November 4, 2025 • 41 mins
Did Bill Gates say, "U.S. citizens must accept digital IDs by 2028 or be excluded from society"? According to a few online alternative sources he did. They quote it from Bill's own publication.... or did they?
We will explore how a claim from one source is parroted by several to make a confirming circle that only goes back to one unconfirmed source and how people spreading it cause a fear to become fact.
We look at the claims of Bill Gates, the potential of the technological development, BUT differentiate whether that was true or speculative so we can bring you the real truth to the matter to expel the hype.
Original source:
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/07/bill-gates-digital-ids-will-be-mandatory-to-participate-in-society/
Here is my article on Biometrics ID tested in India
https://jimdukeperspective.com/citizens-india-biometrics-forced-mark-beast/
Here's my article on Biometric ID clase to the Mark of the Beast?
https://jimdukeperspective.com/biometric-id-one-step-away-mark-beast/
We will explore how a claim from one source is parroted by several to make a confirming circle that only goes back to one unconfirmed source and how people spreading it cause a fear to become fact.
We look at the claims of Bill Gates, the potential of the technological development, BUT differentiate whether that was true or speculative so we can bring you the real truth to the matter to expel the hype.
Original source:
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/07/bill-gates-digital-ids-will-be-mandatory-to-participate-in-society/
Here is my article on Biometrics ID tested in India
https://jimdukeperspective.com/citizens-india-biometrics-forced-mark-beast/
Here's my article on Biometric ID clase to the Mark of the Beast?
https://jimdukeperspective.com/biometric-id-one-step-away-mark-beast/
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Hi, everybody, it's me Cinderella Ax. You are listening to
the Fringe Radio Network. I know I was gonna tell them, Hey,
do you.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Have the app?
Speaker 3 (00:15):
It's the best way to listen to the Fringe Radio Network.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
It's safe and you don't have to log in to
use it, and it doesn't track you or trace you,
and it sounds beautiful.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app?
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Just go to Fringe radionetwork dot com right at the
top of the page.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
I know, slippers, we gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
Make your space smell like you with a free Pureplus
diffuser for a limited time. Get a free set when
you subscribe to two cents monthly for a year, and
transform every space with Premium Fragrance. Customize your experience with
are easy to use app and a stylish diffuser that
suits every esthetic. You don't miss out. This exclusive deal
(01:07):
won't last. Shop now before it's gone only at Pura
dot com.
Speaker 5 (01:15):
Wake Up Radio Network, A rational voice in a world
of conspiracy.
Speaker 6 (01:23):
Jim Duke Perspective.
Speaker 7 (01:30):
Welcome to Jim Duke Perspective.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
This is where we're starting to challenge the narratives both sides,
not just the left, not just.
Speaker 7 (01:40):
The the what is it called the.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
Sleeping but also the the truthers, the truth community, that
they put out fabrications here and there, and we expose
these agendas and we look behind the curtain. But what
we're taking a look at is is we're tackling viral
claims that stirred up in the truth community lately. Darren,
(02:07):
did you see the meme about Bill Gates declaring the
US citizens must accept a digital ID by twenty twenty
eight or be excluded from society.
Speaker 7 (02:21):
Did you see that?
Speaker 8 (02:22):
No good thing?
Speaker 2 (02:24):
Okay, well it was on certain video content creators.
Speaker 7 (02:29):
So because it was a video, we could believe it, right.
Speaker 8 (02:31):
Darren, Absolutely, because videos they always just tell just the truth.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Yeah, and it was if it was in a graphic
meme picture, it absolutely absolutely substantiates and confirms the truth.
Speaker 8 (02:45):
Right, absolutely, And cartoons are even better.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
And that's a big claim. But here's this is what
it's saying. It hits all the pressure points. That's the thing.
Memes are designed to cause shock, stir up people, and
hype the situation so that everybody's frantically looking for excitement
and truth or whatever. They're trying to look for truth,
but they're not looking behind the claims. I do, but
(03:15):
they don't. Most people see a viral, send something sent viral,
and they believe it because many people send it to them,
it must be true because of consensus sending it. Well,
I'm going to prove that wrong. But this certain claim
hits a lot of pressure points. It hits digital surveillance,
it hits social credit systems which we're leary of, and yes,
(03:39):
even prophetic mark of the beast. So this is a
really heightened, hyped, a really situation that people love to
toss around and believe and send and share. But the
question is is it true Bill Gates really say that?
(04:02):
And are we looking deeper into something said and making
a false conclusion about it to bring hype to it
or could it be another case of circular journalism? Remember
I talked about circular journalism, Darren, Let's see I talk
about circular journalism. That's the idea that you get one
(04:24):
source and you see something, and then you see another source,
and you see another source, and you see another source
and you say, oh my gosh, there's four sources that
are reporting the same thing.
Speaker 7 (04:34):
So it must be true. Yes, I remember, right.
Speaker 2 (04:37):
But then you go back to each of the sources
and you examine where they're quoting from or what their
links are, and they said from the original source this,
and they each either go back to the last source
and quote each other that goes back to one original source,
or they all go back to the original source. So
(04:57):
they're all basically sourcing off of one tabloid article. But
it sounds like it's truth and it's viral because they're
all saying the same thing. But all they're doing is
resurfacing one article. It's all they're doing. So this is
where the fringe article quotes another fiction and it becomes fact.
(05:19):
So let's take a look at this. Let's break it
down and separate what's real. The meme that set the
Internet on fire had started. I saw it on my
feed and I tried to comment, and I moved away
from it and then lost it because I looked into it.
So the meme is spread across social media. It's on Facebook, Twitter,
(05:43):
or x Telegram channels, and then people do viral videos
of it, so it sounds like it's confirmed by all
these different sources and everybody's saying, well, since they all
reported it. Somebody must have glanced at it and saw
that Bill Gates had said this, so they all confirm it.
But it's claiming that Bill Gates said that by twenty
(06:07):
twenty eight, Americans will have to accept an ID digital
ID or they'll be shutouts out of society. And people
started posting this warning. Here it comes the technocratic system,
or they said, Gates is announcing the beast system. He's
the beast. He's the second beast, proclaiming the beast. You know,
Bill Gates is the Antichrist. You'll hear all this stuff.
(06:30):
It states that Bill Gates said something definite absolute. It's
in quotes, so it's it's quoting him. However, he never.
Speaker 7 (06:43):
Said that per se.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
The source came from an article I got it from.
I got it from Global Research. That's where I saw it,
so it was quoted. It was from Global Research, and
then I looked it up and it's also in transcend International.
(07:06):
So I looked up both articles and I read through
it and said, okay, they look like they say the
same exact thing. It looks like it's just copy paste.
So I said, all right, where are they sourcing it from?
Where are they quoting it from and they both go
back to this article from this publication called The Expose,
dated September of twenty twenty five, and all they've did
(07:30):
was echo that article. That's all they did. So what's
this article say. Well, when you look at the article,
it basically states some of the claims of Bill Gates,
but then it points you to a redirection of its
conclusion that this is what it must mean. Therefore, it's
(07:56):
it's opinionated. It's only telling you an opinion of how
they conclude. So let's look again at what these what
the transcript is, and what's true.
Speaker 7 (08:11):
Did Gates actually advocate this sentiment?
Speaker 2 (08:15):
Well, you and I both know that he probably really
wishes this, right, he probably desires it. We could say that, right,
I mean, Bill Gates is Bill Gates. He desires everybody
to get vaccinated too. But did that happen? No, it didn't.
Just because he wants it, and just because he's a
billionaire and he has the money and he's in charge
(08:38):
of certain things doesn't give him the authority to govern
the world. But he's well respected, right, But are they
going to listen to him completely? Are we going to
listen to him completely? So here's what I found out.
Bill Gates was appointed major stockholder of Global Digital ID Systems.
(09:00):
There therefore he does have a stake in it. The
Bill Gates and Gates Foundation has supported digital ID initiatives,
especially in developing countries, and they've invested in ID twenty twenty.
Speaker 7 (09:16):
You ever hear of that, Yes, they have, I believe.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
So it came from I remember this from the past,
and I'm reaching, but I think it came from what's
called in the United Nations a program of digital ID
called ID four D. I don't remember what it stands for,
but ID four D transferred to ID twenty twenty, and
(09:41):
then another program called MASSIP MOSIP. I think I got
the what the initials stand for. I'll say that later.
But there's other projects that aim to give legal identity
to people who lack it, and it's often for access
to healthcare, banking, and education. Now these are for certain
(10:04):
people in welfare situations. Gates never publicly actually said that
he's aiming towards digital IDs mandatory, or that the US
citizens must accept them by twenty twenty eight. There's been
no data that that was uttered by him, So I
(10:26):
don't know where these groups get this from this truther
magazine called The Expose.
Speaker 7 (10:31):
I don't know where it got it from.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
It could be just assuming that the twenty twenty five
agendas here and by twenty twenty eight, that's a likely
date that could happen, and they speculated that that's the date.
But when you say for a fact, when you make
a factual statement in quotes that says Bill Gates said,
digital ID mandatory twenty twenty eight, what you're doing, You're
(10:58):
you're putting an app so loot statement on something that
wasn't necessarily stated. Is that as much as a fabrication
as anything else there?
Speaker 8 (11:10):
Sure is?
Speaker 2 (11:10):
It is now the World Bank and the UN certainly
promote digital public infrastructures, but they're as voluntary systems for inclusion,
not exclusion. So they're for inclusion of reaching them for
certain services. They're not excluding those that don't have it.
(11:30):
They're just giving access. So what's false and misleading is
that the Expose articles and Global Research and Transcends International
and other magazines that quoted it have misrepresented gates advocacy
or development of digital IDs. And these also these went
(11:53):
into circular source in quoting each other, rather than any
primary true statement. Basically one said oh, the other one
said this, Oh, they must they must have researched it,
so we're gonna quote it. When that first source did
not quote exactly what's been said. We can't find it.
There's no policy or law or statement from Gates, the UN,
(12:16):
or any even the US that says that Americans will
be excluded from society if they refuse a digital ID. Now,
there are suspicions of this, and there are people in
that are well more communicative than I am with YouTube videos.
They're much more authoritative than I am, Darren, because they
(12:38):
have a whole slew of of of listeners and followers
to their channels, so they must be they must be authentic,
right of course. And they're telling you that we have
a credit card, a credit rating system here and people
are being snuffed out of the system every day. I
don't know where they're seeing it, because we haven't, but
(13:00):
that's what they're saying. And all they're doing is taking
a suspicion and making up a fabrication that it happened
when it didn't happen, because it's not happening yet, could it?
Speaker 9 (13:11):
Sure?
Speaker 7 (13:12):
Sure? Anything could happen?
Speaker 2 (13:13):
We could go into we go to martial law tomorrow, right,
anything could happen. But by saying it is happening, or
that's what they're planning, or is this is what's coming soon,
you put an excess of fear hype into people's minds,
and you got them to worry about stuff that isn't here.
Doesn't the Bible say something about don't worry about tomorrow.
(13:35):
Tomorrow's got its own problems. But so the meme claiming
the twenty twenty eight deadline is fabricated.
Speaker 6 (13:44):
Feeling stuck, burned out, or just tired of pretending everything's fine.
At Ellie Mental Health, they don't do boring therapy. They
do real talk, real help. Whether life's throwing punches or
you just want to level up. Ellie's got your back
in person or online. There are ready, no judgment, no fluff.
Not sure where to start? Ellie's team will match you
(14:05):
with the right therapist two locations post falls in Cordelaine.
Your brain deserves better.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
Visit E L L I E.
Speaker 6 (14:12):
Mentalhealth dot com and start your comeback story today.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
The article by Expose is fabricated. It doesn't appear at
any Gates Speeches. Microsoft reports or UN documents documents that
I've seen, but we will say Gates certainly applause modern.
Speaker 7 (14:31):
Development of technology.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
He pushes vaccines and insists on digital IDs. So I
went to some of Gates's own writings his blog Gates
Notes and Statements from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and
it says, in plain language, digital public infrastructure, including digital
ID systems, can transform economies the way roads and bridges
(14:56):
did in the past. Okay, great, what's that mean. I
don't know, he's an idiot, but that's from an article
called why Digital Public Infrastructure is Key to Global Development.
He certainly talks about digital IDs as part of something
called DPI digital public infrastructure, and that includes a few things.
(15:19):
It includes digital IDs, digital payment systems, and data exchange systems.
And they say these systems are to help people, especially
in poor nations, get access to banking, healthcare, and education
where they're third third countries, third world countries and they
don't have access. Now, Gates is not talking about forcing anyone.
(15:43):
He's talking about giving people an ID voluntarily that don't
have one, so they have access. And about eight I
guess there's an estimate of eight hundred and fifty million
people worldwide have no form of legal identification, meaning that
they can't even open bank accounts or medical accounts. But
(16:05):
I'm thinking that this is perhaps more support of illegal immigration,
giving them a compliance rather than excluding citizens who don't
have it. I think that should be our real concern,
shouldn't it. Darn that it's more likely of giving access
to people that are illegal immigrants or even people in
(16:27):
other countries that are poor. Well, that's not a concern,
But it's a concern if they're trying to conclude that
eight hundred and fifty million people worldwide, including those that
come here illegally, have no form of identification and need access,
and they're looking for an avenue to give them access.
I think that's more of a concern of whether we're
(16:49):
going to get stuffed out of the system.
Speaker 8 (16:51):
Right, really makes sense.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
We have to be careful of what we're aiming towards.
Could these other articles that are inflaming or hyping up
the false narrative, Could they be actually redirecting us from
the truth of what we should be concerned with.
Speaker 7 (17:10):
Could they be controlled opposition.
Speaker 8 (17:13):
Well it's very possible, could be yep.
Speaker 7 (17:17):
So when.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
Gates talks about digital ideas. He's not saying take this
or else. He's saying, let's build a system everyone has
an option for. And I'm not supporting what he's saying.
I'm just saying that this is what he's actually saying. Now,
does this mean there's no risks? Well, we have already
had surveillance issues in the misuse of it are real possibilities.
(17:41):
But that meme quotes exclusion by twenty twenty eight, where
are they getting this from? That's absolutely a reach for
a fabrication of a spe speculative conclusion that has not
really been a reality.
Speaker 7 (17:58):
It exaggerates what his his wishes are.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
So the projects that are behind these buzzwords that are
used to cause alarm are projects that Gates funded or
that Gates Foundation funds. And I named I named it before.
Let's uh go over a couple of them again. ID
twenty twenty Alliance, which is a nonprofit coalition promoting privacy
(18:26):
protecting digital ID systems or solutions, especially for the the
unbanked and undocumented, in other words, for those that don't
have finances and.
Speaker 7 (18:38):
Are and are illegal.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
That's what it's for. So I told you that's what
it's for. That's what they're aiming to do that. MASSIP
is Modular open Source Identity Platforms, which is an open
source framework that countries can customize to create their own
ID systems. It's mostly used in Africa, and the keyword
(19:01):
is open source. It's not a Microsoft product. It's not
a chip in your hand. So before we go into
the whole Beast fabrication system, it's not that yet. However,
I did some research years ago. I was the Darren.
I was the first to break this. I swear because
(19:22):
after I broke it years later, Uh, people like Lisa
Haven was on it and people in the community were
doing videos on it. They came up with it later
and saying breaking news. This is what we found out. No,
I'm sorry, Jim Duke perspective had it first. I had
this first. I announced it and you can look and
(19:46):
you can look back in twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen,
somewhere around there where I was talking about this because
I had a guy from India, friend of mine from
India alert me to what was going on and asked
me if this could be part of a mark or
a system of the Beast. So I looked into it
in India. They were it was I was made aware
(20:09):
to me back then that there was an ad Hoar system.
Speaker 7 (20:13):
It's called Adhar.
Speaker 2 (20:14):
I can't remember what AA dha R stands for, but
it was tested in India where it has the big
biggest population of those that didn't have any identity and
it was like it affected six hundred thousand volunteers from
what I remember of getting them a biometric ID system.
(20:38):
It's the world's largest biometric ID system lost by launched
by the Indian government in two thousand and nine under
the Unique Identification Authority of India UI DAI, and every
Indian resident can enroll voluntarily to reve a twelve digit
(21:01):
unique identity number linked to their biometric data fingerprinting, IRIS
scans and basic demographic information. Not a chip, but it
is scary enough that it was an identity system.
Speaker 7 (21:17):
Anytime there's an identity system.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Whether it's a chip, whether it's a card, whether it's
a credit card, whether it's a vaccine, no matter what
it is, we hype up warning and the hair stands
on our end and we're told resist, resist, resists, And
what happens years later nothing Just people that took it
(21:39):
voluntarily took it. People that didn't still function and they
didn't get mandated. So it's not a universal mark of
the beast. And half the time we resist these systems,
and then years later we're adopting them.
Speaker 7 (21:55):
What's that mean?
Speaker 2 (21:55):
Did we have to first wait to see if it
was the mark of the beast before we could accept it.
AI was wildly thought that it was the image of
the beast. Now you may not use it, but you
can't go on Internet without it being utilized because even
your phone has it, and every single search engine, including
(22:17):
Duck duck Go, utilizes their own version of AI that
when you put in a search word, you actually get
a whole list from an AI program of an explanation.
Do you ever see that, Darren? Did you do you
go online? Yeah?
Speaker 8 (22:37):
I actually pay attention to.
Speaker 7 (22:39):
Yeah, pay attention to.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
First thing comes up underneath or above all your search links.
You'll see AI generating. It'll say AI generating, and then
it gives you a quick snippet that if you want
to go to it, I'm not going to it.
Speaker 7 (22:53):
I'm gonna avoid it. Oh yeah, well it's there.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
Anyway, it worked on your system, whether you avoid it
or not. And now some people are utilizing AI and
no harm done except for if it leads you to
demonic system, or it's an avatar for demons, or it's spiritual,
or or it's gonna lead you to the Everything can
(23:16):
lead you to the mark of the beast. The bar
code system is the mark of the beast. It says
six six six, how much closer can you get? But
we all avoided it, but now we all use it.
I mean pretty much. The only thing we want to
avoid is getting it stamped on us. We want to
avoid the tattoo system, right, Darren. But if someday they say, hey,
you know, our credit cards are too invasive, so we're
(23:39):
gonna have a barcode on you. You're gonna avoid it
the first years, but when you realize it's not made
universal and it's volunteer and you need it or it's
helping you, eventually we'll just squash all the fears and
we'll adopt it. So we have to be concerned with
the real concerns, things that we know are evil, not
(24:00):
the speculations of trying to hope we didn't fall into
the mark. Then I got people calling me saying, uh,
did I accidentally accept the mark, I said, what do
you mean. I may have utilized AI or I may
have uh given into one of the digital systems by accident.
(24:22):
Oh boy, you're by Oh you're doomed. Now you're going
to I tell one person I was kidder. I go, oh,
you're going to hell. Now they go, really, I go, no,
not really, stop it.
Speaker 7 (24:34):
Don't fear everything.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
You're gonna know if you're if if you're not, if
you're not following Jesus Christ. This is, by the way,
the mark of the Beast is something specific to the Bible.
So anybody says, oh, this is gonna be a religious rant, No,
the mark of the Beast is a religious rant. It's
based on the biblical term. That's what it is. So
let's go to the biblical term. You have to basically
(24:57):
denounce Jesus Christ and worship specifically the image or the
beast in order to be sealed with his mark. So therefore,
if you're not worshiping him and you're in Jesus Christ
and you have the mark of the Holy Spirit, don't
fear it. You're not gonna accidentally tweak something and miss
(25:18):
it and fall in line with the beast.
Speaker 7 (25:20):
You didn't worship it. Oh, the vaccines.
Speaker 2 (25:22):
If you take the vaccine, you're worshiping the beast because
the vaccine is a worship. No, the vaccine is a medicine.
Has nothing to do with a worship. Maybe you're submitting
to something that's naive. Maybe maybe you give into the system,
but you didn't worship the system. You didn't bow down,
you didn't salute to the god of the world. You
just basically took a service. So there's my rant. Okay,
(25:46):
So let's get back to this. You have anything to
add to that, deren No, I'm trying to give you
some I try, I try. I'm rant and trying to
get through this because we're a little bit short notice here.
But uh, if you have anything to say, just plug away,
all right. So the digital infrastructure is already here. You're
you're If you think you're still buying and selling without
(26:07):
digital ideas, then you're foolish. Our social security is tied
into digital now, your your banking is died into digital.
Even your cash. When you submit your cash, even though
it's cash cash, it's untraceable that way, it still goes
into a register, still goes into a database that you
paid cash for something so we can't get away with it.
(26:28):
But digitize specifically is a system that's used in modernizing
government services like digital roads, digital there's there's encryptions, there's
digital uh, tracing datas, all this stuff. And basically even
if you go to the doctors, you're digitally being input
(26:50):
into their system and there the database. That's how they
know how many drugs you have in your system or whatever.
But these systems could be used for control. Yes they
if governments or corporations abuse them, have they? Yes, they
probably have. What are you going to do about it?
Probably not much. If you think you escape it or
can escape it, forget it. You're already in it. How's
(27:13):
that for dispelling your fear?
Speaker 6 (27:16):
Feeling stuck, burned out, or just tired of pretending everything's fine.
At Elie Mental Health, they don't do boring therapy. They
do real talk, real help. Whether life's throwing punches or
you just want to level up. Ellie's got your back,
in person or online. Their therapists are ready, no judgment,
no fluff, not sure where to start. Ellie's team will
(27:37):
match you with the right therapist two locations post falls
in Cordelaine. Your brain deserves better visit E L l
I E. Mentalhealth dot com and start your comeback story today.
Speaker 7 (27:48):
But we have to be concerned with legitimate concerns. Our
individual privacies are possessions, confiscated privacy or ownership or let's
say this protection of our homes centralized power. Yeah, but
(28:09):
Bill Gates mandate, that's still fictional at this point. So
he's on record saying that these systems should enhance privacy
and let individuals control what data they share. Whether that's
what governments will do or do is another questions, But
that's not what Gates said. So let's dispel that fear
(28:33):
and ask anyway, does Bill Gates have that much control?
Speaker 2 (28:37):
I don't think so. Does he have that much authority?
I don't think so.
Speaker 7 (28:42):
So.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
Again, it starts with a headline, an article that shares
information that reaches and fabricates it. That's what the expose
headline anticipates digital IDs will be mandatory to participate in societ.
It sounds shocking, right, but actually yeah, but when you
(29:07):
read the article, it actually never quotes him saying that
it's just inferred. So the expose was fabricating, it was
never confirming it. And yet global Research picked it up
and republished it, citing the expose, and so did Transcend
(29:28):
International republishing Global researches piece. Who's uh, who's citing the expose?
There's your circular journalism. Transcend International republishes it from Global Research.
Global Research republishes it from the expose and cites that
(29:49):
it's it's as its source. This is circular sourcing. So
everyone quoting each other and no original statement in sight
is a fabrication. It's a hall of mirrors. It looks
like consensus, but it's a lie.
Speaker 7 (30:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (30:07):
Now, of course we have fact checkers checking this, and
we can believe Snopes, right because they're always authentic. No,
Snopes is not credible, so if we see it on Snopes,
we can't really necessarily conclude that Snopes is even telling
the truth.
Speaker 7 (30:24):
But Snopes did dispute this.
Speaker 2 (30:25):
However, I do go to Snopes to see what they
say about things, because I laugh about it when they
don't know what they're talking about. But they will actually
give you if you look even at discredited sources like
Snopes or Alex Jones or anybody. If you take a
look at even if they quote this is what Bill
Gates says, and here's where.
Speaker 7 (30:46):
He says it.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
Right, they'll say that, so you could find articles that way.
But what they've done is they made up what he says.
And when you go to that source, because who's going
to look at the sources? Do you look at all
the sources they give you?
Speaker 1 (30:59):
Now?
Speaker 2 (31:00):
Know? Most people don't. That's how they get pulled over
the wool over their eyes. They never check it themselves.
So that's why I could say anything and never fear
being checked because nobody's gonna check it. Most people are lazy.
They're relying on me to tell the truth and cite it.
But I could cite anything and make it up. And
that's what these guys do. They make it up. But
(31:21):
if you go to the source they quote, it doesn't
say anything about what they said. I've done that many times.
I'm like, what the heck that they get out of this?
How did they get that out of this? But the
closest we come is that politifacts yahook News Myth Detector
(31:42):
has debunked some of these things, Like there was one
that said Bill Gates is implanting microchips and Kenyan babies.
Now he may be doing something with vaccines because We
did hear about that. He may be doing something about
(32:02):
digital IDs for their access, but I don't know about
microchipping them. He misinterpreted, They misinterpreted the vaccines. It wasn't
about digital IDs at all. So this pattern of speculation
and fabrication is more scarier than the real stories. We
(32:25):
have to be careful. So what is the real global
agenda and what isn't Well, there is no US mandate
talked about with a global digital ID or UN packs
about this. In twenty twenty five and twenty twenty four,
the UN and World Bank talked about something called digital
(32:46):
Public Infrastructure for all. They did encourage member states to
build compatible systems, IDs, payments and data to improve efficiency.
But it was never a mandated thing. It's a volunteer
thing and each country itself decides what to do. And
there's no global enforcement for this. For it to be
even being a mark of the beast, it have to
(33:07):
be a universal global enforcement. You can't just say vaccines
in America is going to unleash the mark of the beast,
or digital ideas in America is going to unleash the
mark of the beast. Because if it didn't happen in India,
and it didn't happen in Syria, and it didn't happen
in all around the world. It's not universal, So I
(33:30):
don't know it's good. So I'm just trying to bring
clarity to what we usually put into hype. We can
stretch it what people say. We can say that this
might be their intent, but does this mean that this
actually is their intent? We take an absolute conclusion or
(33:51):
an absolute yeah conclusion, and we make an absolute statement
about it of what they didn't say, and we put
unnecessary fear and hype into it. There may be a
concern with digital identity systems becoming universal universal that could
(34:11):
become tools for control if centralized, but it doesn't necessarily
mean that we could say that about our our I
don't know. Breakfast cereal, they're in a mandate that you
have captain crunch breakfast cereal or you won't be able to.
Speaker 7 (34:28):
Get in the healthcare system. Is that still a thing
people still eat?
Speaker 1 (34:34):
That?
Speaker 8 (34:35):
Hope not because they put a magnet to them. They
found bits of iron coming out of the cereal, So
they're not lying when they say fortified with.
Speaker 2 (34:43):
Iron and UH and natural flavors. We know is fetal tissue.
Of course, culture not necessarily babies samples of babies, so
it's not the same thing.
Speaker 7 (34:57):
That's what they tell us.
Speaker 2 (34:58):
But it's also got carcinogen is in other toxins, but
let's not go there. So but that's more dangerous than
this thing is.
Speaker 7 (35:06):
So now they're there.
Speaker 2 (35:12):
The the bill gates digital id meme follows a pattern
that a real initiative is announced digital ideas. The headline
exaggerates it though mandatory participationation, and others echo it, forming
a loop circular loop, and then social media media shares it,
(35:34):
makes it viral, social media amplifies it, and suddenly everybody's conficient,
convinced its official official policy. It's not that the fears
are completely misplaced or unnecessary like it's it's it's still
a risk of something potential, but the global digital identity
(35:55):
systems don't carry a danger unless it's misused. But we
can't defend truth with falsehoods. We can't fabricate it just
to make a point. Even in the truth or community.
We have to practice discernment. We should ask where did
(36:17):
this quote come from? Who verified it? And let's look
at the original source and see if there's any truth
to it. So we can't conclude that he is authorizing anything,
that he's even has even has power to do so,
or calling for mandate mandate and dating them, or that
(36:39):
the US is complying with that. And certainly there's no
twenty twenty eight deadline mentioned. I don't know where they
got that. It's an invention born out of conspiracy communities.
So question everything, verify before you amplify. Please remember, the
truth shouldn't put fear scrutiny in us. It should just
(37:04):
basically inform us. We should be outraged at the truth
or community spreading fear, spreading unnecessary fear, and they're all
doing it. From Dave Hodges, I don't know if he's
around anymore. From the Hageman, from Lisa Haven, from all
these guys that are spreading fear to build hype to
(37:25):
their audiences, to their channels.
Speaker 7 (37:29):
We don't do that.
Speaker 2 (37:30):
That's why we don't have the large audience, because we're
snuffed out. Do you know why they're not snuffed out
and we are because they're fabricating so much that everybody
they're making it obvious that they're not telling their truth.
So what do the authorities care? Right, That's what I
figured out. Why am I being shadow band being stifled?
Why is my YouTube channel getting off the air? Because
(37:53):
I have the truth on here and I'm calling out
the truth and I'm exposing the lies and I'm narrowing
it down and separating fact from fiction. I pose more
of a threat than all these channels put together, even
Alex Jones. Is that a boast? Wow, I must be,
(38:13):
But I'm serious. I probably pose more of a threat.
That's why I'm squashed. And I don't have a large
reach because they're squashing me because they don't want my
threat of exposing the truth, so they keep me the
low and so that you know, that doesn't get out,
and they allow these other twenty thirty forty thousand listener
(38:34):
audiences of these things to go out because they're obviously
not telling the truth or they're fabricating it, and people
are seeing through it, and it's only their communities that
are seeing it, so they keep the rest of the
mainstream away from it. But if mainstream comes in their
senses and they want to see the truth, they don't
want to see conspiracy hype, they want to see conspiracy truth,
(38:56):
then they can come here. So invite your friends share
this information. I mean I could get things wrong too,
don't get your you know, but I mean I have
more of a track record of calling it out and
finding the truth than they do. But I'm looking for
the truth. That's the difference. And I'm not hyping and
I'm not trying to find the hype. So my website
(39:19):
is Jimdukeperspective dot com and you can listen to me
on all your favorite podcast players. Give my social media
a like Jim Duke Perspective and subscribe to us and
put a review out on Apple Podcasts. And I thank
you for listening, and we'll see you next time.
Speaker 7 (39:38):
God bless.
Speaker 5 (39:41):
At Spokane Tribe Resort and Casino, indulgence knows no bounds
and every moment is a winning experience Unwind and style
with luxury rooms, stellar live entertainment, and delicious dining for
every appetite. Whether you're looking for an adrenal unpact weekend
or a midweek recharge total comfort, We've got something for everyone.
(40:03):
Thrill meets chill at Spokane Tribe Resort and Casino.
Speaker 3 (40:07):
You just don'twind here.
Speaker 9 (40:10):
You care about your team and at Regents, so do
we That's why our health plans include head to toe
benefits that fit their lives at prices that fit your budget.
Regent's Blue Shield. Together, we Health.
Speaker 1 (40:29):
Hi everybody, it's me Cinderella Acts. You are listening to
the Fringe Radio Network. I know I was gonna tell them, Hey,
do you have the app?
Speaker 3 (40:40):
It's the best way to listen to the fringe radio network.
Speaker 1 (40:44):
It's safe and you don't have to log in to
use it, and it doesn't track you or trace you,
and it sounds beautiful.
Speaker 3 (40:52):
I know I was gonna tell them.
Speaker 1 (40:54):
How do you get the app? Just go to fringeradionetwork
dot com write the top of the page.
Speaker 3 (41:02):
I know, slippers. We gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Speaker 2 (41:09):
M
Hi, everybody, it's me Cinderella Ax. You are listening to
the Fringe Radio Network. I know I was gonna tell them, Hey,
do you.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Have the app?
Speaker 3 (00:15):
It's the best way to listen to the Fringe Radio Network.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
It's safe and you don't have to log in to
use it, and it doesn't track you or trace you,
and it sounds beautiful.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app?
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Just go to Fringe radionetwork dot com right at the
top of the page.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
I know, slippers, we gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
Make your space smell like you with a free Pureplus
diffuser for a limited time. Get a free set when
you subscribe to two cents monthly for a year, and
transform every space with Premium Fragrance. Customize your experience with
are easy to use app and a stylish diffuser that
suits every esthetic. You don't miss out. This exclusive deal
(01:07):
won't last. Shop now before it's gone only at Pura
dot com.
Speaker 5 (01:15):
Wake Up Radio Network, A rational voice in a world
of conspiracy.
Speaker 6 (01:23):
Jim Duke Perspective.
Speaker 7 (01:30):
Welcome to Jim Duke Perspective.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
This is where we're starting to challenge the narratives both sides,
not just the left, not just.
Speaker 7 (01:40):
The the what is it called the.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
Sleeping but also the the truthers, the truth community, that
they put out fabrications here and there, and we expose
these agendas and we look behind the curtain. But what
we're taking a look at is is we're tackling viral
claims that stirred up in the truth community lately. Darren,
(02:07):
did you see the meme about Bill Gates declaring the
US citizens must accept a digital ID by twenty twenty
eight or be excluded from society.
Speaker 7 (02:21):
Did you see that?
Speaker 8 (02:22):
No good thing?
Speaker 2 (02:24):
Okay, well it was on certain video content creators.
Speaker 7 (02:29):
So because it was a video, we could believe it, right.
Speaker 8 (02:31):
Darren, Absolutely, because videos they always just tell just the truth.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Yeah, and it was if it was in a graphic
meme picture, it absolutely absolutely substantiates and confirms the truth.
Speaker 8 (02:45):
Right, absolutely, And cartoons are even better.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
And that's a big claim. But here's this is what
it's saying. It hits all the pressure points. That's the thing.
Memes are designed to cause shock, stir up people, and
hype the situation so that everybody's frantically looking for excitement
and truth or whatever. They're trying to look for truth,
but they're not looking behind the claims. I do, but
(03:15):
they don't. Most people see a viral, send something sent viral,
and they believe it because many people send it to them,
it must be true because of consensus sending it. Well,
I'm going to prove that wrong. But this certain claim
hits a lot of pressure points. It hits digital surveillance,
it hits social credit systems which we're leary of, and yes,
(03:39):
even prophetic mark of the beast. So this is a
really heightened, hyped, a really situation that people love to
toss around and believe and send and share. But the
question is is it true Bill Gates really say that?
(04:02):
And are we looking deeper into something said and making
a false conclusion about it to bring hype to it
or could it be another case of circular journalism? Remember
I talked about circular journalism, Darren, Let's see I talk
about circular journalism. That's the idea that you get one
(04:24):
source and you see something, and then you see another source,
and you see another source, and you see another source
and you say, oh my gosh, there's four sources that
are reporting the same thing.
Speaker 7 (04:34):
So it must be true. Yes, I remember, right.
Speaker 2 (04:37):
But then you go back to each of the sources
and you examine where they're quoting from or what their
links are, and they said from the original source this,
and they each either go back to the last source
and quote each other that goes back to one original source,
or they all go back to the original source. So
(04:57):
they're all basically sourcing off of one tabloid article. But
it sounds like it's truth and it's viral because they're
all saying the same thing. But all they're doing is
resurfacing one article. It's all they're doing. So this is
where the fringe article quotes another fiction and it becomes fact.
(05:19):
So let's take a look at this. Let's break it
down and separate what's real. The meme that set the
Internet on fire had started. I saw it on my
feed and I tried to comment, and I moved away
from it and then lost it because I looked into it.
So the meme is spread across social media. It's on Facebook, Twitter,
(05:43):
or x Telegram channels, and then people do viral videos
of it, so it sounds like it's confirmed by all
these different sources and everybody's saying, well, since they all
reported it. Somebody must have glanced at it and saw
that Bill Gates had said this, so they all confirm it.
But it's claiming that Bill Gates said that by twenty
(06:07):
twenty eight, Americans will have to accept an ID digital
ID or they'll be shutouts out of society. And people
started posting this warning. Here it comes the technocratic system,
or they said, Gates is announcing the beast system. He's
the beast. He's the second beast, proclaiming the beast. You know,
Bill Gates is the Antichrist. You'll hear all this stuff.
(06:30):
It states that Bill Gates said something definite absolute. It's
in quotes, so it's it's quoting him. However, he never.
Speaker 7 (06:43):
Said that per se.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
The source came from an article I got it from.
I got it from Global Research. That's where I saw it,
so it was quoted. It was from Global Research, and
then I looked it up and it's also in transcend International.
(07:06):
So I looked up both articles and I read through
it and said, okay, they look like they say the
same exact thing. It looks like it's just copy paste.
So I said, all right, where are they sourcing it from?
Where are they quoting it from and they both go
back to this article from this publication called The Expose,
dated September of twenty twenty five, and all they've did
(07:30):
was echo that article. That's all they did. So what's
this article say. Well, when you look at the article,
it basically states some of the claims of Bill Gates,
but then it points you to a redirection of its
conclusion that this is what it must mean. Therefore, it's
(07:56):
it's opinionated. It's only telling you an opinion of how
they conclude. So let's look again at what these what
the transcript is, and what's true.
Speaker 7 (08:11):
Did Gates actually advocate this sentiment?
Speaker 2 (08:15):
Well, you and I both know that he probably really
wishes this, right, he probably desires it. We could say that, right,
I mean, Bill Gates is Bill Gates. He desires everybody
to get vaccinated too. But did that happen? No, it didn't.
Just because he wants it, and just because he's a
billionaire and he has the money and he's in charge
(08:38):
of certain things doesn't give him the authority to govern
the world. But he's well respected, right, But are they
going to listen to him completely? Are we going to
listen to him completely? So here's what I found out.
Bill Gates was appointed major stockholder of Global Digital ID Systems.
(09:00):
There therefore he does have a stake in it. The
Bill Gates and Gates Foundation has supported digital ID initiatives,
especially in developing countries, and they've invested in ID twenty twenty.
Speaker 7 (09:16):
You ever hear of that, Yes, they have, I believe.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
So it came from I remember this from the past,
and I'm reaching, but I think it came from what's
called in the United Nations a program of digital ID
called ID four D. I don't remember what it stands for,
but ID four D transferred to ID twenty twenty, and
(09:41):
then another program called MASSIP MOSIP. I think I got
the what the initials stand for. I'll say that later.
But there's other projects that aim to give legal identity
to people who lack it, and it's often for access
to healthcare, banking, and education. Now these are for certain
(10:04):
people in welfare situations. Gates never publicly actually said that
he's aiming towards digital IDs mandatory, or that the US
citizens must accept them by twenty twenty eight. There's been
no data that that was uttered by him, So I
(10:26):
don't know where these groups get this from this truther
magazine called The Expose.
Speaker 7 (10:31):
I don't know where it got it from.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
It could be just assuming that the twenty twenty five
agendas here and by twenty twenty eight, that's a likely
date that could happen, and they speculated that that's the date.
But when you say for a fact, when you make
a factual statement in quotes that says Bill Gates said,
digital ID mandatory twenty twenty eight, what you're doing, You're
(10:58):
you're putting an app so loot statement on something that
wasn't necessarily stated. Is that as much as a fabrication
as anything else there?
Speaker 8 (11:10):
Sure is?
Speaker 2 (11:10):
It is now the World Bank and the UN certainly
promote digital public infrastructures, but they're as voluntary systems for inclusion,
not exclusion. So they're for inclusion of reaching them for
certain services. They're not excluding those that don't have it.
(11:30):
They're just giving access. So what's false and misleading is
that the Expose articles and Global Research and Transcends International
and other magazines that quoted it have misrepresented gates advocacy
or development of digital IDs. And these also these went
(11:53):
into circular source in quoting each other, rather than any
primary true statement. Basically one said oh, the other one
said this, Oh, they must they must have researched it,
so we're gonna quote it. When that first source did
not quote exactly what's been said. We can't find it.
There's no policy or law or statement from Gates, the UN,
(12:16):
or any even the US that says that Americans will
be excluded from society if they refuse a digital ID. Now,
there are suspicions of this, and there are people in
that are well more communicative than I am with YouTube videos.
They're much more authoritative than I am, Darren, because they
(12:38):
have a whole slew of of of listeners and followers
to their channels, so they must be they must be authentic,
right of course. And they're telling you that we have
a credit card, a credit rating system here and people
are being snuffed out of the system every day. I
don't know where they're seeing it, because we haven't, but
(13:00):
that's what they're saying. And all they're doing is taking
a suspicion and making up a fabrication that it happened
when it didn't happen, because it's not happening yet, could it?
Speaker 9 (13:11):
Sure?
Speaker 7 (13:12):
Sure? Anything could happen?
Speaker 2 (13:13):
We could go into we go to martial law tomorrow, right,
anything could happen. But by saying it is happening, or
that's what they're planning, or is this is what's coming soon,
you put an excess of fear hype into people's minds,
and you got them to worry about stuff that isn't here.
Doesn't the Bible say something about don't worry about tomorrow.
(13:35):
Tomorrow's got its own problems. But so the meme claiming
the twenty twenty eight deadline is fabricated.
Speaker 6 (13:44):
Feeling stuck, burned out, or just tired of pretending everything's fine.
At Ellie Mental Health, they don't do boring therapy. They
do real talk, real help. Whether life's throwing punches or
you just want to level up. Ellie's got your back
in person or online. There are ready, no judgment, no fluff.
Not sure where to start? Ellie's team will match you
(14:05):
with the right therapist two locations post falls in Cordelaine.
Your brain deserves better.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
Visit E L L I E.
Speaker 6 (14:12):
Mentalhealth dot com and start your comeback story today.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
The article by Expose is fabricated. It doesn't appear at
any Gates Speeches. Microsoft reports or UN documents documents that
I've seen, but we will say Gates certainly applause modern.
Speaker 7 (14:31):
Development of technology.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
He pushes vaccines and insists on digital IDs. So I
went to some of Gates's own writings his blog Gates
Notes and Statements from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and
it says, in plain language, digital public infrastructure, including digital
ID systems, can transform economies the way roads and bridges
(14:56):
did in the past. Okay, great, what's that mean. I
don't know, he's an idiot, but that's from an article
called why Digital Public Infrastructure is Key to Global Development.
He certainly talks about digital IDs as part of something
called DPI digital public infrastructure, and that includes a few things.
(15:19):
It includes digital IDs, digital payment systems, and data exchange systems.
And they say these systems are to help people, especially
in poor nations, get access to banking, healthcare, and education
where they're third third countries, third world countries and they
don't have access. Now, Gates is not talking about forcing anyone.
(15:43):
He's talking about giving people an ID voluntarily that don't
have one, so they have access. And about eight I
guess there's an estimate of eight hundred and fifty million
people worldwide have no form of legal identification, meaning that
they can't even open bank accounts or medical accounts. But
(16:05):
I'm thinking that this is perhaps more support of illegal immigration,
giving them a compliance rather than excluding citizens who don't
have it. I think that should be our real concern,
shouldn't it. Darn that it's more likely of giving access
to people that are illegal immigrants or even people in
(16:27):
other countries that are poor. Well, that's not a concern,
But it's a concern if they're trying to conclude that
eight hundred and fifty million people worldwide, including those that
come here illegally, have no form of identification and need access,
and they're looking for an avenue to give them access.
I think that's more of a concern of whether we're
(16:49):
going to get stuffed out of the system.
Speaker 8 (16:51):
Right, really makes sense.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
We have to be careful of what we're aiming towards.
Could these other articles that are inflaming or hyping up
the false narrative, Could they be actually redirecting us from
the truth of what we should be concerned with.
Speaker 7 (17:10):
Could they be controlled opposition.
Speaker 8 (17:13):
Well it's very possible, could be yep.
Speaker 7 (17:17):
So when.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
Gates talks about digital ideas. He's not saying take this
or else. He's saying, let's build a system everyone has
an option for. And I'm not supporting what he's saying.
I'm just saying that this is what he's actually saying. Now,
does this mean there's no risks? Well, we have already
had surveillance issues in the misuse of it are real possibilities.
(17:41):
But that meme quotes exclusion by twenty twenty eight, where
are they getting this from? That's absolutely a reach for
a fabrication of a spe speculative conclusion that has not
really been a reality.
Speaker 7 (17:58):
It exaggerates what his his wishes are.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
So the projects that are behind these buzzwords that are
used to cause alarm are projects that Gates funded or
that Gates Foundation funds. And I named I named it before.
Let's uh go over a couple of them again. ID
twenty twenty Alliance, which is a nonprofit coalition promoting privacy
(18:26):
protecting digital ID systems or solutions, especially for the the
unbanked and undocumented, in other words, for those that don't
have finances and.
Speaker 7 (18:38):
Are and are illegal.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
That's what it's for. So I told you that's what
it's for. That's what they're aiming to do that. MASSIP
is Modular open Source Identity Platforms, which is an open
source framework that countries can customize to create their own
ID systems. It's mostly used in Africa, and the keyword
(19:01):
is open source. It's not a Microsoft product. It's not
a chip in your hand. So before we go into
the whole Beast fabrication system, it's not that yet. However,
I did some research years ago. I was the Darren.
I was the first to break this. I swear because
(19:22):
after I broke it years later, Uh, people like Lisa
Haven was on it and people in the community were
doing videos on it. They came up with it later
and saying breaking news. This is what we found out. No,
I'm sorry, Jim Duke perspective had it first. I had
this first. I announced it and you can look and
(19:46):
you can look back in twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen,
somewhere around there where I was talking about this because
I had a guy from India, friend of mine from
India alert me to what was going on and asked
me if this could be part of a mark or
a system of the Beast. So I looked into it
in India. They were it was I was made aware
(20:09):
to me back then that there was an ad Hoar system.
Speaker 7 (20:13):
It's called Adhar.
Speaker 2 (20:14):
I can't remember what AA dha R stands for, but
it was tested in India where it has the big
biggest population of those that didn't have any identity and
it was like it affected six hundred thousand volunteers from
what I remember of getting them a biometric ID system.
(20:38):
It's the world's largest biometric ID system lost by launched
by the Indian government in two thousand and nine under
the Unique Identification Authority of India UI DAI, and every
Indian resident can enroll voluntarily to reve a twelve digit
(21:01):
unique identity number linked to their biometric data fingerprinting, IRIS
scans and basic demographic information. Not a chip, but it
is scary enough that it was an identity system.
Speaker 7 (21:17):
Anytime there's an identity system.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Whether it's a chip, whether it's a card, whether it's
a credit card, whether it's a vaccine, no matter what
it is, we hype up warning and the hair stands
on our end and we're told resist, resist, resists, And
what happens years later nothing Just people that took it
(21:39):
voluntarily took it. People that didn't still function and they
didn't get mandated. So it's not a universal mark of
the beast. And half the time we resist these systems,
and then years later we're adopting them.
Speaker 7 (21:55):
What's that mean?
Speaker 2 (21:55):
Did we have to first wait to see if it
was the mark of the beast before we could accept it.
AI was wildly thought that it was the image of
the beast. Now you may not use it, but you
can't go on Internet without it being utilized because even
your phone has it, and every single search engine, including
(22:17):
Duck duck Go, utilizes their own version of AI that
when you put in a search word, you actually get
a whole list from an AI program of an explanation.
Do you ever see that, Darren? Did you do you
go online? Yeah?
Speaker 8 (22:37):
I actually pay attention to.
Speaker 7 (22:39):
Yeah, pay attention to.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
First thing comes up underneath or above all your search links.
You'll see AI generating. It'll say AI generating, and then
it gives you a quick snippet that if you want
to go to it, I'm not going to it.
Speaker 7 (22:53):
I'm gonna avoid it. Oh yeah, well it's there.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
Anyway, it worked on your system, whether you avoid it
or not. And now some people are utilizing AI and
no harm done except for if it leads you to
demonic system, or it's an avatar for demons, or it's spiritual,
or or it's gonna lead you to the Everything can
(23:16):
lead you to the mark of the beast. The bar
code system is the mark of the beast. It says
six six six, how much closer can you get? But
we all avoided it, but now we all use it.
I mean pretty much. The only thing we want to
avoid is getting it stamped on us. We want to
avoid the tattoo system, right, Darren. But if someday they say, hey,
you know, our credit cards are too invasive, so we're
(23:39):
gonna have a barcode on you. You're gonna avoid it
the first years, but when you realize it's not made
universal and it's volunteer and you need it or it's
helping you, eventually we'll just squash all the fears and
we'll adopt it. So we have to be concerned with
the real concerns, things that we know are evil, not
(24:00):
the speculations of trying to hope we didn't fall into
the mark. Then I got people calling me saying, uh,
did I accidentally accept the mark, I said, what do
you mean. I may have utilized AI or I may
have uh given into one of the digital systems by accident.
(24:22):
Oh boy, you're by Oh you're doomed. Now you're going
to I tell one person I was kidder. I go, oh,
you're going to hell. Now they go, really, I go, no,
not really, stop it.
Speaker 7 (24:34):
Don't fear everything.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
You're gonna know if you're if if you're not, if
you're not following Jesus Christ. This is, by the way,
the mark of the Beast is something specific to the Bible.
So anybody says, oh, this is gonna be a religious rant, No,
the mark of the Beast is a religious rant. It's
based on the biblical term. That's what it is. So
let's go to the biblical term. You have to basically
(24:57):
denounce Jesus Christ and worship specifically the image or the
beast in order to be sealed with his mark. So therefore,
if you're not worshiping him and you're in Jesus Christ
and you have the mark of the Holy Spirit, don't
fear it. You're not gonna accidentally tweak something and miss
(25:18):
it and fall in line with the beast.
Speaker 7 (25:20):
You didn't worship it. Oh, the vaccines.
Speaker 2 (25:22):
If you take the vaccine, you're worshiping the beast because
the vaccine is a worship. No, the vaccine is a medicine.
Has nothing to do with a worship. Maybe you're submitting
to something that's naive. Maybe maybe you give into the system,
but you didn't worship the system. You didn't bow down,
you didn't salute to the god of the world. You
just basically took a service. So there's my rant. Okay,
(25:46):
So let's get back to this. You have anything to
add to that, deren No, I'm trying to give you
some I try, I try. I'm rant and trying to
get through this because we're a little bit short notice here.
But uh, if you have anything to say, just plug away,
all right. So the digital infrastructure is already here. You're
you're If you think you're still buying and selling without
(26:07):
digital ideas, then you're foolish. Our social security is tied
into digital now, your your banking is died into digital.
Even your cash. When you submit your cash, even though
it's cash cash, it's untraceable that way, it still goes
into a register, still goes into a database that you
paid cash for something so we can't get away with it.
(26:28):
But digitize specifically is a system that's used in modernizing
government services like digital roads, digital there's there's encryptions, there's
digital uh, tracing datas, all this stuff. And basically even
if you go to the doctors, you're digitally being input
(26:50):
into their system and there the database. That's how they
know how many drugs you have in your system or whatever.
But these systems could be used for control. Yes they
if governments or corporations abuse them, have they? Yes, they
probably have. What are you going to do about it?
Probably not much. If you think you escape it or
can escape it, forget it. You're already in it. How's
(27:13):
that for dispelling your fear?
Speaker 6 (27:16):
Feeling stuck, burned out, or just tired of pretending everything's fine.
At Elie Mental Health, they don't do boring therapy. They
do real talk, real help. Whether life's throwing punches or
you just want to level up. Ellie's got your back,
in person or online. Their therapists are ready, no judgment,
no fluff, not sure where to start. Ellie's team will
(27:37):
match you with the right therapist two locations post falls
in Cordelaine. Your brain deserves better visit E L l
I E. Mentalhealth dot com and start your comeback story today.
Speaker 7 (27:48):
But we have to be concerned with legitimate concerns. Our
individual privacies are possessions, confiscated privacy or ownership or let's
say this protection of our homes centralized power. Yeah, but
(28:09):
Bill Gates mandate, that's still fictional at this point. So
he's on record saying that these systems should enhance privacy
and let individuals control what data they share. Whether that's
what governments will do or do is another questions, But
that's not what Gates said. So let's dispel that fear
(28:33):
and ask anyway, does Bill Gates have that much control?
Speaker 2 (28:37):
I don't think so. Does he have that much authority?
I don't think so.
Speaker 7 (28:42):
So.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
Again, it starts with a headline, an article that shares
information that reaches and fabricates it. That's what the expose
headline anticipates digital IDs will be mandatory to participate in societ.
It sounds shocking, right, but actually yeah, but when you
(29:07):
read the article, it actually never quotes him saying that
it's just inferred. So the expose was fabricating, it was
never confirming it. And yet global Research picked it up
and republished it, citing the expose, and so did Transcend
(29:28):
International republishing Global researches piece. Who's uh, who's citing the expose?
There's your circular journalism. Transcend International republishes it from Global Research.
Global Research republishes it from the expose and cites that
(29:49):
it's it's as its source. This is circular sourcing. So
everyone quoting each other and no original statement in sight
is a fabrication. It's a hall of mirrors. It looks
like consensus, but it's a lie.
Speaker 7 (30:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (30:07):
Now, of course we have fact checkers checking this, and
we can believe Snopes, right because they're always authentic. No,
Snopes is not credible, so if we see it on Snopes,
we can't really necessarily conclude that Snopes is even telling
the truth.
Speaker 7 (30:24):
But Snopes did dispute this.
Speaker 2 (30:25):
However, I do go to Snopes to see what they
say about things, because I laugh about it when they
don't know what they're talking about. But they will actually
give you if you look even at discredited sources like
Snopes or Alex Jones or anybody. If you take a
look at even if they quote this is what Bill
Gates says, and here's where.
Speaker 7 (30:46):
He says it.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
Right, they'll say that, so you could find articles that way.
But what they've done is they made up what he says.
And when you go to that source, because who's going
to look at the sources? Do you look at all
the sources they give you?
Speaker 1 (30:59):
Now?
Speaker 2 (31:00):
Know? Most people don't. That's how they get pulled over
the wool over their eyes. They never check it themselves.
So that's why I could say anything and never fear
being checked because nobody's gonna check it. Most people are lazy.
They're relying on me to tell the truth and cite it.
But I could cite anything and make it up. And
that's what these guys do. They make it up. But
(31:21):
if you go to the source they quote, it doesn't
say anything about what they said. I've done that many times.
I'm like, what the heck that they get out of this?
How did they get that out of this? But the
closest we come is that politifacts yahook News Myth Detector
(31:42):
has debunked some of these things, Like there was one
that said Bill Gates is implanting microchips and Kenyan babies.
Now he may be doing something with vaccines because We
did hear about that. He may be doing something about
(32:02):
digital IDs for their access, but I don't know about
microchipping them. He misinterpreted, They misinterpreted the vaccines. It wasn't
about digital IDs at all. So this pattern of speculation
and fabrication is more scarier than the real stories. We
(32:25):
have to be careful. So what is the real global
agenda and what isn't Well, there is no US mandate
talked about with a global digital ID or UN packs
about this. In twenty twenty five and twenty twenty four,
the UN and World Bank talked about something called digital
(32:46):
Public Infrastructure for all. They did encourage member states to
build compatible systems, IDs, payments and data to improve efficiency.
But it was never a mandated thing. It's a volunteer
thing and each country itself decides what to do. And
there's no global enforcement for this. For it to be
even being a mark of the beast, it have to
(33:07):
be a universal global enforcement. You can't just say vaccines
in America is going to unleash the mark of the beast,
or digital ideas in America is going to unleash the
mark of the beast. Because if it didn't happen in India,
and it didn't happen in Syria, and it didn't happen
in all around the world. It's not universal, So I
(33:30):
don't know it's good. So I'm just trying to bring
clarity to what we usually put into hype. We can
stretch it what people say. We can say that this
might be their intent, but does this mean that this
actually is their intent? We take an absolute conclusion or
(33:51):
an absolute yeah conclusion, and we make an absolute statement
about it of what they didn't say, and we put
unnecessary fear and hype into it. There may be a
concern with digital identity systems becoming universal universal that could
(34:11):
become tools for control if centralized, but it doesn't necessarily
mean that we could say that about our our I
don't know. Breakfast cereal, they're in a mandate that you
have captain crunch breakfast cereal or you won't be able to.
Speaker 7 (34:28):
Get in the healthcare system. Is that still a thing
people still eat?
Speaker 1 (34:34):
That?
Speaker 8 (34:35):
Hope not because they put a magnet to them. They
found bits of iron coming out of the cereal, So
they're not lying when they say fortified with.
Speaker 2 (34:43):
Iron and UH and natural flavors. We know is fetal tissue.
Of course, culture not necessarily babies samples of babies, so
it's not the same thing.
Speaker 7 (34:57):
That's what they tell us.
Speaker 2 (34:58):
But it's also got carcinogen is in other toxins, but
let's not go there. So but that's more dangerous than
this thing is.
Speaker 7 (35:06):
So now they're there.
Speaker 2 (35:12):
The the bill gates digital id meme follows a pattern
that a real initiative is announced digital ideas. The headline
exaggerates it though mandatory participationation, and others echo it, forming
a loop circular loop, and then social media media shares it,
(35:34):
makes it viral, social media amplifies it, and suddenly everybody's conficient,
convinced its official official policy. It's not that the fears
are completely misplaced or unnecessary like it's it's it's still
a risk of something potential, but the global digital identity
(35:55):
systems don't carry a danger unless it's misused. But we
can't defend truth with falsehoods. We can't fabricate it just
to make a point. Even in the truth or community.
We have to practice discernment. We should ask where did
(36:17):
this quote come from? Who verified it? And let's look
at the original source and see if there's any truth
to it. So we can't conclude that he is authorizing anything,
that he's even has even has power to do so,
or calling for mandate mandate and dating them, or that
(36:39):
the US is complying with that. And certainly there's no
twenty twenty eight deadline mentioned. I don't know where they
got that. It's an invention born out of conspiracy communities.
So question everything, verify before you amplify. Please remember, the
truth shouldn't put fear scrutiny in us. It should just
(37:04):
basically inform us. We should be outraged at the truth
or community spreading fear, spreading unnecessary fear, and they're all
doing it. From Dave Hodges, I don't know if he's
around anymore. From the Hageman, from Lisa Haven, from all
these guys that are spreading fear to build hype to
(37:25):
their audiences, to their channels.
Speaker 7 (37:29):
We don't do that.
Speaker 2 (37:30):
That's why we don't have the large audience, because we're
snuffed out. Do you know why they're not snuffed out
and we are because they're fabricating so much that everybody
they're making it obvious that they're not telling their truth.
So what do the authorities care? Right, That's what I
figured out. Why am I being shadow band being stifled?
Why is my YouTube channel getting off the air? Because
(37:53):
I have the truth on here and I'm calling out
the truth and I'm exposing the lies and I'm narrowing
it down and separating fact from fiction. I pose more
of a threat than all these channels put together, even
Alex Jones. Is that a boast? Wow, I must be,
(38:13):
But I'm serious. I probably pose more of a threat.
That's why I'm squashed. And I don't have a large
reach because they're squashing me because they don't want my
threat of exposing the truth, so they keep me the
low and so that you know, that doesn't get out,
and they allow these other twenty thirty forty thousand listener
(38:34):
audiences of these things to go out because they're obviously
not telling the truth or they're fabricating it, and people
are seeing through it, and it's only their communities that
are seeing it, so they keep the rest of the
mainstream away from it. But if mainstream comes in their
senses and they want to see the truth, they don't
want to see conspiracy hype, they want to see conspiracy truth,
(38:56):
then they can come here. So invite your friends share
this information. I mean I could get things wrong too,
don't get your you know, but I mean I have
more of a track record of calling it out and
finding the truth than they do. But I'm looking for
the truth. That's the difference. And I'm not hyping and
I'm not trying to find the hype. So my website
(39:19):
is Jimdukeperspective dot com and you can listen to me
on all your favorite podcast players. Give my social media
a like Jim Duke Perspective and subscribe to us and
put a review out on Apple Podcasts. And I thank
you for listening, and we'll see you next time.
Speaker 7 (39:38):
God bless.
Speaker 5 (39:41):
At Spokane Tribe Resort and Casino, indulgence knows no bounds
and every moment is a winning experience Unwind and style
with luxury rooms, stellar live entertainment, and delicious dining for
every appetite. Whether you're looking for an adrenal unpact weekend
or a midweek recharge total comfort, We've got something for everyone.
(40:03):
Thrill meets chill at Spokane Tribe Resort and Casino.
Speaker 3 (40:07):
You just don'twind here.
Speaker 9 (40:10):
You care about your team and at Regents, so do
we That's why our health plans include head to toe
benefits that fit their lives at prices that fit your budget.
Regent's Blue Shield. Together, we Health.
Speaker 1 (40:29):
Hi everybody, it's me Cinderella Acts. You are listening to
the Fringe Radio Network. I know I was gonna tell them, Hey,
do you have the app?
Speaker 3 (40:40):
It's the best way to listen to the fringe radio network.
Speaker 1 (40:44):
It's safe and you don't have to log in to
use it, and it doesn't track you or trace you,
and it sounds beautiful.
Speaker 3 (40:52):
I know I was gonna tell them.
Speaker 1 (40:54):
How do you get the app? Just go to fringeradionetwork
dot com write the top of the page.
Speaker 3 (41:02):
I know, slippers. We gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Speaker 2 (41:09):
M
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies!
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!