PART II – Unmasking the Scholarly Bias: Why Did Rogan & Huff Mention Mormons 10 Times?

​ @joerogan  and  @WesHuff  had a lot to say about Mormons in their recent conversation—but how much of it was actually true? Spoiler: To borrow a phrase from Huff, "It was rough." In this video, I break down their claims, expose the inaccuracies, and fact-check the so-called "scholarship" behind Huff’s takes. This episode explores themes like the complete Biblical silence on the resurrected ministry, the ability to recognize ancient disruptions of established conventions but not modern ones, and the irony of admitting we cannot comprehend eternity while dismissing prophetic teachings about it. Once again, we see a "scholar" confidently getting it wrong—over and over. Let’s dive into the details and set the record straight.

👇 Watch now and let me know in the comments: Did Rogan and Huff get anything right? Why do scholars of all ages go sideways when it comes to revelation? Subscribe & hit the bell so you don’t miss future discussions!

💬 What’s your take on the debate? Drop a comment below! 

YOUTUBE:https://youtu.be/YSypS6lSFPE

🔹 Substack: 30 Fruits of the LDS Church That No Others Can Beat https://open.substack.com/pub/halestorm/p/data-backed-evidence-of-fruit-in?r=a4hxv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

🎧 Prefer audio?
🔹 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6wmtsNQCl0ToLeSkt6j4hs?si=439a1219b7924c9a 🔹 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/halestorm/id1438201012
📲 Follow me on: YouTube only. I am not on social media.