Tim Pool Property Attacked, Cinnabon Woman Drops Bomb | HBR News 530

Welcome to HBR News where we give the badger treatment to the news of the week! This week we will be following up on the Jan 6 pipe bomb and how it's being reported, Tim Pool's property is attacked in a drive by, and more!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:04):
This is HBr News Number five thirty, Temple property attacked, Cinnabon,
woman drops a bomb, where we discuss the news of
the week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everyone,
and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian.
I'm here with Mike and Hannah and this is HBr News.

(00:27):
I did that intro all wrong, That's okay. So we're
here to talk about the news of the week and
give it the Badger treatment. And this week we have
a great show. We're going to be talking about some
follow up stories involving the January sixth pipe bomb and

(00:48):
how that was covered. Temple's property was attacked in a
drive by incident that wasn't in Chicago for a change,
and more so, stick around. It's going to be a
good time and we should have afterwards for the Patron
only show.

Speaker 2 (01:02):
So the Patron Show.

Speaker 1 (01:03):
This week, I have this opinion piece from the New
York Times called the case for ending a long, mostly
good marriage. So how can you take something that should
be seen as a blessing and just just.

Speaker 2 (01:18):
Throw it out completely?

Speaker 1 (01:19):
I'm gonna make this person is gonna make a good
case for doing that, and I'm guessing it's not for men.
I'm just gonna throw it out there. It's probably not
something for husbands, but specifically for wives.

Speaker 2 (01:33):
So if you guys.

Speaker 1 (01:34):
Want to learn more about the case for ending along
mostly good marriage, then become a patron by going to
feed Thebatchel dot com, forward slash subscribe and joining our
little community. You'll be able to watch all of the
additional content. And there's also lots of other things that
happen on, you know, all the time, there's stuff going

(01:56):
on in the patron discord. So it's it's a good
time and I think you'll enjoy yourself, so please consider
doing that. If you just want to see what it's like,
you can go to the free version of it, which
basically has limited access, but there's still a lot going
on there at Badger Nation dot online.

Speaker 2 (02:12):
So it's a great little community.

Speaker 1 (02:14):
And if you don't want to wake up one morning
to find that we've been yeaded from the Internet, go
to badger Feed dot com or honey Badger Radio dot com,
which is where all of our content lives. So with
that out of the way, apologically the late start, we're
gonna go ahead and get into today's stories and I
got some good, good one. So we're gonna start off. Oh, actually,

(02:37):
wait before we get into Jake Tapper, there's something I
want to show you guys. I'm matting a bonus story. So,
Jasmine Crockett has announced her like bid to run for
the Senate in the like taking like the Texas seat
in the Senate, and she has a little campaign ad

(02:59):
that she put together and I think it's just kind
of endemic of let's say, you know, feminist campaigning. So
let me know if you notice what it makes this
this campaign ad so special, and then we'll talk about
it afterwards.

Speaker 2 (03:12):
Let me know if you guys can hear this too.
How about this new one? They have their new star, Crockett.

Speaker 3 (03:18):
How about her? She's a new star of the Democrat Party,
Jasmine Crockett. They're in big trouble, but you have this
woman Crockett. She's a very low IQ person. I watched
it the other day. She's definitely a low IQ person.

Speaker 2 (03:34):
Crockett. Oh man, oh man, she's a very low IQ person.

Speaker 4 (03:41):
Somebody said the other day she's one of the leaders
of the party.

Speaker 3 (03:44):
I think you gotta be kidding. Now, are they going
to rely on Crockett's gonna bring them big.

Speaker 5 (03:54):
What the fuck?

Speaker 2 (03:56):
So that's the ad.

Speaker 1 (03:58):
It's Jasmine Crockett for those of you guys who are
listening at you know, on the podcast later, it's Jasmine
Crockett in profile with Trump, just you know, basically commenting
on her, calling her low IQ and stuff, and then
turn into the camera defiant, defiant against the misogyny and

(04:19):
racism that's being hurled at her stoneface. We don't know
what our policies are, we don't know what she stands for,
we don't know what she's gonna do, but we do
know this. She is a victim of the Orange patriarchy
and therefore you should vote for her.

Speaker 3 (04:34):
But that's all you need to know. That is all
you need to know, she.

Speaker 5 (04:38):
Said, with her face. I'm Jasmine Crockett and I approved
this message.

Speaker 3 (04:44):
Okay, this is typical, I mean, and it's something that
you know, people on the right have been noticing for
a long time, because this is essentially what what Obama
did when he was running for office. You were not
allowed to ask about his policy plans, You were not

(05:05):
allowed to ask what he stood for, You were not
allowed to ask about his experience. You were not allowed
to ask any questions. He was just entitled to be
the first black president of the United States. You weren't
even allowed to think about the fact that there were
other black candidates who had run for president and been

(05:26):
torpedoed by the Democrat Party with all kinds of various attacks,
and that included black Republicans. So when black Republicans ran
for president ran for the primary, they didn't just have
to fight a primary against their opponent who would attack

(05:48):
their policies. They also had to fight against the Democrat
opponents who would then treat them as race traders and
all kinds of nasty things. But you know, you weren't
allowed to remember any of that either. You weren't allowed
to discuss anything to do with criticisms that are normally

(06:12):
put out there when a white man runs for president.
And the same thing happened then when Hillary Clinton ran
for president, if you criticized her policies, it wasn't because
you disapproved of the policy. Even if you criticized those
policies when they were put out there by some other
Democrat or by a Republican, if you didn't like it

(06:35):
when Hillary said it, it was because you were a misogynist, right,
And if you didn't like it when Obama said it,
it was because you were a racist. It had nothing
to do with what you valued and what you wanted.
This is no different. You're just supposed to presume her
the legitimate winner of the race from the beginning, because

(07:00):
you know, if you criticize a woman or a black person,
you have been infected with the isms and the phobias,
and therefore your opinion is illegitimate, no matter who you
are and no matter what your opinion is.

Speaker 2 (07:18):
All right, Mike, do you want to say anything about this?
Have you seen this ad?

Speaker 5 (07:22):
No, I'm just seeing it for the first time.

Speaker 2 (07:24):
I like throwing you a monkey wrench.

Speaker 5 (07:28):
I'm as speechless as she was, but I liked that. Yeah,
she's much more persuasive, persuasive when she doesn't open that
fucking trap of hers. Keep it up, Jasmine, Yes, I
just you know.

Speaker 1 (07:45):
I shared this because it's very telling. Essentially, unfortunately, this
is normal for women in politics. And I know that
you know that you probably know some women who are
great in politics, but this is more in line with
the norm. It is essentially she is putting herself in
the position of the attacked by playing a bunch of

(08:08):
Trump you know statements over her where he's basically doubting
her ability, and I see no reason why not.

Speaker 2 (08:16):
She is notorious by the way, guys.

Speaker 1 (08:18):
Don't know if you guys remember she got into like
a cat fight with Marjorie Taylor Green on the Senate
floor a while back, and they were, you know, insulting
each other's like, but based on their appearance, I think,
you know, Jasmine Krockett got was told that her eyelashes
are fake, and I was like, this is where.

Speaker 2 (08:36):
We're at right now, you know.

Speaker 1 (08:39):
Yeah, the women were just cat fighting on the Senate
floor and nothing is getting done because they're all concerned
about how people are, you know, disrespecting them or whatever.
And she's trying and she is like, currently this is
you know, whatever you feel about this is irrelevant. She
is the sort of like rising star in the DNC,

(09:04):
but it's only because of how often she makes headlines.
It's got nothing to do with her ability, you know,
it's just about all She's always runded by controversy, and
that makes it's like a reality show character. You know,
she's just like the Honeybooboo child of the Senate and
it's a mess.

Speaker 2 (09:21):
It's a mess.

Speaker 5 (09:22):
So I can't wait to see what happens when she
goes up against AOC in the primaries. That's gonna be spicy.

Speaker 3 (09:30):
And I will say, yeah, you know, fisticoufs have always
been and probably always will be a an occasional occurrence
on Senate floors and congressional floors and houses of Lords
and wherever in in parliamentary politics. That's that's been a

(09:53):
thing throughout history. However, it hasn't been since the days
where it was it was normal for men to wear
powdered wigs as part of their fancy dress. I don't
think they can hear me. I hear somebody just posted
dead silent?

Speaker 2 (10:13):
No what you guys can't hear it?

Speaker 1 (10:16):
No, no, no, no, there he's he's talking about something else.

Speaker 2 (10:20):
The sounding should.

Speaker 3 (10:21):
Be good for for for uh wig pulling and UH
colleague people's eyelashes fake and attacks on physical appearance UH
to be the main way that they fight, like congressmen
and senators occasionally used to knock each other out. I

(10:43):
believe god, I can't think of where is it that
the is it New Zealand that the Maori are doing mahaka.
But only in America do we have redneck bitch fights
like that, And unfortunately that's probably going to be a

(11:04):
thing forever too. Yeah, sure, yeah, I don't know if they,
as a Gabriel feel and Lucas says, everyone in the
Senate knows kung fu. I don't know. I don't know
if they know kung fu, but they do know the
sacred art of who flung poo?

Speaker 1 (11:22):
Well, all I will say is like I think that
I do think that the discourse level has dipped in
America significantly. Look at old debates with like, you know,
guys from the sixties like Richard Nixon, you'd think that
they were like in Oxford or at least Oxford of
you know, decades ago as well. I don't think Oxford
is Oxford anymore either, But it's it's all become gotcha's

(11:46):
and like, you know, stupid rhetoric games. But that that's
a bit of a diver divergence. But my point is
is that Jasmine Crockett is doing what women in politics do.
A lot of them they use they're first of all,
they're all feminists, like there's no there's no left and right.

Speaker 2 (12:05):
When it comes to.

Speaker 1 (12:05):
Feminism, everyone's a feminist for the most part. They're just
it just depends on what speed they're going at, and
that means that they had to be victims of men
and that's how they make progress. Remember when who was
the Republican woman that was running Why am I forgetting
her name? She was running for president and there was
like the debates and she was saying something about, you know,

(12:27):
basically just you playing the woman card when she was
at the debate stage.

Speaker 2 (12:32):
I mean, it.

Speaker 1 (12:33):
Doesn't matter where they sit on it, and it's just
that some people like Crockett are really really clumsy and
sloppy about it. And so what she's doing is she's
she's what she's doing is it's gonna work. Okay, I
know you guys are laughing, but this is gonna work
on a lot of women.

Speaker 2 (12:48):
We're gonna see this, and the more men.

Speaker 1 (12:51):
It's gonna work on, well, we'll work on men too,
but they're gonna the women are gonna see this woman
taking it on the chin, taking these insults and staring,
staring evil in the face, defiant and stoic, and they're
gonna think, oh my god, that that's a girl.

Speaker 2 (13:08):
Boss. I'm gonna vote for her, and so doesn't mean
she's gonna win.

Speaker 3 (13:12):
Nick Haley sat her like for from what she's she
did standing there, it could all be true. Just just
holding your chin up and uh, you know, sticking your
tits at and walking like walking in like you own
the place, Uh, might be effective at persuading the unthinking.
But the moment anybody actually carefully considers the questions that

(13:37):
he's bringing up, she has done nothing to knock that down.
And the thing that that really bugs me about this,
And I think you're talking about maybe Sarah Palin.

Speaker 2 (13:49):
No, I was thinking about Nicki Haley.

Speaker 3 (13:51):
Nikki Haley, Okay, yeah, I was just say Sarah, Sarah Palin.
One of the points that she did make that was
pretty legitimate is we get this narrative that if a
woman is running for office, she's a girl boss, and
you're supposed to vote for her as long as she's
got the right politics for the left wing media and

(14:13):
the left wing politicians. You know, if she's a feminist,
if she claims to be a victim of men in
masculinity and so on, if she wants abortion and more
social safety nets, more welfare spending, and so on, if
she wants to cut government, if she wants to end abortion,
if she wants women to choose other alternatives, even if

(14:35):
she just wants women to choose other alternatives and isn't
talking about outlawing it. All of a sudden, she stops
being a woman to do the media, and the idea
that it's misogynistic to vote against a woman suddenly disappears.
It vanishes in thin air. Sarah Palin didn't get to
be a woman when the woman card was in play

(14:58):
because her politics. We're not correct, we're not politically correct.
And Nikki Haley tried, she mistakenly tried to play the
woman card. But the woman card doesn't belong to women.
It belongs to Democrats. And the sooner Republicans figure that out,
the better. But in the meantime, I stand by my

(15:22):
old statement. I'll repeat it today. The United States is
not ready for a female president, and we never will
be until we can have a woman run for political
office without playing the woman card, without playing the misogyny card,
and without even acknowledging misogyny when it's actually being used

(15:43):
on her. There's missonry or miss injury gets used against
male politicians all the time. They get treated like they
are less of a man if they don't live up
to a stereotype, Like they're not qualified if the other
guy is ex military and they're not. Even if the

(16:05):
other guy's only ex military because somebody made him do
it right, they get treated like if they're not guynocentric enough,
they're not man enough. That's all miss andry. None of
them complain about it. When women can do that, and
the public can do that, and journalists can do that,

(16:28):
and anybody who does otherwise will get made fun of
for bringing up misogyny, then we'll be ready for a
woman president. Maybe yep.

Speaker 1 (16:41):
Well, anyway, I thought that I thought the campaign that
was funny, and I don't really I approve of that
message as well. I don't think that I don't think
this is the own that you think it is, although
it probably will get her some votes, but I don't
think it's gonna She doesn't look like she's doing very well.

Speaker 2 (16:58):
She might not win her primaries, so but we'll we'll,
I guess we'll see.

Speaker 1 (17:03):
I'm curious to see if the woman worsting is still
like how viable it is, So that's what I'm that's
the reason why I chose this story. It's not really
about the politics. She's in Texas, I don't I don't
see that happening. But anyway, let me know what you
guys think about this one in the comments before I
move on to the next story. I did get a
super chow yesterday, but my social stream chat was a

(17:26):
little bit off, so I didn't see it. And it
was when I was doing the fireside chat with the
former Prime Minister of East Turkestan.

Speaker 2 (17:37):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (17:37):
Kind of a weird, guess, but interesting, a lot of
a really good talk if you guys want to check
it out. Richard Bierre gave us five dollars yesterday and
said Naomi Wu who used to who used to the
technology pieces and make her content on YouTube, has been
out of you for a while, and there are rumors
that she did have a Muslim boyfriend. It is speculative

(17:58):
whether the government disappeared her or not.

Speaker 2 (18:00):
Thank you for that.

Speaker 1 (18:01):
Yes, yeah, China's not good to the Ugers Wigers oigers, wigers, wikers.

Speaker 3 (18:08):
I'll say wigers, all right, Yeah, I think it's wiers.

Speaker 2 (18:10):
Yes, weaker.

Speaker 1 (18:11):
Well, there is a he was pronouncing it the correct
way it's it's a little bit like Harsher in the
throat area.

Speaker 2 (18:16):
It's like a Wiger.

Speaker 1 (18:17):
But I'm not sure if I'm I'm gonna I'm not
gonna try and butcher that. So let us know what
you guys think about that one in the comments. Well, yeah,
we'll see that in the We're gonna move on to
the next story. So all right, Jake Tapper, So we
did get a follow up on the January sixth pipe bombing.

Speaker 2 (18:39):
Was really the bombs were put down on.

Speaker 1 (18:40):
January fifth, so it was like the day before, and
we have arrested or yes, there was an arrest of
the long sought pot pipe bomber suspect, describing him as
Brian Cole Junior. And here is Jake Tapper on CNN
covering that Report's like thirty seconds and I think it's important.

Speaker 6 (19:01):
So planting pipe bombs near the Republican and Democratic National
Committee headquarters the night before the January sixth, twenty twenty
one capital attack, Brian Cole Junior, a thirty year old
white man from the DC suburbs, is charged with transporting.

Speaker 2 (19:16):
An explosive device in.

Speaker 6 (19:17):
Interstate commerce and with malicious destruction by means of explosions
seeing an observed local and federal law enforcement outside his
home in Woodbridge, Virginia this morning. Attorney General Pambondi gave
very few details about the suspect this morning, but said
this cold case has been solved.

Speaker 1 (19:36):
And the white man in question is pictured here. Oh
I'm sorry, No, that's not the guy. This is the
guy that was the other black face of white supremacy.
So he described him as a thirty year old white
man from the DC suburbs, and this is the guy.

(19:58):
So okay, So he issued an r so. Jig Tapper
issued an on air correction the following day, attributing the
error to a script mistake and apologizing, Yeah, right, CNN.

Speaker 2 (20:14):
Doesn't make mistakes, but the truth is okay.

Speaker 1 (20:17):
The pipe bombs and Questions were two non functional devices
placed outside the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee
headquarters in Washington, d C. On the evening of January fifth,
So this was like the day before, and it was
actually they were non functional and they were outside of
both headquarters of both parties. They went undiscovered until the

(20:40):
afternoon of January sixth, amid the chaos, prompting evacuations but
causing no harm or detonation. The case lingered unsolved for
nearly five years, spawning conspiracy theories of an inside job
or Antifa involvement, particularly among Trump allies like Danpongino, now
FBI Deputy Director. On December fourth, twenty twenty five, the

(21:02):
FBI arrested thirty year old Brian Cole Junior, a black
resident as you can see of Woodridge, Virginia, charging him
with transporting and explosive device across straight lines, state lines,
and attempted malicious destruction by explosives. Evidence included cell phone
pings matching surveillance timestamps of the hooded suspect and Nike sneakers,
credit call purchases of bomb components, galvanized pipes, timers, and

(21:27):
batteries in twenty nineteen and twenty twenty so like in
that time period, and his twenty seventeen Nissan Sentra captured
on license plate readers near the sites. Cole reportedly confessed
or in questioning, expressing anarchist leanings and disappointment over the
twenty twenty election results, believing it's stolen, though no ties

(21:48):
to organized groups or clear motive linking the riot to
the riots or you know what happened on January sixth,
the worst day in American history. Authorities noted he continued
buying bomb parts post six The breakthrough stem from realizing
existing evidence under the new Trump administration's FBI leadership, with

(22:08):
no new tips involved.

Speaker 5 (22:11):
Yeah, bear in mind, this is all stuff being told
to us by the FBI. I said it a couple
of weeks ago, and I'll say it again. The FBI
does not tell the truth like ever, certainly not the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I have no
doubt that they were at their most duplicitous under the
Obama regime. And everyone knows the Biden regime was just

(22:32):
Obama's third term, and that would explain why they didn't
even bother investigating this pipe obomba for those entire four years. Honestly,
it's probably because they did it. Who was only ever
a sigo up to get people outraged or distracted or both.
January the sixth was entirely a false flag operation. It

(22:54):
couldn't be more obvious. It was obvious from the start
to anyone who's not a retard. We have no reason
to think the alleged pipe bombs or anything but another
element of the false flag operation. But just because cash
Betel is in charge now doesn't mean they're suddenly telling
the truth. The FBI, as an institution, is not going

(23:16):
to admit that they are a rogue institution that just
lies and entraps people and churns up the fog of
war at every opportunity. If they admit the truth, it
would jeopardize its existence as an agency, and just like
any other government agency, its primary function is to keep
itself existing. So I'm not all that convinced that this

(23:41):
Brian cole Junior chap did a goddamn thing. I'm not
even convinced he's a real person. They don't even need
a real life Patsy anymore. They have AI They can
just invent a person out of whole cloth and then
wash their hands of the whole affair. Maybe they didn't.
Maybe this is the one time they're telling the truth.
But I'm not confident, and I don't know why anyone

(24:05):
would be. Governments and their agencies have always lied, and
now that governments have the technology to lie even harder
than ever before, you should be even more skeptical. This
boy has done nothing but cry wolf for generations. Once
upon a time they could at least show you a
picture of a wolf and that would be somewhat convincing

(24:29):
on the surface, but that no longer means anything. The
wolf is probably AI generated. Does that mean we can't
believe anyone anymore anymore? Yeah, yeah, it kind of does.
You should be skeptical of everything that you haven't seen
with your own eyes, an even if you have seen
it with your own eyes, you know, you could still

(24:49):
be under a misapprehension. But in the meantime we can
still laugh at the media and it's clowns like Jake Tapper.
Some people we can't be sure if they're lying or not.
But some people are so obviously pathologically lying that it's comical.

(25:10):
They will literally show you black and say it's white.
They can't help themselves. They lie are sport at this point.
They try to tell the most obvious lie they can
think of and see if they can get away with it.
And it's tempting just to let them get on with
it and see what happens when they finally hit a
brick wall, when they can say black is white and

(25:32):
get away with it, When they can say the sky
is green and get away with it. When they could
say two plus two is a banana and get away
with it. I mean, they're going to descend into madness
right in front of our eyes on live television, and
I'm here for it. I want to see what happens.
But at the same time, in a sane world, these

(25:56):
people should lose their jobs. Point the FBI and the
CIA need to be gutted from top to bottom and
never replaced with anything, because they're probably lying about everything.
But before that, we should deal with the people who
are definitely lying about everything, like CNN. That's the first

(26:17):
thing that needs to be gutted and never replaced. You
literally to try to tell us black is white, Jake,
you should not have a job. If you say a
swear word on the air, you'll get fired overnight and
never invited back. Swearing is nothing compared with saying up
is down, that shit is mental. You're supposed to be

(26:39):
telling us the truth, not the clear and exact opposite
of the truth. You should be tired and feathered and
bum rushed into the street where you belong to spend
the rest of your life standing on the corner of
an alleyway selling pencils from a cup until that happens.
It's not a serious country and it hasn't happened, so

(27:03):
it's not it's like we're living in the seventh sequel
to nineteen eighty four. This is way too far fetched
to be reality, and I don't think it is. We're
in a simulation. We have to be. I will continue
to tell myself that because it's the only thing that
keeps me saying if indeed I am saying, probably not,

(27:25):
I'm probably lying to and I don't even know it.
Ignore me in time, ignore me.

Speaker 3 (27:34):
I just I'm just flabberg acid. I agree with Mangaka
ninety two or Mangoca ninety two. I'm just shocked that
Steve Herkle would do this.

Speaker 1 (27:43):
One question he said, did I do that?

Speaker 3 (27:51):
I think that that was a brilliant comment and needed
to be highlighted. But in all actuality that when they
they finally found, you know, the conspiracy theorists who did
something intended to be violent as a result of the
belief that the that the election was stolen, and he

(28:17):
turned out to be somebody who actually couldn't put things
together properly the way he wanted them to go, so
that they would do the thing he was trying to do.
I could do that what he tried to do, Like, like,
I have no background in chemistry and since high school

(28:40):
except a couple of classes in college that that you know,
after I took those, I ended up changing majors, dropping
out for several months, and then going to a different
university and not taking any further chemistry. So this isn't
something that you know, you have to be an expert

(29:01):
to be able to do this, right.

Speaker 2 (29:03):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (29:04):
And and yet he fucked it up. And you know,
which is good because nobody got hurt. That's great. But
at the same time, how how absolutely pathetic the only
person they could find if if this this is true
at all, you know, if like Mike said, if it's
not completely invented, if if he's not an AI image

(29:29):
that they created in order to make it look like
the case was solved. Uh, if there was ever anything
actually planted, their their scapegoat turns out to be a
complete dumbass, who can't he can't even do that, right.

(29:50):
I'm just I'm here for it for for for five
years we've been hearing five and a half years. Really
we've been hearing because it was predicted that this that
there would be riots and all kinds of crap that
you know, the right was going to start a civil
war even no one was already kind of going on.

(30:14):
And and this this is what we get, Steve Herkle
want to be who cannot do the most basic like
people who are literally intellectually disabled have created better working
incendiary devices than this man did. And yet the left

(30:42):
would have you believe that we should be panicking over
right wing violence in response to the election that occurred
in twenty twenty. Granted, we can look back and see
that in response to the twenty sixteen election, left wing

(31:03):
violence burned down whole cities, took over neighborhoods and used
weapons and physical attacks to keep people out, broke into homes,
looted businesses, killed people's pets. It basically destroyed large swatches

(31:27):
of the country. But you know, we should be terrified
of the right because an incompetent n income poop planted
two non working pipe bombs. Once Hmm, there you go.

(31:50):
That's the balance of things.

Speaker 1 (31:56):
Yeah, well, that's that's absolutely correct.

Speaker 2 (32:01):
That is the balance of things. And I you know,
like I said, I just my.

Speaker 1 (32:10):
Intention with this was mostly to point out how CNN
reports these things, because like, whether it's a mistake or not,
I don't think it was. I think that if it
was a mistake, it was made because of some prejudice
or bias, because remember they these people left us, They

(32:31):
use things like being on the right interchangeably with things
like being white or being male, And so when they
hear there was a pipe bomb and they caught the guy,
let us will assume firstly, that was put there by
one of the rioters, even though it was done the
night before. So I don't really I mean, granted, the

(32:53):
guy supposedly said in his confession that he was unhappy
with the election, but he's also an anarchist. Plus it
looked like he was wanting to tear down the whole system,
or at least had that sentiment. Maybe he couldn't follow
through on it, irrelevant, but because he was involved and
was somebody who was you know, essentially, there was a
lot of discussion around in terms of like the damage

(33:14):
that was done on that fateful day. Then the media,
the people in the media where like, well, this.

Speaker 2 (33:21):
Guy has to be a white guy.

Speaker 1 (33:22):
It has to be because that's what they are, right,
Like they're like like they do this a lot. Actually,
there's other instances of them erasing someone's ethnicity, race, and
gender if it if it suits that the narrative, which is,
you know, the greatest threat to American democracy are straight

(33:45):
white men, period on the right. You know, but like that,
that last part isn't even as completely optional anyway. But
they're all intended to be used interchangeably. And again this
is important because this kind of reporting, people will see,
they'll hear the SoundBite and they won't look into it anymore.

(34:06):
It's be like, well, that's what they said. It was
a white guy. I'm not surprised. And then they'll go
on TikTok and talk about it. You know, the saying goes,
a lie is halfway around the world before the truth
gets his pants on. And so that's why I'm here
because remember my city was burned down over a lie.
And I see this a lot. I've lost a lot

(34:27):
as a result of lies, and I take them very seriously,
especially when the media spreads them. So this is the
guy in custody. Maybe it's AI generated, I don't know.
I'm not willing to go that far. I'm just gonna
take it at face value. For now if we learn more,
I'll go with it. But this is the guy and
he's not a white guy, and he's not even Larry Elder.

Speaker 2 (34:50):
It's this guy Erkle. Okay.

Speaker 1 (34:52):
So, and as far as we know, this is what
we have, right so and yeah, so I just think
that that's the most important thing.

Speaker 3 (35:03):
Yeah, they lied, and they always do.

Speaker 2 (35:06):
And yeah, they lied like they always do exactly.

Speaker 1 (35:09):
So okay, let me see I think somebody did somebody
send a super chat. Yeah, I got a super child
from Richard Bierre, who it's not in here, Oh here
it is. He gave us five dollars and.

Speaker 2 (35:22):
Said there are four lights. Thank you Richard for that.

Speaker 3 (35:28):
But what are they black lights or white lights?

Speaker 2 (35:33):
They're flesh lights.

Speaker 3 (35:34):
No, we crossed over and go into the light.

Speaker 2 (35:37):
Oh god.

Speaker 1 (35:38):
All right, Well, anyway, let us know what you guys
think about this one in the comments and we're gonna
move on to the next story. So this has gone viral,
and I know it's a little thing, but we covered
the Shiloh Hendricks incident as well, and so this is
sort of related. Okay, So all right. On December. On
December sixth, a TikTok video captured a confrontation at a

(36:01):
cinnabon Kiosk in Bay Park Square Mall. And I'm not
even going to try to pronounce that, but it was
in Wisconsin, so it's got like an Indian name, Ashwubenon
or something near Green Bay, where a white female employee
named well identified in some reports as Crystal Willsey Wilsey
unleashed a tirade against a black Somali Muslim couple. And

(36:23):
by the way, Wisconsin is getting its share of Somali Muslims,
just like I think Michigan and especially Minneapolis, they're all
like kind of next to each other, so there's a
bit of a spread happening. The altercation reportedly began when
the woman asked for more caramel on her cinnamon roll,
prompting the employee to mock her key jab as a

(36:43):
witchcraft bandana. The employee then escalated, repeatedly using the N word,
declaring I am racist and I'll say it to the
whole entire world, flipping them off with both hands, exchanging expletives,
and threatening to throw water on them, all while from
behind the counter.

Speaker 2 (37:01):
As the couple recorded. The footage exploded.

Speaker 1 (37:04):
Online, amassing tens of millions of views. Across TikTok I'm
not going to play the clip because I'm not sure
you guys know what she said, So she said the
gamer word across TikTok x and Instagram, sparking widespread outrage
over supposed anti Black and anti Somali racism, especially amid
recent comments by Trump about the Somali community in the area. Cinnabon,

(37:28):
which operates the location as an independently owned franchise, swiftly
fired the employee, stating in a social media post, we
do not condone this behavior. Their actions and statements are
completely unacceptable and in no way reflect the values of Cinnabon.
The couple launched a GoFundMe for trauma counseling and legal fees,
raising over fifty thousand dollars, while a counter fundraiser on

(37:50):
gibsen Go for the ex employee after she was fired
has drawn criticism, supposedly for promoting a false narrative. As
of December ninth, the Gifts and Go fundraiser for the woman,
framed by organizers as aid for her being harassed and
losing her job, has raised over eighteen thousand dollars towards

(38:13):
a goal that was increased to two hundred and seventy
one three hundred and one dollars, So she's doing just fine.
But the reason why I'm bringing this story up is
it's an interesting trend that I'm noticing that. So, like,
you have these people that are like, so, okay, here's
the reality. Most people are tribal. This is like our

(38:35):
base nature to be this way. Now, this isn't a
good thing. I'm just describing it as it is. And
some of the mistakes that people in first world Western
countries in particular make is they think that because they
try not to be tribal and they behave like say
civic nationalists or this belief that we all share we're
trying to like build a culture together, and that like

(38:57):
they don't see color and they don't see race and
all of that. That's all fighting good, but a lot
of people don't play by those rules. Like most people
don't play by those rules, and most people do things
completely tribally, completely for tribal reasons, Okay, especially people who
come here from other countries. And I'm not saying that
to disparage I'm just telling you the truth. In those

(39:19):
states that I mentioned, the reason why I brought up Michigan, Wisconsin,
and Minnesota. Is because there are Somali migrants running for
office and getting elected purely on the basis of their identity.
Just like Obama ran on the premise of being a
black guy, and there are black people who voted for
him because he was black, just like Brendon Johnson and

(39:42):
the Beetlejuice that came before him, both mayors of Chicago,
they won because they're black. They said, I'm black, vote
for me, and the black people voted for the black
person because that's what they do. This is the truth.
I don't like it. I hate it, to be honest,
because it's not the way you do things. But a
lot of people are this way. This is just the reality,
and you can't really get around that. And unfortunately it's

(40:05):
starting to go the other way.

Speaker 2 (40:07):
Now.

Speaker 1 (40:07):
You got white people doing the same thing where they're like,
we're we're just gonna operate in our interests and we're
gonna we're gonna support our people no matter what. Because
that's where what it's sort of like been reduced to. Okay,
this is an achnology reality. This is what it is.
This is what it is. This is where we are Now,
this is how it is, Okay. And the thing about this, though,

(40:29):
is that what's interesting is that how this is weaponized
the most effectively is through women.

Speaker 2 (40:36):
So when women are the victims.

Speaker 1 (40:38):
Then it's more it's like more amplified, Like you're just
you can like, look what happened to our woman. Look
at what happened to Arena Zarutzka on the train right,
Like I thought it was terrible. It shouldn't have happened,
Like the guy should have been in jail or mental
asylum or something.

Speaker 2 (40:54):
I'm not defending that at.

Speaker 1 (40:55):
All, like the guy who set the girl on fire
on the on the train in Chicago, you know, and
like these things are terrible, but because we are getting
to the point where people are interested only as seeing
the world we live in as a tribal a set
of tribes that are all fighting each other. In fucking Minnesota, Okay,
there was a Somali guy running. I think he was

(41:16):
for mayor or something, but I'm not sure. He was
running for office and he was gonna He was basically
there because he was trying to get all the Somali
immigrants to vote for him. And the only reason why
he lost because he did lose, but the only reason
why he lost was because there were different Somalian tribes
that were at odds with each other, and there were

(41:38):
a bunch of Somalians that didn't vote for him because
he wasn't in their specific tribe within the Somalian you know,
like population, right, So like that's that's the reality.

Speaker 2 (41:50):
Like you don't like it. I don't like it, but
that's what it is.

Speaker 1 (41:53):
And I'm pointing out that this particular woman, you know,
I'm not defending what she did, but as I understand it,
like the harassment, well there was harassment before the recording
came out, and this is often what happens to the
same thing was the case with Shiloh Hendrix. Apparently the
man they're Muslims, right, So the man was basically saying

(42:15):
something about the way this woman was dressed, like she
was like showing too much skin or something, and she
flipped out on them because again it's a woman and
telling a woman, especially like a woman from the first world,
how they should be dressed or to smile more or
whatever is gonna They're gonna fly off the handle over that.
And so it just became an altercation because there was

(42:35):
a culture clash, but ultimately she got the boot because
she acted out. She shouldn't have done that, and that
cost her her job. But a bunch of white identarians,
I want this. The guy who created her go fun
me was the same guy who created the go funme
for Shiloh Hendrix, which was the woman who cussed out
a dude like at a part at a playground or something.

(42:58):
And it's the same. It's the same sort of like
elements at play. Right, there's a woman, she's a victim.
We're gonna use her. And so this is what's happening,
Like we're becoming more tribal because we are becoming more
guidocentric to a point where it's not even rational, and
this is going to create more problems in the future.

(43:18):
So this is why I'm bringing this up. I mean,
like it's something that no one's gonna talk about. They're
gonna talk about the race thing, and they don't see
that it's women's victimhood or lack thereof, like perceived victimhood
that is the weapon that is used to cause these clashes.
Like even on the other side of this exact same incident,

(43:40):
the woman in the of the two people that were
that she was cussing out is the bigger victim on
the other side. So that's how they're doing this. And
I just that's why I'm bringing this up. So anyway,
you guys have your own take on it, that's fine,
and uh yeah, I'll just like let you all have
the floor.

Speaker 2 (43:57):
So you can say whatever.

Speaker 3 (43:59):
Just from the perspect active of a person who has
worked in retail and food service, I'm gonna I'm gonna
answer a little skepticism here and and I have serious
doubts that this situation has been as presented by fully
presented by either side in my experience. There's a phenomenon

(44:22):
and this is probably about ninety percent female, but men
do it on occasion as well. But men only have
race that they can use, whereas women have well and disability,
whereas women have gender as well. And that is gift
card seeking or compensation seeking where the individual will come

(44:48):
into an establishment and they'll they'll behave in an aggressive
or essentially taunting manner or otherwise bad behavior manner toward
people that are there. Like I had a lady come
in and when I was I worked as a coffee

(45:11):
steward at speedway and I had a lady come in,
look over at me, wait until I was watching, and
then deliberately pull a pot of coffee from a brewer
that was actively brewing coffee, so coffee was coming out
and going into the pot, and she pulled the pot,
so there was a huge mess. And then as soon

(45:32):
as I went over and cleaned it up, she went
to complain to the manager that I had implied that
she had done something wrong, and when that didn't get
her a gift card, she called corporate and accused me
of being aggressive and everything, and it was all because
she was female and because this or because that, and
none of it had anything to do with what actually happened. Now,

(45:56):
at that time, there was nobody filming anything, and there
wasn't a camera trained on the on the actual site
of the coffee bankers, so nothing could be proved either way.
So I didn't get in trouble, but she did get
a gift card. I was told that she did get
a gift card and that I was not to interact

(46:16):
with that customer again, you know, So when she came in,
I had to stop what I was doing and go
in the background and go do some other task. But
then if I didn't finish my work because she's out
in the front room, I would get in trouble for
not getting stuff done right. So this is a common practice.
You go in, you heckle, you, you know, behave aggressively,

(46:41):
as long as you're not actually threatening right, as long
as you don't lay a hand on somebody, as long
as you don't you know, do anything you can get
into legal trouble for or get kicked out for. And
of course the company gives you ten bucks to fifty bucks.
I had a coworker that got fired and the customer

(47:03):
was given fifty bucks because when he rang up a large,
larger than normal amount on a credit card, she checked
his ID and he made something racial out of it,
even though she did that with many customers, and there
was evidence that that was that was true, and it
had absolutely nothing to do with race or sex or

(47:25):
any other demographic. So when I see this as a
presented as a common conflict between a white employee and
any non white demographic or in other other news stories
where it's been a male employee and some female and demographic,

(47:48):
I'm skeptical that this was organic. And I suspect that
this couple was was compensation seeking. Now I don't have
any other evident of that, like there's not something I've
read online about this specific case or anything like that.
But yeah, it's a common practice, and I suspect very

(48:13):
strongly that this is a story of that that particular
type of behavior, and we're never going to find out.
And it mostly works best when the person seeking compensation
like that is female. And I've known companies that have
had a deal with women who do this over and
over again, and basically the company never makes any money

(48:38):
off of that woman because every time she comes in,
she goes back out, and whatever she spent, she makes
complaints until she gets gift cards and other discounts and
close to or at the amount that she spent, basically
using up all of the difference between what the company
spent serving her and what they made from her. And

(49:02):
it's it's really the cheaper the food place, the more
frequently this kind of behavior is tolerated. And at a
place like Cinnabon, I imagine that they probably see this all
the time. Starbucks probably sees it all the time. McDonald's,
I know sees it all the time because I've seen
people doing it when I was a kaffle house. Waffle house. Well,

(49:24):
you know what happens at waffle house is they just
throw chairs and if you if you can't catch it
and toss it aside, you're fucked, right, and then waffle
house fires you for being attacked and and so on.
But it's funny. There's a waffle house down the street

(49:45):
from one of the homes that I work at, and
the last last time I needed to ask somebody to
to give me a ride there instead of driving my
own vehicle. We we go past that waffle house and
there's six six cop cars in the parking lot, lights
flashing like it was difficult to drive past the place

(50:05):
because the light blinded you to the light on the road.
And we never did find out what happened. But yeah,
this is you know, once in a blue moon, somebody
makes a legitimate complaint, like McDonald's having their four thousand
degree coffee. That doesn't have to be that hot to
be safe, right, But you know, most of the time,

(50:27):
most of the time, it's just somebody who rudes themselves
into a reaction that they can use or complains about
perfectly legitimate behavior and then gets paid. So I have
all the sympathy in the world for people who are

(50:49):
actual victims of racial incidents or sexist incidents. You know,
mostly that's men. This guy's intimidating me. Really, what did
he do? He stood less, you know, less than twenty
feet away from me. That's intimidation. Uh, and and and such.
But I don't I don't believe that a trained worker

(51:17):
at a fast food place, which uh you know, cinebun
is fast dessert, gave anybody a rough time over politely
being asked to add more of a condiment to the food.
It's it's insane to ask anybody to believe that. It'd

(51:38):
be like being told that somebody went on a racist
rant because somebody asked for extra ketchup on their burger.
I'm calling bullshit. Yeah, I don't.

Speaker 1 (51:48):
Believe it, saying the people who recorded it were the
couple the right, the Muslim couple, so they it starts
right in the middle of whatever is going on.

Speaker 2 (51:58):
So this is the thing, like we don't know what
happened before, right.

Speaker 3 (52:01):
Right, But I don't believe the story that all they
did was ask for some some carameulnt or whatever it was.

Speaker 2 (52:09):
But I think that stuff is anyways.

Speaker 3 (52:12):
So right, well, it's it. They may have been asking
to get it for free, because yes, they didn't think
she put on enough. But even then, like I worked
worked in food source service according to your training, like
we customer serviced out things that we wouldn't ordinarily just
give the customer if somebody was mad, because it's worth

(52:35):
it for the company. If the customer isn't complaining, right,
somebody comes along and says, I, the last half inch
of my cup is empty from from the cappuccina machine.
I didn't get my money's worth. I want I want
this free. And there you can see that they're willing
to argue it. Nine times out of ten, the manager

(52:56):
is going to say, all right, well, customer service that
out for you. And you know, unless the person habitually
comes in and does that over and over again, uh,
you know, or some some other thing like that, they
don't nobody is uh nobody's gonna act like this woman
acted over something like that. It's just not I don't

(53:20):
believe it. Like I said, having having worked in this industry,
I'm calling bullshit. This is this is not as it's
been presented by either side, you know, at the other
end of it, like I I've had incidents where somebody
pushed or shoved me where so I got knocked down

(53:40):
in a strong armed robbery. I've had at a woman
stand there two inches away from me and yell at me.
There was a woman that came in the She would
she would literally reach around things in order to get
your attention by patting you on the boobs, and and
like I would, I'd you're coming, and I'd pick up

(54:01):
a box just to see how hard I could make
her work for it. You know, Like I didn't get
upset about it because there wasn't anything else she was doing.
She was just putting her fingertips on my boob. But
and I would do the same thing if it was
a dude, because I thought it was funny. But she
felt she could get away with it because she was
a woman. And you know, if I'd have complained about it,

(54:22):
I would have sounded crazy because she was a woman.
And my response, generally speaking, and most of us that
I you know, worked in that store or that worked
in other stores that I've worked with, our response is
to weather the situation. You know, let the person scream
and yell, let them stomp their feet, let it you know,

(54:43):
help them as best you can be respectful back to
them no matter how they behave and then go into
the break room and cry or make fun of them
when they're not listening, you know, and things like that,
and you know, complain to the manager or yourself that
you know, this individual has been coming in and behaving

(55:04):
X Y Z way towards you most of the time.
You just you just just deal with it. None of
this racist rant, none of that. So I this woman
had to have been really antagonized in order for her
to behave this way at the risk of her job.

(55:25):
And these similarly, these I think these people that did
this were seeking money and they were probably accustomed to
getting it. Yeah, they didn't.

Speaker 2 (55:37):
Remember she's the one who got fired.

Speaker 1 (55:39):
They just got like called names and they made a
bunch of money.

Speaker 2 (55:43):
She did too, but she doesn't have jobs.

Speaker 3 (55:45):
So I will bet you the company also they probably
complained to the company, and the company probably also gave
them money because that does happen. And they're probably they've
probably done this before, and they've probably gotten gift card.

Speaker 2 (56:00):
And Somalians don't scam anybody. What are you talking about, Hannah,
That doesn't happen down there. I don't know why they
ship whole.

Speaker 3 (56:09):
Country and and women in particular never to it.

Speaker 2 (56:12):
Yeah, they never.

Speaker 3 (56:14):
An incredibly common way for for certain types of women.
Uh And and there's not a particular color or particular
other demographic. It's just females in general, but a certain
personality type. Uh, dishonest women that they get their Christmas
money that way. You know, I got a discount card

(56:34):
for this place because I complain, and I got a
coupon from this place because I complain, and so on,
like I have seen that multiple times. So yeah, that's
that's probably what's going on here too. Uh And And
until companies develop a backbone where women are concerned, that's

(56:57):
not going to change, and people like this are going
to be thrown under the bus on the regular because
of it. I don't think that this woman was thrown
under the bus because she was white. I think that
she was thrown under the bus because the couple was dissatisfied.
But just saying and they were female. Now, I think

(57:19):
this woman made money for being a victim of this
type of behavior because she was white and because she
was female. And I don't think very often you see,
they don't usually fire black people or Hispanic people when

(57:42):
when they do something like this. I have seen workers
in this position who are not white. I've been present
when workers in this position who are not white have
threatened to take the customer out back and beat them
because I am in Dayton, Ohio and we are rednext

(58:04):
here no matter what color we are, and that employee
did not get fired. Yeah, so yeah, all right.

Speaker 2 (58:14):
Mike, Do you have any thoughts?

Speaker 5 (58:16):
I do. I'm gonna I'm gonna focus on the language
aspect of all of this. Identity politics is a fucked
up enough subject already, but it broadens out into general semiotics,
which is very often my personal bugbear, because I'm something
of a word nerd, and semiotics is the nuts and
bolts of identity politics, after all, and I really don't

(58:39):
like it when the beauty of language is misused in
various layers, misused to retard us. Language is supposed to
be there to accelerate us normally. I'm not a proponent
of accelerationism because usually accelerationism entails escalation, escalation to the

(59:00):
point of violence, which is wrong. Whosoever takes it as
far as violence should be shunned and ostracized and frankly
deserves whatever violence happens to them in retribution. It's destructive,
it's counterproductive, it's low IQ bullshit. But when it comes
to words, it's different because a word is not an

(59:21):
act of violence. And I'm not talking about putting a
series of words together that amounts to a death threat
or a call to violence. I'm talking about syllables that
come together to form a single word. Like I said
in my last video, and like I've been saying ever
since I learned to talk, a word by itself is

(59:44):
not offensive unless you choose to be offended by it.
A word can be insulting, but only if it's a
negative description. Calling someone stupid is insulting. Calling someone ugly
is insulting. Someone hateful is insulting. That's something for everyone
to bear in mind. But referring to someone by their

(01:00:06):
nationality or their ethnicity, it's not insulting by itself. It's
not insulting to call someone an Anglo. I find it
rather amusing whenever Scottish people do that, because Scottish people
are Anglos. Like, yes, I am an Anglo, and so
are you? You dope becut Calling someone a cheese eating,

(01:00:30):
surrender monkey is only half insulting. The surrender monkey is
the insulting part of it. It's used against the French
by other Europeans, other Europeans who invariably also eat cheese.
We all eat cheese.

Speaker 3 (01:00:46):
You know.

Speaker 5 (01:00:47):
It's like black people calling each other nigger. It's not
an insult, and if it is, it's rather retarded one,
and it's no more insulting when it comes from anyone else,
such as this white lady. You can be like, what
does nigger mean? It means black person? Okay, well, yes

(01:01:08):
I am one of those. What's your point? Well, my
point is it's an offensive word for a black person.
Oh well, in that case, I'm offended.

Speaker 2 (01:01:18):
You see what I mean.

Speaker 5 (01:01:19):
You don't need to get offended by someone prompting you
to be offended. It's like someone saying you there, I
here by order you to feel hurt. Okay, I hear,
by feel hurt. It's fucking retarded. It's impossible for anyone
to hurt you with a word unless you give them

(01:01:40):
complete and express permission to do so. So maybe don't
do that. But I've been saying this for years and
nobody listens and it's because that's not actually quite what's
going on most of the time. The truth is, people
don't feel hurt by these words. If anything, they like

(01:02:00):
of hearing them because it gives them a reason to
hurt the person saying them. Like the lady behind the
camera at the cinema incident, so you you're you're ruining
your life? She yeah, I'm going to you. She didn't
feel hurt at all. She was delighted to hear that
word because now she gets to ruin someone's life like that.

(01:02:22):
It's like in that episode of The Boondogs where the
teacher calls Riley uh nigger. Riley acts all outraged in public,
but behind the scenes he's ecstatic. He's jumping on the nose,
high fiving everyone and having the time of his life
because it means he's going to get a payload. I
know it's fiction, but many a true word is spoken
in jess and that is what happens. That is how

(01:02:44):
it goes down. But as it happens nowadays, there's been
a turnaround. On top of a turnaround. It's not just
the person who hears the word who gets a payout.
It's also the person who says the word first with
Charlo Hendrix. Now is this chick. It's a worrying prospect,
isn't it? You too, can make a one hundred thousand
dollars if you go viral blasting out the bad word.

(01:03:10):
I mean, it's not that people are getting black fatigue.
They're getting nagger fatigue. They're second tired of being nagged
into not saying certain words, and with good reason. It's
fucking retarded. No one's actually offended. They're just looking for
a payload. And at this stage people aren't even being offensive.

(01:03:32):
They're looking for a payload. What's the only way out
of this retarded mess? Like I said, accelerationism. If everyone
just said these words all the time like they're nothing,
they will lose all their power. That's the only way
to wait. To make them lose all their power. They
will become normal words that have no special effect on anyone.

(01:03:54):
There'll be no more offensive than the word butterfly. Try it,
when you see a butterfly. Go look at that flappy
little nigger. It's majestic. Oh, look the sun has come out.
Look at the sun. Look at that hot, shiny nigger.
What a beautiful day. It'll sound weird for a while,
but eventually we'll get used to it. And once we

(01:04:16):
get used to it, the novelty will wear off. It'll
be just like any other word, and it will no
longer be an international scandal every time someone says a
fucking word. It should never be a scandal of any
magnitude when someone says a fucking word, never mind a
scandal that makes millionaires of whosoever said it and whosoever

(01:04:39):
heard it. Seriously, you all need to put your big
girl panties on and grow the fuck up. Imagine a
world where anyone can just say any word and it
doesn't fucking matter. What a wonderful world that would be.
What a fun, chilled out, mature environment that would make

(01:05:00):
fucking a boy can dream. But all the boy can
do is dream when he's surrounded by cunts.

Speaker 2 (01:05:09):
I said, we're going to bring that word back. Yeah,
I mean, I get I'm with you. Like the word.

Speaker 1 (01:05:15):
But the thing is, this is why it won't be
normalized because it has a lot of power, and so
it and and it's supposed to have that power. I mean,
it's the power to make you tens of thousands of
dollars apparently, so I think that if if there is
any silver lining, it is that we will get to
a point where that word will lose its power because

(01:05:36):
it will be overused. And that's what needs to happen
in my opinion. But one other thing about this, and
I thought was interesting. Two other things. Actually, First, let's
talk a little bit about the power of that word.
So there was another incident that I considered bringing up
that was related to this story, which involved a high

(01:05:57):
profile case from Portland, Oregon, where a black man, Gary Edwards,
who was a homeless man in Portland, it's basically just
a Portland resident, was acquitted on October thirty first of
second degree assault charges for stabbing a white man, Gregory
Howard Junior, in the shoulder on July eighth, near a

(01:06:17):
public beach and light rail stop. Edwards admitted to the stabbing,
cleaning self defense, testifying that Howard immediately yelled the N
word upon seeing him, instilling fear of an imminent attack.
So and we don't even know if it was actually
said because there was no evidence. So we have a
case where a black man stabbed a white man could

(01:06:40):
have killed him. Maybe he would have. I don't know
if like the white guy didn't get out of there,
and instead of the black man going to jail for
you know, stabbing someone with a knife, he got off
because the dude called me a name. He called me
the most powerful insult on earth that lets you be
immute to crime. And this is the kind of thing

(01:07:02):
that you see people will like, you'll get like a
violent incident and then someone will investigate him like, well,
he called me a name, so I had to do something.
And it's not like fighting words or anything. And again,
we don't even know if this really happened. So we
have one incident where you're involving a man and he
gets stabbed for his trouble and the guy who stabs
him gets off. And you have another incident involving a

(01:07:22):
woman who gets like loses her job, but she makes
like one hundred grand and she's probably gonna make even more.
So this is another sort of expression of that that
I thought was really interesting. The other thing I was
gonna bring up is that Harry Sisen got in on
this when this broke because he saw racism. So he
was like, oh yeah, absolutely, like maga conservative whatever, because

(01:07:44):
that's what that's what these people think.

Speaker 2 (01:07:46):
Folks, check this out. Another Trump supporter has been caught on.

Speaker 4 (01:07:50):
Camera being racist and a total piece of trash to
a Somalian couple in Wisconsin.

Speaker 1 (01:07:58):
So again, somebody was being racist in his opinion, automatically
a Trump supporter, but turns out she was a Biden
and Harris supporter.

Speaker 2 (01:08:08):
This is her lawn. Women's choice is on the ballot,
vote Democrat. So there you go. Well, I know, but
again and again, I wouldn't.

Speaker 1 (01:08:20):
I wouldn't care like I don't. I don't have to
make these arguments for what party person belongs to. But
this is the tactic these people use.

Speaker 3 (01:08:30):
The actual party that matters. It's the dishonesty that matters. Yeah,
there's another thing here. If if it had been one
of those incidents like where the one chick at the
fast food place I was at threatened to take the
customer out in the back parking lot and beat her
ass was black, and that had been this incident, he

(01:08:54):
wouldn't have assumed she was a Trump supporter, even even female.
Or foot was a white guy, he still might have.

Speaker 2 (01:09:03):
Well, yeah, Harry System lies at his job.

Speaker 3 (01:09:05):
He's a propagandas, but not a black guy. He wouldn't
have assumed, No.

Speaker 1 (01:09:09):
Well, there are white guys that look like black guys
that are bombing the you know, the DNC, So like
this the mistaken identity at.

Speaker 3 (01:09:21):
The point is he assumed she was a Trump supporter
because she was white.

Speaker 2 (01:09:25):
Yeah, she was.

Speaker 3 (01:09:27):
A woman, and she got fired because she was white.

Speaker 2 (01:09:31):
Mm hmm, no for sure.

Speaker 1 (01:09:34):
So anyway, I just thought, like again, like most things,
it's not that simple. So I'm just sort of like
showing you all. But like there's like the what people
jump to conclusions on, and then there's the truth.

Speaker 2 (01:09:47):
There's a theme.

Speaker 1 (01:09:48):
Today, like a lot of the stories are like, you know,
misinformation or like sprinkled in misinformation for the purpose of
crafting a larger narrative of like who the enemy is
and the mistakes and in them getting caught because we
live in the time of social media where we can
get information, we can get confirmation or at least like
question what's being presented, and that's a good thing. So anyway,

(01:10:13):
we're gonna move on to the next story. But I
just thought I would share that and if there's like
any interesting developments, I'll I'll follow up. But okay, we
got to talk about timpoole. So oh, did we get
another one? Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, oh he did,
I got Let me find it, let me find it.

Speaker 2 (01:10:31):
Okay.

Speaker 1 (01:10:32):
Remember when various businesses had their polaroid pictures of those
who wrote hot checks. Perhaps that should be implemented for
disagreeable customers.

Speaker 3 (01:10:41):
I would be for that, by the way, especially if
they if they get a gift card from a corporation
when they when they complain.

Speaker 2 (01:10:50):
Mm hmmm.

Speaker 3 (01:10:52):
I would be for if if you got a serial complainer,
Uh yeah, that that there should be a wall of
shame for that.

Speaker 1 (01:10:58):
Absolutely, yeah, absolutely, Okay, Well, let us know what you
guys think about this one of the comments. We're gonna
move on. So this one's given to me by Mike Jay.
Thank you, Mike Podcast. Political commentator and operator of Timcasts
Irl Tim Poole has revealed on Twitter slash x that

(01:11:19):
Saturday quote a vehicle approached our property and open fire.
No one was hurt. Our security team is reviewing the
incident and will be relaying the report to appropriate law enforcement.
This is the price we pay for speaking out against
evil end quote. This is sadly not a new occurrence
for Pool, as his property has been swatted over a
dozen times and there has been at least one other

(01:11:42):
instance of gunfire in or around his property due to trespassing.
In the hours after the attack. Poole further shared his
thoughts on Twitter slash x, saying, quote, my immediate thoughts
is someone is trying to scare us, but we have
a security gate and armed guards, and it's possible this
deterred something more serious.

Speaker 2 (01:12:02):
End quote.

Speaker 1 (01:12:04):
So before I get into the rest of Mike Jay's rider,
because he goes into like a broader conversation about leftist violence,
because that's what this is. And they accused Pool by
the way of being a conservative commentator. I don't know
if you guys know, but Tim Pool is far from that.
He is the the the king of the fence sitters okay,
and I'm okay with it. I respect it, I get it,

(01:12:26):
but not at all what their painting them as. But
this is another case of what I've been saying where
they basically like they what's the saying go, They don't
they don't say you are a Nazi because they they
they they don't try to kill you because you're a Nazi.
They call you a Nazi so they can kill you.
So it's it's well, that's all it is. Paint him
with the negative brush of right wing conservative, white male whatever, racist, sexist, homophobic,

(01:12:52):
and then just wait, wait until some nut job acts
on it. And so what we have to do, in
my opinion, is destigmatize the things. Stop giving a shit.
If someone is conservative. It doesn't mean they're the devil.
It just means they have views and you might agree
and you might not, because the things that people are
just not that simple. So they labeled him this thing

(01:13:13):
like maga conservative, right wing blah blah blah, and someone
tried to do something, and so Tim Poole is here.
Some people have claimed that this isn't real, and again,
all we can do is take what he has said.
I don't see any reason why Timpole would lie. I
know that he is generally concerned about safety because I

(01:13:34):
remember covering her story a while back where Andy no
who reports on Antifa in the Portland area, went to
do some reporting and he was attacked by Antifa and
he had like some brain damage or some a concussion.
He was seriously, yeah, he had serious injuries. And Tim

(01:13:56):
Poole sort of finger wagged and said he shouldn't have
done that. And I gave Timpole shit for it because
I said that, like, you know, the journalists, what they
do is extremely crucial. And Andy knows a grown ass man,
and he knew the risks that was involved in going
to these places. And I back him up for that,

(01:14:16):
and I think i I've been vindicated because since then,
you know, there have been arrests and and he knows
done the rounds, and he's written books and he's okay.
But the point is is that if we don't confront evil,
then like you know, this shit's just going to keep happening.
And that's what I was saying. You can't hide in
your compound. But that being said, I'm not saying that

(01:14:36):
Tempole was never in danger because again, like Mike Jay said,
he had been swatted several times. And now Timpole has
like a wife and a child, So I think that
this is putting him in a different state of mind,
especially in the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination and the
multiple assassination attempts on Trump and other politicians. Right, so

(01:14:58):
we're looking at the big picture. There's a lot going
on here. And anyway, so Temple's kind of like he
goes on a rant here because and this is sort
of not related, but I thought i'd bring it up.
Candice Owens has basically like been like, let's say, she's
been putting tip. She put Temple in one of her
thumbnails and it suggested that he's like incahoots with the

(01:15:21):
people who killed Charlie Kirk in some way, even though
she doesn't explicitly say it, but because she uses this
kind of click baity imagery to get people to watch,
Temple was not happy about that.

Speaker 2 (01:15:32):
And so I'm gonna play a bit of this clip.

Speaker 4 (01:15:34):
Organization that's rallying young people, causing a shift in the
political leanings of a generation for the first time in
history is now in dire straits. Their leader and founder murdered,
and prominent pieces of human trash are trying to destroy it.
It's it's fucking evil. So you know what, when someone
pulls in front of my property and fires on it

(01:15:55):
several times, I'm sitting here looking at these vile pieces
of shit and thinking to myself, or what purpose will
I stick my neck out if this is what happens.
If it Charlie Kirk is killed. Kennis Owens is a
fucking evil scumbag. She is a degenerate cunt. She is
burning everything down, and she's gloating and smiling while she

(01:16:17):
does it. And you know what, you fucking told me.
She has no security. She has a fucking deal with
the shit we have to deal with. She's a piece
of shit. She's making everyone else suffer. And all of
these fucking conservatives out there that send me these fucking
messages have no fucking balls to call her out. More
and more people have started doing it. They send me
these fucking messages. Good for you, Tim, Good for you, Tim.

(01:16:40):
I wasn't the first person to do it. I'm not
gonna take credit for that. But don't fucking dm me
like I did something for you as you cower, as
you fucking cower, scared that she'll put you on her
thumbnail and claim you benefited from Charlie Kirk's assassination, which
she's doing to me right fucking now. I'm fucking done
with these people.

Speaker 2 (01:17:00):
She has security, just not on the level of you.

Speaker 4 (01:17:02):
Oh yeah, the one fat guy you mentioned with no
wall and no barrier in a suburban neighbor with neighbors,
shouldn't give two fucking shits. No one's out for her.
She's lying about all of this. You told me you
went to her house and she's got a four foot
wall and one fat guy and she doesn't give a
shit about a security.

Speaker 1 (01:17:18):
All Right, I'm pausing it there, So like this tell
I mean, he doesn't normally get that upset. So that
makes me think that what, like the danger was real
and that it's very concerning. So and just so to
like sort of drive it home because I don't like
this both sides shit, Like, there are people that are
killing people and then there are people who disagree with people.

(01:17:41):
It's not the same guys, but anyway. A recent survey
released by the Young America's Foundation concerning the assassination of
Charlie Kirk found that while seventy percent of those asked
believe there is never any justification for murdering someone due
to their viewpoints, seventy percent is not a high number
when you think about the moral implications here. Two percent

(01:18:03):
claimed that Charlie Kirk brought about his own murder due
to his viewpoints to some extent. A separate survey conducted
by the Pew Research Center post kirk assassination found that
eighty five percent of Americans believe that political violence is rising,
and this is it's it's related because this guy is

(01:18:24):
you know, he's moderate as fuck to an annoying degree
to be honest, but still a target. It's almost like
it doesn't matter how extreme you think people can get,
because the people were up against will kill you anyway.
They don't care. They only care about how effective you are,

(01:18:45):
and Temple is pretty effective. So I think this is
like worth bringing up and uh yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:18:53):
So those are my thoughts on that.

Speaker 5 (01:18:55):
Maybe it's a maybe it's a blessing in disguise how
apparently ineffective we are. Maybe it's a blessing in disguise
that we haven't had in ICMI in public since twenty nineteen.
I'm starting to wonder if it'll ever be safe to
have one again. There was a there was a mines
conference in Philadelphia shortly after that. I seem Timple was

(01:19:17):
there and Sagon and a bunch of other you know,
big shots. After that, we all crammed into a small
bar and got all sweaty and drank a selection of
craft hypas. It was fun, but I recall there there
was a roving band of Antifa thugs kind of circling
the venue. At the time, it was all sort of

(01:19:38):
what the hell is going on? Do we need to
be worried? And I remember thinking, you know, one efficient,
coordinated attack and they could do a hell of a
lot of damage. It's not like we're in a convention
center in Anaheim, like at a vidcom two years before that.
We were just in a bar, just crammed together like
sheep sheep with an accumulated total of several million subscribers,

(01:20:02):
like one stout bomb, one sudden fire, and just like that,
we'd all be dead and there'd be a huge gap
in the rebellion against the ucophobic empire. Would we ever
recover from that kind of massacre? Yes, it's the thing.
We would. It's easy to get the impression that there's

(01:20:24):
only a handful of handful of us out here, because
there's only so many voices you can listen to in
the small hours of your spare time. But the fact
is there's millions of us. We're hungry to listen and
we're hungry to talk, and as long as people are listening,
there will be people talking. They went after Charlie Kirk

(01:20:45):
because he was big. They went after Tim Poole because
he's big, but they're never gonna come after us here
at Honey Badger Radio because of the where it's small there,
and you know there are thousands of small fry operations
just like and they can't kill us all. So yeah,
take heart, my fellow rejects, my fellow unapproachable space leapers.

(01:21:10):
They could take out the biggest person and then the
next biggest person and the next biggest person after that,
but that's just going to leave behind a dispersed resistance.
You know why they couldn't bring down gamer Gate because
gamer Gate didn't have any leaders, It didn't have a headquarters,
it didn't have a nucleus. It was like a sea sponge.

(01:21:35):
You could blow a dozen holes in it. You could.
You could put it in a blender and blast it
into a fine goo, but it will still reform itself,
sell by sell. That's what we that's what we need
to be. Not a titanic beast with a heart that
you can strike with a harpoon, but a swarm of microorganisms.

(01:21:59):
You might go in to this thinking I'll never be
as big as Tim Poole, But my friend, that's a
good thing. You need a six million dollar security detail
to be as big as Tim Poole fucky. You don't
want that in your life, but you can be one
of millions of small voices chipping away at this well.

(01:22:20):
We call it the blob for a reason. Our enemy
is also a swarm of microorganisms. That's why it's so resilient.
We need to be resilient in the same way. So yeah,
make your voices heard, folks, even if nobody's listening. We've
been sword fighting against a fart for too long. It's

(01:22:43):
time to become a fart, one that smells worse than
the fart we're fighting, or smells better. Whatever. Do you
ever hear yourself talk and wonder how the you got here? Well,
not me, I know exactly what I'm doing. I'm a
fat particle eavy roll.

Speaker 3 (01:23:03):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (01:23:04):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:23:08):
My first foray into the politics of or the violence
of politics, I shouldn't say the politics of violence, but
the violence of politics was was due to a small
town controversy. My mom was on the city council in
my community when I was growing up, and there was

(01:23:28):
a controversy over who was going to be the chief
of police, and it was it was small town bullshit.
Mostly it involved a false allegation. It involved people's opinions
about the DEA drugs, locals, non locals, and men in general. Right.

(01:23:54):
But one of the things that has always stood out
to me that occurred during this controversy is that there
people who were angered by the ensuing hearing and the
evidence coming out to the degree that that they went
after the investigators. My mom was the main investigator. She

(01:24:16):
was trying to get to the bottom of what was
really going on, who really should be the chief of
police in our community? Did somebody do something illegal or
unethical or even just questionable, and who did and what
should be done about it? That was her whole purpose

(01:24:37):
and in investigating, and it was it was quite an
interesting experience when people became violent toward her side of
the investigation, the what the fuck actually happened and what

(01:24:57):
should we do about it side of the investigation. They
didn't attack her, the adult woman who they were pissed
off at for investigating the situation. They attacked her teenage son,
her underage teenage son by following him around town while

(01:25:19):
he was driving and civilians behaving in an intimidating manner
and involved police officers going to his girlfriend's house to
meet him there and hand him a ticket for something
that he allegedly did at some point during his trip
through town where there were no police. And Nope, they

(01:25:44):
didn't go after her. They went after him. Why Because
if you go after a woman, she's a victim. Right.
If you go after a man, he must have done
something to deserve it. If you go after a boy,
nobody questions you. He must have done I'm paying to
deserve it, right, So I have some predictions regarding this. You,

(01:26:07):
Candace Owens, we knew, gamer Gate knew, and I tried.
I gave her the entire extent of my benefit of
the doubt that she might have become a better person
after the social autopsy bullshit, And it turns out that
she did not, right. And I haven't been listening to

(01:26:27):
her whole investigation into the Charlie Kirk Marty because it's
Candace Owans, and I don't trust her, even even with
the entire benefit of the doubt, like she I've so
run out of benefit of the doubt that she got extra.
She used extra and uh, you know, I hoped, I

(01:26:49):
actually gave her hope and and and uh no, no,
she stepped all over that so I haven't really been
paying attention to her investigation because of that, I haven't
been paying attention to her presentation of evidence or any
of that. I noticed that her titles are always clickbaity too,
but you kind of have to do that. Ours are two,

(01:27:10):
you know, now, you kind of have to do that,
or the YouTube algorithm just buries your shit. But I
also noticed that everything that she has promised and everything
that she has said, everything she's saying on X, it's
all clickbaity, And she keeps promising to drop bombshells, and

(01:27:31):
then after she makes these promises, the only comments I
see are about how that wasn't really a bombshell. It
was interesting information, and there may be are things to
debate about it, it's not really a bombshell, right, So
clearly she's doing the female thing of attention seeking and

(01:27:53):
making it more about herself than the investigation or the
subject of the investigation. And at the same time, she
has zero problems with painting a big fucking bullseye on
someone for questioning her, because that's someone happens to be male.

(01:28:17):
She's been in slap fights with other people. She's had
slap fights with other female celebrities. I remember she had
a pretty big one with Three House News, and at
no point did she treat it as a threatening situation

(01:28:38):
where she was proclaiming herself the victim of threats or
any other such you know, bullshit that might paint a
bullseye a target on her opponent. She had a similar
fight with one of the Fox News anchors I can't
remember which, but one of the female ones I know

(01:29:00):
it wasn't Shannon breem Get. I can't see her getting
herself into any anything like that, and anybody on the
other side of that would be viewed as as the
same as somebody who kicked a kitten anyway. But in
any case, she doesn't seem to do that when she's
in a slap fight with another woman, But she did

(01:29:20):
it when she was in a slap fight with a man,
didn't she. Because she can get away with it. Nobody's
going to criticize a woman that does that, except for
maybe me and a few other honey badgers. And nobody's
going to care about him because he's a man, except
for me and a few other honey badgers, who will

(01:29:41):
care about him because he's a man, And who will
care about him, because you shouldn't be doing that to
other people in your slap fights. Right now, regarding the
whole statement about evil and bullshit, you know, yeah, it
is pretty evil to exploit somebody death for clicks. And

(01:30:02):
if that's what's going on with Candice, fuck her right
then and there. If she's investigating something legitimate, lay your
goddamn cards on the table, make enough people convinced that
you get on some news program and stop targeting your critics.
Because if you're if all you're gonna sit there and

(01:30:22):
do is target your critics and you're not, you know,
you're not going to bring the proof, then I'm gonna
believe and the layman in general is gonna believe that
you are just exploiting somebody's death for clicks, which is despicable.
It's it's more pathetic than evil. Evil at least is

(01:30:47):
somewhat somewhat motivated and directed, even if it's just motivated
and directed for for personal gain. Right, But this, this
is this is retarded, This is pathetic, This is beneath
any adult. And people shot at his house. A drive

(01:31:13):
by shooting resulted from this. Fortunately nobody actually got hit.
Fortunately none of the bullets found a window, but that's
not always what happens. It's bullshit that nobody is outraged

(01:31:35):
about this. It's bullshit that individuals who confront lies and
evil have to deal with violence against them. Do I
have to agree with everything Tim Pole says to say that,
I don't think so. I want you to remember the

(01:32:00):
number of men in media who have been through something
like what he just went through versus the number of women.
I can only think of one woman off the top
of my head, and I can't think of her name.
Fox News anchor that and they didn't come to her.
She went to them. By the way, she was in

(01:32:20):
the middle of a violent and dangerous environment when she
experienced violence that was directed at her because she was
behaving in a manner that women are expected to not
behave in that area. They didn't come to her house.
She went to them. But you know, Tucker Carlson had

(01:32:41):
his house surrounded and threatened to the degree that his
wife and children had to hide in an interior room
and call police. The Men's rights movement has had bomb threats.
I think that's correct, MARLINN. Laura Logan. She went into

(01:33:03):
a war zone, if I remember right, that was she
wasn't just in but she was definitely in an environment
where she put herself in danger. So it was closer
to Andy No than what Pool experienced. But they came
to his house, they came to Tucker Carlson's house. That's

(01:33:24):
what men experience, and when they complain about it, then
people treat them like their whimps for complaining about it.
You know, it's it shouldn't be that level of risk
for them to have those statements, that those opinions and
make those statements, but it is, and it is because

(01:33:45):
they are men. So in terms of what's been going on.
In my opinion, yeah, this is something that Kansas Candice
should take accountability for. She won't, she won't apologize, she

(01:34:06):
won't admit that she's contributed to this happening, and nobody
will criticize her for failing to admit that and for
changing her approach to debate between herself and Pool. And

(01:34:28):
this will probably happen to him again because he will
piss people off again, and you know it shouldn't And
I would say the same thing if he was the
furthest left wing person on the planet saying all kinds
of bullshit about people being infected with isms and phobias.
He's not advocating for violence, he's not asking for violence.

(01:34:51):
He just happens to be a male stating of his
opinions and he happens to have a large audience. And
that's it.

Speaker 1 (01:35:04):
All right, thank you for that, And now, yeah, I
want to know what you guys think about this story. Also,
I only brought up Candace because what happened was Tim
thinks that one of the things that may have brought
this attack is Candace does have a lot of followers.
In her thumbnail it she had a picture of Timpole,

(01:35:25):
which seems to connect him to, you know, something damning.
Of course, she doesn't really present any evidence in the
video itself. I didn't watch it, but this is what
Tempole says. He watched it, but it doesn't matter because
there's an implication, and that's the problem.

Speaker 2 (01:35:42):
It's a clickbaity thumbnail. But I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:35:44):
Maybe he was just on edge because of what happened
and he's just trying to figure out where it came from.
But anyway, Meredith g ohwe got a couple of supershows here.
Richard Pierre gave us five and said, since Candace started
her true crime series about Charlie's. There has been a
lot of a shortage of red yarn and pushbins. Are
these two things connected?

Speaker 2 (01:36:05):
Maybe? Thank you, Mary.

Speaker 1 (01:36:08):
The g gives us five dollars and says, HBr News
number five thirty. Sorry, I'm late to the party, got
out of work late. I'm not suspicious at all that.
A few weeks after, The Blaze runs a story identifying
a white woman who worked as Capital security as being
the pipe bomb, a woman who was filmed firing gas
canisters at the crowd that magically, the FBI finds a
thirty year old black man who supposedly has the mental

(01:36:29):
maturity of a sixty year old to charge for placing
the bombs. No, I'm not suspicious at all, all right,
that's that's fair as well. Richard Bierre then gives us
five dollars and says I heard the Candae operates a
tip line where the callers are charged fifteen hundred dollars
per minute to leave a voicemail tip in her various investigations.

Speaker 2 (01:36:50):
Thank you for that. I don't know that is that real?
Are you just being funny? All right?

Speaker 5 (01:36:57):
Something? Opt Jesus pointed out on I think Impole's show.
Who's who has benefited most from Charlie Kirk's death? It's
cand of Owens, isn't it. I guess, Yeah, she run
this story, I guess, the biggest story in history, and
she's boosted her profile something chronic. It makes you wonder,

(01:37:19):
doesn't it if? And maybe I shouldn't finish that sentence.
Well Temple did yell at me just now for not
going after her. But yeah, uh que bono is the answer?
Who benefits seems like a Candace. Maybe Candace kill Charlie.

Speaker 2 (01:37:36):
I mean maybe maybe maybe she when it happened. I mean,
I'm just saying.

Speaker 5 (01:37:41):
Maybe it was Candace. He shut at Temple's house as well.
I'm just asking questions.

Speaker 2 (01:37:47):
I'm just asking questions.

Speaker 1 (01:37:50):
All right, Well, anyway, none of this is medical advice.
I'm not a doctor, but anyway, Okay, we're gonna wrap
it up here, though, and thanks guys for coming on
the stream. Thank you to Mike Jay for helping me out,
Thank you Ta Hannah and Mike for contributing your thoughts
on these stories. And thank you guys most of all

(01:38:12):
again for tuning in. All Right, We're gonna head into
the Pagers show. Now we're gonna look at this opinion
piece entitled the Case for ending along mostly good Marriage,
because why not? Why not shake things up and destroy
your marriage and break up your family?

Speaker 2 (01:38:27):
Why not?

Speaker 1 (01:38:28):
And if you want to find out what wisdom awaits
in this New York Times opinion article, then go to
feed Thebadger dot com for last subscribe to set up
a monthly subscription five bucks a month. We'll get you
into discord where you'll be able to watch all the
additional content and partake in all of the various community activities.

Speaker 2 (01:38:45):
That are going on.

Speaker 1 (01:38:46):
All right, So, with all that said, thank you guys
so much for coming on today's episode of HBr News.
If you guys liked this video, please hit like subscribe
you're not already subscribed, hit the bellfal notifications, leave us
a comment, let us know what you guys think about
what we discussed on the show today, and share the
video because sharing is caring. With all that said, I
will see you all next Tuesday.