All Episodes

July 12, 2025 61 mins

Peter Greste spent more than a year locked up in a tiny concrete jail cell in Egypt. He’d been working as a journalist when he was arrested and wrongly convicted of terrorism charges. The foreign correspondent had spent years reporting in war zones, was shot at and even held his dying colleague in his arms, but it was the war on journalism that almost broke him.

Want to hear more from I Catch Killers? Visit news.com.au.

Like the show? Get more at icatchkillers.com.au
Advertising enquiries: newspodcastssold@news.com.au 

Questions for Gary: icatchkillers@news.com.au 

Get in touch with the show by joining our Facebook group, and visiting us on Instagram or Tiktok.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.
Detective see aside of life. The average person is never
exposed her I spent thirty four years as a cop.
For twenty five of those years I was catching killers.
That's what I did for a living. I was a
homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,
I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

(00:23):
The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories
from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw
and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some
of the content and language might be confronting. That's because
no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.
Join me now as I take you into this world. Today,

(00:46):
I had the pleasure of speaking to award winning foreign
correspondent Peter Grest, who was wrongfully imprisoned in an Egyptian jail.
He spent four hundred days locked up in the Cairo prison,
whereas forced to survive conditions after he's falsely accused of
being a terrorist. We talked about his lengthy time behind
bars and how that experience made him reflect on his

(01:09):
own life and discover a strength and resilience he didn't
realize he had. Peter also spoke about his life on
the road, working as a journalist for the BBC, Reuters
and Al Jazeera in some of the world's most dangerous locations.
In these environments where colleagues have been kidnapped and murdered
just for simply doing their jobs, Peter also spoke about

(01:31):
the importance of freedom of the press and the crucial
role at plays in world events, a subject he is
very passionate about. Here is his story, Peter Gresser, Welcome
to our catch Killers.

Speaker 2 (01:43):
Thanks for having me.

Speaker 1 (01:45):
Well, I've got to say, Peter, I've learned a bit
about you. I knew a bit about you before you
were coming on as a guest. And I've got to
say a career as a foreign correspondent that's about as
good a job as you can get. I think. What's
your take on it?

Speaker 2 (02:00):
Yeah, I loved it. I mean the thing that drew
me into the career was a couple of things. It
was a license to indulge your curiosity. You know, if
there was something that you're interested in, then it meant
that you were someone was prepared to pay you to
go and investigate, to stick your nose into someone else's
business to find out. But it was also I guess,

(02:20):
a license to have adventures to some extent. You've got
to be careful what you wish for. I guess.

Speaker 1 (02:25):
Yeah, Well, I suppose for all the good parts there
was well, the experience you had in Cairo and Egypt.
Obviously you don't put that as a high point. But
it's a fascinating job because you get to go to
some of the world's hot spots where everyone's curious about it,
and you were actually there reporting on the ground.

Speaker 2 (02:46):
Yeah, and not just I mean the hot spots are
the obvious ones. They're the ones that tend to make
the headlines. But places like Antarctica, or places like you know,
corners of Africa where they're translocating offence, or parts of
the Middle East where the extraordinary archaeological excavations that are

(03:08):
taken place. I mean, all of this stuff is open
to you as a foreign correspondent. So as long as
as I said, as long as you can make a
case for a good story, then you're able to go
and stick your nose in.

Speaker 1 (03:19):
I think it gives you a worldly view, doesn't It's
like we've come back to Australia, but it gives you
a more worldly view.

Speaker 2 (03:25):
Yeah, you can't help but not have an understanding of
the globe as a as a fascinating, extraordinary place. I
miss it terribly, I really do. It became a part
of my identity and not being able to do that,
I think is something that was quite tough for me.
But yeah, it's still very much a part of my DNA.

Speaker 1 (03:46):
Okay, And you're also a member of a very limited
club of people that have been arrested in foreign grounds
for a variety of fenss terrorism. For your one, we've
dealt with Kylie Moore Gilbert and also Sean Turnbell and yeah,

(04:06):
even chain Lay.

Speaker 2 (04:08):
Yeah. In fact, we're all together as a part of
the Awada group of people who are Australians who have
formerly detained arbitrarily. And Kylie, Sean and myself are all
coincidentally academics at mcquarie University where we've decided to form
our own little nest of spies and terrorists.

Speaker 1 (04:26):
We've had all those guests, all the people we just
mentioned on the podcast here, and I've been amazed by
this story, but the amazed how they also came through
the experience, but one exclusive club you're a member of.

Speaker 2 (04:40):
Yeah, it is a pretty special club. And I love
them all. You know, they're all extraordinary people, and I
guess in a way there's a sort of self selecting
group in that they've come out of it, out of
their experiences with the determination and strength to do something
with the time that they spent behind bars hasn't killed them.

(05:00):
It has made them stronger and it's given us all,
I think is a kind of common language to talk
about the experience. The trouble is, you know, when you
go through that kind of a kind of time, when
you're imprisoned like that, the language that you use really
isn't understood by people who don't who haven't experienced it themselves.
It means that we can talk about time behind bars

(05:21):
and understand each other in a way that is very
very rare, and that's that's quite special. It gives us
a special bond.

Speaker 1 (05:28):
I would imagine it would help in that regards, and
then be a fascinating discussion around the dinner table when
you lot got together too, I would imagine. But how
ironic you've all ended up at Macquarie University.

Speaker 2 (05:39):
Yeah, yeah, Well, like I said, maybe there's something special
about Macquarie. Nobody tell Asier.

Speaker 1 (05:44):
Though now your time that we're going to obviously break
it down what happened to you over in Egypt, But
I just want to upfront, like I know through your experiences.
I've read your book and really enjoyed it, and it
was very open book about the experiences you're going through,
not just physically but emotionally and every psychologically, everything that

(06:07):
happens to you in the prison and having you freedom
taken away. What was the lowest point as you spent
four hundred days there, but was there a low point
that stands out?

Speaker 2 (06:16):
Yeah? I think the day we were convicted. You know,
up to that point, we'd always believed that the case
would go away. When I was arrested, I was convinced
that someone had screwed up, someone had made a mistake.
Maybe they'd misread the arrest warrant for Peter Greystone rather
than Peter grest Or, they'd misinterpreted something that we'd written

(06:38):
or published, and that with a bit of explanation, maybe
a few phone calls, the thing would go away. It didn't.
We thought when the investigators started looking at the prosecutor
started looking into the case that they'd realized there was
no substance to any of the allegations and drop the
whole thing. We thought much of the same when we
started the trial. We thought the judges would chuck it

(06:59):
out the end of the trial. We thought that it
was so obvious there was no evidence to convict us,
that the whole thing would would have have to be
acquitted and that free. At the very worst, they might
have convicted us of some kind of administratives of fans
and sentences to six months. We'd already done that time
at that time and release it's on time served. But
to then be convicted and sentenced to seven years, that

(07:23):
was a very very tough day.

Speaker 1 (07:25):
I suppose that's when it became real and that's the
light that you were hoping or where justice would would come.
It must also impact on you greatly that you're in
there knowing that you haven't done anything wrong. So it's
not just I think there's two ways you could do prison, aka,
well I've made a mistake and I'm paying my dues.
But if you're in there and you know you haven't

(07:47):
done anything wrong, that sense of injustice must either way.

Speaker 2 (07:52):
Well, yeah, but there is a third way, and that's
to use the time that you have behind bars as
a way of fighting for the greater issue, the greater injustice.
I mean I didn't. I realized after we were convicted
that it had nothing to do with anything we've done,
but everything to do with what we'd come to represent,
and that was press freedom, okay, And so in framing

(08:14):
our case as an attack on press freedom, we come
to fight for that principle rather than for our own
our own selves, and I think that made it much
more survivable because it gave what we were doing, what
we were going through a sense of purpose and meaning
that it wouldn't otherwise never have had.

Speaker 1 (08:31):
Okay, that makes sense, makes sense. Well, look we're going
to take you, take you back there. I apologize for that,
but before we do, let's find out a little bit
about who you are, and so what what's your story?
Where'd you grow up in your childhood?

Speaker 2 (08:46):
Childhood in Sydney, out the northern suburbs in Waronga, kicking
around the bushlands of Lancove River National Park.

Speaker 1 (08:56):
Those bush lands very well. I grew up in Epping
though that spent half my childhood roaming the bush around there.
I probably threw rocks at.

Speaker 2 (09:05):
Yes, probably did. We probably chased the same snakes as
well through the bush at various points. So I had
my childhood in Sydney, you know, pretty idyllic really, as
a lot of kids do if you're living growing up
in that kind of environment. We moved to Brisbane when
I was about twelve thirteen, so I had primary school
here in Sydney and then high school in the university

(09:25):
in Brisbane. Yeah, very easy going childhood, really camping and
falling around, going surfing and enjoying the beach. The countryside
has a lot of a lot of kids do.

Speaker 1 (09:39):
Okay, what was what drew you to journalism?

Speaker 2 (09:43):
I guess it was funny because it was more the
thing that didn't turn me off than anything that particularly
drew me to journalism. I remember at the end of
high school I had to I knew I wanted to
study something. I didn't want to go on to the
workforce at that point, but I had no idea what
on earth I wanted to study. And there was I
remember midnight before the university application form was due. It

(10:08):
was completely blank. I had no idea what I was
going to stick on there, and there was a book
with all of the courses that you could do in
the state was called the q TAC Book and the
queenslan Tertiary Admission Center Book. And I remember thinking, if
I don't know what I do want to do, let
me get rid of everything I don't and see if
I can narrow the field. And I started crossing style.
I got rid of accounting, No architecture nowhere that was

(10:29):
my dad's thing, medicine, law, no engineering. I just kept
crossing and crossing and crossing until the only thing that
I didn't cross off was journalism. And I figured that's
that's it. Then that must be the thing to do.

Speaker 1 (10:43):
Follow follow that path.

Speaker 2 (10:45):
Yeah, And so I went overseas. I applied and deferred
and went overseas as an exchange students South Africa for
a year. And while I was away that time in
South Africa, during really what was the height of the
apartheid years, it really settled in my mind that this
is what I wanted to do, that was the right
thing for me, because I think that time in South

(11:05):
Africa really gave me a sense of social justice or
injustice as I saw it. Then, So what.

Speaker 1 (11:12):
Period of time was that?

Speaker 2 (11:13):
So that was when I was about seventeen.

Speaker 1 (11:16):
Okay, so you would have seen the injustice.

Speaker 2 (11:18):
And yeah, yeah, exactly. This was during the This was
before the end of apartheid in nineteen ninety four, when
Nelson Mandela finally won the first post election of post
apartheid elections. It was in the early nineteen nineteen eighties
rather so, very much a lot of injustice, a lot
of social turmoil the time, fascinating but also very difficult.

Speaker 1 (11:43):
Do you think that the experience sort of broadened your
view on life?

Speaker 2 (11:47):
And I think so. I lived with Africanas who were
wonderful people, and I could see and understand who they
were and where they came from and why they felt
the way that they did. It gave me a degree
of empathy and understanding that they weren't necessarily villains, but
they were also exploiting a system that they benefited from

(12:08):
hugely and it was fundamentally racist. And so it gave
me a sense of empathy and understanding that everyone has
a perspective, everyone has a point of view, but also
a sense of social justice that I wanted to follow through.

Speaker 1 (12:23):
So one thing to tick the box and say, I
want to be a journalist and study for it where
did you get your first start?

Speaker 2 (12:29):
And I got my first start at GMV six in Sheperdon,
in my rural TV station down in northeast.

Speaker 1 (12:36):
Victoria, reporting on cattle sales or yeah.

Speaker 2 (12:39):
Reporting on dairy milk prices and on droughts and on
farming issues, and local flower shows and school sports competitions,
all of those sorts of good things. I guess in
a way, it was the place. And I often tell
my students there that I learned the skills to be
a foreign correspondent in that job in Shepperdent.

Speaker 1 (12:59):
Okay, that's interesting that it explained, well.

Speaker 2 (13:02):
You had to work very very quickly. You had to
work across a very large geographical footprint. You had to cover.
You had to figure out how to make really obscure,
odd little stories accessible and interesting to a much wider audience.
You had to be accurate. You had because I remember,

(13:22):
I mean, all journalists have to be accurate, of course,
But the thing about Shepherd was that in most newsrooms,
and most capital city newsrooms, you're fairly disconnected from the audience.

Speaker 1 (13:32):
It's not going to bump into the person you're You're.

Speaker 2 (13:34):
Not going to bump into the person you're reporting on it,
and you could guarantee in Shepherd and if you've made
some cock up, sooner or later someone would tap you
on the shoulder and as you're walking down the street
and say, mate, you know you've mispronounced Uncle Joe's name.
You got that, You got the age.

Speaker 1 (13:49):
I can see where you be coming from. Its sharpening
up your sharpening up your skills.

Speaker 2 (13:52):
Sharpening up the skills, teaching you to work independently. You work,
you know, you're producing a lot of stories across a
large area. So yeah, I think a lot of the
basic craft skills I learned out there.

Speaker 1 (14:03):
Okay, now I'm sure BBC didn't pluck you from from there?
How did you? How did you make your move to
me working overseas and working as a foreign corres sliment?

Speaker 2 (14:14):
From there, I went to Darwin. I was in Darwin
for a year, again getting a little bit of a
taste for the adventure.

Speaker 1 (14:20):
Well that would to foreign correspondent.

Speaker 2 (14:23):
And then I got a job in adelaide in covering
the basically for the ten network, and I was there
for about three years, and I remember towards the end
of those three years, I started to feel as though
I was repeating stories time and again. I've been able
to pick up a script that done from twelve months earlier,
changed the names and the dates pretty much and refile

(14:45):
it because not much seemed to change. I didn't feel challenged,
I didn't feel I felt it was sort of rinse.
I was doing, covering stories on repeat, and I read
and two things happened. The first was that I read
a book called One Crowded Hour, which is an extraordinary
biogra of a guy called Neil Davis, an incredible Australian
cameraman who covered the Southeast Asia during the late sixties

(15:08):
and seventies an eighties. He was in Vietnam, he was wounded,
He saw more combat than almost any soldiers active soldiers.
He was wounded something like twenty three times. And what
I saw was an extraordinary professional who was deeply dedicated
to his craft but was also experiencing was in the

(15:30):
middle of really pivotal moments in history, and also having
some incredible adventures. And I thought, well, that's actually that's
what I'd love to do. Soon after the ten network
went into receivership. This was in nineteen ninety one, and
to save money, they closed down the London Bureau, and

(15:51):
I thought, well, this is ridiculous. He can't have one
of the main Australian networks without what's going without having
a London correspondent. So I marched into my bosses office
and said, listen, if I quit and take myself to London,
would you use me as a stringer? And he said sure,
why not. It wasn't going to cost them anything, and
they had a known entity in London, and so.

Speaker 1 (16:13):
That's what I did, So rolled the dice, really, I.

Speaker 2 (16:16):
Guess, so, I mean it didn't feel like that much
of a role looking back, I suppose it was, but
you know, I had I had, I had some clients,
you know, the ten network, I had a job to do.
It was still the journalism that I wanted. It was
an inroad into a place that was really the hub
of correspondence of journal of world journalism, and and I

(16:37):
had the resources, I guess to keep me there for
about a year, and I figured, well, if it all
goes pear shaped, I'll be back. And it didn't. I
kind of went from there to to Yugoslavia to Bosnia
in the war.

Speaker 1 (16:50):
Okay, so like covering in those those areas of conflict
like Bosnia and different things. Tell us about your first
expre because you mentioned Neil Davis and yeah, people that correspondence.
It's a dangerous thing. They're in there where the bombs
are going off and the bullets and bullets are flying.
What was did you have to test yourself that you

(17:13):
were comfortable with that environment, because I would imagine some
people I.

Speaker 2 (17:16):
Guess it was a bit of toe dipping. So it
started with when I met a girl in a pub
in London, which is where all good start, this flamehead
Irish girl who was dancing on the table and just
really having a great time, and I was really I
was inamateant, and so I thought i'd chatter up and

(17:37):
started talking to her. She told me that she was
about to go on this pilgrimage, on a Catholic pilgrimage
to a place called Magriagori, which was this town, a
village right in the middle of a place of a
region of Bosnia called hertzig Bosna, which was controlled by
the Croats, and it had become a place of pilgrimage
since the nineteen seventies when a group of young Croats

(18:00):
had seen these visions of the Virgin Mary, and the
place became developed a reputation for medical miracles, for spiritual
insights and so on, and so pilgrim started going and
they kept going all through the war. And so Kathy Haggerty,
the girl that I met, was about to go on
one of these pilgrimages, and I thought it was a

(18:22):
fascinating story. Anyway, she said, well, why don't you come?
And I told the story. I didn't take it seriously,
but I told the story to two friends of mine,
one who worked for the ABC and the other who
worked for the Australian, about this girl had invited me
to go on this trip. And within a couple of
days I got messages from the foreign editors of both saying,
for God's sake, if you're all thinking of going, then

(18:42):
let us know because we're in the market for freelancing.
And I thought, well, it's a no brainer, isn't it.
You know, I've got the story and the clients, and
there's the girl. Why wouldn't you go? So I went.
I did that story, and then I started working at
what I thought was THEES, although I made it to
Sarajevo for a while, and I found out a couple

(19:06):
of things. I found out that I actually was reasonably
good at it. I had the kind of mentality I
guess that helped me to operate in a place like Bosnia.
It didn't freak me out. Yeah, the gun via the
combat didn't freak me out. I was fascinated by the
people that were operating there. I worked very closely with

(19:28):
some of the more established correspondents who were able to
show me how to get around and work and operate
and survive. I didn't spend I spent a few months
in the region, but it was enough to again make
help me understand that actually this was something that I
thought I was capable of and really kind of interested in.

Speaker 1 (19:50):
Yeah, found the passion. So working as a freelancer at
that stage, at what point did you get with the
BBC or writers. What was the I had some events.

Speaker 2 (20:01):
Yeah, I had another trip to South Africa nineteen ninety
four to cover the post election post Aparthei had election
and again for the same clients. And it was after
that that I started thinking about getting some freelance work
for BBC World Service. My plan was to just start
doing some producing work in the office in the newsroom

(20:23):
in London and then find a place out in the
field that was undercovered and go and do that. And
so I figured, rather than send my CV and have
some secretary chuck it in the round file, I'd apply
for a proper job. The job wasn't important, but it
was the application process that mattered. And that way the
management would have to look at my CV and think
of me as a prospective employee. And when I didn't

(20:44):
get the job, I'd say, thanks, I'm also in the
market for freelancing, how about it. So the first job
that came up a way of approaching Yeah, So the
first job that came up was the Carble correspondence job, right, okay,
And I remember looking at it thinking, thank Christ, I'm
not because Carble at that point was in the middle
of civil war.

Speaker 1 (21:03):
There was a front line that was pre that was
mid nineties.

Speaker 2 (21:08):
That that wasn't at the end of nineteen ninety.

Speaker 1 (21:10):
Four, okay, So it was yeah, okay.

Speaker 2 (21:12):
There was a front line running. So the Afghanistan was
being torn apart in the civil war between rival militias
rather hideen factions with a front line running right through
the guts of Carble. The Taliban had just emerged. They
just started to form in Kandahar and the far south
of the country, but they hadn't really spread out of

(21:34):
there to threaten the rest of the country at that point,
and so it was a pretty wild, wild time in Carbo.
In fact, there are a few correspondents who'd spent a
lot of time both in Carble and in in Sarajevo
who judged that Carble was by far and away the
more dangerous of the two places. So anyway, I remember
applying for it and thinking, Thank Christ, I'm not going
to get this thing, and then they offered me the job.

Speaker 1 (22:00):
Might get what you wish for.

Speaker 2 (22:01):
Yeah, you need to be careful about that. I was
kind of flawed and also actually quite scared, but also
felt there is no way, no way that I could
turn this down, pass it down. Yeah, I had to
go and do it.

Speaker 1 (22:16):
What do you We've talked about you going into the
wall zones or conflict theres. What do you see the
role of media in these conflict areas.

Speaker 2 (22:25):
So there are a whole bunch of them. There is
the classic idea of being of writing the first draft
of history of being a witness. At the time, there
were only three foreign correspondents permanently based in Carble. There
was myself for the BBC Reuter's stringer. There was another

(22:46):
a guy who was a staffer for Asian France Press,
the big French news agency, and there was a third
guy called Tim Johnston who worked for Voice of America
and Associated Press, and a bunch of other strings as well.
And we recognized that the three of us really controlled
the world's understanding of Afghanistan and it was a pretty
heavy responsibility. We'd cover some aspect to some human rights abuses.

(23:11):
I remember covering a story of a mass grave that
some people had uncovered, and a few months later my
report appeared pretty much for Bartum in a UN Human
Rights Council inquiry into Afghanistan. So you realize that the
reports that we were doing at that point were having

(23:32):
a very very direct impact on the public's response to Afghanistan,
and I think that was a heavy responsibility. There's also
I think it's a bit of a cliche giving voice
to the voiceless, but there is actually truth to that.
I remember a lot of the Afghans ordinary Afghans, and

(23:52):
that includes some of the Afghan fighters, the militiamen which
it can come to find on the front lines. They
were actually grateful to someone from outside, a journalist who
actually gave a damn about what they were doing, that
was prepared to list sit down and listen to them,
talk to them, hear their stories, and in hearing their
stories and telling their stories, you're giving meaning and significance

(24:14):
to their experience, and that I think is an important
thing to do.

Speaker 1 (24:18):
In important role role in it. Because I know and
I want to speak in more detail later on about
your concerns where media is suppressed and it's not being
reported objectively, like the War on Terror and different things,
weapons of mass destructions issues, issues like that. But from

(24:38):
your personal point of view, you saw a specific role
and an important role that you had had in those environments.

Speaker 2 (24:46):
Yeah, absolutely, you know, it's it was one of those
rare moments where as I said, I felt that the
reporting we were doing actually did have an impact both
internally and externally, and I felt that that idea of
the first draft of history, accurate accounting of what was

(25:08):
taking place as a record was really was really crucial.

Speaker 1 (25:15):
You said that the people on the ground appreciated people
giving an objective view of what was going on. Me
But later at certain stages and certainly now media journalists
in those environments have been targeted because they've upset someone,
or that they're seen not to be objective, or they're

(25:35):
on one side or the other. What's your what's your
experience with that? And so under a take on.

Speaker 2 (25:41):
That, So I think back in let's let's it's a
really interesting thought that because things haven't always been the
way that you've just described. But let's go back to
nineteen ninety five, pre nine to eleven, we crossed the
front lanes all the time, and it was in nineteen
ninety five that the Talibhan came through and in fact
started laying siege to Carble. Now I would cross the

(26:03):
front lines whenever I could. Often the front lines would stabilize,
things would settle down, and you'd end up with a
few civilian traders so tentatively making their way across the lines.

Speaker 1 (26:13):
So from one opposing force to the other closing force.

Speaker 2 (26:17):
Yeah, with impunity, we were able to do it. And
part of that was because I felt that I not
only did I have a response a professional ethical responsibility
to do that, to make sure that we covered all
of the parties, all of the side to the conflict,
but also I thought it was a matter of my
own safety. I wanted because I knew it was a
clean shaven white guy operating in a country full of hairy,

(26:38):
brown skin gloves standing there, I'd stand out. Sooner or later,
someone on the other side of the front lines would
pick me out in their rifle sights, and I didn't
want them to feel justified in pulling the trigger. I
didn't want them to see me as as a voice
for the enemy, and so it was important for me
to be seen to be crossing the lines, to be
seen to be talking to everyone, to exercise that neutrality

(26:59):
and independence. But what happened with nine to eleven was
that it created a war of ISAMs, a war of ideas.
The War on Terror became a war over ideas, and
that was a fundamental shift in the nature of conflict.
A lot of in most of the pre nine to
eleven conflicts, there wars other stuff of the land or ethnicity,

(27:24):
political power, that kind of thing. But the War on
Terror created a war of ideas, and in that war
of ideas, the space where ideas are transmitted, in other words,
the media quite literally becomes a part of the battlefield.
So journalists to target it because of the way in
which they're suddenly seen as agents of ideas that various

(27:44):
governments are hostile to. Now, if we go fast forward
to nine to eleven and post nine to eleven, the
war in Afghanistan suddenly crossing the lines was a hostile act.
Al Jazeera got the first interview with the one person
who had weighed that pretty much every journalist would have
given their right arm for, and that was with the
sum had been loud Now, again, I don't agree with

(28:06):
the Summer Bin Loudin's ideology, but I think I would
argue that it's important for us to hear from him,
to have his have an interview with him, to understand
his ideology, to understand where he's coming from, so that
we can tackle that from a place of knowledge and understanding.
Ignorance doesn't help anybody. And yet Al Jazeera was condemned

(28:27):
and the US dropped a bomb on Al Jazeera's bureau
and Carble for advocating what a terrorist ideology.

Speaker 1 (28:34):
Well, and I think it started after September eleventh with
President Bush came out with his statement, I think you're
even with us, or you're with the terrorists, which.

Speaker 2 (28:45):
Is exactly which exactly, and that made it a binary choice. Yeah. Yeah,
you're either on one side of this line or the other.
And if you if you if you go and stick
a microphone under someone knows who we considered to be
a terrorist, then you're with them. Yeah, and therefore you're
against us. And I think that's a very very dangerous concept.

Speaker 1 (29:03):
And if you're happy to talk about it, one of
your friends in Somalia was targeted and yeah, murdered and
reasonable to suggest that targeted because of the role that
she had as a journalist. Do you want to talk
us through that? Yeah, that's deeply personal for you.

Speaker 2 (29:23):
It's a very very difficult time for me. But yes,
I mean, I think what happened to Kate Payton, my producer,
is exactly an example of the kind of threats that
journals were facing in that post nine to eleven world.
So Kate and I were working together covering Somalia, which

(29:46):
was really a byword for anarchy at that point. This
is in two thousand and five. The government had been
such as it was, had been in exile in Nairoba
for many many years, and Somalia, like Afghanistan before, was
being torn apart by rival clan militias, but things that
stabilized to the point where the government was considering going

(30:08):
back to Mogot Issue to reclaim its seat of government,
and so we felt that it was important to produce
a series of features that would help our audience understand
what Somalia had become. We thought we were that we
knew it was dangerous. We went in with eight armed

(30:30):
bodyguards and a technical with a fifty calival machine gun
mounted on the back. We had battlefield first aid kits,
we had battlefield body armor, what was necessary to get
the round what we felt was necessary. But at the
same time we knew that westerners aid workers had not
been targeted up to for almost ten years, and that

(30:50):
we felt that our understanding, all the intelligence that we
had was that foreigners weren't participants in this conflict, that
it was a battle between clan militias rather outsiders. But
at the time a group had emerged called the Islamic
Courts Union, and they'd started making very hostile noises, very
anti West noises. We just arrived in Mogot Issue and

(31:17):
we had a free afternoon. We went to we got
some briefings from some other journalists who'd been who had
also been there to cover the arrival of a government
delegation that had just come to try and work out
how to set up the logistics for the full government's return.
And so we thought, we'll just go around to visit
their hotel and see what they're what's happening there, and

(31:39):
see if there's anyone to talk to. We went to
the hotel. We couldn't park inside the compound. We're you're
supposed to park off the street, but the whole street
was filled with bodyguards and government and technicals and so on,
including our bodyguards, and so we thought, look that it's
reasonably safe parked right outside the gate. It was literally
only about ten fifteen meters into the compound. So he

(32:03):
walked in, had a few meetings, chatted. There wasn't anyone
really worthwhile talking to, so we decided to go and
as we walked out, I stood on the curb side
of the car and Kate walked around to the street side.
We called for the driver to open up and our
bodyguards to mount up, and as we were waiting, there

(32:26):
was a single crack. Everyone dropped to the dropped to
the to the deck. There was a bit of shouting,
some gunning of engines and so on. I thought it
was a bit odd. I didn't know where the shot
had came from had come from, but there was no
other gunfire. So I stood up and saw Kate slumped
across the back of the vehicle, and I went round

(32:46):
to her, and as I did, she put her head
against my chest and I rubbed her back and just
to say that it's okay. It was just you know,
I know, you've got a fright. I didn't realize you'd
been hit until my hand came up with blood, and
so we rushed at the hospital and she went into surgery,
but she never survived that. She didn't make it out that.

Speaker 1 (33:08):
I can only imagine what she went through, but what
you went through it in doing your job.

Speaker 2 (33:15):
It was an incredibly tough thing to experience. But we
also realized I learned later that we as far as
we can tell, it was a case of mistake and
identity in that another journalist, a female reporter, and the

(33:36):
mouth cameraman a photographer, had interviewed the head of the
Islamic Courts Union and one of his aides, who was
a particularly hardcore radical guy, was offended by the interview
and ordered a hit on her. They left without incident,
But it seems likely that we were targeted, or that

(34:01):
the order went out to target a white female journalist
and a male companion, and we fitted that description. So
it was it seems a targeted hit on a journalist
for the work that they were doing. It's just that
it wasn't supposed to be us.

Speaker 1 (34:16):
When you've been involved in an incident like that, did
that make you question whether this is what you want
to do?

Speaker 2 (34:23):
No, it made me more bloody minded about Look I questioned,
I suppose I questioned my own, our own decision making.
I questioned the processes that we went through, but I
never really questioned the value of the importance of what

(34:43):
we were doing. We knew that it was dangerous. Neither
of us were naive. We both worked in combat zones,
and conflict zones were as I said, we were carrying
all of the equipment that you'd need to deal with
the hostile environment like that. We weren't. We weren't naive,

(35:04):
and we both lost colleagues, so we knew it was dank.

Speaker 1 (35:07):
So that that was when I say, accepted understood consequences.

Speaker 2 (35:11):
Of Yeah, it was understood. Now, this is not in
any way to diminish what happened to Kate or the
impact that it had on me. But I also felt
I felt like, screw you.

Speaker 1 (35:27):
Yeah, you know you.

Speaker 2 (35:28):
You you can't. You can't shut us down. You will
not silence us. And that's why I went back five
years later to do another film about Somalia, about the
crisis in Somalia, that also covered what had happened to Kate.

Speaker 1 (35:41):
Okay, Kate's one example, There's been many. Another one that
there was no ifs or butts about it was James Foley,
a journalist that was abducted and ended up held hostage,
and it was clear who's a journalist that was known
and he was to capitate it. That is obviously saying well,

(36:03):
this is what we're going to do this And what
with a situation happened to James? What did that do
to the broader community of war correspondence.

Speaker 2 (36:13):
I think I think it's it's said very very clearly
that Islamists or were journalists as the enemy. What James
was doing was trying to understand what was happening in
Islamic state controlled areas of Syria and Islamic state would

(36:34):
brook no nobody that that questioned or challenged the ideology
that they were perpetuating, that they were that they were
using to exercise control over their areas. And that's that's
the fundamental point here, Garry. It's it's the way in
which both governments and Islamist extremists have come to regard

(36:55):
journalism as the enemy they've come to regard in this
back of ideas. The people that interrogate ideas, that transmit ideas,
that try to understand ideas, those are the people that
we need to get rid of. And as I said,
it's not just it's not just those extremists. Governments the
world come to you.

Speaker 1 (37:17):
I'm delving into this because in part it plays a
role in what happened to you with your imprisonment. That
might be from a regime or the terrorist group or whatever,
but it was from a government body.

Speaker 2 (37:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (37:28):
Absolutely, And so if you're looking at it, we can't
say it's a one way straight that works both ways.
Our Jazeera you mentioned that, when did you start working
for them? And just give us a history of Our
Jazeera because we watch it over here and they're sort
of a disconnect. But there's a perception that they're aligned
with the Islamic states more so than the Western countries.

Speaker 2 (37:52):
Yeah, I would never have worked for them if they
were alone with Islamists.

Speaker 1 (37:56):
Well that's where I find their history quite interesting, if
you could just it's fascinating.

Speaker 2 (38:01):
So the BBC World Service produced a BBC Arabic language
news service for the Arabic world, and they survived. It
lasted for a few years until the funding from Saudi's
finally was pulled and the Qataris saw the extraordinary influence

(38:25):
that World Service that the Arabic Service had for on
the region and the soft power, the soft influence that
it gave the UK in the region, and they recognized
that the Arabic speaking world had lost something when when
the BBC closed down its Arabic service. So they basically

(38:45):
hired a lot of those BBC journalists to set up
Al Jazeera Arabic, which became the only serious news news
service that was interrogating all of those Arabic language communities
with real independence and integrity. Because even I think I

(39:07):
think of it as there as a bit of window dressing,
to be honest, if you watch our deasier English, what
you'll see is an organization that champions the underdog, that's
very liberal in its approach to human rights, to democracy,
freedom of speech and so on, which is patently frankly
everything that Katara is not, you know. But from a

(39:27):
journalist's perspective, I didn't mind. I didn't mind that as
long as they didn't mess with my journalism. As long
as I was able to have the editorial independence that
I needed to do my job, I was comfortable with that,
and so I joined our de Zerra end of twenty
ten covering East Africa, and it was extraordinary. They had

(39:50):
the resources to and the interest in covering all sorts
of stories that I would never have been able to
do for the BBC because it was interesting, because it
was I thought, editorially sound, even if it wasn't necessarily
quite as sexy as as in the way that the
BBC needed to see those stories or directly connected to
the British audiences. Just to be very clear on this,

(40:13):
by the way, very there is a perspective right in
the same way that if you're sitting in London reporting
the world or editing your news packages, your news stories
and news programs, you'll have an anglocentric view of the world.
That's just how it is because geographically, culturally, politically, where

(40:34):
you are influencers, how you understand relationships, and how you
report there is no make no mistake. By sitting in
Doha and reporting the world, you're going to have a
view of the world that's colored by that geographic position,
by that cultural and political environment that you're operating in.
But that doesn't mean that they are pro Islamist. It

(40:56):
also does mean too, that they've got networks within these
world that gives an access that other people would never
have had, and they certainly exploited that.

Speaker 1 (41:04):
Twenty ten you started working with Al Jazir, the leading
up to your arrest in Cairo. That was twenty and thirteen.
Correct me if I'm wrong, But it was just a
tempor You were leaving someone over over a break, as
simple as that sounds, but that's how you found yourself

(41:25):
in Kira.

Speaker 2 (41:26):
Yeah. I hadn't worked in I hadn't covered Egypt before.
I didn't know the place very well. My base was Nairobi,
and Al Jazeera called and said, listen, do you mind
just covering the bureau for a couple of weeks over
the Christmas New Year period. We're a bit light staffed.
Just need you to tread water, keep the stories ticking over,
would you mind? Of course I didn't mind. You know,

(41:46):
I was fascinated by what was taking place in Cairo
and Egypt at the time and.

Speaker 1 (41:50):
What talks through what was happening at the time there.

Speaker 2 (41:54):
So just to one o'clock back a little bit back
in twenty eleven, we saw the Spring uprising hostin will Barrack,
the long standing autocrat was forced from power with that
popular uprising, and the following year, middle of twenty twelve,
we saw the first democratic elections in Egypt's history. Now,
the Muslim Brotherhood won those elections. Moment Morsey became the president,

(42:16):
the leader of the Brotherhood, and that was unexpected. There
was a product of the political system at the time,
but indisputably the Brotherhood won. Middle of twenty thirteen, like
so many governments, so many revolutionary movements, they really make
crap governments. And there was a lot of discontent in
the street. It's a lot of protests some of the

(42:38):
more conservative policies. But by the by the middle of
twenty thirteen, when we saw those street protests, the military
stepped up and said listen, we're a democracy. Now you've
lost clearly lost the confidence of the people, and you've
got to stand aside, and he's a gun to You
had to make sure that you'd do it. It was
a coup in other words. And so by the time
that I arrived, there were a lot of a lot

(42:59):
of violent protests in the streets between and clashes between
supporters of the of the Brotherhood and supporters of the
military installed regime.

Speaker 1 (43:11):
And you your role there was to cover it, got
to the location, gave the site, and cover the demonstrations
and what was going on, and.

Speaker 2 (43:19):
To cover some of the political changes that were that
were that were happening. The interim administration, the military installed
administration was redrafting the constitution, for example, and that make
some changes. You know. We'd pick up the phone and
call the opposition, which was the Brotherhood, the party that
was last in power, to find out their response, and
then you'd go and speak to a political analyst to

(43:40):
make sense of it all.

Speaker 1 (43:41):
It was. It was vanilla journalists, very similar what you're
do in any democracy, just covering the different opinions. So
there was nothing that you were doing in the short
time you were there that you thought I'm pushing it here.

Speaker 2 (43:52):
Or no, in fact I was. You know, as a journalist,
when you when you get the better you know a story,
the more you start to understand the edges, you understand
how far you can push things before you're going to
get some kind of blowback, and you can take calculated
decisions about just how much you prepared to publish and broadcast.
Because I didn't know that with the Egypt I was

(44:14):
playing with a very very straight bat, and we were
very scrupulous about being factually accurate too. I had two
local guys, two local producers that knew and understood the
story inside and out, that were very very careful to
keep me on the straight and narrow when it came
to the fact So I was pretty confident that we
weren't doing anything that was controversial, that it was all
very very straightforward.

Speaker 1 (44:36):
Okay, So when did when that either misassumption or not
the misassumption that's what you were doing. But when did
that unravel?

Speaker 2 (44:46):
So December twenty eighth, twenty thirteen, I was about to
go out for dinner with a friend of mine, a
BBC correspondent who was also in town over that period,
who I hadn't seen for a while, and I was
forward to catching up. I was getting dressed when there
was a knock on the door. I didn't think too

(45:08):
much of it. If anyone ever wanted to speak to me,
they'd use the phone. But you know, there was a
rather rather more urgent knock soon after that, a lot
more forceful. I remember cracking the door open, and as
I did, it was flung open as if there was
a powerful spring behind it. Yeah, and the room was
filled with I had ten guys. I still don't I

(45:31):
still don't know.

Speaker 1 (45:31):
I'm even comprehending what was going on.

Speaker 2 (45:35):
No, they barred their way in, they moved. They weren't
playing clothes, so that I didn't know initially if they
were cops or who they were. But they moved with
a professionalism that suggested that these guys weren't just a
bunch of thugs that were raiding.

Speaker 1 (45:51):
Had some purpose.

Speaker 2 (45:52):
They had purpose and discipline and leadership. There was one
guy who was very clearly in charge.

Speaker 1 (45:57):
And what did they What did they say to you?

Speaker 2 (46:00):
What? Oh? They just demanded to see that demanded I
open up the safe. They demanded that I basically they
ransacked the place. They didn't ask me too many questions
at that point, and just I wanted to see that
they had an arrest warrant, what was going on on
a search warrant. They asked me if I spoke or

(46:21):
if I could read Arabic, and of course I couldn't,
so they shrugged and said, well, there's not much point
in showing you.

Speaker 1 (46:26):
What we've got, and they had to make any phone
calls or.

Speaker 2 (46:31):
No phone calls, no no communication whatsoever. We were taking
down into another room in the hotel that had been
commandeered by the police, and there was my other colleague,
Mouhammad Fami, who was a producer, who had also been
detained in another from another room at the hotel that
we were using as an office. And then when they

(46:55):
started asking his questions, you know what we were doing
in the hotel, whether we had licenses for the question
and why we were you know, why we were using
while we were working for Al Jazeera.

Speaker 1 (47:04):
I looked at the questions that sounded like you had reasonable,
reasonable answers for them. Yeah, so I'm looking. I've got
some of them down here because I'm thinking, Okay, I'm
trying to be objective. I'm trying to look from their
point of view. But there these are the questions they've
asked you. Why are you're hiding in the Marriott Hotel,
What are you doing with the Muslim Brotherhood, Why don't

(47:26):
you have press accreditation? Where is your license to operate
this equipment? Why are you're working for Al Jazeera? All
of which you've got reasonable answers for.

Speaker 2 (47:36):
Yeah, there's there's nothing sinister about any of that stuff.
There didn't seem to be any agenda, which is also
part of the reason why I thought, look, this is
going to be over fairly quickly. There are good answers
to all of these questions. Younsidered or later they'd realize
that that someone had screwed up, or that you know,
that overstepped the mark, or you know, they'd rattle the

(47:57):
cage and we'd be allowed to go home.

Speaker 1 (48:00):
But that definitely wasn't the case. So where were you taken?
After the sort of informal question.

Speaker 2 (48:08):
So we were taken into a police cell, horribly crowded,
overcrowded place with I think they're about eight guys in
that cell, which is nothing compared to the following night,
where there was sixteen guys in a in a two
meter square box.

Speaker 1 (48:24):
To describe that, because I've seen people when they've been arrested,
and it's intimidating when you're in your own country and
you know what you've been arrested for. You're in a
foreign country, but you've got a worldview and you're well traveled,
but still that unknown and then being taken to a
detention center, prison or whatever and put in a cell
with that many people, What was going through your mind?

Speaker 2 (48:46):
Yeah, that was pretty scary. I was so the second
sell in particular, so fammy and I were together in
the first cell and we had the night there in
that box that it was very, very tight. We were
like literally like sardines.

Speaker 1 (49:04):
You know.

Speaker 2 (49:04):
You couldn't you just lying down. You all had to
roll over together. You couldn't. You had to lie on
the same side. You had to coordinate movements. But the
following night was even worse. Family went was taken to
a different prison. I was taken into it, this police cell.
It was about eight foot square, as I said, to meet,
a square no reading, no, no furniture, no you know,

(49:28):
just a leaky tap and leaky sink in one corner
tap and a bother stinky squat toilet and the other
and the door, and that was it. And in that
concrete box there were sixteen.

Speaker 1 (49:40):
Guys eighty eight.

Speaker 2 (49:41):
Yeah, it was. It was impossibly cramped, and some of
the guys had been in that cell for the better
part of six months and they were quite literally losing
their minds. The kind of psychological pressure of confinement, of
that of that type of confinement is immense, and I
realized then that this was getting pretty serious. There were

(50:04):
some students in there who had also been a lot
of the guys had been picked up in the sweeps
that the military had been doing looking for people who
were suspected of being wasn't Brotherhood sympathizers, but we you know,
And so I had a sun inkling of what was
going on, but didn't know a great deal about it
until the next day when we were taken to the

(50:26):
National Intelligence Director for interrogation. And that's really when I
learned the charges that we were facing.

Speaker 1 (50:33):
And did you have your employer our JASEA were zero?
Were they informed or the Australian Consulate.

Speaker 2 (50:40):
They were yes. So the Australian consul, the Australian Embassy center,
a consular official to the National Intelligence Director at the
next day, so Al Jazeera was obviously aware. I had
no idea what they knew. I had no idea how
much information they had or what they were doing. All
I knew was a to the official had been alerted.

(51:02):
That was a pretty difficult conversation just because it was
a limit to what they could actually tell you.

Speaker 1 (51:07):
I've heard that from quite a little group of colleagues
and other people that have been arrested in foreign lands.
It's you think, Okay, it's all going to be sorted
out now, and they basically walk in and go, we
can inform your family and not much not much else.

Speaker 2 (51:24):
Yeah. Yeah, And to be fair to the constant the individuals,
because I think it's pretty difficult for them too, because
they'd love to help them. A lot of the time
that you know, they're kind of rolling their eyes because
most of the people that they're having to deal with,
they're Aussies who've I don't know've gotten themselves drunken and
crashed a motorbike into someone's car or done something stupid,

(51:45):
you know, gotten broken, maybe shoplifted some food or done
something like that, you know, And so it's really difficult
in those circumstances. But even in cases like mine and
Sean's and chang Lais and others. Is a domestic legal
process that you're stuck in. And apart from monitoring and

(52:05):
observing what you're going through, and apart from telling your
own family what's happened and perhaps giving you a list
of English speaking lawyers, there's nothing really that they can
actively do. They can't directly intervene, certainly not without significant
political and diplomatic weight behind them, which we didn't have
at that point.

Speaker 1 (52:25):
So charge is how long can they hold you? Could
you even find out.

Speaker 2 (52:29):
That or was it?

Speaker 1 (52:30):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (52:31):
So there was a kind of six week process. It
could be held for six weeks for questioning before you
had to go before a magistrate and have the case
reviewed and they would either throw it out and release
you or the charges the tension period would be renewed.
And so yeah, you kind of stuck within that interrogation process.

Speaker 1 (52:53):
Where is like and where are your house? Have you
been moved from the eight by eight?

Speaker 2 (52:58):
Yeah? I was moved from that cell to a place
called Limentura, which was the political wing of one of
the political wings of the Torah prison complex, and I
was placed in solitary confinement but also learned through some
of my neighboring the inmates in the wing who would
come past the outside of the door and speak through

(53:20):
the door, whispered through the door when there were no
guards around, and tell me what was going on. And
they said that I was in Limentura alongside a lot
of the leaders of the of the Arab Spring uprising,
the pro democracy activists, writers, poets, activists, lawyers, trade unionists,

(53:40):
all sorts of sort of civil society actors, I guess
is the way that you might describe them, who were
all there on terrorism charges and espionage charges and so on.
But it was in I was in solitary confinement. So
you know, that's a that's a that's a pretty tough
thing to.

Speaker 1 (53:58):
Us through that. When you say so litry confinement, what
what did that involve?

Speaker 2 (54:03):
Well? Nothing, no.

Speaker 1 (54:05):
Question, dumb question answer.

Speaker 2 (54:11):
You stuck, Yeah, exactly. No, really material you've got you
know you've got no, you've got to you've got to
look after your own mind. I mean, one of the
things I remember, but it was pieces of advice that
I had from from one of the other inmates, from
an extraordinary guy called who said to me that at
one point when I was told him that I was

(54:32):
really struggling. In one of these conversations through the through
the door, I told him, I'm really struggling. I I've
got because the thing that happens in solitary is the
absence of anything else to do with your mind. You
start to play the movie of your life on the
walls of the cell, and I remember previous relationships, you know,
the people, previous exes that I'd let down, Kate's murder,

(54:56):
all of that stuff was going through my mind, and
you know, starting to think, well, because I couldn't see
any connection between the reality of the form, the ordinary
journalism that we've done, and the ridiculous terrorism charges that
we were facing, I started to think, well, maybe this
is the universe, right, this is this is this just can't.

Speaker 1 (55:13):
That's the way the way your mind plays.

Speaker 2 (55:16):
And I was saying this to alone. He said to
me that this and you you're you're not going to
make it through this unless you're able to make peace
with yourself, which was perhaps the most important. I think.

Speaker 1 (55:28):
I actually what that relates to. I pulled the quote
out of out of your book and that and I'll
just read that out because I think it speaks very
much to what you're just talking about. There. In the
time I've burned in prison, I've learned a few things
about getting through it, and the biggest lesson is this,
you cannot make it through prison. You will not survive, certainly,

(55:50):
not with your centery intact, unless you are able to
make peace with yourself. And so it's almost like an
enlightening moment, isn't it that.

Speaker 2 (55:57):
It's funny you say that, because remember there was another
moment when I was saying to one of the guys
that came outside the cell that I was really finding
trying confinement really hard. And he said, I think he
misunderstood what I said. And he said to me, like yes,
he said, he said, you know, monks and try for

(56:18):
years to find solitude, to find the space to think.
And he said, it's a blessing, isn't it.

Speaker 1 (56:26):
I always look on the bright side of light.

Speaker 2 (56:28):
Well, yeah, exactly forty days and forty nine. It's the
kind of classic period and the desert of self reflection
and meditation.

Speaker 1 (56:36):
But you had to dig deep. There was things I
think you had delved into Buddhism and meditation previously before
you were locked up, and you found some solace in
those practices and those thoughts.

Speaker 2 (56:48):
Yeah. I actually think it was the Buddhist meditation that
really helped keep my sanity intact. Yeah, the kind of
approach to sitting still and to watching your thoughts almost
as an independent observer, learning to see the thoughts as
a kind of detached witness, not seeing them, not owning

(57:10):
the thoughts, and starting to recognize them as just functions
of what the mind does rather than getting invested in them.
That was a really crucial part of surviving.

Speaker 1 (57:21):
Yeah, it's interesting how you can dig deep in those situations. Also,
you trained as much as you could depending on the environment, mentally,
running like physical, trying to Yeah, absolutely once as well.

Speaker 2 (57:34):
Absolutely you have to. You know, if we go back
to those guys that have been in this in that
tiny eight by eight foot square, cel I realized that
that a lot of them had also lost contact with
the diurnal rhythms, with the daily rhythms. They're up until three,
four five in the morning, joking, laughing, crying and doing
all sorts of hysterical things and sleep through the day.

(57:58):
And I realized what was really important was to hold
on to the dianal rhythm. To get to the end
of the day and be physically tired and sleep at
night and then wake up early and be physically active
during the day. And that meant exercising, whether it was
running on the spot or when we were finally when
I was finally out of the cell, doing laps up

(58:19):
and down the cell corridor, around the exercise yard, always
doing whatever I could to be physically active, so that
come the end of the day, I'd be exhausted and
tired and ready to sleep.

Speaker 1 (58:31):
And I would imagine finding some of the group of purpose.
That's what a lot of mental health experts always if
people are going through tough times or have purpose.

Speaker 2 (58:39):
It's purpose and discipline. But it's also about filling time too.
It's the empty time that does your head in. And
so the exercise was really crucial way of filling the
time in a way that I felt was productive. We'd
also do a lot of creative stuff as well, you know,
deliberately creative time. I'm saying that through this period of

(59:01):
the day, we will now do creative things or play games,
things that would keep us mentally active, you know. I remember.
So sometimes the food would come wrapped in aluminum foil
and you know, but aluminum foil has a shiny side
and a mate side. And I discovered that foil actually
sticks quite well to the prison walls if you smear

(59:23):
it with soap.

Speaker 1 (59:24):
And so that's right, you made that.

Speaker 2 (59:26):
So we made these big murals on the wall.

Speaker 1 (59:29):
Which reflect the light better than you anticipation.

Speaker 2 (59:31):
Yeah, it was beautiful.

Speaker 1 (59:33):
That's the architect from your father coming through.

Speaker 2 (59:38):
But Gary, here's the thing in a way that I
didn't understand suddenly, and it was only afterwards I realized
when I was reflecting back on it. We started to
deal with mind, body, and soul. Yes, those three key
elements I guess of of survival.

Speaker 1 (59:53):
When it's all stripped back, that's what it comes down.

Speaker 2 (59:56):
That's what it comes down to, and you have to
manage all three.

Speaker 1 (59:58):
Yeah. Interesting, Well, I think we might take a break here.
I'm going to leave you in prison at this stage.
I'm sorry. I had to hope to get you out
of prison before the end of part one, but we're
going to have to leave you in prison. When we
come back, we're going to talk about your battle for freedom,
because it was a battle and there were some big
decisions to make, including about going on a hunger strike.
The people that you were arrested with had different strategies

(01:00:20):
on how to get through this or fight the allegations
against you. I also want to ask you what it's
like having a famous Australian actor play you in a
movie about your life and what your thoughts on him,
because I can't get Rake out of my mind. Either
character that Richard Roxburgh played in that Rake or the
last person he actually played was a real life person

(01:00:44):
he played was Roger Rogerson, notorious criminal, and he played
him very well.

Speaker 2 (01:00:48):
So yeah, notoriously corrupt cop exactly.

Speaker 1 (01:00:53):
He's probably more fitting. He's passed away now, but yeah,
so we'll have a bit of fun talking about that.
And I also want to delve into your thoughts on
journalism because that's something you're very passionate about and the
thing the importance of journalism and journalists have been allowed
to tell their stories and the impact that can have.
So we'll do that when we get back to part
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know
The Joe Rogan Experience

The Joe Rogan Experience

The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.