Je Suis Charlie From CALGARY ALBERTA | HBR News 519

Hello and welcome to a special HBR News show from the badger meetup here in Canada where we talk about the news of the week! This week we discuss the bloody murder of Charlie Kirk, women's rights groups warn of racism against some rapists, and more!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
I'm just probably get the microphone. Okay, Hello everybody, and
welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian and
this is HBr News. What was our I forgot the intro,
but that I used to do for this, that I
that I do for this. This is HBr News number
five nineteen Jay, Sweet Carl Charlie from Calgary, Alberta. So

(00:22):
this is a special news show because we are live
in front of an actual audience of our listenators and contributors.
And yeah you don't, you have no idea A huge show,
very big, the biggest crowds now. But we are doing
a special show and I have my lovely co hosts
Hannah and doctor Randabercam as always, and we're gonna be

(00:45):
looking at the week stories here from Calgary, Alberta from
the Badger Meetup. So hopefully you know you guys that
are watching are happy to see I see some people
in the chat. Hello everyone. This is gonna be a
little bit more informal, not that the new shows formal.
We have cartoons on screen, for God's sakes, and we
get called furries by the vertical chat, which we are not.

(01:06):
They did they ruined cartoons just like animals.

Speaker 2 (01:09):
We think they're cool.

Speaker 1 (01:10):
Yeah, that's it, right. So anyway, we have a lot
to get to today, so we're gonna try to keep
it as light as we can be with you know,
with regards to recent events. And I may open the
floor to any of you guys if you wanted to,
like say anything about the stories. We try to take
what's happening in the news address it as badger's So

(01:33):
we're looking at it from our particular unique perspective and
trying to like, you know, maybe like add an angle
to it that other people had not considered when discussing
these things, or sometimes the jokes tell themselves not this
one though. So let us now get into today's stories.

(01:53):
Let me switch. So you probably heard something happened recently
On step Stember tenth, twenty twenty five, Barley Kirk, a
thirty one year old influential conservative activist and close ally
of President Donald Trump, was fatally shot during a public

(02:13):
speaking event at Utah Valley University in Orum, Utah. The
incident occurred around twelve twenty pm as Kirk, known for
his proved me wrong debate style and leadership of Turning
Point USA, was answering a question about transgender mass shooters
in front of approximately three thousand attendees, which is still

(02:37):
smaller than this crowd by the way. The shooter, identified
as twenty two year old Taylor or Tyler Robinson, fired
a single bullet from a rooftop, striking Kirk in the neck,
an act captured on security cameras showing the suspect climbing
stairwells and fleeing the scene. The killing, which Trump labeled
a heinous assassination, took place amid a surge in US

(03:01):
political violence, with over one hundred and fifty politically motivated
attacks reported in the first half of twenty twenty five,
marking a significant escalation since the January twenty one capital incident.
Following the assassination, authorities quickly released images and video of
a person of interest, later confirmed as Robinson, wearing a

(03:23):
distinctive black top with an American flag and eagle design,
black sunglasses, and Converse shoes. A rifle believed to be
the murder weapon was recovered, and a one hundred thousand
dollars FBI reward led to Robinson's arrest on September twelfth,
twenty twenty five. That would be today, as confirmed by
Utah Governor Spencer Cox, and Trump investigators noted that Robinson's

(03:45):
family reported his expressed animosity towards Kirk, citing the activists
perceive hate as a motive. The event drew widespread condemnation
from figures across a political spectrum, including former President George W.
Bush and Joe Biden, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and
even liberal commentator Dean Withers, highlighting concerns about escalating political

(04:09):
violence and its impact on free speech, especially given Kirk's
role as a father of two and a key figure
in mobilizing young conservative voters. So, I mean, there's more
I could say about this. I've said a lot in
the latter, just like since it's happened and it's been
on my mind. I had trouble sleeping for a couple
of nights after this happened. But I'm gonna let Mike

(04:29):
or Hannah take the you know, say a few words
about the story if you guys want so, which one
of you guys wants to go first, give me that
all right, here you go.

Speaker 2 (04:37):
I'm not going to talk about the shooter or any
of the conjectures. Still being made about because it's not
the point. It seems almost counterintuitive that this has put
the shits up people far more than the Trump assassination
attempt the first one. I mean, there was certainly a
lot more on the line when Trump almost died, but

(04:58):
that's the point. He didn't die. If he did, there
would have been the boogoloo to end or bogleo is.
They probably would have been rioting in the streets and
a bunch of mostly peaceful us and attacks and whatnot.
They might even have been that civil war thing that
we've all been warned about for a our time. But
we're not in that timeline. We're in a timeline one
inch to the right of that timeline where Trump got

(05:19):
shot but didn't die, and in the aftermath all we
had to witness online was a load of nasty bastards
lamenting that their favorite boogeyman didn't die and ghoulishly praying
that he does. It's a whole different kettle fish where
not only does a man actually die in such a
harrowing way, but we watched it happen, We saw it

(05:42):
close up. For all the pretend violence we see in
movies and TV's not every day we watch a real
person get murdered in real time. It's extremely rare, actually
that we're ever presented with that kind of footage, and
now we know why. It genuinely chills you to the bone.
To see that happen. You kind of sort of stop

(06:05):
breathing for a few seconds, and your eyeballs sort of
bulge out and sort of freeze in place, and your
summit feels weird. You can't even cry because it happens
so fast and it's just too much to take in,
so you just sort of short circuit. Call me a
pussy if you like, for having that kind of emotional reaction.
That's fine. I will go ahead and call you a
demon for not having it, because that's the other thing.

(06:26):
It's not necessarily the murder itself that's made us so angry.
The death was sad and tragic. What made us angry
is the idea that someone, anyone, can watch that footage
and feel delight. A lot of them did watch the footage.
They didn't just hear about it. They watched it happen,
and then they smiled and they laughed and they danced
in the aisles like underwork nurses dicking around while people

(06:50):
are getting their lungs blown out in the next room.
There are some dark thoughts that I can understand if
I use my imagination, Like how you can secretly hope
that bad things happened to someone, or even wish that
they would die, like in a moment of rage and
vengeance when you sort of lose yourself. But in no
nightmare recess of my mind, can I countenances how anyone

(07:11):
could actually watch a defenseless man get murdered in cold
blood and then celebrate it, even if it's someone you hate,
even if it's like the Sama bin Laden or something,
even if you believe he really was responsible for three
thousand deaths. You'd be okay with him being assassinated, and
you'd be okay with just knowing he's dead. You'd be

(07:32):
okay with taking someone's word for it, but you wouldn't
want to watch it actually happening. Charlie Kirk didn't kill anyone,
He didn't even hurt anyone. He just had opinions and
express them. But people watched the life leave his body
and they rejoiced. It just doesn't make sense. It can't

(07:53):
make sense. I can't understand how any human mind can
work like that, and if it ever does, I would
only expect it from serial killers, cannibals, amateur torturers, that
sort of thing. They kind of one in a million
person who belongs in solitary confinement for the rest of
their lives being stared at through a tiny window by

(08:13):
criminal psychology professors with clipboards. So what's really put the
shits up us is discovering that we are, in fact,
surrounded by people whose brains work like that. They're in
every city, they're in every town, probably in every street,
and certainly in every college. They probably outnumber us in
most colleges. So it's not just mental illness, it's not

(08:36):
even mental illness. Mental illness of that magnitude is rare,
vanishingly rare. What we're dealing with is evil. There's actually,
there's no other way to describe it. They're not just NPCs.
They are demons. They are barons of hell. They don't
have a mentally ill conscience. They simply don't have a conscience.

Speaker 1 (08:59):
It's been taken from them.

Speaker 2 (09:01):
Their souls have been sucked out from an early age
and now there's nothing left. They weren't bond demons. They
became demons.

Speaker 1 (09:09):
A lot of us have.

Speaker 2 (09:09):
Landed on this same terminology, like independently from each other.
Whatever religious or spiritual beliefs we may have or not have,
we've concluded that these are demons. We're not talking about
a hell that you go to after you die. We're
talking about hell on earth. It's real and we're watching
it happen. We're talking about demons on earth. They are real,

(09:30):
and we could hear them cackling in the fires all
around us.

Speaker 1 (09:35):
And they're proud of it.

Speaker 2 (09:37):
By the way, they're not just remorseless, they're not just unashamed.
They are proud. They're patting each other on the back
and sucking each other's scaly demon appendages for upholding what
they consider it to be virtues. You'd think some kind
of glimmer of humanity would flash past them at some
point and give them a moment's pause. Maybe we should
tone down our rhetoric just to smidgen. No, it's the

(10:00):
murder victims who are wrong. These people are psychotic, and
we live in a psychocracy. We are ruled over by
people who can only find happiness in cruelty and slaughter
and death. They have no breaks on this train and
they have no reverse gear. There's no compromising, there's no diplomacy,
there's no peaceful revolution, there is only war. And no,

(10:25):
that does not mean I'm glorifying killing. That is what
you people are doing, literally and to the letter. Just
for argument's sake, I want to be able to say,
imagine if milk Toast lefty commentator was murdered just for speaking.
But no matter which Milk Toast lefty commentator I name you,
broken buses would chant you're inciting murder against milk Toast

(10:47):
lefty commentators while you literally incite murder against Milk Toasts
righty commentators. At long last, have you no shame stupidest
question I've ever asked?

Speaker 3 (11:00):
Now?

Speaker 2 (11:00):
Yeah, by war, I mean culture war, that thing I
mean cancelation war. We've been taking the high road for
the last dozen years and more in the hopes that
you people would follow our example and stop persecuting people
for their opinions. But you've only gotten worse, and now
you're flagrantly at the point where you're proudly declaring that

(11:21):
we deserve to be murdered for expressing our opinions. And
now we've finally reached the point where we think you
deserve to be fired for expressing opinions like that. And
we're the hypocrites, are we bro We're just ten years
behind you. We've finally reached the conclusion that we can't
just play defensively anymore, and our only option is to

(11:43):
fight back with the very weapons you've chosen for this duel.
We're done reasoning, we're done debating, we're done praying. Praying
is all well and good when you feel like it's
all you can do, but it's not. So we're getting
off our knees and we're standing up with parting our
hands and we're clenching our fists. If God let this happen,

(12:04):
then God wants war, So we're declaring it. So, yeah,
it's it's not about Charlie. For the first few minutes,
it was about Charlie. For the first few hours, it
was about Charlie because Charlie was killed by a zombie.
But then the rest of the zombies burst out of
the monster closet yelling you will be killed by demons.

(12:25):
We pulsmed at them, but it was too late.

Speaker 1 (12:27):
No, John, you are the demons, and then John was
a zombie.

Speaker 2 (12:30):
I'm ending on some levity with a dank meme from
ages ago. But seriously, folks, rip and tear and so on,
you are in hell.

Speaker 1 (12:38):
Act like it day hama.

Speaker 4 (12:40):
Another term for holding people to their own standards even
if you don't like their standards is malicious compliance. It
is a highly effective tactic and we should not shy
away from it. But that's not really what I was
going to talk about. One of the things that struck
me about this is that in some ways Charlie Kirk

(13:02):
is like a Jordan Peterson of America, of the United States,
and that he engaged quite a bit with young men
on university campuses with signs of strength, having strengthened his
convictions and having confidence in his convictions, and still being
willing to listen to the other side, to debate, having

(13:24):
the maturity to consider other people's ideas, and then explain
when his conclusion is no, that's wrong, in a manner
that was civil and kind and considerate and in very
often in caring terms. Not I hate you because you're
different or because you're wrong, but I want you to

(13:47):
be right because it will be better for you, not
even because it would be better for me, but because
it would be better for you. Your life will be
easier if you're right about this, and if you take
the wrong path, that your life will be harder. And
I really think that that was why he was targeted.
I don't think it was the trans issue as an oh,

(14:08):
he's transphobic. I don't think it was he's racist. I
think it was he's giving young men a pathway to
strength in their own convictions, to rational thinking instead of
emotional outbursts, and to creating their own boundaries when it
comes to how they're going to progress in life, how

(14:31):
they're going to orient themselves, and then how they're going
to move forward from where they started to through the
direction that they've oriented themselves too. And that terrifies people
who exploit instability and lack of boundaries and lack of guidance.
It terrifies them that they won't have that generation of

(14:54):
young men to manipulate. You can't manipulate people if they
know themselves and they know their values, and they know
their interests, their goals, their needs, and their impact. You
can only manipulate people if you can confuse them and
scare them and emotionally cripple them. And that made him

(15:16):
the most dangerous man in America, and for that he
took a bullet in the neck. And to me, the
people that are focusing on whether or not we are
being as mean to the people who are celebrating his
shooting as they are to us are dramatically missing the point.
This was an attack on manhood and masculinity, on men's

(15:39):
ability to be themselves in the way that best serves
their needs and their interests, including their interest in serving
other people, rather than being little cogs in a machine
that was created to destroy them. And it really doesn't
matter if we're being hypocritical when we hold our opponents

(16:02):
to their own rules, it matters whether or not we lose,
because if we lose, manhood will never get an opportunity
to come back. It'll be gone forever. So be a hypocrite,
engage in malicious compliance their rules apply to them, be
the instrument of that application. It is one of the

(16:24):
only things that we can do to put the kabash
to this kind of behavior. And when it comes to
how the situation is going to be handled, what's going
to happen to the young man who shot him? I
understand all the christ for blood. I understand all the
Christ for public execution. The rage behind those is fair.
I have it myself, but I would ask people to

(16:45):
consider if Charlie Kirk had got a chance to speak
to that man Peter reached out to him, and if
he was to watch what's happening now, I think he
would be sad because it's not the way that he
dealt with hell hateful people. He wasn't angry and enraged
and vengeful. He reached out, he tried to change minds,

(17:06):
and he did what he could, and then he moved
on if he couldn't. And I think the way that
the rest of us can approach that it's a tragedy
that the very age of young men that he was
trying to save ended up being the person that killed him.

(17:29):
And every element of what's going to happen now is
just sad, and that's really all that we need to
react to. And when you're dealing with the anger at
what happened and what's being done, what's being said, honestly,
the best way to handle that is to get a

(17:50):
grip on it, recognize it, and then focus it as
a form of energy and use it to fuel your
argument in defense of masculinity, and in defense of masculine
signs of strength and maturity and growth, and not in

(18:11):
defense of returning to barbaric practices that we've abandoned in
the past. And I guess that's all I've got to
say about this.

Speaker 1 (18:18):
All right, Thanks Hannah. So obviously Charlie Kirk's not at
men's rights activists, Okay, But I guarantee that if I
had a chance to talk to him, he would have
been open to what I had to say, because I
think that his political journey, which I didn't not watch
super close, because I wasn't like, I don't know, I
just didn't follow him super close. I was a little

(18:40):
bit consumed with other things, but I knew, I was
aware that he was out there doing stuff, campaigning and such.
I saw him on an episode of Tucker Carlson's podcast
after Tucker was fired from Fox News and went independent,
started doing his own thing, and it was about two
and a half hours long, and they spent and probably

(19:01):
seventy five percent of it talking about young men. And
that was Charlie Kirk's primary concern, and it wasn't in
the context of, you know that they have to take
responsibility or they have to put down the video games
and the weed. It wasn't it wasn't what you would
normally conceive of when you think of what a you know,
conservative commentator would say. It was real things. It was like, look,

(19:24):
young men are they're not getting, you know, the opportunities
they're supposed to get. And he didn't he didn't specify
white men, but he did say a couple times in
particular white men. But it was just across the board
men all of their issues. They're not you know, women
don't want to marry them, they can't find anybody, they're
not getting job opportunities, they can't afford, you know, simple

(19:45):
things like like previous generations were able to like home
and all of a living wage, et cetera. And that
he said that this is going to be a problem
if we can't address it, like we have to, like
because you know, why would men like try anything if
every if everything is again, so he was start I
think he was going on that path. I think that

(20:06):
if you're if you're approaching anything that involves like wanting
to make the world better and you are trying to
do so honestly, and you're just like looking for that
what's true you're going to land there, You're going to
be like, oh, what's going on with men? Like it's
going to become because it's it's buried under so many
other distractions. You know, we're distracted by economics and trade

(20:29):
and immigration and race and sexuality and all of these
other things. And like, at the end of the day,
a lot of that stuff gets strips away and all
that you have left is men and women. Every You know,
if everything collapsed tomorrow, there'll be men and there be women,
and they had to figure out how to work together.
But they can't do that if women have been taught
to hate them and men have been taught to fear them,

(20:52):
fear fear women. That is right. So he was starting
to do that, and I think that it could have
gone somewhere, and I'm still I'm still optimistic that whoever
picks up the torch will start to go that way,
and it's not going to be one person. I think
that when he died. No, I'm not gonna say that.
I'm going to ask you, guys in the audience and

(21:13):
those of you who are here, if you refer to
what happened to Charlie Kirk, that you refer to it
as an assassination every single time, and not he died,
because that sounds like he slipped in the bathtub. No,
someone went out of their way, They plotted and planned,
and they murdered him. Right. I don't care what it
was for. It doesn't matter. There's a lot of theories.

(21:35):
I don't care about that right now, but that is
what happened, okay, And we the language war is really important,
like people using the right words to describe what happened
matters a lot. So and if we're going to get
people to change their mind about things, we have to
use the right words. So assassinated. And I'm sorry, I'm
a little I'm still really heated about this whole thing

(21:55):
because what we do here at HBr involves the same thing.
We're going to public places and we're trying to whether
that is a public square online or we're going out
and talking to people like we're doing today, And it
is still what I think is the most like the
best way to get the word out is to talk
to people. And I knew for the longest time that

(22:17):
the people were up against don't want us to talk,
like they have done everything they could to silence us.
For years and years and years, and censorship is it
is basically dress rehearsal for murder, like it is practicing
murdering you without actually having to take, you know, take
on that like the burden of actually taking a life.

(22:39):
But if they can just silence you or pretend like
you don't exist, or ridicule you to make you irrelevant,
or discredit you or ruin your life, they'll do that.
They'll do all of that, and then if none of
that works, then you're gone. Right. Charlie Kirk was experiencing
censorship early on. He was banned from colleges, like you know,
from going there. So he decided, I'm gonna start my organization.

(23:01):
I'm going to do it myself. And then he would
just go to these public spaces and do these things.
And he built his whole turning Point thing from the
ground up because he was getting censored, and that whole
time he was being slandered just like we are. Just
like anybody these people oppose, they get slandered and they
get lied about, and they gaslight their you know, their

(23:21):
followers into thinking that we are the worst possible humans imaginable.
So to put it in the context, because we're talking
about a you know, right wing American Republican political commentator
that was murdered, assassinated. But let's put it in context
and look at the history of the Men's movement and
what has happened to some people there that had to

(23:42):
deal with this kind of resistance. Maybe it didn't get
this far, but Aaron Pittsy was driven out of the
UK because she dared to say what Oh, it turns
out women can also be abusers. That was the only
thing she was guilty of was looking at the truth
and stating it. They killed her dog and they drove
her out of the UK. Okay, Earl Silverman was pushed

(24:05):
to suicide. I'm not saying that they made him do that,
but he was in a state where there was nothing
he can do that. He was just like blocked at
every opportunity. He could not make it work because no
one wanted to help him, right because he had the
bad ideas, I guess, and he ended up taking his
own life. He couldn't do it. Mark Angeloucci was assassinated

(24:27):
and we still don't know everything there is to know
about that. For people who are Gamergate people, Alec Holoka,
who was accused of raping Zoe Quinn by Zoe Quinn
with no evidence, and his own sister unpersoned him and
then he took his own life as well. Donald Trump
was almost killed Nick Fuentes. I mean, he's again, he's

(24:48):
not an MRA. But but we're looking at people, anyone
who was against it. There was a guy at his
door with a gun. Like, we're not talking about people
that just have a difference of opinion. I mean they do,
but it's more than that they think that our opinion
should not exist, and if they will take these measures
to ensure that nobody gets to hear what we have

(25:10):
to say. And it just so happens with Charlie Kirk.
They managed to get to someone. And the one of
the things they want to get out of that is
that it makes everybody shut up because we don't want
it to happen to us. And what I've noticed, like
you remember Janet Bloomfield, she used to make content all
the time, Judgie bitch that was anti feminist content, and
she stopped making content because her children were threatened, so

(25:35):
she just had to back out. If you guys didn't
know that, and that's why you're not I don't know
if you'll ever see her again. But plenty of people
either quietly left the Internet because things got too hot,
or they were driven out, or they were killed themselves.
So we're not dealing with people who actually want to
have a dialogue. We're dealing with people that want to
destroy us. And if you're feeling that anxiety, you know

(25:59):
that's that's where that comes from, because a part of you,
in a primal way, knows that you can't reason with
these people. That's why I can't do the both sides thing.
I just can't do it. And I think that we
should be looking for ways to ally ourselves with anyone
who isn't these demons, even if we are not politically

(26:19):
aligned or whatever. But if they believe in these principles
of like having conversations and pursuing truth and free speech,
then we should be like, okay, you're with me now,
Like we're gonna work together and we can work out
our differences later, because right now we're up against a monster,
and the monster doesn't care what side you're on. Like
this guy was probably it was very moderate and they

(26:41):
still thought he has to die. So what are they
going to think about you? I mean what, like, seriously,
you know, I don't know that. I don't know if
I got everything out that I wanted to say, But
the time for compromise with these people is done. You'll
know based on how they reacted to what happened, so

(27:04):
like if they treat it lightly, if they laugh at it,
if they celebrate it, or even if they do this
whole thing of well, I didn't like the guy, but
don't know. Shut up, Like you can't murder people and
then try to find a way as well, but your
murdering is always wrong. No, you were calling us Nazis
for ten years, and now that something has actually happened,
you want to back out and say, look, man, I'm

(27:24):
against that. No you're not, because you didn't stick up
for us when we were, you know, wondering if we
were gonna like be able to you know, do I
don't know, do our work? So anyway, does anybody here
want to say anything about this? I give you an
opportunity to know. All right, okay, well thanks for that.
Let me see if I know that there's people in

(27:46):
the chat. I got a super chow that I'm going
to read out here. So Kinoko's evil twin gave us
fifty bucks. Unfortunately I can't display it for you guys.
And he says the assassination of Charlie Kirk is one
hundred percent in line with the Democrat policy to just
destroy the nuclear family. Divorce is the usual method of
eliminating fathers from families. On this occasion, a bullet was

(28:06):
used instead. Charlie just wanted to build bridges. The takeaway
lesson from his murder is that not only can you
not build bridges with evil psychopaths, you cannot build civilization
itself either. There is no middle ground for compromise with
evil that will see you dead merely just because of
the words that you say, the ice blow beckons for

(28:27):
the hazardous hominid bio waste that we must discard. The
other thing too, is that, just as an aside, for
those guys who are watching in the live chat and
you guys that are here, I want you to go on, Well,
if you've been on x slash, Twitter or any parts
of social media and you've seen like the clips of
people celebrating how many of them are women, That's all
I'm gonna say about that. Like, what is what do

(28:49):
you think the ratio of women to men is on
the people doing this and yeah, that's that's all. That's
all I'll say about that. So we're gonna move on
to the next story. Let us know what you guys
think about this. One of the comments that look forward
to your thoughts. So all right, let me see here,
did I do that? Right? Yeah? So all right, so
this guy is I gett to get my write up

(29:11):
out here, Greg something Graham Linan. I can't say it,
Greg linham Linim Graham Graham Graham linehem, Uh, why don't
I have this up?

Speaker 3 (29:25):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (29:26):
It might it might be buried in my history. Well, okay,
let's try to like sum it up, because you guys
know what happened to him, right, Mike, do you remember
what he said? It was? It was a series.

Speaker 2 (29:38):
It was a series of transphobic tweets, and one of
them was, hey, ladies, if if men come into your bathroom,
you should something something punch them in the balls. That's right,
it's something like that. That's probably because it's incitement to
violence against people that you're absolutely not allowed to incite
violence against. And he said this in a tweet while
he was in the USA, and he's an iri citizen.

(30:01):
But then he went through he Throw airport in London
and the British police arrested him five of them at gunpoint.
In case you Americans thought you were safe tweeting in
your own country. If you if you annoy the British police,
then you ever want to come to Britain. Well not
a good advert for a beloved country.

Speaker 3 (30:21):
Is it.

Speaker 1 (30:21):
Yeah, so he was arrested for tweets in the UK.
They might have their priorities a little bit mixed up,
but I wanted to get because one of it's actually
what's funny is that this guy also like stuck up
for Charlie Kirk after his assassination, which is weird. I
don't know if he's like on the road to being
red pilled on some things. But I I if you

(30:43):
guys don't know who this guy is, Greg Linham, Graham whatever,
Greg Graham, Linham whatever. He made the He was the
writer and did he direct it or something show running?

Speaker 2 (30:54):
No, he just wrote things. He's a bit actor as well.

Speaker 1 (30:58):
He wrote Tea Crowd and Father Ted right, and I
watched a lot of Ice Crawd very funny show. But
but yeah, so I don't know. I think you want
to say something about in general, or did you just
yeah yeah.

Speaker 2 (31:11):
To some degree, I do feel sorry for Graham. He's
being made an example of by this cult of missionry
that's determined to erase men from society and history.

Speaker 1 (31:21):
You'll notice JK.

Speaker 2 (31:22):
Rowling has never been arrested, despite having the exact same
opinions as Graham Lenihan, and having expressed those opinions with
just as much vitriol online. And I don't want to
reduce this to the label of simply turf, even though
the shoe does fit. I think it's important to describe
things and not just label them. Some feminists hate every

(31:43):
man who doesn't disavow his masculinity. These are commonly called
trans inclusive, whereas some feminists hate every man even if
he does disavow his masculinity. These are commonly called trans exclusive.

Speaker 1 (31:59):
Tear.

Speaker 2 (32:00):
Justice still applies, of course, it's only the turfs who
get arrested. But like I said, they never arrested JK.

Speaker 1 (32:06):
Rowling.

Speaker 2 (32:07):
It's not just two tier. It's a pyramid with men
at the bottom. It's why Graham Lennaho got arrested, because
he's the most prominent male turf that the police could identify,
at least when it comes to celebrity discourse in the UK.
That's why I feel sorry for Graham, because he's the
one being hoisted on this petard. But at the same
time it is his petard. He doesn't just hate men

(32:30):
who transition.

Speaker 1 (32:32):
He hates men.

Speaker 2 (32:34):
But to be clear, he doesn't hate himself. He hates
all men except himself. He thinks he's, as we were
talking about earlier, the one good man, the one good
man who has the unique emotional intelligence to prioritize women
over men. And he doesn't seem to realize that the
men who arrested him at gunpoint suffer from the exact
same delusion. To quote Graham himself, men are vicious, men

(32:58):
are aggressive. They communicate in an aggressive way, especially when
they don't have any basis for any of these beliefs.
And then he throws a shocked Pikachu face when other
men apply this outlook to him. That's why they apprehended
you at the airport, Graham, because they think you're vicious
and aggressive, and that you're communicating in an aggressive way
because you don't have any basis for these beliefs. But

(33:20):
I don't have a basis for these beliefs. They don't agree, Graham.
They don't care because you're a man. They just think
you're a hateful, criminal thug who wants to hurt people
because you're a man. Why would you expect them to
snap out of it when you won't snap out of it.
You're in the same cult, the same mindless, missandric cult
as the police force that is victimizing you. You can

(33:41):
leave the UK, you can leave Ireland, you can leave
Europe altogether and escape to the sanctity of the USA.
But for some reason, you won't leave the cult that
is victimizing you. You remain staunchly and unwaveringly devoted to
the cult that is victimizing you, the cult that blames
men for everything.

Speaker 1 (34:00):
Under the sun.

Speaker 2 (34:01):
I'm sorry to tell you this, but that cult is
also ravaging its way through the USA, and it will
continue to do so as long as you and your
ilk are dragging it with you everywhere you go. You're
like a Democrat who escapes the tyranny of a blue
state only to land in a red state and continue
to vote blue. And for that reason, Graham, I can
only feel so sorry for you. My sympathy can only

(34:23):
go so far. You didn't necessarily bring this on yourself
to the extent that you expected. But if you're going
to carry on bringing it onto everyone else around you,
no matter where you go, then at some point I
have to recommend that you go fuck yourself. Your ideological
hatred of men is what got you into this mess,
but only because you extended that hatred towards the only

(34:45):
white men who we are not allowed to hate, the
ones who have officially denounced their masculinity.

Speaker 1 (34:51):
Just stop hating men, Graham.

Speaker 5 (34:53):
Just stop it.

Speaker 1 (34:54):
Get some help.

Speaker 2 (34:55):
You can go somewhere where you won't get arrested for it,
but it will continue to blacken your sol wherever you go,
and it will tar the destinies of all the other
men around you. Women are not the victims of everything.
Gay people are not the victims of everything. Men, plain, old, normal,
boring men can also be victims. And would you believe

(35:15):
me if I told you that the men who feel
the insatiable need to denounce their masculinity are themselves victims
victims of who feminism?

Speaker 1 (35:26):
Graham?

Speaker 2 (35:27):
They are victims of feminism, and you are a feminist.
Hence they are victims of you. Just like you are
a victim of them. It's a vicious cycle and a
hideous state of affairs. And all you have to do,
all of you, is stop hating men. But you won't,
none of you. You have no incentive to stop hating men,
and you can't live without it. So yeah, in conclusion,

(35:48):
fuck you all, don't give a shit anymore. Go the
fuck away. I don't want you in anyone's toilet. Go
sit in a ditch and piss yourself for all O care.
Needless to say, I'm not a doctor. None of this
is medical advice, so take.

Speaker 4 (35:59):
A lot of the reason why men who try to
navigate feminism end up in this situation is that they
don't understand what feminism is. It is the combination of
that female victim grift and a deep, undying hatred and

(36:20):
fear of masculinity. We always say feminism is hating men.
It's masculinity that they hate. They hate the masculine level
and style of accountability and how rewarding it is for
the people that exhibit it, and how difficult it is
to get what those people have without that degree of accountability.

(36:42):
So if that was the base, the table, is that hatred,
that undying, seething, resentful, angry, rage boiling up toward masculinity.
Combined with that female victim narrative, you then have I'm
going to these were not put here as a prop
but let's say if I can get a hold of

(37:04):
them and put them where they can be seen. So
you have intersectional feminism, which worked its way through academia
and did the long march through the institutions. So you
have this in journalism prominently. You have this in business prominently,
you have this in education prominently. It's in entertainment media prominently.

(37:28):
It is everywhere anything that is part of the mechanisms
of exercising social power in the world, intersectional feminism is there.
And then you have gender feminism, radical feminism. It's all
about masculinity versus femininity. The difference between these two is

(37:51):
this side things you can't cure men of their masculinity,
and this side things that you can. Because they both
treat it like a disease. And when feminism first became
prevalent and prominent in the institutions, they were like this right,
so men could do this and get away with it.
And obviously, as intersectional feminism began to travel and migrate

(38:17):
farther and farther this way, which I'm not going to demonstrate.
So I don't want to break the glasses, even though
that is the name.

Speaker 6 (38:23):
Of my blog.

Speaker 4 (38:24):
I don't want to break this type of glasses that
refers to this type of glasses. Eventually they're too far
apart for a man to straddle, and what happens is
he falls into the gap in between, and he gets crushed,
or he gets impaled, or he gets broken, And that
is what happened here. He fell into the gap in
between intersectional feminism, which embraces all of the gender mafia

(38:50):
communists takeover of gay rights issues and all of the
surrounding issues about sexuality and identity, and feminism that thinks
masculinity is such a terrible disease that it cannot be
cured by any means. And as long as people do
not recognize those two separate branches and how much farther

(39:16):
and farther apart they're becoming. And from my perspective, radical
feminism is right wing feminism and intersectional feminism is left
wing feminism, and it's part of the reason why when
tradwives sound like feminists, they usually sound like radical feminists,
they don't usually sound like intersectional feminists. But as long
as men think that they can navigate, they can't, They're

(39:40):
going to get hurt. The other thing that happens between
these two, between your radical and your intersectional feminists, is
that they have been at war with each other for
about fifty years. They hate each other like only women
can hate each other. And if you ever grew up
around women, if you had a sister, if you had
female cousins, if you played with little girl in your

(40:00):
neighborhood when you were a little boy, at some point
in your life you were probably told if you see
two females fighting, you don't get in between them, because
you're gonna die. This is the same thing. So if
you try to navigate or negotiate between and negotiate the
space between and the space where the fight is happening,
you will get crushed. So the best thing that you

(40:22):
can do is recognize that in the war between feminisms,
both sides are wrong, and you're outside of that war.
There is no way that you there's no side you
can alli with, there's no side that you can trust,
there's no side that you can accept a little bit of,
and say, well, now that I'm on your side against them,

(40:42):
you can see some of my points. Because they won't
do that because they hate you, you have masculinity disease
and therefore you're the bad guy. Then they will actually
a lie with the other side against you, like they
did here. So that's essentially what happened to him, and
there's no getting around that. There's no way for men
to get involved in a feminist issue on the side

(41:04):
of feminism without putting themselves in the position that at
some point this is going to happen to them.

Speaker 1 (41:09):
All right, thank you, Hannah. Does anybody else want to
say anything about grand Lin Holme's situation? I'm sorry, I'm
not going to say it right, what is it?

Speaker 7 (41:20):
No?

Speaker 1 (41:20):
No, for some reason, I got grand on the mind.
I just want to say that it's it's Graham, Yeah,
it's uh. Anybody want to say anything else about Lawrence
Fox released? I guess so, But I mean, what was
he under arrest for.

Speaker 2 (41:36):
His bail condition? Was his bail condition was he wasn't
allowed to tweet? Oh well, I think he got out
of that eventually.

Speaker 1 (41:43):
Yeah, yeah, we'll let you go. Just don't tweet anymore. Awesome. Anyway,
let us know what you guys think about this one.
In the comments. We're gonna grayhand land Lin Holme Irish
Irish name. That's what I'm gonna say.

Speaker 4 (41:58):
But if I ever started a retail business, that's what
I'm gonna call it. Grand lind homes.

Speaker 1 (42:02):
Yeah, Grand lin homes. Nobody can afford houses anymore. Hi, Monique,
was up a question? You get up and come over here,
Just come up to the table.

Speaker 3 (42:12):
I'm just really curious because it seems like they are
so like like they eat up themselves, right, they eat
up their own men that support them? Is there because
of social media and more information, I guess more awareness.
Do you think that that that there'll be a time
when they just they've chewed up too many people and
they've thrown a lot of their own people under the bus,
especially men that may have some influence. I mean, it

(42:34):
doesn't seem like they can keep attacking their own and
they are tucking each other the cannibalism, like the in
their own in their own squad. What would you think
about that?

Speaker 1 (42:44):
All right? Thanks Monique? Well, I mean, personally, I think
that this ideology, it is built on a constant spiral.
That's a purity spiral, Right, So as they continue to
compress and compress because there's like new things they get
upset about somebody fails the vibe check at some point,
and then they get yeah, they will exactly. It's an

(43:05):
unsustainable project, like they're they're gonna keep like compressing and
compressing and shrinking. It's basically gonna, you know, destroy itself.
All I'm saying is I think that when we cover
these things, I'm trying to, like, for my part, help
people see it so they can just avoid that. Like
that's what we need is to like avoid these nut jobs,
recognize them as nutjobs. Look for the signs, you know,

(43:28):
septum piercing danger, hair like you know, crazy opinions, bird hands,
Like just look for the signs and then avoid them
and then you'll be safe. And but the other thing too,
is that like you have to like stop concerning yourself
with like whether or not you are I don't know,

(43:50):
saying something inappropriate. There There is such a thing as
sort of like social norms of like being polite. I'm
not saying that we should just run through the hotel
with our pants down, but like or just like yell
curse words, you know, like just yell gamer words in
the hotel. But when you're like online and you're saying something,

(44:11):
you shouldn't be constantly either guarding yourself from what you're
gonna say or how you normally communicate, and you shouldn't
also be worried that other people might think you're a
bad person. Right, So, and this is really hard because
we've all been conditioned to feel like we have to
signal to everyone that we're not bigots. Like being a
bigot is the worst thing in the world. It's worse

(44:34):
than you know, committing crimes. I mean, there's like that.
Literally one of the stories we have is gonna show
demonstrate exactly what I'm talking about. One of the stories
we have on the show. And what we have to
do is we have to be able to have the
courage to say I know who I am and you
don't get to tell me what that is, right, And
I think it's it's the only way that you're gonna

(44:55):
that if people do it on a larger scale, it's
the only thing that's gonna beat cancel culture too, because
cancel culture is built on the same premise where there's
a bunch of people saying we've all agreed that you
can't be this way, and if somebody steps out of line,
then we are going to correct that behavior. Usually it's
done through, you know, like getting you in trouble with
your school or your boss or whatever. Yeah, or maybe

(45:18):
assassination like that might happen. But I'm just that's exactly right,
because that is, like I said before, censorship is practicing assassination,
and people the ghules online. I love that this word
ghoul has just been getting used everywhere since the assassination
they have. They've only been able to act this way

(45:38):
because their opponents have been dehumanized to such an extent
through these threat narratives. Right, this is old. These are
old practices, old tactics, and it's been so effective to
do it to the point where when you hear someone died,
you're relieved. You actually think that, you know, Harry Potter

(45:59):
defeated con or whatever whatever the enemy is from the books,
right well, like you know, defeated Palpatine. And because we don't,
we don't care about those people because they're not human.
And that's one of the reasons why I noticed. Have
you noticed that a lot of these people are often
referencing like pop culture things like they'll show you, like,
you know, these characters from movies and cartoons and books

(46:20):
that they've read that they're already dehumanizing when they do that,
because they're not those are not based in reality. Yeah,
they're absolute characters. So anyway, somebody's corrected me. I know
it's Voldemort. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (46:32):
They only eat themselves from the top down, and they
they grow that base from the bottom up. Something we
were talking about last night, how you'd think this movement
would destroy itself because feminists and leftists, Uh, they're not.
They're not breeding. They hate men, they hate the family unit.
They want to they want to destroy the family unit.
And even when they do breed, they sterilize their children

(46:53):
in the name of trans rising all that. So you think,
why wouldn't this movement shrink itself to death very quickly.
It's because they're they're in charge of the educate system.
They're indoctrinating. They don't need to breed because they get
their converts from an early age, even as early as kindergarten.
They get kids involved in this, and it works, especially
in teenage years, because teenagers are already predisposed to rebel

(47:14):
against their parents, and the teachers in the education system
from the top to the bottom, are teaching them to
be feminist transdegenerates. So there's this endless supply. They can
just steal other people's children, and then once they grow up,
then they start eating each other. And they're going to
keep doing this with every generation until they've killed everyone.
The solution is to get them out of the education system,

(47:36):
but that's going to be pretty difficult because we need
to offer an alternative. While homeschool your kids obviously, if
it's even legal to homeschool your kids wherever you live,
and yeah, some pushback needs to be made against this
long slow march through the institution. We need a long
slow match in the other direction through the institutions, and
that could take several generations, so good luck.

Speaker 1 (48:00):
We could start an online college though, like that's an option.

Speaker 4 (48:03):
But here I'm going to go back to Charlie. This
is one of the reasons why he was so dangerous.
Feminism had time for a long march through the institutions.
We don't, and it's the next generations that are going
to be the next set of institutions. And to understand
why it's so hard for feminism and all other forms

(48:26):
of collectivist, authoritarian, social micromanagement to eat themselves and disappear.
You have to understand the incestuous relationship between the establishment
and these ideologies, these identity victim identity politics. They use
the establishment, and the establishment uses them. Women didn't get

(48:47):
the vote because women wanted to vote. Women got the
vote because it served the needs of the establishment. Women
will give up independence and their own boundary and their
famili's boundaries, and their neighbor's boundaries, and their community's boundaries
for gibbs and safety and perceived safety where they're not

(49:10):
actually safe, but they feel safe. And there's a huge
difference between feeling safe and being safe, right. You think
about it this way. When you're a little kid and
you're in your room in the dark, and you're scared
of the dark, and there's a shadow on the wall
and it doesn't look nice. It looks like a monster
or something scares the crap out of you.

Speaker 1 (49:29):
But if you.

Speaker 4 (49:30):
Create an environment where your room is so pitch dark
that you can't see any shadows, you might have a
burglar in your room that you can't see, and you
feel safe because you don't see that scary shadow on
your wall, But are you? And that's the difference between
feeling safe and being safe. Feminists will give up everything
that makes you safe, your ability to defend yourself, your

(49:52):
ability to think for yourself, your ability to choose where
you're gonna go, what you're gonna do, how you're gonna work,
how you're gonna live for authoritarian state that makes them
feel protected but can't get to their door for an
hour after they call nine one one when somebody's breaking in.

Speaker 1 (50:10):
With a gun.

Speaker 4 (50:11):
So, when you have this environment in which the state
uses women's tendency to give that up to gain more
and more authoritarian power, and then they use that authoritarian
power to create systems of an indoctrination and fear mongering
to make little girls feel like the most important thing

(50:33):
they can do with their vote is give the state
more power. You create a self perpetuating machine. It's a
Rupe Goldberg device for growing more authoritarian feminism. And so
no matter what, no matter how many men they break,
no matter how many men they kill, no matter how
many women get pissed off and leave, no matter how
many men get pissed off and say tell it to

(50:55):
the bear, there will always be more feminism, there will
always be more guyness centrism, there will always be more
state power. And the only care for this is a slow,
short rush through the institutions. The younger generations need to
take over. The young men of the younger generations need

(51:17):
to start running for local office and then state office
and then federal office in short order and setting things right.
That's the only way to do this.

Speaker 1 (51:27):
Hi, prim you're fine, Well, I gotta lose the next story.

Speaker 4 (51:34):
Yeah, and I got it. That was basically all I
wanted to say is men need to start getting involved
in civics because if not, women are going to destroy
the world.

Speaker 1 (51:42):
All right, Well, with that said, let me know what
you guys think about this one in the comments. We're
gonna move on to the next way. You have two
more to get through, and I don't know if there's
a time of it, but okay, this week in Zoomer,
women are cooked. We're gonna be looking at a study
that was recently least here. You're not gonna be able
to see it because it's where our little picture is

(52:05):
kind of covering. I'm gonna move this down so you
guys can see this because I think this is striking
but not surprising. This was shared by Steve co Kornaki
on x or Steve Yeah, Steve KORNACKI, I am pronouncing
that right. This is not me trying to say grave
Lin Bucket or whatever his name is. Dated September Stember eighth,

(52:27):
twenty twenty five, and there was an NBC News Decision
Desk poll focused on gen Z men and women aged
eighteen eighteen through twenty nine and their personal definitions of success,
segmented by gender and political affiliation based on the most
recent twenty twenty four election in the United States, although

(52:50):
I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these data
would reflect in zoomer men and women in other parts
of the world as well. And so they basically show
what are the highest priorities that men and women have zoomers.
And these are people that are getting into the thirties now,
just so they're not kids, okay. These people are at

(53:10):
the point now where they're thinking about the future and
what they want out of their life. And you only
get one. So this is important to think about. And
if you look here men who voted for Trump, so
you could say right wing men, they're top three. Let's
just look at the top four, okay, or top five.
So thirty four percent having children, thirty three percent financial independence,

(53:32):
thirty percent fulfilling job or career, twenty nine percent being married,
and twenty eight percent having money to do the things
you want. So they're you look at For the men,
I'm just gonna like explain why this is why this
is interesting but not surprising to me anyway. So men

(53:52):
want primarily a family, and they want to be married,
and the job part financial independence, fulfilling job. Those only
exist on that list in that order because it supports
the other two things, because a man inherently knows that
if he doesn't have a job that, you know, if
he doesn't have a job and financial independence, he's not
getting married, and therefore he's not having kids, which is

(54:13):
why kids are at the very top. And then after
all that, he says, well, it'd be nice if I
could have money to do the things I want after
everything else. So I'm just looking at the top five.
I mean, the rest could fall in line, and I
think they seem pretty reasonable. Then we look at left
wing women women who voted for Harris number one, fulfilling job,

(54:34):
career number two having money to do the things you want.
Number three having emotional stability. That's not even on the
list for the men for some reason. Oh it's at
the bottom. Yeah, number four using talents and resources to
help others, and number five financial independence. So this shows that,

(54:56):
at least to me, I mean, this says something pretty obvious,
but men and women men of this generation are at
completely paradoxical priorities, like their purposes are different. Now, there
is also studies that show what men for Harris, like
left wing men and right wing women want. But right
wing women are not the same as the right wing men.

(55:17):
They still are putting their jobs and everything else up
higher on the list. So this isn't this isn't really
a left right thing. But this is just what the
study shows, right. So we're looking at a situation where
the thing that men want the most women don't want
to give them. And this is going to be a
big problem because men are looking for women that want

(55:40):
the same thing, right. And I don't know if Zumer
women are already saying, like where all the good men
I think they are. I think they're making videos from
their cars, you know, with their septum rings. But yeah,
this is something that I thought was pretty shocking. Not really,
but it might be shocking to the people watching. So
the original post, I did want to make sure that

(56:03):
the sources were real or like what was involved. There
were The study was big, thirty thousand, two hundred adults,
so that's not a small poll, so that's worth looking at.
And that was like the main thing I want to say.
So what do you guys think about this? And again,
if you guys want to say something, that's cool, But

(56:23):
first I'm going to give it hold on. First, I
want to give it to Mike Orhanna to say something. So,
do do you have something for this?

Speaker 2 (56:28):
Yeah, there are things I don't trust about this survey,
mostly because some of these options are loaded terms that
in themselves imply success. Nosis is not just having a job.
It's having a fulfilling job slash career. The fact that
it's fulfilling necessarily means it's successful, so it would be
in your definition of success. It doesn't say having fulfilling

(56:51):
children is just having children. I mean, you could have children,
but you could inadvertently do a bad job of raising them.
They could go on to become psychos who hate.

Speaker 1 (56:58):
You and everyone around them.

Speaker 2 (57:00):
Similarly, with regards to marriage, you'll notice it just says
being married, not having a long and happy marriage. Being
married does not necessarily mean success or even lead to it.
Far from it, given how many of them end in
divorce these days. How the hell so many men prioritize
that if anything speaks to how short sighted men are,

(57:21):
or at least how naive they can be about how
the family courts work. What's also quite telling is that
men's lowest priority is having emotional stability. I think that's
probably because men don't worry about that sort of thing,
because they generally are emotionally stable, probably because they're blissfully
unaware of how much women hate them and will readily

(57:42):
ruin their lives. Whereas for women, emotional stability is their
third priority because they don't have it, and to them
it's like gold dust, it's like winning the lottery. They've
never known emotional stability because they've been taught to be
constantly terrified about men raping them or stabbing them on
a bus or something, which is another story we might

(58:02):
get around too soon. It reminds me of that historical
exchange between an Englishman and a Frenchman. The Englishman says,
you French fight for money, us English fight for honor,
and the Frenchman responds, yes, we fight for that which
we lack the most sick burned Frenchmen, I will give
you that. Like these aren't necessarily the things that men
and women aspire to as a field of excellence. They're

(58:23):
the things they're most worried about never being able to achieve.
It's extremely easy for women to have children and retain
custody of them, where it is extremely difficult for men,
whereas using talents and resources to help others is a
low priority for men because they're basically already obliged to
do that. I'm already doing that. It's my job to

(58:44):
do that. For at any point I stopped doing that,
I won't be able to achieve any of the other
things on this list, whereas women are more concerned with
having money to do the things you want. I mean,
do I even need to explain that women don't aspire
to provide, they aspire to deserve. This is where we
make the obligatory recommendation of home math slacest video. I

(59:05):
think it's called which which they'll never get from the state.
But yeah, this survey really isn't telling us what it
looks like. It's telling us, in my opinion, like so
many of these questionnaires, it's not really diving deep into
people's psyche is it's just scratching the surface of what
people think they should be saying, which is at all
times tempered by what people have been taught to think

(59:26):
by a corrupt system of shallow gender studies slop wherein
men give everything and women receive everything. I wouldn't take
it too seriously if I were you, especially given that
it was conducted by NBC. I mean, we really expecting
such shysters to be asking the right questions, that alone,
collating the right answers in short, opinion discarded fuck bitches

(59:49):
get money, and so on and so forth. The prophet
has spoken, I'm not a real prophet. None of this
is sooth saying advice.

Speaker 4 (59:55):
I think one of the first things that struck me
is the difference between how men and women look at
work and money. You're looking at the causes of the
wage gap right there, where women put having a fulfilling
job or career and having money to do things they
want well above financial independence. If you don't want financial independence,

(01:00:20):
as much as you want to have money to do
things that you want, that means that you're willing to
use other people's money to do things you want. And
if you don't want to have money to do things
you want as much as you want a fulfilling job
or career, that means you're willing to take a job
that you like instead of a job that pays you well,

(01:00:44):
and then rely on other people's money to supplement your lifestyle,
which is pretty much feminine economics and a nutshell that
is to be fair home math. My money and his
money are my mind. His money is our money, or
maybe even just my money, and that's the way that

(01:01:06):
women live. And then the result of that is that
women go through life financially unprepared, and they expect men
to work harder and longer and uglier, more dangerously, more
painful to make up for it, and being married and
having children at the bottom of the list, being able

(01:01:28):
to retire early at the bottom of the list, Well,
a lot of women don't retire because they don't get jobs.
They stay home, So you don't retire from that. Your
kids grow up and they move out, and you're an
empty nester. So why would they care about that, And
they don't care about him retiring early because they want
that money to do things they want, but they don't
want financial independence as much, so therefore he can't retire

(01:01:51):
early either. This is why we have such a high
divorce rate in the United States. It's why we have
such a rate, such a high rate of credit card debt.
If you look at men's debt habits, it's usually for
things like I have to have a car that's reliable
to get to work. I'm gonna go into debt to
have this car and I'll pay for it. I'm gonna
get a mortgage to house my family. I'm going to

(01:02:14):
take out a business loan to start this company. Women,
it's I'm gonna buy new shoes and a set of
curtains that don't fit the windows in my house, and
so that that debt doesn't get paid off always and
it wrecks their credit and then they rely on men more.
It's it's also why we really need to go back
to a dowry system, even in the West. I worked

(01:02:37):
for ten years before I got married, and if my
parents had been of a wise mindset with regard to
my responsibility toward my husband and my future family. They
would have ordered me because for part of that time
I was underage to sock that away somewhere instead of

(01:02:57):
spending it on movies and shoes and dresses and snacks
and crap books. A lot of it went to books.
Most of it went to books. But you know, I
would have had a nest egg. We would have been
able to put a down payment on a house. Life
would have been a hell of a lot easier. And
since girls don't usually pay for dates, since girls don't
usually have to be the one financially supporting the relationship,

(01:03:19):
and a lot of them do plan on becoming stay
at home moms that don't have a job and don't
bring home any of the bacon, they just cook it.
The wise thing is if you use the intern between
you start when you start working and when you tie
the knot to put away a savings and contribute to
the start of your family's financial stability as a woman,

(01:03:41):
you are building something that will serve your family for
the rest of your life, and then you won't have
so much of a worry about financial stability, having money
to do things you want, And whether or not financial
independence is related to that because you've created a foundation
on which what you're asking your man to do will

(01:04:03):
be more stable, and you'll be taking some of the
burden off of him, and you might get to keep
him longer, and which you know, if you're getting married,
that means you really like him, you want him around.
That's a good thing. But we don't tell women that.
And when we bring it up, like you say that
on X, you get flooded with women accusing you of misogyny.
How dare you suggest women should have to pay to

(01:04:23):
get married? That's not the suggestion.

Speaker 1 (01:04:26):
Maybe women should have to pay to.

Speaker 4 (01:04:28):
Get married, But the suggestion is maybe women make their
contribution in bulk at the beginning so that they can
do the other things they want to do.

Speaker 1 (01:04:36):
Without being a deadbeat.

Speaker 4 (01:04:37):
And you know, yes, I have called myself a dead
beat right here now, I am judging a woman, this one,
this one fucked up her family's beginning and paid for
it with years and years of having two and three
jobs trying to make up for it. I had a
baby out of wedlock. Wedlock was coming, but putting the

(01:05:00):
cart before the horse is not healthy for anybody involved.
It made things harder for me, made things harder for
my husband. It made things harder for my children. So
when I talk about this, I'm talking about it from
a place of regret. I wish I had done better
by everyone I love, because if I had, there'd been

(01:05:22):
a lot of things that happened over the last twenty five,
twenty six, twenty seven years. I'm getting old the last
twenty seven years that I wouldn't have cried over that
they wouldn't have happened. And I've had a lot of
sweat and tears as a result of that. And that's
not as bad as the sweat and tears that I
saw my husband go through. I'd rather have had double

(01:05:44):
and spared him that. And I don't want other women
to go through that. I don't want other husbands to
go through that. I don't want other people's kids to
go through that. So when I talk about this, I'm
telling you because I want people to have an easier life.

Speaker 1 (01:05:59):
And that's a.

Speaker 4 (01:06:00):
Pathway to an easier life. And this difference in goals,
it may be pathological, it may not be pathological, but
it exists, it's real, it's there, and it guides how
people live their lives. And one of the best ways
to handle knowing that information is to approach it in
terms of what can we do to mitigate the consequences,

(01:06:23):
and a dowry system encouraging young women to sock away
savings while they're working before they get married is one
method that would be highly effective.

Speaker 1 (01:06:33):
Let's go dowry. Let's bring it back. Okay, take the
gold pill. Guys, all right, I got a before I
move on to the next story, I got a super
chat and I'm gonna ask for audience participation because it's
from Master Rogue. If you guys know Massarogue, he only
tweets or Superchat's one thing. So Massarogue gives us two

(01:06:54):
dollars and says, we're gonna say prim together. Okay. He
gives us two dollars and says, okay, she says hello,
all right, prim did she just said hello back? That's
what I'm saying. We're narrating, Okay, all right, so thank you,

(01:07:14):
Master row. Let me just check super Child's really quick.
Nothing's come through. Send a super child. If you guys
have a comment on the story, I did get one.
That's Feedbatchel dot com. Ford last, just a tip to
send us a message anytime during the show. So let
us move on to the last story. This one I
think ties in with the others. I'm sorry, I was
asking the audience that they wanted to say anything. So

(01:07:35):
we're gonna yeah, let's take a statement.

Speaker 8 (01:07:37):
Here you go, Yeah, if you exactly cargo, if you
can't just be French is cargo? Can you put? But
because the data the number, what about yeah, because there's
a little That's the first thing that I noticed. Actually

(01:07:57):
women who voted for arrists having to do things they
want almost alf financial independence, third, no doubt a fifth.
So howould they get the money to do what they want?
It's someone else money being married one in twenty so

(01:08:18):
eether it's a given or they get someone else's money
without being without being married. By fourth, by state, I
think that's just how we should look. It's facism everything
through the state by the state, nothing out of the state.
That's not very constructive. But at least we see the
red flag.

Speaker 1 (01:08:39):
All right, thank you? Yeah? Did you want to see
you go ahead? Thank you?

Speaker 6 (01:08:42):
Okay, So this has been doing around this table that
we're all seeing, obviously, but a lot of people have
not quite been understanding it because they've it's been taking
a little out of context. But what NBC did was
they handed all of these people this complete list of
thirteen things, and then they said, pick the top three
that are the most important to your personal definition of success.

(01:09:03):
And so what this table is showing is that thirty
four percent of men who voted for Trump put having
children in their top three, so that was one of
the most popular And thirty three percent of those men
said financial independence and so on and so forth. So
this is a ranking of the people who thought these
were in the top three. So it's a bit of
an odd table. Like if someone says being able to

(01:09:24):
retire early is not in my top three, well, okay,
but it might be your fourth most important thing. There
might be a very narrow definition, a narrow separation between
that and having children. Even though it's only nine percent,
So this is not nine percent of men think yeah, yeah,
it's not the case that only six percent of women
who voted for Harris think having children is important. It's yes,

(01:09:45):
there's a difference in values, but it's not as extreme
as some people have been led to believe. And it's
also kind of a weird way to ask the question,
or maybe to display it. I'm not sure. It's just
maybe it was calculated to cause a lot of controversy
and not a lot of communicating very clearly in NBC
what they were doing and they knew people would misunderstand
and misinterpret. Or maybe they're just incompetent and other news.
You do not hate journalists enough, Thank you, Alison.

Speaker 1 (01:10:08):
You wanted to say something, well, I'll say you gotta
get up. I don't know, but it reads you here.

Speaker 7 (01:10:14):
Okay, I just have a logistical question. Do you mind
if we piggyback the response to adolescents onto that one
of you guys, well on your stream? Can we hijack
your stream?

Speaker 3 (01:10:24):
Yeah?

Speaker 7 (01:10:24):
Yeah, you could do the like the intermission, then we
can change it and then to continue.

Speaker 1 (01:10:29):
So are you asking me to stop the show? No? Okay,
I have one more story, Yes, go ahead, Yeah, okay.
The other thing I wanted to say too, though, there's
one more other thing I thought about as we were
like talking about this list. I think one of the
reasons too, to consider why so few women would find
being married, having children and you know, like those things

(01:10:50):
like they would find those to be in their top three,
probably because maybe they don't think that they have to
worry about them, like maybe they think that they're gonna
get married. It's a given. You know, I got men
waiting in my DMS. I got this, and so it's
not like something they have to put a lot of
like mental energy into being worried about because it's probably
a given. Right. It's delusion. But you know, I'm just saying,

(01:11:12):
maybe this is why they're not ranking it that high
or or the yeah, or they're like living the call
her Daddy like era of like just doing whatever you want. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:11:21):
So the other aspect of that is that it may
be that they women answered this on the basis of
what was what was their top three right now, starting
with the boomer generation, So all of a sudden, here
that are Gen xers. We got to hear this. The
millennials got the same thing shoved down their throats that
the one of the mantras of the sexual revolution was

(01:11:45):
have your fun now and you can settle down later, right,
And so women feel entitled to party, enjoy themselves, focus
on everything except the future that they want with a
family for so many years, and then expect that later
when they're ready for that to be in their top three,

(01:12:07):
they'll have an easy time, making it happen just just
the same as they would if they had started when
men start planning for it. And this is this is
another reason why we need to go back to a
dowry system, right. I think I've said this on the
show before too. Love your children before you have them,
Love your children before you conceive them. Start building their

(01:12:28):
circumstances for their childhood and how you're going to raise
them before you bring children into the world or don't
have children. And again before anybody's like misologyny, I'm judging myself.

Speaker 7 (01:12:39):
You know.

Speaker 4 (01:12:40):
I got one finger pointed out at the women of
the world and three pointed back at me, because that's
my big mistake was the child wasn't a mistake, but
the failure to get ready was huge, huge mistake. And
that's what connected to it. Being raised in an environment

(01:13:01):
where we're told that you can put off preparing, you
can just wing it. Parenthood is easy. You know, it's
the hardest job in the world, being a mother, but
it's so easy that you don't have to think about
it till after you've conceived the baby. Which one of
these things has to be true, you know, right, you
can't make a mistake. You can't be wrong, you can't
be damage your child. You can't Yeah, yeah, you can't

(01:13:23):
do anything wrong, which means you don't have to try
to do anything right. So why would it be high
on their priority list when they're still young, Because you
don't have to think about it until after you're in
that situation and scrambling. How am I going to feed
this kid? How am I going to make sure that
he or she has everything? Am I doing this right?
Am I saying and teaching the right things? Am I

(01:13:45):
demonstrating the right things? What's going to happen when Junior
hits junior High and since I'm letting him be online unsupervised,
he finds Mommy's Shoot, what's that stupid site called only Page?
You know? From ten years ago? And women don't think
about these things when they're eighteen, nineteen, twenty twenty five.

(01:14:10):
They don't think about it till they're thirty, and nobody
wants to date them because their body count is higher
than their age, and their debt is higher than all
of the ages of their whole community put together, and
their degree got them a job at Starbucks.

Speaker 1 (01:14:26):
That's better. I like that, all right? So yeah, that's things.
All right, We're gonna move on to the next one.
Let us know, you guys think about this in the
comments of final chance for anybody to say anything about
No Alison, you talk too much? Somebody else? Oh the
Mormon Dating Show. Yeah yeah, all right, okay, anyway, move

(01:14:46):
on to the next story. This one should ruffle some feathers.
This is remember when I was talking before about how
something something women are like kind of but the idea
of being a bigot is like so repulsive that would
just like destroy ourselves to not be called one. So

(01:15:06):
one hundred UK women's rights organizations, including Rape Crisis, England
and Wales, Refuge and South Hall Black Sisters issued open letters.
Let me put this on the screen so you guys
can see this. It's just the image issued open letters
condemning far right efforts to link immigration, particularly asylum seekers,

(01:15:27):
with sexual violence against women and girls. They labeled these
claims racist lies, arguing that they exploit gender based violence
to fuel anti migrant hate, citing cases like protests and
epping essex after an asylum seekers alleged assault. The groups
emphasize that sexual violence is a widespread societal issue, with

(01:15:48):
over ninety percent of cases involving known perpetrators, not strangers
or specific ethnic groups, and that scapegoaing migrants distracts from
addressing systemic male violence while in danger marginalized women, including refugees. Notice,
I just want to say this because I know someone
else is going to bring it up when you get
into this. They're this situation where you see there are

(01:16:11):
male offenders and maybe female ones from foreign you know,
they're like migrants, they're illegals. Whatever. What feminists do because
of intersectionality is they pivot to all men instead of
like saying, well, maybe we could address this issue. And
this makes it to where that can keep happening without
them actually having to talk about the issue itself, because

(01:16:32):
the last thing they want is to be called racist.
Far right figures like Nigel Faraj and Robert Jared Jenrick
sorry Jeneric fuel of the controversy, with Farage claiming Afghan
males are disproportionately convicted of rape, and genic alleging forty
percent of London's sexual crimes involve foreign nationals, though these
claims were criticized for relying on flawed data. A follow

(01:16:55):
up letter Women against the Far Right, signed by over
two hundred prominent figures on September second, twenty twenty five,
rejected these narratives as divisive and urge focus on real solutions.
Critics like which are I don't think they have any.
Critics like Tory MP Alicia Kerns argue that ignoring migrant
related crimes risks women's safety, but the women's groups stressed

(01:17:16):
that such rhetoric perpetuates harmful myths, silences the survivors, and
undermines justice for all victims. So I'm going to do
my panels first. So, Mike, do you have anything to
say about this? I mean, you're from there. I might,
I might know something theory.

Speaker 2 (01:17:31):
Yeah, you think I'd have more to say about this,
but I've already covered it. Most incidentally, there's a million
people marching in London. Yes, they are specifically against immigration,
and that's such a start. But this story is sort
of an indication that we need another million people marching
for the cause of our immigration problems. And it's sort
of outlined there. We gave women the vote, and eventually,

(01:17:54):
eventually they started voting not just for their own for
their own gimmes, but to give means to everyone in
the world. Except englishmen, and and to place everyone in
the pyramid above english men. So this time next year, Tommy,
I know you're not interested in this, but we we
need a million men much because the immigration problem is

(01:18:17):
only a symptom. It's only it's only the leaves of
the poison ivy. We need to we need to sort
out the problem of the seeds, which are and always
have been feminism. Well women, let's just get rid of
the women. Never mind the vote, shall we just slaughter
all the l stop we still need them?

Speaker 1 (01:18:37):
Sort of boy.

Speaker 4 (01:18:38):
So a large part of this issue is the culture
clash between women. You have women of one culture that
consider being entitled to a sexual display to be a virtue,
being entitled to not only put on a sexual display,
but expect that nobody will react to it as a
sexual display unless they want. That's a virtue. Your status

(01:19:02):
is higher if you can demand that only the people
you want notice that you've stuck your tits out and
it's not very quality. And then the other culture, reserving
yourself sexually is a virtue, and so women who don't
do that are scum and therefore anything is fair to
do to them. And women are the ones that raise

(01:19:23):
the boys. So when you have these two cultures shoved
in together by the elites where they're they're told, you know, here,
you go, get along. We're not going to provide you
with any support or guidance or anything like that, you
have the women of the conservative culture saying, well, those
women are scum. You can do anything to them that
you want, and we don't care, and actually we're going

(01:19:44):
to get mad if you don't. And you have that
tendency in both cultures. Men want to please their women,
and if that means mistreating the women of the other culture,
then that's on the table. It's not necessarily because they're
naturally predatory, rapee bastards that just want to run around
and take advantage of someone. There are other cultural things

(01:20:06):
that are influencing this at the same time, women's pathological politeness.
I could exclude myself from this because I'm not polite.
I'm too far in the other direction sometimes, right, but
women will women will offer a burglar that's broken into
their house a glass of water to make sure he's comfortable,
because they don't want to seem like a bad hostess, right,

(01:20:27):
And they'll especially do that if he's burglarizing their neighbors
and not them. They're okay, they're safe. You know, by
the way, don't park there. The cops will take it
to just you know, want to get out of the
neighborhood fast park over there. And it's something that results
in tolerance for any kind of behavior like I just described,

(01:20:47):
where their outgroup treats them as an outgroup and mistreats
their whole group. They allow it, they don't care because
it's not happening to them directly, and you do get
a rise in violent crime and conflicts, misunderstandings, lawsuits, cancelations
on social media sites, and little girls running around with
axes and knives trying to defend themselves because some chicks

(01:21:10):
started to fight with them or their mother or their
sister and then got her man involved, and then he
gets into trouble, and the kids get into trouble, and
the lady that started the whole thing walks away completely
unscathed because she's female and they can't hold her accountable.
Then feminists come along and like to say, ninety nine
percent of rapists are men and this is just a

(01:21:31):
man thing, and men do it. But when you look
at the statistics, right, even if it was true, which
is not, that ninety nine percent of rapists were men.
What percentage of men are rapists? So I had gropped
you a calculation on this a while back. What percent
of the population, the general adult male population is represented

(01:21:54):
by crime statistics? What percent of adult males in the
just the United States are perpetrators? And it is a
fraction of one percent. So if ninety nine percent of
a group, that is a fraction of one percent of
the overall general adult male population. And I used as

(01:22:17):
the age you can be charged as an adult, so
fifteen and up right, then is that really typical of
that general population? Or is it that whatever causes human
beings to go wrong so wrong that they commit violent
crimes hits men more often than women. And so when

(01:22:39):
feminists turn around in try to use that as a
characterization of men, well, if ninety nine plus percent of
the people who do do not commit violent crimes are men,
then why is that not considered a characteristic It's a
very poignant question, and when you turn it around on them,
they get mad all around. In this issue, it is

(01:23:02):
again an in group, out group, false framing, feminist complaint,
exploitation of your inability to notice how they're framing things
kind of an issue. Yes, these things are happening, and
yes there is a racial component to it. Yes there
is a cultural component to it. No, it's not characteristic

(01:23:24):
of the race or the culture. There are other causes.
But we can't talk about it until we can acknowledge
all of the things that are involved in the false
framing and all of the things that are true. And
we can't do that as long as we suffer from
women's pathological politeness.

Speaker 1 (01:23:42):
All right, who's next? You want to go? All right,
here we go? Here is the dream.

Speaker 8 (01:23:48):
I don't know what that means.

Speaker 1 (01:23:49):
So this is speaking too.

Speaker 8 (01:23:52):
You will explain that later.

Speaker 1 (01:23:55):
I think I've seen it.

Speaker 8 (01:23:57):
I'll have to remember that one resistance guys and.

Speaker 4 (01:23:59):
They all have these It always comes back injured.

Speaker 1 (01:24:03):
Well, that coruestion to what I do.

Speaker 8 (01:24:06):
This is speaking directly to something that is happening in
Frience with women's group fighting the immigrants. It's nemesis collective.
And guess what the first opponent, physical opponent is other women.
So if women in England or in other countries want

(01:24:26):
to start fighting against other cultures raping them, you will
face other women you will face your own kind fighting you.

Speaker 1 (01:24:35):
That's normal.

Speaker 8 (01:24:36):
When you wake up, you're surrounded by people who will
sound asleep and we won't like you waking up from
their sweet dreams. But you will also find a lot
of people ready to help you. That's was just for
saying that everybody else.

Speaker 5 (01:24:53):
Yeah, yes, okay, Well, of course, the reason why ninety
nine percent of men are not raped just because feminists
have been very successful in their campaign off teaching men
not to rape.

Speaker 4 (01:25:07):
All right, Alison, so so successful. The effect was retroactive.

Speaker 1 (01:25:11):
All right, Alison wants to say something again. Oh fix that?

Speaker 3 (01:25:15):
What do you do?

Speaker 7 (01:25:16):
That's okay, that's okay.

Speaker 1 (01:25:18):
I don't know if this is right. Okay, it's good.

Speaker 7 (01:25:21):
I want to sit down. I feel all right, you're fine, okay,
just a second is this will take a little bit
of time. There we go, Okay, sit down please. Now
we're safe. Now we're safe. I gotta get my thoughts
back in order. All right, So this is okay. To
Romerck's point, I think about how many political issues come

(01:25:46):
down to two groups of women fighting, just just the
trans issue, two groups of women fighting, and not just
even trans women. It's liberal women, liberal feminists versus turfs.
The immigration issue, two groups of women fight, abortion, two
groups of women fighting like every most of the I
can't even think of one issue that isn't two groups

(01:26:07):
of women fighting over it, and then both groups of
women blaming men for the other women's positions. So, for
use the abortion one, the pro pro abortion people say
it's conservative men wanting to keep women pregnant and barefoot,
and they pro pro life women say that it's it's liberal.
And I've seen mats where they refer to this, that

(01:26:30):
it is liberal men who just want to exploit women's
sexuality without any kind of responsibility. And it's like, no,
it's you know that this is not a this is
not a dialogue. That really what we need to do
is we need to create a gigantic thunderdome, right, and
we need to dress these women up in like leather
and studs and say, okay, you guys go in and

(01:26:50):
one point of view comes out, and that's the point
of view that we'll use, right, Sorry, Yeah, yeah, okay,
I was just thinking of Mad Max and Maiden crossover
outfits that would be definitely interesting. But yeah, so it's
like this is and these things never get resolved because

(01:27:12):
the women do not seem to have a way of
debating them and concluding the concept. So they come in,
they set up these camps. They use men as escapegoats
and also foot soldiers for each of these political positions,
and they never get resolved because the women won't come
together and say, Okay, let us hash this out logically rationally,

(01:27:34):
and nobody calls them out on it, says, no, go
into the thundernomet go hash this out in whatever way
you need to do it, but find a solution that
doesn't involve blaming men or expecting men to go kill
themselves over it, right, And it's like that, and then
you just see that when you see it, you see
it all the balkanizes and the two camps and votes
for women was the same thing too, two camps of

(01:27:57):
women thought. Much larger camp was like do it, like
don't do it, don't do it. And then there was
a smaller camp there was like do it.

Speaker 8 (01:28:04):
Do it, do it, do it, do it, do it,
do it?

Speaker 7 (01:28:06):
And and then you know the one that was supported
by the Rockefellers one, yeah, more money, but yeah, so
it's it's you look back through history. Prohibition everything. It's
like two camps of women. You go back far enough,
it's probably tribal conflicts, two groups of women. It's like, ah,
she stole my goat, and which is really actually sort
of what the Christian narrative was about, is about, you know,

(01:28:29):
don't send your sons to go die over your goat,
you know that kind of thing, and then suddenly an
empire or suddenly a stable civilization. But anyway, I'm getting
into the weeds. But yeah, this is this is sort
of the same thing, and nobody wants to take responsibility
for I got into arguments with people and I said,
I remember it was with Andrew Wilson. We got into
this huge Twitter spat with Twitter spatting with Andrew Wilson.

(01:28:52):
But it was the girl with the axe and the
machete or whatever. I think it was just an axe,
an axe and a dagger.

Speaker 1 (01:28:59):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (01:29:00):
Now, the full story that I've managed to piece together
is that they were approached by a man and he
was harassing them but not doing anything to them, like
not physically or following it perhaps, and then they confronted
her him his wife or girlfriend came out and attacked

(01:29:20):
one of the girls, and then she defended herself and
this is this is the end. So this is, this
has gone from a situation where potentially one woman attacks
another woman into somehow men are all to blame, and
specifically British men or Scottish men for not protecting this
girl from being attacked by another woman, and the woman

(01:29:41):
who initiated the violence disappears into the smoke from the
entire narrative like she's gone right and U and I
actually pointed out, well, what do you expect these U
came in to do to Fatima? But what do you
expect you know, the instance they touched in her there
to in jail for twenty years on a hate crime,
you know. And it's like this, this entire problem is

(01:30:03):
intractable because again it's two camps of women, each blaming
men and each what is there? Each blaming men and
each wanting to use men as their foot soldiers. And
as a result, there's a bunch of women's organizations in
the UK who were saying that that British men who
call out migrant men's sex crimes are themselves sex offenders

(01:30:27):
who are trying to hide their own crimes. And it's
and so you got one side women are saying, your cowards,
you're allowing these foreign men to rape your daughters. On
the other side is if you bring this stuff up,
you are a sex offender who's hiding your own offenses.
And also if you bring it up, you're going to jail.
And it's like, well, what are me like?

Speaker 1 (01:30:47):
What?

Speaker 7 (01:30:47):
What? How? This is not a functioning society. And it's
because the women will not first step look across the aisle,
you know, clear, wipe your glasses, look across the aisle
and tell me if that's a man or a woman
on the other side of your argument. And if it's

(01:31:07):
a woman, stop blaming men. Right, if it's a woman
sending the men out and blaming the men of your side,
stop blaming men. There you go, then we can start
to get somewhere. And I think this is honestly, and
I'm not against the Nineteenth Amendments. I have reservations, but
I can see why many societies said we got to

(01:31:31):
keep women out of direct politics. Because he can't keep
them out of politics. They get in, they're in new politics. Yeah,
just keep them out directly, because this is what happens balkanization.
They set up they blame men they send men and
and the society breaks down into threat narratives. Okay, right, yeah,

(01:31:52):
one last thing, one last thing. It's not just migrantmen,
it's also migrant women. At least twenty five percent of
the sexual violence is done by migrantmen women twenty five percent,
and this is a lease, this is the sleep, this
is the floor. Twenty five is done against British boys.
Most migrant men are just trying to get by in
a society that probably makes absolutely no sense to them,

(01:32:14):
and they're still just putting their nose to the grindstone
and doing the work. So I just wanted to point
those two things out and give it back to you.

Speaker 4 (01:32:21):
The reason that it's always two groups of women fighting
with each other by by throwing men as ammunition is
because they don't think of their own agency. Women will
vote a warmonger in as the leader of their nation,
and then they'll be absolutely shocked when a war starts.
How did this happen? And it's obviously masculinity that caused it.

(01:32:42):
Women will marry a guy, or just get pregnant by
a guy that has no job, has no prospects, you know,
dresses like a scumbag and treats everyone around him like shit.
Is it just an absolute dipshit? And they'll be just
absolutely shocked when he doesn't step up to the plate

(01:33:04):
and become a good father and marry them and raise
the child with them. They don't consider the fact that
they chose badly. They don't consider the fact that this
is a consequence of their choices, and they don't consider
the fact that what the other side is doing has
consequences that are a result of women's choices. They can't
blame other women because they would have to accept that

(01:33:27):
they're responsible, and as long as society allows that, nobody
calls them out. No men say, hey, we didn't vote
in that warmonger. You did because you wanted to be
able to have abortions, you know, and he promised to
protect those we didn't marry the dipshit, you know, It takes,
and it takes two groups of people. It takes men
refusing to tolerate that, and it takes the few women

(01:33:49):
that have woken up and understand that if you make
a stupid choice, if you play stupid games, you win
stupid prizes to call out the other women and you
can be polite about it or you can be like
me and tell some girl on the internet that the
reason she's unhappy about her divorce is because you can't

(01:34:10):
turn a dipshit into a diamond by polishing his nub
and get cussed at for three days afterwards for saying it.
But one way or another, you know, you've got to
get that into other women's heads or this will never end.
There's no other cure.

Speaker 1 (01:34:27):
All right, thank you for that, And that is all
of our stories. I think, what's the next thing going on?
Are we taking a break or is it starting at three? Yeah? Yeah, no,
I know I'm about to. I'm just trying to figure out,
like how much time I have to work with, because
i'd like to know. I'd like to I'd like to
get a coffee because I feel like I'm yeah, yeah,

(01:34:49):
all right, So we're gonna take a coffee break, and
for those of you who are patrons, you'll be able
to keep watching. We've been streaming all morning. Well you
want to stream this live the adolescence thing? Are you
sure we're not gonna get dinged for that? Yeah, it's
gonna watch it, well, not the whole thing, but it's
like an edit. It's like an it's like a it's

(01:35:11):
like a compilation because of the way the show is shot. Yeah,
so this this is gonna go unlisted, although I you know,
I we had record numbers. We had like one hundred
and thirty people watching the news show on YouTube. Yeah probably,
I don't know, so I don't. I don't know why
that is good? Do you guys were here?

Speaker 3 (01:35:31):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (01:35:32):
Okay, So we're gonna we're gonna take a ten minute
break and then if you guys are followers, if you're
if you're yes, so we're gonna close this off live
feedbadger dot com. What Yeah, just a tip to send
us a message or a comment during any time and
we'll be sure to read it on the next relevant show.
I know that already. I don't know what I thought

(01:35:53):
she was telling me something different, But anyway, thanks guys
for coming on today's news show. If you guys liked
this video, please hit like subscribe you're not already subscribe
with the BELF clorifications lead a comment. Let me know
what you guys think about what we discussed on the
show today, and we'll see you guys in the next one.