Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Welcome everybody, and we'll come fel patriots welcome, fell deplorables,
welcome all of you, Drace's Society and rock dwellers. You
seek of fence and stinkos. That means our friend's allies
and patriots, And as you know, you're always welcome here.
And this place is the Conservative Commando's radio show. And
I'm Rick Trader coming to you from the my Pillow
(00:28):
studios and my store studios of the au N TV
network and joining me today as he does to lead
off the week, is the president and CEO of Frontiers
of Freedom, and that is my friend, George Landerth and George,
welcome back, Welcome back to Conservative Commandos.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
It is good to be here because this is the
place to be and after all a you and TV
Conservative Commandos, I'm very happy to be on both.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
Well, we're we're grateful to have you on and not
just this show, but Frontiers are eat and weekly reporting. Hey, George,
I've always admitted I'm working progress as far as my faith,
as far as Christianity goes. But what was exhibited yesterday
at Charlie Kirk's memorial when Erica gets up and says
(01:16):
that she forgives the shooter. Georgia's got to admit she's
a better woman than I'd ever be a man.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
Yeah, certainly impressive. I would agree with you. That doesn't
necessarily mean she wants us to drop all charges against
the murderer personally, because justice. You can forgive someone and
still want for justice to be done. But the question
is is what you know? Are you looking for vengeance
or something? And it doesn't sound to me like she's
interested in vengeance. It sounds to me like she and
(01:44):
Charlie believed kind of the way. The good example was
the Savior on the cross told God to forgive these
people because they knew not what they were doing. And
I'm thinking myself, that wouldn't have been me. I mean,
think about what he went through the previous two days,
fake dishonest trials, beatings and other tremendous suffering and so forth,
and then crucifixion, which was considered and I think historically
(02:06):
is one of the most painful ways to die. And
so I'm thinking to myself, if that had happened to me,
I would have never been the Savior I'm just talking about.
But many other people yet crucified. I can't imagine that
I would be telling forgive them, you know, I'd be
like no, I'd be.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
Like, get even with them.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
And so that demonstrates to you, I think the very
very strong example Christ set of love. And so I
was very impressed to see that in Charlie's Wife because
Erica showed that, and that's I think very clearly a
step in the right direction. And there was don't be
filled with hatred. Doesn't mean you have to like someone's behavior.
An example with the Savior always called out sin, and
(02:44):
he did not act like sin was okay. He never
once said, hey, I love you so much, I don't
care if you sin at all. Like with the woman
taken in adultry, he did not belittle her, he didn't
call her names. He protected her from being stoned to
death by the mob that caught her. But at the
same time, the end he said, go forth and send
no more. And so the point was he was always
willing to stand up for truth, but he in a
(03:06):
kind way. He did it in a loving way. What
he didn't do was treaty like she was garbage and
she should be stoned to death or be made fun
of and belittled. And so forth. It's just I think
that's a very good example for us all. But like
you said, it's hard. Well, I think it's very safe
to say that none of us are like Christ in
the sense that he was perfect.
Speaker 3 (03:26):
But he's a.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
Great example for how we ought to try to live,
and while we may not always do it perfectly, our
life will be blessed if we follow his example.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
Well, Church, and following his example. What I'm confused is
with the left, the left, we're more upset about Jimmy
Kimmel losing his job than the fact that in innocent man,
husband and father of two was killed for wanting to
talk to the other side. How forgiving should we be
(03:55):
of the left? How forgiving should we be? For members
of Congress who refused to condemn this, How forgiving should
we be the left? The members of Congress refused, refused
a prayer in a moment of silence for Charlie Kirk?
How forgiving should we be of these people? George Again,
getting to the service yesterday, President Trump said himself, the
(04:21):
rifle was aimed at Charlie Kirk. The bullet was intended
for all of us. George, How should how forgiving? How forgiving?
Should we be of the left when they're not even
asking to be forgiven? Well, help me, George, I'm really confused.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
I understand your point, but I think the difference is
what does forgiveness mean. I think the idea is it
means that we don't want to like, get even with them.
An example would be to be a really bad idea
of conservatives started shooting at liberals to get even with them.
So in that sense, we should forgive them, but I
think we can still hold them accountable. An example that
you go to the when you go to the polls
(04:59):
to vote, Americans should remember what the left has done
to our country, how little they've been interested in things
like free speech, how little they've been interested in freedom
of religion, and how people are for example, faithful Christians.
Some people are reacting like, oh, that's Christian nationalism and
they're dangerous and they're bad. It's just like so I
(05:19):
think we can forgive them, which means we don't hate
them and seek to kill them, for example, but when
we go to vote at the polls, we need to
remember what's happened. The example would be if there was
someone who were a child molester, you could forgive them
for what they'd done. That wouldn't mean you'd want to
have them babysit your own children, because you would have
the obligation to protect your children. And forgiveness doesn't mean
(05:42):
that you act like that never happened. It just means
you don't have like a continued hatefulness towards them. So
I would argue that we would be a big mistake
for us to use government power to start silencing the left,
or to use government power to start punishing and you know,
doing things to just like we don't like you, so
we're going to throw you in prison. If you committed
(06:03):
a crime, we'll throw you in prison. Obviously, I'm just saying,
if I don't like what someone said, it would be
very inappropriate to put them in jail simply for saying
something I disagree with. And so we could theoretically have
the power to do at some point, but we should
never abuse that power in that way, and we should
be willing to forgive in the sense that we don't
(06:24):
seek vengeance. But I'm going to go to the polls.
I hope americans remember this. A year from now, Americans
were going to the poll to vote for Congress and
the Senate. I hope they remember that. In the House,
the Democrats booed the idea of a moment of silence,
and it's just amazing to me. I don't think that
you or I ever once called for the death of
(06:45):
Barack Obama or Joe Biden simply because we disagreed with them,
and clearly they were doing a lot of damage to
our country. But it wouldn't have been worthwhile to want
to promote violence against them, because what we should do
is promote education, like what we do here on the show.
We try to help people understand what's going on and
help them understand the reality of things. But what we
(07:08):
don't do is say, oh, and by the way, pick
up your gun and start shooting at people who don't
agree with you. It's like, no, we've never once said that,
and we would condemn that as horrible, awful behavior. And
it would be nice if the left could start doing
that too, instead of they wanted to start a government
agency of propaganda. You know, they were focusing on making
sure everything was true. And yeah, it's like, okay, communists
(07:30):
and fascists had departments of truth, but they weren't about truth.
They were about propaganda, and that's clearly what Joe Biden
was all about, and so we should never replicate that
simply as a way to fight against the lies that
have been told by the left. Instead, we should fight
those lies with truth, not with vengeance.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
Well, George, when you talk about continued hatefulness, should we
hold companies like ABC responsible for letting their people like
Jimmy Kimmel. And by the way, they're forgiving Jimmy Kimmel,
they're bringing his show back on now. Should we the
people forgive ABC not just for forgiving Jimmy Kimmel, for
(08:12):
letting Jimmy Kimmel come on back on, but for letting
Jimmy Kimmel spew these lies and hatred were over the years,
which he has done. Should we forgive Disney? Should we
forgive ABC?
Speaker 2 (08:26):
Well?
Speaker 1 (08:27):
Should we turn the other cheek once again to get
it slapped again and again and again?
Speaker 2 (08:32):
Yeah? Well, I think the question is what do we
mean by forgiveness? It doesn't even have to approve of it.
Christ was certainly forgiving of the woman taking adultery, but
he never once approved of adultery, and I would argue
the same thing is here. So if we find that
ABC or Disney are promoting falsehood, anti American approaches to things,
then we can certainly say, you know what, we're not
(08:54):
going to support them. We're not going to buy their products,
we're not going to view their shows. And I don't
think that's mean or vengeful, but I do think, for example,
you know that guy Manngoni that shot the CEO because
he didn't like the healthcare system in America. I don't
want to see any conservatives, for example, do something crazy
like that. My point is we ought to forgive them
(09:16):
in the sense that we ought to not look for vengeance.
We ought to look for the ability to do harm
to them, but we ought to also be reasonably responsible,
which is we don't need to pad the pockets of
people who promote lives and dishonesty and or who are
anti American. And that's not failing to forgive, that's simply
being a reasonable, responsible person. And I think we're supposed
(09:39):
to be reasonable and responsible but never violent, in the
sense that we should never decide, you know that we
don't like someone, so we're going to try to physically
harm them. We can have all the disagreements we want,
but we ought not become violent about those disagreements. What
we ought to become is effective in communicating. And of
course we can then vote and use our pocketbook in
a way that would just stand up for truth and
(10:02):
justice and good principles.
Speaker 1 (10:04):
You know, George, I we're gonna make this comment before
we go to our break. There was over sixty five
thousand people in that stadium yesterday to honor Charlie Kirk
and his memories.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
From what I understand in an adjacent one.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Well, that's what I was going to say. There were
thousands more that wanted to get into that service. And
I've said here last week here in the Conservative Commandos.
Then maybe Charlie Kirk's message will be stronger, will be
louder because of this senseless tragedy, just as Jesus Christ
during his lifetime probably never spoke to more than five
(10:42):
thousand people in his life. And there's no one that's
had a greater impact on the world than Jesus Christ
than Jesus Christ. And this is all taking place basically
since his death. There are thousands of applications to start
turning point USA eight chapters we're in Charlie's life through
(11:04):
is maybe twenty one hundred. I heard there were like
twenty four thousand applications. Now, I would love to think
that Charlie's senseless death might have this kind of effect,
not saying that he is christ Like by any means,
but just by saying that Charlie's death has shown the
world where Charlie was trying to do a few hundred
(11:26):
or a few at a time, by going onto a
college campus, going into a gymnasium, going into an auditorium.
And I would love to think that Charlie's work will
continue twenty times over.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
Now, I think you're right. I think that's the likelihood,
because I think this sort of obvious tragedy wakes people up.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
They go WHOA.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
It's kind of like if you're walking down the street
and you hear a really really loud crashing noise. All
of a sudden, your head turns and you see what
just happened. If it was a friend of yours that
got maybe you know, some collapsed on them, you dash
to their aid. So I would argue that that's what
this is like. I think Americans are going to wake up.
I hope that this creates a tremendous impact, not that
(12:10):
I'm happy that Charlie Kurt was killed. But I would
like the idea that you take a tragedy and something
awful and then the Lord can turn into something good.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
I want to bring this up. Jd. Vance has said
that he has used the word Lord and Savior, Jesus
Christ or Jesus more now within the last week than
he did since he has become vice president. And he
said why because in the past he was a little
cheapist about using those terms, that he is no longer
(12:39):
and he will continue to use him at every opportunity.
Your thoughts on that one before we get well?
Speaker 2 (12:44):
I think that's a very good point, is that this
may awaken people to realize because a lot of societies
acts like secularism is important. So don't you bring your
faith into the public square. If you're going to have faith,
do it privately in your home, but don't let anybody
else be aware of it. This is an example of
where certainly people have the freedom to not believe, but
we have the freedom to believe and to express our belief,
(13:05):
and perhaps we can be tools in the hands of
the Lord, or instruments in his hand to help his
word get out to people who might not hear it otherwise,
And so I think that maybe this tragedy could be
a real long term blessing, because maybe millions of Americans
will decide I'm willing to talk about my faith and
my love of the Savior and my love for God
(13:26):
and what they've done for me, and that might influence
other people who that all of a sudden go oh,
I didn't know that. That's interesting. And so I think
it's a very good thing. And I was glad to
see jd Vance say that, because I think I'm hoping
for that. He's not the only one. I hope there
are millions of.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
Us bring people's faith out of the shadows. And with that, George,
let's stuck get breaking, And you are listening to and
watching The Conservative Commanders with George Landreth, Imric Trader and
Today's show like each and every one versus being brought
to you by the First Amendment protected by the second.
Go nowhere or sch and I'll be right back and
(14:01):
we'll tell you our guests are and the topics for
our conversations.
Speaker 4 (14:18):
Are you having trouble hearing your TV or listening to
conversations and loud spaces, then it might be time to
consider nano hearing aids. The days of expensive hearing aids
are over. Nanos are FDA registered OTC hearing aids. They
are powerful, lightweight, and simple to use, and their tiny
in ear design makes them nearly invisible. Plus they are rechargeable,
(14:41):
saving you hundreds of dollars on batteries. Don't be fooled
by overpriced hearing aids. Prescription hearing aids could cost three
thousand dollars or more. Nano hearing aids are only three
hundred and ninety seven dollars. But wait, we are so
confident you are going to love your nanos, we are
offering one hundred dollars off through this special TV offer.
Call now and get two ci see rechargeable hearing eights
(15:01):
for only two hundred and ninety seven dollars. You get
a free portable charging case, free twenty four seven lifetime
telephone support, free shipping, and a forty five day money
bag guarantee.
Speaker 5 (15:10):
Call eight five five six nine zero six four sixty four.
That's eight five y five six nine zero sixty four
sixty four. Call eight five five six nine zero six
four sixty four. That's eight fifty five six nine zero
sixty four sixty four. Call eight five five six nine
zero six four sixty four. That's a five y five
six nine zero sixty four sixty four.
Speaker 6 (15:29):
You're still looking God, I'm still feeling good.
Speaker 7 (15:32):
You know I've got all your MyPillow products, mattress, topper,
that sheets, my pillows, towels, slippers, blanket.
Speaker 8 (15:37):
I'm interrupted this commercial tattoo something I've never done before.
Get two my pillows absolutely free on orders of one
hundred dollars or more. I can't do this forever, so
get on board with this great sale today. Our best
selling six piece bath towel sets are kitchen towel sets
just twenty nine ninety eight, our famous standard my Pillows
only fourteen ninety eight, Queens eighteen ninety eight, King Size
(16:01):
only a dollar more, Body pills twenty nine ninety eight.
Multi use my Pillow two point ohers with pillowcase nine
ninety eight, say forty dollars on our spring per killing
Geezy dream Beds sheet says any size, any color. So
go to my pillow dot com. Call that number on
your screen, use your promo code to save up to
eighty percent on all my Pillow products. And when you
(16:22):
spend one hundred dollars or more get two standard my
pillows absolutely free.
Speaker 9 (16:27):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code a
U n TV. To order, Please call eight hundred seven
nine seven seven eight nine three, and please use the
promotion code a U n TV. To order, Please call
eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine three and
(16:49):
please use the promotion code a U n TV to order.
Please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine
three and please use the promotion code A you and
TV And welcome back.
Speaker 1 (17:02):
Welcome back to the Conservative Commandos with George Landers. Then
you're truly Rick Trader, coming to you from the MICHAELA
Studios of my Stewart Studios of the AUN TV network. Hey, George,
tell us about our guests and our interviews.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Well, we always have the very best guests on TV
and radio, and today will be no exception. So we're
gonna talk with Carrie Tlasco. She's the executive vice president
of Election Integrity Network and she's responsible for their communication
and marketing, their external and partnership relations, and their media outreach.
(17:36):
She's also, for example, used to be a VP here
at Frontiers of Freedom, and so we're going to talk
with her about election integrity and it's an important topic.
It's certainly a foundational element to a democratic republic. And
then we've got Jonathan Tobin. He's the editor in chief
of the Jewish News Syndicate. He's a senior contributor for
The Federalist, and he's a columnist at Newsweek and a
(17:58):
contributor to many other public patients. And he hosts the
JNS Think Twice podcast and the Jonathan Tobin Daily Program.
And so we want to talk with him about President
Trump and how he's working with Benjamin net and Yahoo
and what is driving what's going on, of course, because
the extreme left has become incredibly anti semitic. But I'm
(18:22):
trying to figure out why, you know, one side can
come in and just purposely target tens of thousands of
civilians and do so in a murderous fashion and in
a terroristic fashion, and then a nation that's defending itself
if a single civilian dies in the process, they're obviously
engaged in war crimes. And I think of myself, well
that's the case, then I guess the Allies committed war
(18:43):
crimes in World War Two because some of our bombings
did not only hit military bases and things like that.
So I just think we have to kind of have
a good conversation about what's really going on.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
All right, George, I've said all along that I'm a
student of the show. I'm a student of our guests.
I'm also a student of my co host. We're so
gratefully blessed to have great guests here in the Conservative Commanders,
and I've been totally blessed by having great co hopes
here in the Conservative Commanders over the year. And obviously, George,
I count you in that in that You've written a
(19:16):
couple of articles for town Hall that I want to
let people know about, and hopefully i'll talk about one
whiz that God given rights versus government power, why Tim
Kaine's comparison to Iran is dangerous. Another article you wrote
debunking the left slide. Fascism is not the far right.
Let's start with this idea of fascism being far right.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
George, sure, Well, you know they always talk about the left,
always refers to conservatives as fascist or Nazis. They used
to call George Bush Hilarian. They've now called Donald Trump,
Hitler and a fascist on numerous occasions, very frequently and
with no willingness to look at history in fact, because
(19:57):
this is the reality. Socialism has its roots and Marxism.
Of course, that's where they came from. They used to
call themselves socialists, and then fascism rose out of that.
It's not part of a right wing movement, which the
left says it is, and some college professors say it is.
And that's like a college professor saying that five plus
five is fifty five. And if you're a college professor
(20:18):
teaching math, the college student saying that you are a
moron and you need to be fired because you're teaching
falsehood and pretending it's true. We don't need stupid people
teaching our kids falsehood. So fascism. For example, Adolf Hitler,
he was the creator of the Nazi Party, and the
Nazi Party stands for the National Socialist let me repeat that,
(20:39):
National Socialist German Workers Party, and he advanced a radicalized
form of socialism. But he was a card carrying socialist,
and so was Giovanni Gentile was the philosopher of fascism.
He was an Italian, he was a devout Marxist, and
same thing with Benito. Mussolini was a card Socialists too.
(21:00):
He was also the editor of Avante, which was the
official newspaper of the Italian Socialist Party. And the only
thing they broke from on the like the Soviet or
Russian Marxist was they based their ideology to try to
motivate people to follow them on class warfare, and that's
(21:21):
why they murdered the Czars and people who were the
middle class kind of thing. The middle class were bad people, right,
But anyhow, the fascist Marxists decided that nationalism was the
way to go. But they all had the same exact
goals if you look at what they did, so they
were not opposites. And so when the left tells you
that they use like in history, like when Hitler attacked
(21:44):
the Soviets, that that proved that they were enemies, And
the answer is they weren't enemies. Ideologically. Hitler just wanted
more Land and he thought that was the potential win
for him. And so these idiots think that that means
that they have completely different ideology. Example of the War
of eighteen twelve was between the United States and Great Britain,
(22:05):
and I will admit that there was certainly a problem there,
but I don't know that our ideology was radically different,
meaning that many of our legal traditions came from Great Britain.
I guess my point there is just to say that
just because you're having a war doesn't mean that your
ideological enemies. You may have some other basis for that,
like I think Britain was hoping to get America back
(22:27):
since they lost the embarrassing American Revolution. But this is
not really a serious conversation. When they say that Hitler
hated communism, it's like, no, he was a socialist, card caring.
He knew all the socialists that were part of the
the international movement. He was one of them and part
of them. So was Giovanna Gentile, and so was Benito Mussolini.
(22:49):
And yet they pretend that they weren't. And then the
other thing that's kind of stupid about what they say
is they say that it's extreme right, and I think,
to myself, let's take what you know. What you and
I are pretty reasonable conservatives and very concerns of conservatives.
But my point is if you took what we believe
to the logical extreme, like we believe in less government.
We believe in smaller government. So let's say you take
(23:11):
that to the extreme, you know, you know, you magnify
it by say ten thousand, you might end up with
no government, and so you might end up then with anarchy.
I don't know a single Republican or conservative who argues
for at that, but if there was someone out there arguing,
we need to get rid of courts, we need to
get rid of our judicial system, we need to get
rid of the Congress, we need to get rid of
(23:32):
everything in government. We don't need government. We'll just kind of,
you know, live in a free society on our own.
We don't want any government at all. In fact, we'll
get to the police, defund the police. That's the leftist thing.
But my point is, let's say you went that far
with your idea that government should be small, and that
would be very dangerous. But that's not what a Nazi believes.
Nazis believe in big government, powerful government, all powerful government,
(23:56):
totalitarian government, just like the communists. And so what this
demonstrates to you is when they say that someone on
the right is a fascist or a Nazi, you're talking
to a person who's advertising their ignorance and their stupidity
and their lack of understanding of history and so forth,
and so I literally would say if I were, for example,
(24:19):
the dean of a school, and I had a professor
who is telling people that the far right is Nazism,
I would come to him and say, you need to
do some studying very quickly and come to a realization
of what fact is, and if you can't, then you're fired.
And the reason for that is not because I don't
believe in free speech. It's that there are opinions out
there that you can have. But if your opinion is
(24:42):
that five plus five is fifty five, then I would
not have you teaching math. And it's not a violation
of your rights of free speech to do that. It's
simply saying truth matters. But there's opinions. An example would
be you and I might have an opinion but the
best movie is and we might not agree. It might
be that my favorite movie isn't your favorite movie. And
(25:02):
that's not that either of us a lyne and it's
not a bad thing. It's just we have different opinions
and that's okay. But if you think five on five
is fifty five, then you're a moron, and you ought
not be teaching math. And if you think that Nazism
is the far right, then again you have no knowledge
of history, no knowledge of ideology. You're just an idiot.
(25:22):
And so we don't want idiots teaching our children things
like history and political philosophy.
Speaker 1 (25:28):
George Way to talk about idiots leading us teachous history
and philosophy, I really do think that we've dodged a
few bullets, you know, Kamala Harris bringing tampon Tim Harris
in as a vice president sho running mate. She chose him,
but she really wanted to chose Pete Buddha Judge. Now
(25:48):
Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton's pick, in my opinion, was probably
as bad either as Tim Harris or Pete Boodha Judge.
And that was Senator Tim Kane. We talk about illogical
extreme In the other article you wrote, Senator Tim Kane
recently suggested that Americus founding belief in God given rights
(26:11):
and our God given rights, George are right in our constitution,
right in our declaration that our God given rights. Quote
is extremely troubling because it resembles the ideology of Iran's
to tualitarian theocratic regime walk us through this article please.
Speaker 9 (26:29):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (26:29):
Well again, that's not just historically stupid and wrong, it's
factually just dead wrong. It's also misleading and it's just
playing stupid politics. So what that tells you is one,
Tim Kaine is a stupid So I think people think
of senators, Oh, if you're a senator, you're smart. Well,
Tim Kane ain't smart. I'm sorry, Tim Kane's a moron.
And someone can say, how dare you say that? And
(26:50):
the answer is, well, it's pretty easy because if you
asked a sixth grader, what's the difference between, for example,
the idea that God given rights exist versus the idea
that they believe in the Iranian regime, which as God
gave them the power to oppress and kill the Iranian people.
I think a sixth grader go, oh, those are totally different.
(27:12):
Those are exact opposites. But Tim Kaine is such a moron,
such a low IQ individual, that he's confused and things
they're similar, And I would argue it's very important. Rights
coming from God suggests, as Jefferson said, that no human
being can take them from you without incurring his wrath.
(27:32):
But if rights come from government, they can take it
from you, and they can alter or abolish them whenever
they choose, and so rights become essentially a privilege that's conditional, temporary,
and revocable, whereas our founders use the word inalienable right,
and just so you understand what inalienable means, it means
it's that idea of God given because what it says,
(27:52):
if something's inaliable, it can't be taken, it can't be sold,
it can't be borrowed. It's absolutely you're stuck with it.
It's like it's attached to you in a very permanent way.
And so I think it's very important that this historical
context because all of these communist regimes, they are the
givers and takers of rights, and of course they don't
(28:14):
give them any rights. They give rights to their friends
and the people who are their allies, and then everybody
else is screwed, killed, murdered, and oppressed. And that's what
Tim Kaine is for. I'm so lucky he was not
elected to be.
Speaker 1 (28:30):
I mean, I think the problem is the mons and
the Commonwealth Virginia that will keep electing this man back
to the Senate. That's right. Where the problem is.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
The truth of the matter is now someone votes for
Tim Kaine, they're illustrating that they're stupid too. That's just
the truth. I'm sorry, how do you vote for someone
who can't tell the difference between a regime that says
God gave us the right to kill you and to
oppress you, and then people who said God gave you
rights and we have no right to take them away.
It is our obligation to protect those rights. If you
(28:59):
can't how the difference between that, you are mind numbingly stupid.
Speaker 1 (29:04):
Please take that to the polls. Please take that to
the pulse. Hey, George, let's get a break in because
we do have a couple of great guests, couple of
great talks of conversation on the other side in the
sisity Conservative commandos. I'm a trader my coas. This is
George landerth George is the president and CEO of Frontiers
of Freedom and we're coming to you from the Mike
Pillar Studios and my Stewart Studios. I' the AU and
(29:27):
TV network. Go nowhere. We'll be back with our interviews
right after this break.
Speaker 10 (29:44):
Are you tired of making trip after trip on doctor
visits only to get wrong medications? That waste time, money
and cause you side effects. If you're on Medicare, call
for a free medical assessment and determine which medications are
right for you based on your genetic acup with our
convenience swab test performed in your home and mailed to
(30:04):
our laboratory. No more trial and error. The results will
tell you and your doctor which medications work for you.
It's that easy. If you're on Medicare and take multiple medications,
call now and see if you qualify for our genetic
testing service covered by Medicare or your insurance. Improve your health,
avoid adverse side effects, and save money. Don't wait. Call
(30:25):
right now and find out if the medications you're taking
are helping or hurting you. Make this free call right now.
Call eight five five eight two zero three two nine
to one. That's eight five five eight two zero thirty.
Speaker 3 (30:38):
Two ninety one.
Speaker 5 (30:39):
Call eight five five eight two zero three two nine one.
That's eight five five eight two zero thirty two ninety one.
Call eight five five eight two zero three two nine one.
That's eight five five eight two zero thirty two ninety one.
Speaker 8 (30:55):
I hear every day about the product you all wish
my pillow carried well, guess what we probably do. Slippers, bathrows,
pet beds, blankets, mattresses, sleepwear, loungewear, dubets, comforters, potholders, aprons
of anmits, and so much more, and they're all on sale.
For example, get our best selling standard my pillows for
(31:16):
only fourteen ninety eight body pillows, twenty nine ninety eight,
six piece bath towels or kitchen towel sets just twenty
nine ninety eight. Multi use my Pillow two point zeros
with pillowcase nine ninety eight, Save forty dollars on our
spring per kil and gize dream bedsheet sets, any size,
any color, and so much more. So go to MyPillow
(31:38):
dot commer call the number on your screen, use your
promo code to save up to eighty percent on all
my Pillow products. And I've never done this before. When
you spend one hundred dollars or more, you're gonna get
two standard my pillows absolutely free.
Speaker 9 (31:53):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotere code a
U n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven
ninety seven seven eight ninety three and please use the
promotion code a u n TV. To order, please call
eight hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine three and
(32:15):
please use the promotion code a u n TV. To order,
please call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine
three and please use the promotion code a U n TV.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
And welcome back, Welcome back to that conservative command in
this radio show with George Lander. Than you're shrely, Rick Traider,
coming to you from the my Pillow studios, the my
store studios of our very you au n TV network.
And hey, George, you know, I always always appreciate it
when our longtime friends of the show that join us,
but it's always great to make a new friend, and
(32:49):
I think we got one here today.
Speaker 2 (32:52):
Well, we do a new friend for the show and
for you, for me. You know, Carrie and I've been
friends a long time. But I'm excited to introduce her
because she has been a very strong advocate for freedom
and opportunity in America for a very long time. She
is well, she's with the Election Integrity Network. She's their
(33:12):
executive vice president. And you might guess that the Election
Integrity Network works on things like election integrity, but anyhow,
she is in charge of their communication, marketing and their
external partnership relations and media outreach, and she also chairs
several of their national working groups, and she conducts their
media training and is a senior advisor to Only Citizens
(33:36):
Vote coalition. Thinking to myself, that's a good coalition. Anyhow,
She's obviously well known in conservative circles. She's worked a
lot of different groups an example these some include the
Conservative and Partnership Institute. She's also been at the Institute
for Liberty, and she's been with, for example, Frontiers of Freedom.
(34:00):
So that's why I say I've known her for a
long time because she used to be a VP here.
And so the bottom line is she has a lot
of experience. She's worked for governor excuse me for Senator
Rick Scott and his plan to help parents rights or
precusing patience rights, and then she's you know, she just
has a lot of experience. So Carrie, welcome to the
(34:21):
Conservative Commandos. We're very glad to have you.
Speaker 11 (34:22):
Yeah, I so glad to be with you. It's a thrill. Thanks, George.
Speaker 2 (34:26):
I wanted to ask you to kind of, if you
will give us some idea about this, you know, idea
of election integrity, because some people think that that means, oh,
why do you want election integrity? You know, if you're
a woke, kooky leftist, what you want is for illegal
aliens and criminals to be able to vote. And I
want everybody who's a citizen to be able to vote.
(34:46):
But you know, some people act like, what you want
to limit it to citizens? How dare you so help
me figure out what's going on in the world.
Speaker 11 (34:55):
Oh gosh, that's a big question. Do we only have
a little little bit of time?
Speaker 1 (34:59):
You know?
Speaker 11 (34:59):
It's sort of it kind of goes back to the
Declaration of Independence, if we can go back in history
a little bit. So in the Declaration of Independence, it
says that the government shall derive its just powers And
we could have an argument about just powers from the
consent of the governed. And the way that the American
citizen either provides or withdraws his or her consent is
(35:21):
through voting. Like there's no other greater way. There's no
other way that we do that really, including voting, you know,
up for balant amendments, voting for president, voting for state legislators,
and no matter what it is, and the security of
our elections has really gone downhill over the last let's
just say twenty years for the sake of argument, and
(35:42):
what that has done. It has created a lot of
fraudulent results. Some of them are knowable, some of them
are provable. We all know what happened in twenty twenty
is approvable in a cortlack maybe yes, maybe no, but
we all know what happened and what it does. The
worst part of all of that is a voting voter confidence.
And when you are road voter confident, and it's you're
basically suppressing the vote because people think, why bother. You know,
(36:04):
if I vote in Detroit, then the left is going
to bring in sixteen boxes of ballots to count and
put the pizza boxes up in the wall and.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
No one will know.
Speaker 11 (36:12):
So really, what I guess, really at the bottom of
what we do at Election Integrity Network is work on
those issues that one make sure that people have confidence
in their results and two that they're fair results, that
they're fair, accurate, provable, demonstrable results.
Speaker 2 (36:27):
It's a very interesting point because it used to be
long before say, democracy became a concept or in our case,
a we're a democratic republic and so we still you know,
people vote, but we don't vote on everything. An example
would be the first ten Amendments give us a long
list of things we won't be voting on. We don't
vote on whether or not your religion is acceptable. We
don't vote on whether your opinions are acceptable. We don't
(36:48):
vote on whether or not you get a fair trial.
You know. And yet people a lot on the left
when they want democracy, I think what they want is
to get rid of those limits on governments because they
want unlimited government power. But I want to ask this
question because you get back in history, the way we
used to make decisions was the the group of people
that had the essentially the largest army or the best
(37:09):
weapons were the ones who got to decide who ruled
and what the tax rate would be and what the
policies would be. And as a result, you can see
all kinds of battles and constant wars in you know,
if we go back to you go back to the
island of England and before it was Great Britain or
the UK, and you had all these kingships that were
fighting with each other to see who could have control,
(37:30):
and that's how they decided things. They never voted, they
never got together to vote, and so I guess my
question is if I guess what it worries me is
if we get to a point where people believe that
voting is not legitimate and that it's going to be
a cheating process, then all you're really doing is begging
people to go back to the old methodology, you know,
(37:51):
And I don't want to do that. I don't want
to create a world in which my children and grandchildren
return to the world that my great great great great
great great great great great great grandparents were in, in
which there was constant wars and constant battles to settle
disputes between people claiming power. And it seems to me
it's much better if we just hold regular elections and
(38:11):
then we can trust those elections we follow the rule.
So I want to ask you to help us sort
that out. Am I being a little unrealistic? Is it
not actually a potential worry or problem?
Speaker 11 (38:21):
It is very much a potential worry because there is
so much manipulation going on in the election system. It's
really really a huge problem. So the left figured out
a long time ago that the way to control elections
is through process. We don't do that. On the conservative side,
we're concerned with the issues. We're concerned with people voting
(38:44):
on policy, on good people and integrity, and with the
left is gone and it done. It's tried to rek
havoc on all the provisions that states have in running elections,
rank choice voting, which people may or may not be
familiar with, with some thing that they've pushed. They've funded a
lot of election offices with private left wing money to
(39:06):
influence the outcomes of those offices, which is being banned
in a number of states. And they've done endless things
and they try to win the pr ward to George
because they're constantly calling us a bunch of racist and
suppressionists every time we try to fix the election system,
and you know, an election integrity network, we say all
the time, we're nonpartisan. We really need that. When we
(39:28):
go out and we do sort of some kind of
legislative advocacy or making sure that election officials are following
the law. We don't say, oh, we just want that
for conservative voters and just leave the liberal ballots in
the trash can, Like we don't do that, but the
left kind of does do that. They try to put
the conservative ballots in the trash can. By changing laws
by unduly and unlawfully and unconstitutionally trying to impact elections.
(39:53):
And we even have foreign governments to foreign actors trying
to do that. There's a lot of states now that
trying to pass a ballot amendment to ban foreign actors
and foreign donors for giving money to ballot initiatives because
under the under federal law, they can't contribute. A foreigner
can't contribute to a candidate, but there's nothing barring them
(40:14):
from giving money to ballot initiative. So in Florida, where
I lived last year, we had a ballot initiative, a
pro life ballot initiative, and a foreign actor, a guy
named Hans york Viz, who lives in Switzerland and who
is busy trying to destroy the American economy and other
aspects of it, said millions of dollars into Florida to
(40:35):
push against the pro life amendment. So you know, that's
just another way they do it. And again, looking at
non citizen voting, there's all kinds of reasons and examples
of we know why, we know that non citizens are
voting in our elections, we know they're doing it, we
know how they're registering we're trying to change the laws
to make sure that that doesn't happen anymore, and the
(40:57):
endless amount of pushback we get is just insane.
Speaker 2 (41:01):
It's very interesting. I'm very surprised that they are so
obviously trying to do things that are unfair and unreasonable,
because it kind of demonstrates who they are and what
they're really about it done. I'm trying to figure out.
You know, I don't think it used to be like that.
I think there was a time when, you know, example
would be today we debate whether or not we should
have free speech or not. But when I was a
(41:22):
kid growing up, that wasn't really a debate. Everybody agreed. Basically,
ninety nine point nine percent of the populace thought the
First Amendment was inspired and made sense. And all of
a sudden, now free speech is violence. Oh no, but violence,
by the way, is not violence. It's the free speech
that's violence.
Speaker 11 (41:38):
Well, if they don't like it, it's bad. Yeah, yeah,
And you know that. And you bring up a really
good point, George. Times have changed. Four years ago, we
didn't really have an illegal immigrant problem. Twenty years ago,
we didn't have a bunch of Democrats fighting against any
kind of law that makes sure that a new registrant,
a new voter registrant, provides documentary proof of citizenship because
(42:01):
our laws are no longer adequate. That The National Voter
Registration Act was passed in nineteen ninety three, and it
codifies what's basically in a number of places in the
Constitution that says only citizens are allowed to vote in
American elections. Well, that makes kind of sense, but there
was no provision to prove that you're a citizen, because
you could argue that you didn't really need to back then,
(42:23):
and there was no provision for enforcement. So recently at AIM,
we've really promoted the SAVE Act, which is a congressional
piece of congressional legislation that passed in the House last
week and now is onto the Senate. And all that
it says is not well, it doesn't say this part.
But now that we have twenty five to forty million
illegal immigrants in our country, and there are several states
(42:45):
that give drivers' licenses to them, and we have a
federal government that gives them social Security cards, no matter what,
we need a provision for anybody newly registering to vote
that says you need to prove that you're a citizen
with your passport, with your birth certificate, with whatever you like,
you can rub and honestly they are just going apoplectic. O.
Speaker 1 (43:03):
But there.
Speaker 11 (43:03):
Their latest argument was that it is disenfranchising married women,
because the Left contend that married women who've gotten married
in changing their name are too dumb to figure out
how to change their voter registration. They could change their
driver's license, they could change all kinds of you know,
their insurance policy, all kinds of various things, but they're
too dumb to figure out how to change their voter registration.
(43:25):
And you just think, how do they even make this
argumented people listen, But they do, and you know, it's
just it's just the craziest thing.
Speaker 2 (43:33):
Yeah, that's a good point. It's very interesting that because
I think myself, when I've gone into foreign countries and
I was there for you know, a week or more
for business or other reasons, I'm wondering, would they let
me walk into a voter registration department of government and
registered to vote because I'm there?
Speaker 11 (43:48):
Yeah, No, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't.
Speaker 2 (43:50):
They'd say no, sorry, you're welcome to visit, but you
ain't welcome to vote because this is not your home
and you don't live here. I'm like, yeah, that makes sense.
I agree with that. That's why I have no were
bothered to try to register to vote when I visit
a foreign country because it's it just makes sense to me.
Speaker 11 (44:04):
Yeah, it's insulting to the foreign country that they would
that you would think that their elections are so unimportant
that you can wander off across the border and influence them,
which is but you know, it's the same argument they
use about voter ID. I am endlessly stunned that they
continue to say that voter ID is mean, racist and
suppressionist because minorities are incapable of going to get a
(44:28):
voter ID. How do they even get away with that
rhetoric is ridiculous.
Speaker 2 (44:31):
We did some point is racist?
Speaker 1 (44:34):
It is?
Speaker 11 (44:34):
It's so insulting and ridiculous, and yet they say it
all the time. We did some polling with Scott Brasmussen recently,
and one of the questions in it's Republicans, Democrats, you know,
all all different racial groups, do you think it's okay
to how even do you think we should demand voter ID?
It was something like eighty three percent that of course
we should have voter ID, and you know, I think
about Georgia. So they changed the law, the voter ID
(44:56):
law in Georgia in twenty twenty one, right before the
twenty twenty two midterm, and one of the requirements now
was you had to have an ID to vote. And
they got rid of the All Star Game out of
Atlanta because all the people in Georgia were racist and
you know, the poor black people couldn't go get an
ID and bot African American community they came out in
twenty twenty two and voted in larger numbers than they had.
Speaker 1 (45:18):
Ever voted before.
Speaker 11 (45:19):
So it's just a ridiculous, insulting and spicious argument. So
that's what we're up against a lot of the times
is you can't really have an organized, reasonable policy discussion
with these people because they did throw crazy terms at you,
and you think, how can you even say that out loud.
Speaker 2 (45:34):
No, that's a very good point, very good point, and
that's a great place for us to take a quick break,
take care of a little business. The folks don't go
away because the Conservative commandos with Rick Trader and George
Landerth and our special guests Carrie Telasco will be right back.
Speaker 12 (46:01):
Now you can leave home and leave the tanks behind
with Imagen, the portable oxygen concentrator that moves with you.
Speaker 13 (46:07):
This little box changed my life. I can now do
all those things that I want to do and just
press the button here and there's my oxygen.
Speaker 12 (46:14):
Imagen portable oxygen systems are small and light and deliver
up to twelve hours of medical grade oxygen on a
single charge.
Speaker 3 (46:20):
Now that I've got my Enagen, I've got my freedom back.
I'm back to living again.
Speaker 12 (46:24):
Call us right now try an Inagen system for thirty
days risk free.
Speaker 14 (46:29):
To order, Call now eight hundred six zero four three
nine sixty six to order, Call now eight hundred six
zero four three nine sixty six to order Call now
eight hundred six zero four three nine sixty six.
Speaker 6 (46:49):
Hello.
Speaker 15 (46:49):
I'm Mike Glendell, and I'm excited to announce my new product,
my Coffee. I get products all the time from entrepreneurs
for my new platform, mystore dot Com. When I tried
my coffee for the first time, I was blown away.
It is the best copee I've ever had in my life.
I spent the last four months doing my due diligence
(47:09):
and this family owned business micromanages every step from the
fields to the cup to ensure the best quality coffee
you're ever going to have.
Speaker 3 (47:18):
It starts with the beans that are grown in Honduras.
Speaker 15 (47:21):
Honduras's volcanic soil and humid climate make the perfect growing
conditions for coffee plants, which produced the best beans ever.
Then each batch is tested for its aroma, tastes, and
other aspects to meet the highest standards in the coffee industry.
And after that it goes into production, which is all
done right here in the USA.
Speaker 3 (47:42):
It's like you're getting that small batch, specialty coffee, but
delivered right to your front door.
Speaker 15 (47:48):
So go to mystore dot com or call the number
on your screen, use the promo code, and you'll get
your very own my coffee for twenty five percent off.
You guys all know that I've traveled the country for
the past year and a half. I've stayed in hundreds
of hotels. I've tried every coffee out there. Well, some
of the coffees have that terrible after taste, some that
leave me jittery, are get an upset stomach.
Speaker 3 (48:10):
Well, my coffee is different.
Speaker 15 (48:11):
It's the richest, smoothest, best coffee I've ever had. My
coffee comes in a variety of flavors. You get them
ground or whole bean. Plus it's certified organic and non GMO.
I guarantee it'll be the best coffee you've ever had.
So go to mystore dot com or call the number
on your screen, use your.
Speaker 3 (48:30):
Promo code, and you'll get my coffee for.
Speaker 15 (48:32):
Twenty five percent off. And I'm gonna give you deep
discounts on all my store products. That's mystore dot Com.
It's my new platform for USA entrepreneurs. Please order now.
Speaker 9 (48:44):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code au NTV.
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three, and please use the promotion code a
un TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven nine
(49:04):
seven seven eight nine three and please use the promotion
code a u n TV. To order, please call eight
hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine three and please
use the promotion code a u n TV.
Speaker 1 (49:19):
And welcome back, Welcome back to the Conservative Commandos Radio
Show with George Landreth and you're truly Rick Trader coming
to you from the Mike Phillis studios, the my Store
studios of the a u N TV network. So in
beside the Conservative Commander, that's what's coming up today on
the AUN network. Well, how about the Stones one with
Roger Stone or Dennesisus's podcast, The Joe Massine Show, More
(49:40):
Money with Stephen Moore, James O, Keith me here, Washington
Watch with Tony Perkins, Colonel Allen West, Deadfast and Loyal
mrc TV Media. Hey, you see all that great stuff
here with the Conservative commandos on the au N TV network.
So as they say, don't touch that dial. And I
want to thank our guests for sticking with this. Sens
(50:01):
Kerrie Alaska, she's the Election Integrity Network's executive vice president
and carry, we want to thank you for holding through
that break. We appreciate you your time. And before we
start talking more about election integrity, let's talk about the
Election Integrity Network. And I know you told George a
little bit about what you guys do, but tell us more.
Speaker 11 (50:21):
I would love to so. At Election Integrity Network, we
were founded in January of twenty twenty one by a
well known election integrity attorney, Cleta Mitchell, who woke up
like the rest of us the week after the twenty
twenty election and said something doesn't smell right. We need
to do something about this, So she created ei in.
We do two things at Election Integrity Network. We do
(50:43):
a lot of things, but two main things is we
are truly a network. We run a number of state
coalitions which we reach out and grow. We have twenty
three states with very active state coalitions that work on
state legislation, fighting ballot amand insider bad, advocating for ballad
consider good, all that kind of stuff. That's one side of.
Speaker 2 (51:02):
What we do.
Speaker 11 (51:03):
The other side of what we do is called national
working groups, and that is our policy arm and so
we have people from all fifty states who join us
on our national working groups. We cover vulnerable voters, voter rolls, machines,
and technology legislation, blah blah blah. You could go through
the whole lone in nonsitizen voting, go through the whole
laundry list. We have a new website coming out, but
right now we're at Who's Counting dot us. So if
(51:26):
anybody wants to sign up to join a state coalition
or we'd like to join us on national work national
working Group, we would be delighted to have you. Just
go to Who's counting dot us and down the bottom
you'll find a join us button and we'd be happy
to get back to because we are the people. We
have a small staff and a giant group of very
active people out in the network. I tell everybody they're
(51:48):
the ten percent that do the ninety percent of the work.
It's not just being on the phone having a nice
zoom twice a month going blah blah blah blah blah. Mean,
these people really get a lot of stuff done, so
God bless every last one of them. We give people
who I say, sometimes maryan Joe from a Tamil Iowa
my example. Don't ask me why. Like Mary and Joe
for Tumo Iowa used to sit around their kitchen table
and cavetch about Oh my gosh, these elections are terrible.
(52:09):
I know that they're stealing it, and I know and
there's nothing I can do.
Speaker 9 (52:12):
Well.
Speaker 11 (52:12):
Our goal is to give them something to do well.
Speaker 1 (52:14):
You know, Kerry, it's interesting you say that because as
head of the au n TV network, we've got this
voice text sideline. Let me plug that always tex outline
four one five eight, five four two six seven seven.
We get people an opportunity to call us and text
and leave their comments and written comment, a voice comment.
I read every single one of these comments. I respond
to most of them, and especially right before the twenty
(52:38):
twenty four election, so many comments. So I got, hey, Rick,
is my voice? Is my vote going to count? Or
how can I assure that my vote is going to count?
Or you know what, I give up my voice. My
vote's not going to count, so I'm not going to vote.
So many people feel that way. Unfortunately, so many people
feel that way.
Speaker 11 (52:56):
It's very distressing and it is nice for me because
that my heart is really in the coalition worlds to
have an organization for those people who call in in
your voice line to actually be part of a group
that can actually do something like we tell people you
don't have to know what you're doing when you come
on our calls here to help you, to teach you.
We tell people, you know, elections don't happen in your
(53:19):
state capital. They don't happen in Washington, you see, they
happen in your local precinct or whatever your voting jurisdiction is,
and you have every right to walk into your officials
your election officials office and ask nicely, always nicely, ask questions, well,
how do you clean the voter rules? And how do
you make sure dead people are taken off the voter rules?
And how do you make sure you stop counting, you
(53:40):
stop letting people in line after seting?
Speaker 1 (53:42):
Carry not hit her up, but it may many many cases.
In fact, one of our co hosts here on a
Conservative Commanders is Sharon Engele huh. And Sharon has been very,
very involved in voter integrity and she has go on
door to door and knocked on doors and ask for
particular voters, speak to particular voters. One place she went
to she had eight names. She had eight names. It's
(54:03):
one particular address. So she knocked on the door. Lady
came to do her and she says, does and someone
so and so live here? And the ladies said, well,
if they did, they have a real problem because this
is a funeral home. Oh my gosh. And you know what,
to get those names, To get those names removed from
the ballots is like pulling teenth out of a lion.
(54:26):
I mean when it comes to when it comes to
going to the county or even go into the course.
Sharon tells the story that she had I forget the
exact number, like six thousand cases of people who had
voted in Nevada who actually lived in California, and she
went to court. When she went to the court, that
judge said to her, that's not enough voter fraud. Wait
(54:47):
a minute, you know, a single case of voter fraud
should be enough. But the judge says, well, that's not
enough voter fraud. It's ridiculous. It is.
Speaker 11 (54:55):
We get that argument all the time on the nonsenising
of voting, and the left will say, well, it's not
that many people. And my question is always the same, Well,
how many is acceptable to you about the first question?
And the second question is okay, so every unlawful voter, however,
are they unlawful, whether a non citizen, whether they're dead,
whether they're from Idaho and they're they're voting in California. However,
that is so, how many US citizens are you comfortable
(55:18):
with having their vote counteracted and negated by the unlawful ones?
Do tell us what that number is like? It should
be zero?
Speaker 1 (55:25):
Nobody should ever zero?
Speaker 2 (55:27):
Yeah?
Speaker 11 (55:27):
Absolutely, absolutely, Yeah.
Speaker 1 (55:30):
Arry, are we finally winning this battle? Yeah, We're finally
winning this battle of voter fraud.
Speaker 11 (55:35):
We are, and I'll tell you why, because everybody's talking
about it. Right November one, twenty twenty, nobody was talking
about it. Now, everybody's talking about it. We rejoice in
the hit pieces that we get. Cleta and I get
hit pieces on us all the time, and we rejoice
in them every single time. And one of the left
wing publications actually said in their article it was I
(55:56):
think last October sixty three percent of people we polled
on Twitter said they had heard of non citizen voting
for the first time on the Contribute election. Sixty three
percent they said, now where they But the bottom line
is everybody's talking about it now, not just we nerdy
people who live in think tank world, but just regular
(56:17):
folks are thinking. You know, it's okay to go to
my election office and ask how they're doing this. It's
okay to be suspicious when this, that or the other
thing happens. It's okay to show voter id So I
think just the fact that everybody's talking about it so
much is a gigantic when and you know the whole
sunshine thing, right, it's a kid in the candy store.
If the kid, the little kid walks in the candy
store and there's no grown ups in there, he may
(56:37):
steal a piece of candy. If the little kid walks
in the candy store and there's fifteen grown ups standing
at him like pole watchers, that kid is not going
to steal the candy. So it's all about the eyeballs.
And you know those eyeballs belong to Patriot volunteers who
are just regular folks who have just really had it.
Speaker 1 (56:54):
You know, carry what there I hate is yes, but
I hate that term. Yes, but but I have to
use it here. Yes, but carry some of us like
whack them ole. Every time we are putting out wildfires.
You put out one here, another one pops up over there,
and you put out that one pops up over there.
So now the left now to the left with all
this illegal immigration, and if you listen to the news
(57:18):
right now, this illegal immigrant from Marlin, who the left
wants to call the Marlin Man or the Maryland Dad.
I mean, they want to bring him back from wherever
Ol Salvador, wherever the plane took him. They want to
bring him back. They call him the Marlin Man. Next,
they're going to make sure that Maryland Man votes that
(57:38):
non citizens votes, and we see in many areas of
the country today where they're allowing or encouraging non citizens
to vote. Not only that, Carrie, the other whack them
ole popping up out of a hole. Last week they
had elections in Yark, New Jersey, for the school board
(57:59):
where they allowed out sixteen and seventeen year olds to vote.
Speaker 2 (58:03):
Carry.
Speaker 1 (58:04):
Don't tell me those sixteen that seventeen year olds are
not going to think they can now vote in any election.
Speaker 11 (58:09):
Yeah no, I mean that's definitely a problem. So a
couple of thoughts. Number one, states are getting smarter. So
just found the non citizen thing.
Speaker 1 (58:18):
New Jersey isn't carried. I'm sorry, New Jersey isn't.
Speaker 11 (58:21):
Yeah no, I listen, Yeah, I gotcha. But this last
election we had in twenty twenty four, six states, including Oregon,
passed legislation are past a state ballot amendment by the citizens,
codifying in their state constitutions that only citizens vote. That
wouldn't happen four years ago. And the lowest number of
(58:44):
votes they that was given in the six states was
sixty three percent. I think that was Oregon. Some of
the other states that passed by seventy two percent. So
what that tells me is that we're making Is it perfect? No,
I would never say it's perfect. The other thing we
have is President Trump, who two weeks ago, three weeks
ago now I guess, put out an executive order on
things that he wants the DOJ to do to DHS
(59:06):
to do. So here's one of the biggest problems we've
had all along is the databases don't talk to each other.
The state databases within the state don't talk to each other,
which would be the DMV records, which you have to
say I'm not a citizen to get your real ID,
and the voter rules don't talk. And then Maryland doesn't
talk to Virginia. So when somebody leaves Virginia and moves
(59:27):
to Maryland, those databases they can't connect them because they're deliberate.
The worst offender is Joe Biden, who refused to allow
state secretaries of state to access what's called the HAVE database.
It's basically a social security database that does have a
box for MIA citizen and also a DHS database that
shows the who is here lawfully and who is here
(59:48):
not lawfully. Neither of those are perfect, but they would
cut down on voter roll problems hugely, so any executive order.
One thing that President Trump said is, henceforth Social Security
and DHS, you have to allow every state Secretary of
State to run a query of your database against their
voter roles. And I guarantee you once they figure out
(01:00:10):
how to magically connect those buttons, that will knock out
a ton of unlawful voters, whether they're dead, illegal, no
matter what the make of somewhere else. And also the NCOA,
which is the national the little card you make out
when you move, that's the NCOA database. The state agencies
are not allowed to integrate with that database. So even
that one thing that President Trump is demanding that the
(01:00:31):
agencies do is just really really helpful.
Speaker 1 (01:00:35):
Carry it out. If Ronald Reagan was here right now,
you know what he'd say about that guy, Rick Trader. Well,
there you go again, Rick Trader. And especially when I
say yes, but again another yes, but Carrie, another yes.
But in Wisconsin last week they had one of these elections, Yes,
eight seventy eight percent, seventy eight percent Carrie to Alasco.
(01:00:58):
Eighty seven percent of the people voted for voter ID.
But those same people voted on the Supreme Court, a
judge who said they believe in anybody can vote. So again,
swhack them O. You get all right, you got your
voter ID. But then you're going to elect a judge
(01:01:19):
on a Supreme Court and that Supreme Court will say
voter ID is illegal. How do you combat that? How
do you combat these state supreme courts with these liberal
judges saying no, not voter ID, voter IDA is it's racist,
it's discriminatory, it's illegal. How do you battle that battle?
Speaker 11 (01:01:38):
Yeah, that was a huge problem. I mean, Wisconsin was
so weird that the spread yeah voted for voter ID
and who voted for Crawford were huge. You got to
flip over the ballot. So if you're a political party
and you're doing a get out of vote event and
you're saying vote for voter ID, you gotta aline people
to flip over the other side of the ballot and
vote for the Supreme Court justice. But there was a
(01:01:58):
lot going on there, a lot actually centered around the
abortion issue for those judges. But that we were so flabbergasted,
but not we not so much by the results, but
by the variance and the results that was that was
just why we all looked at each other and said,
how is that possible that you have a thirty point spread?
Speaker 1 (01:02:17):
Yeah?
Speaker 11 (01:02:18):
Yeah, yeah, that was that was not fun, nobody. And
again again you know this one, that one, this thing,
that thing is bad, this thing, that thing still needs work.
But we can't forget that there's really has been great progress.
It's it's uh, you know, it's it's I wish it
were a sprint, but it's not. It's a marathon. And
the more you guys talk about it, the better it is.
Speaker 1 (01:02:39):
Curry to Alaska again, we want to thank you so
much for joining us. It was great to meet you.
You just we are kindred souls. We are kindred souls
and as you say, this is such such a huge
important issue. That's why we love talking about it here
on Conservative Commandments. But again, Carrie, thank you so much
for joining us. Take care and God.
Speaker 11 (01:02:57):
Bless thank you. Same to you.
Speaker 1 (01:02:59):
And if you are listening to and watching The Conservative
command Us with George Landrath, I'mric Trader go nowhere.
Speaker 4 (01:03:17):
Are you having trouble hearing your TV or listening to
conversations and loud spaces, then it might be time to
consider nano hearing aids. The days of expensive hearing aids
are over. Nanos are FDA registered OTC hearing aids. They
are powerful, lightweight, and simple to use, and their tiny
in ear design makes them nearly invisible. Plus they are rechargeable,
(01:03:40):
saving you hundreds of dollars on batteries. Don't be fooled
by overpriced hearing aids. Prescription hearing aids could cost three
thousand dollars or more. Nano hearing aids are only three
hundred and ninety seven dollars. But wait, we are so
confident you are going to love your nanos, we are
offering one hundred dollars off through this special TV offer.
Call now and get two seeic rechargeable here eights. For
(01:04:00):
only two hundred and ninety seven dollars. You get a
free portable charging case, free twenty four seven lifetime telephone support,
free shipping, and a forty five day money bag guarantee.
Speaker 5 (01:04:09):
Call eight five five six nine zero six four sixty four.
That's eight five y five six nine zero sixty four
sixty four. Call eight five five six nine zero six
four sixty four. That's eight five y five six nine
zero sixty four sixty four call eight five five six
nine zero six four sixty four. That's eight five y
five six nine zero sixty four sixty four.
Speaker 6 (01:04:28):
You're still looking God, I'm still feeling good.
Speaker 7 (01:04:31):
You know I've got all your MyPillow products, mattress, topper,
bed sheets, my pillows, towels, slippers, blanket.
Speaker 8 (01:04:36):
I'm interrupted this commercial to do something I've never done before.
Get to my pillows absolutely free on orders of one
hundred dollars or more. I can't do this forever, so
get on board with this great sale today. Our best
selling six piece bath towel sets are Kitchen towel sets
Just twenty nine ninety eight, our famous standard my Pillows
only fourteen ninety eight, Queens eighteen ninety eight, King Size
(01:05:00):
a dollar more body pills twenty nine ninety eight. Multi
Use my Pillow two point ohers with pillowcase nine ninety eight,
say forty dollars on our spring per killing Geeza Dream
bed sheet says any size, any color. So go to
my Pillow dot comer call that number on your screen,
use your promo code to save up to eighty percent
on all my Pillow products, And when you spend one
(01:05:21):
hundred dollars or more get two standard my pillows absolutely free.
Speaker 9 (01:05:26):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code a
u n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven
nine seven seven eight nine three and please use the
promotion code a U n TV. To order, Please call
eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine three and
(01:05:48):
please use the promotion code a U n TV. To order,
Please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine
three and please use the promotion code a U n TV.
Speaker 1 (01:06:01):
And welcome back, Welcome back to the Conservative Commander's Radio
Show with George Landrath and you're truly Rick Trader, coming
to you from the Michelis Studios, the Mysture Studios of
the AUN TV network. Hey George, your first guest of
the days with this and please make that introduction.
Speaker 2 (01:06:19):
Absolutely we always have the very best guest on TV
and radio, and we have Jonathan Tobin here to prove it.
He is editor in chief of the Jewish News Syndicate.
He's a senior contributor at the Federalist, and he's a
columnist for Newsweek and a contributor to a number of
other publications. He also hosts the jns Think Twice podcast
(01:06:44):
and both the weekly video program and the Jonathan Tobin
Daily Program. And you can find these on essentially all
the major platforms things like you know where you look
for podcasts and things like that, as well as YouTube.
And he also used to be the executive editor of
(01:07:05):
The Senior and then the I Think Senior online editor
and chief political blogger for the Commentary magazine. And then
before that he was the editor in chief of the
Jewish Exponent in Philadelphia and the editor of the Connecticut
Jewish Ledger. So he has a lot of experience in journalism.
(01:07:26):
So Jonathan will welcome the Conservative Commandos. We're very glad
to have you.
Speaker 16 (01:07:30):
Well, thanks very much, great to be with you.
Speaker 2 (01:07:32):
I wanted to talk to you today about this because
we had Benjamin Nahu has visited the White House and
met with President Trump, and so I wanted to get
your sense of what that was about, because it seems
to me certainly there could have some you know, obviously,
trade has been an important issue right now, but I'm
kind of thinking to myself, I don't really think that
(01:07:54):
the US and Israel are going to become, you know,
in some sort of trade war. So I don't think
it's an attempt to avoid that. I have a feeling
they have other things to work on, things like piece
the Middle East, trying to figure out how to prevent
Iran from continuing to fund and promote terrorism all across
the globe and in the Middle East and so forth.
(01:08:15):
So I want to ask you what your take on
this is and what you see is actually happening.
Speaker 16 (01:08:19):
Well, you're right, you know trade is at issue, obviously.
You know, the tariffs impact all countries, and you know,
Israel is a very small country. It has a free
trade agreement with the United States, but still there are
some discrepancies in terms of a trade deficit. But it's
not as big an issue for Israel as it would
(01:08:39):
be for you know, many other countries, you know ses
is Israel's a leading trade partner, but I think its
economy is not really based on you know, sort of
you know, no jobs are being offshore to Israel as
they would be to China or Vietnam or something like that.
In terms of making cheap goods, that's not what Israel does.
It's Real's main exports are really high tech.
Speaker 3 (01:09:02):
Things.
Speaker 16 (01:09:02):
So Natanna, whose main agenda in the White House, today
is to keep on the same page with the United
States on its most important national security items, namely the
war in Gaza. Any possible uh you know, deals you know,
being negotiated with the Hamas terrorists about getting the hostages
out and very importantly Iran as you as you noted,
(01:09:26):
Israel is deeply concerned as it has been all along
by Iran's nuclear program and let alone its export of terrorism.
Bran means the remains the leading world state sponsor of terrorism.
It helped foment the current war in Gaza as well
as Lebanon. It's more or less fomenting a seven front
war against Israel in the Huties.
Speaker 3 (01:09:48):
And in yeahmen, so.
Speaker 16 (01:09:51):
There is It's important for Natina who to make sure
that the United States and Israel are not across purposes
as they were during the Biden administration, was doing everything
you know, while in theory supporting Israel's right to exist
and defend itself, was doing everything to hamstering those efforts
and of trying to force it to agree to allow
Hamas to continue in power in Gaza in one way
(01:10:12):
or another. Trump has said he doesn't want that, and
he's given Israel a greenlight to do what it needs
to do to get rid of Hamas, and that's very important.
But Israel is also very concerned about whether as Iran
gets closer and closer to a nuclear weapon, they are,
for all intensive purposes now a threshold nuclear power, a
power that has launched attacks directly on Israel as well
(01:10:35):
as molementing terrorism against it. And it is vital that
you know, Israel doesn't you know, it stays on track
with with Trump. Now Trump right now. You know, if
there was one issue on which there was a slight
divergence between Washington and Jerusalem, it is on Iran. Because
Trump is not enthusiastic about the idea of attacking Iran,
(01:10:57):
you know, quite rightly. You know, he was to the
American people, he was not elected to get us into
more new wars. He liked to be able to solve
that problem from negotiations or economic leverage, which he tried
to do in his first term, and if he had
been re elected it might have succeeded. It's not clear
that it can now. And I think Natanya, who had
(01:11:18):
the White House, said that if these negotiations lead to
Iran giving up its nuclear program, then that's great. But
the worrying, although it's not a great worry with this administration,
is that Iran always thinks it can out bargain, outthink
the Americans, and he succeeded in doing so when Obama
was president. When o'biden was president, the Iran nuclear deal
(01:11:39):
was not merely weak. It actually guaranteed that the Iranians
would sooner or later get a nuclear weapon. Natanya, who
is hopeful that Trump is smart enough and tough enough
to ensure that that doesn't happen again. And I think
there's good reason to hope that that is.
Speaker 2 (01:11:55):
So that's some very interesting points. One of things I
wanted to ask you about that I think I think
you kind of alluded to, which is when Donald Trump
was in office the first time around, he puts such
heavy sanctions on Iran and other countries that might be
trying to help Iran or trade with Iran, so that
it was basically was you get to pick would you
(01:12:15):
like to do trade with the US or Iran? And
that made it, you know, but you don't get into both.
And that had a real impact on Iran. And they
were running out of money and they were struggling, and
that meant they couldn't afford, you know, to fund terrorism
quite as heavily around the globe as they had been.
And then what does Joe Biden do. He immediately gets
in office, lists the sanctions, removes the designation as a
(01:12:40):
terrorist nation and so forth, and starts sending them cash.
And then what do they do. They attack Israel and
we see the Huthies start attacking Americans and American forces
and things like that, and you think yourself, this would
be like imagine during World War Two, if FDR had
been funding the Nazi army so they could kill Americans
(01:13:01):
and kill allies, I think we would have said that
that would make him a well, an enemy of the
United States.
Speaker 16 (01:13:09):
And well, the suggestion is so absurd that you know,
there's no trying, no use trying to define it. It
just wouldn't have happened.
Speaker 2 (01:13:17):
But it did happen this time, yeah, exactly. And that's
the question is how does someone like a Biden essentially
fund America's enemies and then they turn around and attack
not just our allies and friends, but literally attack America
and American soldiers and shipping and other things. And we
act like, yeah, well, yes, you know, it's just like really,
(01:13:40):
because I guarantee if Donald Trump had done that, we
hear about it, criticizing him and talking about how irresponsible
it was for him to do that. But somehow we
give a pass to the essentially disloyal, anti American administration
of Joe Biden.
Speaker 16 (01:13:57):
Yeah, listen what Barack Obama did and then Joe Biden
tried to do, you know, and during their times in
the White House was outrageous. When it came to Iran,
it was rooted in a myth about you know, Barack
Obama thought that Iran wanted a chance to get right
with the world.
Speaker 3 (01:14:14):
It did not.
Speaker 16 (01:14:15):
In fact, it wanted to wage war against the West,
against the United States as well as Israel. And Obama
was too concerned about apologizing to the Muslim world for
America's supposed sins to really care about that. And in fact,
he was more on their side. He wanted to realign
the United States, to make Iran America's partner in Middle East,
(01:14:35):
and to abandon American allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Trump wants the opposite, and that's the right that's the
right way to do it. Now, can Trump go back
to where he was in the first in his first
administration with those you know, severe sanctions with maximum sanctions
which really brought Iran's economy to its knees, and could,
as I said before, have it been continued, might well
(01:14:58):
have forced Iran to make concession rather than you know,
getting concessions from the United States as it did under
Obama and Biden. I'm not sure, because they're much closer
to a nuclear weapon. They more or less you know,
there are a week to ten days away if they
wanted to race towards a nuclear weapon. Even the Department
of Defense is admitted that under Biden. And you know,
(01:15:19):
as poor as there and as much as the strategic
situation is now very much not in their favor, their
ally Assad in Syria is gone there, you know, their
auxiliaries in Lebanon HESBLA has been defeated. They're in a
weak position, but they have one card up their sleeve,
and that is China. China continues to buy Iranian oil
and to keep them afloat. So it's not clear that
(01:15:41):
you know, even a tough sanctions policy that forced the
world to really isolate and boycott Iran would work because
the Chinese are there to sort of bail the Iranians out.
So that's what Netanyahu is likely pointing out to Trump, saying,
you know, okay, try try to do this diplomatically. But
(01:16:02):
in the end, President Trump may have to choose between
whether he wants to tolerate a nuclear Iran or whether
he wants to do something about it. And you know,
he'd rather not be put in that position because America
doesn't want to get into a war, and it shouldn't
want that. That said, it really can't tolerate an Iran
a rogue nation, you know, not merely destabilizing them at least,
(01:16:23):
but threatening international shipping and you know, in the Red
Sea and the the Horn of Africa, as well as
threatening terrorism everywhere. So the United States is sooner or
later going to have to make a decision about Iran.
It's theoretically possible, theoretically possible that Trump's strong policy and
threats and the knowledge that the Iranian you know, that
(01:16:44):
the Iranians know that they can't bluff Trump, that that
will lead them to, you know, sort of abandoning their
nuclear program. But I don't know that that is really
a safe bet. I think in the end it may
come to something you know a little more a sanguinary
than that. That's unfortunate, but that's the fruit of the
(01:17:04):
last four years of Biden's appeasement.
Speaker 2 (01:17:08):
Very interesting and very good point. I think you make
also a good point that the United States shouldn't ever
really want war because war is costly in terms of
treasure and blood. That doesn't mean you should never have
a war. I would argue that no American would have
wanted World War two. They would have preferred for not
to happen. But at some point you can't look back
(01:17:29):
at that and say, wow, that's a shame we fought
that war. We should have let that one go. It's like, no,
it's very obvious.
Speaker 16 (01:17:34):
There are people who say that, but they're kind of
sympathetic to the wrong side.
Speaker 2 (01:17:37):
Yeah, well, that's a fair point. But so I mean,
I understand the idea we don't want war, and I
think that's what Donald Trump is clearly not wanting war.
But at the same time, I don't think he's so
opposed to war that he would let our enemies run
rough shot over top of US and our allies.
Speaker 16 (01:17:54):
He's opposed to American weakness, and he should be opposed
to American weakness. Obama and Biden welcomed.
Speaker 2 (01:18:01):
It exactly and they projected it very very good point.
And that's probably a good place for us to take
a quick break handle a little business. But we'll be
right back, folks, So don't go away, because Rick Trader
and George Landreth here at the Conservative Commanders with our
guests Jonathan Tobin will be right back and there's lots
more discuss than I can guarantee you. It will be
not only informative, but very interesting, So don't go away.
Speaker 10 (01:18:37):
Are you tired of making trip after trip on doctor
visits only to get wrong medications that waste time, money
and cause you side effects. If you're on Medicare, call
for a free medical assessment and determine which medications are
right for you based on your genetic makeup with our
convenience swap test performed in your home and mailed to
(01:18:57):
our laboratory, no more trial and errors. So also will
tell you and your doctor which medications work for you.
It's that easy. If you're on Medicare and take multiple medications,
call now and see if you qualify for our genetic
testing service covered by Medicare or your insurance. Improve your health,
avoid adverse side effects and save money. Don't wait. Call
(01:19:17):
right now and find out if the medications you're taking
are helping or hurting you. Make this free call right now.
Call eight five five eight two zero three two nine one.
That's eight five five eight two zero thirty two ninety one.
Call eight five five eight two zero three two nine one.
That's eight five five eight two zero thirty two ninety one.
(01:19:40):
Call eight five five eight two zero three two nine one.
That's eight five five eight two zero thirty two ninety one.
Speaker 8 (01:19:48):
I hear every day about the product You all wish
my pillow carried well. Guess what we probably do. Slippers, bathrobes,
pet bets, blankets, mattresses, sleepwear, loungewear, dubs, comforters, potholders, aprons
of admits, and so much more, and they're all on sale.
For example, get our best selling standard my Pillows for
(01:20:09):
only fourteen ninety eight body pillows twenty nine ninety eight,
six piece bath towels or kitchen towel sets just twenty
nine ninety eight. Multi use my pillow two point zeros
with pillowcase nine ninety eight. Save forty dollars on our
spring per killing giz a dream bedsheet sets, any size,
any color, and so much more. So go to MyPillow
(01:20:31):
dot comor call the number on your screen use your
promo code to save up to eighty percent on all
my Pillow products. And I've never done this before. When
you spend one hundred dollars or more, you're gonna get
two standard my pillows absolutely free.
Speaker 9 (01:20:46):
To order, please call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code au
n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven nine
seven seven eight nine three, and please use the promotion
code a U n TV. To order, please call eight
hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine three and please
(01:21:09):
use the promotion code a u n TV. To order,
please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight ninety
three and please use the promotion code a U n TV.
Speaker 1 (01:21:21):
And Wright again, we do want to welcome you back
to the Conservative Commando's Radio Show with George landerth and
You're truly reck Trader, coming to you from the my
Pila studios and my Store studios of the a u
n TV network. And speaking of the AUN network, if
you want to see shows like The Stones On with
Roger Stone Denesis is his podcast. Does you have Massina
(01:21:41):
Show More Money with Steven Moore, James o'keith, Media Washington,
wat Tony Perkins, Colonel Allen West, Steadfast and Oil. Hey,
then stay right here with the Conservative Commandos and the
au N TV network. Jonathan Tobin is our guest segment.
He's the editor in chief of the Jewish News Syndicate
and we're discussing with Jonathan and meeting that Benjamanya who
(01:22:06):
had with President Trump this afternoon. Jonathan, thank you for
holding through that break. We really appreciate your time, and
you know, Jonathan, before we get back into the topic here,
tell us a little bit about the Jewish News Syndicate
and what you guys do.
Speaker 16 (01:22:21):
Well jnsjns dot org is a news website. It is
the place to go if you want news about Israel,
the Jewish world, international politics that isn't tainted by left
wing bias, anti Israel bias, and anti Semitism. As so
many publications are, including some that are based in Israel
and some that have Jewish in their title. We provide
(01:22:43):
twenty four to six news coverage of the world and
especially Israel and the Jewish world as well as a
whole array of podcasts on our j ands YouTube channel
as well as you can get them wherever podcasts or available,
including My Thing Twice show as well as my Jonathan
Tobin Daily Show.
Speaker 1 (01:23:03):
Jonathan. This meeting with Betchaminnette out here and the President say,
this is the second one I believe that they've had
together since Donald Trump took office. That in itself must
really really say something to the people of Israel. Would
you agree with that?
Speaker 16 (01:23:22):
Oh, I think that it's undoubted. Obviously there is a
close alliance between Israel and the United States, and the
atmosphere has really changed since Trump took power, as was
the case in his first administration. Trump, you know, love him,
hate him, whatever you think about him, there is no
reasonable argument against the proposition that Trump is the most
(01:23:42):
pro Israel president that we've ever had since the birth
of the modern state in nineteen forty eight. His record is,
you know, on this is really unblemish. You know, he's
the person who moved the US embassy from Tel Aviv
to Jerusalem as it should have been all along. He's
the one who recognizes it's a really sovereignty of the
go on. He's the one who held the Palestinian authority
(01:24:03):
for accountable for its support for terrorism. He's the one
who helped bring us the Abraham Accords peace with Muslim
and Arab countries in the Middle East and really expanded
the circle of peace. And that's why Israelis trust him
and he deserves that trust. I might also add on
the domestic front, we have never had a president who
(01:24:25):
was as active in the fight against anti Semitism again
as Donald Trump has been his actions. This is my
particular beat, you know, and to deal with the you know,
woke reign on college campuses which has fueled anti Semitism.
This is really the most in many ways, it's the
most important issue for all Americans because so the woke
(01:24:46):
catechism of Dei and critical race theory are a deadly
threat to America, to our idea as a nation. The
fact that it is targeted Jews because the people who
promote these toxic left wing myths falsely characterized Israel and
the Jews as wide oppressors. You know, it's a big lie.
But the Jews in the sense are the canaries in
(01:25:08):
the coal mine, because the anti Semitism that these woke
ideas have caused are really just the tip of the
iceberg threatening Westerns. It's about a war on Western civilization
and a war on the ideas the foundation of the
American Republic. The Jews are just the ones who have
been in the sites. Right now, Trump is actively doing
something about it in a way that certainly his predecessors
(01:25:28):
never did. Certainly not Biden the Democrats, and he deserves
the trust of certainly of Israelis and friends of Israel.
Speaker 1 (01:25:37):
Johnason. When you talk about the anti Semitism that we've
seen on college campuses, it just seems to have arisen
rather quickly, starting with the October seventh innovationion of Israel,
the terrible murders and slaughters that we saw. Where did
this come from? Who is funding these operations? Do we
(01:26:01):
have any idea yet?
Speaker 16 (01:26:03):
Yeah, we do, And well, it made itself manifest in
a way that you know, had never been quite so
prominent before after October seventh, after the you know, unspeakable
atrocity is the worst, the messload of juice since the
Holocaust on October seventh, twenty twenty three. But it had
been building for many years. I mean, the long march
of the so cooled progressive of the radical left through
(01:26:25):
our institutions and in particular season control of American education
had been in place for some time. This didn't just happen,
you know, the day before yesterday. But you know much,
you know, many people, including conservatives, including people who oppose this,
you know, were asleep. And you know, when people, some
of us, raised these issues, especially after you know, the
Black Lives Matter or you know, the moral panic of
(01:26:47):
the summer of twenty twenty, we were told this is
a culture war issue, and you know it's it's no
big deal. But in fact we've seen how it has
led to this surge of anti Semitism. And who's paying
for it. Well, obviously there are a lot of people
who are doing this. It don't need to be paid.
These are radical leftists, you know, Marxist, it's a Marxist movement.
But it is being paid for.
Speaker 3 (01:27:06):
It is being.
Speaker 16 (01:27:07):
Subsidized by Qatar, and you know, very various elements linked
to the Hamas terrorist Islamis. This is as well, as
I might add, some of the same people funding the
same toxic left wing a tax on America elsewhere, namely
you know the Soros you know foundation, and you know
(01:27:29):
other far left groups. It doesn't didn't arise out of
a vacuum. It didn't happen. It didn't just happened. It
had been building for a long time. It's you know,
it was part of the same battle that we when
we talked about the critical race theory in American schools
and sort of the mainstream media told us to shut up.
It was, you know, as I say, just a culture
war thing and partisan. No, no, no, it's a very
(01:27:51):
direct threat to America. And it proved to be a
direct threat to American Jews because it fueled this surge
of anti semitis, this normalization of anti Semitism in the
mainstream media throughout our culture. And this is a deadly
threat to America's future as a nation, but very specifically
to Jews right now. And Trump is the one who
(01:28:13):
is taking it seriously and his efforts to defund these
major universities, including places like Mi Alma, Monter, Columbia, and others.
Speaker 3 (01:28:21):
This is very much to be applauded.
Speaker 16 (01:28:23):
This is exactly what is needed because it wasn't going
to happen. You know, any hope for change isn't going
to happen any other way. But by the same sort
of tough action that Trump is taking.
Speaker 1 (01:28:34):
Jonathan. You wrote an article recently aoc and that this
diminishing prospects for Jewish Democrats. Jonathan, it seems to me,
at least prior to the Barack Obama administration, that the
the Israel, Jews in America and the Democrat Party were allies.
(01:28:55):
Question for you, now, what allies do Jews does Israel
have in Congress among Democrats?
Speaker 16 (01:29:05):
Well, you know, I think you know, sort of to
look at this from you know, thirty thousand feet, the
two parties have more or less changed, exchanged identities on
the question of Israel over the course of the last
half century. I mean, maybe back in the nineteen sixties,
the Democrats were pretty much a pro Israel party. Republicans
were split on it. Not that there was an active
anti Semitic wing of the Democrats of the Republican Party then,
(01:29:28):
but a lot of Republicans were really indifferent to it,
didn't care. That changed and really changed by the nineteen nineties.
It's not really something recent, partly because of the growing
strength of Evangelical Christians in the Republican Party. There were
a lot of factors that led into it, but Republicans
have become more or less a lockstep pro Israel party,
(01:29:49):
a pilot Semitic party, a party that cares about anti Semitism.
The Democrats, you know, went from being a pro Israel
party to being deeply split. There is still, you know,
a sector of Democratic Party that is pro Israel. Some
of the you know, more of the officeholders in Congress
tend to be old old time you know, sort of
geriatric Democrats, or at least in principle or you know,
(01:30:10):
would claim to be pro Israel. Some are actively pro Israel,
like John Federman the Center from Pennsylvania, or Richie Torres,
a congressman from New York, but most are lukewarm now
and there is a growing you know, the Democratic the
activist wing of the Democratic Party. And I'm AOC of
Alexandria A. Kazio Kortez being you know, the most prominent,
the leader of the congressional left wing squad they are,
(01:30:32):
that's the intersectional left wing of the party. They're the
ones who embrace these toxic ideas we were just discussing,
and they're openly anti Israel, you know, in some cases
really you know, anti Semitic and calling for Israel's destruction
like Reshi It's Alive and iljan Omar and many of
their other sympathizers in favor of you know, defunding Israel,
(01:30:53):
to stripping it of its ability to defend itself, taking
the sides of Hamas. The Democratic Party has banned in
Jewish interests and it's abandoned them also by not you know,
supporting Trump's efforts on college campuses to get rid of
these anti Semites. They're taking their side, and even some
who claim to be supportives of Israel, namely you know,
Senator Chuck Schumer, who is Jewish himself and has always
(01:31:16):
claimed to be the guardian of Israel's interests. In fact,
he's quite the opposite. He's he's really you know, he
advised Columbia University to keep their heads down, that nobody
cares about this anti Semitism stuff but Republicans. So the
fact is, although the majority of Jews still vote for
the Democrats, because you know, it's a complex issue, I
think a lot of non orthodox liberal you know, you know,
(01:31:39):
liberal religiously Jews see liberal politics as their religion. I mean,
the fact is, you know, politics plays the role that
religion used to play in most people's lives. And that's
true for Jews as well as many non Jews. But
they to the extent that the Jewish community of this
country still cares about Israel, the majority does. The Democrats
(01:32:00):
are not their party anymore.
Speaker 1 (01:32:02):
Well, why would you say that those voters, those Jewish
voters that still back and support the Democrat Party not
just with their voter but with their money.
Speaker 16 (01:32:11):
Yeah, well, the fact is, yeah, many of them do.
They see their their religion is aligned with quote unquote
social justice, which is just left wing democratic political stands.
A lot of a lot of left wingers who are
Jews as well as non Jews. The abortion is you know,
more important to them than israel is. And indeed many
of them don't really care that much about Israel. Those
(01:32:33):
who do are obviously concerned. They still have a few
friends in Congress, as I said, people like Federman or Torres,
but most of the Democrats have more or less, you know,
are not much used to Israel anymore, are not very
much or not very supportive. And you know what we're seeing,
you know, as Bernie Sanders basically hands the torch of
the left wing of the Democratic Party to AOC which
(01:32:54):
seems to be the way things are going, and it's
it's not clear what her future is, what whether she's
going to run in Chile and Schumer in twenty eight
or run for president as she might well, but the
Democratic Party is far you know, the Democratic Party in
twenty twenty five was far more left wing than it
was for eight, twelve, sixteen years ago or twenty years ago.
The Democratic Party in twenty twenty eight is going to
be even more left wing than that. That's where all
(01:33:16):
the energy is. So I think we can expect, you know,
the Democratic establishment is not going to be able to
shut out the Bernie Sanders wing of the party, the Socialists,
the Marxist, the intersectional wing of the party the way
they did in twenty twenty. And if someone like AOC
or you know, someone who logically aligned with her is
their candidate, you know they're going to be really anti Israel.
(01:33:38):
And the message for pro Israel Democrats, for Jewish Democrats
is you're kind of in the wrong party right now.
That's unfortunate because it would be better for Israel and
the Jews if both parties as kind of they used
to be. There used to be something like a bipartisan
pro Israel consensus, but the cows out of the barn
door on that one. The Democrats have abandoned Israel largely,
(01:34:00):
and I fear that that's only going to grow worse.
Speaker 1 (01:34:04):
Jonathan Tobin give our audience thee for one one the
good information how they could follow you, read things that
you write, find out and work about the Jewish News Syndicate,
and watch your programs well.
Speaker 16 (01:34:16):
Go to JNS dot org. That's JNS dot org for
our website for access to all of our news, analysis,
opinion and our podcast or go to our YouTube channel
on J and S, J and STV or wherever podcasts
and we found. You can follow me on x at
Jonathan s Underscore Tobin.
Speaker 1 (01:34:36):
Jonathan again, thank you so much for joining us. Take care,
God bless and.
Speaker 16 (01:34:40):
Thanks very much, and happy Passover and happy Easter to
all of our viewers.
Speaker 1 (01:34:44):
Thank you so much. And you are listening to and
watching the Conservative Commanders with George landerth and you're shrewdly
Rick Trador.
Speaker 12 (01:35:04):
Now you can leave home and leave the tanks behind
with Imagen, the portable oxygen concentrator that moves with you.
Speaker 13 (01:35:11):
This little box changed my life. I can now do
all those things that I wanted to do, and just
press the button here and there's my oxygen.
Speaker 12 (01:35:18):
Imagen portable oxygen systems are small and light and deliver
up to twelve hours of medical grade oxygen on a
single charge.
Speaker 13 (01:35:24):
Now that I've got my Enagen, I've got my freedom back.
I'm back to living again.
Speaker 12 (01:35:28):
Call us right now try an Inagen system for thirty
days risk free.
Speaker 14 (01:35:32):
To order, Call now eight hundred six zero four three
nine sixty six to order, Call now eight hundred six
zero four three nine sixty six to order Call now
eight hundred six zero four three nine sixty six.
Speaker 6 (01:35:53):
Hello.
Speaker 15 (01:35:53):
I'm Mike Glendell and I'm excited to announce my new product,
my coffee. I get products all the time from Entrepreneur
for my new platform, mystore dot com. And when I
tried my coffee for the first time, I was blown away.
It is the best coffee I've ever had in my life.
I spent the last four months doing my due diligence,
(01:36:13):
and this family owned business micromanages every step from the
fields to the cup to ensure the best quality coffee
you're ever going to have.
Speaker 3 (01:36:22):
It starts with the beans that.
Speaker 15 (01:36:23):
Are grown in Honduras, Honduras's volcanic soil and humid climate
make the perfect growing conditions for coffee plants, which produced
the best beans ever.
Speaker 3 (01:36:34):
Then each batch is tested.
Speaker 15 (01:36:36):
For its aroma, taste, and other aspects to meet the
highest standards in the coffee industry. And after that it
goes into production, which is all done right here in
the USA. It's like you're getting that small batch, specialty coffee,
but delivered right to your front door. So go to
mystore dot com or call the number on your screen,
use the promo code, and you'll get your very own
(01:36:58):
my coffee for twenty five off. You guys all know
that I've traveled the country for the past year and
a half. I've stayed in hundreds of hotels. I've tried
every coffee out there. Well, some of the coffees have
that terrible after taste, some that leave me jittery or
I get an upset stomach.
Speaker 3 (01:37:13):
Well, my coffee is different.
Speaker 15 (01:37:15):
It's the richest, smoothest, best coffee I've ever had. My
coffee comes in a variety of flavors. You get them
ground or whole being. Plus it's certified organic and non GMO.
I guarantee it'll be the best coffee you've ever had.
Speaker 3 (01:37:31):
So go to mystore dot com or call the number
on your screen, use your.
Speaker 15 (01:37:34):
Promo code, and you'll get my coffee for twenty five
percent off. And I'm gonna give you deep discounts on
all my store products. That's mystore dot com. It's my
new platform for USA entrepreneurs. Please order now.
Speaker 9 (01:37:48):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code au
n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven eight
nine three, and please use the promotion code aa U
n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven ninety
(01:38:08):
seven seven eight ninety three and please use the promotion
code a U n TV. To order, please call eight
hundred seven ninety seven seven eight ninety three and please
use the promotion code a U n T.
Speaker 1 (01:38:23):
And welcome back, Welcome back to the Conservative Commanders for
George Landreth and Armoric Trader. Commit to you from the
mic Pila Studios at my Stewart Studios of the aun
TV Network. Georgia, Tim minute, dingy time, what do you
got for us?
Speaker 2 (01:38:38):
Well, I'd noticed an interesting poll that I saw just
this weekend, and it said that Trump's margin of approval
has jumped by ten points in just four days, and
I'm wondering kind of what could be the cause of that.
And it seems to me, at least some of it
might be the fact that Donald Trump's doing things to
get America back on track after the craziness of the
(01:38:59):
last four years with Joe Biden. But some of it
could very well also be the impact of Charlie Kirk
and the fact that his assassination has been just kind
of a wake up call to America and said, folks,
don't sit back and be quiet, look at what's going on,
and do what you can to fix it. And so
(01:39:20):
I'm hoping that it's all of the above there, but
I think that's definitely a possibility.
Speaker 1 (01:39:25):
Well, George, I think it is too. I think there's
a Charlie Kirk effect. I think that people are, I want,
sim motivated, but they're shocked. They don't approve of this
type of thing happening into in their country. I think
that they're also listening to the left, and the left
again is more concerned about Jimmy Kimmel losing his job
(01:39:47):
than the killing of Charlie Kirk for his political opinions
and belief.
Speaker 2 (01:39:53):
I also saw a poll.
Speaker 1 (01:39:56):
Where Democrat registrations are down by two points two million,
where Republican registrations are up by two point four million.
So I think that is I would believe that is
more of effect of an effect of people looking at
the country where it has been for four years prior
(01:40:18):
to Donald Trump, coming back to the Washington and what
Donald Trump is doing in Washington today. So I think
Donald Trump's ten point swing in his polls, I think
that can be attributed to Charlie Kirk. But when you're
looking at a swing of four point six million people
(01:40:38):
the in voter registration, I really do believe that is
the the Donald Trump effect of people seeing what Donald
Trump is doing and accomplishing and wanting to accomplish, versus
the tract of the country prior to January.
Speaker 2 (01:40:58):
That's a very good point. We see something interesting Virginia.
Virginia has a track record of whoever the party in
the White House is, the other party has the upper
hand when we have our gumnatory elections. And not that
we've never elected a Republican when there was Republican president,
but it's generally not the case. Not nine out of
ten times that's not the case. And yet what's interesting
(01:41:21):
is we have early voting now in Virginia, which I'm
not really excited about because but at least it's in
person voting, meaning that you can go to the county
headquarters and vote early, so you have to show your
idea and things like that, so it reduces the chances
of it being fraudulent. But the bottom line is you
would expect normally that in early voting the Democrats would
(01:41:42):
be doing better, even in a year like this year
where the Republicans have the White House. Yet what's interesting
is the articles I've seen on this are that right
now all the jurisdictions that tend to be Republican oriented
jurisdictions are radically outpacing the Democrats in their jurisdictions with
early voting. And that's a good sign. And I would
(01:42:04):
say that I wonder if maybe some of that's not
Charlie Kirk, where if some of it isn't just the
comparison people are going. I lived through the last four
years of Joe Biden with twenty to thirty million illegals
in our country. Crime going through the ceilings, you know,
energy prices going up, inflation, being out of control, et cetera,
et cetera. And now many of those things are starting
(01:42:25):
to resolve themselves. And I'm not saying they're all fixed yet. Well,
the fact that we don't have any more people coming
into the country illegally, but we haven't necessarily gotten rid
of all thirty million illegals. But the point is the
problems are being fixed, and we can clearly see it happening.
And likewise, crime was getting out of control in d
C to the point where DC was a dangerous place
(01:42:46):
to be, and many of us that lived in Virginia
didn't really want to go to DC because at least
certainly not at certain times because it's like I don't
want to be the next victim of some crime. But
all of a sudden, now crime is down by like
eighty five percent, and incredible. We're supposed to believe, of course,
that that means Donald Trump's a racist, and I think
to myself, say he's protecting minority citizens from crime.
Speaker 1 (01:43:10):
I think.
Speaker 2 (01:43:12):
That's racist.
Speaker 1 (01:43:13):
Georgia. Is my facts right that DC is seventy three.
Speaker 2 (01:43:18):
I believe that it is. And you know, like the
neighborhoods are the most if you will, white are also
neighborhoods that are a little less in danger. And I'm
not saying there's no crime going on there. I'm just
saying that many of them have gated communities and so forth.
Whereas the parts of the city of the most dangerous
are the parts that are predominantly black areas, and so
(01:43:42):
solving the crime problem there is predominantly disproportionately benefiting black
citizens who live in those neighborhood It's kind of like
the same thing in Chicago. You know, Chicago, there are
certainly whites that live there, but the every weekend, the
majority of people are victims of crime. Guess what, they're
black or other minorities. And so if you could stop
(01:44:03):
crime there, the beneficiaries would be disproportionately minorities. And yet
somehow the left would say it's racist to stop that crime.
And I think myself, that's interesting because I can't imagine
that there's any person the color to their skin would
make no difference. They don't want to be killed, they
don't want their children to be killed, they don't want
their house burnt to the ground, they don't want their
(01:44:24):
car stolen, they don't want to be robbed or rate
that's universal. Your skin color doesn't change your goals there,
and so I think Donald Trump's attempt to put them
in a position where they're safer is actually really the
exact opposite of racist. I would argue, what's racist is
to say I don't care if blacks are disproportionately murdered.
(01:44:47):
And that's quite frankly, what Governor Pritsker says, that's what
the Mayor of Chicago says. They may not say it verbally,
but they clearly say it with their actions, and so
they're obviously the racists. I'm glad that we have leaders
in this country that want every American, regardless of skin color,
to be safe, secure, and we ought to be proud
(01:45:08):
of that, and we ought to promote that.
Speaker 1 (01:45:10):
Well, George, when you talk about the fact that Donald
Trump is doing something to really solidly doing something to
stop crime, not just a political statement by some politician
fronting for office, and every one of them say, George,
I'm going to stop crime. I'm going to cut crime.
Donald Trump is doing something about it. But to call
(01:45:31):
it racis you know, in the last segment or in
the second segment, we're talking about the illogical extreme. This
is another example of the less illogical extreme Ye to
call that racist, George. We had a couple of great guests.
Would you thank them for us?
Speaker 2 (01:45:48):
Absolutely. We had Kerrie Telasco as executive vice president the
Election Integrity Network, and we had a great conversation with
her about election integrity. I really appreciate her expertise and
sharing her time with us. And then we had Jonathan Tobin,
who's the editor in chief of the Jewish News Syndicate.
He's also a contributor at The Federalist and a columnist
at Newsweek, and he has podcasts and other things like that,
(01:46:11):
and we had a very interesting conversation with him about
what's going on with President Trump and Benjaminett and Yahoo
and how he's trying to essentially drive there to be peace,
but he's also not trying to make it so that
Benjamin Nette NoHo agrees to empower Hamas to attack them again.
I think basically Donald Trump's trying to find a balanced
(01:46:34):
approach there, which is, yeah, we'd like to see if
we can get some peace here, but at the same time,
we can't empower Hamas to continue what it did.
Speaker 1 (01:46:43):
And I just think it's shocking that great Britain has
now recognized the Palestinian flag. I mean, you talk about ridiculous,
and I think this shows the effect of illegal immigration
into Great Britain, how it's spun that country, and we've
got to be very, very concerned that it does not
happen here in the United States. After all, what do
we have now seven or eight people who are Muslim
(01:47:07):
in Congress right now? So Georgia, indeed, we had a
couple of great guests in your book. Tell us a
little bit about your book.
Speaker 2 (01:47:16):
Well, here's the book let Freedom Ring. Again, that's the
name of it. You can find that at Amazon or
any other place you buy books. You can also find
that at Fronts or Freedom's website ff dot org, and
that gives you links to all the various places to
buy it. But the subtitle, of course, is can self
evident truths save America from further decline? The answer is yes,
(01:47:40):
because self evident truths are what made America a great nation.
It's what promoted freedom and opportunity for all. And so
I'm really grateful for this concept that we got from
our founders, and I'm grateful for the idea of let's
let freedom ring, because freedom promotes well being, prosperity, and
(01:48:00):
important very basic enaliable rights as well. So anyhow, that's
what this book gives you, and I hope you'll enjoy
it and read it folks.
Speaker 1 (01:48:09):
All right, Also check out Frontiers of Freedom. Do you
think thank that? As George's president and CEO of and
website www dot ff dot or org. George's articles are
on town Hall. Go to town Hall. Do we do
a search for George Landrath L A N D R
I T H. But for right now, we are out
(01:48:31):
of time. That means you've got to run and we
got to go. Take care, godless, and we'll see you tomorrow.
That's going to be on TV and on radio.
Speaker 6 (01:48:57):
You're still looking God, I'm still feeling good.
Speaker 1 (01:49:00):
You know.
Speaker 7 (01:49:00):
I've got all your MyPillow products, mattress topper, bed sheets,
my pillows, towel, slippers, blanket.
Speaker 8 (01:49:06):
I'm interrupted this commercial to do something I've never done before.
Get two my pillows absolutely free on orders of one
hundred dollars or more. I can't do this forever, so
get on board with this great sale today. Our best
selling six piece bath towel sets, our kitchen towel sets,
just twenty nine ninety eight, our famous standard my Pillows
only fourteen ninety eight Queens eighteen ninety eight, King Size
(01:49:29):
Only a dollar more Body Pillows twenty nine ninety eight.
Multi use my Pillow two point ohers with pillowcase nine
to ninety eight. Save forty dollars on our spring per
killing Giezer Dream bedsheet says any size, any color, So
go to MyPillow dot com or call that number on
your screen. Use your promo code to save up to
eighty percent on all my Pillow products, and when you
(01:49:50):
spend one hundred dollars or more, get two standard my
pillows absolutely free.
Speaker 9 (01:49:55):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code a
U n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven
nine seven seven eight nine three and please use the
promotion code a U n TV. To order, please call
eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine three and
(01:50:17):
please use the promotion code a U n TV. To order,
Please call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine
three and please use the promotion code a U n TV.