June 4, 2025 • 51 mins
Democrats struggle to find direction, antisemitism running wild and more news, commentary and analysis.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Do you want more success, more growth, more results than
It's time for the Boundless Success Accelerator from the Modern
Observer group. This isn't your average coaching program. It's where
top performers come to dominate. Weekly group sessions, on demand coaching,
a community that's got your back, and a powerpack library
(00:23):
of tools to supercharge your business and career. No more excuses,
no more waiting. Get in, level up and start building
the life you've been dreaming about. Visit us at modernobserver
dot com slash Boundless Success to join today. Let's get
you to the next level.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
Welcome to another edition of Carnivor Bites. I'm your host
Jeff Sherman, along with doctor Eric Lopkin and the scourge
an increasing veracity of anti Semitism. We had the shooting
a couple of weeks ago outside the Jewish Museum in Washington,
d C. Was two fine young people that we're going
(01:25):
to get married. Now we have another horrific incident. This
involves an illegal alien from Egypt who basically I mean horrific,
vented his anger and as insanity from some people that
(01:45):
actually survived the Holocaust that were peacefully trying to draw
attention to the hostage situation in Gaza, and essentially he
lit them on fire. And what I find most horrific,
beyond the actual incident, is some of the reaction, Like
you have Andrew McCay, the disgrace f FBI director who
(02:07):
on CNN moments after that, Well, there's no real clear
motive here. If you don't know that, you're not too bright.
Let's start with that, doctor, lockin in your thoughts.
Speaker 1 (02:18):
Well, not too bright as an understatement, given that he
confessed to doing it and stated he did it because
he wanted to kill all Zionists, there is no question
about his motive. He himself said it.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Now, what's the motive, Yes, there is no question about
that motive, But what's the motive of McKay. He's not
a dummy though, I just you know, alluded to that
he knew what was going on, so what And then
he can even take it a step further. You look
at CNN's overall broadcast kind of and saying that it
was a white male. Yeah, it was a white male.
(02:58):
But they didn't dive any deeper. New York Times on
an icon of liberalists to saying quotations journalism had it
beyond page fifteen. You're telling me that doesn't there's fifteen
pages of more important and relevant events than that. You're crazy.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
Well bringing up the New York Times. It's an interesting
case because also just this week, the New York Times
reported that Israeli soldiers fired upon Palestinians who were online
to get aid. Now they reported this, their source was
(03:43):
humm Us.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Of course.
Speaker 1 (03:45):
Now, now, when you actually dig into the story, which
the Times did not do. Several other media outlets did
not dig into this, the actual truth of the matter
is the Israeli soldiers were the one on providing the aid.
It was Harmasue that was shooting them. But these for
(04:06):
some reason, anti Semitism has become so ingrained, anti Israelism
has become so ingrained in these media outlets that they
report what Hamas is telling them as gospel.
Speaker 2 (04:22):
Yes, I would agree with that, and it's also become
a pillar of liberal democratic ideology. It's just is there's
too many incidents that just pooh pull it. It is
a big part of their overall belief system. And I'm
sorry to say, we're not going to you know, elaborate
too much on this, but Jewish leaders like Raskin, did
(04:46):
he condemn it as a act of anti No, he
went into gun gun control. I mean, these people are disgusting. Well,
you know, even the Jewish members of the Democratic Party.
And where's our buddy Blumenthal, who never met a camera
he didn't love.
Speaker 1 (05:03):
Yeah, he doesn't like the cameras on this one. But
you're talking about gun control. This is actually evidence that
the current laws we have for gun control work because
the reason he used molotov cocktails was because he tried
(05:24):
to get a gun and was unable to do it
because illegal immigrants cannot own firearms, so he was stopped
from owning a gun, so he continued his rampage with
molotov cocktails. It also goes to show what the right
(05:46):
has said for years that getting rid of guns is
only going to keep them out of the hands of
legal gun owners. The folks that are dead set on
committing crimes with guns, they're going to find ways to
do it anyway, which this one actually did.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
Well done. I agree one hundred percent. But yes, I
agree with that one. But I also find it very
despicable that you have Jewish leaders like Raskin, who might
be I know, he's a bright guy who went to Harvard,
even though that doesn't really mean too much anymore. But
what a pathetic asshole. Okay, you know, had nothing to
do with guns anyway, but you know, you just because
(06:29):
they're crazy thick ideology. Trump's no pun intended, even their
own religious and ethnicity. It's really discussing. But we do
a proud jus like Michael Rappaport. I think he had
a show on VH one, and he think he does
some other things, probably a podcast as well, I'm sure
of that. And he basically said, hey, hey, everyone, the
(06:50):
cavalry talking to Jewish people. The cavalry ain't coming because
they don't give a shit, and he excoriated Black Lives Matter,
among other We're gonna oh yeah, and the LBGQ plus
whatever it is now movement for not saying shit.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
Yeah. Michael Rappaport was a die hard liberal. He was
not just dem he was leftist. And over the past
six years he has seen what the Democratic Party has
become and he is the embodiment of I didn't leave
(07:27):
the Democrats, the Democrats left me. He has been critical
of them. He has become a Trump supporter because Beth
Trump is all for Israel. Trump is about stamping out
anti Semitism. He's about getting these people out of the
country where the Dems are dead set on protecting criminals,
(07:53):
protecting men pretending to be women in sports.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
I do not go on you have you know, you
have an exceptionally good point, and that's why the Dems
have gone off the rail. Let's just cut the shit.
If it was differences with economic issues or policies, maybe
some foreign relation like it used to be in the
good old days of the nineties. Okay, you're kind of
split one near splitting hairs, so to speak. One might
(08:20):
you know, potato potato, But now you're talking about insanity. First,
letting someone in unvetted into this country that's basically a
radical Muslim extremist is a definition of insanity. Okay, giving
them he had an extended a expired visa, when I
just give him re up them on a work permit.
(08:42):
I mean you have to really think about this with
this gentleman Rappoport and others. Again, when you look at
the Democratic approval numbers or what is it, nineteen percent
or something like that, it is yes, oh okay, poison
IVY has fifteen approvals Okay, So it's not just by chance,
(09:03):
it's not it's because they've gone into insanity land, Okay.
And I think even people that are let's just say,
with the incident, you know, with the uh, with with
the with the with the braiders, the the the incident
with the U flamethrower, even if someone's not like unbelievably
(09:25):
pro Jewish or whatever, you know, regular person from pre
Oria's looking at this and then they're looking at the
Democratic response and it just puts another layer on the cake.
Do you agree with that, doctor Lopkin? Along with people
like uh what Jamie Not, Jimmy A. Crockett and AOC.
It's just literally you can put these people and they'd
(09:46):
be completely at home enities in a mental hospital. How
do you like that?
Speaker 1 (09:52):
Well, AOC just came out with a statement against anti Semitism. Now,
of course the statement has no teeth whatsoever, and it
has drawn people who are not political into the political arena,
calling her out, lifelong Dems who have said, you know,
(10:16):
first of all, where have you been for two years?
You've been absolutely quiet? And second of all, she is
the de facto head of the squad.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
So whyd so whye that cried, and the one who
cried when the Iron Dome funding went through two years
ago cried.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Right, So, if she's so concerned about anti Semitism, why
has she not slapped down Ilian Omar, slap down to
Talita Rishid Crockett. You know Crockett. Also, she actually has
the ability to rain these wackos in. She's done nothing.
(11:00):
Why is she starting to come out with statements against
anti seventy it's not even the presidency, it's getting herself
re elected next year because she has a large Jewish
community in her district. She's not concerned about the presidency yet,
she needs to make sure she can stay in Congress
(11:22):
next year.
Speaker 2 (11:24):
Any Jew that votes for her gets what they deserve,
will just leave it at that, And basically she could
be talking about the theme of a mental hospital should
be committed. They're voting for their own demise and they're
complete idiot sidy like that.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
Well, I think anybody of any political background, religious background
in AOC's district that votes for her gets what they deserve.
Crime in her district since she took office is up
seventy percent. It's only up twenty percent as an average
around New York's city.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
You know, she never gave a shit about her district.
She's the one who chased out Amazon, right, and you
know she did get this bullshit about being a barca
be Okay, you know I pumped gas. I mean O, yeah,
in high school, no one's done a you know, a
remedial job or whatever. But the fact of the matter,
she is really an eliti. It's that whole shtick about
(12:23):
that she's some poor but now she grew up upper
middle class. She went to bu It's one of the
most expensive schools you can possibly imagine. And obviously not
for all that money didn't turn out a mensic candidate,
did it?
Speaker 1 (12:37):
No, it certainly did it. And you know, for someone
who claims to be, you know, for the people, she's
flying around the country when rallies in a first flying
first class flying private jets, because you know, she can't
be with the great unwashed.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
Oh, that's the same thing with Bernie. He literally said it.
It's almost not paraphrasing. I'm going to wait in the
America can Airlines line. I mean, oh god forbid, who
are you the pope? It's totally unbelievable, But it's really
funny in this whole. Let's just say society will shift
towards a more conservative event. You have Bill Maher, a
(13:15):
long time liberal. I love this. He said Harvard is
a breach an a whole factory. I think that is
totally fascinating, interesting and funny. And you have these breaks,
like even Fetterman is calling the Dens to task on
the border and on the border. It's really kind of interesting.
(13:37):
Doctor Lockin. Your comments on this is that there was
some discussion that Biden signed some executive orders basically, you know,
clamping down on border activity early in his presidency, but
it was basically thrown out and they wrote some auto
(13:59):
pen crap Yvery interesting.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Jake Tapper actually touches on that in the in his
book Original Sin, where Joe Biden wanted to shut the
border down. He intended to do this early in his presidency,
and the leftists around him kept him from doing it.
And in fact, former I'm trying to I'm blanking on
(14:29):
his name, the former Speaker of the House McCarthy macarthury. Yes,
McCarthy has gone on the record saying that he had
a conversation with Joe Biden where he asked him, why
did you sign this executive order, and Biden said to him,
(14:52):
what are you talking about? I didn't sign any such order.
Speaker 2 (14:57):
I think the real villain is in all of this
is obviously doctor Jill, but Ron Klain a socialist, anti
American piece of crap, and I think he was very
much behind all this, and he's definitely any brains. They
will as Macum what's her name, the former press secretary
(15:18):
for Trump. This is an issue the Republicans can run
to the goal line, do you agree?
Speaker 1 (15:23):
And they can, but I don't. I don't know that
that Claine is working alone because we're starting to get
new names coming out, and these are people that we've
never heard of, but they all have one thing in common.
They're all long term members of Jill Biden's staff. So
(15:46):
I think when all is said and done, all of
this is going to come back to point to Jill Biden.
Speaker 2 (15:55):
Doctor Jill doctor, a PhD in teaching its surgeon. She's
right up there with a surgeon, isn't sure? Yeah, no question,
and anyone who has I know people have PhDs. Okay, uh,
no one I know as a PhD. I'm not saying
a doctor. They don't call themselves doctor smith. They call
(16:18):
himself John.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
Yeah. Generally people with PhDs don't make a big deal
out of the doctor, you know, using the title. It's
it is something of a unique situation with her because honestly,
looking at her behavior, I think she has deep seated
(16:42):
insecurities that she needed to be called doctor. She needed
to be calling the shots in the White House, she
needed to be there. Yeah, I think she needs therapy,
is what she needs.
Speaker 2 (16:57):
I think you might be curl you you have me correct.
And I also think it's indicative of a lot of
liberal relationships. Nancy, her husband, the great investment guru. You
have the Clintons, a lot of these people. It's not
exactly the Dick Van Dyke show, the old one, you know,
where Laura and Robert were in true Love. It's a
(17:20):
marriage of convenience. I mean doctor Jilly probably didn't even
like the son of a bitch. I mean, he basically
had a proposed towards I could I could see once,
doctor Lopkin once, damn seven, you're probably not that into it.
So and she Budgy bumbled around with his bumbling idiot
(17:40):
who was a low grade senator from a minuscule state.
The population of let's just say Indianapolis is probably bigger
than Delaware, and all of a sudden she gets the
chance to be president, and all that putting up with
a mental midget and Hunter and the other crap finally
pays off, and she was kicking his communion. Talk about depression,
(18:05):
I bet she is so heesen miserable. It would make
your head spin.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
It wouldn't surprise me. But you know, you bring up
a good point about the marriages. I mean, we've been
hearing a lot, especially lately, about the Biden's marriage, not
all that it's cracked up to be. The Clintons, They've
been going essentially leading separate lives for decades. At this point.
(18:34):
The Obamas, there seemed to be a lot of problems
with their marriage. But take a look in contrast to
the Reagans. Ronald Reagan got sick, Nancy Reagan devoted the
rest of her life to taking care of him.
Speaker 2 (18:52):
The true love.
Speaker 1 (18:54):
Yeah, the Bushes, George George, I mean, there was no
question of George hw Bush, you know, and and the
first lady they you know, they were together for decades,
you know, joined.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
At the hip sixty years.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
It was something like that, Yes, joined at the hip
Laura Bush. When George w You left the White House,
she went with him. He wanted to have a quiet
life and do things, you know, without all the spotlight.
She went with him. She was more than happy because
they made these decisions together.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
And I think, way, I have to interject something because
you have a very profound point. It's together a healthy relationship,
it's a team, and it's not leveraging one for your
own benefit exactly.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
And you see this in all of these relationships. They
were partners in marriage. It wasn't one was doing this
and the other was just coming along for the rid.
Whereas I mean, there was never any question that after
the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Hillary stayed with Bill because she
(20:10):
wanted her own political career. That's what people have been
talking about that for decades now.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
Karma's a bitch, okay, because you invest, just like just
like doctor Jill and Hillary your whole life. You let
a lie, Okay, you sacrifice the most important thing in life.
And I'm not being hokey, and that is a loving
relationship and family and friends. At the end. Even Steve
Job said it, when you're in her deathbed, no one
(20:39):
gives it. You know what I want your four to
Oh one K looks like Okay, So they sacrifice that
and in Hillary's case got buckus and with Joe's case,
they got the presidency. But it's basically be better off
without it. Okay, I think it's a disgrace presidency.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Oh, there's no question. It's a disgraced president. And see
even with just what's come out now, it's been an
abject disaster, and there are at least four more books coming,
got you get.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
That's just what I have thought of this when when
Joe if because I heard he's financially bankrupt with no
funds coming in. If he ever gets a library, at
least he'll be able to stock it with all the
books coming out of one aisle, nothing else, just one
aisle of the ten books about his disgraced administration. Now
you talk about love or the lock thereof We're going
(21:34):
to say this for a little later in the podcast.
But I also I just I'm really kind of perplexed
with Michelle Obama. It's really interesting that are true. There's
suggestions that she might have been radical when he first
was running back in the day in four or whatever
it was. Okay, oh, well, I should say, oh eighth four,
(21:56):
I guess whatever, who cares? But the fact that oh eight.
So what's interesting is she's on this podcast that is
literally unwatchable. She has a brother that literally is not
a mensa candidate as the charisma of a light bulb.
And all she does is, first of all, she trashes
her husband, and she shows how entitled, you know, being
(22:18):
the first lady kind of sucked. You got to you
gotta pay for your own meals, really like every American doesn't.
And I had to fly sometimes I had to pay.
And also very very Texus and racist, I mean. And
also the way she's changed physically, not just getting older
that's nothing, but she's going like she looks kind of radical. Yeah,
(22:42):
and I think I have to imagine that that Barack's
not happy with this because he's all about his legacy
and about image.
Speaker 1 (22:50):
Well, between Joe and Michelle, Barack's a legacy is dad.
They have absolutely ruined it. And Hillary, well, Hillary not
so much because.
Speaker 2 (23:06):
He said it's my third term and didn't.
Speaker 1 (23:11):
He was he was, he was campaigning that it was
you know, the whole reason he was campaigning for Hillary
was to protect his legacy and the American people went, yeah,
we don't want her. But I think he could have
he could have escaped that. He could have just said, well,
you know what it was, the election wasn't really about
(23:33):
my legacy. It was a repudiation of Hillary Clinton, which,
let's face it, it was that was why why she right?
It was all about her. But with Joe and now
with Michelle, he can't escape it.
Speaker 3 (23:52):
I mean he's now stopped funny your marketing guru, and
sometimes less is more, Okay, if after Hillary.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
He just went away minimized his exposure. Sometimes like a
fine wine, he might have actually increased his popularity and
his image. But it shows you it's like an old
rock and roll band. Yeah, he was really great in
the seventies, but guess what, it's twenty twenty five. It's over,
(24:25):
you know, talking down to black people, black men in
particular about yo. You know, basically these black guys were saying,
it's kind of like, yes, N word, go out there
and vote. Very condescending and very out of touch.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Yes it was. And you know again, in contrast, I
think the perfect contrast to that was George HW. Bush
because after now he had his whole career in the military,
in the CIA, in politics, and when he stepped away
from the presidency, yeah, he still had you know, George W.
(25:02):
And Jeb Bush were still active in politics. There are
still bushes that are in office, local offices, et cetera.
But when he stepped away, he didn't walk away from
the spotlight. But he didn't participate. So the images we
all saw was him in his eighties going skydiving, y know,
(25:28):
him meeting with world leaders just casually, you know, talking
with them. And when he let you know when he
was when he lost the election to Bill Clinton, his
approval rating was pretty low. Just just six seven years
after that, even before Bill got out of the White House,
(25:50):
Bush's approval rating had skyrocketed because people started seeing him
as a person and not a politician. Never took the
opportunity to do that. People see him he's a politician.
He's never done anything to let the people see who
(26:10):
he is as a person.
Speaker 2 (26:12):
Maybe he is not possible. It's very and he's not
and he should not. I'm not big on giving career advice,
but I would certainly recommend Barack not to get into
the construction business. Okay, you write a book, maybe have
a little to more Netflix episodes. But do not cease
(26:34):
and desist, do not do do don't even build a
mobile home.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
Library library.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
Yes, the prison, and it's a billion dollars over budget.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
The design of the design of the library was horrible.
The construction has been problematic from day one. It is
years behind schedule, a billion dollars over budget. It and
at this point, ye know you mentioned the possibility of
a Biden library. It doesn't look like Biden's gonna have
(27:08):
a library because donors don't. These presidential libraries are all
built by donors. That's who pays for He wants to
donate to either one of these projects anymore?
Speaker 2 (27:21):
Yes, because the question is doctor Lopkin. People don't do
anything without a reason. Yeah, they donate to the lot,
but they're getting to do They're entering that circle of power.
When you have a vacuum of power, there's no reason
to donate. And Barrock probably had tons of donations. Wait,
I don't know. Thing's been going on for like ten years.
I don't think he's got shit for donations. Now any
(27:44):
other thing goes into You can look at anything you
want about Trump or George h I'll get George. Let's
look at George h He was in the military, did
things I could never even imagine at a young age. Right,
had a private career in the oil business. Right Obama.
That's why it's funny, It's not surprising. He's never done
anything besides being either you know, a community organizer or
(28:11):
basically a race baider. He's never built anything, he's never
run a business. There's no idea how to manage anything.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
No, that's the main difference. If you take a look
at the Trump administration and the Biden administration, the Obama administration,
the Biden and Obama administrations were staffed with career politicians.
(28:40):
These were people that never did anything except for either
run for office or support people who were running for office.
They were all on the federal They were federal employees.
They were all Washington insiders or local political insight in
(29:01):
Obama's case, Chicago. Trump brought in people from outside the Beltway,
from the real world, who all had successful careers before
they decided to take a break from their success to
help the American public and enter the public sector. And
(29:25):
now that is what the founding fathers had in mind.
They did not imagine career politicians. They thought people were
going to run for office, serve a term, maybe two,
and then go back to their lives.
Speaker 2 (29:45):
It ain't really very indicative of that. When you look
at you juxtapose Biden's cabinet, which was something out of
a b movie Rachel Levine, She's the Health Secretary of healthy,
like eighty pounds overweight. But anyway, that aside being generous,
(30:06):
I'm being nice. I'm in a good weather's nice and
in a good mood. But then you hit you juxtapose that,
and you look at when Trump's people, all very successful
people in various aspects of life outside the belt weigh
they go on let's they meet the press, on any
(30:27):
of these talk shows. They they electrocute the mind because
it used to be the Republicans could have their head
handed to them because they they couldn't go toe to
toe these people. It's not even close. You look at
the Biden cabinet versus these people, and I think that's
one of the reasons Trump, in spite of all the
(30:48):
controversy of late with the tariffs, has a fifty three
percent approval rating and the Democrats have a nineteen.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Yeah, the basic difference, and yah, you made a good point.
You said, you're the Republicans used to go on and
you know, get their asses handed to them by the
by the pundits. Well, realistically, we have to look at
the Trump administration as a separate animal. Yes, they're operating
(31:19):
under the agis of the Republican Party, but these are
not traditional Republicans. These are not traditional politicians. That's what
makes this successful, the fact that they're taking real world
experience and bringing it to the public sector.
Speaker 2 (31:42):
Just to elaborate on that, you're right. When you're in
the private sector, you need to deal with many people
on many levels, with many issues. You can become very
adapt in that. When you're just a Washington bureaucrat, you're
one dimensional. I'm talking about I'm talking about from a
communications standpoint.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
Yeah, you get you, you get your talking points, you
stick to your talking points, and god forbid anybody should
go off. And this is both parties. This is how
politicians have been trained to operate. And it's really starting
to show, especially now because we have such a wide
(32:26):
range of media covering this, that you're seeing the lack
of depth in the career politician. And I'm really hoping
that a lot of these career politicians take this moment
and go, you know what, I'm out, I'm done.
Speaker 2 (32:46):
You would only hope you think someone will be running
for the hills when the potential investigation comes up, comes
to the forefront in terms of the auto pen that
would be musty TV, don't you think? I think you
tell talking about a nineteen percent approval rating by the
for the Dems could go down? I know, could you
(33:06):
imagine single digits and people are gonna be shocked.
Speaker 1 (33:11):
I'll be honest, I find it hard to believe it's
as low as it is, just because you have the
die hard Democrats who will always say the Democratic Party
is right, the Democratic we always approve what the Democrats do. Yeah,
when you're running political campaigns, there is essentially this theory
(33:36):
that you've got thirty percent of the electorate will vote
Democrat no matter who's on the ticket. Thirty percent of
the electorate will vote Republican no matter who's on the ticket.
It's that other forty percent that you have to sway. Well,
the fact of the matter is to get an approval
(33:58):
rating as low as nineteen percent, it means you've lost
that entire forty percent, and you've lost a good part
of your.
Speaker 2 (34:08):
Base without any question. And it's the whole thing that's
been bantered about for now a couple of years. I
didn't leave the Democratic Party, they left me. Yes, And
it transcends race religion. You have African Americans used to
be at the core of the especially African American men.
They can't go for the hill a Hispanic man that
(34:30):
was going to be the new base right because of
immigration trends and Ian boy had the times change. Hispanics
are now basically it's a fifty to fifty split going
in the Republican's direction. But you think about the nineteen
percent that do approve of the Democrats. I wonder that
(34:50):
goes into the whole recent study. Maybe they're part of
the over fifty percent of Democrats that have severe mental
health issues versus conservatives that are below ten. Yeah that
that drug company, the drug companies would want more dens
because there's a lot more Prozac fails associated with them.
Speaker 1 (35:13):
Yeah, that that was a very interesting study. And you know,
mental health has been talked about for for quite a
long time, and in fact, the Democrats relied on mental health,
claiming that that was why they were for providing transsurgeries
(35:34):
because it was going to help these children with mental health. Now,
sure study studies have studies actually showed that not only
didn't having transgender surgery improve the mental health of the patient,
it actually deteriorated it in most cases. So that didn't work.
(35:56):
But now we have another study find that when you
ask people who are suffering with poor mental health, fifty
percent of Democrats identify with that group, as opposed to
ten percent of Republicans. And this wasn't you know, being asked, well,
(36:20):
how do you rate your mental health? Because let's face it,
you can't believe surveys like that, no matter what they said.
Of course, not this this was clinical studies of people
with mental health disorders.
Speaker 2 (36:35):
And it turned maybe.
Speaker 1 (36:38):
And it turned out there were so many more Democrats.
Speaker 2 (36:43):
Maybe it is a good strategy for the If over
fifty percent of the Democrats are in sugar, maybe it
is a good strategy to have aoc omar Crockett because
the sickness associate with the sick good way to keep
your base. No, it's a shrinking base, but it might
(37:05):
become more loyal, just kidding, it might.
Speaker 1 (37:09):
Become more loyal. But you know, we've actually heard from
several prominent Democrats over the last few weeks who are
saying that the left needs to split away from the
rest of the Democratic Party. And it's coming from both sides.
It's coming from moderate Democrats who don't want to have
anything to do with the far left, and the far
(37:31):
left who are tired. They think the moderates are dragging
them down.
Speaker 2 (37:36):
Well, go at it, I mean, and I think the
only hope for the Democratic Party is spending more money
with consultants and reaching Jim Young, Jim going men, Yeah,
that's gonna do it. And to understand why they go
to the gym, just asking that question speaks volumes volumes.
Speaker 1 (37:58):
Well, I mean, let's face fact, when the most masculine
member of your party is Michelle Obama, you had them up. Yeah,
you have a problem with masculinity. And for decades the
Democrats have fought against toxic masculinity. They have told men
(38:20):
that they are the cause of everything that's wrong in
the world. So now they can't understand why men are going,
you know what, We've had it with you. We're out
of here.
Speaker 2 (38:31):
Can I throw a concept at the great doctor. I
think this is just the beginning, because now men feel
a permission to express themselves. So I think they will
increasingly turn on the Democrats because it was once it
was once taboo, it is no longer taboo. How do
(38:53):
you like that concept? It might increase.
Speaker 1 (38:56):
I think it will, and I think it was Jesse
Waters who was talking about this the other day said
the fact of the matter is that men like success.
They want to strive for success, they want to achieve.
And the Democrats, first of all, the Democrats right now
(39:18):
are the personification of failure.
Speaker 2 (39:21):
But no, but they no, no, no, We talked about this.
You may not remember, maybe years ago time Flies. It
was on the podcast, so it was in Terrestrial that
the Democrats embraced, embrace failure. Yes, they resent success. They
hate when you're successful, like you could be a down
like Hispanics. Right, let's look at that. We talked about
(39:43):
that just you know, minutes ago when they were struggling
newly new new immigrants. Oh can we help you? You watch,
increasingly they'll become the enemy as they they're very entrepreneurial,
they're very religious, very catholic. When they're no, when they
no longer when they represent the threat they're successful, which
they're increasingly becoming more than even other ethnic groups. It'll
(40:08):
be the number you've reached is not in service like
they did to the Jews.
Speaker 1 (40:12):
Absolutely, because the core belief of the Democratic Party is
you can't succeed unless we help you. It's a power
trip for them. They need to believe they're right about
everything they If you do what they tell you, everything
(40:33):
will be all right. Except we've seen the disaster that
their policies actually cause. And you know you just mentioned
Hispanics are a very Catholic group, you know, as a whole.
Now we've got more coming out that the Biden Justice
Department was targeting Catholics. How do you think that's going
(40:57):
to play with Catholic Hispani.
Speaker 2 (41:01):
Let me go on on a limb. Probably not well. Yeah,
But also, speaking of insanity, we have two candidates, and
I'll let you be the judge who's crazier one person both.
I do not like one of them. I saw their
concert like fifteen years ago. Pretty good. But I'll tell
you a funny story. It's Bono. I came to the
(41:23):
conclusion I smoked a joiner too, but I came to
the conclusion that God, this guy's a dumb son of
a bitch he had living in the concert. Do you
know what? It's some profound things. He said, war is bad.
And I turned to my friend and go, wow, can
you believe that? You know, like wow, that's groundbreaking. So
the boy g is and both of these people are
(41:45):
high school dropouts, Greta Thnberg and Bono. Bono says that
the closing of the USAD killed three hundred thousand people.
And then Greta, I love this one, another high school dropout,
and men's a care and I think she's actually disturbed.
Bono's not disturbed. Gret is actually disturbed. It's on a
(42:06):
sailboat to God, was on a sailboat to Gaza. What
they were doing, I couldn't tell you to put a
gun to my head, bringing to attention, probably to the
plight of the Gosins. And guess what they're now. You've
just seen a look on Greta's face, you know, like
a deer in the headlight. They had to have an SOS. Basically,
(42:28):
they ceased and desisted. They're now dead in the water,
as they say, because they had a drone following on them.
And someone commentators saying, you know, the remarkable thing about
a boat. It has a steering wheel, so if you're
going in the wrong direction, like drones following you, you
can always turn to the other on the other side. Genius.
(42:49):
So what do you think of that? Two genius is
one girl genius, one boy genius. And by the way,
I love this about Bono's real quick is igot who
was saying that it It's like he was relevant about
I'm going to really seriously, like two thousand and one,
that's like twenty four years ago. You talk to a
young first.
Speaker 1 (43:09):
Think it's I think it's longer than that. I don't
think I'm being.
Speaker 2 (43:12):
Very nice because the weather. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. He
was the coolest when I was right out of college
early eighties. Yeah, you know, I even got the stupid songs.
But yeah, so thirty years later, whatever, thirty five since
he's been relevant, it's like and then, you know, it's
really funny. I don't know if you remember this, because
you know, Hubris is everything with liberals and with entertainment people,
(43:35):
they never admit they're getting older or not irrelevant anymore.
He did a thing I think it was at and
t Uh to put on everyone's phone their latest hit.
You know, this is not the Beatles like in.
Speaker 1 (43:47):
Fact eight I remember, it wasn't.
Speaker 2 (43:49):
It wasn't get the ship off the get the ship
off my phone?
Speaker 1 (43:53):
It was it wasn't. At and T. They had cut
a deal with Apple to be on all of the
new ice that that were purchased, and people deleted it
on Moss they did not want the music on their phone.
Speaker 2 (44:08):
And what did I tell you? Okay, now wait to
hold on to real quick. Let's just say they had
the you know, cell phones in nineteen eighty five, right,
and they had their latest hit the Streets have No
Name or whatever. Okay, people would have been whoa. It
would have been calling you get the one for free?
This is amazing. It wouldn't be just they ship off
my phone. Whit this idiot?
Speaker 1 (44:31):
I think? I mean, take a look at Bono. It's
not even unusual anymore because you know, change changed the name.
We've been talking about this constantly. Robert de Niro, Bruce Springsteen,
(44:52):
the two who were touring with Bernie Sanders, what was it,
Joan bias.
Speaker 2 (44:57):
And and Leo Yo Young?
Speaker 1 (45:00):
What are they all have in common? They're all prime
and they're all irrelevant at this point.
Speaker 2 (45:08):
Joe Montana is past his prime. Okay, you're talking Jurassic Park. Okay,
you're talking about like Auto Graham. These people. When the
last time Neil Young sold an album, I mean, of
any kind of cont I would nineteen ninety maybe.
Speaker 1 (45:28):
Probably wouldn't surprise me. I mean, the fact is, most
of these celebrities who are coming out fighting Trump and
how terrible all of this is, most of them don't
even have careers anymore.
Speaker 2 (45:46):
You know that it's their career. No, I disagree that
that's the only thing they're hanging onto, and that's it's
thinking of hanging on to that nineteen percent. We talked
about approval. The only approval the Democrats have is mummified
geriatric boomers.
Speaker 1 (46:03):
Well, you know that's it. It's also an interesting point.
I have to wonder if they did not survey anybody
in southern California, the Hollywood area in particular, how much
lower would that cause that approval rating to go.
Speaker 2 (46:26):
I think there's a song how low can you go? Thing? Whatever? Yeah,
it's a good, good point. Yes, you're correct. Finishing up
on a lighter note, because very interesting fun it couldn't
happen to nicer people. You're talking about the implosion. I'd
say Dynasty, but I'd be stretching. It's MSNBC. Uh not good,
(46:49):
no good.
Speaker 1 (46:50):
You know, about two months ago they announced their restructuring.
New programming came in a month ago, and over the
course of the month. Jen Pisaki, the former Biden Press secretary, who,
by the way, still claims she never saw any sign
(47:11):
that he was deteriorating, ratings for her show, lost fifty
percent of the audience of the previous occupants, which were
Rachel Maddow and there was another guy who also had
the time slot. The whole reason that they restructured was
(47:34):
because their ratings were so low, and the new schedule
is fifty percent lower.
Speaker 2 (47:42):
Well, doctor Lopkin, we talked about the plus fifty percent
with acute mental health issues. I have to say, really seriously,
that's the ms audience. That's their audience. And number two, though,
you could take someone who's completely staying and force trap
(48:05):
them to a chair. Within a week of watching NonStop MSNBC,
they would be in a straight jacket.
Speaker 1 (48:13):
You know, you do you do have to wonder if
that fifty percent of Democrats that suffer from mental disorders
are not just the MSNBC audience. But the view, Oh
good more, Yes, that's got that's their core audience.
Speaker 2 (48:33):
And wait a second, talk about target marketing. If you're
a psychologist or psychiatrist, get the Nielsen ratings, get the
households with the cell phone numbers and just dialing for
dollars anyone who's listening to the view, or you gotta
quite sure, you gotta have the house in the Hamptons.
(48:54):
Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1 (48:55):
That's it. I think this would be a gold mine
for the pharmaceutical industry.
Speaker 2 (48:59):
Focus day, yep, folk, a direct mail piece.
Speaker 1 (49:02):
Yo, Focus the antidepression drug commercials, Focus the antipsychotic pill commercials.
All of this on MSNBC and during the view. You've
got your audience right there.
Speaker 2 (49:16):
I love you know something, Lockkin, that's actually right on.
So anyone you know it can can advertise, you know,
like you know, antidepressants whatever. But I think that if
you're really going to get your niche market for not
antidepressant but antipsychotics like schizophrenic, that's that's that's their bailt.
(49:36):
I think they may be able to charge a premium
because that's a very fertile audience. You might have about
fifty percent hit ry Well Lockedkin another great show, and
our listeners can contribute to our continued progress Unlike MSNBC.
Speaker 1 (49:58):
Yes, let's hear what you have to go to theex
go to xvadio dot com, slash connect, send us a
message and tell us what you think. You can also
message us at the Carnivore Radio Facebook page. We want
to know what's important to you. What do you think
about what's going on? Let us know, and of course
you can catch every episode of Carnivore bites at xvadio
(50:21):
dot com, the Carnivore Radio website, the Apple Podcasts app, YouTube, Rumble, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Audible,
Amazon Music, and other platforms that respect freedom of speech.
Speaker 2 (50:36):
Thank you, doctor Lopkin, Great Chelsea next
Speaker 1 (50:38):
Week, We'll see you then two
Do you want more success, more growth, more results than
It's time for the Boundless Success Accelerator from the Modern
Observer group. This isn't your average coaching program. It's where
top performers come to dominate. Weekly group sessions, on demand coaching,
a community that's got your back, and a powerpack library
(00:23):
of tools to supercharge your business and career. No more excuses,
no more waiting. Get in, level up and start building
the life you've been dreaming about. Visit us at modernobserver
dot com slash Boundless Success to join today. Let's get
you to the next level.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
Welcome to another edition of Carnivor Bites. I'm your host
Jeff Sherman, along with doctor Eric Lopkin and the scourge
an increasing veracity of anti Semitism. We had the shooting
a couple of weeks ago outside the Jewish Museum in Washington,
d C. Was two fine young people that we're going
(01:25):
to get married. Now we have another horrific incident. This
involves an illegal alien from Egypt who basically I mean horrific,
vented his anger and as insanity from some people that
(01:45):
actually survived the Holocaust that were peacefully trying to draw
attention to the hostage situation in Gaza, and essentially he
lit them on fire. And what I find most horrific,
beyond the actual incident, is some of the reaction, Like
you have Andrew McCay, the disgrace f FBI director who
(02:07):
on CNN moments after that, Well, there's no real clear
motive here. If you don't know that, you're not too bright.
Let's start with that, doctor, lockin in your thoughts.
Speaker 1 (02:18):
Well, not too bright as an understatement, given that he
confessed to doing it and stated he did it because
he wanted to kill all Zionists, there is no question
about his motive. He himself said it.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Now, what's the motive, Yes, there is no question about
that motive, But what's the motive of McKay. He's not
a dummy though, I just you know, alluded to that
he knew what was going on, so what And then
he can even take it a step further. You look
at CNN's overall broadcast kind of and saying that it
was a white male. Yeah, it was a white male.
(02:58):
But they didn't dive any deeper. New York Times on
an icon of liberalists to saying quotations journalism had it
beyond page fifteen. You're telling me that doesn't there's fifteen
pages of more important and relevant events than that. You're crazy.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
Well bringing up the New York Times. It's an interesting
case because also just this week, the New York Times
reported that Israeli soldiers fired upon Palestinians who were online
to get aid. Now they reported this, their source was
(03:43):
humm Us.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Of course.
Speaker 1 (03:45):
Now, now, when you actually dig into the story, which
the Times did not do. Several other media outlets did
not dig into this, the actual truth of the matter
is the Israeli soldiers were the one on providing the aid.
It was Harmasue that was shooting them. But these for
(04:06):
some reason, anti Semitism has become so ingrained, anti Israelism
has become so ingrained in these media outlets that they
report what Hamas is telling them as gospel.
Speaker 2 (04:22):
Yes, I would agree with that, and it's also become
a pillar of liberal democratic ideology. It's just is there's
too many incidents that just pooh pull it. It is
a big part of their overall belief system. And I'm
sorry to say, we're not going to you know, elaborate
too much on this, but Jewish leaders like Raskin, did
(04:46):
he condemn it as a act of anti No, he
went into gun gun control. I mean, these people are disgusting. Well,
you know, even the Jewish members of the Democratic Party.
And where's our buddy Blumenthal, who never met a camera
he didn't love.
Speaker 1 (05:03):
Yeah, he doesn't like the cameras on this one. But
you're talking about gun control. This is actually evidence that
the current laws we have for gun control work because
the reason he used molotov cocktails was because he tried
(05:24):
to get a gun and was unable to do it
because illegal immigrants cannot own firearms, so he was stopped
from owning a gun, so he continued his rampage with
molotov cocktails. It also goes to show what the right
(05:46):
has said for years that getting rid of guns is
only going to keep them out of the hands of
legal gun owners. The folks that are dead set on
committing crimes with guns, they're going to find ways to
do it anyway, which this one actually did.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
Well done. I agree one hundred percent. But yes, I
agree with that one. But I also find it very
despicable that you have Jewish leaders like Raskin, who might
be I know, he's a bright guy who went to Harvard,
even though that doesn't really mean too much anymore. But
what a pathetic asshole. Okay, you know, had nothing to
do with guns anyway, but you know, you just because
(06:29):
they're crazy thick ideology. Trump's no pun intended, even their
own religious and ethnicity. It's really discussing. But we do
a proud jus like Michael Rappaport. I think he had
a show on VH one, and he think he does
some other things, probably a podcast as well, I'm sure
of that. And he basically said, hey, hey, everyone, the
(06:50):
cavalry talking to Jewish people. The cavalry ain't coming because
they don't give a shit, and he excoriated Black Lives Matter,
among other We're gonna oh yeah, and the LBGQ plus
whatever it is now movement for not saying shit.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
Yeah. Michael Rappaport was a die hard liberal. He was
not just dem he was leftist. And over the past
six years he has seen what the Democratic Party has
become and he is the embodiment of I didn't leave
(07:27):
the Democrats, the Democrats left me. He has been critical
of them. He has become a Trump supporter because Beth
Trump is all for Israel. Trump is about stamping out
anti Semitism. He's about getting these people out of the
country where the Dems are dead set on protecting criminals,
(07:53):
protecting men pretending to be women in sports.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
I do not go on you have you know, you
have an exceptionally good point, and that's why the Dems
have gone off the rail. Let's just cut the shit.
If it was differences with economic issues or policies, maybe
some foreign relation like it used to be in the
good old days of the nineties. Okay, you're kind of
split one near splitting hairs, so to speak. One might
(08:20):
you know, potato potato, But now you're talking about insanity. First,
letting someone in unvetted into this country that's basically a
radical Muslim extremist is a definition of insanity. Okay, giving
them he had an extended a expired visa, when I
just give him re up them on a work permit.
(08:42):
I mean you have to really think about this with
this gentleman Rappoport and others. Again, when you look at
the Democratic approval numbers or what is it, nineteen percent
or something like that, it is yes, oh okay, poison
IVY has fifteen approvals Okay, So it's not just by chance,
(09:03):
it's not it's because they've gone into insanity land, Okay.
And I think even people that are let's just say,
with the incident, you know, with the uh, with with
the with the with the braiders, the the the incident
with the U flamethrower, even if someone's not like unbelievably
(09:25):
pro Jewish or whatever, you know, regular person from pre
Oria's looking at this and then they're looking at the
Democratic response and it just puts another layer on the cake.
Do you agree with that, doctor Lopkin? Along with people
like uh what Jamie Not, Jimmy A. Crockett and AOC.
It's just literally you can put these people and they'd
(09:46):
be completely at home enities in a mental hospital. How
do you like that?
Speaker 1 (09:52):
Well, AOC just came out with a statement against anti Semitism. Now,
of course the statement has no teeth whatsoever, and it
has drawn people who are not political into the political arena,
calling her out, lifelong Dems who have said, you know,
(10:16):
first of all, where have you been for two years?
You've been absolutely quiet? And second of all, she is
the de facto head of the squad.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
So whyd so whye that cried, and the one who
cried when the Iron Dome funding went through two years
ago cried.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Right, So, if she's so concerned about anti Semitism, why
has she not slapped down Ilian Omar, slap down to
Talita Rishid Crockett. You know Crockett. Also, she actually has
the ability to rain these wackos in. She's done nothing.
(11:00):
Why is she starting to come out with statements against
anti seventy it's not even the presidency, it's getting herself
re elected next year because she has a large Jewish
community in her district. She's not concerned about the presidency yet,
she needs to make sure she can stay in Congress
(11:22):
next year.
Speaker 2 (11:24):
Any Jew that votes for her gets what they deserve,
will just leave it at that, And basically she could
be talking about the theme of a mental hospital should
be committed. They're voting for their own demise and they're
complete idiot sidy like that.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
Well, I think anybody of any political background, religious background
in AOC's district that votes for her gets what they deserve.
Crime in her district since she took office is up
seventy percent. It's only up twenty percent as an average
around New York's city.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
You know, she never gave a shit about her district.
She's the one who chased out Amazon, right, and you
know she did get this bullshit about being a barca
be Okay, you know I pumped gas. I mean O, yeah,
in high school, no one's done a you know, a
remedial job or whatever. But the fact of the matter,
she is really an eliti. It's that whole shtick about
(12:23):
that she's some poor but now she grew up upper
middle class. She went to bu It's one of the
most expensive schools you can possibly imagine. And obviously not
for all that money didn't turn out a mensic candidate,
did it?
Speaker 1 (12:37):
No, it certainly did it. And you know, for someone
who claims to be, you know, for the people, she's
flying around the country when rallies in a first flying
first class flying private jets, because you know, she can't
be with the great unwashed.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
Oh, that's the same thing with Bernie. He literally said it.
It's almost not paraphrasing. I'm going to wait in the
America can Airlines line. I mean, oh god forbid, who
are you the pope? It's totally unbelievable, But it's really
funny in this whole. Let's just say society will shift
towards a more conservative event. You have Bill Maher, a
(13:15):
long time liberal. I love this. He said Harvard is
a breach an a whole factory. I think that is
totally fascinating, interesting and funny. And you have these breaks,
like even Fetterman is calling the Dens to task on
the border and on the border. It's really kind of interesting.
(13:37):
Doctor Lockin. Your comments on this is that there was
some discussion that Biden signed some executive orders basically, you know,
clamping down on border activity early in his presidency, but
it was basically thrown out and they wrote some auto
(13:59):
pen crap Yvery interesting.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Jake Tapper actually touches on that in the in his
book Original Sin, where Joe Biden wanted to shut the
border down. He intended to do this early in his presidency,
and the leftists around him kept him from doing it.
And in fact, former I'm trying to I'm blanking on
(14:29):
his name, the former Speaker of the House McCarthy macarthury. Yes,
McCarthy has gone on the record saying that he had
a conversation with Joe Biden where he asked him, why
did you sign this executive order, and Biden said to him,
(14:52):
what are you talking about? I didn't sign any such order.
Speaker 2 (14:57):
I think the real villain is in all of this
is obviously doctor Jill, but Ron Klain a socialist, anti
American piece of crap, and I think he was very
much behind all this, and he's definitely any brains. They
will as Macum what's her name, the former press secretary
(15:18):
for Trump. This is an issue the Republicans can run
to the goal line, do you agree?
Speaker 1 (15:23):
And they can, but I don't. I don't know that
that Claine is working alone because we're starting to get
new names coming out, and these are people that we've
never heard of, but they all have one thing in common.
They're all long term members of Jill Biden's staff. So
(15:46):
I think when all is said and done, all of
this is going to come back to point to Jill Biden.
Speaker 2 (15:55):
Doctor Jill doctor, a PhD in teaching its surgeon. She's
right up there with a surgeon, isn't sure? Yeah, no question,
and anyone who has I know people have PhDs. Okay, uh,
no one I know as a PhD. I'm not saying
a doctor. They don't call themselves doctor smith. They call
(16:18):
himself John.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
Yeah. Generally people with PhDs don't make a big deal
out of the doctor, you know, using the title. It's
it is something of a unique situation with her because honestly,
looking at her behavior, I think she has deep seated
(16:42):
insecurities that she needed to be called doctor. She needed
to be calling the shots in the White House, she
needed to be there. Yeah, I think she needs therapy,
is what she needs.
Speaker 2 (16:57):
I think you might be curl you you have me correct.
And I also think it's indicative of a lot of
liberal relationships. Nancy, her husband, the great investment guru. You
have the Clintons, a lot of these people. It's not
exactly the Dick Van Dyke show, the old one, you know,
where Laura and Robert were in true Love. It's a
(17:20):
marriage of convenience. I mean doctor Jilly probably didn't even
like the son of a bitch. I mean, he basically
had a proposed towards I could I could see once,
doctor Lopkin once, damn seven, you're probably not that into it.
So and she Budgy bumbled around with his bumbling idiot
(17:40):
who was a low grade senator from a minuscule state.
The population of let's just say Indianapolis is probably bigger
than Delaware, and all of a sudden she gets the
chance to be president, and all that putting up with
a mental midget and Hunter and the other crap finally
pays off, and she was kicking his communion. Talk about depression,
(18:05):
I bet she is so heesen miserable. It would make
your head spin.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
It wouldn't surprise me. But you know, you bring up
a good point about the marriages. I mean, we've been
hearing a lot, especially lately, about the Biden's marriage, not
all that it's cracked up to be. The Clintons, They've
been going essentially leading separate lives for decades. At this point.
(18:34):
The Obamas, there seemed to be a lot of problems
with their marriage. But take a look in contrast to
the Reagans. Ronald Reagan got sick, Nancy Reagan devoted the
rest of her life to taking care of him.
Speaker 2 (18:52):
The true love.
Speaker 1 (18:54):
Yeah, the Bushes, George George, I mean, there was no
question of George hw Bush, you know, and and the
first lady they you know, they were together for decades,
you know, joined.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
At the hip sixty years.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
It was something like that, Yes, joined at the hip
Laura Bush. When George w You left the White House,
she went with him. He wanted to have a quiet
life and do things, you know, without all the spotlight.
She went with him. She was more than happy because
they made these decisions together.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
And I think, way, I have to interject something because
you have a very profound point. It's together a healthy relationship,
it's a team, and it's not leveraging one for your
own benefit exactly.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
And you see this in all of these relationships. They
were partners in marriage. It wasn't one was doing this
and the other was just coming along for the rid.
Whereas I mean, there was never any question that after
the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Hillary stayed with Bill because she
(20:10):
wanted her own political career. That's what people have been
talking about that for decades now.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
Karma's a bitch, okay, because you invest, just like just
like doctor Jill and Hillary your whole life. You let
a lie, Okay, you sacrifice the most important thing in life.
And I'm not being hokey, and that is a loving
relationship and family and friends. At the end. Even Steve
Job said it, when you're in her deathbed, no one
(20:39):
gives it. You know what I want your four to
Oh one K looks like Okay, So they sacrifice that
and in Hillary's case got buckus and with Joe's case,
they got the presidency. But it's basically be better off
without it. Okay, I think it's a disgrace presidency.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Oh, there's no question. It's a disgraced president. And see
even with just what's come out now, it's been an
abject disaster, and there are at least four more books coming,
got you get.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
That's just what I have thought of this when when
Joe if because I heard he's financially bankrupt with no
funds coming in. If he ever gets a library, at
least he'll be able to stock it with all the
books coming out of one aisle, nothing else, just one
aisle of the ten books about his disgraced administration. Now
you talk about love or the lock thereof We're going
(21:34):
to say this for a little later in the podcast.
But I also I just I'm really kind of perplexed
with Michelle Obama. It's really interesting that are true. There's
suggestions that she might have been radical when he first
was running back in the day in four or whatever
it was. Okay, oh, well, I should say, oh eighth four,
(21:56):
I guess whatever, who cares? But the fact that oh eight.
So what's interesting is she's on this podcast that is
literally unwatchable. She has a brother that literally is not
a mensa candidate as the charisma of a light bulb.
And all she does is, first of all, she trashes
her husband, and she shows how entitled, you know, being
(22:18):
the first lady kind of sucked. You got to you
gotta pay for your own meals, really like every American doesn't.
And I had to fly sometimes I had to pay.
And also very very Texus and racist, I mean. And
also the way she's changed physically, not just getting older
that's nothing, but she's going like she looks kind of radical. Yeah,
(22:42):
and I think I have to imagine that that Barack's
not happy with this because he's all about his legacy
and about image.
Speaker 1 (22:50):
Well, between Joe and Michelle, Barack's a legacy is dad.
They have absolutely ruined it. And Hillary, well, Hillary not
so much because.
Speaker 2 (23:06):
He said it's my third term and didn't.
Speaker 1 (23:11):
He was he was, he was campaigning that it was
you know, the whole reason he was campaigning for Hillary
was to protect his legacy and the American people went, yeah,
we don't want her. But I think he could have
he could have escaped that. He could have just said, well,
you know what it was, the election wasn't really about
(23:33):
my legacy. It was a repudiation of Hillary Clinton, which,
let's face it, it was that was why why she right?
It was all about her. But with Joe and now
with Michelle, he can't escape it.
Speaker 3 (23:52):
I mean he's now stopped funny your marketing guru, and
sometimes less is more, Okay, if after Hillary.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
He just went away minimized his exposure. Sometimes like a
fine wine, he might have actually increased his popularity and
his image. But it shows you it's like an old
rock and roll band. Yeah, he was really great in
the seventies, but guess what, it's twenty twenty five. It's over,
(24:25):
you know, talking down to black people, black men in
particular about yo. You know, basically these black guys were saying,
it's kind of like, yes, N word, go out there
and vote. Very condescending and very out of touch.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Yes it was. And you know again, in contrast, I
think the perfect contrast to that was George HW. Bush
because after now he had his whole career in the military,
in the CIA, in politics, and when he stepped away
from the presidency, yeah, he still had you know, George W.
(25:02):
And Jeb Bush were still active in politics. There are
still bushes that are in office, local offices, et cetera.
But when he stepped away, he didn't walk away from
the spotlight. But he didn't participate. So the images we
all saw was him in his eighties going skydiving, y know,
(25:28):
him meeting with world leaders just casually, you know, talking
with them. And when he let you know when he
was when he lost the election to Bill Clinton, his
approval rating was pretty low. Just just six seven years
after that, even before Bill got out of the White House,
(25:50):
Bush's approval rating had skyrocketed because people started seeing him
as a person and not a politician. Never took the
opportunity to do that. People see him he's a politician.
He's never done anything to let the people see who
(26:10):
he is as a person.
Speaker 2 (26:12):
Maybe he is not possible. It's very and he's not
and he should not. I'm not big on giving career advice,
but I would certainly recommend Barack not to get into
the construction business. Okay, you write a book, maybe have
a little to more Netflix episodes. But do not cease
(26:34):
and desist, do not do do don't even build a
mobile home.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
Library library.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
Yes, the prison, and it's a billion dollars over budget.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
The design of the design of the library was horrible.
The construction has been problematic from day one. It is
years behind schedule, a billion dollars over budget. It and
at this point, ye know you mentioned the possibility of
a Biden library. It doesn't look like Biden's gonna have
(27:08):
a library because donors don't. These presidential libraries are all
built by donors. That's who pays for He wants to
donate to either one of these projects anymore?
Speaker 2 (27:21):
Yes, because the question is doctor Lopkin. People don't do
anything without a reason. Yeah, they donate to the lot,
but they're getting to do They're entering that circle of power.
When you have a vacuum of power, there's no reason
to donate. And Barrock probably had tons of donations. Wait,
I don't know. Thing's been going on for like ten years.
I don't think he's got shit for donations. Now any
(27:44):
other thing goes into You can look at anything you
want about Trump or George h I'll get George. Let's
look at George h He was in the military, did
things I could never even imagine at a young age. Right,
had a private career in the oil business. Right Obama.
That's why it's funny, It's not surprising. He's never done
anything besides being either you know, a community organizer or
(28:11):
basically a race baider. He's never built anything, he's never
run a business. There's no idea how to manage anything.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
No, that's the main difference. If you take a look
at the Trump administration and the Biden administration, the Obama administration,
the Biden and Obama administrations were staffed with career politicians.
(28:40):
These were people that never did anything except for either
run for office or support people who were running for office.
They were all on the federal They were federal employees.
They were all Washington insiders or local political insight in
(29:01):
Obama's case, Chicago. Trump brought in people from outside the Beltway,
from the real world, who all had successful careers before
they decided to take a break from their success to
help the American public and enter the public sector. And
(29:25):
now that is what the founding fathers had in mind.
They did not imagine career politicians. They thought people were
going to run for office, serve a term, maybe two,
and then go back to their lives.
Speaker 2 (29:45):
It ain't really very indicative of that. When you look
at you juxtapose Biden's cabinet, which was something out of
a b movie Rachel Levine, She's the Health Secretary of healthy,
like eighty pounds overweight. But anyway, that aside being generous,
(30:06):
I'm being nice. I'm in a good weather's nice and
in a good mood. But then you hit you juxtapose that,
and you look at when Trump's people, all very successful
people in various aspects of life outside the belt weigh
they go on let's they meet the press, on any
(30:27):
of these talk shows. They they electrocute the mind because
it used to be the Republicans could have their head
handed to them because they they couldn't go toe to
toe these people. It's not even close. You look at
the Biden cabinet versus these people, and I think that's
one of the reasons Trump, in spite of all the
(30:48):
controversy of late with the tariffs, has a fifty three
percent approval rating and the Democrats have a nineteen.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Yeah, the basic difference, and yah, you made a good point.
You said, you're the Republicans used to go on and
you know, get their asses handed to them by the
by the pundits. Well, realistically, we have to look at
the Trump administration as a separate animal. Yes, they're operating
(31:19):
under the agis of the Republican Party, but these are
not traditional Republicans. These are not traditional politicians. That's what
makes this successful, the fact that they're taking real world
experience and bringing it to the public sector.
Speaker 2 (31:42):
Just to elaborate on that, you're right. When you're in
the private sector, you need to deal with many people
on many levels, with many issues. You can become very
adapt in that. When you're just a Washington bureaucrat, you're
one dimensional. I'm talking about I'm talking about from a
communications standpoint.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
Yeah, you get you, you get your talking points, you
stick to your talking points, and god forbid anybody should
go off. And this is both parties. This is how
politicians have been trained to operate. And it's really starting
to show, especially now because we have such a wide
(32:26):
range of media covering this, that you're seeing the lack
of depth in the career politician. And I'm really hoping
that a lot of these career politicians take this moment
and go, you know what, I'm out, I'm done.
Speaker 2 (32:46):
You would only hope you think someone will be running
for the hills when the potential investigation comes up, comes
to the forefront in terms of the auto pen that
would be musty TV, don't you think? I think you
tell talking about a nineteen percent approval rating by the
for the Dems could go down? I know, could you
(33:06):
imagine single digits and people are gonna be shocked.
Speaker 1 (33:11):
I'll be honest, I find it hard to believe it's
as low as it is, just because you have the
die hard Democrats who will always say the Democratic Party
is right, the Democratic we always approve what the Democrats do. Yeah,
when you're running political campaigns, there is essentially this theory
(33:36):
that you've got thirty percent of the electorate will vote
Democrat no matter who's on the ticket. Thirty percent of
the electorate will vote Republican no matter who's on the ticket.
It's that other forty percent that you have to sway. Well,
the fact of the matter is to get an approval
(33:58):
rating as low as nineteen percent, it means you've lost
that entire forty percent, and you've lost a good part
of your.
Speaker 2 (34:08):
Base without any question. And it's the whole thing that's
been bantered about for now a couple of years. I
didn't leave the Democratic Party, they left me. Yes, And
it transcends race religion. You have African Americans used to
be at the core of the especially African American men.
They can't go for the hill a Hispanic man that
(34:30):
was going to be the new base right because of
immigration trends and Ian boy had the times change. Hispanics
are now basically it's a fifty to fifty split going
in the Republican's direction. But you think about the nineteen
percent that do approve of the Democrats. I wonder that
(34:50):
goes into the whole recent study. Maybe they're part of
the over fifty percent of Democrats that have severe mental
health issues versus conservatives that are below ten. Yeah that
that drug company, the drug companies would want more dens
because there's a lot more Prozac fails associated with them.
Speaker 1 (35:13):
Yeah, that that was a very interesting study. And you know,
mental health has been talked about for for quite a
long time, and in fact, the Democrats relied on mental health,
claiming that that was why they were for providing transsurgeries
(35:34):
because it was going to help these children with mental health. Now,
sure study studies have studies actually showed that not only
didn't having transgender surgery improve the mental health of the patient,
it actually deteriorated it in most cases. So that didn't work.
(35:56):
But now we have another study find that when you
ask people who are suffering with poor mental health, fifty
percent of Democrats identify with that group, as opposed to
ten percent of Republicans. And this wasn't you know, being asked, well,
(36:20):
how do you rate your mental health? Because let's face it,
you can't believe surveys like that, no matter what they said.
Of course, not this this was clinical studies of people
with mental health disorders.
Speaker 2 (36:35):
And it turned maybe.
Speaker 1 (36:38):
And it turned out there were so many more Democrats.
Speaker 2 (36:43):
Maybe it is a good strategy for the If over
fifty percent of the Democrats are in sugar, maybe it
is a good strategy to have aoc omar Crockett because
the sickness associate with the sick good way to keep
your base. No, it's a shrinking base, but it might
(37:05):
become more loyal, just kidding, it might.
Speaker 1 (37:09):
Become more loyal. But you know, we've actually heard from
several prominent Democrats over the last few weeks who are
saying that the left needs to split away from the
rest of the Democratic Party. And it's coming from both sides.
It's coming from moderate Democrats who don't want to have
anything to do with the far left, and the far
(37:31):
left who are tired. They think the moderates are dragging
them down.
Speaker 2 (37:36):
Well, go at it, I mean, and I think the
only hope for the Democratic Party is spending more money
with consultants and reaching Jim Young, Jim going men, Yeah,
that's gonna do it. And to understand why they go
to the gym, just asking that question speaks volumes volumes.
Speaker 1 (37:58):
Well, I mean, let's face fact, when the most masculine
member of your party is Michelle Obama, you had them up. Yeah,
you have a problem with masculinity. And for decades the
Democrats have fought against toxic masculinity. They have told men
(38:20):
that they are the cause of everything that's wrong in
the world. So now they can't understand why men are going,
you know what, We've had it with you. We're out
of here.
Speaker 2 (38:31):
Can I throw a concept at the great doctor. I
think this is just the beginning, because now men feel
a permission to express themselves. So I think they will
increasingly turn on the Democrats because it was once it
was once taboo, it is no longer taboo. How do
(38:53):
you like that concept? It might increase.
Speaker 1 (38:56):
I think it will, and I think it was Jesse
Waters who was talking about this the other day said
the fact of the matter is that men like success.
They want to strive for success, they want to achieve.
And the Democrats, first of all, the Democrats right now
(39:18):
are the personification of failure.
Speaker 2 (39:21):
But no, but they no, no, no, We talked about this.
You may not remember, maybe years ago time Flies. It
was on the podcast, so it was in Terrestrial that
the Democrats embraced, embrace failure. Yes, they resent success. They
hate when you're successful, like you could be a down
like Hispanics. Right, let's look at that. We talked about
(39:43):
that just you know, minutes ago when they were struggling
newly new new immigrants. Oh can we help you? You watch,
increasingly they'll become the enemy as they they're very entrepreneurial,
they're very religious, very catholic. When they're no, when they
no longer when they represent the threat they're successful, which
they're increasingly becoming more than even other ethnic groups. It'll
(40:08):
be the number you've reached is not in service like
they did to the Jews.
Speaker 1 (40:12):
Absolutely, because the core belief of the Democratic Party is
you can't succeed unless we help you. It's a power
trip for them. They need to believe they're right about
everything they If you do what they tell you, everything
(40:33):
will be all right. Except we've seen the disaster that
their policies actually cause. And you know you just mentioned
Hispanics are a very Catholic group, you know, as a whole.
Now we've got more coming out that the Biden Justice
Department was targeting Catholics. How do you think that's going
(40:57):
to play with Catholic Hispani.
Speaker 2 (41:01):
Let me go on on a limb. Probably not well. Yeah,
But also, speaking of insanity, we have two candidates, and
I'll let you be the judge who's crazier one person both.
I do not like one of them. I saw their
concert like fifteen years ago. Pretty good. But I'll tell
you a funny story. It's Bono. I came to the
(41:23):
conclusion I smoked a joiner too, but I came to
the conclusion that God, this guy's a dumb son of
a bitch he had living in the concert. Do you
know what? It's some profound things. He said, war is bad.
And I turned to my friend and go, wow, can
you believe that? You know, like wow, that's groundbreaking. So
the boy g is and both of these people are
(41:45):
high school dropouts, Greta Thnberg and Bono. Bono says that
the closing of the USAD killed three hundred thousand people.
And then Greta, I love this one, another high school dropout,
and men's a care and I think she's actually disturbed.
Bono's not disturbed. Gret is actually disturbed. It's on a
(42:06):
sailboat to God, was on a sailboat to Gaza. What
they were doing, I couldn't tell you to put a
gun to my head, bringing to attention, probably to the
plight of the Gosins. And guess what they're now. You've
just seen a look on Greta's face, you know, like
a deer in the headlight. They had to have an SOS. Basically,
(42:28):
they ceased and desisted. They're now dead in the water,
as they say, because they had a drone following on them.
And someone commentators saying, you know, the remarkable thing about
a boat. It has a steering wheel, so if you're
going in the wrong direction, like drones following you, you
can always turn to the other on the other side. Genius.
(42:49):
So what do you think of that? Two genius is
one girl genius, one boy genius. And by the way,
I love this about Bono's real quick is igot who
was saying that it It's like he was relevant about
I'm going to really seriously, like two thousand and one,
that's like twenty four years ago. You talk to a
young first.
Speaker 1 (43:09):
Think it's I think it's longer than that. I don't
think I'm being.
Speaker 2 (43:12):
Very nice because the weather. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. He
was the coolest when I was right out of college
early eighties. Yeah, you know, I even got the stupid songs.
But yeah, so thirty years later, whatever, thirty five since
he's been relevant, it's like and then, you know, it's
really funny. I don't know if you remember this, because
you know, Hubris is everything with liberals and with entertainment people,
(43:35):
they never admit they're getting older or not irrelevant anymore.
He did a thing I think it was at and
t Uh to put on everyone's phone their latest hit.
You know, this is not the Beatles like in.
Speaker 1 (43:47):
Fact eight I remember, it wasn't.
Speaker 2 (43:49):
It wasn't get the ship off the get the ship
off my phone?
Speaker 1 (43:53):
It was it wasn't. At and T. They had cut
a deal with Apple to be on all of the
new ice that that were purchased, and people deleted it
on Moss they did not want the music on their phone.
Speaker 2 (44:08):
And what did I tell you? Okay, now wait to
hold on to real quick. Let's just say they had
the you know, cell phones in nineteen eighty five, right,
and they had their latest hit the Streets have No
Name or whatever. Okay, people would have been whoa. It
would have been calling you get the one for free?
This is amazing. It wouldn't be just they ship off
my phone. Whit this idiot?
Speaker 1 (44:31):
I think? I mean, take a look at Bono. It's
not even unusual anymore because you know, change changed the name.
We've been talking about this constantly. Robert de Niro, Bruce Springsteen,
(44:52):
the two who were touring with Bernie Sanders, what was it,
Joan bias.
Speaker 2 (44:57):
And and Leo Yo Young?
Speaker 1 (45:00):
What are they all have in common? They're all prime
and they're all irrelevant at this point.
Speaker 2 (45:08):
Joe Montana is past his prime. Okay, you're talking Jurassic Park. Okay,
you're talking about like Auto Graham. These people. When the
last time Neil Young sold an album, I mean, of
any kind of cont I would nineteen ninety maybe.
Speaker 1 (45:28):
Probably wouldn't surprise me. I mean, the fact is, most
of these celebrities who are coming out fighting Trump and
how terrible all of this is, most of them don't
even have careers anymore.
Speaker 2 (45:46):
You know that it's their career. No, I disagree that
that's the only thing they're hanging onto, and that's it's
thinking of hanging on to that nineteen percent. We talked
about approval. The only approval the Democrats have is mummified
geriatric boomers.
Speaker 1 (46:03):
Well, you know that's it. It's also an interesting point.
I have to wonder if they did not survey anybody
in southern California, the Hollywood area in particular, how much
lower would that cause that approval rating to go.
Speaker 2 (46:26):
I think there's a song how low can you go? Thing? Whatever? Yeah,
it's a good, good point. Yes, you're correct. Finishing up
on a lighter note, because very interesting fun it couldn't
happen to nicer people. You're talking about the implosion. I'd
say Dynasty, but I'd be stretching. It's MSNBC. Uh not good,
(46:49):
no good.
Speaker 1 (46:50):
You know, about two months ago they announced their restructuring.
New programming came in a month ago, and over the
course of the month. Jen Pisaki, the former Biden Press secretary, who,
by the way, still claims she never saw any sign
(47:11):
that he was deteriorating, ratings for her show, lost fifty
percent of the audience of the previous occupants, which were
Rachel Maddow and there was another guy who also had
the time slot. The whole reason that they restructured was
(47:34):
because their ratings were so low, and the new schedule
is fifty percent lower.
Speaker 2 (47:42):
Well, doctor Lopkin, we talked about the plus fifty percent
with acute mental health issues. I have to say, really seriously,
that's the ms audience. That's their audience. And number two, though,
you could take someone who's completely staying and force trap
(48:05):
them to a chair. Within a week of watching NonStop MSNBC,
they would be in a straight jacket.
Speaker 1 (48:13):
You know, you do you do have to wonder if
that fifty percent of Democrats that suffer from mental disorders
are not just the MSNBC audience. But the view, Oh
good more, Yes, that's got that's their core audience.
Speaker 2 (48:33):
And wait a second, talk about target marketing. If you're
a psychologist or psychiatrist, get the Nielsen ratings, get the
households with the cell phone numbers and just dialing for
dollars anyone who's listening to the view, or you gotta
quite sure, you gotta have the house in the Hamptons.
(48:54):
Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1 (48:55):
That's it. I think this would be a gold mine
for the pharmaceutical industry.
Speaker 2 (48:59):
Focus day, yep, folk, a direct mail piece.
Speaker 1 (49:02):
Yo, Focus the antidepression drug commercials, Focus the antipsychotic pill commercials.
All of this on MSNBC and during the view. You've
got your audience right there.
Speaker 2 (49:16):
I love you know something, Lockkin, that's actually right on.
So anyone you know it can can advertise, you know,
like you know, antidepressants whatever. But I think that if
you're really going to get your niche market for not
antidepressant but antipsychotics like schizophrenic, that's that's that's their bailt.
(49:36):
I think they may be able to charge a premium
because that's a very fertile audience. You might have about
fifty percent hit ry Well Lockedkin another great show, and
our listeners can contribute to our continued progress Unlike MSNBC.
Speaker 1 (49:58):
Yes, let's hear what you have to go to theex
go to xvadio dot com, slash connect, send us a
message and tell us what you think. You can also
message us at the Carnivore Radio Facebook page. We want
to know what's important to you. What do you think
about what's going on? Let us know, and of course
you can catch every episode of Carnivore bites at xvadio
(50:21):
dot com, the Carnivore Radio website, the Apple Podcasts app, YouTube, Rumble, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Audible,
Amazon Music, and other platforms that respect freedom of speech.
Speaker 2 (50:36):
Thank you, doctor Lopkin, Great Chelsea next
Speaker 1 (50:38):
Week, We'll see you then two
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.