🔴#MeToo accuser facing jail; boys celebrated, women most affected | Maintaining Frame 183

Are gender reveal parties sexist against women? Are they a sign of how women are marginalized if they aren't born boys? How does this connect to genocide and eugenics? Well, intellectual powerhouse Bryrony Claire has the answers and we are going to be educated on it. Also a bodycam video dropped exposing a #metoo accuser as well!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, we are live. Hello everyone, and welcome to
Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian, I'm here with Alison.
This is maintaining frame number one eighty three. Me too
accuser facing jail, boys celebrated women most affected? Well maybe
that woman is most affected, but uh yeah, so well.

Speaker 2 (00:18):
Maybe disambul ambulgate this Well, okay, So there's two things
we're going to try to get through. The first is
that essentially a me too case that is being covered
by Megan Fox has come to the point of believe
being charged. You can give the details, eh. And then

(00:40):
the other thing I wanted to cover was Byrony Claire
is complaining about boys being celebrated, which is really amusing
because the only time that boys are celebrated is I
suppose you can celebrate a woman for having given a
birth to a boy. Name any other point in a
boy's life where it's celebrated for being a boy, I

(01:02):
dare you. But if a woman can be congratulated for
the existence of a boy, then that's celebrated. But that
really isn't celebrating the boy. Do you think the infant
knows what's going on? It's about celebrating the mother having
given birth to a boy. Yeah, right, just like the
merriage really isn't about the relationship, it's about the bride.

(01:23):
These events aren't about the kid, They're about the mom.
Let's be frank, because I don't think there's any infant
in the history of human race that said, you know
what I really need loud noises and obnoxious smells during
the first couple months. Actually, this is prior to their birth.
If they don't even have an opinion, they can't even
possibly express an opinion at that point. So no embryo

(01:46):
preborn child has ever expressed a desire for a name
reveal party. But still, we will blame boys for this.
We will blame them, by Golly, by God, they will
be blamed, all right. So those are the two things
I want to get through. And I apologize if my
voice sounds like crap. I'm trying to get over some

(02:09):
sort of cold flu thing vaguely unpleasant, increasing mucus kind
of activity. Anyway, that's too much information, so let's get
into the first story. Also, we have sad news as well.
If you wanted to talk about that.

Speaker 1 (02:27):
I was gonna mention on the news show tomorrow, but
unfortunately cause you guys don't don't know this. Aaron Pitsy
passed away, so she is no longer with us. Yeah,
and you know she was a Titan and you know
she'll be missed. So yeah, I don't I don't really
have much to say on it now, but our ip
Aaron Pitsy the absolute legend of I mean, you know,

(02:52):
she was adored by everybody.

Speaker 2 (02:54):
So yeah, well she she was the she was the
the woman who was responsible for the first women's shelter
the UK and I think in the world. And she
also went to back for male victims of domestic violence
and got absolutely excuriated by feminists for that. So that's

(03:15):
that's amber.

Speaker 1 (03:16):
This month is a domestic violence awareness month too. Yeah,
that's a that's an interesting coincidence.

Speaker 2 (03:25):
Mm hm. We actually we interviewed her in the twenty
eighteen I semi we talked to her a couple of times, yeah,
on this show, and.

Speaker 1 (03:34):
I was actually working on getting her on this show
more recently, just to catch up with her. But she
was being cared for by relatives and while she was
like more than happy to do it, for whatever reason,
it was just really hard to like get her to
come on the show working with her. You know, I

(03:55):
think it was one of her grandchildren or something. So
you're all or relatively some.

Speaker 2 (04:01):
Kids'll zoom out, so you guys can see a bit
of voidcat. She's been distracting me while I've at tempted
to do this interest. Well, let's give a summary of
what's going on with this me too accusation.

Speaker 1 (04:11):
Do you want to do that first?

Speaker 2 (04:12):
Yeah, I think we could get through that first because
we've had Megan Fox on the show as well.

Speaker 1 (04:19):
Yes, who we had a Megan Fox on the show.
I think it was like twenty eighteen or something. That
video is privated right now because you know, YouTube is
coming after us, and I guess it was who knows
what it was about, So but yeah, I talked to
her on the show.

Speaker 2 (04:36):
So yeah, we we talked to her. The reason why
I privated it about three years ago was because we
were under a sustained false like flag attack by parties
unknown and we received in the matter of like a
couple of weeks, multiple channel ending strikes against both channels,

(04:57):
and it was like I had to do something or
we would have lost our entire channel. So, you know,
it's it's been a it's been a battle to stay
on YouTube, let me tell you. But that's why it's privated.
I don't think I don't think she requested it. So
we could technically unlist, like make it public again, or
even make some shorts out of it. People might be interested.

Speaker 1 (05:18):
Well, yeah, there's a lot of old older videos that,
like like fireside chats that would be good. So anyway, Yeah,
So Megan Fox not the actress. She is a writer
for PGA Media. And she also wrote a book called
Believe Evidence The Death of Due Process from Saloami or
Sloam to me too. And so she's been like fighting

(05:39):
against this narrative for years and she still writes for
PGA Media. Might have to catch up with her again.
And she wrote this article which well, let me just
read the article. It's kind of written from her perspective. Okay,
all right, so body me too, accuser raided by Megan Fox.

(06:03):
Whenever I write about the celebrity court cases I follow,
inevitably some of you readers here on PJ Media. Let
me know you find it beneath you in the comments section.
Not all of you, of course, but enough that there
are several comments on every article. Bemoaning the lack of
importance of the topic, with Snotti remarks like he's a
celebrity who cares and other jabs to let everyone know
you're too good for this topic. You're focused on important

(06:26):
things like never ending clown show in Washington, which, when
you think about it, is celebrity entertainment. If the celebrities
were unattractive, overweight, overpaid bureaucrats, they even have the same
amount of substance abuse and prostitution problems as Hollywood stars.
The only difference is that no one wants to go
to their orgies, which is probably why they have to

(06:47):
enlist these services of guys like Jeffrey Epstein to procure
unwilling participants. But for some reason, if my stories include
a celebrity, even a minor one, some of you want
to pretend like it's meaningless. Okay, so whatever, we're going
to get into the topic. Yeah, a little bit defensive
and weird, but I'm not gonna let you do that today.
Unraveling in Maricopa County, Arizona is one of the most

(07:10):
important stories in the last decade of Me Too injustice,
when false accusers destroyed lives without consequence and Just when
it looked like false accusers were going to win it all,
Johnny Depp won his defamation suit against Amber heard that
cracked the towers of power and rattle the foundation of
the insidious ideology of believe all women. But the Laura

(07:32):
Owens case in me Copa County is the case that
will light the fuse and obliterate the remains of the
me too narrative. Not only did her victim, Clayton Eckerd,
former Bachelor star on ABC, win his case in family
court against her, but the judge also referred Owens to
the prosecutor for perjury, tampering with evidence. So perjury, tampering

(07:54):
with evidence, and fraud. Owens is facing seven felonies for
pretending to be pregnant with twins and trying to destroy
Eckert's reputation. So, uh, these, I guess are reality stars.
I will bring up their faces and just look them up.

Speaker 2 (08:11):
We should look at that bodycam footage.

Speaker 1 (08:14):
I have the Yeah, it's kind of like a twenty
minute long video, but I could jump around. I watched
it and just to sort of like get my head
in the right space to see what this was about.
So Laura Owens so let's see who is this? Yeah,
so the Bachelor? So she was on the Bachelor. Let

(08:35):
me see. I'm trying to see if there's anything. Who, like,
just give me the short version of who the hell
this is? You know? So, Okay, there is a website
called Victims of Laura Owens dot com. I don't know
if you knew this, but but wow, this guy is
not the only one that she has tried.

Speaker 2 (08:54):
I knew it from Megan Fox's article that I didn't
know any.

Speaker 1 (08:57):
Of her article. Yeah, okay, anyway, not only let me
already read that part right, Yeah, okay. This is much
more significant than a lot of you might believe. When
conservatives say the law must be upheld to deter others
from committing crimes, this is the case to champion. Hardly
anyone has ever prosecuted for perjury, which is a mistake

(09:18):
the judiciary makes that has led to Wanton lying on
the stand with no fear of reprisal. The Owens case
is sending shockwaves through the narrative that perjury is no
big deal. Owens is facing jail time, and so far
the prosecution has offered no plea. The trial. Its schedule
for this January, and Owens will have to answer for
every lie and every piece of fabricated evidence she presented

(09:41):
to the court and the media. Women who have seen
what is happening to Owens, including a pre dawn raid
on her home by an armed swat team, will think
twice before playing dangerous games of deceit. This week, bodycam
footage from the raid on Owens's house has dropped, and
you need to see it to appreciate. This is the
final boss of me too accountability. Arms squat dragging your

(10:04):
parents out of bed at six am and rifling through
your things should be the wake up call every false
accuser needs to stop doing what they're doing. It's also
telling that parents she lives with her parents. Yeah, yeah,
she lives with her parents, which is totally fine if
you're a woman. No, no, it doesn't make you a
loser at all.

Speaker 2 (10:24):
You're on the Bachelor, just fiscally sensible. She's I know,
I know, how.

Speaker 1 (10:30):
Okay, Well anyway. It's also telling that Owens can be
seen in the video not only having a tantrum like
a toddler, but also sticking to her lies and attempting
to lie about the police hurting her Luckily it's all
on camera and the police were protected against those lies
one and they basically up uploaded the entire interaction, so
you can't take it out of context, you know, so
you can see that she has been She is completely

(10:54):
spastic like the entire time, and they're totally chill and
they're not doing anything aggressive at all. They're playing it
very cool. And yeah, it looks and she's trying to
accuse them of hurting her and having their guns out
and all this other crazy shit that they're clearly not doing.
So yeah, we'll look at it in a sec One
moment in particular, stuck struck me as Owens flips off
the swamp team, screams obscenities at them, and then yells

(11:17):
in her mother's face. They're acting like I murdered someone.
Laura Owens did commit several murderers in a way. She
murdered the reputations of at least three men in their
prime years, taking out fraudulent restraining orders against them with
fake allegations of domestic violence, and impeded their ability to
get the jobs they wanted. Among other indignities, she drove

(11:37):
several of them to dark places where they wondered if
they should just end it all. It's not a small
thing to bear false witness against thy neighbor. It is
a grave and outrageous offense, and it deserves a grave
and harsh response. And that's exactly what Laura Owens got.
I congratulate the Maricopa County Attorney's Office on this important
arrest and prosecution. They're determined to see it through and

(11:59):
for the first time in her life, Owens will get
a consequence for her actions. Also, on a parenting note,
it's said that the state of Arizona had to step
in and be the parent Owens needed her to tell
her no in a meaningful way. Her parents failed her
by enabling and supporting her bad behavior and funding her
legitious habits. Their consequence is having the worst moments broadcast

(12:20):
to the nation. And then there's the video. So let's
let's look at that. I'm gonna share this. I don't
know if you want to say anything about that as
it was.

Speaker 2 (12:30):
I like this, it's just so brutal. But she she
is not just just you know, telling it like it is,
but she's also saying that, you know, we have to
we have to take satisfaction in the punishment of false
accusation accusers, there has to be at some level satisfying

(12:50):
that we see these people see justice. And if that's vindictive,
so be it. If people think that's vindictive, so be it.
So it won't stop until until these these people, these criminals,
due time and they start seeing that. And I know
there are feminist organizations out there that feed off of
the money that these cases make that are not happy

(13:12):
with this. Actually, I really wonder what our friend from
the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, I think that was
the one who remarked on the Amber heard and Johnny
deppcast case and said it was not a very good
case for them. In what she meant was that they
didn't make a lot of money us christ of course

(13:35):
the perfidity. Anyway, let's let's get into it.

Speaker 1 (13:39):
So, I don't know if you guys need a little
bit more context here. So they're trying to they're basically
getting evidence, they have a warrant and they're looking for Well,
the cops are not actually doing this, they're just basically,
like you know, creating the conditions or securing the area
so that detectives can then go in and and you know,

(14:01):
get the evidence that they're looking for, at least search
for the evidence. And I guess this is the evidence
of her, you know, lying, her perjury and fraud, which
is what she is accused of. Like it hasn't been
you know, it's not finalized yet, so I have to
say accused. But it doesn't look good for her. So,
and there is a website here. Let me just share
this really quick. It's called Victims of Laura Owens Justice

(14:24):
for Clayton. It was originally the website was originally called
Justice for Clayton. And then they found out that she
had done this to other men, so that she has
a pattern of this kind of behavior, right of accusing
men of domestic violence and all kinds of other stuff
to destroy their lives. I don't know why, but there
it is. So and this will explain a welcome to victims, okay.

(14:47):
So basically, it's a comprehensive resource dedicated to documenting and
raising awareness about Laura Owens and the men who have
been impacted by her actions. Inspired by the Justice for
Clayton movement, our site seeks to provide a thorough and
respectful examination of the cases involving Laura Michelle Owens and
the individuals she has taken advantage of, including but not
limited to, Clayton eckerd, Greg Gillespie, Michael Marasini, two anonymous

(15:13):
male victims, Loan Cactus, fence and wedding or welding p has,
creative studios, and more. In addition, Victims of Laura Owens
features detailed information, updates and discussion of Laura Owens's actions,
the Justice for Clayton movement, and the ongoing pursuit of
justice for those affected. So yeah, so this is like
I could you know, if you guys just look up
Victims of Laura Owens dot com, you'll see that they

(15:37):
have like all of the information about what she did. Yeah,
it's cool to see that there's like a support network
for these guys, you know. So all right, but anyway,
so here is the bondycam footage. Is two cops and
they're showing up at miss Owens's place at like six
point fifty in the morning, and this is Maricopa County, Arizona.

Speaker 3 (16:01):
Okay, just come up just a couple with me, Laura
scott Still Police you see my dadge but with the.

Speaker 1 (16:06):
Scott Still Police department. Okay, can you come out and
talk with us police. The county attorneys have a search
warm for your property. So we need you to come out.

Speaker 2 (16:14):
Okay, So if you need to get dressed or get
a coat, whatever you need, I just need you to
come out here with us. I'm sorry it's stopping in
seven in the morning, Brian. Can I ask a request?
Can we expand this so people can see it better
on the short shorts?

Speaker 1 (16:30):
I could. I could fill the screen with it, like
you're yeah, I can do that all right, because it's a.

Speaker 2 (16:38):
Little bit small, and it's like it's a little it's
a little we're all squinting, like we don't know how
to drive.

Speaker 1 (16:43):
Okay, hold on, let me just grab the.

Speaker 2 (16:47):
Under the radar.

Speaker 1 (16:49):
Well what I don't know how to drive?

Speaker 2 (16:52):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (16:52):
I get I get what you did. Yeah, I see
what you did there. You want me to just fill
the screen.

Speaker 2 (16:57):
Yeah, just fill the screen. And I know it's a
little bit clunky, but yeah, just fill the screen and
that way everybody can see what the heck's going on
in this.

Speaker 1 (17:05):
All right, I'm just gonna do that and then I'm
gonna let it play. Here we go.

Speaker 4 (17:10):
I'm not comfortable having you. I don't know who you
guys are.

Speaker 1 (17:13):
I'm not I don't know.

Speaker 2 (17:16):
I'm not comfortable with opening my screen. Okay, well, if
we were going to handle it comfortable, Trying to handle
this is low key's plu. I was told that if
the police were going to come, they would come during
business hours. Can I call my attorney please, I'm not comfortable.

Speaker 1 (17:32):
We can call your attorney. That's fine.

Speaker 2 (17:33):
Let me call my attorney. What okay? What the hell?
This is like the most polite swat team ever.

Speaker 1 (17:41):
I don't know. There's a lot of body cam footage
out there, and then generally the the cops are not
They're pretty accommodating unless you like make a scene. But
so she's she wants to call her up. She's obviously
taken aback because these guys showed up pretty suddenly, and
I guess she didn't expect police had her door for
what she did whatever, right, and she's just trying to

(18:03):
get out of this right now.

Speaker 2 (18:05):
Yeah at the home right now, talking to your parents,
and we have County detectives here.

Speaker 1 (18:09):
You see her hands shaking. What I'm giving you an opportunity.
I told you we have a search.

Speaker 2 (18:13):
Wark and let me have my parents out here.

Speaker 1 (18:15):
Again on the phone.

Speaker 2 (18:17):
I have just listen to me.

Speaker 1 (18:19):
Okay, I've been nothing but respectful to you.

Speaker 2 (18:21):
No, seven o'clock in the morning. Let me just call
my attorney.

Speaker 5 (18:25):
Okay, my attorney.

Speaker 1 (18:28):
It's a nice place to have a pool and ship.
So there at another point, they you know, obviously they
have to rouse the parents. Her place is a fucking
mass too, and uh, I mean obviously, like it's early,
so you know that. And the dad is kind of
like bed ridden but able to walk. He's got like
a walker. I want to jump ahead. After they talk

(18:49):
to the dad, who's like, what's going on here? And
the mom so here here talking with her, So we
don't want.

Speaker 2 (18:55):
To like what.

Speaker 1 (19:00):
The bachelorette, yes, why she was a contestant or whatever
it is.

Speaker 2 (19:05):
Yeah, she must really well.

Speaker 1 (19:08):
Yeah, she looks a little worse for wear, a little like.

Speaker 2 (19:14):
How she's using her father as like a human shield here.

Speaker 1 (19:18):
Oh yeah, whatever it takes, whatever it takes.

Speaker 2 (19:22):
At what point do you get a charge for resisting arrest?

Speaker 1 (19:26):
Well, I mean they're not trying to arrest her, they're
so like there's that they're just they like they're just
letting her know. Literally, all she has to do is say, okay,
you know, come on in, like she's not under arrest,
like that was never even the thing, you know, so
but anyway, let's let's play some more.

Speaker 2 (19:46):
Okay, you want, you want?

Speaker 1 (19:50):
I want to see.

Speaker 2 (19:51):
Yeah, I want to see my father. I think we
all do, sir, we all do.

Speaker 1 (19:58):
For what you're doing, I guarantee you I will have
bruises from there. I will. Now remember, this is exactly
what those other men were accused of, like the like
she uses claims of domestic violence and of and abuse

(20:19):
to destroy the reputations of men. And now these these
cops are here and they're just trying to get it
a relax, and she's claiming that they're hurting her, so
she's using the same I mean, look again, I don't
think they're hurting her. The cops are probably pretty aware
that they're not, that wouldn't be good, and they know
they're on camera anyway. But I think that she's being

(20:40):
dramatic on purpose. It's like setting it all up right,
and the purpose of it is to get you to
feel a certain way while you're watching this, Like, man,
they're man handling her, she's she looks like she's gonna
cry it must be legit. I'd like to see them
over here.

Speaker 2 (21:02):
And the thing is that this is what she wanted
to subject these men to. But this is this is
what she wanted these guys to go through. Except believe me,
the police aren't kinder to guys two men. They're a
lot rougher. Yep, at this point she would have had
at this point she was a man, She probably would
have been arrested.

Speaker 1 (21:19):
For sure. He would have been pinned down, handcuffed. Probably.

Speaker 2 (21:24):
Okay, Oh good lord. The sound's even worse when it's
harribled by slow internet.

Speaker 1 (21:29):
This woman's they have their guns drawn on her, she
claimed this earlier. And they're literally not. They don't have
their guns out at all. So this is like another
It's like either delusional or manipulative. I suspect the latter.

Speaker 2 (21:43):
So no, So are you having trouble hearing me? Are
you guys having trouble hearing me? Because I'm having a
little trouble hearing Brian. Although I have to say that
her damseling doesn't sound any better going robo through the internet,
Am I can hear you? It's just yeah, a little bit.
I just don't know if it's me or you. I
think it might be me.

Speaker 1 (22:02):
Yeah, what do you?

Speaker 2 (22:04):
What do you guys think? Are we? Is either myself
or Brian Robo? Yeah? Canon har.

Speaker 1 (22:12):
Sound fine? They're saying we sound fine.

Speaker 2 (22:17):
Oh okay, so it's just me. It's just my chaotic
vol based internet all let's keep going.

Speaker 1 (22:22):
All right.

Speaker 2 (22:23):
This is one of those bodycam footages that you start
to feel for the cops a lot that what this is? Okay,
so I must be choppy if you didn't hear me.
This is one of those BODYCM footage that you watch
and you feel really bad for the cops like that
they have to deal with this crap.

Speaker 1 (22:41):
Yeah, you know, I think you're lagging. That's what it is.
You're not hearing what I have to say for like
a second or so. After I'm done.

Speaker 2 (22:51):
All right, let me see if I can fix that. Guys.

Speaker 1 (22:54):
Yeah, apparently looks forty, but it sounds fine on YouTube.
I think it's just you.

Speaker 2 (23:02):
Okay, let me let me try just restarting. How's that and.

Speaker 1 (23:05):
I'll be all right back, come on back, all right,
let me play some more of this in the meantime,
So you have to look at my ugly mug in
the morning. Those are the things they would have used
to open the door if they had to, but they
didn't have to. So she's saying, I haven't done anything
except get pregnant by the fucking bachelor. So she knows

(23:28):
that that's what this is about. She's like, it's not
like I killed somebody.

Speaker 2 (23:32):
Well, you're also not being arrested, Like if you had
gone and killed somebody, you would have been being arrested,
not just cops coming in to search your house.

Speaker 1 (23:41):
He's not being arrested, I don't think. So she's being
detained until the detectives come. They're basically like showing up
to say we have a warrant. The detectives are here,
they're on their way. They show up at the end
of the video and they go in, and you know,
by that time things have like more or less relaxed.
But yeah, it's not even seven o'clock. Guys, go go,

(24:03):
cops can just leave, it's too early.

Speaker 2 (24:04):
Come back later, come back in business hours.

Speaker 1 (24:07):
Co yeah, yeah, come. She does say that. She says
you should be here during business hours.

Speaker 2 (24:12):
You know, I know that she must. This must be
really awful, no doubt, but again, this is what she
wanted to have happened to her victims. If not worse,
well guaranteed worse. Yeah, okay, let's keep going.

Speaker 6 (24:26):
All right, Okay, so she tries to like, get this
is the bargaining stage.

Speaker 1 (24:42):
Yeah, she curses them out at one point. Do you
see what you've done?

Speaker 4 (24:46):
I mean, really needs somebody to support him.

Speaker 2 (24:49):
Excuse me, he can't.

Speaker 1 (24:53):
Yeah, she's just shrieking and and look, it's it's all
embarrassing and stuff. But I mean, this is what happens.
Like they didn't you know, she basically it seems to me,
and again this is an ongoing case, but it seems
to me that she did not think that there was
actually gonna be consequences to her actions. I don't know

(25:14):
what else to call it.

Speaker 2 (25:15):
Yeah, consequences. I feel a bit bad for the parents,
although I would like to note that if you, if
you're watching closely, one of the cops is helping her father,
helping well, maybe she can't go over to her father,
But I mean they didn't. They didn't seem to be
detaining her. They were just getting her under control so
they could search her room, presumably, which is that's another

(25:39):
job that I don't wish on anyone. I can only
imagine what you're gonna find in that room. Yeah, but
uh yeah, that's I thought that was interesting that the
cop was actually helping her father, not her. All right,
that was that was a thing.

Speaker 1 (25:55):
Huh yeah, yeah, I mean it, yeah, basically doesn't really
go anywhere else, Like the detectives show up and they
take her away. Oh, not to her away, but they
like the squawkeyes let the detectives and I don't know
what happens after that. The body. They turned the cameras
off once it's done. So all right, so let me

(26:16):
see the web. Let me just put this back in
the correct position.

Speaker 2 (26:23):
That's okay, It's just it was really small and murky,
so I figured nobody could see the damn thing the
way it was, at least on the shorts.

Speaker 1 (26:31):
All right, Yeah, do you want me to put something
different up? And do you want to do Brianny Claire now?

Speaker 2 (26:37):
Or yeah, let's do Byrony Claire. Let's do Barrony. We
tease them with Byrony. Was this the one that was
you told me was making you infuriated?

Speaker 1 (26:47):
Yeah, I mean yeah, it's pretty awful. So this video
is called The Boys Supremacy of Gender Reveals and.

Speaker 2 (26:54):
Does she have any evidence for it?

Speaker 1 (26:57):
She does make claims, and I have timecodes for her claims.
There are various There are various claims. But then she
does the thing that she always does where she shows
you TV shows and claims its evidence. Oh you know,
that's our whole thing, is using media that's already feminist

(27:18):
to make feminist claims. Oh and yeah, all right, So
let me play a little bit of the intro so
you can see what this is about, and then we'll
get into the timecodes that I have. I'm basically just
gonna show you the timecodes where she makes a claim
because this is like a half hour long, So I

(27:39):
gotta suit A rumble. Rant from Nova Fan twenty one
gives a dollar and says, I can't wait to hear
the feminist fear mongering over her arrest footage holding women
accountable and its consequences. Lol.

Speaker 2 (27:52):
Yeah, and I remember, I remember the name of the woman.
She is from the National Coalition of Domestic Violence. She
said that the Amber her and Johnny deptrial was no
good for her organization because they didn't get they didn't
make money off of it. And her name is Ruth
Glynn and she's part of a number of feminist TV
organizations that called out the verdict in the Hamper Herd

(28:14):
and Johnny Deptrell for you know, I guess they have
no motivation to do that other than their pocket books.
But yeah, I just wanted to clarify that because I
just figured it out, just popped into my head.

Speaker 1 (28:27):
Anyway, all right, all right, cool, let's play a little
bit the intro.

Speaker 3 (28:32):
Gender revels reinforce and agenda, binery, Bunny Houl in people's
pockets and.

Speaker 4 (28:36):
Bending down the planet.

Speaker 3 (28:36):
Whilst we're at it, that's still happening wildly over the
top light this one where blue powder is sprayed out
from a helicopter and wow, this dude is so happy
it's a boy. He even jumps in the pool.

Speaker 1 (28:49):
I don't think men ask for this, you mean ask
for gender reveal parties.

Speaker 2 (28:53):
Yeah, I don't think this is driven by men. Byrony,
And how do you know that she's not just happy
his kid is healthy? Like would he be? You'd have
no evidence that he would not be as happy if
it was a girl. I mean, yeah, it just seem
a little bit weird, Like I don't know the whole
concept of the gender reveal parties just seems extraneous, but.

Speaker 1 (29:13):
Well it's it's it's kind of self serving, you could
say that, But at the same time, it's like, well,
that's your money. But to look she does. Did you
notice that she made like at least three claims in
that first sentence though, well, she operates off of three
feminist assumptions in like her first sentence. Okay, let's go

(29:35):
back and listen and I'll break it down.

Speaker 4 (29:38):
Reinforce an agender.

Speaker 1 (29:39):
Binary, reinforcing the gender binary feminist talking point number one, right,
the gender binary.

Speaker 3 (29:46):
Bad, honey houl in people's pockets.

Speaker 1 (29:48):
And burning a hole in people's pockets. Claim number two
capitalism bad, typical feminist talking point.

Speaker 4 (29:56):
And turning down the planet whilst we're at.

Speaker 1 (29:58):
It, destroying the planet, environ mentalism. These are all right
off the bat, one, two, three, boom boom boom, gender capitalism, environmentalism.
So you know, this is how these people operate, and
they shoot these things out so fast that normal people
will be like, oh, well that's just yeah, sure, gender
binary is bad. Yeah I get it. Yeah, I heard it.
I heard it said one hundred times today, so it

(30:20):
must be true, you know. So that's before we get
into the fact that, yes, women organize these things, but
the problem is not like that. We've we've moved past that. Now,
we're not we're not talking about that the fact that
they reinforce the gender binary, that they cost money because
that's capitalism, or that they damage the planet, because we've

(30:42):
moved on to the problem being men being happy that
they have sons. So we're we've already we know women
do that, but we're gonna ignore that because it's not convenient.

Speaker 6 (30:50):
Now.

Speaker 1 (30:51):
Now, the problem is that men are happy that they
have sons, and that's how she's gonna frame it, even
though yes, they probably be happy regardless, you know, I mean,
maybe like what's wrong with if you're a dad or
a mom. Like my mom wanted daughters and my father

(31:11):
gave her three sons, and she was like, well, I
wanted a daughter, but I'm not going to try anymore.
Oh so she just gave up on it and just
and I mean it doesn't mean that she didn't love us,
you know, but like that's sometimes men want a son
and women want a daughter, And sometimes women want a
son and men want a daughter. Who knows, you know,

(31:32):
you have to make a lot of assumptions about what
people desire. So most people are probably just happy to
have kids no matter what you know, and most of
us can't afford gender reveal parties, or at least not
extravagant ones like the ones that usually end up being
made into viral videos.

Speaker 3 (31:50):
This one, I was just thinking, whichever car hits you first,
is the genders of your child?

Speaker 4 (31:55):
Like, what is going on? But it turns out it's
a boy and everyone is happy.

Speaker 2 (32:00):
God, let's help them. Do you look at the ones
where it's revealed that it's a girl.

Speaker 1 (32:05):
Well, there are a couple though, she brings up, but
these are obviously all cherry picked. This is all cherry
picked stuff. So yeah, I mean it's like because when
later on she'll show some girl reveals and she shows
that the men are either disappointed or not as excited,

(32:25):
and she she's as evidence that you know, men don't
want daughters or something.

Speaker 2 (32:31):
So anyway, I mean her chair picked showed her thesis
exactly what a surprise.

Speaker 3 (32:37):
Yeah, and this one really confused me because of all
the ways he a gender reveal. You can have two
grown adults in baby costumes battle it out to see
which one wins. It sounds that they're having a boy,
and so the boy literally beats the girl.

Speaker 1 (32:57):
So yeah, like it's supposed to be funny, and sperm
are literally fighting for survival, like there's only one winner.
Usually it's a joke, but no, I guess it's not.

Speaker 3 (33:10):
Literally beats the girl. It's tying into the videotopic all
too well. Okay, these balloons are actually setting off a tripophobia.
I'm sorry if anyone else is also feeling super uncomfortable,
but I really wanted to inclothe this one. But clearly
they spent thousands of dollars on this. And oh it's
revealed as a boy, and oh my goodness.

Speaker 4 (33:25):
The excitement. He's so excited. I thought he was actually
going to knock a rover and just be like, look like.

Speaker 3 (33:30):
She's carrying your child. Make calm down. But it's okay.
He rolls around on the floor himself.

Speaker 4 (33:35):
Oh it's pink.

Speaker 1 (33:36):
Anyway, so yeah, so basically happy father. Okay, here we go.
Here's one where it's pink.

Speaker 4 (33:41):
But why do you fall over?

Speaker 1 (33:42):
Bro?

Speaker 4 (33:42):
Aren't you happy?

Speaker 3 (33:43):
He's he looks like he scored his final goal in
a World Cup. Okay, they've got to get happier. They've
got to get Batterle at sea some more, and I haven't.

Speaker 2 (33:51):
That was that was exactly the same kind of reaction
as falling in the or jumping in the pool, wasn't it.

Speaker 1 (33:56):
I mean different people react to good news in different ways. Yeah,
Like not everyone does backflips like am Maury Povich when
they learn they're not the father. Some people just faint
or they just have like like a sigh of relief,
like finally we know, you know or whatever. I don't know.
But of course that doesn't She's she's spinning a yarn.

(34:16):
This is a narrative. She's got to set up the narrative.
That's all.

Speaker 4 (34:20):
This is concoction. Oh it's pink. Is the excitement in
the room with us?

Speaker 3 (34:25):
The only one that's excited here is what I'm presuming
to be your other daughter.

Speaker 2 (34:29):
Damn, he's not. He's not upset, Like there just might
be quieter people.

Speaker 1 (34:35):
Dumb it, Yeah they might. They might be more like
inside voice people.

Speaker 2 (34:39):
Why are we even why are we even arguing this?
This is her having chosen a bunch of videos to
prove a point, which doesn't prove a point.

Speaker 4 (34:48):
Yes, so this is their daughter.

Speaker 3 (34:51):
I would burst into tears. This is such a cute
little blanket set up, and it feels Australian too me
that their child is gonna be a girl. He's trying
to keep strong. You can kind of tell.

Speaker 2 (35:04):
About you, dumb bunny. What the hell was unp what
was unpleased about any aspect of his behavior there verstual
he probably already knew, I think honestly. But yeah, but
also he kisses her, he looks thrilled. What do you
expected to do to jet off his knees and do
backflips into the sky.

Speaker 1 (35:26):
If he did, she wouldn't pick this clip for the video.

Speaker 2 (35:29):
Oh yeah, that's right, she wouldn't.

Speaker 1 (35:33):
So, like I said, it's all about like cherry picking.
And and also there has to be a lot of suggestion,
Like she's not she doesn't know what's in his head
or his heart, so she has to suggest it to
us that she does know and that this is what's
going on. She's a false prophet. Oh, she's lying basically,
or at least like trying to imply heavily something that

(35:56):
we can't know.

Speaker 3 (35:58):
No, yeah, let's cut on Cameron now for future generations
to see. Okay, I've got a twin situation for you.
Here the first child is revealed to be a girl.

Speaker 4 (36:09):
Everyone's super happy. Okay, this is really cute.

Speaker 2 (36:11):
Everyone's very happy.

Speaker 4 (36:13):
Okay, let's see what's in the box. Number two for.

Speaker 2 (36:16):
A boy because they want to have too, because they
will one of the girls. They want to have one
of each. Dumbass.

Speaker 1 (36:26):
Yeah, no, we're not supposed to see boys as.

Speaker 2 (36:31):
Why are you begrudging the one time a boy will
be celebrated in his entire life?

Speaker 1 (36:35):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (36:36):
Why are you begrudging that? Because from here on out
it's that could be celebration. From here on out, he's
going to be learning what a slimy is by virtue
of being one of the per penis people, by people
like you, Byrony, it isn't sufficient that you get the
rest of men and boys lives to tell them what
shit they are. This one moment where somebody's happy that

(36:58):
they exist has to be done away with two.

Speaker 1 (37:01):
Lord, yeah, men, men are not allowed to enjoy things.
If g thank you Meredith for the super Chow gives
us five and says, maintaining frame number one eighty three,
A gender revealed party is just a part of the
celebration of the child and the pregnancy. There has to
be someone at the party that knows the gender, either
the mother, father, or another family member involved in the planning. Yeah, obviously,

(37:24):
And that's what I'm saying, Like she there's a lot
of assumptions you have to make to conclude the things
that she wants us to conclude. So and it is
it is baked in to manipulate her audience.

Speaker 2 (37:38):
Anyway, and they're they're open for it. How many how
many views does she get? How many subscribers does she get?

Speaker 1 (37:45):
He is one hundred and seventeen thousand subs, And yeah,
one hundred and seventeen thousand subs. Maybe, uh, what if
they legitimately are happier it's a boy, because a boy
would be more useful, They would be less of a
cost investment and more of a profit investment. I don't know.

(38:08):
I mean, I'm being really like cold, but like if
you worked well anyway, let's like, she's gonna show a
couple more.

Speaker 4 (38:16):
This is a new one.

Speaker 3 (38:17):
We haven't seen boxing yet that she has got really
good skills. Oh it's a boy. Oh my goodness. Wow,
with the excitement on the screen right now.

Speaker 4 (38:25):
It's barely able to stay contained within the screen. Why
is all of this.

Speaker 3 (38:29):
Explosive joy reserved for boys? I thought this was meant
to be a happy moment, regardless of like whatever sort
of genitalia your child is going to have. We've all
seen this one with the umbrella, I'm sure.

Speaker 2 (38:39):
And so what's wrong with men wanting to have boys? Like,
what the heck's wrong with that? What's wrong with men
having that? Wanting to have boys?

Speaker 1 (38:48):
You know, they're not supposed to want boys more than girls,
but really, if they wanted girls more than boys, that
wouldn't be a problem either way.

Speaker 2 (38:57):
No, no, no, then they'd be predators. You see, they
shouldn't want children at all. I just read an article
from one of these individuals, like Byrony that looked at
the fact that men want children and said, it's because
they want to extend their patriarchal control and they feel
like it's a feather in their cap and an award
and its status and all, except they get to dominate

(39:21):
another life. And I'm like, so if they if if
a man was happy to have a girl, she'd probably,
like someone said in the chat, she'd probably be calling
him a predator. He's happy to have a boy, it's
because he's a patriarchal, toxic male. So you just can't win.
There's no point playing in this particular particular social milia. Guys,

(39:43):
no point playing. You can't win. All right, let's keep going.

Speaker 1 (39:46):
So anyway, there is this video. I'll play the rest
of this.

Speaker 3 (39:49):
I think confetti falls down and he storms off with
the first word being ouse three.

Speaker 2 (39:55):
Girls, bro sad.

Speaker 1 (40:00):
Yeah, so obviously he keeps getting girls, and that's his
third girl. And I think that he was just like, look,
I love my daughters, but I kind of wanted a
son this time, and you know that, I get it.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that. But he
didn't get that, you know.

Speaker 2 (40:17):
So it's like watching an alien try to understand human beings. Honestly,
what is this humor? What is this woman? Why is
she laughing? Oh she must be laughing to appease the
primate miles. He doesn't smash her head in fire brains.
That's that's freaking Bernese interpretation of human behavior.

Speaker 1 (40:39):
Yeah, anyway, anyways, Okay.

Speaker 3 (40:43):
He's angry. This dude shoots a gun to do the
gender reveal. I can't quite imagine what sort of gender
they were hoping for, and.

Speaker 4 (40:50):
This dude is very angry.

Speaker 3 (40:51):
It would seem that boys are still best. But some
of you may be quickly commenting, Oh, but this is
gender disappointment. This is completely valid. Do not go telling
people to police themselves. Why is it majority of the
time at genda disappointment about having a girl. Why is
everyone so much more excited when they're going to be
having a boy? My goodness, Why we're still stuck in
this gender binery? What about these kids who grew up
to see these supposedly cute videos to see their parents

(41:14):
as super disappointed in them before they've even left the womb.

Speaker 2 (41:18):
Before this gender reveal crap. The only time I'd ever
one of the few times I'd ever heard about gender preference.
My grandmother wanted girls. She had seven boys and one girl, right,
she didn't like boys, one of the grants and she
ended up having a whole bunch of grandsons too. And
one of her grand one of the grandma, like, there

(41:39):
was some party in the where they were talking about
the next kid was also going to be a boy,
and she says no, and she said she's Dutch. She's
like swearing in dutchiness. Why couldn't you have a girl
and the boy like his her granddaughter, her grandson looked
up and said, but boys are good too, Like that's
the That is the one time, prior to all of

(42:01):
this mess, that I have ever heard anyone say a preference. Ever. Yeah, well,
and unfortunately for her, I was her only granddaughter.

Speaker 1 (42:10):
You're yeah, but that is the.

Speaker 2 (42:13):
One time in my entire life, prior to this nonsense,
that I had ever heard anyone really express an opinion.
Nobody had ever really expressed an opinion in my family,
except for my grandma, who really liked daughters and granddaughters
and nothing else. But you know, honestly, considering how many
grandsons and sons she had, you know, like you could

(42:35):
begrudge it, but it's the same situation with that guy
and the two daughters. You know, she's getting a third daughter,
you can sort of that was the joke, right, yeah,
you know, And Byrony just doesn't understand that because she
hates the fact that she's part of a species that
comes in male and female. She has a beef with

(42:56):
God because men exist and have opinion and might be
celebrated once in their lives for anything. Hey, maybe they're
celebrating the fact that another person who will be far
more responsible for the upkeep, maintenance and running of society
than Byrony Claire will ever be, is been born into
the world that needs him a hell of a lot

(43:18):
more than we need her. Like you were saying, well,
boys are more useful, maybe we'll on for another generation.

Speaker 1 (43:24):
I was being a bit cynical and tongue in cheek,
but I think that generally parents love their children no
matter what their children turn out to be, and I
don't think that it's the fault of gender revealed parties that,
like you know that, I think she's trying to go
after what I believe ultimately is that Brianny Claire she

(43:45):
has to make content, and she has to find things
to aggrieve over so that she continues to make content.
And so we're at the point now where she's scraping
the bottom of the barrel for content and for ways
to find how women are victims and men are perpetrators,
and patriarchy, capitalism, heteronormativity, the gender binary, and whatever other

(44:10):
thing they want to throw in there are oppressive and
this is just the new vehicle. And her audience wants
that they want her to constantly find new things to
be aggrieved about, which is why I'm and I'm saying
this because that's why she has to literally make shit up.
She has to find videos and then like put together
construct a narrative which is like, oh, look, boys get

(44:32):
celebrated too much at gender reveal parties. Like the overwhelming
majority of people who have kids don't even have gender
reveal parties. So you're already looking at a very small
percentage of people. And I don't I don't have a
problem with them having gender reveal parties if you want to.
I mean, I think could be fun. I get it.
But when we used to have baby showers and stuff,

(44:52):
I guess we still do. And so we're looking at
a small subset of people that are doing this. And
then you're looking at an even smaller subset of that
small subset, which are people who get really expensive or
extravagant with their gender reveal parties where they they say,
we're gonna make this into a video, we're gonna post
it on the internet, and we're gonna try to go

(45:13):
viral with it, and in order to do that, you
have to do it up really big, right, So they
do like they have fucking shit coming out of a
helicopter or you know, a pyrotechnic show that would put
Iron Maiden to shame or gwar. And then like, you know,
it's a subset of that, and then within that, it's
a smaller subset of boy reveals that have enough excitement

(45:35):
that she can point to them and say, ooh, that's suspicious.
I mean, it's just to make her make her already
angry audience more angry, and she does a decent job
of it. And her reaction, which is the thing that
she claims nobody cares about, is the primary vehicle through
which this is even occurring, right because yeah, don't care
what women believe or what they think or what they feel.

(45:57):
Then seeing a woman's reaction to something sn't affect us,
but she knows it does. That's why she uses it.
You know, let's look at this face right here. She's
just like shocked and you know, in awe of like
how sexist everything is, and her audience is like, I'm
with you, sister. So she has to make content, and

(46:18):
that's what this is. It's just content.

Speaker 2 (46:20):
Mm hmm.

Speaker 1 (46:21):
Anyway, so she's gonna try and give us some data
to sub to sort of like justify this. So we're
gonna reveal the boy preference and go right here.

Speaker 3 (46:31):
I already have the extended and uncensored version of this video,
but for everyone else, let's crack into it.

Speaker 1 (46:37):
No, pumpkin, I've had my share of disappointments too. It's
a girl. Can you check again?

Speaker 3 (46:42):
Why is everyone so ecstatic to be a joke?

Speaker 1 (46:45):
It's a joke.

Speaker 2 (46:47):
It's a joke.

Speaker 1 (46:47):
There's a joke at the expense of Meg. Remember he
had Chris after that. If you've seen Family Guy, Chris
is borderline retarded and nobody, nobody seems to have a
problem with It's okay, it's a cartoon.

Speaker 4 (47:00):
So having a boy.

Speaker 3 (47:02):
Gender reveals, which are technically sex reveals, however, for YouTube
purposes and because it's widely known as gender reveals, I'll
be sticking to that, even though it's literally just about
a baby's genitalia. Despite being a modern phenomenon, is still
very common to this day. A quick science lesson.

Speaker 1 (47:16):
For every interesting A lot of minority I don't know
if you saw that there were a lot of Latinos
in those gender reveals as she was talking about, and
they were all very happy to have boys. I'm okay
with that.

Speaker 3 (47:28):
Everybody the fact that they were having a girl. Sperm
decides the sex of the baby. The egg is always
X chromosome like this.

Speaker 2 (47:36):
Click.

Speaker 1 (47:37):
So she's saying this is the first claim sperm always
decides the sex of the baby. Probably not like terrible,
but she's trying to blame men for having girls. I guess.
So let's just go back a little bit.

Speaker 3 (47:52):
Still very common to this day. A quick science lesson
for everybody who displays anger at the fact that they
were having a girl. Sperm decience the sex of the baby.
The egg is always X chromosome like this, clear blue
diagram shots.

Speaker 4 (48:04):
And actually more things come down to the.

Speaker 3 (48:06):
Condition and age of the spam than we what you
may think. Like you know, all of this autism fairmongering
that's been happening over the past few years, and now
Trump is trying to link it to Thailand All, which
is one of the only things which is safe for
pregnant people to be able to take.

Speaker 2 (48:19):
Like I have never been it is Thailand All. Came
out and said, do not take thailand All during your pregnancy.
It is on its.

Speaker 1 (48:28):
Dim anti science Alison.

Speaker 2 (48:31):
So okay, I have some let's let's let's get some
freaking perspective here. I don't know if you can see that,
but then even has the one that she showed, you
can continue that that image of him flip flopping.

Speaker 1 (48:44):
Over and which one back here? At least see if yeah,
what do you want me to show you?

Speaker 2 (48:52):
I want you to show me or should show this
on the top row, the middle one. I'm pretty sure
that was the one. These are gender revealed parties with girls.
Let's take a look and see if that holds true
what she's saying about how men. Oh no, it's the
one on the Okay, show what I just sent you,

(49:13):
because I don't feel like talking about Byrony Claire's bullshit
anymore unless you have more time codes, because it's just
gonna be more of this shit. Sure, okay, let's get
some context. It's just basically TikTok. I know that you
hate TikTok.

Speaker 1 (49:26):
No, it's fine. I'm just trying to figure out why
it's not opening.

Speaker 2 (49:29):
Yeah, well it's probably because it's TikTok. But anyway, I
found the video that she showed. It is the one
where she said, oh, he's so unhappy or whatever. It
is on the top row. If you look at the
top row right, I can see it. Okay, the top row,
the far right, the far right.

Speaker 1 (49:49):
God, this one the moment, At this moment, I was
ready to go home this one.

Speaker 2 (49:53):
Yeah, yeah, I think that's the one. No, that's not
the one. Oh does TikTok give you different options? Of
course it does. No, go back, go back.

Speaker 1 (50:02):
The woman was unhappy about a pink baby. It's a
pink baby? Is it? This one? It's a girl?

Speaker 2 (50:07):
He gave me. It's giving me completely different freakin' options.

Speaker 1 (50:11):
Then you let me the actual video. What are you
doing for the video? Question?

Speaker 2 (50:16):
Spinky stuff? Are you doing here? Why would you that
Brian wants different options than me? Here, you go direct
the video. Let's listless analyze it ourselves without the byrony
lens and editing.

Speaker 1 (50:29):
There he faints, Yes, but it's out of out of excitement.

Speaker 2 (50:33):
It's not exactly, it's out of excitement. Look at this guy,
he's like dancing because it's a girl. Did you see that?

Speaker 1 (50:41):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (50:42):
What the hell?

Speaker 1 (50:44):
It's a pink Mercedes.

Speaker 2 (50:45):
Look at that you Look at how happy he is.
I don't think that person's going to ever dance. Look
look at look at this. Look at these men. Look
at how happy they are and also probably feeling like
they're under fire and some kind of wow.

Speaker 5 (51:00):
This is a elaborate girl real and honestly, I'm not surprised.
Men don't like run around because you don't know if
you're gonna be hit by a firework. And these just
stay this is the safe location, stay out of the
pink litter minefield.

Speaker 2 (51:18):
Look at this. None of these guys look in any
way not enthused.

Speaker 4 (51:22):
Huh.

Speaker 2 (51:23):
They're picking them up, they're women up, they're they're you know,
throwing them, not throwing them around, but twirling them around.
This guy, remember, Dirony, stop it right there. This is just.

Speaker 1 (51:37):
Disappointments, just disappointment.

Speaker 2 (51:40):
It's obvious when you watch it further that he's fainting
out of excitement.

Speaker 4 (51:45):
And look at this list.

Speaker 2 (51:46):
Does this look like these are the ones she didn't choose?
Look at that it's a girl. Look at the jumping
and the dancing. So this was all cherry picked by Byrony.
You have a really retarded point yep, yep.

Speaker 1 (52:02):
That was exactly what it was, all right? Should we
go back to it? You can jump, so she's gonna
make some scientific claims and patriarchal okay, sure.

Speaker 2 (52:13):
Sure, let's look the sciences that she brings in.

Speaker 1 (52:16):
Yeah, yeah, so let me let me see what we
got next here. Yeah, older sperm linked to autism, schizophrenia,
and leukemia. So yeah, aside from the tailenol thing, which again,
this is like the way they get these target points in.
It's all like very quick little stuff, right, like you
just got to like, oh that that, you know, It's
how they communicate propaganda quickly, like they machine gun it.

Speaker 3 (52:39):
Sperm decides the sex of the baby. The egg is
always X chromosome like this clear blue diagram shots. And
actually more things come down to the condition and age
of the sperm than we what you may think, Like
you know, all of this autism fearmongering that's been happening
over the past few years, and now Trump is trying
to link it to taylanol, which is one of the
only things which is safe for pregnant people to be
able to take.

Speaker 2 (53:00):
Ironey is full of bullshit, like she just constantly lies,
like no, Tyland Allison not safe when you're pregnant the men.

Speaker 1 (53:08):
Yeah, but I think Byrony Claire is like probably okay,
if you have an abortion or a miscarriage anyway, which
is like another thing that I'm like, why are you
making a big video? This is how I know it's
comes down to content. She's making a video defending the
fact that we have to love it when when girls
are born and not boys, because we're giving too much

(53:28):
love to boys. But also we should kill our babies too,
because you know, we can have both of these things. Guys.
Feminism is about choice, but women have to do you know,
emotional labor if they have kids. Which I saw that
one going around on x as well, you know where,
like I forget what it was, but a woman was
comparing like motherhood to like some like crazy male job,

(53:50):
like fucking you know, lumber work or something like, because
it's like, well, oh no, I know what it was.
It was a husband was saying he made a with
a picture of his wife and she was like pregnant,
and he said that he's able to retire his wife
from her job so that she can focus on being
a mother, which means he was going to be working

(54:11):
to support them, and they were calling it a retirement,
and a feminist retweeted that and say women never get
to retire because they have to be mothers and you
know mother and all this. So this is like sort
of like that side of it. It's this idea that
motherhood is labor. Labor should be unionized and stay controlled
and seized so that women are just taken care of. Right,

(54:32):
So it's just like, how do we make this communist?
And that's what they do. So Nova Fan gives us
a dollar and says Brierdy shows Family Guy clip ripping
on Meg a Family Guy episode where Peter mistakenly believes
the baby boy is a girl and predicts transsurgery on kids.
Do we tell her anyway?

Speaker 3 (54:53):
Spam is actually linked to autism. Now, look, autism doesn't
need to be cured. It is not a disease. It's
just better diagnosed these days.

Speaker 2 (55:00):
It is an issue you absolute cretness, jello human. It
is a severe disability.

Speaker 1 (55:11):
No, it doesn't need curing. We just have to pretend
like everything's fine because if we if we assume that
there is such a thing as a disability, then we
might want to look for solutions. But it also suggests
that some people are are worse off than others. Yet, look,
this is this I can't even untangle this progressive rats
nest of bullshit. But I will say that even people

(55:34):
with autism probably wish they didn't have autism on some level,
especially if they're not like super well functioning. Right, it's
worth asking, like, if this has been going, if this
has increased, people want to know why. So I don't
know anyway, Yeah, let's keep going.

Speaker 3 (55:53):
Blane keeps on falling solely on the mother. Oldes swim
is also linked to schizophrenia and leukemia too.

Speaker 4 (55:59):
No, no, no, no, no. All of blame kings on going.

Speaker 3 (56:01):
On women for not following their biological clocks and not
having babies younger.

Speaker 2 (56:05):
Not because there is a huge amount of detrimental effects. Okay,
so what so everybody should be having kids younger?

Speaker 4 (56:13):
What?

Speaker 2 (56:14):
Okay, women are still exciting when they're the timing occurs.

Speaker 1 (56:19):
Did anyone in the clips that she brought up blame women?

Speaker 2 (56:23):
No? Are being blamed well because of Thailand all, because
Thailand all has a warning label that says don't take
Thailand all while you're pregnant.

Speaker 1 (56:33):
That's not blaming women, though, it is is.

Speaker 2 (56:35):
Because yes, if you if you say taking Thailand all
while pregnant can cause autism, then you're blaming women for
autism because you know they may have taken Thailand all
while pregnant. So we should never tell women anything. What, Yeah,
just drink that thirty six of vodka while you're four
months pregnant. Right, smoke those cigarettes like a chimney. Right,

(56:59):
go have sex with completely random people, shoot up with
shoot up with heroin or even better, meth like, don't
don't even bother caring about any of the kid that
you're carrying, because if you do, that's victim blaming.

Speaker 4 (57:15):
And don't care.

Speaker 2 (57:16):
Like, also don't care, they don't. Don't care about taking
any precautions against rape or men who are unsavory, like, don't, don't, don't,
don't do that, that's victim blaming. Any kind of statement
to women that tells them that a negative consequence is
a result of their actions and any capacity is victim blaming.

(57:40):
That's because we don't care about preventing women from having
negative consequences. We care about upholding an ideology that refuses
to recognize consequences of women's actions, that women have consequences
to their actions. For some reason, feminism is just fascinating

(58:00):
with this idea that women are completely passive and everything
just happens to them. I don't want else to say
that that means that women are blameless. Feminism is fascinated
with the idea that women are completely blameless for everything. Yep, okay, all.

Speaker 1 (58:15):
Right, so there is she's she makes a claim. I
can jump to this part. But she makes a claim
on let's see Tiffany Burgh. No, let's jump ahead to
the patriarchy because she's gonna talk about patriarchy here. Oh
good lord, you know mustachiode. You know that I'm sick, right, yeah,
I know.

Speaker 2 (58:35):
This is exactly what I need. Byrony talking about her
favorite made up boogeyman. Okay, what is said?

Speaker 3 (58:42):
Because they've got two other kids already. He's clearly angry
and upset that they're going to be having another girl.
And he's saying, oh, not again, not again.

Speaker 2 (58:49):
Because he has two girls.

Speaker 1 (58:52):
It's a joke, idiot kind of a joke. But I
do I think again, like if you if you're like ideal,
I think people who want kids there they probably ideally
want like a son and a daughter, or maybe like
some you know, depending on how many, but like a
number of sons and a number of daughters. Because there

(59:13):
are it's be interesting to like see how that grows up, right,
So you know, I mean not that it's a comparison
to pets. But before Jojo, I had a dog named Leslie,
and Leslie was a girl and I had her until
she was about eighteen seventeen and a half. And I
love Leslie. I still do. And it was I had
to put her down. She was very sick. And then

(59:36):
when I said, well, we're gonna get another dog, I
was like, I want a boy this time. And you know,
I know these are not people, but I'm just saying, like,
I love Leslie, I love Jojo. It's just it's just like,
you know, I don't think that anyone is really thinking
of it in that way. Did you send me another
link to something?

Speaker 2 (59:52):
Yeah, I think that this. Let mean, I'm not quite
sure what this is, but we could take a look
and oh, yes, okay, just let's see.

Speaker 1 (01:00:00):
Well should I okay, fine, hold on, Yeah, so I'll
have to just give me a second hand throwing.

Speaker 2 (01:00:06):
Your curve bulls today. But apparently this.

Speaker 1 (01:00:09):
Woman wanted a girl. I'm gonna please this woman for
the way she reacted during her gender reveal when she
found out that she was having a.

Speaker 2 (01:00:18):
Boy, crying like a two year old. Okay, Byrony explain
that we don't need to listen to this this guy's comments, Sherry,
what happened? Yeah, he's going to chivalalously defend her, which is,
you know what, who knows? Maybe she's already had a
boy a right, maybe she wants a girl it you know,

(01:00:41):
but that's the same situation, right, she wanted a girl,
she finds out she having a boy. I'm sure I
can find more just like that. Of course, what's Tyrony
and Claire not showing and really terrifying is how many
subscribers this woman has, how distorted her worldview is. But
let's go with the patriarchy. Let's let's let's hear what

(01:01:03):
she has to say about patriot.

Speaker 3 (01:01:05):
Pay attention to the eldest daughter because she walks off sad.
She has probably already heard them having discussions about I
really want a boy. I want a boy. Why was
this other one? Because she's already holding a baby. Why
would they not a boy? I wanted a boy?

Speaker 4 (01:01:18):
She'll probably be caring.

Speaker 2 (01:01:20):
What does this she talks over this person? What was
the original? And not again? Gender revealed? Girl? Let me
see if I can find that, because this is really dishonest.
She's not even letting us hear it.

Speaker 1 (01:01:31):
Yeah, well, I mean.

Speaker 2 (01:01:34):
No, I found it, found it. Yeah, I figured out
how to search things in TikTok. It's actually fairly easy
once you figure it out. It seems a little pick
because it just doesn't integrate what with Google, but there
is Let's see the actual footage because I don't really
trust Byrony to actually tell us nobody should.

Speaker 1 (01:01:54):
No, All right, hold on, yes, look at that.

Speaker 2 (01:02:01):
That was she. He didn't even let her walk off.
He was just what was he saying?

Speaker 1 (01:02:05):
Listen to it again? He said? Can I have a
boy's lad? Can I have a boy? Lad? Can I
have a boy? Yeah? It was just you know, like
I said, it's wholesome. It's obvious that.

Speaker 2 (01:02:15):
She cares about his daughter and his other daughter and
his wife.

Speaker 1 (01:02:19):
Yeah, trauma dumping some personal ship right here. Yeah. I
don't think my daddy loved me because my mom said
he was a piece of shit.

Speaker 2 (01:02:29):
Why is it that cutting these videos just before? It's
obvious that you know, the guy wanted to have a
son because he got two daughters. Right, That is okay,
It is okay. For men to want to have sons.
I hate to tell you, Byrony, but it's okay for
men to exist and want things that you don't want.

(01:02:51):
That's okay. But she cuts this video off because he
makes it obvious that he does care about his daughters,
and he might be disappointed he's not having a son.
I don't think he's disappointed he's daughter. Do you understand
the difference, right? You can have those two ideas at
the same time, barony barony, Byrony, he's disappointed he's not

(01:03:12):
having a son, but he is not disappointed he's having
a daughter. If you are an adult with a human
understanding of emotions, you can understand that people can have
thoughts and feelings like.

Speaker 3 (01:03:22):
That, all right, all right, panting to ruin the lives
of her other sisters until they come across this video
in the future and their lives are crush too. There's
all sorts of old wives tales of how to conceive
the boys, all right, enough.

Speaker 2 (01:03:37):
Time, things like this, Actually there's some truth to them.
Environmental factors such as the pH of the vaginal track,
timing of intercourse have been hypothesis to slightly skew the odds,
but evidence is weak and consistent, so there is some
evidence because apparently newer research has found that maternal uterine
conditions do affect, to some degree subtlely effect whether or

(01:04:02):
not a boy or a girl is conceived. I mean,
I have no idea how my family always had boys.
Actually there were. One of my uncles had three girls eventually,
so there you go. But for the most part, my
family just was really heavy on boys. Interestingly enough, my
mother's family was really heavy on girls. And I think
my brother is the only I actually am not.

Speaker 1 (01:04:23):
I was correct.

Speaker 2 (01:04:24):
There was a series three girls that ended up being
granddaughters in my paternal family. Well that was well after
I was born, so I was the only granddaughter for
like twenty years or something. And in my other family,
the only grandson, oh no, no, there's two more. But
the for the only grandson for a while was my brother.
So so it's weird how families can have these very

(01:04:46):
strong skews towards girls and boys. But apparently there is
some evidence that there's a subtle effect, subtle maternal effect
on s sex ratio. So there you go. Take that
for what it is. I mean, I guess you can
give her for a point.

Speaker 1 (01:05:01):
Okay, let's keep going.

Speaker 2 (01:05:03):
She's sort of right blue.

Speaker 3 (01:05:04):
Wall I reference earlier. They even discuss this, They go
into food positions and timing of the deed. However, I'm
really glad that they note that there is no scientific
evidence backing any of these Old wive's peals up once
again that the spam that wins decides. As we saw earlier,
when it's revealed that people are having a boy, the
excitement is palpable. It's basically jumping off the screen, especially

(01:05:27):
by the men, with some even having like such joyous
reactions that they are violent, like this guy.

Speaker 1 (01:05:32):
Yeah that's violence, Yeah, that's yeah. Oh my god, everyone
should be afraid. You see. This is another thing that's
demonic is that she is implying by saying this is
a violent reaction and then showing the clip, and you know,
you're you're supposed to be like, oh my god, that
poor pregnant woman. She's trapped. She's trapped with this man

(01:05:57):
and he's not getting the baby he wants. What's going
to happen her anyway?

Speaker 3 (01:06:02):
Yeah, he finishes celebrated by kissing his very bemused wife,
and I can only imagine the reaction he would have
if he was at this level of violent, being happy, scary.

Speaker 4 (01:06:11):
We still live it.

Speaker 1 (01:06:12):
A oh, this is because you got the kit he wanted.
You see what she's.

Speaker 2 (01:06:16):
Doing, Yes, I see exactly.

Speaker 1 (01:06:18):
You imagine how you would have reacted if he didn't
have the kid he wanted.

Speaker 2 (01:06:22):
And now we can embrace for some really egregious lies,
particularly in Australia, because I got a lot to unload
about Australia when it comes to I'm guessing domestic violence
is the next crap coming out of her mouth.

Speaker 3 (01:06:34):
Let's go patriarchal culture where boys are seen as better
and gender revens show this through various ways, from girls
reveals being met with happiness or a shrug or kind
of ignored all the way to sadness and anger and
boys being mostly met with him a contagious joy which
everyone around joys in on.

Speaker 2 (01:06:52):
Yeah. Well, unfortunately, we shows you the truth right here,
right now. There was plenty of contagious joy and exuberance
with the female reveals that we showed. Also a lot
of the reveals in which the man was disappointed about
not having a boy. He had multiple girls. Okay, and
we showed you a video of a woman who basically

(01:07:14):
turned into a two year old toddler and threw a
tantrum when it was realvealed that she was having a boy.
So Byrony is just lying her ass off. Yep, there's
no two ways about it.

Speaker 1 (01:07:25):
It's she's just blooming patriarchy for this for some people
like having kids and me excited about it.

Speaker 3 (01:07:31):
Yeah, where everyone involved is clearly super happy to be
having a girl.

Speaker 4 (01:07:35):
But those are a lot more rare, and so they weren't.

Speaker 3 (01:07:39):
There was a guy in New York who in September
of twenty twenty four his wife and stabbed his two
daughters because the sex of that unborn baby that she
was caring was revealed to be a girl.

Speaker 2 (01:07:49):
And why dad.

Speaker 1 (01:07:52):
Killed his pregnant wife and stabbed his two young daughters
because he wanted a son. When whenever they do like
with he did this thing where they sense her everything
that it could be remotely sown a little bit edgy.
This is how you know it's a grift because they're
not interested in communicating the truth. They're interested in like
appeasing the algorithm in every single way possible. And it's

(01:08:15):
super annoying because we're fucking adults here just just say
what you're saying. She didn't have a problem with the
guy saying fuck on on the screen when she was
showing him being disappointed in the in the daughter. So
it's obviously not like I don't like those words. They
might be uncomfortable, So I'm sorry. I just get annoyed
with this self censorship stuff anyway. So again, even if

(01:08:38):
this is true, even if it's true, it's just this
one dude, And like, why was she having kids with
a guy who was like to kill her? Anyway? Like
is he just every dude? Doubt it? Probablies.

Speaker 2 (01:08:50):
This is one hell of an outlier. But also the
allegation that this.

Speaker 1 (01:08:54):
Guy killed we don't have a motive. We don't know, right, No, it's.

Speaker 2 (01:08:58):
It's from the father in law who said his daughter
Samantha was killed by her husband because he wanted a boy.
Although you look at him, that guy looked like he's
a walking red flag. Okay.

Speaker 1 (01:09:10):
Yeah, And how many women have killed their children because
they just didn't want to have them or what? And
I'm not just some out abortions. I'm talking about dumpster
babies and you know people who like like they legit
kill their children. Posts after they have them, they suffocate them,
they starve them, you know, they cut them up. And look,

(01:09:31):
I'm not saying that, I'm not even using that to
like make a claim against all women. So yeah, yeah,
this is this.

Speaker 2 (01:09:37):
Is basically alleged the father in law, so he doesn't
necessarily know why he this miss This is a claim,
great so, and this is a claim that's going to
become another thing to use to beat over men over
the head of men who are celebrating the birth of sons.

Speaker 7 (01:09:58):
An outlier in this is really deceitful report because this
should be and why dad killed his pregnant wife and
is to stab his two younger daughters because the father
in law alleges he wants wanted a son.

Speaker 6 (01:10:14):
Mm hmm.

Speaker 2 (01:10:15):
I mean you can say whatever you want in a
victim impact statement, right, this could be you can make
whatever conjecture you wanted. My guess is he did this
because he probably is a criminal background. This probably didn't
come out of the blue. I really doubt it did.
He might be like schizophrenic or have some sort of
although that probably would have come out at trial. And

(01:10:37):
why father or and why man kills wife for because
he wanted a boy. Prior criminal history, Okay, crime history,
all right. No prior criminal history for Drew Garnier was
mentioned in the available news reports concerning this crime. Yeah. No,
there has to be something in his background that explains this.

Speaker 1 (01:10:58):
Either that or again, this is a crazy outlier that
she's using as evidence of something. So she's making a
claim that this is worth bringing up because it suggests
a trend or a propensity amongst the male population in general.
And she only found one example. And again, even if
it was completely true, that doesn't prove anything about men.

Speaker 3 (01:11:19):
She was five months pregnant and the daughters were nine
and six at the time. He was sentenced to thirty
years in prison with fifteen years of post release supervision
as part of the plea deal aimed at protecting the
surviving daughters from the trauma of a trial. I'm so
glad that they did that so his two poor daughters
didn't have to go up and be witnesses at the
stand and also share their first hand experiences of what

(01:11:41):
they suffered at their own father's hands.

Speaker 4 (01:11:44):
Those poor kids.

Speaker 3 (01:11:45):
He's forbidden from seeing his daughters until twenty fifty six,
the maximum allowed, which only the girls can overrule. If
they eventually want contact. If I were them, I don't
know if I'd ever want to have contact with him again,
other than to say how much of a terrible person
he is and how he should be rotting in hell.
The daughters have been adopted by their maternal grandfather. I
just cannot imagine how hard it's going to be for

(01:12:05):
these girls, knowing how much their father hated them, to
the point that he even murdered their mother.

Speaker 1 (01:12:13):
What he didn't murder them, No.

Speaker 2 (01:12:15):
He stabbed them, Like, I mean, I think that that's
probably you know, like, honestly, Byron, you don't have to
invent more trauma for these girls. Please stop? Yeah, that's uh, please.

Speaker 1 (01:12:26):
Stop now, all right?

Speaker 2 (01:12:28):
But you know, we could look at lesbian couples that
torture killed boys. Let's let's let's say that implies something
about all women. There plenty of those. It's ridiculous anyway,
So does she say anything further that.

Speaker 1 (01:12:43):
She will don't know the claim after this? Okay, this
is about like basically she's gonna use So there's another
thing they do. They take an anecdote and then they
extrapolate from that a much broader claim using the antidote
as the foundation, the anecdote as a foundation.

Speaker 3 (01:13:01):
Because he was so angry that more girls would be
brought into the world. Patriarchy is violence. It is not
good for anybody.

Speaker 4 (01:13:08):
And this is you are a liar.

Speaker 2 (01:13:11):
Patriarchy is violence. Is it okay? What I might I
tell you something about violence? Byrony Claire. In Australia, a
male victim of domestic violence by a female abuser needs
twice evidence to be even considered a victim, and if
his abuser makes one counter claim, his evidence is void.

(01:13:36):
So he is subject to sudden death. He has deeds
twice the evidence and one counter claim by his abuser
means that he is cast in the role of abuser.
Now why is that? That's because the feminist organization known
as Anrose, that's the acronym A n Rows petitioned the
courts and the lawmakers and the policymakers to change the

(01:14:01):
burden of proof. So the burden of proof is now
on male victims of domestic assault in Australia. How do
you justify that? Byrony Claire. And that's not just some
weird os lesbian couple shoving their sun into a cage,
castrating him with a blow torch or other awful things.

(01:14:22):
That's not some weird outlier. That is the behavior of
a funded and federally recognized feminist organization towards male victims
of domestic violence in Australia, to literally construct a two
tier justice system that actively discriminates against male victims. How

(01:14:43):
do you justify that with your claims of patriarchy and
how does that exist and what you claim patriarchy to be.
And it doesn't end there. In the US, feminist groups
again control the narrative around domestic violence and again using
the Duluth model, have placed it put in place greater

(01:15:06):
conditions on male victims of domestic violence, which has led
to them being more likely to be arrested than their abusers.
In the US, and not just that, there is an
intervention called ACTV. It's a completely new intervention, well not completely.
It's been known for about a decade. It is non feminist.

(01:15:26):
It is a non feminist batterer's intervention program. It has
been shown to reduce recidivism by something like forty percent,
which is phenomenal. Forty to fifty percent, which is phenomenal
in the field. It is being drummed out by feminists

(01:15:47):
because it doesn't support their ideological interventions. They prefer to
put their ideology ahead of interventions that potentially protect female
victims of domestic violence. What does it mean? What is
an effective better intervention program? It means fewer female victims

(01:16:07):
and feminists prefer their ideology to that. And you talk
to me or anybody else about patriarchal violence when it
is your movement that is primary. Are they responsible for
these issues continuing generation after generation after generation because you
prefer to uphold your blaming men then caring about anyone.

(01:16:29):
I guess I don't have much of a filter today.

Speaker 1 (01:16:31):
Because I'm not.

Speaker 2 (01:16:32):
I told you it was rage inducing, although I think
I have blown out my voice. Now, Yeah, another another
week of.

Speaker 1 (01:16:38):
Since it gets better, Okay, that's a good get Well.
I mean, like, look, this isn't really, this is not new.
This is the claim. It's always the same claim. They
just wrap it in different gift rap and you know
they package it differently, they put different seasoning on it,
whatever it's it comes in a bun as opposed to

(01:16:59):
on bread or to but it's the same shit sandwich.

Speaker 3 (01:17:02):
So but globally, sun preference, which means that people would
rather have a son than a daughter, and they often
celebrate when people have a son and don't do anything
when someone's having a daughter.

Speaker 2 (01:17:12):
Worldwide million it's.

Speaker 1 (01:17:14):
Just she's just a lie. It's just a lie. So
anyway she says worldwide, this is this is nuts. Listen
to this, let letter finish, and.

Speaker 3 (01:17:23):
Don't do anything when someone's having a daughter. Worldwide, one
hundred and forty two million girls are quote missing as
a result of sun preference and daughter a version and
gendered by a sex selection.

Speaker 4 (01:17:33):
These girls were.

Speaker 3 (01:17:34):
Unwanted, neglected, abused, or malnourished, deprived of the care they
needed to survive, or when they do survive in families
that wanted them to be sons, they're often neglected, have
worse health outcomes and are often abused.

Speaker 1 (01:17:45):
This is this is United Nations Population fund. So consider
the source United Nations. I hope, ah that, I.

Speaker 2 (01:17:54):
Hope that Trump withdraws from the United Nations.

Speaker 1 (01:17:57):
Right, yeah, we should all leave.

Speaker 2 (01:17:58):
But if the US withdraws in the US, the UN
disappears because it gets the primary funder of this bullshit organization.
But also, why is it that most of the children
on the streets are boys? If this is the case. Yeah,
why in these war torn situations girls get help first.

Speaker 1 (01:18:19):
Yeah, I mean they're not being specific on where where
these girls are missing from. They just say worldwide, one
hundred and forty two million girls are missing as a
result of sun preference. So are we talking about like
parts of the world where they need boys to fight
wars for them and like die And that's why, like

(01:18:39):
they're just like, you know, are they mistreating the boys
as well in other ways or maybe not mistreating but
they're just like have to take certain things of consideration
for survival that affects the boys and girls differently because
of their conditions Or is that like racist to point out,
like you can't talk about it because you know it

(01:19:00):
might look bad if they're brown. So because we don't know,
this could be Africa, this could be anywhere. Did I
blow out the sound? No, you're you're fine. Richard Vill
gets us five dollars and says, anyone remember the trend
where women were doing their version of a gender reveal
with the question will it be a girl or an abortion? Yes?

(01:19:21):
I remember that. I also remember Sarah Silverman did like
a commercial and she said, sorry, it's a boy again.
These are you know this is like big Hollywood stuff
and or whatever. But I mean, the idea that we
all just like love boys more than more than girls
is ridiculous. It's just ridiculous on its face. So anyway,

(01:19:42):
should I keep going? We look at my next time
code here there's yeah, there's a little bit more here.

Speaker 3 (01:19:48):
Often abused plus them really is pressure on it women
to provide sons, even though once again, the sperm is
the thing that decides. But of course women just keep
being blamed for everything. She is still seen as letting
the family.

Speaker 1 (01:20:01):
Do you know we blame women for everything? Did you
know that that means that you're deciding to blame women
for things? Is good because that's what we're supposed to do,
I think, or at least that's what we normally do.
So what you're doing isn't new blameing women standard?

Speaker 2 (01:20:17):
So yet somehow I get so much pushback for it.

Speaker 3 (01:20:21):
Yeah, and if she doesn't provide a son, an air
even though we don't need.

Speaker 2 (01:20:26):
To head this, okay, all right, she's just just go
on and on and on. Does she like at this
point is there anything else in here? Like, I'm like,
I'm I'm in pain. After that, shouting thing. I feel
like my voice is like, oh, I'm getting that tickling.

Speaker 1 (01:20:43):
Well, here are some claims that I have time codes for.
You told me if there's anyone you want to listen to.
Reference to jk Rowling's personal history and website claims her
father's resentment influence her views. So the claim is that
jk Rowling said that her dad wanted a son and
had her. And she tries to connect this to the
fact that jk Rowling chose the pen name J. K

(01:21:05):
Rowling or her Moniker as a writer because she thought
that if people thought she was a man, her writing
would be taken more seriously, and that's why she went
by jk Rowling. Of course, this is again feminists referencing
other feminists' feelings about things and then using that as data.

(01:21:25):
So she's saying because jk Rowling is a feminist, therefore
insecure about men and like worried that men and boys
won't like her, and so she decided to change her
name to jk Rowling for her Harry Potter books because
she was sure that if they learned it was a woman,
no one would take her seriously. And then Brian Declair
takes that and says, see, this is proof that men

(01:21:48):
don't take women seriously because this other feminist said it,
and that's basically the claim. Then there's claim gender disappointment
is real but often tied to binary expectations, so basically
talking about, you know, gener disappointment shouldn't exist because gender
is a social construct. Then there's reference to doctor Chrissy Jr.

(01:22:09):
On male preference in Eastern cultures and rise in Western
cultures via social media. This is like a well documented
apparently in Eastern cultures, you know, like India, there is
a desire for boys, and there is a feminist that
says this is real. An Indian feminists, which are probably
some of the worst ones by the way, that makes
this claim. And let me see reference to a study

(01:22:32):
is gender disappointment of mental health or social cultural issue.
So that's another one. I don't know if any of
that's jumping out at you or not. Gender selection via
blood tests and IVF favors boys globally though, you know,
for IVF, apparently she's saying that more people are willing

(01:22:53):
to pay for boys or like they want boys. And
there's another study claim reasons for sun preference in Eastern cultures,
financial stability, dowry, and gender roles. Obviously, like you know,
if you have sons, then they're more likely to make
money and then you can they can support you. So

(01:23:14):
what else is any of this jumping out? Or you
do not really care?

Speaker 2 (01:23:19):
I'm actually looking at the Garnier case. In the case
of Drew Garnier, there was no statement made as to
his being motivated by wanting a son or a boy.
It was only the father in law's statement. In fact,
this apparently was an incident stemming from a domestic dispute
on September fourth at the family's home in Masonville, to

(01:23:42):
provide no specific details on the motive, so essentially that
this was something that apparently came out of a domestic
dispute and he actually expressed remorse, I would trade my
life for my wife's. So and attorney Shawn J. Smith
or I've describe the acts as incomprehensible, didn't elaborate on
motive and press releases potential indirector family sources. Well, I'm

(01:24:04):
not going to go with the father in law statement
because he can imply anything. It implies prior knowledge of
Guarney's and disappointment yeah, but that searches for when his
statements from friends or relatives. Okay, so it's the only
the father's statement that really the father in law's statement,
So there doesn't seem to be a motive. It just

(01:24:24):
seems to have stemmed out of a domestic incident. So
it was possibly the most common form of domestic violence,
which is mutual, also results in the most physical, most severe,
the most severe injury to women. But I don't know,
I couldn't tell. All they say is it stemmed from
a domestic incident. I can ask a bit more, see

(01:24:46):
if there's any information on the family.

Speaker 1 (01:24:48):
Yeah, well, do you want me to like not play
anymore clips or what are we doing?

Speaker 2 (01:24:54):
Well, you can comment on it, well on what Byrony
is saying. I mean, you went through it, you did
the work, so might as well make the comments.

Speaker 1 (01:25:03):
Sure, I mean you seem kind of checked out, which
is weird because we're reacting to this video. So yeah,
we don't have to, like we can.

Speaker 2 (01:25:11):
Well, I haven't done the thing, so maybe I should
do that. The monthly fundraiser isn't available yet, but it
will be soon and if you're interested, feed the Badger
dot com slash support. I'm also finding it hard to
speak right now. I really did blow out my voice
with that anger, and now I'm in a bit of pain,
so I might seem a little checked out from that.
And also you can send a comment feed the Badger

(01:25:33):
dot com slash just the tip. Let's feed the Badger
dot com slash just the tip best way to send
a tip and the best way for you to send
us a comment. So if you would like to continue
and just comment on what you found, I mean.

Speaker 1 (01:25:45):
You went through this, you yeah, I'll go to the
next I'll go to the next part where she basically
talks about being the daughter when a son was wanted,
and it's all like, like, how are how are women
the victims of not being wanted? And we're going to
use a bunch of TV shows as our proof, TV
shows as data, guys, pop culture created by feminists, because yes,

(01:26:08):
pop culture is feminist, like almost all of it is
proof of the real world. It's the world outside your window.
Goes back to the day I was born. You get
me my son?

Speaker 4 (01:26:18):
Oh no, he went out a son and the fact
that I was a girl didn't change his plan.

Speaker 1 (01:26:24):
What do you mean?

Speaker 4 (01:26:25):
My full legal name is Robin Charles Schrubotsky.

Speaker 3 (01:26:29):
Or it's actually really surprising to me that we still
haven't had.

Speaker 2 (01:26:32):
Hey, this is interesting, all right? Why this matters? In
this case, the lack of prior incidents contributed to the
plea deal reducing charges from murder to manslaughter. So his
charges were reduced from murder to manslaughter, which is very odd,
and the narrative of an outer character act is described
by the defense. It also underscores the unpredictability of a

(01:26:55):
domestic violences, as highlighted by advocates and post incident coverage.
I don't think that domestic violence is the unpredictable, but
this case remains a stark example of how domestic violence
can escalate without warning, even in families with no recorded history.
I really doubt that, but who knows. It just seems
like a real outlier. But the fact that his charges

(01:27:16):
were reduced down in manslaughter, that's something weird is going
on there. That's all I can say.

Speaker 1 (01:27:22):
Okay, well, she'll just frame it as this is like
men get away with it, so you know we'll have
to like you know, I don't, I don't know. We'll
just be an impasse because you can say, well, this
seems really strange. There's probably something we don't know. But
then somebody this will just say, well, this just proves
that men get away with it, and they're they get

(01:27:42):
treated with a lighter sentence when they murder women.

Speaker 2 (01:27:44):
Yeah, she'll ejaculate any bullshit to prove your position.

Speaker 1 (01:27:49):
Well, not just her, it's like feminists and even women
in general will do that, and the male sims that
follow them, they'll just you know, they'll justify it. They'll say,
oh no, this is totally this guy's have gotten buried
under the prison. Like they wouldn't even want to know
what the conditions were. All they know is, you know,
a woman died and a man killed her or a

(01:28:09):
man was involved, therefore he must have done something terrible.
I mean, nobody, nobody asks these questions. Usually they're just
like bury him.

Speaker 3 (01:28:17):
So anyway, she was a girl, but her father really
wanted a boy and raised her as such. There are
others like Audrey and her sister from Atlantis and the
father really wanted boys.

Speaker 2 (01:28:28):
But the funny thing, what the wait, wait, what why
are we looking at freaking cartoons?

Speaker 1 (01:28:36):
It's data, Allison, this is too. They referenced pop culture
made by feminists to prove their arguments. That's why they
dominate pop culture because that becomes people's reality.

Speaker 2 (01:28:51):
Also, what what is she trying to prove? So she
got raised as a boy. It just does a character
sketch in a freaking cartoon. It doesn't meaning to what
you're saying. And who the hell knows if JK. Rowling's
father really did reject her. Maybe he rejected her because
she's a horrible misinterest. I've ever considered that. But anyway,

(01:29:15):
I'm you know what I'm done? Yeah, like this this
is ridiculous. This isn't even an argument, This isn't even
passing as anything worthy of. Like I can show you
all kinds of examples of bullshit from media. What's it proved?
You know? Like, honestly, I'm sorry, I'm not yelling at you, Brian.

Speaker 1 (01:29:38):
Well, I mean, how many videos of Briarny Claire have
we done? He always makes references to movies and TV shows,
Like every video has at least like a good chunk
of it. Maybe twenty five percent of the video is
her referencing pop culture stuff to prove her point, and
people eat it up. They eat it up. Oh, I
watched Atlantas. Oh that was totally me. I mean, yeah,

(01:30:01):
it's frustrating, but it is what it is. Like we
we're gonna do another Priority Claire response video in a
week and it's gonna have this in't it. So I
don't know why we're upset. I'm not. This is just
what we have.

Speaker 2 (01:30:12):
Well, how do you respond to it? You're like, there's
all the All you could do is say you're using
cartoons to make a point, and you can't do that.

Speaker 1 (01:30:23):
Well, obviously you can't. But more than that, though, they're
they're making So look people in the creative space that
are building the culture, the people who are who are
given the keys to do that, they've been like they've
gotten past the gatekeepers, they've gotten past the academics, they've
gotten their degrees, they've gotten in touch with their contacts.

(01:30:46):
Everyone who has made their way into like Warner Brothers
in Disney and Sony and all of these like large
media conglomerates, they all had to pass the purity test,
the feminism. So everyone making content is doing it with
that lens, and that means that it becomes the ocean
you swim in. So that when a feminist activist like

(01:31:09):
Briaranny Clair makes content. She doesn't have to bring up studies.
She can just be like, did you see that movie? Yeah,
that's reality. Did you see that show about the women
who are being turned into slaves or reproduce for the
next generation. Yeah, that's that's reality. That's that's the world.
Because it's it's on you know, it's on TV. So
the only thing we can do is point out that

(01:31:30):
it's that it's just content made by true believers. It's like, yeah,
you got people in your cult making videos that you're
responding to and you're doing and you're pretending like you're
pointing outside. That's why they criticize Hollywood for stuff too,
because it's to give them a sense of well they're
not we're not exactly the same, but you are. You

(01:31:51):
all believe the same things. So that's what I mean.
And yeah, I mean that's not just Briarannie Clair. Every
one of these online even people in government are doing it.
I mean like the British Parliament was like, look, we're
all gonna watch adolescents now, Like this isn't even at
a small scale, it's not stupid. It's a tactic to

(01:32:13):
normalize a worldview through our media, and look, I liked Atlantis,
but I knew what they were doing, you know, and
I was just like, well, okay, I mean this is
like when you know that it's on some level untrue,
then you can just enjoy it for what it is
and just like ignore it.

Speaker 2 (01:32:30):
But yeah, that's what what were they doing in Atlantis.
I don't recall it being particularly feminist or anything.

Speaker 1 (01:32:36):
Uh. I mean, like if you watch it, you'll you'll
have to watch it again, but like, you know, there
it was a uh they like looking for Atlantis or something,
and there's like a you know, I think Michael J.
Fox as the voice of the guy, the main guy,
and they're and they're on an expedition or an adventure
to find Atlantis. And there's it's it's got a decent

(01:32:56):
plot and everything, but there are some like the Girl.
There's like a girl who's like the key to everything,
and you know, she's like magical and special and everything,
and then you got like these little side characters. I
wouldn't say that it was like as aggressive as like
modern content, but like a lot of the stuff from
this era was pretty feminist. It was just subtler, I

(01:33:19):
would say, you know, her maid was feminist. I've talked
about that. It's obviously feminists. Beating the Beast was feminists.
A Latin was feminist. All of it was that whole
silver Age of stuff was more progressive than what came before.
But even what came before was a bit progressive. Like
it's just like it's incremental, you know, it's like little steps,

(01:33:40):
And this is how you get lesbian space witches. Is
that at one point, you know, you thought that, you know,
Ariel should like betray her father or whatever, like disobeit,
disobey her father.

Speaker 2 (01:33:53):
Yeah, well, I mean it's not gonna be a lot
of I don't know, I think there might be a
line a little bit. I would say that Atlantis just
was pretty clunkily written in some places. Also, this girl
being raised as a boy gave her access to the world.
And I don't mean insofar as, oh, she got patriarchal privilege.

(01:34:14):
I mean, being raised as a boy would have given
her a certain amount of toughness and ability to disregard
discomfort that would enable her to be able to travel
the world and engage in these kinds of activities that
made her useful to an expedition. So it didn't do
her any harm. I'm sorry, Byrony. You know, us masculine women,

(01:34:36):
we exist and we are sort of valid in and
of ourselves and we don't have to answer to you.
And maybe it wasn't as well. I mean, I guess
she said her her father wanted a boy. I don't
think my father cared at all. I didn't think it
occurred to him to care. I just sort of came
out first granddaughter, and it was me.

Speaker 1 (01:34:57):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:34:58):
I bet my grandma was so happy until I started
eating dirt and playing with legos. Okay, all right, okay,
is there anything further we can say about this?

Speaker 1 (01:35:09):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (01:35:11):
I mean, I'm sure she's gonna come up with even
more cartoon examples of her thesis.

Speaker 1 (01:35:17):
That's what she does.

Speaker 2 (01:35:18):
I know. You know what, for some reason, I didn't
think Brimony was the one.

Speaker 4 (01:35:21):
You don't They all do this.

Speaker 1 (01:35:22):
They all do this, Yes, so they all do it.
They'll make up, they'll reference so, show a movie, a song,
a game, a song. It's basically, the culture is the
weapon that they use. And the culture gets worse. It's
like a feedback loops like an Ora boros, you know,

(01:35:44):
and they just keep going back to it. So yeah,
they all do it. That mean when you don't, you'll
you'll share some data, because she does have some, but
it's not good data. And then she'll make a claim,
and then she'll make generalizations and strawmen the opponent position
and misrepresent her opponents, and then she'll bring it home

(01:36:07):
with some references that everyone can relate to, so it's like, oh,
did you see this movie? It has this in it
and that's that's my point. And then her you know,
sub room temperature IQ audience will be like, oh, yeah,
I totally saw that. I get it. Ooh that's real.
It works, and it's like a surface level reading. That's

(01:36:32):
why you said, well I don't think that's what it is. Yeah,
but it doesn't matter, Like you can say that that's
not really what Atlantis was about, but it doesn't matter
because she doesn't need she doesn't need people to actually
think about it. She just wants them to believe. So
she just shows a clip which is just a brief
little scene of this character saying something about her backstory
and then say, see, this is evidence, and then people
be like, I remember Atlantis, it's sexist or something whatever

(01:36:55):
they're supposed to take away. It's a feeling you're supposed
to get. That's it. That's why they use media because
it's effective, especially on her audience.

Speaker 2 (01:37:03):
And yet all of their media is so boring, Like
you know that we should probably cover that that Film
Industry Watch article that I sent you that's talking about
how much film has been inundated with like overt missingry,
Like the entire the entire plot of the story is

(01:37:24):
every man is either incompetent or a predator, and a
woman just goes kills them. It's just this kind of violent,
mis miss injury exploitation film. And so they're there. Their
writing is getting worse and worse and more, and even
the people who I guess resonate with it have said
that it's starting to get boring. Ok Are so you're

(01:37:45):
okay with ending it here?

Speaker 1 (01:37:47):
Yeah? Sure, you can look at that study on another
shows that the thing that you sent Sendema's formula for
awards and festivals, the humiliation and plification of men.

Speaker 2 (01:37:59):
Yeah, no, I was. I didn't want to go through
it on this show. I just wanted to. Yeah, just
put it, put it to you and then maybe we
can do it on another show.

Speaker 1 (01:38:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:38:08):
I didn't want this. Huh, I said, I don't want
this show to go for another two hours.

Speaker 1 (01:38:14):
No, no, no, no, this is good enough.

Speaker 2 (01:38:17):
All right? Then, I like, I don't know what else
to say. This is ridiculous, Like this is rank stupidity.

Speaker 1 (01:38:25):
It's content basically, like you you'd have to you'd have
to operate off the assumption that men hate women so
much that if they happen to decide to tolerate them
long enough to impregnate one, they don't want more women
to come as a result. That's what she's saying. And

(01:38:46):
if they do, it's kind of like they and and it.
And if they do have women children, it's their fault
because their sperm are weak or old, and that's their fault,
so they shouldn't be angry about it. Those insecure men. Yeah,
this is okay, that's basically it. I mean, I don't know,

(01:39:08):
it's men. Men are bad.

Speaker 2 (01:39:10):
Mm hmmm. Will also apparently masculine women are bad, And.

Speaker 1 (01:39:14):
I'm going to say, well, they're victims of they're victims
of men who wanted boys. That's what she's saying about it.

Speaker 2 (01:39:20):
No, no, okay, this is what really annoys me about fems,
not just not just women, but fems, feminine women, feminine men. No, no,
it's not so bad with femininin them. Boys. They're cool.
They don't allow that there's any other form of existence
but themselves. They believe that they're the only ones who

(01:39:40):
are valid. This is a conceit that I see consistently
with them. If you're not a feminine woman, you're invalid.
At least with from people like Byrony Claire. There's a
lot of feminine women that don't buy into this. They
just live and let live, right, You just do what
you want to do anyway. Okay, I'm done. I don't

(01:40:03):
know what else to say.

Speaker 1 (01:40:04):
I have nothing more. Okay, let's wrap it up.

Speaker 2 (01:40:07):
Yeah, so, if you would like to send a message
at any point after the show is over, you can
do so it feedbadger dot com slash just the tip
and we will address it at the next reasonably relevant show.
Let's feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip,
and I'm going to hand it back to you, Brian,
since we don't have our monthly fundraiser up yet.

Speaker 1 (01:40:23):
All right, okay, then, thanks guys for coming on the show.
If you guys like this video, please hit like subscribe.
If you're not already subscribed, hit Develop Notifications, leaves a comment,
let us know what you guys think about what we
discussed on the show today, and please please please share
this video because sharing is caring. Also, one more time,
rest in peace, Aaron Pitsi, you are a legend. Thank

(01:40:45):
you guys so much for coming on today's episode of
Maintaining Frame, and we'll talk to you all in the
next one.

Speaker 8 (01:40:52):
Men's right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are literal machines.
They are talking point mashe. They are impossible to deal with,
especially if you have like especially if you have like
a couple of dudes who have good memory. On top
of that, too, holy shit, you're fucked