All Episodes

March 8, 2025 • 35 mins
Patriarchy psychology

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/brainbow--4812228/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Hi, Welcome back to brain Bow. This is part two
of the Epstein List, the Tarot Reading. I I wanted
to add a correction from the first part, which I
didn't make it clear because I talk about this so much.
You know, I was doing like a whole series on

(00:24):
evolutionary psychology, and Robert Ardi and.

Speaker 2 (00:28):
I talk about it so much.

Speaker 1 (00:29):
I just assume that everybody, like all the anybody who
listens would.

Speaker 2 (00:37):
Would would know.

Speaker 1 (00:39):
That I don't promote the patriarchy. Like, okay, So the
first episode, the first part, I talked about alpha males
and so forth. So okay, in the chimpanzee world, in
the primate world, there's there's patriarchy systems, and there's major systems.

(01:01):
And the generalizations I made in part one had to
do more with a the patriarchy system. And so this
is what we have now we have Trump and the
patriarchy is back, and it's neither better or worse. But
each system could be corrupt or good, on good or bad.

(01:25):
Anything could be good or bad, and the matriarchy too.
So I I didn't want to come across as like, well,
this is the way people are because of the alpha patriarchy,
because it could just as easily be run by a matriarchy,
which we've seen with the Democrats for a long time.
It's more of a matriarchal system. So in the animal world,

(01:52):
specifically with primates, because we're primates. So let's just deal
with that.

Speaker 2 (01:56):
I'm not going to get into hyenas.

Speaker 1 (01:57):
You know, my least favorite is the hyena, and it's
because they team up.

Speaker 2 (02:05):
They're not fair.

Speaker 1 (02:06):
They don't they they they they have the politics of
the sex is used as a bartering type of tool
when it when females are in charge. More so when

(02:26):
males are in charge, there's more like strict adherence to
allocation of resources based on status and merit and how
they acquired status. So when there's I'll just give you
some specific examples. Okay, So with the bonobos, there's they're

(02:48):
a type of chimpanzee that they're more promiscuous. They don't
only have sex when the females in heat. They do
it mostly for political reasons and to soothe each other
to they groom each other and appease each other sexually.

(03:18):
It's a way to form friendships and alliances, and so
the females will gang up on the males and make
sure that they are submissive to the female, and if
in adolescence, if they don't show that kind of submissive temperament,
then they kill they kill them. So there's a lot

(03:38):
more infanticide, which is killing of babies and killing of
young adolescents in a matriarchal society.

Speaker 2 (03:49):
And females are.

Speaker 1 (03:55):
More corruptible because they're more passive and waiting for opportunities,
any opportunity to take advantage of, rather than steadily fight
its way up to the top every day and then
in the process gets stronger. So by taking that more

(04:17):
like if you're if you're weak, or if you can't,
like if you can't get something just out of sheer
action and force, which would be like a masculine type
of energy, which could be a good or bad too,
because then that could lead to like tyrants, conquerors, just
you know, people of using that their power instead of

(04:39):
being like a good leader. With that, a female that
tends to be more corrupted.

Speaker 2 (04:49):
Because they have to be.

Speaker 1 (04:50):
It's just a smart evolutionary advantage. If you don't have
as big muscle as if your muscles aren't as big,
then you got to use your head or you're you
gotta land and plot and scheme, and females are just
more manipulative and all the primate species they plot mostly

(05:10):
for their offspring to give them an evolutionary advantage. So
by getting rid of opponents, like say, you would see
I remember those cheerleader moms that were like killing other
cheerleaders competitions like that kind of mentality.

Speaker 2 (05:31):
So when I was.

Speaker 1 (05:33):
Talking about I just thought I should add this because
I made a comment about about an alpha, and it's
the alpha sidekick. How the alpha the king doesn't really
naturally engage in the dynamics so much.

Speaker 2 (05:51):
They He just delegates that to his.

Speaker 1 (05:55):
Two friends and mates with the females when they're ready,
but doesn't spend more time. It's not it's not monogamous.
It's whoever is in heat basically, whereas with a female
society when there's a matriarchy, it's an ongoing thing all

(06:20):
the time. It's like basically they call it the Bnobyl handshake.
Vanessa Woods, who studied them with her husband Brian Hare,
she called it the Bernoble handshake because it's like their
instinct is to have sex, like even the infants. They
She once had this baby infant and she refused to

(06:42):
stroke him, and that was to that baby, that was
just a comforting feeling and she just was like, nah,
I can't do that, and the baby wound up dying
and then she regretted it.

Speaker 2 (06:54):
She's and so that's what when you.

Speaker 1 (06:57):
Greet a banoble, that's what they do. They stick out
their boner and then you just like you have to
stroke every that's they all do that, and they call
that the Banova handshake. And that's just a cultural or
instinctive thing, like why do we shake hands? Even it's
too like Indian, like the Native Americans would hold up
their palm like look, you know, you can trust me,

(07:19):
And it's showing that kind of receptivity, right that there's
nothing to hide, put up your hands, show your hands,
there's nothing to hide. To shake someone's hand. It's kind
of like you feel their energy. You can kind of

(07:40):
get a good sense of them and if they're hiding
anything or.

Speaker 2 (07:49):
You can tell.

Speaker 1 (07:50):
You can tell a lot by a handshake, but with
a Banova handshake, you can tell a lot more because
they're shaking something else. I I have this belief that
females are more corruptible because of just the way we
evolve to. We have to, we have to be sneakier.

(08:14):
We can't use our just our sheer power because we
don't have that power. And also with the caring of offspring.

Speaker 2 (08:26):
It's just like.

Speaker 1 (08:29):
The people are out for themselves, so putting. Like when
a female looks at another female's children, they see them
differently than like a male. A male that looks at
someone's children, it's like, okay, they're they're instinctively, it's not
like I want to kill you.

Speaker 2 (08:51):
Excogiate. That's the word of the day.

Speaker 1 (08:55):
Two system, yes to. I'm doing a podcast right now.
You know we have this word of a day. Every
day learned something new. You don't really retain it if
you don't use it though, so so I know that

(09:15):
people hate it when I make these generalizations. But pattern
recognition is important for psychology because you everything is comes
in a pattern, and when it comes to behavior, one
thing leads to another's cause and effect. And when it

(09:38):
comes to politics, when the male's in charge, compared to
whether the female is in charge, there's it's more easily
it's more easy. Females are more easily corrupted because there's
just more of a self serving instinct than a male

(10:00):
who has to prove himself to all of the females
in the entire community. See, when you ban together, you're
greater in numbers, but that doesn't necessarily lead to a stronger,
better leader overall, because depending on why these people are

(10:21):
conspiring to become the leader, they may just want to
take all Like I like that movie The Lion King.
It's a good analogy or parable for this type of
thing that we're talking about, because you see, when there's
a true king like Mufasa, who is appointed by God
and who has his lineage, then everybody benefits from it.

(10:45):
But when there's somebody who comes into power who doesn't
deserve to be in power, everything is corrupted. And so
there could be a good matriarchy if there are like
Native Americans, there were some trial where they had matriarchal
matriarchy societies. And what would happen is when the boys

(11:10):
reached I guess when they were about sixteen or so,
they would all have to go off to a they
would have to defend and they had all these like
battles with all these other tribes, territorial battles and stuff.
The females would elect the next leader based upon how

(11:32):
all of the boys interact with each other, and it
would be a democratic vote of who is going to
be elected. So with that kind of when females are
in charge and there's a democracy, it keeps everybody honest
because there's transparency. There's not supposed to be like a

(11:53):
group that's conspiring to take over. Everyone is supposed to
have equal vote. And so let's say that even if
that happened he had that cheerleader mom, you know, try
to take out one of the adolescents. Everybody would know
that and they and they would, you know, they would
take care of that themselves. So that's all I wanted

(12:15):
to say about that.

Speaker 2 (12:20):
I have I have some.

Speaker 1 (12:21):
Quotes here from Robert Artery, and he's the one who
talks about the territorial instinct. He wrote about he lived
in Italy for a while, he married a woman who
was Italian. He was he was actually an actor in Hollywood,
and he's I think he got canceled for these political.

Speaker 2 (12:39):
Types of ideas at the time. He was also pro.

Speaker 1 (12:45):
Equal rights, and this was like in the fifties where
it wasn't popular to be a civil rights activists in
the fifties, So.

Speaker 2 (13:07):
He fell out of favor.

Speaker 1 (13:10):
I discovered him because of Loretta Grazziana Bruni, who writes
about she's ahead.

Speaker 2 (13:18):
Of her time.

Speaker 1 (13:18):
She has a PhD in business management, and she just
naturally has this curiosity about animal behavior and human behavior.
And I suffered from depression since I was eleven, and
it got really bad. I wound up go into a library.
I just saw one of her books. It was like
Secrets of a Happy Brain, and I just bought it

(13:39):
because I got all these other books, and I was like,
I normally don't go for those types of pop psychology
sounding books, but I just got exos there. I looked
at it and it talked about like serotonin and dopamine
and how are you know we are based our emotions
are these chemicals that come from interaction in our relationships

(14:01):
and our social structures and how we measure up toward others.
So I was, I s I read that and it's fascinating.
It basically is not pop psychology, but more like anthropology,
cause and effect, evolutionary psychology. And she she's been she's been,

(14:25):
I guess I don't I wouldn't say she's been canceled,
but she's been like kind of shadow band in academia,
probably because it's doesn't support the pharmaceutical narrative where oh,
depression is chemical and balanced. Here take this, it's like, no,
depression is from a chain of events that you can

(14:46):
deconstruct through cognitive behavioral therapy. You know how they have
cognitive cognitive cognitive behavioral therapy is basically talking to yourself
about your thoughts about like But the problem with that is,
let's say if you have a thought like, oh, I'm
not good enough in this person, and you play this

(15:07):
thing over in your head, like where you're embarrassed or
rejected or something, and then that gives you a low
sense of self worth, low serotonin, and depression. So yeah,
you're gonna have low serotonin if you have a low status.
But if you just artificially give serotonin to that person,
then you're giving them status chemicals. You know that they

(15:31):
would only get in nature if they were to achieve something,
and it causes all of a whole different type of
brain chemistry. So the way she describes it in her books,
it would put the pharmaceutical companies out of business if
people actually looked at psychology in this way that like

(15:53):
we're animals, and we have this survival. We have instincts
and impulses, and if we were to just look at
each other like that, it's it's considered like offensive, I
guess because I think it's psychology. It's still they don't
look at animals animal behavior and compare our behavior to that.

Speaker 2 (16:17):
It's like.

Speaker 1 (16:22):
It's I don't know, it's just considered offensive or something.
But I think in the future we're gonna have more
of her philosophy that will be included in cognitive behavioral
therapy so that we have a better understanding. And I've

(16:43):
already been seeing it, like in the past five years.
So Loretta Graziana Gratziana Burning is a wonderful person. She's
the one who told me about this because I was
asking her about I had some questions and like I said,

(17:04):
like she's her work is the only stuff that helped me.
And I was on medications, as on all sorts of things,
and it just like it woke me up, Like I
had a paradigm shift and I started seeing things in
a different way, and I wasn't attached to things that

(17:25):
would happen between people, and like I didn't really care
what people thought of me anymore. And I just helped
me to realize, like you could be strong on your
own and you don't need validation approval, You don't need
to verify anything or second guess yourself so much like

(17:45):
you just need to be solid and strong and know
what you're doing. And I also think there's a spiritual
components too, because if it's more important like what God sees,
how God views you, what everybody else does, and if
you can get to that point, you're going to be
happier if you're doing right like that.

Speaker 2 (18:05):
So she told me to read Robert Artery.

Speaker 1 (18:09):
To learn more about the territorial instinct, which I find
out this is, this is the instinct that.

Speaker 2 (18:22):
Leads to.

Speaker 1 (18:25):
I guess, if you were to boil it, it would
probably boil down to every every power struggle can be
boiled down to this territorial instinct. And the territorial instinct
is born from the death instinct and the sex instinct.

(18:48):
I have this other theory that all of human instincts
is boiled down to two things death and sex instinct,
and they're the opposite of each other. So you're either
pro creating, whether not just sexually, but through your ideas
and inventions and innovations, or the fear of death keeps
you alive. And so the older men get, the more

(19:15):
they reach toward sex as a way to keep their
mortality from.

Speaker 2 (19:24):
Naturally occurring.

Speaker 1 (19:25):
They don't want to die, so then you know they
it makes them feel alive. Put it that way, it's
not so much about just wanting to procreate, but it's
like avoiding death. Sex could be used that way.

Speaker 2 (19:40):
When the two are combined.

Speaker 1 (19:41):
It's a very powerful almost has like an addictive quality
to it, which is instinctive.

Speaker 2 (19:49):
And low natured, low minded.

Speaker 1 (19:52):
But that's where you would get like the type of
whatever causes people to have violent rape sex like we
were hearing about in the Epstein files, Like I don't
really want to hear about that, but if you want
to psycholane it, like why would somebody do that? Well,
it comes down to that it makes them feel powerful,

(20:15):
makes them feel like invincible, immortal, no fear, any kind
of repressed neurosis that they have about not being in
control or not being powerful enough would be subdued by
the act of being the dominant one who has the

(20:41):
power of sex and death in his hand.

Speaker 2 (20:46):
So Robert Ardrey.

Speaker 1 (20:49):
The top twenty five quotes from asy quotes. Do you
care about freedom? Dreams may have inspired it and wishes
prompted it, but only warn weapons have made it yours?

Speaker 2 (21:01):
What do you think about that.

Speaker 1 (21:02):
That freedom is allowed only because of more?

Speaker 2 (21:12):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (21:13):
I mean it's it's it may be true. It may
be true, like if if you think about, like.

Speaker 2 (21:27):
What it means to be free?

Speaker 1 (21:29):
Like who who actually is free? Even the animals that
live outside of nature, they're not completely free, they're they
they have to abide by nature's laws. It's not like free,
free from what, free from harm? Free free, like who
is actually free? We have to create this artificial protection

(21:55):
where we're so strong we dominate nature, and we dominate
other tribes. And so okay, the next one we are not.
I'm sorry, but we were born of risen apes, not
fallen angels. And the apes were armed killers besides, And

(22:16):
so what shall we wonder at our murders and massacres
and missiles, and our irreconcilable regiments, or our treaties, whatever
they may be worth, our symphonies, however seldom they may
be played our peaceful acres. However frequently they may be
converted into battlefields. Our dreams, however rarely they may be accomplished.

(22:39):
The miracle of man is not how far he has sunk,
but how magnificently he has risen. We are known among
the stars by our poems, not our corpses. Yeah, the
wars are often won by ideas, not so much by

(23:03):
killing that doesn't last. Aggressiveness is the principal guaranteur of survival.
I don't really like that one either. I mean, I
hate it could be a truth I don't like to admit.
Aggressiveness is the principle. Whoever is the most aggressive wins.

(23:29):
The dog barking at you from behind his master's fence
acts for a mode of indistinguishable from that of his master.
When the fence was built to keep people out, to
establish this is my territory, this is your territory. One
of his theories was that having territory is not so

(23:50):
much to protect the one who has it, but it
actually protects everyone so that they know not to go there,
because then there would be a fight. It's interesting to
think that way. How we have these borders not to
just keep them out, but just to prevent any kind

(24:13):
of strife, any kind of future fighting.

Speaker 2 (24:19):
It's just okay.

Speaker 1 (24:20):
This is a sign of peace, not so much as
a sign as keep out. While we pursue the unattainable,
we make impossible the realizable. While we pursue the unattainable,
we make impossible the realizable. So the more you chase

(24:41):
after something you can't have, the more impossible it is
to realize something that's already there. The city is a
cultural invention and force, sing on the citizen knowledge of

(25:01):
his own nature. And this we do not like. That
we are aggressive beings easily given to violence. That we
get along together because we must, more than because we
want to. And that the brotherhood of man is about
as far from reality today as it was two thousand
years ago. That reasons realm is small, that we never

(25:24):
have been and never shall be created equal, That if
the human being is perfectible, he has so far exhibited
few symptoms all our considerations of man, from which space
tends to protect us. We are born of risen apes,
not fallen angels. Well, okay, I have a lot of

(25:48):
I don't really believe that man is a fraction of
the animal world. Our history is an afterthought, no more
tacto and infinite calendar. We are not so unique as
we should like to believe. If you watch lizards and
lions copulating, then you will see that in two hundred
million years, the male has not had a single new idea.

(26:10):
Far from the truth lay the antique assumption that man
had fathered the weapon. The weapon instead had fathered man.
That's interesting, who made who?

Speaker 2 (26:29):
Human war has.

Speaker 1 (26:30):
Been the most successful of our cultural traditions. We may agree,
for example, that our societies must provide greater security for
the individual. Yet if all we succeed in producing is
providing increase anonymity and ever increasing boredom, then we should

(26:50):
not wonder if an ingenious man turns to such amusements
as drugs, housebreaking, vandalism, mayhem riots, or at the most
harmless strain, chair cuts, costumes, standards of cleanliness, and sexual experiments.
So we must agree, for example, that our society must
provide greater security.

Speaker 2 (27:11):
For the individual.

Speaker 1 (27:12):
Yet if we succeed in producing is a Yet if
all we succeed in producing is providing increased anonymity and
ever increasing boredom, then we should not wonder if ingenious
men turn to these derangements. There is nothing so moving,

(27:35):
not even acts of love or hate as the discovery
that one is not alone. Robert Ardrey, I thought I
heard this someone else say. I love this. This is
one of my favorite quotes ever. There is nothing so moving,
not even acts of love or hate, as the discovery that.

Speaker 2 (27:51):
One is not alone.

Speaker 1 (27:53):
There is a virtue I must presume in shamelessness, since
by placing on parade the things one does not know,
one discovers that no one else knows either. Men, unlike mockingbirds,
have the capacity for systematic self delusion. We echo each

(28:15):
other with equal precision, equal eloquence, equal assurance. Not in innocence,
and not in Asia was mankind born. The home of
our fathers was that African highland, reaching north from the
Cape to the lakes of the Nile. Here we came about, slowly,
ever so slowly, and a sky swept savannah glowing with menace.

(28:39):
The part about him saying that people are born from
apes and not of angels, I am. I have this
theory about Neanderthal and chral magnet, and It's not just

(29:02):
my theory, but I've had this for a while, and
I've discovered other people have had it, had these similar
thoughts that Neanderthal is we know that autistic genetics have
more Neanderthal DNA.

Speaker 2 (29:27):
I would.

Speaker 1 (29:29):
This is the way I see evolution. This is the
way I see it happened. Okay, So we started out
in Africa, there were some neurodivergence around, and these are
the ones like the Shamans, who would two percent of
the population have this neurodivergence that.

Speaker 2 (29:49):
Allows for.

Speaker 1 (29:52):
Innovations to occur in like creativity and artistic endeavors and
that sort of thing. And these are the ones that
are needed for a species to provide mutations if that's
what the specie needs. If the species needs that, then
that's what happens. So these neurodiversions have more mutable genetics

(30:17):
that adapt. Not only do they adapt for so evolution
is not always like good. Sometimes it's just damage. And
so if it works, then it keeps going in that direction.
And if it doesn't work, then they get killed off.

(30:38):
So with shamans, universally in all cultures, most of them
don't make it to become influential innovators or religious leaders.
Most of them are cast away and cast off from
the group and they are left like alone wolf. They're

(31:00):
left out to die. They go crazy and they never
make it back, but the ones that do are become
stronger and they make the whole group stronger for it. Now,
as soon as that shaman makes a mistake, then they
sacrifice that one and then a new one comes up.

(31:22):
So it's kind of like a leader. They're a leader,
but they're they're different kind of they're like the priests
of the.

Speaker 2 (31:32):
Of the group.

Speaker 1 (31:33):
Not maybe maybe even an advisor or maybe even a
craftsman in the past, or an artist. They would be
looked to for inspiration and as an outlet to release
the group's pent up aggression.

Speaker 2 (31:57):
Okay, so that would be their purpose.

Speaker 1 (32:02):
Now, these types of people, I believe.

Speaker 2 (32:07):
Came from mutations.

Speaker 1 (32:11):
That have occurred throughout our evolution with chromagnin and neanderthal
because the Neanderthal DNA, I mean everybody has Neanderthal and chromagnant.
Some people have more Neanderthal than other people, and autistic

(32:31):
people have more Neanderthal DNA, And that's what they're saying
is prone to more of the neurodivergence, not just autism,
but bipolar and all these schizophrenic, all these other things.
And if we see the way that the Neanderthals lived,
they were peaceful, compared to Chromagnin that were warring primates.

(32:52):
They created the weapons, they went through pillaging, raping, stealing,
and taking over. The Neanderthals they were more self sufficient,
self contained, they were autonomous. They didn't live in big
groups like Chromagnin. They had just like a family or

(33:14):
even there were solitary ones, and so it was so
easy when the Chromagnant came and they just obliterated them.
They just interbred with them and killed them off. And
so we see like these mass graves around, so we
know that there was wars, and we don't see weapons
made by Nean mass weapons like we see with the Chromagnin.

(33:35):
So that's there is this theory that autistic genetics comes
from the Neanderthal line and that it's continue to be
passed down to for the benefit of our species in
case there needs to be some kind of adaptation to

(33:57):
our environment.

Speaker 2 (33:58):
Like canaries in a coal mine.

Speaker 1 (34:00):
We can look at them to see like, okay, is
this toxic because there's a more of a sensitivity to
everything in the environment. All right, I'm gonna leave o there.
It's getting kind of out of my house. It's a
Friday night. I had a great time watching Trump's speech today.
It was it was, it was. It was maybe like

(34:21):
a two hour speech, and just watching the Democrats sitting
there like freaking Gotham City getting caught for every all
of the corruption that they did, especially watching Nancy Pelosi,
you know, squeal around in her seat. It was. It
was a beautiful sight to see. And yeah, I'm so
grateful that the corrupt matriarchy is out and and I

(34:46):
hope that that this new patriarchy will continue to uphold
the highest standards of our of our political system. And
who knows, you know, in the future again when we
when we do have a group of of matriarchs and

(35:09):
a hopefully by then the democracy will be less corruptible,
people will be I mean, democracy is democracy is only
as good as the people. You know.

Speaker 2 (35:20):
We need to have a complete like a cleaning up
of our.

Speaker 1 (35:27):
Are I guess I hate to say morality, but just
just doing what's right and what's fair, what's honest. No
more conspiring making backhanded deal you know, backroom deals and
putting just this group of special interests before the the

(35:51):
interests of the entire group. So okay, thank you for
being here with me today, and I hope see you
next to my brain.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Fudd Around And Find Out

Fudd Around And Find Out

UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.