September 4, 2025 • 47 mins
Also, Epstein's victims speak out, Trump and Cuomo meet to stop Zohran, and Tim Dillon's insane new video
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/newsflash--2206348/support.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/newsflash--2206348/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
Hello everyone, My name is Speca Walsh. Welcome to today's
episode of Newsflash. We have a good one for you.
As always on the show, today we are taking a
look at all things related to that crazy RFK junior
Senate testimony where he was really getting grilled about the
fact that he wants to take especially take vaccines out
(00:32):
of the American healthcare system and the fact that some
of the people are the CDC are not liking that
too much. Also, we're taking looking at this Epstein survivors
holding a press conference. They're promising to put together their
own client list, and very few people but some in
Congress are trying to help them get their word out.
(00:53):
Rocanna and Thomas Massey, a bipartisan combination trying to force
the release of the FDA fouls, will give you all
of the details on that. Also, new revelations showing how
Andrew Clomo, Eric Adams, and Donald Trump are teaming up
to try and clear the field for Andrew Clomo to
take on zoron mom Nanni that is now getting exposed
(01:14):
and mom Nannie, as you can imagine, making some hay
out of it. And a prominent right wing comedian is
bragging about taking Saudi blood money, really blood money to
perform at a comedy show in Saudi Arabia with a
whole bunch of other comedians, big names like Dave Chappelle
and Pete Davidson. But this guy is the only one
(01:36):
very proudly bragging about selling out. We'll take a look
what that says about where we are headed. It's gonna
be a great show newsflash starting right now. You're on
sworn and once again, of course under that all of
(02:01):
the clips from today show out now on this Mental
Weal YouTube channel, so go check it out. So just
another day in Donald Trump's America where we get to
watch our wonderful Health Secretary, our F. K Junior, Robert F.
Kennedy Junior, taking the stand and testifying for the UH
(02:21):
essentially to tell the Senate Sate Financi Committee how good
of a job he is doing, essentially ridding the American
healthcare system of those pesky little things called vaccines, just like,
get them out of there. When have they ever noticed
any good before? It really was a pretty crazy situation,
and we'll take you through all of the clips here
on this, but it's just like another one of these
(02:45):
just things where It's just like, do we really have
to put up with this? Because like you get the
bad policy and you get the really evil prophe seeking policy.
You always know that's gonna be part of any Republican administration,
especially a Donald Trump Republican administration. But in terms of
the pure stupidity, I feel like that's a real extra
second bonus that we get with this this second term
(03:07):
here with mag the Maha Movement and RFK Junior. So
this is the this is the first clip here. This
is actually a Republican senator giving him some grief on
this bill Cassidy centator from Louisianna, who's a doctor. The
only time he really talks any kind of sense is
on healthcare because I guess he's like, I know this
(03:27):
to be true. I can't watch you guys fake this bullshit.
So I'm gonna actually have to uh to tell the
truth here. But this is the.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
Time, and I'm approaching this as a doctor, not as
a senator. I am concerned about children's health, seniors health.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
All of our health.
Speaker 2 (03:44):
And I applaud you for joining the president and a
call for radical transparency.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
Thank you for that. I said yesterday.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
I believe it that President Trump deserves a Nobel Prize
for Operation Warp Speed.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
If he had been President Obama, he would have gotten it.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
But because of Operation Warp Speed forcing the federal government
to come to a vaccine development within ten months when
others said it couldn't be done, we saved millions of
lives globally, trillions of dollars. We reopened the economy economies,
an incredible accomplishment. Mister secretary, do you agree with me
that the president that the President deserves a Nobel Prize.
Speaker 3 (04:19):
For Operation Warp Speed.
Speaker 4 (04:21):
Absolutely?
Speaker 3 (04:23):
Let me ask you.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
But you just told Senator Bennett that the COVID vaccine
killed more people than COVID.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Wait, that was a stake.
Speaker 4 (04:34):
I did not say that.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
Okay, then let me ask because you also are the senator.
Speaker 4 (04:38):
I just want to make clear.
Speaker 3 (04:40):
We'll check the record. That's a question of fact.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
You also said that you were also, as lead attorney
for the Children's Health Defense, you engage in multiple lawsuits
attempting to restrict access to the COVID vaccine.
Speaker 3 (04:55):
Again, it surprises me that you think so highly of.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Operation Warp Speed when as an attorney you attempted to
restrict access.
Speaker 1 (05:03):
Yeah. So, there's a lot going on there, and he
did do that the Children's Defense Fund, and he has
said some crazy things. RFK has about the COVID vaccine
over the years, and it really is kind of a
fascinating insight into the Trump administration cabinet official mindset because
it's like the one crazy thing that I believe that
(05:23):
contradicts Trump and contradicts what he's trying to do. And
of course Trump is not gonna like turning on the
TV and saying seeing RFK say, oh no, the President
doesn't I know about peace Pride. Okay, I'll stop the impersonation,
but anyway, you get the he would not like to
see one of his subordinates saying that he doesn't deserve
a big fancy trophy for all the great work that
(05:44):
he's done saving America. Essentially is what the what the
case is with Trump and RFK there so he RFK
is then forced, you know, his his loyalty to Trump
supersedes his long held hatred of vaccin scenes, particularly the
COVID vaccine, and he has to come in and say, oh, yeah,
(06:05):
I think Trump should get a Nobel Peace Prize for
an operation that I hate and I despise because I
am an anti vaccine psychopath. Even though the COVID vaccine
undoubtedly saved tons and tons of lives, even though of
course it wasn't always done perfectly, it really did obviously
save tons and tons of lives. This is you know,
(06:26):
this is the next clip. You heard some of the
background noise here. This is just because this is our
house sector.
Speaker 3 (06:31):
Here from Science Center Renda.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
And you could see he's just belching into the microphone
and he's got an aid whispering his ear to be
like you can see him reach for it. He's like
he goes to mute his microphone because he just can't stop.
The microphone is like two inches away from his mouth
and he just just you can hear the disgusting noises
he's making into the microphones. It's like, this is who,
(06:57):
this is who the dramasvation is making us put up
with in terms of the people leading our garment. Like
this is how pathetic the situation is. Here's another one,
a pretty tentic change with Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire. Hassen,
I guess is how you would say it, and yeah,
pretty confrontationally. Let's say, look and have you.
Speaker 5 (07:16):
Produced the data that you relied on and that this
FDA relied on to change those parameters. You did it
behind these doors of the now pro now parents who
decide that they do want their children down, which I'm
not just because you know, sometimes when you make an accusation,
it's kind of.
Speaker 6 (07:36):
A confession, mister Kennedy.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
So let's just I'm hop with this. So here's what's
going to happen to Senator Warner's point to the parents
who are concerned all around the country, to people who
want to get the COVID vaccine this fall, even if
they're under sixty five. Because the boosters have worked, there's
been much less serious disease. People do not have the
same level of threat and risk COVID that they used
(08:00):
to because of these vaccines. People who want to exercise
their freedom of choice are being denied that because you
are citing data that you won't produce to the public.
Speaker 4 (08:13):
Acting.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
Yeah, and it just this is such an unappealing like
think about the contrast there, right, you have this one
guy who's just yelling into the microphone, you know, and
that just one other person who's just calmly citing statistics,
taking a look at the situation saying, you know, people
need freedom of choice. Like you could very much make
it convincing argument that the Democrats went too far with
(08:37):
vaccine stuff early on. But this kind of stuff, this
kind of positioning here is really really apparent. And you
can really see here who looks like an absolute crazy person,
and who looks like an absolute you know, you know,
just standard person who's actually interested in people's health, which
(08:58):
is really quite quite clear here. And this is another
Democrat center. Ron Wyden challenging RFK about the vaccines as well.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
I didn't politicize it, but I depoliticize it the Congress.
Speaker 7 (09:13):
He said, all over the country, mister Secretary, scientists and
doctors are saying otherwise. They're all wrong too, They're all lying,
according to.
Speaker 4 (09:22):
You, a scientist, doctors are supporting me all over the country.
Oh there is division on opinion.
Speaker 7 (09:28):
I don't I don't get letters from thousands of people
who are not political saying that this set of changes
is going to damage American healthcare and particularly these healthcare
agencies for.
Speaker 3 (09:41):
Decades to come.
Speaker 7 (09:42):
I don't get any letters.
Speaker 4 (09:43):
I'll say, Oh, he's going to make a big difference forever. Yeah,
maybe you're listening to a selective group of people.
Speaker 1 (09:50):
You get me and I will find.
Speaker 4 (09:52):
I will tell you what Senator I got. I will
put my mail bag against your mail bag any day
thirty seconds.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
Yeah, this is such a weird way of putting it.
Just like all these people telling me about that now
right I am. It's just like you're just supposed to
be a government official. It's like you're not really engaging
in any sort of facts. It's not really engaged with
any sort of broader consensus here and just looking at
the these people are not political people are like, hey,
(10:21):
you know, maybe we should keep some of these vaccines.
Maybe you shouldn't attack the people the CDC for you know,
this is the next stup that we're gonna play. This
is about the data and him just essentially saying, yeah,
I don't know how many Americans die from COVID, I
don't know how many Americans were saved by the vaccine,
or you know. I so questioning is kind of a
two to one there, questioning the basic data that was
(10:41):
taken by the CDC for whatever reason, and then questioning
the efficscy of the vaccine when you know it's not
so much that people need to be taking a vaccine
right now. But it's more the fact that for the future,
when you know it's very possible we could get another
pandemic on their outbreak very soon. If we just have
someone who does it, believe in the basic tenants accepted
(11:02):
tenants of modern medicine. It's like we are in for
a very bad situation like this. Even if you're somehow
listening to this in your voter for Trump the first
time around, or voted for Trump just this past year,
do you really want the guy talking like this to
be in charge the next health crisis that there is.
Speaker 3 (11:23):
To just again some basic facts.
Speaker 6 (11:24):
Do you accept the fact that a million Americans died
from COVID?
Speaker 4 (11:29):
I don't know how many die.
Speaker 6 (11:32):
You're the Secretary of Health and Human Services. You don't
have any idea how many Americans died from COVID.
Speaker 4 (11:38):
I don't think anybody knows because the there was so
much data chaos coming out of the CDC and they.
Speaker 6 (11:46):
Will all take.
Speaker 4 (11:48):
You and these are models.
Speaker 6 (11:50):
You know the answer of how many Americans from COVID?
This is the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Do
you think the vaccine did anything to prevent.
Speaker 4 (11:59):
Addition, again, I would like to see the data and
talk about the data.
Speaker 6 (12:06):
Ana had this job for eight months and you don't
know the data exactly whether the vaccine.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
The problem is that they didn't have the data. The
data by the Biden administration absolutely disfault.
Speaker 6 (12:20):
Who is the size you're saying the Biden administration politicize
all the data. Go back to camp Well, Jess from
Surgeon General.
Speaker 4 (12:30):
They fired doctor Ground, they fired all the people who
questioned the orthodoxy.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
They quest like, I'm just like, we should not have
to put up with this. It's just like there has
been no convincing evidence, and you're there there. You could
make a pretty good case with the lab leak, with
the way that certain elements of this whole program were handled,
that there were some serious misgivings, But we can make
there's no real evidence. There's no convincing evidence that I
(12:57):
have seen that we need to be talking about this
in a hearing months and months on about anything to
do with the direction of COVID and how its handles. Like, yes,
there were some mistakes, there's inquiry going on. There was
no type of criminal activity except for the fact the
profit hearing that was done by some of these drug
companies that were pushing the vaccine as much as possible
on American people and trying to get you know, the
(13:18):
insurance to pay for it, even the people to pay
for it out of pocket. But you know the only
reason why we're talking about this now is because we're
going against just irregardless of COVID, the people who have
been pushing this for years and years and years long
before COVID are using this as the trojan horse to
using is and RK is the leader, and now he
is in charge of Health and Human Services. Just because
(13:40):
Donald Trump won a few extra more percentage points, he
is now using this as the kind of wedge to
break in and now go attack all vaccines, which which
is going to have tremendously bad consequences on the health system.
You know, Florida, I don't know if I mentioned already
Florida getting rid of vaccine managed for school children. You
know that is an RFK inspired policy decision. You got
(14:01):
the surch and general there comparing vaccines to slavery. You
know how many more states up and down the South
and the Midwest are going to be doing the same,
and that really endangers a bunch of people who are
not even involved in this situation, but they are having
to deal with and put their kids in the same
school with people who just do not make very sound
(14:21):
health decisions. It's just it really is a testament to
how far backwards and how much will we are in
decline and retreat from basic knowledge as a country. And
that is the real takeaway I had watching this RFK testimony.
The incredibly brave survivors of the monster Jeffrey Epstein, held
a press conference on Capitol Hill where they made some
(14:43):
pretty interesting announcements, including that they, as a group of
survivors who are coming together with the purpose of getting
these files released, are so pissed off at the inaction
of Congress, led by Donald Trump, whose only response this
has just been to call it a democratic hoax, that
they are are going to these Epstein survivors are going
to try and create a list of their own to
(15:04):
release and expose these people who are behind it. Here's
one of the very brave survivors explaining their plan.
Speaker 8 (15:11):
Transparency is justice, release the files and the secrecy, and
stand with us in declaring that no one, no billionaires,
no politicians, not world leaders, is above the law. And
let me announce now, several of us Epstein survivors have
(15:34):
been discussing creating our.
Speaker 9 (15:35):
Own list of names. We know the names many.
Speaker 10 (15:47):
Of us were abused by them. Now, together as survivors,
we will confidentially compile the names we all know we're
regularly in the Epstein world, and it will be done
by survivors and for survivors.
Speaker 11 (16:01):
Well, no one else is involved.
Speaker 10 (16:06):
Stay team for more details on that, because history is
washing and some are the women who will come after us.
Speaker 11 (16:15):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Yeah. So that's some pretty cool stuff and a pretty
big announcement there, And I think, unfortunately, because the way
our legal system works, representive Thomas Massey and Rocanna, who
have been a Thomas Massey's a Republican, Rocana's Democrat. They've
been one of the few duos, especially bipartisan duos, that
actually been working to shed light on the truth of
(16:37):
this situation. So let's take a look at what they
had to say about how they can get around what
is obviously gonna happen if they release the survivors release
the list, they get sued by a bunch of people. Well,
Thomas Massey has a solution to that.
Speaker 12 (16:52):
The survivor said that they had decided to compile their
own list. But the reality is if they try to
release that list, they're going to be sued into homelessness,
they will be attacked, they will have death threats. And
so what my colleague Marjorie Taylor Green volunteered to do,
and I've volunteered to do as well, is to read
(17:13):
that list.
Speaker 13 (17:13):
On the floor of the House of Representatives. Because our
founders put into the constitution speech or debate immunity, which
says that we can't be prosecuted for what we say
on the floor of the House. So we're willing to
help those survivors get those names out there. And as
my colleague Grocanna has said, we trust the public to
(17:34):
determine who were donors to the Epstein Scholarship Fund and
who were users of the women who were exposed to
sexual abuse, to differentiate between those two groups of people.
Speaker 1 (17:47):
Yeah, I mean the people. You know, some people are stupid,
you know. I'm not going to deny that, but it
really is a good point there. And also, by the way,
I love that idea of actually reading it out on
the congressional record. I think that would be so important
in terms of that actually going a long way to
protect obviously the survivors, protect the women, which is by
the way, what Trump and Cash Betalent all these people
(18:08):
have been saying that they want to do, Oh, we
just care about the women, care about the surviv blah
bla blah about whatever. You know, this is clearly bs
because they're the ones who are trying to obstruct this
with the whole coordination with Mike Johnson and the Congress
early and then we'll take you a look at what
Trump's just been saying today about you know, still calling
it a democratic hoax. But it would also, i think,
would do a really long way to protect the women,
(18:30):
which is again what supposedly what Trump wants, but also
to restore people's trust a little bit in Congress, because
to see them actually stand with the survivors and read
out the names of the people who are involved in
this stuff on the House floor, I think that would
be a really powerful jester. But like, we actually have
a government that most of the time, no, but just
(18:51):
some of the time may be capable of actually doing
the right thing and fighting for these files to be
released when they absolutely everyone knows should be released, and
actually standing with the people who are victimized to do them.
I think it would be a sign and be like, Okay,
Congress is with you, and we're gonna get this done
and we are not gonna let these people get away
(19:11):
with it. And people like Normanis who are kind of
checked out of politics, would really be like, Wow, I
didn't I didn't see this coming. You know, this is
surprising to see Congress actually on the right side of issue.
And I think they could get a lot of credit.
They could get a lot of a play on that.
In addition, of course the most important thing revealing who
(19:34):
was involved in this. It would be another small benefit
to that as well. Here's what, by the way, what
Trump had to say when he was asked about it.
Speaker 14 (19:40):
Yet again, the SURVIVORSUS Jeffrey Epstein not seeking at a
press conference on Capitol Hill, and they're calling for at
least case files these documents to release. And Thomas Massey,
who has fought who was functionally a discharge issue to
get the House to vote on the lease of the documents,
it says he hasn't lead you're advocated.
Speaker 15 (19:59):
In these, but many of your friends and donors maybe,
And he says that's why the Justice Farman is adapting
them and slow walking the release of Park. He is
a justice ferment protecting any friends or donors.
Speaker 16 (20:11):
So this is a Democrat hoax that never ends.
Speaker 9 (20:16):
You know.
Speaker 16 (20:16):
It reminds me a little of the Kennedy situation. We
gave them everything over and over again, more and more
and more, and nobody's ever satisfied. From what I understand.
I could check, but from what I understand, thousands of
pages of documents have been given. But it's really a
Democrat hoax because they're trying to get people to talk
(20:36):
about something that's totally irrelevant to the success that we've
had as a nation since I've been president. Even if
you look at d C right now.
Speaker 1 (20:45):
Yeah, so much success, so much success that's been It's
been coming out of everywhere from every orifice of the
Trump deministration. That that is for sure. And it's like,
I don't get this whole line about oh, it's a
democratic hoax. It's like the best way to end space
and you know, get rid of the democrats evil plan
to distract from all President Trump's great success is to
(21:06):
just actually release the full files and the files that
have not been publicly released, as the Trump Ministration tried
to do yesterday, but essentially putting out a bunch of
files again. This is, by the way, the second time
they've done this in terms of putting out Epstein files
that were already released into the public and acting like
they were just getting put out right now by the
Trump Ministration of the first time, when in reality they've
(21:28):
been out for a lot longer that for years, some
of them at you know, at this point. But all
they can do to end the speculation, to get at
the Democrats' evil plan and to get you know, get
people focused back on how good Trump is is literally
just to release the full files and the actual files
that people want to see again, not the files that
(21:48):
have been public for years and years at this point,
and that would really that actually dispel a lot of
the fears and the concerns and the conspiracy theories that
a lot of people, not just you know, the Democrats
have because of course they want to get a Trump,
but also people who are a political who may have
voted for Trump in twenty twenty four because he just
(22:08):
seemed like they're kind of culturally cool thing to do.
They were the first people to be repulsed by this,
and they thought, you know, Trump, he's so different, he's
so cool, He's going to expose Epstein files. And when
they didn't do that, when Trump didn't do that, and
he essentially lied to their faces about it, they were
pretty pissed. And the best way to stop, the best
way to get them all back on side is to
(22:30):
release the full files. And Trump knows exactly what those
files are, and for some reason he just doesn't want
to do it. Just give people what they want. The
evidence is there, You have the evidence, So why are
you so hesitant to release the full files? If again,
of course, and this is what we all assume without
(22:52):
a shadow of a doubt, is that Trump isn't implicated
and he's innocent. So just release the files. You know.
It's a simple, simple situation. Yeah, so it it really is,
I think quite quite apparent here. And let's go to
a clip from these are the Virginia Dufray, who is
(23:12):
one of the most prominent survivors and people testified against Epstein. First,
this is her family talking about the importance of this
stuff getting out there. We haven't had an opportunity to
relate review in detail.
Speaker 8 (23:29):
There's a lot of At least upon initial reports, it
appears that it's not any new information.
Speaker 3 (23:37):
So, like we've been saying, it's time to release.
Speaker 8 (23:39):
All the documents, and bear in mind, guys, is at
your quality, Like the people in these files are great politicians.
Speaker 11 (23:46):
They are bankers, they are the very wealthy.
Speaker 8 (23:48):
And powerful people, and it shouldn't be up to the
survivors to have to release that list.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
This is it's time for the government to protect the
people and stop.
Speaker 5 (23:56):
Protecting these rich and powerful men that essentially they are
trying they're very darn best.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Yeah, I think that was really I think that guy's
name I don't know, but he's the brother of Virginia
Drew Frey. I mean, what a testimony. Right, It's like,
it should not have to be up to the survivors
to expose this kind of situation when they've already gone
through so much with you imagine being part of this
kind of a ring, and then people still don't believe you.
(24:25):
People are hiding the files, even the ones who say
that they're going to release them, and you have to
go through the whole thing of fighting for them and
pushing for them all over again, you know, I mean,
it really is it's a great sentiment. It's like people,
the government of the people should be trying in such
an important sentiment, you know that the government people should
be trying to expose this, should be trying to make
(24:45):
this clear. And that's why I thought the idea of
Thomas Massey of reading this the list of the Epstein
survivors into the Congressional record on the House floor to
give it that immunity. You can say anything you want,
you can sue if it's said on the House floor.
I think it's a really great idea to protect the
survivors and actually give Congress so much needed credibility back
(25:08):
with the American people. But again, it's it really makes
Trump and this is I think he knows this because
he is implicated, and it's been reported so many times
the close ties that Trump and Epstein had with stealing
Virginia Dufrey from Marl Lago or whatever the hell like that,
and all the pictures of them together, the videos of
them partying, all that stuff. We know there is a
(25:29):
real tight tie between Trump and Epstein, or there at
least there was, at least for a certain period of time.
And because of that, we know that he is not
going to be an ally in this and he is
going to stand against it while continuing to feed the BslI.
That is a democratic hoax. It's a democratic hoax. Then
(25:49):
it's very easy to end the hoax by just proving
them wrong un releasing the files. The only reason why
you wouldn't do that is if you're implicated, and if
you think that those files, when they are released and
an attempt to end the Democratic coachs would look bad
for you. That's literally the only reason logically why you
would not release the files. So it's gonna be very
interesting to see what these survivors can do in terms
(26:12):
of linking up with these members of Congress who are
not completely corrupt, in order to try and get these
files out. Hopefully, most importantly, these survivors can stay safe
and stay sane with all the pressure and the death
threats they've been dealing with. And also we can hopefully
get some real answers on this whole saga. So they
(26:33):
are really going all out in a desperate attempt to
stop Zoraman Nodding from becoming Mayor of New York. And
when I say they, I mean everybody Trump advisors here.
This is the headline in the New York Times have
discussed a job for Eric Adams if he quits the
mayor's race. So Eric Adams has been in discussions with
the Trump team. That's what this article says, to essentially
get himself put up for a job in the Trump administration.
(26:56):
You know, Eric Adams is the current mayor, he's gonna
bow out of the race for his reelection. Put himself
up for a job. And where else in the position
where Trump puts every black person who's housing in urban development,
of course, and put Eric Adams up for that position.
That way it would clear the field for Andrew Cuomo
to get a better shot at beating Zoramon Man. He
says here they've been talking to the Eric Adams team.
(27:18):
But if you don't think Andrew Cmo knows what Trump
is doing here and in talking to the Adams team,
you got another thing coming. Let me tell you he
knows what's going on, and he probably got in touch
with some people at Trump's team to try and push
for it. So that's really who Andrew Clomo is. And
of course I know you're gonna want to see Zoran's
response to this. He came out swing let's say, Look.
Speaker 17 (27:40):
I think there are many ethical issues with this news.
We are talking about a mayor who was facing an
indictment that was then dropped by this administration to ensure
greater collaboration with the immigration directives of this administration, now
(28:00):
being considered for a job offer such that he would
drop out of a race to represent this city because
of the fact that they believe that would increase the
odds of anyone being able to defeat me. Those are
incredible ethical issues. And none of this has to do
with New Yorkers. None of it has to do with
(28:22):
the welfare of this city. It all has to do
with power. It all has to do with the audacity
that we have here to believe that we could pick
our own mayor, that we have to believe that The
most pressing issues are not how to ensure that Donald
Trump continues to have an ambassador in City Hall, but
that New Yorkers can actually afford the place that they
call home.
Speaker 1 (28:41):
Yeah. I mean, I think that's really, you know, really
well said and touches on. You know, Eric Adams. I
think he's going to be bought off by anyone but
Donald Trump and Andrew Cormle Here they really it makes
their contempt for New York City and any place where
voters are that don't automatically agree with them and reelect
(29:01):
them and think they're the best. It shows really their
contempt that both of them, that they have for Blue voters,
and it's like they're not allowed to go about their
own affairs. And it's the same thing with the National
Guard in DC and in Chicago and LA and all
those other places that they want to put the National Guard,
probably in New York as well. You know, like these
(29:23):
people just really have just complete and utter contempt for
anyone and everyone living in a blue city. They don't
think they deserve the privilege of self governance and to
choose how they want their own city to run and
who they want their own city to be led by.
So Donald Trump preserves the right. Andrew Cuomo, by the way,
who has always thought incredibly low things about the people
(29:45):
of New York City, and he always thought being the
mayor of New York City was a job for Trumps,
but he just tried to get back in it to
restart his political career. They just the lack of respect
here for the democratic choice of New Yorkers just could
not be more clear. And I think it's something that
Sorn touches on very effectively, especially in the times all
(30:06):
these National Guard occupations is complete just contempt in the
taking way of rights that Trump has for so many
other blue studies, But he also touches on it pretty well.
I would say here in this clip on MSNBC.
Speaker 18 (30:19):
How are you thinking about preparing for the job itself
in terms of having this threat looming over it?
Speaker 19 (30:28):
You have to prepare for the inevitability of Donald Trump
to continue being Donald Trump. We cannot, as you've said,
rely on any notion of the law or what is
appropriate for how he will determine his course of actions.
Speaker 18 (30:39):
And I look at California as an example such that
we are ready here in exactity in January first, with
a plan of partnership across city and state government to
be ready whether it's for the deployment of the National
Guard or it's for his attempt to pass legislation like
the one he just did, which will take an ax
to so much of what keeps so many New Yorkers afloat.
(31:00):
And I think we've seen what New York City can
gain if we have a mayor who is willing to
collaborate with Donald Trump, which is not that much at all.
We've had money directly taken out of bank accounts. We've
had a six year old public school student from Jackson
Heights being deported. This is what we have when you
want to work with Donald Trump. We've seen what it
looks like to manage Donald Trump, which is what we
(31:22):
see in Andrew Cuomo. We need someone who's actually willing
to fight Donald Trump. And we've seen examples of that
right here in New York with Kathy Hokl. We've seen
examples of that in California. It's time to have that
in city Hall.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
Very smart little tip of the cat there to Kathy
Okle to try and butter up for the future coming
zoron agenda. But it really is a very very good point,
which is like you need somebody. And this is really
why Trump is so pissed off, and this is why
he's trying to intervene and come over the top with
Andrew Cuomo is because he just can't believe it's just
the audacity of people in New York to actually choose
(31:54):
how they want their own affairs to be run, Like
these are just dumb Democrats. These are people don't even
know how to govern themselves. They need Trump to come
in and save them. You know, he's just like he's
saved every other possible thing under the sun, as you know,
is obviously he's the perfect god, emperor, king of the world.
Here like that is how him and his supporters see
(32:15):
the situation in New York City, and they just are
so pissed off. They just can't believe that there's you know,
people in that position, Democratic voters would dare to go
in a different direction, would dare to chart their own
path and have it be in any way critical to
the aims of the Trump administration. They just can't process it.
It's just it's really crazy, you know. We also have
(32:38):
some reactions here. This is Eric Adams talking to reporters
about the story here that he's in coordination with Trump
try and get a government drop for him to drop
out of the race and clear the field for Cuomo.
So he denying the story, no surprise, Yes.
Speaker 3 (32:57):
Mayor Adams, do you want to talk more?
Speaker 17 (32:58):
If you have been offered a job at a Trump
and administration, have you.
Speaker 1 (33:05):
Still got anyone from.
Speaker 20 (33:08):
Say I'm surprised of how the standards of recording in
the New York Times has dropped so much. I've never
asked for a job with HUD. I've never been promised
job with HUD. I have not communicated with the president.
What I must do is what I've always have said,
(33:29):
Stay focused, gonna be distracted by all this cessationalism, run
out city, keep it safe, and run from the election.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
Yeah, so that that was actually reported originally by Jeff
Colton of Politico. So you're glad he's denying the reporting
of the New York Times there, So any he never
you noticed that? He said, I never asked about the
hood job. Did you ask about something else? Maybe you
ask about another job, you know, trying to expand your
horises a little bit there. I don't know. But it
really is a just exemplifying the entire just rejection of
(34:00):
Zoron from some of these Democratic parties, especially New York
City elites, like they have been some of the top
of the Democratic Party in New York City been the
most intense resists of him. This is a New York
Democratic Congressman, Tom Swosey, who had to win his seatback
from a young fellow named George Santos, who actually beat
him for that seat, I believe in the twenty twenty election.
(34:22):
But this is, yeah, this is Swosey weighing in and saying,
Zora mam Donnie get out of my party as Lo
Long Island Congressman.
Speaker 4 (34:29):
Take a look, Zorean mam Donni and other Democratic socialist
should create their own party because I don't want that
in my party.
Speaker 1 (34:37):
Yeah, I mean it so ridiculous. It's just like, first
of all, on a certain level, I do agree with
him because it's like, you know, we don't belong the
same party, like with people like you who just don't
want any sort of change, just want to surrender to Trump.
I just want to keep the status quote in all things.
But who's to say that you have any sort of
aim in the Democratic Party. You're supposed to a sort
(34:58):
of edict on the way the Democratic Party should be run.
The Democratic Party, last time I checked, is supposed to
be democratic. And if you have people like Zora mam
Nani winning the elections and taking control of the Democratic
Party in a democratic fashion, you may want to consider
what's going wrong with you. But you know, I really
think he had a pretty good response to this as
(35:18):
well when he was asked about this, Tom Swozy remark
that Zora mom Nadi getting out of the Democratic Party.
This is what he had to say for the House.
Speaker 17 (35:28):
I have yet to meet a New Yorker who has
asked me about the opinions of Tom Swazi as.
Speaker 1 (35:33):
It pertains what it means to lead this city.
Speaker 17 (35:36):
And with regards to the mayor and the allegations of
different job offerings that have been made in the Trump administration,
it's not the question of where that job is, what agency,
It's that the sole intent of this entire conversation is
how to increase the odds of any candidate defeating our camp.
(36:00):
That's what all of them are working backwards from. And
it speaks to how threatened the Trump administration is by
our agenda, because it's an agenda that actually seeks to
fulfill the very things that he campaigned on, which are
lower costs for working class Americans coast to coast. And
yet while he has exacerbated that cost of living crisis,
he knows that we are sincere in our commitments to
(36:21):
transform the ability of New Yorkers to live in the city.
Speaker 1 (36:24):
Yeah, I think that's really great messaging, especially because you know,
if you look at where Zoron won in the race,
in the mayor race. A lot of times it was
places that have explicitly voted for Trump in bigger numbers,
especially in twenty twenty four. We're talking about the outer boroughs,
some of the non white voters that went big for
Zoron in the election, but also you know, swung in
(36:45):
big numbers towards Trump. Now, in the end, you know,
the grand scheme of things. I don't think any of
this stuff is going to really affect things too much,
but it really just it does show you the a
I think two things now. It shows you the contempt
that people have for you know, not just Trump, but
a lot of the established political class of this country
(37:08):
has for particularly when Democratic voters try and chart their
own paths and say, we don't want to go in
the same direction. We actually want to try policies that
are left of what the Democratic Party has certainly done,
and you have these are of course all the same
people that would turn around and say vote blue no
matter who you know you're supporting, fashion like they these
are the people when they get control taken from them
(37:30):
in a democratic fashion, they cannot take it. And they
have such a lack of respect for their own base
voters that they have to call on Donald Trump, by
the way, who hates their voters almost as much as
they do. It really feels like, if not more, you know, honestly,
probably more to come in and usurp the democratic will
of their own voters. It's a great indication as to
(37:52):
why that faction, that centrist faction in the party, the Party,
the faction that just wants to compromise and do nothing
and cavtat to Trump, is really not going to go
very far when compared with the really dynamic wing of
the party that Zorn is a part of. So Tim
Dillon is one of these comics that really made a
(38:15):
big name for themselves. They got they got a big
splash in the run up to the twenty twenty four
election by essentially saying, you know, Trump's so cool, Kamala Harris,
she's so weird, and all the Democrats they're they're not
fun at all. Let's just vote for the Republicans. Let's
just have a good time. And then three months of
the trumpdministration, when he started doing a lot of the
same stuff on Israel, when the economy started not to
(38:38):
look so good. Is essentially the moment the vibe shifted
against Trump. You know, we all kind of saw it happen.
If you're paying attention to the culture, they to give
him credit. Tim Dillon was right there being like, hey,
wait a minute, maybe Donald Trump isn't the most honest
person in the world. Maybe he's not gonna do everything
that he said he was gonna do. Could that possibly
(39:01):
be the case? And you know, he was doing it
in a very funny way, but it was just like,
you know, who could have seen this coming, right, who
could have possibly imagined that he would have done? He
would have done, he would have done he would have
done something like this. Anyway, he is now making headlines,
he's making waves because he along with many many others.
(39:24):
Let's take a look at this here, you know, zoom
in on the flyer of this comedy festival. He is
going to this comedy festival that took place in Saudi Arabia.
You got Tom Segura, Pete Davidson, Joe Rogan, Christis Stefano,
Dave Chappelle, they got over there. They got Kevin Hart,
Bill Burr, Zarna, the Indian Lady, the Indian mom. Pretty
(39:47):
funny and you know, every single and not every single,
but a lot of big name comedians are going to
this Sally Arabian Comedy Festival, and obviously they sold out
the highway. But the thing about Tim Dillon, not everyone
is going to be as blunt as him talking about
and really just saying loud and proud, hell yeah, I
(40:10):
sold out. Ah, And I think he's just will turn
it down everybody years. So I think he's practicing the
Islamic call to prayer. There we're in Saudi Arabia.
Speaker 11 (40:24):
Come on, get your tickets now, October eighth, the day
after October seventh. Just funny how it all works. Not
something that I had planned.
Speaker 1 (40:37):
Hei.
Speaker 11 (40:40):
I think it's very exciting that we're all going to Rid.
People are very upset about. They're angry that comedians are
going to read Saudi Arabia. Are very and they're don't
boliver anything.
Speaker 1 (40:51):
They're way more mama, Get over it.
Speaker 11 (40:55):
The House of Saud is paying us hundreds of thousands
of dollars, some of us millions. It's not me, but
they're paying millions of dollars to comedians. Get over it.
We're taking the money. How about that? Sorry? Oh you
weren't invited. Oh you got nothing going on? Boohoo hoo
for you. I would never do it. You weren't offered,
No one invited you. There's people that I respect it
(41:18):
turned it down, But a lot of people are doing it,
like a lot, like almost everyone. They bought comedy. So what, Well,
they have slaves, then they kill everyone.
Speaker 1 (41:30):
Hey, hey, hey, hey, heyy.
Speaker 11 (41:33):
Get over it. So what they have slaves? I imagine
the slaves in those countries are good at what they do.
Everyone who works at all the hotels, they take their passports.
They're not allowed to leave their slaves. Hey, is the
hotel nice? I'm not here to be a spoil sport.
(41:54):
I'm not here to ruin the good time that everyone's having.
Do I have issues with some of the policies towards women,
towards the gays. Yeah, towards the freedom of speech, well,
of course I do. But I believe in my own
financial well being, and I think you better start believing
in that, because when Peter Tiel puts all of you
(42:16):
in a cage, you're gonna want some way to get
out of that. I'm not gonna tell you how much
you're paying me. It doesn't matter paying me three hundred
and seventy five thousand dollars for one show. Now, a
lot of other people are getting one point six million.
Speaker 1 (42:27):
That's not me.
Speaker 11 (42:28):
I'm not in that bracket. Others have gotten one fifty.
Speaker 1 (42:31):
Why are they doing it?
Speaker 11 (42:32):
Here's the point. I am doing this because they're paying
me a large sum of money. They're paying me enough
money to look the other way. If something bad is
happening to your left, look to your right. If, for example,
I'm at a breakfast and I see someone get grabbed
and they start hitting them.
Speaker 1 (42:51):
With that's you know, that that big stick.
Speaker 11 (42:53):
I don't know if it's bamboo or whatever. It is.
It's kind of a wood, but it kind of snaps back.
It's it's perfect.
Speaker 1 (42:59):
Yeah, So you could. He's going on and on and
on there about how he does not care about any
of it, and it's like, to a certain extent, it's like,
I you can't deny the consistency in what he's preaching,
because he's done this before. He's being like, you know,
one of his other famous rants is like, find the
billionaire who's the least pedophilix, find the candidate, find the
(43:20):
politician who's the least pedophilic because everyone is so screwed up.
Just make selfish decisions. He's saying, it's okay, you know,
you can do it. It's not gonna be the end
of the world. But I kind of think that he
could be kind of almost running himself up into a
little bit of a trap here, because you know, he
he his whole brand is being this edgy guy, this
(43:42):
guy who doesn't care about what anyone thinks. He's gonna be.
He's gonna be a little bit controversial, he's gonna be
a little bit uh, you know, he's gonna shock value.
That's a big part of modern day shock jock of
the Internet. And he's, yeah, he's made it clear that
I don't care when whatever anyone says. I'm in there
(44:02):
to make money. I'm this, you know, gonna say anything
to shock you. You do feel a little bit icky
listening to someone being like, I don't care about anything
about slavery, you know, the slaves probably like the nice
hotel that they built, you know, all this stuff in
Saudi Arabia, but it doesn't entirely convey everything that I
think Tim Dillon's trying to do. Because if you look
(44:23):
at some of the things that he's done in the past,
they're actually pretty morally impactful. They have a moral pitch
to them, and a big part of that moral pitch is,
let's not, for example, commit genocide. Let's not you know,
let's not be selling or you know, housing stock to Blackrock.
Let's not be focusing all this energy on Ukraine. You know,
(44:47):
Like what he is saying now is whenever I try
and make a case, whenever I try and make a
pitch to somebody that's or to my audience in support
of something that's different, that's a little bit controversial, that
a little bit you know, against the mainstream, you know that,
and it's saying we should stop doing this, we ought
(45:08):
to stop doing this. You're making a moral case. And
that's a big part of what he does every day.
Now that whole aspect of it is completely gone, it's
completely out the window, because it's like, if you're making
a case about you know, what he's essentially saying is
if he could be paid well enough to change his
vision on anything. And I'm sure he's gonna say, yeah,
you idiot, that's the case. Yeah, of course I'm telling everyone,
(45:30):
And it's like, yeah, you are. But I don't think
everyone's listening, Like they like the fact that you're making
these big moral cases and you have some sort of
you know, yeah, you're a dirt bag, you say some
kind of unpleasants of tough things, but they like the
fact that you were principled and you say things like
they are. And he's saying that that's saying things like
(45:51):
it is that I'm an honest guy. I'm gonna kick
my feedback. You know, that's subjected to the bottom line.
And I think that could you know, he could run
himself into a risk if you know, he's essentially kind
of put himself into an honesty paradox, like he's so honest,
he's gonna be honest about how he's dishonest and how
his opinions and his analysis is commentary because you know,
(46:15):
it is jokes, but it's also political commentary as well.
That whole equation is subject to financial you know, can
be changed with the right number on the bottom of
the check. So that that is essentially what I think
he's running the risk of, you know, if he wants
(46:35):
to maybe change a position or if he wants to
take another bull new position against something or for something
to like you, Oh did Donald Trump pay you a
bunch of money for that?
Speaker 10 (46:44):
Oh?
Speaker 1 (46:44):
You know, how are you some real bull drew teller?
When you know your bottom line is your your opinion,
what comes out of your mouth in front of that
microphone every time is totally incompletely for sale. So I
think that is something that he's established for himself. You
can't criticize him on the principle because he's been very
upfront and very very honest about what he's doing. So
it's kind of almost refreshing to see it, and you
(47:05):
got a given credit for doing it in a pretty
funny fashion. But you know, it pays, especially when you're
making these political commentaries, to have some sort of moral credibility.
This is some sort of credibility with the audience that
your principles are actually your principles and not being paid
for by whatever sponsor happens to pay you enough money. There,
(47:27):
So interesting to see where this goes here for Tim Dillon.
All right, that's all we have for you today. Thank
you so much for listening. Once again, All of our
videos are out right now on the Spenser wal YouTube channel.
Every segment from the show individually clipped up in video
format on the Spencer Walsh YouTube channel. We'll be back
(47:51):
next week. It's news flush
Hello everyone, My name is Speca Walsh. Welcome to today's
episode of Newsflash. We have a good one for you.
As always on the show, today we are taking a
look at all things related to that crazy RFK junior
Senate testimony where he was really getting grilled about the
fact that he wants to take especially take vaccines out
(00:32):
of the American healthcare system and the fact that some
of the people are the CDC are not liking that
too much. Also, we're taking looking at this Epstein survivors
holding a press conference. They're promising to put together their
own client list, and very few people but some in
Congress are trying to help them get their word out.
(00:53):
Rocanna and Thomas Massey, a bipartisan combination trying to force
the release of the FDA fouls, will give you all
of the details on that. Also, new revelations showing how
Andrew Clomo, Eric Adams, and Donald Trump are teaming up
to try and clear the field for Andrew Clomo to
take on zoron mom Nanni that is now getting exposed
(01:14):
and mom Nannie, as you can imagine, making some hay
out of it. And a prominent right wing comedian is
bragging about taking Saudi blood money, really blood money to
perform at a comedy show in Saudi Arabia with a
whole bunch of other comedians, big names like Dave Chappelle
and Pete Davidson. But this guy is the only one
(01:36):
very proudly bragging about selling out. We'll take a look
what that says about where we are headed. It's gonna
be a great show newsflash starting right now. You're on
sworn and once again, of course under that all of
(02:01):
the clips from today show out now on this Mental
Weal YouTube channel, so go check it out. So just
another day in Donald Trump's America where we get to
watch our wonderful Health Secretary, our F. K Junior, Robert F.
Kennedy Junior, taking the stand and testifying for the UH
(02:21):
essentially to tell the Senate Sate Financi Committee how good
of a job he is doing, essentially ridding the American
healthcare system of those pesky little things called vaccines, just like,
get them out of there. When have they ever noticed
any good before? It really was a pretty crazy situation,
and we'll take you through all of the clips here
on this, but it's just like another one of these
(02:45):
just things where It's just like, do we really have
to put up with this? Because like you get the
bad policy and you get the really evil prophe seeking policy.
You always know that's gonna be part of any Republican administration,
especially a Donald Trump Republican administration. But in terms of
the pure stupidity, I feel like that's a real extra
second bonus that we get with this this second term
(03:07):
here with mag the Maha Movement and RFK Junior. So
this is the this is the first clip here. This
is actually a Republican senator giving him some grief on
this bill Cassidy centator from Louisianna, who's a doctor. The
only time he really talks any kind of sense is
on healthcare because I guess he's like, I know this
(03:27):
to be true. I can't watch you guys fake this bullshit.
So I'm gonna actually have to uh to tell the
truth here. But this is the.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
Time, and I'm approaching this as a doctor, not as
a senator. I am concerned about children's health, seniors health.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
All of our health.
Speaker 2 (03:44):
And I applaud you for joining the president and a
call for radical transparency.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
Thank you for that. I said yesterday.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
I believe it that President Trump deserves a Nobel Prize
for Operation Warp Speed.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
If he had been President Obama, he would have gotten it.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
But because of Operation Warp Speed forcing the federal government
to come to a vaccine development within ten months when
others said it couldn't be done, we saved millions of
lives globally, trillions of dollars. We reopened the economy economies,
an incredible accomplishment. Mister secretary, do you agree with me
that the president that the President deserves a Nobel Prize.
Speaker 3 (04:19):
For Operation Warp Speed.
Speaker 4 (04:21):
Absolutely?
Speaker 3 (04:23):
Let me ask you.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
But you just told Senator Bennett that the COVID vaccine
killed more people than COVID.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Wait, that was a stake.
Speaker 4 (04:34):
I did not say that.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
Okay, then let me ask because you also are the senator.
Speaker 4 (04:38):
I just want to make clear.
Speaker 3 (04:40):
We'll check the record. That's a question of fact.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
You also said that you were also, as lead attorney
for the Children's Health Defense, you engage in multiple lawsuits
attempting to restrict access to the COVID vaccine.
Speaker 3 (04:55):
Again, it surprises me that you think so highly of.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Operation Warp Speed when as an attorney you attempted to
restrict access.
Speaker 1 (05:03):
Yeah. So, there's a lot going on there, and he
did do that the Children's Defense Fund, and he has
said some crazy things. RFK has about the COVID vaccine
over the years, and it really is kind of a
fascinating insight into the Trump administration cabinet official mindset because
it's like the one crazy thing that I believe that
(05:23):
contradicts Trump and contradicts what he's trying to do. And
of course Trump is not gonna like turning on the
TV and saying seeing RFK say, oh no, the President
doesn't I know about peace Pride. Okay, I'll stop the impersonation,
but anyway, you get the he would not like to
see one of his subordinates saying that he doesn't deserve
a big fancy trophy for all the great work that
(05:44):
he's done saving America. Essentially is what the what the
case is with Trump and RFK there so he RFK
is then forced, you know, his his loyalty to Trump
supersedes his long held hatred of vaccin scenes, particularly the
COVID vaccine, and he has to come in and say, oh, yeah,
(06:05):
I think Trump should get a Nobel Peace Prize for
an operation that I hate and I despise because I
am an anti vaccine psychopath. Even though the COVID vaccine
undoubtedly saved tons and tons of lives, even though of
course it wasn't always done perfectly, it really did obviously
save tons and tons of lives. This is you know,
(06:26):
this is the next clip. You heard some of the
background noise here. This is just because this is our
house sector.
Speaker 3 (06:31):
Here from Science Center Renda.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
And you could see he's just belching into the microphone
and he's got an aid whispering his ear to be
like you can see him reach for it. He's like
he goes to mute his microphone because he just can't stop.
The microphone is like two inches away from his mouth
and he just just you can hear the disgusting noises
he's making into the microphones. It's like, this is who,
(06:57):
this is who the dramasvation is making us put up
with in terms of the people leading our garment. Like
this is how pathetic the situation is. Here's another one,
a pretty tentic change with Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire. Hassen,
I guess is how you would say it, and yeah,
pretty confrontationally. Let's say, look and have you.
Speaker 5 (07:16):
Produced the data that you relied on and that this
FDA relied on to change those parameters. You did it
behind these doors of the now pro now parents who
decide that they do want their children down, which I'm
not just because you know, sometimes when you make an accusation,
it's kind of.
Speaker 6 (07:36):
A confession, mister Kennedy.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
So let's just I'm hop with this. So here's what's
going to happen to Senator Warner's point to the parents
who are concerned all around the country, to people who
want to get the COVID vaccine this fall, even if
they're under sixty five. Because the boosters have worked, there's
been much less serious disease. People do not have the
same level of threat and risk COVID that they used
(08:00):
to because of these vaccines. People who want to exercise
their freedom of choice are being denied that because you
are citing data that you won't produce to the public.
Speaker 4 (08:13):
Acting.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
Yeah, and it just this is such an unappealing like
think about the contrast there, right, you have this one
guy who's just yelling into the microphone, you know, and
that just one other person who's just calmly citing statistics,
taking a look at the situation saying, you know, people
need freedom of choice. Like you could very much make
it convincing argument that the Democrats went too far with
(08:37):
vaccine stuff early on. But this kind of stuff, this
kind of positioning here is really really apparent. And you
can really see here who looks like an absolute crazy person,
and who looks like an absolute you know, you know,
just standard person who's actually interested in people's health, which
(08:58):
is really quite quite clear here. And this is another
Democrat center. Ron Wyden challenging RFK about the vaccines as well.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
I didn't politicize it, but I depoliticize it the Congress.
Speaker 7 (09:13):
He said, all over the country, mister Secretary, scientists and
doctors are saying otherwise. They're all wrong too, They're all lying,
according to.
Speaker 4 (09:22):
You, a scientist, doctors are supporting me all over the country.
Oh there is division on opinion.
Speaker 7 (09:28):
I don't I don't get letters from thousands of people
who are not political saying that this set of changes
is going to damage American healthcare and particularly these healthcare
agencies for.
Speaker 3 (09:41):
Decades to come.
Speaker 7 (09:42):
I don't get any letters.
Speaker 4 (09:43):
I'll say, Oh, he's going to make a big difference forever. Yeah,
maybe you're listening to a selective group of people.
Speaker 1 (09:50):
You get me and I will find.
Speaker 4 (09:52):
I will tell you what Senator I got. I will
put my mail bag against your mail bag any day
thirty seconds.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
Yeah, this is such a weird way of putting it.
Just like all these people telling me about that now
right I am. It's just like you're just supposed to
be a government official. It's like you're not really engaging
in any sort of facts. It's not really engaged with
any sort of broader consensus here and just looking at
the these people are not political people are like, hey,
(10:21):
you know, maybe we should keep some of these vaccines.
Maybe you shouldn't attack the people the CDC for you know,
this is the next stup that we're gonna play. This
is about the data and him just essentially saying, yeah,
I don't know how many Americans die from COVID, I
don't know how many Americans were saved by the vaccine,
or you know. I so questioning is kind of a
two to one there, questioning the basic data that was
(10:41):
taken by the CDC for whatever reason, and then questioning
the efficscy of the vaccine when you know it's not
so much that people need to be taking a vaccine
right now. But it's more the fact that for the future,
when you know it's very possible we could get another
pandemic on their outbreak very soon. If we just have
someone who does it, believe in the basic tenants accepted
(11:02):
tenants of modern medicine. It's like we are in for
a very bad situation like this. Even if you're somehow
listening to this in your voter for Trump the first
time around, or voted for Trump just this past year,
do you really want the guy talking like this to
be in charge the next health crisis that there is.
Speaker 3 (11:23):
To just again some basic facts.
Speaker 6 (11:24):
Do you accept the fact that a million Americans died
from COVID?
Speaker 4 (11:29):
I don't know how many die.
Speaker 6 (11:32):
You're the Secretary of Health and Human Services. You don't
have any idea how many Americans died from COVID.
Speaker 4 (11:38):
I don't think anybody knows because the there was so
much data chaos coming out of the CDC and they.
Speaker 6 (11:46):
Will all take.
Speaker 4 (11:48):
You and these are models.
Speaker 6 (11:50):
You know the answer of how many Americans from COVID?
This is the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Do
you think the vaccine did anything to prevent.
Speaker 4 (11:59):
Addition, again, I would like to see the data and
talk about the data.
Speaker 6 (12:06):
Ana had this job for eight months and you don't
know the data exactly whether the vaccine.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
The problem is that they didn't have the data. The
data by the Biden administration absolutely disfault.
Speaker 6 (12:20):
Who is the size you're saying the Biden administration politicize
all the data. Go back to camp Well, Jess from
Surgeon General.
Speaker 4 (12:30):
They fired doctor Ground, they fired all the people who
questioned the orthodoxy.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
They quest like, I'm just like, we should not have
to put up with this. It's just like there has
been no convincing evidence, and you're there there. You could
make a pretty good case with the lab leak, with
the way that certain elements of this whole program were handled,
that there were some serious misgivings, But we can make
there's no real evidence. There's no convincing evidence that I
(12:57):
have seen that we need to be talking about this
in a hearing months and months on about anything to
do with the direction of COVID and how its handles. Like, yes,
there were some mistakes, there's inquiry going on. There was
no type of criminal activity except for the fact the
profit hearing that was done by some of these drug
companies that were pushing the vaccine as much as possible
on American people and trying to get you know, the
(13:18):
insurance to pay for it, even the people to pay
for it out of pocket. But you know the only
reason why we're talking about this now is because we're
going against just irregardless of COVID, the people who have
been pushing this for years and years and years long
before COVID are using this as the trojan horse to
using is and RK is the leader, and now he
is in charge of Health and Human Services. Just because
(13:40):
Donald Trump won a few extra more percentage points, he
is now using this as the kind of wedge to
break in and now go attack all vaccines, which which
is going to have tremendously bad consequences on the health system.
You know, Florida, I don't know if I mentioned already
Florida getting rid of vaccine managed for school children. You
know that is an RFK inspired policy decision. You got
(14:01):
the surch and general there comparing vaccines to slavery. You
know how many more states up and down the South
and the Midwest are going to be doing the same,
and that really endangers a bunch of people who are
not even involved in this situation, but they are having
to deal with and put their kids in the same
school with people who just do not make very sound
(14:21):
health decisions. It's just it really is a testament to
how far backwards and how much will we are in
decline and retreat from basic knowledge as a country. And
that is the real takeaway I had watching this RFK testimony.
The incredibly brave survivors of the monster Jeffrey Epstein, held
a press conference on Capitol Hill where they made some
(14:43):
pretty interesting announcements, including that they, as a group of
survivors who are coming together with the purpose of getting
these files released, are so pissed off at the inaction
of Congress, led by Donald Trump, whose only response this
has just been to call it a democratic hoax, that
they are are going to these Epstein survivors are going
to try and create a list of their own to
(15:04):
release and expose these people who are behind it. Here's
one of the very brave survivors explaining their plan.
Speaker 8 (15:11):
Transparency is justice, release the files and the secrecy, and
stand with us in declaring that no one, no billionaires,
no politicians, not world leaders, is above the law. And
let me announce now, several of us Epstein survivors have
(15:34):
been discussing creating our.
Speaker 9 (15:35):
Own list of names. We know the names many.
Speaker 10 (15:47):
Of us were abused by them. Now, together as survivors,
we will confidentially compile the names we all know we're
regularly in the Epstein world, and it will be done
by survivors and for survivors.
Speaker 11 (16:01):
Well, no one else is involved.
Speaker 10 (16:06):
Stay team for more details on that, because history is
washing and some are the women who will come after us.
Speaker 11 (16:15):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Yeah. So that's some pretty cool stuff and a pretty
big announcement there, And I think, unfortunately, because the way
our legal system works, representive Thomas Massey and Rocanna, who
have been a Thomas Massey's a Republican, Rocana's Democrat. They've
been one of the few duos, especially bipartisan duos, that
actually been working to shed light on the truth of
(16:37):
this situation. So let's take a look at what they
had to say about how they can get around what
is obviously gonna happen if they release the survivors release
the list, they get sued by a bunch of people. Well,
Thomas Massey has a solution to that.
Speaker 12 (16:52):
The survivor said that they had decided to compile their
own list. But the reality is if they try to
release that list, they're going to be sued into homelessness,
they will be attacked, they will have death threats. And
so what my colleague Marjorie Taylor Green volunteered to do,
and I've volunteered to do as well, is to read
(17:13):
that list.
Speaker 13 (17:13):
On the floor of the House of Representatives. Because our
founders put into the constitution speech or debate immunity, which
says that we can't be prosecuted for what we say
on the floor of the House. So we're willing to
help those survivors get those names out there. And as
my colleague Grocanna has said, we trust the public to
(17:34):
determine who were donors to the Epstein Scholarship Fund and
who were users of the women who were exposed to
sexual abuse, to differentiate between those two groups of people.
Speaker 1 (17:47):
Yeah, I mean the people. You know, some people are stupid,
you know. I'm not going to deny that, but it
really is a good point there. And also, by the way,
I love that idea of actually reading it out on
the congressional record. I think that would be so important
in terms of that actually going a long way to
protect obviously the survivors, protect the women, which is by
the way, what Trump and Cash Betalent all these people
(18:08):
have been saying that they want to do, Oh, we
just care about the women, care about the surviv blah
bla blah about whatever. You know, this is clearly bs
because they're the ones who are trying to obstruct this
with the whole coordination with Mike Johnson and the Congress
early and then we'll take you a look at what
Trump's just been saying today about you know, still calling
it a democratic hoax. But it would also, i think,
would do a really long way to protect the women,
(18:30):
which is again what supposedly what Trump wants, but also
to restore people's trust a little bit in Congress, because
to see them actually stand with the survivors and read
out the names of the people who are involved in
this stuff on the House floor, I think that would
be a really powerful jester. But like, we actually have
a government that most of the time, no, but just
(18:51):
some of the time may be capable of actually doing
the right thing and fighting for these files to be
released when they absolutely everyone knows should be released, and
actually standing with the people who are victimized to do them.
I think it would be a sign and be like, Okay,
Congress is with you, and we're gonna get this done
and we are not gonna let these people get away
(19:11):
with it. And people like Normanis who are kind of
checked out of politics, would really be like, Wow, I
didn't I didn't see this coming. You know, this is
surprising to see Congress actually on the right side of issue.
And I think they could get a lot of credit.
They could get a lot of a play on that.
In addition, of course the most important thing revealing who
(19:34):
was involved in this. It would be another small benefit
to that as well. Here's what, by the way, what
Trump had to say when he was asked about it.
Speaker 14 (19:40):
Yet again, the SURVIVORSUS Jeffrey Epstein not seeking at a
press conference on Capitol Hill, and they're calling for at
least case files these documents to release. And Thomas Massey,
who has fought who was functionally a discharge issue to
get the House to vote on the lease of the documents,
it says he hasn't lead you're advocated.
Speaker 15 (19:59):
In these, but many of your friends and donors maybe,
And he says that's why the Justice Farman is adapting
them and slow walking the release of Park. He is
a justice ferment protecting any friends or donors.
Speaker 16 (20:11):
So this is a Democrat hoax that never ends.
Speaker 9 (20:16):
You know.
Speaker 16 (20:16):
It reminds me a little of the Kennedy situation. We
gave them everything over and over again, more and more
and more, and nobody's ever satisfied. From what I understand.
I could check, but from what I understand, thousands of
pages of documents have been given. But it's really a
Democrat hoax because they're trying to get people to talk
(20:36):
about something that's totally irrelevant to the success that we've
had as a nation since I've been president. Even if
you look at d C right now.
Speaker 1 (20:45):
Yeah, so much success, so much success that's been It's
been coming out of everywhere from every orifice of the
Trump deministration. That that is for sure. And it's like,
I don't get this whole line about oh, it's a
democratic hoax. It's like the best way to end space
and you know, get rid of the democrats evil plan
to distract from all President Trump's great success is to
(21:06):
just actually release the full files and the files that
have not been publicly released, as the Trump Ministration tried
to do yesterday, but essentially putting out a bunch of
files again. This is, by the way, the second time
they've done this in terms of putting out Epstein files
that were already released into the public and acting like
they were just getting put out right now by the
Trump Ministration of the first time, when in reality they've
(21:28):
been out for a lot longer that for years, some
of them at you know, at this point. But all
they can do to end the speculation, to get at
the Democrats' evil plan and to get you know, get
people focused back on how good Trump is is literally
just to release the full files and the actual files
that people want to see again, not the files that
(21:48):
have been public for years and years at this point,
and that would really that actually dispel a lot of
the fears and the concerns and the conspiracy theories that
a lot of people, not just you know, the Democrats
have because of course they want to get a Trump,
but also people who are a political who may have
voted for Trump in twenty twenty four because he just
(22:08):
seemed like they're kind of culturally cool thing to do.
They were the first people to be repulsed by this,
and they thought, you know, Trump, he's so different, he's
so cool, He's going to expose Epstein files. And when
they didn't do that, when Trump didn't do that, and
he essentially lied to their faces about it, they were
pretty pissed. And the best way to stop, the best
way to get them all back on side is to
(22:30):
release the full files. And Trump knows exactly what those
files are, and for some reason he just doesn't want
to do it. Just give people what they want. The
evidence is there, You have the evidence, So why are
you so hesitant to release the full files? If again,
of course, and this is what we all assume without
(22:52):
a shadow of a doubt, is that Trump isn't implicated
and he's innocent. So just release the files. You know.
It's a simple, simple situation. Yeah, so it it really is,
I think quite quite apparent here. And let's go to
a clip from these are the Virginia Dufray, who is
(23:12):
one of the most prominent survivors and people testified against Epstein. First,
this is her family talking about the importance of this
stuff getting out there. We haven't had an opportunity to
relate review in detail.
Speaker 8 (23:29):
There's a lot of At least upon initial reports, it
appears that it's not any new information.
Speaker 3 (23:37):
So, like we've been saying, it's time to release.
Speaker 8 (23:39):
All the documents, and bear in mind, guys, is at
your quality, Like the people in these files are great politicians.
Speaker 11 (23:46):
They are bankers, they are the very wealthy.
Speaker 8 (23:48):
And powerful people, and it shouldn't be up to the
survivors to have to release that list.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
This is it's time for the government to protect the
people and stop.
Speaker 5 (23:56):
Protecting these rich and powerful men that essentially they are
trying they're very darn best.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Yeah, I think that was really I think that guy's
name I don't know, but he's the brother of Virginia
Drew Frey. I mean, what a testimony. Right, It's like,
it should not have to be up to the survivors
to expose this kind of situation when they've already gone
through so much with you imagine being part of this
kind of a ring, and then people still don't believe you.
(24:25):
People are hiding the files, even the ones who say
that they're going to release them, and you have to
go through the whole thing of fighting for them and
pushing for them all over again, you know, I mean,
it really is it's a great sentiment. It's like people,
the government of the people should be trying in such
an important sentiment, you know that the government people should
be trying to expose this, should be trying to make
(24:45):
this clear. And that's why I thought the idea of
Thomas Massey of reading this the list of the Epstein
survivors into the Congressional record on the House floor to
give it that immunity. You can say anything you want,
you can sue if it's said on the House floor.
I think it's a really great idea to protect the
survivors and actually give Congress so much needed credibility back
(25:08):
with the American people. But again, it's it really makes
Trump and this is I think he knows this because
he is implicated, and it's been reported so many times
the close ties that Trump and Epstein had with stealing
Virginia Dufrey from Marl Lago or whatever the hell like that,
and all the pictures of them together, the videos of
them partying, all that stuff. We know there is a
(25:29):
real tight tie between Trump and Epstein, or there at
least there was, at least for a certain period of time.
And because of that, we know that he is not
going to be an ally in this and he is
going to stand against it while continuing to feed the BslI.
That is a democratic hoax. It's a democratic hoax. Then
(25:49):
it's very easy to end the hoax by just proving
them wrong un releasing the files. The only reason why
you wouldn't do that is if you're implicated, and if
you think that those files, when they are released and
an attempt to end the Democratic coachs would look bad
for you. That's literally the only reason logically why you
would not release the files. So it's gonna be very
interesting to see what these survivors can do in terms
(26:12):
of linking up with these members of Congress who are
not completely corrupt, in order to try and get these
files out. Hopefully, most importantly, these survivors can stay safe
and stay sane with all the pressure and the death
threats they've been dealing with. And also we can hopefully
get some real answers on this whole saga. So they
(26:33):
are really going all out in a desperate attempt to
stop Zoraman Nodding from becoming Mayor of New York. And
when I say they, I mean everybody Trump advisors here.
This is the headline in the New York Times have
discussed a job for Eric Adams if he quits the
mayor's race. So Eric Adams has been in discussions with
the Trump team. That's what this article says, to essentially
get himself put up for a job in the Trump administration.
(26:56):
You know, Eric Adams is the current mayor, he's gonna
bow out of the race for his reelection. Put himself
up for a job. And where else in the position
where Trump puts every black person who's housing in urban development,
of course, and put Eric Adams up for that position.
That way it would clear the field for Andrew Cuomo
to get a better shot at beating Zoramon Man. He
says here they've been talking to the Eric Adams team.
(27:18):
But if you don't think Andrew Cmo knows what Trump
is doing here and in talking to the Adams team,
you got another thing coming. Let me tell you he
knows what's going on, and he probably got in touch
with some people at Trump's team to try and push
for it. So that's really who Andrew Clomo is. And
of course I know you're gonna want to see Zoran's
response to this. He came out swing let's say, Look.
Speaker 17 (27:40):
I think there are many ethical issues with this news.
We are talking about a mayor who was facing an
indictment that was then dropped by this administration to ensure
greater collaboration with the immigration directives of this administration, now
(28:00):
being considered for a job offer such that he would
drop out of a race to represent this city because
of the fact that they believe that would increase the
odds of anyone being able to defeat me. Those are
incredible ethical issues. And none of this has to do
with New Yorkers. None of it has to do with
(28:22):
the welfare of this city. It all has to do
with power. It all has to do with the audacity
that we have here to believe that we could pick
our own mayor, that we have to believe that The
most pressing issues are not how to ensure that Donald
Trump continues to have an ambassador in City Hall, but
that New Yorkers can actually afford the place that they
call home.
Speaker 1 (28:41):
Yeah. I mean, I think that's really, you know, really
well said and touches on. You know, Eric Adams. I
think he's going to be bought off by anyone but
Donald Trump and Andrew Cormle Here they really it makes
their contempt for New York City and any place where
voters are that don't automatically agree with them and reelect
(29:01):
them and think they're the best. It shows really their
contempt that both of them, that they have for Blue voters,
and it's like they're not allowed to go about their
own affairs. And it's the same thing with the National
Guard in DC and in Chicago and LA and all
those other places that they want to put the National Guard,
probably in New York as well. You know, like these
(29:23):
people just really have just complete and utter contempt for
anyone and everyone living in a blue city. They don't
think they deserve the privilege of self governance and to
choose how they want their own city to run and
who they want their own city to be led by.
So Donald Trump preserves the right. Andrew Cuomo, by the way,
who has always thought incredibly low things about the people
(29:45):
of New York City, and he always thought being the
mayor of New York City was a job for Trumps,
but he just tried to get back in it to
restart his political career. They just the lack of respect
here for the democratic choice of New Yorkers just could
not be more clear. And I think it's something that
Sorn touches on very effectively, especially in the times all
(30:06):
these National Guard occupations is complete just contempt in the
taking way of rights that Trump has for so many
other blue studies, But he also touches on it pretty well.
I would say here in this clip on MSNBC.
Speaker 18 (30:19):
How are you thinking about preparing for the job itself
in terms of having this threat looming over it?
Speaker 19 (30:28):
You have to prepare for the inevitability of Donald Trump
to continue being Donald Trump. We cannot, as you've said,
rely on any notion of the law or what is
appropriate for how he will determine his course of actions.
Speaker 18 (30:39):
And I look at California as an example such that
we are ready here in exactity in January first, with
a plan of partnership across city and state government to
be ready whether it's for the deployment of the National
Guard or it's for his attempt to pass legislation like
the one he just did, which will take an ax
to so much of what keeps so many New Yorkers afloat.
(31:00):
And I think we've seen what New York City can
gain if we have a mayor who is willing to
collaborate with Donald Trump, which is not that much at all.
We've had money directly taken out of bank accounts. We've
had a six year old public school student from Jackson
Heights being deported. This is what we have when you
want to work with Donald Trump. We've seen what it
looks like to manage Donald Trump, which is what we
(31:22):
see in Andrew Cuomo. We need someone who's actually willing
to fight Donald Trump. And we've seen examples of that
right here in New York with Kathy Hokl. We've seen
examples of that in California. It's time to have that
in city Hall.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
Very smart little tip of the cat there to Kathy
Okle to try and butter up for the future coming
zoron agenda. But it really is a very very good point,
which is like you need somebody. And this is really
why Trump is so pissed off, and this is why
he's trying to intervene and come over the top with
Andrew Cuomo is because he just can't believe it's just
the audacity of people in New York to actually choose
(31:54):
how they want their own affairs to be run, Like
these are just dumb Democrats. These are people don't even
know how to govern themselves. They need Trump to come
in and save them. You know, he's just like he's
saved every other possible thing under the sun, as you know,
is obviously he's the perfect god, emperor, king of the world.
Here like that is how him and his supporters see
(32:15):
the situation in New York City, and they just are
so pissed off. They just can't believe that there's you know,
people in that position, Democratic voters would dare to go
in a different direction, would dare to chart their own
path and have it be in any way critical to
the aims of the Trump administration. They just can't process it.
It's just it's really crazy, you know. We also have
(32:38):
some reactions here. This is Eric Adams talking to reporters
about the story here that he's in coordination with Trump
try and get a government drop for him to drop
out of the race and clear the field for Cuomo.
So he denying the story, no surprise, Yes.
Speaker 3 (32:57):
Mayor Adams, do you want to talk more?
Speaker 17 (32:58):
If you have been offered a job at a Trump
and administration, have you.
Speaker 1 (33:05):
Still got anyone from.
Speaker 20 (33:08):
Say I'm surprised of how the standards of recording in
the New York Times has dropped so much. I've never
asked for a job with HUD. I've never been promised
job with HUD. I have not communicated with the president.
What I must do is what I've always have said,
(33:29):
Stay focused, gonna be distracted by all this cessationalism, run
out city, keep it safe, and run from the election.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
Yeah, so that that was actually reported originally by Jeff
Colton of Politico. So you're glad he's denying the reporting
of the New York Times there, So any he never
you noticed that? He said, I never asked about the
hood job. Did you ask about something else? Maybe you
ask about another job, you know, trying to expand your
horises a little bit there. I don't know. But it
really is a just exemplifying the entire just rejection of
(34:00):
Zoron from some of these Democratic parties, especially New York
City elites, like they have been some of the top
of the Democratic Party in New York City been the
most intense resists of him. This is a New York
Democratic Congressman, Tom Swosey, who had to win his seatback
from a young fellow named George Santos, who actually beat
him for that seat, I believe in the twenty twenty election.
(34:22):
But this is, yeah, this is Swosey weighing in and saying,
Zora mam Donnie get out of my party as Lo
Long Island Congressman.
Speaker 4 (34:29):
Take a look, Zorean mam Donni and other Democratic socialist
should create their own party because I don't want that
in my party.
Speaker 1 (34:37):
Yeah, I mean it so ridiculous. It's just like, first
of all, on a certain level, I do agree with
him because it's like, you know, we don't belong the
same party, like with people like you who just don't
want any sort of change, just want to surrender to Trump.
I just want to keep the status quote in all things.
But who's to say that you have any sort of
aim in the Democratic Party. You're supposed to a sort
(34:58):
of edict on the way the Democratic Party should be run.
The Democratic Party, last time I checked, is supposed to
be democratic. And if you have people like Zora mam
Nani winning the elections and taking control of the Democratic
Party in a democratic fashion, you may want to consider
what's going wrong with you. But you know, I really
think he had a pretty good response to this as
(35:18):
well when he was asked about this, Tom Swozy remark
that Zora mom Nadi getting out of the Democratic Party.
This is what he had to say for the House.
Speaker 17 (35:28):
I have yet to meet a New Yorker who has
asked me about the opinions of Tom Swazi as.
Speaker 1 (35:33):
It pertains what it means to lead this city.
Speaker 17 (35:36):
And with regards to the mayor and the allegations of
different job offerings that have been made in the Trump administration,
it's not the question of where that job is, what agency,
It's that the sole intent of this entire conversation is
how to increase the odds of any candidate defeating our camp.
(36:00):
That's what all of them are working backwards from. And
it speaks to how threatened the Trump administration is by
our agenda, because it's an agenda that actually seeks to
fulfill the very things that he campaigned on, which are
lower costs for working class Americans coast to coast. And
yet while he has exacerbated that cost of living crisis,
he knows that we are sincere in our commitments to
(36:21):
transform the ability of New Yorkers to live in the city.
Speaker 1 (36:24):
Yeah, I think that's really great messaging, especially because you know,
if you look at where Zoron won in the race,
in the mayor race. A lot of times it was
places that have explicitly voted for Trump in bigger numbers,
especially in twenty twenty four. We're talking about the outer boroughs,
some of the non white voters that went big for
Zoron in the election, but also you know, swung in
(36:45):
big numbers towards Trump. Now, in the end, you know,
the grand scheme of things. I don't think any of
this stuff is going to really affect things too much,
but it really just it does show you the a
I think two things now. It shows you the contempt
that people have for you know, not just Trump, but
a lot of the established political class of this country
(37:08):
has for particularly when Democratic voters try and chart their
own paths and say, we don't want to go in
the same direction. We actually want to try policies that
are left of what the Democratic Party has certainly done,
and you have these are of course all the same
people that would turn around and say vote blue no
matter who you know you're supporting, fashion like they these
are the people when they get control taken from them
(37:30):
in a democratic fashion, they cannot take it. And they
have such a lack of respect for their own base
voters that they have to call on Donald Trump, by
the way, who hates their voters almost as much as
they do. It really feels like, if not more, you know, honestly,
probably more to come in and usurp the democratic will
of their own voters. It's a great indication as to
(37:52):
why that faction, that centrist faction in the party, the Party,
the faction that just wants to compromise and do nothing
and cavtat to Trump, is really not going to go
very far when compared with the really dynamic wing of
the party that Zorn is a part of. So Tim
Dillon is one of these comics that really made a
(38:15):
big name for themselves. They got they got a big
splash in the run up to the twenty twenty four
election by essentially saying, you know, Trump's so cool, Kamala Harris,
she's so weird, and all the Democrats they're they're not
fun at all. Let's just vote for the Republicans. Let's
just have a good time. And then three months of
the trumpdministration, when he started doing a lot of the
same stuff on Israel, when the economy started not to
(38:38):
look so good. Is essentially the moment the vibe shifted
against Trump. You know, we all kind of saw it happen.
If you're paying attention to the culture, they to give
him credit. Tim Dillon was right there being like, hey,
wait a minute, maybe Donald Trump isn't the most honest
person in the world. Maybe he's not gonna do everything
that he said he was gonna do. Could that possibly
(39:01):
be the case? And you know, he was doing it
in a very funny way, but it was just like,
you know, who could have seen this coming, right, who
could have possibly imagined that he would have done? He
would have done, he would have done he would have
done something like this. Anyway, he is now making headlines,
he's making waves because he along with many many others.
(39:24):
Let's take a look at this here, you know, zoom
in on the flyer of this comedy festival. He is
going to this comedy festival that took place in Saudi Arabia.
You got Tom Segura, Pete Davidson, Joe Rogan, Christis Stefano,
Dave Chappelle, they got over there. They got Kevin Hart,
Bill Burr, Zarna, the Indian Lady, the Indian mom. Pretty
(39:47):
funny and you know, every single and not every single,
but a lot of big name comedians are going to
this Sally Arabian Comedy Festival, and obviously they sold out
the highway. But the thing about Tim Dillon, not everyone
is going to be as blunt as him talking about
and really just saying loud and proud, hell yeah, I
(40:10):
sold out. Ah, And I think he's just will turn
it down everybody years. So I think he's practicing the
Islamic call to prayer. There we're in Saudi Arabia.
Speaker 11 (40:24):
Come on, get your tickets now, October eighth, the day
after October seventh. Just funny how it all works. Not
something that I had planned.
Speaker 1 (40:37):
Hei.
Speaker 11 (40:40):
I think it's very exciting that we're all going to Rid.
People are very upset about. They're angry that comedians are
going to read Saudi Arabia. Are very and they're don't
boliver anything.
Speaker 1 (40:51):
They're way more mama, Get over it.
Speaker 11 (40:55):
The House of Saud is paying us hundreds of thousands
of dollars, some of us millions. It's not me, but
they're paying millions of dollars to comedians. Get over it.
We're taking the money. How about that? Sorry? Oh you
weren't invited. Oh you got nothing going on? Boohoo hoo
for you. I would never do it. You weren't offered,
No one invited you. There's people that I respect it
(41:18):
turned it down, But a lot of people are doing it,
like a lot, like almost everyone. They bought comedy. So what, Well,
they have slaves, then they kill everyone.
Speaker 1 (41:30):
Hey, hey, hey, hey, heyy.
Speaker 11 (41:33):
Get over it. So what they have slaves? I imagine
the slaves in those countries are good at what they do.
Everyone who works at all the hotels, they take their passports.
They're not allowed to leave their slaves. Hey, is the
hotel nice? I'm not here to be a spoil sport.
(41:54):
I'm not here to ruin the good time that everyone's having.
Do I have issues with some of the policies towards women,
towards the gays. Yeah, towards the freedom of speech, well,
of course I do. But I believe in my own
financial well being, and I think you better start believing
in that, because when Peter Tiel puts all of you
(42:16):
in a cage, you're gonna want some way to get
out of that. I'm not gonna tell you how much
you're paying me. It doesn't matter paying me three hundred
and seventy five thousand dollars for one show. Now, a
lot of other people are getting one point six million.
Speaker 1 (42:27):
That's not me.
Speaker 11 (42:28):
I'm not in that bracket. Others have gotten one fifty.
Speaker 1 (42:31):
Why are they doing it?
Speaker 11 (42:32):
Here's the point. I am doing this because they're paying
me a large sum of money. They're paying me enough
money to look the other way. If something bad is
happening to your left, look to your right. If, for example,
I'm at a breakfast and I see someone get grabbed
and they start hitting them.
Speaker 1 (42:51):
With that's you know, that that big stick.
Speaker 11 (42:53):
I don't know if it's bamboo or whatever. It is.
It's kind of a wood, but it kind of snaps back.
It's it's perfect.
Speaker 1 (42:59):
Yeah, So you could. He's going on and on and
on there about how he does not care about any
of it, and it's like, to a certain extent, it's like,
I you can't deny the consistency in what he's preaching,
because he's done this before. He's being like, you know,
one of his other famous rants is like, find the
billionaire who's the least pedophilix, find the candidate, find the
(43:20):
politician who's the least pedophilic because everyone is so screwed up.
Just make selfish decisions. He's saying, it's okay, you know,
you can do it. It's not gonna be the end
of the world. But I kind of think that he
could be kind of almost running himself up into a
little bit of a trap here, because you know, he
he his whole brand is being this edgy guy, this
(43:42):
guy who doesn't care about what anyone thinks. He's gonna be.
He's gonna be a little bit controversial, he's gonna be
a little bit uh, you know, he's gonna shock value.
That's a big part of modern day shock jock of
the Internet. And he's, yeah, he's made it clear that
I don't care when whatever anyone says. I'm in there
(44:02):
to make money. I'm this, you know, gonna say anything
to shock you. You do feel a little bit icky
listening to someone being like, I don't care about anything
about slavery, you know, the slaves probably like the nice
hotel that they built, you know, all this stuff in
Saudi Arabia, but it doesn't entirely convey everything that I
think Tim Dillon's trying to do. Because if you look
(44:23):
at some of the things that he's done in the past,
they're actually pretty morally impactful. They have a moral pitch
to them, and a big part of that moral pitch is,
let's not, for example, commit genocide. Let's not you know,
let's not be selling or you know, housing stock to Blackrock.
Let's not be focusing all this energy on Ukraine. You know,
(44:47):
Like what he is saying now is whenever I try
and make a case, whenever I try and make a
pitch to somebody that's or to my audience in support
of something that's different, that's a little bit controversial, that
a little bit you know, against the mainstream, you know that,
and it's saying we should stop doing this, we ought
(45:08):
to stop doing this. You're making a moral case. And
that's a big part of what he does every day.
Now that whole aspect of it is completely gone, it's
completely out the window, because it's like, if you're making
a case about you know, what he's essentially saying is
if he could be paid well enough to change his
vision on anything. And I'm sure he's gonna say, yeah,
you idiot, that's the case. Yeah, of course I'm telling everyone,
(45:30):
And it's like, yeah, you are. But I don't think
everyone's listening, Like they like the fact that you're making
these big moral cases and you have some sort of
you know, yeah, you're a dirt bag, you say some
kind of unpleasants of tough things, but they like the
fact that you were principled and you say things like
they are. And he's saying that that's saying things like
(45:51):
it is that I'm an honest guy. I'm gonna kick
my feedback. You know, that's subjected to the bottom line.
And I think that could you know, he could run
himself into a risk if you know, he's essentially kind
of put himself into an honesty paradox, like he's so honest,
he's gonna be honest about how he's dishonest and how
his opinions and his analysis is commentary because you know,
(46:15):
it is jokes, but it's also political commentary as well.
That whole equation is subject to financial you know, can
be changed with the right number on the bottom of
the check. So that that is essentially what I think
he's running the risk of, you know, if he wants
(46:35):
to maybe change a position or if he wants to
take another bull new position against something or for something
to like you, Oh did Donald Trump pay you a
bunch of money for that?
Speaker 10 (46:44):
Oh?
Speaker 1 (46:44):
You know, how are you some real bull drew teller?
When you know your bottom line is your your opinion,
what comes out of your mouth in front of that
microphone every time is totally incompletely for sale. So I
think that is something that he's established for himself. You
can't criticize him on the principle because he's been very
upfront and very very honest about what he's doing. So
it's kind of almost refreshing to see it, and you
(47:05):
got a given credit for doing it in a pretty
funny fashion. But you know, it pays, especially when you're
making these political commentaries, to have some sort of moral credibility.
This is some sort of credibility with the audience that
your principles are actually your principles and not being paid
for by whatever sponsor happens to pay you enough money. There,
(47:27):
So interesting to see where this goes here for Tim Dillon.
All right, that's all we have for you today. Thank
you so much for listening. Once again, All of our
videos are out right now on the Spenser wal YouTube channel.
Every segment from the show individually clipped up in video
format on the Spencer Walsh YouTube channel. We'll be back
(47:51):
next week. It's news flush
Popular Podcasts
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com