BIDEN ATTACKS INNOCENT RITTENHOUSE AND, HILLARY CLINTON GETS MORE BAD NEWS WITH DURHAM INVESTIGATION!

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Freedom, victory, the court system and the constitution and everything
that is right about this country that you are supposed
to be innocent until proven guilty happened in Kenoshua. Of course,
the laft is saying you better brace for trouble, police
on alert is nightfalls in Kenosha, and the anarchists of

(00:24):
the laughter saying we're not done. Ritten House not guilty
and it's time for him to sue the hell out
of the media. I want to remind you what the
media is said about Written House, and I want you
to remind you how evil the media is. The media

(00:44):
wanted to turn Rittenhouse into a Trump supporting white supremacists.
They wanted to use him and this case right before
the election to say don't vote for Donald Trump because
these are what Trump supporters look like. Was any connection
to Donald Trump. No. They said he was a racist,
he said it's a vigilante. They said he was an anarchist.

(01:05):
He was none of those things. Remember Joe Biden jumped
on this gravy train too, in dieting Written House with
his words when it happened and afterwards during the campaign trail.
In fact, today you had the president of the United
States of America who was asked about his Written House
comments because he played judge and jury and slandered written

(01:28):
House just like the others did in the media. Let
me remind you of what some of the things the
President of the United States of America actually said. When
the President was asked about this guy early on, he
had no problem implying that he was some sort of
horrible person. Quote. There's no other way to put it.
The President of the United States refuses to disavow white

(01:50):
supremacists on the debate stage last night, remember when he
was playing the race card. Just to give you a
mindset of where Joe Biden was right when this happened Kenosha.
They wanted to make sure that they turned Rittenhouse into
a white supremacist and this is what Trump's people are,
even though they had no connection to actual Trump's supporters

(02:13):
or the presidency. It doesn't matter. Joe Biden even did
a one on one at the time with Anderson Cooper,
talked about how terrible Rittenhouse was, how awful it is,
how this guy's randomly run around his shooting people. Right,
it's the guy running for president. They needed to use this.
There was no other They had to use it. It

(02:34):
was a must. The verdict in Kenosha, in fact, these
are the exact words of Joe Biden, will leave many
Americans feeling angry and concern. Myself included, Yeah, Biden, reacting
the Writtenhouse verdict, quote, the verdict and Kenosha will lead
many Americans feeling angry and concern. Myself included, why are

(02:54):
you concerned the guy used to going to protect and
defend his life. You gotta understand, this is what mob
culture looks like. This is what tyrants do. They attack
innocent citizens, and even after they're innocent, they still say
crap like this. The presence exact words that verdict in
Conosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concern. Myself
included to in other words, what you decide he's not guilty,

(03:16):
even though a jury said he's guilty or innocent on
all charges. You've decided that he's guilty. I should say
that we make when we clarify this the presence basically
implying that Rittenhouse is in fact guilty because you wanted
mob vigilante justice. You wanted the same thing that the
Taliban does. Drag him out in the street and off

(03:36):
with their head, hang him, shoot him. We decide on
the left who's guilty and innocent based on the narrative.
We want to teach you. We want to tell you
because we must use issues like this to drive awdge
in this country so that we can win. You want
to know why Joe Biden put out this comment today,
quote the verdict and Conosha will leave many Americans feeling

(03:57):
angry and concern, myself included, is because he needs something
to distract the American people from the dismal failure which
is its presidency. And this is a great place to start.
It's exactly what the media did. Let me remind you
of all the scumbags that deserve to get sued. I
hope Rittenhouse wins millions. I hope he wins billions of dollars.

(04:17):
I hope he gets the best lawyer out there. I'd
go with the same team Nick Salmon had, and I'd
own every one of these scumbag evil members of the
media who slandered you with lines the things that just
weren't true because they wanted to make sure Joe Biden
won an election. Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse, he murdered two
people by the way. Didn't he didn't see her, He didn't.

(04:39):
You didn't murder anybody self defense vigilante, not a vigilante.
Jury of his peers says, no, you're wrong. Sue her.
The house is basically what you would have had in
a school shooter. Sue him. Scumbag on MSNBC, sue him.
I hope Rittenhouse gets every dime they have. Eventeen year

(05:00):
old kid, he shouldn't have had a gun. He crossed
state lines to supposedly protect property. No, he was going
out to shoot people. Kyle Ritten, that's a lie. Sue him.
House the seventeen year old vigilante. Kyle rittenhouse of vigilante.
Sue him. Al Rittenhouse the arm teenage vigilante. Sue him,
seventeen year old vigilante. Sue him for every dollar. Arguably,

(05:23):
a domestic terrorists picked up a rifle, drove to a
different state to shoot people. Sue him. He's not domestic terrorists.
He didn't cross state lines with a gun, and he
had the gun legally. Sue every one of the son
of a You know what. Al Rittenhouse, a guy who's
deeply racist, went with weapons to a Black Lives Matter
protest looking to get in trouble. He did, he murdered

(05:46):
a couple of people. Sue him. Sue him. The young
Turks right there, sue him. Rittenhouse, the seventeen year old
kid just running around shooting and killing protesters. Sue Joe
Scarborough and Win seventeen year old who was radicalized by

(06:07):
Trump is um took his AAR fifteenth to Kenosha and
became a killer. Sue him. Sue that guy on TV
as well, and of course trying to connect it to
Donald Trump before the election. Right, these are Trump supporters.
This is what you get. Sue him. White Trump supporting,
MAGA loving Blue Lives Matter, social media partisan seventeen years

(06:30):
old picks up a gun, drives from one stage to
another with the intent to shoot people. That's not what
he did, he lied. Sue him for slander. A seventeen
year old boy who drove across state lines with an
AAR fifteen. That didn't happen. Joe Scarborough and I hope
they sue your a double ass and started shooting people up.

(06:54):
That didn't happen either, Sue him, including a guy with
a skateboard Kyle. Sue Rittenhouse, who has killed protesters. Unarmed
protesters written House a seventeen year old that went with
a weapon into the middle of protests and then provoke
people and then shot and killed him. Kyle, Sue them

(07:15):
for every dime they have written. House is the enemy.
Boy Kyle Rittenhouse the enemy. Sue him from out of state,
drives up to the state with an AAR fifteen around
his neck and kills a couple of people, shooting wildly.
Running didn't wasn't shooting wildly, sued Joe Scarborough around acting

(07:39):
like Rittico drove. Sue him. He didn't run, he didn't
cross state lines with a gun. You're slandering him. Sue him.
Across state lines armed with a rifle. Sue him. That's
a lie. He didn't cross state lines with a firearm.
That's slander. Sue this one too. To go and shoot people,
what a g He didn't go to shoot people. He

(08:01):
went to go protect people in property and he got attacked.
Sue every one of them. Mark a dystopian scene where
a seventeen year old boy is carrying around a rifle,
running around and gunning down protesters. Didn't happen. Sue Joe Scarborough.

(08:22):
Every one of these scumbags deserves to be sued for
every single thing that I just played for you, every
single one of them. This is a seventeen year old child,
by the way, seventeen year old child. Sue every one
of them. You do this to a child, sue them
all and get every dime you can get out of him. Whatever,

(08:46):
you can take it all. If you're written House own
these scumbags. They will never stop until you make them
pay financially. What happened with Nick Sandman was clearly not enough,
because they did it again the next time. They found
a white seventeen year old who they wanted to ruin
his life, and that is exactly what they just did.

(09:09):
They tried to ruin his life. You look at this,
President Nitis America. Shame on you coming out saying to yourself, well,
I'm gonna have a hard time with this. Really, that's
how you want to describe it to You want to
imply the kids guilty, even though he's innocent. Alice Sharpton

(09:35):
getting all woke on TV today because remember, this is
good for business. Anytime you can throw down some race card,
it's good for business, he said. The message from the
Written House trial as vigilantes can go to protests and
kill people talking about it being racist. Just so you
know it's not racist either. He didn't kill anybody soup,
by the way, he didn't. He didn't murder anybody. Let

(09:56):
me say that differently. He did. He killed a couple
people in self defense. Yes, and that's why he was
found innocent on every charge against him. Girlfriend of Kyle Rittenhouse,
she came out today. She said that he was blanked
by the system and that's a problem. I couldn't agree more.

(10:22):
Ted Williams, African American law enforcement agent, sent on TV today,
there's really no winners in the Kyle Rittenhouse case. I
totally agree with that. You ruin this kid's life. He's
gonna have to go into hiding. He's gonna have to
look over his shoulder, he's gonna have to get lawyers,
he's gonna have to have protection, and he's got to
target on his back. He's probably gonna have to move
and even if he gets a bunch of money, he's

(10:43):
still walk around the rest of his life with a
name that everybody's going to remember, Kyle Rittenhouse. Kyle Rittenhouse
family spokesman said this about the not guilty verdict. Nobody's
spiking the football on this because this family has just
been repeatedly attack and the President got in on it
today as well. Spring back David Hancock, who's a spokesman

(11:05):
for Kyle Rittenhouse and the family. David, it's good to
be with you. I wanted to ask a couple of questions.
First of all, we know that Kyle has left the
court and is headed for a location unknown. What is
he up to now? How is he feeling about the verdict?
We saw him break down, Uh, you know a lot
of emotions clearly that we're running through him as the

(11:27):
jury run off the verdicts. We saw him hug his
counsel as well. What is the plan for the rest
of the day for him? Spend time with his family?
Spent a long road. It's been a long it's been
a hard road. I mean, his family has been been

(11:49):
just repeatedly attacked and with no basis in truth. And
now he can be a free he can be a
I mean, he can be just a young man now. Yeah.
So I think he's just gonna spend time with his

(12:10):
family and they are just ecstatic that it came down
this way. But I mean nobody is spiking the football
on this This brought up a lot of issues. At
least this case brought up a lot of issues, and
specifically to your last speaker's point as it relates to
the prosecution, I mean, this needs to be looked at

(12:31):
the conduct of the prosecution in this case and the
re narrating and the revisionist history as we went through
this case was despicable and just horrendous, and still the
jury came to the proper and the just verdict of
a not guilty across the board. David, this is Sandra.

(12:53):
I'm sorry my colleague John already asked this question, but
have you spoken to Kyle since since the verdict was read?
I did not. He was taken out the back door
and taken off property quite quickly with his family just
to get out of this. Have any of them related

(13:14):
to you what he said or what he's had to
say since he left the court. I looked at Kyle,
and he looked at me, and it was just one
of those um you know, finally, finally, like Kyle gets
to start his life as a young man, as an innocent,

(13:38):
as an acquitted, as a not guilty young man who clearly,
clearly defended himself when he was attacked, and that, I
mean that came out for the past two weeks and
that is what, thank God, that the jury came to
and they noticed. David, we're probably gonna need to take
a break in about a minute and thirty second. It's briefly,

(14:00):
don't go away because I want to play back some
tape of the president returning from camp. David, who was
asked about this, But you said that Kyle gets a
chance to get back to his life. But I mean,
you know his life is never going to be the same. No,
it's not. But everybody who knows Kyle, everybody's going to
do everything we can to give him the most normal

(14:21):
life that he can possibly. David, I'm sorry, Can you
just stand by with us. I just gotta say this
real quick. He knows this. And you notice that that
John Roberts said this, and he's absolutely right. There's no
way he's ever going to have a normal life. It's
his life is no longer his own. His life is
over the way that it was going to be will

(14:42):
never be the same. And that's the reason why I
tell you over and over again, Sue, these scumbag, pure
evil people in the media that tried to ruin your
life for every dime they have and when and you will.

(15:02):
The most disappointing part of this Written House trial was
not just the media, but the fact that the President
of the United States of America was willing to pander
to try to get votes and to still divide this country,
to try to get supports, try to get us approval
rating up. Joe Biden returned to the White House. He
was asked about the Written House verdict, and this is
what the President of the United States of America decided

(15:24):
to say. Look, I stand by with your jury as
it concluded. Juris system captains. What is saying, sir, What
is the state of your health after this exam today? Good?
We're going to release all the detail. I feel great.
Nothing's changed for a riot ship so and I'm looking

(15:48):
forward to celebrating my coming. That's it. You try to
make a joke about your birthday. Stand by what the
juris conclude. The jury system works, and we have to
abide by it. He said. You don't want to say, hey,
this kid deserves to be left alone, because you're the
one that was trashing this guy, Biden, you trust written House,

(16:14):
you attacked him. Do you think the media is done
with us? They're not. NBC News Meet the Press host
Chuck Todd had this to say after the verdict about
all you gun tote Americans. You know, it's pretty obvious
to me. More people the next time there's a protest
of some sort, and it may get politicized, that gun

(16:38):
owners with a certain ideology may feel incentivized now, may
feel even emboldened. And that does seem to be an
uncomfortable message that may be received by someone. So let
me get this straight. You want to convict people over
what you think other people might do in the future.
If you don't convict somebody now, even if they're innocent.

(16:59):
That is what NBC News is takeaway is from Kyle
Rittenhouse being acquitted on all charges. You know I'm gonna
get I'm gonna quote it here, check and this is
this is scum bag. This isn't journalism, this is pos reporting. Quote.
You know, it's pretty obvious to me. More people the
next time there's a protest of some sort, and it

(17:23):
may get politicized. The gun owners with a certain ideology
may feel incentivized now may feel even emboldened, and that
does seem to be an uncomfortable message that may be
received by this. You're a pos I'm sorry. I'm just
gonna say it. This is what you'll do to a child,

(17:43):
seventeen year old. This is it now, this is what
you're gonna say. Alice Sharpton. The message from the Right
Righttenhouse trial as vigilantees can got a protest and kill people.
That's what you want to say. Andy McCarthy said it right.
Andy McCarthy said this about the trial, and he's absolutely

(18:05):
right on Fox earlier. Take a listen, all right, thank you, Gare.
Let's bring back former assistant the US Attorney for the
Southern District of New York and Foxy's contributor to Andy McCarthy. Andy,
there was a narrative going about Kyle written, well, there
was two of them. Really. There was one that he
was out there acting in self defense, which the jury
initially or which the jury ultimately agreed with. But then

(18:27):
there was this whole other narrative out there that he
was a white supremacist, that he crossed state lines with
an a R fifteen, which apparently didn't happen because the
gun was actually in Kenosha at the time, just as
a litany of horribles about Kyle rittenhouse, where people had
come to conclusions about the case before the first testimony
was ever given in court. So, now that we've seen

(18:48):
this whole process unfold, what does that say about the
rush to judgment, in large part by politicians and by
what was supposed to be a respectable media going into
this whole thing, John, I think it says what our
constant lament is and frankly why I'm happy to be here,

(19:11):
which is that it's very hard anymore to try to
find out what the news is. You know, there's so
many outlets unfortunately that they're bringing a lot of political
and ideological baggage to news reporting. And like all of us,
I have very strong opinions. I don't hide being a conservative,
but you know, as a trial lawyer for a long time,

(19:33):
before you can make credible arguments about what the evidence is,
you need to know what the evidence is. You know,
it's really important in this country if we're going to
have a functioning democracy, that people can actually with confidence
know what happened. And I think if you get to
a point where news organizations that you used to rely

(19:54):
on for at least that purpose, shade everything that they
report through an id theological lens or a partisan lens
or whatever whatever is bothering them on that particular day.
I think people lose faith in the idea that they
can understand with confidence to the actual news that we
have to rely on in order to make decisions in

(20:16):
our everyday lives. You know, it is amazing about what
he's just saying, and I'm going to give you a
perfect example of wine what he's saying is absolutely factual.
Facebook and Twitter actually came after us, and we were
one of those that defended cow Written House early on
last year, and we defended Kyle Rittenhouse and we put
up a meme of Kyle Rittenhouse, and they attacked us

(20:38):
and said that our page was being threatened to be
shut down unpublished because of what we put which now
immediately should go away that's been on it. They also
said our page was going to have reduced distribution, meaning
that we won't be able to reach all the people
that follow us anymore as part of our punishment. Clearly
now that should be taken up not going to happen.

(20:59):
We have now been told at Facebook and Twitter are
still silent on whether Kyle Rittenhouse support is still banned
on their platform. Facebook and Twitter banned support for Kyle
Rittenhouse across their platform shortly after the riots. After during
Wisconsin has now found Rittenhouse not guilty on all charges
brought against him, those same platforms refused to say if

(21:20):
support for the teenager is still banned. So all those
people that got silence and shut up because they supported
written House early on, we're gonna get an apology from
big Tech. I doubt it. You got to really take
a step back, just for a moment and think about
this Rittenhouse case. And I want you to think about

(21:42):
what he was up against. He was up against big Tech,
he was up against the media. He was up against
the President elect and then candidate Biden and all his supporters.
He was up against virtually everybody that had power in
this country. He was up again, say over zealous scumbag

(22:02):
da and as Ted Cruz put it earlier today, quote
where a nation governed by laws, and the Rittenhouse verdict
reminds us we have the moral, illegal right to self defense.
For months, the left and justly try to convict mister Rittenhouse.
I pray now that those who wish to divide us
don't use this verdict as an excuse for violence. Couldn't

(22:25):
agree with him more on that point. You look at
that prosecutor and it worries me how many others are
like him out there. And if you want to remember,
a lot of people forget a lot of people forget
what actually was happening and the reason why Rittenhouse went there.
They were burning down buildings, burning down entire blocks, burning

(22:48):
apartment complexes. They even went after the Portland Courthouse and
burned it. Remember what happened when they burned down a
church by the White House or on fire. Remember that
outside the White House they were attacking Secret Service agents.
The same protests that went and happened in Kenosha. This
was happening all over the country. They were burning down

(23:12):
everything and get their hands on And then they tried
to turn the people that attacked Writtenhouse into some sort
of victims, and they tried to turn into some sort
of race war when it clearly had nothing to do
with the race. He's white and the three people he
had to shoot they were attacking him or white. Never
forget the facts, the narrative that they tried to sell
you wasn't anywhere close to what the facts were in

(23:36):
this case, and they wanted to ruin and destroy his life.
And I hope he sues him, and I hope he
gets every dime out of him he possibly can. I
hope he makes him pay millions and millions and millions
for all of these horrible people in the media that

(23:57):
did this to a child, and even the President nine
States of America was in on it too, Part six
of our deep dive expose into the new indictments coming
now from the Durham investigation and the media. The biggest
news day of the week on Sunday, they started to
move into what we're referring to his damage control. Liberal

(24:21):
media outlets have not been following what some in the
media have decided to start doing, which is to delete
bad information on the erroneous Still dossier. Even the Washington
Post now quietly is now correcting their own reporting. Now

(24:41):
ABC News, CNN, and MSNBC are among news organizations that
actually relied on the Washington Posts now corrected reporting. Yet
they have not come out and corrected what they told
the American people for virtually two years now. The Washington
Post didn't do it like on a front page. We

(25:02):
were wrong or we must correct this. They just went
back to the online stories, and in those online stories
they decided to hit that pause button and delete some
of the erroneous still dossier reporting that they did. Now,
the Washington Post was the lead on this. Don't forget that.
Remember this is you know, this is Amazon Bezos. They

(25:24):
own this thing, right, This is pure propaganda. And the
liberal media outlets took the Washington Post reporting. Why why
would they do it? Well, they're the Washington Post. The
Washington Post, the same group of people that brought down
the Knicks administration. They're the same ones that did the
deep dive investigation into Watergate. They're the ones that are
you know, the print of the Pentagon papers. They're the

(25:47):
most trusted name in DC. So every other news organization
relied on them. Put it on them. Oh well, the
Washington Post reporting. So therefore we can do what we
want to do now. This weekend, you also had something
else that happened. Representative Adam Schiff went on TV to
take a few slaps. Now I say a few slaps

(26:09):
because that's really all that it was. It was very
clear that the Biden administration now with their connections directly
to steal dossier, needed a distraction and kind of need
this thing to go away. And how do you get
to go away. What you do is you say, well,
all right, here's the deal. You need to go on TV,

(26:30):
and we'll get you to go on TV. And then
when you do go on TV, what we'll end up
doing is we'll kind of tell everybody that, well, some
of this was wrong, but you can just say, well,
a lot of it was right. And then we get
to check the box and the media that we covered
the fact that this thing is completely totally full of crap.
It's been totally discredited and you can spend it how

(26:52):
you want to, but we need you to come on
TV because for two years, three years, four years, not
only do we help you sell this thing, we were
a part of the conspiracy to overthrow the will of
the people. So this is what some referred to as
a confrontation. Quote Meet the Press confronted Representive Adam Schiff

(27:12):
on the fake Steel dossier. Democrat Representative Schiff and says
he doesn't regret pushing it. Now. If this is confronting,
then I'm sorry, But they haven't watched their own show.
When they're attacking people on the right, Go look at
the venom that was being spewed at Trump for four
years from Meet the Press and Chuck Todd over the

(27:33):
fake reporting. Now, did he come on TV and say
to the American people, we got it wrong. Did he
come on there and say the American people, I'm sorry
that we got this thing so wrong. Did he come
on TV and say, I apologize for misleading you. I
apologize to former President Donald Trump for undermining and slandering

(27:54):
his entire administration for the entire time that they were
in office. Of course, not right. Why would you do that,
Because if you really are retracting this, and you really
aren't admitting that what you did was wrong, then you
would have no problem saying it this way. You should
start your show by saying, we like to say here
at ME and BC News and Meet the Press to

(28:15):
form President Donald Trump, we are sorry. We got this
story wrong. We relied on the Washington Post, throw them
under the bus for this reporting, and we were wrong
and we were unfair to you the way that we
dealt with things. We are sorry. You could do that.
You could say that, and then you might have some credibility,
but they're not. Instead, they act like they are the

(28:36):
conveyors of truth and only truth, and so they're going
to ask the tough question, right, They're going to ask
the hard question and go, well, Adam Schiff, do you
regret pushing something that was wrong? That's it, and then
we get to close this book and move on. What
to ask you something about the Steel docier because it
is been in the news for a lot of other reasons,

(28:57):
including some questions about it'dity. By the way, I love
how he says that some questions about its validity. It's
not some questions, folks. The fact is, and it's confirmed now.
There is no validity to the Steal dossier. Don't say
some questions about its validity. The only reason why it's
in the news right now is because of the fact

(29:20):
that there is no validity to the information. That's a fact,
plain and simple. We wouldn't be talking about this right
now if it wasn't for the German investigation and doubting
the people that created the dossier for lying about what's
in the dossier. Don't don't. Don't sit there and tell
me and think I'm stupid enough to buy this crap
checked out where you say, well, it's been the news

(29:40):
this week for some questioning the validity. No, it's not
even questioning. It's a fact. It's not true. The Steal
dossier is not true. It's the Clinton dotsier. We need
to stop calling it the steal dossier. We need to
call it the Clinton dot cier. Ink some questions about
its validity. I want to play some recent u that
you had on the Steel dosia over the years. Take

(30:02):
a listen. According to Christopher Steele, a British a former
British intelligence officer who was reportedly held in high regard
by US intelligence. When you look at just what has
become public, some of the public information is very much
in line with what is reported in that dossier. And
the most significant thing to me is that Christopher Steele

(30:23):
may have found out even before our own intelligence agencies
that the Russians were in fact aiming to help Donald
Trump in the election. As chair of the House Intelligence Committee,
do you regret giving some credibility to the Steele dossier?
Before hold on, he just says, do you regret giving
some credibility? You didn't give it some credit ability, You
preached it like it was the gospel. You didn't. There

(30:46):
wasn't a moment where you said, look, we need to
be careful here, we need to pause here, we need
to take a moment here, we need to step back
and look, there's certainly some concerning issues, but we also
need to check the ability. That's what That's not what
they did. That's not what the media did. By the way,
none of them did this. They all went to completely
opposite direction on this. Don't don't act like this was

(31:09):
a you know, well, we played both sides of it.
You didn't. You didn't play both sides of this at all.
You were one hundred percent all in on it. You
were one hundred percent moving forward with this. And to
sit there and go, well, should you have paused a
little bit, There was no pausing here, give me a break.

(31:31):
There was zero pause, folks, no pause at all. Don't
tell me there was a pause when there wasn't a pause.
You guys ran with it, and you wanted to run
with it because you wanted to destroy people's lives, and
that's why you did it. You did it to destroy
and to put people in jail. You did it to

(31:52):
overthrow the will of the people. And this idea that
you know. Now, I'm gonna ask Chuck Todd, I'm gonna
come out of this. You know you're coming. I'm gonn
ask you this question. Do you regret it a little bit?
Give me a break? As chair of the House Intelligence Committee,
Do you regret giving some credibility to to steal dossier
before anybody had been able to verify anything in that

(32:13):
a lot of those clips were done before there was
any good verification. Look, there's some news organizations that made
the mistake of publishing this docier without verifying, and that's
a separate conversation. But I love this well, there are
some media organizations. Let's go with all of them, yours included.
By the way NBC News put the dossier out there,
you're on NBC News right now. You guys ran with

(32:36):
the story, and you ran with it for four years,
and you use it to impeach the president, to undermine
the president. Now you're trying to separate yourself from it,
acting like you weren't a part of the mob that
was trying to take down Donald Trump, that you weren't
a part of the conspiracy to overthrow the will of
the American people, and who they voted for MBC News
was in on it now and they're trying to act
like they weren't. Listen, listen, listen to the way Chuck

(32:58):
Todd says this again, Patians, that may the mistake of
publishing this dociate without verifying it. That's a separate conversation
with those news organizations. By the way, NBC News, you
really want to act like you were different. Do we
need to go back and look at the propaganda. Look
at the number of appearances that you had from people
that were on your air saying that Donald Trump colluded

(33:20):
with the Russians, The number of guests that you allowed
to come on the air and to sell this crap
and act like this was totally factual when it clearly wasn't.
None of this was factual, and everybody knew, including you,
that was based on crap, and you did it anyway.

(33:41):
You did it anyway, and the reason why is because
you were part of the conspiracy to take down Donald Trump.
That's what you did. Now listen to the response quickly
of Adam Schiff, But you helped give it credibility. Do
you regret it? I don't regret saying that we should

(34:01):
investigate claims of someone who, frankly was a well respected
British intelligence officer. And we could have known, of course,
years ago, that we would learn years later that someone
who was a primary source lied to him. But what
I love it there, well, I don't regret it. You
undermind the president ates America. You tried to overthrow in
many ways you did. You were successful. You undermined the

(34:22):
point where he didn't get reelected. You damage his presidency
to the point where the country was trade up divided
on this. And you guys kept saying he's a Russian,
he worked with the Russians, he colluded with the Russians.
The last election wasn't fair. You guys did it, and
so did NBC News. And for NBC News to do
this interview and act like they weren't a part of it,
give me a break. Liberal media outlets, like I said,

(34:45):
if not followed the lead of the Washington Posts. They
were forced to correct their erroneous Steldossier reporting claims. They
just did, you know, little hey updates on their major
stories they had on their website, and the Washington Post
not only corrected, but also removed large chunks of its

(35:06):
own reporting on the anti Trump Clinton doc. Let's just
start calling it that Friday the middle of the night,
admitting quote it could no longer stand by the accuracy
of those elements. Their words, not mine. ABC News hadn't
changed their reporting, MSNBC hasn't changed it. M Our CNN
hasn't followed the Post lead on their erroneous reporting. It

(35:30):
still remains uncorrected. The mainstream media was always united in
their unverified reporting for one reason. They were in on
the conspiracy to overthrow the will of the people and
declare that former President Donald Trump was somehow compromised by

(35:50):
the Russians, when reality it was Hillary Clinton, her campaign
in the DNC. Here's how Fox had it this weekend
when they broke the story that the Washington Post was
pulling their stories on the Steel Dossier. A major walk
back from the Washington Post, a paper correcting and retracting

(36:12):
large portions of two articles based on the now discredited
Steele Dossier. A Post media reporter explaining that the piece
quote identified a Belarussian American businessman as the key source
of the Steele Dossier, a collection of largely unverified reports
that claimed the Russian government had compromising information about then
candidate Donald Trump. Executive editor Sally Buzzby said the Post

(36:35):
could no longer stand by the accuracy of those elements
of the story. Here now to react. Fox News contributor
Joe Concha, Joe, good morning to you. You know, I
described it there as a major correction. But what shocking
to me is this entire story, Joe, has completely fallen
apart as we all knew that it would. It was

(36:55):
largely built upon a falsehood, on lies, and I think
it's been relative islands from the mainstream media about this revelation.
I'm amazed will that they even counted on the dossier
in the first place. Right, I'm old enough to remember
in twenty sixteen, this was pitched around every major news organization,
whether it be Fox News, whether it be The Hill,
whether it be political. I could go down the list,

(37:16):
and almost nobody touched it. Almost no one except for
BuzzFeed and CNN that got it out into public domain
and off it went. But but the removal of the
parts of the Steel reporting from this initial report, It's
a start, but almost no one's going to see that.
We know that, right, and the damage has already done.
To your point, if the Washington post New York Times
were truly serious about getting it right. The pulsers they
won would be returned. And you remember Dan Rathergate Rights

(37:38):
two thousand and four, rather than producer Mary mats And
put on a false report on sixty minutes about George W.
Bush's National Guard Service just days before a tight election.
And after that story was decided to be a crock
was decidedly proven to be a croc, CBS conducts a
thorough investigation, and Rather's fired along with his producer and maps.
No such investigation here will is going to be conducted
by any news organization here because there are no real

(38:01):
standards anymore, no accountability, And again the damage was done.
Means to an end. Three years of a presidency were
consumed by this tall tale conjured up by the Clinton administration.
In fact, you know, well, the liars get rewarded, right
Rachel Maddow MSNBC the biggest narrative in terms of the
megaphone of this narrative, and we hear now there's a
bidding war for her where CNN is considering hiring her

(38:22):
away with a substantial raise. That didn't go through. But
now she's even more attractive to certain news organizations. Adam
Schiff gets a multimillion dollar book deal and still hilariously
claims that this collusion occurred in that book, and he'll
continue to be the Michael Avenati on two thirds of
cable news despite him being completely disproven, because that's just
the way it works. Now. Such a good point, Joe.

(38:43):
The damage is done. A presidential election was swung. Rachel
Maddow showered between twenty and thirty million dollars, awarded themselves
Pulitzers based upon a complete fake story. Again, the media
not correcting this. They can't correct it. They're terrified that
if they correct it, what's going to happen If they

(39:06):
correct this story, it is going to be so damning
to their credibility that I think at this point they
finally just decided, we'll just look the other way. What
else can we do. We'll just act like it was true,
and then we'll blame the Washington Post. That's how we'll
pull this off. You know, you look at what the

(39:29):
Wall Street Journal said this week, and it was a
brilliant article that they put out saying that this steel
dossiers should be called the Clinton dossier, not the Steel dossier.
You look at the Washington Post The Hill now reporting
this morning. Washington Post removes large portions of two stories
and the Steal Dossier quote. The Washington Post Post was

(39:51):
forced on Friday to amend and eliminate major parts of
two stories the newspaper did regarding the Steel Dossier and
light of the recent indictment and new reporting. A story
published in March twenty seventeen and one of February twenty nineteen,
So think about the distance almost two years apart, that
connected source D in former British intelligence analyst Crystal Steals

(40:15):
Dowsier to a Belarus American businessman, Sergey Milan, were corrected
and had portions of the story removed. An editor's note
appeared on each one, providing those of the articles had
been amended. That's it, That's how they fixed this right.
The March twenty seventeen article identified Milan is sourced and

(40:36):
source E is different in different areas of Steal Dossier,
including identifying m as source D behind a claim that
Russian intelligence learned that a hotel room in Moscow once
was used by former President Obama and his wife was
defiled by President Trump hire prostitutes. According to the Washington Post.

(40:57):
The Donsier said that source also substantiate the claim, though
the newspapers said that those allegations have not been proven
true you think. The Post also reported on a February
twenty nineteen story which ran with a headline Belarus born
businessman sought proximity to Trump's world in twenty sixteen, discussing

(41:17):
the man's involvement in some business activities of the former president.
Analysts du Chenko, who was indicted earlier this month, helped
put together the information for the Steel dossier, which should
be called the Clinton dossier at this point. Dashenko's indictment
alleges at the analysts might have received information regarding these

(41:39):
delicious claims in the twenty seventeen story from an operative
of the Democratic Party from Hillary Clinton and her campaign
instead of Milan, according to the newspaper, The Post that
it also was The Post that it was also not
clear if Milan was sourced in the dossier, based upon

(42:00):
a recent review an interview with one of the two
sources cited in the March twenty seventeen article. So, in
other words, the Washington Post can put this out there
and run with it for years and years and years
and now they just get the point of the PingER
at something else, say when we were lied to by
multiple sources, not really our fault. So we're not gonna
say we're sorry to Trump. We're not gonna apologize for

(42:20):
misleading you the readers. We're gonna We're not gonna say that.
We're just gonna say we got duped our bad. As
a result, it created doubts amid the new reporting. The
Post rites and indicated that after the indictment. Regarding the
publication of the two stories, the executive editor, Sally Busby said,
according to the newspaper, we needed to make the corrections.

(42:43):
When asked for common as spokesperson for the Washington Post
directed The Hill Newspaper to an editor's note that was
put on the twenty seventeen story. This is what it read.
The original version of this article, published on March twenty nine,
twenty seventeen, said at Sergey Milan was a source for
parts of a doosier of unverified allegations against Donald Trump.

(43:09):
The account has been contradicted by allegations contained in a
federal indictment filed in November twenty twenty one, and undermine
by further reporting by The Washington Post. As a result,
portions of the story and an accompanying video have been removed,
and the headline has been changed. The editor's note read
the original account was based on two people who spoke

(43:31):
on the condition of amenity to provide sense of information.
One of those people now say the information the new
information quote puts engraved doubt that Milan was a source
for parts of the dossier. The other declined to comment,
it continued, So the Washington Post doesn't have to be
held accountable for this, because it's not our fault. Other

(43:54):
people I do us. We just gave you the best information,
stuck with it for four years, undermine the present, try
to overthrow the will of the people, and now we'll
correct it. We're not gonna say we're sorry. Okay, everybody
calmed down. I'm not gonna say we're sorry. We're not
gonna apologize at Trump. We're not gonna apologize our readers.
We're not going to run a full retraction on page one.
We're just gonna update the online story. In fact, if

(44:15):
you buy the Washington Post, you wouldn't even know this happened.
If you get the real newspaper, because it's not in
the real newspaper. Just so you know, this goes back
to exactly why the Wall Street Journal has now come
out and said the Steal dossier should not be called
the Steel Dossier, should be called the Clinton Dota. Howard
Kurtz on Fox put it this way brilliantly. The indictment

(44:40):
of Igor Danchenko, the key source for the Tarners Steele
dossier that was intertwined with the investigation of President Trump
and Russia, triggered this admission from The Washington Post, the
paper set in today's lead story. The allegations cast new
uncertainty on some past reporting on the dossier by news organizations,
including The Washington and Post. Yet, despite the enormous media

(45:02):
attention to the Russia investigation, including the dossier, the NBC,
ABC and CBS Evening newscast ignored the dan Chenko indictment. Yesterday.
Dan Chenko was charged with lying to the FBI about
false information he fed to former British buy Christopher Steele,
including unsubstantiated and selacious accusations against Trump. Dan Chenko allegedly

(45:24):
fed some of his falsehoods to Charles Dolan, a former
Clinton administration official. The FBI has said it launched the
Russia probe before seeing the Steel Dossier, but in a
wire tap application for former Trump advisor Carter Page, the
Bureau used the dossier's claims. Fox News covered the story extensively.
They were obvious red flags with the dossier from the

(45:46):
very beginning. For one thing, Christopher Steele was working for
an opposition research firm called Fusion GPS, which was funded
by the Hillary Clinton campaign. CNN and MSNBC did not
cover the story after five PM, except for Joel Maddow,
who had relentlessly trumpeted the investigation. This report comes in
the midst of a concerted attack on Christopher Steele himself

(46:09):
from Republicans in Congress, their alleging that he was basically
peddling false information, and last night she slams Special counsel
John Durham's case. The unmistakable impression is that this indictment
is designed to smear Christopher Steele's intelligence reports as things
that were deliberately made up and concocted by rascally Democrats.

(46:32):
The Steel Dossier may seem like a mere footnote of
the incredibly complicated saga that once dominated our national politics.
But now that it's wild chargers are being further discredited.
Many in the media have lost interest. You want to
know how much they've lost interest. CNN's Brian Skelter. He
is the guy whose entire job is to police the media,

(46:57):
tell the stories about the media, the stories that happen
each week. He has a history of ignoring stories that
would make Democrats and liberal news outlets organizations like his
own CNN look bad. It's a bomb show media story

(47:18):
in the media world that the Washington Post had to
go back and correct years and remove large chunks of
its own reporting on a discredited Clinton dossier. Americans, by
the way, rely on CNN right for their news. They
pushed this for four years. I know. I was there

(47:38):
the entire time, fighting back and defending Trump and defending
these ridiculous allegations. CNN's media program is called Reliable Sources.
If you want such show, you wouldn't even know any
of this happened because they ignored it. So ronic gets

(47:59):
named reliable sources right. They claim to examine their words,
not mine. The top media stories every Sunday, so the
Washington Post adding editors notes, amending headlines, and removing sections
of major stories that didn't make the cut when it
came to truth, We're actually cut by CNN. The post

(48:22):
corrections came as other news outlets, including CNN, have criticized
have been criticized, I should say, for failing to adjust
reporting after the Special Council Gerham's investigation. The Trump Russia
probe has further discredited the r already shaky dot sier
now the point where people are getting indicted. Reliable sources right,

(48:46):
which got a pretty big audience sixty five thousand viewers
last week, granted that was its smallest audience of the year,
ignored the scandal because it made Democrats and CNN look
bad instead of covering the post massive and significant corrections
because they were in on this collusion with Russia. CNN

(49:09):
and Sculptor were in on it from day one. They
wanted to bring down Trump at all costs. They didn't
care what lies I had to tell you. Instead, you
know what they did. Instead of covering this issue, CNN
traded viewers to segment after segment about Steve Bannon. Yeah,

(49:31):
they did segments about Brian Williams leaving MSNBC. They did
a segment on Steve Bannon's podcast, whether or not Americans
should believe inflation headlines, even though inflation is real. American
journalist Any Finster being jail a mere Mark and Britney
Spears in a local newspaper fighting to survive. That is

(49:52):
what they reported on during their Media watchtog show Reliable Sources,
sculptor of we did the significant media story on his
program because it didn't fit. They don't want to tell
people that they lied to you, and they don't want
to tell people that Donald Trump is innocent and that

(50:14):
the people that were around and that were harassed and
their lives were being pushed. People were trying to ruin
their lives. That's really what we're talking about here. People
were trying to ruin their lives, and people's lives were
ruined financially. Certainly, they just wanted to look the other way.
That's all they wanted to do was look the other way,

(50:35):
look the other way at all costs. And make sure
that we never tell people that we lied because we
ultimately got what we wanted. We got rid of Trump.
That was our goal and we accomplished it. We did it,
that was the objective, and we accomplished it. Why would
we tell you that the entire thing was a fraud.

(50:56):
Why on earth would we tell you that the entire
thing was a fraud. The same thing they did with
Written House. By the way, there's no difference here. Look
at how they've attacked Written House. You know the media
is bracing for the closing arguments in that trial. Why
because they know they lied to you. They said the

(51:16):
guy was a white supremacist murderer who wanted to know
as a Trump supporter, even though there's nothing to back
that up. Doesn't matter, right, because this is what we
do now. The media all we can along was saying
the only reason Written House will walk is because the
judge sucks and he's white. That's what they're now saying.

(51:37):
I don't see how anybody can say that this judge
is not biased and is not leaning in a certain direction.
I think that the behavior of the judge in totality
is the problem. His judge is an absolute joke. He's
been a joke from the very beginning. Clearly, this guy
has biases that are affecting the administration of this case.
I completely agree from my observation that the judge is

(51:58):
entirely biased. Judge is making it pretty much impossible for
the jury to actually consider all the facts and come
up with a verdict where justice will be served. You've
tweeted and talked about the fact that the judge is racist,
and you think that impacts how he is managing this trial.

(52:19):
He has made a series of decisions, each one perhaps
may be individually defensible, but in totality lead to the
impression of a biased, racist judge. Bias and racist. So
a white guy shoots people in self defense, a white
guy shoots white guys in self defense, not even not
black people, white people in self defense, and we don't

(52:44):
like the outcome because it's the white guy that defended
himself after convicted felons who had illegal guns pointed the
guns at him and tried to kill him, and he
defended himself, all caught on tape. Well, it's a white
racist judge. If it's a narrative, let's keep going with
it on national TV all day long. Because Trump rally
cell phone um that is trying to get rid the

(53:04):
house a walk. God bless the USA ring tone, which
is the true I love this right you got the
guy's ring tone goes off it. He's a guy that
represents his country. He serves his country. He has a
ring tone that is about God bless America, God Bless

(53:26):
the USA, and now they say it's a Trump ringing tone.
This is how much they hate America. By the way,
this goes back to exactly what I'm saying. Connect this
with this Clinton story. They hate America this much, You
need to understand that. This is how much they hate America.
They despise America, they cannot stand America. You're now the

(53:50):
worst person in the world, the worst person in the world.
If you love America. And if you're a judge who
doesn't convict somebody of a crime that the media says
you need to convict them of, you're a racist judge

(54:10):
and you're a Trump judge, and you're evil. They've just
moved on from the Clinton dossiers straight into this. This
will be the new controversy in Kenosha when Rittenhouse and
the jury comes back with her decision. If they don't
get what they want, this is what they'll say for months.
So use this as an election issue. White kid walked,
he killed two white people that attacked him. Nothing wrong
with It's called self defense. Judge is auditioning for the

(54:32):
cameras and looking for his next gig on Fox News.
He sounds like he's watched too much Bill O'Reilly. I
mean he's acting like Archie Bunker in there. When the
judge asked the entire room if there are any veterans
here and demands that the entire room clap for a veteran,
and the one veteran room happens to be the expert
witness coming forth to testify on behalf of Kyle Rittenhouse.
That's an example of a pretty biased courtroom. How the

(54:54):
guy talked about the lunch order. I don't get it.
I Asia joke. I don't get it. I don't know
that even an Asian joke. Well, I know that I'm
not allowed to judge it because I'm not Asian. The
judge has had so many moments in this case that
bring into question his own biases. Whether it's the ringtone,
whether it's the Asian statement, whether it's the applause and

(55:17):
mentioned the applause for a defense witness because he was
a veteran. Those things really impact people's feeling that this
is a courtroom that we can have to trust him.
This guy, Maybe you know legally he's right about things
I've been listening to the legal folks, but certainly his demeanor,
the way he speaks to the prosecution, the way he

(55:37):
looks at Kyle Rittenhouse like as his grandson. I mean,
come on, America, he looks at him like he's his grandson.
I mean, you want to talk about insanity. This is
the media. Don't ever trust him. Look at whether it's
the Clinton story or the Rittenhouse story. They do the

(55:58):
same thing over and over again. They decide their narrative
and they stick with it regardless of the facts. And
they don't care if you burn in hell because of it.
They don't care if you get the death penalty because
of it. They don't care if you get locked up
for the rest of your life because of it. They
don't care. They don't care. Failure after failure after failure.
That is now what is happening with the Biden administration.

(56:21):
And it seems that this week may actually be the
worst week on record for the Biden administration, as we
are now starting to see cracks within the Democratic leadership.
Why the Biden administration just sold offshore oil leases has
made a bunch of people angry. Yeah, they've already broken
that campaign pledge. They're also saying, we need to investigate

(56:43):
the rising prices of oil and gas in this country,
even though they're the ones that cause the problem by
shutting down the Keystone Pipeline and refusing to be energy independent.
We'll deal with that also in a moment. Democrats are
also upset right now becausevaccine mandates don't seem to be
working in place like Vermont, for example, where they have

(57:04):
where the highest vaccination rates in the country. They're seeing
a huge outbreak and COVID injections are also continuing to
fail nursing homes as they continue to admit that there
may be other ways to fight COVID outside of just
the vaccines. Now, Representative Airington on the Biden requesting and

(57:28):
investigation to high gas prices is the biggest head scratcher
of the day. We know why high gas prices are here.
The reason why they are here is one simple reason,
because Joe Biden abandoned energy independence for the Green New
Deal for the woke. We got to save the environment

(57:48):
plan that he promised, and now people are very angry
about it. But before I get to all of those
headlines of failure, one of the biggest shocks today is
this top Biden aide, Jake Sullivan is now under serious
fire by Democrats amid the Durham indictments and the botched

(58:10):
Afghanistan exit. Now, if you listen to the five now
actually six part series, I should say into the Durham
investigation with Hi Lee Clinton in our podcast. You know
how big of a deal it is that Jake Sullivan,
now the National Security Advisor, the top level person the
Biden administration, is directly linked to the indictments in the

(58:32):
Durham investigation. You know how damaging this is directly to
Hillary Clinton. We've got new news. Now the Democrats are
starting to throw him, Jake Sullivan under the bus, saying
maybe he's too toxic, get rid of him. The White
House Sensal Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan is not only already
under fire for his role and the disastrous you have

(58:54):
to withdraw from Afghanistan, but Democrats seemed to be okay
with that because they were held been on getting out
of Afghanistan, no matter how many Americans are left behind,
no matter how many people were tortured or killed, no
matter how many translators and people that worked with the
American government we left behind to be destroyed and tortured
and beheaded and dismembered by the Taliban. They stood by him,
but they now may use the disastrous you have to

(59:18):
draw from Afghanistan is now a reason to get rid
of him. Because of his connection to Hillary Clinton, Russian collusion,
and the Clinton dossier. Democrats are now saying it's probably
time for Sullivan to resign a big questions about a
suspected connection to the debunk claims of collusion between Russian

(59:38):
Donald Trump's twenty sixteen presidential campaign. Multiple reports surface last
week and this week that mister Sullivan, a longtime confident
of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a two time
presidential hopeful, is now the foreign policy adviser named. This
is a fact not up for debate. This is a fact.

(01:00:01):
He is the person named in the latest indictment. He
is the quote foreign policy advisor named in special counsel
of John Durham's indictment. Last week of Democratic lawyer for
Hillary Clinton, Michael Sussman, charged the line to the FBI
about what he knew about mister Trump in Russia and

(01:00:22):
Hillary Clinton's campaign, Citing well placed sources, Fox News first
reported that mister Sullivan is the adviser in question. The
news report appeared to tie mister Sullivan directly the Clinton
campaign's effort to amplify the Russian collusion narrative, which they
created out of thin air during the height of the
twenty sixteen presidential race. Mister Trump had fiercely denounced those charges,

(01:00:49):
and the Durham investigation is now showing us and his
work suggests that some of the key sources who helped
spread that story in the first place not only are
not credible, but lied to the FBI. If the dots
and the suspicions are accurate, that Jake sullivan revelation would

(01:01:10):
link directly the two sixteen effort to the White House,
where mister Sullivan is President Obama's top security advisor and
frequent spokesman for the administration policy in the media. It
would also seem to contradict mister Sullivan's claim to Congress
in twenty seventeen that he was quote unaware of the

(01:01:33):
source and one of the most explosive accusations about mister
Trump involving collusion between the Trump organization, Business Empire, and
Russia's Alpha Bank. We all know that was a lie.
The White House has tried to brush aside questions this
week about mister Sullivan's involvement in the entire ordeal. Yet

(01:01:55):
Democratic insiders are saying privately that they are extremely worried
now about the Durham probe and the possibility that's targeting
mister Sullivan, which would mean it would target the Biden
White House. They're now saying, maybe it's time to throw
him under the bus and blame it on Afghanistan, and

(01:02:18):
that's how we get rid of him. In other words,
he'll be the sacrificial lamb now. Questions about mister Sullivan's
credibility were swirling long before the indictment last week of
mister Sussman. Jake Sullivan is the youngest AS Security advisor
in six decades. He was also deeply involved in the

(01:02:40):
administration's handling of the US military withdrawal from Afghanistan this summer,
which we know what happened. The hasty withdrawal paved the
way for a rapid Taliban takeover of the country and
left American citizens and Afghan allies stranded inside the country.
Despite mister Biden's repeat assurance to the contrary that people

(01:03:00):
have died because the decisions made by Biden and by Sullivan.
Democrats are now saying, maybe that's what we use is
the premise for getting rid of him. Republican leaders signing
the misreading of the Afghan situation and mishandling of the
final pullout say mister Sullivan is not fit to serve
as a national security advisor. Senator Josh Holly, Republican from Missouri,

(01:03:27):
told The Washington Times quote Jake Sullivan led the anchors
the entire process that resulted in the disasters withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Josh Holly is echoing his past calls from mister Sullivan
either stepped down or be fired by Joe Biden. Now

(01:03:50):
more than ever. Our nation needs leaders who are competent
and who are trustworthy. Sullivan has shown himself to be neither,
so it's time for him to resign, he said yesterday.
Other Republicans now point to the growing list of controversies
involving mister Sullivan dating back to the attack on the

(01:04:10):
US diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libyan twenty twelve. Why is
he connected that well? At the time, mister Sullivan was
at top aide to missus Clinton then serving as Secretary
of State during the terrorist assault that led to the
deaths of the US ambassador and three other Americans. He
was the top aide to missus Clinton when she said

(01:04:32):
what difference does it make about them dying? Being questioned
in Congress. From Benghazi to then the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan,
Jake Sullivan has been at the epicenter of the worst
foreign policy crisis and decisions over the past decade. That's
what represented James Comer Kentucky, the ranking Republican the House

(01:04:53):
Oversight and Reform Committee, said yesterday as well. Given this
administration's tennessee to create self inflicted crisis, it's no surprise
Jake Sulivan has been given a top post at the
Biden White House. White House officials have said a little
publicly about suspicions of mister Sullivan's direct connections to the

(01:05:15):
lies from the Trump Russian collision story and possibly lying
to Congress in twenty seventeen. Administration officials at the top
have made clear repeatedly, at least publicly keyword publicly and
repeatedly that they stand behind mister Sullivan. The problem is internally,

(01:05:39):
we're now being told that people are saying it's time
for him to go. They say, not only were the
terrible decisions that he made and other key advisors listened
to with the African withdrawal, but it also did not
make the President have any more faith in his team.
I'm not sure I would agree with that. Hillary Clinton,

(01:06:02):
by the way, does not want Jake Sullivan to lose
his job at the White House because that's how she's
getting her inside her information. And as long as he
is at the White House, the White House is going
to do something to protect him because if he's on staff,
they certainly don't want him to get in trouble or
being dieted at or anything else. Other Democrats were saying
his time to cut him loose because the risk now

(01:06:23):
is too great for him that he could bring down
Biden and others. And let me go back to August seventeenth,
of the height of the frantic US led airlift from
the Kibol Airport in Afghanistan, it was White House Presecretary
Jen Psaki that had to admit acknowledge that the mission
had quote results in some chaotic scenes, directly contradicting Jake Sullivan.

(01:06:45):
Just hours before, she also said this, but the President's
confident is now a security team in their ability to
get the mission done and get the mission accomplished. We
now know that was a failure. That same day, mister
Sullivan appeared before reporters and face a lot of questions
about the administration's handling of Afghanistan and the US back
Kabul government was crumbling in the face of an offensive

(01:07:08):
bout the Taliban insurgency. What did Sullivan say? He defended
mister Biden's calculation that a withdrawal was better for the
US and the long run. Quote, when you work on
any policy issue, domestic policy, foreign policy, any policy issue,
the human costs and the consequences loom large. But President
Biden had to think about the human costs of the

(01:07:30):
alternative path as well, which was to stay in the
middle of a civil conflict, which was to stay in
the middle of a civil conflict in Afghanistan. In other words,
we made these decisions knowing as much people would die,
probably Americans and were cool with it. Along with Secretary
of State Anthony B. Lincoln, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, host
of other officials, mister Sullivan had become a top target

(01:07:52):
for Republicans jusas someone must be held accountable, publicly accountable
for the Afghan exit and the damage it did to
the American reputation abroad. Congress held another meeting yesterday, hearing
from analysts and former commanders about what went wrong in Afghanistan.
Don't worry, the media is not covering that, but we will.

(01:08:13):
Even those not explicitly calling for mister Sullivan's firing say, quote,
the White House decision making process on Afghanistan, of which
the National Security Advisor was a key part, needs more
thoroughly needs to be thoroughly investigated quote. In order to
be able to hold anyone accountable for the disastrous withdrawal
from Afghanistan, Congress must conduct a thorough and comprehensive investigation,

(01:08:35):
which should include looking at decisions may at the White House,
the State Department, the Intelligence community, and the Pentagon. That's
what the ranking Republican the House Foreign Affairs Committee said
to The New York Times yesterday. Meanwhile, the indictment of
mister Sussman seems to suggest that mister Sullivan may have

(01:08:58):
had at least some knowledge directly the Clinton campaign was
deeply involved in pushing the Trump Russia collusion story. The
indictment said an unnamed Clinton campaign attorney exchanged emails with
a campaign's manager, the communications director, and quote foreign policy

(01:09:20):
adviser that would be Jake Sullivan about sharing the Alpha
Bank accusations with an unidentified reporter. The indictment also said
mister Sussman told the FBI General Council James Baker that
he was not representing a client during the meeting, but
was there on behalf of the Clinton campaign. In October

(01:09:44):
twenty sixteen, missus Clinton tweet a statement from mister Sullivan
promoting a sense debunk claim about a secret computer server
connecting the Trump organization to Alpha Bank. Now that came
directly from Hillary Clinton. Say you know, I want to
read that for you again because this is really important.

(01:10:05):
Or explain it to you maybe a better way to
put it. Hillary Clinton tweeted out a statement from her
advisor at the campaign, her foreign policy advisor for the
Clinton campaign for the presidency in twenty sixteen, and she
tweeted out a direct statement from mister Sullivan, who was
promoting something that he knew was a lie, a lie

(01:10:30):
about a secret computer server connecting the Trump organization directly
to Alpha bank, which he knew was a lie. What
does this mean? This is exactly what it means his
words in that tweet, this quote, this could be the
most direct link between let me rephrase that. I want

(01:10:51):
to make sure I get these words exactly right from Sullivan.
His tweet was this, This could be the most direct
link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow. Mister Sullivan wrote
in that statement, computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert

(01:11:13):
server linking the Trump organization to a Russian based bank.
The secret hot line may be the key to unlocking
the mystery of Trump's ties to Russia. This line of
communication may help explain Trump's bizarre adoration of Vladimir Putin.
That is what Sullivan wrote in the statement that was

(01:11:36):
sent out in October twenty sixteen by missus Clinton. So
now you understand it. Now you get it. Now you understand,
and now you get why Democrats may be folding on
Jake Sullivan. This may be why they're doing it, folks.

(01:12:01):
The reason is pretty simple. They want to make sure
that Jake Sullivan, okay, is not used to bring them down.
And if he has to go down, his own and
we got to bury him to protect Hillary Clinton to
protect Joe Biden, to protect this White House, and we've
got to use Afghanistan, admit that we failed to Afghanistan

(01:12:23):
and say he's the guy that failed to present and
he's the guy that failed us. I think what they're
showing right now is all right, we'll so be it.
This is the part I don't understand about Democrats that
work for these scumbacks. Look at their track record and
look at their history. There is no indication okay, there
is zero indication zero. Want to be clear about this,

(01:12:51):
that they will ever protect and defend you once you
become a liability to them, Even if you're Jake Sullivan
and you've worked for Hillary Clinton for the last twenty
years and you get to the White House and you're
the National Security advisor for the President nine States America,
Joe Biden, if you become too big of a liability,
they will get rid of your abs. They don't care.

(01:13:13):
They are soulless, they have no soul, and they will
do whatever they have to do to get rid of you.
That's just the way it is, folks. And yet Democrats
like Sullivan think that they're on the inside. They act security.
They don't care about you. They don't care about you.
I'm just telling you they don't care. So there's a

(01:13:34):
good chance that Sullivan could be excommunicated from the Democratic Party.
And they're gonna use Afghanistan as a reason. It's not
the reason. Okay, the real reason is anything but that, right.
The real reason is that he is way too close
to the Russian investigation. It's way too close to Biden,

(01:13:55):
and it's way too close to Hillary Clinton. They will
sacrific by Soloovan if they've got to. And that's why
Democrats are now starting to say that they've lost confidence
in him, because they got to set it up to
just flat out and get rid of him. Now, this
is just one of the problems Democrats are having right now.
Their other problem is now Democrats are revealing that they're

(01:14:18):
also frustrated with Biden's Attorney General Merritt Garland. Why, because
they need to get rid of some people so that
people won't blame Joe Biden going into the midterms. Are
these are the sacrificial lambs of Biden's failures. We also
have this ridiculous move by Biden saying we're gonna investigate
the high prices and the high prices that we're seeing

(01:14:40):
right now at the gas pump, and we're gonna investigate it.
You're the one that caused it, dude. You're literally the
one that caused it. You undid all the all of
the things that gave us energy independent under Donald Trump.
You undid all of it. You unraveled all of it
right away. And now you want to know why gas
prices are the roof? What did you think was gonna happen? Man?

(01:15:03):
And then you want to make the American people believe it.
This isn't your fault that you're not the one that
actually did this. Come on, Democrats right now have a
problem when you have Biden babbling like a moron and
saying stupid things because they're all up for reelection in
the House and half of the Senate it's gonna be

(01:15:23):
up for reelection, which is majority Democrats, and it's a
very very thin margin, as you know. And so when
Joe Biden comes out and he's like, I'm going to
request an investigation high gas prices. This is this is
a political stunt that is not even a good one,
like some political stunts are actually a good one. All
all the fingers are going to point back to Joe Biden.

(01:15:45):
You did this, sir. You undid every policy that gave
us energy independence that Donald Trump did. You did that.
This is why prices have gone through the roof. It's
your fault. There's no reason to investigate it because you're

(01:16:05):
the one that did it. Like this is literally on you.
You did it. But to come out there and to
say I'm going to have an investigation use taxpayers dollars
to investigate a problem that you actually created also tells
you what he thinks about the American people. He actually, truly,
genuinely believes that we are so stupid that we will
somehow believe that the guy who created the problem is

(01:16:27):
somehow on our team, on our side, that somehow the
idiot that did this is going to investigate himself and
then get somebody in trouble for what he did. Representative
Arrington had this to say about this on Fox Business.
Take a listen, OPEC has said no to increasing the supply.

(01:16:51):
Back to you, Edward Lawrence at the White House. Thank you, Edward.
I want to hear from Texas about this. You just
tell me that it's the oil companies are responsible for
a high gas process. I don't know what Texas thinks. Ideally,
we have Jody Arrington with us, a Republican from the
state of Texas, and he joins me, Now, what do
you make of this? The President blames the oil companies.
Go for it, Well, Stu, I have never seen such

(01:17:13):
political cowardice in my career. This is an abuse of
power for the President of the United States to call
for an investigation and weaponize the fourth branch of government
to go after an industry that is given us low
energy prices for consumers. It is one of the reasons
why we are the economic envy of the world, and

(01:17:35):
of course energy independence. It's one thing for him to
have a philosophical disagreement with fossil fuels, but this is
beyond the pale for a leader of the greatest country
in the world. And obviously he needs a lesson on
economics one O one. When you tax something or regulate
something or both, you get less of it, you get

(01:17:58):
less of it. It's going to cause this inflation crisis
across the board, and especially with prices at the pump
are self inflicted. He has to own this and any
leader worth their salt wood. But I suspect he won't
and listen. The FTC, by the way, is responsible for
unfair and deceptive practices. They ought to investigate the president

(01:18:21):
for the false claims and the deception to accuse this
industry of something that he created. Joe Biden did create it,
but now he's going to use the government to investigate
what he created, which is high gas prices. And the media,
by the way, they're going to do everything they can
to help him out. I'll give you a great example.
Joy Read on MSNBC said, maybe one of the dumbest

(01:18:42):
things I've ever heard talking to the Native American Indian
Elizabeth Warren. Most of you get that joke. You're laughing
right now. Joy Read actually asked this question, how is
it the gas prices still went up even when people
were staying home. That's how dumb they are for an
MSNBC families. And there's another thing, because a lot of

(01:19:04):
people are really upset about gas prices, but people weren't
driving for a year, and how and somehow gas prices
still went up. There have been some calls to investigate
these oil companies because also they don't really like build
backbit ter either because it deals with their issues on
the environment. But how is it that when people stay
at home for a year, suddenly the price of gas
went up? He was playing, Well, yeah, so come on

(01:19:27):
joy by the way, this is the this is joy
read and this is what she's saying on National TV.
Everybody's stay at home, so gas prices should stay cheap. Well,
if the rest of the world opens back up and
you have less production, it's the same reason why hell
everybody was staying home. And what happened with klorox wipes? Right,
what happened with everything in the pipeline? If you make

(01:19:51):
less of it and then people collude against you in
the Middle East to make the prices skyrocket, what the
hell did you think was gonna happen? And did you
really think that prices weren't We're gonna just like tank
because only in America we weren't driving while the rest
of the world was driving. I mean, there's so many

(01:20:11):
different ways to analyze how stupid this actually is. But
this is how they're gonna sell this, right, Well, I
mean gas prices went up evil when people were staying
at home. How does that happen? Sounds like we need
to investigate these evil, evil oil companies. No, you're you
put a guy in office, you support him who undid

(01:20:33):
everything that made its energy independent. We are now totally
dependent on OPEC and for an oil you shut down
the Keystone pipeline, they decide to make it hurt and
screw us. That's what's happening right now. Doesn't matter if
people are driving or not, you moron. But this is
liberal logic. This is liberal logic. This is a real

(01:20:54):
moment on TV, a real conversation, and this is how
you mind warp at half of the country to believe
that somehow Joe Biden didn't do this. A lot of
people are really upset about gas prices, but people weren't
driving for a year, and how and somehow gas prices
still went up. There have been some calls to investigate
these oil companies because also they don't really like build

(01:21:14):
back better either because it deals with their issues on
the environment. But how is it that when people fade
home for a year, suddenly the price of gas went up?
He was playing, ah, yeah, so come on, joy, We
know exactly who the oil companies, what the oil companies
pay attention to, what is their number one priority profits?

(01:21:35):
And so think about it this way. If we really
this were just ordinary inflation. We might see prices go up,
but prices that the pump have gone up. Why well,
let me give you a hint. Chevron Xon have doubled
their profits. This isn't about inflation. This is about price

(01:21:57):
gouging for these guys. So so now we're accusing them
of price couching. You guys took away all of our
ability to control the price of the marketplace. And now
you want to go back and say it's all big
Oil's fault. So you attack big Oil and you investigate
them because you shut down everything in this country. Now
here's the other part that's so funny about all of this.

(01:22:19):
While this is happening, the Biden administration just sold offshore
oil leases, despite a campaign pledge to never do it.
Environmentalists are fuming after the Department of Interior auctioned leases
to drill for oil in an eighty million acre section
of the Gulf of Mexico. On Wednesday morning, the Bureau
of Ocean Energy Management sold three hundred eight tracks covering

(01:22:41):
one point seven million acres of fossil fueled Giants such
as Chevron, an x On Mobile are the ones at bottom.
The ones that we're now accusing up being the worst
people in the world. Now, you want to know why
the Biden administration did this, because they need gas prices
to come down a little bit and they realize they
screwed up. Quote this morning was met with extreme disappointment,
depleted hope, and shutter trust. So the legal director for

(01:23:04):
Friends of the Earth It said in a statement, the
Bide administration has opted to move forward with the relinquishing
all remaining parcels of the Gulf of Mexico to all
in gas interests, decisions based on unlawful analysis that ignores
climate change and the serious environmental injustice posed to the
frontline communities. We are left to gas to the administration
and how they have ignored its clear authority to defer

(01:23:26):
the sale. And our final hope lies with a federal
court to remedy these violations. Why did Joe Biden do this?
He decided to make the action because he desperately needs
and Democrats running for reelection in twenty twenty two need
the prices to come down. Now. They can't just be
so obvious as saying, screw it, We're going to reopen
the Keystone pipeline. But what they can do is start

(01:23:48):
getting some drilling out there, and they're selling to the
same people they're saying and accusing of price couging us.
You can't make it up. They sold these leases on
the same day that Elizabeth Warren went on propaganda TV
and tells you that the real problem is the companies
that we just sold these oil lease rights too. Only

(01:24:09):
in America can the people be this stupid and the
media pull this crap off. Chevron Xon have doubled their profits.
This isn't about inflation. This is about price gouging. So
on the same day you're saying this, you just sold
off oil and gas leases to Chevron and Xon. If

(01:24:34):
you agree with me that this doesn't make sense, you're brilliant.
They're lying to you, That's what they're doing. They are
flat out lying to you, the same way that they
lie to you about mass mandates, the same way they
lie to you about, you know, following their own rules.
I mean, look at Pelosi caught. This is the greatest
headline ever. I'll say it again. Pelosi was caught parting

(01:24:56):
at a swinger's bar, and one big thing was missing
her mask. She was with another congresswoman at a swingers Bar,
and neither of them had their masks on. When there's
a mass mandate and washing in DC. You can't make
it up, can you. It's a swingers bar. She's at
What's Pelosi tonight? Got her mask off at the swingers bar? Really? Yep,

(01:25:20):
I'm trying to figure out what's more newsworthy the swingers
bar that Pelosi's out of the mask. Same Democratic Party
that will tell you that we must investigate Chevron and
Xon for price gouging is selling them leases on the
same exact day. If you're Chevron or Xon right now,
you've got to be laughing your abs off. Then how

(01:25:42):
stupid the Bidendministry she is when they literally come out
and they're like, Wow, they're they're price gouging and we're
gonna investigate them. Hey, guys, I want to buy some
hole leases in the golf real quick. We're gonna open
those up. We need you guys to start producing fast.
Can you please hurry up and start producing quickly? We
really need your help here, right, We need your help
here very quickly. We gotta get this going before the

(01:26:03):
We gotta get this going quick, folks. We gotta get
this going before election. Day, because we're in serious trouble. Otherwise.
The Democratic Party is on fire right now. So is
the media, and not in a good way. They are
in serious trouble. I hope every one of you will
grab this podcast and you'll share it on social media.
I hope every one of you hit that little forward

(01:26:24):
button and put it on Twitter, on Facebook, Instagram, wherever
you put your stuff. I hope you'll text it to
your family and friends. See you back here tomorrow.