Door Dasher Done Goofed, MarryLisa.com | HBR News 527

Welcome to HBR News where we give the badger treatment to the news of the week! This week we will be looking at mankeeping, California woman gets desperate, Scottish eugenics, and more!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:04):
This is HBr News number five twenty seven Nordon asher
Brook done goofed Marylisa dot com, where we discussed the
news of the week and give it the Badger Treasure.
Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. Hope you
guys are doing well this week and that you're laughing
at all of the absurdity so that you are not

(00:24):
consumed by it. I am your host, Brian. I am
joined by doctor Randamercam. Hannah is trying to get in.
She'll be in. I'm pretty sure she'll figure it out,
but I had to get the show started, so as
soon as she gets in, I'll give her a voice.
As you know, we men, we like to control women's voices.
So we have a great show line up for you

(00:44):
guys today, So please be sure to continue the conversations
both in the chat as well as the comments section,
and please try to smash that like button so that
we can maybe reach more people. It's always helpful to
get a like button smashed because, like the YouTube algorithm,
dark lords may allow us to slip through the cracks

(01:06):
if you do that. So on today's HBI News show,
we're going to be looking at mankeeping because it is
something that we talked about a while ago, and it
looks like the rest of the world is catching up,
or at least some people in the red pill space
are A California woman gets desperate and tries marketing herself

(01:27):
Scottish eugenics. No, I'm not kidding, and more so, stick around,
it's going to be a good time and be sure
to join us afterwards for the Patron Only Show. So
the Patron Only Show, we got this article from I
don't remember the website, but it doesn't really matter. It's
some rag, but it's a big one. It's like Washington

(01:48):
Post or New York New York or New York Times
or something like that. And apparently the Department, the US
Department of Labor, is putting out a social media campaign
to try to get like know men back in the workforce.
And well it's a problem because apparently there's too many
white men in the imagery. They're using like a retro
sort of style and it's probably all AI generated. But

(02:12):
that that doesn't really matter because it upset the right people.
So it says here the Labor delevent ah, I see
what you did there?

Speaker 2 (02:22):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (02:22):
The Labor Department social media campaign depicts a white male workforce.
The campaign has drawn scrutiny, with critics saying the agency
is not realistically portraying the diversity of the country and
is setting messages that feel exclusionary. Yes, that happens.

Speaker 2 (02:36):
This is gonna pick your cotton and your vegetables. As
I said, what the problem.

Speaker 1 (02:40):
Is, Yeah, right, who's gonna these are the guys that
are gonna mow your lawns and uh, you know, watch
your kids where you're at work or something. So we're
gonna be reading through this article in the Patron Show.
And if you guys want to join us, you have
to become a member by going to feed the Badger
dot com forward slash subscribe five bucks a month. They're
gonna get you into Discord where you will be able

(03:03):
to watch all of the additional content, like all of
our Patron shows and works in progress. And there's also
lots of community things that are going on, like movie
nights and game nights and such. I think they usually
do game nights today or tonight. They play Cards against
Humanity for example, Still Going Strong and uh yeah, so
like please consider if you just want to check it

(03:24):
out for free, you can just go to Badger Nations
dot online. You'll get access to some of the like
the public parts of the discord and uh yeah, come
check us out there. And if you don't want to
wake up one morning to find that we've been yeaded
from the Internet, then go to where our archive content
is at, which is badgerfeed dot com or Honey Badger
Radio dot com. And also follow us on Rumble because

(03:45):
I don't think Rumble's gonna be getting like yeading us
from the internet, so our content will continue to go
up there and we would really appreciate it. So let
me just do a quick well up there goes Hannah.
She's here sell you things. Yes, yes we can. Let
me just give you a voice because the audience can't yet,
so I'm just gonna plug you in. Uh, here we

(04:09):
go because you can only speak because I allow it. Okay,
there we go. All right, yeah you're here. Okay, So
with that said it, yes exactly, Uh that said, let
us get into today's stories. So first off, we gotta
follow up Allison and I covered it, but I figured
you guys would want to get a swing at this

(04:29):
topic as well. Yes, uh yeah, So I don't think it.
See that's the thing. Like also like well we already did.
It's like yeah, but they they're they got words, they
got words for this, and we gotta let them have it.
And and so we're just gonna we're gonna revisit this
because it's awesome. So in October of twenty twenty five,
Olivia Henderson, also known on I Guess TikTok as Lee

(04:53):
liv Rose Henderson Uh, the twenty three year old door
dash delivery driver in Oswego, New York, went viral on
TikTok after posting a video claiming she was sexually assaulted
during a contactless food delivery on October twelfth. She alleged
that the customer had deliberately left his door open and
was passed out on his couch with his pants down,

(05:14):
exposing himself as she approached. Henderson recorded the scene from
inside the home and shared the footage online, accusing the
man of intentional exposure. The video sparked widespread debate about
gigworker safety, with many initially supporting her, while DoorDash quickly
deactivated her account, stating it was due to a privacy
violation for filming and posting inside a customer's home without consent,

(05:35):
not for reporting the incident. Following the investigation, Oswego Police
found that basically they have arrested her, arrested and charged
with two class E felonies, second degree unlawful surveillance and
first degree dissemination of an unlawful surveillance image. So they

(05:57):
found no evidence of criminal intent or sexual assault on
the part of the customer who was intoxicated and unconscious
inside of his own private residence. Okay, so these these
are under New York law. Each carries potential penalties of
a four years in prison. Authority cited her entering the

(06:20):
home beyond what was necessary for a contact was drop
off literally just leave it at the door, I know,
because people will get DoorDash all the time around here
and that's what they do, uh, to record and then
publicly sharing the video. She was released with an appearance
ticket and is scheduled to appear in Oswego City Court
on December fourth, twenty twenty five. The customer faced no charges,

(06:42):
but both parties were banned from door dash like as
as clients and yeah, so uh this has there are
still people supporting her thinking that she's the victim here
but this is what this is what happened. Close up?

Speaker 2 (06:59):
Good lord, look at the state of that.

Speaker 1 (07:01):
Yeah, I know that's I figured this is a good
a good face.

Speaker 2 (07:04):
All right, So yeah, I was. I was pretty fuming
last time we talked about this, not not just because
it's highly unprofessional conduct for a delivery person, but because
it's yet another example of a woman somehow painting herself
as the victim of her own predatory behavior. Frankly, but

(07:28):
anger does subside when justice is done, and I really
wasn't expecting quite so much justice. I didn't even think
she'd get like one misdemeanor, let alone two felonies. It
almost seems a bit overboard, But whatever, I didn't know
those were felonies. That's just that's just my ignorance. I'm

(07:51):
guessing she didn't either, But ignorance of the law is
no defense against it. And to be fair, what she
did was pretty fucked up, especially when you scan it
for men's rear, which is a legal term meaning mind
with guilty mind guilty mind. And now that I've seen

(08:14):
the footage of the incident and the last I have,
it has cleared a few things up. Yes, the door
was wide open, and you could see from the doorstep,
albeit at an angle or rather cute angle, that there
was a person lying on a sofa, But he clearly
wasn't moving or looking up from his reclined state, and

(08:40):
at a glance, it wasn't at all apparent that what
he was wearing or not wearing, unless you go out
of your way to examine the scene. And that's what
she did. She very much examined the scene. She called
it sexual assault, and only a deluded feminist darv artists

(09:01):
could possibly call that a sexual assault. The remaining question
is was it indecent exposure? And I'd give it a
fairly confident no, and it seems like the law agrees.
But did she even act like it was indecent exposure?
How do people normally react when they become the victim

(09:25):
of indecent exposure? I mean, you'd probably scream and run
right or at least you'd make some kind of startled
noise and then walk away pretty fucking quickly. If she
had made a startled noise, it probably would have woken
him up, as you can see by the footage if
you have seen it. What she did was quietly take

(09:48):
her phone out film the scene for several seconds, even
zoomed in on the centerpiece of the scene, and it
was an optical zoom. And then she walked away down
the driveway, still recording. She held the phone up to
her face and nonchalantly said, that's worked up. She did

(10:11):
the meme, folks. What about how when men want to
show you a picture of something, they show you the thing,
But when women want to show you a picture of something,
they show you the thing with her face in front
of it. And that's what she posted on the internet.
She couldn't help herself. It would still be a double

(10:34):
felony with or without her face, but this self insertion
of her face gives a reasonably clear indication of her motive.
She wanted to be famous. She wasn't filming evidence of
a crime so she could show it to the police
or even to dow Dash. She was filming an episode

(10:55):
of the Livvy Rose Henderson Show. She could display it
to the whole world for clout for entertainment points and
indy for victim points. Those two kinds of points are
one and the same in the fucked up mind of
a feminist. Of course, ironically enough, the filming was itself

(11:18):
the crime, and the insertion of her face only proved
bang to rights that she was the criminal. She went
ahead and shot herself in the face figuratively and kind
of literally. So all in all, it's kind of hilarious.

(11:40):
I can't stay mad mad as someone who does something
as hilarious as that. She deserves applause. If anything, it's
the greatest self phone of the year, and she did
it with a self phone. It almost makes you wonder
if that's why they're called cell phones. You just love
it when a plan comes together, a cell phone plan.

(12:04):
I'm just milking out at this point. Yeah, yeah, rotten
Jelly's stupid, bitch, fucking deserve and so on.

Speaker 3 (12:11):
Yeah. I I only have one one caveat to to
add to to that in terms of agreeing with you know,
the description of what she did, because the video does
not contain evidence that the door was open before she
interacted with it. This is something that you have to understand.

(12:34):
We don't know still that she walked up and found
a door a jar enough for her to not be
able to avoid seeing, right, we don't. We don't know
in fact, that it was even a jar at all.

Speaker 1 (12:54):
Actually we do, we do, Actually know that she there.
She basically re up loaded the video editing out the
part where she pushes the door open, and there's actually
like a screenshot of that.

Speaker 2 (13:09):
She didn't add out the part where she put her
face in at the end of it.

Speaker 3 (13:12):
Fuck yeah, but that's not what's important. I mean, that's
the funny part. But the important thing is this, all right,
according to the law, if you have been told not
to interact with someone's property, right you've been told drop
the thing off on the porch and leave, Entering the

(13:34):
property is trespassing. So anything she did after that is
on her, not on him. So she if she pushed
the door open, which in you know, the video shows
that she did, and there's no evidence that she could
see in there prior to doing that, that she could

(13:57):
have been exposed to anything prior to making it possible
for herself to see in there, and her pushing that
door open is a huge part of what makes this
a crime. If that had been a female on the couch,
even if she was completely buck naked, the bare ass

(14:21):
bear tits everything. The fact that the guy entered her
place without her permission would have gotten him arrested. Everybody
would be arguing that it was his fault. Nobody would
be arguing that he was a victim of sexual assault,

(14:44):
much less any kind of harassment or any other inappropriate behavior.
Nobody would be mistaking this for anything other than a
crime of voyeurism, which is what she did. She committed voyeurism,
and then she compounded it, and if her state has

(15:04):
revenge porn laws, she's really in deep chick. She compounded
it by publishing a nude image of a person against
their will. Now, voyeurism has been illegal for generations, so
it's not something like, you know, you can't really blame

(15:25):
voyeurism laws on feminists, right, but revenge porn laws you can,
because they're the ones who advocated to get those laws passed.
That if you are in possession, even of nudes that
somebody gave you, and you put those on the internet
against the will of the individual who gave them to you,

(15:48):
that that is a crime and it's considered a felony
and you can go to jail for that. They knocked
down several revenge porn sites, and I'm not saying they're
any objection to that, but I did say when that
passed that, you know, the first state that passed that.
My my response was that this is going to come

(16:09):
back to bite feminists in the ass, and here is
where it did. She's going to go probably to jail
for both entering this individual's home after he told her
not to, He explicitly told her not to, and then
also if her state, if their state has revenge porn laws,

(16:35):
she's going to go to jail for that. So I
don't feel bad for her. What she did was predatory.
She exploited a passed out, drunk naked man for clicks,
and she publicly humiliated him for clicks. And no man
would get away with doing that to any woman, And

(16:58):
you know, rightfully, so nobody should have that done to them.
But yeah, I've been arguing with somebody on x recently
that keeps wanting to portray this as her as the
victim of this. This woman has psychoized. This wasn't fear,
She wasn't afraid of this guy. She wasn't victimized by

(17:20):
this guy. He didn't pose anything on her. This was
a person who saw an opportunity to exploit a past out,
drunk naked man for clicks on the internet, took it
and is now regretting her choices, and that's it. That's
all that is. More power to the state in this

(17:42):
instance because they did the right thing. You know, it's
just one time you'll hear me say more power to
the state in any instance. Women need to know, you know,
being a woman doesn't mean that you can do this,
and it doesn't make you a victim when you prey
on someone else. This is the same praying sexually on

(18:05):
someone for clicks, which is sexual pleasure in its own right.
For for this chick, like she's she's getting her ego
fed by doing this. Isn't really any different than sexually
praying on someone so you can masturbate. To the photos,

(18:26):
she's masturbating her ego instead of her genitals. Big whoop.
It's the same thing, and she deserves exactly what she's getting.

Speaker 1 (18:37):
All right, sounds good to me, So yeah, again, this
is good news.

Speaker 2 (18:43):
Maybe we'll call back in like in a few months
when we've got the results of her trial. Yeah, because
she was found not guilty on both charges.

Speaker 1 (18:55):
I hope that she's going to be appearing on court
in December fourth, so we'll probably find something by that time.
Unless you know, these things take time. They might be
multiple hearings, but we'll definitely follow when we know more.
So let us know what you guys think about this
one in the comments. We're going to move on to
the next story. So on November fourteenth, and I found

(19:18):
this out the other day and I thought it was crazy.
An independent expert group chaired by Professor Anna Gasler, Scotland's
Women's Health Champion, published a report commissioned by the Scottish
government recommending sweeping reforms to abortion laws. The key proposals
include fully decriminalizing abortion for women, removing all criminal penalties

(19:39):
for self managed terminations, allowing abortion abortion on request for
up to twenty four weeks without needing any specified grounds
or approval from two doctors, and regulating the procedure purely
as healthcare rather than under the nineteen sixty seven Abortion Act.
The group explicitly advised that any new legislation should not

(20:00):
include a specific prohibition on sex selective abortion, arguing there
is nope, there is no robust evidence of it occurring
in Scotland, that such a band would be unworkable, requiring
intrusive questioning of all women or racial profiling of certain
ethnic communities, and that it could deter access to care.
The recommendation sparked immediate controversy, with politicians, pro life groups

(20:24):
and some media outlets accusing the SNP led government of
paving the way to legalize sex selective abortions, a practice
currently unlawful under interpretations of existing UK law as fetal
sex is not a valid ground. Critics called it morally
repugnant and dystopian, warning that it disproportionately affects female fetuses,

(20:46):
So sex selective abortion exists, female fetuses most affected, or
at least they're proposing sex specific abortion, so if you
find out you have a boy you didn't want a boy,
you can abort the boy, for example. The expert panel
and supporters rejected these claims as misleading, emphasizing the focus

(21:07):
on decriminalization and women's autonomy, not endorsement of sex selection.
The Scottish government, via Minister Jenny Minto, stated it is
only the first stage of review, will gather further evidence
and stakeholder views, and has made no decisions on implementing
any changes. Sex selective abortion remains illegal under current law

(21:28):
and no bill has been proposed, so this is just
like tabling an idea from the let me just go
back and get this person's name again, Professor Anna Glazier,
Scotland's women's health champion. Apparently it's just like some kind
of warrior, I don't know, bring forth your champion of
women's health. But yeah, she's the ones proposal she won

(21:54):
two cun center or one cunt leaves. So anyway, so yeah,
what are you there? There? You go, there's there's there's.

Speaker 2 (22:04):
Been outraged from both sides, well from many sides, but
as you already heard what the outrage sounds like from
the feminist side, this is going to allow people to
kill female babies. I mean abot female babies, I mean
abought female not babies yet, I mean abought birth giving,

(22:30):
not babies yet, not babies yet who were assigned female
at birth, I mean before birth. It's it's a wonder
they can discuss this ship at all when every aspect
of it is something they have to twist into this
euphemistic spaghetti. And when they're quite finished with all that ship,
you have to ask them, but who would do that?

(22:53):
In what kind of culture would people make a habit
of killing female babies, like specifically female babies, And that
sends them into another tailspin of cognitive dissonance, because the
only option in their playbook is to blame everything on
white men, and white men don't do that. Men in

(23:13):
general don't do that unless you count the doctors. But
even they don't have the power to elect such elective procedures.
They can't blame it on religious people either, because religious
people generally aren't allowed to do it to any fetus.

(23:34):
At the very least, they heavily frown upon it. They're
thinking of China, aren't they. That's the stereotype they're thinking of,
and it stops them in their tracks because they haven't
done all that much thinking about it. There used to
be a one child policy in China, and at the time,
daughters were not legally obliged to financially support their families

(23:57):
like sons were. You know, Chinese mothers got into the
habit of drowning their baby daughters and it was the mothers.
But hey, when you remind people that men are raped
more often than women are, when you include prison statistics,
you're invariably told, yeah, but those men don't count as

(24:21):
victims because they're raped by other men. Okay, okay, doki.
Then females don't count as victims when they're killed by
other females. Wamp WANMP, no harm done, not my fucking problem, right,
And to reiterate, every elective abortion in this country is
ultimately an unilaterally, unilaterally elected for by women. The Scottish

(24:47):
government report we're talking about has been conducted by largely
women and chaired by a woman, So any females who
fall afoul of it do not count as victims.

Speaker 1 (25:00):
Do I have that right?

Speaker 2 (25:02):
Is that accurate? In any case? It's all by the bye,
by the way, all of this is a formality because
we appear to be pretending that it wasn't always perfectly
possible for a woman to abort her baby because of
its sex. For as long as abortion has been legal,

(25:24):
a woman can choose to abort her baby for any
reason or for no reason. The vast majority of abortions
fall into that category. Not rape, not incest, not the
health of the mother, not the health of the child,
but simply because she wants an abortion. She doesn't need
a reason, and she doesn't have to give one, and

(25:46):
she can get this abortion up to twenty four weeks
what's it, And the baby's sex can be determined at
sixteen weeks by ultrasound, as early as six weeks by
blood test. So there is already nothing stopping a woman
from finding out the sex of her baby and then

(26:10):
aborting it because it's not the sex she wanted. She
doesn't have to tell the doctor that that's why she
wants it aborted. She can just say because I say so,
and that's enough. She can keep her secrets to herself.
So we already know that this can happen. We have

(26:33):
no idea how much it does happen. What do you
suppose we can suppose about how often it happens to
male babies? Bear in mind, this isn't China under the
one Child policy, it's Scotland after a hundred years of
demonic feminist death spiraling. A good fellow friend of the

(26:57):
show did a video about this story of days ago,
and he did a quick but extensive Twitter search for
a certain key phrase that comes up quite a lot.
Does anyone know the keyphrase we're talking about?

Speaker 3 (27:12):
Is that women saying is it a girl? Or an abortion?

Speaker 2 (27:15):
A girl? Or many times yeah yeah. It's something pregnant
women like to chant when they're about to get their
clinical gender reveal. Am I about to have a girl
or an abortion. Now, maybe they're joking. Maybe most of
them are joking. Maybe one hundred percent of them.

Speaker 1 (27:33):
Are just joking.

Speaker 2 (27:35):
What do we suppose are the chances that one hundred
percent of them are just joking given the aforementioned century
of bloodthirsty feminist insanity. So don't give me this shit
that this is going to cause people to kill female babies.
All it's going to do is provide further justification for

(27:59):
the male baby is they're already killing. The only thing
I'm emergently worried about is whatever clause is indicated by
this phrase? What was it? Removing all criminal penalties for
self managed terminations self managed term terminations? Does that mean

(28:23):
what I think it means? Unless I've got the wrong
end of the stick here, that does seem to be
a significant change to the law, not just by the
spirit but by the letter. Someone please correct me if
I'm wrong. But does that mean the coat hanger?

Speaker 3 (28:38):
I think you're wrong. I think you're wrong on that
there is an abortion pill. Don't ask me to pronounce
the name of the drug. I haven't looked at the
name of the drug in weeks so and it's not
one that I regularly pronounced, but it starts with a name.
It is it causes a miscarriage, and it is used

(29:00):
usually during the first two weeks after sex, when an
individual thinks she might be pregnant, and there's also a
procedure to cause early miscarriage beyond that, and they call
it self managed. Even if you go to a doctor
and get the abortifatient and take it home and use

(29:25):
it and then have your miscarriage at home and dispose
of the remains at home, because it's too small to
count as biological waste. It's not called a self managed
abortion if you have the procedure done in a medical
facility or if you have to go to the hospital

(29:47):
to manage the abortion, so it's probably not a coat hanger. However,
that does bring up a salient point. People keep blaming
for this, the concept of abortion itself, the incidence of abortion,

(30:08):
the fact that women quote unquote have to abort, which
is a lie. In the modern Western world, women have
access and in the UK women have access to like
sixteen or fifteen different categories of birth control paid for

(30:29):
by the national healthcare system, so they don't even have
to pay their own birth control bill, somebody else pays
for their birth control. If a guy wants a condom,
I don't know if he has access to that for
free or not. But if a woman wants birth control pills,

(30:50):
if she wants the shot, if she wants the implant,
if she wants an IUD, which I always reference the
fact that I like to get that confused with ied.
Please don't do that. If you're getting the implant, it's
not healthy. But if she wants any of those things,
anything that requires a medical procedure for her to use

(31:11):
it and has a medical cost for her having access
to it, it is provided to her free by the taxpayers.
So it's not Women don't have the excuse that they
can't afford to use birth control and they need to
substitute abortion as a means. It's not a good excuse anyway,

(31:35):
because abortion costs more. But I suppose under u UK
med systems it's probably covered too. In the United States,
it's not always, And so there's no excuse whatsoever for
a woman to need an abortion unless she has been

(31:57):
raped or she's in the rare circumstance where her baby
cannot survive delivery. Before the pregnancy will kill her from
from complications. Right, every other abortion outside of those two
circumstances is elective, and it's arguable that abortion following a

(32:22):
rape is also elective because you don't have to abort
if you've been raped. That's a choice even even in
that circumstance, but it is a choice that you're making
because somebody imposed it on you in that circumstance instead
of you know, you were pleasure seeking. And I will

(32:45):
say this as well, prior to the legalization of abortion
for elective circumstances, you had sex, you didn't use sufficient
birth control, and you didn't partner with somebody to make
a baby and raise a family. You know that there

(33:07):
were thousands of women who had abortions for health reasons,
at least in the United States, and they extended health reasons,
not just to she's going to die if she tries
to carry that baby to term, but she's going to
have mental health problems like depression if she's going to

(33:28):
carry that baby to term. There were two hundred some
thousand abortions in the United States the year before Roe
versus Wade that were legal and done in medical facilities
medical settings. Women will also abort even if it's illegal.
So women do not care about the law of the

(33:49):
land when this issue comes up. They don't They Men
cannot stop women from aborting by saying that it's not
approved of under the law of our nation. We will
stop you by making it illegal and prosecuting the doctor
you go to and prosecuting the woman. Women will still

(34:10):
go to an unsanitary environment in a back room in
some women's home and have this procedure done. So there
is no instance where it is arguable that abortion is
under the control of men. Most abortion doctors are women.

(34:31):
Most most of the majority of physicians who perform abortions,
and especially at abortion clinics as opposed to in emergency
rooms because it is an emergency, are women. And then
in addition to those medical professionals, most of the staff

(34:52):
are nurses or nurses, aids, medical texts, candy stripers, those
are mostly women. Also those those different categories, and so
the professional end of it mostly women. Planned parenthood is
mostly run by women. The promotion of abortion in various

(35:19):
nations has been done by women's organizations who have used
government funding funding without the knowledge or consent of most
taxpayers to do it, and then on top of that,
it's been mostly women fighting against having this outlawed. So

(35:42):
for the people that are blaming men for this, oh,
this is a sign of how exploitative men are that
women want more expanded abortion. No, women choose whether or
not they consent. If they don't consent, it's a felony
to not stop. Women choose whether or not they're going
to use birth control. If you sabotage their birth control.

(36:02):
In a lot of countries, that's rape. So you can't
even argue that women aren't in control of that. Women
in Scotland in particular, should should be getting care through
the national health system. They're they're able to use birth
control without having to pay for it. And then on

(36:25):
top of that, you know they can choose more than
one type of birth control, so they can refuse to
consent without a condom, use two types of birth control
of their own, and then you know, no pregnancy, Like
it's your chances of getting pregnant are so infinitesimally small
at that point as to be statistically zero, and yet

(36:51):
hundreds of thousands of abortions are done annually. Women have
made abortion the leading cause of human death in the world.
If you count it as a human death, which anybody
who knows me knows that I do. A zygote counts
as a living human organism under scientific rule for what

(37:12):
counts as a living organism and what species it is,
So it is a living human organism. When you do
have an abortion, you are causing a death, and it
is not just slightly past the leading cause before that.
The leading cause before that is cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary issues,

(37:34):
heart related issues, and the if you put the two
next to each other in a bar graph, the bar
for abortions would be half again as high as the
bar for cardiopulmonary and cardiovascular issues. So it's not even close.

(37:58):
It's a huge cause of death. Three in ten pregnancies
around the world are aborded, and people are wondering, you
know what's the cause of low birth rates? Well, three
in ten pregnancies around the world are aborded, and before

(38:18):
people are like, oh, you're misogynistic, you hate women, blah
blah blah. Name one instance where men have a legally
protected right with legal impunity, to use deadly force against
an innocent third party to avoid the natural consequences of
their own pleasure seeking and then blame their co pleasure

(38:42):
seekers as a socially acceptable means of not taking accountability
for it. Oh wait, load something into the comments. Say
one thing in the comments that you think involves society going. Yeah,
men can seek this type of pleasure and then go
out and kill someone to avoid the consequences, the naturally

(39:06):
occurring consequences of that pleasure seeking and and then blame
the person they were they were pleasure seeking with instead
of themselves for their perpetration of that violence, because I
don't I don't think anybody can. So this is a
women perpetrated, female worker lead industry that serves female consumers

(39:37):
at the behest of women's advocates, doing women's bidding by
women's exclusive choice. No man can be blamed for this,
not one.

Speaker 2 (39:56):
And yeah, it wouldn't surprise me if there is a
loophole in this proposed set of laws that does include
the coat hanger or any pair of tweezers that you
can get hold of. If she finds out it's a boy,
she's perfectly within her rights to to hook it by
its barely formed testicles and yankee straight out into the

(40:17):
kitchen sink and then eat it. Or something is that
what's coming next. Women can just eat their babies alive
like starving rats. Did I just do that thing where
I tell the darkest joke I can think of and
then it comes true six months later. I do that
all the time. I fucking hate myself for it. So

(40:38):
I'm gonna stop talking for the good of humanity.

Speaker 1 (40:42):
All right, Well, guys, let us know what you guys
think about this one. I mean, again, it's still in
the proposal stage, but could you imagine if they Well
I don't. I don't want to think about it because then, yeah,
like Mike said, I might, I might manifest it into being.
So just let us know what you guys think about
this one in the comments. I got a super child

(41:03):
from mereth g and she just simply says, five dollars
for five dollars HBr News five twenty seven, Honey for
the Badgers. Thank you, Meredith. I really appreciate it. And
all right, we're gonna move on to the next story.
Let us know what you guess king about this one
in the comments. So on September in September, so this
is not like new but I'm I'm learning about it now.

(41:27):
Forty two year old is the beer that of mine.
Forty two year old San Mateo resident Lisa Patilano, a
vintage clothing seller and content creator who lost her fiance
to a terminal illness in twenty twenty three, launched an
unconventional search for a husband by renting a dozen digital
billboards along Highway one oh one in the San Francisco

(41:50):
Bay area from Santa Clara to South San Francisco, displaying
her photo and the url Marylissa Marylisa dot com. Frustrated
with dating apps, she created a detailed application form on
the site seeking college educated, drug free, left leaning men
aged thirty to fifty ready for marriage and children. Within

(42:12):
a few years, the campaign quickly went viral, attracting over
thirty eight hundred applications in weeks from the US and abroad,
national media coverage, supportive messages, and even a forthcoming docu
series on local station KRON four. While Catialano has been
dating applicants or has begun dating applicants, reporting several promising

(42:36):
first and second dates and expressed no regrets, the attention
also brought some criticisms such as and this is according
to the article misogynistic insults, Accusations of desperation. I mean,
I don't know if that's an accusation and abusive messages
she compiles in a separate binder. Oh, she's a victim

(42:58):
of this now. A Fox News set notably labeled her
efforts negatively contributing to what she called next level hate mail.
Despite the vitriol, she emphasized safety protocols, views the supportive
responses as a bright spot, and maintains the bold approach
was worth it for potentially finding a lifelong partnership.

Speaker 3 (43:20):
Woman gets treated like a man misogyny.

Speaker 2 (43:24):
I suppose it's better than doing only fans. At the
end of the day, it's just another way of getting
thousands of symps to line up to give you a
free dinner. But hey, it doesn't count as prostitution because
you're not even giving them a glimpse of what they're
never going to get. Thirty eight hundred men. Eh, I'm

(43:46):
I'm not sure what it is she finds so frustrating
about dating apps. That's a normal day on Tinder for
a normal woman. Your cup will still runneth over with
and who you still have to vet for all the
criteria you've outlined and all the criteria you did not

(44:07):
if you're.

Speaker 3 (44:07):
In you said liberal men, so it's her cook runn
it's over very good.

Speaker 2 (44:12):
And yeah, if you're in the San Francisco area, then
left leaning is kind of redundant, a drug free though. Yeah,
I guess that does narrow it down. It's fucking San Francisco.
Even the Starbucks is lace with fentanyl and human shit.
And yeah, college educated doesn't mean college educated, does it.

(44:37):
It doesn't include the millions of men who completed their
college education and have been flipping fast food burgers ever since.
It means rich, It means raking in at least six
figures a year, preferably seven. And I do mean that
because she's probably going to want a man who's at
least as rich as she is. And Jesus tap dancing

(45:02):
juggling on a unicycle, Christ, just how loaded do you
have to be to afford a dozen digital billboards on
a highway in San Francisco. There are fortune five hundred
companies who can't afford that kind of swag, Like no one.
She got thirty eight hundred potential suitors. Most of those

(45:23):
will be like temp worker bums who thought they'd shoot
their shot with a filthy.

Speaker 1 (45:29):
Rich milf.

Speaker 2 (45:31):
I mean, it's San Francisco. Thirty seven hundred of them
are probably Indians who work in it or so burderful.
Most of them are calling from Calcutta. Untelegr. Do not
redeem I mean, God bless her for trying. I'm not
I'm not throwing her any shade like like, well done

(45:53):
for doing what you can. I just don't know how
what the fuck she's doing or what she's supposed to
do with that many candidates. I assume she has like
an office of paid administrators spreadsheeting all of these men
to try and weed out the overwhelming saturation of perfetic, insufferable,

(46:16):
left leaning college educated men. It's kind of a curious
inversion of what a pimp is, what a madam is.
I guess it's a network of black market pen pushes,
all trying to get one woman laid. It's fascinating. Actually,
let me know how it goes. Let someone at Netflix

(46:38):
know how it goes. There's at least three seasons of
shenanigans in this, for sure, as long as you turn
out to be a truon of course, because it's Netflix.
And then if your husband turns up alive and he's
a trune as well. He only faked his death so
he could go off and live the truon life. But
then he finds out you're a trune too, so he

(47:01):
he falls in love with you all over again. But
but you don't want him back because you want to
conquer a battalion of suspended underage boys. Like so many
truths do so much potential for ochs and whatnot. I'll
write it myself if I have to. All right, I
think I think I'm already doing it. It's all right,
I'm gonna work at it. Call me, but not for sex.

(47:24):
I don't do truths.

Speaker 3 (47:26):
There we go. I I my my initial statement is
pretty much my main take on this. I don't know
what she's complaining about. I mean, if she was a man,
that's exactly what would have happened, except that he wouldn't
have had the excuse. You're being misogynists for criticizing this.
Men who put their profiles on Tinder often get you know, oh,

(47:48):
nobody's gonna date that guy. Look at that guy. That's
a terrible picture. What the heck? Uh? You know? Always
he's under six week tall. No, nobody's gonna date that guy.
I'm I'm not I'm not interested, you know that kind
of thing. And on top of that, the idea of
actually approaching a woman is discouraged. There are even dating

(48:12):
sites that women will flock to where you know, the
men can put their profiles up and everything, but they
can't be the first one to message. She has to
be the first one to message, so you know, it's
women treat it like, you know, the dude being the
first one to message makes him creepy, and men get

(48:35):
treated like creeps for approaching women in social settings where
people usually go to find someone they might want to date,
men get deemed creepy, weird, or otherwise illegitimately bad, you know,

(48:57):
any kind of nasty, negative characteristic, for preferring that a
woman be college educated, preferring that a woman be healthy
and not not you know, a land will if they
want a dator, preferring that you know, she has the

(49:17):
same some of the same kind of interests as he does.
Like if if a guy regularly likes to work out
and he wants to get together with a woman who
also is into exercise, instantly he's fat shaming and how
dare he not be interested? Further, if he requires that
she be a biological female. He can get shamed for

(49:40):
that as well. So I don't I don't see why
this this is even a news article, Like this woman
didn't get anything message to her that is any worse
than would be sent to a man who did this,
and in fact, people might accuse him of being a

(50:01):
sexual predator looking for victims, and in fact, a man
who did this might even be investigated by police after
getting reported as a sexual predator looking for victims, because
of the misogyny narrative, because of the bare narrative, because

(50:23):
of the xyz percent of this particular that particular so
called gender based violence is male perpetrated, despite the fact
that you're talking about less than one tenth of one
percent of the population's perpetration, as if the gender balance

(50:46):
of that perpetration relates on or reflects on either sex.
So yeah, it's it's really this is a nothing burger.
You know, some woman looking for attention, she got attention,
she didn't get universally positive attention, and now she's mad

(51:11):
and making a big deal about it. And because she
is a woman, the media is listening.

Speaker 1 (51:19):
Yeah, I mean, it's unfortunate about her late husband, but
I do think this was a lead. Like she's still
she doesn't have kids, so she seemed to have waited
too long to start thinking about it. And that's why
she's putting this out there. It's kind of like, I'm
almost out of time. I have to have kids. Now

(51:41):
I'm gonna put out an ad. And I mean it's
you know, like I said, it's a shame about your
husband and everything. But this is a cautionary for people,
you know, like if you're a younger you're a younger
woman and you happen to see this. I'm just all
I'm asking is that you think about this and take
it seriously, because you don't want to be forty looking

(52:03):
for you know, someone if you want, if you want children,
you have to think about that early. So I and
that's the thing too, is that she's trying to, like,
you know, find a guy really fast, get married right away,
and start a family. I don't I'm surprised at that
many men were like willing to do that, because I
feel like that's really I don't. I don't think that's

(52:25):
the thing you rush into and she's ready to rush
into it. So this this could be a mistake. But
but yeah. I mean there's also the you know, it
is definitely an attention grabbing thing, and it probably helped
her reach more men because there's a lot of thirsty
simps out there. But uh, yeah, I don't know. I'm

(52:45):
this is just all I'm saying is like, if you're
if you're young, and you're fertile, don't waste your time.
You know, if this is what you want, If you
want this, get on it right away, or at least
start thinking about it and taking it seriously, and don't
do this thing where it's like, well, I have so
many things I want to do, and then you're like
forty and you're you know, you finally find somebody and

(53:05):
then he dies and now you're like scrambling. So I
don't know, but let me know what you guys think
about this one of the comments. We're gonna move on
to the next story. So all right, so mankeeping is
now in the mainstream and it's being covered by Vice. Now.

(53:28):
I talked about this on this channel a while back.
I think I did a thing with Alison. I may
have done a thing with you guys, but I definitely
had on this guy named James Nuzzo who does a
lot of research into un women and various academic research
into you know, sort of like where feminists get their
funding from, all the ways that they are publicly funded,

(53:50):
by NGOs, by independence, et cetera, and the way that
they operate. A lot of times it revolves around like
a new form of missing, basically a new kind of
terminology that they get pushed into the mainstream. And he
was like right on the edge of when man keeping
was a thing. Now mankeeping is just a new name
for an old idea. It's emotional labor. But they're rebranding

(54:15):
it because I think, you know, it's this what they do.
This is what it's all about. So Vice, they're they're
a part of that whole network, and they have an
article on it. The Vice article called man keeping is
why women are done with dating. So it's not the
men that are walking away, guys, it's to women. You
know that this is a cop By the way, defines

(54:35):
man keeping as the extensive, often invisible, emotional labor that
women in heterosexual relationships perform for the male partners, also
pointing out that they usually they only directed to heterosexual relationships.
They don't they don't say this about other kinds because
that's not what's under attack. Okay, it's only the heterosexual stuff.
That's why they have a term called hetero fatalism, because

(54:58):
that's what they're trying to do. They are trying to
destroy normal sexuality. This includes managing amen's a man's stress
and moods, acting as his primary or only emotional support system,
interpreting his needs, and serving as an unpaid therapist with benefits.
All are receiving little reciprocation. The piece frames this as

(55:20):
an evolution of traditional emotional labor exacerbated by the male
loneliness epidemic, where men reportedly have fewer close friendships than
women and thus dump their emotional processing onto romantic partners,
according to these assumptions, turning relationships into one sided burden
on women. Drawing on research from Stanford and Pew, the

(55:41):
author argues that this dynamic is the key reason many
millennial and Gen Z women are opting out of dating. Altogether,
only thirty eight percent of single American women are actively
seeking relationships versus sixty one percent of single men, preferring
the piece of being alone over constantly keeping an adult
man emotionally afloat. The article portrays women's choice to stay

(56:02):
single not as defeat but as a rational boundary, concluding
that that until men build better support networks and relationships
become more mutually supportive, more women will walk away because
solitude is far easier than managing someone else's inner life
without help. The tone is empathetic towards women's exhaustion and

(56:25):
unapologetically supporting, supportive of prioritizing personal peace.

Speaker 3 (56:31):
With I have to jump in on this one. This
pisses me off. One hundred years ago, if a man
wanted to make friends with other dudes, there were dozens
of different clubs and organizations just for men where they

(56:52):
could go and associate with people based on common interests,
whether it was a an interest in sports and interest
in a particular job or hobby. Whether they were men
with high income who were philanthropic and trying to relate

(57:13):
with other men who were also high income and philanthropic.
There were organizations just for that, Guys who wanted to
be involved in civics, guys who wanted to be involved
in business. In general, all of these organizations could be
male only. They could bar women, and they could allow

(57:38):
men a female free environment in which to hang out
relate to each other, organize their thoughts organized socially, and
just do their thing, be dudes without women, without female supervision,

(57:58):
without getting told they're doing it wrong, without being called
misogynist for for any complaints they might have about their wives,
without being called a misogynist for any ideas they might
have about dating nothing right. And then on top of that,
you also had bars that were called stag bars, and

(58:24):
a stag bar for the younger generation was also male only.
Women could not go in they were they were not
legally barred, but the bar owner could say no women,
and under the law that was that was his right.
He could say no women in this bar, you can't
come in here, go home, or go to another bar.

(58:47):
And it wasn't really all that common for women to
go to bars by themselves anyway. But in a stag
bar you had the same situation that was, you know,
men hanging out with men, just shooting the shit. They
didn't have to have a particular subject why they were
hanging out. They could just hang out and have something
to drink, have a meal, and then go home. And

(59:14):
and women didn't have the modern practice down of keeping
a man from having a social life and then complaining
because he doesn't have a social life. And I talked
to other married women, and everybody, you know, loves their

(59:36):
husbands and they talk about how great their marriage is
and how happy they are with their man. And a
lot of times these women will talk about, you know,
he doesn't go out with the boys. He stays at home,
and that's something that they're happy about. That would drive
me nuts. I want my husband to be able to
do whatever the fuck he wants. I don't want to

(59:57):
have responsibility for his social life. And I think that
feminist pushes to stop or men from having the ability
to go out and do things without a woman's permission
are detrimental to both sexes mental health. But it's not
men's fault that women did that. It's women's fault. It's

(01:00:20):
not men's fault that women sued for access to male spaces.
It's not men's fault that women sued to prevent male
spaces from being created. Women are even trying to invade

(01:00:41):
men's therapeutic male only spaces, men's sheds where men engage
in therapy by working side by side on a project
together while they're discussing their issues, because it is easier
for men to things out with each other about a

(01:01:02):
particular subject if they're engaging in some sort of collaborative
effort on something that doesn't necessarily have anything to do
with it. Two men building a bookshelf will have an
easier time talking about why one of them is having
difficulty getting over the death of his father, getting getting

(01:01:24):
his grief to that stage where you know, yeah, it
still hurts, but you can function and you know, or
or handling his emotional responses to the abuse he's suffering
in his divorce. They'll be have an easier time talking
about that while doing something than just sitting around chit

(01:01:44):
chatting the way women do. It's a different behavior that
is different between the sexes, and there's nothing wrong with
men having their different way of doing it. So this
complaint that women have all this emotional labor over men

(01:02:05):
not having any friends, this idea that men don't have
any friends, all right, If it were true that men
did not have deep friendships, long standing friendships, frequent friendships
like women do, it would be women's fault. But the
other end of it is it's not. Men and women

(01:02:26):
do friendship differently too, And I've seen this with male
friends and female friends. A woman will have. She'll call,
you know, ten different gals her close friends. But if
you judge the closeness based on how she trusts those

(01:02:46):
friends and how she interacts with those friends, she has
one or two, maybe three, and the other seven, eight
or nine of them are people that you can't tell
anything too without having it plastered all over social media
or being judged for it. Instead of giving advice, and

(01:03:08):
you have, you know, people that will literally sabotage each
other and still claim to have a friendship. And it's
it's not just competitive, you know, friendly competition. It's cutthroat, angry, hateful,
lashing out behind each other's back with claws and teeth,

(01:03:30):
and then the moment somebody turns around, just like cats,
all of a sudden, it's all, you know, cute and
cuddly and looking innocent, except that there's no innocence there
at all. They've just torn each other other to shreds
and you didn't notice. Men seem to be more upfront

(01:03:54):
about that. So if you know, if two men are
not friends, if they're they're not in a real friendship,
you know it, and they can do rivalry without being
mean to each other about it if they are friends
and maintain that friendship, and even men who are cutthroat
with each other can maintain mutual respect that women have

(01:04:18):
forgotten how to do. So you have a very different
situation between men and women and how they treat each
other as friends and how they treat the same sex
as friends. You also have a situation wherein if a
woman has a male friend who is just a friend,
and her guy is not allowed to complain, criticize suggests

(01:04:42):
that there's something else going on, and you know, she
needs to keep a distance and not hang out alone
with that guy, and that kind of thing. And if
anybody says any differently, they're a misogynist and they're slutshaming
and they're all that. But if a guy is hanging
out alone with another woman for for more than five minutes,

(01:05:06):
something's wrong, right, He's accused of something. He's accused of
something going on. A guy often in relationships can't even
say hi to a classmate and and talk about when
the next class reunion is coming up without his wife
or girlfriend going. How do you know her? You know?
How close are you?

Speaker 1 (01:05:25):
Guys?

Speaker 3 (01:05:25):
What have you talked about? Why are you going there
because she's going to be there. It's it's completely different
between the sexes and how people react. And as a
result of this, you know, men are very limited and
who they can associate with. But at the same time,

(01:05:47):
men will form deep, trusting, supportive and very closely understood
between the friends friendships with other men where maybe they
haven't hung out in a week or a month or

(01:06:07):
even a year, but if they call the other guy up,
the conversation starts back up like it never ended. If
they call the other guy in for a favor, he's
right there. And uh, you know, if if one of
them is with somebody who is doing something that she

(01:06:28):
shouldn't be to him, the other guy will be there
for him when he falls without going I told you so.
You should have known better well that guy that that woman, uh,
she saw an easy mark. You're gonna have to to,
you know, make up for that. In her friendships you

(01:06:50):
threw me over for you a bit like they just
helped the guy pick up the pieces and move on.
And whereas women women, we'll step on another woman in
a situation like that, tear her down further before helping
her because it gives them power. So I don't want

(01:07:10):
to hear any bullshit about women being frustrated with the situation,
because first of all, you created it, and second of all,
you're lying about the dynamics of it. So until you
can be honest about those two things, don't come bitch
into me, you know, learn to learn to live with
men who are men, and learn to let them be

(01:07:33):
themselves and let them be together without bitching about it,
and then get back to me.

Speaker 2 (01:07:42):
Yeah, this this shit just baws the crap out of
me at this point. It's the same bollocks repackaged over
and over. Mankeeping is just a rebranding of emotional labor,
of male fragility, of toxic masculated see of patriarchy, of

(01:08:04):
the problem that cannot be named as it was called
in the fifties, even though they find a new name
for it every couple of fucking years. Men are damned
if they do, and damned if they don't, and damned
if they neither do nor don't do, or anything in between.
Men spend more time at work and then nagged for

(01:08:25):
being absent. Men spend more time at home and then
nagged for being deadbeats. Men throw themselves into their hobbies
and then nagged for being boring. Men abandoned their hobbies
and then nagged for being boring. Men are nagged for

(01:08:47):
doing anything other than devoting themselves to the women in
their lives. So men devote themselves to the women in
their lives, and then those women resent them for being
needy men. Men invent machines and build those machines, and

(01:09:07):
pay for those machines, and maintain those machines so that
women can have more free time to spend with their friends.
But if he goes to the pub with his friends
maybe once a month, he gets a fucking ear full
of nagging when he comes home an hour later than
he's supposed to. It is just men do everything they

(01:09:32):
can to make women's lives easier, and women respond by
doing everything they can to make men's lives more difficult.
It with what it looks like is an abusive relationship,
and it is, but what it really resembled is What

(01:09:53):
it really resembles is the relationship between parents and their
teenage children. At that age, children are never satisfied with
what their parents do. All they can be is annoyed
and ungrateful. Most teenagers, I mean, everything is either too
much or not enough. Parents can never find themselves in

(01:10:13):
the goldilocks zone. They're always pushed away from it like magnets.
But you know this is to be expected from teenagers.
It seems to be a natural phase. Evolution pushes us
into it, presumably to prepare us for adult independence. You
just have to stick it out until it's over, and

(01:10:35):
when it's over, you can finally appreciate each other as
fully formed adults. But it is not a natural dynamic
when it comes to men and women. They're already supposed
to be fully formed adults who have already got over
this phase. But for whatever reason, a perturbing amount of

(01:10:56):
women can never stop acting like spoiled teenagers, perpetually resenting
the men in their lives for any protracted, irrational reason,
even though those women have complete social and legal power
over those men. They have all the rights that parents have,
despite having all the lack of responsibilities that teenagers have.

(01:11:21):
And to be honest, i'm understating it. If anything, there
are many women who never even make it as far
as the emotional maturity of a teenager. They never progress
beyond toddler mentality. I mean, they they can learn how
to use language, to a college educated level. They can

(01:11:43):
learn how to obfiscate and redefine, and euphemize and gas light,
but they never get beyond the fundamental dynamic of I
get what I want and you just have to give
it to me the end. What's mine is mine, what
yours is well, not even ours, it's mine, me, mine,

(01:12:04):
I want, and so on. Everything they learn about squirrely
language is in service to this selfish hypocrisy, this never
ending game of peekaboo. To anyone with a fucking brain
in the nogin, it's obvious why this is happening, because

(01:12:26):
this is what women are being taught from the cradle
to the grave. They are taught that men have everything
and women have nothing, and so men owe women everything.
And we finally get to the point where men are
getting really fucking sick of it, but they are powerless

(01:12:48):
to change it because men don't get to teach women
or girls, not as teachers and not as parents. The
few men who do are compelled to teach them nothing
but the feminist narrative that men have everything and women
have nothing, and so men owe women everything. If they
don't teach them that and only that, then they don't

(01:13:11):
get to be teachers or parents. They'll get bum rushed
out of the place on the grounds of muthodny. Can
everyone please hurry up and finish arguing about immigration and
the economy and the goddamn Epstein filest Remember the shit
we were talking about ten years ago. Yeah, still happening,

(01:13:35):
still worse than ever. We could send all the foreign
freeloaders home. We could reverse inflation and increase the GDP,
We could arrest everyone who was ever on that island,
and it would not make a goddamn dent on the
near vertical decline of the West and indeed the global

(01:13:58):
situation in general. We got here because of this, because
our world has been split down the middle, not between
left and right, but between men and women. The whole
left right paradigm is just a projection, a two dimensional
projection of the three dimensional problem that set the whole

(01:14:19):
apocalypse apocalypse in motion. This is the problem between men
and women. Yes, I know no one's listening. I know
no one cares. I know the left and the right
are gonna keep arguing about hokey shite while they both
agree that women need to be protected at all costs

(01:14:40):
and that men need to be punched in the face.
But I'm gonna keep saying this shit until I'm dead
and buried, buried in a rolled up newspaper by the
side of the road and slowly eaten by blue bottles.
I don't care. This is what's going wrong. This is

(01:15:00):
the lesson we're supposed to be learning. So on the
off chance that this is all a simulation that in
reality we're all living in a Dyson sphere in deep
space and we're playing an elaborate educational video game, I'm
playing to win non principle. I'm maxing out this stat

(01:15:21):
and that is what I will tell my maker when
I die. I I played the misogyny meta. I played
the the maybe we can blame women for some things
some of the time meta. No matter how much you
have nerved us. Oh lord, if hell awaits so be it.

(01:15:44):
Bottom text.

Speaker 3 (01:15:50):
All right, bring back stag bars.

Speaker 1 (01:15:54):
Yeah, all right, Well that's that's well said. You guys
get it. So okay, I got a super chow. Let's
take a look at that. Zarangs gave us ten dollars.
Thank you, Zaraangs and says on the subject of mankeeping.

(01:16:14):
The following article is two years old. Better Bachelor has
covered the author more than once. The pool of men
these women draw from is ridiculously small, and it's their
own doing. The husband's store joke is something few women
appear to stop, and you think they benefit from it
if they could. The article is by Jana Hawking, archived
of course, and she realizes that she and other women

(01:16:36):
she knows are sharing men. They're called spit sisters ew
and he includes a link. I'll go ahead and look
at it really quick.

Speaker 3 (01:16:45):
I couldn't find a nicer way to say that.

Speaker 1 (01:16:47):
Huh, I just read it. I probably should have. I
feel bad, but okay, superchow, let's click on it archive
dot iss Uh what a reason Sydney. Sydney, Australia's dating

(01:17:07):
scene is one sortid hot mess right now. This is
kind of familiar. Actually, l's wee guy. I went out
to drinks when few Yeah, so show. I feel like, yeah,
I feel like I've seen this before. And yeah, the
man keeping thing, like I said, it's not new, it's

(01:17:28):
it's been covered, it's just been rebranded. It's it's always
like you know, and I don't know for whatever reason,
Like I don't know if it's the media or what
But like a lot of people just eat this stuff up.
They just they just are so comfortable blaming men for
for whatever. I mean, because this is the thing about

(01:17:49):
man keeping is, or at least what they're calling emotional labor.
It's like the opposite of toxic masculinity. It's literally what
they want supposedly men to do. It's like what they're asking.
And when men say, okay, then I will I will
share my feelings and concerns and my anxieties and my problems,

(01:18:09):
then they're like, oh no, no, that's no, we we
actually don't want that, and let let's just like I mean, like,
let's just be honest about what it is. Then if
women don't want that, then just say you don't want that,
but stop telling men that you do want that, and
let men form their own spaces, because that's what men need.
They need, they need, like Hannah said, stag bars, they

(01:18:32):
need some places and women have basically taken all of
those away, like even the workplace. So the this is
like what we get, and I think that more I
guess on the On the on the plus side, the
more I look around online, the more I'm seeing that

(01:18:53):
a lot of people are discussing these these things and
they're they're not you know, like anisphere people. They're not
MRAs or not red pillars or anything like that. But
that just shows you that the problem is getting, you know,
to the point where people are all being forced to
see it and they're going to reckon with it in

(01:19:14):
some way.

Speaker 3 (01:19:14):
So you know what's funny about that article. Women will bitch, right,
They'll they'll bitch and moan that a guy cares about
their body count because he cares about their sexual hygiene.
He doesn't want to get herpies or HPV and get

(01:19:35):
cancer or AIDS and have to take pills for the
rest of his life, you know. But then they bitch
about it if the top five percent or ten percent
of guys that they're all going for are dating the
other women that are also going for them. Like, again,

(01:19:57):
it's women bitching that guys do what women think they
should be able to get away with.

Speaker 1 (01:20:04):
Mm hmm, yeah for sure. So yeah, not a new thing.
I just think that they're you know, like just trying
to look for new ways to rebrand it. And I
don't think there's any goal, Like they don't really want
a solution. They want to make normal women more and
more repulsed by normal men. They're intentionally driving men and

(01:20:29):
women apart. And it's been that way forever from the beginning.
That's what it was about. So every time they come
up with a new term. And the thing is, most men,
I mean I don't think. I think most men don't
really take it seriously and they don't really react to it.
They don't really take it to heart that much. But
women do. And that's all you have to do is

(01:20:50):
get half the population on board, and they do, and
so it is having an effect. I mean women are basically,
like I think they're radicalized, like politically radicalized, and it
is because they are put in a perpetual state of
insecurity and fear and of men. So like, this is

(01:21:12):
what they're going to do. I think that we have
like not we, but like are I guess the cathedral
they have. They have done this to women, and women
don't know that things are that they're that their lives
are not like in as much danger as they think
they are, but they're reacting as though it's true. So

(01:21:33):
it's a problem. And the man keeping thing is just
it's always these little things, right, and you just look
at like women on TikTok or social media talking about
what they want from men, or just like shitting on
men because they voted the wrong way or whatever it is,
just being men. They're looking at the data of women
going far far, far left, and they're saying, well, it's

(01:21:55):
the men's fault that like when when women overreact and
they earn ship down, they destroy, you know, things, they
blame men for it, like you made me do this,
And that's kind of like where we are right now.
That's the kind of dynamic in the in the sort
of meta sense that's happening. So if men are going

(01:22:18):
to react and you know it's not going to be
pleasant when its overt I'm ready for it.

Speaker 3 (01:22:25):
So what Yeah, we need to start spelling it overy
acting instead of over reacting, because it is something that
is unique to women. The way the way that women
overreact is completely unique to women.

Speaker 1 (01:22:42):
Yep, all right, So anyway, that was that article. Let
me know what you guys think about man keeping in
the comments. I know that we've talked about it briefly.
I just noticed that more people are talking about it
that are just sort of like finding it for the
first time, and I thought it was worth bringing up

(01:23:03):
that it's going into like the sort of like the
the let's say, the broader zeitgeist. So uh, and yeah,
it was basically a slow newsweek. So that's all I
have for you guys today. So we're gonna go into
the Patron Show. Now we're gonna look at this article.
I mean, this is a sausage of the correct size anyway,
which is from the Washington Post and it's entitled Labor

(01:23:25):
Department social media campaign depicts a white male workforce. Oh no,
so let's find out what the problem is with this.
I mean, like, ultimately it's a male America. American male
workforce is the focus because that's what we want to
focus on. So I think that's what they're doing. But
we'll find out in the Patron Show. So if you

(01:23:46):
guys want to join us for that, go to feed
the badgel dot com ford slash subscribe and become a member,
join us in the Patron show chat or in the
discord and the discord whatever badgination done online. Hopefully I'll
see you guys there. And I want to thank Mike
and Hannah for joining me on the show. But I
want to thank you guys most of all for tuning

(01:24:06):
in because without you, we wouldn't be able to do
this thing that we do, which is I think it's
unique because not a lot of people are having these conversations,
at least not as early as we are often having them,
and they're not willing to say the things that we're
willing to say. So anyway, with that said, thanks you
guys for coming on the show today. If you guys

(01:24:27):
like this video, please hit like subscribe if you can
not already subscribe to the bellflonifications, leave us a comment,
let us know what you guys think about what we
discussed on the show today, and please please please share
this video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so
much for coming on today's episode of HBr News and
we will see you next Tuesday.