October 8, 2025 • 32 mins
(October 08, 2025)
San Andreas and Cascadia faults could produce back-to-back earthquake disasters. For older Americans, the cost of poverty is 9 years of life, study finds. Vaccine Court: Inside the high-stakes battle over vaccine injury compensation. Think that empty airplane seat is fair game? Think again.
San Andreas and Cascadia faults could produce back-to-back earthquake disasters. For older Americans, the cost of poverty is 9 years of life, study finds. Vaccine Court: Inside the high-stakes battle over vaccine injury compensation. Think that empty airplane seat is fair game? Think again.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Yeah bye, Am six forty Handle Here on a Wednesday morning,
October eighth. We're waiting school, waiting for Hamas to come
back and accept or not accept the latest peace proposal.
And yesterday Pambondy and the Senate the subcommittee investigating well
the weaponization of the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Oh, they got into it.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
Okay, Now we are moving ahead with earthquakes. Now, earthquakes
are sort of part and parcel of southern California and
northern California and as a matter of fact, the entire
West Coast, Washington, Oregon, into British Columbia because there are
two major faults. One the San Andreas fault, which is
(00:52):
here in southern California Palmdale bulge, and the other one
is the Cascadia subduction zone. I have no idea what
a subduction zone is, but I'm assuming it's a fault,
and that's along the North coast and then Oregon, Washington
and BC. As I said, now, we always thought they
were separate. Scientists always thought they were two separate entities.
(01:15):
But the question is, what if they were back to
back one goes and then the other goes almost simultaneously.
Speaker 1 (01:25):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Well, there's a new study that was published in the
journal Geosphere and the authors are suggesting that for thousands
of years, large earthquakes on the Cascadia Zone quickly followed
by large earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Not good.
Speaker 2 (01:45):
So they're going through it and they're doing the research
and they're looking at the dates in which this happened,
and the research is fascinating. First of all, the dates
the Cascadia subduction Zone earthquake of seventeen hundred. They figure
it was around a magnitude nine and based on archaeological
evidence that villages sank had to be abandoned. This earthquake
(02:09):
was so powerful the entire sections of the Pacific coastline
dropped as much as five.
Speaker 1 (02:15):
Feet on the coast of both.
Speaker 2 (02:18):
Those of you that have spend fourteen million dollars on
a home in Malibu on the water, congratulations. The big
mazeleotove to you when it comes, because you're going to
be underwater. Native American stories in the Pacific Northwest told
of how the prairie became ocean and canoes were flung
onto trees so the study suggests that the Cascadia earthquake
(02:43):
was about it, excuse me, about a nine, and then
you had the Sandrea's fault, San Andrea's fault following that
literally within minutes maybe a day two, And that was
around seven point nine, which in and of itself is
a big, big quake. A nine is monstrous because if
(03:04):
you look at the Richter scale, it is not seven
goes to eight. This is geometric eight is one hundred
times more powerful than seven.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
I mean, it gets a little crazy.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
So that was around seven point nine is what they
figure all these studies, these studies. So the hypothesis, and
this is the study's lead lead author said this that
this one two punch of earthquake was probably not just
a one in a million chance.
Speaker 1 (03:37):
It's most of the time.
Speaker 2 (03:39):
And the only exception to this in the last twenty
five hundred years was nineteen oh six.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
That's when both didn't go.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
And the nineteen oh six quake, the tsunami, if you will,
the earth quake wave went away from the city as
opposed to coming into the city, which would have just
been far worse. So let's go to the Cascadia earthquake
followed by the San Andreas Fault. That earthquake happened between
(04:17):
fourteen twenty five and fourteen seventy five, and then between
eleven seventy five and twelve twenty five.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
It was a while ago, and.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Then it happened around the years ada twenty five and
four to seventy five BC. Hmm, now a repeat of
just the nineteen oh six earthquake. Just that, thousands of deaths,
hundreds of billions dollars in property, A magnitude nine earthquake
(04:46):
up in Cascadia. We're talking about tsunami wave heights that
would wash away entire coastal towns, Highway one oh one,
gone billion dollars, ten seventy billllion dollars in damage along
the coast, one hundred bridges, lost power lines, toppled, coastal
towns isolated, and people would have as little as fifteen
(05:08):
minutes notice to go to higher ground. And they figure
ten thousand deaths. See, this is all good news for you.
This is when you want to pick up and go
to Florida and get hit by hurricanes. And South Florida
is a terrific place to live. It's full of either
Cubans or my mother old Jewish jentas who do nothing
(05:32):
but complain. That's South Florida and it's hurricanes and.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
We are are you going to move?
Speaker 2 (05:39):
I'd rather have a I'd rather have an earthquake than
a hurricane, because it's done.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
I mean, you're done.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
Well, you get the aftershocks too, but it's a okay,
we got it now, hurricane. You're sitting there for days now.
Scientists won't know for sure. And this is the part
of the study that I find the most fascinating, because
this is archaeological evidence, this is written evidence that this
(06:07):
happened this way. This is oral stories that come down
among for example, Indian tribes. The hypothesis is we won't
know for sure until it happens. Thank you very much.
Doctor's good for you. How's that for ending this study?
(06:29):
It won't happen till it happens. It won't happen till
the old lady was it the old lady sings? Or
the fat lady things? Let's see fat ladies? Oh yeah, okay,
she's just fat. Interesting stuff. Very depressing right now. Let
me get into another story. Oh this is depressing day,
it really is. This is a fun day for me. Okay,
(06:52):
I'll get calls on handle on the wall all the
time about folks, especially elderly folks who are dead broke
used credit cards and max them out and ask me
about lawsuits. Bill, Am I going to get sued for
the twelve thousand dollars? I own no idea, but I'll
tell you they can't collect your social Security And I
assume that's all you live on, is social Security?
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Right? Yeah?
Speaker 2 (07:16):
Fifteen hundred dollars a month, eighteen hundred dollars a month,
one thousand dollars a month here living in southern California.
Speaker 1 (07:22):
Can you imagine that? So this one is a heartbreaker.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
This is one of those I joke, but in reality
it really is heartbreaking. Wealth has been tied to longevity
in the US and other countries too. And here's an
analysis just came out, and that is how long low
income older Americans live or don't live, and the more
(07:47):
affluent people, how much longer they live average nine years
nine years of life. If you're rich and old, you're
going to live on average nine years longer than.
Speaker 1 (08:02):
If you're poor and old. That is a real problem.
Speaker 2 (08:07):
Now, I want to make a social point here, sociological
point I'm not an exceptionalist. You know, Americans, a lot
of people say we're the greatest country in the world.
And in many ways we are the greatest country in
the world. However, there's some issues. There are some places
where we're not the greatest country in the world. Talk
to someone who's on Social Security that can't afford food. Hey,
(08:31):
we're the greatest country in the world. Go to Europe
and people don't starve. Go to other cultures and people
don't starve when they're old because our culture is very
different in other cultures. Old people move in with their kids.
That's it, you know, you take care of your parents.
That's the way it works here. No, not so much.
Speaker 1 (08:56):
You have your own life.
Speaker 2 (08:57):
You have your family, and as your parents a or
as a u age, you're on your own. And what
it costs to stay alive if.
Speaker 1 (09:07):
You're not earning money and living on.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Social Security and whatever pension, which of course don't exist anymore.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
That is a tough one. That is not easy.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
About fifteen percent this research, it just came out a
new study from the National Council on Aging. Generally, middle
income older Americans are also dying younger than wealthier people.
The secret to living a nice long life is to
have money. Now that doesn't automatically translate, but what ends
(09:38):
up happening, Well, you have better healthcare. Nutritionally, you have
better nutrition. The stress of whether you're going to pay
your rent or eat doesn't exist. And the kind of
stress that does happen when you're in that position that
leads to dying because we know how stress affects health.
(10:01):
And this is the first time wealth and health have
been tied together. This is a study from twenty eighteen
to twenty twenty two University of Michigan did. There's ten
thousand households, so we're talking about a serious study and
it has all kinds of implications for an aging society.
We have widening economic inequality. The rich are getting richer,
(10:24):
the poor are getting poorer. And it now translates into
they've got some figures nine years difference, and the US
population is aging and how many of us and we've
done these We do this with Joe Larsgard all the time.
How much you think it's going to cost to literally
you have to have in savings to get for example,
(10:47):
fifty thousand dollars a year, okay, which is not a
huge amount of money. Income fifty thousand dollars a year,
you need a million dollars in the bank. How many
of us have a million dollars in the bank or invested?
That is throwing off five percent? Four five percent? That
(11:08):
keeps you alive. Very few people. We don't plan for
the future, and we don't have a society where we
move in with our kids and the entire extended family
takes care of grandma grandpa, because that's the way it
works in Europe, that's the way it works in Asia,
but it doesn't.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Work that way here.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
So we have elderly people on their own, literally living
in dumpsters or living in maybe not dumpsters, but living
in a very tough life and making very tough decisions.
And what I tell folks is if you're only living
on social Security, doesn't matter if you're going to get sued,
no one's going to be able to collect because social
Security as exempt.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
But that is one.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Of the one of the worst parts of the US.
We're the best country in the world really infant mortality.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
We're number twenty something.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
When it comes to literacy, we're maybe in the teens.
When it comes to healthcare, we're way way down. And
we all know the healthcare system is broken. When it
comes to opportunity, we're the best, if not one of
the best.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
When it comes to lifestyle.
Speaker 2 (12:22):
Other than if you live in Finland and you happen
to like snow that's nineteen feet deep, we're in pretty
good shape here in America gun violence.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Are we the greatest country in the world to live in?
Speaker 2 (12:35):
No? And the rough part is when it comes to
elderly people, it is very tough to be old in
this country. It's very tough to be poor in this country.
You want to be poor, I'm going to suggest you
move to the Scandinavian countries where you're not going to
live on the street, You're not going to starve. There
is a social safety net there that we don't have here.
(12:59):
So yeah, I mean, that's that's tough. So what's the answer,
h get rich? How's that for an answer?
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Huh? Or die trying or die Well, you will die trying,
that's for sure. Nine years earlier. I mean that that's
a stunning figure. That really is.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Kno, will I be invited to your funeral next week?
Speaker 1 (13:26):
No? You won't, Okay, just you No? No, Okay?
Speaker 2 (13:33):
Moving on a crazy time in the Trump administration really
as in every day. And one of the crazier people
in the administration is Robert Kennedy Junior, who is a
head of Health and Human Services, who is head of
the CDC and controls what the CDC tells us about vaccines.
(13:55):
And he is a vaccine skeptic to some degree. He
used to be a lot more He's calmed that down
a little bit. And I'll tell you what is going on.
It's a little complicated, but I want to unwonk this.
When you see a commercial on TV about any drug,
the disclaimer will read in very rare circumstances, this could
(14:17):
lead to loss of an erection for the rest of
your life, oily stools. You may die in very rare instances.
And what is it one in one hundred thousand. I mean,
the studies have shown because frankly, the FDA won't approve
drugs that at least have some eacy, efficacy and don't
(14:39):
kill people.
Speaker 1 (14:40):
So what happens in those.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
Very rare instances where vaccines do give people those side effects?
When you have one hundred million kids over the course
of decades getting vaccinations, well, frankly, all of us have
gotten vaccinations for the most part. I mean, I don't
(15:03):
know many people who have not been vaccinated really quickly.
Neil vaccinated, Yes, sir, Amy vaccinated or what. It doesn't
matter in general for MMR and polio and all of
the diseases. Yeah, so does Kno, and so does everybody,
Which means we have three hundred and forty million Americans
(15:24):
of which the vast, vast majority, and you've been vaccinated,
I ask you already.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Absolutely just got my flushell last week. Okay, good for you,
and I did too a few weeks ago.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
So you have three hundred and forty million Americans, of
which the vast majority, and I'm going to speculate here,
I would say three hundred and thirty million.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
Of them have been vaccinated.
Speaker 2 (15:47):
Now, if you have one in let's say fifty thousand
having a severe reaction to the vaccine and maybe it
kills them, maybe it causes some very serious serious disease
or react, you still have a lot of people. So
what ended up happening was there was a documentary film,
(16:08):
a quasi documentary film, and it caused a lot of feur.
It basically connected these vaccines to autism and is this
where Robert Kennedy got his great view of vaccines. And
then there was one study by this guy Wakefield in
(16:30):
the late nineteen nineties. In early two thousand, Andrew Wakefield,
he wrote a paper which is now retracted, alleging that
link between MMR vaccine, that young people vaccine and autism
all of a sudden, that fuels a surge of claims.
And where did people go. They went to vaccine Court.
(16:54):
They didn't sue the manufacture because frankly, you're not going
to win against the manufactur Sure, the chances and the
connection are so tenuous that it's not a win. However,
if you have ten million people suing a manufacturer, you
know what ends up happening. They're out of the vaccine business.
(17:15):
They don't want to deal with it anymore. So what
happened was that by law, vaccine Court was created, and
this came out of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
of nineteen eighty six, creating a no fault system families
who believed a vaccine caused harm, and in many cases
(17:37):
did or one in a zillion cases did, but it's
still real. There were kids who got in back to
who were vaccinated who did react and became very seriously
ill to the point where they need lifetime care. And
so this Injury Act of nineteen eighty six created this
(17:59):
no fault cis if a family believes that a vaccine
caused harm to the child, if the injury appeared within
a table set within a time frame. In other words,
that's one of the requirements. Kid is vaccinated and within
a time frame in fact got this illness. Was the
(18:21):
argument was the vaccine was connected to whatever syndrome, whatever
horrific illness.
Speaker 1 (18:26):
And by the way, it was probably why.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Because one in fifty thousand and one in twenty thousand
and one and one hundred thousand are in fact affected.
Because there's no such thing as one hundred percent of everything.
So what do what does that family do? Well, they
go to vaccine court, not the actual name, and compensation
(18:51):
is automatic.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
They don't have to prove the connection.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
All they have to prove is the kid got vacated
within this timeframe in some cases thirty days and some
cases a year. Then compensation occurred. You don't sue the
manufacture of the vaccine. You simply go to court and
the government pays for the compensation, which every manufacturer puts
(19:21):
in a little bit of money per vaccine, so it's
a small hit.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
And it works. It works. Claimants could present medical evidence.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
If the vaccine court says there is no connection, then
the claimant can go forward and present evidence and try
to overrule vaccine court. Which has happened the Vaccine Injury
Compensation program, and it is a court of sort of
a court. It's an administrative court. It's not in front
of a judge. You're in front of what is called
a special master who is an expert on this and
(19:57):
the way it works. If you are or your child,
for example, is one of the very very rare number
of children that react to vaccines. And it does happen.
We know that that's a given and hear you'll see
the disclaimer on TV commercials. Half the commercial is these
are the side effects. Now the side effects what very
(20:21):
rare cases. I mean I'm talking about rare, but it
does happen. So what ended up happening is lawsuits would
hit these vaccine manufacturers, and enough of them to hit
you're done. And when that first study came out in
the late nineties, Wakefield wrote that paper Connection between Autism
(20:41):
and Vaccines, which By the way, there is no connection.
Speaker 1 (20:45):
His numbers were flawed.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
He made up the numbers and it was debunked and
he lost his license. But that's the basis of Robert
Kennedy's autism is connected to vaccines. So you have this
court vaccine injury compensation program, and it's a no fall program,
as I said, And what happens if a child does
(21:08):
react and gets seriously seriously ill or reacts incredibly negatively,
simply goes to the vaccine compensation court and the court
the master looks at it. Yes, there is a connection.
How is there a connection? There may not be a
connection at all. But the way it is designed is
within a certain timeframe, this particular disease or syndrome happens
(21:31):
or effect things like encephaly and a few others, there's
about ten of them. Then compensation is awarded, no fault.
It's automatic. You don't have to prove anything. The only
have to prove is you got the vaccine, this happened
within the timeframe.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
And these are the diseases that are covered period. Easy.
Speaker 2 (21:50):
Now what Kennedy wants to do is add autism to
that table. The problem is there are ye years and
years of study that have proven conclusively autism is not
connected to vaccine. Now autism is being diagnosed to half
(22:17):
of the kids in the country now, I mean, autism
is out there and it's like French fries at McDonald's.
It's amazing how many people now have autism. What Kennedy
wants to do is add to that table of diseases autism,
which means it's going to blow open the number of
(22:37):
claims that are being made. Because everybody gets vaccinated, the
number of kids that are diagnosed with autism has exploded.
And if they go to this autism court, it's going
to be overwhelmed. There are only eight masters and we're
talking millions of claims. And if the autism is accepted
(23:01):
by the vaccine Court, and by the way, the Department
of Health and Human Services makes the determination of which
of these diseases are in fact connected to those vaccines,
the one in a million connection, and doctors make this decision.
But we know what the Department of Health and Human
Services says, screw the doctors.
Speaker 1 (23:19):
We've made this decision.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
We're going to go forward and it's simply going to
break the system. And this vaccine Court is a wonderful idea.
This is where the government did a terrific thing because
it number one saves the manufacturer from being sued.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
It's no fault.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
The compensation is automatic, so the manufacture of the vaccine
is not going to get hit and the patient is
still going to get paid. And the trust fund that
pays these is actually paid by the many, by the
manufacturer of the vaccine. But I think it's twelve cents
(24:05):
per vaccine or whatever it is. It's a very low figure.
But if you add all the vaccines up, there's a
ton of money. There's four billion dollars in that trust fund, which.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
At this point is you know, it's working. It's working.
Speaker 2 (24:21):
Since nineteen eighty eight, the federal data shows that twenty
five thousand petitions have been made to Vaccine Court and
have been adjudicated. Of those, twelve thousand were granted compensation.
Thirteen thousand were dismissed, saying what you have is not
in our table of diseases.
Speaker 1 (24:42):
You didn't meet the timeline. Certain timelines or a year.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Certain timelines are thirty days because some react immediately and
you didn't make it. So over half have been been
denied saying nope, you didn't make it.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
So this helps people.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
So you have kids who families who get the compensation
they needing taking care of the kids for the rest
of their lives.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
Millions of dollars of compensation are given.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
So it helps these kids, it helps keep the vaccine
manufacturers in the market, and it's sort of a win
win for everybody.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Now, can this be blown up?
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Yeah, as soon as you add autism to that table,
to that number of syndromes or reactions in.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
Opposition to all.
Speaker 2 (25:34):
Of the evidence over decades and decades. So during this
time that whatever number of kids have autism and we're
vaccinated with something, hundreds of millions of vaccinations have occurred
around the world and how many how many people were saved?
Speaker 1 (25:57):
Millions and millions.
Speaker 2 (26:00):
So Kennedy may get his wish and do an end
around on this and not officially say and have the
government say yes autism or vaccines cause cause autism. What
he is going to do, what he could do is
simply add to that table of diseases that react to
(26:24):
vaccines and will break the system.
Speaker 1 (26:26):
It'll just break the system.
Speaker 2 (26:28):
It'll blow up, and he gets his wish, Ye vaccines
cause autism.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
Crazy isn't it just completely crazy? Okay, a lot going
on now.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
This is the week of Nobel Prizes, and we've already
had I think the Physics Prize and the Price for Medicine,
and these Nobel Prizes now are really obscure stuff. I
mean they're minute scientific discoveries, proteins and within the body.
(27:03):
I mean it used to be where you could understand
Nobel Prizes. For example, whoever invented flying that got the
Nobel Prize. That's easy to understand, right X rays where
Marie Currey got the Nobel Prize at the show in
the last century.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
She received two.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
By the way, very very few people have ever received two,
and she certainly was the only woman.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
To ever do that.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
So we're gonna the big one is coming up on Friday,
the Nobel Peace Prize. This is what everybody looks at.
And there's been some weird ones on that one too. Now,
the Nobel Prizes are awarded in Stockholm or is it Oslo?
And then the Peace Prize award in Stockholm is one
or the other. It's on It's very different. It's on itself.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
So you've got the Nobel Prizes and they're extraordinary discoveries,
and they're given well once a year and sometimes not
at all, to very important findings and usually issues that
affect mankind in a positive way. Well, there's also called
(28:09):
the Ignobel Prizes, and they've been going on for thirty
five years.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
And what they do is.
Speaker 2 (28:19):
They celebrate science's more unusual contributions. They honor the imaginative,
maybe spur people's interests in science, medicine, technology. Now, these
are real studies done by real researchers, as crazy as
it may sound. So let's go through this year's winners
(28:41):
of the Ignobel Prizes.
Speaker 1 (28:45):
Okay, let's do it.
Speaker 2 (28:48):
For the Nutrition Prize, which the Ignobil Prize is awarded,
not the Nobel Prize, but the Ignobel Prize. This is
a study that was done by I can't even go
through the names Daniellie Dandy, Gabriel Sega, Atia Betto and
it goes on and on, and they were awarded the
(29:10):
Nutrition Prize for studying the extent to which a certain
kind of lizard chooses to eat certain kinds of pizza.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
Real study.
Speaker 2 (29:21):
So the team spotted a rainbow lizard stealing a slice
of pizza at a resort, and then the scientist said
they wanted to know if the rainbow lizards, who usually
eat insects, had a taste for pizza, and they had
a do they do lizers have a preferred topping. So
(29:41):
they followed nine lizards who had a choice between the
four cheese pizza and a plate of four seasons pizza
a lot of meat on it, you know, pepperoni and sausage.
Speaker 1 (29:53):
Et cetera.
Speaker 2 (29:55):
Now, the lizards found the pizza and ate it, but
only the four cheese pizza.
Speaker 1 (30:01):
They didn't eat the rest of them.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
Why because it could be easier for them to digest
the cheese pizza. It could be some cues attract them
to the cheesier pizza. So they discovered why, Well, we
really don't know, but it was one of the winners.
Then another winner of this was the Physics Prize and
(30:27):
went to a bunch of people Italian people, and it
honors and basically studies pasta sauce.
Speaker 1 (30:35):
Hmm.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
So they were given the Ignobel Prize for discoveries about
the physics of pasta sauce, especially the phase transition that
can lead to clumping, which can cause unpleasantness because so
many of us suffer from pasta sauce that clumps.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
So if you're making caccio.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Epeppi, I think that's one of the sauces. If the
water is too hot or you don't have the right
ratio of cheese to starch, the sauce turns into a
thin liquid filled with these congealed globs of curds.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
And earlier this year.
Speaker 2 (31:10):
These physicists developed a way to prevent clumping. You use
corn starch in the cheese and pepper sauce instead of
just relying on how much starch gets into the boiling
water while the pasta cooks. And while why they got
that prize is because pasta sauce is so important to
those of us who eat pasta. And that's around the world,
(31:34):
and there was and there is physics to it. Oh
there's more. There's more big Nobel prizes coming. Diseases that
react to vaccines and will break the system. It'll just
break the system, it'll blow up. And he gets his wish. Yeah,
(31:54):
vaccines cause autism.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
Crazy, Isn't it just completely crazy? KF I am six forty.
You've been listening to the Bill Handle show.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
Catch my show Monday through Friday six am to nine am,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Yeah bye, Am six forty Handle Here on a Wednesday morning,
October eighth. We're waiting school, waiting for Hamas to come
back and accept or not accept the latest peace proposal.
And yesterday Pambondy and the Senate the subcommittee investigating well
the weaponization of the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Oh, they got into it.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
Okay, Now we are moving ahead with earthquakes. Now, earthquakes
are sort of part and parcel of southern California and
northern California and as a matter of fact, the entire
West Coast, Washington, Oregon, into British Columbia because there are
two major faults. One the San Andreas fault, which is
(00:52):
here in southern California Palmdale bulge, and the other one
is the Cascadia subduction zone. I have no idea what
a subduction zone is, but I'm assuming it's a fault,
and that's along the North coast and then Oregon, Washington
and BC. As I said, now, we always thought they
were separate. Scientists always thought they were two separate entities.
(01:15):
But the question is, what if they were back to
back one goes and then the other goes almost simultaneously.
Speaker 1 (01:25):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Well, there's a new study that was published in the
journal Geosphere and the authors are suggesting that for thousands
of years, large earthquakes on the Cascadia Zone quickly followed
by large earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Not good.
Speaker 2 (01:45):
So they're going through it and they're doing the research
and they're looking at the dates in which this happened,
and the research is fascinating. First of all, the dates
the Cascadia subduction Zone earthquake of seventeen hundred. They figure
it was around a magnitude nine and based on archaeological
evidence that villages sank had to be abandoned. This earthquake
(02:09):
was so powerful the entire sections of the Pacific coastline
dropped as much as five.
Speaker 1 (02:15):
Feet on the coast of both.
Speaker 2 (02:18):
Those of you that have spend fourteen million dollars on
a home in Malibu on the water, congratulations. The big
mazeleotove to you when it comes, because you're going to
be underwater. Native American stories in the Pacific Northwest told
of how the prairie became ocean and canoes were flung
onto trees so the study suggests that the Cascadia earthquake
(02:43):
was about it, excuse me, about a nine, and then
you had the Sandrea's fault, San Andrea's fault following that
literally within minutes maybe a day two, And that was
around seven point nine, which in and of itself is
a big, big quake. A nine is monstrous because if
(03:04):
you look at the Richter scale, it is not seven
goes to eight. This is geometric eight is one hundred
times more powerful than seven.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
I mean, it gets a little crazy.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
So that was around seven point nine is what they
figure all these studies, these studies. So the hypothesis, and
this is the study's lead lead author said this that
this one two punch of earthquake was probably not just
a one in a million chance.
Speaker 1 (03:37):
It's most of the time.
Speaker 2 (03:39):
And the only exception to this in the last twenty
five hundred years was nineteen oh six.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
That's when both didn't go.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
And the nineteen oh six quake, the tsunami, if you will,
the earth quake wave went away from the city as
opposed to coming into the city, which would have just
been far worse. So let's go to the Cascadia earthquake
followed by the San Andreas Fault. That earthquake happened between
(04:17):
fourteen twenty five and fourteen seventy five, and then between
eleven seventy five and twelve twenty five.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
It was a while ago, and.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Then it happened around the years ada twenty five and
four to seventy five BC. Hmm, now a repeat of
just the nineteen oh six earthquake. Just that, thousands of deaths,
hundreds of billions dollars in property, A magnitude nine earthquake
(04:46):
up in Cascadia. We're talking about tsunami wave heights that
would wash away entire coastal towns, Highway one oh one,
gone billion dollars, ten seventy billllion dollars in damage along
the coast, one hundred bridges, lost power lines, toppled, coastal
towns isolated, and people would have as little as fifteen
(05:08):
minutes notice to go to higher ground. And they figure
ten thousand deaths. See, this is all good news for you.
This is when you want to pick up and go
to Florida and get hit by hurricanes. And South Florida
is a terrific place to live. It's full of either
Cubans or my mother old Jewish jentas who do nothing
(05:32):
but complain. That's South Florida and it's hurricanes and.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
We are are you going to move?
Speaker 2 (05:39):
I'd rather have a I'd rather have an earthquake than
a hurricane, because it's done.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
I mean, you're done.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
Well, you get the aftershocks too, but it's a okay,
we got it now, hurricane. You're sitting there for days now.
Scientists won't know for sure. And this is the part
of the study that I find the most fascinating, because
this is archaeological evidence, this is written evidence that this
(06:07):
happened this way. This is oral stories that come down
among for example, Indian tribes. The hypothesis is we won't
know for sure until it happens. Thank you very much.
Doctor's good for you. How's that for ending this study?
(06:29):
It won't happen till it happens. It won't happen till
the old lady was it the old lady sings? Or
the fat lady things? Let's see fat ladies? Oh yeah, okay,
she's just fat. Interesting stuff. Very depressing right now. Let
me get into another story. Oh this is depressing day,
it really is. This is a fun day for me. Okay,
(06:52):
I'll get calls on handle on the wall all the
time about folks, especially elderly folks who are dead broke
used credit cards and max them out and ask me
about lawsuits. Bill, Am I going to get sued for
the twelve thousand dollars? I own no idea, but I'll
tell you they can't collect your social Security And I
assume that's all you live on, is social Security?
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Right? Yeah?
Speaker 2 (07:16):
Fifteen hundred dollars a month, eighteen hundred dollars a month,
one thousand dollars a month here living in southern California.
Speaker 1 (07:22):
Can you imagine that? So this one is a heartbreaker.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
This is one of those I joke, but in reality
it really is heartbreaking. Wealth has been tied to longevity
in the US and other countries too. And here's an
analysis just came out, and that is how long low
income older Americans live or don't live, and the more
(07:47):
affluent people, how much longer they live average nine years
nine years of life. If you're rich and old, you're
going to live on average nine years longer than.
Speaker 1 (08:02):
If you're poor and old. That is a real problem.
Speaker 2 (08:07):
Now, I want to make a social point here, sociological
point I'm not an exceptionalist. You know, Americans, a lot
of people say we're the greatest country in the world.
And in many ways we are the greatest country in
the world. However, there's some issues. There are some places
where we're not the greatest country in the world. Talk
to someone who's on Social Security that can't afford food. Hey,
(08:31):
we're the greatest country in the world. Go to Europe
and people don't starve. Go to other cultures and people
don't starve when they're old because our culture is very
different in other cultures. Old people move in with their kids.
That's it, you know, you take care of your parents.
That's the way it works here. No, not so much.
Speaker 1 (08:56):
You have your own life.
Speaker 2 (08:57):
You have your family, and as your parents a or
as a u age, you're on your own. And what
it costs to stay alive if.
Speaker 1 (09:07):
You're not earning money and living on.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Social Security and whatever pension, which of course don't exist anymore.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
That is a tough one. That is not easy.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
About fifteen percent this research, it just came out a
new study from the National Council on Aging. Generally, middle
income older Americans are also dying younger than wealthier people.
The secret to living a nice long life is to
have money. Now that doesn't automatically translate, but what ends
(09:38):
up happening, Well, you have better healthcare. Nutritionally, you have
better nutrition. The stress of whether you're going to pay
your rent or eat doesn't exist. And the kind of
stress that does happen when you're in that position that
leads to dying because we know how stress affects health.
(10:01):
And this is the first time wealth and health have
been tied together. This is a study from twenty eighteen
to twenty twenty two University of Michigan did. There's ten
thousand households, so we're talking about a serious study and
it has all kinds of implications for an aging society.
We have widening economic inequality. The rich are getting richer,
(10:24):
the poor are getting poorer. And it now translates into
they've got some figures nine years difference, and the US
population is aging and how many of us and we've
done these We do this with Joe Larsgard all the time.
How much you think it's going to cost to literally
you have to have in savings to get for example,
(10:47):
fifty thousand dollars a year, okay, which is not a
huge amount of money. Income fifty thousand dollars a year,
you need a million dollars in the bank. How many
of us have a million dollars in the bank or invested?
That is throwing off five percent? Four five percent? That
(11:08):
keeps you alive. Very few people. We don't plan for
the future, and we don't have a society where we
move in with our kids and the entire extended family
takes care of grandma grandpa, because that's the way it
works in Europe, that's the way it works in Asia,
but it doesn't.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Work that way here.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
So we have elderly people on their own, literally living
in dumpsters or living in maybe not dumpsters, but living
in a very tough life and making very tough decisions.
And what I tell folks is if you're only living
on social Security, doesn't matter if you're going to get sued,
no one's going to be able to collect because social
Security as exempt.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
But that is one.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Of the one of the worst parts of the US.
We're the best country in the world really infant mortality.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
We're number twenty something.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
When it comes to literacy, we're maybe in the teens.
When it comes to healthcare, we're way way down. And
we all know the healthcare system is broken. When it
comes to opportunity, we're the best, if not one of
the best.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
When it comes to lifestyle.
Speaker 2 (12:22):
Other than if you live in Finland and you happen
to like snow that's nineteen feet deep, we're in pretty
good shape here in America gun violence.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Are we the greatest country in the world to live in?
Speaker 2 (12:35):
No? And the rough part is when it comes to
elderly people, it is very tough to be old in
this country. It's very tough to be poor in this country.
You want to be poor, I'm going to suggest you
move to the Scandinavian countries where you're not going to
live on the street, You're not going to starve. There
is a social safety net there that we don't have here.
(12:59):
So yeah, I mean, that's that's tough. So what's the answer,
h get rich? How's that for an answer?
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Huh? Or die trying or die Well, you will die trying,
that's for sure. Nine years earlier. I mean that that's
a stunning figure. That really is.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Kno, will I be invited to your funeral next week?
Speaker 1 (13:26):
No? You won't, Okay, just you No? No, Okay?
Speaker 2 (13:33):
Moving on a crazy time in the Trump administration really
as in every day. And one of the crazier people
in the administration is Robert Kennedy Junior, who is a
head of Health and Human Services, who is head of
the CDC and controls what the CDC tells us about vaccines.
(13:55):
And he is a vaccine skeptic to some degree. He
used to be a lot more He's calmed that down
a little bit. And I'll tell you what is going on.
It's a little complicated, but I want to unwonk this.
When you see a commercial on TV about any drug,
the disclaimer will read in very rare circumstances, this could
(14:17):
lead to loss of an erection for the rest of
your life, oily stools. You may die in very rare instances.
And what is it one in one hundred thousand. I mean,
the studies have shown because frankly, the FDA won't approve
drugs that at least have some eacy, efficacy and don't
(14:39):
kill people.
Speaker 1 (14:40):
So what happens in those.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
Very rare instances where vaccines do give people those side effects?
When you have one hundred million kids over the course
of decades getting vaccinations, well, frankly, all of us have
gotten vaccinations for the most part. I mean, I don't
(15:03):
know many people who have not been vaccinated really quickly.
Neil vaccinated, Yes, sir, Amy vaccinated or what. It doesn't
matter in general for MMR and polio and all of
the diseases. Yeah, so does Kno, and so does everybody,
Which means we have three hundred and forty million Americans
(15:24):
of which the vast, vast majority, and you've been vaccinated,
I ask you already.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Absolutely just got my flushell last week. Okay, good for you,
and I did too a few weeks ago.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
So you have three hundred and forty million Americans, of
which the vast majority, and I'm going to speculate here,
I would say three hundred and thirty million.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
Of them have been vaccinated.
Speaker 2 (15:47):
Now, if you have one in let's say fifty thousand
having a severe reaction to the vaccine and maybe it
kills them, maybe it causes some very serious serious disease
or react, you still have a lot of people. So
what ended up happening was there was a documentary film,
(16:08):
a quasi documentary film, and it caused a lot of feur.
It basically connected these vaccines to autism and is this
where Robert Kennedy got his great view of vaccines. And
then there was one study by this guy Wakefield in
(16:30):
the late nineteen nineties. In early two thousand, Andrew Wakefield,
he wrote a paper which is now retracted, alleging that
link between MMR vaccine, that young people vaccine and autism
all of a sudden, that fuels a surge of claims.
And where did people go. They went to vaccine Court.
(16:54):
They didn't sue the manufacture because frankly, you're not going
to win against the manufactur Sure, the chances and the
connection are so tenuous that it's not a win. However,
if you have ten million people suing a manufacturer, you
know what ends up happening. They're out of the vaccine business.
(17:15):
They don't want to deal with it anymore. So what
happened was that by law, vaccine Court was created, and
this came out of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
of nineteen eighty six, creating a no fault system families
who believed a vaccine caused harm, and in many cases
(17:37):
did or one in a zillion cases did, but it's
still real. There were kids who got in back to
who were vaccinated who did react and became very seriously
ill to the point where they need lifetime care. And
so this Injury Act of nineteen eighty six created this
(17:59):
no fault cis if a family believes that a vaccine
caused harm to the child, if the injury appeared within
a table set within a time frame. In other words,
that's one of the requirements. Kid is vaccinated and within
a time frame in fact got this illness. Was the
(18:21):
argument was the vaccine was connected to whatever syndrome, whatever
horrific illness.
Speaker 1 (18:26):
And by the way, it was probably why.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Because one in fifty thousand and one in twenty thousand
and one and one hundred thousand are in fact affected.
Because there's no such thing as one hundred percent of everything.
So what do what does that family do? Well, they
go to vaccine court, not the actual name, and compensation
(18:51):
is automatic.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
They don't have to prove the connection.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
All they have to prove is the kid got vacated
within this timeframe in some cases thirty days and some
cases a year. Then compensation occurred. You don't sue the
manufacture of the vaccine. You simply go to court and
the government pays for the compensation, which every manufacturer puts
(19:21):
in a little bit of money per vaccine, so it's
a small hit.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
And it works. It works. Claimants could present medical evidence.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
If the vaccine court says there is no connection, then
the claimant can go forward and present evidence and try
to overrule vaccine court. Which has happened the Vaccine Injury
Compensation program, and it is a court of sort of
a court. It's an administrative court. It's not in front
of a judge. You're in front of what is called
a special master who is an expert on this and
(19:57):
the way it works. If you are or your child,
for example, is one of the very very rare number
of children that react to vaccines. And it does happen.
We know that that's a given and hear you'll see
the disclaimer on TV commercials. Half the commercial is these
are the side effects. Now the side effects what very
(20:21):
rare cases. I mean I'm talking about rare, but it
does happen. So what ended up happening is lawsuits would
hit these vaccine manufacturers, and enough of them to hit
you're done. And when that first study came out in
the late nineties, Wakefield wrote that paper Connection between Autism
(20:41):
and Vaccines, which By the way, there is no connection.
Speaker 1 (20:45):
His numbers were flawed.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
He made up the numbers and it was debunked and
he lost his license. But that's the basis of Robert
Kennedy's autism is connected to vaccines. So you have this
court vaccine injury compensation program, and it's a no fall program,
as I said, And what happens if a child does
(21:08):
react and gets seriously seriously ill or reacts incredibly negatively,
simply goes to the vaccine compensation court and the court
the master looks at it. Yes, there is a connection.
How is there a connection? There may not be a
connection at all. But the way it is designed is
within a certain timeframe, this particular disease or syndrome happens
(21:31):
or effect things like encephaly and a few others, there's
about ten of them. Then compensation is awarded, no fault.
It's automatic. You don't have to prove anything. The only
have to prove is you got the vaccine, this happened
within the timeframe.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
And these are the diseases that are covered period. Easy.
Speaker 2 (21:50):
Now what Kennedy wants to do is add autism to
that table. The problem is there are ye years and
years of study that have proven conclusively autism is not
connected to vaccine. Now autism is being diagnosed to half
(22:17):
of the kids in the country now, I mean, autism
is out there and it's like French fries at McDonald's.
It's amazing how many people now have autism. What Kennedy
wants to do is add to that table of diseases autism,
which means it's going to blow open the number of
(22:37):
claims that are being made. Because everybody gets vaccinated, the
number of kids that are diagnosed with autism has exploded.
And if they go to this autism court, it's going
to be overwhelmed. There are only eight masters and we're
talking millions of claims. And if the autism is accepted
(23:01):
by the vaccine Court, and by the way, the Department
of Health and Human Services makes the determination of which
of these diseases are in fact connected to those vaccines,
the one in a million connection, and doctors make this decision.
But we know what the Department of Health and Human
Services says, screw the doctors.
Speaker 1 (23:19):
We've made this decision.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
We're going to go forward and it's simply going to
break the system. And this vaccine Court is a wonderful idea.
This is where the government did a terrific thing because
it number one saves the manufacturer from being sued.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
It's no fault.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
The compensation is automatic, so the manufacture of the vaccine
is not going to get hit and the patient is
still going to get paid. And the trust fund that
pays these is actually paid by the many, by the
manufacturer of the vaccine. But I think it's twelve cents
(24:05):
per vaccine or whatever it is. It's a very low figure.
But if you add all the vaccines up, there's a
ton of money. There's four billion dollars in that trust fund, which.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
At this point is you know, it's working. It's working.
Speaker 2 (24:21):
Since nineteen eighty eight, the federal data shows that twenty
five thousand petitions have been made to Vaccine Court and
have been adjudicated. Of those, twelve thousand were granted compensation.
Thirteen thousand were dismissed, saying what you have is not
in our table of diseases.
Speaker 1 (24:42):
You didn't meet the timeline. Certain timelines or a year.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Certain timelines are thirty days because some react immediately and
you didn't make it. So over half have been been
denied saying nope, you didn't make it.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
So this helps people.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
So you have kids who families who get the compensation
they needing taking care of the kids for the rest
of their lives.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
Millions of dollars of compensation are given.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
So it helps these kids, it helps keep the vaccine
manufacturers in the market, and it's sort of a win
win for everybody.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Now, can this be blown up?
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Yeah, as soon as you add autism to that table,
to that number of syndromes or reactions in.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
Opposition to all.
Speaker 2 (25:34):
Of the evidence over decades and decades. So during this
time that whatever number of kids have autism and we're
vaccinated with something, hundreds of millions of vaccinations have occurred
around the world and how many how many people were saved?
Speaker 1 (25:57):
Millions and millions.
Speaker 2 (26:00):
So Kennedy may get his wish and do an end
around on this and not officially say and have the
government say yes autism or vaccines cause cause autism. What
he is going to do, what he could do is
simply add to that table of diseases that react to
(26:24):
vaccines and will break the system.
Speaker 1 (26:26):
It'll just break the system.
Speaker 2 (26:28):
It'll blow up, and he gets his wish, Ye vaccines
cause autism.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
Crazy isn't it just completely crazy? Okay, a lot going
on now.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
This is the week of Nobel Prizes, and we've already
had I think the Physics Prize and the Price for Medicine,
and these Nobel Prizes now are really obscure stuff. I
mean they're minute scientific discoveries, proteins and within the body.
(27:03):
I mean it used to be where you could understand
Nobel Prizes. For example, whoever invented flying that got the
Nobel Prize. That's easy to understand, right X rays where
Marie Currey got the Nobel Prize at the show in
the last century.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
She received two.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
By the way, very very few people have ever received two,
and she certainly was the only woman.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
To ever do that.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
So we're gonna the big one is coming up on Friday,
the Nobel Peace Prize. This is what everybody looks at.
And there's been some weird ones on that one too. Now,
the Nobel Prizes are awarded in Stockholm or is it Oslo?
And then the Peace Prize award in Stockholm is one
or the other. It's on It's very different. It's on itself.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
So you've got the Nobel Prizes and they're extraordinary discoveries,
and they're given well once a year and sometimes not
at all, to very important findings and usually issues that
affect mankind in a positive way. Well, there's also called
(28:09):
the Ignobel Prizes, and they've been going on for thirty
five years.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
And what they do is.
Speaker 2 (28:19):
They celebrate science's more unusual contributions. They honor the imaginative,
maybe spur people's interests in science, medicine, technology. Now, these
are real studies done by real researchers, as crazy as
it may sound. So let's go through this year's winners
(28:41):
of the Ignobel Prizes.
Speaker 1 (28:45):
Okay, let's do it.
Speaker 2 (28:48):
For the Nutrition Prize, which the Ignobil Prize is awarded,
not the Nobel Prize, but the Ignobel Prize. This is
a study that was done by I can't even go
through the names Daniellie Dandy, Gabriel Sega, Atia Betto and
it goes on and on, and they were awarded the
(29:10):
Nutrition Prize for studying the extent to which a certain
kind of lizard chooses to eat certain kinds of pizza.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
Real study.
Speaker 2 (29:21):
So the team spotted a rainbow lizard stealing a slice
of pizza at a resort, and then the scientist said
they wanted to know if the rainbow lizards, who usually
eat insects, had a taste for pizza, and they had
a do they do lizers have a preferred topping. So
(29:41):
they followed nine lizards who had a choice between the
four cheese pizza and a plate of four seasons pizza
a lot of meat on it, you know, pepperoni and sausage.
Speaker 1 (29:53):
Et cetera.
Speaker 2 (29:55):
Now, the lizards found the pizza and ate it, but
only the four cheese pizza.
Speaker 1 (30:01):
They didn't eat the rest of them.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
Why because it could be easier for them to digest
the cheese pizza. It could be some cues attract them
to the cheesier pizza. So they discovered why, Well, we
really don't know, but it was one of the winners.
Then another winner of this was the Physics Prize and
(30:27):
went to a bunch of people Italian people, and it
honors and basically studies pasta sauce.
Speaker 1 (30:35):
Hmm.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
So they were given the Ignobel Prize for discoveries about
the physics of pasta sauce, especially the phase transition that
can lead to clumping, which can cause unpleasantness because so
many of us suffer from pasta sauce that clumps.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
So if you're making caccio.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Epeppi, I think that's one of the sauces. If the
water is too hot or you don't have the right
ratio of cheese to starch, the sauce turns into a
thin liquid filled with these congealed globs of curds.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
And earlier this year.
Speaker 2 (31:10):
These physicists developed a way to prevent clumping. You use
corn starch in the cheese and pepper sauce instead of
just relying on how much starch gets into the boiling
water while the pasta cooks. And while why they got
that prize is because pasta sauce is so important to
those of us who eat pasta. And that's around the world,
(31:34):
and there was and there is physics to it. Oh
there's more. There's more big Nobel prizes coming. Diseases that
react to vaccines and will break the system. It'll just
break the system, it'll blow up. And he gets his wish. Yeah,
(31:54):
vaccines cause autism.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
Crazy, Isn't it just completely crazy? KF I am six forty.
You've been listening to the Bill Handle show.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
Catch my show Monday through Friday six am to nine am,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
The Bill Handel Show News
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com