Will Hunter and Donald's legal problems affect the election?

This podcast edition of Kenny Webster's Pursuit of Happiness features journalist Brandon Waltens.

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Giganic government sucks. The suit ofhaving us radio is DeLux. Liberty and
freedom will make you smile. Ofa suit of habing and us on your
radio tol just as cheeseburgers a libityrise. It's the food has. A

(00:22):
flight attendant in India was busted forsmuggling gold inside of her body or if
she looks at it, her rectumreached gold status. Hi everybody, thanks
for turning your radio on. Ihave Brandon Walton's joining me this afternoon from
texascorecard dot com at the bottom ofthe hour, it's the fastest hour in
talk radios. To stick around,It's gonna go by quick. I promise

(00:44):
you. I will cram your earholes full of entertainment and useful information,
a combination of entertainment and information infotainment, if you will. It's one of
those buzzwords people in media executive positionsuse, and they're terrible people. So
why would we want to repeat anythingbased I don't know. I guess I
just did. Can we start offwith this Hunter Biden's on trial now.

(01:04):
Joe Biden's brain is in decline.The economies in shambles. They just issued
executive orders on border security that aren'treally going to do anything but make it
look like they're doing something. Weare involved in four major wars. You
might even argue this is the beginningof World War III. Pride Month is
infecting every major institution in the federalgovernment, from the FBI to the Pentagon,

(01:29):
and all the DOJ can do,All the Democrats can do is send
Merrick Garland off to go work withprosecutors around the country to try to put
Trump in prison or at the veryleast make him less popular. Yesterday,
Merrick Garland sat in front of Congress. We played the clips this morning on
the show, so I'm not goingto waste a lot of time doing it,

(01:51):
but there was one really interesting momentwith Matt Gates yesterday. All we're
asking you is this, Merrick Garland, You're the Attorney General of the United
States of America, and it's yourjob to go out and prosecute criminals.
But that's not what you do.Instead, what you do is try to
prosecute your president's political opponents while emptyingout the jails and vastly transforming the country

(02:19):
that we live in into a verydifferent place than how we remember it.
Merrick Garland is probably working with prosecutorslike Alvin Bragg and Fanny Willis and Letitia
James, the district attorneys and statesattorneys and places like New York and Manhattan
and Fulton County to try to hurtDonald Trump. Now, he says that's

(02:43):
a conspiracy theory. He says,that isn't true. If it isn't true,
all we're asking is for you toshow us your emails, Show us
your emails, show us any documentswhere you've communicated with those people's offices,
Like why did why did one ofFanny Way tell us his attorneys visit the
White House on multiple occasions? Youguys are investigating voter fraud, that are

(03:07):
you know, election interference that supposedlytook place in twenty twenty. Well,
the president in the White House,Joe Biden, they weren't in charge of
counting the ballots. That all happenedat Fulton County. What was the prosecutor
doing visiting Joe Biden's white House isa great question, right Who invited him?
Did Merrick Garland invite him? MattGates asked this very question yesterday during

(03:28):
a congressional hearing. Merrick Garland refusedto answer. Attorney General, You've told
us that it's a dangerous conspiracy theoryto allege that the Department of Justice is
communicating with these state and local prosecutionsagainst Trump. You can clear it all
up for us right now. Willthe Department of Justice provide to the committee
all documents, all correspondents between theDepartment and Alvin Bragg's office and Fannie Willis's

(03:53):
office and Letitia James's office. Theoffices you're referring to are independent office of
state. I get that, Iget that state. The question is why
you will provide all of your documentsand correspondence. That's the questions. I
don't need a history lesson. I'mgoing to say again, we do not
control those offices. They make therethe questions where you communicate with them,

(04:15):
not whether you control them. Doyou communicate with them? And will you
provide those community to make a request, We'll refer it to our Office of
Legislatives. But see, here's thething that you come in here and you
lodge this attack that it's a conspiracytheory that there is coordinated law fair against
Trump, and then when we sayfine, just give us the documents,
give us the correspondence and then ifit's a conspiracy theory, that will be

(04:36):
evident. But when you say,well, we'll take your request and then
we'll we'll sort of work it throughthe DOJ's accommodation process, then you're actually
advancing the very dangerous conspiracy theory thatyou're concerned about. Yeah, I mean,
he's right about that. If that'snot what you're doing, what are
you doing? Show us, showus the money. You know that old

(04:57):
expression, right, why won't youlet us see what's going on? And
by the way, none of thisis working. Christopher Tremgley reporting at The
Examiner today, there's a new memothat shows that the Trump trials are going
to have almost no effect on voters, which, for the record, isn't
as good or bad for Trump aspeople might think. Some Trump guys might

(05:17):
think, oh, all these prosecutorsgoing after Trump's going to make them more
popular. But most people already havean opinion about Trump these trials. He's
been in the public eye since theeighties. None of this is changing that
you either love him or you hatehim. Shortly before the verdict of former
President Trump's hush money case was announcedlast week, a memo circulated explaining what

(05:39):
I just said. According to theappended a memo based on our internal surveys
conducted by Tony Fabrigio, well overfifty percent of Americans have consistently stated the
trial as a political sham. Avast majority of Republicans independents believe the prosecution
has failed to make their case.They see the corrupt judge and the Biden

(05:59):
show trials for what they are.The bottom line is in this case,
it doesn't have an impact on voters. That's what they noted. The accuracy
of these surveys conducted remains to beseen. We don't know if it's true
or not, but probably it isright. Let's assume it is. But
before we even do that, allof this just raises the question whether the
trial doesn't have an impact on voters. Is that a good or bad thing?

(06:20):
A lot of people seem to agreethat Trump's hush money trial was politically
motivated. Youet Robert de Niro showingup and doing a performance art piece out
in front of the trial with membersof Biden's campaign while a non sequestered jury
inside knew he was out there.What does all this mean for Trump's support

(06:40):
for those happy with the verdict againstTrump, One could safely assume such people
will not be voting for him theyalready weren't going to. Could also be
that the person conducting the survey underestimatedthe backlash from the verdict. It's possible
to gauge whether more people were happywith the verdict or were outraged. We
don't know, but many of thepeople who have claimed they support such American

(07:02):
principles have also tried to sabotage Trump, both as president and candidate. It's
hard to say one way or theother what influence the trial has, particularly
because, as Byron York recently pointedout, it takes the general public a

(07:23):
while before they can even really processwhat all of this means. The first
thing you have to remember about momentousevents and public opinion is that people have
to understand it before they could processthe truly consequential developments. With the Trump
verdict, of course, partisan zealotson both sides know exactly how they feel,

(07:45):
but normal people are not entirely sure. They want to take time to
think about it. So that's whereall these polls come in. The polls
are intended to influence your positions onthings. For months, we've seen polls
suggesting that a small number of voterswho might be inclined to vote for Trump
would reconsider or decide that they wouldnot vote for him if he's convicted of
a felony. Now he's been foundguilty on thirty four felony counts, the

(08:11):
case against Trump was weak. Itwas politically motivated, but guided by a
prosecutor who pledged to pursue Trump whilerunning for office, a judge who is
a donor to Biden, and atop Biden Justice Department official who joined the
prosecution for the purpose of trying Trump, not to mention, a jury in
deep blue Manhattan convicted Trump. Maybethis will all be overturned on appeal.

(08:35):
Maybe Trump will end up in jail. But the next decision in this case
is going to be made by votersin November. Let's hope they make the
right choice. Coming up more KenneyWebster's Pursuit of Happiness a safe space for
those who love liberty and try notto take themselves too seriously, even if
your name is Karen. Doctor Pepperis now the second most popular soda pop

(09:03):
in America. It joins Doctor fellisyet more proof that Americans love fake doctors.
Thanks for turning on your radio,kids. We were talking about the
Trump trials and the prosecution against Trumpin the last segment, and I think,
in the natural order of things,you might expect me to move on
to the Hunter Biden trial right now, just covering the week's news and polling
data and how voters are reacting tothis stuff and how everything will be impacting

(09:28):
November. But I don't think theHunter Biden trials affect the November election as
much as Joe Biden's broken brain does. President Biden forgot key facts about the
economy, foreign policy, and histime in public office during a sit down
interview with Time Magazine last month.It's even worse than it sounds. He
even mixed up Chinese President Jijinping andRussian President Vladimir Putin. It's a report

(09:52):
about it today at RedState dot com. If you want to know why the
Department of Justice is doing every thingit can to block Joe Biden's Special Counsel
interview from seeing the light of theday, the interview he just did with
Time Magazine provides all the reasoning necessary. You remember, not long ago,
the Department of Justice and a specialcounsel did an investigation into Joe Biden to

(10:16):
determine if he broke the law afterhe left confidential classified documents all over the
country. And what they determined wasthat he couldn't be prosecuted, not because
he didn't break the law. Hemost certainly did not because he didn't know
what the laws were. He knowsthe laws. He's been in public office
for over fifty years most of hislife. No, the reason they wouldn't

(10:41):
prosecute Joe Biden is because they saidhe was mentally unfit to stand trial.
But it's okay if he wants tobe leader of the free world. And
as bad as that interview was,right, they didn't want you to see
the transcripts. That's exactly what thisTime magazine is interview was like saying that
this thing went off the rails.Might actually be too low key. Yeah,

(11:07):
it's that bad. And the crescendoof the President of the United States
challenging the interviewing reporter to a fightis proof enough of what I'm talking about.
We'll get there in a second.Well, let's start with this exchange
on inflation, which Time actually wentback and fact checked. Time fact checked
Biden's defense on his record of inflation. Listen to this quote. Biden says,

(11:28):
wage increases have exceeded what the costof inflation is. He says,
I'm helping him with his grammar herebecause he made no grammatical sense at all.
Instead of finishing his point, whichis a lie, he launches into
an angry rant about shrinkflation and pricegouging. Listen to this sentence and try
to make sense of it. I'mjust going to read it to you verbatim.
Quote. You have everything from shrinkflation to what's going on in terms

(11:52):
of the way in which they're artificiallymoving significantly to increase their their profits.
Huh. Time actually fact checked him. They pointed out nothing the President said.
There is true wages of not outruninflation over Biden's term. There's also
no evidence the current situation as aresult of price gouging. Shrinkflation is the

(12:18):
result of inflation. Companies want tokeep prices low, so they cut back
on how much of a product theyinclude. Whatever. Biden really shouldn't have
done this interview because things just gotworse from there. Next he mixed up
Vladimir Putin and Jijin Ping. Timehad to offer an editor's note to clarify.

(12:39):
Listen to this from the article.Biden quote, No, because here's
the deal. There's a difference.I made it clear to putin from the
very beginning that we're not engaging inFor example, Trump wants a ten percent
tariff on everything that will raise theprice of everything in America. Editor's note,
Biden appeared to mean gee when hemeant not putin like what. They

(13:03):
actually corrected him. They helped him. I would be bold enough to suggest
that if someone is going to bethe president, they shouldn't continually mix up
countries and leaders. Given the geopoliticalstakes at play, this kind of thing
has become commonplace for Biden. Hisbrain simply isn't nimble enough to keep everything
straight, and when he gets intoa situation where he needs to answer questions,

(13:28):
disaster follows. And then there wasthe part of the interview where he
challenged the interviewer to a physical fight. I'm just going to read you the
article. Listen to this quote.The last two years of presidents. Two
term president's tenures are usually focused onforeign affairs. You are eighty one years
old and would be eighty six.By the time you leave office, large

(13:52):
majorities of Americans, including the DemocraticParty, tell pollsters they think you are
too old to lead. Could youreally do this as an eighty five year
old man, Biden says, Icould do it better than anybody. You
know. You're looking at me.I can take you. I'm sorry?

(14:13):
Did you just threaten to violently attackthe guy that's interviewing you? You've ever
been in a dementia clinic before?I have. My grandma died of dementia
Alzheimer's. I'm not sure exactly whather diagnosis was, but the equivalent of
that. When you visit somebody ina dementia clinic, they will often get
angry and frustrated because they're confused.They're emotional, they're reactionary. Joe Biden

(14:39):
is a feeble, eighty one yearold man. He finds walking up the
stairs to be very difficult, andhe decided to snap at a reporter by
challenging him to a fight. Whata scene I could take you, said
the president of the freaking United States. Do you feel the norms being restored?
They told us everything would back tonormal when Joe Biden became president.

(15:03):
Do you think things are normal.The rest of the interview from there wasn't
much better. You could check outthe full thing if you want. It's
on Time's website. The buck stopswith Biden kids. What are his handlers
doing by putting him in these situations? And this happened with one of the
most friendly outlets out there. RememberTime Magazine likes Joe Biden. They like

(15:24):
the Democrats. They try to makethe Republicans look bad. Imagine what he's
going to look like at the debatedebates plural if he gets even the slightest
amount of pushback from a moderator.Biden is senile and those around him are
too scared to keep him out ofthe spotlight. That's a bad combination.

(15:50):
Supposedly, we have debates coming upthat should be fascinating. Another note I
want to make about Time Magazine.Shortly after Time Magazine, shortly after Joe
Biden won and got into the WhiteHouse, Time Magazine published this article.
It's a thirty five minute read fromthe twenty twenty election. The headline reads

(16:11):
the secret history of the shadow campaignthat saved the twenty twenty election by Molly
Ball, and then the article goeson to explain how they did things like
twenty four hour polling locations, mailin ballots mailed out to dead people across
the country, ballot harvesting in placeslike California, where it's completely legal to

(16:33):
go around and collect someone's ballot andhand it in for them. As if
that wasn't an obvious example of away to cheat in an election. Time
Magazine actually published an article to explainaway why, Yeah, maybe the Democrats
did steal the twenty twenty election,but it's okay because they didn't steal it,
they saved it. Those are thepeople that just published that article about

(16:57):
Joe Biden where they made him lookbad simply by printing a transcript of his
own words. They published word forword what he said, and what he
said didn't make any sense. TimeMagazine's position in four years on Joe Biden
seems to have changed quite a bit. Is it possible they have buyer's remorse?

(17:18):
If I were you, I'd stayput Kenny. You'll be right back
with more of what you came for. Far jokes they tried to get rid
of Ken Paxton didn't work, didit? The Texas Attorney General, he's
still sitting in that office, stillprosecuting cases, still launching investigations, despite

(17:41):
what the deep state, the Bushdynasty wanted. And then there's Trump.
You look at a guy like DonaldTrump, boy, they'd love to have
all these lawsuits against Trump result inDonald never being president. But the latest
polling data, especially if you lookat Las Vegas, Las Vegas odds on
and who becomes president almost never wrong. And right now they have Trump ahead

(18:03):
by double digits, more than aten point lead in Las Vegas for people
that are betting on the presidential election. But it's kind of bittersweet too,
isn't it? Because we want Trumpto be president and we want Ken Paxton
to be the attorney general. Butwhat if Trump gets elected and he goes
off to Washington in November and hetakes Ken Paxton with him. I mean,

(18:25):
we'd have a better attorney general thanMerrick Garland, especially if you look
at what happened with him yesterday.But we'd miss him in Texas, wouldn't
we? And I do worry afterthe hermit crab cart crawls out of his
shell, does he get replaced byGeorge P. Bush. I'm getting ahead
of myself here. There's a lotgoing on right now with our Attorney general.
In fact, Ken Paxton is askingthe Texas Supreme Court to review what

(18:47):
he is describing as politically motivated lawfair by the state Bar, the Texas
State Bar. Wait a second,Brandon Walton's of Texas scorecard dot Com.
What is the State Bar of Texastrying to do to Ken Paxton? Yeah,
so the state Bar these are thepeople that license lawyers in the state

(19:07):
of Texas. It's an organization.They have for the past couple of years
been suing Paxton in an attempt tostrip his law license away. Why well,
because back in December of twenty twenty, after the November twenty twenty elections,
Paxton led eighteen states in challenging afew of the state's election results in

(19:29):
the Supreme Court. Obviously, thatcase was dismissed by the Supreme Court at
the time, But the state Baris now going after saying, how dare
you that was a frivolous lawsuit andyou need your license taken away? Which
is absolutely absurd. Yeah, it'spretty crazy, and it does often remind
people that the powers that be ina state like Texas, even red conservative

(19:52):
Texas, aren't necessarily people that areon our side. I mean, you'd
think the state bar would be dominatedby conservatives, but it's not. Yeah,
and you don't see any of theseother these other states that were part
of the lawsuit. I haven't seenwhere their attorney general has been gone after
like this. But because Texas wasreading, because Attorney General Can Paxton was

(20:14):
at the forefront of those lawsuits,you know they're attempting to go after him.
So not only are they saying right, let's be very clear, not
only are they saying, you know, you can't challenge, you can't challenge
the the election results in twenty twenty, but they're also saying that if you
do try, we're going to we'regoing to ruin your life. We're gonna

(20:37):
we're gonna take away your life.That you can't even file the lawsuits.
Like I said, the Supreme Courtdismissed it, and I disagree with that
move, but that's that's the process. They're saying, don't even bring you
can't even bring you can't even bringthe case forward, which is which is
ridiculous. Isn't the point of theState Bar of Texas to adhere to the
needs to improve the value of thequality of life of the citizens of Texas,

(21:00):
and the citizens of Texas think KenPaxton should be our attorney general and
the basic duties of the attorney generalare to go out and prosecute and investigate
crimes. And why wouldn't there becrimes and elections? It doesn't make any
sense. Well, the state barhas increasingly lunged leftward here in the state

(21:21):
of Texas. You know, notonly are they doing this to the Attorney
general, they've also in the pastand sued for compelling essentially bar fees to
go towards leftist causes. They youknow, literally, you know, you
have one job, right to tolicense lawyers, and they can't even seem

(21:41):
to manage that. They have tothey have to expand their scope there.
So yes, that's I mean,that's a good point. You're right,
Okay, So Attorney General Ken Paxtonjust did something else that was interesting.
One of the things I hear fromour more libertarian listeners is they say,
all right now that I can't lookat porno websites in the State of Texas

(22:03):
without proving my age. This isgoing to be a danger to my privacy
and my digital data. And Idon't know if that's true or not.
Frankly, I don't think it is. But the Attorney General's Office just launched
an initiative to protect citizens data,which is, you know, a statement
that's so vague it could mean almostanything. But this has a lot to
do with artificial intelligence, doesn't itIt does, I mean the way.

(22:27):
One of the big concerns, oneof the many concerns right with AI and
AI development right now is where it'slearning from and in many cases it's learning
from user data, it's learning fromdata citizens, and some of that might
be acceptable, but it quickly goesinto a line where you're actually violating citizens
privacy rights, in violation of stateand federal law. And so you have

(22:49):
the Attorney General's Office now launching aninitiative to specifically go after They've got a
new team that'll focus on enforcing someof these state and federal laws that are
designed to protect citizens data. Thesethe stuff is moving so fast, you
know, it's it's becoming very veryclear that, unfortunately, some of the

(23:10):
actors that are developing AI are doingso with very very little concern about citizens
sensitive data, especially when you talkabout big tech companies. Yeah, and
you're onto something here because somebody thatisn't as involved in this, you know,
do nothing. Liberals and their ivorytowers might look at Ken Baxton telling
everybody to be concerned about AI andthink, oh, Republican, stupid,

(23:32):
caveman, dumb. But for andcurrent, former and current Open AI employees
just released an open letter claiming they'rebeing silenced against raising safety issues. One
of the letters, Sinnees made aneven more terrifying prediction that the odds that
artificial intelligence will either destroy or catastrophicallyharm humankind are greater than a coin flip.

(23:56):
He says, it's about seventy percent. Now, you and I both
know, when you're listening to talkradio, when you're watching cable news or
some podcast or some political blog,people often throw out percentages that mean nothing.
But the guy that made this claim, who's saying it's a seventy percent
chance, is a computer software programmer. This is a guy that deals with
you know, objective numerical data allthe time. When he says seventy percent,

(24:22):
I think he means it. Yeah, And you know you've even got
some you know, even less nesariousbut still certainly concerning in the broader scheme
of things issues with this. Youknow, I saw like a few weeks
ago. I think it was chatGPT. It done like a demo that
got like a new version where whereit talks and so it has a voice,

(24:45):
and essentially I think Carlott Johanson,who was in the movie Her where
she plays like a similar product,but from like ten fifteen years ago,
AI voiced Essentially, she was accusingthem of like just ripping off her voice
and putting it in their app.You know, that's an allegation. I
don't think that they've said that.That's exactly what they've done. It sounds

(25:06):
exactly like her. But the pointthere is is that, Okay, so
we can make these apps that willmake that will you know, take a
user's voice, your voice, andthen we're going to monetize that. That's
really concerning when you think about itin the broader scheme of things. All
Right, tell me again, whatwas the movie she was in that was
about AI? Yeah, it wasit was her. It was oh,

(25:29):
what's his name? Watching Fennix WalkPhoenix? Right? Yeah, that she
has an AI girlfriend. Okay,I listened to the recording. Scarlett Johnson
is a very specific voice, Brandon. I didn't think it sounded that much
like her. It just sounds likea woman with a deeper voice, but
still a woman. She can't owndeep voice with Scarlett Johansson, can't have
the rights to white women with adeep voice, right. I don't know.

(25:53):
We'll see, We'll see she getpaid. Apparently they had like approached
her beforehand, I think and saidand said do you want to do this?
And she said no, and thenthey released this, So I don't
know, right, but but butmy point is that if you know it
sounds like her or not, isknow he's moving so vapidly right now that

(26:14):
there's gonna be a lot of concernsabout you know, who owns your voice,
who owns your likeness, who ownsthese things. I mean, there's
the questions we've never really thought ofbefore, and now we're having to think
of really fast as it's all developed. Oh big time. Look, I
work in advertising on the radio.One of the best things you can do
in radio advertising for your small businessesgo out and partner with a talk radio

(26:34):
personality and have him tell his listenersabout your brand. Right, That's how
our whole industry works. Sean Hannitysays, go to MyPillow dot com or
whatever. Right, So, so, who owns the sound of your voice?
And I don't think you can ownthere's no way to trademark that.
For the record, chat GPT andopen AI, after hearing that they were
being accused of stealing her voice,immediately changed the voice. But I still

(26:59):
assert here I don't think she wasripped off. But to your point,
I don't think you can own avoice. I don't think. I don't
think I can own my own voicebecause how do you describe it in paper?
How do you describe it in acontract? Brandon? Oh, I
know, It's why. I don'tknow how you do? Right, you,
I said, I mean, thisis just this is just a tip
of the iceberg though of this stuff. It's crazy to think about looking back

(27:22):
on this. I have to assumehistory's probably going to remember Ken Paxton as
being the good guy. Years fromnow, when people forgot about the twenty
first century early twenty first century Republicanversus Democrat fight, they'll remember that he
wrote policies that were supposed to protectpeople from this. But right now,
here, in this little corner oftime, here in this little window with
most stupid liberals believing anything that SiliconValley does is in our best interest and

(27:48):
anything a Republican does is evil andbad. Most of them are probably going
to miss the boat on this,aren't they? Probably so? But you
know, I was actually thinking whenyou started segment talking about Attorney General Paxton
maybe becoming Trump's attorney general certainly onepossibility. But you know, he's also
a couple of weeks ago when weinterviewed him, when our Saragen Vallas interviewed

(28:11):
him on her show here Texas Scorecard, he said a Senate run might be
in the cards too, So we'llsee to replace Cornyn maybe maybe what do
you so, Okay, just youropinion, what do you think is a
more who has more power? MerrickGarland or John Cornyn? Whose job would

(28:33):
you rather have if you were KenPaxton, Oh, I wouldn't want to
move to DC, reguard with Yeah, well it's in both cases. Yeah,
yeah, you got to be inDC. If you operate like the
Bidens Department of Justice, they obviouslyhave the upper hand. I mean,
you're right exactly if you could whetheryou go to the Department of Justice or

(28:55):
the Senate in Washington, d C. Either way, you're going to be
eating dry brisket inside the that way. His name is Brandon Walton's. You
could follow him on Twitter x youknow what that is. But what you
ought to really go consider doing isgo to Texas scorecard dot com subscribe to
his email list. You'll be gladyou did. You were listening to Kenny
Webster's Pursuit of Happiness. We're everyoneis welcome, even scum sucking meggot swallowing

(29:18):
socialist bastards you used to refer toas mom. Hey, I love my
mom. NASA wants to build arobot moon train. Elon Musk wants to
do the same, but his versionof the train will probably be a lot
cooler than NASA is. Huh,just my two cents on that. Hey,

(29:41):
Happy birthday today to Pancho Via Youguys know who that is, the
former governor of Chihuahua. He wasa Mexican revolutionary, he was a gorilla
leader. And today's birthday, anddon't we just love a good birthday party.
You may not know the story ofPancho Villa. That's okay. Fortunately
for you, we have young peoplehere to describe it. Welcome to another

(30:03):
episode of a Millennial's Guide to History, a lesson in the Earth's most riveting
moments to explain world events to societiesmost entitled and ignorant. Today's episode,
Pancho Villa raids America. Welcome toa Millennial's Guide to History. Today we're
gonna tell you the story of PonchoVilla. Pancho Villa was a gorilla from

(30:29):
Mexico. But I thought they onlyhad gorillas in Africa. No, that's
a different kind of gorilla. Thisis a kind of can like talk and
stuff, you mean, like Coco. Yeah, but was that all the
sign language. So Pacho Villa wasthis peasant dude who turned into a badass
revolutionary guide from Mexico. Yeah,he was a total bad boy. He

(30:52):
was really hot too, waite.How do you know he was hot.
I saw him open up for PittBull at the Houston Road. Oh,
yeah, that show is awesome.Pancho Villa was all pissed off because America
was totally supporting his enemies for controlover Mexico. So Pancho had to do
what Pancho had to do. Hey, let's attack the border town of Columbus,

(31:14):
New Mexico that would show these greengoals was boss. And that's exactly
what Pancho did. So Pancho andhis homies killed nineteen townspeople and left the
town in flame. Wow, youguys totally burned down the Taco cabana.
Now where are we gonna go fordiet? Mountain dew? The Americans were

(31:36):
pretty salty about a bunch of Mexicancriminal dudes invading one of their towns.
So American General John Pershing got permissionfrom President Woodrow Wilson to meet six thousand
American troops in New Mexico and capturePancho Villa. Get or alive? Dead
or alive? Can I just chooseneither. For nearly two years, General

(31:56):
Pershing chased Pancho Villa through Mexico,using horse cars and even airplanes. Pancho
of the American soldiers got into severalbloody squirmishes, but they had no success
in capturing him. Ah see here, this Mexican guy is really pissing me
off. She'll never get me eskeezy American dude. Finally, the American

(32:19):
soldiers decided to give up, andit seemed as though Pancho Villa got away.
Ha ha. These American guys aregiving up, They're so lazy.
But then Pancho was assassinated by oneof his own men. Hey, Pancho
Vianna, Dancy's far sleeping with Mariabehind the CANTEENA he's the sty in the
Pancho. Even though Pancho was killedby one of his own men, many

(32:42):
Mexicans still blame his death on theUnited States, and to this day,
dudes at the border will sing PanchoVilla's name whenever they lean like a cholo.
This has been a millennials guide tothe street. Let's got to Hollywood.
We're going to Hollywood, everybody.Is this a spoiled, pampered,

(33:05):
narcissistic Hollywood bratt or what I toldyou? Prepart dot com today reporting on
what Disney is doing during Pride Month. Apparently it's June now and it's very
important for your four year old tobecome queer. The Disney grooming syndicate is
not playing around when it comes tosexualizing kids, including really small kids.

(33:30):
I'm serious, it's really strange what'shappening here. Look, I'm not sure
if you've heard, but June isPride Month. It's a big deal.
So over the weekend, if youlogged into your Disney Plus account to see
what type of gay trans content theywere suggesting to children, you would immediately
see there was quite a bit tolook at. A rotating banner at the

(33:52):
top of the screen featured a massivePride logo. Obviously, trans colors were
included in addition to the traditional rainbow. And you're probably thinking, that's not
for me. I'll just search forold content. So you go over to
the search page. The first tile, the one in the top left corner
of the screen, defaulted to whatelse Disney's Pride collection. That's a bit

(34:14):
aggressive for a brand best known asbeing a content creator for children. Okay,
so you go in and you putyour birth date in, and someone
didn't experiment. They entered the birthdate of a four year old to see
what kind of content they'd get ifit would be less sexual. It was
not. If a hypothetical four yearold selected the Pride tile, all manner

(34:36):
of adult oriented content was promoted,including dragged themed shows, because four year
olds love drag queens for some reason. One thing that you cannot ignore is
this very controversial light year movie,which was a flop. By the way,
it was listed in the LGBTQ pluslove Story section. Marvel's Eternals,

(34:57):
which was also a failed movie,is featured all over the page. Apparently,
Apparently one of the great things aboutPride is if somebody was gay in
the movie and the movie flopped,it's a second chance for the movie,
according to Disney. Okay, soif you go in and you set up
your parental controls, which is nota quick process to g rated content,
that does not remove a lot ofthe content that I just described to you.

(35:22):
You tell Disney Plus a four yearold's watching, and Disney pushes gay
content on them, including drag queenshows. Here's a question. What kind
of man dresses up as a hypersexualized woman and then wants to expose himself
to small children. There's an answerto that question. I'm not even gonna
say it out loud, because youand I both know the answer. Okay,

(35:45):
I'll say it. It's a degeneratorwho has no business being your kids.
What kind of corporation aids in abets a man like this and is
perverted desire to expose himself to littlekids? A demonic corporation one that's openly
grooming kids. I'm sorry, butthere's nothing okay exposing little kids to gay
content. You're not trying to showyour kid footage of heterosexuals having sex.

(36:07):
Why do they need to see gaypeople being sexualized? All this does is
destroy a child's innocence. It opensthem up to a world of adult sexuality
before the child's prepared to process itand before the parent's prepared to explain it.
You can cry to me that I'moverreacting here, but what is the
point of all this. The pointof all this is to groom kids.

(36:29):
There's no reason to show a childtwo men kissing. Of course, teaching
tolerance for others is great, it'sa good thing. But why is America
the most tolerant country in the world, celebrating one month a year a very

(36:49):
specific group of people simply because theyhave gay sex, and then telling people
that we're not a tolerant country.The last one hundred years prove you need
not destroy an innocent child, innocentchild's very innocence to accomplish the task of
proving that we're a tolerant country.Look, I don't have a problem with
gay TV shows, and movies.There's nothing wrong with it. Go ahead,

(37:10):
watch gay stuff. You're gay,watch gay stuff. We live in
a great, big, beautifully diverse, melting pot of humanity filled with all
kinds of people. But why kids? This is not what Disney Plus is
doing. It's not for adults.Disney is pushing this propaganda on kids,
all kids, including four year olds. Remember when they said they just wanted

(37:34):
to get married. I'm Kenny Webster. I'm so grateful you all listen to
my radio show every afternoon. Ifyou ever miss a minute of it,
there's a podcast you could subscribe toit. I hope you do. Download
it. It's free. You couldfind my podcast on iHeartRadio. You can
also find it on the Walton Johnsonsmartphone app. You can even find it
on Spotify and all the other placeswhere podcasts are located. Follow me on

(37:57):
social media. I love you all. I'll be back bright and early tomorrow.
Mon warning for more what you boughta radio for. You are listening
to the Pursuit of Happiness Radio.Tell the government to kiss your ass when
you listen to the show.