December 9, 2025 • 43 mins
Did Bill Gates reverse his position on Climate Change? The 190 countries signed onto the Climate Change agenda met in Brazil for the COP30 Climate Change Conference, in which they discuss concerns over the environment and collaborate on how to handle it. They expect $1.3 trillion to address the crisis. To them we are in a dangerous catastrophic consequence that needs immediate attention.
We also mentioned Candace Owens and her focus on the Charlie Kirk murder. Is she blaming Erika Kirk? She certainly is baiting them to challenge her. Some called her bluff, in which Owens provided evidence for what she claims (sort of).
Will the Epstein Files be released? Congress is voting on their release. What does Trump say about it?
You know how we feel about the climate change hoax.
CNN article about the conference:
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/11/climate/cop30-explainer-belem-brazil
We also mentioned Candace Owens and her focus on the Charlie Kirk murder. Is she blaming Erika Kirk? She certainly is baiting them to challenge her. Some called her bluff, in which Owens provided evidence for what she claims (sort of).
Will the Epstein Files be released? Congress is voting on their release. What does Trump say about it?
You know how we feel about the climate change hoax.
CNN article about the conference:
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/11/climate/cop30-explainer-belem-brazil
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
Hi, everybody, It's me Cinderella.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
As you are listening to the Fringe Radio Network. I
know I was gonna tell them, Hey, do you have
the app?
Speaker 1 (00:15):
It's the best way to listen to the Fringe Radio Network.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
It's safe and you don't have to log in to
use it, and it doesn't track you or trace you,
and it sounds beautiful.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app?
Speaker 2 (00:31):
Just go to fringeradionetwork dot com right at the top
of the page.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
I know, slippers, we gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Pacebook can how's winter trading? You? Wait, don't answer. We
hear the shoveling from here. If you're craving a getaway
where the snow doesn't follow you around like a clinging X,
head to Vancouver, Washington. Sure we still do winter, but
ours comes with green evergreens, cozy cafes, riverfront views, and
exactly zero mandatory snowplok conversations. When your driveway is buried,
(01:07):
our trails are open, when your windshield freezes, our skits
A polite missing Vancouver Washington winter, just softer.
Speaker 4 (01:17):
Wake Up Radio Network, a rational voice in a world
of conspiracy Jim Duke Perspective.
Speaker 5 (01:29):
Welcome to Jim Duke Perspective. My website is Jim Duke
Perspective dot com and you can check us out on
all your favorite podcasts players. Uh so, Darren, do you
think do you think they're going to release the Epstein files?
I mean, is this still a big deal?
Speaker 6 (01:47):
Well, I'm guessing that they are, because it seems like
they are very serious about it. And President Trump is,
you know, finally given the okay, setting the liberal lefts
up all this time, and.
Speaker 5 (02:01):
So he did after resisting or seemingly you know, pushing
it aside. We don't need this, This isn't important right now.
Uh what did Congress voted for it and pushed it
or something?
Speaker 7 (02:13):
Yeah, they're going to be voting on it for tomorrow.
Speaker 5 (02:16):
Oh, they didn't vote on it yet as this recording. Okay,
so it still may fail. It's possible, but not likely,
all right. And and what's Trump saying about it?
Speaker 7 (02:30):
Well, he's saying, definitely, go for a pass it.
Speaker 5 (02:33):
He was not hiding from it anymore like they thought
he was hiding from it.
Speaker 7 (02:37):
He was pretending he was hiding from it to set
them up.
Speaker 5 (02:40):
So yeah, because there was a lot of emails that
they said when back and forth how Epstein said, Oh
that trumpy, he was a bad dude, stuff like that.
What's that all about.
Speaker 7 (02:55):
Well, he's not in the list, that's what I sened.
Speaker 5 (02:57):
And but what about those pictures that keep him of
him with Gleayne mask Maxwell and showing him with the
little girls, the young girls, Well they weren't little younger
you know, Okay, yeah, should say because because Megan Kelly
clarified that too, when.
Speaker 6 (03:14):
They weren't having sex there and Trump and the younger ladies.
Speaker 5 (03:18):
Right, younger, you're right, right, because we have we have
to that creeps myself.
Speaker 6 (03:22):
It doesn't mean they're participating their creepiness. You know, we
all know creeps and have photos of them and hung
out with them in their past. But you know, it
doesn't make us a creep.
Speaker 5 (03:31):
Yeah. No, Megan Kelly made a stipulation that says it
wasn't like they're eight years old, they're fourteen year olds.
Speaker 7 (03:37):
Oh yeah, big difference.
Speaker 5 (03:40):
She said something like that. Don't defend us, please, you know,
I don't know, but Candice is still on the Charlie
kirk pe Oh yeah, she's easy talking about you said,
setting them up, baiting them. Talk about baiting. She's like
throwing out hooks, you know, throwing out hooks and hoping
(04:03):
they they grab. It's like she's thrown out stuff almost
like she's trying to incriminate herself. And then they're like,
well look at the nonsense she's saying. And then she goes,
oh nonsense, Well how about this? And then she proves
she puts out a proof. It's like, is she baiting
them too?
Speaker 7 (04:21):
Who knows what that? I don't know.
Speaker 5 (04:23):
That's crazy, isn't it?
Speaker 7 (04:24):
Yep? It sure is. Maybe it's just a big script,
like they say, is.
Speaker 5 (04:29):
I don't yeah, I don't know, though I can't. I
can't read her. I mean she did come out and
say I realize now I had handlers. Is she starting
to realize she was controlled before? And maybe she's let
loose now? I don't know. I know she's not taken
seriously by well, the conservatives just threw her right off
(04:50):
the boat. They said, no, get away from us, and
you know, turning points. Is what is this woman trying
to do? You know, she's just jealous because she did
and get the seat. You know, that's what they're saying.
And then and then you got the Truthers are saying
Candace is a trickster, she's a controlled opposition. Don't you
know that she's throwing out bait for us. Well, she
(05:12):
might be, but if nobody's really paying attention to her,
like the Truthers, if they know, if they're onto her,
and they don't, then she's not really catering to that audience.
What audience is she catering to? I know there's people
defending her because I see people on her comments going,
go Candace go, you know, so there's people defending her.
Others are saying you're a wacko. So you know, is
(05:36):
she just trying to is she just speaking? And just
does she have extreme OCD or something? Because she won't
get off this thing.
Speaker 7 (05:45):
I know, it's just almost like she's possessed it is.
Speaker 5 (05:50):
It's like that's her one focus in life right now,
and she's just on it like like day and night.
And you know, I mean, I I could see us
getting compelled to things, because we we tend to do.
But she's got a reputation, she's got a you know,
a podcast, she's got a you know, a presence that
(06:11):
that she was supposed to be, you know, really conservative,
and now she's dumped them. She's she's trying to cater
to the truthers, but she's not really catered to them
because she don't care what they think either. I don't
know what her game is. I mean, she seems like
a whack oh, but she's saying some things that you know,
she's bringing out some things, and they're they're they're taking
(06:34):
the bait, getting themselves in trouble. Every time they comment
and and challenge her, she brings out the proof. I
don't know, what do you think? Do you think she's.
Speaker 6 (06:47):
Well, maybe they're in on it together. I wouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 5 (06:51):
Well, she keeps claiming that they had an inside communications,
that they that he was uh you know, relating to
her how he was in danger and carry on my
mantle for.
Speaker 7 (07:06):
Me, and yep, I heard that part. Yeah, But I.
Speaker 5 (07:09):
Mean that they're they're accusing her of saying, did even
that Ali Stuckley or whatever, that that podcaster, the Christian podcaster.
She's come against Canvas too. It said, just drop it already.
You know, none of this is true that she's claiming,
and you know, she's trying to taint Erica, uh, you know,
(07:29):
about about her involvement, and and then others are saying
she's accusing Erica of of being involved or killing her husband.
And then she's coming on saying that's not what I
said at all. And it sounds like she did kind
of accuse Erica of being involved, right. Did it sound
(07:49):
like that to you?
Speaker 7 (07:50):
Yeah? It sounded absolutely sound like.
Speaker 5 (07:52):
But then she say, no, I'm not saying you guys
said it, not me. I'm only telling you the suspicions.
Speaker 6 (07:57):
Man, it seems kind of weird because the what the
toy was rented out and I think three months in
advanced that when in.
Speaker 7 (08:04):
Utah oh yeah, yeah, reserve.
Speaker 5 (08:07):
Yeah, I don't know, probably poison to go there. Uh
So the thing I saw recently, I don't know if
you caught this, that there has been a climate change
conference in Brazil.
Speaker 7 (08:23):
I didn't hear about that one.
Speaker 5 (08:24):
Yeah, November tenth to the twenty first, still going on,
and it's it's called the COP thirty conference, and it
stands for the Conference of Parties Signing Agreements to to
co CO you know, coincide with this climate change strategy.
(08:51):
And believe it or not, you got another thirty in
there COP thirty. What do you think the thirty stands
for YEP twenty thirty, Agenda twenty thirty five. They all
have those date deadline code words. So this conference is
(09:11):
it's been going on since nineteen ninety five in Berlin
it started this is the first time in Brazil. One
hundred and ninety countries from around the world had signed
on to this strategy of concern for the climate change
(09:31):
to measure the conditions and see if we can rein
in on get this. You know the language they use,
the dangerous catastrophic consequences. Are we in dangerous catastrophic consequences?
Speaker 7 (09:48):
Of course? Life?
Speaker 5 (09:50):
Well, I remember in the nineteen eighties. I remember in
the nineteen seventies we were in a catastrophic dangerous consequence
because if you remember, and you were, you were, you're
my age about and you remember this stuff that they
were talking about global cooling. Remember that in the seventies
(10:13):
they were talking Remember they were talking about global cooling
and what was the saying, it's a dangerous catastrophic consequence
that if we don't address this in ten years, we're
going to hit another ice age. Then what happened in
the nineteen eighties, the weather conditions were favoring warming, so
(10:33):
they started saying, the ozone's depleting, we have an ozone problem,
and the Earth is warming. There's a global warming dangerous
catastrophic consequence. Well, how can you have a dangerous catastrophic
consequence for icing? Now there's a dangerous catastrophic you know,
consequence for for warming. What the heck? Which way can
(10:58):
it go? Well, it kind of to got teeter tottered.
In the year two thousand and what happened was during
the climate conferences for global warming, they had to cancel
because it was too cool. It was cold, and they
didn't expect it to be cold. So when people started saying,
(11:20):
what's going on here? I thought there was a warming,
not a cooling. They go, yeah, the cooling is due
to the climate warming. Do you remember that now? Only
I yeah, I do. I remember it clearly because I
was listening to it and they were trying to say
it's it's cooling because of the global warming. The conditions
(11:40):
has caused a reverse situation that caused it to seemingly
that it's cooling, but it's actually part of the drive
of the warming. It's like, are you are you just
making this up, but idiots believe it because they just
take in the bait for the for the agenda. But
(12:02):
what they did was, instead of agreeing that it's cooling
and going with that narrative, they changed the term to
climate change. That way they can hit it both ways.
Isn't that convenient?
Speaker 6 (12:17):
So now it's great come up by that when they're
at the Committee of three hundred sitting around, yeah, figuring
out the global events.
Speaker 5 (12:23):
Well they could have done this when they were at
the nineteen ninety two UN Treaty to limit the UH
the rising of the planet heating pollution, and what they
found out after analyzing the statistics of them saying, well,
climate change, cooling and warming and cooling, and so we
(12:44):
have a dangerous situation. Both ways. Hey, that's convenient, let's
make the agenda both ways. And they were right either way.
But what happened was they found out, by the measure
of the record set they kept only goes back to
certain time, that it actually shows a cycle, a natural
cycle of cooling and then warming and then cooling and
(13:05):
then warming. And it's all a matter of what agenda
they're hitting according to what ten years we're gonna die
in because that's what they said, global warming, we're gonna
get We're gonna warm up in ten years and die.
So this goes back and forth. So what happened was
they struck out a couple of the stats. One was
in nineteen thirty five. I think by taking out the
(13:27):
one stat it led to an agenda that they needed.
So they basically fixed the statistics. They faked it, and
then when they what what I've read is that when
they go to measure the warming, like where do they go?
They go to the ice places, right, they go to Alaska,
(13:49):
they go to Iceland, they go they go to places
where it's it's really cool to measure whether the temperature dropped,
and if they see Iceberg's they say that's proof of
global warming. Unfortunately, at the same time they say, there's
some melting, there's other parts of it that are freezing.
(14:10):
So what do you think is happening. I'll tell you
what's happening. They go and measure it in the most
strategic places they can so they can collect their data
and make the claim. It's an agenda. It's a religion.
It's actually part of the religion of Mother Gaya, worship
of entervironment. It's what the un do, it's what the
(14:33):
occultists do, the New Agers and you know, the tree
huggers and all this. They want a perfect environment and
only man can help the earth. Unfortunately, they don't realize
that the Earth has cycles and it replenishes itself. And
if you take the pollutants in the air of volcanic
eruptions pollute the air more than what they claim man does,
(14:57):
so you can't claim it's man made.
Speaker 7 (15:00):
Good point, although there.
Speaker 5 (15:01):
Is fog and smog and everything else contributing. But you know,
maybe we can lessen some of the pollutants, but we're
never going to control climate change. So what they're doing
is they add the aerosols in the air and they
start to film the sky and with a blanket with
clouds or with aerosol aluminum and bury them and all
(15:25):
this junk in the air, toxic chemicals in the air,
so that they go hope the whole back the sun
or the you know, the warming or whatever the heck
they say they're doing and blotting out the sun. Remember
that they said they wanted to blot out the sun.
Speaker 7 (15:42):
Yep, for a global coin.
Speaker 6 (15:45):
No, if they just got a life and minded their
own bass.
Speaker 7 (15:49):
It's some good we wouldn't have any of these problems.
Speaker 5 (15:51):
Let it go. But I'm gonna I'm gonna share you
with you some mindsets that I've heard these people say.
Speaker 4 (15:55):
The holidays are here, filled with gatherings, toasts, and plenty
of tear. Make every moment shine with total Wine and more,
where you'll find it all at the lowest prices. Raise
the spirits of the season with rich whiskeys, smooth tequilas,
and festive liqueurs perfect for sipping or gifting. And for
wine lovers. Explore everything from velvety pinos two elegant champagnes
(16:16):
ready to pour or share. You'll always find what you love,
and love what you find only at Total Wine and
More spirits not sold in Virginia and North Carolina. Drink
responsibly be twenty one.
Speaker 5 (16:27):
Well, like there's Brazilian President Luis in the Nacio Lula
da Silva. He wants to raise one hundred and twenty
five billion dollars for funds that will protect the countries
and their forests. And last year they said at the
COP twenty nine, I got oh, I guess thirty stands
(16:51):
for the year that they're doing it. I'm sorry, my correct,
it doesn't stand for twenty thirty, although it is saying
that the agenda they're trying to and submit their plans
by twenty thirty five, So it is to do with
the thirties, but not the way I said. I guess
COP thirty is last year was COP twenty nine, And
(17:13):
what they said was there that they agreed to provide
three hundred billion dollars annually by twenty thirty five, and
a wider ambition to reach one point three trillion dollars
from a range of sources. Now, don't get me wrong,
but are isn't like there's not a lot of money
(17:39):
in the world to give out three hundred billion annually
and one point three trillion dollars for a stupid cause
like this is there?
Speaker 7 (17:52):
I mean of all countries collectively.
Speaker 5 (17:55):
Yeah, maybe, but to waste that money on this one
cause I.
Speaker 6 (18:00):
Could at least AI that ask AI, how much is
a total amount of uh, well, monetary like just I
know there's.
Speaker 5 (18:06):
More growth produce, but we don't even really everybody's bankrupt,
where do they get the money? If the United States
is bankrupt and Spain is bankrupt and Europe is bankrupt
and Canada's bank. Who's got the money to throw it
into this that they're trying to collect?
Speaker 7 (18:24):
Good questions paying for it? Nobody ask right.
Speaker 6 (18:27):
Now how much currencies in the world right now among
all countries anyway. I'll be back in a minute with
the answer for.
Speaker 5 (18:33):
That, right But this is crazy that that they have
the money to throw out then all the nations, all
the countries at the borrow from each other because it
can't survive. You know, we're in debt and we have
to pay money to Israel to help their expansions, and
you know, but they can give one point three trillion.
(18:55):
So the concern about this is the fossil fuels. We've
talked about this before. It's it's the driver of the
climate crisis, which they mentioned that they want to try
to transition away from oil, coal and gas. I mean,
what do they want to what do they want to
(19:16):
use for energy? Trump is pushing fossil fuels, isn't he?
Speaker 7 (19:24):
Oh yes he is.
Speaker 5 (19:24):
Yeah, he's pushing fossil fuels. But the rest of these
countries they're using I guess they're pushing back with language
blaming fossil fuels for climate change and trying to commit
to phase them out. It's crazy how much I.
Speaker 6 (19:45):
Think there's a new form of energy that they're working
on that even the Arabs are now trying to transition
over from oil because they want to be, you know,
in on it. I forget that hydrogen not not hydrogen
and those what the heck? Some type of earth element.
I forgot the name of it.
Speaker 7 (20:01):
I'm gonna google it.
Speaker 5 (20:02):
Helium. No, no, no, let's feel everything with helium and
everybody could talk high and and and lift up and.
Speaker 7 (20:12):
Float in the air, talk like ducks. Yeah. Did you
ever in heal helium? Helium?
Speaker 5 (20:19):
Yeah?
Speaker 7 (20:21):
I did it once. It's just amazing.
Speaker 5 (20:22):
Yeah, it's fun, isn't it.
Speaker 7 (20:24):
You don't call somebody up and start talking.
Speaker 5 (20:26):
To Let's do a whole show like that.
Speaker 7 (20:30):
Yeah we should you.
Speaker 5 (20:34):
Godcham Yeah. There is an article on in CNN and uh,
the the the controversy with this, with this thing. What
they're trying to do, let me find the place here.
(20:56):
What they're trying to do is their ambition is to
reach right, I mentioned one point three trillion. Now, what
they're saying is they're just trying that. They're saying that
the rate of the rate of temperature is like exceeding
up to two point eight degrees, you know, overall over
(21:23):
a certain amount of time, and they're trying to narrow
that down to one point something degree. So the thing
is is there that one point five degrees is what
they're shooting at. But they said in order to get
this down, what they can hope for is that they're
(21:43):
going to ask for one point three trillion dollars in
hope they could come close. They're just overshooting to try
to reach somewhat of the goal so that they can
have enough to provide for Now, what's this funding do
(22:04):
when they fund this? What what do they say? Are
they are they funding meetings? Are they funding? What are
they doing? Because they're making regulations, especially in America. Other
countries don't even have to follow it. But America we have,
we have the UN regulating US. We have the United
States is saying telling businesses how much emissions they can have,
(22:25):
and it's we're being controlled. And then poor countries, poor
companies have to uh re redo their machines and get
new machinery and spend more money on environmental safe machines
and all this stuff. And we're we're setting the goal
for this, and they're making the companies pay for this.
(22:49):
So what's this money for? What does this money do?
Speaker 6 (22:51):
I don't good question. Yeah, really it's like for popcorn
at their meeting.
Speaker 5 (22:58):
I guess it's to explore that money to explore new
energy things.
Speaker 7 (23:04):
Oh I did ask ai?
Speaker 6 (23:07):
What's the total amount of currency collectively among all countries?
And what it comes up to is the broadest measure
including like a large time deposits, institutional funds, and other
broader liquidy. The figure is estimated at approximately one hundred
and fifty trillion US dollars.
Speaker 5 (23:23):
Okay, so one hundred So it's not too bad to
ask for two trillion, right of that's what's two trillion
when you got one hundred and fifty trillion?
Speaker 7 (23:34):
Right? And what is a thousand billion?
Speaker 5 (23:36):
Yeah? And what's what's two trillion dollars? You know? To lose?
It's just numbers. When when you know, when you got
one hundred you know what, what's two trillion loss? If
you got that much money? Oh wow, it's like it's
like people like you and I we fred over one
hundred dollars we lost Oh we just lost one hundred dollars.
(23:57):
Oh my gosh, I can't get groceries this week. Millionaires say, ah,
I lost a million on that one.
Speaker 7 (24:05):
Same equivalency in the percentage terms.
Speaker 5 (24:08):
So countries that are rich could say add two two billion,
two trillion. Who cares?
Speaker 7 (24:13):
M H.
Speaker 6 (24:14):
But now if we try to extract that from our
banks simultaneously, they couldn't do it. But yet they're printing
all that money. So you gotta ask, where's that paper
currency going?
Speaker 5 (24:23):
You know what I hear now? Well, first of all,
it's not paper anymore. It's all digital. But you know
what I'm hearing now that banks are not people are
going like trying to withdraw you know. You know that
if you if you deposit or withdraw one thousand dollars
in cash, they have a dirty look. No, they have
(24:43):
cameras on you. They monitor it. But if you ask
for ten thousand dollars, you have to sign, you have
to fill out an affid David to claim the money.
Speaker 7 (24:55):
Now, probably ask you what you're going to be spending
on it?
Speaker 5 (24:57):
Yeah, and I and some of the will not even
allow you to have it. We know. It's a couple
of banks that uh, friends of mine said they they
went to take out ten thousand dollars in the banks.
Is we don't we don't have it, We can't give
it to you. What do you mean you don't have
the You don't have the deposits in there. You don't
have the deposits you're supposed to hold. Where are my deposits?
Speaker 7 (25:19):
Yeah?
Speaker 6 (25:20):
I tried with drawing I think a couple of grand
and the tell her looked at me like I was
a mass murderer. And I told her that her dress
she's wearing looks makes her look fat, and I popped
her lunch bag and kicked her puppy.
Speaker 7 (25:31):
Yeah, I just got the dirtiest look ever.
Speaker 5 (25:34):
Oh my gosh, I know it's well, you got spied
on because they have a camera on you. Once you
get that, you know, say, say you're buying you're buying
a car from somebody, and you know you want to
pay cash. You take out the cash to buy a
car five thousand dollars or whatever. They they they look
at you and you're not supposed to do that. And
if you want ten thousand dollars, god forbid, they're gonna
(25:57):
they're gonna make you sign papers. Now what if somebody
says they do is they take out nine thousand dollars
each time just to make sure they're never at that
ten thousand dollars.
Speaker 7 (26:06):
Right, that's a good idea circumvent that restriction.
Speaker 5 (26:10):
But it's crazy that that's how they look at things. So,
you know, you wonder how much money they have the
flow around let alone, you know, regulating companies. And it's
demanding one point three trillion dollars for this cause we
don't even know if it's really you know, what's going
on about it, but the WEF is involved in this.
(26:34):
They're raising four trillion dollars to address concerns that UN
Secretary General Antonio Gutaris warned in October that they're trying
to reduce the emissions by ten percent I guess, and
we would need sixty percent to stay within one point
(26:57):
five degrees. So they're over shooting to try to get
to that point. Now, one person that did you hear
one person that has turned away reversed his position supposedly
of climate change, Bill Gates, whoa did you hear that?
(27:20):
Now here's what happened. It's a claim that Bill Gates
reversed his position and now is not supporting the climate
change agenda and bowed his knee in surrendering climate change argument.
He has given up. What happened was Donald Trump made
a claim on truth Social that he won the war
(27:43):
on climate change hoax, asserting that Bill Gates finally admitted
that he was completely wrong on the issue. Now that's
what Donald Trump claimed. But the fact, as you know,
I look into right, I never go. I don't care
if Donald Trump said it. I want to know what
(28:04):
Bill Gates, or real least said.
Speaker 8 (28:05):
When it comes to your money, confidence changes everything. At FACET,
you get flatfee financial planning from a certified financial planner,
no commissions, no hidden agendas, just objective guidance that covers
everything your money touches. With a personalized roadmap and help
to stay on track. You'll feel confident you're making the
right decisions with your money. Facet Financial Planning for the
life you want. Visit facet dot com to get started.
Speaker 5 (28:27):
At a sponsored by Facet. An sec registered investment advisor,
not an offered to buy or sell securities, nor is
it an investment, legal or tax advice. Past performance is
not a guarantee of future performance, and according to an
article and Bill Gates his own article about this, he
(28:47):
wasn't necessarily reversing his long standing acknowledgment of climate change.
In a recent climate memo, which multiple interviews he gave reaffirmed,
he didn't say climate change was a hoax and it
(29:07):
wasn't a serious threat. However, he changed his focus to
be more on more important aspects of improving human welfare.
So when he wrote that climate change shouldn't supersede humanity's
(29:28):
need for welfare, what he claimed was climate change not
addressing it will not lead to human demise, So he
demoted the emphasis that he took over it. He didn't
say it was a hoax. He just said it's not
as What he's saying is it's not as dangerous to
(29:51):
humanity as these other issues. So he wants alongside of
this to have a focus on human welfare. That's all
he was really saying. He wasn't saying climate control or
climate change is not real. What he's saying is it's
(30:12):
not as much of an urgency as these other issues.
But he still lessened his hold on it. Right.
Speaker 7 (30:22):
Sounds like it he.
Speaker 5 (30:24):
Doesn't think that. He thinks the climate community is too
focus on the temperatures. It's taking away from improving human
suffering and poverty and hunger and things like that. He
didn't negate it. He just says that hunger is more
important to address in fund. But so, you know, he
(30:48):
still believes it's important. He just doesn't think it's at
the crisis that they're making out to be. So he's
on our side with not making it a big deal.
Right maybe hmmm, so for the best, I mean, he
did say that he got you know, people started spinning.
You know, everybody's gonna spin it. Once he says something
(31:10):
and somebody picks up on it, they're gonna say But
you know, at the other end, Trump was exaggerating a
little bit to say that he admitted he was wrong.
He didn't admit he was wrong. See, this is this
is the fake news that we talked about. Trump's involved too,
Darren' don't let a kid you when when we talk
about circular journalism, Trump started this one and the papers
(31:31):
picked up on it.
Speaker 6 (31:33):
Right, Well, you can say anything you want bad about
Gates because he deserves it.
Speaker 7 (31:37):
So that's probably way Trump looked at it.
Speaker 5 (31:38):
Yeah, he was, you know, he was exaggerating the stance.
But what he was getting at is is, uh, Gates
did reverse his emphasis on the urgency of it, so
we can at least say that with all confidence.
Speaker 7 (31:53):
M hm.
Speaker 5 (31:54):
So that's uh, that's where that is. So yeah, So
these uh, these people are every year they gather in
this thing and they you know, they're trying to say,
what's at stake for climate and we have to have
global collaboration. I mean, think about it. They've been doing
this since nineteen ninety two and they said in ten
(32:17):
years there's going to be a crisis. But they've been
doing this since nineteen ninety two. Every ten years is
a crisis? What's that tell you? When there's no, it
hasn't got to that point yet. It says that every
year they're just basically restating the urgency. And they've been
doing it since the sixties and the seventies. They're all
(32:39):
they're doing is is pushing pushing it down to the
next generation, the next you know, the next the next
you know, the next demographics to try to get them
on board for the next decade. It's just just this
ongoing agenda. And then you got like Greta Thunberg going
(33:02):
out and this we gotta put a stop to this.
She's like a little hitler. You know, no spending. No,
you know, she she'd have you not going out in
the wilderness if it was for her, you know, don't
danger the climate.
Speaker 7 (33:20):
Yep.
Speaker 5 (33:24):
So I don't know this, you know, if it's that
much of an agenda and we're still fighting it, you know,
is it that I just don't like the fact that
the UN gets involved and starts mandating regulations and we
comply with it, like like they're our boss. I mean,
just because we you know, we we signed on to
(33:44):
the u N, the u N treaties and stuff. Why
Trump was supposed to erase that. Why didn't he get
that done? He was supposed to get us off, get
us off the u N. M. I don't know the
first term he was saying that he wanted the u N.
He wanted the UN out of the out of the
(34:06):
New York I think to look that up, because I
remember him saying.
Speaker 7 (34:12):
And then huh, good question.
Speaker 5 (34:15):
And now now he's all for it. Now he's why
are we complying with the u N?
Speaker 7 (34:21):
Hmmm?
Speaker 5 (34:26):
I don't know. The whole global thing is an agenda.
We know that.
Speaker 7 (34:31):
Oh yeah, it's bigger than you think.
Speaker 5 (34:33):
Yeah, and what about this man deep donnie guy in
New York City.
Speaker 7 (34:42):
Oh my gosh, socialist democratic communists.
Speaker 5 (34:46):
What a socialist? He wants free food? Who does he
think pays for this stuff?
Speaker 6 (34:50):
I know there's something like seven hundred thousand millionaires are
leaving New York now or something.
Speaker 5 (34:55):
That's what they said. Is that true? I don't know,
but I did see leaving. Yeah, or they're coming up state.
Oh fine, bring your businesses here. There was some rumors
too that you know, he said things that against circular
circular reporting, that he said things you know, uh, that
(35:20):
he was against. Do you hear that? One? He was
he's against pro pro life organizations for helping guide pregnant women,
and he's going to strip the funding and ban them.
And then they said, no, that's not what he said.
He's not doing that. But the fact that you know,
(35:43):
he's a communist, I don't know who knows what he
can do. And not only that, he's a communist Muslim,
not against Muslims, but Muslims who you know, I don't
know how how fundamentally he is. You know, if you're
fundamental Muslim, you're gonna support the militants mm hmm.
Speaker 7 (36:04):
Faithful Muslim too, Yeah, that's what that's what.
Speaker 5 (36:08):
Yeah, so you got that on him, and that means
that he's for Sharia law, wouldn't it be so he'd
support this Muslim sharia law. This uh, this mandate for
you know Muslim I don't know, if you know. There's
a secret pact with Muslims. They're supposed to yield to
each other. And and there's what's called takaya and different
(36:32):
types of lying is in their doctrines. They can lie
to the infidels.
Speaker 7 (36:39):
I've heard about that.
Speaker 5 (36:40):
They could tell you right to your face. It's just
it's called justified lying. They could tell you right to
your face, you say, hey, are you planning on this? No? No, no,
no no. And as long as they're doing the agenda,
they can lie. And when I say agenda, I mean
the Muslim you know, agenda, the Muslim doctrines or whatever
(37:03):
they plan to do. I mean in essence Muslims. It's
a militant religion. I hate to say it so as Christianity. No,
the difference is the Muslim religion is actually militant in
form killing the infidels and all this militant action that
they're told to carry out. That's a new, precedented doctrine.
(37:25):
It transcends the Old just like our New Testament would
be and our New Testament. Christians aren't told to go
out and slaughter. Those that do are outside the jurisdiction
of what the doctrine says. So anybody that says Christians
go out and kill two no, Christians who aren't following
the precedents of the Bible are doing it, not those
(37:47):
who are following the Bible. There's a difference. Christian fundamentally
is not violent. Muslim fundamentally can be. So there's the difference.
Is Now, how much hate mail am I going to
get for this? You don't understand a Muslim faith? Oh? Okay, okay,
(38:12):
Well I kind of do, but I don't. I don't
know the Muslim faith per se. But I do know
what their current doctrines say, and how they justify lying,
and how they have to step aside. If there's a militant,
more militant Muslim, they yield to it. I know, I
(38:32):
know the secrets. I know enough of the secrets that
I'm dangerous, but not enough that I can inform you
or instruct you on how it works. You know, I
can't tell you what the Muslims really think, you know,
per se. I don't know if that makes sense. But anyway,
so we have the Prince of Wells and and all
(38:56):
this attending these these climate changes and you know China's
president z zimpig Ping. So oh no he wasn't there. No,
him and Trump decided not to be there. Okay, so
good good. I don't know what that means China and
(39:21):
America are allies on the climate change. I don't know.
Speaker 7 (39:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (39:27):
I was told, oh, this person had a prophecy. You
can't believe this, Darren. Somebody actually posted this on Facebook
and said God told them. And anytime somebody says God
told me, I really put my red flags up because
many people that say God told me are saying that
God spoke to me personally. Thus saith the Lord, and
if they're wrong, they get to be stoned. But when
(39:49):
they say this, this scares me. This person came out
and said, thus saith the Lord that America is under
crisis and God warned her to tell everybody to move
out of America because China was attacking us. So she says,
I'm going to obey God. Now I love it when
(40:12):
people state this stuff because I want to follow through
and find out where they moved to what they did, right,
you know, darn well, they didn't pack their bags and move.
So I asked this person, I said, where did you
end up moving to? And she says, I haven't yet.
I said, so, you gave the warning to everybody else,
but you're not doing it, and she says, Israel. I said,
(40:34):
so you're going to move to Israel. You realize that
Israel is under under the Sanhedrin, under the Noahide laws,
and you know that they loathe Christians and they're they're
they're they're persecuting Christians there, right, and you know that
Israel is an a godly nation, not awarding Jesus Christ
(40:58):
and God of you know of Jesus. There there they
have their own religion, their own God, and they followed Kabbalah.
And I went into it. That's where you're gonna go.
You feel safe there, That's that's where God told you
to go for safety. You know she did, She turned around,
She just named another state, another country. You don't even
(41:21):
know where you're going. And she said you better pray
about it. Yeah, okay, I pray that you're a looney anyway,
be careful when people say thus say, it's the Lord
to tell you to do something that they don't do.
So anyway, let's close there. Uh my website Jim Dukeperspective
(41:41):
dot com. Check us out on all your favorite media platforms,
the podcast platforms, and we'll see you next time. God
bless well.
Speaker 9 (41:52):
Holiday shopping is almost always fun. Credit can be confusing.
Download the my Phyco app now and shop with confidence
knowing that you can stay on top of your credit
twenty four to seven. Get your fycoscore straight from the
people that created it, plus free credit monitoring and a
free credit report every month, no credit card required. Phycoscores
are used by over ninety percent of lenders, so trust
(42:14):
the Myfyco app to keep you in the know. Visit
myfyco dot com, slash free or download the Myfyco app today.
You know what you want, a career that matters in
a path that's real. At Carrington College, you can train
to become a medical assistant.
Speaker 8 (42:30):
Through hands on learning and a clinical externship.
Speaker 4 (42:33):
You'll build the skills, healthcare facilities and need from patient
care to front office procedures, finish in as few.
Speaker 9 (42:40):
As nine months, and hit the ground running. Classes are
now enrolling in Spokane. Visit Carrington dot edu for more
information about the student outcomes.
Speaker 8 (42:49):
Visit Carrington dot edu.
Speaker 9 (42:50):
Slash sci.
Speaker 1 (42:56):
Hi, everybody, it's me. It's and relax.
Speaker 2 (43:00):
You are listening to the Fringe Radio Network.
Speaker 1 (43:04):
I know I was gonna tell them, Hey, do you
have the app? It's the best way to listen to
the fringe radio Network.
Speaker 2 (43:11):
It's safe and you don't have to log in to
use it, and it doesn't track you or trace you,
and it sounds beautiful.
Speaker 1 (43:20):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app?
Speaker 2 (43:23):
Just go to fringeradionetwork dot com right at the top
of the page.
Speaker 1 (43:29):
I know, slippers, we gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Hi, everybody, It's me Cinderella.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
As you are listening to the Fringe Radio Network. I
know I was gonna tell them, Hey, do you have
the app?
Speaker 1 (00:15):
It's the best way to listen to the Fringe Radio Network.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
It's safe and you don't have to log in to
use it, and it doesn't track you or trace you,
and it sounds beautiful.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app?
Speaker 2 (00:31):
Just go to fringeradionetwork dot com right at the top
of the page.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
I know, slippers, we gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Pacebook can how's winter trading? You? Wait, don't answer. We
hear the shoveling from here. If you're craving a getaway
where the snow doesn't follow you around like a clinging X,
head to Vancouver, Washington. Sure we still do winter, but
ours comes with green evergreens, cozy cafes, riverfront views, and
exactly zero mandatory snowplok conversations. When your driveway is buried,
(01:07):
our trails are open, when your windshield freezes, our skits
A polite missing Vancouver Washington winter, just softer.
Speaker 4 (01:17):
Wake Up Radio Network, a rational voice in a world
of conspiracy Jim Duke Perspective.
Speaker 5 (01:29):
Welcome to Jim Duke Perspective. My website is Jim Duke
Perspective dot com and you can check us out on
all your favorite podcasts players. Uh so, Darren, do you
think do you think they're going to release the Epstein files?
I mean, is this still a big deal?
Speaker 6 (01:47):
Well, I'm guessing that they are, because it seems like
they are very serious about it. And President Trump is,
you know, finally given the okay, setting the liberal lefts
up all this time, and.
Speaker 5 (02:01):
So he did after resisting or seemingly you know, pushing
it aside. We don't need this, This isn't important right now.
Uh what did Congress voted for it and pushed it
or something?
Speaker 7 (02:13):
Yeah, they're going to be voting on it for tomorrow.
Speaker 5 (02:16):
Oh, they didn't vote on it yet as this recording. Okay,
so it still may fail. It's possible, but not likely,
all right. And and what's Trump saying about it?
Speaker 7 (02:30):
Well, he's saying, definitely, go for a pass it.
Speaker 5 (02:33):
He was not hiding from it anymore like they thought
he was hiding from it.
Speaker 7 (02:37):
He was pretending he was hiding from it to set
them up.
Speaker 5 (02:40):
So yeah, because there was a lot of emails that
they said when back and forth how Epstein said, Oh
that trumpy, he was a bad dude, stuff like that.
What's that all about.
Speaker 7 (02:55):
Well, he's not in the list, that's what I sened.
Speaker 5 (02:57):
And but what about those pictures that keep him of
him with Gleayne mask Maxwell and showing him with the
little girls, the young girls, Well they weren't little younger
you know, Okay, yeah, should say because because Megan Kelly
clarified that too, when.
Speaker 6 (03:14):
They weren't having sex there and Trump and the younger ladies.
Speaker 5 (03:18):
Right, younger, you're right, right, because we have we have
to that creeps myself.
Speaker 6 (03:22):
It doesn't mean they're participating their creepiness. You know, we
all know creeps and have photos of them and hung
out with them in their past. But you know, it
doesn't make us a creep.
Speaker 5 (03:31):
Yeah. No, Megan Kelly made a stipulation that says it
wasn't like they're eight years old, they're fourteen year olds.
Speaker 7 (03:37):
Oh yeah, big difference.
Speaker 5 (03:40):
She said something like that. Don't defend us, please, you know,
I don't know, but Candice is still on the Charlie
kirk pe Oh yeah, she's easy talking about you said,
setting them up, baiting them. Talk about baiting. She's like
throwing out hooks, you know, throwing out hooks and hoping
(04:03):
they they grab. It's like she's thrown out stuff almost
like she's trying to incriminate herself. And then they're like,
well look at the nonsense she's saying. And then she goes,
oh nonsense, Well how about this? And then she proves
she puts out a proof. It's like, is she baiting
them too?
Speaker 7 (04:21):
Who knows what that? I don't know.
Speaker 5 (04:23):
That's crazy, isn't it?
Speaker 7 (04:24):
Yep? It sure is. Maybe it's just a big script,
like they say, is.
Speaker 5 (04:29):
I don't yeah, I don't know, though I can't. I
can't read her. I mean she did come out and
say I realize now I had handlers. Is she starting
to realize she was controlled before? And maybe she's let
loose now? I don't know. I know she's not taken
seriously by well, the conservatives just threw her right off
(04:50):
the boat. They said, no, get away from us, and
you know, turning points. Is what is this woman trying
to do? You know, she's just jealous because she did
and get the seat. You know, that's what they're saying.
And then and then you got the Truthers are saying
Candace is a trickster, she's a controlled opposition. Don't you
know that she's throwing out bait for us. Well, she
(05:12):
might be, but if nobody's really paying attention to her,
like the Truthers, if they know, if they're onto her,
and they don't, then she's not really catering to that audience.
What audience is she catering to? I know there's people
defending her because I see people on her comments going,
go Candace go, you know, so there's people defending her.
Others are saying you're a wacko. So you know, is
(05:36):
she just trying to is she just speaking? And just
does she have extreme OCD or something? Because she won't
get off this thing.
Speaker 7 (05:45):
I know, it's just almost like she's possessed it is.
Speaker 5 (05:50):
It's like that's her one focus in life right now,
and she's just on it like like day and night.
And you know, I mean, I I could see us
getting compelled to things, because we we tend to do.
But she's got a reputation, she's got a you know,
a podcast, she's got a you know, a presence that
(06:11):
that she was supposed to be, you know, really conservative,
and now she's dumped them. She's she's trying to cater
to the truthers, but she's not really catered to them
because she don't care what they think either. I don't
know what her game is. I mean, she seems like
a whack oh, but she's saying some things that you know,
she's bringing out some things, and they're they're they're taking
(06:34):
the bait, getting themselves in trouble. Every time they comment
and and challenge her, she brings out the proof. I
don't know, what do you think? Do you think she's.
Speaker 6 (06:47):
Well, maybe they're in on it together. I wouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 5 (06:51):
Well, she keeps claiming that they had an inside communications,
that they that he was uh you know, relating to
her how he was in danger and carry on my
mantle for.
Speaker 7 (07:06):
Me, and yep, I heard that part. Yeah, But I.
Speaker 5 (07:09):
Mean that they're they're accusing her of saying, did even
that Ali Stuckley or whatever, that that podcaster, the Christian podcaster.
She's come against Canvas too. It said, just drop it already.
You know, none of this is true that she's claiming,
and you know, she's trying to taint Erica, uh, you know,
(07:29):
about about her involvement, and and then others are saying
she's accusing Erica of of being involved or killing her husband.
And then she's coming on saying that's not what I
said at all. And it sounds like she did kind
of accuse Erica of being involved, right. Did it sound
(07:49):
like that to you?
Speaker 7 (07:50):
Yeah? It sounded absolutely sound like.
Speaker 5 (07:52):
But then she say, no, I'm not saying you guys
said it, not me. I'm only telling you the suspicions.
Speaker 6 (07:57):
Man, it seems kind of weird because the what the
toy was rented out and I think three months in
advanced that when in.
Speaker 7 (08:04):
Utah oh yeah, yeah, reserve.
Speaker 5 (08:07):
Yeah, I don't know, probably poison to go there. Uh
So the thing I saw recently, I don't know if
you caught this, that there has been a climate change
conference in Brazil.
Speaker 7 (08:23):
I didn't hear about that one.
Speaker 5 (08:24):
Yeah, November tenth to the twenty first, still going on,
and it's it's called the COP thirty conference, and it
stands for the Conference of Parties Signing Agreements to to
co CO you know, coincide with this climate change strategy.
(08:51):
And believe it or not, you got another thirty in
there COP thirty. What do you think the thirty stands
for YEP twenty thirty, Agenda twenty thirty five. They all
have those date deadline code words. So this conference is
(09:11):
it's been going on since nineteen ninety five in Berlin
it started this is the first time in Brazil. One
hundred and ninety countries from around the world had signed
on to this strategy of concern for the climate change
(09:31):
to measure the conditions and see if we can rein
in on get this. You know the language they use,
the dangerous catastrophic consequences. Are we in dangerous catastrophic consequences?
Speaker 7 (09:48):
Of course? Life?
Speaker 5 (09:50):
Well, I remember in the nineteen eighties. I remember in
the nineteen seventies we were in a catastrophic dangerous consequence
because if you remember, and you were, you were, you're
my age about and you remember this stuff that they
were talking about global cooling. Remember that in the seventies
(10:13):
they were talking Remember they were talking about global cooling
and what was the saying, it's a dangerous catastrophic consequence
that if we don't address this in ten years, we're
going to hit another ice age. Then what happened in
the nineteen eighties, the weather conditions were favoring warming, so
(10:33):
they started saying, the ozone's depleting, we have an ozone problem,
and the Earth is warming. There's a global warming dangerous
catastrophic consequence. Well, how can you have a dangerous catastrophic
consequence for icing? Now there's a dangerous catastrophic you know,
consequence for for warming. What the heck? Which way can
(10:58):
it go? Well, it kind of to got teeter tottered.
In the year two thousand and what happened was during
the climate conferences for global warming, they had to cancel
because it was too cool. It was cold, and they
didn't expect it to be cold. So when people started saying,
(11:20):
what's going on here? I thought there was a warming,
not a cooling. They go, yeah, the cooling is due
to the climate warming. Do you remember that now? Only
I yeah, I do. I remember it clearly because I
was listening to it and they were trying to say
it's it's cooling because of the global warming. The conditions
(11:40):
has caused a reverse situation that caused it to seemingly
that it's cooling, but it's actually part of the drive
of the warming. It's like, are you are you just
making this up, but idiots believe it because they just
take in the bait for the for the agenda. But
(12:02):
what they did was, instead of agreeing that it's cooling
and going with that narrative, they changed the term to
climate change. That way they can hit it both ways.
Isn't that convenient?
Speaker 6 (12:17):
So now it's great come up by that when they're
at the Committee of three hundred sitting around, yeah, figuring
out the global events.
Speaker 5 (12:23):
Well they could have done this when they were at
the nineteen ninety two UN Treaty to limit the UH
the rising of the planet heating pollution, and what they
found out after analyzing the statistics of them saying, well,
climate change, cooling and warming and cooling, and so we
(12:44):
have a dangerous situation. Both ways. Hey, that's convenient, let's
make the agenda both ways. And they were right either way.
But what happened was they found out, by the measure
of the record set they kept only goes back to
certain time, that it actually shows a cycle, a natural
cycle of cooling and then warming and then cooling and
(13:05):
then warming. And it's all a matter of what agenda
they're hitting according to what ten years we're gonna die
in because that's what they said, global warming, we're gonna
get We're gonna warm up in ten years and die.
So this goes back and forth. So what happened was
they struck out a couple of the stats. One was
in nineteen thirty five. I think by taking out the
(13:27):
one stat it led to an agenda that they needed.
So they basically fixed the statistics. They faked it, and
then when they what what I've read is that when
they go to measure the warming, like where do they go?
They go to the ice places, right, they go to Alaska,
(13:49):
they go to Iceland, they go they go to places
where it's it's really cool to measure whether the temperature dropped,
and if they see Iceberg's they say that's proof of
global warming. Unfortunately, at the same time they say, there's
some melting, there's other parts of it that are freezing.
(14:10):
So what do you think is happening. I'll tell you
what's happening. They go and measure it in the most
strategic places they can so they can collect their data
and make the claim. It's an agenda. It's a religion.
It's actually part of the religion of Mother Gaya, worship
of entervironment. It's what the un do, it's what the
(14:33):
occultists do, the New Agers and you know, the tree
huggers and all this. They want a perfect environment and
only man can help the earth. Unfortunately, they don't realize
that the Earth has cycles and it replenishes itself. And
if you take the pollutants in the air of volcanic
eruptions pollute the air more than what they claim man does,
(14:57):
so you can't claim it's man made.
Speaker 7 (15:00):
Good point, although there.
Speaker 5 (15:01):
Is fog and smog and everything else contributing. But you know,
maybe we can lessen some of the pollutants, but we're
never going to control climate change. So what they're doing
is they add the aerosols in the air and they
start to film the sky and with a blanket with
clouds or with aerosol aluminum and bury them and all
(15:25):
this junk in the air, toxic chemicals in the air,
so that they go hope the whole back the sun
or the you know, the warming or whatever the heck
they say they're doing and blotting out the sun. Remember
that they said they wanted to blot out the sun.
Speaker 7 (15:42):
Yep, for a global coin.
Speaker 6 (15:45):
No, if they just got a life and minded their
own bass.
Speaker 7 (15:49):
It's some good we wouldn't have any of these problems.
Speaker 5 (15:51):
Let it go. But I'm gonna I'm gonna share you
with you some mindsets that I've heard these people say.
Speaker 4 (15:55):
The holidays are here, filled with gatherings, toasts, and plenty
of tear. Make every moment shine with total Wine and more,
where you'll find it all at the lowest prices. Raise
the spirits of the season with rich whiskeys, smooth tequilas,
and festive liqueurs perfect for sipping or gifting. And for
wine lovers. Explore everything from velvety pinos two elegant champagnes
(16:16):
ready to pour or share. You'll always find what you love,
and love what you find only at Total Wine and
More spirits not sold in Virginia and North Carolina. Drink
responsibly be twenty one.
Speaker 5 (16:27):
Well, like there's Brazilian President Luis in the Nacio Lula
da Silva. He wants to raise one hundred and twenty
five billion dollars for funds that will protect the countries
and their forests. And last year they said at the
COP twenty nine, I got oh, I guess thirty stands
(16:51):
for the year that they're doing it. I'm sorry, my correct,
it doesn't stand for twenty thirty, although it is saying
that the agenda they're trying to and submit their plans
by twenty thirty five, So it is to do with
the thirties, but not the way I said. I guess
COP thirty is last year was COP twenty nine, And
(17:13):
what they said was there that they agreed to provide
three hundred billion dollars annually by twenty thirty five, and
a wider ambition to reach one point three trillion dollars
from a range of sources. Now, don't get me wrong,
but are isn't like there's not a lot of money
(17:39):
in the world to give out three hundred billion annually
and one point three trillion dollars for a stupid cause
like this is there?
Speaker 7 (17:52):
I mean of all countries collectively.
Speaker 5 (17:55):
Yeah, maybe, but to waste that money on this one
cause I.
Speaker 6 (18:00):
Could at least AI that ask AI, how much is
a total amount of uh, well, monetary like just I
know there's.
Speaker 5 (18:06):
More growth produce, but we don't even really everybody's bankrupt,
where do they get the money? If the United States
is bankrupt and Spain is bankrupt and Europe is bankrupt
and Canada's bank. Who's got the money to throw it
into this that they're trying to collect?
Speaker 7 (18:24):
Good questions paying for it? Nobody ask right.
Speaker 6 (18:27):
Now how much currencies in the world right now among
all countries anyway. I'll be back in a minute with
the answer for.
Speaker 5 (18:33):
That, right But this is crazy that that they have
the money to throw out then all the nations, all
the countries at the borrow from each other because it
can't survive. You know, we're in debt and we have
to pay money to Israel to help their expansions, and
you know, but they can give one point three trillion.
(18:55):
So the concern about this is the fossil fuels. We've
talked about this before. It's it's the driver of the
climate crisis, which they mentioned that they want to try
to transition away from oil, coal and gas. I mean,
what do they want to what do they want to
(19:16):
use for energy? Trump is pushing fossil fuels, isn't he?
Speaker 7 (19:24):
Oh yes he is.
Speaker 5 (19:24):
Yeah, he's pushing fossil fuels. But the rest of these
countries they're using I guess they're pushing back with language
blaming fossil fuels for climate change and trying to commit
to phase them out. It's crazy how much I.
Speaker 6 (19:45):
Think there's a new form of energy that they're working
on that even the Arabs are now trying to transition
over from oil because they want to be, you know,
in on it. I forget that hydrogen not not hydrogen
and those what the heck? Some type of earth element.
I forgot the name of it.
Speaker 7 (20:01):
I'm gonna google it.
Speaker 5 (20:02):
Helium. No, no, no, let's feel everything with helium and
everybody could talk high and and and lift up and.
Speaker 7 (20:12):
Float in the air, talk like ducks. Yeah. Did you
ever in heal helium? Helium?
Speaker 5 (20:19):
Yeah?
Speaker 7 (20:21):
I did it once. It's just amazing.
Speaker 5 (20:22):
Yeah, it's fun, isn't it.
Speaker 7 (20:24):
You don't call somebody up and start talking.
Speaker 5 (20:26):
To Let's do a whole show like that.
Speaker 7 (20:30):
Yeah we should you.
Speaker 5 (20:34):
Godcham Yeah. There is an article on in CNN and uh,
the the the controversy with this, with this thing. What
they're trying to do, let me find the place here.
(20:56):
What they're trying to do is their ambition is to
reach right, I mentioned one point three trillion. Now, what
they're saying is they're just trying that. They're saying that
the rate of the rate of temperature is like exceeding
up to two point eight degrees, you know, overall over
(21:23):
a certain amount of time, and they're trying to narrow
that down to one point something degree. So the thing
is is there that one point five degrees is what
they're shooting at. But they said in order to get
this down, what they can hope for is that they're
(21:43):
going to ask for one point three trillion dollars in
hope they could come close. They're just overshooting to try
to reach somewhat of the goal so that they can
have enough to provide for Now, what's this funding do
(22:04):
when they fund this? What what do they say? Are
they are they funding meetings? Are they funding? What are
they doing? Because they're making regulations, especially in America. Other
countries don't even have to follow it. But America we have,
we have the UN regulating US. We have the United
States is saying telling businesses how much emissions they can have,
(22:25):
and it's we're being controlled. And then poor countries, poor
companies have to uh re redo their machines and get
new machinery and spend more money on environmental safe machines
and all this stuff. And we're we're setting the goal
for this, and they're making the companies pay for this.
(22:49):
So what's this money for? What does this money do?
Speaker 6 (22:51):
I don't good question. Yeah, really it's like for popcorn
at their meeting.
Speaker 5 (22:58):
I guess it's to explore that money to explore new
energy things.
Speaker 7 (23:04):
Oh I did ask ai?
Speaker 6 (23:07):
What's the total amount of currency collectively among all countries?
And what it comes up to is the broadest measure
including like a large time deposits, institutional funds, and other
broader liquidy. The figure is estimated at approximately one hundred
and fifty trillion US dollars.
Speaker 5 (23:23):
Okay, so one hundred So it's not too bad to
ask for two trillion, right of that's what's two trillion
when you got one hundred and fifty trillion?
Speaker 7 (23:34):
Right? And what is a thousand billion?
Speaker 5 (23:36):
Yeah? And what's what's two trillion dollars? You know? To lose?
It's just numbers. When when you know, when you got
one hundred you know what, what's two trillion loss? If
you got that much money? Oh wow, it's like it's
like people like you and I we fred over one
hundred dollars we lost Oh we just lost one hundred dollars.
(23:57):
Oh my gosh, I can't get groceries this week. Millionaires say, ah,
I lost a million on that one.
Speaker 7 (24:05):
Same equivalency in the percentage terms.
Speaker 5 (24:08):
So countries that are rich could say add two two billion,
two trillion. Who cares?
Speaker 7 (24:13):
M H.
Speaker 6 (24:14):
But now if we try to extract that from our
banks simultaneously, they couldn't do it. But yet they're printing
all that money. So you gotta ask, where's that paper
currency going?
Speaker 5 (24:23):
You know what I hear now? Well, first of all,
it's not paper anymore. It's all digital. But you know
what I'm hearing now that banks are not people are
going like trying to withdraw you know. You know that
if you if you deposit or withdraw one thousand dollars
in cash, they have a dirty look. No, they have
(24:43):
cameras on you. They monitor it. But if you ask
for ten thousand dollars, you have to sign, you have
to fill out an affid David to claim the money.
Speaker 7 (24:55):
Now, probably ask you what you're going to be spending
on it?
Speaker 5 (24:57):
Yeah, and I and some of the will not even
allow you to have it. We know. It's a couple
of banks that uh, friends of mine said they they
went to take out ten thousand dollars in the banks.
Is we don't we don't have it, We can't give
it to you. What do you mean you don't have
the You don't have the deposits in there. You don't
have the deposits you're supposed to hold. Where are my deposits?
Speaker 7 (25:19):
Yeah?
Speaker 6 (25:20):
I tried with drawing I think a couple of grand
and the tell her looked at me like I was
a mass murderer. And I told her that her dress
she's wearing looks makes her look fat, and I popped
her lunch bag and kicked her puppy.
Speaker 7 (25:31):
Yeah, I just got the dirtiest look ever.
Speaker 5 (25:34):
Oh my gosh, I know it's well, you got spied
on because they have a camera on you. Once you
get that, you know, say, say you're buying you're buying
a car from somebody, and you know you want to
pay cash. You take out the cash to buy a
car five thousand dollars or whatever. They they they look
at you and you're not supposed to do that. And
if you want ten thousand dollars, god forbid, they're gonna
(25:57):
they're gonna make you sign papers. Now what if somebody
says they do is they take out nine thousand dollars
each time just to make sure they're never at that
ten thousand dollars.
Speaker 7 (26:06):
Right, that's a good idea circumvent that restriction.
Speaker 5 (26:10):
But it's crazy that that's how they look at things. So,
you know, you wonder how much money they have the
flow around let alone, you know, regulating companies. And it's
demanding one point three trillion dollars for this cause we
don't even know if it's really you know, what's going
on about it, but the WEF is involved in this.
(26:34):
They're raising four trillion dollars to address concerns that UN
Secretary General Antonio Gutaris warned in October that they're trying
to reduce the emissions by ten percent I guess, and
we would need sixty percent to stay within one point
(26:57):
five degrees. So they're over shooting to try to get
to that point. Now, one person that did you hear
one person that has turned away reversed his position supposedly
of climate change, Bill Gates, whoa did you hear that?
(27:20):
Now here's what happened. It's a claim that Bill Gates
reversed his position and now is not supporting the climate
change agenda and bowed his knee in surrendering climate change argument.
He has given up. What happened was Donald Trump made
a claim on truth Social that he won the war
(27:43):
on climate change hoax, asserting that Bill Gates finally admitted
that he was completely wrong on the issue. Now that's
what Donald Trump claimed. But the fact, as you know,
I look into right, I never go. I don't care
if Donald Trump said it. I want to know what
(28:04):
Bill Gates, or real least said.
Speaker 8 (28:05):
When it comes to your money, confidence changes everything. At FACET,
you get flatfee financial planning from a certified financial planner,
no commissions, no hidden agendas, just objective guidance that covers
everything your money touches. With a personalized roadmap and help
to stay on track. You'll feel confident you're making the
right decisions with your money. Facet Financial Planning for the
life you want. Visit facet dot com to get started.
Speaker 5 (28:27):
At a sponsored by Facet. An sec registered investment advisor,
not an offered to buy or sell securities, nor is
it an investment, legal or tax advice. Past performance is
not a guarantee of future performance, and according to an
article and Bill Gates his own article about this, he
(28:47):
wasn't necessarily reversing his long standing acknowledgment of climate change.
In a recent climate memo, which multiple interviews he gave reaffirmed,
he didn't say climate change was a hoax and it
(29:07):
wasn't a serious threat. However, he changed his focus to
be more on more important aspects of improving human welfare.
So when he wrote that climate change shouldn't supersede humanity's
(29:28):
need for welfare, what he claimed was climate change not
addressing it will not lead to human demise, So he
demoted the emphasis that he took over it. He didn't
say it was a hoax. He just said it's not
as What he's saying is it's not as dangerous to
(29:51):
humanity as these other issues. So he wants alongside of
this to have a focus on human welfare. That's all
he was really saying. He wasn't saying climate control or
climate change is not real. What he's saying is it's
(30:12):
not as much of an urgency as these other issues.
But he still lessened his hold on it. Right.
Speaker 7 (30:22):
Sounds like it he.
Speaker 5 (30:24):
Doesn't think that. He thinks the climate community is too
focus on the temperatures. It's taking away from improving human
suffering and poverty and hunger and things like that. He
didn't negate it. He just says that hunger is more
important to address in fund. But so, you know, he
(30:48):
still believes it's important. He just doesn't think it's at
the crisis that they're making out to be. So he's
on our side with not making it a big deal.
Right maybe hmmm, so for the best, I mean, he
did say that he got you know, people started spinning.
You know, everybody's gonna spin it. Once he says something
(31:10):
and somebody picks up on it, they're gonna say But
you know, at the other end, Trump was exaggerating a
little bit to say that he admitted he was wrong.
He didn't admit he was wrong. See, this is this
is the fake news that we talked about. Trump's involved too,
Darren' don't let a kid you when when we talk
about circular journalism, Trump started this one and the papers
(31:31):
picked up on it.
Speaker 6 (31:33):
Right, Well, you can say anything you want bad about
Gates because he deserves it.
Speaker 7 (31:37):
So that's probably way Trump looked at it.
Speaker 5 (31:38):
Yeah, he was, you know, he was exaggerating the stance.
But what he was getting at is is, uh, Gates
did reverse his emphasis on the urgency of it, so
we can at least say that with all confidence.
Speaker 7 (31:53):
M hm.
Speaker 5 (31:54):
So that's uh, that's where that is. So yeah, So
these uh, these people are every year they gather in
this thing and they you know, they're trying to say,
what's at stake for climate and we have to have
global collaboration. I mean, think about it. They've been doing
this since nineteen ninety two and they said in ten
(32:17):
years there's going to be a crisis. But they've been
doing this since nineteen ninety two. Every ten years is
a crisis? What's that tell you? When there's no, it
hasn't got to that point yet. It says that every
year they're just basically restating the urgency. And they've been
doing it since the sixties and the seventies. They're all
(32:39):
they're doing is is pushing pushing it down to the
next generation, the next you know, the next the next
you know, the next demographics to try to get them
on board for the next decade. It's just just this
ongoing agenda. And then you got like Greta Thunberg going
(33:02):
out and this we gotta put a stop to this.
She's like a little hitler. You know, no spending. No,
you know, she she'd have you not going out in
the wilderness if it was for her, you know, don't
danger the climate.
Speaker 7 (33:20):
Yep.
Speaker 5 (33:24):
So I don't know this, you know, if it's that
much of an agenda and we're still fighting it, you know,
is it that I just don't like the fact that
the UN gets involved and starts mandating regulations and we
comply with it, like like they're our boss. I mean,
just because we you know, we we signed on to
(33:44):
the u N, the u N treaties and stuff. Why
Trump was supposed to erase that. Why didn't he get
that done? He was supposed to get us off, get
us off the u N. M. I don't know the
first term he was saying that he wanted the u N.
He wanted the UN out of the out of the
(34:06):
New York I think to look that up, because I
remember him saying.
Speaker 7 (34:12):
And then huh, good question.
Speaker 5 (34:15):
And now now he's all for it. Now he's why
are we complying with the u N?
Speaker 7 (34:21):
Hmmm?
Speaker 5 (34:26):
I don't know. The whole global thing is an agenda.
We know that.
Speaker 7 (34:31):
Oh yeah, it's bigger than you think.
Speaker 5 (34:33):
Yeah, and what about this man deep donnie guy in
New York City.
Speaker 7 (34:42):
Oh my gosh, socialist democratic communists.
Speaker 5 (34:46):
What a socialist? He wants free food? Who does he
think pays for this stuff?
Speaker 6 (34:50):
I know there's something like seven hundred thousand millionaires are
leaving New York now or something.
Speaker 5 (34:55):
That's what they said. Is that true? I don't know,
but I did see leaving. Yeah, or they're coming up state.
Oh fine, bring your businesses here. There was some rumors
too that you know, he said things that against circular
circular reporting, that he said things you know, uh, that
(35:20):
he was against. Do you hear that? One? He was
he's against pro pro life organizations for helping guide pregnant women,
and he's going to strip the funding and ban them.
And then they said, no, that's not what he said.
He's not doing that. But the fact that you know,
(35:43):
he's a communist, I don't know who knows what he
can do. And not only that, he's a communist Muslim,
not against Muslims, but Muslims who you know, I don't
know how how fundamentally he is. You know, if you're
fundamental Muslim, you're gonna support the militants mm hmm.
Speaker 7 (36:04):
Faithful Muslim too, Yeah, that's what that's what.
Speaker 5 (36:08):
Yeah, so you got that on him, and that means
that he's for Sharia law, wouldn't it be so he'd
support this Muslim sharia law. This uh, this mandate for
you know Muslim I don't know, if you know. There's
a secret pact with Muslims. They're supposed to yield to
each other. And and there's what's called takaya and different
(36:32):
types of lying is in their doctrines. They can lie
to the infidels.
Speaker 7 (36:39):
I've heard about that.
Speaker 5 (36:40):
They could tell you right to your face. It's just
it's called justified lying. They could tell you right to
your face, you say, hey, are you planning on this? No? No, no,
no no. And as long as they're doing the agenda,
they can lie. And when I say agenda, I mean
the Muslim you know, agenda, the Muslim doctrines or whatever
(37:03):
they plan to do. I mean in essence Muslims. It's
a militant religion. I hate to say it so as Christianity. No,
the difference is the Muslim religion is actually militant in
form killing the infidels and all this militant action that
they're told to carry out. That's a new, precedented doctrine.
(37:25):
It transcends the Old just like our New Testament would
be and our New Testament. Christians aren't told to go
out and slaughter. Those that do are outside the jurisdiction
of what the doctrine says. So anybody that says Christians
go out and kill two no, Christians who aren't following
the precedents of the Bible are doing it, not those
(37:47):
who are following the Bible. There's a difference. Christian fundamentally
is not violent. Muslim fundamentally can be. So there's the difference.
Is Now, how much hate mail am I going to
get for this? You don't understand a Muslim faith? Oh? Okay, okay,
(38:12):
Well I kind of do, but I don't. I don't
know the Muslim faith per se. But I do know
what their current doctrines say, and how they justify lying,
and how they have to step aside. If there's a militant,
more militant Muslim, they yield to it. I know, I
(38:32):
know the secrets. I know enough of the secrets that
I'm dangerous, but not enough that I can inform you
or instruct you on how it works. You know, I
can't tell you what the Muslims really think, you know,
per se. I don't know if that makes sense. But anyway,
so we have the Prince of Wells and and all
(38:56):
this attending these these climate changes and you know China's
president z zimpig Ping. So oh no he wasn't there. No,
him and Trump decided not to be there. Okay, so
good good. I don't know what that means China and
(39:21):
America are allies on the climate change. I don't know.
Speaker 7 (39:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (39:27):
I was told, oh, this person had a prophecy. You
can't believe this, Darren. Somebody actually posted this on Facebook
and said God told them. And anytime somebody says God
told me, I really put my red flags up because
many people that say God told me are saying that
God spoke to me personally. Thus saith the Lord, and
if they're wrong, they get to be stoned. But when
(39:49):
they say this, this scares me. This person came out
and said, thus saith the Lord that America is under
crisis and God warned her to tell everybody to move
out of America because China was attacking us. So she says,
I'm going to obey God. Now I love it when
(40:12):
people state this stuff because I want to follow through
and find out where they moved to what they did, right,
you know, darn well, they didn't pack their bags and move.
So I asked this person, I said, where did you
end up moving to? And she says, I haven't yet.
I said, so, you gave the warning to everybody else,
but you're not doing it, and she says, Israel. I said,
(40:34):
so you're going to move to Israel. You realize that
Israel is under under the Sanhedrin, under the Noahide laws,
and you know that they loathe Christians and they're they're
they're they're persecuting Christians there, right, and you know that
Israel is an a godly nation, not awarding Jesus Christ
(40:58):
and God of you know of Jesus. There there they
have their own religion, their own God, and they followed Kabbalah.
And I went into it. That's where you're gonna go.
You feel safe there, That's that's where God told you
to go for safety. You know she did, She turned around,
She just named another state, another country. You don't even
(41:21):
know where you're going. And she said you better pray
about it. Yeah, okay, I pray that you're a looney anyway,
be careful when people say thus say, it's the Lord
to tell you to do something that they don't do.
So anyway, let's close there. Uh my website Jim Dukeperspective
(41:41):
dot com. Check us out on all your favorite media platforms,
the podcast platforms, and we'll see you next time. God
bless well.
Speaker 9 (41:52):
Holiday shopping is almost always fun. Credit can be confusing.
Download the my Phyco app now and shop with confidence
knowing that you can stay on top of your credit
twenty four to seven. Get your fycoscore straight from the
people that created it, plus free credit monitoring and a
free credit report every month, no credit card required. Phycoscores
are used by over ninety percent of lenders, so trust
(42:14):
the Myfyco app to keep you in the know. Visit
myfyco dot com, slash free or download the Myfyco app today.
You know what you want, a career that matters in
a path that's real. At Carrington College, you can train
to become a medical assistant.
Speaker 8 (42:30):
Through hands on learning and a clinical externship.
Speaker 4 (42:33):
You'll build the skills, healthcare facilities and need from patient
care to front office procedures, finish in as few.
Speaker 9 (42:40):
As nine months, and hit the ground running. Classes are
now enrolling in Spokane. Visit Carrington dot edu for more
information about the student outcomes.
Speaker 8 (42:49):
Visit Carrington dot edu.
Speaker 9 (42:50):
Slash sci.
Speaker 1 (42:56):
Hi, everybody, it's me. It's and relax.
Speaker 2 (43:00):
You are listening to the Fringe Radio Network.
Speaker 1 (43:04):
I know I was gonna tell them, Hey, do you
have the app? It's the best way to listen to
the fringe radio Network.
Speaker 2 (43:11):
It's safe and you don't have to log in to
use it, and it doesn't track you or trace you,
and it sounds beautiful.
Speaker 1 (43:20):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app?
Speaker 2 (43:23):
Just go to fringeradionetwork dot com right at the top
of the page.
Speaker 1 (43:29):
I know, slippers, we gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.
The Brothers Ortiz
The Brothers Ortiz is the story of two brothers–both successful, but in very different ways. Gabe Ortiz becomes a third-highest ranking officer in all of Texas while his younger brother Larry climbs the ranks in Puro Tango Blast, a notorious Texas Prison gang. Gabe doesn’t know all the details of his brother’s nefarious dealings, and he’s made a point not to ask, to protect their relationship. But when Larry is murdered during a home invasion in a rented beach house, Gabe has no choice but to look into what happened that night. To solve Larry’s murder, Gabe, and the whole Ortiz family, must ask each other tough questions.