All Episodes

March 26, 2025 • 38 mins
Lawfare against the Trump administration, 150 indictments against Democrats in CT for election fraud, and more news, commentary and analysis.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Do you want more success, more growth, more results than
It's time for the Boundless Success Accelerator from the Modern
Observer group. This isn't your average coaching program. It's where
top performers come to dominate. Weekly group sessions, on demand coaching,
a community that's got your back, and a powerpack library

(00:23):
of tools to supercharge your business and career. No more excuses,
no more waiting, Get in, level up and start building
the life you've been dreaming about. Visit us at modernobserver
dot com slash Boundless Success to join today. Let's get
you to the next level.

Speaker 2 (01:04):
Welcome to another edition of Carnivore Bites. I'm your host,
Jeff Sherman, along with doctor Eric Loopkin, who's been hobnobbing
with a rich and famous and that's one of the
reasons why we did the podcast on Tuesday versus Wednesday
of last week. If any of you noticed but a
lot to report their doctor o'lopkin a lot of interesting

(01:27):
bits of information. I'll just let you take the floor.

Speaker 1 (01:31):
Yeah, this was an amazing conference. This was the ten
X Growth Conference in Las Vegas that was put on
by New York Times bestselling author and real estate investor
Grant cardone and the lineup of speakers, Now what makes

(01:53):
this conference absolutely amazing. Every speaker was a multi millionaire
or a billillionaire. They were there to discuss how they
got where they are and what was really interesting. Okay, Now,
first of all, this was hardly an exclusive group of

(02:14):
attendees that I was in. There were seventy five hundred
people in the venue and another one hundred and fifty
thousand attending virtually, so this was.

Speaker 3 (02:28):
Not yo like a Davos type you know setting. This
was thank God.

Speaker 1 (02:36):
Yeah, multimillionaires and billionaires reaching out to talk to people
about how they can improve their situations. And number of
very well known folks were speaking. Some of the business
people talking Jimmy John, founder of the Jimmy John Sandwich

(02:58):
shop chain, Mike Rowe from Dirty Jobs, Martha Martha Stewart,
act actor Ryan Reynolds, and I was actually really impressed
with his talk, which shocked me because I've never been
a big fan of his acting, but as a businessman
he was amazing. But also there was Eric Trump, Alina

(03:25):
Haba who was Trump's Trump's attorney, Gary Yes, and she's
a member of the administration. Gary Cohne who was the
former COO of IBM and Trump's former economic advisor, and
Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA at the two big

(03:47):
things that were absolutely stand out. First of all, again
with the exception of Eric Trump, every one of these
folks started with nothing. They weren't born with silver spoons
in your mouth. They and these folks completely blow away

(04:07):
the image of the millionaires and billionaires that Bernie Sanders
is trying to put forth. Not only are these folks
incredibly successful in business, but Gary Kohane, Alena Habba, they
actually had to put all of their success aside so

(04:30):
they could join the administration for next to no money
compared to what they were making.

Speaker 2 (04:38):
Oh, a little bit of mirror image of what happened
with the Democrats, right. And it's really interesting that you
say that because the Democrats supposed to be the part
of the people to do the Bernie impression, which is
a complete bs. But you know, actually you can say
that a lot are basically insatiably greedy. How do you
like that, Oh, Bernsie actually needs any more money? I

(05:02):
doubt it.

Speaker 1 (05:03):
And that's another thing that really stood out at the
conference when when Eric Trump spoke, he talked about how
he grew up, and of course he grew up in
real estate, but before he was making any decisions, he
learned contracting. He was working on Trump properties as a

(05:27):
construction worker.

Speaker 3 (05:28):
He was working.

Speaker 1 (05:29):
He learned to be an electrician. He was working as
an electrician and he actually was just joking about that
because apparently he still does that from time to time
in his own home and it drives his wife nuts.
But he learned the business from the bottom up. There

(05:50):
was no silver spoon. Alina Haba was defending rape victim
pro bono. You had a venture capitalist there, Bob Duggan
and doctor I'm probably going to struggle with the pronunciation

(06:13):
of her name, but it's Mackie Zangane, Okay.

Speaker 3 (06:18):
She was.

Speaker 1 (06:19):
She was involved in biotech. Now, these two actually worked
together to bail out a struggling biotech that actually had
an amazing discovery that is now the basis for loutrita,
which is a cancer treatment. If these guys hadn't risked

(06:40):
their own money and went in and turned the company around,
we would be short treatment for that has helped a
lot of people with cancer.

Speaker 2 (06:54):
Wait a second, I thought, Biden, whoa, WHOA? I thought
Biden was going to cure cancer.

Speaker 1 (06:58):
Yeah, apparently you also have a couple of folks independently
working on education programs bringing education to underprivileged children. One
project was for kids underprivileged kids here in the United States.
Another one was for underprivileged kids overseas where their own

(07:24):
government I it was South American government. I can't remember
which country. Their own government had actually given up on them,
saying they're too stupid to ever learn to read. Well,
these folks went in and actually created educational materials to

(07:48):
teach these kids to read and write and help get
them out of poverty. Now, yes, this was you could
take this was a business conference, but you could tell
it was overwhelmingly MAGA And I'm saying Maga not Republican,

(08:08):
because these were people that wanted to make America great again.
And Bob Dugan actually said making America great again is
just the first step. We need to make the world great,
and he actually used the term make humanity great.

Speaker 3 (08:28):
This is the focus of.

Speaker 1 (08:30):
The millionaires and billionaires that Bernie Sanders and AOC want
to tear down.

Speaker 2 (08:37):
But there is a huge difference. Okay, you talk about
the celebrity that you were impressed with Okay, probably a
very smart person. Juxtapose that to George Clooney, a college
dropout who thinks he's And that's the other thing about
the Democrats is the talent neutraliosity into the extreme. These

(09:02):
people are probably just the opposite, I would have to imagine.
And there's another difference, doctor Lot, but not being at
the conference I'm talking about between Democrats, the and the
now rising Maga movement is that these people did it themselves,
as you said, self made people, but also did it
independently in the private sector. It seems like the Democrats

(09:26):
almost entirely get their fortunes, and not just little bits
of money fortunes from their public service bide in Pocahontis.
The list goes on, doesn't it. Even our little Chrissy
Murphy who is a teacher and now he's worth millions.
I don't know how that happens, but you can maybe
inform me of that.

Speaker 1 (09:48):
Yeah, your thoughts that the Democrats view public service as
a career and they don't treat it as public service.
They use that as a platform to make them money,
which this is not what our founding fathers had in mind,
and in fact Charlie Kirk talked about this.

Speaker 3 (10:10):
At the conference.

Speaker 1 (10:12):
Our founding fathers envisioned public service as you would take
a few months off from your actual job, go to
the capital, do your duty to help the country run,
and then go back.

Speaker 3 (10:29):
To what you were doing before.

Speaker 1 (10:31):
Not stay in politics and stay in public service for
an entire career. This was something you were supposed to
do on the side for the good of the country.
And certainly you've got political families now, and.

Speaker 3 (10:47):
This is both sides of the aisle obviously.

Speaker 1 (10:50):
Who've turned yeah, who've turned it into a family business
instead of public service.

Speaker 3 (10:58):
Yes, in the case.

Speaker 1 (11:01):
Of the Biden family, that's the only way you can
describe it.

Speaker 2 (11:06):
Well, Elizabeth Warren, I mean, Pocahonta is a big socialist.
He's worth twelve million on one hundred and fifty thousand
dollars a year. Valery, I mean you're a smart guy,
and sorry to say, I'm gonna throw it out there.
I don't think you can do that. Not many people can,
but they can. Pelosi, who's pretty much you said she's intelligent.
I disagree with that, and she probably has a drinking

(11:26):
problem at this point. But I see I see a
difference in ideology. They actually look down on private enterprise
and they're enamored with big government. With what's going on
with DOJE.

Speaker 1 (11:41):
Absolutely they want big government because that's where they get
their kickbacks from the trough. And the fact of the
matter is this group of business people that address the
conference have done more for America then the entire Democratic

(12:02):
Party has done over the past thirty years.

Speaker 3 (12:05):
They were talking.

Speaker 1 (12:06):
About who they work with, and this was also very important.
It was a big focus of almost every one of
their talks is that none of them claimed they did
this on their own. They all partnered with people, They
worked with people, But it was the people they worked
with that stood out. Eric Trump talked about one of

(12:28):
the managers of their Las Vegas hotel. This is someone
that never went to college that originally joined the Trump
not administration, the Trump Company as a driver, learned the
business and worked his way up.

Speaker 3 (12:49):
And Jimmy Johnes was the same thing, no.

Speaker 1 (12:53):
College education, learned the business by doing it and worked
his way to be a billionaire.

Speaker 2 (13:02):
At Charlie Burry is not a college graduate either.

Speaker 3 (13:05):
No, he's not.

Speaker 2 (13:06):
He should be. A common trend, doesn't it.

Speaker 1 (13:09):
This also goes to talk about what we've mentioned on
a lot of podcasts, how the value of a college
education has been completely overblown, blown up.

Speaker 4 (13:24):
So yeah, I mean if I told you, yes, I
told you about a video I saw a real quick
that had college graduate going into an interview in nineteen
fifty and people jumping, you know, backwards.

Speaker 2 (13:35):
Oh my god. Now it's like they're smoking a cigarette,
going all right, checkbox number ninety. It's like, okay, whatever.
So yeah, very interesting. And I actually think as an
aside that talking about, you know, the whole college thing
is I don't think people and I love your opinion.
I'm sure our listeners would as well. I don't think
people are as enamored with the whole college stick. Remember,

(13:59):
like you go with cocktail party, where'd you go to school?
I don't think it holds the same weight.

Speaker 1 (14:04):
No, no it doesn't. You never hear that where did
you go to school? Except for in certain industries they
still do that.

Speaker 3 (14:16):
And that's a holdover.

Speaker 1 (14:17):
And that's actually something that Elena Habbo was talking about
because she obviously she went to college and to law school,
but she did not go to an Ivy League college.
So a lot of her colleagues looked down on her
because she was not a Harvard graduate. Meanwhile, in the

(14:38):
courtroom she was kicking their asses.

Speaker 2 (14:42):
Yeah. I think that happens in business too, But it
is really interesting. You look at that lineup, and of
course I have to admit of obviously I am biased.
But then you look at the Democratic Party, I mean
aoc crocket Bernie. I mean, it just there's just nothing

(15:03):
there there. I mean, am I just delusional? I don't
see it. No no original thought, no new ideas, just
pissing on what they don't like. And I think that's
one of the reasons why gen Z is leaning conservative
slash MAGA. Yeah, no, there's no it's I'm not gonna

(15:24):
say one thing. It's being older than you. And this
is kind of almost before my time. If you had
all these baby boomers enamored with Kennedy, I think the
same thing's happening, different, completely different scenario. But I think
the new vision, the new aspiration, is on the MAGA side,

(15:47):
not the old seventies plus or insane AOC side of
the Democratic Party. I think if you're younger, you're looking
at MAGA.

Speaker 1 (15:55):
Yeah, you're absolutely right, And a lot of the recent
polls have shown that one more thing about the conference
before we move on. If anybody is actually interested in
seeing clips from the conference, go to Instagram and follow

(16:15):
Grant Cardone because he is posting video clips of these
interviews and you'll see exactly what I've been talking about.

Speaker 2 (16:25):
Very interesting. We also have our own problems with the
Democratic Party right here in this beautiful fashion of liberalism Connecticut.
Don't we in beautiful Bridgeport.

Speaker 1 (16:36):
By the week we do one hundred and fifty indictments
for election fraud? Now correct me if I'm wrong, But
when Trump was saying that the twenty twenty election was fraudulent,
didn't the Democrats swear up and down that there was

(16:58):
no election fraud?

Speaker 2 (17:00):
Of course it never happened, just pure as a driven snow.

Speaker 1 (17:05):
Yeah, one hundred and fifty indictments against Democrats for election fraud.
And now the Connecticut Republican Party has approached Pam Bondi
to do a wider investigation to see how far this
corruption goes.

Speaker 2 (17:28):
Could it be with Dnang Dick meaning Bluomenthal are proud
a veteran of Vietnam service, or maybe Chrissy the adultering Murphy.

Speaker 1 (17:39):
It would never know it wouldn't surprise me for Richard
Blumenthal to be involved. However, there does seem to be
a focus on Chris Murphy. It pretty much seems that
he is involved in this, and we'll see what the
investigation turns up.

Speaker 2 (17:59):
Oh, he looks like he's been a little tarnish having
an affair with a liberal news reporter, abandoning his wife
as he did his house several years ago. And I
think that might do him in the little Bridgeport fiasco,
or might rise him through the ranks even more given

(18:19):
the Democratic Party, who knows, I don't know what the
hell knows With the Democratic Party, all bets are off.
Do you agree? Yeah?

Speaker 1 (18:26):
I mean you've heard the critiques of Doge. The Democrats
keep using the phrase that yes they're they're well oligarchs also,
but they keep saying, yes they're you know, they're in
favor of getting rid of waste and fraud, but you
need to do it with a scalpel, not a hack saw. Now,
the reason they want to use a scalpel is because

(18:50):
they want to leave the structures in place so that
once they return to power, they can put the waste
and fraud.

Speaker 2 (18:58):
Back in Why. And they're also scared shitless that where
these money trails lead and it's very scary again tarnishing.
And we look at the even CNN had a poll
that the majority of people believe and then say overwhelming.

(19:18):
It's not me and it's you think it'd be higher
if it's overwhelming with like forty five pc, but the
second highest since oh nine, that people believe the country
is going in the right direction, which is a complete
almost mirror image of under Uncle Joe. So and also
you look at we'd already talked about gen Z's uh

(19:40):
leaning towards MAGA. Anything can happen, but at this point
I'd have to say the Democratic Party is broken right now.
Anything can happen. I get it. And you never count
your chickens before they're hatched, especially with the flu, the
bird flu. But anyway, would you assess the same thing
that they're in a world to hurt when Chrissy Murphy

(20:03):
and AOC and Crockett are your flag bears, that's the problem. Yeah,
they don't we have a problem.

Speaker 1 (20:12):
Yet they don't seem to understand that that was why
they lost the twenty twenty four elections because they were
going too far to the left and now they're doubling
down and it's not going to end well for them
if they can't pull back. And that same CNN poll

(20:33):
that had, you know, forty five percent of the country
thinks we're going in the right direction finally, also had
only twenty seven percent of the country had a favorable
view of the Democrats. And what I found really amusing
about that is that a Fox News poll. Everybody says, oh,

(20:54):
you know, well, fox News swings to that. The Fox
News poll done at the same time gave the Democrats
a thirty one percent positive rating.

Speaker 2 (21:05):
So they and that's across both Democrats and Republicans. Correct, Yes,
put that in perspective, that means probably only forty percent
of Democrats might have a positive or thirty five were
close to forty percent would have a positive impression of
their own party.

Speaker 1 (21:24):
I think it has to be lower than that because
you know, seeing wings. But yeah, CNN swings very far
to the left, so most of the people they poll
are going to be Democrats and independence and they got
the lower rating.

Speaker 2 (21:43):
Yeah, very interesting. So I think they need some real
uh you talking about the scalpel or hammer. The Democratic
Party needs a hammer, I don't think And it's not
just wishful thinking, Doctor Eric Lopkin, I don't think they
can help themselves are really I think they're drifting more
towards all left AOC, Bernie and Bernie had the self

(22:03):
aiding jew having like rallies. I think I think they're
until until the midterms. If the midterms blow up, then
I think AOC and that crowd will be excommunicated. What
do you think of that analysis? Only until then?

Speaker 3 (22:21):
Yeah, I think they're going to.

Speaker 1 (22:23):
Be in the weeds and until we see what happens
with the midterm.

Speaker 3 (22:27):
I think one of two things is going to happen.

Speaker 1 (22:32):
You're either going to have the left completely blow up
and the Democrats will say, all right, that's it, We've
gone too far.

Speaker 3 (22:41):
We need to.

Speaker 1 (22:42):
Regroup the same way they did after Jimmy Carter. Now
they're not going to do that until after, you know,
after the midterms. But I see that as a possibility,
although again, at this point, any leadership they might have
is going to have to come from left field. There
is no national figure that is capable of doing this.

(23:04):
The other possibility is that the left permanently takes over
the Democratic Party and the centrist Democrats leave the party
either become Republicans or possibly form a more centrist third party,
which could mark the end of the Democratic Party.

Speaker 2 (23:27):
I think that is a well thought out analysis and
not beyond the pale. How do you like that? But
you almost saw something I want your analysis on. You
had the chat leak if you will, And I always thought, okay,
you know, not a good thing, but you know not
the Why am I saying this because you have Joa
Joaquin Jeffries. He has he basically portraying it is the

(23:52):
most outlandish, anti patriotic, dangerous thing since the Cuban missile crisis.
It's not even clothes. What is the point?

Speaker 3 (24:04):
Is?

Speaker 2 (24:04):
They always overreach and I think you get to a
point where you've cried wolf too much.

Speaker 3 (24:10):
Well, they don't even have.

Speaker 1 (24:14):
They don't even have any credibility on this because they're
all up in arms. But when you take a look
at the operation that went forward, it was a complete success,
no American casualties and everything worked. Meanwhile, these same Democrats
were absolutely silent with the botched withdrawal of Afghanistan that

(24:39):
cost American lives.

Speaker 2 (24:42):
Great analysis one, and that's why they basically if it
wasn't for if it was for not for no credibility.
Credibility wouldn't even be there in their diction. I mean,
nothing happened. It's a slap on the risk kind of
a thing, and just stave your gunpowder for when you

(25:03):
really have an issue. I'm not going to try to
advise them, but I would if that's what I would say.
And it's really interesting that same chat leak if you will.

Speaker 3 (25:12):
The judge that.

Speaker 2 (25:15):
Put the put the gobage on stinting criminals to back
to where they came from, has now been appointed or
has been given a nod by a Americans for Oversight,
which is obviously a Sorrow's front organization, but kind of interesting.

(25:36):
You always talk about the deep state, just coincidence, I'm sure. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (25:40):
Never mind the fact that this judge has family members
that work at NGO's trying to work with illegal immigrants,
so you know, the fact that the judge was even
allowed to hear the original case was beyond belief. But

(26:03):
American Oversight, as far as I can tell, this is
a nonprofit government watchdog group. This is how they describe themselves.
They actually don't have any standing to file a lawsuit
against this. They're claiming they that federal records laws.

Speaker 3 (26:24):
Were violating.

Speaker 2 (26:27):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (26:28):
Right, But the fact of the matter is.

Speaker 1 (26:32):
There was no difference except for the technology involved, between
having a conversation on signal and having a conversation in
a skiff. The same laws should apply, which means there's
nothing was violated. Now, I'm sure that you know the

(26:53):
judge is going to rule against the administration, because that's
what this judge does. But as we were talking about
before the podcast, in our prep, so far and there
have been so many legal challenges, the ones that have
made it to the Supreme Court, and they all eventually

(27:15):
will because neither side is going to let it go
until it gets that far. But all of the court
cases that have gotten to the Supreme Court have been
decided in favor of the administration.

Speaker 2 (27:32):
Yes, I will be if it doesn't, I don't know
how you have a country if everything, and by the way,
is in it. Kind of this coincidence that over the
last hundred years all lower court interference the Gating executive
Action ninety have gone against Trump over the last hundred years,

(27:55):
sure this is coincidence.

Speaker 1 (27:56):
Trump Trump has actually had more of his decision is
challenged in court in the last two months, then all
the other presidents in the twentieth century combined.

Speaker 2 (28:12):
There you go. It's called judge shopping. And it's really
funny because nuke are interesting. Actually, new Gngridh said that
it's they've lost everything else to Democrats and this is
their last bash hit. But reflecting back on what you
said about Reagan, that's what they did when they lost.
They were on the outs. They were in the woods
under Reagan, okay, and ganglish, but what they did is

(28:33):
they looked at local governments, they looked at the education
school boards and worked their magic there. So the virus
is never totally eradicated. One thing that which I would
like to be is me eradicated is MPR. Why for
the life of me are we funding a wing of

(28:55):
the a communications wing of the Democratic Party. So it
was really interesting thing. I think it was today that
Catherine Mahr, one of the two leaders of the MPR organization,
basically was grilled and her text came out calling Trump
like a psychopath and blah blah blah. Pull the funding

(29:17):
immediately from this shit organization. It lost any It used
to actually be somewhat listenable, and it used to years ago.
It was people used to goop. They called it National
Palace in radio because everything was anti Israeli. Now it's
anti Trump and anti American. Pull the plug. You can't

(29:37):
pull it quick enough. They have plenty of money, they
have fundraising, they have licensing. Pull the plug immediately.

Speaker 1 (29:45):
They actually don't have plenty of money.

Speaker 3 (29:48):
Oh too bad.

Speaker 1 (29:49):
This is this, This has just been coming out because
the general public has stopped supporting PBS, n NPR and
in fact, in fact, Sesame Workshop may have to close down.
These are the folks behind Sesame Street because over the

(30:12):
past twenty years or so, maybe a little longer, I'm
not one hundred percent sure of the timeframe, they stopped
teaching reading and math on the show and kept focusing
on and kept focusing on people's.

Speaker 3 (30:28):
Feelings and inclusiveness.

Speaker 1 (30:31):
And this is why six years ago they had to
cut a deal with HBO. HBO paid them a lot
of money to get the first run episodes on HBO
specifically the Max streaming service, and then six months later
it would air on PBS. Well, HBO has canceled that contract.

(30:55):
They are no longer doing this, So Sesame Workshop is
suddenly out in the fields and PBS NPR The basic
problem is they haven't had any credibility since the Reagan administration.
And the reason for this is because this was one

(31:16):
of Reagan's big mistakes. He did this with great intentions,
but did not take into account the unforeseen consequences. NPR
and PBS were bound, as the other broadcasters were, by
the fairness doctrine from the FCC. They were required by

(31:42):
rule to cover both sides of an issue. Regan Reagan
got rid of the Reagan FCC got rid of the
fairness doctrine because it was actually squelching coverage of certain
issues because the broadcaster said, well, you know, if we
have to cover both sides, we're not going to cover

(32:04):
it at all. So he thought the Reagan FCC and
I don't remember who the commissioner was that came up
with this, said well, if they're not covering at all,
at least if we say you can, you know, you
just have to cover it. You don't have to cover
it balanced they would at least get coverage. Well, that
backfired big time and led to the current echo chambers

(32:29):
system that we have now.

Speaker 2 (32:32):
I also think it's interesting, though it's a bigger issue.
I know nothing about this Catherinine Mahr. But I would
be dollars to donuts that she's an IVY League entitled
little brat. Okay, And again we talked about the value
of Ivy League or college in general. How smart is

(32:53):
this intelligencia genius? Okay? You know ruining? How do you
ruin Sesame Street? I mean you have to try to
do that? It was a simple formula. They just can't
help themselves. So I love it when elitists go down
the shitter, and I hope she does, and I hope
MPR does. And speaking of going down the shitter, we

(33:14):
have snow White, another enterprise that you have to try
to screw up. Well, it bombed. I think it did
forty five million, and sodd Hector the Spotted Cat did
twenty two million.

Speaker 1 (33:30):
It did just under forty three million, which was the
worst showing of a Disney live action remake to date.
Prior to this, the worst showing was Dumbo, and even
Dumbo beat this. But the question is, I mean, DEI
is so ingrained in Disney.

Speaker 3 (33:52):
They knew this.

Speaker 1 (33:54):
Was going to be a failure and didn't back away
from the project. And I don't remember who it was
that I heard, but somebody was talking about the telltale
signs of how they knew. Aside from all the bad
reviews in bad press coverage, every Disney movie, especially Get

(34:15):
you know, particularly the ones Gears at Kids, has had
a massive merchandising effort, dug toys, happy meals, you know,
all the this had nothing. Someone that were someone that
worked at a movie theater said, you know, usually when

(34:36):
Disney has a big release, there're stand ups that they
put up in the theaters, There's all sorts of promotional items. Nothing,
dead silence from Disney. They knew it was going to fail,
and quite frankly, they should have just shelled the project,
taken the losses attacks right off, and done away with it.

Speaker 2 (35:01):
But it's the same thing as a day. It's a
microcosm of the Democratic Party, and it's the same thing
like a drug addict or an alcoholic. You can't help yourself.
You know it's bad, you just can't stop it, you know. Again,
and I love all these again geniuses and entitled people. Basically,
maybe it's the echo chamber that just reinforces their stupid ideas,

(35:24):
because you could get a non college graduates, common sense
person and I think, hey, go run Sesame Street. They go, okay, no,
no problem. But not Catherine Nope, Nope, nope, not Katherine
Maher Nope. She wants to have how you feel. And
she never really looked into the facts. Since nineteen seventy

(35:44):
it was all about enjoying education and in educating young people.
But let's quite get that one.

Speaker 1 (35:53):
What's really sad about it is if you take a
look at the treads the general my generation, because Sesame
Street debuted in nineteen sixty nine. It literally debuted two
weeks after I was born. So I was the first
generation to grow up on Sesame Street. And this was

(36:17):
the last time that our educational grades actually went up.
And after that you had the Department of Education come
in in the seventies, you had eight you had Sesame
Street go to oh, we have to talk about tolerance

(36:38):
and feelings, and all of a sudden, all of our
results started dropping. We went from number one to number
twenty nine. And you know, as you and I have said.

Speaker 2 (36:51):
Twenty nine is zero. Let's cut this shit. Twenty nine
is zero.

Speaker 3 (36:54):
You and I have said this over and over again.

Speaker 1 (36:57):
It all goes back to Casey Stengel, How do you
lose that badly it was a team effort.

Speaker 2 (37:04):
I would agree, well, this is a team effort, Carnivore Bites.
We're on a roll unlike MPR, and our listeners can
contribute to the show, can't they.

Speaker 1 (37:13):
They can go to the Carnivore Radio Facebook page. Message us,
let us know what you're thinking, and you know what
are your opinions about what's going on in America And
if there's something you want us to take a look at,
let us know. You can do the same thing at
xvadio dot com, slash connect and of course you can

(37:33):
catch every episode of Carnivore Bites at xvadio dot com,
the Carnivore Radio website, the Apple Podcasts app, YouTube, Rumble, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Audible,
Amazon Music, and other platforms that respect freedom of speech.

Speaker 2 (37:52):
I thank you, doctor Lopin. Always a pleasure, always informative,
and I'll see you next week.

Speaker 1 (37:57):
Well, see you then.

Speaker 4 (38:01):
At other time.

Speaker 1 (38:10):
Compas
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.

The Joe Rogan Experience

The Joe Rogan Experience

The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.