August 26, 2023 • 62 mins
Trump has been booked and mug-shot by a local DA who, herself, is an election denier. Is this an attack on free speech and the American Way? Political Pursuits' Lou Ann Anderson and Planet Logic's Lynn Woolley discuss this and many other aspects of the current ascent of tyranny into the American system. This episode is not particlarly optimisic. It is, however, truthful. And it's time to face the truth. We have this election cycle, and perhaps one more to fix it. We have a Republic -- if we can keep it.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome to Planet Logic and Political Pursuitsthe podcast. Today's episode One Giant Step
for Tyranny. I'm Glynn Woolley.I'm the pilot of the podcast on Planet
Logic and the proprietor of Political Pursuits. The podcast is low Anne Anderson.
One Giant Step for Tyranny And what'sthe second half of this One Giant Leap
(00:24):
for Fanny? Willis without a doubt? Well, you know what, No,
no, no, I think that. I think the secondary headline is
that is Fanny's fifteen minutes of fame. Oh, Fanny went out and did
some new publicity pictures. She gother hair done. She's riding high right
now. You know It's it's likeit's like Mayor Lightfoot. You got you're
(00:47):
gonna be on TV. You gottalook good. Yeah. Yeah, Well,
I hope she follows in the footstepsof Kim Gardner. Remember Kim,
Yes, yes, yes, theformer DA in Saint Louis, the one
who went after the McCluskey's, theone who went after Eric Gryten's had a
similar career path as she ready,yes she did. She had similar career
(01:11):
path Ie Soros backing to help gether into office. She did resign.
They got into some troubles, youknow. Now, besides the McClusky,
she targeted a guy named Eric Grten'swho had been at one point the governor
of Missouri. Harrock got himself intosome very tawdry situations with another woman and
(01:34):
a lot of allegations and things.He resigned as the governor of Missouri based
on that. This was like fouror five years ago. Then he was
running for Senate. She went afterhim again and they got in and were
making all these allegations about issues relatingto his divorce and his ex wife.
It was a very acrimonious parting andthere were two little boys involved, and
(02:00):
I can't even remember all the chargesthat she was living against Grayton's. It
ended up he lost the primary inthe age's race. So in terms of
election interfering, sullying someone's reputation,torpedoing their aspirations in a political race,
(02:20):
mission was accomplished. However, whenthat case moved further, and there were
also some grievances filed against her withthe I don't know the I'm not sure
what the what the governing authority wasover there, but it was found that
she had had been involved in allsorts of misconduct, falsification of evidence,
(02:43):
uh, the squelching of exonerating information, all sorts of misconduct, and she
did have to resign from office.She was disbarred, which is no easy
feat. And the last I heard, she's now a nursing cool. Well,
that's that's very interesting. As you'regoing through that litany, I'm thinking
(03:04):
of all the parallels here. Imean, it's it's unbelievable all the parallels.
Last week I found out. Iknow other people in Georgia obviously knew
this, but it came out ona national basis. One of the biggest,
most egregious election deniers in the UnitedStates is Fanny Willis, the district
(03:28):
attorney that's going after Trump in Georgia. That the emails and the Facebook posts
and the Twitter posts are a giantline of evidence. She was absolutely,
absolutely denying the election when Trump won. And where was she with Stacey Abrams
(03:50):
or she and Stacy real good buddies. I don't I don't know. One
can only imagine, but you know, I think the election denier of all
election deniers is Hillary Clinton. StacyAbrahams is famous for it. MSNBC and
CNN were so shocked after Trump won, and the next morning the headline in
the Washington Post was impeachment begins.Now, well, you know what you
(04:13):
gotta say about Hill. Are yougotta give her credit? She was the
biggest election tone and she put hermoney where her mouth was. I either
Steele Dossiers see the biggest, fakest, most egregious election interference of our lifetime
followed, followed the Laptop from Hell, followed only by the suppression of the
laftop rail. Your mind is goingright where mine is. Absolutely I want
(04:39):
to say this, and I'm gonnamention John Durham real quick. When John
Durham was doing his work and hewas silent, there weren't even even very
many pictures. There was that oneiconic picture of John Durham in that beard,
looking like a bulldog, and Ithought, men, I wouldn't want
that guy after me until I heardhim speak and he sounded like a win
(05:00):
and he didn't do much swamp creature. You know what, That picture of
Durham reminds me of the picture ofTrump. Trump in that picture that they
took for the mugshot, he lookslike I am going to get every one
of you as soon as I beatthis rap, and I don't doubt it.
(05:20):
A Trump presidency is going to befun, and I would not want
to be certain people because there arepeople out there that have things that Trump
can latch onto. There are somany things he can get even with.
I mean, look at look atall the things Biden's going through right now.
Is it getting even or would itjust be getting justull equal application of
(05:44):
the law and coming in and actuallyapplying the law to credible allegations that can
be prosecuted. You've hit on somethingthat has been a theme in my mind
for a while. I despise theidea of social justice. I hate it.
I'm just sick to my stomach everytime I hear the left use the
term social justice. Screw social justice. You may quote me what this country
(06:10):
was based on and what we didn'thave through Jim Crow, but I think
we have it a lot more now. Is called equal justice. That is,
if you're a Democrat or you're aRepublican and you break the law and
it's egregious and it's enough to beindicted, then you should be treated the
same. And that's why it justgalls me every time I see Hillary Clinton
(06:33):
go on MSNBC with Rachel Madcow RachelMaddow and gloat over what's happening to Trump
when what she did was worse.Well, I mean it's a statement of
the obvious. However, let's doremember that that model that you're talking about,
the equal application under the law,that model was created by our founding
(06:57):
fathers, and it was based uponon they wanted to be everything that the
place they came from wasn't exactly,and that was a place where two tiered
system of justice absolutely was. Thewas the you know, law of the
land. It was the status quo, the modus operandi. If you were
(07:19):
part of the powerful, the elite, the rich, the landowners, you
operated under one system of justice.If you were a peasant, well it
was open season on it. Ifyou've seen the movie To Kill a Mockingbird,
I mean, that's kind of waswhat the theme was. And Emmett
(07:39):
Till certainly didn't get any kind ofa fair shake. But you know,
the days of Jim Crow are longbehind us, and I think the modern
era of social justice aka jury nullificationcame about with O. J. Simpson.
Never have I seen a guy thatI felt in my heart for what
(08:00):
I knew was as guilty as O. J. Simpson, who is out
to this day searching for the realkillers. But that was a jury decision
based on race. But it wasalso but it was also a trial that
was turned into a public spectacle thatwas orchestrated in the aftermath of the LA
(08:28):
riots and with massive concern that awrong verdict in the eyes of some people,
could bring back a second replay ofthat. Well, sure, and
it was therefore orchestrated for the verdictthat was delivered. Let me ask you
(08:48):
then, with that as a backdropwhat you just said, what happens in
the United States of America on thestreets of cidies like Chicago, New York,
Los Angeles, Baltimore, of Kenosha. If Trump is acquitted or if
Trump is convicted, are we headedfor violence? Absolutely? Either way,
(09:16):
more if he is acquitted, ButI think it depends on the timing.
I think it's going to depend onwhat else is going on where we are,
even in the election cycle. Butabsolutely if he's acquitted, and I
think there's a good likelihood if heis convicted, because you think the right
(09:39):
has had their fill of it.No, no, absolutely not. I
think I think I think American patriotshave had their fill of it. But
the establishment right is going along toget along. Oh no, no,
no, there there there, it'sthe uniparty, it is the uniparty party.
(10:00):
I think there is a whole nothertrack. You know, the Dershowitz
has his Get Trump book, andthere is the lawfair side of getting Trump.
There is the electioneering side of gettingTrump that is coming out of the
DNC, and that well, well, I think that I'm thinking more in
terms of the Mark Elias side,the you know things now to keep him
(10:24):
off the ballot, which Newsome hastalked about, you know, trying to
mount some movement to keep him offthe California ballot. I think you're going
to be seeing that. But atthe same time, there are rumblings on
the Republican establishment side that you're goingto that I think there will be efforts
to get Trump disqualified as a asa candidate or as the nominee of the
(10:50):
Republican Party. In fact, theother night at the Kids Table debate,
ASA Hutchinson even made some comment aboutwhen he was the one that didn't raise
his hand saying that he would supportTrump if he were convicted. He made
some comment about, well, it'sgoing to be important to go back and
(11:11):
look at the rules or the bylaws of the r and C and see
if even with a conviction, hewould be eligible to be the nominee.
Well, you know something, Isuspect that if that rule hadn't been inserted
yet, it will be in thenext few months. I was glad that
(11:31):
Asa Hutchinson was there because it hadn'tbeen for Asa Hutchinson. The person I
think I hated most on that debatestage would have been Chris Christie, but
Asa Hutchinson edged him out. Iam hoping at the next debate Bergham,
who had one good line and itwas a joke about breaking a leg at
(11:54):
the event. I don't have anythingagainst him. I just don't see any
reason for him to be on thestage. And we can get back to
this debate a little bit later.But when you talk about one giant step
for tyranny, which is what we'venamed this program today, what Gavin Newsom
is doing is a super giant step. If they can keep Trump off the
(12:15):
ballot, he has no way towin. And what makes it Lunn,
I'll throw this out and you cantell me if you have any other thoughts.
What makes this so important for themto do is, in spite of
what they say about Trump not beingable to beat Biden, they're worried,
sick about Trump beating Biden. Oh, without a doubt, without a doubt,
(12:35):
because you look at these polls thatare coming out. You know,
poles, you always have to takewith a huge, huge grain of salt,
But on these you know, CBS, CNN, these liberal polls that
are coming out, and Trump iseither allegedly tied or leading or within the
(12:56):
margin of rum, within the marginof errors, and without looking at the
cross tabs to know exactly what wasasked, how was asked to who it
was asked. If that's what they'republicly coming out with, what they're seeing
privately has got to be even farmore concerning. Well, it absolutely does.
Let me ask you this. Wetalk about equal justice and Biden,
(13:22):
who is very concerned about a terriblefire at his house. He almost lost
his wife, he almost lost hishouse, he almost lost his nineteen sixty
seven corvette and his cat and hiscat, and we could have also lost
some classified documents. Why is itthat. Of course, let me rethink
(13:45):
here. The reason that they're sayingthat Trump is in trouble over the documents
at Mara Lago and Biden isn't isbecause Trump didn't cooperate with the Department of
Justice and Biden did. May Iask you whose department of is it?
And who had no fear about cooperatingwith this particular Department of Justice? Where
(14:11):
do you even start there? They'renot going to go after Biden. No,
so he could sure he could cooperate. I mean, look, when
you're looking at Andrew Weiss, whois the joke of a special prosecutor see
special counsel's special counsel, not anindependent prosecutor, talk about failing upwards.
(14:31):
Yes, he's the guy that helpedput together this sweetheart deal that thank god,
we actually had a serious judge thatthrew this thing out. He's the
guy that didn't want hunter Biden tohave any jail time and wanted to give
him essentially blanket immunity and slow walkedit so that the statute of limitations ran
(14:52):
out on some of the other charges. So what would happen? What would
have happened if Trump had said tothe archives or who where it is.
Yeah, sure, come on andtake all of them. They would have
found something else. They would haveprobably found something in those papers. There
would have been the nuclear codes orsomething that he was trying to give to
Iran or to Kim Jongoon or something, because they were out to get him
(15:16):
and there was going to be evidence. And when they barred all of the
attorneys from coming in as they weregoing through things, you know, once
again, there, how does that? How does that smack of that they
didn't put some would you talk talkabout a giant step terity? One thing
that has just driven me crazy.All these pictures that we got of all
(15:41):
these file folders on the floor atMarlon, that nice little staged photos,
all those stage photos. Did weget anything like that out of Joe Biden's
various vacation homes that he makes onhis government salary. Did we get anything
like that out of the University ofDelaware? I was gonna say, Depen
Biden's Center, That's where I wantto know what we did. Or that
(16:03):
that office that they had down therein Chinatown in DC. So there's I'm
thinking that you had the Chinatown thing, you had the Penn Biden Center.
You had the Rehobeth was there,some there Rehobeth Beach at his home there
and then some in Delaware, Sothere is as many as four and who
knows what else. Who knows whereelse those those documents were. But yeah,
(16:26):
let's go to Hunter's house. Yes, but but the Kunter really didn't
seem to have much of a house. He seems to pretty much just kind
of his he's living at the WhiteHouse. Yeah, I was gonna say
wherever Joe lives. That seems tokind of behere he where he hangs.
And let me ask you another thingabout a giant step for tyrrany, since
you got me on that subject.Who's Who's cocaine? Was it? Anyway?
(16:51):
Which would make a great name fora TV sitcom, Who's cocaine was
it? If that was the TrumpWhite House? Oh my gosh, would
that have been handled differently? Withouta doubt, without a doubt? And
you know with this, I mean, and you know, I guess now
that's one more thing they're happy aboutall these indictments, because boy, that
one's just gone away, hadn't it. It's gone away. But if you
(17:14):
look at the mainstream media, theydon't need a distraction for this stuff to
go away. I believe that onereason the election was rigged, and one
reason I hesitate to use the wordstolen because I don't know most people consider
the stolen to be rigged voting machines. And I said from the start,
if you're going to if you're gonnasay the voting machines are rigged, you've
(17:36):
got to have some evidence. Idon't know that they were. They weren't,
but here's what I do know.They change the laws in Pennsylvania and
some other states because of using thepandemic as an excuse some states, some
places I'll mention Harris County, Houstonin Texas, just throughout the idea comparing
signatures when somebody had a provisional vote. The Democrats are very good at using
(18:00):
legal means as well, which theRepublicans didn't use, like ballad harvesting.
But the biggest thing of all tome may have been the media's refusal to
cover anything that was adverse to Biden, like the laptop from Hell. They
just refused to do it, andpolling has shown that that could have changed
as much as ten percent of thevote. And remember Biden had Watch seven.
(18:25):
I mean Trump had about seventy ninemillion votes, seventy four to eighty
one. He had seventy four million, eighty one million, my ass,
you have to put that right atthe end of that. I'd not for
a minute, I do not fora minute believe that Biden got eighty one
million votes. I don't think it'spossible. No. Well, and the
(18:47):
other thing too, is that therewere a number of these counties that ended
up having more votes than they hadregistered voters. That happened in Dade County
in Michigan, that happened in someof the Atlanta counties. And Gateway Pundit
has been carried has been covering thisstory. I've written a little bit about
(19:10):
it. I tied in with iton wb Daily about Muskegon Muskegan, Michigan,
and a woman who showed up ata county there to the registrar's office
several weeks before the election with liketens of thousands of voter registration applications.
(19:32):
They were all signed, they allhad the same signature, the same address.
This office aptly called the police.The police then contacted the state the
whole thing, an investigation was done. It was found to be conducted by
a company called GBI, who notonly was doing this in this town,
(19:55):
but they were doing it across Michiganas well as in I think about thirteen
fifteen other states, and they wereinjecting voter applications into the system, bogus
voter applications. Now, Gretchen Whitmerand Joscelyn whatever her name it, Benson,
the Michigan AG They're like, oh, well we caught this. See
(20:18):
the system works. Well, itwas exposed in this one area. About
how many other areas was it notexposed? And were those applications used to
insert names onto voter rolls? Andthat's how you end up having more votes
than you had actual voters. Iwant to ask you about another giant step
for tyranny. Suppose that I'm indictedby a local DA for some political thing
(20:45):
that I did, and suppose theydon't have enough evidence, but they got
enough to indict me, because youknow, I'm kind of similar to a
ham sandwich in which you can indictat any time, and to get a
little bit more information on me,they go, oh, well, when
does a podcast with lew and Anderson, So let's indict her all right,
(21:06):
So you get indicted on trumped upham sandwich type thing and they come to
you and they say, what doyou got on old Lynn over there?
Because you know you're never going tosee your family again if we put you
away. But you know, wemight make a deal where you don't serve
any time at all. We mightjust quash the whole indictment if you will
(21:26):
give us certain information. Is that'swhat That's what's just happened to Trump without
a doubt. Oh those poor guysdown there in the down there, the
employees at Marlago, I mean,that's ridiculous. But all these other people,
and that's what they have been doingthough all along, because that's the
same kind of thing that happens withlike the J six when they were bringing
(21:49):
all the Trump people into the Jsix or into you know, any of
these congressional hearings. Because you've gotto remember, and this is something as
somebody who has been targeted in acivil lawsuit and been forced to have to
go in and pay tens of thousandsof dollars of lawsuit on a bullshit claim,
(22:12):
I know the pain that that caustI know the irreparable harm that that
causes. I know, the illwill that that causes, I know,
the problems that causes within a family, all of the dynamics that come into
that, the emotional experience it is. It's galling and all of those people.
I mean, that's one of thethings that has been so difficult for
(22:33):
me watching because all of those people, all those little congressional staffers, every
time they have to go in thereand testify for something, they got to
get lawyered up, and that couldeasily cost them, especially in the town
like DC, to get a lawyerthat would actually do anything for you.
That could easily cost you six figureseasy for a one day thing to go
(22:53):
into a congressional hearing. These peoplenow that are being indicted, like these
eighteen people in Georgia, not tomention all those election people that they've done
in Michigan and are probably getting readyto do a slew of them in Arizona.
They're looking at half million and morethose people in Georgia, probably because
(23:14):
this is criminal, they're probably lookingat a million dollars minimal their defense.
But that's part of it too,that's the extortion. That's why they call
it lawfare. Doubt it's we maynot be able to convict you, we
may not be able to send youto prison. We're going to make your
life a living hell for the restof me. We are going to end
any semblance of a life for youand your family, everyone you love,
(23:38):
your livelihood. And this is theproblem, and that I don't know how
to make a recommendation right now.I'd like to think about it at some
point. The absolute terrible swift swordof the government of the United States,
especially with a special counsel like wehave with unlimited funds, underlimited ability our
(24:02):
funds, but unlimited they can hirea Durham could have done it. And
now weiss as many lawyers as theywant to, as powerful of lawyers as
they want to, unlimited, notime limits on anything, the ability to
subpoena things, to have a friendlyjudge, to get a warrant, the
ability to indict people for the explicitpurpose of forcing them to turn against somebody
(24:26):
else like Donald Trump. That reallyis one of the worst aspects of the
United States of America. And that'swhat over the last years, say what
you will about people like Roger Stone. Roger Stone was somebody they thought,
oh, they'll get him to turnon Trump, and as long as he's
known Trump, he's got to havesome good dirt. And God bless that
(24:48):
man. He stood firm. Andthere's others that have have similarly done so
they may not be names that peopleare so familiar with. Rudy Giuliani,
they have pushed him to try andget him to turn on Trump and it's
not happening. He hit some choiceHe had some choice words at his arraignment.
(25:08):
Yes, it's just it's beyond beliefthe power that this government has.
I just finished reading a novel fromnineteen fifty five called The Doorbell Rang.
You should read it. It's aNero wolf mystery and it's absolutely delicious.
(25:30):
You know who the villains are inthat murder mystery, the prosecutors, the
FBI, and the whole thing isabout Wolf trying to get the FBI off
this woman's back. They're following her, they're tailing her, and he says,
you know, you're asking me foran impossible task, but I love
impossible tasks, and it's just amazing. That was in the fifties and it's
(25:53):
worse today. It's absolutely worse today. If you get the FBI on your
look at what they did with theFaiza warrants. Well, that's one of
the things that RFK Jr. Hasbeen so strong about helping to expose.
And quite frankly, that is whyI would love to see him be given
(26:15):
serious consideration as an ag and aTrump administration is because he understands the corruption
that's there. He understands the historyof that corruption being there. You know,
you're talking about the fifties. Hecertainly has upfront knowledge of the FBI,
the CIA, all of the biggovernment agencies, as Eisenhower warned us,
(26:41):
the military industrial complex, all ofthe interlocking activities that these agencies engage
in, and the ill you know, ill acts that they do. And
I mean it's frightening in that there'sa lot of things that you go and
(27:03):
look back on in history, andI think the Ukraine War is going to
become one of those things at apoint that we were on the wrong side.
Well, I'm no Putin fan,so you'll have to convince me of
that. Just last just well,earlier this week, the head of the
(27:27):
Wagner group the mercenaries plane went down. Was it shot down, was it
bombed or was it some error onthe just a normal everyday pilot error,
plane crash. Okay, to yourbacktrack a bit. To your point about
convincing you, I think you haveto change, get your mindset right,
(27:49):
and understand that in a lot ofthese situations there are no good guys.
It's our nature that we want tohave a good and the bad in the
world. It's not good and bad. Sometimes it's just bad and worse.
Well, that that's true. That'strue bad, bad dressed up differently.
(28:12):
And Putin absolutely is no good guy. No, he's a mass murderer of
historic proportions. Well, except he'sstill behind che on that. In terms
of contemporary sure, I would Iwould probably say Putin. Putin's murder count
is under twenty thousand people. ButI don't know with Well, there's a
(28:34):
lot of windows in Russia, andit seems like a lot of people fall
out. You mean defendis strate.Yes, that's true. But he bombed
an entire apartment complex one time,killing children. Oh, without a doubt.
I doubt he's not a good guy. She yes, she is a
bigger problem. No doubt about theproblem is is that we our State Department
(28:57):
people like Tony Blaine, Jake Sullivan, Victoria. Nowlan they've been jacking around
over there in Ukraine for a decadeor more, and back in I guess
it was the first Bush administration.They'd signed an agreement, the Minsk Accords,
which they said at that point thatNATO would not come any further west
(29:22):
than Germany, because that was partof what was being negotiated with the fall
of the Berlin Wall, and Putinwanted that buffer. Once our State Department
goes over there and starts jacking aroundwith Ukraine and talking about Ukraine coming into
NATO, that's what stirred all ofthis up. Does that make it right
(29:44):
for Putin to have invaded CRIMEA No. But there is a case to be
made that he has a rational actionor a rational attitude about it, and
that wait a minute, I signedthis agreement and now these people are renegging
on it. And so that's notto be a Putin apologist and say,
(30:06):
oh, what he's doing is right, but it does get I think it
is something that at least is fairto insert into Well. I mean,
Ukraine is a very corrupt country.Well, and I say that from the
standpoint of somebody who believes the UnitedStates is a corrupt country too. Absolutely,
(30:26):
absolutely, and we have they area corrupt country, but we also
are such exploiters. With regard toUkraine, God only knows what kind of
bile labs are over there, andwe have used that country to you know,
launder a lot of money. Youknow, look at it, absolutely,
(30:49):
and I mean in fact, it'salmost like you know, you look
at every country the Bidens are areinvolved with. They seem to gravitate toward
every bottom feeder tree that prides itselfon engaging in all sorts of illicit activities.
Well, I don't know that Presidentshe would be as desperate to get
(31:11):
something influenced in America as would Ukrainebecause she has a lot more resources.
He can do his own infiltration.He doesn't need Hunter Biden to do that.
Although they used him well, Imean he was a he was a
convenient instrument hell pumping in getting intothe highest level. The Chinese are in
(31:33):
our schools. Oh, they're everywherewith the Confucius Confucius. Yeah that's and
then they got the road, thebelt belt and Road initiative. They do
all these things and they do themin the open. What about the Biden
The Penn Biden Center was financed byChina. When we talk about unrestricted warfare,
(31:56):
which is what they engage in.Unrestricted warfare, the idea it's not
just kinectic, that it's cyber,that it's biological, that it is economic,
all of these different types of warfare. Well, when they come in
and have their own infiltration, theyare using the same type of thought process
and that it's multifaceted. They're notjust coming into government, No, they're
(32:21):
coming into academia. They're coming intoHollywood and the entertainment set. They're coming
into our medical industry, asserting themselvesvia all this pharmaceutical, the aips that
they provide, helping the development ina technology, every facet of our economy,
(32:43):
of our social constructs. Again,it's unrestricted warfare. They are asserting
themselves. They don't miss a beat, No, they don't. I want
to go back going back to ourtheme about tyranny taking over. How do
you compare two speeches. One speechtook place in Charlottesville, where the University
(33:07):
of Virginia is, and the guythere said, well, you know,
I think that there were people onboth sides with great people find people on
both sides of the issue. Now, the media that was Trump, the
media, both people on both sides. He's saying the racists or have good
(33:31):
people, or the Proud Boys orwhatever it was. In my mind,
Biden was talking about the issue ofremoving the statue or whatever it was that
was causing the flap down there.I would say there were three sides.
There were the people who wanted toremove the statue. There were the people
(33:52):
who were more coming up things froma historical context and wanted to preserve our
national heritage. And then you hadthese other and I would call them provocateurs
in the same way that I considerANTIFA and BLM provocateurs. You had these
(34:14):
other I don't know what that neoNazis, white supremacy groups, whatever you
want to call them, they wereover there too, and I think they
were there more to raise hell thannecessarily because of any kind of noble cause.
I think that the two sides thatTrump was referring to were the people
(34:39):
who believe that the heritage should beremoved. That you know that they think
it's it's symbolic of slavery, andthey have an issue with that. I
think he was trying to acknowledge thatthat is a perspective that in a free
country, they are welcome to havethat perspective. And then there is the
other side that say, but wait, this is a part of our history.
(35:01):
Let's not forget it. And withthat, let's remember and be thankful
that we have made the strides we'vemade today. All right, Now,
compare that to another speech. BecauseCNN, MSNBC and the mainstream media,
lamestream media, whatever you want tocall it, was just on Trump.
It is to this day. I'veread a number of columns by Larry Elder
(35:23):
explaining what Trump said. Trump hasexplained what Trump said. I've gone back
and listened to the audio in context, and I can't find anything wrong with
it. I'm not going to usewhile it was a perfect speech, but
I can't find anything wrong with it. Now, there was another speech.
This one was on the steps ofthe Supreme Court. The Democratic leader of
(35:45):
the United States Senate openly seemed tobe calling for the assassination of Supreme Court
justices. I'm telling you, Goresuch I'm telling you Kavanaugh, you have
reaped the whirlwind and you're not goingto know what hit you. The Left
had no problem with that. Andthen a guy goes out and tries to
(36:06):
kill Kavanaugh. Who Kavanaugh's a worm? Okay, I don't like Kavanaugh,
but I don't want to kill him. Yeah, asking you shall receive.
That's exactly right. So the differencein the reaction in the media to those
two speeches just blows me away.And it's it's like, if you're on
the left, you can say anything, Maxine Waters, get in their face.
(36:27):
Don't let you see them. They'repumping gas. You go get in
their face. You see him ina restaurant, you chase them out,
which they chased Kavanaugh out of arestaurant. They chased Ted Cruz out of
a restaurant. They are nearly killedRand Paul and his wife as they were
walking to their car after an eventat the White House. Correct, we've
(36:47):
got problems in this country. Well, and when you have the media,
and I mean the media is anecessary to all of that, because the
media does not report, you know, in the same way we talk about
the unequal system, the two tieredsystem of justice, Well we have a
two tiered system of reportage as well. Oh, no doubt about yes.
(37:08):
And that helps incite more of thisbecause if you want to go burn down
a federal building and you're doing itin the name of Black Lives Matter or
Antifa, Well, then you allof a sudden become a patriot if you
want to go and stand and holda flag on a January sixth, cold
(37:30):
day in DC and here your presidentspeak, you're an insurrectionist because you know
what you might have looked over yourshoulder at the Capitol. Very true.
I want to talk about the futurehere. We're probably getting a little low
on time here, but I wantto talk about the future of a couple
of politicians coming up early September.Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas,
(37:52):
who is not a state figure,he is a national figure. He has
been on Fox News more times thanI can count. Foreign newspapers are going
to be covering this trial in theSenate, and if you're trying to go
to it, you're going to haveto get tickets. This will be a
ticketed event. As they say,Paxixton has done things with this real estate
(38:17):
developer, Nate Paul that has lefthim open. He's had an affair that
nobody questions, even though his wifeis in the Senate and just can't vote
on this. But the senators aregoing to be the jurors, and the
guy running all this will be theLieutenant Governor Dan Patrick. Do you think
Paxixton can get out of this.I hope that he can, but right
(38:47):
now I would give it less thana fifty fifty chance. I also would
would would make mention that yes,this is a state proceeding a state issue.
However, Paxton has been such achamp in terms of taking on the
(39:09):
federal government. And if you don'tthink that that doesn't have a whole hell
of a lot to do with this, oh, I think it absolutely doesn't.
And Paxton is crossways with one particularfamily that really dislike him. I
eat the Bush family, and theBush family are you know, the ultimate
(39:30):
uniparty stalwarts. So the Bush family, I mean, this is almost a
twofer for them if they can takehim out, because they're helping to protect
the uniparty in DC, because hewould be somebody who when people are saying,
well, where are our state attorneygenerals? Why aren't they coming in
(39:52):
here and dieting all these Democrats andthings, and they're you know, doing
the same lawfare that's being turned onTrump. Pat Austin would be one of
the lead people doing that, butinstead they've got him over here, neutralized
and potentially benched forever. And sothat's one thing. But also this for
(40:13):
the Bushes, this is retribution becausethey're poor little George P. He got
trounced. George P is on thewitness list, by the way, Oh,
in that convenient, And I'm sureEva Gooseman, who was Austo in
there, Yeah, of course sheis. Of course everybody's on the way.
Jack Ken Paxton's on the witness list, and they may be able to
force him to testify. He'll probablyhave to take the fifth I wish I
(40:34):
thought that he was going to beatthis, but I'm afraid that Austin is
as swampy in its own way asDC ever thought of. No, I
think I think it borders. Ithink it borders on being worse if you
look at the history of Speakers ofthe House, Joe Strauss and Dave Feeling.
(40:55):
Yeah, the Democrats are pretty muchin charge of the House. And
that's topic for another time, Isuppose. But I want to ask you
about about another thing, since we'retalking about tyranny entering the picture here.
It's all of these layers, youknow, you and I have both been
involved in business deals and corporations.And you know, you have Woolly Anderson
(41:22):
Incorporated, which is owned by WoollyAnderson LLC, which is owned by Woolly
Anderson Limited Liability Company, which isowned by whatever you know, and you
sue us, try to sue us, see if you can find out who
really owns us. Well, that'sthe way it is with the Shell companies,
(41:42):
with biden Ink by design, butby design, all these shell companies.
But it is also the way itwas with the Steele dossier. Every
time I drive by the new PerkinsCoolly office in downtown Austin, I think
about it. Those are some ofthe worms and weasels that helped shade all
this. If we are going tobe a real country and we're going to
(42:07):
not have a two tiered justice system, it seems to me that those shell
companies have got to be fully exposedin the media for the Bidens and all
the Steel dossier and what Hillary hadto do with it. Even though it
was started by Republicans, they abandonedit once Trump became the nominee because they
didn't want Trump to be the nominee. The Hillary Clinton campaign picked it up
(42:27):
along with the DNC and ran itthrough Perkins Cooy and what was there was
another copy Fusion GPS, Yes,Fusion GPS, and all this to try
to shield Hillary Clinton, who wasable to take hammers to her hard drive,
who was able to have a homeserver that Barack Obama used a pseudonym
(42:52):
so he could communicate with her,and every country in the world probably hacked
into And now we know not onlydid Ken Paxton used Dave p as his
pseudonym, but also Joe Biden hadfour of them pseudonyms. It's very interesting.
It's a nice way to avoid toavoid being culpable for some of these
(43:16):
things that you do. Getting tothe bottom line, what do we need
to do to save this country?I mean elect Trump, elect one of
those nice people on the debate stagethe other night. What do we do
because the Democrats have declared war andit's unconditional warfare. And the Republicans who
(43:42):
are not part of the uniparty,and I would I can mention two or
three of them. I think TedCruz isn't and I think Chip Roy is,
and I think Chip Roy's probably themost up and honest and hard working
member of the Congress trying to keepthe Democrats from taking over. But there
aren't enough. Chip Roy not evenclosed. So where do we go now?
(44:05):
I think that the next I thinkthat these next years are going to
be pivotal. We've talked many timesbefore about how that you know, and
it's not you and I, it'sother people who were very much in the
No. Kevin Roberts of Heritage Foundationtwenty twenty four could be it, and
I mean that is not an uncommonpoint of view, and he says,
(44:27):
if it's not, the next presidentialelection is our last opportunity. And I
think that I am rapidly losing anyany sense of looking at this as a
Democrat and Republican. This is we'vetalked before, and I've talked about it's
about the globalists and the populace,and I think that it is that same
(44:54):
thing here, although in a domesticstandpoint, you might call it more of
the you know, the establishments,the administrative state, and the elite class
which encompasses that, because it's notjust the administrative state from a federal government.
It's also big tech. It's alsothe pharmaceutical companies, it is also
(45:17):
entertainment media, all of those otherthings. So they all come together.
I think it is that cabal ofpeople versus the American population, basically the
middle class, you know, middleclass and lower American patriots of all socioeconomic
(45:37):
levels. That's where I think thefight is. And I think that within
that American patriotic group, I thinkwe are increasingly seeing it the Democrat and
Republican both, because so many Democratsare realizing that today's Democratic Party has become
a party of Marxists and communists,and they're like, know, that's that's
(46:00):
not me. You know. Yeah, you know, some of them probably
are more liberal on some of thesocial policies than I would be, but
at the same time, they havetheir lines that are being drawn, and
you know, things are just gettingreal wacky and out of control. With
that, I think that I stillmaintain and I know this is not an
(46:24):
easy catch because I think there's toomany people that still have their little temperamental
sensitivities of oh Trump, you know, he's he talks tough and he doesn't
mean tweets and all that kind ofstuff, which to me, that's just
like, get the hell over itwith that, you know, And that's
where that's what to me shows theweakness of the American population, which could
(46:45):
be our downfall. But past that, I think that Trump coming in with
a unity ticket is what the answershould be. And I think that put
Robert Kennedy Junior in his ag andyou bring in people like Tulsey Gabbert,
(47:06):
you bring in people like Michael Schellenberger, you bring in people like Naomi Wolf,
Robert Malone. What Robert Malone,Okay, what about Mansion. I
think he has to prove himself.You know Dennis Cassinach, he's working with
with rfk's campaign. Cassinach was oneDemocrat who would always go on Fox back
(47:30):
years ago, and you know,I wouldn't agree with him a lot,
but you know, he was areasonable man and I didn't always disagree with
him. You know, maybe Blogocomes back. You know, it's maybe
Bloggo comes back. You're talking aboutright now. Is something I've had to
look in the mirror and say,some of the Democrats I thought were horrible
(47:51):
back in the Clinton administration seems somoderate now. I mean by today's standards,
even Bill we balance the budget.Clinton, I mean, gain Rich
made him do it, but hedid it. So I don't know,
no, if that's where. Ithink that's where we have to come in
and embrace the idea that this isnot We've got to find the people who
(48:14):
want to save this republic. That'sexactly. Got to find the people who
will tell the truth. It's notCNN, it's not MSNBC, it's not
the New York Times Fox or theWAPO. Fox is not them yet,
But they're not. They're not theFox they were. They have been neutered
by the dominion voting machine thing.They have been neutered by Rupert Murdop,
(48:35):
well essentially his two sons, Laughlinand what's the better? Yeah, probably
not, and Rupert probably is reachingan age where he doesn't care much anymore.
But yeah, but no, that'swhat I think. I think it's
that unity ticket that is our onlychance. Well it may be all right.
(48:57):
So I know that you're very verybig on Trump is the nominee.
Who do you want to run withhim? I don't know yet. Do
we have Do we have somebody thatcan live up to the high standard that
Biden set with his vice presidential pick? That ham Sandwich. You know that
(49:20):
God and died that ham Sandwich willdo be great? What do you think
Okay, try wrap this up,but I want to I've got to ask
you about the debate. I thoughtthree people on that stage should be on
the next one, definitely, andmaybe four. I liked him, Scott.
I think that's a good guy.Not a bulldog though. No,
no, no, no, Imean, if you're looking for the bulldog
(49:43):
theory, that's not him. Andthe excuse me, the junkyard dog theory
that and Anderson taught me. He'syou know, the junkyard dog is the
leader of the pack, but thejunkyard dog does have his pack. Tim
would be one of the most docilemembers of the pack, and he would
(50:04):
be a nice guy to have.And I don't care about his story.
It's great, it's wonderful, butwe got to talk about saving this country
exactly now. Haley. I thoughtit made a good showing. Not that
I agreed with a lot of howshe made the showing, but she said
one thing that really impressed me.She said, the spending, the problem
we have spending like drunken politicians.The fact that we have a thirty two
(50:29):
trillion dollars debt, which I don'tthink she brought up, but this is
parenthetically part of it. The Republicansare largely responsible for that because it's the
Democrats brand, their tax and spend, that's been their brand for decades and
generations. It's the Republican's job tostop them, and we didn't. And
I thought to Satis had a verygood debate. I did not agree with
(50:52):
the people that said that he bleweverything when playing back his clips on the
radio when you're not watching the wholespectacle and you're just listening and concentrating on
the audio, he was fine.I thought that who was it that came
out and said, oh, wasit Pince? I thought he was almost
(51:14):
the worst person on the stage.What happened to Morning in America? Well,
Democrats and Marxism and colleges and anddishonest media happened to Morning in America.
That's what happened to it. AndRamaswamy, who's an interesting guy.
I'll say that I thought he wasthe other one of the three that I
(51:35):
thought stood out absolutely. And youknow, I know you're not a big
Descandis fan, but my god,he does have a great record in Florida
anyway. You cannot deny that.And if results are what we're looking for,
then there's a place for him,whether he's the nominee or not.
I might make him Secretary of Educationwith one goal in mind. Destroy deplete,
(51:59):
get rid of the Department of Education. We've got to start chiseling away
at that debt. The Democrats willnever do it. They don't care,
and ninety nine percent of the Republicansdon't care either. But if we reconvene
this debate, it would suit mejust fine, obviously Trump, but it
would suit me just fine if itwas DeSantis. I leave Tim Scott in
(52:24):
and Ramaswamy and Nicki Haley at thispoint, the others, nobody else on
that stage contributed one iota that Isaw. No Chris Christie was just like
a big bundle of negativity. Yeah, he's all negative. And Scott is
too optimistic. When Ramaswamy said,we are in a dark period of our
(52:45):
country, and I'm thinking, yeah, And the first thing you have to
do is when you're an alcoholic,is say yeah, my name is John
Smith and I'm an alcoholic. Weare in a dark period. I think
we're in the worst period in mylifetime, without a doubt, since the
Vietnam War. Well, we're inwhat's called sports turning in and I mean
(53:06):
these things happen about every eighty years. Now. We had the Civil War,
that's the worst period ever. Butbut we're close to a domestic civil
war without a doubt, without adoubt. And well, the problem is,
and it's not just we are closeto a domestic civil war, but
we are also more at risk interms of our global standing than we ever
(53:28):
have been. I mean we arenow we already have a warfront that we're
involved with. And you know,they can say, oh, we know,
all we're doing is supplying arms andmoney, but no, we're up
to our eyeballs in Ukraine and whoknows what that could spill over to in
Europe. But at the same time, in the Pacific we may be in
the same type of fight with Chinaover Taiwan. Eight. The asshole that
(53:54):
is in the President's office right now, do you never refer to bideness?
President? I cannot do it,cannot bring myself to do it. This
whole thing with Ukraine has depleted ourstockpile. It's also added to our debt.
It's made us weaker if she decidesto invade Taiwan. Taiwan is crucial
(54:15):
to the United States. We can'tmanufactor a car, build a computer without
Taiwan. And he's shut down.He's shut down one of our strongest economic
assets, our energy production capable.Absolutely we're finding out right now the worthlessness
of solar panels, which there's Ithink somebody put a post up on w
B Daily about that, which Iread and thought it was pretty darn well
(54:36):
written. And our windmills which arejust sitting there silent right now because there's
no wind. Oh. And youknow what, we're in better shape during
the summer months than we are inthe winter because in the winter that solar
drops, it becomes even more Here'sthe last point I want to make,
and then I think we can wrapit. We've got to wrap this up.
And here's here's the thing. Andthis is what scares me more than
(54:58):
anything else in the world. Andwatching Houston and what's happened with it over
the last twenty years. And whenI was working radio in Dallas, Alan
Steelman was my congressman, a strongRepublican. You don't see that anymore.
Dallas is gone, Houston is gone. Austin is a joke politically, I
(55:19):
mean, Austin is an embarrassing bloton the state of Texas most beautiful city,
but politically eleven members of a citycouncil, ten of them are far
leftist, including the mayor. SanAntonio is a disaster. I had a
chance to interview the one conservative onthe city council of San Antonio about two
(55:42):
weeks ago. He's a great guythat tells you, I think, why
the border is open. Joe Bidenand whoever's controlling the puppet here has got
that border open. They know thatat some point, the millions and millions
of people that Biden is bringing inare going to vote one way or the
(56:04):
other. They'll either legislatively give themthe vote, or they will reproduce and
their children will have the vote.If they turn Texas blue. And they're
so close, this country's done.At that point. We can never win
another national election ever if Texas goesDemocrat. And that's the biggest danger that
(56:24):
we're facing from the standpoint of politics, of politics and voting. And I
don't know how to change that.I mean, do we start deporting people
if we get a Republican in allthese people Biden's let in. I think
we have to. I think webuy parachutes in seven forty seven's and we
(56:45):
dump them out of the plane oneafter another. They pull this string,
count to ten, and pull thisstring because otherwise we're gone. This country
is in great danger. No itis, and I do believe there are
people waking up, but it's notenough. I have been this week.
(57:07):
It has been horrifying to me thatI have so many people, hey,
how are things going? And whensomebody knows me and knows my interests in
politics and they come to me andit's like, well, what's been going
on? Well, I'm sorry,Well, dumbass, our country just took
a real dangerous step in and thatyou don't even want to bring it up.
(57:30):
That's why we're in the trouble.That's why we're in trouble. So
many, so many people have droppedout of politics. It's just amazing.
And when you drop out, you'rethen part of the problem. Or they're
just complacent and think, oh,well, it's not really gonna happen.
You know, I don't disagree withKevin Roberts. You mentioned him. He's
a good friend. I've gotten toknow him very well since working on the
(57:53):
Carlin Wooly Show. Austin and talktheir teen seventy who's now head of the
Heritage Foundation, disagree with them inthis. He went on Glenn Beck and
then I called him and he cameon our show said the same thing.
So we have two more national electionsto turn this around. I'm thinking we
have one. I think I thinkwe have not w O N O N
(58:15):
E. I think we have one. If Joe Biden were to get re
elected, I think this country istoast. I believe that the electioneering that
in addition to what we see goingon right now with the you know the
law fair. But also what ifwe give them another cycle to change the
(58:39):
change the laws, to shore upwhat is it to fortify the election,
like Molly Ball talked about in theTime article, to fortify the actual election
process. I don't think. Ithink it will be so corrupted. Well,
if they take, if they takethe White House, the House,
(59:01):
and the Senate, then they willthey will give make DC estate, they
will make Puerto Rico estate. Theymight split California into a couple of states.
They will pack the Supreme Court,they will render states like Wyoming irrelevant
by getting rid of the electoral college. And it's over for conservatives, we
(59:22):
might as well. Just you know, if you're a conservative in that situation,
you move to a part of thecountry where you think you're safer because
the urban urban centers are going tobe disastered. They're also going to start
passing very, very aggressive gun laws. And you you hoard two things.
One is precious metals and the otheris ammunition. Yes, and that's how
(59:45):
to grow your own food. Andyou read the story of Randy Weaver,
and you worry and you do everythingyou can to resist any kind of CBDC
which will be coming, because that'sthe other way that they will start using
as social credit system to oh yeah, your life, oh yeah, as
soon as money as we know itis gone and it's all digital, and
(01:00:07):
you go to the grocery store orthe gun store, assuming there is one,
and you want to buy a gun, you will find that your money
won't transfer. And so this isgetting bad. I want to remind people
about something as we close out,and that is that there is a website
called wb Daily. It stands forWorldbeat and you can access it at wbdaily
(01:00:30):
dot com or if it's easier toremember, Worldbeat Daily dot com. It's
not quite as daily as we wouldlike it to be, but we're working
on that. When we do putup a column, it's usually a Barnburner
Lunn's new column on the solar farms. I hope she follows up with one
(01:00:51):
on windmills, because that's just asbad. If you want to know what's
in those books that are in yourschool's library. Lund did a three part
series on that, and we didn'thold back. We showed the pictures and
you can see them, but hopefullynot with your children around. We try
to stimulate your thought there to cutthrough the mainstream media's clutter and frankly crap
(01:01:19):
and try to tell you the truth. We both work in concert sometimes with
the Epic Times, which is Ithink one of the sources of information that
you can generally rely on absolutely andthrough political pursuits. The podcast and Planet
Logic and WB Daily, we're doingour little bit. We hope that if
(01:01:40):
you read something there or you likethis podcast, you'll tell your friends or
send them a link. I'd beeven better and we will be back as
soon as we have a chance anddo an update for you. Meanwhile,
we appreciate everybody tuning in today.I would just saying courage just contagious.
Please please, let's go spread somearound, take a stand for the United
(01:02:05):
States of America the way it oughtto be, with equal justice for all
under our constitution, and let's let'shope for the best. Well for lou
An Anderson. I'm Lynn Woolley.This has been one giant step for tyranny
from political pursuits, the podcast andPlanet Logic and we'll see you next time.
Welcome to Planet Logic and Political Pursuitsthe podcast. Today's episode One Giant Step
for Tyranny. I'm Glynn Woolley.I'm the pilot of the podcast on Planet
Logic and the proprietor of Political Pursuits. The podcast is low Anne Anderson.
One Giant Step for Tyranny And what'sthe second half of this One Giant Leap
(00:24):
for Fanny? Willis without a doubt? Well, you know what, No,
no, no, I think that. I think the secondary headline is
that is Fanny's fifteen minutes of fame. Oh, Fanny went out and did
some new publicity pictures. She gother hair done. She's riding high right
now. You know It's it's likeit's like Mayor Lightfoot. You got you're
(00:47):
gonna be on TV. You gottalook good. Yeah. Yeah, Well,
I hope she follows in the footstepsof Kim Gardner. Remember Kim,
Yes, yes, yes, theformer DA in Saint Louis, the one
who went after the McCluskey's, theone who went after Eric Gryten's had a
similar career path as she ready,yes she did. She had similar career
(01:11):
path Ie Soros backing to help gether into office. She did resign.
They got into some troubles, youknow. Now, besides the McClusky,
she targeted a guy named Eric Grten'swho had been at one point the governor
of Missouri. Harrock got himself intosome very tawdry situations with another woman and
(01:34):
a lot of allegations and things.He resigned as the governor of Missouri based
on that. This was like fouror five years ago. Then he was
running for Senate. She went afterhim again and they got in and were
making all these allegations about issues relatingto his divorce and his ex wife.
It was a very acrimonious parting andthere were two little boys involved, and
(02:00):
I can't even remember all the chargesthat she was living against Grayton's. It
ended up he lost the primary inthe age's race. So in terms of
election interfering, sullying someone's reputation,torpedoing their aspirations in a political race,
(02:20):
mission was accomplished. However, whenthat case moved further, and there were
also some grievances filed against her withthe I don't know the I'm not sure
what the what the governing authority wasover there, but it was found that
she had had been involved in allsorts of misconduct, falsification of evidence,
(02:43):
uh, the squelching of exonerating information, all sorts of misconduct, and she
did have to resign from office.She was disbarred, which is no easy
feat. And the last I heard, she's now a nursing cool. Well,
that's that's very interesting. As you'regoing through that litany, I'm thinking
(03:04):
of all the parallels here. Imean, it's it's unbelievable all the parallels.
Last week I found out. Iknow other people in Georgia obviously knew
this, but it came out ona national basis. One of the biggest,
most egregious election deniers in the UnitedStates is Fanny Willis, the district
(03:28):
attorney that's going after Trump in Georgia. That the emails and the Facebook posts
and the Twitter posts are a giantline of evidence. She was absolutely,
absolutely denying the election when Trump won. And where was she with Stacey Abrams
(03:50):
or she and Stacy real good buddies. I don't I don't know. One
can only imagine, but you know, I think the election denier of all
election deniers is Hillary Clinton. StacyAbrahams is famous for it. MSNBC and
CNN were so shocked after Trump won, and the next morning the headline in
the Washington Post was impeachment begins.Now, well, you know what you
(04:13):
gotta say about Hill. Are yougotta give her credit? She was the
biggest election tone and she put hermoney where her mouth was. I either
Steele Dossiers see the biggest, fakest, most egregious election interference of our lifetime
followed, followed the Laptop from Hell, followed only by the suppression of the
laftop rail. Your mind is goingright where mine is. Absolutely I want
(04:39):
to say this, and I'm gonnamention John Durham real quick. When John
Durham was doing his work and hewas silent, there weren't even even very
many pictures. There was that oneiconic picture of John Durham in that beard,
looking like a bulldog, and Ithought, men, I wouldn't want
that guy after me until I heardhim speak and he sounded like a win
(05:00):
and he didn't do much swamp creature. You know what, That picture of
Durham reminds me of the picture ofTrump. Trump in that picture that they
took for the mugshot, he lookslike I am going to get every one
of you as soon as I beatthis rap, and I don't doubt it.
(05:20):
A Trump presidency is going to befun, and I would not want
to be certain people because there arepeople out there that have things that Trump
can latch onto. There are somany things he can get even with.
I mean, look at look atall the things Biden's going through right now.
Is it getting even or would itjust be getting justull equal application of
(05:44):
the law and coming in and actuallyapplying the law to credible allegations that can
be prosecuted. You've hit on somethingthat has been a theme in my mind
for a while. I despise theidea of social justice. I hate it.
I'm just sick to my stomach everytime I hear the left use the
term social justice. Screw social justice. You may quote me what this country
(06:10):
was based on and what we didn'thave through Jim Crow, but I think
we have it a lot more now. Is called equal justice. That is,
if you're a Democrat or you're aRepublican and you break the law and
it's egregious and it's enough to beindicted, then you should be treated the
same. And that's why it justgalls me every time I see Hillary Clinton
(06:33):
go on MSNBC with Rachel Madcow RachelMaddow and gloat over what's happening to Trump
when what she did was worse.Well, I mean it's a statement of
the obvious. However, let's doremember that that model that you're talking about,
the equal application under the law,that model was created by our founding
(06:57):
fathers, and it was based uponon they wanted to be everything that the
place they came from wasn't exactly,and that was a place where two tiered
system of justice absolutely was. Thewas the you know, law of the
land. It was the status quo, the modus operandi. If you were
(07:19):
part of the powerful, the elite, the rich, the landowners, you
operated under one system of justice.If you were a peasant, well it
was open season on it. Ifyou've seen the movie To Kill a Mockingbird,
I mean, that's kind of waswhat the theme was. And Emmett
(07:39):
Till certainly didn't get any kind ofa fair shake. But you know,
the days of Jim Crow are longbehind us, and I think the modern
era of social justice aka jury nullificationcame about with O. J. Simpson.
Never have I seen a guy thatI felt in my heart for what
(08:00):
I knew was as guilty as O. J. Simpson, who is out
to this day searching for the realkillers. But that was a jury decision
based on race. But it wasalso but it was also a trial that
was turned into a public spectacle thatwas orchestrated in the aftermath of the LA
(08:28):
riots and with massive concern that awrong verdict in the eyes of some people,
could bring back a second replay ofthat. Well, sure, and
it was therefore orchestrated for the verdictthat was delivered. Let me ask you
(08:48):
then, with that as a backdropwhat you just said, what happens in
the United States of America on thestreets of cidies like Chicago, New York,
Los Angeles, Baltimore, of Kenosha. If Trump is acquitted or if
Trump is convicted, are we headedfor violence? Absolutely? Either way,
(09:16):
more if he is acquitted, ButI think it depends on the timing.
I think it's going to depend onwhat else is going on where we are,
even in the election cycle. Butabsolutely if he's acquitted, and I
think there's a good likelihood if heis convicted, because you think the right
(09:39):
has had their fill of it.No, no, absolutely not. I
think I think I think American patriotshave had their fill of it. But
the establishment right is going along toget along. Oh no, no,
no, there there there, it'sthe uniparty, it is the uniparty party.
(10:00):
I think there is a whole nothertrack. You know, the Dershowitz
has his Get Trump book, andthere is the lawfair side of getting Trump.
There is the electioneering side of gettingTrump that is coming out of the
DNC, and that well, well, I think that I'm thinking more in
terms of the Mark Elias side,the you know things now to keep him
(10:24):
off the ballot, which Newsome hastalked about, you know, trying to
mount some movement to keep him offthe California ballot. I think you're going
to be seeing that. But atthe same time, there are rumblings on
the Republican establishment side that you're goingto that I think there will be efforts
to get Trump disqualified as a asa candidate or as the nominee of the
(10:50):
Republican Party. In fact, theother night at the Kids Table debate,
ASA Hutchinson even made some comment aboutwhen he was the one that didn't raise
his hand saying that he would supportTrump if he were convicted. He made
some comment about, well, it'sgoing to be important to go back and
(11:11):
look at the rules or the bylaws of the r and C and see
if even with a conviction, hewould be eligible to be the nominee.
Well, you know something, Isuspect that if that rule hadn't been inserted
yet, it will be in thenext few months. I was glad that
(11:31):
Asa Hutchinson was there because it hadn'tbeen for Asa Hutchinson. The person I
think I hated most on that debatestage would have been Chris Christie, but
Asa Hutchinson edged him out. Iam hoping at the next debate Bergham,
who had one good line and itwas a joke about breaking a leg at
(11:54):
the event. I don't have anythingagainst him. I just don't see any
reason for him to be on thestage. And we can get back to
this debate a little bit later.But when you talk about one giant step
for tyranny, which is what we'venamed this program today, what Gavin Newsom
is doing is a super giant step. If they can keep Trump off the
(12:15):
ballot, he has no way towin. And what makes it Lunn,
I'll throw this out and you cantell me if you have any other thoughts.
What makes this so important for themto do is, in spite of
what they say about Trump not beingable to beat Biden, they're worried,
sick about Trump beating Biden. Oh, without a doubt, without a doubt,
(12:35):
because you look at these polls thatare coming out. You know,
poles, you always have to takewith a huge, huge grain of salt,
But on these you know, CBS, CNN, these liberal polls that
are coming out, and Trump iseither allegedly tied or leading or within the
(12:56):
margin of rum, within the marginof errors, and without looking at the
cross tabs to know exactly what wasasked, how was asked to who it
was asked. If that's what they'republicly coming out with, what they're seeing
privately has got to be even farmore concerning. Well, it absolutely does.
Let me ask you this. Wetalk about equal justice and Biden,
(13:22):
who is very concerned about a terriblefire at his house. He almost lost
his wife, he almost lost hishouse, he almost lost his nineteen sixty
seven corvette and his cat and hiscat, and we could have also lost
some classified documents. Why is itthat. Of course, let me rethink
(13:45):
here. The reason that they're sayingthat Trump is in trouble over the documents
at Mara Lago and Biden isn't isbecause Trump didn't cooperate with the Department of
Justice and Biden did. May Iask you whose department of is it?
And who had no fear about cooperatingwith this particular Department of Justice? Where
(14:11):
do you even start there? They'renot going to go after Biden. No,
so he could sure he could cooperate. I mean, look, when
you're looking at Andrew Weiss, whois the joke of a special prosecutor see
special counsel's special counsel, not anindependent prosecutor, talk about failing upwards.
(14:31):
Yes, he's the guy that helpedput together this sweetheart deal that thank god,
we actually had a serious judge thatthrew this thing out. He's the
guy that didn't want hunter Biden tohave any jail time and wanted to give
him essentially blanket immunity and slow walkedit so that the statute of limitations ran
(14:52):
out on some of the other charges. So what would happen? What would
have happened if Trump had said tothe archives or who where it is.
Yeah, sure, come on andtake all of them. They would have
found something else. They would haveprobably found something in those papers. There
would have been the nuclear codes orsomething that he was trying to give to
Iran or to Kim Jongoon or something, because they were out to get him
(15:16):
and there was going to be evidence. And when they barred all of the
attorneys from coming in as they weregoing through things, you know, once
again, there, how does that? How does that smack of that they
didn't put some would you talk talkabout a giant step terity? One thing
that has just driven me crazy.All these pictures that we got of all
(15:41):
these file folders on the floor atMarlon, that nice little staged photos,
all those stage photos. Did weget anything like that out of Joe Biden's
various vacation homes that he makes onhis government salary. Did we get anything
like that out of the University ofDelaware? I was gonna say, Depen
Biden's Center, That's where I wantto know what we did. Or that
(16:03):
that office that they had down therein Chinatown in DC. So there's I'm
thinking that you had the Chinatown thing, you had the Penn Biden Center.
You had the Rehobeth was there,some there Rehobeth Beach at his home there
and then some in Delaware, Sothere is as many as four and who
knows what else. Who knows whereelse those those documents were. But yeah,
(16:26):
let's go to Hunter's house. Yes, but but the Kunter really didn't
seem to have much of a house. He seems to pretty much just kind
of his he's living at the WhiteHouse. Yeah, I was gonna say
wherever Joe lives. That seems tokind of behere he where he hangs.
And let me ask you another thingabout a giant step for tyrrany, since
you got me on that subject.Who's Who's cocaine? Was it? Anyway?
(16:51):
Which would make a great name fora TV sitcom, Who's cocaine was
it? If that was the TrumpWhite House? Oh my gosh, would
that have been handled differently? Withouta doubt, without a doubt? And
you know with this, I mean, and you know, I guess now
that's one more thing they're happy aboutall these indictments, because boy, that
one's just gone away, hadn't it. It's gone away. But if you
(17:14):
look at the mainstream media, theydon't need a distraction for this stuff to
go away. I believe that onereason the election was rigged, and one
reason I hesitate to use the wordstolen because I don't know most people consider
the stolen to be rigged voting machines. And I said from the start,
if you're going to if you're gonnasay the voting machines are rigged, you've
(17:36):
got to have some evidence. Idon't know that they were. They weren't,
but here's what I do know.They change the laws in Pennsylvania and
some other states because of using thepandemic as an excuse some states, some
places I'll mention Harris County, Houstonin Texas, just throughout the idea comparing
signatures when somebody had a provisional vote. The Democrats are very good at using
(18:00):
legal means as well, which theRepublicans didn't use, like ballad harvesting.
But the biggest thing of all tome may have been the media's refusal to
cover anything that was adverse to Biden, like the laptop from Hell. They
just refused to do it, andpolling has shown that that could have changed
as much as ten percent of thevote. And remember Biden had Watch seven.
(18:25):
I mean Trump had about seventy ninemillion votes, seventy four to eighty
one. He had seventy four million, eighty one million, my ass,
you have to put that right atthe end of that. I'd not for
a minute, I do not fora minute believe that Biden got eighty one
million votes. I don't think it'spossible. No. Well, and the
(18:47):
other thing too, is that therewere a number of these counties that ended
up having more votes than they hadregistered voters. That happened in Dade County
in Michigan, that happened in someof the Atlanta counties. And Gateway Pundit
has been carried has been covering thisstory. I've written a little bit about
(19:10):
it. I tied in with iton wb Daily about Muskegon Muskegan, Michigan,
and a woman who showed up ata county there to the registrar's office
several weeks before the election with liketens of thousands of voter registration applications.
(19:32):
They were all signed, they allhad the same signature, the same address.
This office aptly called the police.The police then contacted the state the
whole thing, an investigation was done. It was found to be conducted by
a company called GBI, who notonly was doing this in this town,
(19:55):
but they were doing it across Michiganas well as in I think about thirteen
fifteen other states, and they wereinjecting voter applications into the system, bogus
voter applications. Now, Gretchen Whitmerand Joscelyn whatever her name it, Benson,
the Michigan AG They're like, oh, well we caught this. See
(20:18):
the system works. Well, itwas exposed in this one area. About
how many other areas was it notexposed? And were those applications used to
insert names onto voter rolls? Andthat's how you end up having more votes
than you had actual voters. Iwant to ask you about another giant step
for tyranny. Suppose that I'm indictedby a local DA for some political thing
(20:45):
that I did, and suppose theydon't have enough evidence, but they got
enough to indict me, because youknow, I'm kind of similar to a
ham sandwich in which you can indictat any time, and to get a
little bit more information on me,they go, oh, well, when
does a podcast with lew and Anderson, So let's indict her all right,
(21:06):
So you get indicted on trumped upham sandwich type thing and they come to
you and they say, what doyou got on old Lynn over there?
Because you know you're never going tosee your family again if we put you
away. But you know, wemight make a deal where you don't serve
any time at all. We mightjust quash the whole indictment if you will
(21:26):
give us certain information. Is that'swhat That's what's just happened to Trump without
a doubt. Oh those poor guysdown there in the down there, the
employees at Marlago, I mean,that's ridiculous. But all these other people,
and that's what they have been doingthough all along, because that's the
same kind of thing that happens withlike the J six when they were bringing
(21:49):
all the Trump people into the Jsix or into you know, any of
these congressional hearings. Because you've gotto remember, and this is something as
somebody who has been targeted in acivil lawsuit and been forced to have to
go in and pay tens of thousandsof dollars of lawsuit on a bullshit claim,
(22:12):
I know the pain that that caustI know the irreparable harm that that
causes. I know, the illwill that that causes, I know,
the problems that causes within a family, all of the dynamics that come into
that, the emotional experience it is. It's galling and all of those people.
I mean, that's one of thethings that has been so difficult for
(22:33):
me watching because all of those people, all those little congressional staffers, every
time they have to go in thereand testify for something, they got to
get lawyered up, and that couldeasily cost them, especially in the town
like DC, to get a lawyerthat would actually do anything for you.
That could easily cost you six figureseasy for a one day thing to go
(22:53):
into a congressional hearing. These peoplenow that are being indicted, like these
eighteen people in Georgia, not tomention all those election people that they've done
in Michigan and are probably getting readyto do a slew of them in Arizona.
They're looking at half million and morethose people in Georgia, probably because
(23:14):
this is criminal, they're probably lookingat a million dollars minimal their defense.
But that's part of it too,that's the extortion. That's why they call
it lawfare. Doubt it's we maynot be able to convict you, we
may not be able to send youto prison. We're going to make your
life a living hell for the restof me. We are going to end
any semblance of a life for youand your family, everyone you love,
(23:38):
your livelihood. And this is theproblem, and that I don't know how
to make a recommendation right now.I'd like to think about it at some
point. The absolute terrible swift swordof the government of the United States,
especially with a special counsel like wehave with unlimited funds, underlimited ability our
(24:02):
funds, but unlimited they can hirea Durham could have done it. And
now weiss as many lawyers as theywant to, as powerful of lawyers as
they want to, unlimited, notime limits on anything, the ability to
subpoena things, to have a friendlyjudge, to get a warrant, the
ability to indict people for the explicitpurpose of forcing them to turn against somebody
(24:26):
else like Donald Trump. That reallyis one of the worst aspects of the
United States of America. And that'swhat over the last years, say what
you will about people like Roger Stone. Roger Stone was somebody they thought,
oh, they'll get him to turnon Trump, and as long as he's
known Trump, he's got to havesome good dirt. And God bless that
(24:48):
man. He stood firm. Andthere's others that have have similarly done so
they may not be names that peopleare so familiar with. Rudy Giuliani,
they have pushed him to try andget him to turn on Trump and it's
not happening. He hit some choiceHe had some choice words at his arraignment.
(25:08):
Yes, it's just it's beyond beliefthe power that this government has.
I just finished reading a novel fromnineteen fifty five called The Doorbell Rang.
You should read it. It's aNero wolf mystery and it's absolutely delicious.
(25:30):
You know who the villains are inthat murder mystery, the prosecutors, the
FBI, and the whole thing isabout Wolf trying to get the FBI off
this woman's back. They're following her, they're tailing her, and he says,
you know, you're asking me foran impossible task, but I love
impossible tasks, and it's just amazing. That was in the fifties and it's
(25:53):
worse today. It's absolutely worse today. If you get the FBI on your
look at what they did with theFaiza warrants. Well, that's one of
the things that RFK Jr. Hasbeen so strong about helping to expose.
And quite frankly, that is whyI would love to see him be given
(26:15):
serious consideration as an ag and aTrump administration is because he understands the corruption
that's there. He understands the historyof that corruption being there. You know,
you're talking about the fifties. Hecertainly has upfront knowledge of the FBI,
the CIA, all of the biggovernment agencies, as Eisenhower warned us,
(26:41):
the military industrial complex, all ofthe interlocking activities that these agencies engage
in, and the ill you know, ill acts that they do. And
I mean it's frightening in that there'sa lot of things that you go and
(27:03):
look back on in history, andI think the Ukraine War is going to
become one of those things at apoint that we were on the wrong side.
Well, I'm no Putin fan,so you'll have to convince me of
that. Just last just well,earlier this week, the head of the
(27:27):
Wagner group the mercenaries plane went down. Was it shot down, was it
bombed or was it some error onthe just a normal everyday pilot error,
plane crash. Okay, to yourbacktrack a bit. To your point about
convincing you, I think you haveto change, get your mindset right,
(27:49):
and understand that in a lot ofthese situations there are no good guys.
It's our nature that we want tohave a good and the bad in the
world. It's not good and bad. Sometimes it's just bad and worse.
Well, that that's true. That'strue bad, bad dressed up differently.
(28:12):
And Putin absolutely is no good guy. No, he's a mass murderer of
historic proportions. Well, except he'sstill behind che on that. In terms
of contemporary sure, I would Iwould probably say Putin. Putin's murder count
is under twenty thousand people. ButI don't know with Well, there's a
(28:34):
lot of windows in Russia, andit seems like a lot of people fall
out. You mean defendis strate.Yes, that's true. But he bombed
an entire apartment complex one time,killing children. Oh, without a doubt.
I doubt he's not a good guy. She yes, she is a
bigger problem. No doubt about theproblem is is that we our State Department
(28:57):
people like Tony Blaine, Jake Sullivan, Victoria. Nowlan they've been jacking around
over there in Ukraine for a decadeor more, and back in I guess
it was the first Bush administration.They'd signed an agreement, the Minsk Accords,
which they said at that point thatNATO would not come any further west
(29:22):
than Germany, because that was partof what was being negotiated with the fall
of the Berlin Wall, and Putinwanted that buffer. Once our State Department
goes over there and starts jacking aroundwith Ukraine and talking about Ukraine coming into
NATO, that's what stirred all ofthis up. Does that make it right
(29:44):
for Putin to have invaded CRIMEA No. But there is a case to be
made that he has a rational actionor a rational attitude about it, and
that wait a minute, I signedthis agreement and now these people are renegging
on it. And so that's notto be a Putin apologist and say,
(30:06):
oh, what he's doing is right, but it does get I think it
is something that at least is fairto insert into Well. I mean,
Ukraine is a very corrupt country.Well, and I say that from the
standpoint of somebody who believes the UnitedStates is a corrupt country too. Absolutely,
(30:26):
absolutely, and we have they area corrupt country, but we also
are such exploiters. With regard toUkraine, God only knows what kind of
bile labs are over there, andwe have used that country to you know,
launder a lot of money. Youknow, look at it, absolutely,
(30:49):
and I mean in fact, it'salmost like you know, you look
at every country the Bidens are areinvolved with. They seem to gravitate toward
every bottom feeder tree that prides itselfon engaging in all sorts of illicit activities.
Well, I don't know that Presidentshe would be as desperate to get
(31:11):
something influenced in America as would Ukrainebecause she has a lot more resources.
He can do his own infiltration.He doesn't need Hunter Biden to do that.
Although they used him well, Imean he was a he was a
convenient instrument hell pumping in getting intothe highest level. The Chinese are in
(31:33):
our schools. Oh, they're everywherewith the Confucius Confucius. Yeah that's and
then they got the road, thebelt belt and Road initiative. They do
all these things and they do themin the open. What about the Biden
The Penn Biden Center was financed byChina. When we talk about unrestricted warfare,
(31:56):
which is what they engage in.Unrestricted warfare, the idea it's not
just kinectic, that it's cyber,that it's biological, that it is economic,
all of these different types of warfare. Well, when they come in
and have their own infiltration, theyare using the same type of thought process
and that it's multifaceted. They're notjust coming into government, No, they're
(32:21):
coming into academia. They're coming intoHollywood and the entertainment set. They're coming
into our medical industry, asserting themselvesvia all this pharmaceutical, the aips that
they provide, helping the development ina technology, every facet of our economy,
(32:43):
of our social constructs. Again,it's unrestricted warfare. They are asserting
themselves. They don't miss a beat, No, they don't. I want
to go back going back to ourtheme about tyranny taking over. How do
you compare two speeches. One speechtook place in Charlottesville, where the University
(33:07):
of Virginia is, and the guythere said, well, you know,
I think that there were people onboth sides with great people find people on
both sides of the issue. Now, the media that was Trump, the
media, both people on both sides. He's saying the racists or have good
(33:31):
people, or the Proud Boys orwhatever it was. In my mind,
Biden was talking about the issue ofremoving the statue or whatever it was that
was causing the flap down there.I would say there were three sides.
There were the people who wanted toremove the statue. There were the people
(33:52):
who were more coming up things froma historical context and wanted to preserve our
national heritage. And then you hadthese other and I would call them provocateurs
in the same way that I considerANTIFA and BLM provocateurs. You had these
(34:14):
other I don't know what that neoNazis, white supremacy groups, whatever you
want to call them, they wereover there too, and I think they
were there more to raise hell thannecessarily because of any kind of noble cause.
I think that the two sides thatTrump was referring to were the people
(34:39):
who believe that the heritage should beremoved. That you know that they think
it's it's symbolic of slavery, andthey have an issue with that. I
think he was trying to acknowledge thatthat is a perspective that in a free
country, they are welcome to havethat perspective. And then there is the
other side that say, but wait, this is a part of our history.
(35:01):
Let's not forget it. And withthat, let's remember and be thankful
that we have made the strides we'vemade today. All right, Now,
compare that to another speech. BecauseCNN, MSNBC and the mainstream media,
lamestream media, whatever you want tocall it, was just on Trump.
It is to this day. I'veread a number of columns by Larry Elder
(35:23):
explaining what Trump said. Trump hasexplained what Trump said. I've gone back
and listened to the audio in context, and I can't find anything wrong with
it. I'm not going to usewhile it was a perfect speech, but
I can't find anything wrong with it. Now, there was another speech.
This one was on the steps ofthe Supreme Court. The Democratic leader of
(35:45):
the United States Senate openly seemed tobe calling for the assassination of Supreme Court
justices. I'm telling you, Goresuch I'm telling you Kavanaugh, you have
reaped the whirlwind and you're not goingto know what hit you. The Left
had no problem with that. Andthen a guy goes out and tries to
(36:06):
kill Kavanaugh. Who Kavanaugh's a worm? Okay, I don't like Kavanaugh,
but I don't want to kill him. Yeah, asking you shall receive.
That's exactly right. So the differencein the reaction in the media to those
two speeches just blows me away.And it's it's like, if you're on
the left, you can say anything, Maxine Waters, get in their face.
(36:27):
Don't let you see them. They'repumping gas. You go get in
their face. You see him ina restaurant, you chase them out,
which they chased Kavanaugh out of arestaurant. They chased Ted Cruz out of
a restaurant. They are nearly killedRand Paul and his wife as they were
walking to their car after an eventat the White House. Correct, we've
(36:47):
got problems in this country. Well, and when you have the media,
and I mean the media is anecessary to all of that, because the
media does not report, you know, in the same way we talk about
the unequal system, the two tieredsystem of justice, Well we have a
two tiered system of reportage as well. Oh, no doubt about yes.
(37:08):
And that helps incite more of thisbecause if you want to go burn down
a federal building and you're doing itin the name of Black Lives Matter or
Antifa, Well, then you allof a sudden become a patriot if you
want to go and stand and holda flag on a January sixth, cold
(37:30):
day in DC and here your presidentspeak, you're an insurrectionist because you know
what you might have looked over yourshoulder at the Capitol. Very true.
I want to talk about the futurehere. We're probably getting a little low
on time here, but I wantto talk about the future of a couple
of politicians coming up early September.Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas,
(37:52):
who is not a state figure,he is a national figure. He has
been on Fox News more times thanI can count. Foreign newspapers are going
to be covering this trial in theSenate, and if you're trying to go
to it, you're going to haveto get tickets. This will be a
ticketed event. As they say,Paxixton has done things with this real estate
(38:17):
developer, Nate Paul that has lefthim open. He's had an affair that
nobody questions, even though his wifeis in the Senate and just can't vote
on this. But the senators aregoing to be the jurors, and the
guy running all this will be theLieutenant Governor Dan Patrick. Do you think
Paxixton can get out of this.I hope that he can, but right
(38:47):
now I would give it less thana fifty fifty chance. I also would
would would make mention that yes,this is a state proceeding a state issue.
However, Paxton has been such achamp in terms of taking on the
(39:09):
federal government. And if you don'tthink that that doesn't have a whole hell
of a lot to do with this, oh, I think it absolutely doesn't.
And Paxton is crossways with one particularfamily that really dislike him. I
eat the Bush family, and theBush family are you know, the ultimate
(39:30):
uniparty stalwarts. So the Bush family, I mean, this is almost a
twofer for them if they can takehim out, because they're helping to protect
the uniparty in DC, because hewould be somebody who when people are saying,
well, where are our state attorneygenerals? Why aren't they coming in
(39:52):
here and dieting all these Democrats andthings, and they're you know, doing
the same lawfare that's being turned onTrump. Pat Austin would be one of
the lead people doing that, butinstead they've got him over here, neutralized
and potentially benched forever. And sothat's one thing. But also this for
(40:13):
the Bushes, this is retribution becausethey're poor little George P. He got
trounced. George P is on thewitness list, by the way, Oh,
in that convenient, And I'm sureEva Gooseman, who was Austo in
there, Yeah, of course sheis. Of course everybody's on the way.
Jack Ken Paxton's on the witness list, and they may be able to
force him to testify. He'll probablyhave to take the fifth I wish I
(40:34):
thought that he was going to beatthis, but I'm afraid that Austin is
as swampy in its own way asDC ever thought of. No, I
think I think it borders. Ithink it borders on being worse if you
look at the history of Speakers ofthe House, Joe Strauss and Dave Feeling.
(40:55):
Yeah, the Democrats are pretty muchin charge of the House. And
that's topic for another time, Isuppose. But I want to ask you
about about another thing, since we'retalking about tyranny entering the picture here.
It's all of these layers, youknow, you and I have both been
involved in business deals and corporations.And you know, you have Woolly Anderson
(41:22):
Incorporated, which is owned by WoollyAnderson LLC, which is owned by Woolly
Anderson Limited Liability Company, which isowned by whatever you know, and you
sue us, try to sue us, see if you can find out who
really owns us. Well, that'sthe way it is with the Shell companies,
(41:42):
with biden Ink by design, butby design, all these shell companies.
But it is also the way itwas with the Steele dossier. Every
time I drive by the new PerkinsCoolly office in downtown Austin, I think
about it. Those are some ofthe worms and weasels that helped shade all
this. If we are going tobe a real country and we're going to
(42:07):
not have a two tiered justice system, it seems to me that those shell
companies have got to be fully exposedin the media for the Bidens and all
the Steel dossier and what Hillary hadto do with it. Even though it
was started by Republicans, they abandonedit once Trump became the nominee because they
didn't want Trump to be the nominee. The Hillary Clinton campaign picked it up
(42:27):
along with the DNC and ran itthrough Perkins Cooy and what was there was
another copy Fusion GPS, Yes,Fusion GPS, and all this to try
to shield Hillary Clinton, who wasable to take hammers to her hard drive,
who was able to have a homeserver that Barack Obama used a pseudonym
(42:52):
so he could communicate with her,and every country in the world probably hacked
into And now we know not onlydid Ken Paxton used Dave p as his
pseudonym, but also Joe Biden hadfour of them pseudonyms. It's very interesting.
It's a nice way to avoid toavoid being culpable for some of these
(43:16):
things that you do. Getting tothe bottom line, what do we need
to do to save this country?I mean elect Trump, elect one of
those nice people on the debate stagethe other night. What do we do
because the Democrats have declared war andit's unconditional warfare. And the Republicans who
(43:42):
are not part of the uniparty,and I would I can mention two or
three of them. I think TedCruz isn't and I think Chip Roy is,
and I think Chip Roy's probably themost up and honest and hard working
member of the Congress trying to keepthe Democrats from taking over. But there
aren't enough. Chip Roy not evenclosed. So where do we go now?
(44:05):
I think that the next I thinkthat these next years are going to
be pivotal. We've talked many timesbefore about how that you know, and
it's not you and I, it'sother people who were very much in the
No. Kevin Roberts of Heritage Foundationtwenty twenty four could be it, and
I mean that is not an uncommonpoint of view, and he says,
(44:27):
if it's not, the next presidentialelection is our last opportunity. And I
think that I am rapidly losing anyany sense of looking at this as a
Democrat and Republican. This is we'vetalked before, and I've talked about it's
about the globalists and the populace,and I think that it is that same
(44:54):
thing here, although in a domesticstandpoint, you might call it more of
the you know, the establishments,the administrative state, and the elite class
which encompasses that, because it's notjust the administrative state from a federal government.
It's also big tech. It's alsothe pharmaceutical companies, it is also
(45:17):
entertainment media, all of those otherthings. So they all come together.
I think it is that cabal ofpeople versus the American population, basically the
middle class, you know, middleclass and lower American patriots of all socioeconomic
(45:37):
levels. That's where I think thefight is. And I think that within
that American patriotic group, I thinkwe are increasingly seeing it the Democrat and
Republican both, because so many Democratsare realizing that today's Democratic Party has become
a party of Marxists and communists,and they're like, know, that's that's
(46:00):
not me. You know. Yeah, you know, some of them probably
are more liberal on some of thesocial policies than I would be, but
at the same time, they havetheir lines that are being drawn, and
you know, things are just gettingreal wacky and out of control. With
that, I think that I stillmaintain and I know this is not an
(46:24):
easy catch because I think there's toomany people that still have their little temperamental
sensitivities of oh Trump, you know, he's he talks tough and he doesn't
mean tweets and all that kind ofstuff, which to me, that's just
like, get the hell over itwith that, you know, And that's
where that's what to me shows theweakness of the American population, which could
(46:45):
be our downfall. But past that, I think that Trump coming in with
a unity ticket is what the answershould be. And I think that put
Robert Kennedy Junior in his ag andyou bring in people like Tulsey Gabbert,
(47:06):
you bring in people like Michael Schellenberger, you bring in people like Naomi Wolf,
Robert Malone. What Robert Malone,Okay, what about Mansion. I
think he has to prove himself.You know Dennis Cassinach, he's working with
with rfk's campaign. Cassinach was oneDemocrat who would always go on Fox back
(47:30):
years ago, and you know,I wouldn't agree with him a lot,
but you know, he was areasonable man and I didn't always disagree with
him. You know, maybe Blogocomes back. You know, it's maybe
Bloggo comes back. You're talking aboutright now. Is something I've had to
look in the mirror and say,some of the Democrats I thought were horrible
(47:51):
back in the Clinton administration seems somoderate now. I mean by today's standards,
even Bill we balance the budget.Clinton, I mean, gain Rich
made him do it, but hedid it. So I don't know,
no, if that's where. Ithink that's where we have to come in
and embrace the idea that this isnot We've got to find the people who
(48:14):
want to save this republic. That'sexactly. Got to find the people who
will tell the truth. It's notCNN, it's not MSNBC, it's not
the New York Times Fox or theWAPO. Fox is not them yet,
But they're not. They're not theFox they were. They have been neutered
by the dominion voting machine thing.They have been neutered by Rupert Murdop,
(48:35):
well essentially his two sons, Laughlinand what's the better? Yeah, probably
not, and Rupert probably is reachingan age where he doesn't care much anymore.
But yeah, but no, that'swhat I think. I think it's
that unity ticket that is our onlychance. Well it may be all right.
(48:57):
So I know that you're very verybig on Trump is the nominee.
Who do you want to run withhim? I don't know yet. Do
we have Do we have somebody thatcan live up to the high standard that
Biden set with his vice presidential pick? That ham Sandwich. You know that
(49:20):
God and died that ham Sandwich willdo be great? What do you think
Okay, try wrap this up,but I want to I've got to ask
you about the debate. I thoughtthree people on that stage should be on
the next one, definitely, andmaybe four. I liked him, Scott.
I think that's a good guy.Not a bulldog though. No,
no, no, no, Imean, if you're looking for the bulldog
(49:43):
theory, that's not him. Andthe excuse me, the junkyard dog theory
that and Anderson taught me. He'syou know, the junkyard dog is the
leader of the pack, but thejunkyard dog does have his pack. Tim
would be one of the most docilemembers of the pack, and he would
(50:04):
be a nice guy to have.And I don't care about his story.
It's great, it's wonderful, butwe got to talk about saving this country
exactly now. Haley. I thoughtit made a good showing. Not that
I agreed with a lot of howshe made the showing, but she said
one thing that really impressed me.She said, the spending, the problem
we have spending like drunken politicians.The fact that we have a thirty two
(50:29):
trillion dollars debt, which I don'tthink she brought up, but this is
parenthetically part of it. The Republicansare largely responsible for that because it's the
Democrats brand, their tax and spend, that's been their brand for decades and
generations. It's the Republican's job tostop them, and we didn't. And
I thought to Satis had a verygood debate. I did not agree with
(50:52):
the people that said that he bleweverything when playing back his clips on the
radio when you're not watching the wholespectacle and you're just listening and concentrating on
the audio, he was fine.I thought that who was it that came
out and said, oh, wasit Pince? I thought he was almost
(51:14):
the worst person on the stage.What happened to Morning in America? Well,
Democrats and Marxism and colleges and anddishonest media happened to Morning in America.
That's what happened to it. AndRamaswamy, who's an interesting guy.
I'll say that I thought he wasthe other one of the three that I
(51:35):
thought stood out absolutely. And youknow, I know you're not a big
Descandis fan, but my god,he does have a great record in Florida
anyway. You cannot deny that.And if results are what we're looking for,
then there's a place for him,whether he's the nominee or not.
I might make him Secretary of Educationwith one goal in mind. Destroy deplete,
(51:59):
get rid of the Department of Education. We've got to start chiseling away
at that debt. The Democrats willnever do it. They don't care,
and ninety nine percent of the Republicansdon't care either. But if we reconvene
this debate, it would suit mejust fine, obviously Trump, but it
would suit me just fine if itwas DeSantis. I leave Tim Scott in
(52:24):
and Ramaswamy and Nicki Haley at thispoint, the others, nobody else on
that stage contributed one iota that Isaw. No Chris Christie was just like
a big bundle of negativity. Yeah, he's all negative. And Scott is
too optimistic. When Ramaswamy said,we are in a dark period of our
(52:45):
country, and I'm thinking, yeah, And the first thing you have to
do is when you're an alcoholic,is say yeah, my name is John
Smith and I'm an alcoholic. Weare in a dark period. I think
we're in the worst period in mylifetime, without a doubt, since the
Vietnam War. Well, we're inwhat's called sports turning in and I mean
(53:06):
these things happen about every eighty years. Now. We had the Civil War,
that's the worst period ever. Butbut we're close to a domestic civil
war without a doubt, without adoubt. And well, the problem is,
and it's not just we are closeto a domestic civil war, but
we are also more at risk interms of our global standing than we ever
(53:28):
have been. I mean we arenow we already have a warfront that we're
involved with. And you know,they can say, oh, we know,
all we're doing is supplying arms andmoney, but no, we're up
to our eyeballs in Ukraine and whoknows what that could spill over to in
Europe. But at the same time, in the Pacific we may be in
the same type of fight with Chinaover Taiwan. Eight. The asshole that
(53:54):
is in the President's office right now, do you never refer to bideness?
President? I cannot do it,cannot bring myself to do it. This
whole thing with Ukraine has depleted ourstockpile. It's also added to our debt.
It's made us weaker if she decidesto invade Taiwan. Taiwan is crucial
(54:15):
to the United States. We can'tmanufactor a car, build a computer without
Taiwan. And he's shut down.He's shut down one of our strongest economic
assets, our energy production capable.Absolutely we're finding out right now the worthlessness
of solar panels, which there's Ithink somebody put a post up on w
B Daily about that, which Iread and thought it was pretty darn well
(54:36):
written. And our windmills which arejust sitting there silent right now because there's
no wind. Oh. And youknow what, we're in better shape during
the summer months than we are inthe winter because in the winter that solar
drops, it becomes even more Here'sthe last point I want to make,
and then I think we can wrapit. We've got to wrap this up.
And here's here's the thing. Andthis is what scares me more than
(54:58):
anything else in the world. Andwatching Houston and what's happened with it over
the last twenty years. And whenI was working radio in Dallas, Alan
Steelman was my congressman, a strongRepublican. You don't see that anymore.
Dallas is gone, Houston is gone. Austin is a joke politically, I
(55:19):
mean, Austin is an embarrassing bloton the state of Texas most beautiful city,
but politically eleven members of a citycouncil, ten of them are far
leftist, including the mayor. SanAntonio is a disaster. I had a
chance to interview the one conservative onthe city council of San Antonio about two
(55:42):
weeks ago. He's a great guythat tells you, I think, why
the border is open. Joe Bidenand whoever's controlling the puppet here has got
that border open. They know thatat some point, the millions and millions
of people that Biden is bringing inare going to vote one way or the
(56:04):
other. They'll either legislatively give themthe vote, or they will reproduce and
their children will have the vote.If they turn Texas blue. And they're
so close, this country's done.At that point. We can never win
another national election ever if Texas goesDemocrat. And that's the biggest danger that
(56:24):
we're facing from the standpoint of politics, of politics and voting. And I
don't know how to change that.I mean, do we start deporting people
if we get a Republican in allthese people Biden's let in. I think
we have to. I think webuy parachutes in seven forty seven's and we
(56:45):
dump them out of the plane oneafter another. They pull this string,
count to ten, and pull thisstring because otherwise we're gone. This country
is in great danger. No itis, and I do believe there are
people waking up, but it's notenough. I have been this week.
(57:07):
It has been horrifying to me thatI have so many people, hey,
how are things going? And whensomebody knows me and knows my interests in
politics and they come to me andit's like, well, what's been going
on? Well, I'm sorry,Well, dumbass, our country just took
a real dangerous step in and thatyou don't even want to bring it up.
(57:30):
That's why we're in the trouble.That's why we're in trouble. So
many, so many people have droppedout of politics. It's just amazing.
And when you drop out, you'rethen part of the problem. Or they're
just complacent and think, oh,well, it's not really gonna happen.
You know, I don't disagree withKevin Roberts. You mentioned him. He's
a good friend. I've gotten toknow him very well since working on the
(57:53):
Carlin Wooly Show. Austin and talktheir teen seventy who's now head of the
Heritage Foundation, disagree with them inthis. He went on Glenn Beck and
then I called him and he cameon our show said the same thing.
So we have two more national electionsto turn this around. I'm thinking we
have one. I think I thinkwe have not w O N O N
(58:15):
E. I think we have one. If Joe Biden were to get re
elected, I think this country istoast. I believe that the electioneering that
in addition to what we see goingon right now with the you know the
law fair. But also what ifwe give them another cycle to change the
(58:39):
change the laws, to shore upwhat is it to fortify the election,
like Molly Ball talked about in theTime article, to fortify the actual election
process. I don't think. Ithink it will be so corrupted. Well,
if they take, if they takethe White House, the House,
(59:01):
and the Senate, then they willthey will give make DC estate, they
will make Puerto Rico estate. Theymight split California into a couple of states.
They will pack the Supreme Court,they will render states like Wyoming irrelevant
by getting rid of the electoral college. And it's over for conservatives, we
(59:22):
might as well. Just you know, if you're a conservative in that situation,
you move to a part of thecountry where you think you're safer because
the urban urban centers are going tobe disastered. They're also going to start
passing very, very aggressive gun laws. And you you hoard two things.
One is precious metals and the otheris ammunition. Yes, and that's how
(59:45):
to grow your own food. Andyou read the story of Randy Weaver,
and you worry and you do everythingyou can to resist any kind of CBDC
which will be coming, because that'sthe other way that they will start using
as social credit system to oh yeah, your life, oh yeah, as
soon as money as we know itis gone and it's all digital, and
(01:00:07):
you go to the grocery store orthe gun store, assuming there is one,
and you want to buy a gun, you will find that your money
won't transfer. And so this isgetting bad. I want to remind people
about something as we close out,and that is that there is a website
called wb Daily. It stands forWorldbeat and you can access it at wbdaily
(01:00:30):
dot com or if it's easier toremember, Worldbeat Daily dot com. It's
not quite as daily as we wouldlike it to be, but we're working
on that. When we do putup a column, it's usually a Barnburner
Lunn's new column on the solar farms. I hope she follows up with one
(01:00:51):
on windmills, because that's just asbad. If you want to know what's
in those books that are in yourschool's library. Lund did a three part
series on that, and we didn'thold back. We showed the pictures and
you can see them, but hopefullynot with your children around. We try
to stimulate your thought there to cutthrough the mainstream media's clutter and frankly crap
(01:01:19):
and try to tell you the truth. We both work in concert sometimes with
the Epic Times, which is Ithink one of the sources of information that
you can generally rely on absolutely andthrough political pursuits. The podcast and Planet
Logic and WB Daily, we're doingour little bit. We hope that if
(01:01:40):
you read something there or you likethis podcast, you'll tell your friends or
send them a link. I'd beeven better and we will be back as
soon as we have a chance anddo an update for you. Meanwhile,
we appreciate everybody tuning in today.I would just saying courage just contagious.
Please please, let's go spread somearound, take a stand for the United
(01:02:05):
States of America the way it oughtto be, with equal justice for all
under our constitution, and let's let'shope for the best. Well for lou
An Anderson. I'm Lynn Woolley.This has been one giant step for tyranny
from political pursuits, the podcast andPlanet Logic and we'll see you next time.
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.