June 13, 2025 • 32 mins
ICYMI: Hour One of ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – Thoughts on the incident involving Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla being handcuffed and forcibly removed from Kristi Noem’s immigration press conference w/ Spectrum News 1 Reporter and friend of the program, Jo Kwon, who was in the room when it happened…PLUS – A look at the states with the most generous tippers AND Costco’s new high-priced membership tier - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app & YouTube @MrMoKelly
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
I Am six forty and YouTube were live everywhere in
the iHeartRadio app in the room where it happened. If
you know Hamilton, you know that song, you know to
what it's referring. But what if I told you about
someone who was in the room where it happened and
when it happened. The biggest story of the day of
a bunch of big stories right now at least, is
(00:44):
Senator Alex Padilla of California and his forcible removal from
the roy Ball Conference Center room in which there was
a press conference being given by Secretary of Homeland Security
Christy Nolan joining me on this sh right now. His
spectrum news is Joe Kwan, who was in the room
(01:05):
where it happened and in the room when it happened.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Jo Quan is good to talk to you tonight.
Speaker 3 (01:11):
Hey mo, Yeah, it was huh a wild wild day.
I would say, first, you know word that US Homeland
Security Secretary Christi Noman was going to be here, so
we're all here in the room. She just started speaking
for a few minutes and then suddenly and I'm holding
(01:33):
a camera. It's a long story, but you have to
go through a lot of screening when you go to
the Federal building understandably. So it's the one at the
corner of a veteran in Wiltshire, just right off the
four or five in case you don't know where it
is or your audience has no word is. And so
I was up there, rushed up there, ended up, you know,
having to hold the camera because my photog didn't quite
make it in. And I hear a voice from the
(01:56):
right side just a few minutes into the press conference.
I have a question, and I have a question. Then
from my peripheral vision, I see somebody walking like assertively
I would say, not sauntering, in kind of in a
relaxed pose. Right, I have a question. I have a question,
And then suddenly you see four or five guys push
(02:20):
Senator Alex Padilla, who I looked over and I didn't
know at first because you know, he was in a
plane blue navy jacket, not in a suit or not
that senators always have to wear a suit. But he
you know, he said hands off, hands off. Then he said,
I'm Senator Alex Padilla. And so when you have DHS
(02:42):
ice FBI, you're in the FBI, you know, Los Angeles headquarters. There,
I security already, and I don't need to remind everybody,
but when President Trump was a candidate at the time,
there was an attempt on his life, so you would
imagine that the level of secure curity is probably even hired.
Probably and just being in the federal building, so I mean,
(03:06):
I think he could have came in and said, Hi,
I'm Alex Padia, because I don't know that you can
expect any administra, anybody on the administration, whether it's this
administration a past administration, to know the face of all
the senators he led with to have a question and
then yeah, Joe.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Let me jump in there because I want to provide
some context.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
I agree with you.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
I wouldn't expect the Secretary of Homeland Security to know
the face of all senators, but I would expect her
to know the face of the senter in California. And
also Alex Padia is the chair of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship,
and Border Safety that's an adjunct to Homeland Security. He
is on the Subcommittee of Criminal Justice and counter Terrorism
and adjunct of Homeland Security, and he's also on the
(03:52):
Subcommittee of Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights. Obviously,
connected to immigration. I only put that out out there
because I've been in a number of federal facilities and
courtrooms in federal buildings, and I know, and you've already
touched upon it, the amount of security is tremendous. But
for Alspadia to actually get in that room, not only
(04:15):
was he escorted up, he was escorted in. I'm thinking
he's a known quantity at that point. They're not just
escorting random people.
Speaker 3 (04:23):
Well, so what I was told by a source, he
well two things. He did come out and talk to
the media very briefly after saying that he did have
a meeting in the building semi related, but not with
knowledge of Gnome and all that. I was told by
a source that he was on a different floor, heard
(04:46):
about the press conference, came up to it, and was
able to walk in again sort of like assertively. And
you know, I just think the approach was probably a
bit maybe taken aback, especially just in the atmosphere of
all the things that have been happening this week and
(05:06):
just everything in general. To be honest, twenty twenty five
has been a year, and to be honest, being in
that room and you know, having been out at the protest.
I don't know if I'm just on high alert, but
hearing a man walk in and say I have a question,
I didn't know what was going on, And to be honest,
(05:26):
I was kind of scared because I wasn't able to
look fully because I was holding a camera. And then
I looked to the rights and then through the crowd,
and I heard him say I'm Sador alex Vidia. He
was being dragged out and then handcuffed.
Speaker 1 (05:43):
So let me ask you this, and I want to
get a sense of other people in the room and
their reactions to the best of your knowledge, and that
you could let us know. When I look at the video,
it didn't seem like anyone was apprehensive or worried that
this might have been a threat, especially not the FBI whomever,
(06:04):
because they were trying to get him out of the room.
They weren't trying to jump on him in that moment,
and I suspect that if he were perceived as a threat,
they would have all jumped on him in that moment.
Speaker 3 (06:17):
I think so when he walked in, it didn't look
like I mean, just again, I wasn't looking. I just
heard a voice, and again I might be on high
alert because just being on protests this week and all that,
you got to watch your back, head on a swivel.
But I mean he walked in probably took five six
assertive steps. So the setup of the room was there
(06:37):
were two rows of chairs, the podium was in the
center in front of those two rows of chairs, and
then all the cameras in the back of those two
rows of chairs. So there wasn't a lot of distance
from the entrance of the door to where the secretary
was along with PBP, you know, ice FBI, so there
wasn't a lot of time for people you react or
(07:00):
have any kind of reaction. But I can tell you
four or five guys jumped on Alex DiDia real quick,
pushed him on the wall because again again you know,
he didn't identify himself until he had said I have
a question, I have a question. Then it was hands off,
hands of I am Senator Alex Didya. That was sort
of the order in which the words came out of
(07:23):
the mouth, and everybody was looking at the secretary because
she was in the middle of just starting to speak.
So I don't know that we even had the time
to react other than me just feeling a little bit
you know on edge.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
Did Secretary Gnomes say anything in the moment? Did she acknowledge, like, yes,
I recognize him or the agent?
Speaker 2 (07:47):
She did nothing.
Speaker 3 (07:48):
He paused for a moment because obviously there's a little
bit of a disturbance. Then all the cameras kind of
swung over there, but she because I kept recording, you
can hear he continued talking and then we all swung back. Joeunk.
She didn't acknowledge that until the Q and A portion
of the press conference.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
Joquan, can I get you to hold over for one
more segment because I know you did ask Secretary Nome
a question, so I want to know what you asked
her and then what was her response. If you just
tuning in, I'm speaking with Joquan of Spectrum News. We're
talking about what happened today between Secretary of Homeland Security
Christy Nome and also California Senator Alex Padia. You haven't
heard this anywhere else. We got an exclusive from someone
(08:31):
who was in the room, where and when it happened.
More with Joequan in just a moment.
Speaker 4 (08:36):
You're listening to later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (08:41):
KFI, AM six forty and YouTube.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
We're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app if you just
tuning in. We're speaking with Joe Kwan of Spectrum News.
We're talking about the events earlier today in that federal
building in which California Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed
from the press conference of Land Secretary Christy Nome and
Joe Kwan. Let me bring you back into the conversation.
(09:05):
You were not just a passive observer, you will also
an active participant. You got in a question to Secretary Nome. First,
what did you ask and how does she answer? Did
she answer?
Speaker 3 (09:16):
Yes, she did answer. I asked her because a lot
of the stuff we've been hearing is, you know, from
both sides, from the Trump administration saying that they are
going after the worst of the worst violent criminals. You
also hear from some other groups that say the people
(09:36):
they're going after may include people without criminal history, without
a criminal history. So I asked her to address that
because that's the big question that everybody wants to know,
how many have a criminal history? Who are these people?
And of course they have been releasing some of that
information very actively on their ex account, and you know,
(09:57):
she did answer it. At first she said, you know,
news it or all that kind of stuff, but then said, yeah,
within some of the some of those criminals that we
are taking in, there are some she said in her words, collateral,
so people who've been living with them or around them.
I don't know if she she didn't specify if she
(10:18):
was talking about family or things like that, and she
said that, you know, those people obviously will have to
vet them. And then she took that as an opportunity
to also say that as a reminder, entering this country
is illegal and we have to adjut or we have
to go through the process with the people who are
(10:38):
those quote that she called collateral as well. So, I mean,
you know, this has been a question that's been ongoing
and kind of the I would say, just hearing from
protesters the sort of impetus for causing some of the
uprising in addition to obviously there are some those bad
players as well with the protests doing certain things, you know,
(11:02):
burning cars and such that we've seen the last few days.
But yeah, she did answer it.
Speaker 1 (11:07):
Did Secretary Gnomes go into any detail as far as
the types of practices or procedures tactics which are being
employed that people have had an issue with.
Speaker 3 (11:18):
She didn't. She really stuck to the messaging that we
have heard all along about why they're doing this, you know,
to help keep the streets of La safe.
Speaker 5 (11:31):
No, they have.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
She didn't get into the tactics because maybe that's something
that they're also trying to keep under wraps right as
they do these type of enforcements, because she said, they
have been faced with She I don't remember exact words,
but talking about the response from the community, those people
(11:55):
who want to do bad things, you know, sort of
she said, attacking some of their officers and people trying
to do their jobs in doing these raids.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Uh Jokwan.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
I have been told, and I've seen a number of
news reports that going back to Senator Padia, that Secretary
Nome and Senator of Padilla did get together for some
short fifteen minute meeting after this incident. Have you been
apprised as far as what was discussed in that meeting.
Was there any type of conciliatory tone struck from either
(12:31):
of both sides. What is the feeling coming away from
that event overall today from the best of your.
Speaker 3 (12:36):
Knowledge, Well, during the Q and a secretary Nome did
address that, saying that I'll have a conversation with him.
He has you know, he didn't ask for a meeting,
He didn't, you know, reach out to us, but that
she did say after the press conference she had planned
to go talk to him, so we knew some kind
of conversation was going to happen. And he did walk out.
(13:01):
He came to the podium where all the media was
after because we knew he was going to talk after,
but he just read a statement he was He did
say that he had been trying to reach out to
DHS to have a conversation about these immigration actions that
are happening here. And he, you know, I'm sure you've
seen the quote or heard it, basically saying that if
(13:23):
this is how they treat a sitting senator, imagine how
they are treating some of the people who are being detained.
And we all tried to ask questions because obviously after
that you're going to want to hear from him and
what did you guys talk about, but he just wrapped
it up and just walked walked away, walked away, like
(13:45):
almost scurried away because he didn't want to answer any questions,
and yes, we all question We all yelled questions, including
myself like was it appropriate to you? You know, like
everybody had the same question. And then why did you
talk about he ran away? He would I would say objectively,
he sort of ran away because he wasn't he probably
(14:06):
wasn't ready to talk about because he was visibly upset.
I thought at one point when he was talking about,
you know, the treatment of a senator and imagining how
he said farm workers and I forget the other one
that he listed, but as he was talking about how
they were being or how imagine how they're being cheated,
(14:26):
he was getting his voice was cracking. I think he
was very close to tears. So maybe he was just
processing all that had happened. And I wanted to go
back to one thing too. When he came out to
talk to us after the incident, he said that he
started out saying that, you know, he had a question,
(14:49):
and then he reminded us, telling us like, the First
Amendment allows us to protest, so when because he wanted
to come out and say that in the context of
a protest, I feel like this whole thing was a
form of protest for him, just because of the way
he described it in his own words, this whole incident.
(15:11):
So I don't know what to make of that, but
I just wanted to mention that very quickly.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
Joquan mom out of time with you.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
But do we know if the secretary plans to stay
in California for the duration or is she just in
and out for this press gathering.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
I'm not sure, you know. Right after that press gathering
she went down, there was a little lunch set up
for the National Guard. Spoke to them. I know she
came in last night, but her plans as far as
how long, I think they're probably keeping that under wraps too,
just for security purposes. But no, there was no word
on if she had other things planned for the next
(15:49):
couple weeks, especially with all the No King stuff happening
right this weekend.
Speaker 1 (15:53):
That's true, Jokwan, Spectrum News, thank you so much for
being available into such very short notice and being able
to give us your first hand account of what did
happen as you were in the room as it happened.
Speaker 3 (16:06):
No problem, Happy to do it anytime, Talk soon.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
It's later with Mo Kelly. We're watching a lot of
stories right now. We're getting notice of some police activity
in San Pedro. There is a protest which is started
in San Pedro near the one ten freeway. We also
have news of a preemptive strike on Iran by Israel.
We're watching that as well when we're watching the more
general protests around southern California. So just keep it right
(16:31):
here on KFI AM six forty and we will keep
you in the know.
Speaker 2 (16:35):
We're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 4 (16:37):
You're listening to Later with Mo Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six fortyfi.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
It's Later with mo Kelly. We're live on YouTube, Instagram,
and the iHeartRadio app. There's so much heavy news going on,
from what's happening in the Middle East, to what's happening
right here in southern California, to what's happening in just
the news in general. Let's just take a moment out
to lighten it up, and let's talk about something that
we all agree on. Tipping. It sucks. Let me give
(17:11):
you some reference points here. Tipping has topped seventy eight
billion dollars in the US. Seventy eight billion dollars in
a given year. That's how much we spend on tips.
Now I'm not talking about whether tips are earned or not,
just the money spent.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Now, let's break it down by state.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
Here are the top ten states in terms of percentage
that people will tip on top of an order like
ten percent fifteen percent. Who do you think is the
biggest tipper by state? Let's find out. Let's see coming
in at number ten, Main Main people tip on average
(18:05):
eight point one eight percent. Coming in at number nine
Rhode Island at eight point five four percent, So they
really don't tip a lot, but they're in the top ten.
Number eight of the top tippers by state, Nebraska, no
(18:31):
real pattern emerging as of yet. Number seven of the
top tipping states in America, Vermont at nine point three
one percent. Not even at ten percent. Even though they
turn around that screen of shame and it starts at
eighteen percent, they're not falling for it. Coming in at
(18:53):
number six. The top tipping states in the Union mark
the state of Washington at nine point five to one percent.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
That seems kind of cheap, doesn't it.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
It is, but they're the most generous all things considered,
relatively speaking.
Speaker 5 (19:11):
Oh, if you say so, this seems fishy to me.
It probably is, But who cares?
Speaker 1 (19:15):
Number five, North Carolina at nine point seventy five percent.
Speaker 2 (19:25):
North Carolina is more generous than Washington, I think. Not
Number four.
Speaker 1 (19:36):
Minnesota at ten point eleven percent.
Speaker 2 (19:40):
Well, you know what they say, Minnesota nice, I guess so.
Speaker 1 (19:43):
I mean, there's probably not much to do except, you know,
have food delivered, because Minnesota is boring.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
There's yeah, there's nothing there. Number three of the.
Speaker 1 (19:50):
Top tipping states, South Carolina average tip eleven point one
seven percent. Number two not a state, but the District
of Columbia comes in at number two at twelve point
(20:11):
sixty five percent. They got some dough there, yeah, they do,
they do. There are a lot of credit cards, there
are a lot of business meals. It lends itself to
a more generous tipper, a.
Speaker 5 (20:21):
Lot of tax payer funded tips I might have, of course,
a lot of write offs.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
And coming in at number one of the most generous
tipping state in all of America, New Hampshire. But get this,
(20:45):
sixteen point zero seven percent. They just open up and
just pour out change sixteen percent. I'm calling this fake news.
It probably is, but it's good to discuss and argue
about just in case.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
And here are the.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
This is if I'm reading this correctly in terms of
money spent the average per person spending annually on dining out.
So this is the top ten states spending money on
eating out each year, and California's on this list. I'll
(21:25):
do this one much quicker. Number ten, don't go anywhere
mark state of Washington. Two dollars okay, per person per year.
Number nine New Hampshire. So not only is New Hampshire
(21:46):
some of the best tippers, New Hampshire individually spends the
most money eating out two and twenty four dollars on
average per person.
Speaker 2 (21:54):
Do you think being the big primary state? Excuse that
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
I've never been in New Hampshire's I don't have a
real reference point.
Speaker 5 (22:02):
Because once every few years they get a massive influx
of people with more money than brains. Yeah, but you
don't see the Iowa on this list. That's all I got.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
Okay. Number eight, I mean I appreciate the low jet,
just couldn't follow it.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
Rhode Island again, four hundred and twelve dollars per person.
Speaker 2 (22:22):
It's the influence of the late HP Lovecraft.
Speaker 5 (22:24):
If you do not leave a proper tip, the elder
god Kuthulhu will have a problem with you.
Speaker 1 (22:30):
Now think about this with number seven, the state of
New York, four four hundred and twenty four dollars, and
you would think everything is so much more expensive in
New York. People by then extension would be paying more.
And New York is definitely one of those eat out places. Yeah,
(22:51):
you would think they'd be higher on the list, but
they're not. Coming at number six Colorado four thousand, five
hundred and seventy nine dollars per person eating out.
Speaker 5 (23:05):
Well, they became a legal cannabis state recently, so that
cot you follow.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
Okay, that there might be something to the market. Look
at this logic you're okay with? Well, I'm saying it follows. Okay,
you know number five Massachusetts at four thousand, six hundred
and twenty six dollars per person on average eating out
(23:30):
coming in at number four California, five thousand and seventy
two dollars per year per person annually. And this is
all according to lending Tree. They know something about money.
Coming in number three, and this one makes sense to me. Hawaii,
(23:56):
Oh yeah, six thousand, six hundred and twenty eight dollars
per person and that's just for one meal per year. Oh,
number two, and this one makes sense on the strength
of one city, Nevada, not to be confused with Nevada.
If you say Nevada, someone will correct you. It's Nevada
(24:20):
six and fifty two dollars per person obviously on the
strength on buffets.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
And in Las Vegas and being drunk that too.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
Yes, coming in at number one the most money spent
per person annually on dining out.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Any guesses, anyone? Anyone?
Speaker 5 (24:38):
I would have guessed New York, So I'm out. So yeah,
New York was seventh. Twallett any guesses.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Let's go on and say Los Angeles. Okay, that's a city.
Speaker 1 (24:51):
Wait where we at?
Speaker 2 (24:53):
Fail? Where are we at with this? Never mind Carneesia.
Speaker 1 (24:57):
You want to venture a state like louis See.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
I know, maybe I would say Alabama.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
On tipping, No, no, no, this is money spent eating out.
You want to draw a show? No, Look.
Speaker 5 (25:12):
I'm still I'm still focused on tipping, on eating out.
Speaker 2 (25:15):
Yes, this is eating.
Speaker 1 (25:15):
Out some almost like California. We're number four. No, that's impossible.
Tula who did the show tonight? Because Twila clearly didn't
put it together.
Speaker 5 (25:31):
Look, I say, I think that that's impossible for us
to be number four.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
California's number four, Hawaii's number three, Nevada is number two,
and we're trying to figure out what number one is.
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Suspense is killing me. We too, Texas, you said, Texas.
No no, no, no, no, no no no. They're fat people, but
they're not.
Speaker 5 (25:51):
They're not eating out like no, no, they just go
out back and kill a steer and be done.
Speaker 2 (25:55):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
Yeah, yeah, they'll they'll eat at home and they'll go
to buffets, but they're not like now, you know, spending
big money.
Speaker 5 (26:01):
They'll go to Applebee's's some stuff like that, go on
back and slaughter one of them beeves.
Speaker 1 (26:06):
Where else do people number one? The District of Columbia. Okay, okay,
you can accept that one, right, Mark, That makes sense.
(26:27):
I mean it lines up with the previous list. Yeah
it does, it does. Yeah, all right, And no, I
know DC is not a state, but you know never
can if I hell forty alive everywhere in the iHeartRadio
app cry found this is bs.
Speaker 5 (26:43):
We're paying our elected representatives too much. That's that's the takeaway.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
And YouTube when we come back, we have a Costco
update specifically for Mark Runner.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six, forty.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
KFI ABS and forty Later both Kelly. We're live on Instagram,
We're live on YouTube and the iHeartRadio app. And this
next story is just for Mark Runner and my wife.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
Just you too. You don't go to Costco.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
I go to Costco when I'm going with my wife
and she needs me to help her out. I don't
individually go to Costco. And you do not avail yourself
of the dollar fifty Costco hot dog. True story, true story.
My dad used to get him all the time whenever
he would go. He would go to Costco every single
day just to get those Costco hot dogs. And when
he passed, not to get morbid. It's just it always
(27:33):
reminds me of him. I was wondering where that was going.
So I just didn't have the same desire to have
them anymore. Okay, I'm glad it went in that direction, ya,
and not in the you don't know what's in hot dome.
No no, no, no no no no okay, no, no,
no no. And so my wife she will usually go
to Costco, usually on a Sunday, and she likes to
get there early, okay, because she wants to avoid the crowd.
(27:56):
She doesn't listen to the show, so I just sent
her a text message of this story. But Mark, since
you like to go to Costco and my wife likes
to go to Costco, this is just for you executive members,
the ones who have that one hundred and thirty dollars
membership plan.
Speaker 5 (28:12):
Oh, that's not me, okay, I just have the proletariat
Plan five Baseline one. Yeah, the white trash plan whatever
it is that was? That was Mark Runner. Mark Runner
said that self describing I didn't say that.
Speaker 1 (28:23):
I say no because invariably someone will say, why did
you call Mark Runner that?
Speaker 2 (28:27):
And it's like, no, no, why did you call Mark
a white devil?
Speaker 1 (28:30):
Why?
Speaker 2 (28:32):
As Mark?
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Since Mark Runner, I do not condone, endorse, or am
I even sympathetic with such language or sentiments.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
Mark a cracker anymore, don't do it, egos. This is
all Mark, It's all Mark. I'm not even going to last.
I can't believe you would talk that way.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
I am not even going to in any way encourage
that juvenile behavior.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
Okay, I want to hear this Costco stuff.
Speaker 1 (28:57):
Okay, Executive members, people who are not Mark Runner, who
play pay one hundred and thirty dollars annually. We'll soon
be able to shop thirty minutes to an hour earlier
than the rest of the squids, the rest of the
folks who are unable to pay the higher price, the
rest of the Chud's word. The shopping hours would be
from nine to ten am on weekdays and Sundays. In
(29:20):
other words, that i'd be perfect from my wife. And
on Saturday it's only from nine am to nine thirty am,
So you've got to get up early. My wife is
a morning person. She gets up at like five something
every day.
Speaker 5 (29:32):
So say, okay, So if you've been to Costco at
the end of the day, you know that instead of
some airport like announcement over the PA system, they've actually
got a live person in the back of the store
shrieking at people, yes to get out because the store
is closing.
Speaker 2 (29:46):
They should just do that. I've done.
Speaker 1 (29:48):
I've been there when the store was closing, and it's
usually a young woman maybe like five 't three, huge voice,
and no, Mark is not exaggerating, I know yelling.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
It reminds me of like uh like hurting sheep. Yeah. Basically,
please get.
Speaker 1 (30:06):
Your final items and moved towards the front of the
store to the nearest checkout line. And I took it
personally because like she was standing right behind me.
Speaker 2 (30:13):
Oh, it's like I'm just following her as my wife.
She she's like the wall. Like once she walks past
the aisle, you can't cant about it anymore.
Speaker 1 (30:21):
You don't try to get behind No. No, it's almost
like playing soccer. So no, that's off side. You can't
get behind her.
Speaker 5 (30:26):
It's so annoying that it's just like a step below
them turning the hose on you to get the hell out.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
It's just, yeah, one step.
Speaker 5 (30:33):
Don't they already have time for older folks to go
in earlier than everyone else.
Speaker 2 (30:39):
Anyway, that was during the pandemic. I think, oh they
got rid of that. I say, like Mark is already
at the age. Okay, no, no, no, that's not a
slide against you. I'm just saying that is Mike, Yes, exactly, when.
Speaker 1 (30:52):
You are on the other side of that level of fifty,
you get in early fifty. He's not claiming the fifty
don't need welull sixty.
Speaker 5 (31:00):
I mean you get in early. I want you both suspended.
So if you pay one hundred and thirty dollars.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
You are able to shop for thirty minutes to an
hour earlier weekdays and Sundays nine am to ten am.
On Saturdays nine am to nine thirty am. GoldStar members
like Mark will have to wait until the privileged people
are done shopping, and it's set to begin June thirtieth. Okay,
(31:28):
we have a cast system here in America. People don't
want to talk about it, but it has to do
with money. We definitely have a cast system. Everything is
a tier, everything from our streaming platforms to a shopping
to airline travel, health, healthcare, and it's always I'm actually
being serious right now, and it's all related to money.
Speaker 2 (31:48):
You have more money, you have more access. Life is
just better and longer.
Speaker 1 (31:53):
It's a cast system, and it's only difference is you're
not necessarily only relegated to where you were born. You
could be born poor and eventually become rich. You could
be rich and eventually become poor, depending how life goes.
But it's a whole lot easier in America if you
have more money. Kf I am six forty YouTube. We're
(32:14):
live everywhere in the iHeartRadio
Speaker 4 (32:15):
App, KSPY and kost HD two Los Angeles, Orange County
more stimulating talk
I Am six forty and YouTube were live everywhere in
the iHeartRadio app in the room where it happened. If
you know Hamilton, you know that song, you know to
what it's referring. But what if I told you about
someone who was in the room where it happened and
when it happened. The biggest story of the day of
a bunch of big stories right now at least, is
(00:44):
Senator Alex Padilla of California and his forcible removal from
the roy Ball Conference Center room in which there was
a press conference being given by Secretary of Homeland Security
Christy Nolan joining me on this sh right now. His
spectrum news is Joe Kwan, who was in the room
(01:05):
where it happened and in the room when it happened.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Jo Quan is good to talk to you tonight.
Speaker 3 (01:11):
Hey mo, Yeah, it was huh a wild wild day.
I would say, first, you know word that US Homeland
Security Secretary Christi Noman was going to be here, so
we're all here in the room. She just started speaking
for a few minutes and then suddenly and I'm holding
(01:33):
a camera. It's a long story, but you have to
go through a lot of screening when you go to
the Federal building understandably. So it's the one at the
corner of a veteran in Wiltshire, just right off the
four or five in case you don't know where it
is or your audience has no word is. And so
I was up there, rushed up there, ended up, you know,
having to hold the camera because my photog didn't quite
make it in. And I hear a voice from the
(01:56):
right side just a few minutes into the press conference.
I have a question, and I have a question. Then
from my peripheral vision, I see somebody walking like assertively
I would say, not sauntering, in kind of in a
relaxed pose. Right, I have a question. I have a question,
And then suddenly you see four or five guys push
(02:20):
Senator Alex Padilla, who I looked over and I didn't
know at first because you know, he was in a
plane blue navy jacket, not in a suit or not
that senators always have to wear a suit. But he
you know, he said hands off, hands off. Then he said,
I'm Senator Alex Padilla. And so when you have DHS
(02:42):
ice FBI, you're in the FBI, you know, Los Angeles headquarters. There,
I security already, and I don't need to remind everybody,
but when President Trump was a candidate at the time,
there was an attempt on his life, so you would
imagine that the level of secure curity is probably even hired.
Probably and just being in the federal building, so I mean,
(03:06):
I think he could have came in and said, Hi,
I'm Alex Padia, because I don't know that you can
expect any administra, anybody on the administration, whether it's this
administration a past administration, to know the face of all
the senators he led with to have a question and
then yeah, Joe.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Let me jump in there because I want to provide
some context.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
I agree with you.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
I wouldn't expect the Secretary of Homeland Security to know
the face of all senators, but I would expect her
to know the face of the senter in California. And
also Alex Padia is the chair of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship,
and Border Safety that's an adjunct to Homeland Security. He
is on the Subcommittee of Criminal Justice and counter Terrorism
and adjunct of Homeland Security, and he's also on the
(03:52):
Subcommittee of Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights. Obviously,
connected to immigration. I only put that out out there
because I've been in a number of federal facilities and
courtrooms in federal buildings, and I know, and you've already
touched upon it, the amount of security is tremendous. But
for Alspadia to actually get in that room, not only
(04:15):
was he escorted up, he was escorted in. I'm thinking
he's a known quantity at that point. They're not just
escorting random people.
Speaker 3 (04:23):
Well, so what I was told by a source, he
well two things. He did come out and talk to
the media very briefly after saying that he did have
a meeting in the building semi related, but not with
knowledge of Gnome and all that. I was told by
a source that he was on a different floor, heard
(04:46):
about the press conference, came up to it, and was
able to walk in again sort of like assertively. And
you know, I just think the approach was probably a
bit maybe taken aback, especially just in the atmosphere of
all the things that have been happening this week and
(05:06):
just everything in general. To be honest, twenty twenty five
has been a year, and to be honest, being in
that room and you know, having been out at the protest.
I don't know if I'm just on high alert, but
hearing a man walk in and say I have a question,
I didn't know what was going on, And to be honest,
(05:26):
I was kind of scared because I wasn't able to
look fully because I was holding a camera. And then
I looked to the rights and then through the crowd,
and I heard him say I'm Sador alex Vidia. He
was being dragged out and then handcuffed.
Speaker 1 (05:43):
So let me ask you this, and I want to
get a sense of other people in the room and
their reactions to the best of your knowledge, and that
you could let us know. When I look at the video,
it didn't seem like anyone was apprehensive or worried that
this might have been a threat, especially not the FBI whomever,
(06:04):
because they were trying to get him out of the room.
They weren't trying to jump on him in that moment,
and I suspect that if he were perceived as a threat,
they would have all jumped on him in that moment.
Speaker 3 (06:17):
I think so when he walked in, it didn't look
like I mean, just again, I wasn't looking. I just
heard a voice, and again I might be on high
alert because just being on protests this week and all that,
you got to watch your back, head on a swivel.
But I mean he walked in probably took five six
assertive steps. So the setup of the room was there
(06:37):
were two rows of chairs, the podium was in the
center in front of those two rows of chairs, and
then all the cameras in the back of those two
rows of chairs. So there wasn't a lot of distance
from the entrance of the door to where the secretary
was along with PBP, you know, ice FBI, so there
wasn't a lot of time for people you react or
(07:00):
have any kind of reaction. But I can tell you
four or five guys jumped on Alex DiDia real quick,
pushed him on the wall because again again you know,
he didn't identify himself until he had said I have
a question, I have a question. Then it was hands off,
hands of I am Senator Alex Didya. That was sort
of the order in which the words came out of
(07:23):
the mouth, and everybody was looking at the secretary because
she was in the middle of just starting to speak.
So I don't know that we even had the time
to react other than me just feeling a little bit
you know on edge.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
Did Secretary Gnomes say anything in the moment? Did she acknowledge, like, yes,
I recognize him or the agent?
Speaker 2 (07:47):
She did nothing.
Speaker 3 (07:48):
He paused for a moment because obviously there's a little
bit of a disturbance. Then all the cameras kind of
swung over there, but she because I kept recording, you
can hear he continued talking and then we all swung back. Joeunk.
She didn't acknowledge that until the Q and A portion
of the press conference.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
Joquan, can I get you to hold over for one
more segment because I know you did ask Secretary Nome
a question, so I want to know what you asked
her and then what was her response. If you just
tuning in, I'm speaking with Joquan of Spectrum News. We're
talking about what happened today between Secretary of Homeland Security
Christy Nome and also California Senator Alex Padia. You haven't
heard this anywhere else. We got an exclusive from someone
(08:31):
who was in the room, where and when it happened.
More with Joequan in just a moment.
Speaker 4 (08:36):
You're listening to later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (08:41):
KFI, AM six forty and YouTube.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
We're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app if you just
tuning in. We're speaking with Joe Kwan of Spectrum News.
We're talking about the events earlier today in that federal
building in which California Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed
from the press conference of Land Secretary Christy Nome and
Joe Kwan. Let me bring you back into the conversation.
(09:05):
You were not just a passive observer, you will also
an active participant. You got in a question to Secretary Nome. First,
what did you ask and how does she answer? Did
she answer?
Speaker 3 (09:16):
Yes, she did answer. I asked her because a lot
of the stuff we've been hearing is, you know, from
both sides, from the Trump administration saying that they are
going after the worst of the worst violent criminals. You
also hear from some other groups that say the people
(09:36):
they're going after may include people without criminal history, without
a criminal history. So I asked her to address that
because that's the big question that everybody wants to know,
how many have a criminal history? Who are these people?
And of course they have been releasing some of that
information very actively on their ex account, and you know,
(09:57):
she did answer it. At first she said, you know,
news it or all that kind of stuff, but then said, yeah,
within some of the some of those criminals that we
are taking in, there are some she said in her words, collateral,
so people who've been living with them or around them.
I don't know if she she didn't specify if she
(10:18):
was talking about family or things like that, and she
said that, you know, those people obviously will have to
vet them. And then she took that as an opportunity
to also say that as a reminder, entering this country
is illegal and we have to adjut or we have
to go through the process with the people who are
(10:38):
those quote that she called collateral as well. So, I mean,
you know, this has been a question that's been ongoing
and kind of the I would say, just hearing from
protesters the sort of impetus for causing some of the
uprising in addition to obviously there are some those bad
players as well with the protests doing certain things, you know,
(11:02):
burning cars and such that we've seen the last few days.
But yeah, she did answer it.
Speaker 1 (11:07):
Did Secretary Gnomes go into any detail as far as
the types of practices or procedures tactics which are being
employed that people have had an issue with.
Speaker 3 (11:18):
She didn't. She really stuck to the messaging that we
have heard all along about why they're doing this, you know,
to help keep the streets of La safe.
Speaker 5 (11:31):
No, they have.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
She didn't get into the tactics because maybe that's something
that they're also trying to keep under wraps right as
they do these type of enforcements, because she said, they
have been faced with She I don't remember exact words,
but talking about the response from the community, those people
(11:55):
who want to do bad things, you know, sort of
she said, attacking some of their officers and people trying
to do their jobs in doing these raids.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Uh Jokwan.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
I have been told, and I've seen a number of
news reports that going back to Senator Padia, that Secretary
Nome and Senator of Padilla did get together for some
short fifteen minute meeting after this incident. Have you been
apprised as far as what was discussed in that meeting.
Was there any type of conciliatory tone struck from either
(12:31):
of both sides. What is the feeling coming away from
that event overall today from the best of your.
Speaker 3 (12:36):
Knowledge, Well, during the Q and a secretary Nome did
address that, saying that I'll have a conversation with him.
He has you know, he didn't ask for a meeting,
He didn't, you know, reach out to us, but that
she did say after the press conference she had planned
to go talk to him, so we knew some kind
of conversation was going to happen. And he did walk out.
(13:01):
He came to the podium where all the media was
after because we knew he was going to talk after,
but he just read a statement he was He did
say that he had been trying to reach out to
DHS to have a conversation about these immigration actions that
are happening here. And he, you know, I'm sure you've
seen the quote or heard it, basically saying that if
(13:23):
this is how they treat a sitting senator, imagine how
they are treating some of the people who are being detained.
And we all tried to ask questions because obviously after
that you're going to want to hear from him and
what did you guys talk about, but he just wrapped
it up and just walked walked away, walked away, like
(13:45):
almost scurried away because he didn't want to answer any questions,
and yes, we all question We all yelled questions, including
myself like was it appropriate to you? You know, like
everybody had the same question. And then why did you
talk about he ran away? He would I would say objectively,
he sort of ran away because he wasn't he probably
(14:06):
wasn't ready to talk about because he was visibly upset.
I thought at one point when he was talking about,
you know, the treatment of a senator and imagining how
he said farm workers and I forget the other one
that he listed, but as he was talking about how
they were being or how imagine how they're being cheated,
(14:26):
he was getting his voice was cracking. I think he
was very close to tears. So maybe he was just
processing all that had happened. And I wanted to go
back to one thing too. When he came out to
talk to us after the incident, he said that he
started out saying that, you know, he had a question,
(14:49):
and then he reminded us, telling us like, the First
Amendment allows us to protest, so when because he wanted
to come out and say that in the context of
a protest, I feel like this whole thing was a
form of protest for him, just because of the way
he described it in his own words, this whole incident.
(15:11):
So I don't know what to make of that, but
I just wanted to mention that very quickly.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
Joquan mom out of time with you.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
But do we know if the secretary plans to stay
in California for the duration or is she just in
and out for this press gathering.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
I'm not sure, you know. Right after that press gathering
she went down, there was a little lunch set up
for the National Guard. Spoke to them. I know she
came in last night, but her plans as far as
how long, I think they're probably keeping that under wraps too,
just for security purposes. But no, there was no word
on if she had other things planned for the next
(15:49):
couple weeks, especially with all the No King stuff happening
right this weekend.
Speaker 1 (15:53):
That's true, Jokwan, Spectrum News, thank you so much for
being available into such very short notice and being able
to give us your first hand account of what did
happen as you were in the room as it happened.
Speaker 3 (16:06):
No problem, Happy to do it anytime, Talk soon.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
It's later with Mo Kelly. We're watching a lot of
stories right now. We're getting notice of some police activity
in San Pedro. There is a protest which is started
in San Pedro near the one ten freeway. We also
have news of a preemptive strike on Iran by Israel.
We're watching that as well when we're watching the more
general protests around southern California. So just keep it right
(16:31):
here on KFI AM six forty and we will keep
you in the know.
Speaker 2 (16:35):
We're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 4 (16:37):
You're listening to Later with Mo Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six fortyfi.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
It's Later with mo Kelly. We're live on YouTube, Instagram,
and the iHeartRadio app. There's so much heavy news going on,
from what's happening in the Middle East, to what's happening
right here in southern California, to what's happening in just
the news in general. Let's just take a moment out
to lighten it up, and let's talk about something that
we all agree on. Tipping. It sucks. Let me give
(17:11):
you some reference points here. Tipping has topped seventy eight
billion dollars in the US. Seventy eight billion dollars in
a given year. That's how much we spend on tips.
Now I'm not talking about whether tips are earned or not,
just the money spent.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Now, let's break it down by state.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
Here are the top ten states in terms of percentage
that people will tip on top of an order like
ten percent fifteen percent. Who do you think is the
biggest tipper by state? Let's find out. Let's see coming
in at number ten, Main Main people tip on average
(18:05):
eight point one eight percent. Coming in at number nine
Rhode Island at eight point five four percent, So they
really don't tip a lot, but they're in the top ten.
Number eight of the top tippers by state, Nebraska, no
(18:31):
real pattern emerging as of yet. Number seven of the
top tipping states in America, Vermont at nine point three
one percent. Not even at ten percent. Even though they
turn around that screen of shame and it starts at
eighteen percent, they're not falling for it. Coming in at
(18:53):
number six. The top tipping states in the Union mark
the state of Washington at nine point five to one percent.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
That seems kind of cheap, doesn't it.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
It is, but they're the most generous all things considered,
relatively speaking.
Speaker 5 (19:11):
Oh, if you say so, this seems fishy to me.
It probably is, But who cares?
Speaker 1 (19:15):
Number five, North Carolina at nine point seventy five percent.
Speaker 2 (19:25):
North Carolina is more generous than Washington, I think. Not
Number four.
Speaker 1 (19:36):
Minnesota at ten point eleven percent.
Speaker 2 (19:40):
Well, you know what they say, Minnesota nice, I guess so.
Speaker 1 (19:43):
I mean, there's probably not much to do except, you know,
have food delivered, because Minnesota is boring.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
There's yeah, there's nothing there. Number three of the.
Speaker 1 (19:50):
Top tipping states, South Carolina average tip eleven point one
seven percent. Number two not a state, but the District
of Columbia comes in at number two at twelve point
(20:11):
sixty five percent. They got some dough there, yeah, they do,
they do. There are a lot of credit cards, there
are a lot of business meals. It lends itself to
a more generous tipper, a.
Speaker 5 (20:21):
Lot of tax payer funded tips I might have, of course,
a lot of write offs.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
And coming in at number one of the most generous
tipping state in all of America, New Hampshire. But get this,
(20:45):
sixteen point zero seven percent. They just open up and
just pour out change sixteen percent. I'm calling this fake news.
It probably is, but it's good to discuss and argue
about just in case.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
And here are the.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
This is if I'm reading this correctly in terms of
money spent the average per person spending annually on dining out.
So this is the top ten states spending money on
eating out each year, and California's on this list. I'll
(21:25):
do this one much quicker. Number ten, don't go anywhere
mark state of Washington. Two dollars okay, per person per year.
Number nine New Hampshire. So not only is New Hampshire
(21:46):
some of the best tippers, New Hampshire individually spends the
most money eating out two and twenty four dollars on
average per person.
Speaker 2 (21:54):
Do you think being the big primary state? Excuse that
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
I've never been in New Hampshire's I don't have a
real reference point.
Speaker 5 (22:02):
Because once every few years they get a massive influx
of people with more money than brains. Yeah, but you
don't see the Iowa on this list. That's all I got.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
Okay. Number eight, I mean I appreciate the low jet,
just couldn't follow it.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
Rhode Island again, four hundred and twelve dollars per person.
Speaker 2 (22:22):
It's the influence of the late HP Lovecraft.
Speaker 5 (22:24):
If you do not leave a proper tip, the elder
god Kuthulhu will have a problem with you.
Speaker 1 (22:30):
Now think about this with number seven, the state of
New York, four four hundred and twenty four dollars, and
you would think everything is so much more expensive in
New York. People by then extension would be paying more.
And New York is definitely one of those eat out places. Yeah,
(22:51):
you would think they'd be higher on the list, but
they're not. Coming at number six Colorado four thousand, five
hundred and seventy nine dollars per person eating out.
Speaker 5 (23:05):
Well, they became a legal cannabis state recently, so that
cot you follow.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
Okay, that there might be something to the market. Look
at this logic you're okay with? Well, I'm saying it follows. Okay,
you know number five Massachusetts at four thousand, six hundred
and twenty six dollars per person on average eating out
(23:30):
coming in at number four California, five thousand and seventy
two dollars per year per person annually. And this is
all according to lending Tree. They know something about money.
Coming in number three, and this one makes sense to me. Hawaii,
(23:56):
Oh yeah, six thousand, six hundred and twenty eight dollars
per person and that's just for one meal per year. Oh,
number two, and this one makes sense on the strength
of one city, Nevada, not to be confused with Nevada.
If you say Nevada, someone will correct you. It's Nevada
(24:20):
six and fifty two dollars per person obviously on the
strength on buffets.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
And in Las Vegas and being drunk that too.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
Yes, coming in at number one the most money spent
per person annually on dining out.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Any guesses, anyone? Anyone?
Speaker 5 (24:38):
I would have guessed New York, So I'm out. So yeah,
New York was seventh. Twallett any guesses.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Let's go on and say Los Angeles. Okay, that's a city.
Speaker 1 (24:51):
Wait where we at?
Speaker 2 (24:53):
Fail? Where are we at with this? Never mind Carneesia.
Speaker 1 (24:57):
You want to venture a state like louis See.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
I know, maybe I would say Alabama.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
On tipping, No, no, no, this is money spent eating out.
You want to draw a show? No, Look.
Speaker 5 (25:12):
I'm still I'm still focused on tipping, on eating out.
Speaker 2 (25:15):
Yes, this is eating.
Speaker 1 (25:15):
Out some almost like California. We're number four. No, that's impossible.
Tula who did the show tonight? Because Twila clearly didn't
put it together.
Speaker 5 (25:31):
Look, I say, I think that that's impossible for us
to be number four.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
California's number four, Hawaii's number three, Nevada is number two,
and we're trying to figure out what number one is.
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Suspense is killing me. We too, Texas, you said, Texas.
No no, no, no, no, no no no. They're fat people, but
they're not.
Speaker 5 (25:51):
They're not eating out like no, no, they just go
out back and kill a steer and be done.
Speaker 2 (25:55):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
Yeah, yeah, they'll they'll eat at home and they'll go
to buffets, but they're not like now, you know, spending
big money.
Speaker 5 (26:01):
They'll go to Applebee's's some stuff like that, go on
back and slaughter one of them beeves.
Speaker 1 (26:06):
Where else do people number one? The District of Columbia. Okay, okay,
you can accept that one, right, Mark, That makes sense.
(26:27):
I mean it lines up with the previous list. Yeah
it does, it does. Yeah, all right, And no, I
know DC is not a state, but you know never
can if I hell forty alive everywhere in the iHeartRadio
app cry found this is bs.
Speaker 5 (26:43):
We're paying our elected representatives too much. That's that's the takeaway.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
And YouTube when we come back, we have a Costco
update specifically for Mark Runner.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six, forty.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
KFI ABS and forty Later both Kelly. We're live on Instagram,
We're live on YouTube and the iHeartRadio app. And this
next story is just for Mark Runner and my wife.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
Just you too. You don't go to Costco.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
I go to Costco when I'm going with my wife
and she needs me to help her out. I don't
individually go to Costco. And you do not avail yourself
of the dollar fifty Costco hot dog. True story, true story.
My dad used to get him all the time whenever
he would go. He would go to Costco every single
day just to get those Costco hot dogs. And when
he passed, not to get morbid. It's just it always
(27:33):
reminds me of him. I was wondering where that was going.
So I just didn't have the same desire to have
them anymore. Okay, I'm glad it went in that direction, ya,
and not in the you don't know what's in hot dome.
No no, no, no no no no okay, no, no,
no no. And so my wife she will usually go
to Costco, usually on a Sunday, and she likes to
get there early, okay, because she wants to avoid the crowd.
(27:56):
She doesn't listen to the show, so I just sent
her a text message of this story. But Mark, since
you like to go to Costco and my wife likes
to go to Costco, this is just for you executive members,
the ones who have that one hundred and thirty dollars
membership plan.
Speaker 5 (28:12):
Oh, that's not me, okay, I just have the proletariat
Plan five Baseline one. Yeah, the white trash plan whatever
it is that was? That was Mark Runner. Mark Runner
said that self describing I didn't say that.
Speaker 1 (28:23):
I say no because invariably someone will say, why did
you call Mark Runner that?
Speaker 2 (28:27):
And it's like, no, no, why did you call Mark
a white devil?
Speaker 1 (28:30):
Why?
Speaker 2 (28:32):
As Mark?
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Since Mark Runner, I do not condone, endorse, or am
I even sympathetic with such language or sentiments.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
Mark a cracker anymore, don't do it, egos. This is
all Mark, It's all Mark. I'm not even going to last.
I can't believe you would talk that way.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
I am not even going to in any way encourage
that juvenile behavior.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
Okay, I want to hear this Costco stuff.
Speaker 1 (28:57):
Okay, Executive members, people who are not Mark Runner, who
play pay one hundred and thirty dollars annually. We'll soon
be able to shop thirty minutes to an hour earlier
than the rest of the squids, the rest of the
folks who are unable to pay the higher price, the
rest of the Chud's word. The shopping hours would be
from nine to ten am on weekdays and Sundays. In
(29:20):
other words, that i'd be perfect from my wife. And
on Saturday it's only from nine am to nine thirty am,
So you've got to get up early. My wife is
a morning person. She gets up at like five something
every day.
Speaker 5 (29:32):
So say, okay, So if you've been to Costco at
the end of the day, you know that instead of
some airport like announcement over the PA system, they've actually
got a live person in the back of the store
shrieking at people, yes to get out because the store
is closing.
Speaker 2 (29:46):
They should just do that. I've done.
Speaker 1 (29:48):
I've been there when the store was closing, and it's
usually a young woman maybe like five 't three, huge voice,
and no, Mark is not exaggerating, I know yelling.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
It reminds me of like uh like hurting sheep. Yeah. Basically,
please get.
Speaker 1 (30:06):
Your final items and moved towards the front of the
store to the nearest checkout line. And I took it
personally because like she was standing right behind me.
Speaker 2 (30:13):
Oh, it's like I'm just following her as my wife.
She she's like the wall. Like once she walks past
the aisle, you can't cant about it anymore.
Speaker 1 (30:21):
You don't try to get behind No. No, it's almost
like playing soccer. So no, that's off side. You can't
get behind her.
Speaker 5 (30:26):
It's so annoying that it's just like a step below
them turning the hose on you to get the hell out.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
It's just, yeah, one step.
Speaker 5 (30:33):
Don't they already have time for older folks to go
in earlier than everyone else.
Speaker 2 (30:39):
Anyway, that was during the pandemic. I think, oh they
got rid of that. I say, like Mark is already
at the age. Okay, no, no, no, that's not a
slide against you. I'm just saying that is Mike, Yes, exactly, when.
Speaker 1 (30:52):
You are on the other side of that level of fifty,
you get in early fifty. He's not claiming the fifty
don't need welull sixty.
Speaker 5 (31:00):
I mean you get in early. I want you both suspended.
So if you pay one hundred and thirty dollars.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
You are able to shop for thirty minutes to an
hour earlier weekdays and Sundays nine am to ten am.
On Saturdays nine am to nine thirty am. GoldStar members
like Mark will have to wait until the privileged people
are done shopping, and it's set to begin June thirtieth. Okay,
(31:28):
we have a cast system here in America. People don't
want to talk about it, but it has to do
with money. We definitely have a cast system. Everything is
a tier, everything from our streaming platforms to a shopping
to airline travel, health, healthcare, and it's always I'm actually
being serious right now, and it's all related to money.
Speaker 2 (31:48):
You have more money, you have more access. Life is
just better and longer.
Speaker 1 (31:53):
It's a cast system, and it's only difference is you're
not necessarily only relegated to where you were born. You
could be born poor and eventually become rich. You could
be rich and eventually become poor, depending how life goes.
But it's a whole lot easier in America if you
have more money. Kf I am six forty YouTube. We're
(32:14):
live everywhere in the iHeartRadio
Speaker 4 (32:15):
App, KSPY and kost HD two Los Angeles, Orange County
more stimulating talk
Later, with Mo'Kelly News
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.