UK Column News - 3rd September 2025

Brian Gerrish, Vanessa Beeley and Sandi Adams with today's UK Column News.

Sources: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-3rd-september-2025

00:00 China Rolls Out the Big Guns as Media Spin GPS Interference — War Drums Beat Louder

10:52 Terrorism Charges, Police Intimidation, and the Story of NHS Doctor Rahmeh Aladwan

25:02 Impact Investing: Where Data Mining Becomes Currency - Introducing Sir Ronald Cohen 

32:59 Clegg the Gagmeister Sticks His Oar in on Censorship

46:03 UK Column Will Be ‘On Location’ In York - Join Us

47:44 Daily Mail Wonders What’s Become of the UK After Linehan’s Arrest

57:44 The New Philanthropists: Meet the Guerrilla Foundation, aka The Fellowship of the Bling

If you would like to support our independent journalism, please join the community: https://community.ukcolumn.org/

Episode Transcript

(00:08):
Good afternoon, it's Wednesday the 3rd of September 2025, just
after 1:00. Welcome to UK column News.
I'm your host Mike Robinson. My Co host today is Brian
Garish. Welcome to the programme, Brian.
Pleasure, pleasure, Mike. And joining us via Livelink, our
researcher and activist Sandy Adamson, journalist and peace
campaigner Vanessa Bailey. And later in the programme,
Brian's going to be reporting onthe duplicity of Nick Clegg,

(00:29):
censorship, politics, big business, these types of topics.
Vanessa's going to be covering the Zionist shadow state here in
the UK and Sandy's going to be taking a look at the at impact
investing and how that's changing the way that we're
governed. But we're going to start off
with going to China. And Xi Jinping was looking at a
huge parade and so on, a major military parade held in

(00:54):
Tiananmen Square in Beijing, of course, to mark the 80th
anniversary of the end of World War Two.
I have to say he said some pretty unpleasant things about
Japan in the course of the speech that he gave.
Perhaps unsurprising in a certain sense, but you know, it
is 80 years later. The BBC and other media took the
opportunity to present this as amajor provocation as China was

(01:17):
showing off some of its new weaponry.
Which well does the West have any defence against any of this,
Brian? Quite a lot of it.
They don't like the moment it goes into hypersonic missiles.
The West's in trouble at the moment.
Yeah, indeed. So the event, as I say, was to
mark 80 years since Japan's defeat at the end of World War
2. Western leaders didn't attend.

(01:39):
Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un were the guests of honour.
And as you can see on screen, lots of new hardware including
the J15, which is China's new carrier based electronic warfare
jet, which you'll see in a second submarine launched
intercontinental ballistic missile was was there as well a
new one along with drones of various kinds.

(02:01):
Perhaps some of them were autonomous.
XI's message was simple. Today mankind, he said is faced
with the choice of peace or war,dialogue or confrontation.
Confrontation win, win or 0 sum.And he went on to say that the
Chinese people firmly stand on the right side of history.

(02:22):
I'm sure they'd probably stand on the left side of history if
we consider their politics. But anyway, that's another
thing. So, you know, he's sending a
message not to to mess with China, apparently by showing off
all his hardware. But he's also apparently, at
least on the surface, offering the option of dialogue, unlike
the West, which is clearly on a non negotiable path to war

(02:44):
despite the demonstrations from China and Russia of what they
have in their arsenals. For example, functioning armies,
navies and air forces. Do we have functioning armies,
navies and air forces? Not entirely.
We certainly haven't got a functioning Navy might because
we've talked about that in a really bad situation and of
course the Army is not big enough to fight and the RAF at

(03:07):
the moment is just something on the sideline.
So UK in a pitiful state. Well, as the war drums keep
beating, let's bring the BBC back because with no scepticism
whatsoever, they were reporting on Monday that a flight with
Ursula von der Leyen on board was disrupted due to suspected
Russian interference. The BBC reports that this was

(03:29):
according to the European Commission and they just
believed them without any particular challenge at all.
They quote an unnamed spokesperson who allegedly said
the GPS jamming happened while von der Leyen was about to
arrive at in southern Bulgaria on Sunday.
The plane landed safely and the spokesperson is allegedly said
to have said we have received information from the Bulgarian

(03:52):
authorities that they suspect that this was due to blatant
interference by Russia. The Financial Times also got in
on this, again with no scepticism and also citing
unnamed officials, and they reported that Von der Leyen's
plane had to land at the airportwith pilots using paper maps
apparently. Yes, I saw, I saw that comment.

(04:14):
I was being shocked for the pilots that they actually had to
do some work. Yes.
The problem is, though, that Flightradar 24 disagrees with
all this. They tweeted out on Monday that
they were seeing media reports of GPS interference affecting
the plane carrying Wanderlion. They said that some reports
claimed the aircraft was in a holding pattern for one hour.

(04:34):
This is what we can deduce from our data.
Flight Radar 24 said the flight was scheduled to take one hour
and 4448 minutes. It took one hour and 57 minutes.
The aircraft's transponder reported good GPS signal quality
from take off to landing. So I think we're going to have
to say that this report from theBBC and all the other legacy

(04:55):
media is nonsense. And the question is why are they
doing this? Well, I suspect that this is all
about security guarantees. That the demand that even though
Ukraine is not going to join NATO anytime soon, that the
Starmer regime and the EU want an Article 5 style guarantee for

(05:16):
Ukraine. So that should our countries put
boots on the ground that any attack on them would mean war.
And This is why there was all the fraud over the claimed
attack on the British Council building and the EU building in
Kiev last week. And of course our illustrious
Secretary of State for War was giving a statement in the House
yesterday, I believe, when he reiterated how disgraceful it

(05:39):
was that the Russians had attacked the British Council in
this way, which of course they didn't, not directly anyway.
So this fake GPS story I think is a continuation of that.
Yeah. I, I wonder, Mike, whether
what's, what's actually gone on is, is aircraft coming close to
the conflict zone or getting some interference from whatever

(06:00):
electronic warfare systems the Russian, Russians are using.
But I think there's a big difference between picking up
interference and actually somebody targeting you with a, a
dedicated electronic warfare system.
So I, I I my view on this is this is a manipulated story.
Absolutely. So with all that in mind and the

(06:21):
war drums beating as hard as they are, it should come as no
surprise then that Le Canard in France is claiming to have seen
leaked French government documents which show that French
hospitals have been told to prepare for French casualties by
March 2026 because of a major war.
In fact, not just French casualties, but NATO casualties

(06:44):
and so on from other countries. Now we have to make it clear
that La Canard is considered a satirical magazine, but it also
covers serious stuff as well. So you've got to make up your
own mind whether this was intended to be satire or whether
it's real. Certainly is real as far as the
mainstream media is concerned, but I suppose we could.
The closest thing in the UK thatwe can compare this publication

(07:06):
to is Private Eye. So the question is, was this
satire or was it real? The article says that on the
orders of Catherine Voltran, hospitals must stand ready to
receive thousands of soldiers wounded in the event of a
generalized armed conflict in Europe.
They had received internal documents asking Regional Health
agencies to prepare caregivers for a possible major commitment

(07:30):
under the mandate of the GeneralSecretariat for Defence and
National Security. Catherine Voltran as plans to
establish medical centres to accommodate patients returning
from the combat zones. These centres will have to be
located close to bus or railway stations, ports or airports.
To quotes enable the rerouting to their home nation of foreign

(07:50):
soldiers and they're suggesting perhaps 100 casualties per day
for two consecutive months or 250 patients daily for three
days at peaks of activities. But it's not clear whether
that's per facility or as as a whole.
As a whole, Brian, for a generalconflict, that seems like quite
low numbers. I would have said so and I what

(08:13):
are what are they talking about here, Mike?
This is the key thing until there's some actual meat on the
bones as to what they think is going to happen.
But this isn't war against the Russians.
This is some sort of game. Again, it's it's manipulation.
Here, yes. Now it should come as no
surprise that Ursche Levon der Leyen, speaking to the FT,

(08:33):
claims that Europe is sorry, Europe is, has sorry, has a
pretty precise plan for sending troops to Ukraine.
There's a clear road map, she said.
For possible deployments. Security guarantees are
paramount and absolutely crucial.
So there we have this reiteration of the security
guarantees. This is this Article 5 scenario,

(08:55):
Article 5 type scenario. As she said, we have clear road
map and we had an agreement in the White House and this work is
going forward very well. So let's just bring her on
screen so you can see these words.
Security guarantees are paramount.
And President Trump reassured usthat there will be an American
presence as part of the backstop.

(09:16):
That's very clear and repeatedlyaffirmed.
Well, they're, they're desperateto get that commitment might
because without the Americans there is no substance there well
amongst European troops and NATO.
Yes, she said that various European capitals were working
on plans for a multinational troop deployment and the

(09:38):
backstop of Americans. So, you know, I don't quite know
what to make of it. But Vanessa, I don't know if
you've got any thoughts on that.I know you're certainly not
necessarily optimistic about what Russia and China are doing,
but the the language from them, despite the the military parade,
does seem to be suggesting that they would prefer to be talking

(10:00):
than than fighting. Oh yeah, I mean, I agree.
I I think no, no, my reservations come from how
little support they're giving toPalestine currently and the
region. But I think as regards
negotiations with the US, EU andUKI think Russia and China are
both perfectly sensible in theirapproach that negotiations

(10:24):
should be 1st and negotiations can continue even through
military activity, which we've seen from Russia, of course, but
not from Ukraine. Yes, thank you for that.
Now you made a comment before the news programme about these
types of parades, but we'll keepthat for extra.
And so if anybody's, you know, interested in in listening to

(10:45):
that discussion, you better and you're not yet a member, you
better join fairly quickly. But anyway, Vanessa, let's let's
move on then to back to the UK. And I mean, we're looking at the
role of the Zionist lobby in this country and we obviously
had David Miller on the programme last week.
But but it's not just him that is under attack at the moment.

(11:07):
No, definitely not. And and you talk about the
Zionist lobby, this is more about Israel and the Zionist
movement. So it's a much bigger complex
than than only a lobbying industrial complex that Israel
deploys against the world basically.
And of course, this comes in thecontext of ongoing unthinkable

(11:27):
genocide in Gaza. We've seen some of the most and,
and I don't even know how we cankeep saying they're some of the
most hideous massacres in the last 7 days of children of aid
camps, of refugee tents, or justbeing burned to the ground with
people still in them, etcetera. So, you know, the, the, the
horror, the absolute horror thatis being perpetrated by the

(11:50):
Zionist regime against the Palestinians in Gaza and the
West Bank is, is, is something that we should all keep in mind
whenever we discuss any of those.
But it's my belief now of watching what is going on in the
UK that it's not only a case of potential state capture, but I
think what we're now actually saying is the expansion of a
shadow state, which of course iswhat the British has always

(12:13):
deployed against countries like Syria, for example.
We talked many times, Mike, about the creation of a shadow
state inside Syria to, to infiltrate and and destroy
infrastructure and structure institutions within Syria during
the regime change war. But effectively, in my opinion,
that is now exactly what Israel is doing within the UK.

(12:36):
So I want to take the case, a relatively recent case, although
it's been ongoing for two years.It's now being ramped up against
an NHS doctor. I understand she's a trainee
orthopaedic surgeon, also DoctorRama Aladwan who you can go to
her ex account to to follow all of the details on her case.

(12:58):
And this is just one section from her pinned post.
If my British government, she's a British citizen, wants to let
you, meaning the Zionist do thisto their NHS Doctor Who has zero
patient complaints or disciplinary actions and let you
dictate who gets to practice medicine in Britain, depriving
the British public of my care, then so be it.

(13:19):
We will never abandoned Gaza. So let's dig down into what is
actually happening. This is a video.
She originally came under investigation by the Medical
Council, the GMC under the Terrorist Act.
Of course, that case after nine months was dismissed or there
were no charges against her etcetera.

(13:41):
And this is just her little explanation on that.
The GMC found no basis for any of the allegations under the
Terrorism Act and asked me to comment on the anti-Semitism
allegations. Case examiners found no
realistic evidence that my fitness to practice is impaired
and closed the case. No action, no warning.
Case closed. Rightfully so.

(14:02):
This smear piece is a retaliation.
What are they saying? Who exactly is saying it?
Who is this mystery colleague and what is their true
intention? So basically, once she was
cleared by the GMC and back at work, this happened.
So in February 2025, the Daily Mail ran a horrendous smear

(14:22):
piece against Rama, the shockingfull extent of anti-Semitism at
the heart of our health service.From the doctor terrifying
colleagues with her views to theneurologist idolising Hamas.
And this is written by junior news reporter Sabrina Miller.
People might recognise her from the formal Bristol University

(14:43):
student who waged a campus war for Israel against David Miller.
Of course, David Miller eventually won his case against
Bristol University and is now facing an appeal case by the the
Zionist lobby, basically the Zionist movement.
So then Rama basically looked into or discovered those who

(15:06):
were attacking her through the Daily Mail article.
She again put all this information out on acts.
So she says here leaked confirmed the Doctor Who had
lied about me in the Daily Mail's defamatory article Doctor
Miriam Green is the same colleague who complained to
Whittington Hospital, our workplace, about my online

(15:26):
Palestine activism and had me fired.
Now, in one video, Rama actuallyexplains what really happened,
is that she was in tears becauseof something that had just
happened in Gaza that had deeplytraumatized her.
She'd entered the work staff room and she had spoken to
Miriam Green about it, who had turned down and said, basically

(15:47):
shrugged her shoulders and walked out.
And as a result of that, she LEDthis case against Rama.
So she then goes on to explain what happened once she'd been
doxed by Doctor Miriam Green, who was her junior on the
medical staff. Her private information was
shared. A friend and fellow Dr. was
doxed. The same night their private

(16:08):
information was shared. I received rape and death
threats. We both had to call the police.
The police came to her home. They sent me panic alarms and
followed up with me for weeks. They transferred me to a hate
crime support group and it goes on from there.
So she basically says in this what is what is happening in
Britain? She she alerts us all to what is

(16:30):
going on. They have done the same to me.
Difference here is they're targeting a British citizen on
British soil, all while rallyingfor a foreign state by
leveraging their ties to the media and the government.
Many UK LFI lawyers are Lords. They're acting as foreign
agents, breaching UK democracy, security and interest.
The. GMC reiterated that my posts are

(16:53):
within the limits of political speech, which attracts the
highest level of protection under Article 10.
The political debate is basically their opinion versus
mine. There's being in support of the
state committing genocide and mine which opposes genocide,
leading to nine months of regulatory action.
This is what creates an issue inmodern day Britain.

(17:15):
I think she's absolutely right there and we can continue to
discuss that in Axtra. But she went on to say that
another doctor was revealed to have been responsible for the
report against her, which is Doctor Justin Stabbing,
previously suspended for mistreating cancer patients and
for inappropriate conduct with afemale patient.
Stabbing is a British Jewish oncologist and cancer expert.

(17:38):
Oh, sorry. Cancer and COVID-19 treatment
researcher. Again, the COVID-19 connection
Imperial College London with a Harley Street private practice.
Um, she goes on to point out that uh, the uh, medical, uh,
practitioner board, uh, the chair of the board, uh, Miss

(17:59):
Margaret Obey called for his erasure from the medical
register, stating that he showedpersistent dishonesty and no
remorse. Sharon BTQC for the GMC agreed
and expressed concerns about an ongoing risk to patient safety
due to his persistent dishonesty, which he had
attempted to cover up, yet he avoided being struck off Why?
And as one person responded on the post from Rama Leila Hamad,

(18:23):
who's a Spanish Moroccan journalist, she said basically
because he is protected by government, shielded by lobbies,
excused by media and weaponizinganti-Semitism to silence
critics. This is why they are immune
everywhere. Again, I agree with this.
And then basically what she thenwent on to explain is regarding

(18:46):
Miriam Green who doxed her and another colleague basically last
year. Sorry, I'm getting mixed up with
the dates. This is what she has now said
about Miriam Green. So part of my now second GMC
investigation. So she's now facing a second
investigation and 1st referral to a tribunal hearing which

(19:06):
could potentially suspend me andrevoke my license.
Is that I doxed Miriam Green? The same Miriam who made sure
that in less than one month of working with me, I was fired.
This is Jewish Supremacy, which is Zionism, this is Jewish
privilege, this is the double standard.
This is Britain, we are occupied.
Very strong words, but I second them entirely.

(19:31):
And then let's have a look at 1:00 and another organization
quickly that is going after Rama.
So this is the Campaign against Semitism organization in the UKI
was speaking to David Miller about this this morning because
they've also now joined in on the attack against David Miller
for the second appeal case. They're trying to take a private

(19:51):
case against David Miller to addto his burden of sinus movement
persecution, basically. Now, the odd thing is Mike and I
were talking about this this morning.
The on the website, the only tworepresentatives that you see are
Gideon Falter on the left and Stephen Silverman on the right.
There are no other employees listed on the charities

(20:13):
Commission. Also, there are no trustees, no
directors listed. And David told me through his
research that he's discovered that they've been given special.
Dispensation do not expose theirdirectors on the Charities
Commission website. Extraordinary.
So David back in, I think this was 2024, he wrote an article

(20:35):
about Gideon Falter campaign against anti-Semitism
instruments of the Zionist entity.
So the CAA is a covert instrument of the foreign policy
objectors of the illegitimate and genocidal Zionist regime
working in the UK. Of course, and it should they
shut down, they're receiving massive funding from basically

(20:58):
organizations within the Zionistmovement in the UK.
And all this while, of course, the Palestine Action Group is
being prescribed as a terrorist organization.
And we still have now 24 Palestine Action young people in
jail facing trial, but they're in jail and undergoing sort of

(21:18):
Abu Ghraib style detention. An anti genocide protester in
British jail. And if we look at what she
actually says in the article, inAugust 2024, heavily on police
arrested me and one other person.
She says basically they came in the first time with guns flying,
flying a drone above our heads while we were completely unarmed

(21:41):
and in our pajamas. She was let go and arrested
again four months later. Police surrounded me in my bed
while I was sleeping and naked, breaking down my front door and
destroying my bathroom. In another brutal example, 30
police officers entered a familyhome to arrest one person.
We were all detained in specialist counterterrorism

(22:01):
units around the country, although the terrorism charge
has been dropped. Oh sorry can I just go back to
that for a second? They're interrogated multiple
times a day and experienced sleep deprivation with lights
kept on 24 hours a day with no windows.
They initially had no contact with loved ones and were kept in
isolation for up to a week before being remanded in prison.

(22:25):
I mean me personally, I just find this absolutely horrifying.
The contrast between how real criminals who happen to be
protected by the Zionist movement are being LED off Scott
free while those that are protesting genocide, defending
the Palestinians are held in conditions that can be compared
to Abu Ghraib. And finally, I just want to end

(22:48):
with with what is an emotional part of her statement from
Doctor Rama Al Adwan and ask youall to support her as much as
you can on her social media and and wherever you can basically.
I have persevered but I am also a human.
It has not been easy and every time I cry I remember 1 martyr

(23:14):
child or a mother of a martyr and it fills me with
determination and resistance. So please don't let them scare
you into silence because of me, because they haven't managed to
scare me into it. Please let this empower you.
If you're speaking out, continue.
If you haven't, you decide what choice of yours history will

(23:37):
remember, whether it's silence in the face of the most
documented genocide in history or your clear stance for
humanity. Thought.
Well, I think it's appalling, Mike.
And we at the UK column have been warning for many years that
we have a foreign power which istaking more and more control

(24:00):
within UK. We talked about David Cameron
saying that his belief in Israelwas unshakable and of course if
you say that and believe it, that means that UK comes second.
So we pointed that out. We had Francis Mord announcing
effectively a partnership of allthe security and intelligence

(24:21):
services and the universities with Israel.
And all of this was done with absolutely no discussion with
the public. So there's no accountability.
And it's clear that this partnership in inverted commerce
has just got more and more complex and buried itself deeper
and deeper into British society.And there's a lot of questions

(24:44):
to be asked and the but I think the good thing which is starting
to happen is more and more Jewish people are expressing
concerns about what's happening here because they realise how
dangerous this is to them. And as you say, Vanessa, we can
talk about this more in UK column Extra at the end of the
news. Sandy, let me welcome you to the

(25:06):
program and you're going to tellus a little bit about impact
investing. Thank you.
Thank you very much, Mike. Yeah, I mean, I, I, I don't know
if many people understand what impact investing is, but it is a
really the currency of data mining and data gathering.

(25:28):
The, you know, gathering of dataand selling that on to to third
parties through things like outcomes, futures markets,
whatever. But it's a new currency that
that that is being traded on ouron our, on us humans, basically.
So the man and sometimes called the father of impact investment

(25:49):
is Sir Ronald Cohen. And he is a businessman both UK
and US, notorious for bankrolling the New Labour
governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown being dubbed Browns
bankers. So Cohen reveals in his book
Impact, Yeah, he's, he's also really in with the Rothschild

(26:11):
Foundation. And they're, they're all in, in,
in this together. The Roth, the the Edmund
Rothschild Foundation is all part of that.
Now in Cohen reveals in his bookImpact, reshaping capitalism to
drive Real change. And it was in that book that he
reveals that in 2007 a meeting was hosted by the Rockefeller

(26:33):
Foundation at their Bellagio Centre and impact investing was
coined as a term to replace social investment.
The Rockefellers private estate in Bellagio, we mustn't forget,
is the same place that gave birth to the Club of Rome in
1968, which was again behind theEarth Summit and everything that
comes with the SGS. Brown himself is now a trustee

(26:57):
of the Rockefeller Foundation. And let's not forget that in
1999 he sold three. He sold 395 tonnes of UK gold
reserves for a song. And that's not to be forgotten
now. Tony Blair is his partner in
Climb Crime obviously. And he shortly after resigning

(27:17):
for British politics in January 2008, Blair joined Rothschild
associated business JP Morgan Chase in a senior advisory
capacity, earning 2.52 million ayear.
So he was on the Business Council of the World Economic
Forum, was a board member of theUnited States China Business
Council, and in 1997 received the American Jewish Committee's

(27:40):
National Human Relations Award. Now Cohen is also involved in
the World Economic Forum, the West's global Shapers project
led by Schwab and his colleague David M Rubenstein of the
Carlisle Group. They're all heavily into impact
investing, as is obviously Tony Blair's Institute for Global

(28:02):
Change, which is his main vectorfor pushing this, this, this,
you know, this it's, it's like afinancial investment company.
Now. The godfathers of the Great
Reset, the Rothschilds, are openly involved in impact
investment, both through the asset management division of
Rothschild and Co with its Social Impact Investment Fund.

(28:23):
And in Israel, impact investing has enjoyed rapid growth in
recent years, doubling from an estimated 130 million in 2016 to
260 million in 2018. Aiming to build the Israeli
impact investment ecosystem, theEdmund Rothschild Foundation in
partnership with the Jewish Funders Network, and I think

(28:44):
we've got a slide on that launched last year, the matching
grant, a $1 million matching grant initiative.
The Israeli Edmund Rothschild Foundation's Impact
Entrepreneurship Programme officer Alina Shaloninkov said
the promotion of the impact industry has to happen through
philanthropy. I think we've got a picture, a

(29:06):
slide there of the global shape,the global shapers.
That's also all part of this impact investment push to to
get, you know, to get it, you know, even more kind of accepted
and, well, it's already accepted, but, you know, more
impactful. The impact investment is totally

(29:27):
reliant on the yeah, we've got on, on the Sustainable
Development Goals, whose acceleration has has, you know,
has been officially pushed by the WEF, which is a kind of
Zionist proxy really since 2019.The real power lies not in the
goals themselves, but in the technical indicators and
algorithms that measure progresstowards these goals.

(29:52):
Now they is a lot of it is done through philanthropy and we've
got, we've got these NGOs, you know, creating change through
family philanthropy. And I'll be going into that a
little bit later with the Guerrilla Foundation, which I'll
be, I'll be covering after, after this.
So this, you know, the, the 17 goals are really the, the, the

(30:15):
driver for impact investing. They act as a covert
legislation, these laws, you know, these, the ways this
legislation didn't really go through any democratic process.
We're witnessing the most sophisticated control system in
human history. And it is, it's debt slavery.

(30:35):
I mean no matter how you look atit, it is a way it's far worse
than capitalism. The SDG values act as a hidden
control panel of global governance.
Whoever sets these parameters and algorithms effectively
programs the automated responsesthat shape billions of lives.
Now looking at the 17 goals, 16 peace, justice, strong

(30:58):
institutions and goal 17 partnerships for the goals
reflect the purpose of impact investing.
So let's have a look at those those two because actually what
they say is now Goal 16 is the official description of goal 16
is promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide

(31:19):
access to to justice for all field effective, accountable and
inclusive institutions at all levels.
The real meaning though is promote peace through
supranational policing, erode local legal systems in favour of
international law and redefine justice to mean ideological

(31:40):
conformity. And Goal 17 is really, really
gets it. I mean, all of these goals kind
of interlink with each other. So I'll be covering some other
ones in the next few weeks. Goal 17 is the partnership for
the goals, which is the final one.
And it the the official description is strengthen the
means of implementation and revitalise the goal partnerships

(32:03):
for sustainable development. But the real meaning is cement
the public private partnership model where unelected
corporations, banks and NGOs dictate policy globally,
bypassing democratic accountability under the banner
banner of cooperation and safeguarding.
So that's a a quick sort of resume of what how these goals

(32:27):
link up really with impact investing and what it really
means to us as human beings, because it is a whole slavery
system built on these these financial instruments.
Back to you. Thank you.
Thank you for that. And as you say, later on, we'll
be looking at the Guerrilla Foundation as just one example

(32:49):
of impacting impact investing inaction.
But Brian, let's move on then and have a look at Nick Clegg.
Has he been speaking out again recently?
Well, unfortunately he has and I've got to say, Sandy, Lovely
Segway talking about public private partnerships.
We're not too sure what is political, what is big business

(33:10):
and up pops Nick Clegg and of course he gets massive coverage
in the BBC article. Let's pull this apart.
This is the headline. Clegg accuses Vance of hypocrisy
over free speech criticism. So when we see Clegg here, what
are we dealing with? Because yes, he was a

(33:32):
politician, Deputy Prime Minister, but then he disappears
off to work in America. Why has he been given all this
street cred by the BBC? Let's have a listen to what he
actually says. And it's quite amazing.
I cannot stand the rank hypocrisy of senior right wing
American politicians flying first class of my private jet
over the United Kingdom and declaring that somehow there's

(33:55):
excessive censorship in the UK and then flying back to the US
to basically intimidate and bully and cow their own
opponents. So pretty strong language.
You would think that he's on a asqueaky clean slate here, but
not quite. He goes on to say that the

(34:16):
behaviour of many in the Trump administration is flagrantly
contrary to American principles of free expression.
So this is the Brit, he's workedin America for a few years, and
he's now going to stick his oar into the pond in order to tell
the Americans how to conduct their business.
The Clegg arrogance is clearly still there.

(34:38):
He went on to say that the UK isover censorious online and he
cited the police making 30 arrests a day for offensive
posts. But it goes on.
Still, part of the definition ofliving in a free society is that
you can say things that are offensive and other people

(35:00):
violent and which other people violently disagree with.
He says that over censoring offensive but legal speech
actually empowers figures like Nigel Farage, who will get more
of a hearing the more imprecise the boundaries are.
So he's deep into politics. He's come back in from nowhere.

(35:24):
Then he sticks the knife in withthis one, which I'm sure you'll
enjoy. Mike.
Age verification rules in the Online Safety Act aimed at
preventing young people from encountering harmful content did
not do not go far enough. So this man absolutely jumping
in to ensure that this pernicious act is going to be

(35:47):
used for even further clamp downon free speech.
Let's look at a little video clip now of Clegg in action from
2014. Let's see how this man
performed. Go, go.
Go on, Cleggy, go. Go.

(36:14):
We're. On the other side, son.
Let's get the dog in the photo. There's a dog already in the
photo. Nick, four years ago I asked you

(36:40):
what were you gonna do with thatinstitutional paedophile?
OK, Sir. Operating in this country now,
your reply to me, Nick, was I don't know what you mean by
institutional paedophile rings. Do you understand what I was
talking about four years ago now, Nick?
And stay in my eyes, no taxes. Thanks.
Very much. Oh, thank you.
Gotcha. What about Leon Britton?

(37:00):
When are we gonna get him out? Yeah, son.
Yeah, you've just been imposing a question.
You are based on a lie. Why isn't the Treasury
reproducing currency? Currency and real interest.
Why aren't you prepared to do that?
Are you not going to answer? To me it's very simple.
Last week the Bank of England and London so we can put to our
own currency. And so that means austerity is

(37:22):
based on an absolute lie and youhave fought it for that lie and
people are dying exponentially. That's an absolute consequence
of your measures, and you will answer.
Traitors. Hi Matthew, I'm not actually
with the Deputy Prime Minister because he's had to abort our
interview because we were here for a little photo of which the

(37:45):
Lib Dems have organised to flag up their, what they say is their
key tax measure, which is raising the lower threshold.
However. So Mr. Clegg was there and all
his Lib Dems people were there, but the whole thing had to be
aborted because, well, a few protesters came along and
spoiled the occasion. So Mr. Clegg has gone over
there. I don't know whether he'll be
coming back in the near future, but that was 1.
Photo op Which? Seemed to hit the buffers, shall

(38:06):
we say. Yeah, those nasty protesters,
they got in the way of stuff andhe had to run away.
I mean, he just had to run away.He had, well, he did have to run
away because actually he knew that what Bill Maloney was
saying to him was absolutely true.
So Nick Clegg didn't want to protect the children.
He didn't want to talk about it.Free speech wasn't his thing.

(38:26):
And of course, eventually he disappears off to America.
Let's finish his words from the BBC, The BBC that doesn't want
to protect children. So Clegg said that seeing tech
bosses like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mr. Zuckerberg line up
behind Donald Trump at this at his inauguration January was one
of the reasons where I thought probably it's time to move on

(38:49):
from Silicon Valley. And then this is the real
masterpiece. There's only one thing worse
than having politicians and business people at each other's
throats. It's having them in each other's
pockets. But that is exactly what he did
by jumping out of a political, asenior political role in order
to go to America straight into not only big business, but big

(39:12):
business which was censoring people's right to free speech
and, and sorry boy. And now the BBC brings this man
back and puts him in front of the public as if we should pay
attention to a word he says. This is obscene.
I'll tell you what's even more obscene than that.
It's the the irony and the fact that he refused to answer any

(39:34):
questions about institutional child abuse and yet protecting
children is a justification for this entire censorious regime
that we have at the moment. These people are disgusting.
They are disgusting and of course the BBC is even more
disgusting because they've chosen this man to put in front
of the British public so that the public should pay attention

(39:54):
to what he thinks and says. We should not pay attention to
anything. Nick Clegg says he should be put
on a flight back to America for Trump to deal with.
But on the subject of child protection and the safety of
children, let's get onto a more positive note.
And actually, the theme is ultimately America.
But I was delighted to be told amonth or so ago that there was

(40:18):
going to be an event at the end of this September in Washington
where a number of people were coming together to protect the
future of children. And this is an international
coalition for children, a lot ofextremely outspoken and very
good people. And I haven't got the exact
date, 29th, 30th of September, but we are going to be reporting

(40:43):
on this event because Kim Isherwood that the UK column has
interviewed several times from Public Child Protection Wales.
She will be attending, but let'sget our minds in the right frame
as to what the problem is. Who is trying to sexualize
children worldwide? This is a really excellent film
clip which Coalition for Children has on their website

(41:08):
together with a lot of other material.
Let's have a look at this this quick clip.
In this film, the term comprehensive sexuality
education, or CSC does not referto sex education programs in
general, but rather to a specific form of graphic

(41:29):
sexuality education. CSC is designed to change the
sexual and gender norms of society, promotes high risk
sexual behaviors and encourages even the youngest of children to
experiment sexually. This is definitely an attack on

(42:07):
healthy family life. It will affect your economy.
It will affect your child rearing.
It will affect your education system.
This has horrified a lot of people in South Africa, and the
tool that has been used, the weapons that been used, is
comprehensive sexuality education.
As president of the American College of Pediatricians, I am
deeply concerned about comprehensive sexuality

(42:30):
education for four reasons. First, it sexualizes children.
Second, it threatens Children's Health.
Third, it promotes a dangerous gender ideology.
And 4th it undermines the parentchild relationship.
Which violates parental rights. My life's work has been to
protect children by exposing theroots of the sexual revolution,

(42:55):
the sexual rights movement that's led to sex education
worldwide, globally. There is a worldwide war raging
across the globe. Not a war of guns and weapons,
but a war of ideas, ideologies and world views regarding sex.

(43:19):
This is just part of the Lesson plan for what's called Making a
Difference curriculum, and it isin Oregon schools and probably
schools around the nation. This is instructions for the
teacher in the classroom to ask her or his students how do
people express their sexual feelings?
What is abstinence? And here are some answers that

(43:42):
they try to elicit from the children.
Oral sex, masturbation, anal sex, massage, holding hands,
touching each other's genitals, Saying I like you and what
they're doing is equating all these things.
Saying I like you is equal to anal sex.
We have had several high level visits to Jamaica and the

(44:04):
Caribbean from Prime Minister David Cameron of the UK, from
the Secretary General of the UN Ban Ki Moon and from President
Barack Obama. This is about pressuring the
Caribbean to accept the sexual rights campaign.
So there it is easy to see what's going on and note the
people peddling this filth, attacking children.

(44:27):
So if we've got any worries about what's happening in UK, we
we shouldn't have any worries because we can see clearly where
this is coming from. Now just to stay on the
positive, Public Child Protection Wales, one of a
number of organisations that will be attending this event at
the end of September. And the important thing is these

(44:48):
organisations are worldwide organisations coming together to
challenge what's going on. I'll just end by a couple of
quotes from Kim Isherwood, herself chairman of Public Child
Protection. Well, she says that she's
delighted with the move, and shefeels privileged to work
alongside some of the biggest names known to be opposed to the

(45:09):
Kinsey deceit. That's The Kinsey Report and the
betrayal of childhood. And she ends by saying this
unified front is crucial for thefuture of our children, ensuring
A collective voice against influences that seek to
undermine their natural growth and purity.
And I'll remind our audience that if you have a look for Kim

(45:30):
Isherwood on the UK column website, you'll see that we've
done a number of interviews withthis amazing and very gutsy
woman. So, Mike, some positive things
there. Clear that a big push back on
this filth against children is happening.
And it's worldwide movement, so a lot more support needed, but

(45:52):
it's happening. OK, Thank you, Brian.
Thank you for it. To anybody as well who is
supporting the UK column, we do need your continuing support.
So if you can support us, pleaseconsider joining us or making a
donation. There's a Big Blue button on the
front page of the website which which will take you to
information on that. Another reminder of the UK

(46:13):
column on location event featuring Doctor Andrew
Wakefield and of course, access to what to call 7, his film.
Also Tess, Laurie and a number of other speakers.
We'll be mentioning more of those on Friday's program.
Did you want to say anything? Well, I've got to say, Mike,
that we're just over 50 tickets left.

(46:33):
So if you want to come to this event and you've been hanging
on, do I, don't I? You need to get on to the UK
column shop and buy a ticket because it's clear that we are
going to sell this event out well before the date of the
actual conference. This is absolutely amazing.
Thank you to all of our supporters worldwide for the

(46:54):
confidence of coming in and getting on board this event.
If you can't make it, of course you can still pay for the live
stream, so we will be talking toyou wherever you are in the
world, but if you can be there with us, it will be fantastic.
OK, tonight at 7:00 PM germ warfare is why is gender

(47:16):
inversion everywhere with Mr. E.And tomorrow at 1:00 PM the
Charles is speaking to Jake Fernabout a picture paint.
It's effectively about the thousand word podcast and news
about that. So do join us at 1:00 PM for
that. Now, Brian, let's move on.

(47:38):
And what's the Daily Mail been up to?
Well, the Daily Mail has produced an article which in my
mind, is absolutely designed to ramp up the angst and the
unhappiness that's in people's minds at the moment,
particularly as we see the police arresting people for

(47:59):
making comments on social media.So here's the incredible
headline page of the Daily Mail,Another day in Starmer's
socialist utopia. Then it's talking about the bond
markets. But then it quickly gets on the
police arrest of the Father Ted writer Graham Linnehan.
And it then asks, when did Britain become North Korea?

(48:23):
Now the amazing thing about thisarticle is that Martin Beckford,
the Daily Mail policy editor, apparently has no idea where all
the mad policies have come from.And yet the UK column has been
tracking all of this over years.So this is a little video of the
article. It's the only way I can get the
actual scale of it. But as you're scrolling through

(48:45):
all these people who've been effectively attacked by the
police and imprisoned or questioned or arrested as a
result of social posts, this is all presented to the public in
in a very glossy, childish way, in my opinion, designed to ramp
up the angst that the public already fear.

(49:09):
And and to the right of the pageas it scrolled down, of course,
is a column of utter dross articles by the Daily Mail.
So in my opinion this article has been put together in order
to ramp up the stress and anxiety in people when they see
the police arresting people for making some casual social media

(49:34):
comments that 20 years ago nobody would have batted an
eyelid. So this is priming the
population for something to happen.
And if I can just quote Graham Linneham himself, because he was
interviewed, surely what before we went live with the news and
he was talking about London and he said basically I, I don't

(49:55):
recognise this place. It's different from the friendly
place I used to remember. And he said the cultural life is
disappearing. It's been taken apart.
And he said the tensions that hefeels, that he knows that other
people feel are growing. And he then says something is
going to blow and that is going to happen next year.

(50:17):
Now, I'm I'm not sure why he says next year, Mike.
But what I do think is significant is he is also
realizing that public emotions are being played.
And the Daily Mail has not got aleg to stand on because we told
them years ago. But I'll come on to that in a
minute. Yeah, keep going.

(50:37):
Sorry. Well, just to show these two
bits, essentially there were comments, so this was JK Rowling
that the paper printed, She usedsome bad language but basically
said what the F has the UK become?
This is totalitarianism, utterlydeplorable.
And this is the really sad stuff.

(50:58):
We got Neil O'Brien, Piers Morgan and Robert Jenrick
commenting. But essentially this is all it's
sort of making a joke. They're puzzled, it's laughter,
it's ridicule. No, what we're looking at is
calculated vicious policy to destroy the UK and the next

(51:18):
objective is breakdown, which iswhy these articles are are
phrased in such a frivolous way.It's playing with the emotions
of the population. Yeah, so if you haven't seen
Gremlin's sub stack, this is it.I just got arrested again, and
he says something odd happened before I'd even bordered the

(51:38):
flight in Arizona. When I handed over my passport
at the gate, the official told me I didn't have a seat and had
to be reticketed. At the time, I thought it was
just the sort of innocent snafu that makes air travel such a
joy, but in hindsight it was clear that I'd been flagged.
Someone, somewhere, probably wearing unconvincing makeup and
his sister, wife mum's underwear, had made a phone call

(52:00):
the moment I stepped off the plane.
At Heathrow, 5 armed police officers were waiting.
Not one, not 25. They escort escorted me to a
private area and told me I was under arrest for three tweets.
In a country where paedophiles escape sentencing, where knife
crime is out of control, where women are assaulted and harassed
every time they gather to speak,the state had mobilised 5 armed

(52:20):
officers to arrest a comedy writer for this tweet.
And no, I promise you I'm not making this up, is what he said.
So this was the first of the three tweets.
The other two tweets, by the way, were not as quite as sort
of graphic as this. But he said here, if a trans
identified male is in a female only space, he's committing a

(52:40):
violent, abusive act. Make a scene, call the cops, and
if all else fails, punch him in the balls.
So that's what he said. And for that, the five officers
with guns picked him up at the when he got off the plane.
Now, for their part, the Met Police claim that this is that
it's normal that police in airports are armed.

(53:03):
They didn't seem to say very much about the fact that the
need for five of them to be there.
But I mean, Lenihan got the usual treatment.
Belt, bag and other devices wereconfiscated.
Lenihan was sorry and electronicdevices were confiscated.
He was seen by a nurse while at the police station and then he
was taken to hospital because ofhigh blood pressure.

(53:24):
He was then released on bail with a single condition.
So that single condition that he's not allowed to use Twitter
or X as it likes to be called these days.
So that's the only bail condition now.
He went on then to say I'll justbring this this on screen.
He went on to say the civility of individual officers doesn't
alter the fundamental reality ofwhat happened.

(53:45):
I was arrested in an airport like a terrorist, locked in a
cell like a criminal, taken to hospital because stress nearly
killed me and banned from speaking online, all because I
made jokes and upset some psychotic cross dressers.
Now Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has waded in with the
BBC this morning on this and basically said, well, what did

(54:07):
he say? Ministers need to look at laws
concerning online speech. He was concerned that there was
a bit of overreach or something more expectation on the police
and because of that they're under pressure and maybe doing
the wrong things. And he was also talking diluting
the diluted the focus and priorities of the public.

(54:28):
That's obviously something we need to look at.
And he said it's very easy for people to criticize police who
are only being enforcing the laws that are being passed to
them by MPs. Well, part of the problem here
perhaps is that those laws are so vaguely defined that that the
police are basically left to make things up as they go along,
and they're clearly making the wrong decisions if that's what

(54:51):
they're doing. Perhaps it's much more likely
that they're making the right decisions, or at least the
decisions that they've been toldto make in the 1st place,
because there's clearly a lot ofthe lot going on behind the
scenes here, Brian. I think that is the way around.
Like the loose definitions are to allow abuse of powers.
In my opinion, that's what it is.
But let's come back to the DailyMail and we'll pop this image up

(55:14):
on screen. Where are we?
Here we are. Now this.
It's got a little bit of reflection on this, on this
letter. It's a letter dated the 14th of
February 2012. It's to me as part of the UK
column team. And it's from Paul Dacre, who

(55:35):
was then the editor in chief of the Daily Mail.
And he says thank you so much for sending me a copy of your
paper containing the article on the Media Standards Trust.
I read the article with great interest.
Now, this is a thank you letter from Paul Dacre because we
explained to him why he was being attacked by the Media

(55:56):
Standards Trust. We also gave him a lot of
information about the perniciouspolitical work of the charity
Common Purpose. And as a result of that, about
two months later, the Daily Mailon a Saturday morning printed 9
1/2 full pages of information around Common Purpose.

(56:19):
And that was what, like 90% of our research in the background?
Now, the point we're making is that we told the Daily Mail in
2012 exactly what was being, what was happening under the
surface. The country was being taken
apart from the inside. And perhaps on top of that, very

(56:39):
importantly, the woke agenda diversity and all the rest of it
was being used as the weapon to destroy and cause friction in
the in the UK public. But despite giving it to the
Mail, they did the one big splash on the Saturday.

(57:00):
And then of course, none of their investigation team
continued to dig in order to find the policy, which their own
policy editor in this latest article just doesn't seem to
understand what's happening. I'm going to use the word
pathetic, Mike. I find this utterly pathetic and
I wonder whether it's because the policy editor has brought in

(57:22):
Sun standards, The Sun newspaperstandards, to the Daily Mail,
that we're seeing this crass situation with the reporting.
We'll talk more about that an extra as well, certainly with
that, Sandy, let's welcome you back and tell us about the
Gorilla Foundation. Well, I stumbled across this

(57:43):
when I was looking into impact investing and it's a, it's an
interesting website, the the Guerrilla Foundation because
they're, they're talking about anew form of philanthropy.
It's a different, it's Generation XA lot of the people
who are involved in this websitehave never worked.
They're immensely rich. A lot of their funders are, and

(58:04):
I'll go into, I'll go into some of the, a lot of them are, are,
are literally rich, rich kind of, I think they, they've just,
they, they, they live, they've, they've inherited a lot of money
from their grandparents, their parents and so on.
And they're, they're, they're, they're pushing away the whole
idea of old philanthropy. So I, I just thought that the

(58:27):
mission statement that they had,the language they use is
hilarious. Well, it's woke, but it says the
dinosaurs that cling to power. Whitosaurus, Plutosaurus,
Machosaurus, and Stratosaurus. Time for meteoric extinction and
cultivation of new forms of democratized giving.

(58:48):
Let's not confuse plutocracy with philanthropy and
philanthropy with real love of mankind.
The world, life, and consciousness itself is
unfathomably queer, steeped in paradox and uncertainty, and
there are too many things to name ideas, quests, journeys,
and pursuits. Perhaps these words give you a
taste of who we are and where our hearts beat.

(59:09):
Let no amount of words substitute a real relationship.
So let's meet. These are simply some of our
emergent visions ever unfolding and interacting with the dreams
of the little earthlings who have not yet been taught what to
dream. So I'm assuming we are the
little earthlings that they are saving in their, you know, in

(59:30):
their philanthropic quest. So anyway, basically, I mean, I
will just read you the what the,the the guy in charge of this
is, is Antonis Antonis Schwartz.He's an activist, philanthropist
and impact investor of Greek German descent and driven by the
ideas laid out in the Guerrilla Foundation's mission.

(59:53):
He has used his inherited wealththat originated from the selling
of pharmaceutical company Schwartz Farmer to support a
variety of social causes since 2011.
In 2013, Antonis Co founded Vuuliwatch, a Greek
parliamentary. Monitoring organization that
claims to increase political accountability.
He also Co funded the Centre forSustainable Finance at the

(01:00:16):
University of Zurich and in his free time he enjoys
skateboarding and playing playing Magic in the gathering.
I don't know what that is for for.
You can find out more about his work on the website Good Move
Initiatives. Well, interestingly, I did.
I, I, you know, I looked at it and that he also is involved in
something called resource generation.

(01:00:38):
And again, it's, it organises young people 18 to 25 who with
access to wealth and class privilege in the US to become
transformative leaders working towards the equitable
distribution of wealth, land andpower.
And it's interesting because there's another one that's
called Sign the redistribution pledge.

(01:01:01):
Wealth inequity stops with our generation.
So these are idealistic people who've never worked in their
lives. And they have become quite woke
in in their thinking and how they really seem to believe that
this is this is really happening.
The Guerrilla Foundation presents itself as a departure
from traditional philanthropy. It claims to reject the

(01:01:22):
charitable industrial complex with the paternalistic model of
billionaire giving, quoting Peter Buffett's sharp critique
that as more lives and communities are destroyed by the
system, it creates vast amounts of wealth for the few.
The more heroic it sounds to give back.
But this just keeps the existingstructure of inequality in

(01:01:43):
place, and I I tend to agree with that.
On the surface, the foundation'sapproach appears radical.
Donors are told to give us moneywhile giving up power, while
decisions about grants are handed to act.
The activist council made-up of grassroots.
The Foundation champions a vision of great transition, much
like the great research, a move away from traditional capitalism

(01:02:05):
towards the so-called solidarityeconomy, ecological balance and
participatory government governance.
Yet beneath this language lies the uncomfortable paradox.
The Foundation is largely bankrolled by new generation of
Europe's wealthy elite, Generation X and millennial
heirs to fuel fortunes amassed by their parents, grandparents
and great grandparents. These individuals who by their

(01:02:27):
own admission have never worked in the traditional sense, yet
now position themselves as the vanguard of reinvented commute
commutarian capitalism. So this is, you know, obviously
this model is is branded as impact investing or stakeholder
capitalism, but it's sold as a moral alternative to the market
economy. It accelerates digitalisation

(01:02:49):
and circular economy frameworks that consolidated data and
resources in the hands of the very same 1% who dominate global
finance. So is it the real foundation
aware of these contradictions? It calls for transparency about
the origin of wealth and openly critiques philanthropy as
conscience laundering. But here lies the central

(01:03:11):
problem. It's all wrapped up in the
language of guerrilla activism or sustainability, and it
continues to insulate the wealthy from deeper
accountability. It's just, you know, wealth is
not being dismantled, It's beingrethemed.
The system is not overturned, but it's being rebranded.
It dream dreams of a, a world inwhich philanthropy itself

(01:03:31):
becomes obsolete. So, you know, it's, it's really
a, a kind of a camouflage of this elite, you know, system
that we have anyway. Now, I, I, I've just flagged up
a few of the, the, the, the, the, the people who actually are

(01:03:52):
helping this, this, the, you know, the, the gorilla
Foundation. And of course you've got
millionaires for humanity. And, and I've got another slide.
There's the edge funders Alliance, impact investing, all
of these, there's leap. Do look at, look these up.
I don't think we've got too muchtime to go into in general, but

(01:04:14):
then you've got the millionairesfor humanity who also are
saying, you know, we want a new,a rebranding of this, of this
philanthropy. So I just want to tie this in
with, with the, with the goals again.
And they talk a lot about climate action in this.

(01:04:34):
So the real meaning goal, goal 13 is climate action.
Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
The real meaning is use the climate crisis narrative to
justify extreme restrictions on energy, travel, diet and
personalized freedom while diverting trillions to climate
finance schemes benefiting corporate operations, impact

(01:04:56):
investors, banks and billionaires who created the
problem. And that's that's the way it is.
Absolutely. OK.
Well, I'm just going to say, Sandy, thank you very much for
that. And it's amazing research from
yourself and Ben now focusing inon this idea of a revision of
philanthropy in order that theseimmensely wealth wealthy people

(01:05:20):
make even more money. A lot to a lot to talk about
this. Yeah, but we are absolutely out
of time for now, so we're going to finish there.
I'm going to say we'll be back in a few minutes.
If UK column member for UK column news Extra.
If you're not AUK column member,please consider joining us.
As I said earlier, we do need your support and you can then
join us for Extra as well. But enjoy Germ tonight, the

(01:05:44):
interview tomorrow and we'll be back at 1:00 PM on Friday with
more news. See you then.
Bye bye.