Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
There's definitely been a lot of changes in the political
and geopolitical field lately, right on the blink of Donald
Trump taking over America again that in a recent collapse
of the Assad regime in Syria, with President Bashir al
a Sad reportedly fleeing to Russia, signifies a profound change
(00:30):
in the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. This event
coincides with the rise of Hayat Taijir Al sham HTS,
a group of with historical ties to Alcadata, which now
holds considerable influence in the region. This development poses significant
(00:52):
challenges for internal policy, particularly in the realm of anti
terrorism and regional Given the US A stance on avoiding
further foreign entanglements, this situation has just scored a debate
on do we get involved or do we not get involved?
(01:17):
I would rever let's not get involved because in Sira
has collapsed. There is a call of not getting involved
from respective aligned with constitutional conservatism. The fall of Assad's
regime can be seen as a validation of basically staying
(01:37):
out of it policies, a viewpoint that has been vocalized
by former President Donald Trump and now to be president again.
Donald Trump. This perspective emphasizes the pitfalls of US involvement
in foreign conflicts, advocating instead for a focus on national
(01:58):
defense and domestic aloraities rather than engaging in what could
be perceived as nation building abroad. And believe me, America's
done enough nation building. We need to start building our
nation back. The rapid change in Syrian governments without significant
US military involvement might be cited as instability, but it
(02:20):
could be preferable to the costs and complexities of direct intervention.
This approach is seen as a way to conserve American
resources and avoid the unintended consequences of foreign policy overreach. However,
this scenario also highlights the complexity of non involvement. The
(02:44):
rise of HTS, despite its terrorist designation, presents a potential
threat to international security. Balancing the principle of non intervention
with the need to combat global terrorism remains a nuanced challenge,
(03:04):
one that requires careful consideration of both the ideological commendments
to sovereignty and the practical implications for government for global
peace and security. This situation underscores the need for strategic
thinking in foreign policy, particularly in how the US navigates
(03:26):
its role in regions like the Middle East without reverting
to past patterns of deep military engagement. A lot of
things going on, folks in the world, and we're going
to report as they come up.
Speaker 2 (03:42):
We'll be right back with go right News dot com, Go.
Speaker 1 (03:55):
Right Go right News with Peter Boykin. We're making moves
in liberty, always on the rise. Tune into the truth
and open your eyes. M