Exclusive: Expert Researcher Jay Dyer Analyzes Zlonism & The Decline of the West

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The Tabastakis actually actually studied Spangler's decline in the West
to figure out how to weaponize it. Other techs talk
about weaponizing this kind of stuff too. Tavistock text. This
text right here talks about similar ideas. But basically, you
have to destroy the individual idea of sovereignty and of
building your own you know, life and family and business.
All that has to be destroyed to put you into

(00:21):
a collectivist mindset. And one of the key ways that
we don't talk about a lot is just guilt, like
using guilt, saying that you're guilty for your ancestors. Colonialism.
There's a great chapter in here. It's kind of funny,
like Margaret Mead, who's kind of a fraud. Margaret Mead says, Oh,
you gave people, you know, clothing and they couldn't wear

(00:43):
grass skirts anymore, so you made them want stuff, right,
That's why what she says like the stupidest argument. Only
academics could believe an argument that retarded. Right, But that's
why colonialism is bad. So, yeah, you might have raised
everybody's living centers and saved lives with medicine, but you're
bad because they have of you don't have grass skirts anymore. Right,
So greed is somehow bound up with the idea of

(01:05):
raising people groups.

Speaker 2 (01:06):
And I'm pro colonialism.

Speaker 1 (01:08):
I think it's nobody should build guilt for their ancestors bringing,
you know, civilization. I think about you know, speaking of
mel Gibson Apocalypto. That's the whole part about Apocalypto is
you know, don't you think those guys were happy when
they saw the Spanish coming and like they're running from
this giant human sacrifice cult, right, I see, like the
Spanish coming, It's like, oh.

Speaker 2 (01:25):
Maybe they'll help us.

Speaker 3 (01:26):
Yeah, it's it's fascinating. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. This
is the War Room. I'm your host, Harrison Smith guest
in studio Jay Dyer. He's an author, comedian, TV presenter

(01:47):
known for his deep analysis of Hollywood, geopolitics, and culture.
Of course you all know that already. If you don't
know it, you can go to Jay'sanalysis dot com. That's
Jay's Analysis dot com. He's on YouTube at Jaydyer, and
he's on X at Jay Underscore zero zero seven D
double o seven. And you got to get the whole name.
I just tried to tag you Jay in a post
and I had to type out all the way to

(02:08):
ja Underscore D zero and then it went, oh, this
is the guy. You mean you you're still shadow band
to some degree, aren't you?

Speaker 2 (02:14):
Probably?

Speaker 1 (02:15):
I mean it was at one point where it was
like straight up shadow band, you couldn't find me at all. Yeah,
and then it kind of went away after like a
week or two, so.

Speaker 4 (02:22):
Well you're you're there now.

Speaker 3 (02:23):
And I was really enjoying, you know, you and Alex's
conversation because it was just sort of a free wheeling,
uh you know, discussion about all sorts of stuff. And
I thought one of the interesting things y'all touched on
is the persistence of like Scottish people in rebellious uh activity,
and how it just seems to be a part of
the nature of Scottish people. And you know, you look

(02:44):
at the Texas Revolution, the American Revolution, Canada was mostly
settled by Scott's there's something about this, the Celtic strain
that sort of bucks under restrictions. What do you what
do you draw from that, and what do you think
the importance of that is and just the way things
unfold across the world.

Speaker 5 (03:02):
Well, we're not inbred, so that doesn't slow us down
with slow boy IQ. So some some groups do that, Yeah,
some Middle Eastern groups do that. That kind of slows
down things. But you know, some of the elite writings.

Speaker 1 (03:17):
There's one that didn't bring with me, which is Charles
Galton Darwin's book The I Forget the title in the
Next Million Years, And in that when he talks about
the genetic heritage of European peoples, of British Isle people,
Scottish people's Irish el etcetera. And in that he says
that these people are probably the toughest to control because

(03:40):
they kind of just have maybe through the environment, you know,
living in those climates that kind of you know, epigenetically
kind of you know, through a microevolution way you could say,
prepared them for very difficult scenarios and a lot of
warfare and that kind of stuff. So I think we're
a tough people. You can see, like I still got
the red here, uh huh.

Speaker 2 (04:01):
But yeah, we're a tough people.

Speaker 1 (04:02):
Were some people even speculate there's this gene that's responsible
for that kind of like both madness and like genius,
and the Scottish people just got a for it. I
Forget the name of that gene. But yeah, I mean
it's a fascinating theory. But regardless, like many of these
texts say explicitly that Western white European peoples and their
religion have to be subverted.

Speaker 2 (04:22):
And that's what we're undergoing right now.

Speaker 3 (04:24):
Yeah, and this, I mean, it's this is an established fact.
I mean, this goes back. You can read you know,
Julius Caesar's writings and you know, you had a lot
of trouble with the Germans because they have this proclivity
to you know, you can't just order him to do something.
I remember reading a Roman general at some point and
he you know, the Romans you just say, go do this,
and they go do it. The Germans, you got to
explain why they're doing it, Yeah, to explain what they're
going to get for doing it. They weren't just gonna

(04:46):
follow orders outright. And then of course, the you know,
Julius Cesar obviously failed to conquer Britain and they never
really got all the way up to Scotland. The end
up just building you know, Hadrian's Wall after a couple
hundred years of trying. But the reason was because Britain
was this generator of conflict against the Romans. Right, It
was this sort of you know, I think about it
like a video game where you've got all the monsters

(05:06):
coming out of the doorway and you have to go
destroy the doorway. All some monsters are going to keep coming,
so you know, and they would they would say, you know,
people would be sent to Britain to study, you know,
under these occult practices in the same way that you know,
a lawyer might be sent to Rhodes to become a scholar.
So you know, Britain was this headquarters of of sort
of this Celtic religion that constantly was rebelling against Rome.

(05:28):
And so they were like, we're never gonna at peace
until we destroyed the source.

Speaker 1 (05:32):
And I don't think they ever got to the source. Yeah,
well they're trying that now, right. So the source is
you know, I believe in the soul of a people
if you read you know, somebody like Oswald Spangler, who
was very critical of Hitler, very critical of the Reich,
and was eventually I think he had to leave Germany
because he thought Hitler was a tiny, tiny little man.

(05:55):
But he's you know, considered a right winger and considered
kind of one of those storicist thinkers that classifies everything
in terms of like cycles, and the Western peoples, he said,
would be subverted by the other nations taking over their technology.
In other words, the liberal socialist ethos of liberal Christianity

(06:17):
would be the undoing of the Western peoples, and that
would allow the other people, groups that aren't necessarily enemies
but that would be imported, to kind of take over.
And he said this would be the fate, although he
was not for it. The Tabisarkis actually studied Spangler's decline
to the West to figure out how.

Speaker 2 (06:37):
To weaponize it.

Speaker 1 (06:39):
Other texts talk about weaponizing this kind of stuff too.
Tavistock text, this text right here talks about similar ideas,
but basically have to destroy the individual idea of sovereignty
and of building your own life and family and business.
All that has to be destroyed to put you into
a collectivist mindset. And one of the key ways that
we don't talk about a lot is just like using guilt,

(07:01):
saying that you're guilty for your ancestors colonialism. There's a
great chapter in here. It's kind of funny, like Margaret Mead,
who's kind of a fraud. Margaret Mead says, Oh, you
gave people, you know, clothing, and they couldn't wear grass
skirts anymore, so you made them want stuff, right, That's
why what she says like the stupidest argument. Only academics

(07:24):
could believe an argument that retarded. Right, But that's why
colonialism is bad. So, yeah, you might have raised everybody's
living centers and saved lives with medicine, but you're bad
because they have you don't have grass skirts anymore. Right,
So greed is somehow bound up with the idea of
raising people groups.

Speaker 2 (07:40):
And I'm pro colonialism.

Speaker 1 (07:41):
I think it's nobody should feel guilt for their ancestors bringing,
you know, civilization. I think about you know, speaking of
mel Gibson Apocalypto. That's the whole part about Apocalypto is
you know, don't you think those guys were happy when
they saw the Spanish coming and like they're running from
this giant human sacrifice cult, right, they see like the
Spanish coming, It's like, oh maybe they'll help us.

Speaker 4 (08:00):
Yeah, it's it's fascinating.

Speaker 3 (08:01):
And you know, obviously the British were just exceptional when
it came to colonialism, and just you see how widespread
the sort of British diaspora went and you know, I
guess you know, the World Wars is the obvious answer,
But like, how did they lose it?

Speaker 4 (08:16):
How did it go so wrong so fast?

Speaker 3 (08:18):
Because you when you had from Australia to South Africa
to America. I mean, this was an Anglo world for
a while, and there were some there were some very
good consequences from that. But then ever since World War Two,
it's just like it hasn't just collapsed, it's gone the
other way. It's like now the white people are just
being driven out of everywhere, including their own homelands.

Speaker 4 (08:39):
Like, how did he go so wrong so fast?

Speaker 1 (08:41):
Even though like we're supposedly colonialist, is not our land,
But then it's wrong if we don't want other people
coming to colonize on, right, So it makes no sense.
Nothing on the loft makes any sense. That's on purpose,
by the way. But one of the books I've been
covering from many years is Jowan Rotiu is amazing book,
The Millner Fabian Conspiracy. It's a it's a geopolitical historical
espionage texts, not really a conspiracy texts. He just kind

(09:03):
of goes from a lot of the same books, and
there's a great chapter that hits on what you're talking
about about the OSS and CIA psychological warfare and mind
control operations that many people don't know about that we
the US did against Germans. So and I'm not again,
I'm very conspiratorial when it comes to the narrative of
World War Two.

Speaker 2 (09:22):
I think that Hitler played a.

Speaker 1 (09:23):
Role in helping to create the dialectic that would lead
to the establishment of the nation of state of Israel.
You couldn't have today's, you know, nineteen forty eight recognition
without what Hitler did.

Speaker 2 (09:34):
So that's a different topic.

Speaker 1 (09:36):
But there's a chapter where it says that the OSS
really went deep into studying the German psyche. And again
I'm not backing up Hitler. I'm against Hitler. I think
he was a bad guy who was an anti Christ
in the orthodox Christian perspective. But it's not accidental that
after World War Two the OSS set up all of
these propaganda operations in Germany to make sure that Germans

(10:00):
would never tap into their native strength, the soul of
that people, to become an engineering powerhouse like they were
before World War Two. So they actually si opped them
into being farmers and stuff.

Speaker 4 (10:13):
Yeah, yeah, weird.

Speaker 1 (10:14):
Yeah, and I was not that it's run to be
a farmer, but they just didn't want them to be warlike.

Speaker 3 (10:19):
Welly, yeah, they didn't want them to reach their potential
and then yeah, you know, be designers of their own destiny.
And you know, I was watching I was watching some
some YouTube drama slop yesterday and part of it was
H three H three. They had a German guy and
the German guy was going, you know, we've studied history,
and we know how evil we are, and so we
you know, Americans are not good at studying the history.

Speaker 4 (10:41):
And I just kept thinking, like, you didn't. You haven't
studied your history.

Speaker 3 (10:43):
You've been subject to a propaganda program that's going on
seventy years that's convinced you to demonize your own people.
And it's it's sad to see Germans pick up that
mantle and like demonize themselves and think that they're doing
a good thing.

Speaker 4 (10:56):
It's it's really a brutal way to treat somebody.

Speaker 1 (10:58):
And yeah, guilt, I mean, like this book talks about
that they've studied the psychology of guilt manipulation, and that's
what part of that is. So if you can manipulate
an entire continent of people through phony, faux guilt narratives.
And that's really what all the social engineer is all about,
is hitting those narratives.

Speaker 3 (11:15):
Yeah, and you know it is it is connected to
you know, the wider, the wider geopolitical goals of the people,
manipulating even even figures like Hitler into serving their ends.
And I thought that was another fascinating thing that you
touched on with Alex is sort of how the Rothschilds
were involved in the settlement of Israel one hundred years
before the nineteen forty eight declaration. So talk a little

(11:37):
bit about that, because that's something I think people don't
understand enough, is that, you know, the Rothschilds are really
central to the whole conspiracy, the whole global conspiracy all
really if you I mean, it goes back farther obviously,
but like starting with you know that first Rothschild, the
first Rothschild with the five sons and the different I
mean you talk about intelligence agencies, you talk about the

(11:57):
control of the central banks, it all goes back to
this one family in.

Speaker 4 (12:02):
Germany in like the sixteen hundreds.

Speaker 1 (12:04):
Well, they were smart enough to really send out the
family emissaries to the European countries to basically set up banks.
And there's a great chapter in Quickly's Strategy and Hope
that's about the French banking system, the pari boss system,
which was dominated and run by the Rothschild So eventually
it wasn't all Rothails. There was also Protestant and Catholic
banking as well, but eventually they came to dominate and

(12:26):
they set up this pari boss banking system. But to
fast forward up to the time of the late eighteen hundreds,
actually mid eighteen hundreds, in eighteen sixties, all the way
into the eighteen nineties, the nation state of Israel was
being planned, right, They didn't know if they would eventually
get a full on nation state. But Edmund Rotheld said, well,

(12:47):
I'm going to start buying tracks of land, and he
became an anonymous benefactor. He went under a code name
Nadev Hayuda, And so they didn't know who this person
was was buying all this land. They were talking to
a Turkish Soulton who was happy to sell it.

Speaker 3 (13:01):
Right, there's sort of absentee landowners that would live in
Istanbul and owned tracks of land in Palestine where they'd
get tax revenue.

Speaker 4 (13:09):
But it was a pittance.

Speaker 3 (13:10):
And so you know, when Rothschild comes along and goes, hey,
I'll give you an exorbitant amount of money, of course
they're going to say yes.

Speaker 1 (13:16):
And according to the Bogger for here, who's you know,
not partisan, it's an official kind of biography. I mean,
he doesn't put it like they really that the Rochels
themselves thought it would be super political. Supposedly, he just
wanted a bunch of religious sites that Jews could go
and be pilgrims too, Okay, But then he meets with
Theodore Hertzel, he meets with other characters involved in political Zionism,

(13:41):
and they try to talk him into it. Initially, supposedly
they weren't that interested in getting political because they were
actually pretty European and they thought, this is going to
damage our name in Europe if we are seen as
a sort of hyper political, you know, involved in the
British imperial project of setting up this nation. So didn't
immediately get that, but eventually they came around to it,

(14:02):
and they did put money into the settlement of Palestine,
massive amounts of money into the nineteen thirties, this is
after Balfur Declaration. At that time, the first donation I
think nineteen thirty one, they gave forty thousand dollars to
weitzmanck Hemwetzmann and the project. They tried to buy the

(14:23):
Whaling Wall, and they wanted to try to find the
Ark of the Covenant and.

Speaker 2 (14:27):
All this kind of stuff.

Speaker 1 (14:28):
But for whatever reason, the Grand Rabbi of Israel at
that time actually told Edmund that he couldn't buy the
whaling Wall. So I don't know what the reason for
the buyer doesn't say. But after this time, though, they
do begin gradually to buy more and more and more,
and then eventually I think my theory is that they

(14:49):
realized that they were not going to get the recognition
of the nation state of Israel until there was some
event that would occur, the forced remigration, and that came
in waves of tens of thousands. Eventually they got five
hundred thousand and six hundred thousand Jews into Israel after
the nineteen thirties and forties, but the tiny mustache man event.

Speaker 2 (15:09):
Helped do that. And after World War Two.

Speaker 1 (15:12):
It's because of World War Two that nineteen forty eight
recognized it the UN you recognize it Israel as because.

Speaker 2 (15:17):
Of World War two.

Speaker 1 (15:18):
So when you look at Quickly from that vantage point
and you see him talking about the money that was
put into funding him, aiding him, bringing him to power,
giving him, as we said, like, there's a whole chapter
in Quickly and Treasury Hope on the dual strategy. And
the dual strategy is that the British power structure was

(15:39):
telling Hitler the whole time, we will secretly support you.
We're not going to attack you. Go into poland, go
into Czechoslovakia. Take the money, take whatever, take the loot.
We're behind you, but we're gonna have to tell a
public that we're against you. And after all this they
stabbed him in the back. They didn't keep supporting him.
Then we got World War two. And why would we

(16:00):
want world War two? Well, world War One was engineered,
according to clearly by the same elite families and power
structure to get the League of Nations, the legal Nations
didn't have any teeth. America opposed it. So well, let's
have a bigger war with a more villainous figure, then
we'll have what we want, which wasn't just the narrative

(16:22):
Israel that's one piece of an overall larger picture, which
is I think what changing images a man is about?
And like, here's the thing. Everybody says, well, what is
it the Jews or is it these people who are
like Theosophists socialists? These projects work together because the socialist

(16:42):
Zionist project, becau Zionism is all socialism, right with especially
with Hess and Hurtzel on these characters, it's the same
socialism as these people, right so when you read these,
when you read like Moses Hess, he's not a fist
in the way that you think of like a personal
god external to you. He exploicedly says, I believe in
hegel process theology, pantheism. Spinoza Spinosa was a Jewish pantheist.

(17:07):
He says, that's what our project is. God is the
dialectic of everything happening in history. That's god dialectical process.
So he thinks that the dialectical process is moving man towards,
in Hess's view, the establishment of a nation state that
would be the beacon for world socialism. Right now, not
everybody has that same idea, right the Theosophists, they didn't

(17:29):
really like the Judaic idea of it. They said, no,
maybe it'll be Tonny mustache man, maybe that kind of
an idea will set up a socialist world government, fascist
world or whatever. But it ended up being none of those,
and it went. And it's basically the Babian socialist model,
which blends perfectly with the Zionist model.

Speaker 2 (17:45):
It's the same stuff, right.

Speaker 3 (17:46):
And of course a lot of the early settlers of
the Kibbutzes were socialists who had been driven out of
the Pale settlement by the pogroms, and then they wouldn't settled,
and once the Tzar was overthrown, they took what they'd
learned and went up and helped to establish the Bolshevik
government in the Communist government, you know, through taking sort
of the theories of Marx that they had been espousing previously,
they put them into action in the Kibbutzz and sort

(18:08):
of learned how politically they could work out. Explain what
you mean by Israel being just part of a much
larger planks. I think that's where people get stuck. They
see Israel doing a lot of stuff, the Greater Israel Project,
all that stuff. I always try to remind them that's
just one party, and tell me if I'm wrong, my
assumption is that they want Israel and specifically Jerusalem, to
be the capital of the global government.

Speaker 4 (18:29):
It will be sort of inviable.

Speaker 3 (18:30):
I always say globalism is sort of the marriage of
communism and Zionism, where you have the nation state that's
inviolable in Israel, but everywhere else is deracinated and the
borders are empty.

Speaker 4 (18:40):
Is that what you mean when you say it's part
of a larger project.

Speaker 2 (18:43):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (18:43):
I think that there's certain people like Moses has or
a Hertzel that would think that we'll set up a
nation state, we will have the real beacon of world
socialism that will save the world. And they actually speak
of in solve efic ways, So like when they read
Isaiah fifty three, the Suffering Servant, and they say, oh,

(19:03):
that's not really about some Messiah or you know, some person,
it's about the Jewish people and the eventual establishment of
this nation state that will be the salvation. So they
internalize the Messianic prophecies, not all of them. I'm just saying. So,
I think for somebody like Moses has or something like that,
or some of the Zionist ideologues, they believe in a

(19:26):
political salve Efic ideology, which is very close to what
we would say is kind of an antichrist ideology, because
that's who would accept the Antichrist as somebody who believes.

Speaker 2 (19:35):
That kind of an ideology.

Speaker 1 (19:36):
But I think other globalists that are don't have any
problem with those flavors, like they think of it more
internationally and more of a who cares if it's Israel.
I mean, Changing Image of Man says multiple times like
all the Western biblical ideas of God have to go,
And people think, well, but what about what you're saying, Well,
I don't think that the Zionist ideology the religious ones.

Speaker 2 (19:59):
They're not.

Speaker 1 (20:00):
It's not classical theism like we think of it. It's
process theology, which melds perfectly with the Theosophus. And the
reason it's part of a bigger project is the whole
world is intended by most of these people to go
into some kind of a controlled technocratic agenda. So like
Alex said, I mean there is one hundred year plan

(20:22):
that the Chinese have. I mean, I'm sure China doesn't
really care about Israel. I think one of their people
was just blambasting the Israeli people the other day so
we don't care about your Israel stuff. So most of
the world doesn't really care about Israel's you know, Greater
Project oded you Noon Project and all the La Coup
Plan and all that. But of course obviously they have
a huge amount of influence in the US government with

(20:43):
what you know, say, it's very easy to move yeah, right,
so we all, I think we know this kind of stuff.
But apart from particular like regions the Middle East or whatever,
there is this overall global plan that people have in
the power structure that again, you don't have to be
wedded to even care about it. There are plenty of
anti Zionists, globalists like Brazenski somebody like that. He was like,

(21:07):
Jews don't really like Brazenski.

Speaker 4 (21:09):
Right, but George Soros, they're gonna make fans of it.

Speaker 1 (21:11):
But so it's bigger than this. But I'm not saying
that it doesn't matter like it does matter. I mean,
the Rothchilds are a huge part of this, and they
were kind of running the British Empire at one point.

Speaker 4 (21:22):
Right right after Waterloo.

Speaker 3 (21:24):
And you know, I feel like a lot of people
think when they think of conspiracies, they think that you know,
the people in power are just omnipresent, omnipotent. They can
do whatever the hell they want, whenever the hell they want.
They have this list of things they're going to do,
and they're just checking them off the list. That's not
really how it is, though, right. They have plans, They
try one thing, it doesn't quite work. They try another thing. Okay,
let's you know, World War one didn't quite have the

(21:44):
oop we needed for the world government. Maybe we're missing
a figure. Maybe we need that single figure to make
the Satan of our new religion. We need a guy,
how about Hitler? So I mean, do you agree with
that that? You know, it's not so much. These people
are just sort of have a plan for the world
and we're all just helplessly watching. They're having to react
to how humanity reacts, and their plans work. Some of
them don't. Some take longer than they think. It's not

(22:04):
a foregone conclusion.

Speaker 6 (22:05):
Is it.

Speaker 2 (22:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (22:06):
I don't think they knew for sure that the way
that they wanted to go, you know, Hitler into World
War two, that that was necessarily going to work. I
think that they strategized and planned it. There's some really
great they're somewhat disputed, but I think they're pretty revelatory.
There's a great document called Red Symphony, and it's an
interrogation of a guy named Christian Rokovsky. He was the

(22:28):
trotsky Heite socialist president of Bulgaria and he was taken
in by the in KVD because Stalin wasn't a huge
fan of Trotsky, so he arrested at one point and
the interrogations are all real.

Speaker 2 (22:43):
This one. Some people debate it because it's so revelatory,
but you.

Speaker 1 (22:47):
Basically have this lower level KVD guy, I think his
name is Gabriel and he's interrogating Rakovsky and he says,
you know, what were you What were you thinking by
opposing Stalin? What did you think you would get all this?
And the guy says, oh, well, you don't understand it,
like we're going to get another war. We're going to
have another you know, there'll be another world war and
we're going to have eventually world socialism. And he mentions

(23:09):
like some really prominent British spies like Sidney Riley, and
he says, we're all worked for the rothchilds. You don't
know that. And the guy who's the sort of mid
level n KVD interrogator. He's like, how could we be
working at the behest of banking capital?

Speaker 5 (23:25):
Right?

Speaker 1 (23:25):
We are socialist Marxists, right, how could? And it blows
his mind. And if you think that it's outlandish, well,
why would David Rockefeller be such a huge proponent of
Harold Laski, the most famous socialist in America? He studied
under him, he wrote under him, promoted him. And you know,
Dad Rockfeller wrote to famous New York Times editorials in

(23:48):
the late seventies about how big a fan he was
A mau Chase Bank was the first bank in China.
So there is no antipathy at that level between Marxism,
socialism and big capital. To go back to Spangler said
it famously that there is no socialist revolution not funded
by big capital.

Speaker 4 (24:07):
Right, It's absolutely true. And I mean not just big capital.

Speaker 3 (24:11):
I mean the American government basically built the USSR during
World War Two. I mean we weren't just in in weapons,
We're in factories and trains and absolutely everything. Why would
we do that if there are a big enemy? More
with Jay Dyer on the other side, don't go anywhere, folks,
more to come, all right, welcome back, folks. This is
the war room Jay Dyer in studio with me, and uh,
you know, I hope, I hope the audience is like

(24:32):
me and appreciates that. While yes, in full Wars tends
to focus a lot on breaking news and political analysis
of what's going on just in the in the immediate
reality of planet Earth, we also have the leeway and
I and the audience to appreciate that we can just
sort of talk about history and how we got to
this point and the the whole the whole timeline, not

(24:55):
just sort of reacting immediately to everything. So, you know,
I think in FORO Wars is very unique outlet in
that regard, and I hope that you support us at
the Alex jonesore dot com the Alex jonesore dot com.
I know it's been ever since I started hosting a
show on Info Wars, I always reveled in the ability
to you know, I'm going to take a segment just
to ramble about Roman history, and I know our audience
will appreciate it and not go get back to the news.

(25:17):
They understand how all this ties in together, and actually
the background is necessary to understand the present. If you
don't know how we got here, how are we going
to get out of the trap they're trying to put
us in? So please do support this extremely unique and
powerful outlet at the Alex jonesore dot com. You can
go to the Alex joneso dot com slash Harrison if
you want to let him know who sent you. Of course,
Jay Dyer is the perfect person to have on in
this regard Jay's Analysis dot com YouTube, Jay Dyer and

(25:39):
on x at J Underscore d double O seven.

Speaker 4 (25:43):
We just continued our.

Speaker 3 (25:45):
Conversation like we didn't even go to break, So I'm like, okay, wait, where.

Speaker 4 (25:48):
Did we drop off? Where do we leave off?

Speaker 6 (25:49):
Now?

Speaker 1 (25:49):
That's off at Cover Commander, Yeah, well yeah.

Speaker 4 (25:52):
That's how we started.

Speaker 1 (25:53):
Actually, when I came in here, they were Harrison was
in her watching like old g I Joe clips because
there's a really good one that you should find on
YouTube or on TikTok or whatever, where Cobra Commander actually
creates Cobra Coin as a competitor to the Federal Reserve.
And the funny part of it is is everything that
Cobra Commanders saying about the Federal Reserve being a scam

(26:13):
is actually true.

Speaker 2 (26:14):
That's awesome. Where I create co reclineism is a scam.

Speaker 4 (26:19):
But he's actually a good guy.

Speaker 1 (26:21):
And then the G I Joe's like, we gota, we
got to prop up the dollar in the federal Reserve.

Speaker 4 (26:28):
Nothing more American than a fat currency. Absolutely see.

Speaker 3 (26:32):
I never watched G I Joe as a kid, so
I know, really, I've watched more of Alex Jones pretending
to be Cobra commander than I've ever actually watched a
Cobra commander.

Speaker 4 (26:40):
So I saw that.

Speaker 3 (26:40):
Yeah, I saw that TikTok video and I was like, okay, based,
all right, I got.

Speaker 4 (26:44):
A new show for my kids that will go on
the approved list.

Speaker 2 (26:48):
I suppose there's episodes on M culture.

Speaker 1 (26:50):
There's episodes on genetic engineering, there's weather modification.

Speaker 2 (26:54):
That's why all of that, and the reason for that.

Speaker 1 (26:56):
If you really want to know, I can tell you
about I did. I did a lecture on this one
time in the UK. Hey, I forget the guy's name,
but the guy who's involved in consulting on G I
Joe is a Pentagon guy. So this is actually like
for people my age, this was like to make me
want to be special.

Speaker 3 (27:14):
Literal programming propaganda. Wow, yeah, well it probably works. You know,
same thing, like, you know, top Gun. You know they
always say that Navy recruits spiked a thousand percent or whatever.

Speaker 2 (27:24):
So my dad went into the Navy from top gun.

Speaker 4 (27:26):
From top Gun. Yeah, yeah, well it works.

Speaker 3 (27:28):
And of course that that's sort of your speciality is
looking into the hidden messages and everything. I know, last
time You're on, we were talking about how just the
facade has fallen away and they're just outright satanic now
at this point, and you know, it's it seems like,
obviously the market is open for people that aren't pushing
that to come in and scoop up some of that
market share. And I know a lot of good people

(27:49):
are are doing that. For people like myself who have
young kids, how would you suggest we, you know, navigate
the modern media landscape just watch stuff from our child
That's basically what we do.

Speaker 2 (28:01):
Well.

Speaker 1 (28:01):
It's funny though, because when I watched childhood stuff like
then you see the propaganda at that right.

Speaker 4 (28:06):
It's but it's just not as bad.

Speaker 2 (28:08):
It's not as bad. It's still pretty wholesome.

Speaker 1 (28:10):
I mean, we got so sick of movies that Jamie
and I were watching a lot of Noah films from
the forties, because I've not seen a lot of those.
And then what's amazing about those is once you know,
all like the World War Two narrative, so many of
those World War Two films were also propaganda, especially like
Humphrey Bogart films.

Speaker 2 (28:28):
Many of those are propaganda.

Speaker 1 (28:29):
And my third book is about to come out Asir
Callywood three, I had old chapter on there's actually a
network of British intelligence spy fiction writers that came to
write a lot of those movies in the nineteen forties.
So even you know John Crawford movies, Humphrey Bogart films,
those are essentially films making America feel the necessity to

(28:50):
be involved in right on the side of Britain, and
that was that was the job of some of those
those people coming over here for British intelligence.

Speaker 3 (28:57):
You know, it's wild how involved British intelligence has been
in American media since World War One, although I think
it was World War Two, didn't they have They had
an office in the Rockefeller Building in New York.

Speaker 2 (29:07):
H Williams. Stevenson's office was there.

Speaker 1 (29:08):
His name with the codename was Intrepid, and they set
him up a specific propaganda office in the Rockefeller Plaza and.

Speaker 3 (29:14):
That creaz so a British intelligence had an office in America.
Two propaganda's Americans in adjoining the war on behalf of
Britain and we just went along with it.

Speaker 1 (29:21):
Yeah, And they were the ones that helped Bill Donovan
set up the OSS. So it's Noel Coward, it's William
Stevenson from Canadian intelligence. Ian Fleming and Stevenson set up
quite a bit of things like that. But they were
really telling Bill Donovan, Okay, here's how you structure your
intelligence apparatus.

Speaker 4 (29:39):
Right, you need to. And that's sort of the thing,
isn't it.

Speaker 3 (29:42):
Any of these institutions you have to go back to
the guy who's done it before, which is why you
know you're talking about Protestant and Catholic bankers, you know
even as far back as like the Middle Ages. But
it's like for them to get money, who they have
to go to how they learned the craft? There were
people already doing it before them. So so when you
trace this stuff up the pyramid, you know, you honestly
always end up at the Rothschilds. Because when you talk

(30:03):
about intelligence and the way that you know, by setting
up five banks and five cities all over Europe. They
just sort of, in a de facto way, established a
method by which information could be transmitted quickly and safely
between all these countries. So they therefore established a better
intelligence network than the countries that they were living in,
which is why when you know, Rothschild went starts selling

(30:25):
bonds after the Battle of Waterloo, everybody knew, Hey, that
guy's got the information. That guy knows more than we do.
He's selling we must have lost. That's how he, you know,
buys up the British economy. But that's sort of to me,
you know, if you're tracing back the birth of intelligence,
you know, CIA to OSS, to British intelligence to the
Rothschild banking family.

Speaker 2 (30:44):
Yeah, if you.

Speaker 1 (30:45):
Watch Wall Street, I don't know how cognizant Oliverson was
when you put this in there, but the Gordon Gecko character,
it's an excellent analogy of exactly what you're talking about.
How when Charlie Sheen, who's the sort of blue collar
guy and he goes to study under Gordon Gecko to
become like the you know, psycho Wall.

Speaker 2 (31:03):
Street guy with the big fet you know. Yeah, yeah,
Zach Morris cell phone.

Speaker 4 (31:07):
The coolest guy.

Speaker 1 (31:10):
What happens is Charlie Sheen thinks, oh, this is all
about sitting at the desk and you know, spending all
hours making the trades, and Gordon Gecko's laughing at him,
and he's like, no, I want you to go get
dirt on the guy. I want you to go sleep
with this person. I want you to become an intelligence
agent and you get the inside information. And then Charlie
seems like that's instart retreating and Gordon Gecko just laughs

(31:32):
at I'm like, yeah, that's how it works, dude. So
just like we're talking about with Waterloo, Yeah, the older
banking structure is essentially an intelligence apparatus. I think Interpol
comes out of that Rocheld network as well. And so
what they had figured out was secret societies are much
like intelligence agencies and they overlap with banking entities. And

(31:53):
that's essentially what we have today is a we're ruled
by banker spies, technocrats.

Speaker 3 (32:00):
Buy's working on behalf of bankers because obviously you can
have a lot of control economically as a bank, but
you can't kill people.

Speaker 4 (32:06):
You need an intelligence agency to do that.

Speaker 3 (32:08):
So the intelligence agencies have formed a sort of the
enforcement arm of the banking caval that took power of
the British Empire after the Battle of Waterloo.

Speaker 1 (32:16):
Well, a few years ago, maybe ten years ago, a
bunch of big stories came out.

Speaker 2 (32:20):
Alex reported at the time.

Speaker 1 (32:21):
There was in the Guardian, it was in all the
big papers, HSBC, big huge megabanks, hundreds of.

Speaker 2 (32:28):
Billions of dollars of laundering drug money.

Speaker 1 (32:31):
Yeah, how do you do that if you're not connected
to intelligence agency?

Speaker 2 (32:34):
Obviously they are.

Speaker 3 (32:35):
And when you look at the document that we've covered
quite a bit, I call it the Eagle To document,
but it's a leaked document that was made by the
FBI talking about the CIA drug running operation, how it
got started and how and basically it says, you know,
at a certain point this operation became so big the
CIA couldn't handle it.

Speaker 4 (32:50):
So it was you know, control was given to.

Speaker 3 (32:53):
Baron de Rothschild and he was operating out of Paris
with the can't remember exactly what it is, not the
Bank of International Settlement, but another organization like that that
basically took control of the drug running operation that had
been the black budget, you know, money generator for CIA.

Speaker 1 (33:08):
Well, that's Gladio and another intelligence bank connected to Gladio
is Charles Hambrough and he was a Jewish British intelligence
operative who started the Hembros Brothers Bank, which was directly
tied into all the Gladio Vatican Bank scandals. So this
is not antithetical. It's not like, well, is it the
Jewish banking or is it the Vatican commit They're all
tied together, right, because it's a giant global network of

(33:28):
organized crime. And if you study organized crime, and if
you you know, go listen's interviews that I've done with
Sammy the Bull. You know, he's very candid now you know,
many years after that life of talking about all these
networks overlapping and how you got to grease the skids
and you've got to be in with the politicians, and
you know, he talks about all Yeah, of course we
work with the Jewish mafia, where all the mafias worked together,
and so it's a big club. You know, I hate

(33:51):
I'm not a huge fan of George Carlin, but I mean, right,
but I mean that's what Gordon Gecko like you know,
represents there, right, and Gecko is a serpent, you know, it's.

Speaker 4 (34:00):
Right, right, Yeah, that's that's super interesting.

Speaker 3 (34:03):
And of course now you know they're rigging NBA games,
apparently the Italian mafia rigging rigging NBA games.

Speaker 4 (34:09):
I don't know if you saw that, the gambling ring.

Speaker 2 (34:11):
I did it. But that's nothing new, I mean, right, I.

Speaker 3 (34:14):
Mean it's been going on since the World Series and
one of the nineteen eleven something like that. Yeah, yeah,
so yeah, And of course we've heard people like Ted
Gunderson say, hey, look, you know there may be a
high value person that wants a child and you got
to know where to get a child for them. You know, yeah,
we got to break the law. But that's what we do.
We're saving people's lives. So they really are able to

(34:34):
justify anything and justify their you know, partnerships with criminal
enterprises because hey, they can do things other people can't
and we might need it for national security. It's really
a very brilliant you know, excuse to keep it secret
and be able to do whatever the hell you want.
Intelligence agencies really are the engine that keeps us whole
this New World Order operation moving forward.

Speaker 1 (34:55):
Yeah, and they were set up by the at least
the oss CIA were set up, as we said, by
British intelligence but British intelligence, the modern security services were
set up at the turn of the century by Fabian
socialists who all had the same Milner socialist ideology. So
to go back to that point that we meant to
mention about Israel, you know, a lot of the British
elite were not pro Israel, right, But that doesn't immediately

(35:17):
make them like good people.

Speaker 2 (35:19):
Right.

Speaker 1 (35:19):
So for example, many of the British spies that are
very well known, very famous.

Speaker 2 (35:23):
You have t. E.

Speaker 1 (35:23):
Lawrence, you have gertrue Belle, Saint John Phillby, San John
Philby became a wall hobby convert, right, and that was
whether he really believed it or I don't know, but
he was working as a British intelligence operative with the
Salafi you know, strain of Islam, so that the Empire
could have control and influence through that branch, and they

(35:44):
ended up using them quite often because that's where we
get this whole Al Kaeda Mujahadeen alliance that we use,
and then Israel's now using that with Jolani and al
Nusra and you know, taking down saw It in Syria,
Timber Sycamore, all those operations that, by the way, I
was writing about timber Sycamore in twenty fourteen and got
called all kinds of names.

Speaker 2 (36:03):
And oh, there's such a crazy tempole.

Speaker 1 (36:05):
Hat and then it comes out in the New York
Times timber Sycamore is the name of the project billions
of dollars.

Speaker 2 (36:10):
Well, we didn't know the name of it.

Speaker 4 (36:11):
What is that? Sorry, I'm I'm blinking on.

Speaker 1 (36:13):
Yeah, just look at New York Times Timber Sycamore. That
was the name for the billions of dollars that were
sent to topple a sad back. Oh okay, remember twenty fourteen,
fifteen sixteen, like that time, and it was like you
can't massolve the Assaud and everybody was like, yeah, so
that was what we were writing about. Talking about the
White Helmets was one of these big propaganda operations that

(36:34):
they were doing.

Speaker 2 (36:35):
They got they got.

Speaker 1 (36:35):
An oscar for the documentary, and of course George Clooney
was a big promoter of all that.

Speaker 2 (36:43):
Yeah, it's not just Saudi money though.

Speaker 1 (36:45):
Look up Timber Sycamore and you'll get the New York
Times headline and it says it came to an end. Well,
it came to an end because like they ended up
eventually toppling a Sawd and they put Joelani in. Jelani
was the head of Al Nowsro back when they were
trying to topple a Sad, when the CFR was writing
articles saying we need al Qaeda in Syria.

Speaker 2 (37:04):
That's it. It's it's on the front page in over Times.

Speaker 4 (37:06):
But yeah, that's right, they are al Qaida, yep.

Speaker 3 (37:11):
And and of course you know Isis was mostly Saudi Arabian,
a lot of people actually out of Europe that were
radicalized in the Saudi Arabian funded mosques there. But when
you look at the history of the sod family, I mean,
it doesn't go back that far. And that was a
project of British intelligence as well, right, a British and
American intelligence setting up the Saud family, which was just
I mean, it was basically just a bunch of barbarians.

(37:32):
This one strong man, you know, got them all together
and and it's been him or his sons or his
grandsons running the entire country ever since. You know, all
of the princes they're all direct descendant of this one
King Saud, who you know, British intelligence picked as the
as the vessel through which they would control the oil.

Speaker 1 (37:48):
Yeah, the British carved up the whole area with the
French sis Pico, and that's where we get Iraq from,
we get Pakistan, we get Saudi Arabia. Those are all
creations of the British Empire. And it was t Lawrence
that went and set up the Souds. Gertrude Bell went
and set up what was in Iraq. She's a pretty

(38:08):
fascinate character. But what's interially about those people is that
they were not pro Zionists. They were arable files. So
amongst the British structure of the spies and the elites,
you had these people that really loved Islam and well Hobbism,
and which as a woman is really odd that Gertrude
Bell would love Islam, but she was really into She
studied Persian Farsie and poetry and Roomy and all this stuff.

Speaker 2 (38:32):
So she was an odd ball.

Speaker 1 (38:33):
But she was working directly underneath the British Foreign Office
for the Middle East, which was headed up by a
Chatham House Royal Society, Royal Sugrainternational Affairs guy, answering directly
to people like Milner and.

Speaker 4 (38:47):
The Rothchild's right right. And you know it was interesting.

Speaker 3 (38:49):
I was shown a clip from this sitcom out of
the UK called a Yes Minister. I don't know I
ever heard of that on it, but it was a
clip from the seventies and it has to do with,
you know, political stuff, and they say, well, you're gonna
go give a speech about Zionism. He says, yes, of course,
and of course I'm going to say I'm going to
stand against it and blah blah blah. And it was
weird because it was at the time, in the seventies.

(39:10):
I guess it was just understood the average Britain and
the entire British government was anti Zionist, which was just
kind of odd because you don't you think there's always
labor governments usually, and I think that's what it was. Yeah,
it was sort of a reforming type of government that
was in there. But it was interesting to me to
see that in the seventies it was just sort of
assumed that if the British government addressed Israel in the UN,
they would be against it and they would be against Zionism.

(39:31):
And people don't know that that it was as early
as you know, as you know, forty years ago, that
was the case in all of the UK.

Speaker 4 (39:37):
So things.

Speaker 3 (39:38):
Things have changed quite a bit, and now you've got people,
I don't know if you've seen the video. This guy's
walking around a he's walking around to protests where people
are being arrested for like waving Palestinian flags, and he's
going up to cops and going, I'm in favor of genocide.

Speaker 4 (39:50):
I want Israel to kill all of the women and children.
Is that okay?

Speaker 3 (39:53):
And they're going, hey, you're allowed to have your opinion,
that's fine. While people are getting arrested for waving a flag.
So it's it's gone the other direction now and people
are literally being arrested for opposing Nen Yahu or Israel
in the UK again, is that like, how does that happen?
How does the UK help establish Israel, then become anti
Zionist and now becomes so pro Zionists that they'll arrest

(40:14):
you if you're not. I mean, it's it's strange how
all this just sort of happens and people don't notice
the change.

Speaker 2 (40:18):
Well, if you go.

Speaker 1 (40:19):
Back to the time of the Balfour Declaration, like I said,
like those British spies and the Royal society elite, they
were actually split between the pro Arab Araba files and
the Rothschild Zionis side of it. They had kind of
a division between them. You can even see this up
into World War Two when you have you know, the
King is basically a Nazi, he marries the Wallace Simpson

(40:42):
marries the American woman. So there was still the split
amongst that power structure in the UK. But when they
you know, when the King David Hotel gets bombed, it
gets bombed by people from the Iragoon, the Stern Gang,
that becomes basically the intelligence apparatus in the military for Israel.

(41:04):
That was I think enough to tell the British that
like they wanted them out. But even to those periods
that you're talking about, like the Labor government was never
really pro Zionist. They were socialists. And if you're some
of the socialists were you know, like Lovatski and these
kinds of characters. They don't care about Yahweh or the Bible,
so they don't have a problem saying like, we don't

(41:26):
care about Israel, we just want like world socialism. But
then you have other people who are you know, Rabbi Zionists.
Maybe not so much in the UK, but but yeah,
I mean ultimately they end up fighting the same wars
that we do because there's a special relationship and it's
the same power structure that runs the UK and runs us.

(41:46):
The only difference is that with Kirs Starmer, who is
an open Fabian socialist member of the Fabian social Society,
like he's just an example of this hardcore technocratic worldview,
rolling out the digital ideas of arresting people for tweets.
All of that is explicitly what the hardcore socialists want.

Speaker 6 (42:04):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (42:05):
But not everybody is as hardcore.

Speaker 1 (42:06):
But that doesn't mean that they're good guys because they're
you know, you can be anti Zionist and be a
bad guy.

Speaker 4 (42:13):
Right right. It's it's funny that you have to say that.

Speaker 3 (42:15):
But I was actually arguing about that with a guy
on on X the other day because you know, I
had people reach out to me, you know, a month
ago and say, how can you like Charlie Kirk he's
a Zionist? And it's like, you think that is my
litmus test. If you're a Zionist, you're good and if
you're not, you're not. It's like no, no, no, I got
a lot of other concerns. That's a very minor concern.
As far as I'm as far as I go.

Speaker 1 (42:35):
I'm about to cover a book called It's a famous
historical text. It's the collaboration between the Zionists and the Nazis. Right,
but there's a book on the Havar Agreement. So they
had to make these I'm not saying they had the
same world view. I'm just saying they had to make
these plans and the deals.

Speaker 3 (42:48):
If they did kind of have the same world view
in a lot of ways. Erta, you were talking about Colergy.
I think he was the one that coined the term
master race. Maybe it wasn't him, somebody else, but you know,
a lot of the ideas from Kolergy.

Speaker 4 (42:59):
So just you know, is Hitler going, hey, they're not.

Speaker 2 (43:01):
The no we are.

Speaker 3 (43:02):
Yeah yeah, yeah, they're not the master race. We're the
master rate. He didn't come up with it, he just
took it for himself.

Speaker 2 (43:07):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (43:07):
Khlergy says that in practical idealism, Jews will be the
master race of Europe. He said everybody else will be monralized.
His words, not mine. Yeah, but yeah, Hitler had a
different idea that the Teutonic, you know, Germanic people would.

Speaker 2 (43:21):
Be the master race.

Speaker 1 (43:23):
And again from the Orthodoxed Christian perspective, like we don't
see Hitler as a good guy just because he was
opposed to usury and this kind of stuff. I mean,
so were all the Orthodox kings and saints, like they
were opposed to usury, Like you didn't have you first
thousand years of Christenum opposed usury. So setting the bar
kind of low to just be like with whoever's against usury? Ohka, well,
I guess you're against the papacy then, because the papacy

(43:44):
is pro usury. But yeah, I mean the motivation we
would say as Orthodoxed Christians that the mantle of Christian
civilization after the fall of Byzantium, we believe that kind
of fell to Russia. Not that it was perfect, but
it was kind of the preserver of the state apparatus
of Christianity.

Speaker 4 (44:05):
It was the third rom right in the sort of
last year.

Speaker 2 (44:07):
That, yeah, exactly, the continuation. And then when that fell.

Speaker 1 (44:11):
To the Bolsheviks, who many of which were Jewish obviously
telm whatick. They murdered the royal family on purpose and
a ritual sacrifice. So like that leaves a vacuum, and
you know, it's odd the only monarchy that's really powerful,
as the British market.

Speaker 4 (44:27):
I was going to ask you.

Speaker 3 (44:28):
I was going to ask you about that, because it
seemed to me like that's what happened, is that the
Rothschild sort of took over the British economy and therefore
the British Empire, and then sort of systematically, you know,
one hundred years later, they're the only powerful monarchy left
and everything else is just sort of a symbolic if
they even exist. Obviously Russia went down, France went down.
That may have been related, but obviously became before. But yeah,

(44:50):
it's like, very clearly, within one hundred years you have
every other monarchy falling.

Speaker 1 (44:54):
Well, the same motivation that promotes that moves Napoleon to
attack Russia, same motivation the moves Hitler to attack Russia.
And I'm not saying that that makes Stalin or that
makes communism good. The idea is to wipe out Christian civilization.
And even if you read quickly who is, I'm not
promoting him as a good guy. He's an admission text

(45:17):
quickly says that the purpose of two World Wars was
to destroy the remnants of Christian civilization, which he calls
authority based civilizations.

Speaker 2 (45:26):
He says the.

Speaker 1 (45:27):
Modern world will be based on democracy and markets and consensus,
and the idea of the Austro Hungarian Empire was a
Catholic civilization and Russian Orthodox Christianity, and the Czar is
a Christian civilization.

Speaker 2 (45:39):
He says, those have to go to have the new
system right.

Speaker 3 (45:44):
It's all so fat like again, we could just get
into all this stuff endlessly, the creation of the CIA
and the Dulles brothers and their involvement in like the
Treaty of Versailles.

Speaker 4 (45:52):
I mean, this stuff is endlessly fascinating.

Speaker 3 (45:54):
I normally have two minutes left, but let's touch on
some modern and ongoing stuff here. What is your take
on the you know, a board of peace to oversee
Gaza and the inclusion of Tony Blair and these people
in sort of an international body to oversee this this land.

Speaker 1 (46:09):
I mean, I don't know what to think of it.
That's nonsense. Fabians. He's a Fabian socialist. He comes out
of the same structure of the Third Way. Bill Clinton,
Tony Blair, they were at the same time under Quigley
and people that have this kind of third Way ideology.
Third Way ideology was this idea that you could combine
Western capitalism with Eastern communism and we would get this
product dialectics, right, dialectical synthesis. And that's really no different

(46:33):
than the Fabian socialist model, which is the people above
them anyway. I mean, this is this is I mean,
he's Clinton's mentor, right, right. So when I see Tony
Blair and people like that, there, who's Labor Party? It's
the Fabian socialists that renamed themselves the Labor Party.

Speaker 4 (46:47):
Oh really, I didn't know that that's them.

Speaker 1 (46:50):
And the fact that they're like, don't care about Israel
doesn't mean that they're good guys. They're just more openly
sort of technocratic.

Speaker 2 (46:57):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (46:57):
So you can have an internationalism that is like is
real focused, or you can have an internationalism that's like
socialist focused and doesn't carebotism, and there's gonna have a
Chinese one.

Speaker 3 (47:06):
And there is sort of a weird sort of sentences, right,
because Tony Blair is obviously very good friends with Larry Ellison,
who's helping to put on all this technocratic control and
it's very pro Israel. So you know, it's different factions,
but they find common cause and work together quite a
bit your new book is coming out, When can people
expect your book?

Speaker 4 (47:22):
What's coming up for you next?

Speaker 1 (47:24):
Well, And to be clear about that in terms of like,
I'm not saying Blair is anti Zionist. No, Blair was
involved with Bush in fighting all those same wars for
the Lecud and all that, So I'm not saying that.
I'm just saying that there's always elements within the Labor Party,
like Jeremy Corbyn who was very very anti Zionist but
attacked in the British and Western media. I don't agree

(47:46):
with Jerremy Corbyn, but I'm saying that he wasn't attacked
until he was like making these sort of public anti
zionist positions. But the book is a circulate with three
and it covers a lot of the big things that
I never got to in the previous text.

Speaker 2 (48:00):
So we cover.

Speaker 1 (48:02):
Some pretty big hitting blockbuster type films, a lot of
Christopher Nolan's stuff that I never got to, a lot
of Marvel stuff. We go pretty deep into cabala Esoterrism,
Lovecraft films, b movies, and Antichrist films. So Ester Collywood
three is going to be a unique installment in the trilogy.
It's the finality of the trilogy.

Speaker 3 (48:21):
There. It's the way to find out the hidden secret
meetings behind the movies that you may love. So if
you want a deeper appreciation for what the filmmakers were
really trying to do, you got to check out the
first two Esoteric Hollywood books and the third ones coming
out soon. You can find all of those and more
at Jaysanalysis dot com. YouTube is Jay Dyer Jay Underscore
d Double seven on X.

Speaker 4 (48:41):
Thanks so much for joining us, Sir eh Calbra, Hel Calbra.
We'll right Backfugs, I'll go anywhere.

Speaker 7 (48:48):
Whatever the future may hold in full wars well always
live wherever the fights will continue. Be sure to follow
us on X, at Real Alex Jones and at AJN Live.
And now you can download the number one news app
in the world. Go to Alex jonesapp dot com and

(49:09):
let the Democrat Deep State Party know that we will
never be silenced.

Speaker 6 (49:19):
Every guest we've interviewed in studio, I've given our ultramethylene
blue too, and they've all been blown away.

Speaker 2 (49:26):
Ladies and gentlemen.

Speaker 6 (49:27):
This is in height all our someonements are great and
have amazing health effects, but this one hits ninety nine
percent of people within thirty minutes, and the long term
effects are even more amazing. So secure your ultramethylene blue
now the most powerful you can get on the market
at the Electrostore dot com, and fund the tip of
the spear in the fight for liberty and supercharge your

(49:49):
own personal life.

Speaker 2 (49:51):
Believe me, if you don't.

Speaker 6 (49:52):
Take action and get it, you will never know how
amazing it is. Over ninety nine percent of people have
had add the incredible effects. You owe it to yourself
right now to try ultramethylene blue excluicily available at the
Alto Store dot com.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Medal of Honor: Stories of Courage

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Exclusive: Expert Researcher Jay Dyer Analyzes Zlonism & The Decline of the West

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Medal of Honor: Stories of Courage

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

Exclusive: Expert Researcher Jay Dyer Analyzes Zlonism & The Decline of the West

Stuff You Should Know