Crypto for Creators - Kirk/JFK Assassination Anomalies - Multi-Generational Ops | Cory Hughes - Forbidden Knowledge News

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I am so excited to tell you about Independent Media Token.
Independent media Token is a brand new way to show
your support for independent media without having to donate a dime.
Independent media Token is a cryptocurrency on the Solana blockchain
designed to generate funds to promote and foster the growth

(00:23):
of independent content creators, allowing them to engage in their
art without having to worry about being demonetized through a
network of media partners of which you, yourself can become
a part of. Independent Media Token's goal is to ensure
the powers that be can never cut off all of

(00:43):
our areas of funding and censor the only free voices
left in the world. Join the movement today. You can
pick up Independent Media Token using Phantom Wallet or the
Solana wallet of your choice, where you can easily swap
your Solana for IMT. Grab some IMT today and remember

(01:04):
to always know your team. To learn more, visit independentmediatoken
dot com or use the link right in the description.

Speaker 2 (01:14):
I think it's just going to get weirder and weirder
and weirder, and finally it's going to be so weird
that people are going to have to talk about how
weird it is. Eventually people are going to say, what
the hell is going on. It's not enough to say
it's nuts. You have to explain why it's so nuts.

(01:36):
The invention of artificial life, the cloning of human beings,
possible contact with extraterrestrials. The systems which are in place
to keep the world same are utterly inadequate to the
forces that have been unleashed.

Speaker 1 (01:58):
Welcome back to Forbid and Knowledge News. I'm your host
Chris Matthew. Today my guest is Corey Hughes. Be sure
to check out my films Doors of Perception as on
Amazon Prime, I call It, Louisiana's on two, be Roku,
Channel Apple and more great films to watch for the
Halloween season. We are booking guests for November and December.
If you have suggestions or you'd like to be a guest,

(02:21):
email me Forbidden Knowledge Neews at gmail dot com. Today,
I want to welcome back to the show Corey Hughes.
He is an author, researcher, host of Bloody History, Morals
and Dogma, and co host of Day Zero. Corey, welcome back,
How you doing good?

Speaker 3 (02:39):
Thank you for having me, Thanks.

Speaker 1 (02:41):
So much for coming back on. We're gonna share some
exciting announcements about crypto opportunities. You have a crypto project
that we're very excited about as well, we'll be sharing
some information. We'll also get some updates on your JFK
research and some other projects that you work on. Before

(03:01):
we do, briefly, remind the audience about yourself and let
them know how they can find out more.

Speaker 3 (03:08):
Sure, my name's Corey Hughes. I'm a Kennedy Assassination researcher
and lately I guess other things too. But you can
find my work at Coreyhughes dot org. My books are
available on Amazon, and there's another book going to be
out probably before the end of the year.

Speaker 1 (03:26):
Well, there is a lot going on in the crypto world,
and I am still very new to it. I often
regret not getting involved a long time ago, but from
what I understand, there's plenty of opportunity right now to
get started, and there's some exciting things happening in the
crypto world. Tell us a little bit about what's going on.

Speaker 3 (03:49):
Sure, So I've been involved in the crypto space really
since twenty sixteen. I've made a ton of money in
crypto and I've lost a ton of money in crypto,
and so I have a pretty good idea of what's
going on in the space at all times, and a

(04:10):
lot of what we predicted many many years ago about
corporate adoption and Wall Street adoption and all that stuff
that's all happening, and honestly, a lot of it has
already happened. And so that brings us to this new
era of crypto. From where it was just kind of
a small group of miscreants who are pushing this thing,

(04:33):
trying to change the world, it has now become something
that Wall Street and all these big companies are buying
and looking at, and that opens up a slew of
interesting debate over what's been happening. And so you have
to understand that there's two ways that you can buy bitcoin.
You can buy bitcoin on the open market, which means

(04:54):
you go on to an exchange and you buy it
at the current price, and when you buy it, it
causes the price to go up a little. And that's
how standard trading works, that's how the stock market works,
that's how these things have always worked. But there is
another mechanism by which these companies have been buying bitcoin
that doesn't affect the market. Okay, so there have been

(05:16):
billions and billions and billions of dollars spent by these
large firms like black Rock and you know, you name it.
All these big hedge funds are getting involved. But they didn't.
They've already bought so much bitcoin that if they would
have bought it on the open market, the price would
be well over a million dollars today. But they didn't
do that. They use what's called over the counter, and

(05:37):
over the counter is where these exchanges coordinate sales off
the market, right, And so these Bay, all these big
companies have been able to bypass the markets and acquire
massive amounts of bitcoin, and it screwed every single person
out there holding bitcoin.

Speaker 1 (05:53):
Is that legal and is something that anyone is able
to do?

Speaker 3 (05:58):
Yes, yes, it's legal. If you and I had ten
million dollars right now and wanted to buy bitcoin, we
it would be difficult for us to do that on
an exchange. We would have to call coinbase or whomever
else and say, hey, look we got ten mil we
want to make a buy, and they would coordinate it
with a seller on the back end. That has nothing
to do with the market. It's just called over the
counter buying, and it's done in the stock market too,

(06:21):
but you don't see it. You see that. See, the
stock markets is way more complicated. They have derivatives trading,
and they have loans against debt, and they have all
kinds of weird Ponzi mechanisms that they're trying to get
Bitcoin into. Right, So, ultimately, why do is bitcoin exists?
Bitcoin exists so that I can transact with you and
not have to ask permission of the government or anyone

(06:43):
else because the rules of bitcoin are baked into the
algorithm and how the system works, and it's not changeable. Well,
it is changeable, and we'll get to that later in
what's brewing as a bitcoin civil war currently, but overall,
the fundamentals were locked. So when you send if I
send you a bitcoin transaction, it does not require trust.

(07:05):
I am not trusting a bank to relay that money
to you. I am not trusting a third party. I
am using a system that you don't need trust because
every transaction gets verified by the blockchain is authentic. So
that is the printing press moment of bitcoin. That is
what it is so special for because you've never been

(07:27):
able to transact ever in history in any kind of
currency that wasn't controlled by a government.

Speaker 1 (07:35):
So when we look at the price of bitcoin right now,
you're saying it should actually be a lot higher than
it is because of this over the counter exchange that
you're talking.

Speaker 3 (07:47):
About exactly exactly, and so that brings up a lot
of questions, is what's going on, what's going on in
the market. I have no doubts in my mind that
bitcoin is going to multimillions of dollars based on demand, functionality,
a whole lot of other things. The problem is, once
these ETFs and Wall Street got involved, they started to

(08:08):
implement their own systems around it, and so there's only
ever going to be twenty one million bitcoin. Just under
twenty million are already in circulation. Okay, However, these people
are masters of creating stuff out of thin air, right,
and so I have no doubts that these ETFs and
whatnot will end up selling what I call paper bitcoin,

(08:31):
which is a paper representation of bitcoin. Right. So let's
say that let's say that one company buys a million
bitcoin and they're sitting in those bitcoin are just locked up,
and they're just sitting there. That company will then issue
speculative bonds and stuff based on those million Bitcoin and
they will basically engage in trading of this paper bitcoin

(08:52):
to make money without even moving any of the underlying asset.
Right this is Bitcoin will expose the underlying Ponzi scheme
that Wall Street really is, because if there's only ever
twenty one stocks, I mean stocks are limited, you have
you might have a company that's got you know, fifty
million stock shares out there and they're allowed to do

(09:13):
derivatives trading and all kinds of speculative stuff on top
of that. And that's never been done on bitcoin before.
Now it's going to start. And so here's my problem.

Speaker 1 (09:23):
That I have.

Speaker 3 (09:23):
These guys have been manipulating the market for months now,
if not longer. Every time you see bitcoin and the
crypto space get above about a four trillion market cap,
it's been getting hammered back down to like hell. This
last one was the biggest drop to three point seventy
five trillion. Now we're up back at like four point
two trillion in the whole market cap, and people keep

(09:44):
thinking bitcoin is going to go to this million dollars
sometime soon. I don't see that, and I don't see
that as being good for the ETFs, because the ETFs
make their money in fees on trading and stuff like that,
so the underlying asset goes up. That's not necessar it's
good for everybody, you would think, But the way that
their manipulation works, they can make just as much money

(10:05):
suppressing the price, like they've done with gold for a century,
you know. So it's a very interesting and questionable time
that we're moving into. But here's the thing I have
to emphasize. The fundamentals have not changed. Bitcoin has not
fundamentally changed. It still does the exact same thing that
it was meant to do from day one, and that's

(10:26):
to get you outside of the current financial system. It
has successfully created a financial ecosystem outside of the US
dollar and other vac currencies. Now, of course you have
on ramps and off ramps, and of course the value
is pegged to the dollar, but one bitcoin will always
equal one bitcoin, right, And so that's kind of what
I'm like nervous about with the space in the short term,

(10:47):
is that the manipulation that's been going on to me
is very reminiscent of the manipulation in gold, because gold
should really be a lot higher in value. Well, technically,
I think bitcoin should be a Technically, I think that
goal should be worth nothing, a bunch of shiny rocks
that has really no use whatsoever except for speculation and
very minor industrial usage. People will say the industrial usage
of gold is like, what gives it some real substate value?

(11:11):
But that's that's bs. They didn't start using gold in
industrial stuff till the eighteen hundreds, right, So gold was
around for thousands of years before that because it was
shiny rocks. That that's it. And to talk about the
scarcity issue, which is why bitcoin is so valuable, there's
only ever going to be twenty one million bitcoin. But
with gold, an asteroid can crash into the planet tomorrow

(11:32):
and deliver us tons of new gold, right, And so
the gold market, just like the diamond market, is mostly artificial.
But at one point in time gold back to our currency.
But that's not the case anymore, right, And so that
cause that has caused us all kinds of problems.

Speaker 1 (11:48):
You mentioned something earlier about a bitcoin civil war. What's
going on with that? All?

Speaker 4 (11:53):
Right?

Speaker 3 (11:53):
So when I said that you can't change bitcoin, that's
not true. You can change bitcoin, but changing bitcoin requires consensus.
Coin is the only true democracy in the world, possibly
the only thing it's ever really been democratic about anything.
Because you have a series of people involved in upgrading Bitcoin. Well,
first you have developers who submit a proposal. Okay, the

(12:15):
proposal needs to be adopted by the community, and they
usually signal miners and node runners can signal support for
certain bitcoin improvement protocols or proposals that will eventually come
into being, and so you kind of get a feel
for what's gonna fly and what's not. Eventually these changes

(12:36):
get packaged into the core bitcoin software that makes Bitcoin work.
And so the core bitcoin software has always been governed
by a group, well it's a kind of a loose
knit group. It's not really an official group, but the
guys who have been working on bitcoin are called the
core developers. The core developers have been the arbiters of
the chain forever and up through they're up through version

(12:59):
twe up through version twenty nine. They have done excellent
work making sure that bitcoin stays a monetary asset, not
some sort of data file storage. But you have a
bunch of the original Bitcoin developers left to do their
own thing, and so what you have is a bunch
of new Bitcoin developers who are now trying to change
the protocol to get it to do things that Ethereum

(13:21):
does in Solana, and to be able to put memes
on it, and like a whole bunch of other stuff. Right,
So there's a push by the Core developers, which is
crazy because Core has always been on the right side
of history. For the first time ever, they're on the
wrong side of history. And so in the new development,
the new version of Bitcoin coming out any day now,
Bitcoin Core version thirty, this changes some very fundamental parameters

(13:44):
that will allow for increased spam on the blockchain. Like
if the Core thirty proposal goes through and people start
to use it, what that means is people will start
to be able to put things on Bitcoin that don't
belong there, like illegal images. Okay, so if you're able
to put an illegal image stored on the blockchain, even
if it's just a hash, which is a numeric representation

(14:07):
of it, that hash can be decoded, and that could
basically if someone were to upload child porn in a
jpeg to the blockchain. Every single person who holds the
Bitcoin blockchain, which right now there's upwards of twenty five
thousand nodes and you can probably double that number with minors,
and every single one of them would be guilty of
possessing child porn if this change in Bitcoin is allowed

(14:30):
to go through. So the last couple of weeks have
been exciting because the Bitcoin civil war is brewing. And
how is it a civil war? Well, because Luke dash Junior,
who was one of the Core developers going back for
a decade, he left the Core team to do his
own bitcoin stuff and he developed a new Bitcoin protocol
called Knots, and Knots is basically an older version of

(14:54):
Bitcoin Core with some changes that eliminate all the unnecessary garbage.
No pictures, no ordinals, no inscriptions, none of the spam
that people were trying to put on to Bitcoin is
possible if people are running Bitcoin knots. Now, this is
historic in the world of bitcoin because for the last

(15:14):
like fifteen years, you've never you've had alternative implement implement
implementations of Bitcoin protocol, but it's never gotten above like
a percent of adoption. You know, one out of one
hundred bitcoin miners will run the alternative software. Bitcoin Knots
is now up to twenty two percent of all bitcoin
node software, which is unbelievable. This is crazy. This is

(15:38):
like the wild. This to me is more unbelievable than
Bitcoin hitting a million bucks tomorrow. Like the idea is
that the Core developers have dropped the ball, put in
some garbage into the Core software, which caused an old
Core developer to come up with new software to fix
that problem, and he's pulling huge chunks of the bitcoin
miners and no runners away from Core. This is this

(16:02):
is crazy. So yes, it's been. It's been a very
lopsided civil war because outside of the Core development team
and a very few handful of developers who are interested
in this, you know, extra garbage on bitcoin, the vast
majority of the bitcoin space has gotten behind Luke dash
Junior and his Knots software as opposed to the Bitcoin
core software. So this is unbelievable. This is wild. I

(16:25):
can't even make an analogy. It's so crazy, you know
what I mean. Core going to this new software is
like if Luke Skywalker would have gone to the dark side.
Like that's how that's that's the equivalent of it. And
so it's wild. What's happening. I'm like, it's the first been,
it's been the most exciting stuff in bitcoin in years, Really.

Speaker 1 (16:43):
What would be the reason for having this extra embedded
information in the bitcoin from your blockchain? Would it be
just to hide things that are illegal or what else
would they be using that for.

Speaker 3 (16:59):
You know, it's like you know, signing your name in
concrete when it's wet. You know, you're just kinda there's
no other real reason. There's no functionality to it. People
tried to add some stuff so that you could end
up doing more ethereum related like smart contracts, and you can.
There's there's some Bitcoin implementations where you can kind of

(17:19):
do some piggybacking and you can even create another coin
on the Bitcoin blockchain that runs off of bitcoin. Uh,
Tether has an implementation that does that. But that is
not what bitcoin is really for. Like, the people who
are really hardcore into bitcoin want it to be purely
a monetary asset as opposed to ethereum, which in solana,

(17:42):
which you can do all this other stuff. So the
bitcoiners are like, hey, if you want to do this stuff,
go right ahead, go do it on your shitcoin, don't
do it on Bitcoin. Leave bitcoin pure. So there was
a years ago there was a there was a couple
of incidents that became known as the block size wars,
and so Bitcoin always ran on a one megabyte block

(18:05):
and there was a very specific reason for that. The
reason for that is if you wanted to maintain there
was a balancing act between a dozen different aspects of bitcoin,
and a one megabyte block was small enough so that
it could be processed fast enough to be done with
the block and move on to the next one in
a timely manner. So when Satoshi designed the one megabyte
block size, and a block is nothing more than a

(18:27):
grouping of transactions. There's no physical block, it's just you know,
you have ten bitcoin transactions, they get lumped together and
they all get sent as one and that's a block. Okay.
So the problem was that there was people kind of
were misinterpreting they weren't well, they weren't misinterpreting. We had
some problems with the cost of bitcoin transactions. The amount

(18:47):
of bitcoin transactions that were going on were causing the
fee amount on bitcoin to be astronomical, and that kind
of screwed bitcoin because it was always supposed to be
a low cost alternative. There were times when to send
one hundred dollars bitcoin transaction, it could cost thirty bucks.
Like you remember back in the day when we were
dealing with ethereum in three hundred dollars fees, right like,
so it's kind of the same thing. So what happened

(19:09):
was you had two different camps. Is always in bitcoin,
is always two different camps. You had the camp that
wanted to basically fork Bitcoin and make the blocks larger,
and that was headed up by Roger Verer and bitcoin
Cash and those guys, and that failed, and then you
had another This was an outright attack on Bitcoin and

(19:32):
an attempt to hijack the chain. So Roger vere forked Bitcoin,
called it bitcoin cash, and then he tried to get
all the nodes and all of the miners to switch
software to bitcoin cash, which would make Bitcoin the new
bitcoin cash, the new Bitcoin. Okay, that project has failed.
It's a dead project, and it still gets traded and
makes some money, but it doesn't do anything. The large

(19:52):
Bitcoin blocks that he made he turned into thirty two
megabyte blocks, and they're all empty. The vast majority of
them are still under one megabyte and transactions right, So
the whole concept of bigger blocks was stupid. How they
fixed that was Luke dash Junior who actually created this
new knots implementation of bitcoin. What he did was he
created a program called segregated Witness, and segregated Witness basically

(20:14):
removed all of the non financial data from the bitcoin
block and put it into its own kind of mini
block known as called a witness sore hence segregated witness
because the block was a smaller block that contained header
and footer data and stuff that was not relevant to
the transaction itself, and that opened up like the vast

(20:34):
majority of the block for bitcoin, and so now one block.
They don't even do it in size anymore. It's considered
block weight, and it's roughly the equivalent of three to
four megabytes of data, which are able to be fit
into a one megabyte block. Still, it is the most
incredible technological advancement in bitcoin ever. And no one knows

(20:54):
who the hell Luke dash Junior is. He got like
four thousand YouTube Twitter subscribers, right, the underlying fundamental guys.
I follow all those guys. And so this is important
because it goes to show today that you have people
who've been around a long time who are trying to
maintain the status quo, which is what we should do,
and then you have these newcomers coming around who grew
up in the era of ethereum, who are trying to

(21:15):
turn Bitcoin into ethereum. This is the fundamentals of the
Bitcoin civil war. If and here's where it's gonna go.
We don't know, We're not sure where it's gonna go,
but it looks like we're gonna end up with a
roughly twenty to thirty percent of people who run bitcoin
nodes running knots. And then you're gonna have a huge percentage,
probably more than fifty percent, who stick with Bitcoin Core

(21:35):
but do not upgrade to the new software. And then
you're gonna have a small percentage of people who upgrade
to the new software. So we're going to see some
turbulence in how bitcoin transactions get transmitted over the next
couple months, and it should be pretty interesting to see
some of these implementations. Like I have a feeling if
Core thirty comes out and if there's any problems at all,

(21:57):
it's going to be pretty much wiped away pretty quickly.
That's the great thing about bitcoin is that being in
it is very democratic. It always tends to fix the
problems that are inherent, and the largest group, the largest
voices are always going to be the bitcoin fundamentalists. And

(22:18):
so yeah, despite all the Bitcoin civil war and all
this stuff, I truly believe bitcoin is a very self
regulating thing and over time it will not be an issue.
But how and the thing is that I find hilarious
is that you have all of these Wall Street guys
who are talking about bitcoin in the future and making
money and millions blah blah blah. Not a single one
is talking about anything with this underlying software implementation stuff.

(22:41):
None of them zero, right, So they don't have a
clue what they're investing in. They're just going with hype.
Most of the latest push is hype. But hey, everything
is hype, really, you know everything. If you've got a
company that only brings in a billion dollars a year
in revenue, but their stock is worth ten billion dollars,
that's bs that's that's that's that's Ponzi Ski territory, right, right, So.

Speaker 1 (23:02):
Let's talk about other type of crypto that people may
want to take a look at. We've basically eluded that
bitcoin is probably the number one investment that people should
be making. But are there any meme coins, anything else
people should be looking at.

Speaker 3 (23:18):
Well, here's the thing. The problem with the meme coin
space is that they don't do anything. They're just there.
When I truly came to get to understand the meme
coin space, it truly is like imagine a meme that
pops up on X, a typical meme, a normal meme,
take that sentiment of popular sentiment, and it's in the meta.

(23:39):
People are talking about it. It's on people's minds. Memes
come out that are funny because people are thinking about
that thing, right, and they get a million and they go,
they go viral. Meme coins are supposed to be that
in a tokenized form, right. So when I'll give you
an example, like when Elon Musk announced the he was

(24:00):
gonna come up with a political party called the America Party.
Right that day, a half a dozen tokens popped up
that were Elon Musk's you know America Party. Yeah, they
all went up and made a bunch of money, and
then they all came down to do nothing. Right. It's
the mean coins are a momentary thing, right, They're not
designed for long term growth. So me having been in

(24:24):
the crypto space as long as I have, me having
worked with all the og bitcoiners and savteen Amus and
Tone Bass and Jimmy Song and all these guys. The
one thing I always left the bitter taste in my
mouth is that these guys only ever cared about the money.
They claimed to be all about the freedom and outside
of the system and all this stuff, but all they
ever talk about is how much bitcoin is going to
in millions, right, And that really put me off. And

(24:47):
then I realized that bitcoin is phenomenal. It solves the
money problem. It's true hard money, but it is not
the kind of thing that you can utilize in a
system them to generate revenue other than through trading or
the value of the token itself going up. Right. So
we wanted to launch a project to raise money for

(25:08):
independent media because independent media is still getting screwed all
the time, people getting banned, demonetized, whatever. And beyond that,
there are people out there with great information that need
money to make projects that they can't afford that nobody
could afford. Who can afford to donate fifty grand to
somebody for them to make a documentary that could change
the world, right? Who can do that? Very few people

(25:29):
unless you're rich. And so we tried to come up
with a system of through crypto that could raise money
without asking for donations, and that people who are involved
in the process can make money as well. Right, And
so what we decided to do, and we've been on
this project, we launch a token called Independent Media Token.
And we've been on this project for nearly two years.
When I went back and looked at some of my

(25:50):
initial messages surrounding the project, I could not believe how
long we've been working on this. It took us a
year and a half just to launch, a year and
a half of planning. And what we do was we
launched a token on the Solana blockchain. And Solana is
great because you have a very low barrier to entry
and there's a full ecosystem of trading and derivatives and
all that stuff already basically built up around it. And

(26:13):
I'm glad we made this decision number one, because the
ecosystem itself has proven through all these junk shit coins
there are over ten million Solana mean coins. Okay, that
is a lot of processing power and a lot of
network capability that really, in my opinion, the only benefit
of all this is that the system on Solana has

(26:33):
proven that is resilient, and it can handle all these transactions,
meaning scalability is not an issue. So that's why we
went with Solana. Another thing about Solana is that it
does what Ethereum does way better. I mean that's a reality.
Ethereum has been out many years now, eight nine years

(26:54):
at this point, it's got a lot of problems, and
Solana looked at all the problems that Ethereum had and
it basically corrected them and it made a blockchain that
is when you look at the technicals on how it works,
it's by far the best blockchain system on the planet.

Speaker 4 (27:08):
Now.

Speaker 3 (27:09):
Is this something that could replace Bitcoin? No, absolutely not,
because Bitcoin, like I said, should be kept specifically a
monetary instrument. You should not be able to put any
other junk on it. With Solana, there's all kinds of
interesting on chain stuff that you can do. It's really wild,
and that's why we went with Solana as opposed to
like ethereum. But if the Solana ETFs the exchange traded funds,

(27:33):
there are federal deadlines I believe next Friday for people
to launch their own ETFs based on Solana. This is
incredible because right now Independent Media Token has a net value.
The market cap is about one hundred and sixteen thousand dollars.
I'm currently we have most of the stash locked right
lock for future growth, but I'm currently sitting on somewhere

(27:55):
around I don't know, seventy thousand dollars worth of tokens
which are all locked ear marked for future exchanges. Our
market cap being one hundred and something thousand dollars, we
aren't doing like any of the fake stuff that a
lot of these meme coins do. They fake their audiences,
they fake their telegram traffic, they fake their volume, they
fake everything to make people think it's a valid project,

(28:16):
and then when people think it's a valid project, they
start to buy in, right, so they fake it until
they make it. Literally, we have decided we're not doing
any of that. That is so in ingenuous and it's
basically lying to people who are going to be buying
your token. So our growth has been pretty slow, but
even with slow growth, we're still sitting at one hundred

(28:36):
and sixteen thousand dollars market cap. Well, one thing that
I think is pretty amazing is the way that the
system is set up with these decentralized exchanges. We've got
somewhere in the neighborhood of eight and a half thousand
dollars worth of Salana and eight and a half thousand
dollars worth of IMT in our liquidity pool. Okay, And
so the liquidity pool holds both sides of the token

(28:59):
at equal value. So as someone buys more of your token,
the value in Solana in your pool goes up. Right.
So if someone came in and bought all of the
IMT and only left one, the price would be driven
up astronomically because it kind of works on this curve
right as you buy in. It goes up on a
curve as compared to like a centralized exchange where you
have to actually pair people selling and people buying. Right,

(29:22):
So it's based off the algorithm. This is amazing because
right now, at one hundred and sixteen thousand dollars market cat,
I anticipate Solana will ten x over the next couple
of years and it'll hit two thousand plus dollars easily.
That right there will take the value of im up
ten times with it because of the way the system works.

(29:43):
So right now, even if this token sales remain low,
which they're not gonna because we're about to close some
really big deals with promoters. On the back end, the
price of the token is going to ten x as
Solana ten x's just because of the nature of the system,
which is absolutely amazing, and that doesn't even take into
consideration any buys that people make in the meantime. So

(30:06):
between now and the time Solana hits two grand, we're
going to go from this hundred and something thousand market
cap to well over a million with very little price action,
just because Solana is going to go up. But once
we start to close these bigger deals for promotion, and
the whole purpose of Independent Media Token is that we
fund independent media projects. We've currently funded well over twenty projects,
and as we as we grow and we get bigger

(30:28):
shows and sponsor more projects, the name Independent Media Token
will go into more circulation, people will draw more attention,
the price will continue to go up, and we hope
to spend somewhere between five and ten percent of the
market cap each year on independent media projects. So if
we can get up to a million dollar market cap,

(30:49):
we hope to be able to distribute somewhere around one
hundred thousand dollars in project funding, and so it is,
in my opinion, it's the only legitimate on the Salona
blockchain right now. Ninety nine percent of them are mean coins.
The ones that are not mean coins are usually exchange tokens,
meaning they're connected to an exchange which you have to

(31:10):
use in order to use the exchange. So I kind
of understand that, but there's nothing like what we're doing
in the crypto space at all. It's I even it's
so new. I kind of consider it a philanthropy token,
which is a new I consider to be a new
style of token, something that you could do for anything else.
If you wanted to raise money for cancer, you can
start some sort of token that has a tax on
it that returns money to you that you then invest

(31:31):
in cancer research or whatever. So this idea of philanthropy tokens,
I think, is something that's going to be picking up,
and we're the first one ever to do it. So
independent media token, I think, is we have a very
long future ahead of us because I'm not going anywhere
and I'm not rugging this thing, and I want to
see independent media grow. And the phrase itself independent media
is on everybody's tongue. So yes, that's what we've done.

(31:55):
You can go check us out at independentmediatoken dot com.
Uh and that has all of our link to all
our deck stuff and whatnot. But yeah, we're real excited.
We're working with Charlie Robinson and Steve Poikinen and we're
working with Ryan Christian from Vagabond and Chris Here from
Forbidden Knowledge News, Lindsay Sharman, Drew Treglia, Don Rogers, who

(32:18):
else Ciphered Past which is like a Kennedy podcast. I mean,
we've got a great list of people supporting us, and
we're in the beginning. This is like day one for us,
pretty much the way we see it like day one.
So look into Independent Media Token, pick you up some
If you have questions, you can email me and I'll
be glad to answer any questions you have. But I

(32:38):
don't like the way crypto is being used for the
most part, But so I created something to use it
in a manner in which I like, because most crypto
doesn't do anything, and if you want to have a
crypto project, you better have something else besides the crypto
itself that it's connected to in order to give it
any kind of credence and substantiality and everything like that.

Speaker 1 (32:58):
You know, this is very exciting. I don't see any
downsides to this. Those that are investing are going to
be benefiting. If people are interested in getting their project funded,
how would they go about requesting funds from IMT.

Speaker 3 (33:17):
Sure, Well, right now, we have a very simple contact
form on our website and it says become a media partner.
And that is how we're doing it for now, because
in the beginning, what we did was we wanted to
work with independent shows and to gather a kind of
a base of support, we funded individual content creators for

(33:39):
their shows. However, we plan on changing that system to
a system for specific projects. Right Like, let's say somebody
wants to make a documentary and they need twenty five
thousand dollars to make the documentary. We are going to
come up with some sort of system for them to
put in an application, and then the board, which will

(34:02):
is you know, you're on the board and Xcube and
Charlie and Steve and Ryan and Lindsay we're currently with
the board. We're looking for more board members too. But
then we will take these applications, we will review the
applications and then we'll make decisions on where that money goes.
So one thing that people could say is that we're

(34:23):
not running a decentralized project, and to that, I would say,
you are very correct. This is not a decentralized project.
The token and Solona function in a decentralized manner. However,
the project itself is a very it's a very specific
centralized project. Right, So we're trying to use this technology

(34:45):
for a traditional type venture capital fund. That is what
we're doing. It's basically a venture capital based on crypto
using independent media token and every transaction has a one
percent tax, so that one percent tax gets sent back
to us and that continue annually funds the project. We
don't really see it no time. There's no way that
we could run out of funding for projects because the

(35:08):
way the system works, every time someone does a transactions,
a piece of that gets sent back to us, which
then gets distributed for these projects. So it's a self
perpetuating system and they'll the more recognition of the name
that gets out there, the more growth in the project.
Hence kind of this cycle of feedback of going back
into the token price and then awareness and all that stuff.
We see it as kind of a perfect storm for

(35:30):
growth and development.

Speaker 1 (35:32):
Speaking of you mentioned that the tokens were locked. Tell
us a little bit about why you decided to lock
them when they should be available.

Speaker 3 (35:41):
Sure, so we have in circulation right now, one hundred
and fifty million tokens. We have another one hundred million
tokens that are in our creator fund now a lot
of these meme coins. What they do is they'll put
out a small amount of tokens and they'll get people
to buy into it, and then they'll just dump all
of their tokens at once and they'll rug the project. Okay,
We to us a couple things are of paramount importance.

(36:04):
Number one, token security. Right, we have gotten it down
to where our our token or our wallet that governs
our project is now on one device only that is
kept offline until needed. Right, So security was paramount. Another
part of security is kind of signaling to people that

(36:27):
you're not gonna be dumping and you're a long term project.
So instead of just letting like you know, the vast
majority of tokens sit in a wallet for future growth,
we lock them up with a company called stream Flow,
which we basically we pay a fee and they hold
our tokens and you can see it you go in
and you can see the project, and you can see
our tokens are locked. And then when the unlocked, when

(36:47):
the date unlocked that we previously set happens, those tokens
are instantly delivered back to our wallet we've already had.
We had originally planned to release all of the tokens
on a monthly schedule. We changed that and we decided
against that because there is simply no need for us
to have seven hundred million tokens or whatever floating around

(37:08):
on a decentralized exchange. So we locked up our tokens
and we are fundamentally going to leave them locked indefinitely.
They could sit there, locked up for years, because we
want to get onto the bigger centralized exchanges by bit
and bitmarked and some of the I mean, we're never
going to be big enough. I don't think for Binance.
I mean, let's be real. You have to pay to

(37:29):
get on Binance millions of dollars. You have to give
them a huge chunk of your supply and a bunch
of millions of dollars, and sometimes they even make you
put up the other half of the liquidity pool. But
the benefit is they will then promote you and do
all that stuff. For us to get on a centralized exchange,
we calculate for it to be worth it is probably
going to be somewhere in the neighborhood of fifty grand right,

(37:50):
fifty thousand dollars plus a huge chunk of our tokens.
That's the reality. So we don't have that money at all,
not even close. But we're long term thinkers and we're
going to have that money and so that money, so
those tokens are going to remain locked on stream flow.
We're going to maintain the circulating supply somewhere between three
to three hundred and fifty million tokens, and that's going

(38:11):
to be it. The rest are going to sit locked
until we get the opportunity and the funding to grow
onto the bigger exchanges. And you got to think, once
we get onto those bigger exchanges, we will be already
upwards in the ten to one hundred million dollar market
cap because that's what it takes to get there, and
so I have no doubts we're going to get there
once people really come to understand what we're doing, and

(38:34):
they really come to understand the fundamentals and the security
and the team and all that. This is a guaranteed
winner for sure, And honestly, I'm not even really too
concerned about how much money it generates for me or
us or like anything like that. In particular. All I
care about really is funding these projects, getting these projects
off the ground, because I'm a big believer in karma, right,

(38:54):
and so if I help these projects, it will come
back on to me tenfold. And I'm not really too
concerned about the money aspect of it. I just want
to get these projects up off the ground so they
can spread their voice, you know.

Speaker 1 (39:05):
Well, you've got some other projects in the works, of course,
always your JFK research. Before we get to that, is
there anything else that the audience should know about crypto
in general or independent media token?

Speaker 3 (39:21):
Well, it's available right now, and the best place to
get it is if we use see nowadays, you have
a lot of these decent it's all decentralized, right, There's
no centralized place to go and buy it, so you
end up buying these tokens through a wallet, right, and
the wallet we suggest is Phantom. You can get it
at phantom dot com and it is a wallet that
once you have some salana in there, you can very
easily do a swap to independent media token. So let

(39:46):
me just throw this out there. If there are any
whales out there who have, you know, ten twenty thousand
dollars they want to invest. We're looking to do some
over the counter deals. We have a token allotment set
aside that we can do an over the counter deal,
which then we would take that MO and do an
official token buyback, which would basically drive the price up exponentially.

Speaker 1 (40:06):
So right on, well, I'll have those links easily accessible
for everyone. Let's get into some of your recent JFK research.
I know that you're constantly updating it. You've got a
second book out, working on a third, got your podcast.
I'm not sure where we left off with what we

(40:27):
were discussing last time we discussed your work with Kennedy.
But where are you at with everything?

Speaker 3 (40:34):
All right? So I am me and my guys. I
got a couple guys in my research chat, and I've
recruited a couple new guys. James Day, amazing Kennedy researcher.
I recruited him. He has been absolutely fantastic with digging
up some things that I don't know how I missed,
and We've been trying to put clay Shaw in Dallas
for years. I got two guys I've had working on

(40:57):
in this thing for at least a year or two.
And I I know Clayshaw was in Dallas. I know
who he was in Dallas with. I have not been
able to prove it. We are inches away from proving it.
We've had some breakthroughs this week. We've basically made some
connections that are one person away from the Clayshaw connection

(41:17):
in Dallas. So we're really excited about that because once
you put Clayshaw in Dallas, that is the most that
up ends the entire story, that justifies everything that Jim
Garrison did at the Clayshaw trial. So yeah, we're super
stoked about that. But no, all my time has spent
on Oswald, and right now it's on Oswald in the Marines.
Now I did. I already did all this stuff a
year ago when I put together my last presentation, but

(41:38):
now that it is going into book form. See, there's
a part of the process. It's kind of like braiding hair,
is kind of how I see it. You have all
these different independent things and they're all random, and then
you eventually when you get to the book. The book
forces you to re examine everything because you get you
can't get it wrong, and you have to do it
correctly in the chronology. And so those two factors alone

(41:59):
have me to reanalyze everything. And oh my god, it's
way worse than we thought. The marine situation is way
worse than we thought. There's I got at least three
guys in the Marines with Oswald who on the paper
have different names. You know, what's going on there? Why? Why?
Why you got different names on the on the roster?

(42:20):
Who are these people? You know? Why? Why are you?
Why do you have one name here and different name
over there with the same marine number. And it's not
a mistake, right, So I'm kind of figuring out that
there were a bunch of people, probably involved in childhood
intelligence stuff that they've at some point you got to
get your official training, so they put you into the
Marines to kind of get you there, right, And that's

(42:41):
kind of what I'm concluding. But I got three other
identity transfer operations going on at the same time that
Oswald is in just boot camp, just boot camp alone,
just his first four weeks in the Marines. I got
those other guys with different names, So there's weird stuff
going on there. And as I'm writing up this book,
I'm iron out all of these little details and laying

(43:02):
them out in a manner so people can kind of
understand what's happening. It's been great. I love it. I
mean this Oswald stuff to me, I love way more
than the assassination itself, which is crazy to me, because
this Oswald stuff leads to a universe of covert operations
that nobody knows about. Nobody everybody talks about covert operations.
They're talking CIA, they're talking FBI, they're talking no, no, no, no, no no.

(43:25):
The progenitors of covert operations was naval intelligence and a
couple of sub organizations surrounding naval intelligence that no one
talks about. No one's ever written books about. It's crazy.
We're about to crack into a world that is basically
uncharted territory in the intelligence scheme of things.

Speaker 1 (43:41):
What's so interesting to me is the multigenerational intelligence families
that work with intelligence in different ways and are embedded
in different projects, but they are actually related in some ways,
and they've been passing down down this intelligence torch multi

(44:03):
generationally for many decades.

Speaker 3 (44:07):
Yeah, yeah, and that's I think that's really most of
what they're hiding with the Oswald stuff, because it becomes
birdly obvious his family was all involved in intelligence. The
woman who they say is Marguerite Oswald is most certainly
not the real Marguerite Oswald, and that whole family is
connected to intelligence. That whole family is connected to the
assassination of Huey Long, that whole thing is I mean,

(44:31):
it is really wild when you start to dig into
the morets. Who are the you know, Marguerite Oswald's sister
and her family, they're all spooks. They all got different
names and aliases. It's just it's just crazy. And that
made me realize that when you're gonna if you're in this,
if you're a spook, if you recruit the children of

(44:52):
your spooks, you're basically guaranteeing loyalty, you know what I mean.
It's not such some Joe Schmoe showing up off the street,
or hey, I think being a spy would be cool. No,
my mom was a spy, my dad was a spy.
My older brother he got picked up and is a spy.
And here I'm only twelve years old and now they
got me kind of going into these spy like engagements, right,
So I'm convinced beyond all doubt that Lillian Murrett, who

(45:15):
is Marguerite Oswald's sister, she impersonated Marguerite Oswald at a
minimum twice from fifty fifty five to nineteen fifty eight.
I have no doubt she impersonated and gave the name
Marguerite Oswald won at a job at Dolly Shoe Company
in nineteen fifty five and then again in nineteen fifty

(45:36):
seven point fifty eight, where she meets a guy named
Palmer McBride who allegedly knew Oswald in New Orleans at
a time when Oswald's supposed to be over in at Ssugi, Japan.
The photographic evidence shows that the woman who introduced herself
as Marguerite Oswald to Palmer McBride is one hundred percent
Lillian Morrett. So then you got to be like, why
is she impersonating her sister when her sister is living

(45:58):
in a different city, and why would they do this
at all? Practice? I think this is practice because the
Lee Harvey Oswald, who was alleged to him working at
Dolly Shoe with his mother was most certainly not Oswald
at all. The timing is bad, the description are bad,
and he was described as being dumb as a box
of rocks pretty much, and Oswald was pain in the ass,

(46:20):
but he was never dumb. So and I believe that
that was Lillian's son, John Marshall Morett, because John Marshall Morett,
I have no doubts he looked just like Oswald, the
real Oswald. I mean, they could they could have been
brothers too. So it's it's really strange to me. But
when I see something like that, when I see a
teenager going and getting a job as his cousin's name,

(46:42):
that to me is like that seems like a practice run,
nothing more, you know. So but then when you dart
to dig into like all these jobs that allegedly everyone
had and the owners of the jobs, it all leads
back to intelligence.

Speaker 1 (46:54):
So I know you probably haven't had much time with
all that you're working on to really look at any
thing with the recent Charlie Kirk assassination. But there are
strange echoes of the jfk assassination. Lots of angles, it
seems that are at play, a lot of possibilities whenever

(47:15):
you try and examine this, and it's very difficult to examine.
I'm trying to follow a couple of people who were
looking at different possibilities, but there's so much convoluted information,
so many angles that are coming out that don't fit
with each other. It's very strange. I'd just love to
get your thoughts on that event.

Speaker 3 (47:37):
The whole story's bs. I mean, the whole story's bs.
Like anyone who says that he got shot with a
thirty out six has never seen the results of a
thirty out six hitting anything. A thirty out six would
have basically entered his neck and blown his neck apart,
his whole. You would have seen it come out like this.
It would have been like one of them puffer fish.
It would have been like like that. That didn't happen.

(47:57):
I don't know what he was hit with. I don't
buy the little microphone thing killed him, even though Israel
is known to have done that stuff. I don't buy that.
I think he was shot. I think he was shot
from a different angle. I think that wound was an
exit wound. But then where's the bullet. Here's one thing
I really pissed me off. I'm an expert at crime
Scene Processing and Analysis and crime scene Security. I was

(48:20):
a crime scene investigator for years. I processed five hundred
plus crime scenes myself. They didn't establish a crime scene ever, never, never,
They did not establish a crime scene period. What really
should have happened was within an hour of that fucking shooting,

(48:41):
one hundred percent of people should have been forced out
of that area. Not only should they have put up
like crime scene tape, they should have put up crime
scene barricades that are like eight foot tall around the
entire thing to isolate the whole area. Okay, they should
have isolated the rooftops of the buildings and about a

(49:02):
ten foot perimeter around each one of those buildings. At
a minimum, they should have isolated the area they saw
him walk on the video. I'm talking like, no, this
whole area should have been shut down for about two
weeks with nobody going in or out unless you've got
a crime scene uniform on. That's not what happened. That's
not what happened at all. They destroyed that crime scene

(49:24):
starting immediately, just things like the camera being taken down.
I don't care if it's a mistake, you violated a
crime scene. You should go to jail. Yeah, that camera
had oh my god, like there should have been blood
spatter on that camera, even microscopically. Okay, So when you
have a shooting like that, even if you don't see

(49:45):
visible blood, you get these like micro clouds that you
really can't see right that you like, you won't you
won't get you You might not get a positive like
blood sample if you test for it, but you'll get
a DNA you know, because it sprays like a mist,
very very fine. I've seen places where they didn't find
any blood, but when they swabbed it for DNA, found

(50:06):
the DNA that came from blood. So that stuff happens
that should have been everywhere in that place, even the
exit wound and just blood spurting out from a neck.
You can't see the fine mist that surrounds that that
should have covered everything. So I'm like, I don't know.
If here's another thing. This was done on a campus.

(50:28):
Campus police suck because they're not real cops. Okay. Campus
police don't deal with homicides, they don't deal with well
usually they don't deal with muggings or robberies, or they'll
deal with sexual assaults because it's a campus. But they
don't get the training that even a good street cop
would get anywhere else, or anybody who's ever been a

(50:48):
cop should have known to isolate that scene immediately, and
they didn't do it. They had only five or six cops.
No university has a full staff of cops like here
in Colorado, like like here in four Collins. The college here,
I would bet you that they probably have somewhere in
the neighborhood of under thirty cops, less than half of

(51:09):
them working at any given time, and on any given shift,
you probably got four or five guys. That's the that's it.
What kind of training you think those guys gotten in
crime scene and bullet trajectories and all that stuff. None. Zero.
So I'm kind of I'm starting to think that these
college campuses are a really good spot to have an
assassination because your initial reaction is going to be dogshit,

(51:32):
The initial clamping down of the scene is going to
be handled by a bunch of rented cops. I mean,
that's that's a reality.

Speaker 1 (51:38):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (51:38):
How long is it before the FBI can get into
a place, Usually an hour or two.

Speaker 1 (51:42):
This is, you know, another one of those events that
have layers and layers that will probably never be able
to peel through and get to look at your work
on the JFK assassination. Each week you're coming up with
new angles that you thought would never have existed in this.
We have footage from the actual event, much better technology

(52:07):
that we have access to to try and analyze this stuff,
and still it's like we have no idea what really happened.
So that seems to be the point of these high
impact events, so that we don't find out what was
really going on, who was really involved in, what the
purpose really was.

Speaker 3 (52:25):
Who benefits from Charlie Kirkman and killed It's the question there. Look, man,
here's it. You know me Israel is behind everything until
proven otherwise. That's where we're at now.

Speaker 1 (52:37):
Before we move on from your JFK work, Is there
anything else that you're working on? I know that you
just release the Oswald book. Let him know how they
can get that, and anything else that you're working on
with JFK.

Speaker 3 (52:52):
Yeah. My Oswald book is pretty much the definitive book
on Oswald's life up until he joins the Marines in
October fifty six, So it's covers the first seventeen years
of his life, which is the most crazy rabbit hole
you'll ever read. When you put together the pieces of
Oswald's life, it doesn't create a single timeline. It creates
two timelines. The only reason for that is because there

(53:14):
were two Oswald's that'll be developed in this book. But
also we're working on a documentary that should be done
before the end of the year. I already have a
script in hand that I have to finish editing and read.
But it's on a Warning from History and the material
in a Warning from History, and so that should be
out on all the major streaming platforms, hopefully by end

(53:35):
of the year. If we can get it out for
the Christmas rush, I think that'd be fantastic. Hell, if
I can get out by November twenty second, I think
that'd be a miracle. But yeah, that's on the way,
and this new book on Oswald and the Marines should
be out. I mean, realistically, i'd like to get it
up by the end of the year, but the latest
after Christmas, I'd say January at the latest. If I
can't get it done, I just keep coming across new stuff,

(53:56):
stuff I thought I already knew. I'm like, oh my god,
this is even this makes it even worse. You know, Like,
when you guys get finished with my first two volumes
of this Oswald stuff, you'll understand exactly that the government lies,
they engage in covert operations with children, and that nothing
you've ever heard about Oswald is true.

Speaker 1 (54:13):
You've also got a new podcast, Morals in Dogma, where
you've been exploring Albert Pike letters and documents. Talk a
little bit about that podcast.

Speaker 3 (54:26):
Those people are weirdos I wanted to do that because
I wanted to understand them. And I think here's the thing.
I think I figured it out in like three episodes,
Like Freemasons is one hundred percent Kabbala and Jewish occultism.
That's it. And that's why you get all of these
ancient references to the Pyramids and Egypt and stuff like that.
And because all of these Zionists, and that's what ultimately

(54:46):
what these are. These guys are Zionists, right, and so
Zionists constantly think that they can find ancient heat, hidden
secrets in the town wood and stuff. And so that's
where this obsession with ancient Egypt comes from, because they
feel like pre Abrahamic religions, all this God stuff was
kind of the Egyptians kind of got part of it right, right,

(55:10):
So they they believe in some of these Egyptian ancient
Egyptian gods and stuff from thousands and thousands of years ago.
And then there's some tie over to like the aztext
They study the aztexts and their ancient stuff. And so
these are a bunch of weirdos who are all about
using ancient mysticism to shape public events today. And yeah,
it's these.

Speaker 1 (55:30):
People are this is a synagogue of Satan anywhere in.

Speaker 3 (55:34):
This one hundred percent, because these people are all Luciferians.
And that's the ultimate secret of these that's the ultimate
secret of not only Judaism, but Freemasonry and all those things,
is that they don't they're not Satan worshippers. They're Luciferians.
And they believe that Lucifer was kicked out of heaven
by a jealous and angry God, and that as Lucifer fell,

(55:54):
he created the heavens and the earth, not God. And
so they worship Lucifer as he's the good, noble, benevolent God,
not that he's like the evil Satan that people worship
in the heavy metal stuff, right, Like that's a totally
false image put forth probably by these people to bring

(56:15):
attention away from them. But ultimately they believe Lucifer is
the true benevolent God and that's why they worship him
and they denounce God. Fucking kind of sick.

Speaker 1 (56:25):
Do you think all these secret societies are intertwined like
the Mason's Roe secrutions that it's pretty much all the
same thing, just maybe different agendas or ideologies between them.

Speaker 3 (56:38):
Yes, one hundred percent. And you have these people who
are up at the top levels of that stuff who
kind of dance between the raindrops of these different organizations. Right,
They'll be like a thirty third degree Freemason and they'll
be in the Rosicrucion stuff, and they'll be in Opus day,
you know, and they're they're basically controlling these organizations from
behind the scenes. So it's a double, double layer behind

(57:01):
the scenes thing, you know.

Speaker 1 (57:02):
And you think you'll be continuing this seriasony.

Speaker 3 (57:06):
I'll be continuing it, Yes, But I swear to God,
I when I read this stuff, my eyes glaze over,
like I'm reading some you know, some weird translation to
Shakespeare or something. It's like, oh, my God, who talks
like this? Right? And it's the thing that's obvious is
they keep pushing the symbology. They keep pushing the They

(57:27):
don't ever say Jewish, they say Kawbalistic. Yeah, and that's
we all know what that is, right, And so yeah,
I'm definitely gonna continue with it. But it's really hard
to get through. Man, it's hard. Like I read it
and my brain shuts off after about ten minutes.

Speaker 1 (57:42):
I love it, Man, got some awesome stuff in the pipeline.
Before I let you go, remind the audience how to
get access to all of it, how to invest in
IMT the best way they can do.

Speaker 3 (57:54):
So, Yeah, for all myself as a core hues dot
org and form, go check out our website independent mediatoken
dot com and then you can download the phantom wallet
and then you can do a swap for some IMT
with some Solana. So but I tell everybody, if you're
interested in crypto, just set up an account at coinbase.
Coinbase dot com is where you need to go. That's

(58:15):
step one for everybody who's new. And so after that
you buy some Solana and then you can do the
swap to IMT. So little barrier, a little difficult barrier
to entry, but not too bad. Once you figure it out,
you're like, oh okay, I get.

Speaker 1 (58:28):
It on, Corey, thank you so much. I'll have your
links right in the description. Until next time, everyone, have
an excellent evening. We'll talk again Tomora. Hello friends. If
you're looking to start your therapeutic microdosing journey but don't
know where to start, especially when looking for the highest
quality ingredients, including new tropics and what you'd expect from

(58:50):
a true micro dose capsule, check out our friends at
Brain Supreme. They offer the absolute highest quality ingredients, so
you can start microdosing journey knowing that you're getting top
notch ingredients. To find out more, visit their website using
that link right in the description, and you can get

(59:11):
fifteen percent off your entire order. The nature of this
experience seems to always be just beyond the reach of
our science, technology, and consciousness collective.

Speaker 3 (59:27):
There's layers upon layers upon layers. Does add such an
element of mystery to this place?

Speaker 1 (59:32):
Why are we here?

Speaker 3 (59:33):
We're getting closer to the truth now.

Speaker 1 (59:37):
Too many people experiencing profound interactions with conscious entities.

Speaker 3 (59:42):
I'm focused on the non human intelligence contact phenomenon in
dreams dreams involve interactions with real entities.

Speaker 1 (59:51):
People are waking up paralyzed their sensing or seeing something
very evil in the room. I have experienced sleep paralysis,
shadow people start to appear.

Speaker 4 (01:00:03):
I was taken from my earliest memories by non human
alien entities. More and more people are wanting to talk
about these things.

Speaker 3 (01:00:16):
A upologist would say, well, that's obviously an extraterrestrial in
our paranormal research, which they will have the ghost. Well
what if it's all of those things in none of
those things, the entities, the intelligence that were just beyond
our understanding. There seems to be something a little extra
that can take forms of anything.

Speaker 1 (01:00:35):
I can't believe what I've seen, but it continues on.

Speaker 3 (01:00:39):
A daily basis.

Speaker 1 (01:00:40):
We're definitely not alone. UFOs, UAPs, portals opening up.

Speaker 5 (01:00:45):
I really thought this supernatural stuff you kind of grow
up with that. Around here, you see a lot of
strange things. I don't like to talk about skinwalkers too much.

Speaker 1 (01:00:57):
I had an experience with a skin walker entity.

Speaker 5 (01:01:02):
People they would say they were transform into bears, into wolves.
There's these bad things that occur, goals, rfos and all
types of things coming from somewhere.

Speaker 1 (01:01:14):
Our beliefs, our emotions, and our fears all seem to
heavily influence the nature of these experiences.

Speaker 3 (01:01:23):
There is so much more that we just don't have
time for in this busy, loud, and noisy life that
we lead.

Speaker 2 (01:01:30):
All of this is planned, everything is synchronicity.

Speaker 3 (01:01:33):
There's so much more out there.

Speaker 2 (01:01:34):
We really are picking up such a small, small percentage
of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Speaker 3 (01:01:38):
The world is an amazing place. It feels like we're
God's in training.

All Episodes

Crypto for Creators - Kirk/JFK Assassination Anomalies - Multi-Generational Ops | Cory Hughes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Crypto for Creators - Kirk/JFK Assassination Anomalies - Multi-Generational Ops | Cory Hughes