Grace Watcher Report - The Truth about Easter that You Will Not Hear in Church

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is an Easter message to listeners of the show,
and for those of you who are also not listeners
of the show but happen to stumble across this on
YouTube or x or anywhere else it is posted. This
will be a short segment, but a powerful one, I believe.

(00:20):
I want to start by saying that I am not
a religious person, nor am I a spiritual person, nor
am I a Satanist. I abhor Satanism. I believe that
Jesus Christ did come in the flesh. But Jesus Christ,

(00:41):
of course is a form of consciousness, and my soul
and my spirit, your soul and your spirit, that is
Jesus Christ. And it is in the flesh which is
crucified to the cross of tariality, of matter, which is

(01:03):
of course the human spine and the outstretched body, the
arms and the legs, and the head is the of
course fifth point being the spirit that rises from the
four corners of the grave or the earth or the sarcophagus, etc.
And it reunites with God above in heaven. So I

(01:27):
believe in Jesus Christ as a title. I believe Jesus
Christ is an identity that could be applied to all
of us in recognizing our choose the word divinity perhaps,
or choose the word spiritual nature. I say I'm not
a spiritual person. I'm not a religious person, because I

(01:49):
tend to find repulsion with these types of labels, especially
because if we have such a label without a clear definition,
then we can just make these assumptions about somebody because
they have like an R or a D next to
their name, Republican or Democrat. Because they have a C

(02:11):
next to their name, they're a Christian. Because they have
a J next to their name, they're a Jew, or
because they have an M next to their name so
they're a Muslim, or even Buddhists they have a B,
so they're a Buddhist. And pretty much anything outside of
that grouping is usually met with frustration, anger, even violence

(02:36):
by very religious individuals, So I don't like to put
myself into that category. I would say the most aggressively
denied belief systems or views would certainly be Hinduism and
anything that would be considered closer to nature in the

(02:59):
sin of I guess you could say paganism. I don't
think that's the correct word, because paganism means the religion
of the country people, and so it is something that
is not institutionalized. And throughout much of the ancient world,
especially during the time and throughout the Roman Empire, paganism

(03:20):
was not really the religion of the people, because paganism
as we define it today was actually institutionalized. So it's
really the Christian cult. And I don't mean that in
a negative way, but the Christian cult that came into Rome,
and in more ways than one, kind of ransacted the
place and might even be responsible for the burning of

(03:44):
Rome under Nero and the destruction of the Pagan temples.
I don't think the Pagans or Nero would have had
a reason to do that. I think it makes more
sense the Christians would have been responsible for that. And
of course Christianity is adopted just shortly before the Western
Roman Empire completely collapses and falls, at least historically officially.

(04:05):
It's a long drawn up process. It wasn't a day
at a certain time, a certain date. But I say
all of that because I want you to understand where
I'm coming from before I present to you what I
have to present here to you. It's also quite common
in the Western world to take anything that is Eastern

(04:30):
and either romanticize it like Buddhists are perfect and they levitate,
or to demean it as pagan, which, yeah, sure, Christianity
is not pagan now, but it used to be a
pagan religion, and I don't mean because of it taking
elements or components from various other belief systems, practices, observations,

(04:51):
et cetera. Obviously, the Christian Holy Days are based on
the quote pagan holidays or holy days, which are really
just the op of nature, and the definition of that
would be science. Science is an observation of nature. So
really paganism is a scientific endeavor, a scientific process, if
we're actually using the definitions of words, which I think

(05:15):
is quite important to do. We know that gods like atis.
We know that gods all around the world, goddesses sometimes
am Atetasu here in Japan, go into a cave for
three days and are resurrected. We know that the central
pillar or the central figure within most of these cults

(05:38):
is of course the tree or the spine or the
axis moondy by which all things rotate and revolve. It
is the central pillar of faith, the central pillar of
the blood, or the blessings that are poured out from
the wound of Christ. It's the universal fountain motif be

(06:00):
find throughout the world, the water, the blood, whatever it
is that rains down and gives us blessing. And that
blessing comes in the form of a pomegranate, It comes
in the form of an apple, It comes in the
form of washing us clean of our sins, comes in
the form of flowers, and many other things, depending on
what myth you look at. So yeah, Christianity, of course
took from Methrism, Persian religion of Methrism, which is now

(06:24):
modern Iran. And yes, Islam is the dominant religion in
that region of the world today, and Islam has a
lot in common with Christianity. And yet Islam is considered
to be this kind of hedonistic pagan religion or something
like this. This is how Christians tend to portray it.
They all have sex with animals, even though if you

(06:45):
read the discussions of the rabbis in the various Talmudic writings,
you'll learn that many of the rabbis actually accuse all gentiles,
all gentile women in particular, of having intercourse with animals.
It's not really a Muslim thing. It's a thing that

(07:05):
gentiles were accused of by those who sat on the
rabbinical high chair Sanhedrin. And I don't think that it's
necessary to get into all of those details, although I
do have pictures from the Talmude where I could pull

(07:26):
this up and I could show you if you are
interested in seeing that. So let's take all of that
into consideration. Right, that's the that's the baseline here, and
now this is my Easter message. I want to show
this to you on the screen. If you're just listening.

(07:49):
This is a free video. You can watch either on
our website at tstradio dot info the links are below,
or on YouTube or on x So let me show
you what I have on my screen here. Okay, people
like artificial intelligence. I don't, but people like AI. So

(08:11):
we can just ask GROC what is Easter. And Easter,
of course is defined. You probably don't need to look
at GROC, but we can ask GROC because people love AI.
It's the story of the arrest and the crucifixion and
the resurrection of Jesus. It's from Palm Sunday, Holy Monday,
to Good Friday and to the resurrection another again, universal motif,

(08:38):
and there are differences in the story even in the Bible.
For example, the story of Judas what happened to Judas,
the Book of Matthew and the Book of Acts tell
two different stories, completely different stories. I'm not going to
spend time looking at that because I don't think it's

(08:58):
necessary for this East message. But the Book of Matthew
in the Book of Acts tell totally different stories as
for what happened to Judas. So this is Easter. We
know what Easter is. Probably some of us don't. Maybe
we just like the Easter eggs and we like the candy,
and we like the rabbits. And Okay, I'm not here

(09:20):
to make you feel bad for celebrating Easter. I'm not
here to make people feel bad for having their beliefs.
I'm not here to convert you to my beliefs because,
as I've explained, I don't have any as it pertains
to this outside of the fact that I'm obsessive about
symbolism and looking at those kinds of details. And so

(09:41):
that's what we're going to do here. So that's the
Easter story. And we could also ask ROC. We don't
need to ask ROC. But again, people love artificial intelligence.
We could ask roc a really important question with the
right kind of terminology, and that question would be that
did Jewish people play a role or did Jews play

(10:03):
a role in the arrest and death of Jesus Christ
in the biblical story. We know that this is true.
In fact, passion plays have been used for centuries to
incite anger or even violenced against Jewish communities. There's a
great episode of South Park about that Christians have accused

(10:25):
Jews of this for centuries because it's true. In part,
it doesn't mean every Jewish person, but of course Jewish
communities and Jewish leaders did conspire to have Jesus removed
from the public eye. Whether you're reading Matthew, Mark Luke,

(10:46):
or John Jewish authorities, the Sanhedrin, they got together and
played a significant role in the arrest of Jesus Christ
or Jesus or whatever his name actually was. It probably
wasn't Jesus and it probably wasn't Christ because it's a title.
But nonetheless, if you read these books of the Bible,

(11:08):
which I have, although I'm not a Christian, but if
you read these books the Bible, you will find contradictions,
but you will find an underlying theme. It was an
exclusively Jewish authorities, but that was the primary sect who
were directly responsible for the arrest and the crucifixion of
Jesus Christ. In fact, Judas himself was Jewish, and Judas

(11:35):
is who sold the Savior out. And there's some irony
to that, as you'll see here in a moment. And
this video won't be much longer. This audio won't be
much longer. This is just a short segment, but you'll
see the irony very quickly to why that is. And
of course, depending on what story or what account you read,

(11:57):
it is largely the Jewish community or the Jewish crowd
that demands the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. And of course
Ponscious Pilot washes his hands of it and says, I
don't want anything to do with it. And you'll find
if you read about the Roman Empire, if you read

(12:19):
the most authoritative work ever written about Rome, arguably the
most Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,
you'll find that the Romans were actually really accepting, like
shockingly accepting, of most religions, and the only reason that
they had an issue with Jews or with Christians is
because these communities of people, both Jews and Christians did

(12:43):
not like that people disagreed with them or did not
like that people were not part of their little group.
The Jews, of course, refused to allow anybody into their communities,
and because of their customs and practices, they were seen
as very foreign and alien in all lands. And the Christians,
who were derived from Judaism, took many of the Jewish

(13:07):
ideas and just kind of tweaked them. Instead of bathing
in blood, for example, they bathed in water as part
of their baptismal ritual, and instead of sucking the blood
from a child's penis, they might have just you know,
circumcised it later. But the Christians said, hey, everybody can
be saved. The Jews said only Jews can be saved.

(13:29):
The Christian said everybody can be saved. The jew said,
nobody can be saved except us. Nobody can be a
part of this. It's just ours. Everybody else is on
the outside. The Christians said, hey, everybody can come into
this and you can be saved. So that Christians changed things,
and the Jews said, well, if you're not part of this,
you should die. And the Christians said, well, at first

(13:53):
they said everybody's welcome, which brought in criminals and thieves
who could just be absolved of their sins. And then
Christianity was largely a group of criminals and of course
communists how they give everything to the church to be
a part of it. That changed, of course, and yes
there were reformations later, several of them. But the Christians said, okay, well,
now if you don't believe us that you can be saved,

(14:14):
even though you're not in this Jewish cult, then we
will also kill you. So Christians basically adopted the Jewish
line and became as aggressive. And of course these are
the reasons why the Romans were very, very angry, because
they just kind of wanted peace within the context of
religious beliefs, which were widely accepted all throughout the Empire

(14:37):
for the most part, also depending on what time period
we're speaking of, but generally speaking throughout Roman history. So
a mob of largely Jewish people, they said, Jesus, crucify him,
crucify him, crucify him. We don't know exactly what they said,
we can imagine something to that effect if we read

(15:00):
the gospels. Now, of course, not all Jews, not all
of them, not all of the jewsky, it's not all
or nothing, just like not all the Christians, are not
all the Buddhists, or not all the Muslims, or not
all of this or that, of course not. But it
is true that largely Jewish people were responsible for the
death of Jesus Christ. That is just a fact. It's

(15:21):
a fact of history. I believe Jesus was a real person,
whatever that person is, he's also a character, and he's
also an archetype. But I also you know, I've read
the Bible as a pseudohistorical text, and even from a
pseudohistorical point of view, again, Jewish people are responsible for

(15:43):
the death of Jesus. And you can actually understand why
the Jews might have thought that or believe that Jesus
was doing something offensive because he's claiming to be these things,
or it's being attributed to him that he's these things
that are considered blasphemous to the Jews. That's not true.

(16:04):
He's not the son of God. It's a blasphemous thing
to say. I actually understand where the Jews are coming
from it. If you were to say I am the
son of God and tell people that today you'd sound
crazy and people would find that blasphemous. But you have
to understand for the time period that was considered blasphemous
not only to pagan communities, it was considered blasphemous to

(16:26):
the Jews, where the Christians came and were derived from
came from. So I actually understand it is considered quite
blasphemous that Jesus, if that is the story, was portrayed
as the son of God literally now figuratively, Yes, we
are all a son of God, as a soul, as
a spirit, and we come in the flesh. God comes

(16:48):
in the flesh, which is our physical body. So yes,
Jesus came in the flesh, and we're all crucified in
like manner. There's also the history of the fact that
certain religious crimesarticularly Christian religious crimes, in the early days
of the integration of Christianity into Rome, were rarely ever

(17:09):
by any magistrate treated as if they were a hangable
or crucifiable offense. In fact, a lot of the times
the magistrates said, we just want peace, take a look
at the pagan altar, put an instant stick on it.
We'll let you go and the Christian said, no, I
want to be slaughtered for Jesus, and they aggressively pursued
that end, to become martyrs because it benefited them in

(17:31):
the same way that pretty much any group of people
do those kinds of things because it benefits them and
their cause, whatever that cause is or whatever that benefit is. Okay,
So we know that this is a factual thing. It
is a pseudohistorical thing as well as a historical thing.
It's a spiritual thing. This is a fact. Jews were
part of the conspiracy to arrest and to crucify Jesus Christ.

(17:58):
Now here's the problem. Under the US Department of States
definition of anti Semitism. You can see this on your screen.
They use the definition from the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance
the ih R, a which the US is a member of.

(18:19):
It's a non legally binding working definition of anti Semitism,
but it is nonetheless a definition of anti simitism. They
have to have some definition. We don't have a definition
of racism, but we have a definition of anti Semitism.
It's anything the IHR or the IHRA sets, okay, And
we have confirmation of that, not just from the State Department.

(18:40):
This is their website. We also have that from the
embassy website the US Embassy in Israel, the International Holocost
Remembrance Alliance Working Definition of Anti Semitism. And you can
read that there on your screen, or you can go
look it up or click the links below in the
video I'll have if they're not up all already, i'll
have them up here in a little bit. Okay, So

(19:04):
there there's the definition a and this is not like
an old story or a new it's a long standing agreement.
Here is a notice in twenty twenty two about this.
This is through Republican and Democrat administrations. So what is

(19:26):
the working definition of anti Semitism as per the IHRA? Well,
among so many other things, here's one of them using
the symbols and images associated with classic anti Semitism, that
is to say, claiming that Jews killed Jesus or blood libel.

(19:46):
Now you already know that what we just discussed by
this definition would be considered claiming that Jesus was killed
by Jews. I can also show you that the New
York City Health Department website has an entire section on

(20:08):
how to properly give what is referred to as direct
oral suctioning the safe briss there's how you pronounce it,
direct oral sectioning. When a baby is circumcised, some ritual

(20:29):
Jewish circumcisers will Helium do a practice called metsitsa and
I don't speak the language, so make fun of me,
but it's still true. It's the play, the part where
the mole uses their mouth to suck blood away from
the baby's circumcision when it is part of the circumcision ritual.
Look at that. So to point that out would also
be considered blood libel, and to point out what the

(20:52):
Bible says would be considered anti semitic. Now Here is
the Department of Homelands Charity screening the social media accounts
of aliens and immigrants to determine if their activity is
anti Semitic. And this is a story from April nineth,
twenty twenty five. Here's the Department of Justice announcing a

(21:13):
task force to combat anti Semitism. This is February third,
two thousand and twenty five. This is for college campuses
to make sure that nobody is saying what a foreign
country would prefer not be said, even if that means
violating your most basic fundamental First Amendment rights. And although

(21:36):
this is not a law, HR sixty ninety is the
Anti Semitism Aware Act, and it essentially would criminalize exactly
what the IHR says. Claiming that Jews kill Jesus by
you know, reading the Bible would be considered an act
of anti Semitism. Now, the definition of a Semite is

(21:58):
a member of any people who speak or spoke a
Semitic language. This includes Jews and Arabs, meaning that Muslims
are also Semites. Now we're not going to go into
a long history of that, but it is important to
point that little detail out for context, because the definition
of things are important. Instead of using that definition, the

(22:21):
IHR has its own definition, which includes pretty much any
of these things that you see on your screen accusing
Jews of wrongdoing, even if it's true. Basically, anything that
Jews consider offensive to themselves, even if you're pointing out
crimes they've committed, then that is anti Semitism. Including the

(22:48):
story of the arrest of the traitor, of the crucifixion,
and of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. That's what you get.
And sadly, there are plenty of people who told you.

(23:12):
So on my show The Secret Teachings, I've been pointing
this out for damn near a year. Now. This is
where we are. This is what the current administration is doing,
criminalizing not just your right to speak and to protest.

(23:32):
And now I'm not talking about acts of violence and
calls for death. I'm talking about your right to protest peacefully,
your right to speak and engage in discourse, your right
to access public forums and have conversations, and hell, your
right to post mainline news articles for that matter, to

(23:54):
talk about anything that's on that list or associated with
that list that is considered anti semitic, and by definition
of the term and the way it's being employed, is
going to prevent people from maintaining their Green card status

(24:17):
or their visa status, or obtaining a visa at all.
And if that is the only crime they've committed, quoting
the Bible, let's say, or opposing a foreign government, let's say,
what makes you think that doesn't apply to you as

(24:40):
well as an American citizen. So if I were to
show you this on the screen, and I'm not sure
if the Chicago Tribune wants me to show you because
they put up this little paywall, but if I try
to stop the Yeah, the paywall came back up. This
is an article here from the Chicago Tribune fixing the

(25:01):
numbers at Alschwitz, where they talk about how Polish and
Jewish scholars have reassessed the numbers and have found that
now the numbers are closer to a fraction of how
many people reportedly originally four million died at Auschwitz, the
number was closer to like one point five and that

(25:25):
included others, not just Jews. To point out that fact,
and to point out a Chicago Tribune article would be
under the political administration and power in the United States
right now, that would be an act of anti Semitism.
And if that definition can be used to prevent someone
from obtaining a visa, or someone loses a visa, or

(25:49):
someone cannot get a green card or they have the
green card torn up, it'll apply to American citizens as well.
So that's what she voted for, and if you vote
for the other side, it would have also happened. Because
there's clearly some sort of parasitic, anti Republican, anti human
force at play here that is both material and non material,

(26:11):
and it really despises Jesus, and it really despises consciousness,
and it really despises life and particularly children and especially women.
Look at Weimar, Germany. That gives you kind of an
idea of what this evil forces that we're dealing with.

(26:32):
It's again material and non material. There is a war
between good and evil. And I need to say this
as I wind down this segment. You don't have to
be a Christian to see this. You don't and you

(26:52):
don't have to be a Satanist if you're not a Christian,
because that's stupid and I'm not. But it is very
obvious when you look at the evidence what we're dealing
with here. While we're running around screaming about America two

(27:12):
point zero and we're winning, I'm not many other people are.
They have criminalized the Bible, they've criminalized the First Amendment,
and they have criminalized Easter. So happy Easter. Maybe that's
anti semitic to say. Am I allowed to say that?

(27:33):
I don't know. You think I'm being hyperbolic? You think
this is sensationalism. No, it's just objective reality. Thank you
for watching and listening to this. The majority