December 10, 2025 • 44 mins
A recent report of a man dying after eating a hamburger has catapulted the Lonestar Tick into the news. Can the saliva of a tick cause an aversion to meat so much as to the point of death? How does this play into the plans of the WEF, UN, WHO and many others to restrict people from eating meat? What if they have already told us what they would like to do with this tick. They actually have and as you would suspect, it isn't good.....
Email us at: downtherh@protonmail.com
Email us at: downtherh@protonmail.com
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
Hi, everybody, it's me Cinderella Acts. You are listening to
the Fringe Radio Network. I know I was gonna tell him, Hey,
do you have the app? It's the best way to
listen to the Fringe Radio Network. It's safe and you
don't have to log in to use it, and it
doesn't track you or trace you, and it sounds beautiful.
(00:27):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app?
Speaker 2 (00:31):
Just go to.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Fringeradionetwork dot com right at the top of the page.
I know, slippers, We gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
This allergy to meet, including beef lamon pork tonight, is
linked to its first step. A forty seven year old
New Jersey man ate a burger in twenty twenty four
and died four hours later. Two weeks earlier, he got
sick after e a stake.
Speaker 4 (01:01):
It really illustrates the need for education because when he
had the very severe episode of abdominal pain, they had
no sense.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
That that could be anaphylaxis.
Speaker 3 (01:12):
University of Virginia's doctor Thomas Platt's Mills identified the death
and the allergy behind it. It's called alpha gal syndrome.
It usually starts with a bite from a lone star
tick that sensitizes a person's immune system to a sugar
molecule found in the meat of mammals called alpha gal.
Reactions can include hives, nausea, and life threatening anaphylaxis.
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Welcome everybody into the midweek edition of NWCZ Radio dot
com Channel ones Down the rabbit Hole. I'm big d
in life. There's not a lot of things that actually
scare me or even frighten me. And we do talk
a lot about things on this program that I find concerning,
(02:35):
things that I believe can be frightening should they be
played out to fruition. And there are a lot of
people out there who are working to make life scary.
But in reality, I don't frighten easily. What I'm going
to talk about today, though, does actually scare me. I
(02:56):
find it extremely concerning. It's very frightening. Not so much
that it's there, it's what people want to do with it.
I have been talking about this kind of issue for
years now, this war on food, and in particular war
(03:17):
on meat. It should not be a conspiracy theory. By now,
I'm not the only one talking about it. And when
we first started mentioning these kind of things. We got
all kind of mockery and flack and eye rolls and
what are you talking about? Which was fine. But the
(03:40):
powers that be, the elites, the World Economic Forum, Bill
Gates and all the usual suspects, they have been talking
about this issue for a long time, just not out
in the open. And so when this rolled across my
screen the other day, it raised a lot of alarm.
(04:04):
And so I'm gonna read this story to you, and
then we're going to talk about how we got here
and the crazy thought processes that are going on around
this incident, because this incident may just be one of many, many,
(04:24):
many many, And they like it, they love it. And
when I say they, I will explain it's not a
vague term. There are names to the they. So this
came across my feed the other day. In New Jersey,
man's death first one to be tied to tick related
(04:46):
meat allergy. This was November thirteenth, twenty twenty five. The
man's name has not been released, but he was forty
seven years old and did not know that tick bites
had triggered an allergy to meet last summer. He became
severely ill three hours after eating steak during a camping trip.
(05:07):
Two weeks later, he was found dead after eating a
hamburger at a barbecue. Now, I know this sounds like
science fiction. It sounds like somebody made this up. It
sounds like a fever dreamed fantasy of a hardcore vegetarian.
But this actually happened. The initial cause of death was
(05:31):
ruled sudden unexplained death, but after an autopsy which came
back inconclusive, the man's wife gave the autopsy report to
a doctor who reached out to Thomas Platt's Mills, who
is the former chief of University of Virginia's Health Division
of Asthma, Algae and Clinical Immunology, and he identified it
(05:55):
as alpha gal syndrome. And we'll get into all of
that moment, Platt's Mills said. The man's wife reported he
did not have any recent tick bites, but had twelve
or thirteen chigger bytes around his ankles the summer he
became ill, and Platt's Mills said many chiger bytes in
the eastern United States are actually bites from the lone
(06:18):
star tick or their larvae. And that's where we're going
to start today. What is this lone Star tick. What
is alpha gal and what does it have to do
with us? Because I know we're all heading into, at
least in the United States, we're heading into Thanksgiving where
most people, vast majority of people are going to consume meat,
(06:42):
and most of us, most of the world consumes meat
on a daily basis, or at least a weekly basis,
for sure. This article was followed up by an article
that came out in US News. The headline is explosive
increase of ticks that caused meat allergy in the US,
And of course they're claiming this is due to the
(07:05):
climate crisis. Says, unusually aggressive lone star ticks common in
the Southeast are spreading to areas previously too cold for them. See,
it's climate change. It's not people moving around. It's not
that they get lodged into a hunter's garment and he
(07:26):
drives from Tennessee to Texas or Arkansas or whatever. That's
not what's happening. It's climate crisis. And this is all
going to come back around because they're going to use
climate crisis very heavily in what we're talking about today.
They're claiming that potentially half a million people in the
(07:49):
United States may already be infected with this. Part of
the problem is, as we'll get into, with the alpha gal,
it's not noted right away. It's an allergy that develops.
It's kind of slow, Whereas if you are allergic to
a beasting or you're allergic to nuts or something, it's instantaneous.
(08:13):
You know right away you get stung, you go into
anaphylactic shock, or you have to be administered some sort
of remedy or cure. Same thing if you're allergic to
peanuts or so forth, you have to have something on
hand because you know right away that something's wrong with
this alpha gal, that the tick is spreading. It works
(08:37):
a little different, and so it's not immediate. And we
don't know how many people potentially have died of this
or who have been infected and become sick with it,
that it was never ever classified as such, because like
this guy, he ate a hamburger and just dropped dead,
(08:59):
like we don't, oh what happened. He could have had
a heart attack, doesn't look like it. It could have
just been his time to go. We don't know. Well,
now we do know, but this is nothing new. Here
is an article after article from seven years ago. Five
years ago, four years ago. There's a certain subculture who
has known about this for quite some time, primarily ranchers hunters.
(09:24):
I've seen posts on Reddit. I went back and looked
through a bunch from two thousand and seven, twelve years ago,
ten years ago, where they're like, Hey, it's hunting season,
watch out for this lone Star tick. Ranchers have known
about this, but most people outside of certain circles have
never been aware of this. And there's a reason, and
(09:47):
I will get to that in a moment. Popular Mechanics
reports up to half a million Americans may now be
allergic to red meat because of a tiny menace, and
this would be the lone Star tick. According to several
articles that I read, here's how this lone star tick
kind of works. Researchers at the University of Virginia have
(10:09):
theorized that a recent string of adult onset meet allergies
are the result of the ticks saliva. Over a thousand
cases have been reported thus far. According to the Center
for Disease Control, the lone Star tick inhabits most of
the eastern and central United States, and unless you live
and hunt in the upper Midwest or the West you're
(10:33):
probably at risk of getting bit by this thing. However,
they're saying because of climate crisis, it's spreading, it's going
places that hasn't been before. So what is the alpha
gal syndrome that this tick spreads. It's a type of
acquired allergy characterized by a delayed onset of symptoms two
(10:58):
to six hours after ingesting any kind of meat, preferably
mammalian type of meat, cows, anything that's a mammal which
is almost meat, so fish, you'd be okay, you probably
wouldn't notice anything. However, the conditions result from past exposure
to certain tick bites, as first reported in two thousand
(11:18):
and two. As of twenty twenty five, physicians in some
states are required to report cases of AGS to their
state health departments. Notice that some states, not all states,
because actually, in the scientific world, most doctors are not
even aware of this, They don't know how to test
(11:39):
for it, they aren't even aware that it really exists
all that much. Because up to this point, I think
it's been hidden. But even if that's not the case,
that it wasn't intentionally hidden. It hasn't been widely distributed
nor discussed. According to the CDC, Symptoms of the allergy
(12:01):
vary greatly between individuals and include rash, hives, nausea or vomiting,
difficulty breathing, drop in blood pressure, dizziness or faintness, diarrhea,
severe stomach pain, impossible anaphylaxis. Death has been reported. So
in a lot of ways, that sounds like food poisoning,
and a lot of people may have experienced that. They
(12:24):
didn't die from it, but they're like, oh, man, something
I ate it did not agree with me, and every
time I eat this, I get sick. And that is
more common as to what's happening. Alpha gal allergy is
a reaction to some carbohydrates, and when the body is
overloaded with this immunoglobulin and antibodies on exposure to the carbohydrate.
(12:50):
The anegal is a human natural antibody that interacts specifically
with the mammalian carbohydrate structure. So what happens is is
that your body overreacts to this foreign substance. Like a sugar.
Overloaded stores itself in body fat, which is why it
takes time for it to break down, which is why
it delays. It's not instantaneous, kind of hides and then
(13:14):
as it goes through the digestion process. It shocks the body.
The body overreacts to it, and that is what's going
on here with this ags alpha gal syndrome. So let's
take a walk back, because I've played some of these
clips before, but I would like to remind you of
(13:36):
some things that have been said out loud from different doctors.
These are all doctors and where they said them from.
This is doctor Matthew Leau and this was at a
World Economic Forum meeting. He's one of the contributors and
he's also somebody who advises them. Remember when he said this.
Speaker 4 (13:59):
I'll give two examples. So one is that people eat
too much meat, right, and if they were to cut
down on their consumption on meat, then they would it
would actually really help the planet. But people are not
willing to give up meat. Yeah, you know, some people
will be willing to, but other people they may be
willing to, but they sort of they have a weakness
of will they say, Wow, this steak is just too juicy.
(14:21):
I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the way,
so you know. But so here's the thought, right, So
it turns out that we know a lot about so
there we have these intolerance to So I, for example,
I have milk intolerance, and there are some people are
intolerant to cray fish. So possibly we can use human
engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to
(14:42):
certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins.
And there's actually analogues of this in light. There's this
thing called the long Star tick where if it bites you,
you will become allergic to meat. I can sort of
describe the mechanism. So that's something that we can do
through human engineering. We can kind of possible you address
really big world problems through human engineering.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Human engineering is a big topic of discussion amongst this crowd.
These are the they, the others, the elites that I'm
talking about when I say they want to use this
tick for their advantage, for their benefit. They don't like
us eating meat because they think the cow should go away,
(15:27):
because they're causing all kinds of problems in the environment.
Ranching causes all kinds of problems in the environment using
any kind of manure or certain types of feed, all
of the problems, erosion of the earth, everything's a problem
with ranching. We saw this big battle going on around
(15:50):
the world just a couple of years ago, where they
were trying to literally put farmers out of business in
multiple countries. So that's doctor lout the first time. Here's
another clip of him talking. Now, this is from a
Ted talk where he talks about the same thing, but
again repeating this idea of human engineering using some form
(16:14):
of something to get people to not like meat. Hmm,
wonder what they could use well in the last clip
he talked about it, let's just use this lone star tick.
How about this clip.
Speaker 4 (16:28):
I want to consider a coss of solutions that have
never been considered before human engineering. It involves the biomedical
modification of human beings. I'll give four examples. Here's one.
Eighteen percent of greenhouse gas emissions come from livestock farming,
(16:50):
so if we eat less meat, we could significantly reduce
our greenhouse gas emissions. Now, some people would be willing
to eat less meat, but they lack the willpower. Human
engineering could help. Just as some people are naturally intolerant
(17:13):
to milk or crayfish, like myself, we could artificially induce
mild intolerance to meat by stimulating our immune system against
common bobine proteins and in this way, we can create
an aversion to eating echo and friendly food. And we
(17:34):
can do this, for example, by having meat patches kind
of like nicotine patches. People can then wear these patches
before they go out for dinner to curb their enthusiasm
for eating meat.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
So, once again he's talking about human engineering people putting
on a patch. I'll get back to that in a moment.
What would be in that patch? What would they put
in that patch that you could put on? Would you
even know? Oh? So there's some questions that I have
about this whole AGS thing and the lone Star tick.
Where does it come from? What we kind of know
(18:08):
comes from this tick? How many have died from it?
I don't think we will ever know that. I think
a lot of people have passed away from this and
they were misdiagnosed or not diagnosed at all. And how
does it get treated. The answer to that actually is
most doctors don't know. In fact, I don't think anybody knows.
(18:28):
They don't want to know. And I will explain why
I say that in a moment. One of the things
we need to pause and do here is just to
reflect back on what we just went through with COVID.
Remember COVID was created and it was unleashed, and then
(18:51):
it was lied about multiple times as to where it
came from. And they lied to cover up how it
was invented, where it came from, and how it was released.
Why to protect themselves obviously from any kind of liability,
but because they wanted it out there. They were using it.
(19:15):
It's what they wanted to do with it, or if
nothing else. Once it got out, they were like, hey,
we can use this to our advantage. Let's run with it,
and we're just gonna lie, lie, lie, to cover up
how it got released, how it got out there, and
would just call it a pandemic and lock everybody down.
Novel diseases are created. Now. I did a lot of
(19:39):
research to see whether this was actually created or not,
and by all estimation, no, it was not. You're going
to see some things that this was created in a lab,
it was put into a tick, genetically modified, and so forth.
I think it's the reverse from all my research. It's there.
(20:01):
It's a real thing, this lone Star tech that carries
this saliva that interacts with our body in a negative way.
The engineering is let's take that lone Star tech and
try to figure out how we can geo engineer it
(20:21):
and spread it. And I believe I have proof of that,
so let's get into some of that. This is an
article titled Professors discuss intentionally spreading tech born meat Allergy.
This is a bioethics paper called Beneficial blood Sucking. It's
by a guy named Parker Crutchfield and Blake Harrith. Parker
(20:45):
Crutchfield is a teacher at Western Michigan Medical School. He
teaches bioethics bioethics at a medical school, and it is
titled The Beneficial Blood Sucking. In the article, they go
on and on about what he talked about. So I'm like, well,
let's just go to the actual paper. I found it
(21:08):
online and I'll be glad to send it to you
if you would like. Here is the abstract of the paper.
The bite of the lone star tick spreads AlphaGo syndrome,
a condition whose only effect is the creation of a
severe but non fatal red meat allergy. Public health departments
worn against lone star tics and ags, and scientists are
(21:29):
working to develop an inoculation to ags. Herein we argue
that if eating meat is morally impermissible, then efforts to
prevent the spread of tick born ags are also morally impermissible.
After explaining the symptoms of ags and how they are
(21:49):
transmitted via TIS, we argue that tick born ags is
a moral bio enhancer if and when it motivates people
to stop eating meat. And then he goes on to
defend this, defend this thought that if it's morally wrong,
according to them, to eat meat because it's destroying the planet,
(22:15):
it's cruel to animals, however you want to put it,
then it's actually morally wrong not to spread the disease
of this tick. They want to spread it. They believe
it's a moral obligation to spread it. And this has
(22:35):
been publicized in a lot of publications which went way
under the radar. I have multiple reports. This is from
the Catholic World report Beneficial blood sucking making you sick
in the name of public health. They go on to
talk about obviously this paper. Now he also this, Parker
(22:58):
Crutchfield wrote another paper. Because people were responding to this,
I'm wondering, like, how are you going to do this?
Why would you do this? And here is his response,
and this is from the National Library of Medicine National
Center for Biotechnology Information, same individual, same doctor, Parker Crutchfield.
(23:20):
Compulsory moral bio enhancement should be covert, and here is
the abstract from this. I'll be glad to send it
to you as well, in case you want to share
this with your friends. They think you're all crazy. Some
theorists argue that moral bio enhancement ought to be compulsory.
(23:41):
That would be him, his partner, and I think a
lot of scientists agree with them. They're just not willing
to step out from behind the shadows such as these
who are on the forefront of this. But it goes on.
I take this argument one step further, arguing that if
moral bio enhancement ought to be pulsory, then its administration
(24:03):
ought to be covert rather than overt. That is to
say that it is morally preferable for compulsory moral bio
enhancement to be administered without the recipients knowing that they
are receiving the enhancement. My argument for this is that
(24:24):
if moral bio enhancement ought to be compulsory, then its
administration is a matter of public health, and for this
very reason should be governed by public health ethics. Thus
a covert compulsory moral bio enhancement program is morally preferable
to an overt moral bio enhancement program. What he's saying,
(24:49):
there is a lot of scientists, the World Economic Forum,
the UN all the usual suspects, believe it is a
moral duty to prevent people from eating meat because they
(25:09):
have found this lone Star tick that gives people an
aversion to meat, and if it's tamped down just a
little bit, it'll only make you sick and you will
not want to eat meat. That it should be administered.
It's their moral duty to administer to the people covertly.
(25:37):
As we heard in the two clips with this doctor Lao,
he was talking about a meat patch. Just put a
patch on and in that patch would be you know,
something like this, something from the lone Star tick that
was bioengineered. It wouldn't particularly make you die, but it
would give you this aversion to meat, so when you
went out or when you were at home and you
(25:59):
felt like eating, you would not want to eat meat.
They all see this as a victory. In fact, in
that clip you could hear everybody laughing, clapping. They thought
this was wonderful, what a breakthrough. Well this Parker Crutchfield
is going one step further and saying no, no, it's
our moral duty to spread this to everybody covertly without
(26:26):
them knowing, under the table, put it in their food,
put it in aspirin, give it to them somehow. They
don't realize they're getting in a vaccine whatever. It is,
something that is mandatory, and they don't know it's in there.
Problem solved. Nobody eats meat anymore because they will all
(26:48):
be sick of it. This is human engineering to the
nth degree. They think they know better about you than you,
and they see it as a moral duty. It's not
like an idea or a thought experiment. This is how
(27:11):
they operate. We have a moral duty to do this
to you because we've figured it all out, and you're
too stupid to know any better. You're no better than
the cattle that you're eating. And so in order to
save the planet, we have to save you, dumb people,
from yourselves. And this is what it's all being couched under,
(27:34):
is this idea of saving the planet. So what are
they saying over at the World Economic Forum about all
of this. Well, I went back into the archives and
I have discussed this before, but again it's worth the
refresher because it shows how we got here. Twenty nineteen
Headlineworldeconomicforum dot Org. Here's how we can rethink the way
(27:58):
we eat meat. They say. By twenty fifty, the world
population is projected to reach nearly ten billion, and according
to the Food and Agriculture Organization, food production must increase
by seventy percent. How we must approach this gap in
our growing food system will directly affect our health, stability
(28:18):
and our natural ecosystem, they say. According to PEDA, it
takes nearly twenty times less land to feed people a
plant based diet than it does to feed meat eaters,
as crops are consumed directly instead of being used to
feed animals which need land. See the animals are a problem.
(28:41):
They take up way too much land and if we
just all ate plant based everything, it would all be
hunky dory. Making the transition from mass produced animal proteins
to plant based alternatives is not just necessary to meat
population demands. The latter have also been linked with a
smaller car footprint and a lower disease risk. Several meat
(29:05):
substitutes have been developed across the last decades and meat
alternatives entirely made of vegetable components have gained market share. Well,
actually they haven't. Impossible. Meat the Bill Gates brand tanked.
Nobody likes it. It's disgusting. They pushed it as hard
as they could, try to dress it up and make
(29:28):
it cool and interesting and everything. Thankfully, most people said
I'll pass on that. Here's another article from the World
Economic Forum dot org. This is June eighteenth, twenty nineteen.
This is a statement by them. This is the opening
of the article. You will be eating replacement meats within
(29:53):
twenty years. Here's why. That is how the article starts,
and here is why they say we will not be
eating meat. New alternatives can be created more effectively than
conventional meat. Solutions for increasing the efficiency of traditional meat
productions are almost exhausted. Meat alternatives have fewer product risks
(30:14):
and conventional meat, and it goes on. Of course, they're
trying to make this case that natural meat meat from
animals is just awful for you, and the non vegan
meat replacement or cultured meat is of course much better.
It's better for the environment, it's better for you, it's
better for everybody. This according to the World Economic Form
you will be eating replacement meats. So one of the
(30:39):
things that has popped up with this is this idea
of not just human engineering, but genetic engineering, gene editing.
So I looked into this because there are several Reddit
posts and a lot of different posts, and I know
Reddit is not a great place to find your information,
but occasionally something pops up on there that has links
(31:02):
and you can verify it and so forth. The common
theme in the conspiracy realm is that they have created
this tick, made it more potent, and unleashed it, and
that's why it's going everywhere. That's why it's moving around.
They've actually dropped it here, there, and everywhere, and they're
trying to make sure everybody gets bit by it. I
(31:23):
think it's the opposite, and i'll explain why here. This
is according to Pennsylvania State University, and this was written
in twenty twenty two headline world's first gene editing tool
for ticks may help decrease tick born diseases. According to this,
reducing born diseases such as a lime disease may now
(31:46):
be possible thanks to new gene editing methods, particularly two
by researchers at penn State, also the University of Reno, Nevada,
and the University of Maryland. The methods could also allow
science listen to this to alter parts of the tick
genome that are involved in harboring and transmitting pathogens, just
(32:10):
like the lone Star tech and the problems we're having
with that. According to this article, in the United States alone,
tics in fact approximately three hundred thousand people with lime
disease each year. And if you really want to get
into the conspiracy world, lime disease I believe we have
talked about it before, probably most likely came from a
(32:34):
US military experiment. Go back and listen to that show,
do your own research on that. But lime disease was
actually created by the US government. Anyway, If left untreated,
the infection can spread to joints, heart, and the nervous system. Currently,
there is no vaccine and existing treatments are not always
fully effective. Ticks are vulnerable foe to public health. We're
(32:58):
in desperate need of new tools to fight tics and
the pathogens they spread. So what are they using. Well,
of course they're using Crisper cast nine, which goes in
and cuts the DNA. I've talked all about that. It's
this gene editing tool, and so they're working on gene
(33:19):
editing these tics. Well, who could be behind that? Who
in the world would be interested in this kind of
editing for purposes of tics and spreading or not spreading
diseases and so forth? Well, Alliancefroscience dot org has the answer.
(33:40):
May twenty one, the Gates Foundation funds research to control
cattle tics through biotechnology. Technology that has been used to
control some mosquitoes and fall armyworm will now be applied
to solving the world's cattle tick problem under a new
(34:00):
one point two to eight three million dollar grant from
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. And then it goes
on to talk about the people who are gonna be
working on this tiic project. They say the ticks are
parasites that feed on the blood of cattle and other livestock,
resulting and losses of billions of dollars each year. Do
you think Bill Gates cares about cattle and losing billions
(34:21):
of dollars every year because of sick cattle? No, he
hates cattle. He's the one behind all of the fake meat.
He wants to do away with cattle. So why would
he be funding a tick editing gene editing program that
deals with ticks and cattle. Now, on the surface, it
(34:42):
sounds really great, right, Oh, we're just going to get
some casts crispher Cast nine. We're gonna go in. We're
gonna try to monkey around with these ticks, maybe solve
some lime disease problems, make sure the cattle aren't sick.
But then you juxtapose that with what we've been hearing
from Parker Crutchfield, from Dr Loo and all the other
(35:07):
articles and all the other people who are saying we
need to not only curb meat eating and knock it
out entirely, we need to reduce the population of the
globe and everything that they are talking about. Now you
have Bill Gates working on gene editing and ticks. They
(35:28):
have identified the lone star tech which, oh, by the way,
if you get bit makes you sick and have a
massive aversion. To me, this all plays into their hands.
This is why I find this extremely extremely concerning. You
even have Parker Crutchfield saying it's our moral duty to
(35:51):
take this, edit it up, maybe put it in a
patch like Doctor Laws talking about, but covertly without telling anybody,
spread this around because we will be saving the planet.
It is very, very nefarious when you follow the thread
here and understand what's going on, understand the players involved,
(36:18):
understand what their ultimate goal is, and understand how they're
playing this game. Because on the surface, again you get
a news report about this poor individual who a hamburger,
he dropped dead. The initial report is, well, we don't
know the autopsy's performed, it's inconclusive. And if it wasn't
(36:41):
for the widow sending it off to the actual man
who found this disease and he confirming it, nobody would
have ever known. So we really don't even know how
many people have passed away from this period. The alpha
gau syndrome is real now, primarily if you are in
(37:05):
sort of the eastern part of the United States. That's
where you have to really be on the lookout for this.
But again they're saying to everybody in multiple recent articles,
the ticks are spreading. This disease is spreading. Now. You
can't hand it off. If you have it, you don't
give it to somebody. It's not airborne. You have to
(37:27):
be bit by this thing. But isn't it strange that
they are claiming that because of climate change. This tick
is now spreading. It makes zero sense. None of that
makes sense. How are they spreading? How are they getting
from here to there? Now? There's a lot of conspiracies
that say, oh, they're gathering them up and they're taking
(37:50):
them and distributing throughout the US. I did not see
any proof of that. It wouldn't surprise me. I don't know.
I do know they are secretly in absolute glee that
this is happening, as proof provided by the clips I
played and the papers that were written by Parker Crutchfield
(38:13):
and several others, And Parker Crutchfield will talk about that
this is not unusual in the circle C's run, this
bioethics circle that he runs in. If you send your
child to college and they take a bioethics class Western
Michigan Medical School, this is what they're going to hear.
(38:36):
And apparently they're hearing this lots of different places. It's
their moral obligation, it's their moral duty to hide this
somehow and transfer it to the people. Have they started
doing it, I don't know. But they don't have any
problem with you having any kind of personal rights, because again, yes,
(39:00):
we have personal rights over our body. We have personal
rights over what we ingest. We have personal rights over
what we you know, shots we take and so forth.
This is completely different. This is nature. This is something
that you can just be walking out in your yard
and it bites you and boom, now you have it.
(39:26):
And so what would prevent them from just spreading this
all over the United States or all over the world,
or if you don't know you're getting it, if they're
actually doing it covertly and you voluntarily buy I don't know,
some cereal or they put it in your sugar, they
put it in flour and they label it or they
(39:46):
list it and you don't know what's there. Are they
on the hook forgiving you something? Maybe it's in you know,
the flu shot or whatever. I don't know how they
would spread it. They haven't gotten into that. But the
fact that they're thinking in this direction, the fact that
they have identified this lone star tick and identified the
(40:08):
alpha gal syndrome and are happy about it. Nobody's really
looking into how to stop it. They will say, oh, yeah,
we're working on some sort of solution to this problem,
but there's been no progress. Well are they really? Because
on the other hand, I see Bill Gates and a
(40:30):
lot of others who are now suddenly working on tics
with this gene editing tool to supposedly save the cattle
that they want to get rid of, and they don't
want anybody to eat because they're messing up the environment,
and we should all be switching over, as the World
Economic Forum says, to non meat products. In fact, we
(40:52):
will not be eating meat by twenty fifty. So it
doesn't take much to put this puzzle together. And that's
why I wanted to share this with you because this
actually does frighten me, the fact that you can unknowingly
be given something that will alter your life, that will
(41:14):
make you sick, that will take away something that you enjoy,
something that you find pleasurable, something that all of mankind
has done since day one, and it's done by people
who morally feel obligated to do this because of the environment,
(41:36):
a couple of less hurricanes and the ozone layer or
whatever it is that they're talking about, which again we
just talked about this. That whole narrative is falling apart,
but they're not stopping. They're not stopping. So I wanted
to bring that to you today. I find it interesting
if you would like any of these articles, I'll be
(41:56):
glad to send them to you. The clips as well,
I can send them to you because, as you discussed this,
people are going to roll their eyes and think you're
nuts because the news isn't reporting this. And when I
say the news, I mean the mainstream news, the news
that's supposedly giving the information that would be important to you.
Speaker 3 (42:18):
No.
Speaker 2 (42:18):
I had to go to medical journals. I had to
go to like a lot of offbeat reporting, and I
had to really look hard to find this. Parker crutch
Field's papers, any serious medical paper titled Beneficial Bloodsucking should
raise alarm. And as far as I know, there hasn't
(42:39):
been really any pushback in his own field. Now, a
lot of those who have read it have written articles
or things about it saying that now, this is crazy,
what's this guy talking about? But in his own field
there has been no pushback. Some will dismiss it as well.
It's just a thought exercise. We're just, you know, we're
(42:59):
just kind of thinking about it and wondering what if.
But this is where it all starts. This is what
you call a think tank, and we all know that
from a lot of think tanks. Terrible things have happened,
So email me at down the rhaprotonmail dot com. Down
the rh at ProtonMail dot com. I'd love to hear
(43:20):
from you. I'd love to hear your feedback on this.
Do you know anybody who's been infected with this? Is
this something that was on your radar where you're aware
of this or is this all brand new? And if
you need any ammunition in your argument or in your
presentation of this to others again, I would be glad
to provide you with all these articles and any of
the clips that I have played as well. So hope
(43:43):
everybody has a great Thanksgiving brand and I will be
back on Sunday with a brand new episode. In the meantime,
I'm big d I'm out of here.
Speaker 1 (43:56):
Hi everybody, it's me Sinder. Relax. You are listening to
the Fringe Radio Network. I know I was gonna tell them, hey,
do you have the app? It's the best way to
listen to the Fringe Radio Network. It's safe and you
don't have to log in to use it, and it
doesn't track you or trace you, and it sounds beautiful.
(44:20):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app, just go to fringeradionetwork dot com right
at the top of the page. I know, slippers. We
gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Hi, everybody, it's me Cinderella Acts. You are listening to
the Fringe Radio Network. I know I was gonna tell him, Hey,
do you have the app? It's the best way to
listen to the Fringe Radio Network. It's safe and you
don't have to log in to use it, and it
doesn't track you or trace you, and it sounds beautiful.
(00:27):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app?
Speaker 2 (00:31):
Just go to.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Fringeradionetwork dot com right at the top of the page.
I know, slippers, We gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
This allergy to meet, including beef lamon pork tonight, is
linked to its first step. A forty seven year old
New Jersey man ate a burger in twenty twenty four
and died four hours later. Two weeks earlier, he got
sick after e a stake.
Speaker 4 (01:01):
It really illustrates the need for education because when he
had the very severe episode of abdominal pain, they had
no sense.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
That that could be anaphylaxis.
Speaker 3 (01:12):
University of Virginia's doctor Thomas Platt's Mills identified the death
and the allergy behind it. It's called alpha gal syndrome.
It usually starts with a bite from a lone star
tick that sensitizes a person's immune system to a sugar
molecule found in the meat of mammals called alpha gal.
Reactions can include hives, nausea, and life threatening anaphylaxis.
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Welcome everybody into the midweek edition of NWCZ Radio dot
com Channel ones Down the rabbit Hole. I'm big d
in life. There's not a lot of things that actually
scare me or even frighten me. And we do talk
a lot about things on this program that I find concerning,
(02:35):
things that I believe can be frightening should they be
played out to fruition. And there are a lot of
people out there who are working to make life scary.
But in reality, I don't frighten easily. What I'm going
to talk about today, though, does actually scare me. I
(02:56):
find it extremely concerning. It's very frightening. Not so much
that it's there, it's what people want to do with it.
I have been talking about this kind of issue for
years now, this war on food, and in particular war
(03:17):
on meat. It should not be a conspiracy theory. By now,
I'm not the only one talking about it. And when
we first started mentioning these kind of things. We got
all kind of mockery and flack and eye rolls and
what are you talking about? Which was fine. But the
(03:40):
powers that be, the elites, the World Economic Forum, Bill
Gates and all the usual suspects, they have been talking
about this issue for a long time, just not out
in the open. And so when this rolled across my
screen the other day, it raised a lot of alarm.
(04:04):
And so I'm gonna read this story to you, and
then we're going to talk about how we got here
and the crazy thought processes that are going on around
this incident, because this incident may just be one of many, many,
(04:24):
many many, And they like it, they love it. And
when I say they, I will explain it's not a
vague term. There are names to the they. So this
came across my feed the other day. In New Jersey,
man's death first one to be tied to tick related
(04:46):
meat allergy. This was November thirteenth, twenty twenty five. The
man's name has not been released, but he was forty
seven years old and did not know that tick bites
had triggered an allergy to meet last summer. He became
severely ill three hours after eating steak during a camping trip.
(05:07):
Two weeks later, he was found dead after eating a
hamburger at a barbecue. Now, I know this sounds like
science fiction. It sounds like somebody made this up. It
sounds like a fever dreamed fantasy of a hardcore vegetarian.
But this actually happened. The initial cause of death was
(05:31):
ruled sudden unexplained death, but after an autopsy which came
back inconclusive, the man's wife gave the autopsy report to
a doctor who reached out to Thomas Platt's Mills, who
is the former chief of University of Virginia's Health Division
of Asthma, Algae and Clinical Immunology, and he identified it
(05:55):
as alpha gal syndrome. And we'll get into all of
that moment, Platt's Mills said. The man's wife reported he
did not have any recent tick bites, but had twelve
or thirteen chigger bytes around his ankles the summer he
became ill, and Platt's Mills said many chiger bytes in
the eastern United States are actually bites from the lone
(06:18):
star tick or their larvae. And that's where we're going
to start today. What is this lone Star tick. What
is alpha gal and what does it have to do
with us? Because I know we're all heading into, at
least in the United States, we're heading into Thanksgiving where
most people, vast majority of people are going to consume meat,
(06:42):
and most of us, most of the world consumes meat
on a daily basis, or at least a weekly basis,
for sure. This article was followed up by an article
that came out in US News. The headline is explosive
increase of ticks that caused meat allergy in the US,
And of course they're claiming this is due to the
(07:05):
climate crisis. Says, unusually aggressive lone star ticks common in
the Southeast are spreading to areas previously too cold for them. See,
it's climate change. It's not people moving around. It's not
that they get lodged into a hunter's garment and he
(07:26):
drives from Tennessee to Texas or Arkansas or whatever. That's
not what's happening. It's climate crisis. And this is all
going to come back around because they're going to use
climate crisis very heavily in what we're talking about today.
They're claiming that potentially half a million people in the
(07:49):
United States may already be infected with this. Part of
the problem is, as we'll get into, with the alpha gal,
it's not noted right away. It's an allergy that develops.
It's kind of slow, Whereas if you are allergic to
a beasting or you're allergic to nuts or something, it's instantaneous.
(08:13):
You know right away you get stung, you go into
anaphylactic shock, or you have to be administered some sort
of remedy or cure. Same thing if you're allergic to
peanuts or so forth, you have to have something on
hand because you know right away that something's wrong with
this alpha gal, that the tick is spreading. It works
(08:37):
a little different, and so it's not immediate. And we
don't know how many people potentially have died of this
or who have been infected and become sick with it,
that it was never ever classified as such, because like
this guy, he ate a hamburger and just dropped dead,
(08:59):
like we don't, oh what happened. He could have had
a heart attack, doesn't look like it. It could have
just been his time to go. We don't know. Well,
now we do know, but this is nothing new. Here
is an article after article from seven years ago. Five
years ago, four years ago. There's a certain subculture who
has known about this for quite some time, primarily ranchers hunters.
(09:24):
I've seen posts on Reddit. I went back and looked
through a bunch from two thousand and seven, twelve years ago,
ten years ago, where they're like, Hey, it's hunting season,
watch out for this lone Star tick. Ranchers have known
about this, but most people outside of certain circles have
never been aware of this. And there's a reason, and
(09:47):
I will get to that in a moment. Popular Mechanics
reports up to half a million Americans may now be
allergic to red meat because of a tiny menace, and
this would be the lone Star tick. According to several
articles that I read, here's how this lone star tick
kind of works. Researchers at the University of Virginia have
(10:09):
theorized that a recent string of adult onset meet allergies
are the result of the ticks saliva. Over a thousand
cases have been reported thus far. According to the Center
for Disease Control, the lone Star tick inhabits most of
the eastern and central United States, and unless you live
and hunt in the upper Midwest or the West you're
(10:33):
probably at risk of getting bit by this thing. However,
they're saying because of climate crisis, it's spreading, it's going
places that hasn't been before. So what is the alpha
gal syndrome that this tick spreads. It's a type of
acquired allergy characterized by a delayed onset of symptoms two
(10:58):
to six hours after ingesting any kind of meat, preferably
mammalian type of meat, cows, anything that's a mammal which
is almost meat, so fish, you'd be okay, you probably
wouldn't notice anything. However, the conditions result from past exposure
to certain tick bites, as first reported in two thousand
(11:18):
and two. As of twenty twenty five, physicians in some
states are required to report cases of AGS to their
state health departments. Notice that some states, not all states,
because actually, in the scientific world, most doctors are not
even aware of this, They don't know how to test
(11:39):
for it, they aren't even aware that it really exists
all that much. Because up to this point, I think
it's been hidden. But even if that's not the case,
that it wasn't intentionally hidden. It hasn't been widely distributed
nor discussed. According to the CDC, Symptoms of the allergy
(12:01):
vary greatly between individuals and include rash, hives, nausea or vomiting,
difficulty breathing, drop in blood pressure, dizziness or faintness, diarrhea,
severe stomach pain, impossible anaphylaxis. Death has been reported. So
in a lot of ways, that sounds like food poisoning,
and a lot of people may have experienced that. They
(12:24):
didn't die from it, but they're like, oh, man, something
I ate it did not agree with me, and every
time I eat this, I get sick. And that is
more common as to what's happening. Alpha gal allergy is
a reaction to some carbohydrates, and when the body is
overloaded with this immunoglobulin and antibodies on exposure to the carbohydrate.
(12:50):
The anegal is a human natural antibody that interacts specifically
with the mammalian carbohydrate structure. So what happens is is
that your body overreacts to this foreign substance. Like a sugar.
Overloaded stores itself in body fat, which is why it
takes time for it to break down, which is why
it delays. It's not instantaneous, kind of hides and then
(13:14):
as it goes through the digestion process. It shocks the body.
The body overreacts to it, and that is what's going
on here with this ags alpha gal syndrome. So let's
take a walk back, because I've played some of these
clips before, but I would like to remind you of
(13:36):
some things that have been said out loud from different doctors.
These are all doctors and where they said them from.
This is doctor Matthew Leau and this was at a
World Economic Forum meeting. He's one of the contributors and
he's also somebody who advises them. Remember when he said this.
Speaker 4 (13:59):
I'll give two examples. So one is that people eat
too much meat, right, and if they were to cut
down on their consumption on meat, then they would it
would actually really help the planet. But people are not
willing to give up meat. Yeah, you know, some people
will be willing to, but other people they may be
willing to, but they sort of they have a weakness
of will they say, Wow, this steak is just too juicy.
(14:21):
I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the way,
so you know. But so here's the thought, right, So
it turns out that we know a lot about so
there we have these intolerance to So I, for example,
I have milk intolerance, and there are some people are
intolerant to cray fish. So possibly we can use human
engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to
(14:42):
certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins.
And there's actually analogues of this in light. There's this
thing called the long Star tick where if it bites you,
you will become allergic to meat. I can sort of
describe the mechanism. So that's something that we can do
through human engineering. We can kind of possible you address
really big world problems through human engineering.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Human engineering is a big topic of discussion amongst this crowd.
These are the they, the others, the elites that I'm
talking about when I say they want to use this
tick for their advantage, for their benefit. They don't like
us eating meat because they think the cow should go away,
(15:27):
because they're causing all kinds of problems in the environment.
Ranching causes all kinds of problems in the environment using
any kind of manure or certain types of feed, all
of the problems, erosion of the earth, everything's a problem
with ranching. We saw this big battle going on around
(15:50):
the world just a couple of years ago, where they
were trying to literally put farmers out of business in
multiple countries. So that's doctor lout the first time. Here's
another clip of him talking. Now, this is from a
Ted talk where he talks about the same thing, but
again repeating this idea of human engineering using some form
(16:14):
of something to get people to not like meat. Hmm,
wonder what they could use well in the last clip
he talked about it, let's just use this lone star tick.
How about this clip.
Speaker 4 (16:28):
I want to consider a coss of solutions that have
never been considered before human engineering. It involves the biomedical
modification of human beings. I'll give four examples. Here's one.
Eighteen percent of greenhouse gas emissions come from livestock farming,
(16:50):
so if we eat less meat, we could significantly reduce
our greenhouse gas emissions. Now, some people would be willing
to eat less meat, but they lack the willpower. Human
engineering could help. Just as some people are naturally intolerant
(17:13):
to milk or crayfish, like myself, we could artificially induce
mild intolerance to meat by stimulating our immune system against
common bobine proteins and in this way, we can create
an aversion to eating echo and friendly food. And we
(17:34):
can do this, for example, by having meat patches kind
of like nicotine patches. People can then wear these patches
before they go out for dinner to curb their enthusiasm
for eating meat.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
So, once again he's talking about human engineering people putting
on a patch. I'll get back to that in a moment.
What would be in that patch? What would they put
in that patch that you could put on? Would you
even know? Oh? So there's some questions that I have
about this whole AGS thing and the lone Star tick.
Where does it come from? What we kind of know
(18:08):
comes from this tick? How many have died from it?
I don't think we will ever know that. I think
a lot of people have passed away from this and
they were misdiagnosed or not diagnosed at all. And how
does it get treated. The answer to that actually is
most doctors don't know. In fact, I don't think anybody knows.
(18:28):
They don't want to know. And I will explain why
I say that in a moment. One of the things
we need to pause and do here is just to
reflect back on what we just went through with COVID.
Remember COVID was created and it was unleashed, and then
(18:51):
it was lied about multiple times as to where it
came from. And they lied to cover up how it
was invented, where it came from, and how it was released.
Why to protect themselves obviously from any kind of liability,
but because they wanted it out there. They were using it.
(19:15):
It's what they wanted to do with it, or if
nothing else. Once it got out, they were like, hey,
we can use this to our advantage. Let's run with it,
and we're just gonna lie, lie, lie, to cover up
how it got released, how it got out there, and
would just call it a pandemic and lock everybody down.
Novel diseases are created. Now. I did a lot of
(19:39):
research to see whether this was actually created or not,
and by all estimation, no, it was not. You're going
to see some things that this was created in a lab,
it was put into a tick, genetically modified, and so forth.
I think it's the reverse from all my research. It's there.
(20:01):
It's a real thing, this lone Star tech that carries
this saliva that interacts with our body in a negative way.
The engineering is let's take that lone Star tech and
try to figure out how we can geo engineer it
(20:21):
and spread it. And I believe I have proof of that,
so let's get into some of that. This is an
article titled Professors discuss intentionally spreading tech born meat Allergy.
This is a bioethics paper called Beneficial blood Sucking. It's
by a guy named Parker Crutchfield and Blake Harrith. Parker
(20:45):
Crutchfield is a teacher at Western Michigan Medical School. He
teaches bioethics bioethics at a medical school, and it is
titled The Beneficial Blood Sucking. In the article, they go
on and on about what he talked about. So I'm like, well,
let's just go to the actual paper. I found it
(21:08):
online and I'll be glad to send it to you
if you would like. Here is the abstract of the paper.
The bite of the lone star tick spreads AlphaGo syndrome,
a condition whose only effect is the creation of a
severe but non fatal red meat allergy. Public health departments
worn against lone star tics and ags, and scientists are
(21:29):
working to develop an inoculation to ags. Herein we argue
that if eating meat is morally impermissible, then efforts to
prevent the spread of tick born ags are also morally impermissible.
After explaining the symptoms of ags and how they are
(21:49):
transmitted via TIS, we argue that tick born ags is
a moral bio enhancer if and when it motivates people
to stop eating meat. And then he goes on to
defend this, defend this thought that if it's morally wrong,
according to them, to eat meat because it's destroying the planet,
(22:15):
it's cruel to animals, however you want to put it,
then it's actually morally wrong not to spread the disease
of this tick. They want to spread it. They believe
it's a moral obligation to spread it. And this has
(22:35):
been publicized in a lot of publications which went way
under the radar. I have multiple reports. This is from
the Catholic World report Beneficial blood sucking making you sick
in the name of public health. They go on to
talk about obviously this paper. Now he also this, Parker
(22:58):
Crutchfield wrote another paper. Because people were responding to this,
I'm wondering, like, how are you going to do this?
Why would you do this? And here is his response,
and this is from the National Library of Medicine National
Center for Biotechnology Information, same individual, same doctor, Parker Crutchfield.
(23:20):
Compulsory moral bio enhancement should be covert, and here is
the abstract from this. I'll be glad to send it
to you as well, in case you want to share
this with your friends. They think you're all crazy. Some
theorists argue that moral bio enhancement ought to be compulsory.
(23:41):
That would be him, his partner, and I think a
lot of scientists agree with them. They're just not willing
to step out from behind the shadows such as these
who are on the forefront of this. But it goes on.
I take this argument one step further, arguing that if
moral bio enhancement ought to be pulsory, then its administration
(24:03):
ought to be covert rather than overt. That is to
say that it is morally preferable for compulsory moral bio
enhancement to be administered without the recipients knowing that they
are receiving the enhancement. My argument for this is that
(24:24):
if moral bio enhancement ought to be compulsory, then its
administration is a matter of public health, and for this
very reason should be governed by public health ethics. Thus
a covert compulsory moral bio enhancement program is morally preferable
to an overt moral bio enhancement program. What he's saying,
(24:49):
there is a lot of scientists, the World Economic Forum,
the UN all the usual suspects, believe it is a
moral duty to prevent people from eating meat because they
(25:09):
have found this lone Star tick that gives people an
aversion to meat, and if it's tamped down just a
little bit, it'll only make you sick and you will
not want to eat meat. That it should be administered.
It's their moral duty to administer to the people covertly.
(25:37):
As we heard in the two clips with this doctor Lao,
he was talking about a meat patch. Just put a
patch on and in that patch would be you know,
something like this, something from the lone Star tick that
was bioengineered. It wouldn't particularly make you die, but it
would give you this aversion to meat, so when you
went out or when you were at home and you
(25:59):
felt like eating, you would not want to eat meat.
They all see this as a victory. In fact, in
that clip you could hear everybody laughing, clapping. They thought
this was wonderful, what a breakthrough. Well this Parker Crutchfield
is going one step further and saying no, no, it's
our moral duty to spread this to everybody covertly without
(26:26):
them knowing, under the table, put it in their food,
put it in aspirin, give it to them somehow. They
don't realize they're getting in a vaccine whatever. It is,
something that is mandatory, and they don't know it's in there.
Problem solved. Nobody eats meat anymore because they will all
(26:48):
be sick of it. This is human engineering to the
nth degree. They think they know better about you than you,
and they see it as a moral duty. It's not
like an idea or a thought experiment. This is how
(27:11):
they operate. We have a moral duty to do this
to you because we've figured it all out, and you're
too stupid to know any better. You're no better than
the cattle that you're eating. And so in order to
save the planet, we have to save you, dumb people,
from yourselves. And this is what it's all being couched under,
(27:34):
is this idea of saving the planet. So what are
they saying over at the World Economic Forum about all
of this. Well, I went back into the archives and
I have discussed this before, but again it's worth the
refresher because it shows how we got here. Twenty nineteen
Headlineworldeconomicforum dot Org. Here's how we can rethink the way
(27:58):
we eat meat. They say. By twenty fifty, the world
population is projected to reach nearly ten billion, and according
to the Food and Agriculture Organization, food production must increase
by seventy percent. How we must approach this gap in
our growing food system will directly affect our health, stability
(28:18):
and our natural ecosystem, they say. According to PEDA, it
takes nearly twenty times less land to feed people a
plant based diet than it does to feed meat eaters,
as crops are consumed directly instead of being used to
feed animals which need land. See the animals are a problem.
(28:41):
They take up way too much land and if we
just all ate plant based everything, it would all be
hunky dory. Making the transition from mass produced animal proteins
to plant based alternatives is not just necessary to meat
population demands. The latter have also been linked with a
smaller car footprint and a lower disease risk. Several meat
(29:05):
substitutes have been developed across the last decades and meat
alternatives entirely made of vegetable components have gained market share. Well,
actually they haven't. Impossible. Meat the Bill Gates brand tanked.
Nobody likes it. It's disgusting. They pushed it as hard
as they could, try to dress it up and make
(29:28):
it cool and interesting and everything. Thankfully, most people said
I'll pass on that. Here's another article from the World
Economic Forum dot org. This is June eighteenth, twenty nineteen.
This is a statement by them. This is the opening
of the article. You will be eating replacement meats within
(29:53):
twenty years. Here's why. That is how the article starts,
and here is why they say we will not be
eating meat. New alternatives can be created more effectively than
conventional meat. Solutions for increasing the efficiency of traditional meat
productions are almost exhausted. Meat alternatives have fewer product risks
(30:14):
and conventional meat, and it goes on. Of course, they're
trying to make this case that natural meat meat from
animals is just awful for you, and the non vegan
meat replacement or cultured meat is of course much better.
It's better for the environment, it's better for you, it's
better for everybody. This according to the World Economic Form
you will be eating replacement meats. So one of the
(30:39):
things that has popped up with this is this idea
of not just human engineering, but genetic engineering, gene editing.
So I looked into this because there are several Reddit
posts and a lot of different posts, and I know
Reddit is not a great place to find your information,
but occasionally something pops up on there that has links
(31:02):
and you can verify it and so forth. The common
theme in the conspiracy realm is that they have created
this tick, made it more potent, and unleashed it, and
that's why it's going everywhere. That's why it's moving around.
They've actually dropped it here, there, and everywhere, and they're
trying to make sure everybody gets bit by it. I
(31:23):
think it's the opposite, and i'll explain why here. This
is according to Pennsylvania State University, and this was written
in twenty twenty two headline world's first gene editing tool
for ticks may help decrease tick born diseases. According to this,
reducing born diseases such as a lime disease may now
(31:46):
be possible thanks to new gene editing methods, particularly two
by researchers at penn State, also the University of Reno, Nevada,
and the University of Maryland. The methods could also allow
science listen to this to alter parts of the tick
genome that are involved in harboring and transmitting pathogens, just
(32:10):
like the lone Star tech and the problems we're having
with that. According to this article, in the United States alone,
tics in fact approximately three hundred thousand people with lime
disease each year. And if you really want to get
into the conspiracy world, lime disease I believe we have
talked about it before, probably most likely came from a
(32:34):
US military experiment. Go back and listen to that show,
do your own research on that. But lime disease was
actually created by the US government. Anyway, If left untreated,
the infection can spread to joints, heart, and the nervous system. Currently,
there is no vaccine and existing treatments are not always
fully effective. Ticks are vulnerable foe to public health. We're
(32:58):
in desperate need of new tools to fight tics and
the pathogens they spread. So what are they using. Well,
of course they're using Crisper cast nine, which goes in
and cuts the DNA. I've talked all about that. It's
this gene editing tool, and so they're working on gene
(33:19):
editing these tics. Well, who could be behind that? Who
in the world would be interested in this kind of
editing for purposes of tics and spreading or not spreading
diseases and so forth? Well, Alliancefroscience dot org has the answer.
(33:40):
May twenty one, the Gates Foundation funds research to control
cattle tics through biotechnology. Technology that has been used to
control some mosquitoes and fall armyworm will now be applied
to solving the world's cattle tick problem under a new
(34:00):
one point two to eight three million dollar grant from
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. And then it goes
on to talk about the people who are gonna be
working on this tiic project. They say the ticks are
parasites that feed on the blood of cattle and other livestock,
resulting and losses of billions of dollars each year. Do
you think Bill Gates cares about cattle and losing billions
(34:21):
of dollars every year because of sick cattle? No, he
hates cattle. He's the one behind all of the fake meat.
He wants to do away with cattle. So why would
he be funding a tick editing gene editing program that
deals with ticks and cattle. Now, on the surface, it
(34:42):
sounds really great, right, Oh, we're just going to get
some casts crispher Cast nine. We're gonna go in. We're
gonna try to monkey around with these ticks, maybe solve
some lime disease problems, make sure the cattle aren't sick.
But then you juxtapose that with what we've been hearing
from Parker Crutchfield, from Dr Loo and all the other
(35:07):
articles and all the other people who are saying we
need to not only curb meat eating and knock it
out entirely, we need to reduce the population of the
globe and everything that they are talking about. Now you
have Bill Gates working on gene editing and ticks. They
(35:28):
have identified the lone star tech which, oh, by the way,
if you get bit makes you sick and have a
massive aversion. To me, this all plays into their hands.
This is why I find this extremely extremely concerning. You
even have Parker Crutchfield saying it's our moral duty to
(35:51):
take this, edit it up, maybe put it in a
patch like Doctor Laws talking about, but covertly without telling anybody,
spread this around because we will be saving the planet.
It is very, very nefarious when you follow the thread
here and understand what's going on, understand the players involved,
(36:18):
understand what their ultimate goal is, and understand how they're
playing this game. Because on the surface, again you get
a news report about this poor individual who a hamburger,
he dropped dead. The initial report is, well, we don't
know the autopsy's performed, it's inconclusive. And if it wasn't
(36:41):
for the widow sending it off to the actual man
who found this disease and he confirming it, nobody would
have ever known. So we really don't even know how
many people have passed away from this period. The alpha
gau syndrome is real now, primarily if you are in
(37:05):
sort of the eastern part of the United States. That's
where you have to really be on the lookout for this.
But again they're saying to everybody in multiple recent articles,
the ticks are spreading. This disease is spreading. Now. You
can't hand it off. If you have it, you don't
give it to somebody. It's not airborne. You have to
(37:27):
be bit by this thing. But isn't it strange that
they are claiming that because of climate change. This tick
is now spreading. It makes zero sense. None of that
makes sense. How are they spreading? How are they getting
from here to there? Now? There's a lot of conspiracies
that say, oh, they're gathering them up and they're taking
(37:50):
them and distributing throughout the US. I did not see
any proof of that. It wouldn't surprise me. I don't know.
I do know they are secretly in absolute glee that
this is happening, as proof provided by the clips I
played and the papers that were written by Parker Crutchfield
(38:13):
and several others, And Parker Crutchfield will talk about that
this is not unusual in the circle C's run, this
bioethics circle that he runs in. If you send your
child to college and they take a bioethics class Western
Michigan Medical School, this is what they're going to hear.
(38:36):
And apparently they're hearing this lots of different places. It's
their moral obligation, it's their moral duty to hide this
somehow and transfer it to the people. Have they started
doing it, I don't know. But they don't have any
problem with you having any kind of personal rights, because again, yes,
(39:00):
we have personal rights over our body. We have personal
rights over what we ingest. We have personal rights over
what we you know, shots we take and so forth.
This is completely different. This is nature. This is something
that you can just be walking out in your yard
and it bites you and boom, now you have it.
(39:26):
And so what would prevent them from just spreading this
all over the United States or all over the world,
or if you don't know you're getting it, if they're
actually doing it covertly and you voluntarily buy I don't know,
some cereal or they put it in your sugar, they
put it in flour and they label it or they
(39:46):
list it and you don't know what's there. Are they
on the hook forgiving you something? Maybe it's in you know,
the flu shot or whatever. I don't know how they
would spread it. They haven't gotten into that. But the
fact that they're thinking in this direction, the fact that
they have identified this lone star tick and identified the
(40:08):
alpha gal syndrome and are happy about it. Nobody's really
looking into how to stop it. They will say, oh, yeah,
we're working on some sort of solution to this problem,
but there's been no progress. Well are they really? Because
on the other hand, I see Bill Gates and a
(40:30):
lot of others who are now suddenly working on tics
with this gene editing tool to supposedly save the cattle
that they want to get rid of, and they don't
want anybody to eat because they're messing up the environment,
and we should all be switching over, as the World
Economic Forum says, to non meat products. In fact, we
(40:52):
will not be eating meat by twenty fifty. So it
doesn't take much to put this puzzle together. And that's
why I wanted to share this with you because this
actually does frighten me, the fact that you can unknowingly
be given something that will alter your life, that will
(41:14):
make you sick, that will take away something that you enjoy,
something that you find pleasurable, something that all of mankind
has done since day one, and it's done by people
who morally feel obligated to do this because of the environment,
(41:36):
a couple of less hurricanes and the ozone layer or
whatever it is that they're talking about, which again we
just talked about this. That whole narrative is falling apart,
but they're not stopping. They're not stopping. So I wanted
to bring that to you today. I find it interesting
if you would like any of these articles, I'll be
(41:56):
glad to send them to you. The clips as well,
I can send them to you because, as you discussed this,
people are going to roll their eyes and think you're
nuts because the news isn't reporting this. And when I
say the news, I mean the mainstream news, the news
that's supposedly giving the information that would be important to you.
Speaker 3 (42:18):
No.
Speaker 2 (42:18):
I had to go to medical journals. I had to
go to like a lot of offbeat reporting, and I
had to really look hard to find this. Parker crutch
Field's papers, any serious medical paper titled Beneficial Bloodsucking should
raise alarm. And as far as I know, there hasn't
(42:39):
been really any pushback in his own field. Now, a
lot of those who have read it have written articles
or things about it saying that now, this is crazy,
what's this guy talking about? But in his own field
there has been no pushback. Some will dismiss it as well.
It's just a thought exercise. We're just, you know, we're
(42:59):
just kind of thinking about it and wondering what if.
But this is where it all starts. This is what
you call a think tank, and we all know that
from a lot of think tanks. Terrible things have happened,
So email me at down the rhaprotonmail dot com. Down
the rh at ProtonMail dot com. I'd love to hear
(43:20):
from you. I'd love to hear your feedback on this.
Do you know anybody who's been infected with this? Is
this something that was on your radar where you're aware
of this or is this all brand new? And if
you need any ammunition in your argument or in your
presentation of this to others again, I would be glad
to provide you with all these articles and any of
the clips that I have played as well. So hope
(43:43):
everybody has a great Thanksgiving brand and I will be
back on Sunday with a brand new episode. In the meantime,
I'm big d I'm out of here.
Speaker 1 (43:56):
Hi everybody, it's me Sinder. Relax. You are listening to
the Fringe Radio Network. I know I was gonna tell them, hey,
do you have the app? It's the best way to
listen to the Fringe Radio Network. It's safe and you
don't have to log in to use it, and it
doesn't track you or trace you, and it sounds beautiful.
(44:20):
I know I was gonna tell him, how do you
get the app, just go to fringeradionetwork dot com right
at the top of the page. I know, slippers. We
gotta keep cleaning these chimneys.
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Brothers Ortiz
The Brothers Ortiz is the story of two brothers–both successful, but in very different ways. Gabe Ortiz becomes a third-highest ranking officer in all of Texas while his younger brother Larry climbs the ranks in Puro Tango Blast, a notorious Texas Prison gang. Gabe doesn’t know all the details of his brother’s nefarious dealings, and he’s made a point not to ask, to protect their relationship. But when Larry is murdered during a home invasion in a rented beach house, Gabe has no choice but to look into what happened that night. To solve Larry’s murder, Gabe, and the whole Ortiz family, must ask each other tough questions.