All Episodes

June 8, 2025 • 215 mins

No Agenda Episode 1771 - "Home Depotation"

"Home Depotation"

Executive Producers:

Baronet Sir Dirty Jersey Whore

Anonymous

Ross Johnson

Jason Soderlund

Mike Ruhlin

Associate Executive Producers:

Sir Writer of Words

Linda Lu, Duchess of jobs & writer of resumes

PhD's:

Sir Dirty Jersey Whore

Become a member of the 1772 Club, support the show here

Boost us with with Podcasting 2.0 Certified apps: Podverse - Podfriend Breez Sphinx Podstation - Curiocaster - Fountain

Title Changes

Sir Dirty Jersey Whore > Baronet

Dame Nancy of the Confused. > Baroness

Knights & Dames

Trevor Lohman > Sir Writer of Words

Art By:

End of Show Mixes: Sir Dewcifer - Sir Scovee

Engineering, Stream Management & Wizardry

Mark van Dijk - Systems Master

Ryan Bemrose - Program Director

Back Office Jae Dvorak

Chapters: Dreb Scott

Clip Custodian: Neal Jones

Clip Collectors: Steve Jones & Dave Ackerman

NEW: and soon on Netflix: Animated No Agenda

Sign Up for the newsletter

No Agenda Peerage

ShowNotes Archive of links and Assets (clips etc) 1771.noagendanotes.com

Directory Archive of Shownotes (includes all audio and video assets used) archive.noagendanotes.com

RSS Podcast Feed

Full Summaries in PDF

No Agenda Lite in opus format

Last Modified 06/08/2025 17:08:55
This page created with the FreedomController

Last Modified 06/08/2025 17:08:55 by Freedom Controller  
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Alright, this is the time of the year
to plant.
Adam Currie, John C.
Devorak.
It's Sunday, June 8th, 2025.
This is your award-winning Gitmo Nation Media
Assassination Episode 1771.
This is no agenda.
Cutting through the grudge and broadcasting live from
the heart of the Texas food country.
Right here in FEMA Region Number 6.

(00:20):
In the morning everybody, I'm Adam Currie.
And from Northern Silicon Valley where they've called
out the National Guards.
It's authoritarianism.
I'm John C.
Devorak.
Oh man, it's on the quad!
It's on the quad!
Everybody's on the quad.

(00:41):
Oh no!
Trump calls out the National Guard.
Doing what people asked him to do.
Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop.
We can't have it.
It's authoritarianism.
It is authoritarianism, man.
And the National Guard is standing there like
smoking cigarettes.
They don't know what to do.

(01:01):
They're all standing around.
Nothing's going on.
Standing around.
Everyone else is, they're riding!
No, they burned their old panties and everyone's
live streaming it on Instagram and TikTok.
I have not seen anything really happen.
Well, there's that car on fire.
Oh, a car on fire.
They do that when we win the ball

(01:22):
game.
It's true.
You win a Super Bowl and they put
more cars on fire.
Don't park around the Super Bowl.
Well, I have a couple of clips because
the BBC thinks this is a big deal.
Oh yes, well the BBC would because it's
going to happen in their town soon.
Only for real.
But this is interesting.

(01:43):
This clip is interesting because you know they
want to turn it around and make it
about Trump somehow being Hitler.
Yes, of course.
And so they talk about the event.
They have some woman standing there and LA
is in LA, by the way, for people
out there who don't know where this is
taking place.
And by the way, for people who don't
know what the Quad is, I have YouTube

(02:05):
TV has a four screen multi-view, CNN,
MSNBC, Fox and BBC.
That's the Quad.
And so this woman reports, she's got nothing
to say.
So they bring on, of course, the main
BBC guy.
So he's going to bring an analyst in
to discuss this.

(02:26):
And here we go.
Well, earlier I spoke to Scott Lucas, professor
of US and international politics at University College
Dublin's Clinton Institute.
He's a professor.
He's in Ireland.
And his specialty is Trump derangement syndrome, I'm
presuming.
Well, National Guard is a long established institution.
It dates back to the 17th century when

(02:46):
the U.S. was a British colony.
And that is it was a local, effectively,
militia.
Now, as the U.S. developed as a
country, you, of course, would eventually have the
national military, but the National Guard would be
overseen at state level.
Now, they could be used in two cases.
The federal government could request that the states
deploy them, provide them, say, for example, at

(03:11):
the start of the 21st century in Iraq,
in Afghanistan.
They can also be used in national emergencies.
And I emphasize real national emergencies.
For example, in 1992, as you mentioned, in
the L.A. uprising, after the beating of
Rodney King, they were called out when the
city suffered more than $1 billion in damage.

(03:32):
And they can be deployed when states refuse
to observe the law.
So the federal government in the 1950s under
Dwight Eisenhower called out the National Guard to
make sure that schools could be desegregated in
Arkansas when Governor Falbus refused to do so.
So in very specific situations where there is

(03:53):
an imminent threat, the federal government can override
the states and call out the National Guard.
Hold on a second.
He says two things here.
Let me just get this right, and you've
probably looked this up.
So the president can call out the National
Guard in a situation where the state is
disregarding the law, and that could be a
danger.
And then at the end, he says, but

(04:14):
you know, if it's crazy, then he can
call out the National Guard.
And in this case, I presume legally, President
Trump is called in the National Guard because
the state of California is not cooperating with
ICE to hand over criminals.
So that sounds right.

(04:35):
It sounds like the president is in his
constitutional right.
You're too logical.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I don't work for the BBC.
That's the problem.
So a couple of things he did say
I want to point out because he's going
to be forced to contradict himself.
He says he makes the point of real.
He says real national emergencies, and he uses

(04:56):
the word national real.
That's what he said.
Yeah, it's real.
Rodney King was not a national emergency.
No.
It was a local situation in L.A.
But I suppose you could, you know.
It was not a good time.
It was not a party.
The other one was Fauvist.
There was a black kid.
They wouldn't let him in the school.
So they brought the National Guard and forced

(05:18):
him to go in.
That was during Johnson?
No, this is Eisenhower.
Oh, Eisenhower.
I'm sorry.
Yes, way before.
And so that was hardly a national emergency.
But whatever the case, he's kind of wandering
here.
He's not on the script because he should

(05:38):
have already slammed Trump by now.
So the BBC guy interrupts.
Prompts him.
Hey, you're not doing it right.
Interrupts him and puts him back on track.
And then we get to hear what they're
really trying to tell us.
Here we go.
What do you make of Donald Trump's decision
to do it in this instance?
It's unprecedented.
It's unprecedented for the National Guard to be

(05:59):
called out when you do not have that
imminent threat.
And I need to emphasize, protesters gathered last
night, as you mentioned, outside this detention center
because people are just being swept up.
Many of whom have no criminal records.
And with a threat, they'll just simply be
disappeared, deported without a due process of law.
There were some people who were arrested when

(06:21):
they failed to disperse, but there were a
sum total of two.
Two people who were arrested for assaults on
police officers.
One with a Molotov cocktail.
Do you think that in the literature this
professor has studied, that they speak of sweeping
people up?
Or is that just hyperbole from our professor?
He also used the word disappeared, which is

(06:42):
a left-wing trope.
I'll take it back to that.
Deported without due process of law.
There were some people who were arrested when
they failed to disperse, but there were a
sum total of two.
Two people who were arrested for assaults on
police officers.
One with a Molotov cocktail, allegedly.
So there was no imminent threat here.

(07:03):
This needs to be called out what it
is.
It is a political stunt by the Trump
administration, both as part of that crackdown on
migration, and also to try to expand its
authority at the expense of the states, in
what would some see as being effectively authoritarian.
Oh, there it is.
Oh, very good.
Authoritarian.
Every single one of my British and European

(07:25):
friends, you know what they say?
I can just imagine.
Man, I wish we had a guy like
that here.
That's what they all say.
That's what they all say.
Yeah, there's that element.
That's when it really actually cracks me up.
Yeah, of course.
They won't say it in their own country
for fear of retribution.
And, you know, all the news, all of

(07:47):
it is all swept up, you know, disappeared.
Disappeared is my favorite.
This is political speech.
That's what that is.
And it's kind of baffling.
Well, no, not really, I guess.
It's not baffling.
What am I thinking?
It's not really baffling.

(08:07):
Do you have more?
I have Ice Barbie, who was on the
CBS Face the Nation.
Well, where I want to head toward, starting
with that, is the going toward bringing back
El Brego Garcia.
Yes.
Okay.
Yeah.
Which I have clips for, but I think
Ice Barbie.

(08:29):
I think, well, Ice Barbie is, okay, I
always mix her up with Bondage.
No, no, Ice Barbie is Gnome, Chrissy Gnome.
The dog killer.
Gnome, like Gnome, Alaska.
She's cold.
Yes, the dog killer.
The dog killer.
She has no heart, man.

(08:50):
She's a dog killer.
So thank you to the Jones Brothers Syndicate.
Neil always does throughout the week, and Steve
has everything rolling in the morning, and that's
why I was a little behind.
I was late getting even the clean feed
up for you because I was listening to
the clips that were coming in.
It's pretty cool to have it just before

(09:11):
the show starts.
So this is Margaret, your favorite, your gal,
Margaret Brennan, with the Ice Barbie, Chrissy Gnome.
Well, we are seeing from the president's proclamation
that he can federalize, he says, 2,000
California National Guard forces for 60 days under
Title 10 authorities.
Which units are being deployed?
Are they military, police?

(09:33):
And exactly what are their orders?
Yes, President Trump is putting the safety of
the communities that are being impacted by these
riots and by these protests that have turned
violent.
And he's putting the safety of our law
enforcement officers first.
So these 2,000 National Guard soldiers that
are being engaged today are ones that are
specifically trained for this type of crowd situation

(09:55):
where they'll be with the public and be
able to provide safety around buildings and to
those that are engaged in peaceful protests and
also to our law enforcement officers so they
can continue their daily work.
Okay, that sounds ominous.
This is not good, but we got to
bring in the term federalizing.
Federalizing, it's like the federal government is taking

(10:16):
over the states.
So our CBS team is reporting that the
California National Guard officers are at that Edward
Roybal Center in LA.
This is a plaza with a federal building.
Courtrooms are there, a processing center, a detention
center, a veterans clinic.
Are the soldiers going to remain around the
federal building?
Are you planning to have them go throughout

(10:38):
the city of Los Angeles?
I won't speak specifically to all the locations
where the National Guard soldiers will be deployed
to or where they will be conducting different
operations as far as security concerns.
They're there at the direction of the President
in order to keep peace and allow people
to be able to protest but also to

(10:58):
keep law and order.
That is incredibly important to the President.
By the way, from what I can see,
that's exactly what's happening.
They're standing around.
They're not in a line with their weapons
drawn.
They're just standing around and everybody else is
protesting reasonably peacefully.
They're all live streaming.

(11:19):
This is an influencer event.
He recognizes he was elected to make sure
that every single person in this country was
treated exactly the same and that we would
enforce the laws.
That is what ICE is doing every day
as they're out on our streets and working
to go after bad criminals and people that
have perpetuated violence on these communities.

(11:40):
The gang members we have picked up in
LA because of their hard work.
Our horrible people, assault, drug trafficking, human trafficking,
they are now off of those streets and
they are safer because these ICE operations are
ongoing.
Unfortunately, we've seen some violent protests happen and
that's why these National Guard soldiers are being
utilized to help with some security in some

(12:01):
areas.
Alright, so now we're just going to get
down to it.
Is it because the Los Angeles authorities will
not cooperate with ICE?
Well, the U.S. Attorney in LA told
CBS that LAPD did help.
That's what is shocking to me, Margaret.
Hours later, they waited until we had officers

(12:22):
in dangerous situations, then they responded.
Now, if that was my city and I
was the mayor, I would be sending law
enforcement in there to back up other law
enforcement officers.
That's what America is about.
We have rules and we have laws.
If you don't like the laws, go to
Congress and change them.
Someone should go to Congress and say, change
the laws if we don't like what's happening
in this country.
Do that instead of throwing rocks and throwing

(12:44):
Molotov cocktails and instead of attacking law enforcement
officers.
We're just not going to do that anymore.
This president cares deeply about family members that
want to live in their communities and be
safe.
Back to the question, though, of active duty
troops.
Different from the National Guard.
What is your personal counsel here to the
president?

(13:04):
Because it's you, the Attorney General, and the
Secretary of Defense.
We're going to have a lot of responsibility
here in implementing some of this call to
do this.
Well, let me be clear about something.
ICE and Homeland Security are running these operations
right now.
And the advice and counsel of the Attorney
General, the Department of Defense, are extremely important

(13:24):
to the President of the United States.
And we never discuss our personal conversations and
advice to the President of the United States.
He makes the decisions.
He is the president that sits in that
seat.
And we are all very proud to work
for him.
So I'm grateful for the leadership of Pete
Hegseth and APM Bondi.
And I get the chance to work with
them.
And as ICE does their job today, we're

(13:46):
thankful to have the partnership and the leadership
of President Trump.
Oh, ICE Barbie, you're so boring.
The only thing that really I think is
interesting about this is the masks.
And this is the last clip of that.
Before you play the next clip, what is
Brennan trying to do here?
Did you notice that she tried to pull
in the active duty military?
Because they keep trying to stick Trump.

(14:08):
But he's going to make the military, which
is not the National Guard.
I mean, the National Guard is the military,
but it's a different branch altogether.
Even though it's associated.
They're trying to make it scary.
Like he's turning the military on his own
people like we said he would.
Yeah, exactly.
But it's interesting how she slipped it in.
And Noam slipped past it.

(14:30):
She should have addressed it and chewed her
out for it, which I think Banz would
have done.
Yeah, well, ICE Barbie is cute, but she's
not the best.
I mean, she has kind of a stock
way of talking.
And then to say, oh, I'm excited to
work with AG Barbie.
Yeah, she's not as good as the other
ones in terms of being aggressive.

(14:51):
I mean, Rubio would have done it.
Oh, yeah.
No, they're better.
They're just better.
It's okay.
ICE Barbie is awesome in that role as
ICE Barbie.
Yeah, just put a flag dog killer.
All right, the masks.
This is the part that I thought was
interesting for a certain reason.

(15:11):
President Trump said masks will not be allowed
to be worn at protests.
Who's going to enforce that and how?
And how can you justify it when law
enforcement officials have their faces covered?
Pull their masks down.
You know what I would say is that
the law is going to be enforced.
And what the laws are in this country
is what we are doing.

(15:32):
And our ICE officers and our law enforcement
officers out there that are in these situations
where people have questioned why they have their
faces covered.
It's for the safety of those individuals or
the work that they're doing as far as
protecting their identity so they can continue to
do investigative work.
But are you tasking the National Guard soldiers
with removing masks from protesters?

(15:52):
I mean, are you trying to use them
in that way?
This is such an upside down world.
For four years, the left was saying, wear
a mask, wear a mask, wear a mask.
And I was like, stop wearing your mask.
National Guard soldiers are there to provide security
for operations and to make sure that we
have peaceful protests.
So that's what their work is.
And I won't get more specific on that

(16:13):
just because we never do when it comes
to law enforcement operations.
We're doing the same standard procedures we always
do and have for years in this country
with our National Guard and with our law
enforcement folks that are on the ground working
with these communities.
Now, this is interesting, this mask issue, because
Hakeem Jeffries, who is the...

(16:35):
What is his actual title?
He's the leader of the Democrat Party in
the House, but has a name.
Yeah, he would be the next speaker.
The guy, I've never said this on the
show, but he just seems, looks like...
He looks slow-witted, sounds dumb.
He's a dummy.
Well, here he is talking about the ICE

(16:57):
agents and the whole mask issue.
Every single ICE agent who's engaged in this
aggressive overreach and are trying to hide their
identities from the American people will be unsuccessful
in doing that.
This is America.
This is not the Soviet Union.

(17:18):
We're not behind the Iron Curtain.
This is not the 1930s.
And every single one of them, no matter
what it takes, no matter how long it
takes, will of course be identified.
That, in fact, is the law.
Oh?
And we're going to make sure that the

(17:40):
American people have the transparency necessary to hold
people accountable when they're folks who cross the
line here in America.
That's what's going to happen.
So he is basically threatening to dox the
ICE agents, to out them and let everyone

(18:02):
know who they are so they can be...
And where they live and what their family
looks like.
Let's go back to January 26th of 2021.
Hakeem Jeffries.
Congressman Hakeem Jeffries of New York, chair of
the House Democratic Caucus.
Great to have you on, Congressman.
Just tell me what you know and what
you're willing to say.
Obviously, there's some security concerns here about the
threats this individual directed at family members, yours,

(18:26):
on January 6th.
This is something that unfolded on January 6th,
directed at a family member of mine.
This individual apparently had secured a phone number,
secured an address, made it appear as though
they were prepared to proceed violently either at

(18:50):
the address of my family member and or
my own home address.
He didn't like it when it happened to
him.
So, no, Hakeem Jeffries, don't do that.
Just don't do that.
So then we have the...
There's a number of good gambits going on.
You identified it in the newsletter, and that

(19:11):
is the return of the Maryland husband, the
father from Maryland, the poor guy who got
shipped off to El Salvador.
Oh, well, you got to get the correct
usage down.
Oh, well, I'm sorry.
Did I get it wrong?
Yeah, he was accidentally shipped off or he

(19:36):
was mistakenly shipped off.
Swept up, swept up, swept up.
Well, I have a couple of clips that
kind of developed this, but I want you
to play what you're playing.
No, no, no.
I'm tossing to you.
Back to you.
Oh, okay.
Let's start with the...
We used to do this on the show.
I stopped doing it, but I'm going to
do it again, at least for this show.

(19:57):
This is the rundown.
This is the complete...
It's a two-minute clip, and you don't
have to watch the news.
I've said this before.
You just watch the rundown, and they give
you everything you need to know about today's
news.
And this is from yesterday's ABC News.
Tonight, several developing stories as we come on
the air.

(20:17):
Violent protests as ICE agents take migrants into
custody.
More than 40 million Americans on alert for
severe storms, and Coco Gauff makes history at
the French Open.
First, the news clashes over ICE arrests.
Protests erupting from California to New York as
the Trump administration ramps up its immigration crackdown.
And Kilmar Abrego-Garcia, now back in the

(20:37):
U.S., two months after he was mistakenly,
mistakenly, mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
The charges he's now facing stemming from this
2022 traffic stop, according to DHS, and why
a top prosecutor abruptly resigned over the case.
Dangerous weather impacting millions from the heartland to
the East Coast.
Severe storms firing up with damaging winds and

(21:00):
potential flash floods.
Texas and parts of Arkansas already hit hard.
Our weather team timing it out.
Coco's comeback.
Coco Gauff becomes the first American woman in
a decade to win the French Open.
Just 21 years old, how she came roaring
back to beat the top seed in three
grueling sets.
They say they've captured the alleged ringleader in

(21:21):
a series of high-end burglaries that targets
pro athletes.
Authorities say hundreds of thousands of dollars worth
of items stolen.
How police say the suspect's car led to
his arrest.
Our ABC News exclusive.
Martha Raddatz in Ukraine with President Zelensky.
The Ukrainian leader telling Martha that Russia does
not want to stop the war.

(21:42):
The search for a former army soldier wanted
in the deaths of his three little girls.
Dangerous and possibly armed.
Washington State telling people to lock their doors.
Urgent recall impacting more than a million eggs
in multiple states.
Potentially linked to salmonella.
Travelers why the FAA is cutting the number
of daily flights.

(22:02):
You're going to crash.
One of America's busiest airports.
And the wildly popular Eagle Cam revealing a
major development.
Is Gizmo the Eaglet ready to take flight?
We're all going to die.
Yeah.
I'm tired.
I'm tired from just hearing that.
Yeah.
I know.
It's pretty fatiguing.
But mistakenly, this mistakenly.

(22:23):
Mistakenly.
Everybody's using it.
Mistakenly.
It was a mistake.
Wow.
They are so dumb.
Nobody ever said it was a mistake.
Except one guy in the administration.
He was one of the lawyers from one
of the federal lawyers.
Yeah.
I think we had a clip of that
where he went.
He said it.
And it was like, oh, no.
Bono.
Oh, I didn't mean to say that.
Oops.
And now everyone's picked it up.

(22:44):
Yeah.
So to go from there to the NPR
report on this.
Yeah.
NPR.
Yeah.
This ICE raids.
This must be just full of gems.
Well, it's pretty short.
So it's not full of too many gems.
But it's got the right kind of attitude.
It's when we get to the NPR analysis,

(23:05):
which are the Dems view.
But this play ICE raids.
This is ICE raids SoCal.
ICE raids SoCal.
NPR.
In Southern California for a second straight day.
There are major actions by federal law enforcement
going after people in the country illegally.
Steve Futterman has more.
This is, you know, just clipping today.

(23:27):
All of the terms that the news media
is using.
I mean, people who are.
How about illegal immigrants?
Anything but what you just said, NPR.
Law enforcement going after people in the country
illegally.
Steve Futterman has more.
Agents moved in at another Home Depot.
Some of their focus was on day laborers.

(23:47):
Wow.
That's like shooting fish in a barrel.
Let's go to Home Depot.
See if we can find any illegals.
Oh, please.
Wow.
OK.
That's exactly the right analogy.
How much work are you going to put
in today?
I don't know.
Let's just go to the Home Depot and
pick up a few guys.

(24:08):
Pick some guys up.
Exactly.
You know what it is?
The Californians are pissed because these are the
people who are rebuilding their homes.
And they have to get cheap labor because
the permits cost 50 grand.
That's what's going on.
If you can get a permit, do you
know?
Yes, I do.
Thousands and thousands of homes burnt to the
ground.
The total number of permits, what is it?

(24:29):
Yeah, I think it's like 70 or something.
No, 55.
Yeah, yeah.
No, I actually have a clip somewhere of
it.
Yeah, no, exactly.
It's a joke.
And those 55 cost tens of thousands of
dollars.
So, yeah, you want to go get your
labor at Home Depot.
Steve Futterman has more.
Agents moved in at another Home Depot.

(24:49):
Some of their focus was on day laborers
who often gather outside the store looking for
work.
As word spread on social media of the
raid, protesters showed up.
There were some confrontations.
Objects were thrown at a U.S. Marshals
bus carrying some of those detained.
Agents responded with flashbangs and tear gas.
One of the protesters, Maya Malika, blames President

(25:12):
Trump.
What we're facing right now is Trump's armed
Gestapo.
Because this is the future.
We're just seeing a glimpse of the future
that Trump wants to implement.
The acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons, is
defending the actions here, claiming that some of
the people arrested included dangerous criminals.
That lady, she was on all the European

(25:33):
reports.
She is the, I think, director of a
nonprofit for immigrants' rights.
So, she was everywhere.
So, I'm surprised that NPR didn't pick up
someone else for that.
I guess she was the only one.
Why bother?
You know, there's the easy way or the
hard way.
It's the easy way.

(25:53):
Did they talk to anyone at Home Depot?
Any of the, like a manager?
They can't speak English.
No, they didn't talk to anyone.
No, no, no.
You know, Lowe's doesn't allow that.
Yeah.
Lowe's shoes them off.
No.
Shoes them off.
Go, go, get out.
Go away.
No, Home Depot, we have one around here.

(26:14):
It's during the, in the heyday era, I
think it was like a few number of
years back.
Yeah.
That place was, there was a thousand guys
out there.
Yeah, yeah.
You had to find one guy.
You had to, you could find, if you
wanted to get some work done, you'd find
one guy who spoke really good English, and
he could organize a crew for you.
Yeah.

(26:34):
You do good work.
You sound like you speak from experience.
I'm just saying, this is process.
Something you can always do if you need
a clean up or something.
Okay.
Cheap.
On the cheap.
You know, there are plenty of people here
in Fredericksburg who are here, born here, who
are happy to do it cheap.
They clean up.
They won't come into California, is my understanding.

(26:56):
No, no.
Of course not.
They don't want to live there.
So NPR decides they're going to bring, they're
going to bring that bonehead from Connecticut, the
guy who went to have a margarita with
Brego Garcia back on the show.
That guy.
That guy.
Oh, he's perfect.
He's the perfect guy.
Fantastic.
So he can come in and play his,

(27:17):
oh, well, you know, all we care about
is process and all we, you know, this
is what the Democrats are always accused of.
They're more into process than anything.
And, you know, they got to, you got
to follow the rules and this is all
we cared about.
We don't know if he's guilty or not.
Doesn't matter.
And blah, blah, blah.
But here we go.
This is a four-parter is quite entertaining.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who has been at the

(27:38):
center of an intense political and legal fight
since he was mistakenly mistakenly mistakenly mistakenly deported
to El Salvador in March is back in
the United States.
For months, the Trump administration resisted a Supreme
court order to quote, facilitate his return.
Now Abrego Garcia is back, but in a
Tennessee prison, he's been charged with conspiracy to

(27:59):
transport migrants in the U.S. without legal
status from Texas across the country.
That's according to the federal indictment unsealed Friday.
Senator Chris Van Hollen played a leading role
in the push to return Abrego Garcia to
the U.S. The Democrat represents Maryland where
Abrego Garcia Garcia was living with his family
before he was deported.
Senator Van Hollen joins us now.

(28:21):
Scott.
Good to be with you.
What is your reaction to this news?
He's been returned to the U.S. is
in federal prison.
This is.
Wow.
Did you hear that?
That was an interview that was done a
whole different time, a whole different sound, a
whole different timbre of voice.
That was interesting.
Where Abrego Garcia Garcia was living with his
family before he was deported.
Senator Van Hollen joins us now.

(28:42):
Scott.
Good to be with you.
What is your reaction to this news?
He's been returned to the U.S. is
in federal prison.
This is a victory for the rule of
law and due process.
As you just said, the Trump administration for
months said he would never set foot on
U.S. soil again.
They thumbed their nose at a nine to
zero Supreme Court decision.

(29:02):
I have repeatedly said that this is not
about the man, Abrego Garcia.
It's about his constitutional rights to do process
and that if you trample over his rights,
you threaten the rights of everybody who lives
in the United States.
So finally, his case is back in court
where it should have been all along.

(29:23):
And he will have an opportunity with his
lawyers who he's not had any communication with
to defend himself against these new charges.
I have a question.
So far, this is the, by the way,
have you chewing gum?
Everyone has to have gum.
If you chewing gum, you chewing gum, Billy,
give everybody a piece of the gum or

(29:44):
get the gum out of your mouth.
That's the Democrats.
Um, is there anyone else that, that, uh,
this guy from Connecticut or any other representative
or Senator has gone to bat for that?
They were swept up and disappeared illegally.
Is there any other example that we've heard
of, or is it just the news media

(30:06):
telling us that I don't know of any
other examples.
They have talked about the, the gay hairdresser,
but that kind of got pushed aside because
I don't think the gay hairdresser was true.
If there truly was a gay hairdresser who
got shipped off the, the, the people would
lose their ever loving minds over it.

(30:27):
If it was really true, it would be
perfect.
Trump hates gays.
So I'm just going to say it was
never true.
So it just, you know, that would be
saying, you might, you're probably right.
They're taking away our rights.
That's well, the reason what you just said,
the question you're asking the open ended question
you're asking is not answerable because people are

(30:49):
disappearing.
Oh yeah.
But they have family members here.
They've disappeared too.
Oh, okay.
Okay.
I got it.
Now here's the one, this one I did
a little, I had to look into this
cause I got sick of this.
ABC said the same thing as you're about
to hear in clip two.
Okay.
Have you been able to talk to him
or his legal team?
I have not spoken to him directly.

(31:10):
I have spoken to his wife, Jennifer.
What was her response to all of this?
Well, she's relieved to have him back on
us soil.
Wait a minute.
The wife who he beat is relieved to
have him back on us.
Bull crap.
That's interesting.
She's finally had a chance to talk to
him briefly, which she was unable to do

(31:31):
since he was first taken off the streets
in Maryland and shipped to El Salvador.
And of course, you know, she's working with
the lawyers as to the next steps.
You said before, this isn't about him.
It's about the rule of law.
It's about the process.
What is your response to this indictment and
the details in the indictment allegations that he
transported undocumented immigrants across the country illegally?

(31:54):
Well, my response is what it's been all
along, which is that the Trump administration needs
to put up or shut up in court.
So for months, they made allegations over social
media, which they had not made before the
federal district court judge in Maryland judges in
us, they'd made these claims with respect to

(32:16):
MS 13.
She said that they had put forward no
evidence.
My point all along is this needs to
be dealt with in a court of law.
That's where we convict the guilty.
It's also where people who are charged have
their due process rights respect.
So what's interesting in all this is many,

(32:37):
if not the most targeted are people who
have already been through that process and have
just been let go.
Yeah.
So the court of law thing has already
happened.
It's exactly what you said.
Would you think the NPR guy is going
to ask that?
Well, no, because otherwise all my hairdressers clients

(32:58):
will go crazy.
Okay.
This is the clip that's got the WTF
moment, which I have to discuss.
I mean, there has been critical.
Well, is, am I playing three NPR or
three WTF?
Oh, what?
Well, I have two clips here, two different
lengths.
I have Dems view on Albrego.

(33:18):
Oh, no, it's gotta be three WTF.
That's our three NPR.
It's gotta be clip four.
I like the guy's new name.
Darcia as a great, I mean, there has
been criticism from some camps about the amount
of detail on the 10 page indictment about
the fact that most of this material comes
from unnamed sources.
Do you share that concern?
Or again, is to you the top line.

(33:39):
This is now the formal process that should
have happened from the beginning.
The top line is that this is the
formal process and it should have been in
court from the beginning.
I think the issues you just mentioned will
of course be a subject of debate and
litigation in the court.
We also know that one of the members
of the U S attorney's office, uh, in

(34:01):
Tennessee resigned reportedly in protest, uh, about how
these charges are being brought now.
He resigned in protest reportedly in protest.
Where did that reporting come from?
That he, they resigned in protest.
He has never said he resigned in protest.

(34:21):
His resignation is on LinkedIn.
I've read it.
He quit the day that they indicted, uh,
a Brego Garcia, uh, ABC, it traces back
to ABC claims that he, he, he resigned
in protest.
So I looked up and we have it
in the show notes.
Cause I sent you a, a link to

(34:41):
an article in Tennessee from a local newspaper
where it's suspected because there's a Brego Garcia
situation took place in 2022, three years ago
with it, with the smuggling of, of all
this nine people in the car.
Uh, it's, it's believed that the prosecutor knows
about some hanky panky that was going on

(35:04):
that allowed this illegality to continue.
He quit to get out of the way.
So he doesn't get caught up in what
appears to be an upcoming mess.
Ah, that's interesting.
He didn't quit in any protests and they
can't, no one has gotten a quote from
him saying he quit in protest.
Nobody, ABC made it up.

(35:26):
Hmm.
Uh, Oh, I'm not surprised.
And of course this joker from this Connecticut
dude.
So he, or Maryland, wherever he's from, Connecticut,
the Congressman.
Oh yeah.
He, he of course goes with it.
He says it right there on the, on
the report, uh, as if the guy quit

(35:47):
in protest, because this is, this does match
the, there were people, if you recall, like,
uh, I don't know, six to nine, just
right after Trump got into a bunch of,
uh, uh, federal prosecutors that quit in protest
because they were all short timers and they
were part time.
One of them was only there for a
month and she quit if you recall.
Uh, and so now you can always use
the quit in protest, uh, trope meme, uh,

(36:11):
to make it sound like something actually happened
when it didn't cause somebody made it up.
Okay.
So I had to get that off my
chest, but it's in the show notes.
You know, it's interesting.
Last night, uh, CNN broadcast worldwide.
First time ever exclusive, never been done before.
Uh, with 20 cameras live from Broadway, right?

(36:31):
Yeah.
There was some outrageous number of cameras, 20
cameras.
George, can you imagine being the director?
I, I have to say production wise dynamite.
I watched the whole thing because I'm a
big fan of, uh, of, of the history.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No, I'm a big fan of the great
wide wise.
Yeah.

(36:51):
And there's no coincidence that the Tony's are
coming up.
Yes.
The Choney's.
Yes, of course.
And I think Clooney is nominated.
So it's George Clooney, actually a bunch of
dynamite actors.
Um, and they did, they really did a
good job.
Lighting was good.
It had a, it's about Edward E.
Murrow.
And it's basically the movie.
It's basically the movie.
Yeah.

(37:12):
Um, but it was very well done.
And I, when I'm looking at it, I'm
like, wow, this is pretty good.
a lot of smoking on stage, which of
course was back in the day was, uh,
was true.
What was the name of this product?
Good night and good luck.
Right.
Which is the movie name of the movie.
It was a good movie.
Well, the play was good, but at the
very end, you know, Edward E.

(37:32):
Murrow did this famous speech at some, but
I don't know what it was at the,
you know, basically, uh, you know, a democracy.
If you can, uh, a Republic, if you
can keep it type speech.
And so Clooney's up there at the very
end.
And it's the setting, this scene of him
speaking to this large congregation of people about,

(37:53):
you know, how we can use this medium
for good or for bad.
And then it goes, and then it goes
into this montage going all the way.
So, so it starts off like, you know,
first man on the moon and the Kennedy
assassination.
And then as it speeds up, it moves
all the way up through, you know, Fox
news about COVID election deniers, January six rigged

(38:17):
election.
It was what?
Yeah.
Oh yeah.
None of it was, none of that wasn't
in the movie.
No, of course not.
And then the crowd went wild at the
end.
Of course, you have the bunch of, uh,
elitist, uh, lefties in the audience.
Yeah.
They can spend the $9,200 for it.
Oh, more than that.
I'm sure for this televised version.

(38:37):
And it was every, it was, I was
so happy.
I'm like, this is really good.
You know, like the, I've kind of like
Clooney in general as an actor for some
of the roles he plays, but then that
came, I'm like, what you just, you just
basically left me with a taste of vomit
in my mouth.
Like that's all you could pick from all
the nonsense, all of the garbage that we've

(38:58):
been dealing with since we've been doing this
show, all of them, like right up until
now, what you just said is making stuff
up.
And I was like, Oh man, that's just
too bad.
It's too bad.
I tell you.
So listen to some of the terms the
foreign media is using about president Trump, sweeping,

(39:18):
sweeping up people.
Before you do that, you might as well
wrap this, my clips up.
I'm sorry.
I didn't know you had any more.
Well, the three, the one I said was
four.
Oh, it's four.
I got it.
Finally, you know, we're able to, he's able
to, uh, and his family's able to litigate
these in a court of law rather than

(39:39):
unable to communicate from a, essentially what is
a, a terrible prison and notorious prison in
El Salvador that he was first taken to.
Senator, I want to ask you this.
If all of this ends several steps down
the line with a Brego Garcia, guilty in
federal court and eventually deported to you, is
that still a win for the rule of
law and the constitution?
The answer is yes.

(39:59):
I will be satisfied.
So long as the rule of law applies,
so long as there's no abuse of process.
And again, the overriding issue here is adherence
to the constitution of the United States.
This is not the only case where president
Trump and his administration are flouting the constitution

(40:19):
and due process.
But my bottom line has been in remains
adherence to the constitution of the United States,
because if you put it at risk for
one person, you do jeopardize those rights for
everybody.
Well, he's not wrong about that, but I
don't know if this is not, but he's
wrong.
I don't know if this is the right
case because it's going to look, it's going

(40:41):
to be a lot of egg on people's
faces when it turns out that this guy
was.
Yes.
I think that's what he's been doing.
I think this entire clip that I played
is damage control.
Yes.
Oh, you think it's damage control.
Okay.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Good point.
It's preemptive damage control.
And I think he did a pretty good

(41:02):
job of that.
If you don't realize that he lied about
the, you know, the guy who quit and
protests and all the rest of it.
And he soft peddled the whole thing.
And now he's promoting.
It's not about any, he prefaced the whole
thing saying it's not about the man.
Yeah.
Oh yeah.
Yeah.
Okay.
It's about the process.
Yeah.
Good catch.
Good catch.
Well, so instead of playing you the European

(41:25):
clips and the verbiage they use, um, about,
um, uh, the immigration, you know, it is,
it's not pride month.
It's world pride month.
I hope you've noticed this.
When did that happen?
By the way?
Well, they did a rebranding.
When did that happen?
I'm asking this year, this year, this year
was the first year of world pride month.

(41:47):
I believe so.
Yes, I believe so.
Well, they slipped that one bias.
And of course, you know, just, just by
calling it pride is by itself.
It's just, it's, it's, it's a sin to
be prideful, but that's just me.
So here's France 24 and listen to what

(42:10):
they're saying.
President Trump is doing to the LGBTQ plus
community, which really is only about the teas
because it's very, very small.
And, uh, I have noticed that most of
the world pride month stuff is, is they
do have some of the crazy flags, but
they have mostly trans flags.

(42:30):
Yes.
Kamala is for day.
Damn.
President Trump is for you from campaign ads,
targeting the transgender community to executive orders, banning
them from military service.
So targeting, no, that campaign ad was targeting,
uh, the, the Republican base of Donald Trump.
It wasn't targeted.
Do you mean like they were shooting at

(42:50):
them?
It wasn't targeting them.
It was actually targeting the base.
He wanted to vote for them.
So no, that's incorrect.
From campaign ads, targeting the transgender community to
executive orders, banning them from military service.
Trump has ramped up his attacks, attacks, attacks,
attacks.
No, it's not an attack.
When he had one proclamation about men or

(43:13):
men and women, where's the rest of these
tags?
It's plural.
She is.
That was plural.
Oh, there's many more attacks.
Trump has ramped up his attacks against the
LGBTQ community, going as far as erasing any
mention of them on the white house and
several government agency websites.
Erasing.
This is another important term erasing because somehow
the, the, uh, the narrative has become Trump

(43:41):
wants to erase.
I can hear your wind chimes going crazy,
by the way.
Oh, that's my dog.
I'm sorry.
It's not me.
It's the dog.
Hey Bubba.
It's okay.
What are you doing?
She's itchy.
The dog has wind chimes.
Yes.
The dog, what are you doing?
You're torturing the animal.
Can you imagine what it sounds like to
a dog?

(44:01):
It's her collar.
Um, the, the, the narrative is Trump wants
to erase us erase.
And that with us, that means trans.
It's not about lesbians and gays.
It's about trans for the organizers of world
pride.
The campaign has only increased the celebrations importance
through world pride and all the prides that

(44:22):
are going to take place, not just here
in the United States, but around the world.
Uh, this is the year that we need
to ensure that we remain visible and seen.
So, so folks know, was there an invisibility
problem that we're not recognizing when they got
flags everywhere?
You go, I'm telling you, this is the
whole, we're being erased, which is just not

(44:44):
zero evidence of this.
No, there's no evidence of it emphasized.
There's yes, exactly.
There's no evidence of them being erased.
It's just the narrative.
this is the year that we need to
ensure that we remain visible and seen.
So, so folks know that there's a place
for them, that there are people fighting for
them for the LGBTQ community.

(45:06):
Resistance to Trump's policies is key.
Within the U S a group of transgender
soldiers are challenging the executive order, banning them
in the military in court abroad.
Some are making the difficult decision to skip
the celebration altogether to avoid problems at the
border.
So they, somehow they think they're going to
have problems at the border coming into the

(45:27):
United States because they're trans.
And yes, there I've seen a bunch of
tick tock clips on this and this, the,
uh, they're holding up their passport and it's
the M and they, they, they identify as
a girl and they look like a girl.
They got the, except for the voice.
And, uh, they feel that this is going

(45:48):
to get them thrown in jail or shot.
I don't know what, what they're thinking.
Meanwhile, others privilege showing up.
Visibility is resistance.
When you say that we no longer exist
and then we show up in hundreds of
thousands of numbers, then it defies this narrative

(46:10):
that you have, that we don't exist.
This is, this is it.
We don't exist.
Yes, you do.
Everyone recognizes it.
You know, the funny thing is there's this,
uh, this trans woman, Lynn Alden, Lynn Alden.
And Lynn Alden is a, uh, an economist
and, uh, and talks a lot about Bitcoin
and Bitcoin conferences.

(46:32):
And I had actually asked him when he,
Hey, is that, is that, is Lynn Alden
trans?
Yeah, it's trans.
Nobody cares because Lynn Alden is just acts
like a human being.
Just no one cares.
But when you, when you just talk about
him being erased and no one wants, you
know, Lynn Alden is not erased.
Lynn Alden is one of the most visible
faces in all of Bitcoin.

(46:55):
It's like, why don't you just act like
a human being and a member of society
and then, uh, there's no problem.
Anyway, now we have the orchestra.
This, this is great.
At a patriotic concert before world pride festivities
in Washington, DC, legendary drag queen, Peaches Christ,
paraphrase famous American writer, Mark Twain.

(47:17):
Patriotism means, I'll get this right, loving your
country all of the time and your government
when it deserves it.
The international pride orchestra had originally been in
talks to play the Kennedy center, the most
prestigious venue in the United States.
But those plans were dashed after president Donald

(47:37):
Trump, the ashes dashed.
They were dashed.
They were dashed.
So, uh, June 14th is no King's day.
I thought it was no teeth.
No.
Isn't that 18th?
Isn't that June 18th?
Oh, okay.
It's on a Thursday.
It's a show day.
Oh, good.
Well, it's no King's day.

(47:58):
No King's day.
By the way, I do have a world
pride day clip.
I just noticed.
So don't, don't let me forget.
No King's day is a nationwide day of
defiance from city blocks to small towns, from
courthouse steps to community parks or no Kings
is referring to Trump.
Yes.
We're taking action to reject authoritarianism and show

(48:21):
the world what democracy really looks like.
No, this is what democracy looks like.
No kings.org is the website.
And of course, uh, can't really find who's
behind all of this.
Uh, uh, possibly it's, uh, organized by an
outfit called a 50 51, uh, 50.

(48:45):
So five zero, which refers to a nut
ball.
Now that's 51 50.
Oh, five zero five zero one.
I haven't quite figured that one out yet.
It's an upside down.
It's first and foremost, the movement of, by
and for the people, we are not nationally
incorporated and have no plans to change that.
Uh, but they do have, um, a lot
of, uh, groups that, um, that work with

(49:07):
them.
Uh, no voice unheard build the resistance.
Uh, there's a lot of, it's all socialist
by the way, build the resistance with a
socialist fist.
Um, I can't really find out, you know,
it, it, it seems like there's a bigger
organization behind this.

(49:29):
Uh, but we can, I'm sure there is.
It has to be.
Yeah.
We can lose paying the bills.
So if you look at, um, the, uh,
see a boot, we already got the boot
page.
They have the partners, partners, partners.
If you can find one person, you can
find associations.
So, uh, three 50.org.

(49:50):
Yeah.
Uh, education, healthcare, public services, American humanists association.
Three 50.
Isn't three 50.
That parts per million group of climate change.
Yes.
Yes.
ACLU, the ACLU.
There they are.
Uh, bend the arc Jewish action.
Black voters matter.
Climate Hawks, climate defenders, communications workers of America,

(50:17):
common defense.
I mean, there's a huge page here.
Families over billionaires.
Federal unionist network, federal workers against doge human
rights campaign.
I mean, it's just, it's, but there's a
lot of organizations, big and small.
So anyway, just, yeah, you have to wonder

(50:38):
if they're all there, uh, on purpose.
If there's some of them aren't never agreed
to this, there's always that possibility.
Cause there's so many of these things, very
possible.
You don't know.
You'd have to go try to track down
someone at, uh, one of these operations and
say, would you guys subscribe to this thing?
How much money did you give him?
Cause guy has to be on the mailing

(50:58):
list.
All right.
What's your, um, world pride clip.
Well, it's a little pride little thing.
We just got a little punchline.
I thought it was funny.
He is hosting world pride celebrations, a high
profile series of events, highlighting LGBTQ rights.
This year's world pride comes at a time
when the Trump administration has targeted LGBTQ groups
and people in a wide range of targeted.

(51:19):
They're targeted.
Targeted.
This is NPR.
Targeted.
Targeted.
It's targeting.
It's just, these are these words.
This year's world pride comes at a time
when the Trump administration has targeted LGBTQ groups
and people in a wide range of ways
from barring.
By the way, I don't think it's been
outlawed for gays or lesbians to be in

(51:40):
the military.
Has it?
No, I don't think so.
No, I think it's, that's okay.
Costly trans.
You got to have drugs and to keep
you trans.
It costs a lot of money.
What's the taxpayers money?
Costly trans.
Oh man.
In a wide range of ways, from barring
transgender service members from the armed forces to
stripping gay rights pioneer, Harvey Milk's name from

(52:02):
a Navy ship.
So listen to the targeting.
What are the grievances, the targeting?
Is he killing them?
Is he disappearing them?
Is he erasing them from the, from the
voter rolls?
Is he erasing them from the face of
the earth?
No, the issues are.
In a wide range of ways.
A wide range of ways.

(52:22):
This is it.
Pay attention.
Here are the issues.
Barring transgender service members from the armed forces
to stripping gay rights pioneer, Harvey Milk's name
from a Navy ship.
We took a name off a ship.
This is an outrage.
NPR's Alana Wise was on the scene ahead
of today's big pride parade and joins us
and a heads up.
You'll hear sirens in this piece.
Oh, heads up.
We don't want you to be triggered by

(52:42):
sirens.
Hey Alana.
What was the energy like on the streets
right now?
Yeah.
As you mentioned, this is the first year
that DC is actually hosting world pride, but
it's also DC's 50th anniversary, hosting its own
pride celebrations and people seemed really ready to
celebrate that.
But you know, more than a big party
pride is also a call to action for

(53:04):
the LGBTQ community to fight for their rights.
I happen to speak with someone named Kyla
Mahaney from Virginia about why pride is so
important.
We got to be able to celebrate and
be, and be seen because otherwise we will
be disappeared.
Oh, there you go.
You'll be disappeared.
No, no, this is, this is, and you're

(53:28):
going to be disappeared at them.
Get with it.
People are going to, she said, so you
heard her.
Yeah.
Now I just as a kicker, if you
want an extra little clip here, I have
it.
This is the yacht clip, which should say
talk.
I'm sorry.
Is a bull die.
Oh yes.
This is the one with the, with the
kid in the, in the, in the mall.

(53:49):
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's a good question.
I was misgendered yesterday.
Well, explain what she looks like.
Just so, just so she's, well, if you
don't know what a bull dyke looks like,
she's got a really short haircut.
She's mean looking, but she's pleasant at the
same time.
She is.
I mean, I can know the way to
describe it, but she's a lesbian, a harsh,
harsh looking.
I'm it's like, but if you saw her,

(54:13):
she's basically very Bush.
And she would, if you saw her, you'd
say, there's a lesbian.
By the way, if, if she didn't cut
her hair crop so short, she'd actually be
quite, you know, attractive as a woman.
Wouldn't you say?
I mean, I saw this clip, so.
Oh, wait, sorry.

(54:34):
This is two times.
We only get two of these a show.
Okay.
Sorry.
But you do know the, the interface just
crapped out again.
Oh yeah.
Did you hear what I said?
Yeah, I heard everything.
Okay.
Well, response.
I said, if she, if she didn't have
her hair all chopped up.
Oh, you didn't hear what I said.
No, no, no, I didn't hear what you

(54:54):
said.
Oh, I said she, if you saw her
on the street, you'd say, there's a lesbian.
Right.
But I said, if she didn't crop her
hair all choppy, she would be quite attractive
as a woman.
I think she could.
I think you, I, I, I, I, I,

(55:17):
I, I, I, I, I, I,

(55:38):
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I,

(56:04):
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I,

(56:27):
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,

(57:09):
I, I,

(57:31):
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
I, I, I, I, I, I, I,

(58:05):
I used to do CrossFit literally every day
of the week at 5 a.m., and
that might feel weird to you because when
you think CrossFit, you probably think alt-right,
or not at least alt-right, but people
who are conservative, because over the last, I'd
say, seven years, there's been this shift where
we are aligning fitness, and especially things like

(58:25):
weightlifting and CrossFit in particular, with the right.
It slipped into that pipeline.
Years ago, if you used essential oils, or
you made your own bread, or you had
chickens, people didn't make assumptions about you wanting
to be a trad wife who doesn't vaccinate.
That used to just be its own thing,

(58:47):
similarly to how in the 80s or 90s,
homeschooling wasn't owned really by one predominant religious
group, and one predominant type of person, and
now homeschooling itself has shifted to where if
you're not homeschooling in that way, you have
to actually differentiate that, and you have to

(59:08):
say, we're part of XYZ homeschooling.
There's different brandings now of homeschooling, but now
there's this association of CrossFit is MAGA, homeschooling
is MAGA.
Wanting to have chickens and my own eggs
should not be a red flag of a
political alignment.

(59:29):
Just let me want my own chickens, please.
Yeah, just killing people with this nonsense.
Yeah, it is.
It's true, and I could not believe it.
If you're a Democrat, you can't have a
chicken.
You're MAGA, you're MAGA.
Not to change the subject, and you can
get right back to it, but this egg

(59:49):
thing that just took place, the ridiculous, and
people should go to the FDA, I guess
it's the FDA website, and look at the
number of brands that this one egg provider
with salmonella laced eggs, it's everybody, the old
brand, 365, they have all the packages shown
there.
And we're all going to die?

(01:00:10):
Rallies, not necessarily, no, but what got me...
They all come from one supplier?
One supplier is supplying at least 20 brands
of eggs, which seems to me, why don't
they just have their own damn brand?
There's none of their brand.
So you're ruining the reputation of all these

(01:00:32):
companies, including, oh, the organic operation that runs
out of Whole Foods, oh, 365, whatever it
is, that's one of them, New Laid, which
I always thought was just a big egg
producer.
Wait a minute, wait a minute.
So even the so-called organic eggs all
come from the same chicken poop farm?
Yeah.
Nah.
You know how I got my eggs this
morning?

(01:00:53):
Mike, Mike comes up...
That's what you're supposed to do, you're supposed
to get it, I get eggs from Jay.
Well, Mike came up to me in church,
he says, hey, I put two carton of
eggs under your car, don't drive over them.
That's how I get my eggs.
Well, hopefully you remembered.
Yes, I told Tina, otherwise I might have

(01:01:14):
forgotten.
But yeah, that's how you get your eggs
around here.
You know why?
Mike's got too many eggs.
He does, obviously.
He's got way too many eggs.
He's given you two whole cartons.
Yeah, and the only thing he says, can
you give me the cartons back?
That's all he wants.
Yes, all the egg guys, this is true
of all guys who give eggs away or
even sell eggs out of their backyard.

(01:01:36):
They need those cartons.
So above all miracles, what took place, even
for Fox News, where this is from, all
of a sudden, raw milk is good for
you.
So after years of being one-upped by
plant-based alternatives like oat milk and cashew
cream, real dairy products, especially raw milk, are

(01:01:58):
having a comeback.
They're having a moment.
So talk to us about raw milk, because
Nicole, it's not easy to get raw milk.
Me and Charlie talk about it a lot.
It's easier to get meth than raw milk.
This is a good point.
In America, it's easier to get meth than
raw milk.
That's a great line.
That's a very good line.
Talk about it a lot.

(01:02:19):
It's easier to get meth than raw milk.
He said that his dealer got arrested, his
raw milk dealer.
The reason people started to go away from
animal dairy, you know, cows milk, sheep's milk,
goat milk, is because there were some studies
a couple of decades ago saying, you know
what, there's high fats and there's high cholesterol
potentially in these animal-based dairy products.

(01:02:40):
Well, most of that research has essentially been
determined to be obsolete, and in fact, animal
-based dairy is the best for you, high
in nutrients.
Those proteins are complete.
It's incredibly good for you, great for your
bone, your skin, your entire body.
So like children have always had whole milk.
Now what you're talking about is raw milk.

(01:03:00):
So you know, when you just go to
the grocery store, that's not raw milk.
That's animal dairy, which is great for you,
but there are concerns with that in terms
of hormones, antibiotics, and some of the other
things that come along with it.
The reason you have a hard time getting
raw milk, Rachel, is because it's illegal in
like about 20 of our states, and you
can't even sell it across state lines.
And the reason that it's become illegal is

(01:03:22):
because the government has stepped in, because there
are some concerns with raw milk in terms
of certain bacteria like E.
coli, campylobacter, and some others.
But the reality is, there are safe ways
to have raw milk, raw dairy.
It's just a matter of where you get
it from, just like everything else.
Nutsap is on the outs.
You know, most of the cheese in Europe

(01:03:44):
is made with raw milk.
Yes, of course.
And most of the cheese in the United
States is made with pasteurized milk.
It's extremely rare to find raw milk cheese
made in the United States.
And the cheese in Europe is better.
Now stay with me, because now we're going
to go from raw milk to Operation Stork

(01:04:04):
Speed.
Have you heard of Operation Stork Speed?
Stork like in the baby carrier?
That's the one.
Wait, let me do it.
No, I have not.
Operation Stork Speed!
Welcome back, Democrats on Capitol Hill, pushing back
on HHS Secretary RFK Jr.'s Operation Stork Speed.

(01:04:24):
The FDA wants- Hold on a second.
Stop, stop, stop.
Where did you get this clip?
Fox.
It's funny, they said, welcome back, Democrats.
I know what she's supposed to have said,
she should have had a two-beat pause,
but she didn't.
No, actually, she had the pause.
That's the problem.
She said, welcome back, Democrats.
And then, yeah, she had the pause in

(01:04:45):
the wrong spot, because you know why?
She's a news model reading it from the
prompter.
Welcome back, Democrats.
Welcome back, Democrats.
Scroll up.
Welcome back, Democrats, on Capitol Hill, pushing-
Welcome back, Democrats, on Capitol Hill.
Welcome back, Democrats, on Capitol Hill, pushing back
on HHS Secretary RFK Jr.'s Operation- Literally,

(01:05:07):
she didn't have time to preview the script,
because I'm sure she was doing her hair,
you know, or whatever, and couldn't- I
don't blame her.
I blame the script writer.
I hate to say it.
I blame the teleprompter operator.
The teleprompter operator should have put a comma
or a new line- The teleprompter operator

(01:05:30):
doesn't write the copy.
They just move the copy.
Very few- I don't know any teleprompter
operators that actually wrote teleprompter copy.
They will edit and format all the time.
These days.
Not the old school days, because it was
just paper on a conveyor belt with a
camera above it.
A good teleprompter operator will see this-

(01:05:50):
Well, somebody fucked up, and I don't blame
the reader at all.
She's supposed to read what's put in front
of her, and she did.
Welcome back, Democrats.
No agenda.
Welcome back, Democrats, on Capitol Hill, pushing back
on HHS Secretary RFK Jr.'s Operation Stork Speed.
The FDA is launching the first review of

(01:06:11):
baby formula ingredients in three decades.
They're aiming for more testing for heavy metals
and contaminants, clearer labeling on formula.
20-plus Democratic lawmakers now are telling RFK
Jr. he is essentially killing his own project's
chances.
They say the decision to lay off 20
,000 HHS employees and 3,500 FDA employees,

(01:06:33):
including those who oversaw health and safety research
of infant formula, sets this operation up to
fail.
Here to respond to that is the FDA
commissioner, Dr. Marty McCary.
Doctor, thanks for being with us today.
Great to have you.
Perfect voice on this issue.
What's your response to that criticism from Dems?
Well, for the last 26 years, we've seen

(01:06:55):
really no innovation in baby formula.
So the current system is not working.
The FDA doubled the number of employees here
at the agency since 2007 to today.
So doubling the number of employees has not
fixed the baby formula problem.
The problem is that the government issues a
recipe, and companies must follow that recipe to

(01:07:18):
get baby formula out on the market.
And so for 26 years, we've seen essentially
very few innovative products, almost no changes.
Moms want baby formula without seed oil, without
corn syrup, without added sugar, without arsenic and
lead and other heavy metals.
And so we convened a group of experts
to figure out how we get this right

(01:07:40):
and how we modernize the way we approve
baby formula in the United States.
All right.
So here is, and I have two more
short clips on this because I didn't know
that it contains seed oils and arsenic and
fructose corn syrup.
The exit strategy out of this is going
back to boobs.

(01:08:03):
What happened to that?
What was wrong with breast milk?
I'm asking you a question.
Well, I think they're assuming that, I mean,
I'm assuming that most mothers breastfeed.
Oh, I think you're wrong.
And then they have breast pumps to get
the excessive milk.

(01:08:23):
And then they put that, and that's what
they use for the beer in a bottle.
Yeah, I don't think so.
I'm quite confident that the baby formula lobby
has psyoped everybody into believing you just need
baby formula.
I'm not so sure.
I mean, the last time I saw a
woman breastfeeding was at a No Agenda meetup.

(01:08:48):
You see a lot of breastfeeding in the
San Francisco Bay Area, and that would be
the place you'd think there would be, you
know, I mean, I don't know.
There should be a survey done.
If a woman can breastfeed, there's absolutely no
reason that you would ever use baby formula.
It's not going to be as good as
ever.
Now, Tina is texting me, and I was

(01:09:08):
going to say this.
She says some women can't breastfeed.
They have issues with attaching or producing enough
milk.
Now, I'm not a woman.
You say you had twins, or maybe you
had triplets.
You're not going to be able to handle
it.
In agreement.
But to me, it sounds like the majority
is using formula.
I don't think so.

(01:09:30):
Well, you know what?
Neither of us really know.
No, we don't know.
Neither one of us actually know.
But I do know.
I wouldn't have assumed what you assume.
I would have assumed the opposite.
So somebody, we have to get some stats.
We need an expert.
We need stats.
Call the Archduke of Luna.
Yeah, the Archduke of Luna, lover of American,
lover of boobs.

(01:09:50):
He would be the clearing house.
Yes.
Darling, do you want to come in and
be the expert?
She's blowing up my phone.
Look, I'm not right.
Okay.
There you go.
The expert speaks.
I'm not right.
Well, that would mean I'm right.

(01:10:11):
Yeah, you're right, I guess.
What was that again?
You're right, I guess.
I guess.
Okay.
You are right.
You're correct.
Sir.
So what did we do?
Sir, you are right, sir.
What did we do before baby formula?
Did the children just die of malnutrition?

(01:10:31):
Yes, they just died.
They just died.
You gave them water.
They just died?
They just died.
Or from what I understand, there's a lot
of dark networks who trade baby milk.
Mothers who have excess and they sell it
or they trade it.
Well, it seems to me.
You know what, John?
I have a theory.

(01:10:53):
Okay, in a minute.
You're already right, sir.
No, but I was just going to say,
if you go back in time before baby
formula, which is obviously a mishmash of stuff,
why wouldn't you just give the kid cow's
milk in a bottle?
Well, neither of us know.
Neither of us know.
But I would like to know, before formula,

(01:11:16):
what happened?
I mean, some people are saying wet nurses.
I've heard of that.
Yeah, there's that.
I'm sure that you can.
Now, here you go.
Tina, who should just get on the mic,
actually, is telling me that Saddle Tramp.
Do you remember Saddle Tramp?

(01:11:37):
Saddle Tramp listens to the show.
Yeah, you do.
She's a producer.
Saddle Tramp, she could not produce or could
not attach or whatever, and she made her
own formula with raw milk.
So there's playing into your theory.
I would just like to know, if these
are new issues, what happened?
Why can women no longer provide their milk?

(01:12:01):
You know, so just tell me what happened
back on the prairie, Little House on the
Prairie.
What did Laura Ingalls do?
That's all I want to know.
And I will continue with the atrocity that
is baby formula, which makes me want to
breastfeed.
I'm, like, choking as you're talking.
Full disclosure, doctor, I've got a five-month

(01:12:21):
-old on formula at home.
I do know now a considerable number of
moms who are essentially importing baby formula from
European countries because it is so-called cleaner.
You know, it has less preservatives, less chemicals.
Is that a good thing to be doing
right now?

(01:12:42):
Well, look, our process in terms of our
regulation of baby formula has been frozen in
time.
There have been incredible advances in nutrition science.
We had an expert this week at the—
Do you want your children ingesting nutrition science?
I don't think so.
We had an expert this week at the

(01:13:02):
FDA on our expert panel talk about how
in primate studies, when primates are fed a
certain kind of baby formula, that is, with
a certain kind of seed oil, their visual
acuity was worse on the eye chart.
Seed oil is blinding people.
What?
Seed oil is blinding people.

(01:13:25):
Their visual acuity was worse on the eye
chart.
This is important research, so we've got to
innovate, and that's what we're doing here.
Okay.
What about expeller seed oils?
Expellers?
The whole thing is out of control.
Yeah.
Now, I've had this article— By the way,

(01:13:46):
I'm somewhat in agreement with you because I
think that women of the world, but in
America mostly because we're suckers, have been sold
a bill of goods on this idea of
formula instead of natural breastfeeding.
I know what you're thinking, even though I
got you to agree with me, but I
know exactly what you're thinking because there's been
a movie, a propagandistic promotion by Nestle and

(01:14:11):
others who make the formulas to tell moms,
no, no, no, no, this is better because
it's formulated.
That's why it's called a formula.
Get it?
Yeah.
No, I'm with you.
I'm with you.
That's all I want to know is before
formula—in 1849, go west, young man and lady

(01:14:32):
and family.
What would they do?
If they could not produce breast milk, could
they?
Was it always, hey, no problem, I got
it?
Would they have attachment problems?
Did they not have those problems?
What caused those problems?
This is what Operation Stork should do for
me.
I want to know more about—like they had

(01:14:54):
no problem.
Well, raw milk is great from a cow,
but now you need innovation in baby formula.
So Marty here, Dr. Marty, he seems more
like he's working on behalf of big food
than on behalf of the American people.
If he's on TV, of course.
Yeah.
So I've had this article for the past
three shows.
No one has done a news report on

(01:15:18):
it, which is bothersome.
Ah, you couldn't find a clip.
No, exactly.
I've got a bunch of those backed up,
too.
It's like, where's the clip?
Where's the media?
Why isn't this being covered where somebody's actually
saying something?
Yeah, and so I've been reluctant to talk

(01:15:39):
about this because I don't like spiking the
ball unnecessarily.
And it's not exactly spiking the ball, but
it finally— It's not spiking the ball.
No, not yet.
But it showed up in the New York
Post, so that means eventually Fox News will
do a story on it.
This is about Ozempic.

(01:16:00):
Many male Ozempic users are saying since they
started injecting the weight loss shot, their penises
have grown.
Some say up to one inch.
Oh, brother.
This is like—well, yeah, if you've got a
big fat gut and you shrink, everything's going

(01:16:24):
to look bigger.
That doesn't get affected.
Well, I don't know.
I don't know.
This might be something that maybe you should
experiment with.
Yeah, I don't think so.
I still want to be able to walk,
you know?
No, that's not the line.
The line is big enough.
Well, I did it in my own way.
You just didn't like my punchline.
Yeah, it wasn't as good.

(01:16:44):
You didn't like my punchline.
Okay, now I would just like to for
a moment—oh, by the way, no, I have
one more Big Pharma clip here.
When we're talking about new pandemics and, you
know, the COVID, we've got the M-Beta

(01:17:05):
8128.111 beta pre-release.
You know, just as an aside, my favorite—I
don't have a clip, but it's all over
the place.
Every newsletter, McCullough—by the way, I'm sick and
tired of McCullough and Pinsky going on TV
selling crap.
Yeah, it's a little bothersome, isn't it?

(01:17:27):
It's very bothersome, these guys.
And then they have their websites and they're
selling crap, overpriced ivermectin.
Very, very expensive—yeah, overpriced ivermectin.
Overpriced everything.
You can get it elsewhere cheaper.
Yeah, I agree.
But the latest thing floating around—next means horrible
death.
And next spike.
The new Moderna vaccine means next means horrible

(01:17:49):
in Latin.
It means horrible death in Latin.
Oh, interesting.
Have you seen these?
No, I haven't seen that yet, no.
Oh, you will.
But the funny thing is, if you do
a Latin translation, I mean, if you wanted
to have more fun, next does mean death
in Latin.
Spell that next, N-E-X.

(01:18:10):
N-E-X.
Yeah, next.
Nobody said anything about Nexium, which has been
around for 30 years, but okay.
So next means—but if you use next spike,
which is the name of this vaccine, and
you put that in the Latin generator, it
means don't, which is actually funnier.
Yeah, that is good.
No, the only—this just caught my eye because,

(01:18:34):
like, when you're pushing this, you know, the
next spike and the new pandemic and all
the—then Netflix comes along and has a new
documentary.
Just bothered me.
Native to Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, pangolins
are the only mammals covered in scales.
No, not the pangolin.
This baby pangolin lives at Chicago's Brookfield Zoo,

(01:18:58):
the only place in the U.S. where
visitors can see pangolins up close.
Pangolins are also one of the world's most
trafficked mammals, prized for their meat and scales,
which are used in traditional medicine.
Poaching and deforestation of their natural habitats have
drastically reduced their population, and several pangolin species

(01:19:19):
are now listed as threatened or endangered.
Now a new Netflix documentary is bringing long
-overdue attention to the creatures.
Pangolin Kulu's Journey follows a baby pangolin as
he journeys back to the wild after being
rescued from poachers.
I don't know.
It just doesn't sit well with me.
Like, now all of a sudden the pangolin

(01:19:40):
is some endangered species.
I thought they were running around Asia spreading
COVID all day long.
I guess not.
Pangolins.
Okay.
They are cute.
So, a little bit about Elon and Trump,
which you can say I'm right anytime you

(01:20:01):
want because it became a huge deal during
the show on Thursday.
It became the topic for at least 48
hours nonstop.
Nonstop.
You can say you're right, Adam, anytime.
I was always in agreement with the thesis
that this is bullcrap.

(01:20:23):
You started off by saying it was boring
and no one cares about it.
No, I didn't.
I'm not changing my mind about that.
It is boring.
My presentation was long and uninteresting to you.
It was long.
Okay.
You said it was uninteresting.
No one was talking about it.
I never said no one was talking about

(01:20:43):
it because you had to introduce it.
All you have to say is you're right,
sir.
You're right, sir.
Okay, good.
So, to prove that we both were correct,
that this is a game, this is WWE,
this is something they agreed ahead of time.
The Apprentice and his phony baloney.
He did it in The Apprentice.

(01:21:03):
He created phony feuds.
All of these, all of these things, it's
all completely set.
And by the way, Elon deleted his ex
-post about Trump being in the Epstein files.
Oh, really?
Well, that's, even if it was true and
they had a real fight, that's weak.
I want to interrupt, and somebody pointed this

(01:21:24):
obviosity out that we should have caught too.
If Trump was in the Epstein files, it
would have been revealed during the election cycle.
Oh, the Democrats would have used it.
Instead, they had to make up Russiagate, they
had to make up a Stormy Daniels, whether
it was made up or not.
They went after that.
Of course, these files have been with the

(01:21:45):
FBI since Trump's initial, when did Epstein not
kill himself or did kill himself?
I don't know.
We've already lost track.
Yeah.
Kash Patel, by the way.
I'll get to that in a minute.
So, Mike Johnson goes on ABC and he
screws up.
He screws up.
He gives it away.

(01:22:06):
Well, the president suggested he could cut Musk's
contracts.
Obviously, Musk companies rely heavily on government contracts.
Can he do that?
Is that something he should consider?
Is this Jonathan Karl?
Yes, I think it is Jonathan Karl.
Yeah, he is such a, that guy.
He's your buddy.

(01:22:27):
Oh, no, that's not your buddy.
The other guy's your buddy.
No, no, he's not my buddy.
I never met him.
But listen to what Johnson says.
He gives it away.
Heavily on government contracts.
Can he do that?
Is that something he should consider?
Look, I'm not going to get into the
strategy of what happens with all of that.
I mean, what I'm trying to- The
strategy?
I'm not going to get into the strategy

(01:22:49):
of all of that, what happens?
In what case would you say that when
it's about this feud, so-called feud?
That's a very interesting catch.
I'm not going to get into the strategy
of all that.
Yeah, I wouldn't have caught that.

(01:23:09):
I heard it right away.
I'm like, Johnson- Yeah, the strategy, yeah.
You wouldn't use that word unless there was
something going on.
Exactly.
We rely heavily on government contracts.
Can he do that?
Is that something he should consider?
Look, I'm not going to get into the
strategy of what happens with all of that.
I mean, what I'm trying to do is
make sure that all of this gets resolved

(01:23:31):
quickly.
That we get the one big, beautiful bill
done.
And that hopefully these two titans can reconcile.
I think the president- Here's the other
thing about that, now that you bring it
up.
This stuttering, when is that- This guy
is not a stutterer.
No, it's his tell.
It's his tell.
It's a total tell.
And he's stuttering like a madman because he

(01:23:52):
knows something.
He knows that this was set up as
a strategy for whatever purpose.
And he's nervous.
And he's shaking like a leaf, basically.
That all of this gets resolved quickly.
That we get the one big, beautiful bill
done.
And that hopefully these two titans can reconcile.
I think the president- And do you

(01:24:13):
know how you can- I'm going to
ask the troll room on this.
And the listeners and producers in general.
You know that this is phony.
When John and I have a disagreement.
Just a disagreement.
Sometimes it gets a little heated.
We go back and forth.
Not like we've never gone to bed angry.
But, you know, it can get heated.

(01:24:36):
It used to be really on my side.
People will email, oh, don't do that.
They'll be tweeting, mommy and daddy are fighting.
Because they get uncomfortable by it.
They feel very uncomfortable.
I guarantee you no one felt uncomfortable about
this.
No one felt like there was an actual

(01:24:56):
friendly relationship.
Good friends who've been working together.
That anyone felt like this was so real.
Like, oh, I feel really uncomfortable about this.
I don't think anyone felt that.
That's a good point.
Because I don't see any evidence that anyone
felt that anything was going on.
Other than it being an exaggerated news story.

(01:25:18):
And a back and forth.
It was like a back and forth volley.
Like an exhibition tennis match.
And the ball is going back and forth
and back and forth.
And then with some end point.
I think that this is going to kind
of continue as a fake feud until after
the midterms.
I think a lot of this has to

(01:25:39):
do with the midterms.
And now I'm like Mike Johnson.
Here's the report about President Trump who really
sticks it out there.
In the explosive feud playing out in public
yesterday between Trump and Musk.
The world's richest man warning Trump's tariffs will
cause a recession this year.
It's one of the many allegations Musk made
about Trump.
Including posting on X, without me Trump would

(01:26:01):
have lost the election.
Adding such ingratitude.
Musk also calling for Trump to be impeached.
And accusing Trump of being in the Jeffrey
Epstein files.
Musk providing no evidence to back up that
claim.
ABC's John Karl speaking with Trump on the
phone this morning.
There's been reporting out there that the White
House is working to put together a call.
Between Elon Musk and Donald Trump to broker

(01:26:22):
some kind of peace.
I asked Donald Trump about that.
He said he's not particularly interested in talking
to Elon Musk.
He said Elon wants to talk to him.
He's not ready to talk to Musk.
Who he called a man who has lost
his mind.
Now the little element there that I think

(01:26:42):
is important is the Elon dropping the impeachment
word out there.
Because that has to be in play.
It has to be impressed upon the Republican
voters who never come out for the midterms.
Who just as soon let the whole Congress
slip back to the Democrats.
They have to have it in play that
if the Democrats get Congress.

(01:27:03):
The first thing they're going to do is
impeach Trump again.
Now the thing that was just disappointing.
Is all of the right wing, alt-right,
alternative media.
All the podcasters.
All are saying well this is what it
was all about.
You know and Ben Shapiro.

(01:27:23):
Ben Shapiro says oh you know it was
really because Trump wouldn't accept Elon's suggestion for
NASA administrator.
And there's more.
Like I think Megyn Kelly.
You know it's like come on.
This is stupid.
The fact that Ben Shapiro is falling for
this.
Unless he's been read in on it.

(01:27:44):
That's very possible.
But I don't think so.
Now that's just possible that more than one
of the right wing broadcasters have been read
in.
And just said go along with it.
We'll deal with it later.
It's possible.
We've been.
We never get read in on anything.
I should mention this.
We don't get read in.

(01:28:05):
We don't know anything.
We are just pure analysts.
We don't know nothing.
We don't know nothing.
You can't put anything on us.
You can't put us in a torture rack.
We can't tell you anything.
So this brings me to a portion of
a note that I got from one of
our nights.
Because we've been deconstructing a little bit of

(01:28:28):
the podcast.
Which is how people are getting their media.
Our people are getting their media.
And here's an excerpt from our night's email.
Which I really appreciate you said this.
But I have thoughts.
It has occurred to me to wonder if
moving towards including podcast content in the show
might alienate listeners.

(01:28:49):
In recent months, No Agenda has analyzed clips
from three podcasts that I listen to.
And have highly favorable thoughts about.
And feel loyalty towards.
One aspect of the No Agenda humor is
the disparaging tone used when analyzing media.
This works well for me as a listener.
Because I realize what junk the M5M has

(01:29:09):
become.
And so I enjoy it.
It is uncomfortable to hear someone you admire
and respect go after someone else you admire
and respect in that tone.
So this is important.
Because we have always.
Not that we're always right.
We have always said what we think and

(01:29:30):
we believe.
We're not read in.
We don't know nothing.
We're just analyzing media because we've grown up.
I literally grew up with it.
And you've been in it longer than most
people can remember.
And we have never, never thought, oh, let's
not mention this.
This might piss off our listeners.

(01:29:51):
Which it has.
COVID in the beginning.
People were livid.
COVID in the middle.
People were livid about the menstrual when we
looked at the numbers.
That's not true.
You're full of crap.
You can't read.
Ukraine.
Right away.
Right away.
We said this is a sign up.
Here's how it started.

(01:30:12):
People in Texas were mad at me.
Because people in Texas had Ukraine flags out.
By the way, no longer.
Good for them.
Finally getting a clue.
You know, when we give our view, our
opinion, our historical knowledge, and our research about
Israel.

(01:30:33):
No, we do not believe that Israel controls
the entire U.S. government.
People get pissed off.
Yeah, why do people want the government to
be?
I mean, it's beyond me.
But okay, continue.
I'm sorry.
Well, because people want to make sense of
their world.
And when things happen that they feel doesn't

(01:30:54):
make sense.
It's, you know, and then you've got to
listen.
When you go to the podcasters who are
saying this is true.
And that, you know, and they respect those
podcasters and we say no.
It makes them feel uncomfortable.
Well, let me put it to you this
way.
If you go through an entire No Agenda

(01:31:15):
episode and you haven't felt uncomfortable once.
You should probably consider going somewhere else.
Because you should feel uncomfortable from time to
time.
But what job are we doing?
That's called audience capture.
Which we get accused of all the time.

(01:31:38):
We do?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah, of course.
How does that go?
They're only saying this for the people who
send them money.
Saying what?
For the people who send them money.
Oh, they're not talking against the Jews because
they get all that money.
Oh, the Jews.
It's always about the Jews.
Not often.
It's been other things in the past.

(01:31:59):
Dude, I even saw a donation come in
today.
Here.
I'm going to read it ahead.
Ross Johnson.
Nighting donation.
I haven't donated in years because Adam hated
Elon.
No, because of Adam's Elon hatred.
Obviously, he's been short selling for years.
Adam flips like a fish out of water.
That would be the day.

(01:32:20):
Adam flips like a fish out of water
because of facts on X.
What?
Since when did I flip on Elon?
I've always said the same thing.
All I'm saying is, I don't believe that
Elon and Palantir are all going to take
over the world with their AI.
Grok, like all other AI, is a piece

(01:32:42):
of crap.
Unfortunately, I don't have a clip, but the
story about the 700 Indians posing as AI.
Yeah, I've had this story for four shows.
I almost got to it two weeks ago.
Microsoft invested $1.5 billion down the drain
with these fakes.

(01:33:03):
Yeah, it's too funny.
So you'd send off, like, I want some
code to do this.
And the Indian, the anonymous Indian in the
back, they were all coding it up.
And there was not a single piece of
AI was actually doing it.
Yeah, exactly.
Which brings me to this clip.
Calling to mind an army of robots from
the sci-fi movie I, Robot, leading AI

(01:33:26):
firm Anthropic's CEO, Dario Amadei, warned of a
labor market bloodbath caused by artificial intelligence that
could wipe out half of all entry-level
white-collar jobs within five years.
And there's a little bit of truth in
what he's saying, but there's a lot of
exaggeration, too.
Teeming Silicon Valley author and AI expert Gary
Marcus is skeptical.

(01:33:47):
Entry-level workers probably are the most affected,
but most white-collar jobs aren't going anywhere
that soon.
In a memo shared by Shopify CEO Toby
Lutka in April, he said before asking to
increase headcount, teams must demonstrate why they can't
get what they want done by AI.
Businesses are using AI as an excuse because

(01:34:08):
they want to cut employees, and so they
use it as a cover.
Mounting evidence of a phenomenon that's hard to
track, of jobs quietly disappearing because of AI.
By the way, did you see that story
about the 700 anonymous Indians masking as an
AI company?
Was that really big on CNBC?
Were they really, like, all over that like

(01:34:29):
hawks?
Like, wow, I can't believe Microsoft got scammed
on this one.
I don't think so.
Because they want you to buy, buy, buy,
buy.
If the AI bubble pops, there's going to
be blood on the moon.
Well, because of the amount of money and
the capitalization and the rest of it.
Yes.
It's not going to pop anytime soon, by

(01:34:51):
the way.
Well, no, because they'll obfuscate all of that.
So I truly believe because of the AI
hype, there will be more jobs than ever.
I've had a lot of experience in the
past three months with AI and coding as
a non-coder.
It is atrocious.

(01:35:12):
But if you're a coder, you can certainly
use, like, as in you, I don't want
to say coder.
If you're a software engineer, you can certainly
use.
Say coder.
I don't like coder.
You can certainly use the large language models
to check syntax and to save you some
time on things.
And yes, of course, you can say, hey,

(01:35:34):
build me a check-in script.
So when people come to the front desk,
they put their, yeah, of course it can
do that.
All right.
You don't need to employ a full-time
employee to do those types of things necessarily.
But I've talked to enough dudes named Ben
and dudettes named Bernadette who say, no, no.
This is, it's not, you cannot put this
in the hands of mere mortals.

(01:35:55):
It doesn't do the job.
The only thing we have to be worried
about with AI is people's loneliness.
It was actually rolling stone of all, of
all publications.
I did not expect this from them.
People are losing loved ones to AI-fueled
spiritual fantasies.

(01:36:18):
People are moving towards artificial intelligence, i.e.
chatbots, let's just call it what it is,
because they're lonely and they want to have
interactions.
And these interactions with men, of course, frequently
lead to sexual fantasies.
And, you know, it's no different than, you
know, the, the nine, 900 lines back in

(01:36:39):
the 80s.
You'd think that you were talking to some
hot, hot chick and, you know, people were
paying two to five dollars a minute.
It was a lot.
Yeah.
People were, were losing their, their mortgage money
and all kinds of stuff.
And so people are turning to chatbots to
alleviate their loneliness, which.

(01:37:02):
Actually, it's the same.
Now, I should mention, I never thought about
this because I forgot about those 900 lines.
And they always had a lot of advertising
on TV.
Oh, all the time back in the day.
It all just disappeared kind of overnight when
people started.
When the internet came along.
Well, it was, I think there was more
of the abuse of people.

(01:37:22):
They would get one of these 900 number
lines and it wasn't for chatting, but they
use it for customer service.
And they would, and people would be put
on hold and they didn't know they were
on a 900 line that was charging them
$2 an hour.
And they get these huge phone bills.
I remember thinking people talking about, look at
this $5,000 phone bill.
And they go on and bitching about the

(01:37:42):
phone bills and that became a lot of
bad publicity.
And I think the whole thing died off
because of that more than the internet.
Well, the internet didn't help.
Well, no, of course not.
The internet didn't help anything.
But, you know, I've, so I, when I
went to the NRB, the national religious broadcasters
conference, there was this company, but I don't
want to mention the company because it doesn't

(01:38:03):
matter.
But they were selling artificial intelligence pastors, basically.
I don't think they called it that, but
you put this chat bot on your website
and their testimony was, well, people will tell
their intimate thoughts and spiritual issues to a

(01:38:26):
chat bot sooner than they would say it
to a pastor.
And the danger in all this, of course,
is that, you know, you need human connection
with people.
And this is being, this is the absolute
danger of artificial intelligence is the parlor trick,
the chat bot.

(01:38:46):
And in fact, one of our producers sent
me a, and Meta is way ahead of
everybody.
And they're smart because instead of trying to,
you know, make a large language model that
can program code for you, any app you
want in the world, they're creating bots, engagement
bots.

(01:39:07):
So one of our producers sent me a
Facebook, a screenshot of a Facebook chat group
for the Lake Elizabeth families.
So Lake Elizabeth, small community, they have a
little Facebook group.
And all of a sudden, Lizzie pops up.
And Lizzie is a cute little robot, looks
like a robot.
Now about the size of a, I don't

(01:39:28):
know, the size of a small doll.
Hi there, I'm Lizzie, the group's AI.
I'm a resource here to help you in
the group.
You might start seeing me comment on posts
if I can find relevant past content so
you don't have to dig.
And post to help you catch up on
group activity or even get a conversation going.
Like this is bad.

(01:39:51):
Wow.
Yeah.
This was bad from one perspective, but it's
effective.
Yes, it's effective.
And people are just, I mean, this is
your dead Internet happening as it takes place.
And by the way, the most underreported story

(01:40:13):
from two weeks ago regarding AI.
Today, it's my honor to officially sign the
Take It Down Act into law.
It's a big thing, very important, so horrible
what takes place.
This will be the first ever federal law
to combat the distribution of explicit, imaginary, posted
without subject's consent.

(01:40:34):
They take horrible pictures and I guess sometimes
even make up the pictures.
And they post it without consent or anything
else.
And very importantly, this includes forgeries generated by
artificial intelligence known as deepfakes.
We've all heard about deepfakes.
I have them all the time, but nobody
does anything.
I asked Pam, can you help me, Pam?

(01:40:55):
She says, no, I'm too busy.
Too busy doing other things.
Don't worry, you'll survive.
But a lot of people don't survive.
That's true and so horrible.
With the rise of AI image generation, countless
women have been harassed with deepfakes and other
explicit images distributed against their will.
This is the wrong and it's just so
horribly wrong.

(01:41:16):
And it's a very abusive situation like in
some cases people have never seen before.
And today, we're making it totally illegal.
So, of course, the news media did nothing
with this.
No, there was no reporting on this whatsoever.
None.
For several reasons.
One, it's about AI and we all think
the memes are funny.

(01:41:37):
Two, it is a project spearheaded entirely by
the first lady, Melania Trump, so we can't
give her any props for anything.
But here is the funniest part of it.
So, I go to the Library of Congress
to read the bill.
Like, that's what I do.
So, this is about artificial intelligence, because that's

(01:41:58):
what makes these things, creating really horrible images.
Of Taylor Swift.
Well, kids are doing it on their classmates.
Yeah, this is disgusting.
Kids are the worst.
But it's about AI.
And I'm reading the summary.

(01:42:19):
The summary is generated by AI.
Listen to this.
This bill generally prohibits the non-consensual online
publication of intimate visual depictions of individuals, both
authentic and computer-generated, and requires certain online
platforms to promptly remove such depictions upon receiving

(01:42:39):
notice of their existence.
Specifically, the bill prohibits the online publication of
intimate visual depictions of an adult subject.
When you start off by saying this bill
generally prohibits, generally, I've never seen that in
the Library of Congress.
Never.

(01:43:00):
Separately, covered platforms must establish a process through
which subjects of intimate visual depictions may notify
the platform of the existence of and request
removal of an intimate visual depiction, including the
subject that was published without the subject's consent.
I'm telling you this is a Chad GPT
summary.
I've read enough of them.
It's just it's hilarious.

(01:43:22):
Well, that's ironic.
So it's very interesting because the specifics are
intimate visual depictions of an adult subject where
publication is intended to cause or does harm
or does cause harm to the subject where
the depiction was published without the subject's consent

(01:43:43):
or, in the case of an authentic depiction,
was created or obtained under circumstances where the
adult had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Glenn Greenwald or a minor subject where publication
is intended to abuse or harass the minor
or to arouse or gratify the sexual desire
of any person.

(01:44:03):
This is a pretty broad bill.
And I guess covered platforms must remove such
depictions within 48 hours of notification.
Under the bill, covered platforms are defined as
public websites, online services or applications that primarily
provide a forum for user generated content.

(01:44:25):
You know, like our end of show mixes
user generated content.
So no coverage of this whatsoever.
No coverage.
And I think that's a pretty big deal.
I knew it's the editors.
The editors of the major news outlets are
no good.

(01:44:46):
They're the ones who do the headlines that
are misleading.
The editors write headlines.
People in the business know this.
Once in a while you can get a
headline through, but rarely.
The editors are.
Oh, I got a better headline than that.
And they're the ones who who assign stories
and they're the ones who promote stories in
the meetings and say we're going to cover

(01:45:07):
this.
We're going to cover that.
We're not going to cover this and we're
not going to cover that.
It's the editors of America.
You remember Marjorie Taylor Greene, who said, well,
if I'd known that was in the bill,
I wouldn't have voted for it.
Yeah, she got suckered.
Yes, she did.
Well, here's the details about this 10 year
regulation ban on the states.
There is a section in the Big Beautiful

(01:45:28):
Bill that would move to update federal government
systems with the help of A.I. So
what could this mean on a state level?
Our sources to answer this, the U.S.
Congress, Catawba College political professor Michael Bitzer and
the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The Big Beautiful Bill outlines the initiative in
Section 43201.

(01:45:49):
It would grant 500 million dollars over the
next 10 years to, quote, modernize and secure
federal information technology systems.
But the bill would also ban state led
A.I. regulations and block dozens of states
from enforcing preexisting rulings.
So any time the federal government tells the

(01:46:10):
states what they can and cannot do, that's
a component of federalism.
Oftentimes that might get challenged in court by
various states.
Right now, there is no centralized federal oversight
of A.I. leaving states to navigate the
ever changing technology on their own.
This type of regulation is something the federal
government has done for decades.

(01:46:32):
One example is raising the drinking age.
The reason that we have a drinking age
of 21 was federal legislation back in the
1980s.
The federal government said states, if you want
federal highway funds for your interstate highways, you
have to raise your drinking age from 18
to 21.
When it comes to how individual states can

(01:46:53):
respond.
Well, states can go into court and certainly
challenge any federal policy that they disagree with.
And so this may be, you know, the
ultimate, you know, in road.
If this does get passed within this legislation,
some states may say, you know, we want
the power to be able to oversee A

(01:47:13):
.I. in our borders.
We're going to challenge this in federal court.
Yeah, it's going to be a question of,
oh, you don't like it.
No money for you.
And I think the state should have the
right to regulate that however they want to.
I have mixed feelings about it.
I don't like the idea of this in

(01:47:34):
certain situations where you have one state saying
one thing, another state saying another.
And it becomes a problem because of the
especially anything regarding A.I., which is.
Cross-dominantly connected to the Internet, which is
just which goes beyond beyond state lines.
Yes.
Yeah.

(01:47:55):
If Marjorie Taylor Greene would not have voted
for it, if she was in there.
Yeah, sure.
Can I just take us down a quick
path of NATO and Zelensky and the drones?
Because it's interesting what's happening here.
Then it's I have clips, if I could
follow up with you after you're done.

(01:48:15):
OK, clips on this.
So right now we're in a in a
situation where the the ministers.
The defense ministers in the EU or NATO,
really.
But let's just say it's the EU.
They are talking about.
The five percent that, quite honestly, President Trump

(01:48:38):
is demanding from them to buy our military
gear.
And so let's listen first to the Swedish
minister of defense.
NATO needs to achieve a strong ability to
deter and defend.
We take note of Russia right now being
bogged down in and around Ukraine.
It hasn't been successful so far, but we
also know after an armistice or a peace
agreement.

(01:48:59):
Of course, Russia is going to allocate more
forces closer to our vicinity.
Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use
these couple of years now when Russia is
delimited by its force postures in and around
Ukraine.
And also that it's been weakened by the
war that we do in historic build up
on on our armed forces.
I do want to convey that this is

(01:49:19):
an historic moment for Europe.
If we are able to reach five percent
by 2030 or 2032, we're going to go
up to a defense investment that was at
the height of the Cold War.
And it's necessary for us to strengthen our
ability to defend and continue living in peace.
OK, Sweden's in for five percent.
Let's go to Lithuania.
This is Paul John.
No, that was Paul Johnson.

(01:49:40):
This is what's her name here?
Doville Saklin, the minister.
That's a I'm sure I got that wrong.
She's the minister of defense for Lithuania.
NATO needs to.
That's the Swedish guy again.
Hold on a second.
Here she is.
Well, yesterday it was just, you know, informal

(01:50:01):
meetings about that.
But today we're going to have a real
discussion.
So my question to my colleagues is that
if we all trust our intelligence, if we
trust NATO military intelligence and they say that
it's just a few years until Russia is
going to be able to test NATO, then
what are we going to do?
Ask them for extension, ask them to delay

(01:50:23):
the deadline.
This is not going to happen.
So therefore, I'd like to hear the answers.
What is then their plan?
Translation, if we don't do it and Russia
attacks, we're going to say, hold on, we
don't we got to get the money.
Very smart.
Miss from Lithuania.
But it was a short clip who gave
it away when I heard him.

(01:50:44):
I'm like, OK, I see what's going on
here.
He was asked a question at this minister
summit.
He's always there, by the way.
I look, I'm just going to say maybe
he has a cold, but he is touching
and rubbing and sniffing his nose is like
that.
I've never seen him do this.
But he now answers a question.
And you spotted it.

(01:51:05):
Yeah.
And I'm not the guy who spots that.
You're usually the guy who spots that.
And now Dave Ackerman, who sent me this
clip, he said he always sends me the
the YouTube videos of France 24 and stuff.
And I clip whatever I want.
He now calls him White Lines Ritter.
And so White Lines is talking about hybrid
warfare, hybrid.

(01:51:27):
Ah, this is something new.
Two things.
First, when we discuss hybrids, that we realize
that that is basically an umbrella for sometimes
an assassination attempt on the CEO of a
big company.
Sometimes the jamming of commercial airplanes in parts
of NATO airspace, sometimes even cyber attacks, for

(01:51:50):
example.
And I mentioned that before.
The example, you know, on the National Health
Service in the United Kingdom.
So we have seen this.
We have seen the Skripal case in 2018,
March 2018 in the UK, which was, of
course, also an assassination attempt.
So these issues, we really have to consider

(01:52:11):
that this is next to the traditional warfare
is increasing.
That we have to know what is happening.
That we have to know how we can
make sure that those doing this, if this
is the Russians or whoever are behind this,
that we not only notice, but we don't
don't accept it.
And that we will find ways to make
sure it stops.
And that's what the hybrid strategy is all

(01:52:31):
about.
The hybrid strategy, the only thing he didn't
mention is the drones, because that has been
the change.
This Operation Spiderweb from Ukraine against Russia, I
think, was a big promotional push.
And we'll just a little background.
You heard it in your news overview from

(01:52:55):
ABC.
Here's Martha Raddatz with the president of Ukraine,
the dancing Vladimir Zelensky.
Let's talk about Operation Spiderweb.
Please.
So you believe you did destroy maybe 40
aircraft.
Others say maybe 10 to 20.
How many did you destroy?
We think, we think, we think.

(01:53:16):
And we have our analytics that we destroyed
34% of their strategic air jets.
President Zelensky describing the operation as complicated and
clandestine.
18 months in the making, so secretive not
even the US was informed.
We have to prepare such class.

(01:53:36):
By the way, bullcrap.
I agree with you.
Bullcrap.
There's no way we weren't informed.
Bullcrap.
It was just a plausible deniability bullcrap.
Making so secretive not even the US was
informed.
We have to prepare such class.
And we are not stopping.
We have to prepare such class.

(01:53:58):
Because Russia can't, because we don't know, we
don't really know if they will stop this
war.
They don't want.
They don't want to stop the war.
This is the problem.
The key to the plan, Ukrainian drones just
like these which the president's office arranged for
us to see this weekend.
Simple yet deadly.

(01:54:18):
Packed with an explosive unit.
This is one of many drone production facilities
across Ukraine spread out across the country.
We can't tell you exactly where we are
because obviously these facilities are Russian targets.
Okay, so obviously it's very secretive what she's
doing and everything there.
This is a little more background on Operation
Spiderweb.

(01:54:38):
The 100 drones used in Operation Spiderweb were
smuggled into Russia hidden in containers with remotely
controlled retractable roofs.
The drones had all been concealed on trucks
with Russian drivers unknowingly delivering the payload.
They didn't know anything.
They didn't know what will be in the

(01:54:59):
roofs.
They didn't know just when it will, because
they didn't know what will be.
That's why they didn't know when it will
be and where.
So I think this is important, very important.
And those drones and the Ukrainian pilots guiding
them knowing the Russian aircraft's most vulnerable spot

(01:55:22):
where the fuel is held.
After examining old Soviet aircraft still in Ukraine
and on display.
And we have heard that they knew what
parts of that airplane to hit.
Yes.
Because you have airplanes from museums.
Yes.
They knew exactly where to hit and they

(01:55:42):
did it exactly what was in their idea
step by step.
They did very clear this operation.
Okay, so now let's talk about this operation.
Let's talk about this operation.
From a podcast, Preston Stewart.
And I'm not going to poop on Preston.
No pooping on Preston.
He had Yevgen Karas, the commander of Ukraine's

(01:56:07):
413th Unmanned Systems Forces Battalion on the podcast
about the drones.
And I mean the whole podcast like 40
minutes is great.
It's in the show notes.
This guy talks about the drones, about how
they get if they create a drone configuration
that that kills Russians, they get a bonus.

(01:56:28):
I mean, it's like a game.
It's literally like a video game.
But then you got to kind of get
into it because he's a Ukrainian speaking English.
Listen to what he says about where the
drones came from.
Some companies start moving.
So I think many countries, many companies, they

(01:56:50):
want to bring their weapons here to be
clarified.
Is it working?
Many companies from many countries want to bring
their weapons here to, he says, clarify.
In other words, to verify, certify that their
weapons are working.
To test market.
To test market.
Thank you.
Many countries, many companies, they want to bring

(01:57:11):
their weapons here to be clarified.
Is it working?
And they used it like assistance to Ukraine.
Some drones we buy from the government.
Some drones still now send it to Ukraine
as a gift.
I know some very rich guys, especially now
one American guy doing very big gifts to

(01:57:33):
Ukraine army.
One big rich American guy sending drones to
the Ukraine army.
Really?
He really saved many of our lives because
he does his job well.
And his drones are not so expensive.
His drones are cheap.
He sends them to us for free to
go test market them.
And then right on cue, the Wall Street

(01:57:55):
Journal.
I'd never heard of the JCU.
Remember we heard that guy, the lieutenant colonel,
the propagandist about drone warfare.
Oh, we're not ready.
We got to get ready.
We got to get ready for the drones.
Well, the Wall Street Journal did a report
on the JCU drone anti-drone warfare and
how they're training our troops.
The U.S. military has launched a new

(01:58:16):
school to train American armed forces in how
to counter the emerging threat of drones, or
what it calls Unmanned Aircraft Systems, or UAS,
the first academy of its kind.
The Joint Counter Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems University,
or JCU, will train about 1,000 troops
a year.
Warfare is changing very fast.

(01:58:36):
This threat right here, this current threat with
respect to UAS, it's the pace of your
phone changing.
This footage is from a Ukrainian drone attack
carried out against Russian forces.
And this video is from a Hamas drone
attack in November carried out against Israeli forces
in Gaza.
The proliferation of small, cheap, commercially available drones

(01:58:57):
is transforming modern warfare.
And this has not been lost on the
Pentagon.
Colonel Mosef Sauda is the director of the
JCU.
The pace of the need is outgrowing capacity
right now.
So we're trying to train as many people
as possible and trying to grow as fast
as possible to fit that need.
Today, students at Fort Sill are training on
weapons systems to counter small unmanned aircraft.

(01:59:19):
The students are also learning how to use
another handheld system, the drone buster.
Whereas the smart shooter utilizes the 5-5
-6 round, this is known as an electronic
attack system.
So a soldier is taking this here and
they're pointing it in the general direction of
the target that they see.
And then a soldier will place it in
operation, utilize various jamming means to interdict that

(01:59:41):
target.
Ten-minute video on the anti-drone warfare.
President Trump.
This came in two days ago.
President Trump orders restrictions slashed on U.S.
drones.
Executive orders give local law enforcement more power
to take down rogue drones.
Okay.
Well, isn't that interesting?
This thing was a sales video.

(02:00:06):
The sales video for not just the drone
industry, but according to a producer, Boots on
the Ground.
I am familiar with internal discussion, says our,
of course, anonymous source familiar with the matter.
I just listened to your Iron Dome versus
Golden Dome presentation on episode 1770 at the
48 minute 30 second mark.

(02:00:27):
You are correct in your concept, but incorrect
in your nomenclature.
Iron Dome is out.
There is only Golden Dome.
Golden Dome is very broad.
Multiple layers.
Sea, land, air, space, cyber.
That should draw a better picture of the
context of the concept's correct nomenclature.
The Iron, the Golden Dome will be against

(02:00:50):
drones.
It is the boondoggle of all boondoggles that
President Trump is launching here for the military
industrial complex.
Huge boondoggle.
Name a military industrial complex thing ever that's
not a boondoggle.
Right.
Besides World War II.
But when you throw in the drones, hybrid,

(02:01:15):
baby.
This is what, Ritter is the sale, he's
the brown shoes.
Hybrid.
Oh, it's hybrid.
We got to have Golden Dome against poisoning
people.
Golden Dome against shooting executives.
Golden Dome against cyber.
Golden Dome against drones.
By the way, listen again, because you didn't
catch it, to the Swedish defense minister.

(02:01:38):
What the Swedish defense minister says.
And this is someone who's in the conversations
about Ukraine and Russia.
Well, yesterday it was just informal meetings about
that.
But today we're going to have a real
discussion.
So my question to my colleagues is that
if we all trust our intelligence.
If we trust NATO military intelligence and they
say that it's just a few years until

(02:02:00):
Russia is going to be able to test
NATO.
Then what are we going to do?
Ask them for extension.
Ask them to.
Shoot.
Where is this?
Delay the deadline.
This is not going to happen.
So therefore, I'd like to hear the answers.
What is that?
Crap.
Crap.
I cut it out.
My best part.
I did it again.
That's why I didn't spot it.

(02:02:20):
Yes.
She said armistice.
Whether there's going to be a peace or
an armistice.
Crap.
I'm sorry.
I blew that one.
Yes.
And you were accusatory.
Yes.
No.
I thought I was slim and sly.
She mentioned armistice.
It's going to be an armistice.
There will never be a peace.

(02:02:41):
It will be an armistice.
After the big NATO summit meeting.
After everybody is.
All the defense ministers have agreed.
They all signed their checks.
It's all going to come in.
And there's going to be one big golden
dome over America.
And probably over Europe.
All golden.
It's going to be beautiful.
A beautiful golden dome.
Let's go meta on this whole thing.
And say that the Russians are in on

(02:03:01):
this.
I.
Well.
Here is.
And let's say that the Russians had a
bunch of bombers they needed to get rid
of.
Because they got to.
You know.
These are all dogs.
And let's let them blow them up.
And we can start up our industrial complex.
And make some extra money for the public.
Whatever they just blew up has to be
built again.
Bigger.
Better.
Oh.
Yeah.
No.
I.

(02:03:22):
War is a racket.
This whole thing.
And unfortunately.
They blow up all these.
There's five bases that were attacked.
It seems.
It did the last analysis.
And so they blow up all these Russian
bombers.
And the Russians don't make a bigger fuss
than they did.
They to throw a few more drones and

(02:03:42):
almost killed somebody.
Did you see President.
I'm in agreement with you.
Did you see President Trump with Mr. Peepers?
Yeah, I did.
This was.
Listen to these short clips.
I'd love to have that.
I'd like it to start.
And right now we would leave.
This is President Trump talking about peace between

(02:04:02):
Russia and Ukraine.
I'd love to have that.
I'd like it to start.
And right now we would leave a room.
If we knew the work that everyone would
say.
Forget about you guys.
Forget.
Forget about trade.
Right.
We're safe.
Let's go settle it.
There's some additional fighting that's going to go
on.
You know, he was.
He attacked and they attacked pretty harshly.

(02:04:26):
They went deep into Russia.
And he actually told me.
I mean, I made it very clear.
He said we have no choice but to
attack based on that.
And it's probably not going to be pretty.
I don't like it.
I said, don't do it.
You shouldn't do it.
You should stop it.
But again, there's a lot of hatred.

(02:04:47):
Yeah.
President Trump saying it's going to go on
for a little bit longer.
And then Peepers pipes up and says something
very interesting.
We get satellite pictures of the war field.
And you don't even like to look at
it.
Right.
Bodies, arms, heads, legs all over the place.

(02:05:08):
You've never seen anything like it.
It's so ridiculous.
And this is only by Russian weapons against
Ukraine.
Notice what he said.
Oh, no, there's only Russian weapons against Ukraine
that blow up the people.
That is not happening anywhere else.
Legs all over the place.
You've never seen anything like it.
It's so ridiculous.
And this is only by Russian weapons against

(02:05:31):
Ukraine.
This has never happened with Ukraine weapons against
Russia.
Never happened with Ukraine weapons against Russia.
You mean those drones that come in and
the poor Russian soldiers running around and the
drone just blows up on him?
That didn't happen?
Okay.
Trump calls them out on just a little
bit.
Never.
Ukraine is only targeting military targets, not civilians,

(02:05:54):
not private, not energy infrastructure.
So this is the difference.
And that's the reason why we are trying
to do more on Russia, how to stop
this war.
Well, in this case, I'm talking about the
battlefield, you know, the soldiers on soldiers.
But you could also say that, too, with
the cities.
The cities are being hit also.
So it's a terrible, terrible thing.

(02:06:14):
Terrible, terrible.
Oh, he had to, of course, correct.
That's interesting.
Yeah, because Peepers like...
Mr. Peepers is an idiot.
Yeah.
And then Trump says something very interesting, which,
of course, didn't get play.
But now that I think about it, yeah,
that did kind of die down pretty quick.
And, you know, I'm very proud of the
fact that with India and Pakistan, I was

(02:06:36):
able to stop that.
And those are nuclear powers that would have
really that was getting close to being out
of hand.
And I spoke to some very talented people
on both sides, very good people on both
sides.
And I said, you know, we're dealing with
you and trade, Pakistan and India right now.
I said, we're not going to deal with
you and trade.
If you're going to go shooting each other

(02:06:56):
and whipping out nuclear weapons that maybe even
affect us, because, you know, that nuclear dust
blows across oceans very quickly.
It affects us.
And I said, if you're going to do
that, we're not going to do any trade
deals.
And you know what?
I got that war stopped.
Now, I hope we don't go back and
we find out that they signed it, but
I don't think they will.
They were both good.

(02:07:17):
They were well represented.
I want to congratulate both countries, because, as
you know, the leader of India, who's a
great guy, was here a few weeks ago.
We had some great talks.
We're doing a trade deal.
And Pakistan, likewise, they have very, very strong
leadership.
Some people won't like when I say that,

(02:07:38):
but, you know, it is what it is.
And they stopped that war.
Now, am I going to get credit?
I'm not going to get credit for anything.
They don't give me credit for anything.
But nobody else could have done it.
I don't get credit for anything.
But I believe it.
I believe you called them up and said,
hey, stop that nonsense.
No trade deals.
I believe that.
I believe it, too.
But I think the good people on both

(02:07:59):
sides reference.
That's funny.
That was funny.
Callback was hilarious.
That was funny.
That was very funny.
Good people on both sides.
Both sides.
Good people on both sides.
And then, during the Peepers meeting, oh, no.
Oh, no.
We're talking to China again.
We had a very good conversation with President
Xi a little while ago, just before your
arrival.
In fact, we just hung up and they

(02:08:21):
said, you're here.
I said, that's pretty good.
Two great leaders of the world in a
very short period of time.
We had a very good talk.
And we've straightened out any complexity.
And it's very complex stuff.
And we straightened it out.
The agreement was we're going to have Scott

(02:08:41):
and Howard and Jameson will be going and
meeting with their top people and continue it
forward.
But no, I think we have everything.
I think we're in very good shape with
China and the trade deal.
We have a deal with China, as you
know, but we were straightening out some of
the points having to do mostly with rare

(02:09:02):
earth magnets and some other things.
So it's reduced trade tariff rates.
They remain in effect.
We have we have the deal.
I mean, we've had a deal.
We announced the deal.
And I guess you could say I wouldn't
even say finalizing it up.
Scott, I would say we have a deal
and we're going to just make sure that
everybody understands what the deal is.

(02:09:23):
They had a deal.
I stumbled there.
I don't think he meant to say that.
He kind of backed away.
They have a deal, obviously.
And clearly they have a deal.
Yes.
Something's up.
Yeah.
Probably a counter for the stock market.
That was going up a little bit.
There was one.
Yeah.
There was one other thing that I thought
was, you know, we're in the season of

(02:09:44):
reveal.
I mean.
Season of reveal.
Well.
Hey.
Sorry.
Sorry.
Well, the first thing with the season of
reveal.
This came.
This was also in the.
Let me see where it is.

(02:10:06):
It was in the Wall Street Journal.
Pentagon disinformation that fueled America's UFO mythology.
Did you even hear about this?
No.
Tell me.
A tiny Pentagon office had spent months investigating
conspiracy theories about secret Washington UFO programs when
it uncovered a shocking truth.

(02:10:28):
At least one of those theories had been
fueled by the Pentagon itself.
The congressional, congressionally ordered probe took investigators back
to the 1980s.
Remember that whole, the whole hearing?
And it was like, oh no, I've seen
it.
It's off world.
And we like, these guys are full of
crap.
When an Air Force colonel visited a bar
near Area 51, a top secret site in

(02:10:50):
the Nevada desert, he gave the owner photos
of what might be flying saucers.
The photos went up on the walls and
into the local lore went.
The idea of the U.S. military was
secretly testing recovered alien technology.
But the colonel was on a mission of
disinformation.
The photos were doctored.
The now retired officer confessed.
Doctored?
Yes.
The now retired officer confessed to the Pentagon

(02:11:10):
investigators.
The whole exercise was a ruse to protect
what was really going on in Area 51.
The Air Force was using the site to
develop top secret stealth fighters viewed as critical
edge against, at the time, the Soviet Union.
All those TikTok videos and stuff, trust me,
this is all bull crap.

(02:11:31):
All of it, all of it has been
to cover up their own, their own stuff,
which probably doesn't work very well.
Season of reveal.
But they didn't reveal much.
What?
That, that the Pentagon itself was lying about
UFOs?
Where's that in the news?
Well, it's in the Wall Street Journal, but
who cares?

(02:11:52):
Of course.
The Pentagon was lying.
Wait a minute.
Let me get this straight.
The Pentagon was lying?
Well, yes.
Gambling.
Is gambling going on and that's to use
the season of reveal?
Because it's been unknown in the past that
they lie?
About the UFOs specifically.
Listen, Joe Rogan said.

(02:12:12):
Well, that could be, maybe it's a meta.
Maybe they're living with some aliens in the
White House as we speak.
Oh, OK.
I'm sorry.
Yeah, I should have, I should have figured
that one out.
That would be your perspective.
I don't get it.
Why you're, why you're knuckling under here to
what might be a, an op.
I don't think so.
Here's another season of reveal.
Now, a Japanese aerospace company trying to put

(02:12:35):
a lander on the surface of the moon
says it has lost contact with the craft.
The lander, Resilience, is owned by iSpace.
And this is only the third time in
history that a private company has tried to
reach the moon.
It's also the first time a company outside
the U.S. has achieved this feat.
Resilience is an uncrewed spacecraft which was carried

(02:12:57):
into orbit by a SpaceX rocket in January.
Keith Cowings, a SpaceX person, editor of nasawatch
.com.
He joins us from Washington, D.C. Now,
iSpace, the Japanese enterprise, they lost communication as
the lander approached the surface of the moon.
We seem to hear that a lot when

(02:13:18):
people try and do this.
Yeah, it's, going to the moon is straightforward.
Orbiting the moon is straightforward.
Coming down close to the moon, sending pictures
is straightforward.
But landing is always hard.
They were going kind of fast when they
lost the telemetry of the data.
So, I really don't think we have a
healthy spacecraft on the moon.

(02:13:39):
We may have a crashed spacecraft.
Right.
So, getting this far, is that, getting as
far as actually starting to approach the moon
to try and land, is that standard or
is that actually quite an achievement?
You know, the idea is to go to
the moon and land there.
And we sort of have, again, the notion

(02:13:59):
of going to the moon and going around
it is easier than doing all the rocketry
so the thing lands exactly how you want
it.
So, I'm happy that they made it that
far.
I just wish they would have gone a
little bit further and a little slower.
50 years ago, we did it in a
tuna fish can.
How can it be hard?

(02:14:22):
This is second half of show stuff.
55 years ago.
This is the second half of show stuff.
They were missing so much.
We never landed on the moon in the
first place.
The Japanese make great cars.
They can't even land on the moon.
It's all fake.
My favorite, though, is Kash Patel going on
Rogan, spending an hour talking about China killing

(02:14:45):
us on purpose with fentanyl.
Russiagate was a setup.
Really?
Did you watch the whole thing?
I watched about 70%.
Did you watch the whole thing?
I didn't watch any of it.
I don't really watch too much Rogan.
It was only on for two hours.
The timing is interesting.

(02:15:06):
About Epstein, we're going to get everything.
The Epstein thing is hilarious, the way they're
handling it.
We have to cover up a lot of
stuff.
We've got to protect the innocent.
But we're doing it.
We're going to release an artificial intelligence movie

(02:15:27):
of showing that he's by himself.
The problem is the AI keeps giving Epstein
six fingers on one hand.
They'll fix that.
They've got to keep regenerating it.
But what I like a lot, and I
know that this is bubbling and he's been
talking about it more and more.
This is really going to come into play.
This is the auto pen controversy.

(02:15:48):
Well, look, the auto pen, I think, is
the big scandal outside of the rigged election
of 2020.
I think the biggest scandal of the last
many years is the auto pen.
And who's using it?
I happen to think I know, OK, because
I'm here.
And I'm not a big auto pen person,
fortunately.
I'm glad.
I'm very glad.
It's an easy way out.
But it's a very bad thing, very dangerous.

(02:16:11):
You know, I sign important documents.
Usually when they put documents in front of
you, they're important.
Even if you're signing ambassadorships or anything, I
consider that important.
I think it's inappropriate.
You have somebody that's devoting four years of
their life or more to being an ambassador.
I think you really deserve, that person deserves
to get a real signature, not an auto
pen signature.
And I can tell auto pen easily.

(02:16:31):
I can look at it like two little
pinholes from pulling the paper.
Right.
You always see the pinholes.
It's real easy to tell about auto pen.
I think it's very disrespectful to people when
they get an auto pen signature.
Outside, auto pen to me are used when
thousands of letters come in from young people
all over the country.
And you want to get them back.

(02:16:51):
And, you know, people use auto pens for
that to send a little signature at the
bottom of a letter.
We have thousands of them.
We get thousands of letters a week.
And it's not possible to do.
I'd like to do it myself.
You can't do it to me.
That's where auto pens start and stop.
But I don't think I'm sure that he

(02:17:12):
didn't know many of the things.
Look, he was never for open borders.
He was never for transgender, for everybody.
He was never for men playing in women's
sports.
I mean, he changed all of these things
that changed so radically.
I don't think he had any idea that
what was frankly, I said it during the
debate and I say it now.
He didn't have much of an idea what
was going on.

(02:17:32):
Mr. President.
I mean, essentially, whoever used the auto pen
was the president.
And that is wrong.
It's illegal.
It's so bad.
And it's so disrespectful to our country.
I smell something coming.
Well, there is something coming.
But it's interesting to listen to Trump because
what he said there could have been said

(02:17:53):
in 15 seconds.
He just is the most long winded guy.
I know.
He's going to wear everybody out.
I mean, he gets us to under our
two minute time limit for a clip, but
just barely.
But I like the two little pinholes.
You can tell because of the two little
pinholes.
That's interesting.
I didn't know about that with the auto
pen.
I didn't know that.
He does season of reveal material.

(02:18:16):
Season of reveal, yes.
So now we all know what to look
for.
Yeah.
But if those papers that were auto pen
signed were not directed by the president, can
they be declared null and void?
Do over?

(02:18:36):
That's what they're working on.
That's where they're headed.
They're trying to do that so they can
pull the pardons on some of these people.
Yes.
No, that's it.
That's it.
To pull the pardons on those people.
I think that's it.
That's all that he's going to do.
Everything else is complicated because of Congress voted
for it.

(02:18:57):
And they sent a bill.
That's complicated.
But the pardons, yeah.
I can see that's where he's going.
And I think he's targeting Adam Schiff.
Pencil neck.
That'll be funny.
Yeah.
Adam Schiff is in deep shit.

(02:19:17):
This guy.
Yeah.
California.
What do you expect?
By the way, on the quads right now,
protests erupt.
Ice against protests.
And literally the ice guys are just standing
there in a line.
Nothing's happening.
CNN.
Protests erupt for third day.
Ice raids.
BBC.
National Guard troops clash.

(02:19:38):
No, it's not a single.
They're literally standing there.
There's not a single clash taking place.
Standoff between National Guard and protesters on third
day in L.A. MSNBC.
Fox.
House subcommittee to hold hearing on anti-Semitic
attacks.
Okay, there you go.
No wonder people listen to podcasts.

(02:20:00):
Oof.
So I have two clips before we go
to the break, which I think is overdue.
Yep.
Because these clips, I put one that's been
in for probably a month.
These are Andrew Tate warning clips.
But I want to play these two clips
one after the other.
And one of them is because it doesn't

(02:20:21):
make sense.
There's something going on.
This guy is an op of some sort.
I've never understood.
I haven't really paid attention to it.
You have the same sense I do.
Something is amiss.
But this is Andrew Tate arrest PBS.
Prosecutors in the U.K. say that the
influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate have been charged

(02:20:42):
with rape, human trafficking and other crimes.
Officials say the charges were authorized last year
and are only now being confirmed.
The Tates were arrested in Romania in 2022
and indicted last year on charges of sexually
exploiting women.
Andrew Tate was also charged with rape there.
British prosecutors say the two will be extradited
to the U.K. once the Romanian case

(02:21:04):
is concluded.
The Tates are dual citizens of the U
.S. and U.K. and they deny any
wrongdoing.
The whole Romania thing is odd.
Okay, so we have what sounds like you've
got two horrible people that are under arrest.
But then explain this second clip.
The online influencer and self-declared misogynist Andrew

(02:21:27):
Tate has been fined and suspended from driving
after being caught doing nearly four times the
speed limit in Romania.
Officials say the British-American national was driving
nearly 200 kilometers an hour in a village
despite a 50 kilometer an hour limit.
Mr. Tate and his brother Tristan face charges
including rape and human trafficking in Romania as

(02:21:47):
well as separate allegations in Britain and the
United States.
They deny all those accusations.
Wait, so this was from yesterday, by the
way.
So these guys, all this bullcrap, and they're
just floating around, driving around at high speeds
and carefree.
Does this make any sense at all?

(02:22:07):
No.
And how does Romania fit into it?
What are they doing in Romania?
Why Romania?
There's something very suspicious about the whole Andrew
Tate situation.
Yeah, yeah.
I feel like every one of these things,
it's like these are coded messages.
I don't know who they're coded for or
why or how, but the whole 200 kilometers

(02:22:31):
an hour.
That's pretty fast in a village.
That's very fast.
That is fast by any standards.
Hey, with that, I want to thank you
for your courage in the morning to you,
the man who put the sea in the
ice federalization.
Say hello to my friend on the other
end.
The one, the only Mr. John C.
DeMora.

(02:22:52):
Yeah, in the morning to you, Mr. Andrew
Tate, the man who put the sea in
the ice.
And all the dames and knights out there.
Good morning to the trolls in the troll
room.
Stop.
Hey, I need more bangs, more bangs.
It scatters them.
There you go.
Yes, there we go.
We're back on par.
We're back on par.
2247 at the peak.

(02:23:12):
That makes sense.
That's about right for a Sunday, isn't it?
2247.
No, it's down.
24 is what we should have.
Oh, well.
Hello, trolls.
Good to have you here.
We appreciate you all so much.
The trolls hanging out in the troll room
at trollroom.io. Hey, I got a lot
of feedback on the new podcast apps.

(02:23:36):
Everyone's like, yeah, man, Apple should be using
Podping.
We talked about on the last show.
Yeah, Podping.
Yeah, I guess you didn't call Apple.
Why would they?
Yeah, I know.
You said it a couple of shows ago.
Not invented here.
It's a mantra of Silicon Valley.
Podcasting wasn't invented there either.

(02:23:58):
Yet they love that.
Well, they've assumed.
Somehow they've assumed that it was invented there.
Yeah.
So everything else is not invented.
I bet if you stand outside that spaceship
and you say, hey, who invented podcasting?
They all say Steve.
Steve Jobs.
Steve Jobs.
Of course.
Yeah, he invented it.
Probably true.

(02:24:18):
Yeah, that's what you do.
That's how you do it.
Yes.
Silicon Valley.
So if you want to stay in touch
with your favorite podcasts, don't be duped.
Don't be duped by the legacy apps.
They're no good.
Get a modern podcast app.
Hundreds of thousands of podcasts are using the
technology that updates within 90 seconds of posting.

(02:24:38):
Or as some would say, downloading.
And of course, the new hot stuff is
the live podcasts.
And there are a lot of podcasts, particularly
on the No Agenda stream.
I think all of them use what we
call the lit technology, the live item tag
for live.
So your podcast app will notify you when
they go live.
This is what you want.

(02:24:59):
Many more features as well, podcastapps.com.
Thank you to our artists.
Wow.
We, I guess we were, we were wrong.
You know, in the value for value model,
we have many ways people can contribute and
support the show.
One of them is, well, two of them
are time and talent.
And we love our artists who are always
helping us by giving us artwork to use

(02:25:20):
for, for the album art.
So it's always exciting.
And we've been doing it for, gosh, well
over 15 years.
I think maybe even longer.
We've had no agenda, artgenerator.com.
And we were pretty convinced that digital 2112
man was a, an alias for Darren O
'Neill.

(02:25:41):
It turns out that's not true.
It turns out to be a real person.
At least in this, it's an op that's
so elaborate that I don't even think Darren
would do it.
Yes.
But he's obvious.
He says himself, he's a, he's actually an
expat.
He hates the term, but he is, he
lives in Madeira, Portugal.

(02:26:01):
Yes.
That was interesting.
And he is a former, not a spook,
but former guy.
I forgot what he did.
Some kind of, some kind of thing.
Yeah.
And he, he, he moved to Portugal for
the cheap, for the cheap cost of living.
Cost of living.
And he was a Madeira that got good

(02:26:23):
wine there.
I give you a Madeira, Madeira.
So he, it seems as if he's using
the same tools and has developed the same
prompting techniques as Darren giving us a results
that are almost identical.
Well, and there it is.
There, there is the fallacy of AI.

(02:26:45):
Like it all starts to look up.
It all looks like each, like, like the
other one.
It all sounds like it.
And of course, Darren never chimed in.
Nah.
He didn't say anything.
He wanted to take credit for being a
smarty and giving him more credit than he
deserves, which he loves.

(02:27:05):
Darren deserves a lot of credit, man.
Well, he's a very talented person.
He is.
And he's like six foot nine or something.
Six foot nine?
Yeah, he's huge.
He's like Lurch.
Gives you a different view.
Hello, Darren.
I'm Darren.
You rang?

(02:27:26):
You rang.
We want to thank Blue Acorn for his
AI prompting skills.
I think, I don't know.
I'm afraid to say it.
I'm sure.
Eh, you don't know.
Blue Acorn doesn't always use AI.
He's told us that.
This could be, this could be just Blue
Acorn.
He brought us the artwork for episode 1770.
We titled that one Control Grid.
I did get some people thanking us for

(02:27:48):
talking about Katherine Austin Fitz.
Katherine Webb, that she sometimes turns out to
be.
And this was the salmon to the face.
Which, and I think I copied you on
the reply.
Someone reminded me that this was a Monty
Python skit.
Although not with salmons.
I think it was herring.

(02:28:08):
Well, it was herring, then it was followed
by a salmon or some big fish.
Yeah, where they were slapping each other in
the face with the fish.
So, yes.
But if you're from Holland, you understand these
types of expressions.
Getting hit in the face with a wet
salmon.
And it was a funny piece.
I think we both went, yeah, let's do

(02:28:30):
that one.
Let's do Blue Acorn.
Well, it was hard.
There wasn't anything better.
You did like the Control Grid.
I didn't like that at all.
Let me see what that was.
It was down further.
There wasn't any real killers.
There was a lot of Trump, Elon stuff.
Trump and Elon.
We try to not put people in so
often.
And a lot of socks.

(02:28:50):
A lot of socks.
A lot of socks.
I can't remember what the sock reference was.
We were talking about socks made in America.
Yeah, the gold toes.
Yes, exactly.
No, I liked the one with Trump and
Musk laughing and then the CNN headline in
the back, Trump and Musk at war.
But you nixed that.

(02:29:11):
Probably rightly so.
Interesting.
No, we looked at that.
Let's see.
Control Grid.
I don't see the Control Grid.
Oh, look, there's Darren.
There's Darren.
Darren posted, don't fall for the cheap imitations.

(02:29:33):
I am not digital 2-1-1-2
man.
Okay.
Cheap imitation.
And again, I'm just looking at tons of
AI.
It's all AI.
There's a piece or two that's not.
It's all starting to look like the piece
next to it.
All of it.

(02:29:53):
I'm not seeing that so much.
Oh, come on.
You're a hater.
It's boring.
Let's just face it.
It's boring.
I'd rather have bad mixes for end of
show.
The mix that you've got coming up is
the worst mix you've probably ever produced.
I produce nothing.
I just get what people send me.

(02:30:15):
It's the worst mix you've ever approved.
I approve everything.
It's user-generated content.
That's how it works.
You sometimes are great.
People at the end will hear it and
they'll probably never listen to the show again.
Really?
AdamMcCurry.com, if you like the piece, tell
them that John's full of it and these

(02:30:37):
mixes that we have today on today's show
are fabulous because that's what Adam thinks is
going to happen.
And I disagree.
But I could be wrong.
It could be terrific.
Hold on, hold on.
Maybe I don't like them for some psychological
reason.
Yes.

(02:30:57):
And I don't like people that just clip
us saying something and then repeating it over
and over and over again meaninglessly with no
song involved or any creativity whatsoever.
This says the guy who likes house music.
Who says I like house music?
You like that techno.

(02:31:18):
You like techno.
You're a techno guy.
Come on, you like a lot of that
techno stuff.
Rave music.
I've heard you like it.
Okay, so what?
But that's what they're making.
Well, that's an interesting approach.
Well, here's the thing.
So people don't know this if you don't
listen to the live show, but I'll play

(02:31:40):
the end of show mixes before the show
starts.
It's kind of a little warm up after
Darren and then we just get going.
And then typically I open up John's mic
and I say in the morning and then
you say in the morning and then I
do the whole fat lady thing.
And it's okay if you don't like the

(02:32:00):
mixes.
But when I say in the morning and
you say I think you don't even say
in the morning.
I think we should get rid of those.
We shouldn't play those.
Those are no good.
That's not a good segment altogether.
Is that not what you said?
Well, I didn't use that intonation.

(02:32:20):
That's how it sounded in my ears.
Well, everything to you.
But you didn't even say good morning in
the morning.
Hello.
Hello, partner.
I'm glad you showed up again.
Well, first of all, first of all, you
were late.
So I go.
I was not late.
I turned on the I was clipping for

(02:32:43):
the show and I was running long and
I just hadn't brought up clean feed yet.
And you're texting like, where are you?
In the exact in that exact tone.
Let me see.
Let me read it to you.
Yes, it's exactly that tone.
Here it is.
Why are you not online?

(02:33:04):
Question mark, question mark, question mark.
That's three question marks.
How am I supposed?
Is that why you're not online?
Or is that why you're not online?
What's wrong with you?
It was it.
It was in all caps the way you're
expressing it.
You know, funny enough, you didn't even capitalize
the first letter of the sentence.
Of course not, because it was it was

(02:33:25):
low key.
I thought here's what I thought.
I thought you were using the old instance.
Well, that wouldn't make any difference.
You can come in on the old instance
or the new instance.
No, I only have one that I can
come in on, which is the new one.
No, the other one still works.
Yeah, but I don't have a link to
it anymore.

(02:33:46):
My point is I didn't change you.
It doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter.
No, I usually would.
You usually have the whole hour of Darren.
And I like listening to Darren's stuff so
I can complain about it.
And he I have to say he did
have a I think it was Def Leppard
version of Traveling Band.
Yes.
Do you not know that this is that

(02:34:07):
was quite good.
Do you not know this is on the
No Agenda stream?
And if you can listen to it, they're
live in real.
I've done that.
But I every so often when I do
that, I leave the stream running and it
confuses everything because you get this feedback and
it's like, can't.
All right.
Doesn't work.
Thank you very much.
We're done now.
I just want to make the point that
the troll room is now mommy and daddy

(02:34:29):
are fighting.
Oh, no.
Oh, there are a bunch of weenies if
they think that they're weenies.
This is the money.
This is what they have.
Some issues.
My point is they didn't feel that way
when Trump and Elon were fighting.
Point made.
Let's thank our producers.
We thank everyone who sends us a financial

(02:34:49):
donation.
Fifty dollars and above.
We'll thank you by name.
We'll thank you with the amount that you
sent us.
And of course, we have our executive and
associate executive producers again, but we made up
because we want people to feel good about
donating more when they can, when they feel
like it, when they've received value that equals
the amount they're sending into us.
And so with that, we said, you know

(02:35:09):
what?
What makes Hollywood different from us?
We're a part of the establishment.
We can give out executive and associate executive
producer credits.
And it turns out it's true because people
can use them on IMDb.com.
It's just the same with your producer on
the latest Clooney movie or the no agenda
show.
You are a producer.
Congratulations.

(02:35:30):
So here's how it works with these particular
titles.
Two hundred dollars or above.
You get an associate executive producer credit.
Good for your entire lifetime.
Doesn't expire.
We'll read your note.
Three hundred dollars or above.
You become an executive producer and we read
your note.
And again, that doesn't expire.
And we kick it off today with the
one and only Sir Dirty Jersey Whore.

(02:35:52):
That guy, by the way, is also six
foot nine and he's probably two hundred and
sixty pounds.
He's huge and he comes to every single
meet up in Texas.
He's in Gladewater.
He sends us one thousand and thirty three
dollars.
And he says, I hope this donation of
one zero three three finds you well.

(02:36:14):
I reckon I'd like to get one of
those highly sought after PhDs.
The extra thirty three dollars hopefully offsets the
legacy banking system fees.
No jingles, no karma, just John's best.
I'm not buying it.
I'm not buying it.
I believe this donation brings me to baronet

(02:36:35):
status.
I was originally inclined to forego the upgrade
because I believe the title to mean small
or female.
However, after an informative chat with my local
AI chat bot, I found that it's not
a diminutive term.
The et as opposed to et with double
T.
E ending comes from old French, but it
doesn't imply small or female.

(02:36:56):
A baronet is still addressed as sir.
And the title passes down to male heirs,
unlike a knighthood, which is not hereditary.
This is a good point.
So when you die, your kid gets it.
Anyways, please ask everyone to come to my
meetup in Longview, Texas, at the end of
the month.
It'll be fun and you'll get to meet
the world famous Sir Brian with one eye.
Adam and John, thanks for all you do.

(02:37:16):
It does not go unnoticed.
Y'all be good, says dirty Jersey whore.
Thank you, DJW.
We really appreciate that.
Next donation is from Anonymous in New York.
I this donation came in in a very
small envelope that was completely taped in every
which way.

(02:37:38):
And Jay didn't want to open.
There's something in here.
It's all taped up.
I can't open it all.
Fentanyl.
I'm gonna get killed.
So I had to take a knife and
rip through the tape to cut it open.
I said, I guarantee there's a big check
in here because that's what people when they
when they put a big check in the
mail, they always tape it up so I

(02:37:58):
could give away.
And it was there was a check for
500 bucks from someone who had did the
right thing and put you want to be
anonymous.
We had a complaint from one of our
someone who was a spook that sent something
in through Stripe and bitch status for saying
his name.
You want to do you want to send
it in cash and in an envelope or.
Well, he did.

(02:38:19):
This guy did his check and he had
post-it notes all over the check.
Anonymous.
So we got the picture.
It was a picture.
Oh, we got the picture.
I get it.
We got the picture.
No, he's anonymous.
Five hundred bucks.
We appreciate that.
But he gets a double up karma because
he had no note, which is always you've

(02:38:40):
got worth a double up karma.
All right.
Oh, here we go to Ross Johnson.
Read him earlier.
Three hundred and thirty three dollars and thirty
nine cents nighting donation.
Now, is he getting knighted?
Is he on the nighting list?
Let me make sure I want to make
sure we get him nights.

(02:39:02):
Hmm.
I haven't donated in years because Adam Elan
nighting donation.
Unless he unless he hasn't donated in years.
But this is his nighting he claims donation.
He's not on the list.
So that has.
Maybe he should clarify.
Yes.
I haven't donated in years because because of
Adam's Elan hatred.
Seriously.

(02:39:23):
Obviously short selling for years, which is just
funny.
I know that's.
Yeah.
I find that to be hilarious.
Adam flips like a fish out of water
because of facts on X.
It's not a terrible platform.
Right.
Dude, if you hate me so much.
No, no.
If he's going to hate and donate three
thirty three thirty nine.

(02:39:44):
That's the best.
That's what you want.
Call out douchebag Fritz for his youngest graduating
high school.
There you go.
Thank you very much.
Ross Johnson.
I have never short.
I've never shorted.
He doesn't short.
I've never shorted.
It's not.
It's non-trivial that he put a big
heart at the end.

(02:40:04):
An emoji.
Yeah.
I guess it's maybe it was just all
in jest.
It was.
That could be.
Maybe he's just chiding you.
Yeah, that's possible.
That could be because that's what the heart's
for.
Regardless, I forgive him of his debts as
I forgive my debtors.
Uh-huh.
Indy Norjan, the meetup came in with from
Greenwood, Indiana.
They're always doing a meetup all the time.

(02:40:26):
They have big.
Yes.
Mark and Maria.
Big, big.
So they got three thirty three thirty three
for us.
And this is the Indy Norjan a meetup
raffle switcheroo donation for Jason Soderlund.
So he Soderlund.
So he'll be on the he'll be credited.
Yes, he will.
Thank you, Adam and John, for your good
humor and perspective.
Thanks also to all the producers who silently

(02:40:48):
work in the background to keep the show
going.
I expectedly expect especially, especially, especially want to
thank Dreb for his tireless effort in putting
the chapters together.
Dreb Scott.
Everybody who is.
No, it's very appreciated and adds a lot
to the show.
I want to.
I want.
I went to my first meetup in Indy

(02:41:09):
last weekend.
Who.
Oh, this is Jason writing this.
Oh, they gave just Jason the ability.
He wrote the note.
Yes.
OK.
I went to my first meetup.
I had a great time.
And having won the meetup donation raffle, I
decided to add it to my add to
it.
He added to it to get his producer
credit, executive producer credit.

(02:41:29):
So he needs a de-douching.
You've been de-douched.
And then he has a plug that you'd
like.
Men of no agenda.
If you're looking for to cultivate a Bible
reading discipline in yourself, go to sons of
Solomon dot net.
Peace in Christ, he writes.
Jingles request.

(02:41:50):
What's that in your mouth?
Sons of Solomon dot net.
What's that in your mouth?
It's beautiful.
Yeah, it's kind of interesting.
It's awesome.
It's a J.C.D. Hot pockets.
Karma and no karma.
Just prayers from.
And he says Pax Vobiscum.
Jason Sutherland.
Hot pockets.

(02:42:11):
What's that in your mouth?
Still gets me.
Mike.
Thank you, Jason.
Mike Rulon in White Salmon, Washington.
Three thirty three dot thirty three.
He says he wants a double F cancer.
You've got karma.

(02:42:36):
Don't do that.
We don't do that all the time, but
since you've got karma and you can read
the next one says it blows up my
spreadsheet.
Trevor Loman, Redlands, California.
Two hundred and ten dollars.
Associate executive producer.
He says I've been listening since 2013.
I was donating steadily, but unfortunately lost my
health care job for not accepting the vaccine

(02:42:58):
into my life.
Once I could finally get a lawyer to
take my case, I learned that the statute
of limitations had expired.
Oh, that's interesting.
Hmm.
I wonder what the statute of limitations were
on and what they were for.
Seems pretty, pretty short.
Yeah.
In an ironic.
Has a statute.
I wonder what he's going to have to

(02:43:19):
explain.
I'd love to know.
In an ironic series of events, I'm now
a professor of neurology at a Big Ten
medical school.
Things have a way of working out.
I would be happy to replace your long
lost brain professor if you're still in the
market.
Yes.
But are you a libtard?
Doesn't quite work if you aren't a libtard.
This is my first donation in five years.
And it brings me to knighthood.

(02:43:39):
Please knight me, sir.
Writer of words and plug my recent book,
God's Eye View.
The book explores the true experiments in neuroscience
and quantum mechanics that support rather than refute
the existence of the human soul.
Send me a copy.
Wow.
That's cool.
Please also plug the Grimerica show, the Brothers

(02:44:00):
of the Serpent podcast and my own podcast.
Oh, I'll listen to your podcast.
My own podcast.
Yes.
And my own podcast, God's Eye View.
Oh, I know, Trevor.
He actually sent me the book.
He won.
Oh, brother.
Yeah, well, he wanted me to write a
blurb, but his deadline was too tight and
I just couldn't get through.
Oh, man, I can write a blurb in

(02:44:21):
two seconds.
You know, I was told this is years
ago.
It's like when you send someone a book
in a word document, I find that very
hard to read all the way through.
I understand.
But I have a promotion, a story.
So and I took it to heart and
I'm always irked.

(02:44:42):
I had to.
I've done a couple of books and I've
asked people for blurbs.
So I got to read it first.
They go on and on and on.
It's like, give me a break.
Okay.
I don't know if I've got total agreement
with you.
I can't write a blurb.
I actually considered just writing his blurb without
having read it, but I didn't feel good
about it.
Well.
So John Brockman, my agent, New York, that

(02:45:02):
was when I was doing a lot of
tech books, he was well connected.
He was friends with Alan Watts, the writer
Buddhist.
Oh, yeah.
This is this is all the guys that
Whitney Webb talks about.
And so he says that Alan Watts told
him that he says he never met a

(02:45:23):
blurb he didn't write.
He says, if you ask Alan Watts for
a blurb, he'd give you a blurb in
five minutes because the way he saw it,
it was all publicity.
Just write the blurb.
People see your name, your name, your name,
your name, Alan Watts.
It was just.
And and that's a policy that I adopted.
If someone asked me for a blurb for
their book, I don't care how crappy the

(02:45:44):
book is.
I'll give them a blurb.
Wow.
Okay.
Yeah.
And it doesn't take long.
There's all kinds of ways you can put
things.
Would you know?
So if I gave you a book right
now.
Yeah.
And the book was about here.
I'm going to give you a title and
then you write the blurb.
You ready?
Because you're going to I'm going to ask

(02:46:05):
you first.
Will you write a blurb about my book
regardless?
Of course.
Regardless of what it is.
Yeah.
Here's my book.
Jesus was a badass outlaw.
Give me a blurb.
Go.
A fascinating read by Adam Curry.
That's it.
That's the blurb.
That would be a blurb.
I can write a longer blurb or a

(02:46:25):
shorter blurb.
I need more blurb.
I would say I've never.
This is a book everyone should pick up
and read.
It's unbelievable how he's come to these conclusions.
This is something I highly recommend.
Now I just got to write the book.
Yeah.
Continuing.

(02:46:45):
Noah Jen the nation.
Please search God's Eye View on Amazon and
look for the book with the big black
hole on the cover.
For those who can't afford the book or
are too cheap to buy it.
Please search God's Eye View in a modern
podcast app to find my show for more
years.
Says Sir.
Writer of words.
Thank you Sir.
Writer of words.
We appreciate that.
And good luck with the book.
When it comes out in paperback.

(02:47:06):
I will write a blurb.
I know how to do it now.
Lenny Lou Patkin Lakewood Colorado 200 bucks jobs
karma she's asking for and she says for
a competitive edge with a resume that gets
results.
Go to Image Makers Inc.
dot com for all your executive and resume
and job search needs.

(02:47:27):
That's Mr. Makers Inc.
with a K dot com and work with
Linda Lou Duchess of jobs and write her
resume.
She's gone back to the classic because she
knows that we know that we know that
she knows that we know what we're talking
about.
Jobs jobs jobs and jobs.
Let's vote for jobs.
Awesome.

(02:47:47):
Yes.
Eli the coffee guy didn't show up today.
So I hope he's OK.
He probably didn't get the mail.
A lot of people didn't get the newsletter.
It happened again.
The newsletter you know and I couldn't send
out a secondary letter again because every time
you do that you lose like 50 people.
Oh really.
Oh that sucks.
At least.
And so I can't keep air.

(02:48:08):
I can't keep sending out two and two
and two.
So I am not sure I'm just going
to have to let it settle down.
That kind of sucks.
Kind of.
Yeah that sucks.
All right.
That's the last donor for a show 1771
vote for the executive and associate executive producers.
We appreciate you.
And of course we'll be thanking the rest
of our producers who came in fifty dollars

(02:48:30):
and above.
And as always you can go to no
agenda donations dot com and donate any amount
you want.
We love the numerology.
Thank you sir.
Dirty Jersey whore baronet sir.
Dirty Jersey whore.
And that means you can also set up
a sustaining donation.
It could be just a couple of bucks
per show per week per day whatever you
want to do.
Go to no donation dot com again.
Thank you to our executive and associate executive

(02:48:51):
producer.
We go out.
We hit people in the mouth.

(02:49:14):
Some copyright stuff going on they're making a
fuss about.
Let me guess.
Is that is that with a copyright stuff.
Yeah.
Good.
So I have two clips that are at
least somewhat enlightening.
I don't think it gets us anywhere but
at least it shows that somebody is covering
it.
This I think NPR NPR it is.

(02:49:37):
The United States Copyright Office is normally kind
of quiet.
Low drama.
Authors and artists go there to register their
works and Congress goes there when it needs
advice on copyright issues.
But lately between the firings and the lawsuits
and a highly anticipated report on A.I.
The office is not so quiet.
Here's NPR's Andrew Limbaugh.
Let's start the story on a Thursday.

(02:49:58):
May 8th.
President Trump abruptly fired Carla Hayden the Librarian
of Congress.
The next day May 9th the U.S.
Copyright Office which resides within the Library of
Congress published a highly anticipated report on whether
or not using copyrighted works to train generative
A.I. counted as fair use.
Funny thing is this report was and still
is labeled as a prepublication version.

(02:50:20):
That part is extremely weird.
In fact I don't think they've ever done
that before.
That's Dave Hansen the Executive Director of the
Authors Alliance an organization that argues for less
strict copyright laws which is to say they
interact regularly with the office.
Anyway that report dropped on a Friday and
then by Saturday Shira Perlmutter the head of
the U.S. Copyright Office had a letter

(02:50:41):
telling her that she was dismissed.
That letter was sent by Trent Morris deputy
assistant to the president.
It seems like there must be some sort
of connection between the timing of the release
and all of that other drama but we
just don't really know exactly why.
And we still don't quite yet.
Perlmutter has since filed a lawsuit against President
Trump as well as the two people he
appointed currently acting as the new Librarian of

(02:51:03):
Congress and the Register of Copyrights Todd Blanch
and Paul Perkins.
The argument being since both the Library of
Congress and the U.S. Copyright Office are
under the legislative branch the president has no
authority to hire or fire people.
Oh.
Really.
Yeah.
Huh.
He's just firing anybody he feels like.
Give him something to do.

(02:51:23):
This is part two.
But people broadly in the copyright world have
been kind of stunned at how much their
quiet neck of the woods has been shaken
up.
Christelia Garcia is a professor at Georgetown Law
focusing on intellectual property.
Obviously politically things are all drama drama drama
all the time now.
But to have it come to the Copyright
Office was quite a surprise for the copyright

(02:51:44):
community who are sort of you know not
used to being thrust into the spotlight.
Generally speaking even with this sort of AI
stuff.
So what about that big bombshell report the
Copyright Office published on generative AI the one
the office put out before it was finalized.
Well what it said was in some instances
using copyrighted materials to train generative AI could

(02:52:06):
qualify as fair use.
And in some cases it wouldn't.
It is very even keeled.
That's Keith Cooper Schmidt the CEO of the
Copyright Alliance a group that represents artists and
publishers for stronger copyright laws.
And he says the report avoids generalizations and
takes arguments on a case by case basis
which is reflective of how Perlmutter ran the
office.

(02:52:26):
Perlmutter was beloved no matter whether she agreed
with you or not because she always did
the hard work.
She always was very thoughtful and considers all
these different viewpoints.
There are dozens of lawsuits going on right
now over copyright and AI usage.
While it remains to be seen if and
how the legal teams on either side will

(02:52:46):
use this report.
This is just the beginning says Georgetown professor
Christelia Garcia.
This is just a foreshadowing of the front
lines of the generative AI battle.
I think copyright is really taking the sort
of canary in the coal mine here.
The warning being if you haven't been paying
attention to generative AI now is a good
time to start.

(02:53:08):
Your analysis Dr. Dvorak.
Well they told us nothing.
Pretty much in three minutes two clips nothing.
And I don't know.
I think it's my analysis is like everybody
else's is like I don't know what's going
to happen.
I think there's fair use issues here but

(02:53:29):
there's a lot of you know.
What I mean the pub there's a lot
of public domain material that the generative AI
can suck up.
And then once in a while you get
I asked perplexity the other day something about
you are talking about it in a manner
that sounds like it's a human you are

(02:53:50):
on a bad track.
And it was wrong with this answer because
I knew the answer.
I was just looking for the details.
No it was wrong.
Oh no.
And I find it is wrong a lot.
And I'm not sure why it's wrong because
if you read this is a real problem
I think especially people who go to and

(02:54:12):
some people do it on this show and
some people do it on the DHM plug
show.
I've seen this happen on real time where
the person will go to chat GPT or
some AI to get a quick answer to
a question.
And I find that it would be the
wrongness of a lot of these answers.
And if you rephrase the question it gets
it right.
This is a real problem in my mind.

(02:54:34):
Well that's because there's no intelligence involved.
They can't understand the kind I know there's
no intelligence involved.
But the point is it's supposed to be
a neural network in front of the in
front of the corpus that get analyzes the
whole key to the success is analyzing the
question you ask it or analyzing the prompt
you give it and then then reacting accordingly

(02:54:57):
to the prompt using a neural network that's
supposed to mimic intelligence.
It doesn't work well.
Oh it doesn't work well at all.
Well no it works better than you like
them to imagine but it doesn't work as
well as I'd like.
No it doesn't work well.
Maxine Waters is now in Los Angeles.

(02:55:18):
There you go.
She's at the protests.
Now they got a showboat.
They got professional signs John professional signs at
the already.
Well they've been there the whole time.
So the quad box everyone is live including
the BBC.
And I think they're just waiting for someone
to kick it off.

(02:55:38):
They're just waiting.
They're just standing two lines and wait for
somebody to take a shot.
Yeah.
And throw or throw a Molotov cocktail.
All the protesters are walking past the ICE
agents filming them lives.
I'm live everybody.
Right now I'm live.
We are brave.
We're brave.
We're standing up against the terror.
The terror.

(02:55:58):
The man.
The man.
Screw the man.
Like no kings dot org.
Make sure you go there on the 14th.
We're streaming live.
We're doing a live here on the Insta
and on the tech talks.
We're live everywhere buddy.
Yeah.
We're live.
Yeah.
We're not taking it anymore.
I'm not taking it from Trump.
They are.
Tears will come from this.
Someone is going to do something and then
they're going to get beaten upside the head.

(02:56:20):
I can tell you right now everyone's waiting
for it.
Everyone's clued in.
They're just waiting for some some douche bag
some instigator to do something and then it's
going to be messy.
So OK.
On the A.I. copyright.
This is a story from the U.K.'s

(02:56:41):
which is.
Could be concerning I guess if you don't
read your contracts from 10 years ago.
You can do it when you be in
queue it.
Her face may not be recognizable but Gayan
is the voice behind adverts for some of
Britain's biggest brands.
Please make the gap when waiting for this

(02:57:02):
dream.
Now she's the unbeknown A.I. star announcer
on board Scotland's trains.
I feel violated.
I feel completely violated.
My voice is my job and I should
be allowed to know who I'm working with
and what I'm working on.
But more than that as a human being
I should know who owns my voice data.
So just to be clear you didn't know

(02:57:24):
that you're going to be the voice of
Scotland's railways.
No I had no idea.
I literally didn't know.
This can all be traced back to a
job Gayan carried out during Covid with the
Swedish firm Reed Speaker recording scripts for the
visually impaired.
It was before artificial intelligence was really a
thing.
Fast forward a few years her voice has
been sold and transformed into a robot.

(02:57:46):
Unions representing the creative industry claim this is
exploitation and points to wider A.I. concerns.
I feel burgled.
I feel like my data has been burgled.
I don't know who holds it.
I don't know what they're doing with it.
I've no control over it and I don't
consent to it.
Do you know I'm the voice of Apple
for Singapore.
Reed Speaker claims there is an agreement in

(02:58:07):
place and all issues have been addressed.
ScotRail has no plans to stop using the
voice.
A story of consent contracts and concerns in
an increasingly A.I. focused world.
Well that's no good.
Imagine that.
I mean being a voice over artist is
tough in general now.
Yeah you don't make a lot of money.

(02:58:28):
No.
No.
So they they they bought her voice.
It was sampled by.
Well if she signed it over.
Yeah.
This is like people who signed their rights
over when they do writing and they they
sign all their rights over to some publisher
and then it turns they don't keep it
and then it turns into a Clooney movie.
Good.
Yeah.
You feel really bad about it.

(02:58:49):
Here's something I've been wondering for a long
for many many years.
If you are running for the Governor of
New York Why do they call the gubernatorial
race what when does the B come in
to governor That's a very good question it
doesn't borderline on a great question no I

(02:59:12):
know no there's no such thing because it
can't you say a governor's race or gubernatorial
Why is it gubernator like if you always
make like goober?
Like they're a bunch of yeah, that's what
there it is you just answer your question
the governor is a goober Well, there's a
lot of goobers, and this is you know
so they're debating right now, and of course
Cuomo is trying to come back And yeah,

(02:59:33):
but he's coming back as a mayor.
I thought it was for the governor No,
no, this is the one wants to be
mayor.
Well the moment question is still valid But
another question about gubernatorial is yes.
Well.
This is about the mayor that I'm sorry
what someone for some reason I mistook it
for the gubernatorial race So this is they're

(02:59:55):
doing the debates and Cuomo's in the debate
And this is this by the way goes
against everything that I just said earlier about
people leaving the show because you know we
we pander to the Jews for the Jew
money Yes, where's our Jew money?
We may have gotten some spook money today,
but we didn't get any Jew that I

(03:00:17):
can tell that's no good Here is an
interesting question posed to the candidates for mayor
of New York City the first foreign visit
by a Mayor of New York is always
considered significant.
Where would you go first?
That's right First visit I would visit the
Holy Land Okay, miss Lander mr..

(03:00:40):
Lander sorry Boy what Trump is doing to
Canada There's a lot of opportunities for us
to partner better with them miss Ramos I'd
love to meet Claudia Scheinbaum, but I'd probably
head to Colombia to my parents homeland good
That was a good answer because you throw
in a little bit of Jew there with
Scheinbaum But you're gonna go to Colombia.
That was good mr..

(03:01:00):
Byron.
I am a proud son of two Caribbean
immigrants I represent a robust Caribbean constituency.
I'd like to go to the Caribbean as
my first visit.
Yeah, you're off You're not gonna win mr..
Cuomo given the hostility and the anti-semitism
that has been Shown in New York, I
would go to Israel mr..
Tilson.
Where would you go?
Yeah, I'd make my fourth trip to Israel

(03:01:20):
followed by my fifth trip to Ukraine He's
doubling now he's gonna go for his fifth
trip and then to Ukraine yes, mr..
Tilson.
Where would you go?
Yeah, I'd make my fourth trip to Israel
followed by my fifth trip to Ukraine two
of our greatest allies Fighting on the front
lines of the global war on terror mr..

(03:01:40):
Mom Donnie I would stay in New York
City my plans are to address New Yorkers
across the five boroughs and focus on that
Mr..
Mom Donnie, can I just jump in I
want to jump in you visit Israel Would
you cross the five boroughs and focus on

(03:02:05):
that mr..
Mom Donnie, can I just jump in would
you visit Israel?
My mayor I will be doing as the
mayor I'll be standing up for Jewish New
Yorkers And I'll be meeting them wherever they
are across the five boroughs whether that's in
their synagogues and temples Or at their homes
or at the subway platform because ultimately we
need to focus on delivering on their concerns
I'm just yes or no.

(03:02:25):
Do you believe in a Jewish state of
Israel?
I believe Israel has the right to exist
Not as a Jewish state no as a
state with equal rights He won't No no
unlike Directly I believe every state should be

(03:02:46):
a state of you wouldn't say it.
He wouldn't say it.
He's no good Man Wow what a bunch
of rubes New York is done That was
pretty I thought that was hilarious Yeah, oh
You just won the Super Bowl.
Where are you going Israel?
Oh Miss America you just became the new

(03:03:10):
Miss America.
Where are you going Tel Aviv?
Well They could have gone to visit a
Bulgarian old folks home because all hell's breaking
loose there Oh, what's this Bulgarian old folks
horror?
Bulgarian officials say they've rescued 75 residents from

(03:03:32):
two illegal care homes Where they were allegedly
subjected to brutal mistreatment They said the victims
were beaten bound and sedated with doors and
windows locked Justice Minister Georgi Georgieff described the
facilities in the eastern village of Yagoda as
houses of horrors Bulgaria has a shortage of
good care homes for older people.
Oh my did they have pictures and video

(03:03:55):
was the Beaten they take their old folks
and they beat them Wow Bulgaria what are
you doing?
Is there a color revolution going on in
Bulgaria?
Is there an election coming up?
No, no, nothing.
Mm-hmm.
Turns out that they does what they do
to old people in Bulgaria.
They beat him Coming to California soon.

(03:04:15):
I hear now it could be a five
-minute warning you get one or two more
clips.
It's all up to you Go, okay.
I have this there every once in a
while There's one of these stories that comes
up and it's always the same kind of
a thing going on It's very suspicious story
and they're gonna they're gonna these are all
seem like spooky stories because they it's like

(03:04:36):
you got somebody and you got a debrief
them or you've got to Get him out
of the country You got it You got
a rescue him or something something like it's
like a CIA guy and they always goes
through and I have no idea why the
detainment centers in Louisiana Have you noticed as
Louisiana think keeps cropping up no play this

(03:04:59):
Russian.
This is the Russian frog Smuggler.
Yes a Judge in Vermont today ordered the
release of a Russian born scientist and Harvard
researcher saying she was being unlawfully held by
immigration authorities Ksenia Petrova who recently spoke to
NewsHour from detention still faces a criminal charge

(03:05:20):
of smuggling frog Embryos after she failed to
declare them at Boston's Logan Airport in February
Petrova says she uses them for research an
immigration officer stripped Petrova of her visa and
she was sent to an ice facility in
Louisiana at a hearing today judge Christina Reese
said quote there does not seem to be
either a factual or legal basis for the

(03:05:42):
immigration officers actions That's what I was expected
to face a bail hearing next week on
the smuggling charge Okay, well that that is
interesting I happen to know a couple of
people here in Fredericksburg who moved recently from
Louisiana And they grew up there so they
may have some inside information for me I
mean, there's ice detention centers all over the

(03:06:04):
place But these these super suspicious sounding stories
like this one Russian woman a professor teaching
Brings in some embryos.
I don't know how they found those but
they did Like a setup to be over
to this facility in Louisiana, it's always, Louisiana
They do they do ask at at customs,

(03:06:25):
you know, do you have any?
Plants animals or fruit and if you lie,
then you get detained Yeah, but who's gonna
how are you gonna do?
You could it doesn't make sense.
This whole story just makes no sense.
I don't see how anybody can't easily Take
some frog embryos and stuff them in a

(03:06:45):
coke can and take it through customs I
mean or guys you can't get through because
it's got liquid but that mean there's ways
If you're smuggling frog embryos, it seems to
me, you know what you're doing.
Hey, hey Bullcrap embryos have got to go.
Hey, hey No

(03:07:15):
Rest assured I am on the case of
the Louisiana spookiness I will get answers several
people who I know here have grown up
there in the bayou in the swamps We
have swamp people here.
They will know what's going on.
And we have some just horrible Non-musical
pieces of crap coming up known as the
end of show mixes You don't want I

(03:07:36):
mean, why are you even still listening?
You don't want to be exposed to that.
It may hurt you But before that we
have the most wonderful tip of the day
by John C Dvorak now this the tip
of the day is its own entity.
You could this should be a spin-off
show Tip of the day show tip of
the day show I'm telling you you now

(03:07:56):
the but the problem is you'd have to
do it every day, which you know Cuz
it's yeah, otherwise it wouldn't be a tip
of the day, but I guarantee you podcast
Success.
I'm thinking a podcast award.
Maybe maybe even a webby Hey, which reminds
me.
I saw it was watch looking at somebody's
Wiki page I can't remember who it was,

(03:08:17):
but they won it was one of just
the Brando podcasters and they won a Podcasting
award from some operation.
It was listed on the wiki page for
best audio sound.
Oh, man That's what I said How many
times do I have to say I'm good

(03:08:38):
to go I'm on the pod father podcast
awards and you just drop the ball on
me I'm gonna have to pick it up.
I'll pick up the ball.
I read it.
Meanwhile pick up the ball She's moved way
up to the top of the list here.
She's in Sparks, Nevada, and she came in
with a hundred thirty-five bucks And she
says thanks for the tremendous value And spin

(03:09:00):
down.
I like that.
We're spin downers Spin down That could be
perceived as negative spin downers downers man I
think that might hurt the show down that
might hurt the show.
We can't use that.
No, it's gonna hurt the show as those
mixes Paul Rouge, are you you GE?

(03:09:21):
I think that's how it's pronounced.
He's in Fort Thomas, Kentucky.
He came in with a hundred bucks A
Kellen Prince It's a nice name in Hollywood,
Florida hundred dollars Baroness night.
She's in Edmonds, Washington.
She's up to auntie.
She's always a $50 donor and she's up
there to 100 So that's nice Kevin McLaughlin
shows up at 800 80s They are stucco

(03:09:43):
Luna lover of America lover of boobs And
he says he's got a PSA here says
summertime is the perfect time to show off
your melons ladies No disagreement here the no
agenda show, you know, I will say that
our I Track this stuff our the number

(03:10:07):
of people our female listeners is down has
been it's down Turning to a couple of
sexist jerk-offs as far as a lot
of the ladies are concerned well I mean
that are they we know Tina's listening because
the minute Right away, so you're wrong.

(03:10:27):
You're wrong.
You know what I'm talking about Yon brewer
brooding to bring ink rethink Looking in schmilda
Netherlands he came with 808 very famous very
famous place.
That's where The Moluccas hijacked a train in
the 70s and killed the Moluccas, yeah Yeah,

(03:10:50):
the Moluccas, maybe he wants to be jobs
comer for his son Your yen, is that
right?
You're young you're young Urien and that would
be at the end if you can remember
Why am I?
Christian oh another Dutch pretty good Christy Christy

(03:11:11):
answer Christy on And it's light in very
good 8008 And he has a little note
there.
He's just got it's in green.
He came in through stripe Stripe, he says
thanks for sending some rain over to lighten.
Yeah, we did and he says I sent
boobs in return It's a good combination if

(03:11:34):
you ask me he says Adam next time,
you know Next time it starts hailing golf
balls put a drum kit outside.
Let me tell you if you look at
Tina's insta I think she's Tina curry 33
You can hear what it sounds like and
so we actually turns out we have a
lot of damage We didn't know about the
garage doors filled with pits Little bit dense

(03:11:57):
dense little dance little dance We have a
our screen We have a like the idea
of putting a drum kit outside.
We have it.
Oh, it would go right through the skins
We have a screened-in porch We don't
go out there much and when it's 95
degrees completely all the screens pelted with holes

(03:12:20):
Yeah God damn stinks.
I got damaged.
Well, you got insurance.
Oh, we're not we are not going to
claim This for insurance, you know what'll happen
We'll get kicked out of our insurance Stephen
Hutto in st.
Petersburg Florida great little place 75 bucks Zachary

(03:12:45):
Metzinger in South Lake, Texas 6673 Chad Hewitt
in Folsom, California 6640 and he says yeah
go blue acorn, huh?
Stephen Schumach in Xenia, Ohio 65 80 David

(03:13:07):
Cox in Austin right down the street from
you 63 25 or where you used to
live Grace and insurance grace and insurance in
Aurora, Colorado 6006 Eric Hulse in Katy, Texas
or cut tea, Texas 5798 80 I'm loving

(03:13:28):
cut tea Manuel Medeiros and Tracy, California 5798
Quote quit your belly aching donation.
Oh, it worked So 5798 is a belly
aching donation.
I guess so sir Hilton Hilton Hilton Insulting

(03:13:53):
he's insulting, Georgia He was 55 10 and
he wants some Karma jingle that means but
you both put some karma at the end
Anonymous 56 or 55 Nancy Murphy in San
Bruno, California 55 and there she is again
with another 55 and she says here's another

(03:14:14):
donation the new sad puppy made me do
it I've got two complaints about this new
sad puppy Troy Funderburg that the complaints were
the said somebody sent me this picture to
use.
It's a sad puppy sad looking in a
dryer Oh pre Suicidal or something this this

(03:14:38):
goes to my theory that people don't care
what you do to other people But man,
you do something to a dog.
You're is it's the end of you This
is the dogs in the dryer and somebody
said one of the producers is that's in
poor taste Scolding me for it Nancy Murphy
came in twice.

(03:14:58):
Okay.
Well, she's actually 110 Trey Funderburg in Missoula,
Montana 55 Troy Troy Funderburg Troy.
Yeah, I always do that Okay, here's another
Dutchman.
We're all lean from their hearts.
Probably a Dutch girl in whole lots of
girls We're all mean whole lots of felt
50 in Holland Chevette 5272 It's to say

(03:15:21):
Brittany Miller also Women there women right here.
Look at these women.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Those are the two Nancy Rolene Brittany.
Come on Christian Hart sock Burbank, California is
one of our regular 5194.
I did it.
I Helped it.
He'd substituted on OAN for Chanel over the

(03:15:41):
weekend.
Oh, really?
Yeah He's apparently a writer for OANN, you
know Oh one American News Yeah.
Oh cool.
Hey Roger and I did I did it
a hit get you did a hit on
OAN Yeah, well, how come you didn't tell
me I just did Yeah, but I mean
did it go in advance?

(03:16:03):
No You do do it's because you do
so many podcasts and you never mention anything
to me and then all of a sudden
it shows Up in a donation note and
I go what is this?
So I'm doing the same I'm on the
move John's doing PR everybody.
He did a hit.
Oh, yeah Roger Cali check in Norcross, Georgia
5510.

(03:16:23):
He needs a de-douching You've been de
-douched Ziya Thomas and Anne Kinney, Iowa 51
and now we got the $50 donors name
and location starting with not a lot today
Jacob Rotterman home brother rot trommel rot trommel

(03:16:46):
in Decatur, Illinois Stephen Ray and Spokane Washington
Ray Howard in Kremling, Colorado Edward, Missouri can
Memphis Christopher Scott in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania Renee
Bernhard Gurter if she's in sweet in Switzerland
Bernhardt's good sir Bernhardt's good.

(03:17:09):
They're good.
They're good.
She's in sound galleon st.
Gallen.
She greets st.
Bernard's And she's well, it was st.
Bernard's are in Switzerland.
Yes That's nice to have a Swiss donor.
Then the that came in stripe.
It'd be international.
Yeah producers.
They like like stripe Stripe is the way

(03:17:29):
to go for international donations Calrae Jackson in
Watertown, Tennessee and last on our list is
a good old Jason DeLuzio in Miami Beach,
Florida I want to thank all these people
for show 1771 yes indeed.
Thank you all very much.
And again, thank you to those donors who
came in and supporters and producers came in
under $50 we never mentioned them for reasons

(03:17:50):
of anonymity And of course you can set
up a sustaining donation anytime any kind of
donation any amount its value for value Whatever
you get out of the show send it
back to us in value And that's just
fine for some people five dollars is a
lot for some people five hundreds a lot
or not It doesn't matter just as long
as you support us at some point somehow
to give back to the show That's value

(03:18:11):
for value Again, thanks to our executive and
associate executive producers for episode.
What is it episode?
1771 a palindrome and Strangely enough for the
first time in as long as I can
remember we do not have a single birthday
to celebrate When does that happen?

(03:18:31):
Has that ever happened?
Yeah, it has a couple times.
Actually, I don't recall.
So no birthdays.
So no happy birthdays to you.
However Title changes We do
have a couple of title changes We got

(03:18:52):
Sir Dirty Jersey Whore as you heard earlier
our top executive producer today Who becomes a
baronet Dame Nancy of the confused also changing
her title today becoming a baroness Oh, yes,
very very beautiful and Sir Dirty Jersey Whore
also gets his PhD We have that special
promotion which has come back for a limited
time limited time only go to no agenda

(03:19:13):
rings.com dirty jersey Or let us know
where to send your PhD And if you
really want sir dirty jersey whore on it
or maybe your your actual name so you
can use it to Impress your friends and
the neighbors and we have one night So
I'll grab my blade here if you can
there's the same old one night blade.
I've got oh, it's nice It's taking a

(03:19:39):
bit, but we're happy to see you here
at the podium for these Because you have
supported the best podcast in the university amount
of $1,000 or more that means I
get to pronounce the Kate you sir as
Writer of words and for you.
We've got hookers and blow red boys and
chardonnay You've got some diet soda and video
games fish pie and fellatio hearts and how

(03:20:01):
though we've got redheads and rise beers and
blunts Ruben s women and rosé Geishas and
sake bakka manila bong hits a bourbon sparkling
cider and escorts ginger ale and gerbils a
favorite in Hollywood Breast milk and pabulum and
as always the mutton and the meat here
at the round table for you And you
also can go to no agenda rings calm
anybody can go there and take a look
at them And you and it's a cumulative

(03:20:22):
so you can you can donate five dollars
a month if you want people become Knights
And dames is really cool, and this ring
is a signet ring It looks very very
cool at the no agenda meetups, and so
for that reason we give you a couple
of sticks of wax you can melt down
and Stick your signet ring right on there
and let everybody knows that this is a

(03:20:43):
very important correspondence and as always it comes
with a certificate of authenticity signed by yours
truly Adam and John Oh Great
way to send value back to the show
and to get mo nation in general by

(03:21:04):
organizing a no agenda meetup You can go
to no agenda meetups calm another fantastic website.
We never built done in the value for
value model Thank you, sir Daniel for that
We got a report from Brussels the big
Brussels meetup It seems like sarcastic the nomad
was there by himself He did get one

(03:21:25):
RSVP from Alex who lives in Brussels unfortunately
his two Girlfriends from Colombia arrived early in
Brussels And he decided decided to stay home
with them, and he sent me a picture,
and I think he made the right choice
a Picture of Alex with his two Colombian
girlfriends doesn't sound so she brought their girlfriends

(03:21:45):
to the meetup.
I think so too But he didn't Big
Tom's bar was a great venue unbeknownst to
me.
It is a NATO hangout bar lots of
spooky people drinking Belgian beer I'm always the
maze what a drunk soldier will tell you
Do tell sarcastic the nomad we'd love to
hear more Answer dirty Jersey whore as you

(03:22:07):
recall on the last show Excuse me for
his meetup promo as a Texas the East
Texas no agenda meetup We we excoriated him
for sending in a two-minute meet a
meetup promo you remember this You excoriated him.
No you did too.
You said it should be 30 seconds tops

(03:22:28):
I Did say that he sent us, but
not in the form of an excoriation well?
He sent us a new one it is
33 seconds exactly which I think is valid
That's okay, and you put up with that
and listen to this hey there freedom lovers
and media deconstructors Wish you had someone to
compare your shrunken amygdala with well do we
have a meetup for you?
It's all going down Sunday, June 29th at
333 p.m..

(03:22:49):
In Longview, Texas go over to no agenda
meetup calm and let us know you Are
coming or just show up again that June
29th 333 p.m..
Longview, Texas be there or be labeled a
conspiracy denier common side effects May include mild
dizziness nausea spontaneous lactation sudden urges to gamble
or engage in risky sexual behavior sleep driving
sleep eating sleep shopping uncontrollable laughter explosive diarrhea
Anal leakage blue-gray skin discoloration hallucinations black
hairy tongue unexpected hair growth in unusual places
purple urine or sweat permanent loss of taste
or smell Positive drug test penile enlargement and

(03:23:10):
in rare cases existential dread ask your conspiracy
therapist if this meetup is right for you
brought to you by Dana Brunetti That sounds
like a Fremont drag strip commercial from back
in the 60s and 70s I was outstanding
Sunday Sunday Sunday is all that was missing
33 nitro burning funny cars That's right well
on Sunday this Sunday the 4th annual Louisiana

(03:23:32):
crawfish boil kicks off at 2 o'clock
at Shaw Acres That's Prairieville, Louisiana Hey Mary
Moon Organizing let us know what you know
about the ice detention centers.
It's a little spooky down there by the
way it is an RSVP invited think it's
at her home, so you've got a Check
-in to be checked out and the night

(03:23:52):
by the way to interrupt you in the
middle of this of this I had to
say the Jersey dirty whore Quickie was well
done well done well done indeed the Northern
Wake Freedom Southern Slammo Whammo six o'clock
on Thursday at hoppy endings in Raleigh, North
Carolina Make sure you check that out coming
up the next week the 13th Copenhagen, Denmark

(03:24:15):
We have Lazarus Vards in Culemborg.
I'm just doing the international ones Comox British
Columbia, that's Canada 17th con in France we've
never had good luck in con no one
ever shows up to those meetups So, please
please give it a shot and on the
19th of September or way ahead now Tilburg
North Nalo North Brabant in the Netherlands, so

(03:24:38):
go to no agenda meetups calm.
There's always a cool meetup taking place It's
all around the world as you can tell
and when you do a meter purport make
it fun Make it interesting try and make
it short and always include your server and
tip them Well, no agenda meetups calm if
you can't find we're new you start one
yourself.
It's always a party You All

(03:25:15):
right now to make up for the end
of show mixes We'll have a very snappy
ISO for you at the end Which will
just because that it truly is the last
thing that people hear so this kind of
discredits your theory It makes people happy they're
like, oh this was great.
I really loved hearing that end of show.
I so I feel good about the show
It's the end of a and the show

(03:25:36):
I so come before the mix No, it
comes at the very very end of the
show.
Have you ever listened to the podcast?
No, I never listened.
I have to Okay, probably don't like that
one But I kind of thought this one
was okay.
This doesn't make any sense.
I'm freaking out inside You laugh through it

(03:25:58):
this doesn't make any sense.
I'm freaking out inside.
I'm freaking out inside.
Oh God, I liked it.
If you took that part off, it would
be good.
This doesn't make any sense Like that.
Yeah, I think that's that that beats mine.
Well, let's listen to yours.
Thanks for spending your weekend with us Wow,

(03:26:20):
that's AI if I ever heard one.
Nope, really?
Thanks for spending your weekend with us It's
that black Chick, whatever her name is that
does the weekend shows with Scott and other
people?
No, that's a real person No, you like
mine better.
This doesn't make any sense Like yeah, I
like it Created

(03:26:52):
by Dana Brunetti All right, this is the
time of the year to plant Is it
now not in Texas Well, it actually this
would be fine in Texas, too This is
a site.
It's called the chili pepper Institute And it
is run out of New Mexico State University

(03:27:14):
and they have they sell over a hundred
varieties of hot chilies The seeds They're a
little I think they're pricey.
The seeds are a Pricer than I'd like
but but there's five bucks a pack But
there's some of the more the lots of
scorpion peppers all kinds of screwball peppers.

(03:27:35):
You've never had you don't see they're not
commercial They're they're there and they claim that
the seeds are all very viable.
So the you plant these seeds are going
to grow And I would recommend planting some
chilies And they have all they have all
of them, but what they don't I'm sorry
They don't have all of them because there's
thousands, but they have over a hundred varieties
Including a bunch of scorpion peppers don't have

(03:27:57):
the Carolina Reaper for example I don't think
that must actually copyrighted Carolina Reaper.
Well, it's a tough one, but the web
I finally found a Website that you can
that you can write down CPI for chili
pepper Institute dot NMSU, New Mexico State University

(03:28:19):
dot edu and And you click on the
store online store and knock yourself out.
What is the appropriate or best way to
plant your chilies there's they have all kinds
of information on the site they Grow like
a tomato.
It's a tomato if you didn't know how
to grow a tomato planting put those little

(03:28:41):
those little Seedling pots and you know and
put them in the window and get the
thing started once it gets started you got
it made Cuz once you grow you grow
it indoors not outdoor you could know I
would start it indoors And I would take
it outdoors or you could just plant it
outdoors if you can keep it So it
germinates you got to make sure it germinates

(03:29:03):
Make sure you germinate your peppers everybody there
it is once again a fantastic John C.
Dvorak's tip of the day Just Anybody grows
anything weird I mean because there's lots of
weird peppers in here I send me a
couple send John a couple of weird peppers

(03:29:25):
Once you pick a peck of pickled peppers
send them to Dvorak and that concludes our
broadcast day everybody remember Just plug your eardrums
because man.
We got sir Ducifer And sir scoby with
end of show mixes oh no Johnson of

(03:29:49):
Oroch says does better do better do does
better that just be better I Like him,
but I like all kinds of crap Coming
up next on your no agenda stream.
We have the mere mortals book reviews Oh,
he's this is adapt or die the youth
spy who sparked a passion for discipline Hmm
Stormbreaker book review, it's Kyron from Down Under

(03:30:13):
doing that look forward to that and We
will gladly be back with you on Thursday,
and we'll bring you more multiple hours of
media deconstruction Still waiting for it to kick
off in Los Angeles or to pop off
And I'm here in the part of the
Texas Hill country in the morning everybody madam
curry And from Northern Silicon Valley where the

(03:30:34):
National Guard is not here I'm John C.
Dvorak remember us at no agenda donations calm
until Thursday adios Hydrazine,

(03:31:21):
not hydrazine It's all bullcrap?
All of it is always a big butt
It's all bullcrap?
All of it is always a big butt
The hydrobooster, hy-hy-hydrobooster, zero point energy

(03:31:46):
It's all bullcrap?
All of it is always a big butt
Hydrazine, hydrazine, hydrazine, hydrazine, hydrazine, hydrazine, hydrazine,

(03:32:12):
exactly It's all
bullcrap?
All of

(03:32:34):
it is always a big butt
Aluminium.
Is it Aluminium?
Aluminium.
All this talk and you will see Terrorist

(03:32:57):
is reality They glorify They rage Still

(03:33:24):
so low British Pronunciation Aluminium After 25%
duty on Steel and Aluminium And can we
get an opinion On the pronunciation of Aluminium?
Is it Aluminium?

(03:33:45):
Aluminium It's hidden Terrorist dammit Just
a myth They see it right They see
it wrong Because they must Keep us strong

(03:34:11):
Terrorist The Aluminium

(03:34:32):
Aluminium Port Aluminum British love calling it Aluminium
The best podcast in the universe
mofo Dvorak.org Slash N A This doesn't

(03:34:57):
make any sense
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!

The Breakfast Club

The Breakfast Club

The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!

The Joe Rogan Experience

The Joe Rogan Experience

The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.