September 30, 2025 • 19 mins
BARB KIRKMEYER JOINS TO TALK THE COMPETENCY BILL We've had some pretty high profile cases lately of people being released from jail after committing crimes because they were deemed not able to stand trial. They are still dangerous, but they are out in the community. Why? A bill passed in 2024 seems to be the reason. It was HB24-1034 and you can read it here. The bill passed in bipartisan manner and now it's created a mess. We'll chat with Senator Barb Kirkmeyer about it today at 1.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I am pleased as Punch to check in with state
Senator and gubernatorial candidate Barb Kirkmeyer. We are going to
talk about something that has turned into.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
A huge problem.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
And Barb, first of all, welcome back to the show.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Well, thank you, it's great to be back on and
thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
So let's talk about HB twenty four Dash ten thirty four.
This was a bill that from the outside looking in,
and you can tell me where I've got it right,
where I've got it wrong, it looks like another well
intentioned piece of legislation that has accidentally created a huge
negative consequence. And that negative consequence for my listeners who
don't know their bill numbers right off the top of
(00:39):
the head, is that we've now seen multiple cases of
people that have demonstrated a propensity to be violent being
arrested and then being released because they are found unable
to stand trial because of a competency issue. And this
is now a huge problem. So Barb, let's start at
the beginning. Where did this bill come from and were
(01:00):
these problems ever discussed?
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Let's do start there.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
But first of all, let me just say this, I
did vote for that bill, and I'm going to say why,
but it is obvious you're right that it's got it
needs to be fixed. There's it did create a huge problem.
We thought we were solving another issue that had to
do with the deal with the Constitution. But in this case,
we need to fix this bill. And I very frankly
(01:26):
believe that the governor should call for a special session,
that we should fix it sooner rather than later. And
I'm concerned that he won't want to do that. I
know the remembers folks that had asked to have this
s get fixed in the special session we had in AUGUSTA.
Obviously it did not get on the call, but we
need to get it fixed sooner rather than later, because
(01:46):
you're right what happened was the bill, and we talked
about this in our caucus as well. But this bill
started actually with a task force who was putting together
recommendations for what's called an introim commit so a committee
that meets when we're not in session and they go
through and have more time to really go in depth
and look at bills and.
Speaker 2 (02:06):
See what's made it there.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
And so it came out of that infram committee and
it was especially built as a necessary fix for a
constitutional deficiency. In other words, way back, like I think
it was nineteen seventy two, but back in the nineteen seventies,
the Supreme Court had made it very clear that individuals
that are deemed incompetent simply cannot just be left in jail.
Speaker 2 (02:29):
It violates the Constitution.
Speaker 3 (02:31):
Do process in the constitution, And you know that's been out.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
There for a while.
Speaker 3 (02:35):
So we we passed this bill thinking that we were
addressing the constitutional concerns, looking at the length of time,
the reasonable amount of time that an individual could be
staying in there. And quite honestly, when we talked about
this billing and in our Republican caucus and when I
mean we all voted for it on the floor in
the Senate, you know, on third reading, we talked about
(02:57):
that it was really they're either going to be in
a correction facility or they're going to be in a
mental institute institution, right, So it wasn't like they should
be letting go or not, you know, getting back out.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
On the streets. So that's where we've got a problem.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
I've talked with, you know, a few district attorneys.
Speaker 2 (03:14):
I've talked with obviously, the sheriff.
Speaker 3 (03:16):
Of my sheriff of Well County, who rightly so is
you know, ringing the alarm bell and thank you for
doing that, And so, you know, we think we can
come up with a fix. I've spoken with one of
the prime sponsors and she's been working with the District
Attorneys Association, the disability groups, victims groups, and others as well,
(03:37):
and we've pledged to kind of try and come together
to see if we can come up with a fix.
But in the meantime, we really just need to have
the governor call special session and then let's get the
bill fixed. But that won't solve all the issue is
part of the other problem. And I've talked about this
in a couple of different places, but you know, it's
one thing to try and address the constitutional concerns.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
Now, we need to.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
Fix this hole it's in this bill. Fix this flawed
law that's letting people go.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
But the other problem is the next phase of this.
Speaker 3 (04:04):
And as I was talking to, like, for example, some
of the district's attorneys like, is the institutions that we
have in the state.
Speaker 2 (04:11):
We have about five hundred beds in the state.
Speaker 3 (04:14):
Four hundred of them are for those that are criminally
Justice involved.
Speaker 2 (04:18):
The others are for civil of.
Speaker 3 (04:19):
People who are involved in civil cases, and it's for
people who are either mentally ill or developmentally disabled. And
so what has been going on in the courts is
instead of the defense having the burden to say that
they are not restorable, in other words, they're incompetent, it's
(04:39):
been put on the prosecution to have to prove that
they are not competent. So again, I think there's a
fixer that we can come up with. But where do
we put them? These beds are full. We've got anywhere
from three hundred and sixty plus bed waiting list to
get into these institutions.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
It's very expensive.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
And you know, in our budget situation, I know last
year in the budget the Joint Budget Committee, we added
additional dollars to this area. Quite frankly, not enough, not enough.
We're going to have to prioritize this area, you know.
And so I tell folks, you know, when you want
to keep voting against the budget, you're also voting against
things like this about you know, increasing bedspace. You're voting
(05:21):
against the Department of Corrections, You're voting against judicial getting funding.
It's like, we have to fund these things and we're
going to have to find the money for it, and
it's it'll be tough. I mean, from my perspective, it's
a must have. It's not a pet project of any kind.
This is a must have that we have to do.
But we got to fix the first problem first, and
(05:41):
that's fixing the flaw in the in the bill, in
the law, and the governor needs to call special session.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Okay, let's talk about the second part of this, because
the first part seems like a no brainer, right.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
That I don't understand.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
I think so anyone could have any issue was saying
we need to make sure the dangerous people are not
getting released back onto the streets. It does seem to
me that there's something wrong, and you sort of referenced it.
There's something wrong with the way people are declared unable
to stand trial or or not competent to stand trial.
(06:12):
There seems to be something there that mechanism, because once
someone is determined to be unable to stand trial because
of competency, it seems like it's far too hard to
get them to a point. Let and I'm going to
use the example of Ephraim oh gosh, what's his last name?
I can't remember his last name. The guy who was
just Collins. It's from something even from something from d
(06:34):
whatever it is, but just getting that guy, because that
guy went on TV with CBS four and is like,
I'm not even getting a chance to plead my case.
And Sheriff Steve Reem said on my show that from
his interactions, this guy does not meet the classic standard
that most people would think of as someone like and
I'm going to use Robert Deer, the guy who's been
accused of shooting up the Planned parenthood in Colorado Springs.
(06:57):
He's been incarcerated since twenty six teen, because he is
completely detached from reality, right, Like I think most people
think when you hear not competent to stand trial, you're
thinking someone with serious mental illness instead of they just
don't seem to understand that they're now in the judicial system,
which the second case feels that way.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
Does that make sense, Yes, it does.
Speaker 3 (07:20):
So there's a difference between being you know, a mental
illness and being able to be treatable. And then there's
also the developmentally disabled, So someone with like a very
low IQ, right, like, you know, I don't know what
this individual in Wild County with our IQ is, but
when I talked to the sheriff, it sounds like he's
got a very low IQ and they're developmentally disabled, right,
and so that's.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
That's the difference.
Speaker 3 (07:42):
But like I said, when I was talking with different
district attorneys, their comment was, look, we need to kind
of flip the burden here and habits where the presumption
needs to be reversed that defendants should have to demonstrate
competency or the defense should have to demonstrate compency rather
than forcing prosecutors to prove incompetence. And that's causing an issue.
(08:07):
And I think that's where we can fix the law.
But the next question is then where do they go?
Speaker 2 (08:12):
Right?
Speaker 3 (08:13):
You know, certainly if they're having a lesser crime, like
if it was you know, shoplifting.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Or a non violent but not just some left or.
Speaker 3 (08:21):
Lesser crime that's more of a misdemeanor type thing, you know,
there are probably other suitable places for them to go
to get resources and services, especially if it's mental illness.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
But if it is developmentally.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
Disabled and they just aren't capable of understanding, we're going
to need to find a location for them. But we
can't just be letting them out on the streets, especially
if they are violent, you know, and have a very
low IQ kind of thing. And that's what's going on here.
So we're going to have to figure out how to increase.
Speaker 2 (08:53):
The number of beds.
Speaker 3 (08:55):
And you know that we have in these institutions and
probably the ones either in Fort Logan are Pueblo. I mean,
that's where we have our two institutions in the state
of Colorado.
Speaker 2 (09:03):
And it's very expensive.
Speaker 3 (09:05):
And I will tell you right now we're under a
consent to cree because of that waiting list we already have,
so we're already paying out money to essentially stay out
of compliance, which I don't like. And we've been trying
to figure this out at the Joint Budget Committee. But
at the same time, we don't have the we haven't
been a well find the funding.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
We have a workforce shortage.
Speaker 3 (09:25):
I mean, we don't have people who want to work there,
right and I wouldn't either, quite frankly.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
But so that's part of the other issue is trying
to figure out especially after COVID.
Speaker 3 (09:34):
I mean, our issue got exasperated with COVID because of
you know, people being furloughed and being left not at
the state, not being furloughed at the state. But like
you know, these types of medical and behavior health providers,
you know, things just got moved around and got switched around,
and now things have gotten a lot more expensive. It's
more expensive to hire people we contract out with these beds,
(09:57):
you know, to get the right workforce there. But it
it is extremely difficult to do that. And that's the
next step. And by no means trying to make any
kind of excuse.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
We have got to fix this.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
We cannot let, you know, violent criminals just because they're
developmentally disabled out on the streets.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
We've got to figure out where they go. And we
also have to follow our constitution.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Amen to that. Now, let me ask this question to
the point that Colorado, and it's not just Colorado, okay.
We know back in the you know, fifties, sixties, and seventies,
of the nineteen hundreds. Back in the nineteen hundreds, as
the kids today say, we had a big emptying out
of mental institutions of all kinds, state, federal, everybody kind
of said, oh, we've got all these new medications and
(10:41):
we're going to just give people medications and they're going
to be okay in the community. The reality is is
that we have underinvested for decades, right, we have underinvested,
and now we've got this situation, which is criminal situations,
but we also have on the streets of our cities
here in Colorado evidence of a significant population of people
(11:02):
with severe mental illness. They are self medicated with.
Speaker 2 (11:06):
Drugs and alcohol.
Speaker 1 (11:07):
So we need to be having a conversation not just
about the criminal element, but we need to be having
a conversation about what are we going to do in
a meaningful way to help people who are stuck in
the throes of addiction have an opportunity to come out
of that addiction and get help for that mental illness
while also being protected in an environment that protects themselves
(11:31):
and the general public.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
You're exactly right.
Speaker 3 (11:36):
And part of the issue is, and I've been having
this struggle with this as well, is we created a
behavior Health Administration, and this is where we were supposed
to be combining things from all these departments and creating
this new administration that was going to figure out this
system of care and how do we get behavioral health.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Services to folks.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
I quite frankly don't really know what our return on
investment has been for the over billion of dollars that
we have put into this administration, into this department, and
I think there needs to be some discussions there about
where are we really putting the funds and how do
we fix how do we fix this issue? I mean,
maybe we need to be pulling some of those funds
over to assist with the issue with the beds that
(12:14):
we have in our institutions where we have a lack
of beds, I mean, because we do not we do
not want to get into the situation that we were
in with our juvenile detention facilities and beds, where we
literally had a cap on the number of beds that
we could have, and just this year we finally were
able to get that cap increase because what was happening
is we were to put someone into that situation, into
(12:37):
that bed, we were letting someone else go.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
And we do not want to be in that situation either.
Speaker 3 (12:42):
So we are literally, quite literally going to have to
sit down and get this figured out. Like I said,
the easiest part, and I'm not going to say it's
really easy, but the easiest part of this is fixing
the law. The most difficult, difficult part is I don't
even think it's finding the funding. I think it's finding
the workforce to increase the number of beds that we
(13:03):
have in our institutions so that we can get that
wait list down. I know the woman who runs this office,
she has worked for district attorneys. She understands what the
situation is. And if we don't get it down, you know,
quite frankly, we just get posed with another lawsuit, which
doesn't do any good.
Speaker 2 (13:21):
We know what the problem is. We're trying to fix it.
Another lawsuit just doesn't happen.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
But you know, sometimes you just can't get those acl
you guys to suffer the loss. But you know, we've
got to. We've just got to get under control, and
we've got to. We will we can find the funding.
I know we will go and work to find the
funding because this is a must have, a must fund.
It's that workforce shortage is what is scaring me. And
I don't know where we find that well.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
I mean this is when when I had then candidate
Mayor Mike Johnson now Mayor Mike Johnston on the show,
and he was talking about creating all these micro communities
and hotels and all of this stuff for homeless people.
My number one question for him was who is going
to work there? Where are you going to find the staff?
Where are you going to find the trained staff? This
is not exactly you can't just PLoP a new high
(14:09):
school graduate into this position. These are people that have
to be highly trained. They have to understand how to
deal with mentally ill people that could be violent.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
I mean, I'm with you on this.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
I think that this is a huge, huge issue and
one that I fear, and I'm going to be honest,
I fear that nothing significant is going to happen until
someone's family member gets murdered or someone gets, you know,
attacked on the streets by someone who should not have
been out. We've already seen some high profile cases of this,
(14:42):
but maybe the wrong people are being attacked maybe, you know.
I don't wish that on anyone, to be clear, but
I really worry that we're going to let this go
and let this go and let this go, and someone's
going to die because of it.
Speaker 3 (14:54):
Well, and I hope and pray that does not happen.
And I know you don't want it to happen either.
I don't think anyone does. And you're right, I think
one of the other things, though, maybe one of the
fixes that we can do in the law is when
this was determined back again, I think I know it
was back in the seventies that you can't just leave
people sit in jail. There has to be a reasonable standard,
a reasonable amount of time, So you can't just leave
(15:15):
them there in a correctional facility, either in a county
jail or in a state correctional facility indefinitely. But again,
I think if one, if we go back and look
at what the district attorneys are saying, where we you know,
put the burden onto the defense that we presume people
are restorable until the defense says no, this individual is not.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
That would help.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
If we've tried some other things with you know, ensuring
that we can get legal guardians appointed. But we also
started another program it's called the Bridges program, and I
don't know how successful it is.
Speaker 2 (15:51):
We started in the last couple of.
Speaker 3 (15:53):
Years as well, but it's like a court appointed individual
that would be on every case like this to ensure
that these individuals are one getting the services that they
need and getting place and that we find placements for it.
But I think the other part of the law that
maybe we need to look at and probably.
Speaker 2 (16:10):
Change is the amount of days.
Speaker 3 (16:13):
You know, the Supreme Court didn't say in their rulings
back in the seventies that it had to be sixty
days or ninety days or one hundred and you know,
twenty days or anything of that nature. They just said
it needs to be a reasonable time frame, and maybe
we need to redefine what reasonable time frame is as well.
Speaker 2 (16:28):
I don't know. I am not an attorney.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
That's why I talked to the district attorneys a lot,
and would talk to my county attorney a lot all
the time.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
But I think maybe that's.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
Another area where we can help fix this law and
maybe start at least giving us a little bit more
time to figure out how we find the funding and
then where do we get the workforce from.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
I mean, that's part. It's going to increase the funding.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
And you know, again I'm not trying to shrink my
responsibility here.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
We're going to have to go find it. That's just
all there is to it.
Speaker 1 (16:56):
Well, I'm speaking with Senator Barb kirk State Senator Barb
Kirkmeyer and given at real candidate. A lot of people
on the tech signe are saying, how did you guys
not see this problem coming.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
How when you passed.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
The bill, did nobody go, hey, we could let some
dangerous people out of jailed. Was that never a consideration?
Speaker 3 (17:14):
I'm telling you in all the conversations I had, now,
I was not in the Interim committee. I didn't you know,
I didn't see all of the task force recommendations. I'm
not on the Judiciary committee that I think this is.
That's the committee that it went through.
Speaker 2 (17:26):
On the Senate side.
Speaker 3 (17:28):
I do know we had conversations about this in our
Republican caucus, and that's that was not the discussion. It
was like, we need to find what a reasonable timeframe is.
We need to ensure that we are adhering to the Constitution,
because again, if we're leaving these individuals, whether it's mental
illness or developmentally disabled folks in our correctional facilities, it
just keeps setting us up for more lawsuits and that's
(17:49):
not solving the problem either.
Speaker 2 (17:52):
So no, we did not.
Speaker 3 (17:53):
I mean, at no point did I hear anybody have
that kind of discussion.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Speaker 3 (17:59):
It just means I'm telling you I was not a
part of that conversation. And maybe it happened in committee.
I'm not sure. I just know on the Senate floor
it passed unanimously. So I'm thinking, you know, we're all
thinking the same thing that we are putting in what
we believe to be a necessary fixed for constitutional deficiency.
But clearly the application of this law has clearly exasperated
(18:23):
Colorado's public safety issues that we have. And you know,
I'm just going to sit again. The governor needs to
call a special session. This is not one of those
things that can wait until January or February for us
to go in and get in session and fix the law.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
I mean, my gosh, we are not back in session
till the middle of January.
Speaker 3 (18:42):
It takes at least three days and then another few
days to get things signed. I mean, at a minimum,
we're talking February first, if you ask me.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
And I think that's way too long to wait.
Speaker 3 (18:52):
I know people don't like to have special sessions, but
I think, too darn bad. Let's all get back to
work and let's fix this flaw on the bill and
at least fix the first step, and then let the JBC,
along with whoever else wants to, let's go look at
let's find that funding, and let's see what we can
do with regard to the bed issue.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
All right, Senator Barb Kirkmeyer, I appreciate the time today
and your willingness to just come on and say, look,
you know, we've solved one problem while creating another one,
which is kind of exactly what happened the worst problem.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
Yeah, it is exactly what happened.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
Yeah. Well, I mean my friend Laura Carno, who has
a book called Government Ruins Everything. I'm just saying in
this case, maybe it. Barbara, a free fut your time today.
We'll see again soon.
Speaker 2 (19:31):
Thank you so much, thanks for letting me on
I am pleased as Punch to check in with state
Senator and gubernatorial candidate Barb Kirkmeyer. We are going to
talk about something that has turned into.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
A huge problem.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
And Barb, first of all, welcome back to the show.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Well, thank you, it's great to be back on and
thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
So let's talk about HB twenty four Dash ten thirty four.
This was a bill that from the outside looking in,
and you can tell me where I've got it right,
where I've got it wrong, it looks like another well
intentioned piece of legislation that has accidentally created a huge
negative consequence. And that negative consequence for my listeners who
don't know their bill numbers right off the top of
(00:39):
the head, is that we've now seen multiple cases of
people that have demonstrated a propensity to be violent being
arrested and then being released because they are found unable
to stand trial because of a competency issue. And this
is now a huge problem. So Barb, let's start at
the beginning. Where did this bill come from and were
(01:00):
these problems ever discussed?
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Let's do start there.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
But first of all, let me just say this, I
did vote for that bill, and I'm going to say why,
but it is obvious you're right that it's got it
needs to be fixed. There's it did create a huge problem.
We thought we were solving another issue that had to
do with the deal with the Constitution. But in this case,
we need to fix this bill. And I very frankly
(01:26):
believe that the governor should call for a special session,
that we should fix it sooner rather than later. And
I'm concerned that he won't want to do that. I
know the remembers folks that had asked to have this
s get fixed in the special session we had in AUGUSTA.
Obviously it did not get on the call, but we
need to get it fixed sooner rather than later, because
(01:46):
you're right what happened was the bill, and we talked
about this in our caucus as well. But this bill
started actually with a task force who was putting together
recommendations for what's called an introim commit so a committee
that meets when we're not in session and they go
through and have more time to really go in depth
and look at bills and.
Speaker 2 (02:06):
See what's made it there.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
And so it came out of that infram committee and
it was especially built as a necessary fix for a
constitutional deficiency. In other words, way back, like I think
it was nineteen seventy two, but back in the nineteen seventies,
the Supreme Court had made it very clear that individuals
that are deemed incompetent simply cannot just be left in jail.
Speaker 2 (02:29):
It violates the Constitution.
Speaker 3 (02:31):
Do process in the constitution, And you know that's been out.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
There for a while.
Speaker 3 (02:35):
So we we passed this bill thinking that we were
addressing the constitutional concerns, looking at the length of time,
the reasonable amount of time that an individual could be
staying in there. And quite honestly, when we talked about
this billing and in our Republican caucus and when I
mean we all voted for it on the floor in
the Senate, you know, on third reading, we talked about
(02:57):
that it was really they're either going to be in
a correction facility or they're going to be in a
mental institute institution, right, So it wasn't like they should
be letting go or not, you know, getting back out.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
On the streets. So that's where we've got a problem.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
I've talked with, you know, a few district attorneys.
Speaker 2 (03:14):
I've talked with obviously, the sheriff.
Speaker 3 (03:16):
Of my sheriff of Well County, who rightly so is
you know, ringing the alarm bell and thank you for
doing that, And so, you know, we think we can
come up with a fix. I've spoken with one of
the prime sponsors and she's been working with the District
Attorneys Association, the disability groups, victims groups, and others as well,
(03:37):
and we've pledged to kind of try and come together
to see if we can come up with a fix.
But in the meantime, we really just need to have
the governor call special session and then let's get the
bill fixed. But that won't solve all the issue is
part of the other problem. And I've talked about this
in a couple of different places, but you know, it's
one thing to try and address the constitutional concerns.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
Now, we need to.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
Fix this hole it's in this bill. Fix this flawed
law that's letting people go.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
But the other problem is the next phase of this.
Speaker 3 (04:04):
And as I was talking to, like, for example, some
of the district's attorneys like, is the institutions that we
have in the state.
Speaker 2 (04:11):
We have about five hundred beds in the state.
Speaker 3 (04:14):
Four hundred of them are for those that are criminally
Justice involved.
Speaker 2 (04:18):
The others are for civil of.
Speaker 3 (04:19):
People who are involved in civil cases, and it's for
people who are either mentally ill or developmentally disabled. And
so what has been going on in the courts is
instead of the defense having the burden to say that
they are not restorable, in other words, they're incompetent, it's
(04:39):
been put on the prosecution to have to prove that
they are not competent. So again, I think there's a
fixer that we can come up with. But where do
we put them? These beds are full. We've got anywhere
from three hundred and sixty plus bed waiting list to
get into these institutions.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
It's very expensive.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
And you know, in our budget situation, I know last
year in the budget the Joint Budget Committee, we added
additional dollars to this area. Quite frankly, not enough, not enough.
We're going to have to prioritize this area, you know.
And so I tell folks, you know, when you want
to keep voting against the budget, you're also voting against
things like this about you know, increasing bedspace. You're voting
(05:21):
against the Department of Corrections, You're voting against judicial getting funding.
It's like, we have to fund these things and we're
going to have to find the money for it, and
it's it'll be tough. I mean, from my perspective, it's
a must have. It's not a pet project of any kind.
This is a must have that we have to do.
But we got to fix the first problem first, and
(05:41):
that's fixing the flaw in the in the bill, in
the law, and the governor needs to call special session.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Okay, let's talk about the second part of this, because
the first part seems like a no brainer, right.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
That I don't understand.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
I think so anyone could have any issue was saying
we need to make sure the dangerous people are not
getting released back onto the streets. It does seem to
me that there's something wrong, and you sort of referenced it.
There's something wrong with the way people are declared unable
to stand trial or or not competent to stand trial.
(06:12):
There seems to be something there that mechanism, because once
someone is determined to be unable to stand trial because
of competency, it seems like it's far too hard to
get them to a point. Let and I'm going to
use the example of Ephraim oh gosh, what's his last name?
I can't remember his last name. The guy who was
just Collins. It's from something even from something from d
(06:34):
whatever it is, but just getting that guy, because that
guy went on TV with CBS four and is like,
I'm not even getting a chance to plead my case.
And Sheriff Steve Reem said on my show that from
his interactions, this guy does not meet the classic standard
that most people would think of as someone like and
I'm going to use Robert Deer, the guy who's been
accused of shooting up the Planned parenthood in Colorado Springs.
(06:57):
He's been incarcerated since twenty six teen, because he is
completely detached from reality, right, Like I think most people
think when you hear not competent to stand trial, you're
thinking someone with serious mental illness instead of they just
don't seem to understand that they're now in the judicial system,
which the second case feels that way.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
Does that make sense, Yes, it does.
Speaker 3 (07:20):
So there's a difference between being you know, a mental
illness and being able to be treatable. And then there's
also the developmentally disabled, So someone with like a very
low IQ, right, like, you know, I don't know what
this individual in Wild County with our IQ is, but
when I talked to the sheriff, it sounds like he's
got a very low IQ and they're developmentally disabled, right,
and so that's.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
That's the difference.
Speaker 3 (07:42):
But like I said, when I was talking with different
district attorneys, their comment was, look, we need to kind
of flip the burden here and habits where the presumption
needs to be reversed that defendants should have to demonstrate
competency or the defense should have to demonstrate compency rather
than forcing prosecutors to prove incompetence. And that's causing an issue.
(08:07):
And I think that's where we can fix the law.
But the next question is then where do they go?
Speaker 2 (08:12):
Right?
Speaker 3 (08:13):
You know, certainly if they're having a lesser crime, like
if it was you know, shoplifting.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Or a non violent but not just some left or.
Speaker 3 (08:21):
Lesser crime that's more of a misdemeanor type thing, you know,
there are probably other suitable places for them to go
to get resources and services, especially if it's mental illness.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
But if it is developmentally.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
Disabled and they just aren't capable of understanding, we're going
to need to find a location for them. But we
can't just be letting them out on the streets, especially
if they are violent, you know, and have a very
low IQ kind of thing. And that's what's going on here.
So we're going to have to figure out how to increase.
Speaker 2 (08:53):
The number of beds.
Speaker 3 (08:55):
And you know that we have in these institutions and
probably the ones either in Fort Logan are Pueblo. I mean,
that's where we have our two institutions in the state
of Colorado.
Speaker 2 (09:03):
And it's very expensive.
Speaker 3 (09:05):
And I will tell you right now we're under a
consent to cree because of that waiting list we already have,
so we're already paying out money to essentially stay out
of compliance, which I don't like. And we've been trying
to figure this out at the Joint Budget Committee. But
at the same time, we don't have the we haven't
been a well find the funding.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
We have a workforce shortage.
Speaker 3 (09:25):
I mean, we don't have people who want to work there,
right and I wouldn't either, quite frankly.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
But so that's part of the other issue is trying
to figure out especially after COVID.
Speaker 3 (09:34):
I mean, our issue got exasperated with COVID because of
you know, people being furloughed and being left not at
the state, not being furloughed at the state. But like
you know, these types of medical and behavior health providers,
you know, things just got moved around and got switched around,
and now things have gotten a lot more expensive. It's
more expensive to hire people we contract out with these beds,
(09:57):
you know, to get the right workforce there. But it
it is extremely difficult to do that. And that's the
next step. And by no means trying to make any
kind of excuse.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
We have got to fix this.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
We cannot let, you know, violent criminals just because they're
developmentally disabled out on the streets.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
We've got to figure out where they go. And we
also have to follow our constitution.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Amen to that. Now, let me ask this question to
the point that Colorado, and it's not just Colorado, okay.
We know back in the you know, fifties, sixties, and seventies,
of the nineteen hundreds. Back in the nineteen hundreds, as
the kids today say, we had a big emptying out
of mental institutions of all kinds, state, federal, everybody kind
of said, oh, we've got all these new medications and
(10:41):
we're going to just give people medications and they're going
to be okay in the community. The reality is is
that we have underinvested for decades, right, we have underinvested,
and now we've got this situation, which is criminal situations,
but we also have on the streets of our cities
here in Colorado evidence of a significant population of people
(11:02):
with severe mental illness. They are self medicated with.
Speaker 2 (11:06):
Drugs and alcohol.
Speaker 1 (11:07):
So we need to be having a conversation not just
about the criminal element, but we need to be having
a conversation about what are we going to do in
a meaningful way to help people who are stuck in
the throes of addiction have an opportunity to come out
of that addiction and get help for that mental illness
while also being protected in an environment that protects themselves
(11:31):
and the general public.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
You're exactly right.
Speaker 3 (11:36):
And part of the issue is, and I've been having
this struggle with this as well, is we created a
behavior Health Administration, and this is where we were supposed
to be combining things from all these departments and creating
this new administration that was going to figure out this
system of care and how do we get behavioral health.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Services to folks.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
I quite frankly don't really know what our return on
investment has been for the over billion of dollars that
we have put into this administration, into this department, and
I think there needs to be some discussions there about
where are we really putting the funds and how do
we fix how do we fix this issue? I mean,
maybe we need to be pulling some of those funds
over to assist with the issue with the beds that
(12:14):
we have in our institutions where we have a lack
of beds, I mean, because we do not we do
not want to get into the situation that we were
in with our juvenile detention facilities and beds, where we
literally had a cap on the number of beds that
we could have, and just this year we finally were
able to get that cap increase because what was happening
is we were to put someone into that situation, into
(12:37):
that bed, we were letting someone else go.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
And we do not want to be in that situation either.
Speaker 3 (12:42):
So we are literally, quite literally going to have to
sit down and get this figured out. Like I said,
the easiest part, and I'm not going to say it's
really easy, but the easiest part of this is fixing
the law. The most difficult, difficult part is I don't
even think it's finding the funding. I think it's finding
the workforce to increase the number of beds that we
(13:03):
have in our institutions so that we can get that
wait list down. I know the woman who runs this office,
she has worked for district attorneys. She understands what the
situation is. And if we don't get it down, you know,
quite frankly, we just get posed with another lawsuit, which
doesn't do any good.
Speaker 2 (13:21):
We know what the problem is. We're trying to fix it.
Another lawsuit just doesn't happen.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
But you know, sometimes you just can't get those acl
you guys to suffer the loss. But you know, we've
got to. We've just got to get under control, and
we've got to. We will we can find the funding.
I know we will go and work to find the
funding because this is a must have, a must fund.
It's that workforce shortage is what is scaring me. And
I don't know where we find that well.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
I mean this is when when I had then candidate
Mayor Mike Johnson now Mayor Mike Johnston on the show,
and he was talking about creating all these micro communities
and hotels and all of this stuff for homeless people.
My number one question for him was who is going
to work there? Where are you going to find the staff?
Where are you going to find the trained staff? This
is not exactly you can't just PLoP a new high
(14:09):
school graduate into this position. These are people that have
to be highly trained. They have to understand how to
deal with mentally ill people that could be violent.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
I mean, I'm with you on this.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
I think that this is a huge, huge issue and
one that I fear, and I'm going to be honest,
I fear that nothing significant is going to happen until
someone's family member gets murdered or someone gets, you know,
attacked on the streets by someone who should not have
been out. We've already seen some high profile cases of this,
(14:42):
but maybe the wrong people are being attacked maybe, you know.
I don't wish that on anyone, to be clear, but
I really worry that we're going to let this go
and let this go and let this go, and someone's
going to die because of it.
Speaker 3 (14:54):
Well, and I hope and pray that does not happen.
And I know you don't want it to happen either.
I don't think anyone does. And you're right, I think
one of the other things, though, maybe one of the
fixes that we can do in the law is when
this was determined back again, I think I know it
was back in the seventies that you can't just leave
people sit in jail. There has to be a reasonable standard,
a reasonable amount of time, So you can't just leave
(15:15):
them there in a correctional facility, either in a county
jail or in a state correctional facility indefinitely. But again,
I think if one, if we go back and look
at what the district attorneys are saying, where we you know,
put the burden onto the defense that we presume people
are restorable until the defense says no, this individual is not.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
That would help.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
If we've tried some other things with you know, ensuring
that we can get legal guardians appointed. But we also
started another program it's called the Bridges program, and I
don't know how successful it is.
Speaker 2 (15:51):
We started in the last couple of.
Speaker 3 (15:53):
Years as well, but it's like a court appointed individual
that would be on every case like this to ensure
that these individuals are one getting the services that they
need and getting place and that we find placements for it.
But I think the other part of the law that
maybe we need to look at and probably.
Speaker 2 (16:10):
Change is the amount of days.
Speaker 3 (16:13):
You know, the Supreme Court didn't say in their rulings
back in the seventies that it had to be sixty
days or ninety days or one hundred and you know,
twenty days or anything of that nature. They just said
it needs to be a reasonable time frame, and maybe
we need to redefine what reasonable time frame is as well.
Speaker 2 (16:28):
I don't know. I am not an attorney.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
That's why I talked to the district attorneys a lot,
and would talk to my county attorney a lot all
the time.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
But I think maybe that's.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
Another area where we can help fix this law and
maybe start at least giving us a little bit more
time to figure out how we find the funding and
then where do we get the workforce from.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
I mean, that's part. It's going to increase the funding.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
And you know, again I'm not trying to shrink my
responsibility here.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
We're going to have to go find it. That's just
all there is to it.
Speaker 1 (16:56):
Well, I'm speaking with Senator Barb kirk State Senator Barb
Kirkmeyer and given at real candidate. A lot of people
on the tech signe are saying, how did you guys
not see this problem coming.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
How when you passed.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
The bill, did nobody go, hey, we could let some
dangerous people out of jailed. Was that never a consideration?
Speaker 3 (17:14):
I'm telling you in all the conversations I had, now,
I was not in the Interim committee. I didn't you know,
I didn't see all of the task force recommendations. I'm
not on the Judiciary committee that I think this is.
That's the committee that it went through.
Speaker 2 (17:26):
On the Senate side.
Speaker 3 (17:28):
I do know we had conversations about this in our
Republican caucus, and that's that was not the discussion. It
was like, we need to find what a reasonable timeframe is.
We need to ensure that we are adhering to the Constitution,
because again, if we're leaving these individuals, whether it's mental
illness or developmentally disabled folks in our correctional facilities, it
just keeps setting us up for more lawsuits and that's
(17:49):
not solving the problem either.
Speaker 2 (17:52):
So no, we did not.
Speaker 3 (17:53):
I mean, at no point did I hear anybody have
that kind of discussion.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Speaker 3 (17:59):
It just means I'm telling you I was not a
part of that conversation. And maybe it happened in committee.
I'm not sure. I just know on the Senate floor
it passed unanimously. So I'm thinking, you know, we're all
thinking the same thing that we are putting in what
we believe to be a necessary fixed for constitutional deficiency.
But clearly the application of this law has clearly exasperated
(18:23):
Colorado's public safety issues that we have. And you know,
I'm just going to sit again. The governor needs to
call a special session. This is not one of those
things that can wait until January or February for us
to go in and get in session and fix the law.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
I mean, my gosh, we are not back in session
till the middle of January.
Speaker 3 (18:42):
It takes at least three days and then another few
days to get things signed. I mean, at a minimum,
we're talking February first, if you ask me.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
And I think that's way too long to wait.
Speaker 3 (18:52):
I know people don't like to have special sessions, but
I think, too darn bad. Let's all get back to
work and let's fix this flaw on the bill and
at least fix the first step, and then let the JBC,
along with whoever else wants to, let's go look at
let's find that funding, and let's see what we can
do with regard to the bed issue.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
All right, Senator Barb Kirkmeyer, I appreciate the time today
and your willingness to just come on and say, look,
you know, we've solved one problem while creating another one,
which is kind of exactly what happened the worst problem.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
Yeah, it is exactly what happened.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
Yeah. Well, I mean my friend Laura Carno, who has
a book called Government Ruins Everything. I'm just saying in
this case, maybe it. Barbara, a free fut your time today.
We'll see again soon.
Speaker 2 (19:31):
Thank you so much, thanks for letting me on
The Mandy Connell Podcast News
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Cardiac Cowboys
The heart was always off-limits to surgeons. Cutting into it spelled instant death for the patient. That is, until a ragtag group of doctors scattered across the Midwest and Texas decided to throw out the rule book. Working in makeshift laboratories and home garages, using medical devices made from scavenged machine parts and beer tubes, these men and women invented the field of open heart surgery. Odds are, someone you know is alive because of them. So why has history left them behind? Presented by Chris Pine, CARDIAC COWBOYS tells the gripping true story behind the birth of heart surgery, and the young, Greatest Generation doctors who made it happen. For years, they competed and feuded, racing to be the first, the best, and the most prolific. Some appeared on the cover of Time Magazine, operated on kings and advised presidents. Others ended up disgraced, penniless, and convicted of felonies. Together, they ignited a revolution in medicine, and changed the world.