The SHOCKING Truth About MEN's Reactions to HUMILIATION

Time to look at some cringe from Bryrony as well as an article that tells us what we already know about men in film.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Okay, and we're live. Hello everybody, and welcome back to
Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian Allison, and this
is red Chill Cinema. We're finally doing those again. Men.
Don't you dare get mad at women who humiliate you?

Speaker 2 (00:15):
Shall I explain the title?

Speaker 1 (00:18):
Yeah? Go ahead, explain the title? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (00:21):
All right. So essentially, I read this article from I
think it's Hollywood Watch about the.

Speaker 1 (00:30):
Latest film industry watch.

Speaker 2 (00:32):
It's called Film Industry Watch, and it's about this latest
trend in media of how would you describe it? Essentially,
it is a condemnation of men, either their incompetent or
their predatory and the climax is that women kill them
as you do. Right, It's sort of like basically birth

(00:54):
of a Nation, except feminists. So it's sort of like
that the whole thing where Helen pluck Rowse and and
her co conspirators published Mind COUMP, except they changed, they
changed jew demand, and they got it published in a
modern feminist academic paper. Well, all of this cinema is

(01:15):
basically just birth of the nation. And if you don't
know what birth of the nation is, it basically revolves
around the lynching of a black man who is predatory
towards a white woman. And yeah, that's that's media. That's
modern media. They just they just do that show that
that that movie over and over and over again, except
the black person as a man, the KKK as women,

(01:39):
and there you go, and never do you actually question
the premise that men are uniquely sexually predatory. But if
men are upset over this, this is this is the
final you know what. Actually that's spoilers. But the title,
the title is actually spoilers to the final conclusion of
the article, which I'll leave as just a exercise for

(01:59):
the viewer because I don't want to spoil it. But
I think you might know where we're all leading up
to in this article. But you know, let's allow a
little bit of anticipation.

Speaker 1 (02:10):
Yeah, don't bury the lead to. Yes, let's get into
the thing. So I just want to tell you guys
before we start. YouTube has done something and it is
affecting our vertical stream. So yesterday, I'm just giving a
little bit of back source. You understand where this comes from,
because I didn't do this, and that's the most important

(02:31):
thing you guys understand is that I didn't do this.
Yesterday when I was hosting the news show. YouTube allowed
me to set up the vertical and horizontal streams the
way I always do, but they now have a new
mode in their studio where you can send out a
vertical and a horizontal simultaneously under one backroom instance in

(02:54):
the studio, and so yesterday I didn't do that. I
put them on separate streams. But the problem with the
horizontal was that it didn't actually show up in a
It didn't show up as a as a vertical. I'm sorry.
The problem with the vertical was it didn't come out
as a vertical, so it wasn't reaching people on their

(03:15):
mobile devices. It instead came out as a horizontal where
most of it was blacked out except for the vertical
section of the video. Kind of like if you put
out like a let's say you put out a short
and it's too long for shorts, so what shorts. It
doesn't make it into a short, it just makes it
into a standard video. And so that's what happened yesterday,

(03:36):
and I didn't I saw that, but I was like, well,
I don't know what to do about it. So today
I thought I would try to do the thing that
YouTube was suggesting I do, which is to essentially create
a simulcast of a horizontal and a vertical. And I
even tried to plug in the stream key from the vertical,
which I was able to grab on its own and

(03:58):
drop it into my vertical plug in over here on
obs in the hopes that it would come out as
a vertical. But it's not. So we don't have We
don't really have a vertical stream. We have a vertical
that is just like the center of the horizontal. Does
that make sense? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (04:15):
Yeah, So so basically YouTube has just screwed the shorts streaming.

Speaker 1 (04:21):
For now unless I figure out a workaround. Yeah, I'm
sure that there are people working on it, because this
literally happened last night, like right before the news show.
They changed it, of course.

Speaker 2 (04:35):
So we don't where this won't actually end up being
a short or is.

Speaker 1 (04:38):
There it's going out, it's going out on the shorts,
but it's not it's not the layout that we have. Yeah,
I see it, let me see if let me see
how it looks. I don't know how it's showing up here,
but I'm just letting you know that, Okay, But I.

Speaker 2 (04:55):
Don't see an actual instance.

Speaker 1 (04:57):
Or yeah, there isn't an instance but for some okay, so,
but it must be that it's streaming to mobile devices,
but it's streaming this stream instead. And it did say,
do you want to do vertical and horizontal? So I said, okay,
let's see what it looks like. And this is what
it looks like. So and it's weird because it was

(05:18):
it's just this channel at least like of the two
that I tried. I tried my channel earlier today and
I was able to do the vertical horizontal as far
as I can tell, and there were no issues. But
then again I didn't check, so maybe I should do
that anyway. I'm just letting you know. The vertical is
out there, but it's not. It doesn't look like what we.

Speaker 2 (05:40):
Have set up here, so okay, so good grief. And
the vertical is where we make our shorts too, yeah,
goddamn YouTube. And of course it's just this channel that's
supposedly having this problem.

Speaker 1 (05:56):
Well I mean I didn't it might not just be
this Channe. I'm just letting you know that, uh, this
is like what we're dealing with right now.

Speaker 2 (06:04):
So yeah, okay, all right, Well, well I guess we'll
figure out I'll see if.

Speaker 1 (06:11):
Yeah, I mean, I'll have to find a fix, see
if anyone, because I know a lot of streamers that
have been using this tool, this this uh set up
for a while, and they must also.

Speaker 2 (06:22):
Be well, it was just fine, it was working just fine.

Speaker 1 (06:26):
Yeah, I know.

Speaker 2 (06:28):
I'm I wonder if this is an effort for YouTube
to be able to control who is able to stream
on the shorts, because of course, we had a whole
freakin' workflow going. We streamed a shorts. My husband Jonathan
would cut the shorts up and publish them, and now
that's in jeopardy because of YouTube's arbitrary changes.

Speaker 1 (06:48):
Yeah, well let me, I'll show you. I'll show you something, okay,
just so you can see what what what it is.
So this is the stream I did today, mm hmm.
And the this is the vertical stream. So if you
if you don't, if you can't tell right off the bat,
it's not laid out in the standard shorts layout. It's

(07:09):
actually just a regular horizontal stream. Do you see that?
And that's what happened today when I did a stream,
So that means that we could do it this way
in the future. And then what Jonathan's gonna have to
do is basically just like you know, use this layout
and just crop out like the black parts and make
the shorts that way. So but that's what it's gonna.

Speaker 2 (07:33):
Look like, so the hell YouTube? Yeah anyway, Jesus Christ, Honestly,
it might be worth it to just maybe change this
horizontal layout a bit like maybe look at like the
way the Lotus eaters do it, and then just use that.
If the shorts have gone to crap on YouTube, why

(07:54):
would they change something that was working? God damn it.
This was really irritating because it changes everything downstream of
this stream and we were doing pretty good with the shorts.
All right, well let's let's let's get to the meat
of the matter.

Speaker 1 (08:10):
But yeah, we I don't think we can fix this
right now. I'm just letting you all know that the
YouTube change something, so we'll figure it out later. But
in the meantime, so we're gonna be looking at the
cinema's formula for awards and festivals the humiliation and vlification
of men.

Speaker 2 (08:31):
Sorry, I'm just I'm just annoyed that I'll just relax
out the annoyance.

Speaker 1 (08:36):
Okay, Well, I mean, yeah, we can't. It's you Brian,
I no, I know, I'm not saying that. I'm just
saying there's nothing we can do about it right now.

Speaker 3 (08:45):
Yeah, I know, Okay, let's let's do it, all right,
maybe Rumbo will start doing vertical streams or doing the
same kind of business, all right, Should I just read
this then?

Speaker 2 (08:58):
Yeah, yeah, let's read it. I mean, what I was
going to suggest is we only read a little bit
and then have a reply, because that makes better shorts,
having whole paragraphs, and then then the short just makes
shorts of the the article without including us. So we're
gonna have to stop more often. And if we do
that format, of course, I don't know if we're gonna

(09:18):
even be able to do shorts from this because of
the YouTube changes. But so, yeah, let's just read a
sentence and then we'll discuss it, okay, or sentence or two.

Speaker 1 (09:30):
So the war, so that this is a I guess
this is like an analysis of this trend that's been
going on forever. And I guess that, you know, maybe
it's an admission. I don't really know. So the war
on men, how cinema became a weapon in the cultural
backlash against men and masculinity. Guest post by concern filmmaker

(09:54):
and fi W staff. That's Film Industry Watch staff. Do
you have anything to say about that? No, let's keep going,
all right, I will say I will say something though,
real quick about this. It's interesting that it's framed as
backlash against men. Backlash for what?

Speaker 2 (10:17):
Yeah, for what?

Speaker 1 (10:18):
That suggests a counter attack or like a defensive maneuver, right,
backlash for what? That's all I would.

Speaker 2 (10:25):
Ask, Yeah, because they have this premise that men shot first. Yes,
and yet again, within the entire premise that men shot first,
every time we point out that men enforced sacrifice on
other men that they didn't do to women, they say, oh,
well men did that. Yes, that's the point. You are

(10:45):
asserting that men constructed a society where women bear the
brunt of the sacrifices for men's benefit. So every instance
where we point out that no, actually it's men enforcing
sacrifice on other men is a counter exis to your assertion,
and you can't dismiss it by saying, well, it's just
patriarchy backfire where men are doing it to each other. Right,

(11:08):
there was no first volley by men nowhere in history,
if you actually look at it outside the feminist framework
which enforces its own viewpoint on the evidence and the
assumption that and then looks at the enforcement of its
own viewpoint on the evidence and says, yes, that proves
our viewpoint. No it doesn't. That's completely sylopsistic. It's eating

(11:32):
your own ass in terms of the science. But if
you look at actually look at history, men enforced sacrifice
on other men in order to maintain society. They enforced
sacrifice in war in order to protect society and women's interests.
This is something they don't mention. They enforced sacrifice on

(11:52):
men to police other men, to make sure they abided
by the rules of society right throughout history, and that
sacrifice sometimes came with a greater say in government, and
the government was about sacrificing. So men were doing the sacrificing,
and oh my god, they had greater say in the sacrifice. Jeez,

(12:15):
what a what a an onerous and position on women.
So they say that that men shot first. This is
a backlash. Men shot first. Men never shot first, all right.
They just tried to construct a society of safety, security
and provision for everyone. Yep, okay, all right.

Speaker 1 (12:37):
M In one jarring scene of promising young women twenty twenty.
A young man gently lays an apparently drunk woman on
a bed and begins unbuttoning her dress. You're okay, You're safe,
he whispers, a grotesque reassurance, even as he pulls down
her underwear without consent. Suddenly, she sits bolt upright, stone cold, sober.

(13:01):
I said, what are you doing, she demands, fixing him
with an icy stare. The predator freezes, terrified at being caught. Okay, shock,
Oh yeah, I'm sorry.

Speaker 2 (13:10):
Go ahead, yeah, okay again, don't go too far. I
know if I put my hand up like this. Let's
just go into the actual text of the thing again.
This generation of women is on track, well, actually has
is already exceeded the violent sexual predatoriness of any generation

(13:36):
and the current generation of men, at least according to
the millennial shift, which has now been replicated at least
two times, possibly more by the research who's been looking
into You don't know what the millennial shift is. It
is that millennial women and probably zoomer women, so younger
women are engaging in sexual violence at rates never seen before.

(14:00):
And what do I mean by sexual violence? I mean
use of drugs, I mean use of weapons, knives, guns,
use of credible threats like if you don't submit to me,
I am going to accuse you of rape. Right, They're
doing this at incredible rates. So this generation of female
cinema goers and female cinematographers and scriptwriters and directors who

(14:24):
creating this shlock. They are the rapist group of people
on the motherfucking planet in history. And the funny thing
is that men are willing to acknowledge their role in
sexual violence, but women aren't, so they create this exploitation

(14:44):
of cinema that completely distorts the reality of it, and
that just put pins it on men. It's just men, right,
It's just men who do this. Meanwhile, it's actually becoming
majority women. Be behavior unbelievable, isn't it. I wonder if
as long.

Speaker 1 (15:04):
As we've been measuring it it may have been an issue.

Speaker 2 (15:06):
For it may have been, but it may also be
the fact that this generation of women has the worst
attitudes towards male victims since they kept track, and also
has the worst expectation of sexual responsibility like and and
also has a narrative that they don't have to take

(15:27):
sexual responsibility because the only sexual predators are men. So
it's entirely possible that feminist and yes, it's feminists who
constructed this, maybe with the you know, the handmaiden of
patriarchy as feminism's handmaiden, they've constructed this what with married
costs is the originator of the one in four women

(15:49):
will be uh raped or attempted rape and saying that
made to penetrate is taken out of the definition of
forced sex. That is a I'm enforcing a man to
have sex is no longer considered rape in the center
of disease control statistics. Right, So that really mutters muddies

(16:09):
the water with all of this. Okay, and I don't
even have feminists arguing that that shouldn't be considered rape,
this shouldn't be rape, can only be a male crime? Well,
what a fatuous Yeah, if I definitionally recast rape is
only a female crime, then I'm gonna find that only
women commit it. It's such a fatuous game of cards,

(16:33):
game of like shells definitional shells. It's and but ultimately
feminism has constructed this attitude towards rape. That means that
feminism has constructed a rape culture targeting male victims. And
what a surprise. As a result of that, that what

(16:55):
feminists constructed, there's an increasing rape, rape of male victims
by women. You're giving them a plausible excuse, they're you're
telling them data. You don't have to take responsibility for
your predatory behavior because it's categorically different. It's not rape,
it's it's a a surprise sex know we wanted even

(17:21):
if it was at knife point, and that this isn't.
And so this whole cinematic universe, this extended cinematic universe
of rape, is a complete fiction that these women have constructed. Meanwhile,
they're probably complicit and doing a lot of sexually predatory
behavior themselves. Yeah, okay, but but it's a backlash everyone.

(17:48):
Men have a having a backlash. Okay, alright, women are
having a backlash. Men shot first.

Speaker 1 (17:58):
This moment of tables turning shock encapsulates a striking new
archetype in today's critically acclaimed cinema, Men as predatory or
pathetic figures and women as their righteous reckoners or survivors.
Don't think that's new. I think that that's been going
on a long time. I remember. I mean, granted, it's

(18:18):
been a lot more like in your face these days,
but there was a grindhouse film in the nineteen seventies
called I Spit on Your Grave, which was a bunch
of like feminist revenge porn on men. I've never seen
the movie, but I could tell you that that and
it was a bit exploitive too, which is weird. So
it was kind of like part like borderline pornography, part

(18:41):
violent feminist revenge fantasy. And that's from the nineteen seventies,
so this is not like a new thing. It's just
kind of very common.

Speaker 2 (18:49):
What It's just that this is now everywhere, Yes, but
that used to be grindhouse and you'd watch it in
like the sticky floor theater on the corner. Yeah, yeah, right,
this is now.

Speaker 1 (19:03):
Yeah. But also like like no, I think that I
don't know, Like, if you look at the way that
men have been portrayed in film historically, a typically you get,
you know, maybe a heroic male figure in in a
you know, in a story, but there will be a

(19:24):
lot of really awful male figures too, and they're often
you know, like be portrayed as rapists that just are
like animalistic and violent, like they can't control themselves, and
the heroic male figure deals with them. But it's still
framed in this kind of like, you know, there are
only a few good men, and the and the and
these are the examples of that, right muh, I mean,

(19:47):
I don't know, maybe I'm over analyzing that, but yeah,
it's definitely gotten a lot worse. In fact, it's basically
impossible to make good male characters these days.

Speaker 2 (19:56):
Mm hmm.

Speaker 1 (19:57):
Anyway, from indie festival ar links to Hollywood blockbusters, a
growing roster of films is casting masculinity in a harsh light,
depicting men as abusive, weak, absent, or broken, while positioning
women as victims turned avengers or the moral centers of
the story. And of course, the world is nothing if
not black and white. Why wrestle with the messy complexity

(20:18):
of gender dynamics when you can flatten it into the
simplest cliche imaginable.

Speaker 2 (20:25):
Okay, Yeah, it's more complex than even this person is
letting on. It is time for male rape victims to
be recognized. We did everything feminists wanted. And I've been
having arguments with feminists online, okay, And I point out

(20:46):
that if you're going to use the statistics on conviction,
then rape is very rare. Okay, If We're only using
the statistics on conviction for pet like who perpetrates, So
it may men are like ninety eight percent of the
convictions and women are two percent. We're going to use
those stats. Then rape is extremely rare, and you can't

(21:09):
say that this is a society wide phenomenon that men
are using to uphold patriarchy, or even that people don't
take it seriously. They take it very seriously.

Speaker 1 (21:23):
Right.

Speaker 2 (21:24):
Once, once get rape gets to the point of being charged,
it is as likely as any other violent crime to
end up in a conviction in the US, and it's
far more likely in the UK. Right, So this is
not a crime that people do not take seriously if
you look at conviction rates, right, And feminists want to

(21:46):
look at conviction rates for who is doing the raping,
But then they want to look at the surveys for
how prevalent it is, how little society takes responsibility for it,
how who rapes end up in convictions. But the unfortunate
problem for feminists is that when you look at the surveys,

(22:08):
you look at the most accurate surveys, women are almost
at parody in terms of sexual violence as men. Okay,
like it's slightly less for women. But then we also
have to consider the underreporting of male victims. So women
are doing a lot. They have probably half of all

(22:30):
sexually sexual violence, to take responsibile responsibility for themselves. If
we look at the surveys, which the feminists want to
point to to say that society isn't taking rape seriously.
While if you're going to point to the surveys and
say that, then it's time to take male victims of
female sexual assaulters seriously, it's time. It's their time now, feminists,

(22:55):
and they don't want to do that, so they play
this ping pong game, this ping game. Oh, society isn't
taking rape seriously because look at the surveys. But the
surveys say that women are equally likely to rape. Well,
don't look at that, look at the conviction stats. And

(23:16):
it's infuriating, and that that is the foundation of this drek.
Think about it, Remember me too? Where were the men?
Where were the male victims? Mm?

Speaker 1 (23:29):
Hm?

Speaker 2 (23:30):
They were ignored, they were marginalized out of stories of
men who brought up their victimization by women, and women
would shut them down. Feminists would shout them down and say,
you're derailing this is women's moment. When is men's moments? Huh?
When are women gonna step up and say, hey, actually,
we have a certain amount of sexually predatory behavior to

(23:52):
take responsibility for. Maybe we should stop stemming with this
sexploitation and all of this revenge fantasy and start taking
some responsibility for our own behavior. What does that happen?

Speaker 1 (24:07):
Okay, all right, let's see so abusive week or absent
the new male stereotype on screen. Recent award winning and
festival circuit films have not been subtle about the state
of their men. In Eliza Hitman's drama Never Rarely Sometimes

(24:28):
Always twenty twenty, the men orbiting seventeen year old Autumn
are all, with no exception, either useless or predatory. At
our supermarket job, the sleazy manager discusses Autumn's illness and leers,
it's really just a few more hours you can do it. Besides,
I get lonely if you left align dripping with inappropriate undertone. God,

(24:51):
I couldn't want. These are the movies that win awards,
By the way, it's this stuff, you know, that gets
praised and an it's interesting that we're gonna be looking
a little bit at this Briarny Claire video. It's exactly
the kind of shit that people like priority Claire will
reference as data. Did you see this move? Allow me
to present you exhibit a this movie as proof of men. Right?

Speaker 2 (25:17):
They construct in reality? Yeah, and they reference that constructed
reality is evidence of reality. It's insane.

Speaker 1 (25:24):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (25:25):
And again, women apparently cannot take responsibility for their half
of sexual violence, and for some reason this is a backlash.
Men took responsibility, right, they continuously take responsibility. Why was
that frenchwoman Gizelle Pellicot? Why is it that she is

(25:49):
not right now continuing to be sexually assaulted in the
three days a week, three or four days a week
that she loses, which I don't know how many people
that actually applies to. I don't know how many people
can just lose three or four days a week worth
of time and just not even question it. But anyway,
she would still be sexually assaulted in her three or

(26:11):
four days of blackout if it weren't for the French
police men who apparently were more on the ball about
her safety than she was found out about all of
this and pursued bringing those men to justice. But what
do we focus on. We don't focus on the fact

(26:34):
that without those men, God Gazelle Pelicott would still be
in the situation she is in. We focus on the
men who did it right. But here's the thing men
have demonstrated throughout history, a willingness to police the predatory
sexual behavior of other men. That's why we have rape
as a crime, at least when it comes to women

(26:57):
right now. That's why we see conviction rates of men.
But they don't have the will to police women's negative
sexual behavior towards other men. There just isn't that kind
of this doesn't feel that important to them. That's where
women can step up and do it. Well, we'll see,

(27:18):
I guess, or we can continue to write this bullshit,
present this bullshit as the truth in cinema. We'll see
what women end up doing. Will they Will they start
to take responsibility for their half of sexual violence? Or
will they continue to offload all responsibility on men in

(27:39):
these cinematic lives. Need some jeopardy music or some like
a thinking music. I wonder what will continue to happen?

Speaker 1 (27:48):
Yeah, all right, all right, So anyway, at our supermarket job,
the sleazy manager already read that right, Yeah, later as
the girls turn in their registers. He even kisses Autumn's
hand through a money slot in a furtive act of harassment.
Judge stock JoJo's picking up sounds outside far worse has

(28:11):
happened to Autumn behind the scenes. During our counseling session,
She's asked if her partner ever made her have sex
when she didn't want to. Autumn cannot even speak. The
script notes Autumn's floodgates open. She breaks down in tears.
The movie is I looked it up because I'm like, Okay,
what is this? And I know it's some feminist shit.

(28:34):
So Never, Rarely Sometimes Always is a twenty twenty drama
film about a teenage girl navigating an unintended pregnancy alongside
Talia Ryder as her cousin the film. The film follows
the pair as they travel from rural Pennsylvania to New
York City to seek medical help, a journey marked by
emotional weight, quiet, resilience, and the challenges of accessing reproductive

(28:56):
health care. So that's the kind of movie it is,
if that helps. So it's not just a film about
like men being predatory and bad, but it's also about
women not able to get like you know, common sense
reproductive health care, i e. Abortions, which is I'm pretty
sure what it's about, and it's just like full to

(29:18):
the brim with like all kinds of propaganda that women
just eat up apparently. But okay, anyway, pressed further, has
anyone forced you into a sexual act? She finally chokes out, yeah,
confirming that a boy in her life raped her. Of course,
that men, the men in Autumn's world, all of them
are either absent when needed or the source of trauma,

(29:39):
whereas the moral agency lies entirely with Autumn and her
female cousin, who supportively accompanies her on a secret trip
to get an abortion.

Speaker 2 (29:48):
Okay, I want to say, I want to lay out
as statistic that I actually I mean, this is based
on some Grock analysis, but you know that's primarily what
that AI is for. Apparently, if you average everything out,
men spend as much time policing lesbian violence as they
do engaging in violence. Think about that, men spend as

(30:12):
much time, possibly more, just policing the violence that women
do in sexual relationships with each other as they do
engaging in their own violence. Is that incredible? And yet
men are the ones? Well, go ahead, Brian.

Speaker 1 (30:31):
No, no, I was gonna say only if you only
if you are shocked to learn that. Yeah, I mean.

Speaker 2 (30:37):
Men, whole like whole cloth, are the ones who police
bad behavior in our society. Without them, women would be
in relationships with other women, which means the domestic violence
and sexual assault would probably increase two or threefold, and
nobody would be there to police it. Mostly you probably
just have feminists excusing it. Oh, it's a good rape,

(30:59):
Oh it's a good beating. You're learning how to be
a proper woman. It's insane because and I base that
on the fact that feminists are in a war against
punishing women. They're getting rid of jails, or they're trying
to get rid of jails in the UK. They've successfully
gotten rid of juvenile detention for girls, but they're going

(31:19):
after jails in the UK. That's what they want to do.
They don't want to see women in prison for their
violent crime. They don't want to see women charged with
crime period. Everybody's got to be excused. So if you're
in the future, the future where there's only women, it's
going to be the woman being beaten who's going to

(31:41):
be told, oh, no, you can't feel bad about this, right,
you can't feel bad about the woman, your your female
partner who's beating you, because that's against the sisterhood. Like
it would be terrifying to have a female only world
because the amount of domestic violence and sexual assault that

(32:04):
would go completely unchecked, and in fact, the victims of
domestic violence and sexual assault would suddenly be the ones
criminalized because nobody is allowed to speak out against the sisterhood.
Nobody's allowed to recognize the violence that women engage in.
It would be an absolute dystopian nightmare because we would

(32:25):
lose men's sense of fair play and justice and their
willingness to put themselves on the line to ensure that
people are peaceful and respect each other. Again, men spend
as much, possibly more time engaging in policing lesbian violence,

(32:46):
as they do engaging in violence against women. And that
doesn't even cover the statistic about how much time men
spend policing other men's violence. It's something like thirty nine
times more time men spend policing, incarcerating the criminal justice system,

(33:09):
protecting women, and uh dealing with the injuries as a
result of other men's violence. Thirty nine times more effort
is putting in to prevent and ameliorate the damage of
criminal men by men. Then the criminal men are putting
in and being criminal towards women thirty nine times more

(33:33):
effort like this is. This is men are absolutely passionate
about punishing other men who hurt women. They are absolutely
This is the their driving passion, This is their driving passion.

(33:55):
If it were up to men, these these criminal men
who hurt women, would be freaking vaporized. But unfortunately, there's
this strange thing that happens because when they're criminal men
who hurt women, like Wade Wilson, suddenly four thousand deluge
of love letters from other women. There's this funny thing

(34:17):
that happens because there's somebody supporting these criminal men. And
it's not other men. It's not other men, not at all.
Somebody is supporting these men. Somebody is creating these men,
these criminal men that other men, normal men have an
absolute passion to destroy. But they heap popping up, They

(34:42):
keep coming from somewhere. Huh, I wonder where? Okay, I'm done.

Speaker 1 (34:50):
Okay, So anyway, film after film paints its male characters
in a similarly dismal hue. Emerald Fennel's acid tinged thrill
Promising Young Woman takes direct aim at nice guys who
are anything but it's parade of men are rapists or enablers,
from the group of college bros who assaulted the heroine's friend,

(35:11):
to the former friend now doctor who laughed it off,
to the seemingly sweet new boyfriend who was ultimately revealed
to have been complicit. So like promising young women, I
remember the trailer for this movie. Actually it's this one
that's hit here, and it's about a woman. I'm not kidding.
This is the plot, okay. It stars Carrie mulligan as

(35:32):
Cassie Thomas, a thirty year old medical school dropout who
works in a coffee shop and spends her evenings pretending
to be drunk in bars and clubs to confront men
who attempt to take advantage of her sexually. She kills them.
It's not confrontations. She is basically a vigilante taking out
all the evil rapist men by going to bars pretending

(35:53):
to be drunk. And of course, all you know, I guess,
all the men they take the bait because we're all
rapists right underneath the surface, and she kills them. It
is another crazy, unhinged feminist revenge power fantasy, and it
is described as like literally feminist. The vigil anti behavior

(36:15):
stems from the traumatic rape and subsequent suicide of her
best friend Nina Fisher, whose rapist Al Monroe was cleared
of wrongdoing. Because you know, that totally happens. The film
incorporates black comedy, crime drama, feminism, rape and revenge, and
vigilanti thriller. It won a lot of awards, but I
don't think it made any money, so I guess that's something.

(36:37):
But anyway, this is just normal.

Speaker 4 (36:40):
Now.

Speaker 1 (36:40):
This is like, you know, uh, par for the course.
This is what our content is. It's paradive. Men are
rapists or enablers from the group of college I read
that part sorry. The film's biting opening illustrates this dynamic
in miniature. Cassie, pretending to be obliterated by alcohol, is
rescued by a man who coups assurances while attempting to

(37:01):
take advantage of her incapacitation. Cassie suddenly drops her ruse,
eyes clear and voice firm, scaring the hell out of
him as she forces him to recognize his predatory behavior.

Speaker 2 (37:13):
We need a real we need a gender reverse like
this is. This is how insane this is. Let's imagine
this was a man doing this to female, to women
who take advantage of men who are incapacitated, and they
just blows like he just kills them.

Speaker 1 (37:29):
Yeah, you'd imagine.

Speaker 2 (37:31):
Can you imagine that Trump Plotlet I don't think it
would happen.

Speaker 1 (37:33):
I don't think it would fly that never, It would
never get off the cutting room floor. It wouldn't even
be like allowed to be written.

Speaker 2 (37:41):
We can't even we can't even we can't even hold
women accountable for their sexual crime. We can't even stomach that.
And that's what's behind all of the oh nice, so
I wish that was my teacher. It's because those men
can't stomach the idea of holding women accountable for sexual crime.
It just goes again against their nature. But the same

(38:03):
men are absolutely passionate about absolutely just white hot passionate
about policing the sexual behavior of other men. Like I said,
thirty nine times more effort put into policing the criminal
behavior of other men towards women than engaging in it

(38:25):
by men as a group. And yet what do feminists say,
you don't carry enough? They still exist you don't care enough.
Where are they coming from? Why do they still exist?
These are the questions. Why do they still exist despite
the average man being absolutely passionate or the average man

(38:47):
being far more like if you're going to just amortize this.
Over all men, they're far more passionate about ending crime
against women than engaging in it. So why does this
still continue? Maybe it's it's not men's fault that it continues.
Maybe they're doing what they can to stop it, but
there's certain things happening that are either outside of their

(39:09):
control or they aren't willing to call to account. Because
those men who say, oh, it's nays I wish that,
I wish that where we do as women When I
was a kid, right, those guys, that scenario a teenage
boy and an adult woman taking advantage of him is,

(39:31):
in terms of the longitudinal studies, the most likely to
cause that young man to become a sexual predator of others. Now,
it's a minority of boys who do that who end
up becoming sexual predators even when they are raped themselves,
minority like ten percent. I mean, that's what it takes, right,
It takes being sexually abused and having impulse control problems

(39:54):
in your brain to make a male predator. But that
is the scenario that creates them. Those guys who are
like where we're where were those women when I was?
You know, those guys, they're signing off on that boy
going on to abuse others, which is what they're concerned about. Well,

(40:15):
if you're that concerned about it, end it at its source,
end it where it begins. But of course, again, men
struggle with acknowledging women's sexual violence because that's not what
they're about about policing other men. But women could step
into this, could step into this and start policing women.
The only problem is attitudes are getting worse among women.

(40:38):
Younger women have shittier attitudes towards male victims of female
sexual assaulters than older women. Can you believe that in
the past we were better about recognizing male victims of
sexual assault than we are today. It's getting worse. And
these are the women who are constructing these cinematic mass

(41:00):
pieces of absolute lies and farting out can't cover for
their own behavior. Oh okay, all right.

Speaker 1 (41:17):
In promising young women men's men's misdeeds are the central evil,
and the avenging angel is a woman driven to drastic
ends to expose them. Even basically decent men are portrayed
as cowardly or culpable. The message is that every man
is guilty, if not of rape, then of complicity or
wilful ignorance, and it's the women who bear the pain
and seek justice, writes one reviewer in summary of the

(41:41):
film's provocations. So this is all on purpose. I mean
like they're literally making shit up and then making it
like try to convince but people that this is the truth.
In this new cinematic landscape, even when men aren't outright villains,

(42:02):
they are depicted as feckless, foolish, or fragile. Take last
year's Cann's Palm Dior winner just In Trie's Anatomy of
a Fall. The drama centers on a wife accused of
killing her husband, Samuel, under murky circumstances. As the trial unspools,
a damning portrait of the late husband emerges. Samuel was

(42:23):
a frustrated writer suffering personal envy and depression, prone to
paranoid behavior. He had been secretly recording his wife, Sandra's
every word for months and grew jealous of her literary success.
In a climactic court scene, the prosecution plays an audio
recording of the couple's final argument, in which Samuel's composure
collapses and an explosion of violence is heard. It suggested

(42:46):
that he physically attack Sondra. She was left with bruises,
leading to the fall that killed him. The subtext is clear.
Samuel is depicted as emotionally broken and volatile, a man
who literally couldn't handle being eclipsed by his wife. Soundra,
by contrast, is portrayed as complex but ultimately more sympathetic,
an intellectual and mother who maintains poise under pressure, effectively

(43:09):
the moral center as the court and audience weigh her fate.
H God is bad writing anatomy of a fault.

Speaker 2 (43:19):
Isn't the audience, It's triggering all the pressure points for
its audience. Yes, Like literally, I guess women in the
West just want to divorce men entirely. They just want
them out of their life. Because you're right, I remember
you said. Initially, there was an observation that there was
usually a man. Even in the lifetime movies, there is

(43:42):
usually a man who helped save the woman and ended
up being a romantic partner.

Speaker 1 (43:49):
There was at least a good man.

Speaker 2 (43:50):
There was at least one good man. Well, now they're
getting rid of that. Now they're getting rid of that.
There are no good men, even though men as a
collective put thirty nine times more effort into policing the
criminal behavior of other men than they do into engaging
in it. If you want to look at men as
a collective, right, far far more passion into punishing men

(44:17):
who hurt women. Men put far far more time and
passion into punishing men who hurt women than hurting them.
If you want to look at men as a collective,
we know that's ridiculous, but if we're going to do that,
let's be honest about the collective nature of men. Right
and again, if this was, if these cinematic masterpieces were

(44:39):
honest with reality, without men, women would be subject to
substantially more violence from other women because men police their
violence too, maybe not as effectively, which is a big problem.
Because men struggle withholding women accountable. That's one of the
things that's the big criticism I'd have with men. They
struggle with holding women accountable, but they still do it,

(45:04):
and they do it more than women. Because that's what's
hilarious by women saying well, patriarch. Well, if patriarchy is
enforcing sacrifice, that's other men choosing to do it, right,
because you wouldn't. You wouldn't enforce this on other women,
and you would not enforce you wouldn't. Well, you probably
would enforce it on men, obviously from this cinema cinematic stuff,

(45:26):
but you wouldn't. You wouldn't enforce it on other women.
For whatever reason, women do not police other women in
this way. They police them if they feel like they're
a threat to women's overall access to resources. Sure, but
they do not police their bad behavior towards men, at

(45:46):
least not in this lifetime.

Speaker 1 (45:50):
Mm hmm.

Speaker 2 (45:52):
Okay, let's keep going.

Speaker 1 (45:53):
Anatomy of a fall isn't clever.

Speaker 2 (45:55):
It's actually sorry, sorry, Brian. They also don't police their
bad behavior to it's other women. They have to rely
on men to do that.

Speaker 1 (46:04):
Okay, continue, Anatomy of a fall isn't clever, it's entry
level bait and switch. The script black stacks, obvious, she
did it, breadcrumbs, loaded anecdotes, conveniently incriminating fragments, a neatly
arranged trail of marital rot, and then smirks, gotcha, misogyny,
as if the audience's suspicion were proof of their bias

(46:25):
rather than the direct result of the film's own engineering.
That's not depth. It's a cheap card trick where the
magician palms the queen and then lectures you for noticing
the deck so apparently because I would never watch it.
They basically set you up to think that the woman
did it this whole time, and then they turn the
tables and say, ha, it's misogyny, and it's your fault

(46:46):
for thinking it was the thing that they were leading
you to believe it was okay, And you're also.

Speaker 2 (46:51):
Part of the problem, right, yeah, you're part of the problems.

Speaker 1 (46:56):
So that's incredibly manipulative.

Speaker 2 (46:58):
Go ahead, you're part of the problem because you believe
the evidence that they presented. They controlled everything, so they
presented evidence of her guilt. But the fact is you
didn't believe her, So they are going to tell you
that you were wrong for following the evidence. You should
only ever believe women. This is such heavy handed propaganda,

(47:21):
and it is this is like, this is destroying women.
The more they invest in this narrative, the more absolutely
insane they become. Have you noticed this that when you
on more a human being from expectations of treating the
under other gender like they're human, they cease to be
human themselves. You become a monster. Because women are not

(47:43):
held accountable for their behavior towards anybody but themselves, they
have descended into becoming monsters. That's what the millennial shift
is showing. I believe all evidence that that is the
no only believe women. That is war cry of female abusers. Okay, okay, yep,

(48:08):
all right.

Speaker 1 (48:11):
I think that they're just gonna go into more of
the of this example. I think I'll jump ahead a
little bit, all right. Even ostensibly light hearted films reinforce
the theme. Greta Gerwig's blockbuster Barbie You may have heard
of this one garnered attention for its candy colored feminist subtext.
In the film's satirical reversal. Barbie Land is a matriarchy

(48:34):
where Barbie's run everything and Ken's our decorative sidekicks. But
when Ken, played by Ryan Gosling, discovers the concept of patriarchy,
he promptly leads an over the top male takeover that
plunges Barbieland into a goofy dystopia of horse inspired macho posturing.
The depiction of Ken and his brethren is pointly comical, vain,
simple minded, and eagerly easily manipulated by their own fragile ego.

Speaker 2 (48:57):
But the fragile egos was their desire to action, protect
and provide for women. That's what's freaking hilarious about it.
These men, the Kens, were manipulated by wanting to help
the Barbies, you know, wanting to protect the Barbies, like

(49:17):
they were manipulated by the things that feminism doesn't say
exist or basically frames as benevolent sexism.

Speaker 1 (49:26):
Yeso to defeat the Kens, the Barbies execute a clever plan,
will distract them by pretending to be helpless and confused.
Kens can't resist the damsel in distress one Barbie.

Speaker 2 (49:39):
Exactly exactly because because they care. Honestly, if men were
women's enemies, do you display of a weakness, ladies, and
men will use that to destroy you, because that's what
enemies do to their enemies weaknesses. They don't use it

(50:01):
as a clarion call, as a call to do whatever
they can to protect women from their own weaknesses to
protect and they don't do That's not how enemies work.
Enemies when you show your weakness to an enemy, that
enemy endeavors to exploit it to their own ends. So
you're essentially saying right there that men are not women's enemies,

(50:22):
and you are using men's desire to protect and provide
for you against them. How honest Barbie was, How absolutely
honest it was to that dynamic that these women manipulate
men by using their desire to protect and provide for
women's weaknesses. Right to get to carry women over the

(50:45):
rushing stream. Oh geez, dudes, geez, you're so horrible to women,
So that's how we can manipulate you by wanting to
protect and provide for us. What a bunch of bullshit.
There's a bunch of snarky, self involved, selfish, syllopsistic bullshit.

Speaker 1 (51:08):
Mm hmm, okay, the Barbie's fain cluelessness to flatter the
men who immediately fall for it. In one scene, a
brainwash can leans over a Barbie to man explaining the
difference between stock market CDs and music CDs. Oh, sweetheart,
you are just so cute when you're confused. CD stands
for a certificate of deposit. He lectures while she bats

(51:29):
her eyelashes and feigned awe. The ruse works perfectly. The
dupe cans relinquish their grip on power without the women
ever needing to use force. Barbie's gleeful message is that
when men do have power, they don't know what to
do with it. Besides impose of sur chauvinism, and savvy
women can easily outsmart them. The film pointedly makes its
heroine the moral and emotional anchor, while the men learn

(51:52):
a lesson in humility. And then there is Yargos, Lenthimos, lanthemos,
this surreal feminist fable Poor Things twenty twenty three, Oh
my God, this is I Can't Wait, which flips the
Victorian Frankenstein trope to shot to sly effect. The protagonist,

(52:12):
Bella Emma Stone, is a resurrected woman finding her independence
in a world of leering or controlling men. Oh God.
Her creator, doctor Baxter, is a grotesque but kind man
who nonetheless literally keeps Bella under lock and key for
her own good. When a slick male lawyer, Duncan Wedderburn
encounters Bella, he is so intrigued by this uninhibited woman

(52:36):
that he spirits her away on a tour of debauchery
across Europe. Duncan styles himself a liberator. Upon meeting her,
he dramatically declares, you are a prisoner, and I am
to free you, or I aim to free you. There
is something in you, some hungry being, hungry for experience, freedom, touch.
But this version of freedom is to indulge the hedonistic

(52:56):
sex and thrilling on his terms. In one after Bella
enthusiastically beds him, Duncan can't resist boasting about his sexual
prowess at the risk of being immodest. You have just
been thrice fucked by the very best, he brags to
her with smug self satisfaction. Eventually, Duncan's self centered antics,
including gambling away Bella's money, prove him to be a

(53:17):
shallow Probably get that.

Speaker 2 (53:18):
Money from, uh what hell? Where did that get the
money from? Probably from the creator or benefactor.

Speaker 1 (53:27):
Poor Things cast its men as either paternalistic protectors or
libertine exploiters and skewers both. Bella ultimately asserts her autonomy,
rejecting the cages both kinds of men offer. The film's
feminist lens makes it sympathy clear the men are foolish
and corrupt, the woman is the one discovering authentic moral agency. God,
it's just one example after another. Can we get to like,

(53:50):
I don't know, like, do you want me to go
through more of these examples or do you want me
to like find something else? Because I get it, like
this has becusion.

Speaker 2 (53:56):
Yeah, I get it. This is pervasive.

Speaker 1 (53:58):
Yeah, it's just a bunch of these Honora triangle of sadness.
Sadness dismantles masculinity from start to finish.

Speaker 2 (54:07):
But let's go back to that one. What mess masculinity
does it dismantle?

Speaker 1 (54:13):
Paarl, a fragile male model, bickers over dinner bills and
is later reduced to Abigail's boy toy in exchange for food.
On the luxury yacht. Rich men from the drunken Marxist
captain to the fertilizer car tycoon are grotesques, vomiting through
storms or ranting drunken politics over the Okay, all right.

Speaker 2 (54:31):
So wait, she's sexually exploiting him, and that's the statement
on masculinity.

Speaker 1 (54:38):
Yes, reduced to Abigail's boy toy. Yeah, looks like it.

Speaker 2 (54:43):
Okay, Yeah, that's that's exactly the attitude that's causing this
generation of women to be the rapist generation in human history.
That is not that is not you getting yours, lady,
that's you exploiting another human being. Well, I mean, I
guess it's pross institution for food. But you know, if
it was a man doing it to a woman, what

(55:04):
would you say. This is why this narrative is so pernicious,
this idea that this is a backlash that women are
engaging against men because men shot first. I'm sorry, but
and again I've gotten into this argument with a woman. Oh,
while men protect women from sexual violence, Well, that's because
patriarchy did it better responsible. Yes, men throughout history have

(55:28):
protected women from sexual violence. Okay, and it wasn't because
they thought of them as their property. You don't lynch
someone for touching your car, right, You don't have that
kind of passion for somebody who does something like that. So, yes,
men have gone out of their way to police other

(55:51):
men's sexual behavior towards women. They've also gone out of
their way to police women's bad behavior. They're violent and
sexual assault of other women. Because men have an inherent
sense of fairness, they just struggle with applying that to
women when it comes to other men. Okay, Anyways, all right.

Speaker 1 (56:16):
The final act on Desert Island flips over completely. Abigail
wants the ship's toilet cleaner, declares herself captain, doling out food,
while billionaires and influencers, especially the men, meekly comply. This
all prostitutes himself for pretzels, embodying male emasculation as comedy.
The film won the Palm, Dior and Oscar nominations precisely

(56:37):
because it revels in humiliating men and celebrating female dominance,
a perfect fit for post hashtag me too festival tastes.

Speaker 2 (56:46):
And this is why this generation. Go back up to
that paragraph, this is why this generation of women is
the most rapeye generation in human history, because they are
empowered by this narrative that it's getting back at men.
There is actually a correlation between women's hatred towards men
and their sexually violent behavior towards men. There isn't as

(57:08):
much when it comes to men for whatever reason. All right, so,
but here's the question, who's upholding her rain?

Speaker 1 (57:20):
What do you mean?

Speaker 2 (57:21):
Well, who's the who's what's How does she establish her
power as captain? Obviously this is a result of some
kind of mutiny, right, Well, who are the mutineers who
are supporting her. Otherwise, well, how would the women be
physically capable of constructing this mutiny against the men? Let

(57:45):
me just let me just see, this is a triangle
of sadness. How does the female and triangle of sadness
create or manage against the male captain? Let's see what
it says. Oh well, I don't. Agail staff member doesn't

(58:11):
stage a traditional mutiny against the male captain the yacht,
but becomes a defect a leader among the survivors after
the shipwreck. Here's how it unfolds contacts the power shift.
After the yacht sinks to a pirate attack, a small
group of survivors and including Abigail, ends up on a
deserted island. The captain, Thomas survives, but it is in
a weakened state both physically and mentally due to his
drunkenness and the chaos of the situation. The established hierarchy

(58:34):
from the yacht collapses as wealth and status become irrelevant.
So more relevant is survival skills. And we're arguing that
a woman is going to take charge in that situation.
You realize that this is absolute bullshit. Okay, Abigail's rise.
Abigail Don't Care takes charge because she possesses practical survival skills,

(58:54):
unlike the other survivors, who are mostly wealthy passengers or
high ranking crew with no real world competent. She knows
how to fish, start a fire, and secure food, making
her indispensable. All right, So apparently the woman has the
survival skills, which is why she ends up in charge.

(59:15):
This is a constructed reality. We've already seen this play
out in reality. I think it was Bear Gillis's Island,
the male island versus the female island. The female island
was completely incapable. The women were completely incapable of taking
care of themselves, whereas the men established a reasonably self

(59:36):
sufficient little tribe almost immediately. I mean, they had their problems,
but they managed it. They managed to get clean water.
It was one of the most hilarious images was the
women's piss water versus the men's clean water. And they
had lots of it too. Like the women, they managed
to pull together and create like one plastic bottle of

(59:59):
what looked like urine. They didn't develop a filtration system.
The men had created a filtration system, and they had
gallons of fresh water, so they're just walking up and
taking a swig whenever they want, and women are just
pissed waters all we have. It's like this is completely
divorced from reality. And honestly, the men who are multimillionaires,

(01:00:24):
unless they inherited their wealth, they've probably had their experience
with hard labor. Like every guy has a worst job,
a story about a worst job. Roofing in July, landscaping
in like August, you know, picking up trash, picking up
chickens in a chicken farm. Every dude that I've talked to,

(01:00:45):
or at least most of them, has a worse job,
which is usually labor focused, not women. Their worst job
is how I had to arrange the products in the
front room of an oar salon. It was so boring,
you know that kind of thing, right, so right there,
this is an incredibly unlike this only occurs in fantasy

(01:01:07):
that then woman has the survival skills. It is proportionately
unlikely to occur in reality. And most of those guys,
unless they were you know, and even if they were,
they may have done things like gone into the military,
even if they were from a rich family, or gone
into military school or gone into scouting, right, that's a

(01:01:30):
that's a far higher proportion of men who would have
cyber survival skills in this instance than women. So it's
a completely constructed reality, absolute bullshit. Why because women's egos
apparently need even more flattering, which is hilarious, because they
constantly need inflating. Because women are feel so insecure, they

(01:01:52):
are feel so humiliated by what men have created. So
insecure and humiliated by the achievements of men. That's why
they do this. We talk about Like a while back,
my therapist pointed out and this was a therapist who
dealt with actual competencies in dealing with anxiety, which I had.

(01:02:14):
He said that anxiety masks humiliation. Women affect this fear
of men because they feel so inferior to men. That's
what this is about.

Speaker 1 (01:02:28):
Mm hmm, okay, that makes sense.

Speaker 4 (01:02:32):
All right.

Speaker 1 (01:02:32):
I got a rumble rant from Nova fan uh for
a dollar and he says, don't forget another feminist trope.
I remember seeing a man is sent to save a woman,
but somehow he keeps failing at every basic task when
she may as well rescue herself. Yes, all right, so
let's just jump to the next section. It basically like

(01:02:53):
summed it up, contextualizing real world statistics against the exaggerated
portrayals of men in contemporary cinema. Oh that's good. The
gap between cinematic narrative and social reality is staggering. You
had no shit, but wow, they are lying a lot.
I'm glad this person said this, though, this is an

(01:03:13):
interesting admission. In the film surveyed above, male characters are
overwhelmingly cast as predators, abusers, or enablers of violence, as
though every man is complicit in misogyny. Yeah, that's the point.
Yet hard data tells a very different story. Globally, only
a small fraction of men are ever accused of sexual harassment,
whether formally or informally. In the United States, for example,

(01:03:37):
the Gender Employment Opportunity Commission or I'm sorry, the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission received about seven six hundred sexual harassment
charges in twenty eighteen, the first full year of hashtag
me two, which represented less than point zero one percent
of the US male population. Even when looking at a
four year span twenty eighteen through twenty twenty one, the

(01:04:00):
little number of men formally accused through EEOC charges remains
well under zero point one percent of American men. Yeah,
but just to add to this, that's just the accusations.
That doesn't actually represent whether or not it happened. It
just means this is how often women complained. These are

(01:04:22):
sexual harassment charges that were made right and in general,
in the workplace, if there is assuming this is a
workplace thing, if there is a an allegation made, the
company usually does whatever it can to just like handle
it as quickly and as quietly as possible, because they're,

(01:04:43):
you know, don't want to harm their reputation, they want
to avoid lawsuits whatever. And a lot of the time
the men just get fired or they separate them in
some way or something, so they usually just do something
with it. Most of the time it results in the
men getting fired, is what I believe. And so you're
not this percentage is actually too big, is what I think.

(01:05:06):
Workplace HR complaints are more common than lawsuits, but still
affect only a small minority of men. Yeah, but that's
because workplace HR complaints don't cost anything to make, so
you can just do it. Lawsuits cost money, so you
have to really think about whether or not you have
a case. Research suggests that perhaps one to two percent

(01:05:29):
of employed men over several years will face such an allegation.
Anonymous surveys castle wider net. About four percent of men
in a twenty seventeen survey admitted to behavior they considered harassment.
Even if we take the higher estimates, this still means
the overwhelming majority of men, upwards of ninety to ninety
five percent worldwide, are never accused of harassment at all.

Speaker 2 (01:05:51):
Well, okay, let's keep going, but I'm gonna give some
more context to the reality of male victimhood.

Speaker 1 (01:05:59):
Yeah yea, Now place those percentages beside the reality of
male victimhood. Around sixty to seventy percent of the homeless
in the US are men, a silent crisis rarely dramatized
in prestige cinema. Men also account for about seventy eight
percent of homicide victims, and globally, men die by suicide
at roughly three to four times the rate of women.

(01:06:19):
They also make up the vast majority of workplace deaths,
overdose fatalities, and combat casualties. In other words, men are
not only disproportionately the accused and cultural narratives, but also
disproportionately the victims in real life.

Speaker 2 (01:06:33):
Okay, and then you can add to that, because this
is this is omitting a big portion. You can add
to that the silent epidemic of sexual violence against men.
The most accurate statistic is the National Intimate Partner in
Sexual Violence Surveys for twenty ten, twenty eleven, in twenty twelve,

(01:06:55):
and possibly also twenty fifteen. I haven't looked too closely
at it. After those dates, they significantly changed their methodology,
which resulted in a massive reduction in the reporting rate
of male victims. And the reason why is because they
changed how they approached the questions. Instead of starting with

(01:07:18):
questions that sort of got people comfortable with revealing any
kind of sexual or domestic abuse, they would just drop
those questions in the middle of other questions, so it'd
be sort of like this, how many adults are in
your household? Oh? Oh, okay, so for adults, five children? Whatever?

Speaker 1 (01:07:41):
All right?

Speaker 2 (01:07:42):
Have you ever been forcibly shoved down into garbage in
a alley and have your ainus expanded by somebody's table leg?
I mean that has ever happened to you? Oh?

Speaker 1 (01:07:55):
Oh oh?

Speaker 2 (01:07:56):
You hung up? Hmm, Well that's really unfortunate, that's what
they were find I mean, it's a bit of an exaggeration,
but instead of actually building a rapport so that people
would start to be able to reveal sexual and domestic violence,
these surveyors started dropping these questions in unrelated questions in

(01:08:17):
an unrelated manner. And what a surprise. Not only did
they receive considerably less responses from men who probably were
much more uncomfortable operationalizing their abuse in the middle of
unrelated questions, they also got a lot more people who
just didn't complete the survey at all, Like the rate

(01:08:40):
went down from eighty to fifty. And then also the
people who just basically nope the hell out of the
whole thing went from thirty or sorry went from mom
like seven percent to thirty. So they actually constructed the
survey instrument that caused people to more than ever before.

(01:09:01):
It actually led to them having to stop the survey
halfway through. And nobody knows if this is actually legitimate,
but this is the kind of chicanery they get up
to to try to make the results fit what they want,
which is that men are the majority perpetrators. But if
you look at the results from the surveys that actually

(01:09:24):
asked men, even though they categorized it in this weird
made to penetrate. They actually asked men, where you physically
forced to have sex in the last year? Who did it?
You find in the end of the day that about
forty three percent of rapists or women, and if you
include underreporting in that, you're looking more at sixty seven percent.

(01:09:45):
If you look at the statistics on underreporting for men,
it could be as high as sixty seven percent. So
the lower bound is about forty percent, the higher bound
is sixty seven percent. Sixty seven percent of rapists or
women within the realm of possibility. We don't know because
they instead of actually creating survey instruments to find out,

(01:10:08):
they do weird chicanery to try to reduce the amount
of men to talk about their experiences like that. They
change the methodology, you know, with a wink, wink, nudge, nudge,
we'll we'll try to get a few male victims to
reveal so that we can continue to perpetrate our grift. Right,
So we don't know. We don't know, but it could

(01:10:28):
be anywhere between forty to sixty seven percent female rapists.
That's an entire epidemic. And these chicks they are we're
not talking about I don't know a glass at a
glass of wine at dinner rate. We're talking about weapons,

(01:10:48):
we're talking about use of drugs, use of minor status.
So in other words, they're preying on underage boys. And
we're talking about use of accusations, threats, credible threats of
this violence. What do you think of false accusation of rapists?
So flat out we are dealing with a silent epidemic
of female rapists in our society that nobody wants to

(01:11:10):
talk about. Nobody except us, not even this article wants
to talk about. Maybe they don't even know about it.
They don't even know about it. So even the absolute
like the specific arrangement of victimhood that they're presenting in
this cinema of sexual victimhood, may is most likely and

(01:11:32):
I actually had Grock run the numbers. It is highly
improbable that the National Intimate Partner in Sexual Violent Survey
for three years in a row would find that high
rate of female perpetration in a society in a world
if reality was significantly asymmetrical in its gender perpetration of
sexual violence. That means, if if reality really bore out

(01:11:56):
the way feminists insists it does, in which men are
ninety percent of the perpetrators of sexual violence. Those that
would that reality would never produce the statistics the National
Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey found for three years
in a row. Never, So something is not not making

(01:12:19):
sense here. And I can tell you one thing. It's
not the most accurate. It is not the most accurate
statistics on who is being raped and who's doing the raping.
That's not the problem. The problem is the feminist framework
of reality. So even there, even if we just look
at what they're talking about, their frame of how women

(01:12:40):
are victims of men, it's unsupported. It is unsupported. They
are constructing an absolute bullshit. We don't have to go
to homelessness rates, suicide rates, death and war rates, death
in workplace, accident rates. Right there, right at the epicenter
of what they are convinced is women's fortress. A victim

(01:13:03):
hard men have a steak. They one hundred percent have
a right to be heard as victims of this thing
that women have claimed for themselves, which is rape.

Speaker 1 (01:13:18):
Okay, all right, So now let's look at relationships and
intimate partner violence. A large US study of young adults
found that about twenty four percent of the relationships had
some violence. About half of those were reciprocal. But there's
here's the real shocker. When intimate partner vants was one sided,
women were the perpetrator in more than seventy percent of

(01:13:39):
those cases. Actually not shocking to us because we knew
this already. So you're basically catching up with like reality.
I guess that's fine. So contrast these statistics with cinematic landscape,
and of course they obviously yeah, it's it's the opposite
of reality. The disjunction matters when films repeatedly suggest that
men as a class are dangerous, complicit, or broken, they

(01:14:01):
risk cementing a cultural script that far outstrips reality. Yes,
harassment and abuse are serious problems, but they are perpetrated
by a minority of men, often repeat offenders. Cinema, however,
portrays them as the majority, if not the entirety. Meanwhile,
the real vulnerabilities of men, homelessness, suicide, homicide are raised

(01:14:22):
from the screen. The result is a distortion. Audiences are
invited to see the problem not as a subset of
bad actors, but as masculinity itself. Yes, all this is true,
and the purpose of it is, of course to present
it this way. And touch the fiefees on the audience
so that they believe this. They even sell a lot
of these films which are fictional accounts completely, but they'll

(01:14:46):
sell them as a reflective of reality, if not reality itself. Remember,
they tried to claim that Adolescence was a documentary, and
that's not an accident. They still make this claim. So okay,
in real life, not on screen. It's actually safer to
be a woman than a man. That's true. I can't

(01:15:08):
argue with that, Alison. Are you arguing with Ryan Lopez?

Speaker 2 (01:15:13):
I am.

Speaker 1 (01:15:14):
He just got here and he just he doesn't know
that we've been doing this for like what fourteen years?

Speaker 2 (01:15:21):
Yep.

Speaker 1 (01:15:22):
Well, you wouldn't have arguments if it weren't for people
like us, I'm sorry to tell you. But your boy
that you love so much, he got his arguments from us.

Speaker 2 (01:15:35):
Who's the boy that he loves so much?

Speaker 1 (01:15:39):
Fresh and fit?

Speaker 2 (01:15:41):
Oh oh yeah?

Speaker 1 (01:15:45):
Those guys earl fresh and fit? You know whatever. Those guys,
they all they all were watching content like ours that's
been here for over a decade and now they're just
adopting it. But they didn't find it, they didn't do
the work.

Speaker 2 (01:16:00):
So yeah, well, I mean Andrew Wilson has done a
shout out for us, So thank you.

Speaker 1 (01:16:05):
Wilson has given us a shout out. Yes, okay, yeah,
so fine, welcome to the stream. But you know you
must be new here because we've been doing this a
long time, and you can go into our channel and
see the track record. We've been doing this a long time.

Speaker 2 (01:16:22):
Lots of predictions.

Speaker 1 (01:16:24):
Yes, we've made a lot of predictions.

Speaker 2 (01:16:27):
Including Gamergaate, Like we predicted Gamergate before it happened. I
don't know if you were a producer then at but
what I remember doing, well, I remember, Actually I don't
think you were, because you came in on twenty fifteen,
but two times I have.

Speaker 1 (01:16:41):
I think I've been doing it since twenty fourteen.

Speaker 2 (01:16:44):
Okay, but twenty thirteen I did an episode on Anita
Sarkisian will Absolve You of your Sins. So it was
talking about how the gaming community was going to be
taken over by this quasi religious expectation that they can
to a particular viewpoint. That was in twenty thirteen. What
happened in twenty fourteen, right, So yeah, we've made we've

(01:17:11):
made predictions. The things that have happened and have subsequently happened,
But so stick around. Maybe you'll find some of our
stuff interesting, even though apparently you have a problem with
my arguments, but you don't.

Speaker 1 (01:17:22):
Know which ones he's taken. The l it's fine, he
thinks that men are being greated better than ever. Well,
I mean they maybe until they're not. But all right,
so anyway, in I don't think they're victims. Don't get
it twisted. I don't bind it the victim narrative. But
I do think there are blind spots in the way

(01:17:43):
that we look at men's problems compared to women's, and
I think that's that's a different thing.

Speaker 2 (01:17:51):
What does it mean victims? Yes, men can be victims.

Speaker 1 (01:17:54):
Of things, No, but I mean victim in the feminist sense,
like the systemic victimhood, Like you can't.

Speaker 2 (01:18:00):
Do that because the thing only women can do that.
Only women can use their victimhood as a form of
social currency. Men can't, Right, And that's why I understand
why people like Ryan reject Ryan Lopez reject the recognition
of men's victim hidden circumcircumstances, because you can't use it
as social currency. It's just supposedly failure. Right, Well, it's

(01:18:25):
the truth, Okay, I'm sorry. It's the truth. Is regardless
of how you feel about it, it is the truth. Yeah,
I'm supposed to lie, Okay, all right?

Speaker 1 (01:18:46):
Bottom line absolute numbers. When you tally deaths and serious injuries, homicide, suicide,
fatal work injuries, and ed treated violence, men are harmed
and killed in greater numbers. Overall. Women do suffer more
sexual and partner violence, usually from a partner, ex partner,
or family member, with only about twenty to thirty percent
of sexual violence is done by strangers. Taking the full

(01:19:08):
ledger into account, it's clear that on balance, it is
much safer to be a woman than a man, and
they live on average five years longer two yeah in
the other world, or one to.

Speaker 2 (01:19:17):
Two of three. One to two of those years is
actually due to stress and workplace injury because they are
responsible primarily for maintaining society, So men are losing life
span in order to make sure everybody is protected and
provided for and comfortable and fed.

Speaker 1 (01:19:39):
Mm hmm, all right. In other words, these so called
brave realist social dramas are anything but in truth. According
to the hard facts, their closement of science fiction fit
to be shelved alongside at astra Inception and Blade Runner.
Turns out sci fi movies can win ponds after all.

(01:20:02):
Post hashtag me too, revenge and the ideological shift in Hollywood, Okay,
I wonder if they're going to make a prediction. All right,
These betrayals are no accident of individual storytelling, but part
of a broader ideological shift in Hollywood after the hashtag

(01:20:22):
me too movement in late twenty seventeen, the Harvey Weinstein
scandal and the hashtag me too reckoning exposed the prevalence
of sexual misconduct by powerful men, not just in entertainment
but across society. The response from the creative community was
swift that continues to reverberate, more films centering women's perspectives,
more brutal examinations of gender power imbalance, and unmistakably less

(01:20:45):
patients for glorifying or excusing bad men.

Speaker 2 (01:20:48):
In fact, Hollywood, when was their patience for glorifying or
excusing bad men? And first of all, I haven't a
lot of the me too accusations collapsed.

Speaker 1 (01:21:00):
A lot of them. Yes, Harvey Weinstein's probably gonna beat, like,
I think, every case against him because it was consensual.

Speaker 2 (01:21:10):
And then Cosby also collapsed because of tampering with the evidence. Yeah,
like this, there is a substantial amount of the me
two cases that collapse because this was a witch hunt.

Speaker 1 (01:21:20):
All right, Okay, let's see. In fact, Hollywood has arguably
turned cinema into a vehicle for advocacy. Determined to dramatize
the wages of male sin, Hollywood is now becoming its
own loudest voice and helping to call out what a
bad thing this is, observes Robert Thompson, professor of Popular

(01:21:41):
culture at Syracuse University, referring to sexual harassment and abuse.
By embedding Meto's lessons into scripts and characters, filmmakers have
essentially institutionalized a cultural reckoning within popular narratives. The me
Too movement was at the front lines, then it becomes
institutionalized by these films and TV shows, which people will

(01:22:01):
continue to watch years later. Thompson notes, pointing out that
fiction can serve as a long lasting record of the
era's lessons. In other words, long after the news headlines
of predatory bosses fade, movies like The Assistant or Promising
Young Women will remain to remind future viewers of the
period when society finally said enough to men's abuse of power.

(01:22:27):
Many creators are openly intentional about this mission to society.

Speaker 2 (01:22:31):
Finally said enough about men's abuse of power, as if
this hasn't been consistent throughout history that when men abused women,
they were subject to censure by other men, like this
is the wear guild. Women commanded more of a wear guild,

(01:22:53):
and not just for being physically hurt, but also sexually
offended against or take or And at the time, sexual
offense could be for things that we wouldn't well maybe
we would now right, being talked out of turn, talked
to out of turn by a man could be subject
to a fine under the wear guild system. So not

(01:23:15):
only women were protected physically against assault and violence like murder,
they were also their sexuality was protected in a way
that men's wasn't against defense. Okay, so men have protected
women against other men throughout all of human history. This

(01:23:35):
is the first time where I'm guessing we made a
women attempted to get rid of the idea of due
process and just make everything a social lynch mob. And
then they called that progress dismantling one of the fundamental
principles of an advanced civilization, due process is progress. For women.

(01:23:57):
This is why they this is why they weren't allowed
to vote. I'm just saying.

Speaker 1 (01:24:04):
Many creators are openly intentional about this mission. Kitty Green,
writer director of The Assistant, based her film's grim portrayal
of a Weinstein like boss on real testimonies, and has
said she wanted male viewers to feel a tad uncomfortable.
A lot of men come out feeling very uncomfortable. Green
noted of audience reactions, adding, I think a little bit
of discomfort is what we need right now if we

(01:24:25):
want things to change again. Okay, so these are portrayals
of a Weinstein like boss based on real testimonies. But
if the testimonies were falling apart, which they appear to be,
then this is a film built on lies because you
just believed what you were told and you've made people

(01:24:46):
uncomfortable for no reason.

Speaker 2 (01:24:48):
Yeah. That's another thing that we've done, honestly, is we
have actually maintained due process and presumption of innocence for
these people who have been accused by the Me Too
and in some cases partly vindicated. Now, Weinstein probably was
a sex pest, but did he actually sexually assault these women.

(01:25:09):
It's looking like No, Cosby definitely had some pretty degenerate
tastes in his sexual piccadellos, but it wasn't looking like
he assaulted anyone. And we have maintained this line for
years now. Okay, all right, just another thing we've done.

(01:25:32):
This essentially, what I'm saying, I always have to justify
your existence. Huh.

Speaker 1 (01:25:36):
The other thing is too, is that like you know,
these films, they they do well with critics and like
the snobs in the filmmaking community space too, so that
encourages more people to make more movies like this. Like
when I was going to art school, if you can

(01:25:57):
be a really shitty artist, but if your art has
said something about the political climate, like whether it was
about you know, socialism being good or climate change or
feminism or race rights, then your shitty project would get
a higher grade and maybe even get displayed in a
gallery somewhere because you had the right opinions about stuff.

(01:26:18):
And what that did was it encouraged, if not straight
up manipulated students to making more content like that because
they wanted to like basically get the accolades for having
the right social opinions on things. And so I think
the same thing happens in film. This is why indie
movies I hate them so much, because they're almost always

(01:26:39):
a kind of like social commentary, which is almost always
a leftist one. And that's what they put out there,
and that's what succeeds, and that's what gets oscars, and
that's what gets you know, baptaz or whatever and so
what that it creates a cycle of everyone else doing
that too, and so you just get more of this
feminist crap than like authenticity. You get more of this

(01:27:02):
shit than anything that's real, Which is why you're not
gonna see movies that are about, you know, like the
truth about male suffering, whether it's homelessness or not having
access to children or whatever it is, Right, You're just
not gonna get that. It has to have something in
it that is, you know, friendly to the sensibilities of

(01:27:23):
people in the industry of filmmaking and that and their
viewpoints on the world. So and the more of those
boxes you can tick, the better your movie is gonna be,
the more praise is going to get. So all right, anyway.
Emerald Fennel, who wrote and directed Promising Young Woman, has
similarly explained that her film is a pointed response to

(01:27:46):
decades of endemic sexism. She deliberately filled it with situations
drawn from real life. There's nothing in it that isn't
extremely commonplace, Fennel said, emphasizing that the predatory behaviors depicted
are all too familiar in widespread. That commonality is precisely
the point. Her film suggests. The problem is all around
us in every nice guy at the bar, which is

(01:28:08):
obviously not true. But we already went over that.

Speaker 2 (01:28:12):
So yeah, and there's a substantial amount of the problem
that women need to take responsibility for and increasing like
increasing that was like those numbers, forty to sixty seven
percent of sexual violence could be perpetrated by women. Those
numbers were from a decade and a half ago. The

(01:28:33):
millennial shift suggests that could have gotten even higher. And
it's not that that's true because we don't have the
science yet. It's that it could be true and we
don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:28:47):
All right, Yep. The surge of female led vengeance tales
and social satires is so notable that even mainstream media
began to notice a new subgenre in a post hashtag
me too world, How better to find escape is fun
than by ruthlessly dispatching awful men at the Multiplex, equipped
the Washington Posts and Hornaday, what unfortunate name that is

(01:29:09):
commenting on the wave of films inviting audiences to revel
in women getting payback against brutish men. It's it's so
it's kind of sick, isn't it. Like do women really
I mean, I guess, I guess there's definitely a subset
of women that get off on that. Even men too,
actually that get off on that stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:29:28):
Yeah. Like I remember being really annoyed at some piece
of fiction. I think it was sort of like a
modern Western TV series, and the guys were just like
every every man was sort of tainted, and then they
were predatory and the women were all basically victims. And
I was like, this is annoying. But there were guys

(01:29:48):
who in the discord who were like, nah, I'll take it.
I'm okay with this, or or actually it was a
it was a movie, to be honest, but it was
have a similar nature. And I realize it's because men
don't have a problem with admitting to the sexual violence
that men engage in, right, They're not going to sit

(01:30:11):
there and say that doesn't happen, or we don't have
to take responsibility for it insofar as preventing it happening,
protecting our female relatives, et cetera, right, and also taking
part in the altruism that prevents and punishes it. The
altruistic punishment basically cops and prosecutors, et cetera, jailers. Right.

(01:30:36):
So the men don't actually have a problem with these narratives.
Now I think they're starting to because now there's no
good guy that's actually fighting back, right and actually represents
the way that men should conduct themselves. So like a
lot of guys are getting more upset at this because
of the removal of that character. But for the most part,

(01:30:57):
and maybe that's something that's admirable about men, They are
okay with narratives in which men are sexually violent because
they recognize that men are responsible for their half of
sexually predatory behavior. It's women who have a problem with that,
not just recognizing it, but going so far as to

(01:31:20):
police it, to start shaming it. And again, this is
something that women were better at a generation.

Speaker 1 (01:31:28):
Echo okay mm hmm, okay. From stylish rape revenge thrillers
like promising women to action flicks with female assassins mowing
down male abusers. Vengeance is presented as cathartic justice. These
movies have a clear emotional aim deliver satisfaction by punishing

(01:31:51):
or overcoming the onscreen avatars of so called toxic masculinity.
Porn Today noted that as gratifying as this can be,
it also has become formulaic, a dubious cycle of abusive
men and the women savagely getting their own back, to
the point where it's feeling monotonous and even like its
own form of toxicity. In short, flipping the gender script,

(01:32:12):
making women the heroes and men the villains. That's not
flipping the script. What are you talking about? When have
we had a period where women were the villains and
men were the heroes? When Yeah, I mean there are
individual examples of female villains, but it's not like a
whole you know, like a whole series of films where

(01:32:33):
all the women were evil and all the men were
good like that. Just what do you mean flipping the scripts?
I get it, I get it. This person's writing this.
They probably thought it was a clever turn of phrase.
It just doesn't make sense.

Speaker 2 (01:32:47):
No, it doesn't, because met women were never universally cast
as villains. Maybe and I don't even honestly, if you
look back at older cinema, they weren't universally cast as
damsels either. No, they may not have gone toe to
toe with men physically, but they usually were competent in
other ways, which is why they were part of the story.

(01:33:09):
But yeah, it's uh, some feminists worry it creates a
new kind of caricature. Why do we have to care
about feminists worrying?

Speaker 1 (01:33:20):
Why is it that it's feminism Because the rest of
the sentence says, in short, flipping the gender script, making
women and heroes and men the villains may redress and
age old imbalance. What are you talking about? What age
old imbalance? But if every story is framed as women good,
men bad, even some feminist worry it creates a new

(01:33:41):
kind of caricature. What do you mean, a new kind
of caricature? Like, you're all of this is presupposing quite
a bit before.

Speaker 2 (01:33:49):
This happened, you know, yeah, you're you're you got a
lot of assumptions you're making here. There was never a
point in time where women were cast as villains and
men as heroes universally like this. This isn't flipping any script, right,
There's never a point in time where women were bad
and men were good, not in this not in any

(01:34:11):
kind of recent memory, certainly not during the Victorian era
when women were the angels of the house, and so
like this is this is just you're you're off in
your weeds here, You're like, oh, this this manufactured reality
doesn't doesn't make sense to me. It's manufactured. My manufactured
reality is correct.

Speaker 5 (01:34:31):
Like what.

Speaker 2 (01:34:33):
Even its own form of toxicity? Oh and uh, I
like monotonous and formulaic. Yeah, enjoy, you're boring regurgitated paint
by numbers movies everyone, because that's what you're getting for
the rest of eternity. No nuance, no character development, just
the same thing, over and over and over again. We're

(01:34:55):
all going to be occupying our little cell in the
intersectional ziggurat being fed the same lukewarm problem for the
rest of eternity. Okay.

Speaker 1 (01:35:07):
I wonder if this period of films will be looked
back on as a kind of exploitation period. Like in
the seventies we had black exploitation movies and they were
all like low budget movies that featured black man, black
casts and black man characters. And then there was what
I guess you ever heard of Bruce Floitation. Because of

(01:35:29):
the popularity of Bruce Lee, there were a bunch of
Bruce Lee imitators like Bruce Lai and Bruce Lay and
I swear to god, these are real, and they made
a bunch of martial arts films trying to pass them
off as Bruce Lee movies, but they weren't. It was
called Bruce Floitation. I wonder if they'll look back on
this and call it like me too'sploitation or something, where
these are all like these female feminist revenge movies that

(01:35:51):
nobody liked, and they were all like the same formulaic,
you know stories. They were just like you know, crank doubt.
So anyway, still it's clear that for now, Hollywood.

Speaker 2 (01:36:06):
What Okay, I'm just really curious why we've offended Ryan
Yulopez so much by our existence. Okay, continue, I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:36:17):
I think he's just spurging out and there doesn't seem
to be any reason for it. But anyway, still, it's
clear that for now, Hollywood and the independent film world
sees itself as having a moral mandate. The entertainment industry was,
after all, ground zero for hashtag me too. No, all,
look all alaving me too. Did was exposed what we
already knew that there was a thing called the casting couch,

(01:36:39):
and there were plenty of women that were willing to
throw away their dignity to get a good role and
become super famous. And that's why they were all thanking
Harvey Weinstein for making their careers. And all it did
was expose that, and they knew that they were ashamed,
and so they tried to cover it up by accusing him.
It's just like what happens when a woman she on

(01:37:00):
her boyfriend or husband, and then when it looks like
she's gonna get caught, she accuses the boy the person
she cheated with, of raping her because it protects her
dignity and she doesn't care what happens to him in
the process. It's basically the same thing. So Pepito gives
us twenty five dollars, can we get some Italian hands

(01:37:22):
in the chat? Pepito is it's twenty five dollars and says,
flipping the script is what we should do. Good show, badgress. Thanks,
thank you, Pepito. All right, anyway, now it is using
the tools of storytelling to reinforce the movement's message. As
one Reuter's report put it, postwin scene, Hollywood is helping

(01:37:42):
to call out mad male behavior and embed these cautionary
tales into the culture. We are essentially watching a form
of cultural revenge play out on screen, a backlash against
generations of male dominated narratives. If the old Hollywood exalted
the suave leading man, the new Hollywood offensive jets him
to a trial by fire, sometimes literally. Yeah, but the

(01:38:04):
suave leading man did not exist as suave at the
expense of the women on screen.

Speaker 2 (01:38:11):
No, that's the that's the that's the assumption at the
heart of this is that male characters in the past
existed at the expense of female characters. Actually, female characters
in past cinema were more interesting, more realized. They just didn't.
We weren't constantly at war with the men, the leading
men in their movies. This is again, this is not

(01:38:35):
a reversal a backlash. This is not a reversal, and
it's not a backlash because there's nothing to backlash against.
And the other thing is how it did Hollywood put
itself in position to lecture the rest of the world
about Hollywood's own problems.

Speaker 1 (01:38:54):
Okay, yeah, exactly what they did the Me Too movement,
which which was a Hollywood problem. And again I would
say not a problem at all, because you don't have
to fuck the guy if you can just like hold
on to your fucking dignity and just say I'm not
doing that. But they didn't. There were women who said
they signed the contract, they sold their souls, and now

(01:39:16):
they want to blame everyone else. And they pivoted away
from Hollywood and they made me to everyone's problem. And
it worked because there were men in the workplace, you know,
getting fired left and right over every little slight yep or.

Speaker 2 (01:39:32):
Even made up slights. Yeah, put out that's that's that's
a firing. Okay, Okay, how many more paragraphs is there?
Because we still have to go through byrony and I'm
assuming that.

Speaker 1 (01:39:46):
You got uh, this is kind of long. It looks like, well,
let's just let's just okay. So they're basically toxic masculinity
from pop psychology to Hollywood gospel. So they talk a
little bit about we know what toxic masculinity is. Uh,
Hollywood's embrace this with.

Speaker 2 (01:40:05):
Zeal We could you know what we could finish this
article at a later date. Yeah, for it goes forever.
So let's let's get.

Speaker 1 (01:40:16):
Into by toxic masculinity. Come back to this later.

Speaker 2 (01:40:21):
There's plenty in here, guys. You can go look at
the article yourself and model and just just a spoiler.
At the end, result of recognizing all of this ship
that's being put on men in cinema, he this individual
calls for let's let's just get along. Mm hmmm, like, okay,

(01:40:44):
don't don't recognize what group of people is pushing this
crap and call them out for it. Let's just all
get along, So men should just keep enduring it. I
guess all right, let's let's get into Barny. I could
use a little bit of a break from this. I
don't know if Barty is really a break.

Speaker 1 (01:41:04):
No, no, it's a different kind of cringe. So this
is a Briardy Claire video called why is everyone quitting
birth control? Everyone? I guess you mean women?

Speaker 2 (01:41:16):
But okay, because men don't really have any?

Speaker 1 (01:41:20):
Yeah, because men don't really have any I mean, but okay.
So she's basically making the argument that women should I
don't know, like they need to have choice in birth
control or something. But let's see, let me see, let
me see here. All right, let's play a little bit

(01:41:43):
of the intro so you guys can get a sense
of it. Let me know a chicken to see if
the sound works. No, it's not working, so I gotta like,
I gotta do this over again. Stop sharing, and then
I got to reshare it? Just give me a second, guys,
for some reason, this happens every so often. But okay,
here we go.

Speaker 6 (01:42:01):
Muvy Wade being overturned wasn't enough. Now they're coming for
birth control. No really, whilst everyone was distracted with the
Charlie Kirk discourse, which, let's be real, is still going on.

Speaker 2 (01:42:11):
Firstly, on the same day the event happened, and everybody.

Speaker 1 (01:42:13):
So Charlie Kirk getting assassinated is a distraction? Okay, all right?
They killer guy? Why are you distracted by that? Okay,
I see where you're at. Byroney, you have no soul,
your demon. All right, let's keep going.

Speaker 6 (01:42:27):
Straight to talking about it.

Speaker 4 (01:42:29):
Senator.

Speaker 6 (01:42:29):
Republicans are voted to block the release of the Epstein files,
and the Trump administration told New York Times that birth
controls such as hormonal implants, the pill and iud's that
those are actually abortions. Jessica FIALENTI was the person I
originally heard this from, and I'm going to link their
substeck for you down below along.

Speaker 2 (01:42:44):
With their Instagram.

Speaker 6 (01:42:45):
As this guy said on my last video, Bye bye.
Aud's birth control and abortions first at South Carolina, hopefully
next sits all of America hold women accountable again.

Speaker 2 (01:42:54):
I just I, just a couple of days ago, responded
to there was a tweet by a woman who said
that real men take responsibility for a single woman's children,
So essentially, real men take responsibility for the effects of
someone else's sex life. Yep, but women can't take responsibility

(01:43:15):
for the effects of their own sex life. Okay, now,
I'm pro choice, but I don't necessarily agree with government
funding that choice or offloading the responsibility for your sex
life onto other tax payers they don't like. They're not
obligated to pay for your entertainment. And as far as

(01:43:37):
I can tell it, you guys just can consider sex
to be entertainment. You don't consider it to be a
human right. If you did, you'd have a completely different
attitude towards in cells you consider it to be entertainment,
why should anyone have to pay for your entertainment? Or
the consequences are preventing the consequences of your entertainment to yourself.

Speaker 1 (01:43:59):
Yep.

Speaker 2 (01:44:00):
Like they're not saying that this stuff won't exist for
you to pay for. They just don't want to pay
for it themselves. They don't want to pay for it
for the other people in their nation, and they don't
want to pay for it abroad. As an a narco capitalist,
even though I'm pro choice, I agree with those sentiments.

(01:44:22):
Nobody should have to pay for the consequences of your
entertainment on yourself.

Speaker 1 (01:44:28):
Okay, I don't think that's inconsistent with being like an
end cap at all. Because what Barrity Claire is arguing
for and a lot of these women Jessica Vlenti, that's
a name I haven't heard in a while. There, they
are saying that this should be paid for by the state,

(01:44:50):
which is slavery.

Speaker 2 (01:44:54):
Yeah, like like nobody has to pay for no, the
rest of the world does not have to pay or
your destruction, yeah, like you're your your your chosen desire.

Speaker 1 (01:45:06):
Your your your irresponsibility.

Speaker 2 (01:45:11):
Well or even funding funding your destruction to the society
that gives you all these rights. Like Okay, I just
wanted to say, because people are like, oh, Ryan Low
Lopez was it Lopez? Yeah, got owned. I just wanted
him to present his argument, that's all, Like I didn't.
I mean, he's all he did was just sit there
and feel, vibe, like create, like add his his feelings

(01:45:36):
to the There was no argument. No, I'm like disappointed.
Where was your argument? Why didn't you present an argument?
You kept saying you had one? Okay, yeah, okay, Like
I have an argument. Well we'll share it, Like, share
it with the class. Please. I have an argument and
it's it's perfect. It'll totally annihilate, blow you out of

(01:45:58):
the water. You'll realize that you're completely lame. Okay, Well
share it with the class.

Speaker 1 (01:46:04):
Yeah, no argument anyway, mongering. I don't think. I don't
think that Trump is going to make birth control illegal
or something. I think that states have whatever right, they
have the right to do whatever they want, and some
of them may do that. But that's your Australian what
do you care? Yeah, anyway, okay, so I'll play the

(01:46:26):
rest of this clip.

Speaker 6 (01:46:27):
Accountable for medical access. What is actually wanted is for
us to lose control about autonomy. This topic was voted
by my patron.

Speaker 2 (01:46:37):
Why do I have to pay for your entertainment? Byrony?
Aren't you a lesbian? Why do I have to pay
for them the police to stop your lesbian lover from
beating the ship out of you?

Speaker 1 (01:46:50):
Yeah? Well, I think she's supposed to be. I think
she's married, but queer or something.

Speaker 2 (01:46:55):
Who knows wherever she's married to. Unless that's a woman,
it's a dude. It's a dude. Okay.

Speaker 1 (01:47:02):
Maybe she has talked about her husband in other videos.
That's the only reason why I know.

Speaker 2 (01:47:07):
Wow. Well, either this is a complete grift and she
just knows how to make money, which I hope for
his sake that's what it is, or this is this
is not gonna end well for him.

Speaker 1 (01:47:21):
Yep.

Speaker 6 (01:47:22):
Okay, taking some cookies because I think we only need
a sweet trait. It's not my recipe. I've just kind of.

Speaker 2 (01:47:32):
All right, let me uh really really okay, all right, fine, pink,
I understand. But that pink, that pepto bismal pink, that
queasy stomach pink that you don't know if you should
put your your your freaking face, your button the toilet
pink like oh good lord, mm hmmm. I just found

(01:47:53):
that pink offensive.

Speaker 1 (01:47:55):
I get it. Everything about her as offensive to me.

Speaker 6 (01:47:59):
What did she get back so much so that she
had to put a stop to it very quickly afterwards?
Because why someone please think of the children.

Speaker 1 (01:48:07):
I guess was a singer who was distributing morning after
pills at her concerts. I think it's weird. It's weird, weird, Like, yeah,
I guess Bernie Claire would just think that's sex positive
or something. But I think it's really strange. I would
feel really strange. Til Deer says she's like most queer people,

(01:48:31):
totally straight, but with extra steps. Again Victim Cloud, Yes, absolutely,
she's married to a man. She's only involved with men,
but she calls himself queer. And what are you gonna
do argue against it? You can't. But she's doing all
of the heterosexual stuff, all of it except making babies probably,

(01:48:51):
And you know what I'm I'm for that.

Speaker 2 (01:48:54):
We don't where DoD til Deer send his message.

Speaker 1 (01:48:58):
He's in the chat.

Speaker 2 (01:49:00):
I don't see the message.

Speaker 1 (01:49:01):
I see it. You gotta switch the live chat maybe
instead of top.

Speaker 2 (01:49:06):
Chat, of course, Oh yeah, there is.

Speaker 1 (01:49:11):
I don't know why YouTube even has a top chat.
I think it's just another way to filter people out.

Speaker 2 (01:49:15):
But yeah, I didn't even realize a live chat.

Speaker 1 (01:49:18):
If you're looking at YouTube otherwise, you'll miss some comments
and I don't know why.

Speaker 2 (01:49:23):
We'll fascinating. Oh, by the way, if you want to
send a comment and not have it get get dead
ended in YouTube's comment labyrinth system, feed the Badger dot
com slash just the tip, very best way to send
us a a tip and send a comment with that
tip if you so desire. Feed the Badger dot com

(01:49:45):
slash just the tip. All right, let's keep going, all right?

Speaker 6 (01:49:50):
The pill and the impant or the rod and not
just prescribe for best control reasons. Yet these are the
ones which are being targeted.

Speaker 2 (01:49:57):
Are you kidding me? Are you is not prescribed for
anything but birth controllers? Are you?

Speaker 1 (01:50:05):
No? No, she said they're not. Well, she's arguing that
IUDs are not only for birth control, but they're.

Speaker 2 (01:50:14):
A freaking thing like that in your womb to make
things better in any conceivable capacity.

Speaker 1 (01:50:22):
I don't know what that is, but it doesn't look
pleasant at all.

Speaker 2 (01:50:25):
I've had one. It is not it is absolutely not.
I cannot what the hell is she on?

Speaker 1 (01:50:37):
Well, she's trying to make the argument that the patriarchy
is trying to destroy women, so she has to like
everything follows from her assumptions. That's all. But anyway, your
guide to.

Speaker 2 (01:50:49):
Birth, Actually I just want to I want to point vasectomy,
tubal ligation, long acting. You mean, end of freaking fertility? Okay, yeah,
let us go.

Speaker 1 (01:51:01):
Let's keep what we're talking about.

Speaker 6 (01:51:04):
Yeah, these are the ones which are being targeted. Lots
of people are put on birth control for a variety
of reasons, from being a teenager onwards, from acne to
PCs to horminal issues and demetriosis PMDD and more. Birth
control in the form of an ied road or the
pill have been incredibly instrumental in allowing people to be
on to actually live their day to day lives more comfortably,

(01:51:25):
I would say more comfortably, and not actually comfortably, because.

Speaker 2 (01:51:29):
With these women who are super firm, married to men
and freaking out about doing like just being that way.

Speaker 1 (01:51:42):
Like it's an act, it's part of the performance.

Speaker 2 (01:51:44):
I think, Yeah, I'm.

Speaker 1 (01:51:48):
Just like me. She bakes and stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:51:50):
If anything, if anything, women like this have less to fear,
supposedly than women like me, and yet they're out here
fearing what I don't know, Like I don't fear stupid
things like the potential of the handmaiden's tail, And yet
these women do. And yet the honestly they probably willing
will we wear the stupid costume and trot themselves out

(01:52:14):
in public and they're probably perfectly happy staying at home
doing female jobs. You got it? I never get I
don't get this. Yeah, honestly, the only way this makes
sense is if this is, as Nature said, tools for
the management management of men. There's tools for the management

(01:52:36):
of men. That's it. This has absolutely no reality outside
of that. Like they just they just make mouth noises.
They don't care if they're logical, rational, if that makes
sense historically, if they're supported, if the arguments are coherent.
They just make mouth noises and men go yep, I'll
do that, right on it, right on it, dear.

Speaker 6 (01:52:58):
Okay, all right, if you know one of the lucky
people out there who doesn't suffer from painful periods and
all of the horrors that go along with it, how
does it feel to be God's favorite? I got on
the pill at the age of sixteen or seventeen years
old due to my inability to go to school because
I was in such excruciating levels of pain at struggling
with migraines all sorts. A couple of years later, Actually, my.

Speaker 2 (01:53:20):
Oriegion says, wouldn't it just be easier not to have sex? Yes,
that's right. It's so critical that women get birth control
for sex that they hate that they constantly complain with
people hate right, with people, they hate sex. They constantly
complain about, Oh, it's so shitty, Well, then stop having it.
It's like it's like you go to the amusement park,

(01:53:45):
you demand people make me pay for your ticket, and
then you complain about every freaking ride in it. Well,
then don't go. Why do I have to pay for
you to be miserable? Like, solve everyone's problems? Stop having sex.
You don't like it, you say it's bad, you say
it's miserable. Well, why are you forcing people to pay

(01:54:07):
for your miserable experiences? Like there's we could just solve
everyone's problem. We could solve the taxpayer not wanting to
pay for you, and you could solve the fact that
you don't enjoy it anyway, Stop doing it, Okay, go
find something entertaining that actually entertains.

Speaker 6 (01:54:27):
You as well, Because health issue is so fun to
deal with it.

Speaker 2 (01:54:36):
Okay, I gotta confirm this is isn't I What health
issues do I U d's fix address address? That's a
good one of reproduction, primarily used for consterception. Oh they do, okay,

(01:55:06):
but you address several non reproductive health issues.

Speaker 1 (01:55:11):
Are they the only way to do that? Hormonal IUD
are is the only way to address.

Speaker 2 (01:55:18):
Oh. Oh, so you put it in and it releases hormones.
She had an IUD inserted to release hormones. You realize
that IUDs make hormonal IUDs can alleviate menstrual crabs by
thinning the uterine lining managed symptoms of So they're not

(01:55:39):
iud specifically, they're hormonal i u ds. Okay, all right,
that would have been nice to clarify. So it's not
actually the IUD that's doing it, it's the hormones. Yeah,
your period's on birth control. Oh, I hope you didn't
meet your partner while you were on birth control. My dear, ever,

(01:56:00):
go off it because you're not going to like what
you smell when you go off.

Speaker 1 (01:56:06):
Let me just jump ahead to the next time code.
So she basically talks about the legalities of bodily autonomy
and then she used a bunch of TV show and
movie clips because those are her primary references. And then
she has a section where basically she's saying they're gonna
be rolling back rights. So because you know, that's that's

(01:56:28):
been that's been the narrative for well since the beginning. Basically,
any day now, ladies are gonna lose all their rights.
Any day now. Oh, I got a big super chow
big one from Dan fid Philippo for one hundred dollars.
Thank you, Dan. I don't have any soundboard stuff yet.
So and he says the question of abortion for women

(01:56:50):
is commonly mishandled. People, especially on the right, frame it
in terms of whether it's good or bad. When the
question should be do women deserve to have abortions? And
the answer is no, but for political capital purposes, we
shouldn't find it.

Speaker 2 (01:57:05):
Uh, you're right, they don't. Yeah, because this is I
don't understand it, right, I mean, you've got a good point.
This is allowing women access to entertainment that makes them miserable, Like,
wouldn't it be better to just be like, yeah, don't,

(01:57:27):
just don't, just don't have sex. You constantly complain about
the results, you constantly complain about the activity. It apparently
makes you miserable and traumatizes you. So why are you
expecting people to pay for you to have access to it? Okay,
just let's just let's just let's end the farce. We

(01:57:52):
don't have to pay for your birth control or your abortion,
and you stop engaging in something that apparently makes you miserable.
When when men are no good at sex, you keep
saying constantly, but why do you seek them out to
the point where you make everybody else pay for the
consequences of your entertainment on yourself? It doesn't make sense

(01:58:16):
to me.

Speaker 5 (01:58:17):
Yeah, all right, he wants a total abortion band with
no exceptions. He's supper bands that would not only criminalize
abortion but ban IVF, Trump and common forms of birth control, and.

Speaker 1 (01:58:32):
That you've uh, speaker Mike Johnson, it was a well, yeah, speaker,
Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House. Okay, So no, not Trump.

Speaker 2 (01:58:42):
Okay, Well again again, we're talking about a form of
entertainment that women universe like seem they seem to be
disappointed with. So perhaps you could go with forms of
entertainment that won't disappoint you as much, such as learning philosophy, learning,
advance calculus, predicate, mathematics, logic, doing art, writing, things that

(01:59:05):
aren't pornographic, could do all kinds of other entertaining things. Ladies.
Then this thing that you apparently do not find entertaining,
you rather find it miserable and traumatic. We'll stop doing it.
Why is it so important that women get this form
of entertainment when they don't find it entertaining? Why that's

(01:59:30):
so bloody important?

Speaker 4 (01:59:35):
Okay, okay, it's a contraception and birth control like really
strews up female brains. By the way, every single one
of you need to make sure that your loved ones
are not on birth control.

Speaker 2 (01:59:45):
The right to contraception.

Speaker 1 (01:59:47):
Yeah, but okay, going back to this, this is Charlie Kirk,
by the way, which I think she's pretty I'm just
gonna say I think this is true. My gut tells
me she is sharing these clips of Charlie Kirk to
justify the murder of Charlie Kirk because if she can
demonstrate to her audience that he had the wrong kinds

(02:00:08):
of opinions, then their sympathy for his being murdered, and
like his children not having their father and his wife
not having her husband is justified because he said a
true thing about birth control. That's a true thing because
we have had Aidan Paladin on our show, and she
spoke at IC twenty nineteen and she made a video

(02:00:30):
on her own where she goes into the problems of
hormonal birth control, and these arguments were picked up by
other people like Sidney Watson, who also has a massive audience,
and she did a whole video on hormonal birth control
as well. Charlie Kirk is just saying what we have
been saying, and Berlie Claire is trying to use this again.

(02:00:51):
If it is the case that hormonal birth control is
screwing with women, and we know it is because we
have seen the data, you can Karen has said this
is herself. She's echoed this. When I started dating Lindsay
and I asked her if she was on the pill,
she said, and this was in twenty fifteen when I
met her, she said, I don't mess with my hormones,

(02:01:12):
so she knew that it wasn't good for you. And
he is just saying that like that is just something
that women should consider. But because Brier Declaire and feminists
think it's so important that women feel as though they
can just like you know, not get pregnant. They just
will fuck with their own bodies to do it. Then

(02:01:33):
they'll just have to permit that. And the funny thing
is is that they could in fact, it wasn't birth control.
Was it invented by a man?

Speaker 2 (02:01:41):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (02:01:42):
Well yes, yeah, so they could literally use this as
another thing to blame men for. But they want birth
control bad enough that they're not willing to stop.

Speaker 2 (02:01:50):
I don't want this is what I don't understand, Like,
at best, this seems to be a form of entertainment
that makes it isn't you don't find entertaining? Why are
you so obsessed with it?

Speaker 4 (02:02:02):
Like?

Speaker 2 (02:02:03):
Why are you so obsessed with it? And yes, birth
control has serious implications for mood disorders, and it doesn't
like it does have this side effect, this drawback, unless
you are somebody who experiences extremely painful periods. But that
is a medical condition, right, Okay, But I just wanted

(02:02:24):
to point out the tielder said it's time we must
repeal women. Yes, I agree, this is how we do it. Okay,
we get rid of the legal category woman. Everybody is
a man now, right, Everybody has the protections of a man. Okay,
that means, uh, if men have this protection, for example,

(02:02:45):
that they have the right to have their bathrooms based
on their genital configuration, men who are biological women will
still have that protection, so there'll still be like biological
male and biological female bathrooms and shit like that. And also,
so handicap men have their own Olympics, so women will
be classified as a form of handicap man and they

(02:03:06):
can have their own sports. So it's all good, except
that women and men have exactly the same rights, exactly
the same rights to birth control, exactly the same rights
to abortion, exactly the same rights to abandonment, exactly the
same rights to work. Everything is exactly the fucking same.
Let us repeal women. Let's get rid of them legal

(02:03:28):
category women, entirely remove it from existence. So but we
can still have medical categories of male and female, which
means that women can or females can still have differential
treatment based on the medical category that they're in, just
like you know, if you're if you're a medical a
man in a particular medical category, you're gonna have different
treatment and whatever. So we can still keep those medical differences,

(02:03:52):
but get rid of the social, political, and legal ones entirely.
Just have one category of person, which is man. There
you go like mankind, mankind. That's it.

Speaker 1 (02:04:05):
Well, I unfortunately I have to go, oh okay, we
have to do this. We can do the rest of
this later, but yeah, I have to go pick up Lindsay.

Speaker 2 (02:04:17):
So I guess we'll have to finish this show off
at a later date. Yeah all right, oh yeah, yeah,
I guess. So feed the Badger dot com slash just
the tip if you want to send those messages anything
that we've discussed and uh yeah, for we got to
figure out what's going on with the shorts thing at
some point hopefully it pops up.

Speaker 1 (02:04:38):
Did it just uh after I get back and you.

Speaker 2 (02:04:42):
Just cannot do it the previous way, like it won't
let you.

Speaker 1 (02:04:46):
It's going to well, I'll have to talk to you
about it later, but it won't will Yeah, all right,
cell phone feeds there, all right.

Speaker 2 (02:04:54):
Feed the badger dot com slash just the tip to
send us a tip and uh a message if you
want that tip. We don't have the fundraiser live yet,
so I'm not going to give you that link, all right,
so I'll hand it.

Speaker 1 (02:05:06):
Back to Bride, all right. Uh okay, well, if you
guys liked this video, please hit like subscribe if you're
not already subscribe to the bellf notifications, leave us a
comment let us know what you guys think about what
we discussed on the show today. Sorry for the abrupt
in I just realized I'm really out of time, And please,
please please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank
you guys so much for coming on today's episode of
Red Pill Cinema, and we'll talk to you guys in

(02:05:28):
the next one.