September 18, 2025 • 31 mins
ICYMI: Hour Three of ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – An in-depth look at indefinite suspension of ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ over comments made by host Jimmel Kimmel regarding the Charlie Kirk shooting suspect…PLUS - Thoughts on a movie going patron that, while watching a showing of the new anime film “Demon Slayer: Kimetsu No Yaiba,” decided to urinate in the theater instead of going to the bathroom AND a brawl aboard a Royal Caribbean cruise that forced the ship back to port - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app & YouTube @MrMoKelly
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
And the News.
Speaker 3 (00:07):
I'm quite sure you may know by now it's not
I'll reset it for you. The show Jimmy Kimmel Live
has been suspended indefinitely by ABC due to remarks that
Jimmy Kimmel made in his monologue on Monday one. I
had a decent copy that I don't see if it's
good enough. It's not a reliable mark runner. This is
(00:30):
what he had to say.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
We had some new rows over the weekend with the
Magga Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered
Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and
everything they can to score political points from and in
between the figure pointing there was grieving.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
That's basically it.
Speaker 3 (00:48):
And some people may say, and I've heard and I've
read that, what that's it. It's not even really a
criticism of Charlie Kirk. Is not a selling his murder.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
What did it? You know? Why did this come about?
Speaker 3 (01:06):
And there are a number of reasons outside of the
remarks which trouble me as to why this happened. I've
never met Jimmy Kimmel. I don't know anything about him.
I don't even watch his show, so I'm not personally invested.
But from a media professional perspective, I'm completely invested. And
(01:28):
when people want to talk about cancel culture, let me
reset how I feel. I don't think that there is
such a thing as cancel culture. I believe that there
is capitalism culture. In other words, the market can decide
who they will or will not support and their consequences
for people's behavior which will play out in capitalism.
Speaker 2 (01:45):
This is not capitalism doing his thing.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
This is not the market forces determining that people have
had enough of Jimmy Kimmel. This specifically happened as a
response to the FCC, and the FCC which governs the
airwaves and to a certain degree, the content of the airways.
In other words, if you're broadcasting on ABC or NBC
(02:11):
or CBS, you're using the public airways, and so that
is governed by the FCC, which is different from cable.
So if you should watch something on Fox News or
MSNBC or CNN, that's not governed by the FCC, because
you're watching a private signal cable and you've opted in
(02:33):
That's why you can turn on HBO and see nudity
in the f Bomb anytime of the day because it's
not governed by the FCC in a content sense, it's
not regulated by the FCC, ABC, your broadcast channels, they are,
so the SEC has some say. But what's different here
is you had the SDC chair Brendan Carr, and just
(02:55):
for politics sake, yes he is a Trump appointee, but
the actions of car were different in that he was
actually going on podcasts and saying because of what you
heard with Jimmy Kimmel, he was saying that people should
boycott the show and also complain about the show, which
(03:17):
is more than odd. You're using the power and leverage
of the federal government to inspire people to take action,
as opposed to there being an actual FCC violation which
would fall under the purview of the FCC chair. That's
very different. And also, let's state the obvious this is.
(03:41):
Let me put it this way. You know how, I
say that it's not a free speech issue because it
doesn't have to do with the federal government.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Okay, ding ding ding, ding ding ding.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
Now we can say this is a free speech issue
because it has to do with the weight of the
federal government using its power to silence Jimmy Kimmel.
Speaker 2 (04:00):
That's not a political statement, that's.
Speaker 3 (04:01):
A CIVIS statement because the government is now actively involved.
I would not support this regardless of the show. I
don't care about the politics of Jimmy Kimmel. This has
to do with the FCC being used in a way
that it was not designed to be used. It's the
(04:21):
FCC is supposed to be the watchdog, but this is
not applicable to any FCC violation. There was no violation
here with the exception of it violating the sensibilities of
the president administration. And there's also this. If this rings
familiar to what happened with Paramount and Stephen Colbert, it's
because it's the exact same frickin thing. ABC Nextstar, which
(04:48):
owns about maybe I don't know, twenty four or.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
So two ABC affiliates.
Speaker 3 (04:54):
Next Star is in the middle of negotiating this merger
with Tegna, a digital media company, and you know who
has to approve the merger, say it with me, the FCC,
just like that recent Paramount merger. And so if you
want to complete the circle and really make all the
(05:14):
parallels ABC slash Nextstar concerned about what Nextstar is going
to program and broadcast and Next Star concerned about making
sure this merger goes through is much more malleable. My
word to the wishes of the SCC who has to
approve this merger and deal, that stinks to high heaven.
(05:39):
That bothers me in ways that I can't even adequately express.
Because if you're going to use the federal government, let's say,
multiple times, to dissuade voices from having their say because
it may be critical of you, what does that have
to say for the future of free speech. This is
(06:00):
not people rising up and saying we want to get
rid of Jimmy Kimmel because we don't like him. That
is the public's purview. We're not talking about the public.
We're talking about the federal government. We're talking about someone
who specifically went out of his way as an FCC
chairman to say get rid of this guy, and also
has the weight of the federal government and also has
(06:22):
the power to kill personally himself, has the power to
kill the Next Star Tegna deal.
Speaker 5 (06:28):
It stinks to high heaven. I'm glad you brought up
the Next star Tegna detail. Here's something else reported in
Rolling Stone that adds another level to this. I'll just
read this to you. In the hours leading up to
the decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel, two sources familiar with
the matter say, senior executives at ABC, its owner Disney,
and affiliates convened emergency meetings to figure out how to
minimize the damage. Multiple execs felt that Kimmel had not
(06:50):
actually said anything over the line, the two sources say,
but the threat of Trump administration retaliation loomed the weight
of the federal government.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 5 (07:00):
It's a direct pressure from a sitting president using the
power of the government just silence mockery and criticism and
even reporting he doesn't like. He just filed a massive
lawsuit against The New York Times yesterday?
Speaker 2 (07:12):
Was it yesterday?
Speaker 3 (07:14):
That is the definition of infringement of free speech. That
right there, That's it for all the conversation about being
a free speech absolutist.
Speaker 2 (07:26):
This is that moment where the government has.
Speaker 3 (07:30):
Overreached to specifically limit the speech of a person on
TV or in media simply because they don't like what
the person is saying. We have an FCC a regulation
test that we have to pass here every single year.
So being here at KFI, we're all very well versed
(07:53):
in what you can, what you can't do, when you
can do it, when you can't do it, and all
the stipulation involved as far advertisement, endorsements, all those kind
of things. We're not talking about an FCC violation here,
We're not even talking about anything close to that. This
is completely political and if you're okay with this, know
(08:15):
that when it comes back around it could be ten
times worse. All the cliches apply here as far as
Pandora's box, slippery slope, all that kind of stuff. And
I'm not saying it's a four alarm fire. I'm saying
the house is on fire and there's no fire engines around.
Speaker 5 (08:32):
Yeah, there's a pattern to this. And Trump has already
said he wants Seth Myers and Jimmy Fallon off the
air too.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
And there you have it. We'll have more on this
in just a moment. It's later with Moke Kelly Cay.
If I am six forty live everywhere on the iHeartRadio
app with f Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app and YouTube.
(09:00):
And if you're just tuning in to Lady with Moe Kelly.
We're talking about the recently announced indefinite suspension of the
show Jimmy Kimmel Live.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
And it's open ended. It's indefinite.
Speaker 3 (09:11):
We don't know whether it's going to be one day,
seven day, or or the show will never come back.
My remarks have less to do with Jimmy Kimmel and
more to do with being a member of the media
and how this is applicable to not only me or
anyone else in the media. Where you have the FCC
(09:32):
chair who was going on podcasts and openly threatening networks
including ABC, trying to encourage boycotts of shows and stations.
When you have the chair of the FCC doing that,
who is a representative of the federal government and has
the power as a representative of the federal government to
(09:56):
levy this type of pressure, then we were one hundred
percent absolutely within the realm of First Amendment rights and
diminishing them. And I would not want that for any show.
I would not want that for the Charlie Kirk Show
if it happened to be on broadcast television as opposed
to cable, I would not want it for any show,
(10:19):
because once you cross this line, then anyone and everyone
who may be critical of a sitting administration would be
subject to the same fate. And from an SCC perspective,
and I said this last segment, I want to say
it again.
Speaker 2 (10:36):
There was no violation here.
Speaker 3 (10:39):
This is not something where Jimmy Kimball went too far
or ran a foul. If you just want to make
it up, then that's fine. You're making it up and
you don't know what you're talking about. But there's no
SCC violation. And this does not happen without the SCC
chair politicking and also campaigning openly for this to have happen. Now,
(11:01):
if this were something that ABC just decided on its
own with no influence from the FCC, with no regard
for appending merger that the FCC has to approve, then.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
We're talking about something completely different.
Speaker 3 (11:17):
We're talking about then a private company making a decision
which is in its best financial interests, having nothing to
do with the federal government.
Speaker 2 (11:25):
But that's not the case here.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
And so it's happening to Jimmy Kimmel today, tomorrow, it
could happen to Seth Myers, It could happen to Jimmy Fallon.
It could happen to anyone who happens to criticize either
MAGA or the sitting administration, and this would scare them.
(11:49):
It should scare them of Jesus out of you, anyone
who wants to believe that the First Amendment still means something,
that the First Amendment is a guiding principle as part
of our constitution. We always hear about, how about you
love the damn Constitution? Well, the First Amendment is pretty
damn important. And the moment that we lose the ability
(12:09):
to criticize the president, the moment we lose the ability
to criticize our government more generally, Well, I know the
words we're not supposed to use anymore in media because it,
you know, it turns up the temperature. But that's what
dictatorships do, making sure the media cannot speak out against it.
(12:33):
I do not want to live in a country where
we're not allowed to criticize the federal government, because, believe
it or not, this has wide ranging consequences for generations
if this is allowed to continue. And I say that
because I've criticized more than one president over the years.
(12:55):
I've criticized more than one City administration. I know what
it means to have free speech and what that means
for someone who works in media to be able to
thoughtfully and completely obliterate in an rhetorical sense, a president
or his policies, and the moment that goes out the door,
(13:18):
we have nothing. And this really concerned me because the
SEC was actively involved to make it happen, not an
official decision by the SEC. And there's also a merger
on the periphery which is also impacting this. I cannot
overstate the importance of what happened today and the untold
(13:43):
consequences and ramifications which could be in play for my business.
We can talk about the ownership of certain media where
you have Jeff Bezos and he makes his decisions relative
to the Washington Post or Amazon because he owns it.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
It's a different animal.
Speaker 3 (14:05):
Because you may not like Jeff Bezos, you may not
like what he does with the Washington Post, but it's
still a private entity making that decision. This is not
that this is the FCC openly and directly targeting a
media outlet because it said something that was critical of
(14:29):
the base which supports this president. I cannot explain it,
make it any more clear than that. That should make
you really consider what is going on and question the
reasons why it's happening right now. Let's say let's just
turn around and say let's say Biden was still president
(14:53):
and Biden took exception to what some people were saying
on KFI and use the FCC, which KFI is governed by,
because these are the public's airwaves that you're listening to
right now, and said we're going to shut down a
couple of those shows on KFI because.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
They are.
Speaker 3 (15:14):
They are ridiculing those who are on the left and
those who support President Biden. I'm sure that would not
go over well. And this has nothing to do with
your personal politics. This has to do with the overriding
principle of whether a president or administration should use the
SCC to shut down speech which is critical of it,
(15:37):
not inflammatory, not in violation of any SCC law. I mean,
because this is something we study all the time. This
is only speech which is critical and disliked by the
SEC share and those who support this move.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
I don't know what's going to happen to my business.
Speaker 3 (16:04):
I really don't, because this is that quote unquote crossing
the rubicon that supposed red line, that point of no return,
that whole idea of going too far, because you're basically saying,
if you criticize this administration, we're coming after you. It's
(16:26):
Later with mo Kelly k IF I AM six forty
we live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app. When we come back,
we're gonna lighten it up. We're going to talk about
urine on a person in a movie theater.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (16:41):
Let's go to the movies and hopefully no one will
urinate on you. During a showing of Demon Slayer in Arizona,
a man, for whatever reasons, decided that he couldn't make
it to the bathroom and stood up in an aisle
and started urinating in the middle of a theater, in
(17:03):
the middle of a movie. Unfortunately, if your man, you
understand this, depending on your angle is going to impact
how much of a splash you're going to make. This
guy's angle made a hearty splash from what I understand,
and there's a video on TikTok going around, unfortunately, and
(17:24):
the splash hit a child theater goer like a row
in front of him. The father of the young boy
commenced to beating the crap the urinator, and yeah, that's
immediate justice.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
I think that is.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
And I'm not a proponent of violence. I'm saying, I understand.
I'm not a proponent of violence, but I am a heavy,
heavy believer in consequence and learning life lessons in the moment.
At times, there was a guy because I went and
(18:03):
saw Demon Slayer commits, so no yaiba, but this started
to pronounce it. This past week with my son, we
went to see Imax gorgeous, gorgeous film.
Speaker 6 (18:16):
Oh my god, I love this film, fantastic. There's a
guy sitting next to us. We're in the top row
in the back. There's a guy sitting next to us
the whole time. First he started had his phone out.
He trying to film the intro to the film. At first,
I'm like, I looked at him. I'm like, give him
a look, like you need to put that away now.
He kind of gets me to look like, what I'm
(18:36):
trying to bootleg here whatever? He puts the phone away.
As the film is going on. At some point in
the middle, there's a long film. Trust I had to
go to the restroom to it, and I'm like, please let
this film be over soon now because it was bad
because I had to go to the bathroom.
Speaker 2 (18:52):
Didn't want to miss anything. But the guy sitting next
to me.
Speaker 6 (18:56):
There's not that many people in the row, so either
someone in front of us, but I swear was coming
from my left. Now, this guy was passing the most
putrid gas ever. And in my mind, I'm thinking of myself, Jesus,
age man, go to the bathroom. So when I saw
this story, I said to myself, maybe I should have
(19:18):
pummeled this guy, but he was just passing gas next
to me.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
Well, the thing is the passing gas.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
I guess there's plausible deniability depending on where people are situated,
and you know, maybe you can claim ignorance. I'm just thinking,
but if someone's gonna urinate and the splashes on you,
it's like, look, the water droplets are there. I mean,
there's there's no denying it. There's a guy standing up,
you know, exposed.
Speaker 6 (19:41):
Presumably if I'm sitting and he's a few rolls back
and all of a sudden, some liquid at my feet.
I'm just like, what is this splashy wishy washing on
my feet? All you would have been doing right now
is reporting producer Twala proceeded to beat a man within
an inch of his life life in a movie theater
for urinating near him.
Speaker 3 (20:03):
I don't think there is a rhetorical response. I don't
think there's something you can say. I don't think there's
a conversation that you can have at that point, because,
as far as I'm concerned, that's we all know that
spitting on someone is vile.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
Yes, that is vile times eight. Yes, what I don't
want to.
Speaker 6 (20:24):
Get arrested, but I'm getting arrested at that point. Cuff me, man, fine,
cuff me. I just I don't understand. And to me,
this is a more serious look at where we're at
right now in society where someone thought that.
Speaker 2 (20:40):
That was an okay thing to do. I don't know
if it's that.
Speaker 3 (20:44):
I get the sense the person might have been on
drugs and not aware of their That's the way I
can describe it, because a person in their right mind
is not going to choose that.
Speaker 6 (20:56):
But this is not the kind of movie that draws
that crowd. I could see if it was, like say,
one of these R rated horror movies that Ronner goes
to see like it was one of those things Fields picked.
Speaker 2 (21:07):
I was like, what did I do?
Speaker 6 (21:08):
No, I'm just saying, just like if it's something like
that where it's like, you know, you got some drunk
kids and they're all like, oh, let's go see the
new horror movie, and you know there's somewhere you know.
Speaker 2 (21:18):
Itching for a runner.
Speaker 6 (21:20):
Yeah, I get that, but this is an and this
is an anime film that has been highly anticipated, and
it did have a wide range. I'm talking fathers with
their little kids ran there. You know, boys and girls.
So it was a wide range of people in this theater.
(21:42):
It's not the type of theater that draw someone that's
going to be high. And I thought, I said myself,
they gotta be hoppy. And I'm like, no, Mark, you
want to defend yourself here, Well, no, I do.
Speaker 5 (21:50):
Like how you'll say pretty much anything to draw me
into this film.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Figures.
Speaker 5 (21:54):
I have never witnessed any golden showering at any of
the horror films or any of the stuff that I
go to that you talk about crossing a line.
Speaker 6 (22:04):
I mean, Mark, you haven't had someone sitting in a
theater just drunk, you know whatever?
Speaker 2 (22:09):
Say I gotta go. Man, this horror movie is crazy enough.
Speaker 5 (22:13):
If you know, they're just moist in their scenes. Oh,
let me tell you something. Even going to horror conventions
and being a guest at them, horror people are the
nicest folks on earth. They get it all out of
their system watching the movies and stuff. Horror people are
absolute sweethearts. We don't do that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Even in your final destination ers, it's not me.
Speaker 5 (22:30):
My final movie was trash. What are you talking about it?
I mean, if there was a movie that deserved a
golden shower, that was it.
Speaker 3 (22:37):
But I still didn't see one there. But see, this
is where I disagree with what Twalla say. It may
not have been the movie for that, but we know
movies sell alcohol now because they're trying to keep people
to go to the movies. It is not beyond the
realm of possibility that this guy was under some sort
of substance, be it alcohol, it doesn't need to be drugs.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
But I think we are in agreement.
Speaker 3 (22:57):
If that happens in our general vicinity, there's nothing to discuss.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
I'm trying to beat you to death.
Speaker 5 (23:04):
Well, look, why don't you have a bucket an empty popcorn,
bucket or something. You can use all those things and
then no, what's interesting?
Speaker 1 (23:11):
No more.
Speaker 6 (23:11):
I forgot just because when you said that at this Imax,
the Universal City Walk Imax, when you go upstairs to
go to the theater, the only thing upstairs, the only
concession stand upstairs, is the bar.
Speaker 2 (23:25):
There is a full sidout. Wow. I mean since you
bring it up.
Speaker 5 (23:30):
Now I can see one of those three hour James
Cameron Avatar movies.
Speaker 2 (23:35):
Sure, maybe we're.
Speaker 3 (23:37):
Not told where it is in the movie, but there's
obviously no reasonable explanation for this person to get up
in the theater and just on the floor. I don't
care if you couldn't hold it. You know, there's no
good ind too that story. It's not like even if
he didn't hit the child, then he was just gonna
go back and sit down.
Speaker 5 (23:56):
Now you got to make a citizen's arrest. I'm gonna
start carrying zip ties to the movies with me now, Oh,
because you see that. See you see why Marcus Cary's
zip ties. Because his people go and see these horror
films and all this other crazy stuff. They're the ones
who do this. I will not be urine scapegoaded by
u khuala.
Speaker 2 (24:15):
But you know, to be serious for a moment.
Speaker 3 (24:17):
This is a perfect example of It makes you think
in advance how you would handle it if thrown into
a similar situation, and so it's less of a surprise,
and then you can meet the moment. I don't go
out looking for confrontation, but I go out expecting that
there might be confrontation.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
There's a difference.
Speaker 3 (24:37):
If you're going out looking for confrontation, then you're probably
going to start something. I go out expecting other people
to be a holes, inconsiderate, rude, and polite, and then
I have to manage my emotions as far as okay,
where is this going to lead tonight if need be, Yeah, I.
Speaker 6 (24:54):
Had to measure When I sit down in a seat,
I think about who's sitting next to me, if I
haven't purchased to seat next to me, or something crazy
like that. I have to think about now if they're loud,
if they're putting out their phone, if they're they're this,
that and the other, and I have to think about
first trying to have a measured response, Like when this
guy first pulled his phone out and he didn't put
(25:15):
it away during the credits, I'm like, okay, well you
know it, Chility, it's the credits. Then the film starts
and it's out, and he kind of like has it
like close to him, and I'm like and I kind
of give him a look and he's not paying attention.
And then he's still and the film is going and
it's still out, and I see the screen next to
me recording and I kind of like lean over to
look at him, like, is there going to be an
(25:36):
issue right now? You're bothering me by having you out,
And he took the hint like let me put the
phone away, and that's fine, But I'm just like, you
have to be ready for anything now anywhere you go,
because if you don't prepare your mind, you're the type
that's going to go off in a moment. You're gonna
type that's gonna react badly in the moment if you're
(25:57):
not already prepared. You have to think these things out
so that way you don't immediately go straight from zero
to one hundred.
Speaker 2 (26:05):
This is a good lead into our next segment.
Speaker 3 (26:06):
As we could close out tonight, there was a fight
on Royal Caribbean, and you know, Twalla and I we've
been on Royal Caribbean. Most of my cruises have been
on Royal Caribbean. This is a perfect example of thinking
in advance of what you would do. How far would
you go under what circumstances would you find yourself in
a situation like this.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
We'll talk about it when we come back.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (26:34):
Can't find Later with Roe Kelly life everywhere in the Iheartradiot.
Speaker 2 (26:38):
We're way over, so this is gonna be real quick.
But you know, I love cruises.
Speaker 3 (26:42):
I don't know if there's anyone here who loves cruises
and can't fight more than I do. I just look
forward to We're going to go on another one in April,
you know, hope to have friends and family join us.
I'll be there and we'll be going Royal Caribbean. So
I know a lot about Royal Caribbean twelve. You know
Royal Caribbean when I saw this story that a Royal
(27:03):
Caribbean cruise had to return to port after a fight
broke out on board. On Wonder of the Seas. All
their ships are named Something of the Seas And this
was not long after it left its initial port. We
were talking about the beginning of the cruise, and they
had to turn around. It had to make a U
(27:23):
turn to go back to Miami just hours after embarking
on its four day trip to the Bahamas, and instead
it was forced to abandon the journey after a fight
broke out that was so bad it apparently injured passengers
and left two requiring hospital treatment. And I do know
(27:43):
if you mess up my cruise, my vacation because your
dumb ass was upset about something the first day, oh yeah,
I might have to join in a fight just because
you messed up my vacation.
Speaker 6 (27:57):
Like there are things that happened on the cruise that
I went on with you, the first cruise ever that
I had to just say, you know what, No, no, no, no, no,
I don't care how much this may annoy you. I
don't get No. You are on a cruise, you were
on a ship. What's gonna come of you getting into
(28:20):
it other than you ending up in the break or whatever?
Now do no, you're now that you're on vacation. Now,
I did see a fight. I did see a fight,
and I totally had forgotten about it while we were
on a cruise and I saw one guy get put
on his behind and I didn't know that there were
actually ship police, like like they had.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
Yeah, and an undercover plenty close. Yeah.
Speaker 6 (28:46):
I was like, wow, they came up quickly and they
shut it down. They shut it down, and during the
comedy show, I swear I thought there was gonna be
nothing but a fight in there because of how rude
people were being while the comedian was trying to perform.
But look, I'm trying to relax on a cruise, man.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
See.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
This is why I believe that drinks are watered down,
Because one, I can drink far more on a cruise
than I could anywhere else, which is odd. And also
they probably want to limit the likelihood someone going overboard,
someone getting in a fight, someone doing all the things
that drunk people do. You don't see super drunk people
on a cruise, and I believe that's because you know,
(29:25):
the liquors water down.
Speaker 6 (29:27):
That's my conspiracy theory is that an all cruiser because
theres like carnival cruises, they fight, they go get on
that ship to fight.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
Well, I don't think one is not mutually exclusive. I
mean they could have both. You could still water down
the drinks and people still feel the need to fight.
I mean, just some people don't know how to go
somewhere and have a good time. They feel at the
slightest hint of quote unquote disrespect in their mind, that's
(29:54):
that's justification to fight. And I always telling you doing
a break gladly spend more money to limit the access
of other folks so I don't have to deal with that. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
that's why I'm not going to do Carnival ever again.
And if I hear more and more fights on Royal,
then I will go somewhere else. I'll do celebrity cruises Earth.
Speaker 6 (30:15):
Yeah, between now and April, there best not be a
bunch of fight reports, you know it. That just reminds me.
I got to get insurance on the tickets that are purchased,
just so that if there is a reason I can cancel.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
That's right, I gotta get that, that's right.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
We also got to make sure we get Mark and
the long suffering one on the cruise as well.
Speaker 5 (30:36):
Say you're really selling them, it sounds like a whole
lot of fun. Could you book me on the non
assault cruise?
Speaker 2 (30:42):
Yeah? The one that we will relatively is.
Speaker 5 (30:45):
Yeah, and you're not gonna get peed on like in
the movie theater on any of those. Well say no more.
All right, we got it. I'll take yeah, yeah, I mean,
however much it costs, I'm sure it's worth it, all right,
Mark is in love it Tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (31:00):
You know, before we get out of here, we're gonna
give away another pair of tickets to see the Temptations
and the Four Tops. Not gonna tell you when other
than that it's tomorrow. We'll see you tomorrow, Ky, If
I have six forty eleve everywhere the I Heartradio
Speaker 1 (31:11):
As I n k ost H D two Los Angeles,
Orange County more stimulating,
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
And the News.
Speaker 3 (00:07):
I'm quite sure you may know by now it's not
I'll reset it for you. The show Jimmy Kimmel Live
has been suspended indefinitely by ABC due to remarks that
Jimmy Kimmel made in his monologue on Monday one. I
had a decent copy that I don't see if it's
good enough. It's not a reliable mark runner. This is
(00:30):
what he had to say.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
We had some new rows over the weekend with the
Magga Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered
Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and
everything they can to score political points from and in
between the figure pointing there was grieving.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
That's basically it.
Speaker 3 (00:48):
And some people may say, and I've heard and I've
read that, what that's it. It's not even really a
criticism of Charlie Kirk. Is not a selling his murder.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
What did it? You know? Why did this come about?
Speaker 3 (01:06):
And there are a number of reasons outside of the
remarks which trouble me as to why this happened. I've
never met Jimmy Kimmel. I don't know anything about him.
I don't even watch his show, so I'm not personally invested.
But from a media professional perspective, I'm completely invested. And
(01:28):
when people want to talk about cancel culture, let me
reset how I feel. I don't think that there is
such a thing as cancel culture. I believe that there
is capitalism culture. In other words, the market can decide
who they will or will not support and their consequences
for people's behavior which will play out in capitalism.
Speaker 2 (01:45):
This is not capitalism doing his thing.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
This is not the market forces determining that people have
had enough of Jimmy Kimmel. This specifically happened as a
response to the FCC, and the FCC which governs the
airwaves and to a certain degree, the content of the airways.
In other words, if you're broadcasting on ABC or NBC
(02:11):
or CBS, you're using the public airways, and so that
is governed by the FCC, which is different from cable.
So if you should watch something on Fox News or
MSNBC or CNN, that's not governed by the FCC, because
you're watching a private signal cable and you've opted in
(02:33):
That's why you can turn on HBO and see nudity
in the f Bomb anytime of the day because it's
not governed by the FCC in a content sense, it's
not regulated by the FCC, ABC, your broadcast channels, they are,
so the SEC has some say. But what's different here
is you had the SDC chair Brendan Carr, and just
(02:55):
for politics sake, yes he is a Trump appointee, but
the actions of car were different in that he was
actually going on podcasts and saying because of what you
heard with Jimmy Kimmel, he was saying that people should
boycott the show and also complain about the show, which
(03:17):
is more than odd. You're using the power and leverage
of the federal government to inspire people to take action,
as opposed to there being an actual FCC violation which
would fall under the purview of the FCC chair. That's
very different. And also, let's state the obvious this is.
(03:41):
Let me put it this way. You know how, I
say that it's not a free speech issue because it
doesn't have to do with the federal government.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Okay, ding ding ding, ding ding ding.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
Now we can say this is a free speech issue
because it has to do with the weight of the
federal government using its power to silence Jimmy Kimmel.
Speaker 2 (04:00):
That's not a political statement, that's.
Speaker 3 (04:01):
A CIVIS statement because the government is now actively involved.
I would not support this regardless of the show. I
don't care about the politics of Jimmy Kimmel. This has
to do with the FCC being used in a way
that it was not designed to be used. It's the
(04:21):
FCC is supposed to be the watchdog, but this is
not applicable to any FCC violation. There was no violation
here with the exception of it violating the sensibilities of
the president administration. And there's also this. If this rings
familiar to what happened with Paramount and Stephen Colbert, it's
because it's the exact same frickin thing. ABC Nextstar, which
(04:48):
owns about maybe I don't know, twenty four or.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
So two ABC affiliates.
Speaker 3 (04:54):
Next Star is in the middle of negotiating this merger
with Tegna, a digital media company, and you know who
has to approve the merger, say it with me, the FCC,
just like that recent Paramount merger. And so if you
want to complete the circle and really make all the
(05:14):
parallels ABC slash Nextstar concerned about what Nextstar is going
to program and broadcast and Next Star concerned about making
sure this merger goes through is much more malleable. My
word to the wishes of the SCC who has to
approve this merger and deal, that stinks to high heaven.
(05:39):
That bothers me in ways that I can't even adequately express.
Because if you're going to use the federal government, let's say,
multiple times, to dissuade voices from having their say because
it may be critical of you, what does that have
to say for the future of free speech. This is
(06:00):
not people rising up and saying we want to get
rid of Jimmy Kimmel because we don't like him. That
is the public's purview. We're not talking about the public.
We're talking about the federal government. We're talking about someone
who specifically went out of his way as an FCC
chairman to say get rid of this guy, and also
has the weight of the federal government and also has
(06:22):
the power to kill personally himself, has the power to
kill the Next Star Tegna deal.
Speaker 5 (06:28):
It stinks to high heaven. I'm glad you brought up
the Next star Tegna detail. Here's something else reported in
Rolling Stone that adds another level to this. I'll just
read this to you. In the hours leading up to
the decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel, two sources familiar with
the matter say, senior executives at ABC, its owner Disney,
and affiliates convened emergency meetings to figure out how to
minimize the damage. Multiple execs felt that Kimmel had not
(06:50):
actually said anything over the line, the two sources say,
but the threat of Trump administration retaliation loomed the weight
of the federal government.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 5 (07:00):
It's a direct pressure from a sitting president using the
power of the government just silence mockery and criticism and
even reporting he doesn't like. He just filed a massive
lawsuit against The New York Times yesterday?
Speaker 2 (07:12):
Was it yesterday?
Speaker 3 (07:14):
That is the definition of infringement of free speech. That
right there, That's it for all the conversation about being
a free speech absolutist.
Speaker 2 (07:26):
This is that moment where the government has.
Speaker 3 (07:30):
Overreached to specifically limit the speech of a person on
TV or in media simply because they don't like what
the person is saying. We have an FCC a regulation
test that we have to pass here every single year.
So being here at KFI, we're all very well versed
(07:53):
in what you can, what you can't do, when you
can do it, when you can't do it, and all
the stipulation involved as far advertisement, endorsements, all those kind
of things. We're not talking about an FCC violation here,
We're not even talking about anything close to that. This
is completely political and if you're okay with this, know
(08:15):
that when it comes back around it could be ten
times worse. All the cliches apply here as far as
Pandora's box, slippery slope, all that kind of stuff. And
I'm not saying it's a four alarm fire. I'm saying
the house is on fire and there's no fire engines around.
Speaker 5 (08:32):
Yeah, there's a pattern to this. And Trump has already
said he wants Seth Myers and Jimmy Fallon off the
air too.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
And there you have it. We'll have more on this
in just a moment. It's later with Moke Kelly Cay.
If I am six forty live everywhere on the iHeartRadio
app with f Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app and YouTube.
(09:00):
And if you're just tuning in to Lady with Moe Kelly.
We're talking about the recently announced indefinite suspension of the
show Jimmy Kimmel Live.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
And it's open ended. It's indefinite.
Speaker 3 (09:11):
We don't know whether it's going to be one day,
seven day, or or the show will never come back.
My remarks have less to do with Jimmy Kimmel and
more to do with being a member of the media
and how this is applicable to not only me or
anyone else in the media. Where you have the FCC
(09:32):
chair who was going on podcasts and openly threatening networks
including ABC, trying to encourage boycotts of shows and stations.
When you have the chair of the FCC doing that,
who is a representative of the federal government and has
the power as a representative of the federal government to
(09:56):
levy this type of pressure, then we were one hundred
percent absolutely within the realm of First Amendment rights and
diminishing them. And I would not want that for any show.
I would not want that for the Charlie Kirk Show
if it happened to be on broadcast television as opposed
to cable, I would not want it for any show,
(10:19):
because once you cross this line, then anyone and everyone
who may be critical of a sitting administration would be
subject to the same fate. And from an SCC perspective,
and I said this last segment, I want to say
it again.
Speaker 2 (10:36):
There was no violation here.
Speaker 3 (10:39):
This is not something where Jimmy Kimball went too far
or ran a foul. If you just want to make
it up, then that's fine. You're making it up and
you don't know what you're talking about. But there's no
SCC violation. And this does not happen without the SCC
chair politicking and also campaigning openly for this to have happen. Now,
(11:01):
if this were something that ABC just decided on its
own with no influence from the FCC, with no regard
for appending merger that the FCC has to approve, then.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
We're talking about something completely different.
Speaker 3 (11:17):
We're talking about then a private company making a decision
which is in its best financial interests, having nothing to
do with the federal government.
Speaker 2 (11:25):
But that's not the case here.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
And so it's happening to Jimmy Kimmel today, tomorrow, it
could happen to Seth Myers, It could happen to Jimmy Fallon.
It could happen to anyone who happens to criticize either
MAGA or the sitting administration, and this would scare them.
(11:49):
It should scare them of Jesus out of you, anyone
who wants to believe that the First Amendment still means something,
that the First Amendment is a guiding principle as part
of our constitution. We always hear about, how about you
love the damn Constitution? Well, the First Amendment is pretty
damn important. And the moment that we lose the ability
(12:09):
to criticize the president, the moment we lose the ability
to criticize our government more generally, Well, I know the
words we're not supposed to use anymore in media because it,
you know, it turns up the temperature. But that's what
dictatorships do, making sure the media cannot speak out against it.
(12:33):
I do not want to live in a country where
we're not allowed to criticize the federal government, because, believe
it or not, this has wide ranging consequences for generations
if this is allowed to continue. And I say that
because I've criticized more than one president over the years.
(12:55):
I've criticized more than one City administration. I know what
it means to have free speech and what that means
for someone who works in media to be able to
thoughtfully and completely obliterate in an rhetorical sense, a president
or his policies, and the moment that goes out the door,
(13:18):
we have nothing. And this really concerned me because the
SEC was actively involved to make it happen, not an
official decision by the SEC. And there's also a merger
on the periphery which is also impacting this. I cannot
overstate the importance of what happened today and the untold
(13:43):
consequences and ramifications which could be in play for my business.
We can talk about the ownership of certain media where
you have Jeff Bezos and he makes his decisions relative
to the Washington Post or Amazon because he owns it.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
It's a different animal.
Speaker 3 (14:05):
Because you may not like Jeff Bezos, you may not
like what he does with the Washington Post, but it's
still a private entity making that decision. This is not
that this is the FCC openly and directly targeting a
media outlet because it said something that was critical of
(14:29):
the base which supports this president. I cannot explain it,
make it any more clear than that. That should make
you really consider what is going on and question the
reasons why it's happening right now. Let's say let's just
turn around and say let's say Biden was still president
(14:53):
and Biden took exception to what some people were saying
on KFI and use the FCC, which KFI is governed by,
because these are the public's airwaves that you're listening to
right now, and said we're going to shut down a
couple of those shows on KFI because.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
They are.
Speaker 3 (15:14):
They are ridiculing those who are on the left and
those who support President Biden. I'm sure that would not
go over well. And this has nothing to do with
your personal politics. This has to do with the overriding
principle of whether a president or administration should use the
SCC to shut down speech which is critical of it,
(15:37):
not inflammatory, not in violation of any SCC law. I mean,
because this is something we study all the time. This
is only speech which is critical and disliked by the
SEC share and those who support this move.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
I don't know what's going to happen to my business.
Speaker 3 (16:04):
I really don't, because this is that quote unquote crossing
the rubicon that supposed red line, that point of no return,
that whole idea of going too far, because you're basically saying,
if you criticize this administration, we're coming after you. It's
(16:26):
Later with mo Kelly k IF I AM six forty
we live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app. When we come back,
we're gonna lighten it up. We're going to talk about
urine on a person in a movie theater.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (16:41):
Let's go to the movies and hopefully no one will
urinate on you. During a showing of Demon Slayer in Arizona,
a man, for whatever reasons, decided that he couldn't make
it to the bathroom and stood up in an aisle
and started urinating in the middle of a theater, in
(17:03):
the middle of a movie. Unfortunately, if your man, you
understand this, depending on your angle is going to impact
how much of a splash you're going to make. This
guy's angle made a hearty splash from what I understand,
and there's a video on TikTok going around, unfortunately, and
(17:24):
the splash hit a child theater goer like a row
in front of him. The father of the young boy
commenced to beating the crap the urinator, and yeah, that's
immediate justice.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
I think that is.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
And I'm not a proponent of violence. I'm saying, I understand.
I'm not a proponent of violence, but I am a heavy,
heavy believer in consequence and learning life lessons in the moment.
At times, there was a guy because I went and
(18:03):
saw Demon Slayer commits, so no yaiba, but this started
to pronounce it. This past week with my son, we
went to see Imax gorgeous, gorgeous film.
Speaker 6 (18:16):
Oh my god, I love this film, fantastic. There's a
guy sitting next to us. We're in the top row
in the back. There's a guy sitting next to us
the whole time. First he started had his phone out.
He trying to film the intro to the film. At first,
I'm like, I looked at him. I'm like, give him
a look, like you need to put that away now.
He kind of gets me to look like, what I'm
(18:36):
trying to bootleg here whatever? He puts the phone away.
As the film is going on. At some point in
the middle, there's a long film. Trust I had to
go to the restroom to it, and I'm like, please let
this film be over soon now because it was bad
because I had to go to the bathroom.
Speaker 2 (18:52):
Didn't want to miss anything. But the guy sitting next
to me.
Speaker 6 (18:56):
There's not that many people in the row, so either
someone in front of us, but I swear was coming
from my left. Now, this guy was passing the most
putrid gas ever. And in my mind, I'm thinking of myself, Jesus,
age man, go to the bathroom. So when I saw
this story, I said to myself, maybe I should have
(19:18):
pummeled this guy, but he was just passing gas next
to me.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
Well, the thing is the passing gas.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
I guess there's plausible deniability depending on where people are situated,
and you know, maybe you can claim ignorance. I'm just thinking,
but if someone's gonna urinate and the splashes on you,
it's like, look, the water droplets are there. I mean,
there's there's no denying it. There's a guy standing up,
you know, exposed.
Speaker 6 (19:41):
Presumably if I'm sitting and he's a few rolls back
and all of a sudden, some liquid at my feet.
I'm just like, what is this splashy wishy washing on
my feet? All you would have been doing right now
is reporting producer Twala proceeded to beat a man within
an inch of his life life in a movie theater
for urinating near him.
Speaker 3 (20:03):
I don't think there is a rhetorical response. I don't
think there's something you can say. I don't think there's
a conversation that you can have at that point, because,
as far as I'm concerned, that's we all know that
spitting on someone is vile.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
Yes, that is vile times eight. Yes, what I don't
want to.
Speaker 6 (20:24):
Get arrested, but I'm getting arrested at that point. Cuff me, man, fine,
cuff me. I just I don't understand. And to me,
this is a more serious look at where we're at
right now in society where someone thought that.
Speaker 2 (20:40):
That was an okay thing to do. I don't know
if it's that.
Speaker 3 (20:44):
I get the sense the person might have been on
drugs and not aware of their That's the way I
can describe it, because a person in their right mind
is not going to choose that.
Speaker 6 (20:56):
But this is not the kind of movie that draws
that crowd. I could see if it was, like say,
one of these R rated horror movies that Ronner goes
to see like it was one of those things Fields picked.
Speaker 2 (21:07):
I was like, what did I do?
Speaker 6 (21:08):
No, I'm just saying, just like if it's something like
that where it's like, you know, you got some drunk
kids and they're all like, oh, let's go see the
new horror movie, and you know there's somewhere you know.
Speaker 2 (21:18):
Itching for a runner.
Speaker 6 (21:20):
Yeah, I get that, but this is an and this
is an anime film that has been highly anticipated, and
it did have a wide range. I'm talking fathers with
their little kids ran there. You know, boys and girls.
So it was a wide range of people in this theater.
(21:42):
It's not the type of theater that draw someone that's
going to be high. And I thought, I said myself,
they gotta be hoppy. And I'm like, no, Mark, you
want to defend yourself here, Well, no, I do.
Speaker 5 (21:50):
Like how you'll say pretty much anything to draw me
into this film.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Figures.
Speaker 5 (21:54):
I have never witnessed any golden showering at any of
the horror films or any of the stuff that I
go to that you talk about crossing a line.
Speaker 6 (22:04):
I mean, Mark, you haven't had someone sitting in a
theater just drunk, you know whatever?
Speaker 2 (22:09):
Say I gotta go. Man, this horror movie is crazy enough.
Speaker 5 (22:13):
If you know, they're just moist in their scenes. Oh,
let me tell you something. Even going to horror conventions
and being a guest at them, horror people are the
nicest folks on earth. They get it all out of
their system watching the movies and stuff. Horror people are
absolute sweethearts. We don't do that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Even in your final destination ers, it's not me.
Speaker 5 (22:30):
My final movie was trash. What are you talking about it?
I mean, if there was a movie that deserved a
golden shower, that was it.
Speaker 3 (22:37):
But I still didn't see one there. But see, this
is where I disagree with what Twalla say. It may
not have been the movie for that, but we know
movies sell alcohol now because they're trying to keep people
to go to the movies. It is not beyond the
realm of possibility that this guy was under some sort
of substance, be it alcohol, it doesn't need to be drugs.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
But I think we are in agreement.
Speaker 3 (22:57):
If that happens in our general vicinity, there's nothing to discuss.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
I'm trying to beat you to death.
Speaker 5 (23:04):
Well, look, why don't you have a bucket an empty popcorn,
bucket or something. You can use all those things and
then no, what's interesting?
Speaker 1 (23:11):
No more.
Speaker 6 (23:11):
I forgot just because when you said that at this Imax,
the Universal City Walk Imax, when you go upstairs to
go to the theater, the only thing upstairs, the only
concession stand upstairs, is the bar.
Speaker 2 (23:25):
There is a full sidout. Wow. I mean since you
bring it up.
Speaker 5 (23:30):
Now I can see one of those three hour James
Cameron Avatar movies.
Speaker 2 (23:35):
Sure, maybe we're.
Speaker 3 (23:37):
Not told where it is in the movie, but there's
obviously no reasonable explanation for this person to get up
in the theater and just on the floor. I don't
care if you couldn't hold it. You know, there's no
good ind too that story. It's not like even if
he didn't hit the child, then he was just gonna
go back and sit down.
Speaker 5 (23:56):
Now you got to make a citizen's arrest. I'm gonna
start carrying zip ties to the movies with me now, Oh,
because you see that. See you see why Marcus Cary's
zip ties. Because his people go and see these horror
films and all this other crazy stuff. They're the ones
who do this. I will not be urine scapegoaded by
u khuala.
Speaker 2 (24:15):
But you know, to be serious for a moment.
Speaker 3 (24:17):
This is a perfect example of It makes you think
in advance how you would handle it if thrown into
a similar situation, and so it's less of a surprise,
and then you can meet the moment. I don't go
out looking for confrontation, but I go out expecting that
there might be confrontation.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
There's a difference.
Speaker 3 (24:37):
If you're going out looking for confrontation, then you're probably
going to start something. I go out expecting other people
to be a holes, inconsiderate, rude, and polite, and then
I have to manage my emotions as far as okay,
where is this going to lead tonight if need be, Yeah, I.
Speaker 6 (24:54):
Had to measure When I sit down in a seat,
I think about who's sitting next to me, if I
haven't purchased to seat next to me, or something crazy
like that. I have to think about now if they're loud,
if they're putting out their phone, if they're they're this,
that and the other, and I have to think about
first trying to have a measured response, Like when this
guy first pulled his phone out and he didn't put
(25:15):
it away during the credits, I'm like, okay, well you
know it, Chility, it's the credits. Then the film starts
and it's out, and he kind of like has it
like close to him, and I'm like and I kind
of give him a look and he's not paying attention.
And then he's still and the film is going and
it's still out, and I see the screen next to
me recording and I kind of like lean over to
look at him, like, is there going to be an
(25:36):
issue right now? You're bothering me by having you out,
And he took the hint like let me put the
phone away, and that's fine, But I'm just like, you
have to be ready for anything now anywhere you go,
because if you don't prepare your mind, you're the type
that's going to go off in a moment. You're gonna
type that's gonna react badly in the moment if you're
(25:57):
not already prepared. You have to think these things out
so that way you don't immediately go straight from zero
to one hundred.
Speaker 2 (26:05):
This is a good lead into our next segment.
Speaker 3 (26:06):
As we could close out tonight, there was a fight
on Royal Caribbean, and you know, Twalla and I we've
been on Royal Caribbean. Most of my cruises have been
on Royal Caribbean. This is a perfect example of thinking
in advance of what you would do. How far would
you go under what circumstances would you find yourself in
a situation like this.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
We'll talk about it when we come back.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (26:34):
Can't find Later with Roe Kelly life everywhere in the Iheartradiot.
Speaker 2 (26:38):
We're way over, so this is gonna be real quick.
But you know, I love cruises.
Speaker 3 (26:42):
I don't know if there's anyone here who loves cruises
and can't fight more than I do. I just look
forward to We're going to go on another one in April,
you know, hope to have friends and family join us.
I'll be there and we'll be going Royal Caribbean. So
I know a lot about Royal Caribbean twelve. You know
Royal Caribbean when I saw this story that a Royal
(27:03):
Caribbean cruise had to return to port after a fight
broke out on board. On Wonder of the Seas. All
their ships are named Something of the Seas And this
was not long after it left its initial port. We
were talking about the beginning of the cruise, and they
had to turn around. It had to make a U
(27:23):
turn to go back to Miami just hours after embarking
on its four day trip to the Bahamas, and instead
it was forced to abandon the journey after a fight
broke out that was so bad it apparently injured passengers
and left two requiring hospital treatment. And I do know
(27:43):
if you mess up my cruise, my vacation because your
dumb ass was upset about something the first day, oh yeah,
I might have to join in a fight just because
you messed up my vacation.
Speaker 6 (27:57):
Like there are things that happened on the cruise that
I went on with you, the first cruise ever that
I had to just say, you know what, No, no, no, no, no,
I don't care how much this may annoy you. I
don't get No. You are on a cruise, you were
on a ship. What's gonna come of you getting into
(28:20):
it other than you ending up in the break or whatever?
Now do no, you're now that you're on vacation. Now,
I did see a fight. I did see a fight,
and I totally had forgotten about it while we were
on a cruise and I saw one guy get put
on his behind and I didn't know that there were
actually ship police, like like they had.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
Yeah, and an undercover plenty close. Yeah.
Speaker 6 (28:46):
I was like, wow, they came up quickly and they
shut it down. They shut it down, and during the
comedy show, I swear I thought there was gonna be
nothing but a fight in there because of how rude
people were being while the comedian was trying to perform.
But look, I'm trying to relax on a cruise, man.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
See.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
This is why I believe that drinks are watered down,
Because one, I can drink far more on a cruise
than I could anywhere else, which is odd. And also
they probably want to limit the likelihood someone going overboard,
someone getting in a fight, someone doing all the things
that drunk people do. You don't see super drunk people
on a cruise, and I believe that's because you know,
(29:25):
the liquors water down.
Speaker 6 (29:27):
That's my conspiracy theory is that an all cruiser because
theres like carnival cruises, they fight, they go get on
that ship to fight.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
Well, I don't think one is not mutually exclusive. I
mean they could have both. You could still water down
the drinks and people still feel the need to fight.
I mean, just some people don't know how to go
somewhere and have a good time. They feel at the
slightest hint of quote unquote disrespect in their mind, that's
(29:54):
that's justification to fight. And I always telling you doing
a break gladly spend more money to limit the access
of other folks so I don't have to deal with that. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
that's why I'm not going to do Carnival ever again.
And if I hear more and more fights on Royal,
then I will go somewhere else. I'll do celebrity cruises Earth.
Speaker 6 (30:15):
Yeah, between now and April, there best not be a
bunch of fight reports, you know it. That just reminds me.
I got to get insurance on the tickets that are purchased,
just so that if there is a reason I can cancel.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
That's right, I gotta get that, that's right.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
We also got to make sure we get Mark and
the long suffering one on the cruise as well.
Speaker 5 (30:36):
Say you're really selling them, it sounds like a whole
lot of fun. Could you book me on the non
assault cruise?
Speaker 2 (30:42):
Yeah? The one that we will relatively is.
Speaker 5 (30:45):
Yeah, and you're not gonna get peed on like in
the movie theater on any of those. Well say no more.
All right, we got it. I'll take yeah, yeah, I mean,
however much it costs, I'm sure it's worth it, all right,
Mark is in love it Tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (31:00):
You know, before we get out of here, we're gonna
give away another pair of tickets to see the Temptations
and the Four Tops. Not gonna tell you when other
than that it's tomorrow. We'll see you tomorrow, Ky, If
I have six forty eleve everywhere the I Heartradio
Speaker 1 (31:11):
As I n k ost H D two Los Angeles,
Orange County more stimulating,
Later, with Mo'Kelly News
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.