December 19, 2024 • 7 mins
Justice and Accountability: Biden's Potential Counter-Pardons for Anti-Trump Figures
https://gorightnews.com/will-trumps-first-day-in-office-see-j6-prisoners-walk-free/
https://youtu.be/T-MFNnW8Ljs
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/biden-s-potential-counter-pardons-for-anti-trump-figures--63397685
GoRightNews #GoRight with Peter Boykin
#BidenPardons, #JusticeAndAccountability, #CounterPardons, #AntiTrumpPardons, #LegalAccountability, #PardonDebate, #PoliticalPardons, #ErosionOfLaw, #PublicTrust, #ConstitutionalConcerns, #RuleOfLaw, #HunterBidenPardon, #GoRightNews, #GoRight, #PeterBoykin
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/goright-with-peter-boykin-gorightnews-com--3096608/support.
https://gorightnews.com/will-trumps-first-day-in-office-see-j6-prisoners-walk-free/
https://youtu.be/T-MFNnW8Ljs
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/biden-s-potential-counter-pardons-for-anti-trump-figures--63397685
GoRightNews #GoRight with Peter Boykin
#BidenPardons, #JusticeAndAccountability, #CounterPardons, #AntiTrumpPardons, #LegalAccountability, #PardonDebate, #PoliticalPardons, #ErosionOfLaw, #PublicTrust, #ConstitutionalConcerns, #RuleOfLaw, #HunterBidenPardon, #GoRightNews, #GoRight, #PeterBoykin
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/goright-with-peter-boykin-gorightnews-com--3096608/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
In a strategic move aimed at countering former President Donald
Trump's intention to pardon those involved in the January sixth
Capitol riot. Discussions within the White House have surfaced regarding
the issuance of pardons for individuals labeled as anti Trump figures.
(00:27):
This could include high profile political allies or public officials
who have been or might be targeted for their opposition
to Donald Trump. These considerations are part of a broader
debate on the use of executive clemency powers, especially in
the light of Biden's recent pardon of his son Hunter Biden.
(00:49):
Now the public and political fields have reaction to this.
The idea of such preemptive pardons has not been universally
welcomed to California Governor Or Gavin Newsoen has publicly voiced
his disappointment, arguing that such actions might compromise the integrity
of legal accountability. As quoted quote, this could be seen
(01:14):
as attempt to shield political allies from accountability, a move
that many view is undermining the role of law, and
it calculates the concern among critics of Biden's pardons considerations.
Now we as we analyze this, the impact of legal
system and public trust, the erosion of legal accountability. The
(01:38):
strategic use of pardons to protect political allies from legal
scrutiny could further blur the lines between law and politics,
potentially leading to a significant erosion of legal accountability. Critics
argue that when pardons are used as political tools, the
(02:00):
public's trust and the legal system is undermined, particularly if
these actions are perceived more as projectionists rather than just
are merciful. And there's constitutional concerns from a constitutional's viewpoint,
the frequent and potential partisan use of presidential pardons. That's
(02:20):
a lot of peace. Potential partisan use of presidential pardons
could be seen as a departure from the intended use
of this constitutional power. The Constitution grants the president the
authority to pardon with the understanding that it should serve
justice or rectified judicial errors, not to manipulate the legal
(02:43):
system for potential and political advantages, and that leads to
the public trust and justice. The broader public discourse centers
on the implications of these actions for the perception of
justice in America, and if the public sees pardons as
being used to favor one political side over anomber, it
(03:06):
could lead to a further decline in trust and government institutions,
especially the Justice Department, which is supposed to operate independently
of political influence. So here we go down the line
where Biden's pardon is considered the debate for justice and
(03:30):
accountability what's the ethical use of pardons? The potential issuance
of pardons by Biden for anti Trump figures has sparked
a debate about the ethical boundaries of executive power, and
the fundamental principle is whether pardons should be a tool
(03:51):
for justice are as a means to shield allies from
legal percussions. In this scenarios challenges the notion of fairness
and legal proceedings, suggesting a selective application of law based
on political affiliations. Meanwhile, if you go to go write
News dot com, you can check out a link for
(04:14):
a article on The Daily Caller that talks about California
Governor Gavin Newsoen said he was disappointed that Joe Biden
parted his son. Meanwhile, you can watch these two videos
coming up. The first video as Charlomagne battles the hags
on the view over Biden's pardon. Hunter, let me ask you.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
Something that's going around right now.
Speaker 3 (04:36):
A lot of this conversation about President Biden getting criticized
from both sides of the offer partnering his son Hunter
after repeatedly saying he would never do it, and a
lot of people are saying that it's hypocritical, etc. As
if the other side doesn't do it. But what's your
reaction to it?
Speaker 4 (04:51):
I mean, I think all of the criticism is valid
because you know, Democrats stand on this moral high ground
all the time, and.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
You know they act so self righteous.
Speaker 4 (05:00):
Reality is, he didn't have to say anything in regards
to you know, whether or not you know, his son
wanted to be part and he could have said, hey, man,
I'm not.
Speaker 2 (05:07):
Focused on that right now.
Speaker 4 (05:08):
But since they were calling trumpet threat at democracy and
they were saying that, you know, nobody's above the law,
but they were speaking about him, that's what they were
running on.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
So when he kept saying things like, oh.
Speaker 4 (05:17):
You know, nobody's above the law, I respect you know,
the jury's decision in regards to my son.
Speaker 2 (05:22):
He didn't believe that, but he didn't have to volunteer
that lie to begin with.
Speaker 5 (05:26):
I'm gonna stop you for a second, only because you
don't know that it was a lie.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
We don't know why he changed.
Speaker 4 (05:35):
You really think he just changed his mind over Thanksgiving weekend.
Speaker 2 (05:38):
All as I'm gonna tell you what I think.
Speaker 5 (05:39):
Okay, I think he changed his mind because he got
sick of watching everybody else get over. And this is
just my feeling because at some point you get to
the place where you just go. So I'm just gonna
follow the straight and narrow always because that's what's expected
of ra But that's.
Speaker 4 (06:00):
Their fault that you're the one got to go out
there and they stand on this moral high ground.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
They don't have to do that. A democrat, tell me
what the moral high grounded.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
The moral high ground is. Nobody's above the law. I
respect what the jurors is saying.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
He didn't. You know, you don't have to. We're mad
at him because he changed his By the way.
Speaker 4 (06:20):
I'm not mad at him pardoning on.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
The next video after that is MSNBC. Joy Reids hated
pardons under Trump, but changed her tune with Biden.
Speaker 6 (06:32):
The presidential pardon was originally meant to grant the president
the power to.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
Temper justice with mercy.
Speaker 6 (06:39):
It was not enshrined in our constitution so that a
dishonorable man could reward his criminal allies, friends and family
for their corrupt practices. I don't have a problem with
Biden parting his son.
Speaker 2 (06:51):
He should have pardoned them. The crazies are coming right,
But to me, it's like pardon more might go right.
Go write news with Peter Boykin.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
We're making moves.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Freedom and liberty always on the rise.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
Tune into the truth and open your eyes.
In a strategic move aimed at countering former President Donald
Trump's intention to pardon those involved in the January sixth
Capitol riot. Discussions within the White House have surfaced regarding
the issuance of pardons for individuals labeled as anti Trump figures.
(00:27):
This could include high profile political allies or public officials
who have been or might be targeted for their opposition
to Donald Trump. These considerations are part of a broader
debate on the use of executive clemency powers, especially in
the light of Biden's recent pardon of his son Hunter Biden.
(00:49):
Now the public and political fields have reaction to this.
The idea of such preemptive pardons has not been universally
welcomed to California Governor Or Gavin Newsoen has publicly voiced
his disappointment, arguing that such actions might compromise the integrity
of legal accountability. As quoted quote, this could be seen
(01:14):
as attempt to shield political allies from accountability, a move
that many view is undermining the role of law, and
it calculates the concern among critics of Biden's pardons considerations.
Now we as we analyze this, the impact of legal
system and public trust, the erosion of legal accountability. The
(01:38):
strategic use of pardons to protect political allies from legal
scrutiny could further blur the lines between law and politics,
potentially leading to a significant erosion of legal accountability. Critics
argue that when pardons are used as political tools, the
(02:00):
public's trust and the legal system is undermined, particularly if
these actions are perceived more as projectionists rather than just
are merciful. And there's constitutional concerns from a constitutional's viewpoint,
the frequent and potential partisan use of presidential pardons. That's
(02:20):
a lot of peace. Potential partisan use of presidential pardons
could be seen as a departure from the intended use
of this constitutional power. The Constitution grants the president the
authority to pardon with the understanding that it should serve
justice or rectified judicial errors, not to manipulate the legal
(02:43):
system for potential and political advantages, and that leads to
the public trust and justice. The broader public discourse centers
on the implications of these actions for the perception of
justice in America, and if the public sees pardons as
being used to favor one political side over anomber, it
(03:06):
could lead to a further decline in trust and government institutions,
especially the Justice Department, which is supposed to operate independently
of political influence. So here we go down the line
where Biden's pardon is considered the debate for justice and
(03:30):
accountability what's the ethical use of pardons? The potential issuance
of pardons by Biden for anti Trump figures has sparked
a debate about the ethical boundaries of executive power, and
the fundamental principle is whether pardons should be a tool
(03:51):
for justice are as a means to shield allies from
legal percussions. In this scenarios challenges the notion of fairness
and legal proceedings, suggesting a selective application of law based
on political affiliations. Meanwhile, if you go to go write
News dot com, you can check out a link for
(04:14):
a article on The Daily Caller that talks about California
Governor Gavin Newsoen said he was disappointed that Joe Biden
parted his son. Meanwhile, you can watch these two videos
coming up. The first video as Charlomagne battles the hags
on the view over Biden's pardon. Hunter, let me ask you.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
Something that's going around right now.
Speaker 3 (04:36):
A lot of this conversation about President Biden getting criticized
from both sides of the offer partnering his son Hunter
after repeatedly saying he would never do it, and a
lot of people are saying that it's hypocritical, etc. As
if the other side doesn't do it. But what's your
reaction to it?
Speaker 4 (04:51):
I mean, I think all of the criticism is valid
because you know, Democrats stand on this moral high ground
all the time, and.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
You know they act so self righteous.
Speaker 4 (05:00):
Reality is, he didn't have to say anything in regards
to you know, whether or not you know, his son
wanted to be part and he could have said, hey, man,
I'm not.
Speaker 2 (05:07):
Focused on that right now.
Speaker 4 (05:08):
But since they were calling trumpet threat at democracy and
they were saying that, you know, nobody's above the law,
but they were speaking about him, that's what they were
running on.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
So when he kept saying things like, oh.
Speaker 4 (05:17):
You know, nobody's above the law, I respect you know,
the jury's decision in regards to my son.
Speaker 2 (05:22):
He didn't believe that, but he didn't have to volunteer
that lie to begin with.
Speaker 5 (05:26):
I'm gonna stop you for a second, only because you
don't know that it was a lie.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
We don't know why he changed.
Speaker 4 (05:35):
You really think he just changed his mind over Thanksgiving weekend.
Speaker 2 (05:38):
All as I'm gonna tell you what I think.
Speaker 5 (05:39):
Okay, I think he changed his mind because he got
sick of watching everybody else get over. And this is
just my feeling because at some point you get to
the place where you just go. So I'm just gonna
follow the straight and narrow always because that's what's expected
of ra But that's.
Speaker 4 (06:00):
Their fault that you're the one got to go out
there and they stand on this moral high ground.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
They don't have to do that. A democrat, tell me
what the moral high grounded.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
The moral high ground is. Nobody's above the law. I
respect what the jurors is saying.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
He didn't. You know, you don't have to. We're mad
at him because he changed his By the way.
Speaker 4 (06:20):
I'm not mad at him pardoning on.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
The next video after that is MSNBC. Joy Reids hated
pardons under Trump, but changed her tune with Biden.
Speaker 6 (06:32):
The presidential pardon was originally meant to grant the president
the power to.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
Temper justice with mercy.
Speaker 6 (06:39):
It was not enshrined in our constitution so that a
dishonorable man could reward his criminal allies, friends and family
for their corrupt practices. I don't have a problem with
Biden parting his son.
Speaker 2 (06:51):
He should have pardoned them. The crazies are coming right,
But to me, it's like pardon more might go right.
Go write news with Peter Boykin.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
We're making moves.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Freedom and liberty always on the rise.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
Tune into the truth and open your eyes.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.