Episode 1179: Deep State Strikes Back

CALL IN: 508-637-5596
GUEST: Science blogger Michael D. Shaw
MICHAEL SHAW SUBSTACK: https://mdspov.substack.com

Charles Moscowitz LIVE
Website: https://charlesmoscowitz.com
Moscowitz Author Page:
https://www.amazon.com/stores/Charles-Moscowitz/author/B00BFLX7S0
Buy Me a Coffee, Join me for Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/moscowitz

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, welcome to the program, Charles Moscow, it's here,
and welcome aboard on TikTok. We'll see how long I
stay there. But either way, Michael D. Shaw is here
and we're doing our thing every Thursday. Mike, I wanted to,
as you said, as we started, the Empire strikes back.
You know, it's it's expected, it's inevitable to a certain extent.

(00:25):
It's healthy because you want to have loyal opposition. But
that's not what we're talking about right now with this.
The Trump Revolution is what I would call it, or
maybe we should call it the Trump counter revolution. Yeah,
I like it. I like it, and you know, the
way they're doing it, unfortunately, is all too predictable. They

(00:47):
are not going to take on President Trump and this
incredible administration on issues because they are just crushing it
in every arena, attracting capital into the United States. The
tariff policy, which by the way, is a policy that's
been done by many many of our great presidents, starting

(01:09):
with George Washington, is resulting in big companies, international companies
investing hundreds of billions of dollars inside the United States
as a way to avoid tariffs, and it is protecting
American industry and labor. Now, obviously the effects aren't going
to be felt right away, but it is a policy

(01:34):
that goes way back. It's the American policy really first
minted by Alexander Hamilton was one of the more underrated
founding fathers, and was embraced by Jefferson as well, especially
toward the end of his life when he wrote that
he acknowledged that manufacturing and protection of industry is key
to a successful republic and a successful society. So Trump

(01:59):
is re inventing this. The only thing you can say
it was good that by the way that the people
that the Biden regime, whoever was running it, did was
that they did not touch Trump's tariffs because they could
see that they were working. You've got a the deportation
of illegal aliens, particularly criminal illegal aliens supporting terrorist organizations

(02:24):
on campus.

Speaker 2 (02:25):
You know, they they stop you there and say, why
in the world are they fighting this? Why do they
think it's a good idea to be on that side
of an issue like this.

Speaker 1 (02:37):
I think that it's the Luigi phenomena for young people.
You know, you get they are looking like they're fighting
the big guy. They're fighting the capitalists. It's a leftist thing.
I mean, I did a bit of a drive by,
for example, on one of these protests, and it was
basically it looked very well financed. It looked like, I

(03:00):
think George Soros. They're holding up a sign stop the oligarchy,
Stop musk the oli. I was saying, does that include
George Soros. No, I didn't say anything because I was
just driving by. But it's the same old characters, the
same old in a way, it looks like the new
faces are look like kind of young tech bros. I guess,

(03:22):
you might say, and girls. And then of course on
the campus it's the same old anti Israel people, And
I guess, and I'm concerned. To me, I don't know
if this is something that's going to metastasize or shrink.
And it reminds me of the arguments that were made

(03:43):
before the September of the eleventh, two thousand and one
attack on the World Trade Center, and that was that
in the nineteen nineties there was an increase in terror
attacks against the United States, Robi embassy attack, the attack
in I think there was a few other like that.

(04:04):
We could go over the Cooba Towers in Saudi Arabia,
you had the first World Trade Center attack, you had
an uptick in terrorist attacks, and there were two schools
of thought. One school said, let's not over react, let's
not do anything, because if we do, they're going to
make them even more mad, and then they're going to

(04:25):
go crazier and they'll start it'll get worse. And the
other school was, let's, you know, nip it in the bud.
Let's hit back, find them, stop them, and that way
keep them at bay. There's no utopia. They're always going
to be there, but we have to engage them in
the field of battle because that's where they are engaging us.

(04:46):
And I think that the appeasement school won and the
result was nine to eleven. They didn't all of a
sudden get warm and fuzzy because we weren't striking back.
They got more bold they were I go to the
United States, as the Communists used to say, is a
paper tiger. I think China you said this and that

(05:08):
we should just you know, they'll just fall apart, you know,
or like Lenin said, it'll be like overripe fruit falling
off the tree, and that's what they did. So I
think that the position that you have to strike them
back and find them and take them out, even if
it's ugly, is the only real way to go. So

(05:30):
you have this sympathetic young woman here at Tufts, picked
up off the street by playing clothes ice agents and
put into a unmarked vehicle and then she disappears. It's
not pretty. I don't feel you know, that's not something
that I feel good, you know, seeing you know, although

(05:52):
I will say the video that's made the rounds certainly
doesn't show them abusing her in any way. They were
very careful. They had a woman on the team, you know,
they kind of guided her. They took off the backpack
very carefully and they guided her into the car. Still,
it's not a nice sight, and it's resulted in some
major protests over toughs. But she was we we we're

(06:15):
going to find out what she was involved in. She
was publishing articles that were supportive of hamas she was,
you know, she very well could have been working for them, literally,
if not figuratively.

Speaker 2 (06:30):
Well have you ever noticed that she was a quote
thirty year old grand student. Yeah, and this Kmille what's
his name, guy Khalil? Right, it was a thirty year
old grand student. All right, that's pretty damn old to
be a grand student.

Speaker 1 (06:49):
Yeah, that's true, isn't it. Yeah, And they're not. They're
not some young impressionable kid either. You can't say, yeah.

Speaker 2 (06:56):
I'm talking about is that I've think it is legit.
I mean, yeah, she's probably a grand student.

Speaker 1 (07:05):
Well, but she was involved, and also he's his wife
was interview. The one in New York is Khalil, and
she is even more radical than he is. I mean, look,
they were a college for.

Speaker 3 (07:15):
What a great front to be a grad student.

Speaker 1 (07:21):
Grad student? Very interesting.

Speaker 2 (07:25):
Well, I mean look I went to school. I was
at grand student. I wasn't thirty years old.

Speaker 1 (07:32):
All right, right, so it is up there. You know.

Speaker 2 (07:36):
I think that they've been installed and the schools are
very happy to have people paying full tuition.

Speaker 4 (07:46):
Right.

Speaker 1 (07:48):
Well, I mean I think Tufts at Harvard they took
something like a three hundred million dollar grant from Qatar,
So you know that already creates an atmosphere that's that's
going to allow these so called students. I think that's
a really really insightful point about it.

Speaker 3 (08:06):
It just bothered me.

Speaker 1 (08:07):
It was just too stupid, Yeah, it was.

Speaker 3 (08:10):
It was too stupid.

Speaker 2 (08:12):
Okay, what were you doing between the time you finished
undergrad and became a grand student?

Speaker 1 (08:18):
All right, we have we had this one case with
this and I remember there was a big bruhund in
Boston as well. This woman who was I think a neurologist.
She worked for mass General Hospital. She was coming to
this country and then the ice stopped her at the
airport and took away her passport and turned it back.

(08:38):
Oh there was like, you know, Elizabeth Warren in a
high Dutch. There's an American moral immorl you know. It
turns out that she attended Nazarala's funeral in Beirute. I mean,
she was very connected to Hasbella, which is an organ

(09:00):
then is on the terror list of the State Department.
You can there's nothing, there's no you know. And I
would point out to people, Oh, this is free speech. No,
these are not American citizens. They have visas, and that
the conditions of those visas are that they observe certain

(09:21):
strictures in terms of what they get involved in while
they're here. It's just like their guests. They don't have
the same rights as an American citizen. If an American
citizen wants to step up and be a communist or
even be a mass supporter. There's nothing that I can
do about that. I may not like it, but they
have a right to do it, as long as they

(09:41):
don't cross the line and start to engage in illegal
activities like supporting them or sending them money or arms.
But they have a right to express those opinions. It's
not a matter of free speech. But if someone is
visiting and they have a visa, it's like somebody visiting
your personal home. You don't have the same rights you have.

(10:02):
You're the host, you're the owner of the renter of
the home. They are there as a guest and you
decide whether or not they can stay or not. If
they choose to de fire you, then they're they're committing
a crime. I mean, they could be arrested. And also,
as a general custom, if you're a guest in someone's home,

(10:24):
you observe certain customs. You know, you respect the host.
You don't do things that would be out of line
in terms of the policies or beliefs of the host,
you know. So that's what they are. They are guests
in our national home. And if they want to start
to support you know, I mentioned this as someone who

(10:46):
is very sympathetic to In this case, there's tought student.
I'm like, what if they came here and they were
supporting white supremacists, or if they came here and they
were like agitating against gays, you know, you wouldn't you
get them out immediately? You know, they put him on
a plane the next plane out of here. The point
is that, you know, if they're coming here and they're

(11:06):
agitating against American policies, American customs, they don't have a
right to do that anymore than you have a right
to go to Cuba and stand in Havana and talk
about capitalism. How long do you think you'd last. I'm
just saying that's a basic function of sovereignty.

Speaker 2 (11:23):
And of course this is very reminiscent, and you could
probably remember the name of the guy.

Speaker 3 (11:28):
I can't right now. There was some as it was called.

Speaker 2 (11:33):
The day Pinko that was identified in the fifties that
was being forever defended by Murrow and Cronkite.

Speaker 3 (11:42):
His name was Larry something.

Speaker 2 (11:44):
Okay, sure enough, it comes out that he was a
big communist, and so when they finally asked Murrow, well
what about well, you know, a big deal.

Speaker 3 (11:54):
So it's the standard crap from the left.

Speaker 2 (11:58):
It doesn't matter how many of these grand students you're
going to find, they are willing to bend over backwards
because they're anti American.

Speaker 3 (12:12):
Classification for it.

Speaker 2 (12:14):
You know what, there's the one bite rule or something
before you kick him out. I don't understand the sympathy
other than they just hate America, right, there's no other
way to say it.

Speaker 1 (12:29):
Well, and it's worse than that. They hate America. They
hate Israel, which is an American ally, but they're actively
involved in incitement on the college campuses. You know, this
guy Khalil, he was there, you know, as part of
one of the ringleaders of this occupation of Columbia, which

(12:49):
was I mean, if he was an America you would
think conventionally that an American student doing that would be
expelled at least because it's vandalism. I mean, it's it's
probably pretty damage. But he also is inciting against Jewish students.
Now that's you know what. If he was there, as
I said, inciting against gays, against blacks, you don't have

(13:12):
that from I mean, it's bad enough if it's an American,
but right, but I mean.

Speaker 3 (13:16):
I don't even know that.

Speaker 2 (13:18):
It's so much that they're tolerating anti Semitism, it's just
that they're a friend to do anything. Academia represents the
absolute worst in America, and they just prove it every
single day.

Speaker 3 (13:33):
I mean, what would I did?

Speaker 2 (13:37):
I mention this last week that I discovered something that
I had heard rumored for years, but I had proven
University of California discriminates against applicants who go to private school.

Speaker 1 (13:53):
Uh huh, right, so far, so.

Speaker 2 (13:57):
This girl ends up going to versus Southern California, your
private school for something that was it? Ninety thousand dollars
a year tuition?

Speaker 1 (14:07):
Crazy? What you know?

Speaker 2 (14:12):
How many times have I asked you, why does anybody
watch lesser whole?

Speaker 3 (14:16):
Why do people watch the news anymore?

Speaker 2 (14:19):
You have whatever news you want on your phone Internet instantly.

Speaker 1 (14:24):
I think it's all people anymore. I think it's people
that are in our demographic Mike, older white guys and
girls watch that. I mean, it's like an old habit.
It's like, you know, we still have checkbooks, you know,
whereas younger people they don't even know what a check
looks like. Now they just do, you know, So it's

(14:44):
an older it's an older generation relic. You know, we
still like the occasional broadsheet, you know, to look at
the newspaper. You know, younger people wouldn't know what the
newspaper was. If they fell on it. It might be
crational thing.

Speaker 2 (14:59):
I don't with all the bad publicity coming out about colleges,
why does every kid still have to go?

Speaker 1 (15:08):
Well, that's that's right. I mean, you're it's it's uh,
you're it's a kind of a collective assumed cultural thing
that it's like, you have to do this right of passage. Yeah,
and you feel bad if you don't do it. I
think that the one remnant left in terms of and
I'm learning this right now firsthand from my own online education.

(15:32):
I'm doing Arizona State University. I'm getting a degree. It's interesting,
but it's very left and it's a lot of Yeah,
I mean, it's it's you know, we're talking about law
and society. It's all about critical race theory. Everything comes
down to that in this case critical legal theory. And

(15:54):
you know, I mean I'm doing my own thing there,
but and I'm using the information to write a book.
But the point is that younger people don't know from this,
and they're going there and there there. I see the
comment board on the courses where people put in their response,
and they're just as bad as a teacher, you know,
they're like, oh, yes, you know the colonial American you

(16:17):
know system and blah blah blah. I mean the view
with we have a class on American the American Revolution,
it is really you know that that the it was
a plot by wealthy Virginians to keep slavery in place
and to screw Native Americans west of the Appalachia and

(16:39):
make money. It's basically the thesis. This is one professor,
in particular, wood This one author, Woody Holton, the real
historian and professor of history at the University of South Carolina,
is this whole thesis. I mean, it's just it's like
so negative. Now, we could look at some of those

(17:00):
things playing a little role in it, but they forget
all about the the ideology of the Constitution and the
founding generation but they believed in. They forget about the
faith that they had, They forget about all of the
factors that went into that. It's like that doesn't even exist.
It's correct.

Speaker 3 (17:19):
I think some of the problem is that.

Speaker 2 (17:22):
You have this this monologue of situation where no one's
going to question the professor, right, and not just kids,
but most people are very impressionable and they'll listen to
this stuff and you know, they've never heard it like
this before, so it's novel. But they don't think about it.

Speaker 3 (17:49):
They don't say all this money, they're fay allays.

Speaker 2 (17:53):
Money, and you're getting from a professor who's been recognized
by his peers.

Speaker 3 (18:00):
Hell is vy.

Speaker 2 (18:01):
How do you become a full professor in history? You
write more crap, publishing more left wing historical journals. But
that's not even the worst of it. You go to
the science and engineering departments and they're permeated with this crap.

Speaker 1 (18:16):
They are. But you know, I actually have a slight
glver of hope that there is some change of foot
because students are waking up. Younger students are not that
left you have, like, for example, Boston University just downgraded
the entire sociology department. It's no longer a degree program.
It's like, yeah, University of Florida did the same thing.

(18:40):
I mean, because it's become so captured by leftists and
such a catspar for leftist agendas that it's lost its
basic legitimacy. I mean, it's always been on the left
a little bit, but at this point, the whole social
science of sociology has been it doesn't have any because

(19:02):
sociology itself is a very important study. I'm getting a
degree in sociology. It's it's a real look at the
functioning of groups within society and how they relate to
each other, individuals, and how they relate to groups, history
and how it relates to the present with a projection
to the future and all of it. It's a the

(19:24):
sociologist c Right Mills talked about the sociological imagination is
a brilliant, brilliant thinker. Although he was a man of
the left, he died young. I think if he had lived,
he would have moved to the right leg I did.
I mean, because he was honest and he was like
really probative and tough. But that's not what it's become.

(19:45):
It's become just a pat a cat's part for legitimizing
every leftist agenda that comes down the pike.

Speaker 2 (19:51):
You know, Yeah, when I was a UCLA I think
as a sophomore or junior, and you'd heard the name
Angela Davis, Yes, just hired as an assistant professor right off,
right out from MARCUSA and all.

Speaker 3 (20:12):
These wonderful lefties. And you heard her speak, and.

Speaker 2 (20:17):
She was so captured by the communist point of view
that it was remarkable. You know, she was supposed to
beat this rebel black woman, but she was so down
the line with the communist struggle.

Speaker 3 (20:37):
I mean I had to keep from laughing at part
of this thing.

Speaker 1 (20:41):
Yeah, she just.

Speaker 3 (20:43):
Got worse and worse and worse, to.

Speaker 5 (20:46):
The point that they many of elections.

Speaker 3 (20:53):
Well, actually she was where I first saw her was
she was doing this sort of big presentation I think
it was.

Speaker 2 (21:02):
It Pollie actually where she gave you know, her little
thoughts because she was so famous, you see, was so happy.

Speaker 3 (21:12):
To have her on there. You know, is there a
civil rights era? And she was this big.

Speaker 2 (21:17):
Black chick with the afro and you know, just checked
off all the boxes. So and the sad part is
that you looked at ninety percent of the audience and
they were.

Speaker 3 (21:30):
Just laughing this up like it was the word of
God or something. You know.

Speaker 1 (21:35):
Yeah, yeah, those are the students who are going to
these rallies to support Khalil. I mean, it's the same leftist.
And again, I mean, I wonder and I worry if
this is just a kind of a continuation of the
same knuckleheads, or if this is something that's expanding. I

(21:55):
don't know. I mean, I think that Trump is making
inro I mean, I think that first of all, expelling
these people, these thirty year old PhD students is a
great step in the right direction. They instigated and fomented
these rallies. They should be gone, and Trump said he'd
do it, and he's doing it, thank god. And also

(22:18):
the colleges are responding to cutting off money. That's another
thing that's working very well. Columbia now is tamping down
on the radicals. They're actually have have taken away some
degrees from people who were extremely radical. And the main
college system is now banning men and women's sports because

(22:41):
Trump has put a deadline on cutting all aid. Unless
they did that, they back down. So I think that
the money is talking, you know, they they're you know,
they're responding to that.

Speaker 3 (22:52):
Well in May, what about the high schoolers.

Speaker 1 (22:56):
I don't know, but I know that the governor there,
who's a real leftist whack job. I mean, man, I
don't know what's happened to Maine. It's like, it's you
want to tell people, because I've talked about this, I
don't for you.

Speaker 3 (23:09):
You know, I lived back east for a whiles, you know,
and so they asked me, like, what the hell's going
on in Maine.

Speaker 2 (23:15):
This was very simple. If Massachusetts isn't liberal enough for you,
then you move up to Maine. But you have to
be right in that Portland corridor. You know, if you
went out into real Maine, you're not going to find
people like that.

Speaker 1 (23:30):
No, of course, I put that little port It's like
the same thing in Vermont. It's that area around Burlington
where you see it's really scummy looking people and homelessness,
and it looks worse than San Francisco or Seattle. It's bad.
And they run the state. They've taken over the they've
probably taken over the voting apparatus. Quite honestly, you know,

(23:53):
they just have the control. Detroit has that kind of
control over Michigan. It's and it's you know, I don't
know if it's because they run the voting machines or what,
but they do seem to control that state and their culture,
and they do seem to suppress the real Mainers and

(24:13):
the real Vermonters.

Speaker 2 (24:17):
Working for effect right that if you remember, could you do?
Vermont was this conservative place of two hundred thousand, and
it was mostly these guys in these Johnson Woolen mill
jackets going around tapping in the maple trees to make syrup.

(24:38):
That was okay, But then the New Yorkers moved out.

Speaker 1 (24:43):
You had you know, the Howard Dean and Bernie Sands
and all of these leftist New Yorkers from Brooklyn. They
both they went up there with their buying up big
estates and they just basically, you know, that whole state
is like a little it's like a plantation, and it's
like it's you know, they just they own it. Lock Stock,

(25:03):
Ben and Jerry Right, they all moved up there, and
all New Yorkers, they all moved up there and they
took over.

Speaker 2 (25:10):
Well now they're complaining. You know, one of my sons
lives in Phoenix, and he's complaining about all the California
people came out. And I said, well, you're you're almost correct.
It's not just the California people came up. It was
the worst California people came out.

Speaker 1 (25:26):
I think that Californians are leaving California because it's become
so far loft. I mean, I think that Bill Maher,
with all of his faults, he's actually a pretty good
example of that California liberal mentality that is kind of
becoming rejecting the left. I mean, he's like, it takes

(25:47):
three hundred regulations to do one little thing out here.
It took me ten years to put in a down
spot on my gutter because of regulations. It's you can't
do it.

Speaker 2 (26:00):
It's very nice, But how much sympathy should I have
for this prodigal son?

Speaker 3 (26:06):
Right?

Speaker 2 (26:07):
I mean, if Bill maherk, we're thirty five years old
to be one thing, right, but we're him too. Now
finally come to this realization. But if the guy's sixty
years old.

Speaker 1 (26:18):
Oh right, great, But he reflects a certain California type
that is leaving. And I wonder, And they're moving to Texas,
they're moving to Idaho, they're moving to Arizona, New Mexico.
Are they taking their leftism with them or are they
how they really are? That's bad?

Speaker 3 (26:38):
Oh, I mean, look at what happened in New Hampshire.

Speaker 1 (26:40):
I know that's true.

Speaker 2 (26:42):
All the Massachusetts people moved up and suddenly it wasn't lived,
free or die anymore.

Speaker 1 (26:48):
You know, Yeah, it became a Boston suburb. No, it's
you know, they commute. They commuted into the city for
work and then they live in New Hampshire. Said to
pay taxes for the policies that they support. It's bad. Yeah,
that's about it.

Speaker 2 (27:05):
So in someday, and I hope it doesn't happen. But
the day that New Hampshire creates a sales tax, we
all lost.

Speaker 1 (27:15):
Oh my god. And every four years they have bus
loads of people come up, they register to vote, they vote,
and they go back to Massachusetts. They have this law
that says that if you intend to move to New Hampshire,
you can be a resident for thirty days. Some weird
obviously right for voter fraud, I think that Trump is

(27:38):
making progress on that front, you know, voter integrity. He
hasn't given up on it. It is I think I
still believe it's one of the key issues that you know,
it has to be addressed. There has to be same
day voting, absentee ballots only if you're really you know,
we have a damn good reason for it, like you're

(27:59):
in the military. If you're overseas, or if you really
can't vote, in which case you have a signature registered
with your town clerk and it's done right, no voter ID,
you know, all of the basic functions, getting rid of
all the machines, which is what Elizabeth Warren called for

(28:21):
in twenty nineteen because she said they were rigged, and
she was right. We don't hear from her anymore about that.
She doesn't talked about that now. I brought it up
on her website. I do it regularly, no comments. They
don't want to talk about that anymore because they realized that, hey,
they are rigged, and we can do the rigging. So yeah,

(28:43):
I mean, it's still an issue. President Trump is not
letting go of it. Even recently he said they're going
to be releasing more information about that fraudulent election. I'm not.
I didn't click YouTube today so I can say that
although I am on TikTok. I hope let's see if
I taken down on TikTok for that.

Speaker 4 (29:02):
But you know that's oh wait, just like they don't
talking about COVID, same thing, right, I mean, I thought
it hard to believe.

Speaker 2 (29:14):
I got a call yesterday from somebody representing CDs uh
telling me that I'm eligible for a COVID vaccine right now?

Speaker 3 (29:27):
Yes? Oh are they still flogging that stuff?

Speaker 2 (29:31):
Oh?

Speaker 3 (29:31):
Yeah, these are all new.

Speaker 1 (29:35):
Oh you know I have I have these relatives in
New York through marriage who they their way left, and
they've told both of them have told me on different
occasions that they quote love unquote Anthony Fauci, and that
the vaccine they hate people who didn't get the vaccine.

(29:55):
The last time I saw them, I wish I had asked.
It would have been too provocative, but I could have
asked them, so have you gotten your booster lately? Are
you up to date on your COVID shots? Because I
don't think they are. No one is, no one's doing
it anymore.

Speaker 3 (30:09):
Why would anyone love Anthony Fauci.

Speaker 1 (30:14):
You know something, I think that people on the far
left have a nostalgic feeling about the pandemic, the lockdowns.
It's it's almost like a fetish, you know. It's like
it was the ultimate example of the government coming in
and literally controlling everything, controlling telling you you had to

(30:34):
wipe your groceries down with a antiseptic cloth.

Speaker 3 (30:38):
So for a few glorious. Once we had Joseph Stalin
running the United States.

Speaker 1 (30:43):
Then yeah, And I think they have a nostalgic feeling
about that. It excites them. And they're still walking around
with those friggin masks, although they were complaining bitterly when
Ice put on masks as they arrested that woman. They're toughts.
Oh my god, why are they wearing masks? Really, they
have a reason for wearing masks. That's a legitimate police action.

(31:05):
They don't want to have people doxing them and showing
up at their house. But anyways, not to digress, the
point is that I think that when it comes to
the pandemic, I think there's a movement around that. It's
like it's really on the left, and it kind of
fits in nicely with their worldview. This experience. It's like

(31:25):
a child having these strong parents take over and take
care of them. They're oh, it's like the government was.
I remember walking around the street with a mask on
and going to the other side of the street when
somebody was coming and putting on the double mask and fauci.
I think for one or two days it actually suggested
that people put on two masks. I know, people, and

(31:47):
I know people who did it of course. Oh yeah.
I mean this is like and it was exciting for them.
They loved it. They look back as if it's a
romantic period in their life. So I think that there's that.
It's it's right, it's like a day Stylino.

Speaker 3 (32:06):
The time of cholera. Oh man.

Speaker 1 (32:12):
But anyways, back to yeah, we are still on TikTok
Let's see what happens. I'm getting comments on TikTok. Well,
let's just see. We'll put that aside. You have the
deep state fighting back, and they are tough, they are entrenched,
they're not taking a line down. They're international, they are

(32:34):
stopping Trump whenever they can. You have this conspiracy and
I do use the word conspiracy of judges who are
openly and brazenly defying the US Constitution by telling Trump
he can't fire people, telling Trump he has to continue
money going to radical groups. He is the violation warning.

(32:59):
Thank you, TikTok Okay, so I've gotten the warning. The
you know it's it's basically I would suggest maybe it
was a conspiracy comment. I'm gonna shut TikTok off. I
don't want to lose the whole channel. All right, I'll
put that away. Enough with TikTok through. Yeah, they are

(33:27):
openly and brazenly violating the law, violating the spirit and
the letter of the Constitution. You have legal professors and
legal experts not saying a goddamn thing about it. They're
going to go to the Supreme Court because they're going
to meet the head of the snake, John Roberts. Now
it turns out that he was part of the secret

(33:50):
society in Washington, the Inn of Courts, which is actually
a British tradition where lawyers and judges get together and
hobnobin's secret and at that society, he is there hobnobbing
with that really rotten judge who tried to turn back
the Trendiagua plane the Bosberg. And that same judge, by

(34:16):
the way, is now handling every Trump case that comes
into his jurisdiction, which is illegal. It's supposed to be
this're supposed to be rotated. This suposed to be a
lottery system, so you don't have like, you can't shop
for a judge. It has you know, it goes random.
He has gotten He's now handling four cases where Trump

(34:38):
is being sued, including a group that's suing over this
chat GPT conversation, you know with Hegseth and that suing
for that. So this, you know, and he's buddy buddy
with John Roberts at this end of have you heard

(34:58):
about this?

Speaker 3 (35:00):
Well, you know, Roberts was a very bad choice from
the get.

Speaker 2 (35:07):
And he's got a lot of people try to control
him based on the hardly secret story of his illicit
adoption of those two kids, which I mean, this is
public knowledge.

Speaker 3 (35:22):
I don't always worried about it anymore.

Speaker 1 (35:25):
On the other hand, I mean, those two kids probably
at this point might be adults by now, so it's
not an issue. They're not going to be able to
take them back, you know, there was. I mean, I
get the fact that he might have felt him and
his wife might have felt threatened that those kids could
they could be removed. That's on legitimate fear. I get it.

(35:45):
But I don't think that that's an issue any longer.
That was they were adopted, I think in the in
the nineteen eighties.

Speaker 3 (35:51):
Well it's that was always the excuse, all right.

Speaker 2 (35:55):
But I figured at the time that he was a
bad guy, and I came to that conclusion because I've
met a few people in my life like this where
their entire existence is all about polishing your resume.

Speaker 1 (36:11):
He doesn't people care about how he's going to look
in history. Everything seems to be hinged on that what
appearance it's you know, yeah, I mean that that's right.
He does seem to be. And it's like, in a way,
if that is his motivation, then that really shows what
a weak, rotten person I.

Speaker 3 (36:29):
Mean, Coort.

Speaker 1 (36:32):
I mean, it's a lifetime appointment.

Speaker 2 (36:34):
He's given with your Bodecare thing. When he said, I
didn't want to be the guy who ruled against this,
and I'm.

Speaker 1 (36:45):
Thinking, and everybody shook their head on that because the
decision that he wrote was so convoluted and so twisted
into knots, and that this thing is a tax and
therefore under Article five, nobody understood it. And you know,
that's when the rumor started that he was being blackmailed

(37:06):
by Obama.

Speaker 2 (37:08):
Well, he's being blackmailed by somebody, and.

Speaker 1 (37:11):
Then there's every Epstein business. I'm not going to even
go there, but he's blackmailing himself.

Speaker 2 (37:17):
Because if every step you take in your life is
how you're going to be judged by history, Okay, then
you just got no balls.

Speaker 3 (37:26):
I mean, you can't do anything.

Speaker 1 (37:29):
Yeah, But he looks beyond that that little box. I
think I hope he realizes that he's not going to
be judged well by history by doing this. It's it's
ultimately going to accue a crewe to him in a
very bad way, and that he and his wingman Coney
are going to screw this country when those cases eventually

(37:52):
make their way to the Supreme Court. And that's why
I'm calling it a conspiracy. It's a conspiracy the way
Whittaker chambers to find cannspiracy and conspiracy of gentlemen. It's
not like they're sitting around in a smoke field room,
although that ends of court looks like a smokefield room
to me. But either way, it's like and anyway, he's
sitting in there with Brown, Jackson and Boseburg and these

(38:16):
other real demons, but they all think alike. I mean,
they did it. During the twenty twenty election. They threw
out the case, the class action suit brought by the
state of Texas Ken Paxton and set six other states
against the so called battleground states because they had engaged

(38:37):
in election to canery that devalued the votes of those states,
a legitimate case that should have been heard, according to
sources that I can't confirm this, but that Roberts when
that case arrived at the Supreme Court, he had a
meeting in his office where he was heard screaming at

(39:00):
the top of his lungs by people who were outside
the door at the three Trump appointees that they had
better get in line and use every kind of expletive
and vote against this, that this can't go forward.

Speaker 2 (39:15):
That was that story made the rounds, and that was
There were two things that convinced me that the judiciary
isn't worth a bucket of piss, all right. One was
when I did an article at A fifteen plus years
ago and I looked into so called Lynmark cases.

Speaker 3 (39:37):
They were all crap. They were all crap if you
looked at what the arguments were. I mean Roe v.
Wade in a classic but Brobin versus the Board.

Speaker 2 (39:50):
Was reached on the fact that some psychologists determined that
black little girls have lower self esteem when they played
with black dolls compared to white dolls.

Speaker 1 (40:02):
Yeah, they brought it. They brought in sociologist Guna murdahal
from He's the one that masterminded that decision.

Speaker 2 (40:11):
So yeah, you look at these cases, and you know
when you're a high school student and you hear about
landmark cases, but when you start looking at them and
how awful they are and how stupid they are and

(40:34):
how they were decided, this is.

Speaker 1 (40:38):
Oh yeah, I mean, wait, I think black men found
emanations and numbers in the Constitution with the hell that means?
I mean, this is I mean even I just I
just finished an assignment for my sociology class. We were
to pick a topic and one of the topics to
pick to criticize with President Trump's executive order dismantling DEI,

(41:02):
which of course is the one I picked, And what
I came to view is that his executive order basically
dismantled Biden's executive order, which he signed in the first
day of his administration, assuming he signed anything, but you know,
it was signed by him that created DEI. And if

(41:26):
you read this thing, it is the most totalitarian, fascist
thing you can imagine. They're going to set up a
whole new bureaucracy to regulate DEI as it's defined on
any given day, and that includes transgendered and everything else.
And they're going to have this bureaucracy accompanied by a

(41:47):
new agency that's going to do data processing and you know,
using artificial intelligence you want to. I mean, this is
a Michael Michelficos panoptocon theory that the panoptercon was. It
was studying this and sociology. It is interesting. It was
a design of prisons. It was created by British thinker

(42:09):
Jeremy Bentham, where you have one column in the middle
of the prison and then there's spokes going out from
that column, with the guards being in the top of
the column in a glass room. And the belief is
every prisoner believes that they're being constantly observed. They may be,

(42:30):
they may not be, but the very design of the
place opens the possibility that they might be, so they
assume that they are. And that the idea was that
that would reduce prison problems. And for Coe brought that
into a social theory, saying that this is the surveillance
state that everyone comes to believe that they're being observed,

(42:53):
which is something that's happening. I mean, he was very prescient, right,
you know, you have you know, i mean Internet of things,
you've got algorithms, you've got Siri and people that's listening
to us. And this part of Biden's DEI program would
have brought that kind of granular control over every not

(43:17):
just public agency, but every corporation. And of course the
corporations were already in the bag because they had capitulated
to communists China in their development of what is it equity, yeah,
the social credits. And it would have been the most
authoritarian thing. It would have been a level of government

(43:38):
control and it would be all to address so called
inequities which exist. But to have it, obviously they've reduced
over time. I mean, this country has made a lot
of progress. They're not Jim Crow anymore. You know, this
is a great time if you're black in America and
if you want to accomplish something, the doors are open.

(43:58):
I mean, this is you know, how about looking at
some positive developments instead of at this late date coming
in with this unbelievable octopus of control. And it was
funded by USAID, with billions of dollars of taxpayer money
going into creating this edifice. It is so rotten. And

(44:18):
as I read into this thing, you're going to read
this it's online Biden signed it on day one, and
then he signed another one in two thousand and four
that was even worse, that added to it. And all
Trump did on day one was simply get rid of it,
and he named it in his document, this is we're
not going to have airline pilots who were chosen because

(44:39):
they were women, you know. And then you had that
crash over New York, right, I mean, it's insane, and
you know it's and that people were reporting there were
whistleblowers all around the country saying, hey, I was told
by my boss we can't hire any white people because
we have to meet this quota. It was really, really bad.

(45:01):
And then they have the nerve and I pointed this
out in my piece. I'm sure my professor's head is
going to explode when she reads this. They have the
nerve to say that Trump is the fascist. You know,
that Trump is a threat to democracy. I mean this thing,
besides these direct orders to establish these entities of control

(45:26):
over both public and private sector, it's also filled with
all of this language of authoritarianism, this kind of what
French scholar Elaine Beniscon called the language of totalitarianism, where
you have these wiggle words and these indirect double talk
and sophistries that can be interpreted anyway people want them interpreted.

(45:47):
And it all sounds kind of warm and fuzzy, you know,
it's which is what it is, fuzzy. It doesn't really
make sense. So Trump got rid of that on day one.
If that's the one thing that he did as president
that we owe him an eternal debt for just that
one act, getting rid of that goddamn thing, that DEI thing.

Speaker 2 (46:07):
Oh what I think happened, and and I must have
been I didn't know it was as bad as you
describe it now, But that proves me I didn't share
it with doubt that Biden.

Speaker 3 (46:18):
Didn't know what the hell he was signing even in
day one.

Speaker 1 (46:21):
Oh yeah, well Biden was not competent. I mean, now
you have Jake Tapper, a left wing you know, apparatchik
of the deep state. He's written a book about this,
noting that Biden did not know what was going on,
and he's being attacked, he's being assaulted. He was assaulted
at an airport by a bunch of angry young women,

(46:44):
you know, a trader. You know, you're criticizing Biden.

Speaker 5 (46:48):
So how crazy they've become well, you know that the
only demographic in the United States that supports DEI is
college she educated white women.

Speaker 1 (47:02):
Yeah, the people they look a lot like Jocelyn Benson,
and they I know, I pick on her. But and
and underneath that very pretty even ear with the blonde hair,
is a really corrupt soul, you know. And it's George
Soros goes out and he selects people like Benson because
they are they look like you're white bread, all American

(47:26):
sister down the street. I mean, how could they do
anything wrong? And they've been deluded. She went to Wellesley College.
She's probably deluded herself early on. And then she's of
course put in office with support from Sorows and also
from the Southern Poverty Law Center, and she's stealing elections.

(47:47):
So I can say this because TikTok is off stealing
elections in Michigan openly and violating the law. And she
just keeps going on. Now she's running with governor Oh
and she has these commercials out it's a that's that's
who Trump struck down when he got rid of DEI.

(48:07):
And all I can say is that if anyone listening
to this or watching this, judge it for yourself. Just
go online and look it up. It is. It's you know,
it reminded me of some of these un documents, like
the Rights of the Child, which was rejected by the
United States, in which my professor complained about in another class.

(48:28):
She said, oh, the United States and only two countries
in the world rejected this document, the United States and Somalia.
You know, I'm like, good, thank you, Somalia. Great, at
least there's somebody out there. But if you read that document,
it talks about children having to mandate cultural rights, whatever

(48:49):
the hell that means. In other words, this unelected international
police bureaucracy can take your child away if your child
sues because their cultural rights have been somehow violated. It
is anything that Stalin or Hitler couldn't have dreamed up anyway.

(49:09):
That's what this DEI thing was about. The DEI expresses
the very essence of the Biden rotten regime, and that
Trump struck it down on day one. That's why they're
going after him. You know, this is something that I
think even most liberals didn't feel comfortable with. It was
this direct interference into people, into business, into communities, into government,

(49:35):
so they can place people in places of position simply
because of various categories like their race, or their sexuality,
or their you know, their gender, and that's you know,
it's just it's un American. It's it's it's not based
on freedom. And I ended my piece by saying, look,
if we want to promote improving people who have less

(49:58):
and improving the condition of people who are underserved, follow
Trump's example by improving educations so that people can think
on their own, having policies that protect American industry and
labor from foreign trade problems. Put in support institutions that

(50:19):
encourage success, like marriage, like faith, like family, and like property,
and other things like that that create organic change. You
don't do change by simply swooping in like a bunch
of dictators and declaring these laws and putting gun back.
You know, action behind enforcing them is yet right.

Speaker 2 (50:43):
Where I disagree with you a little bit is when
you said earlier that even liberals.

Speaker 3 (50:48):
Are uncomfortable with this. But that's the problem, all right.

Speaker 2 (50:52):
I noticed, even back in the sixties and seventies, there
were older liberals that were uncomfortable with let's say, firmative action,
whatever it happened to be. But they stayed in Man
and they kept voting Democrat and they just swallowed hard

(51:13):
because that's what Comrade Stalin told them to do.

Speaker 3 (51:17):
So I quote the sympathy.

Speaker 1 (51:19):
Oh yeah, no, I mean you know you mentioned affirmative action. Originally,
the whole idea was started by Nixon, and it was
simply an outreach to minority communities to apply for jobs
in the government. They were running ads in Jet magazine
and black publications, that's all it was. And that was

(51:41):
a to me, that's a good and artist approach. Let's
help people get into the job market by letting them
know how to do it, by maybe helping them. But
it turned into what's the left got the hands on it.
It became this mandated authoritarian agenda to overthrow the system, right,
I mean the Cloward Python approach, overwhelm the system as

(52:05):
a way to create socialism. And I don't think that's
what Nixon had in mind, but that's what happened.

Speaker 2 (52:10):
Now that wasn't well, I mean, in fairness and Nixon,
what he had in mind for the DEEA is the
way it turned out.

Speaker 3 (52:17):
Either.

Speaker 1 (52:18):
Yeah, I don't think Kennedy had that in mind for
the USAID when he established it. He actually thought that this.
I think he had some genuinely idealistic ideas. He was
copying an Israeli system that was put in place where
they would go into African countries and help them build
water wells and help them build infrastructure and help bring

(52:40):
you know, humanitarian aid during crisis. That's what it was
supposed to be, not becoming a basically a laundering system
for billions of dollars to go into George Soros's pocket
so he could create color revolutions and you know, force
transgender and birth control on third world countries. No, that's

(53:03):
not what it's supposed to be.

Speaker 2 (53:06):
Well, I mean, you know, you and I can say that,
but the problem is you take any of these institutions.
It's not a very powerful argument anymore to say, well, no, no,
that's not what he was intended. And in fact, that
actually happened to your old buddy, Hubert Horatio Humphrey towards
the end of his life, when he saw what happened

(53:30):
with furmative action, and he was one of the original
guys on the Civil Rights.

Speaker 3 (53:34):
Act, he said, no, no, this is not what we intended.

Speaker 2 (53:38):
And he was shouted out, sorry, old man, this is
what it's become.

Speaker 1 (53:43):
Oh no, A lot of these people later on. I mean,
Truman realized at the end of his life that the
you know, the national security state. I mean, Michael Glennan
talks about this in his book Double Government, that it
was not what he intended, and he came out publicly
and wrote an essay about it, and it was not published.
I mean, he was just you know, shut up, go

(54:04):
back to independence.

Speaker 3 (54:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (54:07):
Yeah, So, I mean, you know exactly. I mean, there's
an agenda behind all these things, and Trump is dismantling
it piece by piece, and the only thing stopping him
is people like Boseburg and these judges. Do you think that.
I mean, I'm worried about that. They seem to have,
As I say, it does seem to me to be
at least an informal conspiracy. They are shutting down everything

(54:31):
they can get their hands on.

Speaker 3 (54:33):
But that was to be expected, okay when you come.

Speaker 1 (54:36):
Up like this. I mean, and also you've got the
very coordinated ACLU. You've got Act Blue, which is funding
these attacks on the on Musks called the Tesla's and
other organizations. They are shopping, They get people, they shop around,
they find the right judge. I mean, could this isn't new?

(54:57):
I mean the ACLU did this with the oap's case.
I mean, which you know of evolution in Tennessee. They
found this this young teacher in a high school scopes
and they basically hired him to bring this case and
then they paid for it. Anyway, they are doing this

(55:17):
and they're shopping these judges and they have been very successful.
And as I said, the top of the snake is
John Roberts and his his his wingman Cony Barrett.

Speaker 2 (55:29):
Things that Speaker Johnston has talked about is defunding the courts.

Speaker 1 (55:36):
Yeah, but I don't know how. I mean, he's I
worry that he's a lot like Jim Jordan, right. Oh,
they sound tremendous and.

Speaker 3 (55:45):
They trouble with all these guys.

Speaker 1 (55:47):
I mean, he shoots his mouth off on He likes
to see his fat face up on Fox, shooting his
mouth off. They're not doing anything. I don't get the
sense that Johnson has a lot of backbone. I mean,
I just something about him. I just you know, I
don't I wouldn't, you know. I mean, I think he
means well, but I think he looks he's weak. Maybe

(56:09):
I have much prejudice because of what he looks like.
He looks like a sixteen year old boy. I don't know,
it's like weird.

Speaker 2 (56:16):
Well, I mean you have to to somebody said, and
lower your expectations because this isn't like playing football. You know,
it was possible for John Elway to carry the whole
team on his back, not even so much Tom Brady,
to be honest, but you don't.

Speaker 3 (56:36):
That's not what you have. Now. You have Donald Trump
and a lot of other very fallible.

Speaker 2 (56:41):
Individuals who are being exposed this stupid thing with the
signal chat business. Not that anything bad happened, because it
was still a successful mission.

Speaker 3 (56:55):
But you don't get the best in the brightest going
in government, all right.

Speaker 2 (57:01):
And Trump proves that because it wasn't in government, all right.
And it and then you're fighting up against the people
that are careers.

Speaker 3 (57:14):
So it's a tough, tough deal, but.

Speaker 2 (57:17):
You're definitely changing the attitude and it's it's a victory.
As far as I'm concerned that the left is try
to fight it rather than controlling it.

Speaker 1 (57:31):
Well, it is a victory. But the one main the
head of the spear, uh, these conspiracy of judges and
they do seem to be I mean, on the on
the political front. I mean, I noticed that Trump had
at least de fonic withdraw her nomination for un which
is good because there was all this backgroom crap going
on in her district to turn it turn it blue

(57:54):
or to put in a rhino. So she's staying I
mean because of that. So they were aware of the
threat to Congress. There's a big election in Wisconsin right now.
I think it's happening next Tuesday for judgeship, which could
determine the future redistricting of the state's congressional districts. And
that could be very bad news for Trump if this

(58:17):
leftist judge wins, and it's very close. So we need
to support I don't know Kimmel, I think his name is,
we could look it up, but the Republican there, we
need to support him because it's one of those elections
that could have bigger ramifications. It could affect things going forward.

(58:40):
You know, it could result in I mean, if the Democrats,
God forbid, take back Congress, Trump will be impeached the
next week, you know. And then if he's and if
that's not successful, they'll just keep filing impeachments and they'll
put him in prison when he leaves office. I mean,
it's just it's that serious. It's very bad, they really mean.
But you know they're they're playing for keeps well.

Speaker 2 (59:03):
I mean, the good news to me is that they're
in a position now would have to fight like this.

Speaker 3 (59:10):
And let's face it, these people have no laws, all right.
I mean, who the hell would volunteer to be a
thirty year old grand student to come in and fight
this cause don't most people want to get married, have
a family, have a normal life. You know what Slalyinsky

(59:32):
is life didn't end well, you know, It's just the
trouble is that the left attracts misfits like this.

Speaker 1 (59:44):
Yeah, but these are there's a dangerous, unscrupulous street fighters,
and we are we need to understand that it's a
night fight and that Trump understands it. But he's you know,
he can't be alone. I mean, he can't show and
I think he's put together a pretty solid administration if

(01:00:04):
I look at some of these people, I mean, Cash
Patel is no pushover, even them. Bondi is turning out
pretty well, you know, I mean, and some of these
other people, RFK, These are excellent. This is probably the
best cabinet since since Lincoln. I think they've even better.
And you know, they're they're you know, they're in place,

(01:00:25):
and they're fighting back and they're planning. I mean, you
know that that signal conversation if you listen, if you
actually read it, it's actually pretty impressive. They were debating,
and you know, JD. Vance is not some mugwamp who
goes along either. He was like pushing back and they
were actually having a substantive debate over whether or not

(01:00:45):
to do something. I'm like in the past probably with
everybody just goose steps along. You know, they were really
going over substantive issues and it was actually a pretty
good glimpse into the inner workings of the administration, which
is impressive. So I think that these are all good
people and they're not effing around either. It is, but

(01:01:07):
the problem is that it is a street fight. It
is a knife fight, and there's a lot going on
in that fight that is out of the view of
the public. It is very fierce and.

Speaker 3 (01:01:18):
Very which all rights.

Speaker 2 (01:01:21):
Jeffy Goldberg guy, for whatever reason, got on this chat.

Speaker 1 (01:01:25):
Well that's something that needs to be investigated. How he
got in there because he's.

Speaker 2 (01:01:30):
But here's the thing, all right, there have been times
I've been on the internet since the nineties that, through
some misadventure I was getting people's emails. So what are
you gonna do? Be some sort of creep that keeps
doing this, or do you advise them? Hey, you know

(01:01:52):
what you spelled the name of your company, You missed
a letter. I'm getting all your email traffic. Like, stop
doing this, right, this guy, whether he got on by
misadventure or he was put on on purpose, don't you say, hey,
you know what, I shouldn't be.

Speaker 3 (01:02:13):
On this thing?

Speaker 1 (01:02:15):
Well? Yeah, well, first of all, he's a reporter, and
I actually get it. He gathered the information, and he's
an enemy of Trump. He made up a lot of
these hoaxes. Anyways, this is a real dangerous guy, and
he's supported by big, big insider media, the Atlantic and
you know this is this is you know, the establishment,

(01:02:36):
this is the CIA, this is the internationalists, and so yeah,
he grabbed everything he could. The question is how did
he get into that system. Apparently he's been involved in
the past in some of these kind of computer Shenanigan's
getting it too. And I'm not saying I'm not suggesting
he hacked, but you know, using other names, using other things,

(01:03:00):
using other letters. Somehow he got into it, and it's
you know, it should be investigated. I think it is
being investigated. And then he gets any lies about it,
and it's bad news.

Speaker 2 (01:03:12):
I think within thirty seconds the usual suspects called for
everybody to resigne.

Speaker 1 (01:03:18):
Oh, of course, I never mind that you.

Speaker 2 (01:03:21):
Had four years of an illegitimate president who is run
by god knows who.

Speaker 1 (01:03:27):
Yeah, and as you mention the fact that they installed
that system and they were using it Blincoln and then
they all use that same system. I mean, the whole
thing I think is dissipating. You know, it's not good.
It's embarrassing that this guy got into that system. But
you know this is going to be I mean, they're
going to make this into the next you know, perfect

(01:03:49):
phone call. I don't know, I mean, who knows.

Speaker 3 (01:03:51):
Now.

Speaker 2 (01:03:51):
I think it's a small part because you don't understand
why they think it's a good idea to be on
that side.

Speaker 1 (01:04:02):
It's not really I mean and and so yeah, I
think it's gonna dissipate. But you know they are capable
of all this stuff. I mean, Trump went in on
day one, and he fired as many of these people
as he could. You know, the Vinman's you know, people
like his snake's waiting in the grass for the right minute.
But now you have these corrupt judges putting them back.

(01:04:26):
I mean, I don't know. That's gonna take a long
time to clean up the judiciary. I think it's going
to probably be long after you and I have shuffled
off the mortal coil. It's gonna be these people are
gonna have to diet.

Speaker 2 (01:04:40):
It got perverted. I don't know how far back you
want to go. I can remember when I had a
friend in high school whose father was a federal judge,
and that meant something. And even then I knew, okay,
Irvi Hill was a man of the left and all
this stuff.

Speaker 3 (01:04:59):
But it didn't seem to be so awful back then.

Speaker 2 (01:05:05):
Right, But it's become a pure joke if you just
watch on YouTube. These hearings were to put these lunatics
to be federal judge.

Speaker 1 (01:05:17):
And that's who's all over the DC Court and they
run it and a half of them, a third of
them not even Americans. Yeah, I know, I just saw
one with Ted Cruz interviewing this judicial nominee. I mean
she had like put like a violent sex rapist and

(01:05:38):
and and sex abuser into a woman's prison because he
had to call himself to be a woman and he
whacked her off the calls. But you know something, she
was confirmed.

Speaker 3 (01:05:48):
Oh yeah, oh no, I knew that was going to happen.

Speaker 1 (01:05:51):
Yeah. So I mean this is like and and her
smug arrogant attitude. And there are several I mean, you
can watch these things and I will.

Speaker 2 (01:06:01):
Tell you that I've had the misfortune of being involved
in a couple of federal cases.

Speaker 3 (01:06:07):
The judges are scum. That's all I.

Speaker 1 (01:06:11):
Can tell you. No, it's true. I mean you can.
I think that the revelation of this whole thing with
YouTube and showing this to the American public, people now
see it. But the problem is they're there and they
have this Fiat power and they're using it now and
blatantly using it in a way that is obviously unconstitutional.

(01:06:32):
And I am not sure that Trump can do anything
about that.

Speaker 3 (01:06:36):
Well, one thing he can do is just.

Speaker 2 (01:06:40):
Cause finally cause the constitutional crisis.

Speaker 1 (01:06:44):
Yeah right, And maybe maybe Johnson will make good in
his comment about defunding some of them. They know, the
only thing the Constitution calls for is a Supreme Court.
All of these federal districts were created afterwards. I mean
there have been presidents who have gone after that. I
mean Jefferson, he he hated.

Speaker 3 (01:07:03):
The He warned.

Speaker 1 (01:07:04):
I mean, you look at some of his writings. He
warned about this judicial power. He wanted to arrest John Marshall.
John Marshall had to leave town. That's why they call
him a circuit judge. He got on his horse and
he went up to another. He kept throughout those ideas.
He kept moving from town to town so we wouldn't
get arrested. So, I mean, j you know this isn't new. Yeah,

(01:07:25):
this goes back. I mean, and he was an activist
in his day, and he's revered by the establishment. He
created this in a sense's powerful judiciary.

Speaker 3 (01:07:36):
Well that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:07:36):
The powerful judiciary is a complete fascist organization because it
doesn't answer to the.

Speaker 1 (01:07:43):
People and it doesn't in the Constitution. Their job was
because you know, we're talking about this in my sociology
and law class, how to use the courts to create
social change? No, the courts are not in the business
of creating social change. That is something that's if any
government agency is and that really, you know, be very careful.

(01:08:06):
It's judicial. It's legislators, state, local, and federal legislators, and
the judiciary then examines these things and decides whether or
not they're constitutional, whether or not they've overstepped their bonds.
That's the separation of powers. They're not supposed to do
these things from the bench. I mean, this is a

(01:08:26):
philosophy that's become accepted that they are. And look what happens.
You have Row versus Wade, you have Plus versus Ferguson,
where the government comes in and declares that it's okay
to have black people get separate treatment. You have Dread
Scott where they declared slavery legal. There was nothing in
the constitution that a lot of that. Those are activist
judges and look what they did. I mean, they created

(01:08:49):
a civil war in that case. I mean, it's a
you know, that's Fiat power anyway. So, Mike, what do
you have coming up on your substect Well, you know,
I have.

Speaker 3 (01:08:59):
The piece yesterday on snow White. I've gotten some good
notices on that.

Speaker 1 (01:09:06):
Yes, a disaster that is good for them, I mean.

Speaker 2 (01:09:09):
But this disaster beyond measurement. How do you start off
with a beloved classic? First of all, no one wanted
a live action remake anyway.

Speaker 3 (01:09:20):
You have a case where everything they did was wrong. Everything.

Speaker 2 (01:09:25):
Okay, the two leads number one can't act. The only
thing that Rachel brings to the table is she can sing.

Speaker 3 (01:09:34):
But so what.

Speaker 2 (01:09:37):
And ai crap that was shoehorned into the movie. It's
gonna lose them hundreds of millions of dollars, as a
referred to in the article in two thousand and nine,
no one remembers this.

Speaker 3 (01:09:57):
Apg Andini's granddaughter. Giannini was a guy who founded Bank.

Speaker 2 (01:10:03):
Of America, all right, and she came out in two
thousand and nine and just criticized the hell out of
the current management of BAA, which was justified. Okay, where
are the Disney airs complaining about how.

Speaker 3 (01:10:23):
This entire thing has been trashed?

Speaker 2 (01:10:26):
Snow White nineteen thirty seven made Disney. He risked everything.

Speaker 1 (01:10:33):
Okay, to get fortunate.

Speaker 3 (01:10:37):
For them to.

Speaker 2 (01:10:38):
Take their most beloved classic and trashed it like this,
These cultural vandals, It just it just defies any kind
of logic. And if the company goes under, you know what,
it was richly deserved.

Speaker 1 (01:10:57):
Well, they're blowing everything that's is he made from the
first one. The second one comes along and it's gonna
sink the whole ship. Yeah, I mean already I think
it opened it. That was like less than fifty million,
which is a disaster for a movie that costs a
half a billion dollars to make.

Speaker 3 (01:11:14):
So so what to write?

Speaker 2 (01:11:15):
Rachel's that gonna say, well, look, we're the number one
movie this week.

Speaker 3 (01:11:20):
Well, yeah, number one.

Speaker 2 (01:11:21):
First of all, nothing else was released that anyone's watching.
They don't know the basic arithmetic of the movie industry,
right right, That film would probably have to do six
seven hundred million dollars to break even. It ain't gonna do.

Speaker 1 (01:11:37):
That, right, No, it's a disaster.

Speaker 2 (01:11:40):
And she's too stupid to realize she's destroyed her career
in Hollywood.

Speaker 1 (01:11:44):
All right, Oh yeah, sure, I mean you talk about it.

Speaker 3 (01:11:48):
I do remark that.

Speaker 2 (01:11:50):
Say what you want about Seam Goldwin, Luby Mayor and
Harry Cole, he wouldn't have tolerated this crap.

Speaker 3 (01:11:58):
No movie.

Speaker 1 (01:12:00):
They were tough as nails. I mean they wanted things
that were excellent. They didn't have this kind of garbage.
So yeah, the whole thing. The whole the whole town
has seemed to be sinking and and as you say,
ritually deserved. I don't know if they'll let it straighten
up after this, they want to stay in business, I
don't know. I doubt it.

Speaker 4 (01:12:21):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:12:21):
Here's the problem.

Speaker 2 (01:12:22):
They keep doubling down, okay, because they haven't done it
quite well enough.

Speaker 3 (01:12:28):
All right?

Speaker 1 (01:12:29):
Oh my god. Yeah, that reminded the high school teacher
who once said that the reason why communism failed is
because they didn't quite do it well enough. Right, Stalin
didn't quite get it right. Right, Let's try it again,
Let's do it more this time.

Speaker 2 (01:12:45):
No, Stalin didn't quite get it right. And it was
seventy years of bad weather.

Speaker 1 (01:12:51):
It's always an excuse.

Speaker 3 (01:12:53):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:12:53):
So anyway, Mike, but as always, thanks for joining me.

Speaker 2 (01:12:58):
Okay, and congratulations. I'm staying on TikTok for nearly half
an hour.

Speaker 1 (01:13:03):
Oh I know. Well I shut it off before they
could suspend me. Anyway, I'll talk to you later. Thanks
a lot, man, all right, take care, all right,