Young Republican Private Chat Leaks, RFK Talks Circumcision | HBR News 523

Welcome to HBR News where we give the badger treatment to the news of the week! This week we will be looking at the recent Young Republican leaks, California gubernatorial candidate Katie Porter's domestic abuse in focus, and more!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Into it.

Speaker 2 (00:05):
This is HBr News number five twenty three Young Republican
Private Chat Leaks RFK Talks Circumcision, where we discuss the
news of the week and give it the Badger treatment.
Hello everybody, I hope you're doing well this week, and
welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. I think I just

(00:28):
got that mixed up. It's okay, it's okay, it's fine.
We have a great show line up for you guys today,
so please be sure to continue the conversations both in
the chat as well as in the comments section. On
this week's HBr News, We're gonna be looking at the
recent Young Republican leaks that have been like making people's
heads explode online. California gubernatorial candidate Katie Porker is well.

Speaker 1 (00:54):
Apparently she's got a little bit of a purpose.

Speaker 2 (00:57):
No, oh, I'm I'm I actually, yeah, I'm misspoke Porter,
not Porker Porter.

Speaker 3 (01:03):
We'll go with that, sorry, Katie Porter. This memes are
created by serendipity. We're calling it Katie Porker.

Speaker 2 (01:11):
The Katie Porter thing is that it's gonna be really
interesting because there is what a lot of people online
have been talking about with regards to her and then
there's like something I found out thanks to some of
the really great people in the men's issues space and
more so, stick around, it's going to be a good
time and be sure to join us afterwards for the

(01:33):
Patron only show where we're looking at this article from CNN,
So you know this is not like a fringe little thing.
And apparently, guys, we are back boys. After years of
progress on gender, the male gaze is back.

Speaker 3 (01:49):
So the years of being blind and just trying to
focus our gaze entirely on Truon's we've finally gone. Actually
think I think we kind of women. Sorry, not sorry,
So what was that I mean? Against our better judgment.
We do prefer looking at women, and we do hate them.

(02:11):
We are all a bunch of misogynists, but for some
reason we find our eyes drifting in their direction, and
for some reason we can't quite help. You do know
what it is? I don't know what it is. It's like, yeah,
it's like God and our evolution have told us to
do this.

Speaker 2 (02:29):
Apparently a lot of it has to do with Sidney Sweeney,
but not only Sidney Sweeney. So don't let this photo
trick you. But I'm hoping that what we're gonna learn
in this CNN opinion piece is that women are the
ones that did this and it's their fault. But obviously
we know that's not what it's gonna be. It's gonna
be on men again because the male gaze. You guys

(02:50):
don't realize this. We're like, we're like the Medusa, like
the gorgon. We can stare at people and like change
reality with the male gaze.

Speaker 1 (03:00):
So anyway, so yeah, that'll be the Patron show.

Speaker 2 (03:03):
If you want to be a part of that conversation,
you have to become a badgery yourself, like going to
feed the Badger dot com ford slash subscribe to join
us and watch all the additional content. For example, Mike
and Alison just put out a super long like Lord
of the Rings length rageing and only the people who

(03:24):
are members or subscribers can watch it. So if you
guys want to check that out and all the other
Patron content, then go to feed the Badger dot com
for slash subscribe and set up a monthly subscription. And
if you don't want to wake up one morning to
find that we've been yeeded from the internet, then go
to Badgerfeed dot com. That's badgerfeed dot com. That's where

(03:44):
all of our content lives. Last thing I forgot to
mention upfront, I'm only it's just me and Mike today.
So it's a picklejar because Hannah is I don't think
she can make it to the show, which is why
she asked that we switch HBr Talk for HBr News
this week.

Speaker 3 (03:59):
It's up do mystic of you to assume that you
and I can fill a pickle jar between us and
you hear myself, I've given myself an image though I
didn't want that.

Speaker 2 (04:11):
But people are saying it's gonna be a half hour
long show. Well, I tend to be like pretty like
short and sweet because most of the opinions about the
topics come out of the write ups or the preparation
that I do up front. But we do have four stories,

(04:33):
and I think that they're they're you know, even the
show is shorter than normal. I think that there's some
stuff you guys could be discussing on these as well.

Speaker 1 (04:41):
So anyway, yeah, Hannah may show up.

Speaker 2 (04:43):
If she does, I will plug her voice in because
I control the audio because I control women, and we
won't know until she shows up. And maybe she'll show
up and I won't let her talk and I'll just
keep her unplugged. I don't know, we'll see. So anyway,
with that, are you listening? If if you're listening, the
and fucking jump in you, I mean I could make
I could give Lauren Hannah's voice. I could if she

(05:06):
wants to. But anyway, with all that said, let us
get into today's stories.

Speaker 1 (05:11):
So all right.

Speaker 2 (05:14):
So Katie Porter pictured here not porkard that was an
accident is a former US Democratic representative from California and
is currently running for governor against Gavin Newsom. She has
long portrayed herself as a survivor of domestic violence from
her ex husband, Matthew Hoffman, whom she accused in twenty

(05:36):
thirteen of physical and verbal abuse, including grabbing her hands,
screaming of obscenities, and shattering a light switch during an
argument while they were separated but still cohabitating. Porter secured
a temporary restraining order against him, citing incidents that endangered
her and her children, and she publicly shared her story
during her twenty eighteen congressional campaign to highlight her resilience

(05:59):
as a single. However, Hoffmann's reciprocal straighting order filing detailed
counter allegations of Porter's abusive behavior, claiming that she routinely
called him her husband, our ex husband, a fucking idiot,
and two fucking done to operate a cell phone. She
threw toys, books, and other objects at him, She smashed

(06:19):
the glass coffee pot in a rage over household cleanliness,
which is ironic, and most sensationally, dumped a steaving bowl
of mashed potatoes on his head in two thousand and six,
which burned his scalp, after brading him over cooking instructions
while the toddler son watched, so with her son present
or their son present. These claims arose amid a contentious

(06:41):
divorce finalized in twenty fourteen with a shared with shared custody,
and while Porter's campaign has dismissed Hoffman's accusations as a
retaliatory tactic later regretted by him, Hoffman reaffirmed in twenty
twenty three that he does not recant them, which fueled
ongoing scrutiny of Porter's temperament amid separate reports of her
allegedly toxic treatment of congressional staff, which you guys might

(07:03):
recognize this woman from a viral video that was going
around where she was basically like, I guess, doing like
a bit of a press interview or something discussing policy
ideas if she became governor of California, and one of
her assistants walked into the shot, which is pictured here
in the background, and she yelled at her.

Speaker 1 (07:25):
Did you guys, did you see this clip what it
was going around?

Speaker 3 (07:28):
Yes? I did.

Speaker 1 (07:29):
You are familiar with this? Okay? And this happened a
couple of times.

Speaker 3 (07:33):
You think should be happy. You think she'd be happy
to have other people in her shot, giving the impression
that she has other people on her side, especially people
who were there to kind of go, hey, Katie, you
got this shit wrong about that thing. You won't want
to redo this because you said this ship that was wrong,
and and Katie's Potter, Katie Potter's way, in the absence

(07:56):
of having a poundful of hot water, boiling water and
potatoes to throw at this degenerate, she was like, fuck you,
I don't fucking care get it. But I know you're
correcting me, but you were in my shot anyway. It
doesn't matter that you're correcting me, Like I don't want

(08:20):
people to know that I have staffers, even though everyone
has staffers. So she just probably boils boiled some water
on the spartan through it. And yet it's idea that
she just threw potato, boiling potatoes and it it almost
certainly was boiling water with potatoes in it. It's because

(08:42):
this is what people are telling us, that it was
just some fucking potatoes. But if if there's potatoes there
that are boiling enough to scold you, it's because they
were in boiling water. Throwing boiling water on someone is
it is an assault of the worst possasolutely disfigure you forever,
just get We're given this this picture that she just

(09:07):
threw some mashed potato on its head. No, it was
fucking boily water with potatoes in it. She's a fucking
psycho anyway.

Speaker 2 (09:16):
Yeah, so somebody in the chat said they did not
see the clips, so we're gonna show it because I
know Katie Porter from this other clip. But I learned
that she's she is an abusive person, like just based
on behaviors that she has done or exhibited. So let
me show you the context for the for this screen

(09:36):
grab here. This is I cut to the middle, because
it doesn't happen till about like towards the latter half.
But this is her being asked talking about like energy stuff,
energy policy, and one of her interns or assistants walks
into her shot. Here, let me play this in her
in her kitchen, because she's trying to give this domestic

(09:57):
you know, let's say a domesticated image.

Speaker 4 (10:01):
An extra six hundred and thirty two dollars in their pocket.
And it's also not just the individual savings, but it's
also the total savings for our economy. So I'm on
the Oversight committee, you might know, and that is where
we did a study recently this fall in September, and
what it showed is if we don't electrify our transportation sector,

(10:23):
that we're going to lose more than half a million
Californians dying prematurely to air pollution and other problems, and
the state could lose.

Speaker 1 (10:33):
Out of my fucking shot, that's actually it's that vehicles.

Speaker 4 (10:39):
It's okay, it does okay. You also were in my
shot before that, all.

Speaker 2 (10:48):
Right, So that was the clip that went viral because
of the way she acted. There was also another one
where she was doing an interview with I want to
say it was just CBS Sacramento, and she was extremely
combative with the interviewer. So I'm going to show you
a little bit of that. I just I'm trying to
get you an idea of like this woman's personality type.

Speaker 1 (11:11):
So let's take a look at this. Okay, Like right here, I.

Speaker 5 (11:15):
Guess sure that we get through this primary in a
really strong position. But let me be clear with you.
I represented Orange County. I represented a purple area. I
have stood on my own two feet and one Republican
votes before. That's not something every candidate in this race
can say. If you're from a deep blue area, if
you're from LA or you're from Oakland, you don't have
an experience.

Speaker 6 (11:34):
Just said you don't need those Trump voters.

Speaker 5 (11:35):
So you asked me if I need them to win?

Speaker 1 (11:38):
So you don't.

Speaker 5 (11:38):
I feel like this is unnecessarily argumentative.

Speaker 3 (11:40):
What is your question?

Speaker 6 (11:42):
The question is the same thing I asked everybody that
this is being called the empowering voters to stop Trump's
power grab. Every other candidate has answered this question.

Speaker 5 (11:51):
This is not and I said I support it.

Speaker 6 (11:54):
So and the question is what do you say to
the forty percent of voters who voted for Trump.

Speaker 5 (11:59):
Oh, I'm happy to say that. It's the do you
need them to win part that I don't understand. I'm
happy to answer the question as for the questions you
haven't written, and I'll answer.

Speaker 6 (12:06):
And we've also asked the other candidates do you think
you need any of those forty percent of California voters
to win? And you're saying no, you don't.

Speaker 5 (12:12):
No, I'm saying I'm going to try to win every
vote I can. And what I'm saying to you.

Speaker 6 (12:17):
Is that, well, to those voters, Okay, so you I.

Speaker 5 (12:20):
Don't want to keep doing this, so I'm gonna call
it thank you.

Speaker 1 (12:25):
So she just like walks out.

Speaker 2 (12:26):
So these are very like Essentially, she wasn't getting like
softball questions that were one hundred percent behind her. They
were just normal questions. They weren't even they weren't even combative.
The point is is that she didn't receive that very well,
and that was what her viral moment was. And I
thought about covering that as a story because I thought
maybe we can get into a little bit of like

(12:48):
of a discussion about you know, like maybe I don't
know women in politics or something but I didn't think
it was like a strong enough thing. And then I
learned from a Twitter channel all men hashtag men too
at the Real Men Too, which I think is Megan
Fox's channel. I don't, I don't remember, or Bettina Aren't. Yeah, okay,

(13:10):
welcome to the Aren't Army championing championing Betina Arn's fight
for fair treatment for men. And she basically this woman,
Katie Porter, is a champion of domestic violence survival, but
she's clearly a violent person. It wasn't and I'm not
just extrapolating that from the interview clips. It's from when

(13:30):
I learned that she poured hot mashed potatoes on her
husband's head and gave him burns, like severely burning him.
So this is she's been exposed as a perpetrator of
domestic violence who dumped scalding mashed potatoes on her then
husband's head. Her ex husband, Matthew Hoffman, filed for divorce

(13:51):
in twenty thirteen and detailed that the Democrat frequently abused
him verbally and through toys, books, and other objects at
him during their marriage. Hoffman also filed for restraining or
from his rage prone spouse, claiming she would routinely call
him a fucking idiot and fucking incompetent, and shattered a
glass coffee pot in their kitchen counter in March twenty
twelve when she felt that the house wasn't clean.

Speaker 1 (14:11):
Enough, which I don't think helps.

Speaker 2 (14:13):
She would not let me have a cell phone because
she said, you're too fucking dumb to operate. It often
said of Porter fifty one, who has been in the
hot seat this week, as videos capturing her going scorch
to earth and berating her former staff members made headlines.
When she gets angry, she will claw and scratch her
arms and then say to me, look what you made
me do. So that's basically a little bit of like

(14:36):
a level beyond what most people are talking about. Right
they're sharing the little viral clips of her yelling at
staff members and you know, like getting really combative with
CBS reporters that are just trying to get her side
of the story on something, getting an opinion, and she
gets frustrated and she like storms out. So imagine if

(14:57):
you're around the person like this all the time and
you're married to this person. That's just what I thought
was interesting. Plus it's ironic that again she portrays herself
as a survivor of domestic violence. So uh, anyway, that's
what I want to share. What do you guys think
about that? Mike, what do you what do you think
about this?

Speaker 3 (15:16):
Yeah, stop the presses, folks. Career politicians are very often
giant pieces of shit. And yeah, I say I qualified
that with very often, but I don't even think it's
all that hyperbolic to say one of career politicians are
giant pieces of shit. You might be thinking, well, surely

(15:39):
there are some exceptions, like maybe one or two. There's
a couple of them that I like, Well, i'll stop
you there. There's a couple of career politicians whose closet
you haven't yet scoured for skeletons because the opportunity hasn't
yet presented itself. But it's it's surely the world's most ruthless,

(16:03):
most cutthroat sector of employment. And it's and it's.

Speaker 2 (16:10):
Necessarily at least meritocratic too when you think about it,
at least one of them.

Speaker 3 (16:14):
Unless the merit is that it necessarily self selects for
ruthless people. I mean, any amount of ruth will leave
you at a disadvantage over those who have zero ruth.
And yeah, it's probably similar in all kinds of sectors.

(16:37):
I mean, to climb to the top of any ladder,
you'll need to shed yourself of as much ruth as possible,
including you know, Internet commentators and whatever. It sounds to
reason that politics, i e. The pursuit of absolute power
is the worst of the worst. In this regard, you're

(16:58):
not just dealing with people who want their voices heard.
You're dealing with people who want the power to silence
everyone else's voices. And that's why libertarians will never win
against authoritarians in a democratic system. It's defense versus attack.
It's a war between paper and scissors taking place in

(17:22):
a factory that makes scissors. And fair enough, not all
career politicians are necessarily Nazs and murderers and thieves. Well,
the thieves. They all work for a glorified mob, So
technically they are all thieves as long as they're accepting

(17:43):
wages made of blood, money stolen from the people. But
aside from that, they're not all criminals. They don't all
murder their staffers to avoid those staffers from squealing about
all the other staffers. The politicians have already murdered like
a certain crime family who I don't think I could mention,

(18:05):
but I would wager a pretty penny that they all
treat their staff as like subhuman surfs on a regular basis,
like we saw in that leaked clip of Katie Porker
just now viciously biting the hand that was trying to
feed her. But I guarantee you they all do that.

(18:27):
They wouldn't have got where they are today without doing that,
without treating everyone around them as subordinate dogs bodies, because
that is their ambition to rise to a station where
everyone is their subordinate dogs bodies. The more they present

(18:48):
themselves as smiling, affable, peaceful, tolerant angels in public, the
more you can be sure that they are tyrannical, demonic
bastards behind the scene. I'm sure Gavin Newsom is exactly
the fucking same. It's simply an anomaly that, in Katie

(19:08):
Porker's case, we happened to catch a glimpse behind the
scenes we don't normally get such a glimpse. Whoever's responsible
for leaking that clip has probably already been murdered. So yeah,
to to paraphrase a paraphrase of what I can only

(19:29):
assume is ancient wisdom. The pathological craving for power should
be an an equivocal disqualification for ever having power. And
that is why democracy is fake and gay and cringe. Actually,

(19:53):
those are the buzzwords we use. They are all euphemisms.
What I should say is, this is why democ is
an apocalyptic disaster, because it weeds out any possibility of
benign rulers, leaving a flag that could only be captured
by the most shameless and self interested tormentors. It's why

(20:18):
monarchy is a far superior system because once the war
is over, once the game of thrones is over, you
get a system where leadership is not conquered but passed
down hereditarily to someone who did not ask for it.
And that's the point. This is well understood when it

(20:39):
comes to jury duty. It's not a responsibility given to
those who apply for it, to those who jockey for it,
because then you'd always get a bunch of busy bodies
who think they have all the answers. It's jury duty
is a responsibility given to those who are reluctant to

(21:02):
accept it. Because that's the closest we can get to impartiality.
For the same reason, power should be passed down not
as a prize, but as a duty from father to
son or from well, no specifically from father to son,

(21:24):
if you please. If you put women in charge, eventually
you'll get some kind of disaster like democracy. And eventually
democracy puts even more women in charge, and it all
spirals downhill from there, and then you end up with
the likes of Katie Parker and only the likes of

(21:47):
Katie Parker personally, personally, I would rather have a king
who paus boiling oil on his enemies and then claims
victory than a queen who paus boiling water on her
enemies and then claims victimhood. Because that's that's fucking backwards,

(22:08):
isn't it. That way lies madness, madness that never sleeps
and never surfaces from hell. They the robber Baron's cruelty
may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated.
But those who torment us for our own good will
torment us without end, for they do so with the

(22:30):
approval of their own conscience. C. S. Lewis. You all
know the quote by now, well take heed for it
is true. And yeah, the moral of the story is,
get yourself a king America. You might as well make
it Trump fuck it, and you know, maybe Baron Trump maybe.

Speaker 1 (22:53):
Yeah, he'll be like a.

Speaker 3 (22:55):
Giant and the giants and the son of Baron and
the son of the son of Baron. Yes, and while
while you're at it, While you're at it, can we
have this dynasty too? Because our king is a dysgenic,
inbred Islamist coming fuck face whose head belongs on a
pike in the Tower of London. I said what I said.

Speaker 1 (23:17):
You're saying this in London, right look out.

Speaker 2 (23:22):
Or in England, England frown in England, parts unknown.

Speaker 1 (23:25):
Yeah, well hopefully they'll track.

Speaker 2 (23:27):
You down, all right, Um, so I got a so yeah,
that was mainly the thing I wanted to say about
it were the usually you know again, it just shows
the people who are the most vocal about this kind
of stuff, like these feminists that are so like anti
domestic abuse and they claim to be survivors, they're often offenders.
This is why the statistic that most domestic violence is

(23:50):
actually just like you know, bi directional, like it's both
parties engaging in it is an important one to point
out whenever because feminists want to redefine domestic violence will
only be wife beating. They've literally said this, This is
just another way of saying wife beating, which we know
isn't true. That's not even looking at lesbians who just
like for them. It's fucking you know, UFC like all

(24:13):
the time. But even in just regular heterosexual relationship, most
of it is, you know, is bi directionals. Both parties
are engaging in it, and women initiate seventy percent of
the time.

Speaker 1 (24:24):
According to data.

Speaker 2 (24:25):
So and it looks like in this case, I mean,
you know, her husband probably got loud with her too,
but she's claiming to be the victim here and obviously
she's got anger issues. So all right, anyway, with that said,
let us don't we you guys think about this one
in the comments. I'm gonna read a super chow and
they're gonna move on to the next story. If you
guys want to send us a superchow, a super chat,

(24:46):
or a rumble rant, be sure to do so. I
will read them in between each story. That's how I
usually do it, So yeah, just go ahead and send
it through. But I did get a super chow. You
can send those by going to feed the badgeer dot
com forward slash just the tip mayred g the g
gave us five dollars and says HBr new five twenty three, Honey.

Speaker 1 (25:07):
For the Badgers.

Speaker 2 (25:08):
I know you meant to say news, but I'm gonna
read it as I see it. I'm like, I'm like
Ron Burgundy. I'm just gonna read what it says on
the teleprompter. Go fuck yourself, san Diego. Anyway, let us
know what you guys think about this one of the comments.
We're gonna move on to the next story. Okay, this
one's There's a lot going on here, but we're gonna
try to unpack it. So in a October ninth, twenty

(25:29):
twenty five White House Cabinet meeting, which was focused on
health policy, US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F.
Kennedy Junior, asserted that there are two studies that show
children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism.
Attributing the purported link to post procedure administration of tailanol

(25:50):
for pain relief, Kennedy referenced a twenty thirteen ecological study
comparing circumcision rates across eight countries with autism prevalence and
a twenty fifteen Danish co study of over three hundred
and forty thousand boys which observed a higher autism diagnosis
rate among circumcised males under age five. He framed this
as suggestive, so he wasn't making a claim he was making.

(26:12):
He was saying that it's suggestive evidence that warrants further
scrutiny or at least to look into it more, tying
it to his broader unproven or his broader campaign not
necessarily unproven against Tailanhall's role in neuro developmental disorders, including
prior warnings to pregnant women alongside President Trump. He later

(26:32):
defended his remarks on social media, citing an August twenty
twenty five pre print review that he claimed validated acetamenafin exposure,
not the procedure itself, as the trigger, while accusing media
of distortion. The claim drew swift unanimous condemnation from various
activists online claiming to be autism researchers, pediatricians, and advocacy

(26:53):
groups as calling him his claim pseudoscientific misinformation that stigmatizes
autism and erodes trust in evidence based medicine. Experts like
Helen tager Flusburg of Boston University label the cited studies
appalling and riddled with flaws, noting their observational designs failed
to establish causation and ignored co founders such as cultural

(27:16):
factors and diagnosis rates or parental health care access in
religious communities practicing circumcision. The UK's National Autistic Society derided
it as dangerous anti science, while US physicians emphasized that
tail and hal is rarely used post circumcision and that
broader reviews, including a twenty twenty four analysis, found no
link to autism or psychological harm. Online mockery proliferated, with

(27:38):
critics highlighting Kennedy's pattern of fringe theories from vaccines and
now infant procedures, amid fears that it could deter routine care.
But there's more to this than that, So all right,
let's back up for a second. I just want to
give my thoughts on this. It is possible also that
circumcision itself causes autism or could contribute to autism minus

(28:02):
the tailen' all thing. The problem with this is that
we've normalized the practice of circumcision to a degree that
people are not likely to look or look at or
examine the potential cause of links. In fact, there aren't
even really a lot of data on this at all,
because in order to get the data, you would have
to first think this is something that we should look into,

(28:25):
and then you look into it. So I looked into
some other things. I have here a study from PubMed Central,
which I want to show you guys, which examines this
from a journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, and
it examines how Then again, this is also specific because
it specifically describes ritual circumcision. But let's just say all circumcision,

(28:49):
because I don't think like a circumcision that takes place
in a medical context versus a ritual context is any different.
It's still cutting a piece off of a newborn ab
penis and that that's basically what that's the PTSD. That's
where the problem is at. Okay, And this was a
cohort study done in Denmark. Now the study, I'm gonna like, look,

(29:12):
dig it up here. I'll give you guys a summary
of this. Let me see, I'm trying to find the
my research here. Okay, This cohort examined three hundred and
forty two thousand, eight hundred and seventy seven boys born
between the years nineteen ninety four and two thousand and three.

(29:34):
These were all recorded as undergoing a ritual circumcision, so
I guess in this was in Denmark. Most of these,
according to this study, were Muslim circumcisions, because Muslims performed well.

Speaker 3 (29:50):
There's showly very few circumcisions that aren't ritual. The well,
I mean, there's just like the thing elective circumcision.

Speaker 1 (29:58):
Yeah, they're all well, they're not they're not for the baby.

Speaker 3 (30:01):
Someone's old enough to like, oh, like.

Speaker 1 (30:04):
If somebody says I want to do this, yeah yeah.

Speaker 3 (30:06):
Yeah, Like every circumcision performs on a baby is a
ritual circumcision.

Speaker 1 (30:10):
Yeah, we could do that. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (30:12):
But I'm just saying that you're right. All circumcisions done
on newborns or on babies, regardless of whether they're done
for religious reasons, cultural reasons, or medical reasons, they're all barbaric.
It doesn't really matter, right. You you take a kid,
you can put him in like I don't know, like
a cave in the Middle East and circumcise him, or

(30:34):
a temple and circumcise him, or in the doctor's office
to circumcise him. It's all the same, it just has
a different backdrop. So yes, I agree with that, but
I'm talking about the context of this because again, there
aren't a lot of studies done on this. There isn't
a lot, at least not enough to like get anything
really definitive because of a lot of obstacles to even
looking into this, you know, and so like I have

(30:58):
to look at what is available. So this study was
shared around and it is looking at Muslim circumcisions. But again,
it doesn't really matter because the Jews do it. It's
the same shit, and doctors do it and it's the
same shit. Okay, So the only difference is is if
you're a grown ass man, you're like, I want to
get this done. I don't know why you would, but
like I you know, that's but that's your business, right.

(31:21):
So anyway, So we got a large sample study and
it found that those recorded as undergoing ritual circumcision but
or just circumcision had a forty six percent higher risk
of autism spectrum disorder diagnosis by age nine, with a
doubled risk for infantile autism before age five. The study

(31:44):
adjusted for factors like birth weight, and maternal smoking, so
you know, like in case there's other factors like you know,
pregnant women the drink or do drugs, but noted limitations,
including incomplete circumcision data, so there were limits even on
this data and a small number of ASD cases among
circumcised boys. The authors suggest that circumcision related pain or

(32:08):
stress might be the contributing factor to neurodevelopmental issues, but
acknowledge the need for further research to confirm the hypothesis.
And I want to also point out that when Robert F.
Kennedy got a lot of shit for saying this, But
when Kennedy said it, he said it was suggestive evidence
and that it warrants further investigation, So he wasn't making

(32:29):
a definitive claim. He was merely suggesting that circumcision or
the use of title and all with circumcision or to
treat the pain could be a factor. Now I don't
I'm not expecting him to get up on a podium
and declare circumcision to be banned, because the problem is
is that it's you still have to change the hearts

(32:50):
and minds of regular people on this topic, and unfortunately,
even a lot of so called red pill guys think that,
you know, circumcision is okay because women, some women they
prefer it, and like, if you understand that women don't
know what the fuck they want, you should ignore them anyway.
But the point is is that this isn't a popular
talking point right now. It's the most common sense one

(33:12):
to start from, for sure, but it's not at the
point now where people are ready to hear it. And
if if And the other thing too, is that anything
that comes from the Trump administration is gonna get rejected
because it comes from the Trump administration. So there are
gonna be people who are gonna go against it no
matter what. Because remember when RFK said there could be
a link, you know, to the pregnant women taking Tayland all,

(33:32):
they probably shouldn't take it because it could affect your kids,
and then Trump like echoed that state sentiment, and what happened.
Women went on TikTok popping pills just to just to
get the Orange Man. And we don't know if there's
gonna be any issues with that, but tailand all themselves
came out and said, please don't do that.

Speaker 1 (33:47):
We don't recommend this.

Speaker 2 (33:49):
Right, So, when you understand that it's not just a
that Robert F. Kennedy wasn't making a definitive claim. He
was simply suggesting that there could be something here worth
looking into which be could lead us to discover that
maybe the actual act of cutting a you know, a
baby boys genitals causes PTSC, which there is some data

(34:10):
that suggests that which could affect their ability to develop
neurologically in the future, and it could affect them in
a lot of other ways.

Speaker 3 (34:18):
Right.

Speaker 2 (34:18):
But and the only way we're gonna get there is
if there is more research done, more studies done on this,
which RFK is calling for, right, He's saying, we should
investigate this further. We may discover something else. And of
course you get the experts quote unquote that step out
and they're like, you can't you know, you're an idiot,
you go do this, This is pseudoscience, et cetera, et cetera.

(34:40):
They probably got like, you know, all the jabs and
boosters but whatever. They probably still wear masks. But yeah,
we'll listen to them and they don't even want to
entertain this idea. And I'm basically telling you that there
is like we're seeing fragments of you know data that
if people follow this trajectory, if they take this path,

(35:00):
we could find that maybe more and more people will
be sympathetic to the idea that circumcision is a problem
and it only, it's only, it's not really hard to
get to the point where you say, to hell with,
you know, whatever your beliefs are, we're going to like
ban this thing, and it's it's not something you're gonna
do overnight. But I think you can get there if

(35:21):
we're if we do this the right way, right, and
we nudge people in the right direction. So anyway, So yeah,
So then there's the already mentioned PTSD, which the babies
will have in many cases as a result of circumcision.
They will have memories of abuse without understanding where it
came from, and it usually goes back to that. That

(35:43):
is setting aside any actual complications with circumcision, which we
know that this is something else that we've also acknowledged
as a reality. So that's basically I think that's I
think that's everything I want to say about that one.
So my final thoughts are on this is that I
hope that the Health and sorry, the Health and Human

(36:07):
Services Committee or department further investigates. This ignores the haters
and the and the shouting lemmings on the side that
just don't want them to succeed at anything, and just
follow this through and you know, hopefully it will lead
to more than just you know, say, asking women not
to take tailand all, or or even like getting the

(36:28):
developers of tileran all to come up with some alternative
that's not going to be harmful. But what I hope
is that it leads to a conversation about circumcision itself,
as you know, whether or not it's a moral good,
because if you look online, it will still tell you
the same bullshit about what the health benefits are. And
the fact is it does it's not proven. It doesn't
prevent HIV, it doesn't make sex better for you, it

(36:50):
doesn't make sex better for her, who gives a shit
what she wants. You know, none of that's true. So
let's just look at it for what it is. It
is abusing children by or boys specifically, by treating something
that is a part is what they were born with.
It is God given. So anyway, that's all I wanted
to say about that. I'll let you take it from here.

Speaker 3 (37:12):
Mike, Yeah, it seems the suggestion being made is that
it's trauma that causes or at least increases the likelihood
of autism, is not specifically circumstances. It's not as though
there's something in in in in the foreskin tissue that
prevents children from becoming artists. It's it's it's any kind

(37:35):
of trauma that causes because that's the tea in PTSD
that that's that's what can increase the likelihood of of
of autism, and that's that's that's what we're driving. I'm
not even going to get into the titlan old thing
because obviously tayland and ol isn't a form of trauma trauma.
It's something that's biochemically based. I don't even understand how

(37:56):
that works. But yeah, what what makes it so difficult
to attribute causation rather than correlation is prevalent, the prevalence
of the procedure and the outcome. Let's take the thlidamide
situation was pretty easy to pin down because solidamide was

(38:19):
a novel and rather localized treatment, and children with those
t rex arms were also a new and localized phenomenon,
and the latter very much followed from the former, So

(38:39):
people went, maybe it's not a coincidence that you know
the ad hoc propter hoc after this. Therefore, because of this,
so maybe we should take a deeper dive into the
biochemical mechanisms taking place a hop, skip and a jump later.
And it's yes, we can can. It's not just a coincidence.

(39:02):
The correlation was what spurred us onto investigating this, and
upon investigation, yes, we can confirm the philidamide is what
causes the t rex arms. So Daisy, we won't make
that mistake again. We'll make sure we never again jump
headfirst into any novel experimental treatments that leave people severely

(39:26):
medically compromised. Don't you worry, your sweet little cotton socks.
We've totally learned our lesson pinky swear. And yes, I'm
sure you can all allude to what I'm alluding to,
but let's let's go on to the main topic. Male
genital mutilation is not rare, like philidamide or its consequences were.

(39:49):
Male genital mutilation is not a novel procedure that was
only recently introduced. It's been practiced for a long time,
even should I say, especially in the USA and it's
more prominent than ever, more prominent than its absence is sadly,

(40:11):
I should say, well scandalously, I should say autism is
also more prominent than ever, not more prominent than its absence, thankfully,
And it too has been around for a long time.
What's been around, possibly forever, but it's prominence, its rise

(40:33):
in commonality or the commonality of its diagnosis, is a
recent phenomenon. But the fact that they're both so prominent
now means that even though there's a huge area of overlap,
there's also a huge area that doesn't overlap. There's like

(40:54):
one hundred million circumcised Americans and nowhere near that many
artistic Americans depending on the diagnosis. So all we can
insinuate is an increased likelihood, And there's all manner of
statistics that we can interpret as likelihoods, when all that

(41:15):
really points to is a correlation with no real predictive properties.
Perhaps what we should look for is what other properties
are held in common by autism and male genital mutilation,
because within those properties we might find the real culprit

(41:37):
behind the causation. We might find the causation we're looking for. Personally,
I have a hypothesis, or rather hair brained hypothesis about
autism and its rise in prevalence in recent years, or
at least the rise in the diagnosis of autism, especially

(41:57):
its milder forms, the spectrum, the Asperger's and whatnot. Now,
I'm not a real doctor to have explained this recently.
None of this is medical advice, but I've noticed that
a child or indeed an adult who would rather interact
with a plasma screen than interact with a human being,

(42:22):
perhaps simply a child or an adult who interacts with
screens more than they interact with humans. I'm sure a
lot of you can relate, is often diagnosed with some
form of autism. Just to be clear, I am skeptical
of such a diagnosis, and I hope you can see

(42:43):
why I'm so skeptical. We live in an age where
children and indeed adults are surrounded by screens, TVs, computers, tablets, smartphones,
all that jazz. And it's not just Saturday morning cartoons
anymore like it was in our day. And it's not

(43:07):
just a handful of whatever Nintendo games your family could afford. Nowadays,
parents can sit their children in front of this giant
plasma screen with twenty four hour a day cocoa Melon
on demand. They can hand their kids a cheap tablet
with hundreds of free to download games, and they will

(43:29):
never get bored. They'll never get frustrated with level four
Dash to of Super Mario and then switch it off
and go play outside. They'll never finish watching today's episode
of Teletubbies and then have no choice but to look
around the room and maybe interact with the real world,

(43:50):
with the toys and the humans in the real world. Nowadays,
kids can remain immersed in these screens all day, very
easily and for a very low price, And even to
a layman like me, it seems kind of obvious that
a child who listens to screens more than they listen

(44:14):
to humans will likely grow up to listen to screens
more than they listen to humans. And no, I am
not saying this is autism. I'm not saying it causes autism.
I'm not even calling it a disorder of any kind.
I'd say it stands to reason that, like all creatures,

(44:35):
we are creatures of habit, and we tend to stick
to those habits. But these particular habits of being preoccupied
with machine interfaces. These habits are sometimes, perhaps often misdiagnosed
as autism, especially there, I say, in boys. Maybe in

(45:01):
some way, boys are more you know, inclined to focus
on clock faces, and they are on human faces in
ways that girls are not. I mean, this has also
been studied, and it's kind of almost incontrovertibly true. We're
looking for common properties, remember common properties between autism diagnosis

(45:23):
and male genital mutilation. Allowing your children to be raised
by screens and the talking flashing lights on those screens
is a form of neglect, a mild form, but still,
and I'm certainly not here to morally judge anyone, especially

(45:45):
not parents, because I'm not a parent, and even if
I if I had children, I would almost certainly neglect
them like crazy. And that's why I don't have children,
and I never should. But it is what it is.
Each successive generation has had more and more children who

(46:08):
have been plunked in front of screens for hours on
end every day because their parents, very often their single parents,
their single mothers, let's be honest, can't be bothered interacting
with them in person. Again, I'm not judging. I wouldn't

(46:29):
want to interact with children all the time either. I
completely understand why you would put them in front of
the screen and let them drift off like zombies so
you can sit back and relax for a couple of hours.
I get it. I'm just saying that's what's happening. It's
what has happened more and more with each successive generation

(46:51):
over the last sixty years. Ever since the popularity of
the television and subsequently the the computer, more and more
parents have been afforded the opportunity to neglect their children.
And this, I put it to you, has led to

(47:13):
a greater prevalence in diagnoses of autism, not necessarily actual autism,
but maybe in some cases actual autism.

Speaker 1 (47:25):
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (47:25):
I'm not a real doctor. Again, I'm looking for common factors,
and what I'm pointing to is child neglect. So what
about male genital mutilation, Well, that would be an extreme
manifestation of child neglect. That's when some quack doctor and

(47:48):
his and his or her bunch of quack nurses who
are trying to harvest human foreskins, They come up to
you going, oh, yes, absolutely, you should let us torture
your newborn baby. It's perfectly safe and effective treatment for
whatever bullshit lie we're making up this week, so we
have an excuse to harvest baby foreskins. Just sign right

(48:11):
here on the dotted line. It'll be fine, and please
ignore the blood curdling screams of your defense defenseless infant.
It's fine. They really can't feel anything, and and and
they won't remember anyway, and with any luck, neither will you.
And the parents just go yeah, feel yeah, that sounds

(48:33):
perfectly plausible. Go ahead, doctor, you know what they say,
trust for science? Am I right? Or even worse, uh,
the father will insist that his son be mutilated because
he was mutilated too, or even even worse, the mother
will insist that her son is mutilated because she simply

(48:57):
prefers the esthetics of a mutilated penis. At that point,
it's such an extreme form of parental neglect that it's
frankly a gross understatement to even call it neglect. Its abuse.
It's cruelty and barbarism without remorse. That too, very unfortunately,

(49:23):
is more prevalent than ever. So that's what I'm saying,
that's the correlation that I'm drawing. What we are facing
is an epidemic of child neglect specifically male child neglect.
A parent who will quite happily allow their son to

(49:46):
be needlessly and tortuously mutilated is also considerably more likely
to go ahead and stick them in front of a
screen and let someone else raise them for like eight
hours a day. Seems kind of obvious when you sound
it out, don't it.

Speaker 1 (50:04):
So?

Speaker 3 (50:05):
Yeah, I again, I don't know what I'm talking about.
I'm just a layman. I'm not a real doctor. I
don't have a quarter million dollars of medical training. All
I have is my two cents, and my two cents
is this. If people simply got back to that old,

(50:25):
tried honored tradition of giving a shit about boys, you
could fix this modern prevalence of the autism problem and
the male genital mutilation problem in one fell swoop. I
think they're both manifestations of this elusive problem that we

(50:47):
in this esoteric corner of the Internet like to call
miss Andre. There's no telling how many of these mysterious
issues that have cropped up in the modern day could
be cleared up if we could at least acknowledge that
miss Andre is in fact a thing, maybe even a

(51:09):
thing in which people should not indulge. But according to
Jerry Nadler, I'm just being anti semitic. I will deal
with you later. You in citious goblin to be continued.

Speaker 1 (51:29):
All right, thank you for that, Mike.

Speaker 2 (51:31):
And again, yeah, I mean, I think that ultimately parenting
will win the day, but unfortunately the Department of Health
and Human Services can't mandate that it's got to come
from parents, and that means that we got to do
something about the relationship between men and women ultimately, although
there are other factors as well, like you know, because
like I said, it's not just a circumcision that is

(51:56):
the issue. I do think there's PTSD. I think circumcision
and should be banned because it's the right thing to do,
not mutilate your children. And I don't have to necessarily
make an argument from consequences like here's how you'll benefit.

Speaker 1 (52:10):
It's just wrong to do that.

Speaker 2 (52:12):
And I agree with that, but I don't think it's
gonna necessarily solve the problem of increased rates of autism.
I think there's parenting, there's food, there's stuff in the food,
there's stuff in the water. There's the way that you know,
people like, the way that they understand that they should
take care of themselves. Vaccines are probably a part of
it too. Like I think that it's okay to say

(52:34):
this and it doesn't make you a terrible person. But anyway,
I'm glad that this is on the table for discussion.
I think that's that's like how everything else this has
to begin somewhere, and that's usually the best place to
have that. So anyway, let us know what you guys
think about this one in the comments. I'm gonna move

(52:55):
on to next story. Okay, first though, I got a
rumble rant from oh I see for five dollars, thank you,
Oh I see, and he says, my internet connection sucks
right now, I will watch.

Speaker 1 (53:05):
This later have some rumblings. Well, thank you for that.
Really appreciate it.

Speaker 2 (53:09):
Okay, So, speaking of autism, we're gonna be looking at
this article or this story here from Politico, which has
been making the rounds. So on October fourteen, twenty twenty five,
political released a an exclusive report which exposed over two

(53:30):
nine hundred pages of leaked telegram chats spanning seven months
among members of the Young Republican chapters in states including
New York, Kansas, Arizona, and Vermont, revealing a torrent of nicest, sexist,
anti semitic, and violent rhetoric that shocked the political world.

Speaker 3 (53:51):
We're just in nine hundred pages. Yeah, and all they
could I bet you, all they could find was like.

Speaker 1 (53:57):
We're just like a few things.

Speaker 2 (53:59):
Yeah, yeah, probably, But you know that's the thing. Well,
I'm gonna get to it in a second, but let
me finish what I wrote here, all right. Participants, including
high ranking figures like the vice chair of the New
York State Young Republicans and the chair of the Kansas chapter,
freely used slurs against black, gay, Latino, and Asian people,

(54:20):
referring to black individuals as monkeys or the watermelon people,
while joking about gas chambers, mass rape of indigenous people,
slaveries merits, and bombing their own conventions. One member quipped
about praising Adolph Hitler with others laughing along and expressing
fears of a leak that could cook them, yet continuing unabated.
The chats also included homophobic epithets, endorsements of pro slavery Republicans,

(54:44):
and discussions of driving rivals to suicide, painting a picture
of unchecked extremism within the GOP's youth wing. The fallout
was swift and bipartisan, with Young Republican national federations demanding
immediate resignations from all the folks involved, leading to the
Kansas Young Republicans disbanding entirely and several leaders, including New

(55:06):
York's Bobby Walker, stepping down from roles amid job losses
and public apologies laced with claims of context manipulation. Democratic
leaders like the New York governor City New York Governor
Kathy Hochel, Who's a piece of shit? And Senate Minority
Leader Chuck Schumer, oh my god, even bigger piece of shit,
weaponized the scandal against g GOP figures, such as a

(55:27):
representative Elise Stephanic trying tying her pass endorsements to the
chat participants. While Republicans from Stephanic to Vermont Governor Phil
Scott condemned the vile and revolting content as antithetical to
party values, Vice President J. D. Vance downplayed the outrage
as pearl clutching over stupid jokes. Yes very based, urging

(55:47):
leadiency for young people while deflecting to a Democratic candidate's
violent text. But the leaks amplify broader concerns about pervasive
bigotry and in the Republican base, especially as midterms approach,
forcing soul searching and distancing across the aisle so evasive.

Speaker 3 (56:03):
How the fuck is it pervasive when it's in private chats?

Speaker 2 (56:06):
Sorry, Brian, Yeah, no, no, it's okay, we haven't gotten
to it. Okay, first of all, yes, there's a private chats.
But here's the thing, and I can bring up Jay Jones,
which I think is what.

Speaker 1 (56:17):
I think it was. Jade Vance brought up j Jones.

Speaker 2 (56:19):
So like in here in the state of Virginia, there's
a woman running for governor and I only know this
because I see fucking ads for her, like every time
I turn on YouTube. Her name is spam Berger and
she's I didn't know who was running and what side
they were on because it was Spanburger, who's a woman
versus win some Earl Sears was also a woman of

(56:40):
a black woman, and so you have like a woman Democrat,
woman Republican. I was kind of indifferent, and then I learned,
you know, as things went on, that Spamberger is like
a super far lefty, like crazy person.

Speaker 1 (56:51):
Okay, and it's funny because wins.

Speaker 2 (56:53):
Some Earl Sears is a black woman, but she's more
like based anyway.

Speaker 1 (56:58):
So she had a.

Speaker 2 (56:59):
Running partner another guy who's running for office named Jay Jones,
and j Jones literally called for political assassinations of his
opponents and their children, and he didn't take it back.
And when Spamberger was pressed on it, like during the
debate that she did with win some earl sears for
the upcoming election for Virginia, she didn't respond to it.

(57:19):
She had nothing to say, like deer in headlights did
not address it at all. Unfortunately, because a lot of
people vote early in Virginia, Spamberger may win. But that's
that's an aside, because the scandal didn't come out about
j Jones calling for assassinations basically after the Charlie Kirk thing,
by the way, that it might be too late for that,

(57:42):
but we'll see, because like obviously that you know, it's
not over till it's over. So uh yeah, I call her, Yeah,
that's right, Zarang said, for five dollars, super chances, I
call her Palpatine Spamberger.

Speaker 1 (57:55):
She literally said, let the rage flow through you in
a video I saw. Yeah, yeah, accurate, do it, do it.
I can feel your anger, your hatred.

Speaker 5 (58:08):
So.

Speaker 2 (58:15):
Good anyway, but so so we have like, actual people
in positions of power calling for death and murder. And
here's the thing, what I think is really under a
first of all, let's just put it out there.

Speaker 1 (58:29):
What's going on here.

Speaker 2 (58:30):
This is just more of the same cancel culture shit
the left's been doing since gamer Gag, since before gamer Gaate,
probably where they go into your history, they try to
dig something up on you, and then they you know,
cherry pick as much as they can, and then they
put it out there and then they try to use
it to blast people. And the thing is there is
a lot of like peoples getting their panties in a

(58:52):
twist over it. But it's not as damning or destructive
as I expected it to be. Because what I've been
seeing a lot lately are people posting on x saying
I don't care about some group chat leak, sharing images
of like, you know, actual violent crimes happening to people.
So I don't remember this is a story where some

(59:14):
guy got set.

Speaker 1 (59:15):
On fire on a train. Here is.

Speaker 2 (59:19):
The guy who stabbed to death at a track meet. Right,
here's everyone knows this one. And we have Charlie Kirk here.
So these are you know, and it's the thing like
saying mean things online that doesn't that doesn't compare to
the actual violence in real world stuff.

Speaker 1 (59:36):
And this was private. And on top of that, here's.

Speaker 2 (59:38):
The thing that I think is most important. Okay, this
is the way men talk to each other. That's all
it is. Like when you're talking with your male friends
or you're in a male space. Men who don't feel
like they're being monitored or surveilled by you know, teachers
or women or whatever, they they feel that they can
speak more freely. They speak their mo It doesn't mean anything. Yes,

(01:00:02):
some people will see that, you know, it rubs people
the right on, wrong way or whatever, but it doesn't matter.
This is literally the way men communicate. And the truth
is this is only going to embolden them more, like
they're just not going to care. And that's kind of
like where we're at because essentially, this entire dynamic, everything
that's going on ever since social media has been feminine

(01:00:25):
minded people trying to control the language, behavior and speech
of masculine minded people. That's all it's been. That's like
what it really like when you boil it all the
way down, That's what it was. Do you remember Candice
Owens social media autopsy that she almost put out that
was gonna like supposedly get like it was basically digital

(01:00:46):
ID for the Internet, and it didn't work right, but
it was like, you know, like she was okay till
that happened, and no one ever forgave her and they shouldn't.
That should like haunt her for the rest of her
life because that is essentially a you know, the female
tyrannical mindset using social media to control the language and
speech of men. And so if you can say shit

(01:01:09):
like this, which I think is pretty mild, because if
you think about it, if Politico was able to find
like really bad things, that would be front and center.
So the examples here are the worst examples they were
able to find. It's just like the woman who walked
through New York for ten hours and you know, we

(01:01:30):
get the cat calling video that's like three minutes long
and most of it is like shit, like hello and
how are you and have a nice day? You know,
So that's the best you can do. And that's that's
what I'm saying. Like this is like you know, just
ship posting in a private space. I mean, like we
get language like this in our own live chat. So

(01:01:51):
I don't know like what the potential consequences of this
are going to be. I think that there is definitely
some cucked people that are going to that have already
basically bent the knee on this stuff. But ultimately what
needs to be recognized, and I think Jade Vance does
recognize this, is that this is just the way men talk.
Like remember when Trump was in got on the hot
mic with Billy Bush and he said grand by to pussy.

Speaker 1 (01:02:14):
This is that they're just trying to get it at scale.

Speaker 2 (01:02:17):
So the only thing we have to do is reject
it as like say, you know what, I don't give
a shit because your people are killing our people and
we're just talking shit. I mean, just frame it like
that and it just falls into place. You got people
running for office that want people dead and they're fretting
about like people saying shit online. So anyway, that's all

(01:02:37):
I got on that one, I think. So Mike, I'll
give it to you.

Speaker 3 (01:02:41):
Yeah, I can. I can only reiterate and to to
anticipate what a lot of our lefty friends slash opponents
are going to be saying. It's along the lines of
whoopa dupper that's that's that's the noise I hear in
my head whenever you say what about ism? That's the

(01:03:03):
noise you make whenever we point out your hypocrisy, as
though your hypocrisy doesn't matter, but the fact that you
people talk about equality, hypocrisy is anathema to equality. You
know that, right, you can't be a hypocrite who advocates
for equality, because hypocrisy is the opposite of equality. You

(01:03:24):
know that right rules for me, but not for thee.
That's what's so I'm going to try and weave my
way around the wibber daba defense. I know, I know
it's intuitive to believe that the further you go behind
closed doors, the closer you get to the truth. And yes,
to some degree, that's true. But it's also true that

(01:03:46):
the further you go behind closed doors, the spicier the
jokes get, and indeed, the harder it gets to differentiate
the jokes from the sincere statements. That it's very much
the case here. I will happily say some spicy, spicy

(01:04:06):
shit in our public live shows, and I'll say some
even spicier shit in the after shows, and some even
spicier shit in the private discord chats, and to be honest,
I'm not even sure how sincere I'm being half the
time in any of these situations. But the point is

(01:04:28):
we temper our spicy shit depending on the size of
the audience. If there's a thousand people listening, including potential antagonists,
we hold.

Speaker 1 (01:04:42):
Back, as it were.

Speaker 3 (01:04:46):
Indeed, if there's only one person listening in like a
private message, that we go, you know, super Vinderloo spicy.
Why because that presents the lowest stability of our comments
being leaked and taken out of context. And yes, they
are always taken out of context. Compare this to our antagonists,

(01:05:12):
to the people who very recently showed their ass to
the world. I'm talking about the Charlie Kirk thing. They
didn't just show their ass, they showed their fucking colon.
They fucking goatsied themselves in full view of the public. Yes,
I want my enemies dead. I want their blood spilled

(01:05:32):
in front of a crowd with their families watching. And
that makes me a good person. And Sean, maybe they're joking,
but what speaks volumes is that they don't feel any
burden to hide what they're saying. They don't temper their
comments to the size of the audience they're talking to.
If they could speak to all eight billion people at once,

(01:05:55):
they would gleefully declare their bloodless that they want straight
white men exterminated en mass and they're proud of it.
They say these things because the education system has taught
them that it's okay to say these things, because the
mass media has taught them that it's okay to say

(01:06:18):
these things. We tell our jokes about fucking Hitler and
whatnot because we've been told that it's not okay. We
know it's not okay. It's obvious that it's not okay,
and that's why we say it. That's how dark humor works.
We say these things because they are taboo, because they're naughty,

(01:06:41):
for the same reason small children joke about farting and pooing,
because they know that these things are naughty. That's the
idea of the top end of naughty. Because these things
are supposed to be suppressed and underplayed and kept behind
the closed doors. We can we can all claim that

(01:07:02):
we're joking when we say these things. But when leftists
quote unquote joke about murdering rightists or just murdering men,
especially white men, especially straight white says men. They don't
relegate them to private group chats. They declare them flagrantly

(01:07:25):
all the way up to national fucking television because they
they know there won't be any consequences. Even Jimmy Kimmel
was only sacked for four fucking days before he came back.
So for them, for them to go hunting for spicy
statements in the darkest annals of online private group chats

(01:07:46):
is a game they can't lose. We could do the same.
We could infiltrate the discords of the likes of Vosh
and Destiny, looking for the most twisted things they say
about fucking horses and buffaloes and their own children. And
sometimes some of us do and we reveal these things

(01:08:07):
to the public, but it doesn't matter because it's not
even a revelation. They say exactly the same dark shit
in full view of the public, and they get away
with it. We live in a world in which leftists
can say whatever the fuck they like on any platform, anywhere,
no matter how public or how popular, and all they

(01:08:30):
get is a pat on the back and yet another
government fucking subsidy. These mothers, these motherfuckers can electrocute dogs
and still get paid a king's fortune for doing it.
If a young Republican so much as jokes about electrocuting
a dog in a private conversation to themselves in their

(01:08:52):
own fucking house, and if an eavesdropping neighbor happens to
hear them saying it, they can get them thrown in
a fucking jail cell in Britain. I mean, I mean
coming soon to America, of course. I mean you're already
on the slippery slope. Thankfully you currently have an administration

(01:09:12):
that is at least purporting to try and pull you
out of that slippery slope. And yeah, best of luck
with that. But yeah, fox sake man, the naked gall on,
these dickheads to lecture us about unacceptable language, eat a
fucking barrel of dicks already? Can I can I get

(01:09:36):
away with her? How dare you? I'm gonna do it?
How dare you? How dare you? There? I said it,
and I'll do it again a bunch of.

Speaker 1 (01:09:48):
Uh yeah, I mean, like what is hashtag kill old men? Right?

Speaker 2 (01:09:51):
So that that's like the mildest version, and again they
will actually they have actually killed people, so uh yeah,
missed me with that, bullshit.

Speaker 1 (01:10:03):
Let me know what you.

Speaker 2 (01:10:03):
Guys think about this in the comments. I look forward
to your thoughts on this story because it is kind
of like a test of your ability to be like
you know what, I don't really care and I don't
personally I language.

Speaker 1 (01:10:13):
I don't give a shit about words.

Speaker 2 (01:10:15):
I mean, like I got into this mess, like you know,
because I didn't give a shit about words. So we're
gonna move on to the next one. In other news
that broke while we were doing our show. Uh, Ace
Freely of Kiss has passed away at seventy four, and
so this wasn't a story I had picked out. I
don't know if he's got any quotes. Mike, I'm not

(01:10:36):
even sure if you're a kiss guy. I mean they're okay,
I guess they're they're not as they're not as hardcore
as they look. So but yeah, Ace Freely has passed away.
If you were, if you if you enjoyed kiss, that
may that may matter to you.

Speaker 1 (01:10:54):
So I thought I would share that. Yeah, Mike's got
nothing I know I did.

Speaker 2 (01:11:01):
Yeah, it just happened like I just learned about it,
like twenty minutes ago.

Speaker 3 (01:11:05):
Yeah, I certainly didn't have time to find any uh
quotes about it. I yeah, you know, I was. I
was never a kiss guy, and I can't imagine I
can't imagine finding many.

Speaker 2 (01:11:21):
He was the guitarist, right, yeah, he was the guitarist
arguably the most talented member of the band. I guess,
but yeah, I didn't, you know, I mean, I just
it doesn't matter. All it means to me is that
I'm getting old because all of the people that I
grew up with are dying. That's all. Like, you know,
who else passed away is Drew Strusan, who this is

(01:11:42):
a couple of days ago. Nobody even, like I don't
even know people know who Drew Streusan is. But Drew
Strusen was an illustrator that made He painted movie posters
back when we used to have people paint them before.

Speaker 1 (01:11:54):
We use photoshop and shit.

Speaker 2 (01:11:56):
And he was very very famously made like the post
for Indiana Jones Back to the Future, basically like all
the big ones, you know, all the ones that you
know it when you see a big trouble, little China,
the thing that was all Drew drewsan very very very
famous illustrator, did a lot of really good work.

Speaker 1 (01:12:18):
He's going like the John Williams of illustrators.

Speaker 2 (01:12:20):
If John Williams is known for doing movie scores, Drews
s Dreusen was the guy who did illustrations for posters
and films. So very good, very talented guy. So yeah,
also died. So you know, I'm just like all the
all of my heroes are growing old and dying, and
it just paints a number on your forehead that you
have to look at every morning.

Speaker 1 (01:12:40):
So anyway, you know when you're getting old, man, that's
how you know.

Speaker 2 (01:12:44):
Yeah, all your heroes don't dying off right, but uh yeah, anyway, rip.

Speaker 1 (01:12:49):
U two.

Speaker 3 (01:12:52):
To this guy. And Shary was a very nice fella.

Speaker 1 (01:12:58):
Yeah sure he was.

Speaker 2 (01:12:58):
I'm sure he was all right anyway, ace freely. Let's
let's move on to the last story. So this one
came I learned about it like Verde Meek says, Strusan
was excellent, stark contrasts to the cheap minimalist posters of today. Yes, yes,
he was great. Fara Farabe says Love Gun was the

(01:13:20):
first LP I ever bought.

Speaker 1 (01:13:23):
You know what the love gun is, it's their dicks.

Speaker 2 (01:13:28):
So anyway, yeah, so yeah, let me know what you
guys think you have any particular work by Ace Freely
or Drew Strusan that you want to remark on. Put
it in the comments anyway. So I learned about this
one just this morning, so I added it kind of
last minute.

Speaker 1 (01:13:46):
I normally do the stories.

Speaker 2 (01:13:47):
The day before, and I heard this and I thought
it was so upsetting I had to add this. So
you guys remember big Balls Edward chorus Stein, who worked
for Doge under Elon Musk, and that he was brutally
assaulted by a group of teenagers doing and attempting during

(01:14:08):
an attempt at carjacking in a Washington, d c. Parking
garage near U Street, just a mile from the White House.
Chorstine interviewed to stop the theft of a woman's car
around three am. We learned that it was his girlfriend,
so it wasn't like a random woman. I guess they
were together when this happened. Suffered severe injuries, including a

(01:14:28):
broken jaw, fractured eye socket, and deep lacerations requiring stitches
and surgery, after being punch kicked and stomped by up
to ten assailants, ten.

Speaker 1 (01:14:36):
People, ten teens ten utes.

Speaker 2 (01:14:42):
The incident captured on video and shared widely by Corstine himself,
so they had video evidence of this drew national outrage
and President Trump's personal attention, who posted graphic images on
truth Social decried DC's crime wave and deployed National Guard
troops to federalized parts of the city despite declining overall
crime stats according to the city. But of course the

(01:15:05):
DC crime SATs are not low there. It's a terrible,
terrible crime ridden city. And it was actually the assault
on Big Balls that was the final straw that I
believe caused Trump to go with the National Guard troops
and federalize parts of the city. Two fifteen year olds,

(01:15:26):
a boy and a girl from Hattsville, Maryland, were arrested
in charge with attempted robbery, simple assault, and for the boy,
additional felony assault and robbery from a separate gas station attack.
Because they are underage, their names and identities are not.

Speaker 1 (01:15:41):
Being shared, okay.

Speaker 2 (01:15:43):
They were detained at DC's Youth Services Center until an
August release on strict conditions like electronic monitoring and curfew.
So there was a court hearing on October fifteenth. Yesterday,
Biden appointed Associate Judge Kendra D. Briggs, pictured here, sentenced
the teens to probation and community service after they pleaded

(01:16:05):
guilty to simple assault, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment for the
younger people who decided to basically terrorize U Street. The
judge barred them from DC except for court or treatment,
with the boy facing ongoing charges for the gas station incident.
Eight other alleged accomplices remain at large. The lenient verdict

(01:16:26):
ignited a firestorm from Trump, who called it terrible and
shamed the judge in the Oval office, and Elon Musk,
who branded it a racist verdict by a racist judge
on X because they were black teens that received a
probation while a race verse scenario would probably yield prison time.

(01:16:46):
Claims amplified by MAGA influencers like Libs of TikTok and
The Maga Voice, are garnering millions of views and calls
for Briggs's disbarment. Chorustine expressed disappointment, but urged focus on
broader DC safety, highlighting the attacks role and Trump's crime
back back, I'm sorry, highlighting the attacks role in Trump's
crime crackdown amid partisan clashes over judicial equity. So this

(01:17:10):
is like interesting because I mean, let's just face it. Okay,
a lot of these activist judges are very lenient to
the right people for certain reasons. They always see this
as an opportunity. There's I think there's just straight up
tribalism going on here, but maybe it's just me. This
is a Biden appointed judge in Washington, d C. Which is,

(01:17:31):
you know, despite it being the capital, it's one of
the most corrupt cities in terms of its its government,
uh in the country, you know, not not quite as
bad as Chicago, but it's one of the one of
the worst. And yeah, she gave them a slap on
the wrist, and if you saw the pictures of Big Balls,
it was brutal, like he was in the hospital. So anyway,

(01:17:52):
that's it. I just wanted to share that story.

Speaker 1 (01:17:53):
I don't know if you guys have any thoughts or
if you have any thoughts on that.

Speaker 3 (01:17:57):
I mean, yeah, their their crime wasn't even aggravated. Big
Bulls tried to prevent another crime and and and they
fucked him up for trying to prevent another crime. It
wasn't as even as though he yelled the N word.

(01:18:19):
Not I know, that's the excuse that's so often given
every time a bunch of words beat the ship out
of a white person. But I mean, it's it's pretty
good and dry that these were criminals in the act
of a crime who then committed another crime against someone
who tried to prevent that crime, Like they would have

(01:18:39):
done the same thing to a police officer if there
were any police officers in DC who were even interested
in addressing these kind of crimes as they actually happened.
And this was why Trump had to send the fucking
military in and and then it all culminates in the

(01:19:00):
decisions of a black judge. And I'm not saying there
shouldn't be black judges. I just a lot of people
like to say it's genetic, and that's up in the air.
I know it's even controversial to call it up in
the air, but I I'm not sure I really want

(01:19:22):
to conclude that it's genetic until I see an experiment
that doesn't involve victim mentality. Such an experiment has never
taken place in America, at least not since the Jim
Crow era. Actually, I guess the victim mentality was I'm

(01:19:44):
implemented in the Jim Crow era. But but you know,
back in the early twentieth century, Black families were just
as together as white families, more so if anything. And
it's largely because of the absence of this victim mentality.
And if people like to attribute this low impulse control

(01:20:11):
to persons of African descent, and well, but I would
attribute this low impulse control to any demographic of people
who've been brain scrambled by victim mentality. And it's hard
to find an experiment involving black people that haven't been

(01:20:34):
brain scrambled by this victim mentality. And you could look
to Africa, yes there's a and how countries in Africa
led entirely by black people haven't done all that well.
But then you have to wonder to what degree this

(01:20:55):
victim mentality has been brain scrambled into them by these
post colonial liberals who have who have convinced them that
they could they could totally run their own country, even
though countries didn't exist in Africa until until white people
colonized it and tried to civilize it. And I and

(01:21:16):
I'm not saying that that was necessarily a good idea
like this, this idea of white colonialism. The biggest mistake
they made was to think that they could make African people,
just like European people. It was it was never possible.
A great deal of African people see time backwards in

(01:21:37):
the same way European people think of time as forwards.
A great deal of African people see time as going backwards.
And it's a it's a complicated You'll have seen interpretations
of this a lot. But yeah, we're not the same.

(01:21:58):
That there's as more things that make us not the
same genetically, but I don't know how significant they are,
and I and I don't know how we can scientifically, empirically,
I mean, really draw the differences until we can actually

(01:22:21):
refrain from teaching black people that they are victims of everything,
especially of white people. I just, I just I want
to see that experiment, and I don't think we're going
to see it in America anytime soon, or yeah, anywhere
anytime soon, because because we're all being ruled by these

(01:22:41):
uh like likechophobic leftists who are just hell bent on
teaching black people and women and especially black women that
they are victims. And so obviously a black female jo
is going to be biased, especially if she's been through

(01:23:04):
the American education system, especially the American higher education system,
where where where they are taught, indeed brainwashed to believe
that if any black person is ever is ever accused
of a crime, then it must be because white men,

(01:23:25):
especially orange men, are are affecting this in some way.
And and again it's not just lack of education. This
judge has obviously been through the ringers of the of
the education system. So I'm not saying black people should
be shouldn't be judges. I'm saying, perhaps there should be

(01:23:48):
some kind of moratorium. Uh, it needs to be an
overhaul of the of the education system where people perhaps
refrain uh from from telling black people that they're all
necessarily victims no matter what they do. And until then,
I don't I don't know how we can trust quote

(01:24:13):
unquote minority judges are quote unquote minority juries from being
objective in any way. The only people you can trust
to be objective are people who don't have any kind
of in group prejudice whatsoever. I know, it's perfectly natural

(01:24:38):
for anyone and everyone to have in group bias, and
that's and that makes it quite difficult to produce a
judge or a jury that's truly unbiased. But in the meantime,
we should look to people who who don't have in
group bias. And when you look.

Speaker 1 (01:24:59):
At this to.

Speaker 3 (01:25:01):
Nowadays, the only people who's whose opinions and decisions are
not directed by in group bias are white people. In fact,
white white, white white people have and have outgroup biased
if anything, and that that doesn't that that doesn't make

(01:25:24):
them any more any less biased. In fact, they are
biased against their own people. I just I just want
a demographic of demographic of people who can be unbiased.
And I know that's not going to happen, but we're
stuck in this weird situation where white people hate their

(01:25:47):
own people and everyone else hates white people. So how
the fuck are we supposed to find unbiased people to
be juries, let alone judges. It's a shite state of affairs.
And I don't know how the fuck we get out
of it other than by gutting the education system and
the mass media. And yeah, I hope that's what Trump's doing,

(01:26:09):
because that's what needs to be done. Let's replace everyone
with orange people, because to be honest, we've had a
good track record with orange people so far. Let's let's
make everyone orange, all right. This is not an advertisement
for orange coin. I don't even know where that.

Speaker 1 (01:26:27):
Is is that a thing? It could be a.

Speaker 3 (01:26:29):
Apparently, don't don't buy orange coin, don't buy any coin.
It's all bollocks.

Speaker 2 (01:26:36):
Yeah, all right, so yeah, that's that's that's the story. Yeah, sad,
so glad it's not happening. But we are now going
to go into the Patient Show and look at that
right on time to a regular length show.

Speaker 1 (01:26:53):
How about that?

Speaker 2 (01:26:56):
Without Yeah, without Hannah, could you imagine I wouldn't have
like done the Ace Freely story if anything.

Speaker 1 (01:27:03):
So there you go.

Speaker 3 (01:27:03):
But we're just we're just spelling in time. It's yeah,
it's not Hannah that makes these things long. It's we
can make it long without Hannah.

Speaker 1 (01:27:12):
Yeah, we don't need to, that's true, all right.

Speaker 2 (01:27:17):
But anyway, Yeah, so we're gonna go into the Patron
Show now and we're gonna look at this. After years
of progress on gender, the male gaze is back. Boys,
we're back. We're back, and we're gonna find out what
it is CNN is getting at and uh, hopefully we'll
see you guys there again. That's Feedbatchel dot com for
slash Subscribe to join our discord and watch the additional content.

(01:27:38):
Uh and if you give it higher levels, you can
hang out with us in the discord and talk to
us directly, you know, give us a piece of your
mind or whatever. So but yeah, with that said, I
want to thank Mike for joining me on the show.
I want to thank you guys most of all for watching,
and I hope that you know Hannah is doing well
wherever she is. I'm pretty sure she had to go
work her other job. So with all that said, if

(01:28:01):
you guys liked this video, please hit like, subscribe to
not already subscribe, hit the bell notifications, leave us a comment,
let us know what you guys think about what we
discussed on the show today, and please please please share
this video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so
much for coming on today's episode of HPR News and
we will talk.

Speaker 1 (01:28:15):
To you all in the next one.

Speaker 3 (01:28:18):
See you next