Unmasking Secrets: Pfizer Papers, Population Control & Government Agendas

Brace yourself for a deep dive into the controversial revelations of The Pfizer Papers. In this episode, Heather Woodward teams up with guest Stephanie to unravel Naomi Wolf’s bombshell findings from Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trials. The discussion delves into the chilling implications for human fertility and raises unsettling questions about population control.




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/nvus-alien--4798594/support.

🛸 Love what you heard? Keep following the weird.
Get full show notes, exclusive content, and the occasional paranormal rant at NVusAlien.com.

🔮 Want the universe to spill its secrets?
Book a tarot reading with Heather and pull the receipts straight from the void: Tarot Readings

💌 Subscribe to the Substack
For unsanitized takes, psychic dispatches, and updates on new episodes: heatherashera.substack.com 

 📢 Tell your weird friends
Seriously. This podcast grows by word-of-mouth. Share it with your favorite conspiracy theorist, ghost hunter, or lowkey witchy cousin.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:04):
You are listening to the Envious Alien Podcast with your host,
Heather Woodward, an award winning psygig, supernatural author, and lover
of all things true crime. On this show, we're going
to deep dive into topics so don't usually see the
light of day, the spooky, the weird, the macabre, the paranormal,
and of course aliens. Sit back, grab a cup of tea,

(00:24):
and let's get on with the show.

Speaker 2 (00:31):
Hey, everyone, welcome to the Envious Alien Podcast. I just
want to say that today's episode is triggering. So if
you are sugared by weird information that is true, if
you are in a place where you're sensitive about birth, abortions,

(00:52):
women's rights, weird things that are medically disturbing, then I
would either care out this episode or listen in a
supportive area, or ticket and bite size chunks because the
information that we are about to give you is off

(01:13):
the chain, strange, but also true. And I would ask
you to buy the book that we were talking about
and do all the research that you need for yourself
and read articles and get your own information. But everything
that we're going to be talking about in this episode
is absolutely factually true, and I will have links always

(01:35):
to back these things up. If you ever wonder where
we get our information from, if you ever wonder why
we say the things we do, we always leave links
in the show notes and all of our resources, and
a lot of times I actually post our scripts. We
always have a Google doc that we refer to, and

(01:57):
if there's any good information on that Google with links,
I always put them in the show notes because I
don't want you to think that we're just making shit up.
Some of it is our own opinions, some of it
is to conjecture absolutely, but we always say that we
would say this is my conspiracy theory, allegedly, this is
what I think happened. So just putting that out there. Also,

(02:19):
I wanted to give you a little bit of an
update on what's going on with other episodes. Right now.
I am doing a lot of research on election fraud
and how could possibly happen, and what's going on possibly
behind the scenes, and all the conspiracy theories and all
the weird chit that is going on on the internets
right now. This is going to be a little bit

(02:41):
of a work in progress. I have a lot of
research already, but I'm waiting for another week or so
into December to see how things play out in the
next week, because we have some big astrological things happening.
We're going into magritrograde and Sagittarius, and like I said
in my last podcast, Sagittarius bring things to light. Scorpio

(03:01):
is the hidden stuff, such a Terarius is that fire
energy that moves things forward, and sat Terrists has always
bought knowledge and information by and large, this would be
the time that things started to come out. I'm gonna
wait it out a little bit here and just keep
taking notes and keep taking voice vlogs, and it'll be
a compilation and you will be able to go down

(03:23):
the rabbit hole with me. Yay for rabbit holes. I
also have a podcast coming up about the Disclosure Congressional
hearing and what I think about it, and some other
stuff around that about UIPS being underwater. I did not
just gloss over that. There's just other things happening right now.

(03:46):
There are a little more important. I know you're like,
disclosure is really important. Sure it is, but it's gonna
be there. It's kind of be there for a little while.
And then I have some personal stuff around that and
an area that I lived I need to do some
recent search on it because it happens to be one
of the hot spots for ups that are underwater. I
used to see things all the time as a kid,

(04:08):
and so now I'm questioning things and having to go
back and do a little bit of research and find
that out. So again, another work in progress, and that's
why it's taking me so long. And then thirdly, I
have another podcast coming out about the Menendez brothers in
that case, and that one is already halfway done. However,
there are some logistics happening with that. The DA talked

(04:33):
about possibly freeing them or giving them an opportunity for parole,
but then a new DA is in town, and now
we'll see, and so I'm waiting out to see what
happens with that. I will get them out as soon
as possible. I just want to give you a little
update so you know what's going on. And yeah, so
let's get into this podcast about the Pfizer papers and

(04:57):
the crazy, nutty fucking things that are happening with that.
And this all has to do with COVID, so the
COVID vaccination and the implications of that in the future,
and it's not pretty, it's not pretty people. So again,

(05:18):
trigger warning. I'm putting out that there is a trigger
warning on this one, and again do your own research
and go to those show notes www dot nvus alien
dot com as I always see you on the flip side.
So I'm here today with Stephanie and we are going
to be talking about this book called The Pfizer Paper

(05:40):
and it's by Naomi Wolf, and we're going to get
into why this book is important and what it has
to do with Roe v. Wade, and what it has
to do with the future since now that we know
that Trump won the presidency and these kinds of issues
are going to come up even more. How are you

(06:01):
doing stuff?

Speaker 3 (06:03):
I'm doing all right, We've got a lot to talk about.
This is going to be interesting, So everybody better put
their tin hats on join in with us.

Speaker 2 (06:14):
Yeah, this is definitely a tinfoil hat episode. So tell
me a little bit about how we got here.

Speaker 3 (06:21):
I was watching an episode of The high Wire where
Dell big Tree was interviewing Naomi Wolf where she was
promoting her new book, The Pfizer Papers, and the discussion
they had triggered to me the conversation that we had
when we did the Roe v Wade podcast. So I

(06:42):
sent it to you and we have decided to now
discuss that.

Speaker 2 (06:49):
Let's play a little bit of that podcast because I
want you to hear it and I want you to
hear what you said. Let me give you some background.
We did this podcast two years ago, three years ago.

Speaker 3 (07:02):
It was right after the overturning of rov Wade.

Speaker 4 (07:05):
So it is twenty two.

Speaker 2 (07:09):
I think it was twenty two. Yeah, so it was
two years ago, and we talked about the overturning and
what we thought the future would look like, and you
talked about this conspiracy theory, and then two years later
it's like almost a reality. Let's hear what you had

(07:31):
to say, and then you can talk about what you
thought and what you think about now and how it
pertains to what we're talking about today. So here's a clip.

Speaker 4 (07:42):
I would like to know your conspiracy because they're probably true.

Speaker 5 (07:45):
I actually don't think it's that much of a conspiracymore.

Speaker 6 (07:49):
I think you're bordering on Truth's lay it down, Okay,
I'm gonna go sideways on you.

Speaker 4 (07:54):
So we're looking at birth rates. That's where I'm going
to go with this. We are looking at a lot
of these different companies.

Speaker 6 (08:04):
That have this agenda of decreasing the population and we
are over taxing the environment, which is true, but they
see it as an agenda to stop people from having babies.

Speaker 4 (08:20):
They don't want to pay out.

Speaker 6 (08:22):
For the maternity leef, they don't want the additional mouse
to feed, so they agree to abortion.

Speaker 4 (08:31):
That kind of perspective, I.

Speaker 6 (08:33):
Hear a lot of people talking about, but there are
studies coming out right now from the vaccine out of Israel,
from some other.

Speaker 7 (08:43):
Places where they are actually fucking with our infertility. Sperm
banks are showing that counts are actually down twenty percent
in some people. My conspiracy, in my theory is that
they know they're fucked and they've messed up, but they
don't want to admit to that.

Speaker 4 (09:02):
They are overturning this to make it where people don't
have a.

Speaker 6 (09:05):
Choice, so they aren't skewing the population numbers. The people
that are fertile and can still have their babies can
do it, and we're not seeing the decrease in the numbers.

Speaker 4 (09:20):
You've been hearing some wild shit.

Speaker 5 (09:22):
I see a lot of holes in the theory, but
on both sides, because a lot of really young liberals
really do want us to decrease the population. They don't
want to bring children into a world that is so
screwed up by previous generations. They don't want to increase
the population because they're not going to be able to
feed them. They're not going to be able to have
enough natural resources to supply them with plastics and electricity

(09:46):
and all of these fun things. The idea that they
don't want to pay out benefits is ridiculous because that's
literally what they're fighting for is health care for everybody.
That was referring to like big corporations or big corporations.

Speaker 4 (09:59):
Really no, they're gonna want you to be.

Speaker 3 (10:01):
On birth control because they don't want to cut into
their profit.

Speaker 4 (10:05):
That's where that theory's coming from.

Speaker 5 (10:07):
That makes sense that I know you and I disagree
on vaccines and stuff, but I don't know what study
you were reading. I know that just my own experience,
I got pregnant after I got the vaccine when I've
been struggling for five years. But that's just one case
in the bucket. So I don't know. But I think
the point here is that they're all theories.

Speaker 2 (10:26):
The rest of the clip, she goes on to say
she took the vaccine and she didn't have a bad pregnancy.
Her movie was okay, though.

Speaker 3 (10:34):
I yeah, after what I have been reading, that does
concern me.

Speaker 2 (10:40):
Hey, this is Future Heather, who is editing the podcast
right now, and I'm going over some details that you
just heard about the decrease in population. Then a couple
days ago, was on Twitter or as they say now,

(11:01):
and there was a clip of Elon Musk talking about
birth rates. And then Stephanie told me about a clip
where Bill Clinton talks about low birth rates, and it
was at Harris event right before the election, and so
I'm going to insert those clips here.

Speaker 8 (11:25):
I just think we should not assume that civilization is robust.
And if you look at the history of civilizations, the
rise and full of the ancient Egyptians, the ancient Sumerians,
Rome throughout the world, They've been a rising full of
many civilizations. So there's an there's a life cycle arc
to civilizations, just as there is to individual humans. Yes,

(11:48):
and I think we just want to make sure that
we have civilization go onward and upward. And that's for example,
why I'm concerned about decreasing both rates and the fact that,
for example, Japan had twice as many deaths last year
as births, so they are leading indicators. This is okay?

Speaker 9 (12:05):
Can I say, and you've written and talked a lot
about this, but can I just ask you to pause
just for a parenthetical note? Why is that the urge
to have sex and to procreate is after breathing and eating,
the most basic urge? How has it been subverted?

Speaker 8 (12:19):
Just in the past we could rely upon simple limbic
system rewards in order to procreate it. But once you
have birth control and abortions and whatnot, now you can
still satisfied limbic instinct, but not to approcreate. So we
haven't yet evolved to deal with that, because this is
all fairly recent, last fifty years or so for the

(12:41):
birth control. But I'm worried that, hey, civilization don't. If
we don't make enough people to at least sustain our numbers,
perhaps increase a little bit, then civilization is going to crumble?
Does the old question of a civilization? And with a
bang or a whimper, it's currently trying to end with
a whimper in adult diapers, yes, which is depressing as hell,
the most depressing serious Yeah, war is less depressing.

Speaker 9 (13:04):
Yeah, it's really gone with a bang, yeah your shoes on.

Speaker 10 (13:07):
Yeah, where there's all this sub people all over the world,
where they're border problems all over the world, where millions
of people are trying to escape the misery they're in,
and other people are saying, I want to do what
I can and take what I can, but maybe there's
a limit how much we can do. In other words,

(13:28):
I don't think Americans are anti immigration. They're anti chaos, right.
They don't want tou toeduce more than we can, but
they recognize, at least most people do. We got the
lowest birth rate we've had in well over one hundred years.
We're not at replacement level, which means we got to

(13:49):
have somebody come here if we want to keep growing
the economy. Unless one of you is one of these
artificial intelligence geniuses and figured out all grow with no work,
which I'm not sure it would be good for us.
I think, you know what helps, it's a little good
at going to work every day.

Speaker 3 (14:12):
A lot of my information was coming from science and
studies that I was seeing and hearing about. My background
is in science. I actually study biomedical sciences in college.
And if I would have gone another year or so.
I would have a double degree, also in microbiology with

(14:33):
a minor in chemistry, so I have a foundation in
all of the coursework that is a foundation for understanding
how the vaccine works, how it works in the body,
the mechanisms they were using. I was looking at the studies.
I think it was the New York Times that had

(14:54):
a list of all of the different vaccine studies and
where they were and the science they were using behind it.
Always had that in my head and there were a
lot of questions that didn't make sense to me. Then
jump ahead to just what a month or two ago.

(15:14):
I don't even remember when I sent you that clip.

Speaker 2 (15:16):
It's within the last six weeks. I can tell you that.

Speaker 3 (15:19):
Yeah, I see this interview with Naomi Wolf where she's
talking about the book The Viser Papers. What happened is
in twenty twenty two, there was a group of doctors
that requested the information that Pfizer and the FDA had
for their studies on the COVID nineteen MATT vaccine before

(15:43):
it was released. Because they weren't releasing any information to
the public. They did a Floyer request ended up going
to court to get the information. The FDA lost, they
had to release the information to the public.

Speaker 10 (15:59):
It was.

Speaker 3 (16:02):
How many pages. There's four hundred and fifty thousand pages
of documents that they had to release, and the AA
asked the court to allow them seventy five years to
release the documents, and the court said, no, you're not
going to wait seventy five years to release the information
on the vaccines. You're going to do it now.

Speaker 2 (16:25):
Seventy five years is basically anybody who is in this
generation that is affected is pretty much dead or on
their way out.

Speaker 3 (16:33):
Red flag right there that they didn't want to release
the information, but they were ordered to.

Speaker 4 (16:38):
So they.

Speaker 3 (16:40):
Sent out all of these documents and it's written in
a scientific language because it's a lot of the documents
from the trials, and then there's also some information on
the postmarketing research that they were receiving. So what Naomi
Wolf did is she helped organize this group of people.

(17:06):
She says three two hundred and fifty people that they
got together over all different professions. They had lawyers, scientists, statiicians,
anybody that had any type of information that you would
need to go through. All of this information they put

(17:27):
together into working groups. So then they went through all
of the papers and then started writing reports that they
published on her website Daily Cloud. So the book is
a collection of those reports. So they actually self published
one before this one, and then they have a Maderna Papers.

(17:47):
I think it's coming out in the spring. That is
the reports for the Maderna paperwork that they received.

Speaker 2 (17:55):
Oh my gi. So there's more.

Speaker 3 (17:59):
There is more. In her opening of the book, it's
introduction has an overview of the documents that they have
put in here, all of their different reports, because the
majority of the book, which is almost four hundred pages,
is the scientists looking at Pfeiser's paperwork and their studies

(18:25):
reviewing it and it's still pretty scientific, but it's not
as scientific as some of the other ones, and explaining
what's going on and what they're seeing from what information
Pfizer received, and then even Peiser's conclusions.

Speaker 2 (18:40):
For those of us who don't know, because I didn't know,
and I asked you directly, what does Pfiser make because
we know they made the vaccine, and then the name
is pretty it's like one of those names you hear
and you go, oh, yeah, medicine, But what specific way
do they make?

Speaker 3 (18:55):
Drug Watch has a bit of information and it says
it's in New York based big pharma company. It's known
for its products like Advil, Viagra, Xanax, and Soloft. Second
largest pharmaceutical company by revenue in twenty twenty. And then
it also makes the community and the visor COVID nineteen vaccine.

Speaker 2 (19:17):
Did it profit from the COVID vaccine? Do you know?

Speaker 10 (19:22):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (19:22):
Because it was mandated eventually by the government, so they
had contracts with a lot of government entities where they
were paying for it. People didn't go out, they didn't
charge their insurance to get the vaccine. It was free.
Our tax dollars subsidize everybody to get this vaccine. Wow,

(19:45):
that was in an emergency youth authorization, so it wasn't
even fully tested when it came out, Like the rollout
of it was essentially the trial.

Speaker 2 (19:56):
It's so mk ultra to me.

Speaker 3 (19:58):
Yes, how Naomi Wolf got into this because she usually
reports on women's rights and things to do with women's bodies.
She was receiving information from women that they were having
issues with their periods and there was a lot of
the menstrual issues that were going on. She started raising

(20:20):
red flags online about hey, we need to look at this,
something's not right. She was deplatformed, so they took her
off of essentially everything. She was banned from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube,
any other platform you could think of. It turns out
that the White House, the CDC, and other senior leaders

(20:43):
of government agencies were behind the removal of her tweets.
They actually pressure Twitter and Facebook to remove her and
to have a bolo out for anything similar.

Speaker 2 (20:55):
I remember during that time period two anything that was
even questioning the vaccine was considered propaganda, like you're trying
to sabotage the air quotes cure.

Speaker 3 (21:10):
Right, you're an anti vaxxer, you don't believe in saving humanity,
you're killing your grandma.

Speaker 2 (21:20):
Yeah, even if you just said I don't know if
I want to take this because there hasn't been a
lot of testing on it, that even was like, oh,
you're against the population.

Speaker 3 (21:33):
I had family that even equated it to your civic duty,
as in paying your taxes, Like injecting something into your
body that could change your physiology is the same as
giving somebody some money.

Speaker 2 (21:46):
I don't see the correlation at all. This was only
four years ago and we switched from the Chinese didn't
do it. That's racist. If we say that cod is
going to kill you, you have to take the vaccination
or else to where we are now, which is maybe

(22:08):
all that wasn't true. It is such a mind fuck
to me.

Speaker 3 (22:12):
Yes, I am going to go through some of this
information that now only lays out in the introduction because
it's a good overview of the depth of information. Now,
I'm going to concentrate mostly on the fertility because that's
what we're talking about. With the other podcasts and the

(22:34):
other reports that they self published before this one came out,
they revealed things like pizer knew within three months after
the rollout in December twenty twenty that the vaccines did
not work to stop COVID. Pfizer knew that the vaccine
materials did not remain in the deltoid muscle as claimed

(22:54):
by all smokes people, and they accumulate in the liver, adrenals,
spleen brain, and if you're a woman, in the ovaries,
there's no no mechanism to see how these materials leave
the body, So every injection that you get, it seems

(23:15):
like it just accumulates there. Phires are new in April
twenty twenty one that the injections damage the hearts of
young people. Fis are new by February twenty eighth of
twenty twenty one that the injections were linked to a
myriad of adverse events.

Speaker 2 (23:31):
When you said, when you put it in your body,
it just stays there, what do you mean by that,
Like it doesn't filter into your blood system.

Speaker 3 (23:39):
Right, They're starting to see that the spike protein that
was made from the injections, it's not degrading, it's not
going away because it's not like a natural substance that's
being made.

Speaker 2 (23:56):
So the spike.

Speaker 3 (23:57):
Protein is accumulating in the difference tissues. They don't know
if it leaves or how it leaves. That's one of
the places that they think there needs to be research
and really examining that more because they really don't know
what's going on.

Speaker 2 (24:13):
That's troublesome. This is going to cause all kinds of
issues in the future.

Speaker 4 (24:17):
This is ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (24:18):
What are some of the other things you've found up?

Speaker 3 (24:21):
Says over one thousand, two hundred and thirty three deaths
in the first three months of the drug being publicly available.

Speaker 2 (24:29):
So the vaccine is killing people. I thought COVID was
supposed to be killing people.

Speaker 3 (24:36):
Ah, I'm gonna read this paragraph. What really emerged from
the first forty six reports was the fact that, though
COVID is ostensibly a respiratory disease, the papers did not
focus on lungs or mucous membranes, but rather the center
creepily and consistently on disrupting human reproduction. By the time

(24:56):
Pfizer's vaccine rolled out to the public, the pharmaceutical giant
news that they would be killing babies and significantly harming
women and men's reproduction. The material in the documents makes
it clear that damaging human's ability to reproduce and causing
spontaneous abortion of babies is quote, not a bug. It
is a feature, not a bug.

Speaker 2 (25:20):
It's a feature.

Speaker 4 (25:22):
Wow.

Speaker 2 (25:23):
Sounds like the vaccine is doing more harm than COVID
actually did. Yes, did you get covid?

Speaker 3 (25:32):
Yes? I think I did.

Speaker 2 (25:35):
I think I did too. I think I got the
first round of it. Do you remember when there was
that weird sickness going around before they called it covid
and it was like a really strange cold that wasn't
a cold, It was a fevery weird thing. Yeah, that
we think was covid. I got it that time, and

(25:57):
then I got it one other time, but I didn't
have really strong symptoms. The second time I got it,
I got a head cold and it wouldn't go away
for a month. It took forever, and it hit me
in the sinuses really bad. Do you remember that one?

Speaker 3 (26:13):
I remember that one. I had the same thing. It
was in my head and it made me really dizzy. Yeah,
And so I called the doctor and said, hey, I
think this is what's going on. And they were apprehensive
to give me anything. They didn't I give me anything
for it. And she's, I guess, because you're dizzy, I'll

(26:34):
give you a steroid to help with that.

Speaker 10 (26:38):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (26:38):
I got a steroid too.

Speaker 2 (26:40):
I got a nasal spread that I didn't use because
I'm like, I don't know what's in this, and I
just sucked it up. But I never got the full
I don't know the respiratory aspect of it, and all
these other things that people are were the how do
I say it, the more or dying part of it.

(27:03):
I don't know what the right word is.

Speaker 11 (27:04):
I'm sorry.

Speaker 4 (27:04):
That's so great.

Speaker 3 (27:05):
More symptomatic.

Speaker 2 (27:06):
Yeah, that seems less traumatic and less symptomatic than what
you were talking about. Right now, we're trading flu like
symptoms for possible infertility issues for not me, but probably
my offspring.

Speaker 3 (27:28):
Yes, she goes on to discuss it's a long sections.
I'm not going to read at all. I'll just paraphrase it.
But they knew that lipid nanoparticles, which have been known
for years that they degrade the sexual system. The lipid
nanoparticles that they use in the vaccine were.

Speaker 10 (27:50):
New.

Speaker 3 (27:50):
They did some modifications to it to make it work
as a vaccine, but the nanoparticles have been around for
a long time. They've done research and studies. They knew
that this happened before they even made the vaccine. They
also know that those passed through the blood testes barrier

(28:10):
and can damage all the male reproductive cells, and those
cells are what boys need to turn into men. So
there is a possibility that a woman that received the
vaccination that it passed through the placenta into the developing

(28:32):
fetus and that child's male hormones they won't develop like
they should, and we won't know if there's any effects
until those babies reach puberty.

Speaker 2 (28:49):
Wow, so we're literally creating new diseases and new kinds
of problems, yes, and deformities essentially.

Speaker 3 (29:03):
Yes.

Speaker 2 (29:04):
Now you said before that they knew that the vaccine
didn't really cure covid. Yes, So then what was the
point of it?

Speaker 3 (29:21):
Exactly?

Speaker 2 (29:22):
Oh?

Speaker 3 (29:23):
Okay, what was the point? What was the point if
they knew that it was not going to stop the.

Speaker 2 (29:29):
Transmission and it doesn't at all, does it?

Speaker 10 (29:34):
No?

Speaker 3 (29:34):
Actually, there's evidence right now that suggests that it does
the opposite, that it actually enhances your risk of hitting COVID.
And that was something that they knew before they even
started this, because people have been trying to develop vaccines
for the common cold other COVID strains for several years,

(29:59):
but they couldn't get past the enhanced immunity effect. I
can't think of what is there's a scientific name for it.
It's a vaccine enhanced is what it is. So when
you have the vaccine, it makes your immune system lock
onto a specific formation of that virus. So then if

(30:22):
you get a mutation of that virus, your body doesn't
recognize it and it actually enhances the virus and it
makes you sick. Instead of making you immune, it makes
you less immune.

Speaker 2 (30:38):
So interesting that you say that because this happened to
a few of my mom's friends. Now she's older. She's
born fifty five, so you do the math, but I
know she's close to her seventies. She has a few
friends who were not sick or in remission from cancer.
They took the vaccine and then the cancer came back

(31:00):
and they got more sick. One of her friends actually
was in the hospital for COVID. She was in remission
from cancer, she got the vaccination, came back a few
months later with a worst version of COVID. The cancer

(31:21):
kicked in from the COVID because her immune system was
so low, and then she ended up dying like within
six months.

Speaker 3 (31:31):
Yeah, there's a lot of conversation right now around turbo
cancers related to the vaccine.

Speaker 2 (31:36):
Wow, Okay, my mom swears as soon as she got
that vaccination, something shifted in her body and she had
so many problems afterwards.

Speaker 3 (31:44):
The reports in this book actually go into that. There's
pretty much one document that this entire book is reviewing,
and it is the Speiser Document five point three point six.
It is called the Cumulative Analysis of Post Authorization Averse
Events Reports. It's the time after they rolled out the

(32:08):
vaccine December twenty twenty through February twenty twenty one. That
ninety days after they started injecting people in the public,
they wrote a report to see what their findings were.
That's what this book is, and it breaks down the
different organ systems and they look at the different effects
that it had on the different organ systems. Which is

(32:33):
scary what they found, but in the majority of those reports,
at the end, Pfizer pretty much says nothing more than
what we would expect. Will continue to monitor and these
are some of what they said that they're going to
continue monitoring. Diverse events occurred in over fifty four percent

(32:55):
of cases of maternal exposure to the vaccine, three reports
of a spontaneous abortion and then one abortion that was
missed following a vaccine. There's premature laboring, delivery cases to
newborn deaths. There were substantial birth rate drops that happened

(33:16):
across thirteen countries in Europe as well as Britain, Australia,
and Taiwan. This was in the nine months following the
public vaccine rollout. Seventy percent officer's vaccine related adverse events
occurred in women. Now, depending on what organ system you're
looking at, sometimes it's as much as one in eight,
which is like eighty seven percent. We're looking at liver failure,

(33:40):
kidney failure, strokes, neurological diseases, cardiovascular events, whatever organ system
you're looking at or you want to investigate. There are
several side effects that are apparent.

Speaker 2 (34:03):
And Pfizer's reply to all of this is we'll just
look further into it. They don't see it as an issue.

Speaker 3 (34:10):
They're going to follow it and they'll follow up, but
they never follow up. There are no other reports that
have ever been released. Some of the documents they reference
other studies that they are doing or that are coming up.
If you go to the website where they have all
the scientific studies, a lot of those studies don't even exist.

(34:31):
They're not even on the books.

Speaker 2 (34:32):
Oh my gosh. Yeah, it's just basically say it so
that people think they're actually doing something about it, but
they're not really going to do anything about it.

Speaker 10 (34:44):
No.

Speaker 3 (34:44):
That was part of the agreement to get the emergency
use authorization is they were supposed to continue monitoring this
for twenty four months. But after they had that preliminary
three months and they show that, oh, it looks like
it's working. After skewing through the numbers and stopping it

(35:05):
way too early. They vaccinated the control group, essentially erasing
all evidence of it not working. So at that point
their study was over. Even though they were supposed to
do for twenty four months, they did it for three.

Speaker 2 (35:20):
You can't get any significant data after three months. No,
not even a scientist.

Speaker 10 (35:25):
And I know this.

Speaker 2 (35:26):
How is this possible? You can find these Fizer papers
other places, not in just this book. You can go
on the internet and you can actually look for them.
This is not something where it's hidden.

Speaker 3 (35:36):
They've been released. They've had to be released, so they
are out there and anybody can go through them if
you want to go through the four hundred and fifty
thousand pages. But yeah, you can find this information. And
in each of these reports it links back to what
paper they're looking at, and I think if you go
online you can go to the actual document they do

(35:58):
have link. If you're a statistician or in any of
these fields that would be relevant to the information, you
can go look it up and you can back up
what they're saying or run your own calculations to see
if they're incorrect. Anywhere.

Speaker 2 (36:15):
But why is this okay? I guess is my question like,
why is nobody doing anything about this. It seems like
they did this whole campaign to get people to take
the vaccine, and then once they realized it was not working,
they're just like and moving on it just they quietly
just don't want to talk about it. We'll just quietly
hope it doesn't exist.

Speaker 3 (36:37):
This was in twenty twenty one. February twenty twenty one.
They had all of this information. That was the beginning
of the rollout. That was before all of the propaganda,
all of the incentives to get people to take the
vaccine before any mandate started, before they even had the
information and voted to inject kids. They had all the

(37:00):
information and they still continued.

Speaker 4 (37:02):
There is a.

Speaker 3 (37:03):
Report in here that is called Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review,
where they looked at what it does if you have
it when you're pregnant or if you are breastfeeding. Here
is one of the headlines for one of the reports,
Acute kidney injury and acute renal failure Following Pfizer mRNA

(37:27):
COVID vaccination, thirty three percent of patients died. Pfizer concludes
no new safety issue.

Speaker 2 (37:35):
No new safety issue. I have to hear it again
because thirty three percent of the people died. That's not
a good margin of error.

Speaker 3 (37:41):
And the renal failure most of it was in like
four days, so you know how fast it has to
work and kill your kidneys for you to go into
renal failure in four days.

Speaker 12 (37:54):
Oh my gee, let's.

Speaker 3 (37:56):
See paper fifteen in this it's titled Pfizer. N FDA
knew in early twenty twenty one that Pfizer MR and
a COVID vaccine caused dire fetal and infant risk, including death.
They began an aggressive campaign to vaccinate pregnant women anyway.
They knew that this was going to affect vetuses and babies.

(38:21):
Rochelle Wolinsky was the director of the CDC. She received
the document Pregnancy in Lactation Cumulative Review. She received that
three days later, she went on TV and told the
pregnant women that it was okay to get the vaccine.

Speaker 4 (38:40):
So when.

Speaker 3 (38:42):
This report came out and they exposed it, doctor Wilensky resigned, Wow.

Speaker 2 (38:49):
We don't hear this on the news though, not that
I'm a big avid news watcher, but I do read articles.
I read a lot of them. And before you told
me about this. I hadn't heard anything about it. I
didn't even know. The reason why we played the clip
that you were talking about the conspiracy theory is because

(39:11):
it seemed so outlandish at the time. At the time,
it seemed like nothing like that could happen. But what
you were saying felt so correct. And now we're here,
what two years later, and all this stuff is coming out,
and it's so on par with what you were talking
about population control.

Speaker 3 (39:33):
When I had that theory two years ago, I was
going off a few scientific studies that were showing that
there were lower sperm counts, and people in government talk
and I knew there were some sort of shenanigans, but
I didn't know what. I'm like, Okay, so they don't

(39:53):
want to admit that they were wrong, so they're just
going to reverse R and b Wade, send it back
to the state. Some states were going to ban the
abortion and it'll just be covered up. I thought this
was all like after the fact, Oops, we messed up,
we went too far too fast, and we should have

(40:16):
slowed down. But this is showing me all of this evidence.
They knew before they even rolled it out, all the hype,
all the mandates, pushing it, forcing it. They knew what
they were doing, So it's much deeper than what I
even thought it was at the time.

Speaker 2 (40:35):
So what is the endgame here? Population control?

Speaker 3 (40:41):
In a nutshell, Yes, I think it is.

Speaker 13 (40:45):
It's not out of the governments, Like, it's not uncommon
for them to do something like that because there's precedence
for them using things in the past for population control,
and those really stemmed out of eugenics.

Speaker 3 (41:04):
I'm not going to put it outside of the government
to have some sort of population control plan because they've
done it before in the thirties and forties. Even after that,
when eugenics was popular, the majority of the states had
some sort of sterilization law or process. Now me growing

(41:30):
up in Oklahoma, I had always heard stories about how
they had given Indian shots to make them sterile. When
I actually looked into that further to see where those
stories came from, it turns out that in the sixties

(41:50):
and seventies, the Indian health services they were using contraceptives
and abortion and even doing like surgeries to sterilize women
without their consent, Like they would go in to have
an appendectomy and they would sterilize them or they would

(42:17):
give them promotional materials on if you don't have as
many kids, then you'd have more money and resources available
for other things. And there's like this pamphlet that you
can find online, but it's like this little husband and
wife with a billion kids, and then next to it

(42:39):
it's like a husband, wife and two kids and a
bunch of horses trying to get them to take birth control.
And where the shots come in. It wasn't actually vaccines
that they were using to sterilize them. It was Depo privera,
so it was a birth control shot, but they were
using it and mentally incapable people intellectually disabled, so they

(43:07):
didn't know what they were giving them. But what's interesting
about that is this was in the seventies that Indian
Health Services were using depot. It was approved at the
end of the sixties and it was used in other countries,
but it wasn't even approved by the FDA for use
as a contraceptive in the United States until the nineties.

(43:32):
It was nineteen ninety two, So then they were using
unapproved drugs to sterilize mentally disabled women who were of
Native American descent without their consent.

Speaker 5 (43:48):
Okay, wow, And that.

Speaker 3 (43:51):
Was through Indian Health Services, so that was a government
funded organization.

Speaker 2 (43:56):
And that's okay. We're okay with that as a society.

Speaker 3 (44:00):
Apparently, I don't hear anybody talking about that or bringing
that up.

Speaker 2 (44:05):
I've gone through a lot of these studies and stuff,
and I know you sent me the paperwork for it
in the show notes, and I was like, no, that's
not true, but it is. It completely is. And if
they're doing it one time, that means they're doing it
lots of other times with lots of other people that

(44:26):
we don't know about yet, and.

Speaker 3 (44:28):
Who knows what else they're doing.

Speaker 2 (44:31):
The more of these studies you show me, just more
of the stuff that I've gotten access to because my
sister edited Plandemics, the plandemic movies and some of the
other movies that are coming out. She sends me stuff
here and there. And the more that I read about

(44:53):
this stuff and the articles that are being sent to me,
it seems like the government feels like it's okay to
test its own people whenever they need to or want to.
And then years later we find out about it and
they go, oh, my bad, I guess it was okay

(45:14):
to insert syphilis into African American men to see what
happens and just watch and just watch and see what happens.
I don't tell anybody about it, and I think we're
all supposed to be okay with that. That's actually a
real mk ultra thing. I didn't make that up.

Speaker 3 (45:30):
That's right, that'sgee.

Speaker 2 (45:33):
Yeah, it actually happened. But there's so many of those
kinds of There's a whole esp program that happened in
the government where they were testing people for psychic abilities.
Then that was beyond remote viewing. They were also microdosing
people with LSD in the sixties to see what would happen,

(45:53):
like large groups of people, like whole towns, or they
would spray them in the middle of the night with
chemicals to see how people react to it. It's so
bizarre to me that this kind of stuff is okay.
And the campaign I think I'm still traumatized by the
campaign for COVID. They pushed so hard for the vaccine,

(46:16):
so hard.

Speaker 3 (46:17):
Yes, they did.

Speaker 2 (46:18):
It became literally part of the culture.

Speaker 3 (46:22):
Yeah. What frustrates me the most about it all is
that they knew this was happening and they still campaigned,
they still mandated it. There's millions of people that had
to choose between going to work and being able to
feed their families or putting themselves at risk of who

(46:47):
knows what side effects, but they weren't told that there
were any side effects. They were told is safe and effective.

Speaker 2 (46:54):
Anybody who was in healthcare had to have it.

Speaker 3 (46:57):
Healthcare, the military, really any sort of first responder. Schools
mandated it for college students. Aviation mandated it. For a time.
It was any company that was a contractor of the government,
or anyone that was over a certain number of employees

(47:19):
were required to take it too. Then they approved it
for children who had almost zero risk. It was less
than one percent of kids that died from COVID, yet
it accelerated their risk for myocarditis and heart inflammation. And

(47:40):
they knew that going in When they had the meeting,
they discussed that, and they also knew that the more
shots you had it seemed to increase the effects the
health risk, but they still approved it.

Speaker 2 (47:57):
So the more shots you're getting, the higher risk you have.

Speaker 3 (48:01):
It's like a subclinical injury. So you're not seeing the
marker with your first shot, maybe not even your second shot,
but the more shots you get, the more the disease
is going to present, They're going to have accumulative effect.
So the more you have, the more at risk you
are to having some sort of side effect. Okay, And

(48:25):
I think what the recommended dose is? What nine now
something stupid like that.

Speaker 2 (48:30):
It was five for a while there, but yeah, I
think it's up to nine or ten.

Speaker 3 (48:34):
And Kamala during her campaign, anybody that applied to be
on her committee or group whatever it was, they had
to be up to date on their shots.

Speaker 10 (48:47):
Okay.

Speaker 2 (48:48):
Why, I don't know.

Speaker 3 (48:52):
Why would it matter. They're not doing anything. Why would
they need to be up to date?

Speaker 2 (48:57):
Is there that really high of a risk nowadays? I
know that variations now, I know we have all these
different strains, but as a whole, are we still in
a place where it is such a big deal.

Speaker 3 (49:12):
No, they've come out and said I think Fauci even
came out and said, We're just going to have to live.

Speaker 2 (49:17):
With this suddenly. It's just okay, it's just something that
we're gonna have to deal with now. I think I
have PTSD because I just remember wearing masks. I remember
the whole issue.

Speaker 3 (49:30):
And at the same time they were promoting this like
right now, if you go to the CDC, they're promoting
the twenty four to twenty five version of the COVID vaccine.
So everyone that's six months and older should get this
new version of the vaccine, even if you've received one
before or if you've had COVID, so just don't get

(49:53):
a new shot.

Speaker 11 (49:54):
Why it's not doing anything, We've already dablished that even
after the vaccin nations, the numbers didn't really.

Speaker 2 (50:05):
Go that much lower. I remember we talked about this
on a podcast before where we looked at the numbers.
It didn't flatten the curve, It didn't do anything. It
was like this whole ploy to get people to take it.
It was just it was so strange.

Speaker 3 (50:22):
And at the same time, they had the huge propaganda
campaign against ivermectin, which actually was working, and they were
telling everybody that it was just horse pace and not
to use it. And actually the FDA had to remove
that post because they were oversetting their authority, Like they

(50:44):
can't tell doctors what to prescribe and what not to prescribe.
That's not their authority. Their authority is to say if
a drug is safe or not. So they had to
remove the horse pace. But by that time, it was
already in the news. And I'm sure if you talk
to people right now, probably people listening to this, they're
gonna laugh at me because I even said ivermectin. Yeah. So,

(51:08):
just to set the record straight, Ivermectin is a medicine
for humans that was developed I think in the seventies
early eighties. The people that discovered it won the Nobel
Prize because it was such a godsend medicine for humanity. Okay,

(51:32):
it it's anti parasitic. In the last ten years they
were settying it for anti viral properties against retrovirus drugs,
which guess what, COVID nineteen is a retrovirus drug. So
it was not a hard jump to theorize and hypothesize
that maybe ivermectin will work against COVID nineteen and guess

(51:55):
what it did. There's tons of studies up there. You
can go look them up, except when you google it
you'll probably find the two fake studies that people always
cite saying that ivermectin didn't work.

Speaker 2 (52:06):
Didn't Trump take ivermectin.

Speaker 3 (52:08):
When he did, he did.

Speaker 2 (52:12):
And that was a big deal. I remember that, so.

Speaker 3 (52:14):
Did Joe Rogan, and so did a lot of people
in India, and so did a lot of people in
South America and Peru. I don't remember where it was
in India. I'll have to look it up. I have
a book around here somewhere. But anyway, they implemented an
ivermectin protocol. I think Mexico City did also, and they

(52:36):
were having amazing results. Guess what they got overthrown or
somebody else came in and told them, oh, you can't
do that because of this study, and stop the protocol.
In India, I don't think they stopped the protocol, but
they always talk about how they did such an amazing

(52:56):
job of containing COVID, but they never mention how. They
just say they had a medical kit that they sent
out to people. Oh, because if people knew that I
frommectin work, they would not be able to do the
emergency Youth authorization for the vaccine because there would be

(53:17):
an alternative treatment.

Speaker 2 (53:19):
Oh that makes sense. It's just Shenanigan's right out of
the gate. So the stuff that actually does work, we
don't want that. We want this other shit that ruins
your ovaries. Some other studies that sent me The one
that really threw me off was Report thirty seven. It

(53:43):
says CDC had proven harms to male sperm quality test
These function from mRNA vaccine ingredients. I was going through
this one. I wanted to ask you about this because
I was like, what are they talking about? They were
seeing that it'smidable through touch, and.

Speaker 3 (54:03):
The initial trial that they did, the men in the
trial had to agree to not pass it on essentially,
and they specifically said touch as part of their things.
Nobody knows what that means exactly. So are they thinking

(54:23):
that there's like virals shedding and that it can transmit
to other people through that? Nobody really knows what that means.
But that was part of the initial trial that of
what men had to agree to.

Speaker 2 (54:39):
Yeah, because I was reading it and there are some
other like really weird things in this. It treats sperm
as an invader, so it actually kills your sperm count.

Speaker 3 (54:54):
That's what they're saying, Yeah, that it's decreasing the sperm,
and then there's a lot of different things that the
spiite protein's doing in your body.

Speaker 2 (55:04):
And it also there was something about I remember reading
this and going, what so basically it kills off your sperm,
but then the sperm that you do have, it lowers.
It's I don't know what the right word is, potency
or something. So it's actually harder for you to like,
even if your sperm they survive, it's harder for them

(55:24):
to actually work. I don't know what the proper term
is for that.

Speaker 3 (55:28):
So it looks like the volume goes down, concentration of
the sperm motility and total count.

Speaker 2 (55:36):
So the concentration of it goes down.

Speaker 3 (55:38):
Yeah, yeah, all of it is going down. And this
study measured through one hundred and fifty days post vaccination.

Speaker 2 (55:46):
That is a long time.

Speaker 3 (55:48):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (55:49):
Basically it's messing with your whole reproductive system.

Speaker 4 (55:56):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (55:56):
One of the reports, because in the Pfizer papers, not
only do they have the rep but they also have
some presentations that different scientists and doctors have given as lectures.
So they have the slides and the transcript in there,
and one of them that's talking about sperm count and
how you can see the spike proteins in the testes
and how it's affecting the different types of cells. He says,

(56:21):
if I was a woman of reproductive years and I
want to have a kid, I wouldn't get into a
relationship with the men that had the COVID vaccine, and
that's the male. It's also doing things to the female too,
like the female organs. There's lots of accounts where there's
abnormal bleeding, maybe no bleeding, even women that are postmen

(56:47):
apostle start bleeding. There's all kinds of weird things happening
in the female reproductive organs as well.

Speaker 2 (56:57):
So it changes your whole menstrual cycle.

Speaker 4 (57:00):
It can.

Speaker 3 (57:01):
Yeah, there is an entire list of what types of
side effects they have seen and see. And the thing
with Pfizer is when they reported a lot of these
side effects, a lot of them were only reported if
there were multiple people that experienced them. So sometimes if
there's only one or two they wouldn't document it. They

(57:24):
would only document three or four or more. So there
could be a lot more side effects and a lot
more issues that we're not seeing.

Speaker 2 (57:32):
This is a lot of effects. When you see those
commercials on TV, it's laughable because they're like you could
get headache and diarrhea and all these there's all these
side effects heart palpitation's dizziness.

Speaker 3 (57:43):
This is not no we talk cancer, autoimmune diseases, heart issues.
I want to say that some of the presentations you
have to take with a grain of salt, because I
think that there's some evidence that the people that are
bringing this evidence to light are also over exaggerating to

(58:04):
a point to cause alarm. But there's definitely something happening,
and there's something that's going on that we need to
get to the bottom of. But they are showing like
if you go in and stay for the spike protein,
it is accumulating in different tissues. If it gets in
your aorda, then you could have issues with blood flow.

(58:25):
You don't want it to destroy your aorta because that
is a major part of your body to get blood flowing.

Speaker 2 (58:34):
I need that to live.

Speaker 3 (58:36):
Yeah, And the LIBD nanoparticles they can pass through the
blood brain barrier, so it's also getting into your brain,
which is never a good thing. So dementia, which actually
some people have theorized that Biden got as bad as
he did so fast, is because of the vaccines.

Speaker 4 (58:56):
I think he may have.

Speaker 3 (58:57):
Been on the trajectory already, but then he took the
vaccines and it exaggerated his symptoms. Then he had a
more rapid deterioration.

Speaker 5 (59:09):
Hmm.

Speaker 2 (59:11):
That's so interesting. I'm sure now everybody's a little freaked out.
What do they do to counteract this if you have
taken the vaccine multiple times.

Speaker 3 (59:22):
I don't know if there's an answer exactly. I know
that there's some doctors that are working with the vaccine injured.
I think ivermectin is part of that protocol that they're using.
So on the daily Cloud. They actually did an interview
with a midwife that came out because she was talking
about the differences in pregnancies that she's seen and that

(59:47):
there's a calcification on the placenta and she's normally you
might see a little bit of calcification, but it's the
entire placenta and the vessel aren't forming like they should,
so then there's a lot more bleeding that's happening. The
placin is not wanting to detach correctly. Babies are being

(01:00:10):
born pre term because they're not able to get the
right flow of oxygen and because of placin is not expanding,
which I know I'm just dropping that in this whole
treatment thing, but the treatment she said, what she's seen
is that the women that have a healthier diet and

(01:00:31):
are taking the whole vitamin C, like the whole food
that helps the strengthen the vessels. So when they have
that plus the healthy diet, that it seems to be
helping a little bit more a theory that I have,
which there's no evidence for this at all, and I've
been reading a lot on substack. The Midwestern Doctor has

(01:00:53):
been doing a whole series on DMSO, which has also
been shoved under the by the FDA and they don't
want people to know about it. But he lays out
and I don't know how many articles with different scientific
evidence and studies that have happened, because there's a ton
of studies on DMSO and how it helps with a

(01:01:15):
lot of the uncurable diseases like muscular skeletal diseases and
pretty much everything that you can think of. There seems
to be a mechanism with DMSO that helps it. That
he was talking about how it can reorient proteins. So

(01:01:37):
in my brain, I'm thinking, Okay, if the spike protein
is messing with things, or there's this like denaturing of
proteins that can happen, because I think I'm trying to
go off my memory. I'm thinking that I heard something
like That's part of the issue is that maybe DMSO
since it can help reorient to those proteins that it

(01:01:59):
could help. Now, obviously everybody needs to do their own
research on that. Midwestern doctor has a ton of information,
but I don't know if there's a definitive answer right
now about what you can do to help shed your
body of the spike protein, because nobody seems to know
how there's a mechanism to get it out. One thing
I do want to highlight about DMSO that is provided

(01:02:23):
on the substack is that it actually helps in the
case of a stroke, So it can help I guess,
offset the side effects and the issues that you have
it like right after a stroke, and it can even
help gain mobility. So since the COVID vaccines are related

(01:02:46):
to a lot of heart issues and there is stroke
related side effects, I think DMSO is probably a good
thing to have on hand. And like I said, you
have to do your own rest search and look at
the information.

Speaker 2 (01:03:02):
When you said vitamin C, are you talking about the
high shows vitamin C they do for cancer and other
diseases like that.

Speaker 3 (01:03:09):
If you go to Google and search like whole vitamin C,
you'll get all kinds of supplements that are like the
whole food, vitamin C.

Speaker 10 (01:03:17):
Got it.

Speaker 3 (01:03:18):
It was like the full spectrum. I think a healthy
diet is probably going to help you more than anything else,
and just making sure that you take care of yourself.

Speaker 2 (01:03:27):
That does make sense. It seems like upping your fruit
and veg and your vitamin C, D and E for
whatever reason, tends to fix a myriad of problems.

Speaker 3 (01:03:39):
Unfortunately, at this time we don't have answers, but you're right,
eating healthy is going to do a lot more than anything.

Speaker 2 (01:03:50):
I'm going to say this out loud. I really feel
like COVID was such a ruse. There's nothing about it
that was real. People die, don't get wrong. I'm not
saying that people didn't die, and I'm not saying that
there wasn't something happening. There were a lot of people died,
which is horrible, and it was also a ruse because

(01:04:14):
I feel like a lot of it could have been prevented.
I feel like the way that they did the ventilators,
the way that they brought up the vaccine, just the
whole thing from start to finish was just an exercise
in I don't know, something. It was like a futility.
I'm not sure what the right word is here. It

(01:04:35):
just doesn't feel right.

Speaker 3 (01:04:38):
I think it was just a continuation of MK ultra.

Speaker 2 (01:04:42):
Yeah, see how we can control the population?

Speaker 3 (01:04:46):
Yes, while doing research for this podcast, that question took
me on a whole other rabbit hole and really took
this even deeper than what we've talked about as it
just being like Pfizer and the government in bed with

(01:05:07):
each other and wanting to make money. But that is
another podcast. Yeah, I don't think we want to get
into that because we will be here for another five hours.

Speaker 4 (01:05:20):
Yeah, for sure.

Speaker 2 (01:05:22):
And it's so strange because I can tell you this
pre COVID, pre pandemic, I thought both of this stuff
was bullshit. Quite honestly. I thought that most conspiracy theories
around this stuff was bullshit. I thought that people were
just nutty living through the pandemic and living through the

(01:05:43):
Shenanigans and just seeing how much propaganda played into what
we were not supposed to do as a society and
the amount of pressure being put on people to do
something for the common good that's really not good for anybody.

(01:06:05):
It made me rethink a lot of things. It made
me feel this weird way. I didn't feel like the
government had my best interest at heart at all, and
I felt very unsafe for not having the same mindset

(01:06:25):
as everyone else and questioning it. Just the very fact
that I was questioning it made me feel like an outlier.
It was the strangest feeling. So, yeah, I don't know
what to do with that. And then all of this
information comes out later and it's not even again, we're
not even talking a decade later. We're talking like four
years later. All this information comes out and it's just again,

(01:06:48):
it's oops, my bad. That's how the government is dealing
with it. Let's just not talk about it. Let's just
pretend like it didn't exist.

Speaker 3 (01:06:55):
And everybody's moved on to another catastrophe and completely forgotten
and we all live through it.

Speaker 2 (01:07:03):
Yeah, it'll just be like this blip in history and
people or when we're in the eighties and we're senile,
there'll be people talking about on their podcasts about the
COVID conspiracy theory because they'll start finding out information, and yeah,

(01:07:26):
that'll be the end of that. I think the last
thing I want to say is think for yourself. I
think that's really important right now in today's day and age,
to use your what's the right word, it's use your instincts,
your intuition. I think we just need to be more
cautious and we need to stop I think right now

(01:07:47):
there's a lot of I know I keep saying it,
but mass formation. I think there's a lot of that
happening right now.

Speaker 3 (01:07:54):
Yes, definitely, there's a lot of people that are getting
swept into ideas and they're not able. Like you were saying,
use your intuition. Like in human design, each person has
their own inner authority to make decisions. You can feel
in your body whether something feels right or not. And

(01:08:18):
people have gotten away from that and they're trying to
use their minds to really think through things and see
what's logical. They're seeing this fantasy of how they want
things to be, and they're not really using their discernment
and feeling into their intuition and knowing what's true. Yeah,

(01:08:42):
not like the subjective truth, but like an objective like overall,
like the real truth of the matter.

Speaker 2 (01:08:50):
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. It's more about
trying to fit in than thinking things through, like you said,
on that more physical, dynamic level where you're like, ooh,
this doesn't feel right, instead of I want to do
what's right, air quotes for humanity or whatever, or to

(01:09:11):
save my grandma.

Speaker 3 (01:09:12):
Like you said, which is fear, and so that's feeling
fear and not like the underlying truth to what's going on.

Speaker 2 (01:09:21):
Yeah, it's just asking what is anything else you want
to say on.

Speaker 3 (01:09:26):
What we're talking about, using your intuition and your discernment,
really knowing what you stand for, because if you know
what you stand for and you know what you value,
then that's going to determine how you're going to respond
to things too.

Speaker 2 (01:09:43):
That is absolutely true. You know what you value, it
doesn't really matter. I'm sorry we didn't have any more
things you could do or how to counteract this if
you've taken the virus. I wish we had more answers
for you. But I think putting the information out there,
even if one person listens to this, they tell one

(01:10:05):
person and then that person tells one person. That's how
information gets out there. So I think the awareness of
it is really important, especially considering what is going to
happen in the next four years with the new president.
There's going to be a lot of this kind of
propaganda out there. We have to be more hypervision than

(01:10:26):
we ever have been in our whole lives.

Speaker 3 (01:10:27):
Not even just propaganda. They're going to hide things. Things
have been censored for the last four years. I don't
see that changing yep.

Speaker 2 (01:10:37):
And thankfully there are people out there that are willing
to push those boundaries and get that information.

Speaker 4 (01:10:48):
So thank you for.

Speaker 12 (01:10:49):
Listening to the Alim bodcast. For show notes, go to
www dombs dot com. If you want more of the
pot and you like what we're doing, consider joining our
patreonon You get the episodes quicker than everybody else. They
are at free pace for production costs, and it gives

(01:11:14):
you more content. That's www dot nvslien dot com, www
Dot n v us alien dot com and as always,
see you on the website.