Live from Mississippi

Kenny Webster's Pursuit of Happiness comes to you live from Mississippi!  ( @KennethRWebster )

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Jack Ganic Government sucks Radio is deluxe. Liberty and Freedom
will make you smiles of the suit of happing us
on your radio toil, just as cheeseburg is Liberty prize at.
A list of America's least desirable jobs has just been published.

(00:25):
You know what topp to the list publicist for p Diddy.
It was out now. Close second was head coach for
the Cleveland Browns, and rounding out number third place reporting
box office totals to the studio that released the Joker sequel.
Nobody wanted to hear that. Hi, I'm Kenny Webster. Thanks
so much for turning on your radio this afternoon. I
am in a I'm in an unusual place, not in

(00:47):
our normal studio back in Houston. If I sound a
little different than usual, well it turns out there's a
reason why we are in a hotel room i'm in.
I'm in Mississippi. I don't know why I'm laughing at that.
That's just what I'm doing. It's I guess it's just
awkward being in a different place. You're not in your
normal studio, outside your comfort zone. But I think that's
when we shine here at the Walton and Johnson Radio Network. Anyway,

(01:10):
I'm Keunny Webster, you're you, And since I'm here in
this unusual place, I don't have any guest book this afternoon,
it's just gonna be me talking about the news. And
shockingly enough, a lot of what we're talking about today
has to do with the election. I really enjoyed this
comparison Derek Hunter over at town Hall just made about
Kamala Harris and what some might perceive as a not

(01:35):
total success out on the campaign trail. I'll explain it
like this, there are some people so incompetent they could
blow a tap and putt they'd say, hand me the wedge.
Then they'd overlook a two inch gap. You really can't
help these people, even though they're likely the most in
need of saving, cause you can't save people from themselves.

(01:58):
And i'd imagine that's why the hand for Kamala have
chosen to run the campaign that they have. They've been
trying to play it really safe right up until the
last week or so, and then you notice they've been
doing a lot of interviews lately. Suddenly she's in the
public eye. They wouldn't let her talk to anyone, and
now suddenly she's on a podcast for women who like

(02:18):
talking about their horrish enterprises. For lack of a better description,
hiding is the only defense against incompetence. But you can't
do that anymore because the only problem is that no
matter where you hide, there you are A person can
escape a lot, but they cannot escape themselves, can they?
After two months of hiding and seeing the results of

(02:40):
hiding thus not working, the public, notice the Democrat Party's
nominee for president not to mention the other guy she's
been hanging out with. Haven't really done much talking beyond scripted,
vapid stump speeches. You've seen them reading off of a teleprompter,
but they're not really zero rowing in on their policy positions.

(03:01):
They're not really telling you anything about themselves. So what
do we do about that? It's only gone so far,
and suddenly it's not making the candidate more popular. It's
actually backfiring. So they decided to let their candidates talk
and what can only be described as either uber friendly
or softly scripted interviews and interviews with supporters at that

(03:23):
How did it go? You'd think that would be pretty easy. Strangely,
it really hadn't gone that well. For either of them.
You can tell a lot about the amount of faith
a campaign has and their candidate by the people they're
willing to talk to. I'll give you an example. Donald
Trump will pretty much talk to anyone anytime. Now. Granted,
he probably won't do an interview with somebody that's mistreated

(03:45):
him in the past, somebody who edited an interview or
selectively chose content to make something seem like it was
being taken out of context. For the most part, Donald
Trump will do an interview with any journalist. What about
Kamala and Tim? A little different? Right? Kamal and Tim
would need their own family members screened and topics agreed

(04:06):
to before they'd sit down for breakfast with anybody. In
Kamala's case, he might be able to understand it. News
recurt reports. There's actually now reports out indicating her husband
smacked a woman, got drunk, smacked a woman. There are
reports out suggesting he cheated on his wife with the nanny.

(04:26):
I think he's admitted to that he impregnated her. He
forced her to get an abortion, purportedly, and that's what
they claim. And then I thought this was very interesting.
He paid an eighty thousand dollars hush money, some hush
money payment he made to somebody who was he paying
what was it for? Very nefarious, suspicious details of a

(04:51):
financial transaction from the Vice president's husband. And I can't
help but compare that to a certain guy named Donald Trump,
Donald Trump Off hush money and it and it actually
made him into a felon claim he was trying to
rig an election or something, you know, making a political
donations without the government's permission, too much of a payment

(05:15):
without declaring it. It wasn't really a political donation. But
whatever they say, you make a hush money payment during
a or affecting a political campaign, that that's supposed to
be illegal. Now they say that's the legal president. But
Doug Emoff doesn't seem to be in any trouble now,
aside from a three on one debate that we saw

(05:38):
between Donald Trump and Kamala, you didn't really get to
see Kamala with any journalist till recently. And now she's
done this sixty minutes interview. It was a little challenging,
it wasn't real challenging. They actually edited it together some
of the footage so they could make her sound smarter,
and it still didn't look good. Then she talked to
Howard Stern. He has fully transitioned into everything he mocked

(05:59):
in order to become famous in the first place, with
whatever testicles he actually had left as sending back into
his body, seemingly all the way into his throat, doing
an interview with Kamala trying to make it seem like
she was really great, but then start of accidentally admitting
that Kamala Harris was, you know, just anybody. He'd vote
for anybody, it didn't matter how great she was. He

(06:20):
he actually said he'd vote for a wall as long
as it was in Donald Trump. And then there was
the Stephen Coleberry interview. Let's put a pin in it
right there, we'll talk about it. Right after this to
the government started listening, proceeds to Happiness Radio with Kena
Webstergitio aka producer Kenny A. New survey says that eighty

(06:50):
percent of Americans fear World War three is possible. Even worse,
one hundred percent of Americans fear that Joker three is possible. Yeah,
it was really bad movie. Don't go see it. It
was terrible, and that funny people still are pretending that
we might get into World War three. If we're not careful,
world War three could happen. If it just gets a

(07:11):
little worse in Israel or Ukraine, it could spawn us
into the next World War. We're there. This is it, kids.
It doesn't get any more World War three than this.
This is your I don't understand why you don't know that.
I mean, okay, you probably know that. And that's the
part of the reason why this election is so important.
It's interesting to think that the person that will be

(07:34):
dealing with our next major global conflict is somebody who's
afraid to do an interview. Kamala Harris is afraid to
talk to Fox News. She'd never sit down even with
Brett Baer Neil Kavudo. She's not going to do an
interview with those people. You're not going to see Kamala
Harris sit down with real journalists for the most part,
unless it's someone on the far left, it's just not

(07:56):
gonna happen. She did an interview with sixty minutes that
a little challenging. Granted, a lot of people probably didn't
even watch it. She was on the view. All they
did was pat her on the back and talk about
how great she was it was very awkward. There was
a point where they actually said that she was gonna
be the next president and nobody applauded. It was an
awkward silence in the room, very strange moment on the view.

(08:18):
And then she did the Howard Stern Show. Howard Stern
said he was going to vote for her, but to
really water down his compliment, he pointed out that he
would vote for a wall as long as it was
in Donald Trump. So yeah, none of that. None of
that was a real flattering moment for her campaign. Now,
Stephen Colbert arrival some of the least funny layers in

(08:40):
the history of humans post primordial ooze emergence, as Derek
Hunter recently put it, and he makes a great point here.
This woman chose to speak to Kamala. Excuse mean a woman.
I'm sorry, I'm being told Stephen Colbert is a man.
Are you sure about that? All right? If you say so, Sorry,
my producer's in my earphone right now telling me that
is is he? Okay, says Stephen Colbert, All right, fine,

(09:02):
This man chose to speak to Kamala because from the
spacious apartment he's taken up in the rear end of
whatever Democrat his establishment bosses toss his way. His show,
which is supposedly a comedy show, has ditched the traditional
structure of set up and punchline for just partisan statements

(09:24):
and applause lines. That's what liberal comedy is nowadays. They'll
just say something like Donald Trump is a Nazi and
then everyone collapse and then the you know, maybe it's
a female comedian and she'll say something like, you know,
I have a vagina, and everyone's yeah, women with vaginas like,
and Donald Trump wants to make it harder for me
to access my vagina. The neo Nazis can access a gun, like, wait,

(09:47):
what is this this is? And everyone laughs and applause.
That's what liberal comedy is. It's terrible. And that's kind
of what the Stephen Colbert Show is. His show is
supposed to be funny, His audience doesn't laugh. They just
clim in agreement. You ever watch it now? We're CBS,
not the network that had to convene sensitivity meetings with

(10:08):
their news staff because some limp wristed loser got upset
that a father of Jewish children who live in Israel
dared to ask a racist black man with a keeping
side dish of anti Semitism about his latest diatribe regarding
how he thinks Israel shouldn't exist. A couple of moderately though,

(10:29):
wrapped in and asked kissing questions during an interview on
an alleged news program. Colbert might be held to some
kind of standard, and he might try comedy, might actually
attempt it. Doesn't actually do that basically murdered David Letterman's
old show, But as was confirmed again in the vice
presidential debate, CBS didn't have any standards, so he'll be

(10:51):
fine now. Tim Walls, I don't know if you know.
The coked up muppet running with Kamala that's her running
mate was sent to Jimmy Kimmel, who, by the way,
hosted a fundraiser for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris before
Joe was forced to drop out, and he pretended the
former was still mentally competent and vital until that line

(11:11):
no longer served the purpose of the Democrat Party. Isn't
it sad how unfunny Jimmy Kimmel has become. I mean,
he was never really funny, but the saddest part is
he's actually funnier. Than he is smart and I don't
know if you catch what I'm saying there, but that's
not a compliment. And then there's the gaggle of harpies

(11:32):
on the View. You ever watched the View? It was
like ABC News saw what CBS had become and said, here,
hold my chardonnay, here comes the View. The View is
actually an anomaly. It used to be thought of as
like a show where different women at different opinions. Previously

(11:53):
that was the case, right the show proves it is
possible for dumb people to get together and be collectively
dumber because everybody on that show has the same opinion.
It's a miracle. Honestly. I think in real life it's
impossible to find five people who agree on anything, so
that's a fair point. But in the media it's easy.
Isn't that strange? You ever think about that. In the

(12:14):
real world, you got five people together, you got five opinions.
But in the media, if you have five people on
a panel on CBS or ABC, they all have the
same opinion. All you need are attention. Whore is willing
to do anything for money. They can't have any standards,
just to desire for attention. An unrivaled laziness, an ability

(12:36):
to repeat whatever a producer says they need to say.
They also have to not care that they routinely make
complete fools out of themselves on live TV in front
of an audience. They get the facts wrong, basic lessons
in civics all incorrect. Normal people would be humiliated doing
these sort of things. One of the hosts of the

(12:58):
View a little while back said she wanted doctor Joe
Biden to be the next Surgeon General. Now, Joe Biden
isn't a real doctor. She has a doctoral degree in education,
and I think she might have gotten it as you know,
like a gift, like she didn't really do that. I
don't know if she did the work or not. It
doesn't sound like it's an honorary degree. I'm gonna climb out.

(13:20):
I'm just gonna say it's an honorary degree. I don't
even know if it is. I'll just say it is
because it doesn't matter, because she's not a real doctor.
If the View can get facts wrong as obvious as
that one, I can, I can just guess that she
probably has an honorary doctor degree in education. Great, good
for you, Kamala, No, sorry, Joe, Biden. I forgot who

(13:41):
I was making fun of. Anyway, The View actually said
that the View one of the women on the View,
look this one up. I'm gonna I would play the
SoundBite for you, but I'm in a radio studio. I'm
in a hotel room instead of a radio studio. At
a casino. A while back, one of the women on
the View thought there was an eclipse happening because climate change.

(14:02):
She blamed mud slides in California and an eclipse on
climate change. Go ahead, I don't even have to make
fun of it. You could do it. You can make
fun of that on your own. So they have no standards.
These are the people deemed worthy to speak to the
Democrat Party nominees. They're the only ones that Kamala and

(14:22):
Tim will do interviews with. Howard Stern, the View one
person on CBS who's kind of a journalist. So one
might find it odd that a person campaigning on the
idea that they want to be president for all of America,
or if I'm not mistaken, she said president for all
Americans will only speak to people who will completely agree

(14:44):
with them, while keeping their lips pressed firmly against their
ass cheeks. As they do right. This is a testament
to just how bad and out of touch these nominees
are with real Americans. If they weren't, they wouldn't have
to run from them. And that's the reason why, that's
the reason why I'm not at all surprised by this

(15:05):
new polling data. The latest polling data out actually says,
and this is from what is a Quinnipiac, not exactly Breitbart,
Quinnipiac reports Donald Trump now leads Kamala in Michigan and Wisconsin.
If Kamala Harris cannot win Michigan in Wisconsin, it is

(15:26):
impossible for her to win this election. So good you're
listening to the Pursuit of Happiness radio. I guess it's
not available in Canada. E an American teenager. He's the
first known person to get the classic video game Tetris

(15:49):
to reset to level zero after beating it. The only
puzzle he can't solve is how to make friends. Poor guy.
You know, I'm not here to pick on nerds. That's
too easy. In fact, I think we need herds nowadays.
Trying to remind everybody my man Ted Cruz, they claim
is down in the polls right now, he's kind of
a nerd, but I like him and I hope he
gets re elected. If Ted Cruz can't get reelected, this

(16:11):
state is in big trouble. Look, there's no nice way
to dress that one up. Seriously, consider donating campaigning. Talk
to your friends anyway, Ted Cruz actually wants to defend
your right to own a gun. Colin already his opponent
does not. I think it's pretty obvious who the good
guy is and who the bad guy is. There in

(16:33):
a state that once have had to fight off foreign invaders.
Something to think about. Reason dot Com today reporting Kamala
has a handgun. That's what she said, she said she does.
Kamala appeared in a conversation with Oprah last month, and
she dropped a little tidbit that may come as a
surprise to some. She says, if someone breaks into my house,

(16:56):
they're getting shot. It was, or at least it should
have been, one of the more relatable things she's ever said.
I think, whatever your politics are, Democrat, Republican, libertarian, Jill Stein, whatever,
the right to protect your life and your family when
threatened with a potentially deadly aggression is something so basic.

(17:17):
I would assume that would transcend partisanship. Right now, it's
a bit less relatable when you consider who the messenger is. Yeah,
it's a bit less relatable when you consider Kamala Harris
has a history of advocating against other people accessing the

(17:38):
same type of protection she has. She was on sixty minutes,
and she gave some more specifics because you got to
ask what kind of gun they've asked her. She said
it more than once that she was asked what kind
of gun and she wouldn't say what kind of gun. Well,
this time she answered the question. She said, I have
a glock. She said she's had it for quite some time.

(18:01):
The admission should hardly be a bomb drop, at least
the part about her saying she was in law enforcement.
But it's difficult to reconcile with her support. As San
Francisco District Attorney for prop Age, she banned the city's
residence from merely processing handguns. The ordinance passed to two

(18:23):
thousand and five and a California appeals court threw it
out three years later, but Harris supported it. She was
all for it. Harris hasn't said exactly how long she's
owned her gun, but if it's been for quite some time.
As she said, then one can reasonably assume that her
owning a gun overlapped with her view that the state

(18:44):
should curtail others from doing the same. Then the next
detail she provided that she was in law enforcement possibly
provides some context for her position. Prop Age in San
Francisco provided gun owners ship exceptions for law enforcement and
military and security guards. And by the way, in California,

(19:08):
I'm sure it goes without saying, if you want to
be a security guard, you gotta have a license. So
all three of those things, law enforcement, military, security guard. Basically,
if you own a gun, the government's still in They're
in your universe, right. Kamala only wants you to have
a gun if the prerequisite is that the government is

(19:33):
deeply involved in your personal life. You know, after all
that happened. Not long after it happened, Kamala went on
to file a brief in the District of Columbia versus Heller,
that was the name of the case. This was a
landmark Supreme Court decision, and this bill, this well, this ruling,
not a bill, ruled DC's handgun ban was unconstitutional, and

(19:58):
it established that people have a right to own a
firearm for self defense, even if they're not in the military.
That was not the outcome Kamala wanted. She cited past
jurisprudence at the time. She said that the Second Amendment
provides only a militia related right to bear arms. Turns out,
the Second Amendment does not apply to legislation passed by

(20:20):
a state or local government, she said. And she also
said the restrictions bear a reasonable relationship to protecting public
safety and thus do not violate a personal constitutional right.
If that view had prevailed, the handgun ban in Washington, DC,
where she now lives, would have remained intact. That means
she wouldn't be allowed to own a gun. Now here's

(20:43):
something that might be a bit easier to reconcile. You know,
there were a lot of people that thought women should
be able to have an abortion, but nevertheless didn't believe
that it was a constitutional right. So, to be fair,
it is possible that you could believe that you should
be allowed to own a gun while while not believing

(21:05):
the Constitution protects that right. Okay, I'll admit you could
have those beliefs at the same time. That's fine, But
the abortion comparison is an apt one, and it's an
interesting one to interrogate when considering Kamala believes the US
Constitution promises you ever right to have an abortion. You
think about it, right, there's no law that says you

(21:27):
have a right to have an abortion. There's certainly nothing
in the Constitution about it. But Kamala thinks you have
a constitutional right to an abortion, but not to own
a gun. She has not struggled to argue over the
years the gun ownership should be heavily regulated, but she
doesn't feel that way about abortions. It's worth noting the

(21:48):
practical implications here. Had the Supreme Court ruled her way,
the law would prohibit the people in a city where
she lives from having the right to protect themselves with
the gun. And here in Texas, we have state we
have city laws right where we don't want abortions. They're

(22:08):
called sanctuaries for the unborn. Have you heard about this?
There are places around the state, even before Roe Viva
Wade was overturned, where people made their city a sanctuary
city for the unborn. Said, if you come here, it's
illegal to get an abortion in this town. And people
like Kamala Harris and a lot of her supporters said
that was unconstitutional, but they think a town should be

(22:31):
allowed to ban gun rights. Isn't it just amazing how
stupid everything is all the time, constantly when you're dealing
with a Democrat. It's just remarkable, isn't it. Kurt Schlicktter
at townhall dot Com recently said it seems bizarre that
a couple of guys with a few hundred billion dollars

(22:53):
between them are now the voice of America's working class.
He's right, two guys, Elon Musk and Donald Trump. With
Donald his politics are pretty much the same conservative Jacksonian
populist politics he's always had, even though as a party

(23:16):
affiliation may have switched, his policies never did. But it's
also true for Elon Musk. A lot of people think
Elon Musk switched sides, but his opinions haven't changed much.
He's not a regular conservative. He has just always believed
in things like free enterprise and free speech and small government.
You know, the same things the nominally conservative conservatives always

(23:37):
talk about but never actually get around to conserving, do they.
You know what's interesting about that, working people appreciate it.
These guys didn't change. Donald Trump still a billionaire, Elon
Musk still a billionaire. Both of them used to be Democrats.
Now they're Republicans. They didn't change, though the Democrat Party
changed their party change. Their party started holding the working

(24:03):
class and contempt and sought to silence and disarm and
disenfranchise its members. So neither Donald nor Elon signed on
for that. I think working class Americans appreciate the fact
that these guys actually build their own businesses. This is
very important. Today's Democrats are the Technocrat Party. It's the

(24:26):
party of hr directors and consultants and unions and lawyers
and bureaucrats and welfare slabs and weirdos and climate freaks.
They value friction over ideology. They don't actually have any principles.
They never build anything. They're just here to tear things down.
They never make anything. They're just here to destroy things.

(24:49):
They barely do anything except wine and complain and make
up the rules and try to boss other people around
and make up words so they can win an argument.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk make things that resonates with
the working people. Kamala Harris says things that don't make
any sense that confuses voters. The only people voting for

(25:11):
Kamala are people that are voting for a gender or
a skin color, and frankly, I think that's pretty sad. Hello,
my name is Pedro. My favorite things to do are
smuggle drugs, pro create like a rabbit, and listen to
Pursuit of Happiness Radio with producer Chini. Please Stupi