Saturday promise a return to
smooth sailing. You may host guests, meet influential figures, and
(30:52):
although a planned trip could be delayed, social connections will thrive.
Scorpio here go taalah Tuwala may feel pressure at the
start of the week, but reliefs set in by Tuesday evening.
Speaker 7 (31:06):
Is he entering that race? That's what I thought too.
We want your pressure relieved.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
Don't do it. Don't do it.
Speaker 3 (31:18):
Come on, don't do it, don't reach for it. Financial gain,
supportive children, favorable outcomes in travel, and strong luck aligned midweek. However,
the weekend may bring may bring increased spending like going
to a concert.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
Yes, minor disputes weekend.
Speaker 6 (31:37):
So.
Speaker 3 (31:38):
Potential issues with vehicles, so vigilance is essential.
Speaker 10 (31:42):
All that makes perfect sense. I mean, I got a
straight fifteen year old birthday happening this weekend. It's like already, yes,
right Thursday? No, No, the party starts actually Wednesday, So
I believe she was like four years old when I
met her. Yes, yes, Sagittary, it's me.
Speaker 3 (32:01):
I can expect an overall upbeat week with pending issues
resolving and fresh financial prospects.
Speaker 2 (32:07):
Emerging.
Speaker 3 (32:08):
Friendships and travel will feature prominently offering new opportunities for growth. However,
caution is required this Thursday to avoid hidden tensions stirred
by Mars.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
I need a release. Ending the week on a positive note.
Speaker 3 (32:23):
Sagittarians like me will enjoy festive events and warm family
interactions through a calm approach, though a calm approach is
recommended on Saturday evening so I won't party. Capricorn will
juggle high expenses early in the week, particularly concerning health,
but gains and property related matters are possible. Income flows
(32:43):
should improve from Tuesday onward, accompanied by progress on long
stalled projects. Aquarius y'all will benefit from favorable lunar energy,
leading to victories and disputes and profitable land related dealings. However,
early to midweek calls for caution as necessary spending and
minor setbacks may arise. Hard work will pay off by
(33:04):
Thursday and Friday, now clearing pending work. Anxiety could spike
slightly on Saturday, so a measured approach to workplace challenges
is recommended. And closing out what Pisces pisce pisce ins
are in for a fast paced week with quick task
completions and smooth progress in their professional plans.
Speaker 2 (33:25):
Quick completions, They're all part of the race.
Speaker 3 (33:28):
Mark quick thing is task completions, thank you, yes, quick.
Speaker 2 (33:35):
No no no quick.
Speaker 10 (33:37):
Task completions yes, absolutely.
Speaker 3 (33:41):
Profitable property dealings are likely, and networking opportunities could help
you achieve major career goals. Midweek could involve spending on
home related purchases, but maternal support will be a source
of strength. Minor family disagreements they might occur, yet. Saturday
promises smoother waters and renewed optimism. And there is your
(34:03):
horoscope for the week. It's lad with mo Kelly can if.
I am six forty. We are live everywhere in the
iHeartRadio app and YouTube, and it is still going down
in the chat they are discussing the horoscope right now
and it is It is high comedy. It is really
high comedy and it's not meant to be shared on air.
(34:23):
That's all I can say, can't. I am six forty.
We're live everywhere on the YouTube and the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (34:29):
We're watching everything so you can watch your sanity k s.
Speaker 2 (34:35):
I'm the KOST HD two Los Angeles, Orange County lives
everywhere on the iHeart Radio app.
Later, with Mo'Kelly News
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com