November 25, 2023 • 48 mins
Are Americans being fed a line of bull? And on a regular basis? For example, is ex-cop Derek Chauvin really guilty of murder? And why would he be placed in prison general population where he could be (and was) stabbed? What do we really know about January 6? And the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan? What are they keeping from us about Jeffrey Epstein and the list of people he associated with? Is climate change real, or just a way to enrich people like Al Gore? And in Texas, would school choice really take away money from public schools? Lynn Woolley (Planet Logic) and Lou Ann Anderson (Political Pursuits) discuss the ways we’re being kept in the dark.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome to Planet Logic and Political Pursuitsthe podcast. Today's episode the Politics of
Deception. I'm Lynn Woolley. I'mthe guy that sort of kind of runs
Planet Logic, and lou Ann Andersonis here. Her podcast is Political Pursuits
and we combine them from time totime, The Politics of Deception. You
(00:22):
know, it's interesting that they wouldput a guy like Derek Chauvin in the
general population in a prison with allthe political charged atmosphere that happened from the
George Floyd situation on through the trialand on beyond, and now he's been
stabbed. Well, we've always heardthat, oh, it's so dangerous for
(00:44):
a police officer, you know,be it current or you know, someone
that was a former officer, tobe put in that general population. And
with Chauvin, it's kind of like, well, that would seem to have
been the point, was it not? Well? I wonder there are obviously
things that Derek Chauvin knows. Imean, he was there, he knows
(01:06):
what happened. I'm sure he's hadplenty of time in prison to study all
this, to look at the autopsyreports, to try to decide if the
doctors that did the autopsy reports onGeorge Floyd were in some way influenced by
politics or by politicians. Well,a lot of this is following the same
kind of trajectory as we've seen withthe j six From the very beginning,
(01:30):
there were questions that went unanswered.We've gone through trials and prosecutions where evidence
has either not been allowed or beenwithheld. Again where there seems to be
an exculpatory information out there, butsomehow it can't get into the right venue
at the right time to help thosethat are being accused, and then it
(01:57):
becomes part of the cover up.And I also, you know, in
the same thing with Chauvin and thishappening. I still do this day wonder
remember old Terry mcveabe. You know, he's the only guy I've ever known
that was actually put to death asquickly as he was with Oklahoma City.
Funny how these people that might knowsomething don't seem to do so, Well,
(02:19):
no, they don't. And it'sinteresting that you mentioned January sixth in
the same breath as the Derek Chauvinsituation, because a lot of stuff's coming
out on January sixth, that apparentlyLiz Cheney wasn't interested in knowing politics of
deception? Is Chauvin a murderer?Was January sixth really a left wing riot
(02:39):
put on by the Proud Boys?Because both of those things are what we
have been told. You know,I just finished a piece and just posted
it actually less than two hours agoat the time we're doing this recording,
and it's about the whole idea ofjustice being at opposite end with OJ Simpson
(03:00):
and with Derek Chauvin. O.J. Simpson because of various things in
society, including race, could notbe convicted. It just wasn't going to
work. Couldn't do it. Socialjustice would not let it happen. Derek
Chauvin, on the other hand,could not be exonerated. Absolutely, no
way that man could walk out ofthat courtroom free. Well, because Minneapolis
(03:23):
would burn, and then Saint Paulwould burn, and then Seattle would burn,
and Miami would burn, and Atlantawould burn again. And there are
certain things that can't can't happen,so they have to deceive us because of
things that have to be done.You mentioned the guy that blew up the
Oklahoma City allegedly, allegedly McVeigh.I was just looking at my copy of
(03:46):
the Third Terrorists by JANEA. Davisearlier this, yar, guess there are
so many things about January sixth thatwe don't know. And do we really
seriously know the results of the GeorgeFloyd autopsy? No, no, absolutely,
do we know what happened and Indiannapoliswhen the school was shot up and
(04:09):
it turns out that they did notwant the manifesto to be leeked. Oh
oh, you mean Nashville, Nashville, Nashville, yea, Nashville, sure,
yes, yes, absolutely, no, we hide lots of things.
You know, what I think isso interesting when you keep talking about the
OJ and the and the chauvin isthat OJ couldn't be convicted because remember all
(04:33):
of that happened right in the aftermathof the LA riots, and all of
the city officials were so concerned thata conviction was going to spark another round
of the riots that they were stillworking to get passed, both you know,
physically in terms of damage to thecity, as well as the the
(04:54):
strained relations, the race relations thatwere still going on. So you had
OJ who couldn't be convicted because itwas going to cause or potentially going to
cause civil unrest. Meanwhile, whenyou have Chauvin here, Jack Pisobok,
he has been maintaining for over ayear that Derek Chauvin's prosecution was all about
(05:17):
using it as a pretext for fomentingcivil unrest, that actually was just simply
a domestic color revolution to get thingsginned up here ahead of the twenty twenty
election. Well, excuse me formaking another ninety degree turn, but it
seems like to me that Epstein diedfairly quickly as well because of the things
(05:43):
he knew died with him. Unlessthere's some records somewhere, and do we
have we ever had the list ofthe people who visited Epstein's island? Oh,
absolutely not. So we don't reallyknow that. We don't really know
the full story of January sixth.We don't really know what happened with the
autopsy and what happened that day thatGeorge Floyd was killed. But we know
(06:06):
what the results of all these thingsare, and the results precisely what somebody
manipulates them into being. Well,and anyone who aggressively pursues them, any
reporter, which strictly it's going tobe people of the Independent, Yeah,
you'll end up you'll end up playingon your back at Fort Marcy Park,
Yes, or or you know,at the least being termed a conspiracy theorists
(06:28):
and so any you know. Soyes, I mean people are are dissuaded
from from from looking into the realdetails. Meanwhile, the corporate media,
how can you have such a bunchof uncurious, intellectually uncurious people that actually
call themselves reporter. Speaking of CNN, I've just, you know, come
(06:55):
to the conclusion that the little snobwoman that does the six o'clock and the
Central time Zone, Aaron Burnett,is just there to do hit pieces.
She was doing them all last weekon every conservative she could think of.
She was doing hit pieces. SoI don't know. I think I think
(07:15):
with Musk coming in and taking overTwitter and changing it into X, you
know that's roiled a lot of peopletoo because X had I think or Twitter
at the time, I think ithas more influence or had more influence.
I don't know where it stands nowon these elections than did Facebook. Facebook
you get a certain feed and youget whatever they want you to have.
(07:36):
X is pretty much out there foranybody to see anything. And I think
that's why you're seeing all the gnashingof teeth, and why I think the
next person who could might want tolook behind him, in front of him,
and to both sides and have afew guards. As Elon musk Oh,
I'm sure he already is. I'msure he is. I'm Robert Kennedy
(07:59):
who can't get secret. Yes,yes, Before we leave on the Chauvin
thing, I just also would wouldmention that the timing of this is kind
of suspicious. Now. Of courseScott Adams has been on Twitter just mentioning
just as it does happen that itwas Black Friday that are Gilbert's father.
(08:20):
Yes, Chauvin happened to have happenedto be stabbed, So just kind of
little f yi. Always wait,wait, wait, wait. When you've
got a cop who's been convicted ofmurder, he's white, the guy that
died is black, you put himin the general population because you want him
dead, right, Well I was. Let's we were told forever that you
(08:43):
couldn't put them in the population,the general population because it would be too
dangerous. So with that line ofthought to put them into the general population,
then yes, that would seem tobe the point that we were setting
up that a dangerous situation being setup. But I think it's also noteworthy
(09:03):
that here in the last week orso, a new documentary has come out
called Fall of Minneapolis, and itis available on Rumble. I have not
seen it yet, but it isavailable on Rumble, and evidently it does
a nice job putting together a lotof this information that has been drip drip
(09:24):
dripping out in the years since theFloyd's death, and certainly does a job
to raise some questions. And withthat, you know, Derek Chauvin is
the loose end that is really inconvenient. He is. He is very inconvenient
because, as we've talked about already, these sorts of incidents seem to be
(09:50):
when they happen. I don't knowthat they're staged or that they're forced in
any way, but when they dohappen, there's this old saying on the
left, never let a good crisisgo to So this George Floyd thing was
trumped up to pump it for everythingyou could get out of it, and
they got an entire summer of riotsin which people were murdered, police were
(10:11):
stoned with rocks, cars were overturned, police units were burned out a separate
country was set up in Seattle.It never stopped, and it went on
and on in Portland longer than itwent anywhere else. We had fiery but
peaceful protest and Kenosha, Wisconsin.According to CNN, somebody wanted that to
(10:33):
happen. Lewenn absolutely And the theoreticalracial divide that that helped, supposedly,
you know, illustrate continues even moreso today when there are you know,
a lot of people both black andwhite that were like, wow, I
didn't realize we were so divided before. Then, Well, if we don't
(10:54):
realize we're divided, maybe we're notall that divided exactly. And you know,
I'm one of those people that youknow, for a long time,
certainly since after high school, hastried my best to ignore the color of
skin of people because I think we'dall be better off if we did.
And we went on merit. Butthere's a big problem with that. It
(11:16):
doesn't fit in with the new Marxism. Now. The old Marxism that Karl
Marx and Frederick Ingalls and all thoseguys promoted divided us by boss and worker,
corporation and worker. It was aworker's movement Socialism was a worker's movement
(11:37):
and Marxism was a worker's movement.It was an economic class warfare. But
you had to have the two sides. You had to have the oppressed and
you had to have the oppressors,and it was all divided by the situation
that you were in, the classthat you were in based on your work.
Now they divide us by race,and they're doing the exact same thing,
(11:58):
except instead of using it as aworker's movement, now it's a racial
movement exactly. No, never mindthat pesky Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty
four that said you can't discriminate basedon, among other things, race CRTDI.
That's all that is. Yeah,I mean we're in a situation now
(12:20):
where if you're if you're a personthat's in a position to hire at a
major US company and it gets downto two people one's white and one's black,
or one's white and one's hispanic,or one's male and one's female,
and he gets down to two peoplein their scores as far as who should
(12:41):
be hired are exactly identical. Theminority is going to get the job every
time. And there's something disturbing aboutthat too. It'd be more fair to
flip a coin in a situation likethat, but that's not we are where
we are. There's politics of deception, though there's another way to say that.
In it is kind of like inthe movies. Because of CG and
(13:01):
because of the special effects, theway they film things, nothing is ever
as it seems in a movie whena horse stumbles and falls and they shoot
it, the horse is probably okayin real life, but in real life
now, in politics, nothing isas it seems. And I want to
bring this up real quick while it'son my mind. You mentioned J six.
(13:26):
J six is becoming infamous for thethings we don't know as well as
the things we know. But Ibelieve the Democrats have had their own January
six, and I don't believe peoplerecognize it to that extent, well because
once again the corporate media is helpingto cover it up. Well, that's
right. If J six is whatyou can look at and say Republicans are
(13:48):
bad people, Republicans don't know whatthey're doing, Republicans can't govern because of
January six, then what do yousay about Democrats? Based on the withdraw
all from Afghanistan where thirteen American servicemendied, where hundreds, if not thousands,
of Afghans died, Where women weresubjugated again, where we left behind
(14:13):
five billion dollars worth of equipment that'snow showing up in other trouble spots around
the world. Where people wanted outof that hell hole so bad that they
were clinging to the wings and thedoors of airplanes as they flew out.
That is the biggest bungle since JimmyCarter tried to rescue the student hostages in
(14:33):
Iran. Was it was what Iwould say is was it an awful,
awful occurrence as you described? Absolutely? Was it a mistake? Well,
that's the question, because what nothingis ever as its exactly? So all
the mistakes, all the mistakes,were they really made? Was it really
(14:56):
just they just know that the mediawas going to have their back? You
think, well, I mean,you know pattern recognition they have for everything
else. Do we have hearings onthat all the time constantly? Do we
have Liz Cheney coming out and talkingabout the afghan withdrawal. I just think
(15:18):
that that's far worse the Afghanistan withdrawal, in my mind, along with a
couple of other stupid things that JoeBiden does, which is pretty much everything
Joe Biden does. I think thatled us directly into two wars. But
you look at things, and wehave been in the managed decline for at
(15:39):
the hands of our elites, theruling class, for a number of years,
even some would say decades. It'sbeen accelerated now with Afghanistan, like
a lot of other things, thesame with Ukraine. Okay, we can
look at it and say the USwere were the citizens payers, we were
(16:00):
the losers. But let's not focuson that. Let's focus on who benefited
from Afghanistan being handled as it did. The Taliban. Yep, every terrorist
group on the globe they have nowaccess because of all of those weapons and
all that equipment that went into theblack market, and it's been sold because
(16:22):
the Taliban at a point they're kindof like, you know, hey,
guys, we got enough here,we can go make some money on this.
Who else? Oh, it wasn'tit China with getting that nice,
shiny, remodeled, updated base therein the Afghanistan Bogram that we had spent
so much money on fixing up,and now the Chinese, the CCP has
(16:47):
control of that. Well, that'strue, and back home. The FBI's
been rewarded with the brand new headquartersas well. You know, you talk
about the politics of deception, namesjust keep flooding into my head. Al
Gore was worth seven point five,no, one point seven. I believe
it was million dollars when he steppedout of the vice president's role. He's
(17:11):
now worth over three hundred million frompushing climate change. Climate change may or
may not exist. It certainly maynot may or may not exist in the
forum that they tell us, butit's damned profitable. It's a it's a
it's a winning issue for some,for many, for many. It's made
Al Gore a very very rich person. Yes, it and it's you know,
(17:33):
obviously there's something to climate change.The climate change is from six o'clock
in the morning till till you know, ten o'clock at night for that matter.
But on the scale that they wantto do, we're now being deceived
to the point that we're being toldthat we're not going to be able to
drive gas powered cars, gasoline poweredcars internally combustion engine. We're being told
(17:55):
that we'll have to get rid ofa gas powered, natural gas powered kitchen.
Right do they think electricity just asmanufactured by putting a key on a
kite string. I mean, howdo they think we get electricity? Well,
I mean the whole thing is basedon an irrational thought process. None
of it, None of it makesreal sense in terms of when you logically
(18:19):
think things through and that yes,okay, we're going to go have all
these electric vehicles and that's going tosave the problem, that's going to solve
the problem from the evils of gasolinepowered cars. Well, this electricity,
that means that you're going to haveto go and create more electricity in order
to be able to charge these cars. Oh but at the same time,
(18:41):
we're going around and when we're closingdown electricity electrical generating plants and we're replacing
them with renewable things like wind andsolar. Solar that even half of the
year, when we have shorter days, produces even and even more of a
fraction that basload generating electricity does.And so none of it makes sense if
(19:07):
you put any kind of critical thinkingskills to what is being proposed. However,
we don't dare do that. Andoh, by the way, our
population is less adept for using criticalthinking skills thanks to a screwed up education
system. And what do we haveto do to the earth to get the
lithium that we have to have tomake these batteries. I mean, it's
(19:30):
unbelievable, and it's somebody told me, and you can tell me if you
think this is right or not.But every time somebody buys an electric car,
that car has been the recipient ofabout fifty thousand dollars worth of government
subsidies. And it just seems tome that to tell us, no,
we can't have a car powered bywhat has turned out to be a very
(19:52):
abundant source of energy, fossil fuels. Coal can burn clean, certainly clean
earth than it used to. Theoil that Biden has to bring in from
other countries isn't as clean oil aswe could have here from Midland Odessa.
And we ignore nuclear as an option. But I'm sure all these things will
(20:12):
be settled out as we move intothe twenty twenty four election cycle. All
right, politics of deception? IsJoe Biden going to be the nominee?
LeWinn, I ask you, itwould seem that if a change we're going
(20:34):
to be made in a rational world, that would be made sooner rather than
later. However, rational is nolonger the world we operate in, and
I think if he is replaced,it will be in some type of crisis
type situation, and you're treading intothe territory where I wanted to go.
(20:57):
There are two ways to choose presidentialcandidate. One way is to go through
the process. Somebody declares, buytelevision commercials and radio commercials and show up
at the debates and go work thecounty fairs and go to all the primary
states. The other way, thelast minute, something happens, maybe an
(21:18):
event, maybe a health event,happens to somebody who you had considered to
be your nominee. In that event, they could easily choose the vice president.
They can't do that this time becausethe vice president's an idiot and a
blithering one at that. They can'tchoose her. She would lose the election.
(21:41):
Yeah, she's not electable. Sotake this line of thought. If
Joe is the proposed or supposed nomineeright up to the point of the trains
about to leave the station, butyet everybody in the Democratic Party is pretty
sure it's not going to be him. At that point, they declare,
whatever kind of emergency you just mentioned, and they get to choose the candidate
(22:04):
they want, absolutely, and thatcandidate could be Gavin Newsom. If they
want to go gay, it couldbe Pete Boudaja, who's absolute failure at
everything he's touched. But then again, Gavin Newsom's record in California is pretty
abysmal as well. Who else isthere? Whitmer, I don't know that
(22:26):
she has any any way to doit, and Papoos would be a laughingstock.
Elizabeth Warren so Michelle Obama, who'sfamous for only one line, I've
never before been proud of my countryuntil it nominated or elected Barack. I
mean that she has absolutely not asingle accomplishment to her name that I can
(22:48):
think of, and that leaves herfinest Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton take that and
run with it. I still thinkthat is a stretch, because anybody really
under the age of forty, ifthey know anything about her, I don't
think it's positive. And this couldbe one time when an ignorant electorate,
(23:15):
an ignorant young electorate could work inour advantage because they'd be like Hillary who
Okay, but people know who TaylorSwift's NFL boyfriend is. I don't know
that. I know he plays forthe Kansas City Chiefs, but I have
not yet committed the name to memorybecause I don't care. But the young
people care and they know about that. Will the young people just recognize a
(23:40):
name, Oh that's a Democrat andautomatically vote. Because Biden's losing the young
vote, Biden's losing the black vote, Biden's losing the hispanning vote. He's
underwater as far as I can tell, in every single demographic group. Now,
is this real or is this deception? Do you believe all this?
You believe he's sinking this fast?Well? People, people, Yes,
(24:08):
I do, because it's people's livedexperience. They may not want to give
Trump the credit for the years priorto twenty twenty being good. You mean,
in which we had a perfect economyand no wars, Yes, exactly
which you know what we had.We had mean tweets, and we had
him sparring with Little rocket Man,and you know, him and the Mulah's
(24:33):
always kind of in each other's grills. And there was a lot of rhetoric
going around that just amazes me.Even people on the right who are educated
people, and they just don't liketheir tonal sensitivity is just so refined that
all that tough talk just really botheredthem. Well, you know what,
I can deal with tough talk overUkraine where right now when they go and
(24:57):
they bring somebody in to them,they're bringing in their fifty year old men
to recruit because they have slaughtered thetwenty year olds, the thirty year olds
of their country. They have slaughtered. Those people are the ones that are
left. They have limbs that areblown off. So you know something,
I can take little Rocketman and Trumptradeing mean tweets all day long when that's
(25:22):
what we have as an alternative,and we are on the precipice of our
own troops going into that same allright, awful ground politics of deception.
Let me throw this one out.The Republican Party is a bunch of maga
extremists, and if we elect themand we put Trump back in power,
(25:42):
it will be the end of democracyas we know it, all right.
Gavin Newsom has said that Hillary Clintonsaid that recently on the View. A
couple of weeks ago, Biden hadwhat they call the red speech, the
Nazi looking imagery he had in Philadelphia. You, uh, this, this
is positioning and branding at its best. But it's also deception because that's not
(26:07):
Trump at all. They're talking abouta guy wanting to end America whose entire
brand is centered around making America great. Joe Joe Scarborough just this week sat
there on with Mourning Meka talking abouthow Trump was going to come in and
ex sex seq p. Yes,I mean I really, I mean,
(26:30):
it's it's fascinating, and I knowthere are people out there that are eating
that stuff up, but I justtruly have to believe that even some of
the people that have been going forthis are now all of a sudden going,
wait a minute, I don't Idon't remember that. And certainly they
love Morning Joe or Mourning Meka andthe rest of them love talking about Jay
(26:55):
six and all that, and theytake with pride that we have all those
that they have, they have allthose people locked up, and so you
got to feel like that there arethose out there who are starting to say,
wait a minute, we need torethink, well, what's the Trump
body count as opposed to the Clintonbody count, for example, or even
(27:15):
the Biden body count. I thinkthe Biden body count, you have thirteen
servicemen dead in Afghanistan because of JoeBiden. There is no telling how many
people in Ukraine have died because hesaid, well, it depends on what
kind of an incursion into Ukraine thatPutin might do, and Putin goes,
(27:37):
well, okay, he's saying,it's okay. Who knows what we would
be having in Israel and in Gazaright now if Joe Biden hadn't been so
anti Israel, so anti Semitic.Biden hates the Israelis. He's always hated
the Israelis. The Democrat Party hatesthe Israelis. So their body count compared
(28:00):
to our body count. And whenI say our, I just mean people
with brains who are able to thinkwith functioning brain stems. I mean we
may have a body count too,but it's nothing like that. Well,
so if Gavin Hillary, Joe MichellePapoos, Patpoos, if they aren't going
(28:22):
to do our, Joe Manchin,Mitt Romney, or they are Salvation,
well, Joe Manchin, there's aninteresting guy. You know what. I
think Joe Manchin is a pretty goodDemocrat. I'll just put it that way.
I don't agree with them on mostthings, but I can find some
things that I would agree with themon. Maybe his pipeline was something that
(28:45):
could have been beneficial, but ofcourse Biden lied about that, and they
told him he would get it,and then they took it away. Joe
Manchin was to me like Robert Kennedy. There are some things I like about
Robert Kennedy, but he's left wingDemocrat all the way on ninety nine percent
of it. You may agree withhim on mandatory vaccinations. That's probably the
extent of it if you're a conservativethe deep state. Yes. So to
(29:10):
answer your question about Mention, Imean, lord knows. I hope he
runs if he runs with Romney.I don't even know how they decide who's
at the top of the ticket andwho's at the bottom of the ticket.
They're pretty close on a lot ofthings. But again go back to our
theme, the politics of deception.Is there some reason for Mansion to run
(29:36):
that would be detrimental to Trump?Because it seems to me everything about his
running would help Trump. And yetI don't believe anything. I don't even
believe anything I say anymore. Halfthe time. I I think they are
just looking to sow the seeds ofjust chaos and it's kind of a let
(30:00):
the chips fall where they may ifthey can just keep things, if they
can keep things just chaotic enough.Now, one of the things that just
so amazes me though about these nolabels, and even to a degree about
Kennedy running as a third party,is ballot access. Now it's been thirty
(30:22):
years, but back in the earlynineties when Ross Perot was running and his
campaign headquarters was based there in Dallas, Texas, and a young leu Ann
Anderson went over and helped sort petitionsover on six thirty five and Park Central
three in an office building I work, and in Park Central three on the
(30:47):
fifth floor. Well, I wouldgo over there and we had conference rooms
full of stacks of petitions for differentstates for him his headquarters Forrest Lane there
is is that, right? Yeah? Yeah, I remember my cousin Bobby
Woolley was second in command there.He got to play on Ross's personal tennis
(31:10):
courts. Nice anyone remember that thatwas a huge undertaking. And but he
got more than any other third partyin history, right, And if it
wasn't for the dumb things he did, like accused the bushes of ruining a
wedding or something. What was theother thing, which which in after even
Ken Paxton thinks that's really dumb.Well not anymore like as we say lew
(31:33):
An, there's anything that can happenthat anybody can charge it turns out to
be true. Yeah, yeah,he's starting to he's starting to have have
a real point with that these dayes. But that hurt him. Yes,
And if he hadn't dropped out andcome back in, that man would have
been president. And I asked mycousin Bobby, who knew him as well
as anybody in the world outside ofhis immediate family, So what do you
(31:56):
think? And he was a Bobbywhat left of center? I said,
what'd you think of Ross? Youknew him? Well, he said,
well, I'll just put it thisway. I voted for him. You
know why why he voted for himis like Trump. I don't see Trump
as a Republican. I see Trumpas a problem solver. We got a
problem with Putin wanting to go intoUkraine. How do we solve that.
(32:20):
We've got a situation in Gaza,how do we solve that Trump. Trump's
not sitting there going gosh as aconservative, how do I solve it?
He's going in there and saying,how do I fix this problem we have?
And he fixed most of them.You know. The only one that
I can think of that he reallydidn't fix, that I wish he would
have, and he might do itin a second term is the horrible amount
(32:43):
of bleeding that we have financially inthe country with a thirty three trillion dollar
debt. But we didn't have wedidn't have a border problem under Trump.
We didn't have an inflation problem,we didn't have an economy problem. We
didn't have much of a Putin problem. I mean, Russia's all ways going
to be Russia. He had Chinaat bay with the Chinese tariffs, he
(33:06):
had basically pretty much terrorism under control. He showed that a relatively non partisan
approach to government could be effective.Exactly. That's dangerous for both sides,
but it's partially why both sides hatehim, exactly. But when if you're
trying to be reasonable about this,I'm going to ask you this question.
(33:30):
If you know, I call myselfthe Secretary of Logic, whereas I think
America needs a Department of logic andwe don't have one, and I'm just
I'm serving without pay. By theway, as the Secretary of the Department
of Logic. If you start thinkingabout ways to fix things that are wrong
in this country, and you takeall the politics out of it, if
(33:52):
that were possible, and you layout the very best solution, which is
what Trump would do, ninety timesout of one hundred, or maybe not
nine times out of one hundred,that solution is going to look conservative,
yes, because that if you pickout the very best solution that would make
somebody like Elizabeth Warren or Hillary Clintonor Joe Biden happy, that's not going
(34:14):
to look like that. That's goingto look like a left wing liberal solution
based on things like color of skinor a commitment to a geological change in
class. Because it's ideological. Mustbelieve it's ideologically based, and for everyone
(34:34):
who believes in that ideology, youalso have a number of people on the
other side who don't believe that.I want to throw that out too,
because this is a phenomenon that hasjust driven me crazy for most of my
life. I understand that let's justuse the terms Republican and Democrat for this
argument, and I'll throw it outand let you comment because maybe you can
help me. I don't understand it. Uh, there are things that you
(34:58):
would expect that Republicans would rally around, less government, moderation and spending.
I don't know, maybe a certainkind of a relationship with foreign powers and
all that. That's fine, Andthere's certain things you would think Democrats so
they would would rally around. Theywant to tax the rich, actually want
(35:22):
to tax everybody. They like tospend more, they like to bring home
the bacon, and so on andso forth. But when it gets into
other issues, have you noticed howeverything lines up left or right if you're
a Republican or a conservative, typicallynot always, but typically your pro life
to at least some extent. Typicallyyou're a little leery about this whole idea
(35:45):
of man made climate change. Typicallyyou support Israel. On the left,
it's all different, everything's about skincolor. Everything you hate Israel, and
you put a Palestinian flag up onthe outside of your office like Rashida Talib
did. How is it that it'snot just political issues that left and right
(36:12):
are so separated on and it almostnever has an exception. Do they go
to a school somewhere. You're goingto be a Democrat and run for Robbins?
All right? You hate Israel wellused to. I think that your
home life, your family was probablythe greatest influence for a lot of your
(36:38):
thinking. Certainly that was the basisfor a lot of knowledge or perspective that
you had. Now there's so manyother sources of influence that are coming in
from the schools. Look how muchmore time kids spend in school these days,
(37:00):
and then when they're not in school, they're sitting here with one of
these you know, devices from hellthat their noses are in, and they're
getting all sorts of messaging from there. And we even have opened our homes,
like with TikTok and even these othersocial media companies, we've opened our
(37:21):
homes to a flow of very hateoriented content coming into our kids to a
large degree. So that's where Ithink that you have this divide that keeps
coming because there's just so many newsources of information that are coming at them.
But you know, as I know, we're watching the clock here and
(37:45):
wanting to wrap on this thing soon. For all the negativity, for all
the gloom and doom, and hey, I'm up there in the doom.
I've got my tinfoil hat. Sosome people would say, because I think
twenty twenty four is going to bea hillatious year. We're in what's called
a fourth turning. You know,if you're interested in in societal trends,
(38:09):
look up turnings. They usually come. They come in four different phases.
The fourth phase is the worst.It's the chaos, it is the the
violence, it is the major socialupheaval. And we got probably another ten
years of that's still to go.And so I think twenty twenty four is
(38:30):
going to be Is it the lastyear of us losing our country? I
don't know about that. I'm notgoing to say it's not, but it's
a big one, and I thinkthat the lead up to it is going
to be crazy. But that said, there are signs that, you know,
as Trump says, are you tiredof winning? There are some wins
that are actually out there. AndI came across a real interesting article this
(38:52):
morning, a substack called Welcome toAbsurdistan by a gal Elizabeth Nixon. And
in this article she brought brought upa guy on Instagram who his handle is,
oh gosh, where is he here? He His handle is Fernandez,
(39:17):
Yeah, Kevin Fernandez, That's Fernandezdees eighty two on Instagram and he does,
goes through and just does an aggregation, the daily aggregation of the winds
by populists across the world. Andcertainly what we see here with Trump and
with a lot on the right isof a populist nature. And that's part
(39:37):
of what that's part of the conflictthat we're in now. It's about the
globalist and the populist and it's somethingthat's happening worldwide. And this guy tracks
that and this is just like fromthe last week, ten days or so.
He goes through and has on hisInstagram he has examples of this.
And we start with Gert Wilders andhis Party for Freedom. They won a
(40:00):
groundbreaking victory in the Netherlands. We'vegot Avier Malay down in Argentina who won
and he's promising to strip government governmentof many ministries. And remember he was
going around campaigning with his chainsaws,even getting rid of a central bank.
Yes, exactly. In Spain,we've got the streets are full of people
(40:20):
calling for an end to socialism becausethey've got a leader there who is trying
to ally himself with the Socialist Partyin order to come up with the coalition
and keep control of the government.And I mean, it's basically it's it's
it's a coup of sorts, andthe people are in the streets that are
actually looking to to to to tryand stop that from happening. You know,
(40:45):
they're upset about losing their government.Too bad. Americans aren't quite as
enthusiastic. Then you've got even someother things like you know, the restaurant.
Remember when Sarah Huckabee Sanders got kickedout of that restaurant way back when.
Aren't it They're closing their doors,they're going out of business. Yeah,
(41:05):
yeah, And it goes on andon and on. You know,
we've just got a Republican that bethe Democrat from the mayoral race in Charleston,
South Carolina, first time since eighteenseventy seven. Remember in Louisiana we
just had the same thing. Yeahyeah. Farmers in France sprayed government buildings
with kalmanur to protest increases in chargesand taxes. Down in Georgia, the
(41:30):
guy that was the Black Voices forTrump, who activist who was pulled into
that whole, Fawnie willis nonsense,you know, being cited as a as
a co conspirator in those cases downthere, and they left him the only
black guy. He was the onethat spent more time in jail. They
wouldn't they wouldn't give him bail.Well, now they came after him again
(41:52):
and the judge rejected a bid tolock him up over his social media posts.
We've got things going on here.Italian court convicted two hundred and seven
people in a mafia trial. Herewe got Mike Johnson releasing the security footage
for the for the j six stuff. I mean, this just goes on
(42:15):
and on and on about the Irishriot after an Algerian migrant injures three three
children, and that now they're youknow, going hard in on their immigration.
Andrew Como was sued for sexual harassmentby a former executive assistant. We've
(42:35):
got we've got some things coming upnow on the election front. Also with
with in Georgia dominion, they're gettingready to go to court, so Lindell,
some of his people are actually gettingready to have their day in court
to adjudicate whether or not there's problemswith those machines. And a similar thing
is getting ready to happen up inNew Hampshire. And I mean, this
(42:58):
just goes on and on and onof all these different things, so believe
it or not, we actually arehaving some wins. Oh, here's when
Elon Musk is donating on ex corporaterevenue from advertising and subscriptions associated with Warren
Gaze at the hospitals in Israel andthe Red Cross Crescent in Gaza. Morning
(43:21):
Joe admits Ukraine has lost the waragainst Russia. Fauci admits COVID vaccine causes
myocarditis and young men. So we'vegot there are things, good things happening,
and this Texas secession movement is backonline up at the Waco Convention Center.
Just a couple of things will wrapthis up. But I did want
(43:42):
to mention a couple of other deceptionsthat are just too big to not mention
if we're talking about the politics ofdeception. One is, and I know
this is obvious, but men cannotmagically turn into women. We can wear
panties, but we can't turn intowomen. Not going to happen. And
this is why LG and B arenot really wanting to align much with T
(44:04):
anymore. The other one is righthere in the good old state of Texas,
where we have been told that becauseof this movement for school choice,
that our schools are not fully funded, but our schools comprise I can't remember
the percentage, but it was somethingungodly like fifty or sixty percent of the
money that the state spends in thisstate. To say the schools are not
(44:28):
fully funded is to look at thepeople of Texas and lie to them.
The schools are fully funded. Sostop peeing on our leg and telling us
it's raining. It's just never enough. No, it's never enough for them.
And I would like to see whatmy good friend Jim Cardell calls the
election the education blob. I wouldlike to see a school superintendent who maybe
(44:51):
actually teaches a class at least oneevery day, and maybe in a different
school or whatever. I would liketo see a school superintendent who does the
work of the school superintendent instead ofthe assistant superintendent's doing it. I think
that we're being deceived on so manylevels by the schools, and that we
need to open up our eyes andtake a look. Remember, they're wanting
(45:15):
control of your children. They don'twant you to have control of your children,
and they're wanting to tell your childrennot how to think, but what
to think. And that's part ofwhy we are at where we are right
now. Well, and Lynn andI, you know, over decades,
you and I have talked and oneof the things that as we talk about
the you know, regular cycles,we've gone through a bond elections, and
(45:37):
most of the bond elections that wesee, certainly here in the state of
Texas, the government's asking for moretaxpayer money. Most of the time it's
the schools that dominate those elections.But the deception there is they say,
your tax rate is not going togo up, but they have ways to
make your taxes go up without yourtax rate. Absolutely, they have ways
(46:00):
to do that through appraisals and everythingelse. So you know, the schools
are not happy with the idea thatthey now by law have to say,
yes, vote will increase your taxesexactly on the ballot. Yes. And
it's been a long haul. It'sbeen a long slog to get that on.
But let me just make this quickpoint that also with those bond elections,
(46:22):
we always hear that rallying cry thatit's for the children. And I've
got a column that I just recentlyput up, and it's like with the
school choice debate, it's now beenrevealed that public education when it comes to
school choice, they've shifted from forthe children to for the system. And
(46:43):
that's very important to look at becausewhat you have the advocacy that you see,
especially with these militant school districts,school superintendents out there moaning because oh
it's they're looking to take money awayfrom the public education and give it to
private schools and all those times things. What what you were seeing is that's
(47:04):
looking to prop up the system.And you see that it's not for the
kids, it's not for the teachers. The teachers got shafted in this most
recent bill that was torpedoed in theTexas House of Representatives. And so anyway,
I think it's important that people lookout check out my column about how
public education has shown itself it's notabout being for the children. It's totally
(47:28):
being for the system, the publiceducation system. When we talk about the
politics of deception, there is neverenough time. But I think we covered
the main points in If you've gotsome more, lew Aenn and I both
have Facebook pages, and you're certainlywelcome to email us or to post some
more of these types of things,but absolutely just remember this. Believe nothing
(47:52):
that you read in the mainstream mediaresearch it. Don't believe what I read,
what I writer Lunn writes until you'veresearched it. Make sure that you've
got multiple sources and sources that youfeel like you can trust, and only
believe about half of what you see, because that can be deceptive as well.
All Right, The show was thepolitics of deception at Planet Logic and
(48:15):
at political pursuits. The podcast,I'm Lynn Woolley for Lewyn Anderson. Thanks
for joining us, and remember courageis contagious. Let's go spread some around
Welcome to Planet Logic and Political Pursuitsthe podcast. Today's episode the Politics of
Deception. I'm Lynn Woolley. I'mthe guy that sort of kind of runs
Planet Logic, and lou Ann Andersonis here. Her podcast is Political Pursuits
and we combine them from time totime, The Politics of Deception. You
(00:22):
know, it's interesting that they wouldput a guy like Derek Chauvin in the
general population in a prison with allthe political charged atmosphere that happened from the
George Floyd situation on through the trialand on beyond, and now he's been
stabbed. Well, we've always heardthat, oh, it's so dangerous for
(00:44):
a police officer, you know,be it current or you know, someone
that was a former officer, tobe put in that general population. And
with Chauvin, it's kind of like, well, that would seem to have
been the point, was it not? Well? I wonder there are obviously
things that Derek Chauvin knows. Imean, he was there, he knows
(01:06):
what happened. I'm sure he's hadplenty of time in prison to study all
this, to look at the autopsyreports, to try to decide if the
doctors that did the autopsy reports onGeorge Floyd were in some way influenced by
politics or by politicians. Well,a lot of this is following the same
kind of trajectory as we've seen withthe j six From the very beginning,
(01:30):
there were questions that went unanswered.We've gone through trials and prosecutions where evidence
has either not been allowed or beenwithheld. Again where there seems to be
an exculpatory information out there, butsomehow it can't get into the right venue
at the right time to help thosethat are being accused, and then it
(01:57):
becomes part of the cover up.And I also, you know, in
the same thing with Chauvin and thishappening. I still do this day wonder
remember old Terry mcveabe. You know, he's the only guy I've ever known
that was actually put to death asquickly as he was with Oklahoma City.
Funny how these people that might knowsomething don't seem to do so, Well,
(02:19):
no, they don't. And it'sinteresting that you mentioned January sixth in
the same breath as the Derek Chauvinsituation, because a lot of stuff's coming
out on January sixth, that apparentlyLiz Cheney wasn't interested in knowing politics of
deception? Is Chauvin a murderer?Was January sixth really a left wing riot
(02:39):
put on by the Proud Boys?Because both of those things are what we
have been told. You know,I just finished a piece and just posted
it actually less than two hours agoat the time we're doing this recording,
and it's about the whole idea ofjustice being at opposite end with OJ Simpson
(03:00):
and with Derek Chauvin. O.J. Simpson because of various things in
society, including race, could notbe convicted. It just wasn't going to
work. Couldn't do it. Socialjustice would not let it happen. Derek
Chauvin, on the other hand,could not be exonerated. Absolutely, no
way that man could walk out ofthat courtroom free. Well, because Minneapolis
(03:23):
would burn, and then Saint Paulwould burn, and then Seattle would burn,
and Miami would burn, and Atlantawould burn again. And there are
certain things that can't can't happen,so they have to deceive us because of
things that have to be done.You mentioned the guy that blew up the
Oklahoma City allegedly, allegedly McVeigh.I was just looking at my copy of
(03:46):
the Third Terrorists by JANEA. Davisearlier this, yar, guess there are
so many things about January sixth thatwe don't know. And do we really
seriously know the results of the GeorgeFloyd autopsy? No, no, absolutely,
do we know what happened and Indiannapoliswhen the school was shot up and
(04:09):
it turns out that they did notwant the manifesto to be leeked. Oh
oh, you mean Nashville, Nashville, Nashville, yea, Nashville, sure,
yes, yes, absolutely, no, we hide lots of things.
You know, what I think isso interesting when you keep talking about the
OJ and the and the chauvin isthat OJ couldn't be convicted because remember all
(04:33):
of that happened right in the aftermathof the LA riots, and all of
the city officials were so concerned thata conviction was going to spark another round
of the riots that they were stillworking to get passed, both you know,
physically in terms of damage to thecity, as well as the the
(04:54):
strained relations, the race relations thatwere still going on. So you had
OJ who couldn't be convicted because itwas going to cause or potentially going to
cause civil unrest. Meanwhile, whenyou have Chauvin here, Jack Pisobok,
he has been maintaining for over ayear that Derek Chauvin's prosecution was all about
(05:17):
using it as a pretext for fomentingcivil unrest, that actually was just simply
a domestic color revolution to get thingsginned up here ahead of the twenty twenty
election. Well, excuse me formaking another ninety degree turn, but it
seems like to me that Epstein diedfairly quickly as well because of the things
(05:43):
he knew died with him. Unlessthere's some records somewhere, and do we
have we ever had the list ofthe people who visited Epstein's island? Oh,
absolutely not. So we don't reallyknow that. We don't really know
the full story of January sixth.We don't really know what happened with the
autopsy and what happened that day thatGeorge Floyd was killed. But we know
(06:06):
what the results of all these thingsare, and the results precisely what somebody
manipulates them into being. Well,and anyone who aggressively pursues them, any
reporter, which strictly it's going tobe people of the Independent, Yeah,
you'll end up you'll end up playingon your back at Fort Marcy Park,
Yes, or or you know,at the least being termed a conspiracy theorists
(06:28):
and so any you know. Soyes, I mean people are are dissuaded
from from from looking into the realdetails. Meanwhile, the corporate media,
how can you have such a bunchof uncurious, intellectually uncurious people that actually
call themselves reporter. Speaking of CNN, I've just, you know, come
(06:55):
to the conclusion that the little snobwoman that does the six o'clock and the
Central time Zone, Aaron Burnett,is just there to do hit pieces.
She was doing them all last weekon every conservative she could think of.
She was doing hit pieces. SoI don't know. I think I think
(07:15):
with Musk coming in and taking overTwitter and changing it into X, you
know that's roiled a lot of peopletoo because X had I think or Twitter
at the time, I think ithas more influence or had more influence.
I don't know where it stands nowon these elections than did Facebook. Facebook
you get a certain feed and youget whatever they want you to have.
(07:36):
X is pretty much out there foranybody to see anything. And I think
that's why you're seeing all the gnashingof teeth, and why I think the
next person who could might want tolook behind him, in front of him,
and to both sides and have afew guards. As Elon musk Oh,
I'm sure he already is. I'msure he is. I'm Robert Kennedy
(07:59):
who can't get secret. Yes,yes, Before we leave on the Chauvin
thing, I just also would wouldmention that the timing of this is kind
of suspicious. Now. Of courseScott Adams has been on Twitter just mentioning
just as it does happen that itwas Black Friday that are Gilbert's father.
(08:20):
Yes, Chauvin happened to have happenedto be stabbed, So just kind of
little f yi. Always wait,wait, wait, wait. When you've
got a cop who's been convicted ofmurder, he's white, the guy that
died is black, you put himin the general population because you want him
dead, right, Well I was. Let's we were told forever that you
(08:43):
couldn't put them in the population,the general population because it would be too
dangerous. So with that line ofthought to put them into the general population,
then yes, that would seem tobe the point that we were setting
up that a dangerous situation being setup. But I think it's also noteworthy
(09:03):
that here in the last week orso, a new documentary has come out
called Fall of Minneapolis, and itis available on Rumble. I have not
seen it yet, but it isavailable on Rumble, and evidently it does
a nice job putting together a lotof this information that has been drip drip
(09:24):
dripping out in the years since theFloyd's death, and certainly does a job
to raise some questions. And withthat, you know, Derek Chauvin is
the loose end that is really inconvenient. He is. He is very inconvenient
because, as we've talked about already, these sorts of incidents seem to be
(09:50):
when they happen. I don't knowthat they're staged or that they're forced in
any way, but when they dohappen, there's this old saying on the
left, never let a good crisisgo to So this George Floyd thing was
trumped up to pump it for everythingyou could get out of it, and
they got an entire summer of riotsin which people were murdered, police were
(10:11):
stoned with rocks, cars were overturned, police units were burned out a separate
country was set up in Seattle.It never stopped, and it went on
and on in Portland longer than itwent anywhere else. We had fiery but
peaceful protest and Kenosha, Wisconsin.According to CNN, somebody wanted that to
(10:33):
happen. Lewenn absolutely And the theoreticalracial divide that that helped, supposedly,
you know, illustrate continues even moreso today when there are you know,
a lot of people both black andwhite that were like, wow, I
didn't realize we were so divided before. Then, Well, if we don't
(10:54):
realize we're divided, maybe we're notall that divided exactly. And you know,
I'm one of those people that youknow, for a long time,
certainly since after high school, hastried my best to ignore the color of
skin of people because I think we'dall be better off if we did.
And we went on merit. Butthere's a big problem with that. It
(11:16):
doesn't fit in with the new Marxism. Now. The old Marxism that Karl
Marx and Frederick Ingalls and all thoseguys promoted divided us by boss and worker,
corporation and worker. It was aworker's movement Socialism was a worker's movement
(11:37):
and Marxism was a worker's movement.It was an economic class warfare. But
you had to have the two sides. You had to have the oppressed and
you had to have the oppressors,and it was all divided by the situation
that you were in, the classthat you were in based on your work.
Now they divide us by race,and they're doing the exact same thing,
(11:58):
except instead of using it as aworker's movement, now it's a racial
movement exactly. No, never mindthat pesky Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty
four that said you can't discriminate basedon, among other things, race CRTDI.
That's all that is. Yeah,I mean we're in a situation now
(12:20):
where if you're if you're a personthat's in a position to hire at a
major US company and it gets downto two people one's white and one's black,
or one's white and one's hispanic,or one's male and one's female,
and he gets down to two peoplein their scores as far as who should
(12:41):
be hired are exactly identical. Theminority is going to get the job every
time. And there's something disturbing aboutthat too. It'd be more fair to
flip a coin in a situation likethat, but that's not we are where
we are. There's politics of deception, though there's another way to say that.
In it is kind of like inthe movies. Because of CG and
(13:01):
because of the special effects, theway they film things, nothing is ever
as it seems in a movie whena horse stumbles and falls and they shoot
it, the horse is probably okayin real life, but in real life
now, in politics, nothing isas it seems. And I want to
bring this up real quick while it'son my mind. You mentioned J six.
(13:26):
J six is becoming infamous for thethings we don't know as well as
the things we know. But Ibelieve the Democrats have had their own January
six, and I don't believe peoplerecognize it to that extent, well because
once again the corporate media is helpingto cover it up. Well, that's
right. If J six is whatyou can look at and say Republicans are
(13:48):
bad people, Republicans don't know whatthey're doing, Republicans can't govern because of
January six, then what do yousay about Democrats? Based on the withdraw
all from Afghanistan where thirteen American servicemendied, where hundreds, if not thousands,
of Afghans died, Where women weresubjugated again, where we left behind
(14:13):
five billion dollars worth of equipment that'snow showing up in other trouble spots around
the world. Where people wanted outof that hell hole so bad that they
were clinging to the wings and thedoors of airplanes as they flew out.
That is the biggest bungle since JimmyCarter tried to rescue the student hostages in
(14:33):
Iran. Was it was what Iwould say is was it an awful,
awful occurrence as you described? Absolutely? Was it a mistake? Well,
that's the question, because what nothingis ever as its exactly? So all
the mistakes, all the mistakes,were they really made? Was it really
(14:56):
just they just know that the mediawas going to have their back? You
think, well, I mean,you know pattern recognition they have for everything
else. Do we have hearings onthat all the time constantly? Do we
have Liz Cheney coming out and talkingabout the afghan withdrawal. I just think
(15:18):
that that's far worse the Afghanistan withdrawal, in my mind, along with a
couple of other stupid things that JoeBiden does, which is pretty much everything
Joe Biden does. I think thatled us directly into two wars. But
you look at things, and wehave been in the managed decline for at
(15:39):
the hands of our elites, theruling class, for a number of years,
even some would say decades. It'sbeen accelerated now with Afghanistan, like
a lot of other things, thesame with Ukraine. Okay, we can
look at it and say the USwere were the citizens payers, we were
(16:00):
the losers. But let's not focuson that. Let's focus on who benefited
from Afghanistan being handled as it did. The Taliban. Yep, every terrorist
group on the globe they have nowaccess because of all of those weapons and
all that equipment that went into theblack market, and it's been sold because
(16:22):
the Taliban at a point they're kindof like, you know, hey,
guys, we got enough here,we can go make some money on this.
Who else? Oh, it wasn'tit China with getting that nice,
shiny, remodeled, updated base therein the Afghanistan Bogram that we had spent
so much money on fixing up,and now the Chinese, the CCP has
(16:47):
control of that. Well, that'strue, and back home. The FBI's
been rewarded with the brand new headquartersas well. You know, you talk
about the politics of deception, namesjust keep flooding into my head. Al
Gore was worth seven point five,no, one point seven. I believe
it was million dollars when he steppedout of the vice president's role. He's
(17:11):
now worth over three hundred million frompushing climate change. Climate change may or
may not exist. It certainly maynot may or may not exist in the
forum that they tell us, butit's damned profitable. It's a it's a
it's a winning issue for some,for many, for many. It's made
Al Gore a very very rich person. Yes, it and it's you know,
(17:33):
obviously there's something to climate change.The climate change is from six o'clock
in the morning till till you know, ten o'clock at night for that matter.
But on the scale that they wantto do, we're now being deceived
to the point that we're being toldthat we're not going to be able to
drive gas powered cars, gasoline poweredcars internally combustion engine. We're being told
(17:55):
that we'll have to get rid ofa gas powered, natural gas powered kitchen.
Right do they think electricity just asmanufactured by putting a key on a
kite string. I mean, howdo they think we get electricity? Well,
I mean the whole thing is basedon an irrational thought process. None
of it, None of it makesreal sense in terms of when you logically
(18:19):
think things through and that yes,okay, we're going to go have all
these electric vehicles and that's going tosave the problem, that's going to solve
the problem from the evils of gasolinepowered cars. Well, this electricity,
that means that you're going to haveto go and create more electricity in order
to be able to charge these cars. Oh but at the same time,
(18:41):
we're going around and when we're closingdown electricity electrical generating plants and we're replacing
them with renewable things like wind andsolar. Solar that even half of the
year, when we have shorter days, produces even and even more of a
fraction that basload generating electricity does.And so none of it makes sense if
(19:07):
you put any kind of critical thinkingskills to what is being proposed. However,
we don't dare do that. Andoh, by the way, our
population is less adept for using criticalthinking skills thanks to a screwed up education
system. And what do we haveto do to the earth to get the
lithium that we have to have tomake these batteries. I mean, it's
(19:30):
unbelievable, and it's somebody told me, and you can tell me if you
think this is right or not.But every time somebody buys an electric car,
that car has been the recipient ofabout fifty thousand dollars worth of government
subsidies. And it just seems tome that to tell us, no,
we can't have a car powered bywhat has turned out to be a very
(19:52):
abundant source of energy, fossil fuels. Coal can burn clean, certainly clean
earth than it used to. Theoil that Biden has to bring in from
other countries isn't as clean oil aswe could have here from Midland Odessa.
And we ignore nuclear as an option. But I'm sure all these things will
(20:12):
be settled out as we move intothe twenty twenty four election cycle. All
right, politics of deception? IsJoe Biden going to be the nominee?
LeWinn, I ask you, itwould seem that if a change we're going
(20:34):
to be made in a rational world, that would be made sooner rather than
later. However, rational is nolonger the world we operate in, and
I think if he is replaced,it will be in some type of crisis
type situation, and you're treading intothe territory where I wanted to go.
(20:57):
There are two ways to choose presidentialcandidate. One way is to go through
the process. Somebody declares, buytelevision commercials and radio commercials and show up
at the debates and go work thecounty fairs and go to all the primary
states. The other way, thelast minute, something happens, maybe an
(21:18):
event, maybe a health event,happens to somebody who you had considered to
be your nominee. In that event, they could easily choose the vice president.
They can't do that this time becausethe vice president's an idiot and a
blithering one at that. They can'tchoose her. She would lose the election.
(21:41):
Yeah, she's not electable. Sotake this line of thought. If
Joe is the proposed or supposed nomineeright up to the point of the trains
about to leave the station, butyet everybody in the Democratic Party is pretty
sure it's not going to be him. At that point, they declare,
whatever kind of emergency you just mentioned, and they get to choose the candidate
(22:04):
they want, absolutely, and thatcandidate could be Gavin Newsom. If they
want to go gay, it couldbe Pete Boudaja, who's absolute failure at
everything he's touched. But then again, Gavin Newsom's record in California is pretty
abysmal as well. Who else isthere? Whitmer, I don't know that
(22:26):
she has any any way to doit, and Papoos would be a laughingstock.
Elizabeth Warren so Michelle Obama, who'sfamous for only one line, I've
never before been proud of my countryuntil it nominated or elected Barack. I
mean that she has absolutely not asingle accomplishment to her name that I can
(22:48):
think of, and that leaves herfinest Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton take that and
run with it. I still thinkthat is a stretch, because anybody really
under the age of forty, ifthey know anything about her, I don't
think it's positive. And this couldbe one time when an ignorant electorate,
(23:15):
an ignorant young electorate could work inour advantage because they'd be like Hillary who
Okay, but people know who TaylorSwift's NFL boyfriend is. I don't know
that. I know he plays forthe Kansas City Chiefs, but I have
not yet committed the name to memorybecause I don't care. But the young
people care and they know about that. Will the young people just recognize a
(23:40):
name, Oh that's a Democrat andautomatically vote. Because Biden's losing the young
vote, Biden's losing the black vote, Biden's losing the hispanning vote. He's
underwater as far as I can tell, in every single demographic group. Now,
is this real or is this deception? Do you believe all this?
You believe he's sinking this fast?Well? People, people, Yes,
(24:08):
I do, because it's people's livedexperience. They may not want to give
Trump the credit for the years priorto twenty twenty being good. You mean,
in which we had a perfect economyand no wars, Yes, exactly
which you know what we had.We had mean tweets, and we had
him sparring with Little rocket Man,and you know, him and the Mulah's
(24:33):
always kind of in each other's grills. And there was a lot of rhetoric
going around that just amazes me.Even people on the right who are educated
people, and they just don't liketheir tonal sensitivity is just so refined that
all that tough talk just really botheredthem. Well, you know what,
I can deal with tough talk overUkraine where right now when they go and
(24:57):
they bring somebody in to them,they're bringing in their fifty year old men
to recruit because they have slaughtered thetwenty year olds, the thirty year olds
of their country. They have slaughtered. Those people are the ones that are
left. They have limbs that areblown off. So you know something,
I can take little Rocketman and Trumptradeing mean tweets all day long when that's
(25:22):
what we have as an alternative,and we are on the precipice of our
own troops going into that same allright, awful ground politics of deception.
Let me throw this one out.The Republican Party is a bunch of maga
extremists, and if we elect themand we put Trump back in power,
(25:42):
it will be the end of democracyas we know it, all right.
Gavin Newsom has said that Hillary Clintonsaid that recently on the View. A
couple of weeks ago, Biden hadwhat they call the red speech, the
Nazi looking imagery he had in Philadelphia. You, uh, this, this
is positioning and branding at its best. But it's also deception because that's not
(26:07):
Trump at all. They're talking abouta guy wanting to end America whose entire
brand is centered around making America great. Joe Joe Scarborough just this week sat
there on with Mourning Meka talking abouthow Trump was going to come in and
ex sex seq p. Yes,I mean I really, I mean,
(26:30):
it's it's fascinating, and I knowthere are people out there that are eating
that stuff up, but I justtruly have to believe that even some of
the people that have been going forthis are now all of a sudden going,
wait a minute, I don't Idon't remember that. And certainly they
love Morning Joe or Mourning Meka andthe rest of them love talking about Jay
(26:55):
six and all that, and theytake with pride that we have all those
that they have, they have allthose people locked up, and so you
got to feel like that there arethose out there who are starting to say,
wait a minute, we need torethink, well, what's the Trump
body count as opposed to the Clintonbody count, for example, or even
(27:15):
the Biden body count. I thinkthe Biden body count, you have thirteen
servicemen dead in Afghanistan because of JoeBiden. There is no telling how many
people in Ukraine have died because hesaid, well, it depends on what
kind of an incursion into Ukraine thatPutin might do, and Putin goes,
(27:37):
well, okay, he's saying,it's okay. Who knows what we would
be having in Israel and in Gazaright now if Joe Biden hadn't been so
anti Israel, so anti Semitic.Biden hates the Israelis. He's always hated
the Israelis. The Democrat Party hatesthe Israelis. So their body count compared
(28:00):
to our body count. And whenI say our, I just mean people
with brains who are able to thinkwith functioning brain stems. I mean we
may have a body count too,but it's nothing like that. Well,
so if Gavin Hillary, Joe MichellePapoos, Patpoos, if they aren't going
(28:22):
to do our, Joe Manchin,Mitt Romney, or they are Salvation,
well, Joe Manchin, there's aninteresting guy. You know what. I
think Joe Manchin is a pretty goodDemocrat. I'll just put it that way.
I don't agree with them on mostthings, but I can find some
things that I would agree with themon. Maybe his pipeline was something that
(28:45):
could have been beneficial, but ofcourse Biden lied about that, and they
told him he would get it,and then they took it away. Joe
Manchin was to me like Robert Kennedy. There are some things I like about
Robert Kennedy, but he's left wingDemocrat all the way on ninety nine percent
of it. You may agree withhim on mandatory vaccinations. That's probably the
extent of it if you're a conservativethe deep state. Yes. So to
(29:10):
answer your question about Mention, Imean, lord knows. I hope he
runs if he runs with Romney.I don't even know how they decide who's
at the top of the ticket andwho's at the bottom of the ticket.
They're pretty close on a lot ofthings. But again go back to our
theme, the politics of deception.Is there some reason for Mansion to run
(29:36):
that would be detrimental to Trump?Because it seems to me everything about his
running would help Trump. And yetI don't believe anything. I don't even
believe anything I say anymore. Halfthe time. I I think they are
just looking to sow the seeds ofjust chaos and it's kind of a let
(30:00):
the chips fall where they may ifthey can just keep things, if they
can keep things just chaotic enough.Now, one of the things that just
so amazes me though about these nolabels, and even to a degree about
Kennedy running as a third party,is ballot access. Now it's been thirty
(30:22):
years, but back in the earlynineties when Ross Perot was running and his
campaign headquarters was based there in Dallas, Texas, and a young leu Ann
Anderson went over and helped sort petitionsover on six thirty five and Park Central
three in an office building I work, and in Park Central three on the
(30:47):
fifth floor. Well, I wouldgo over there and we had conference rooms
full of stacks of petitions for differentstates for him his headquarters Forrest Lane there
is is that, right? Yeah? Yeah, I remember my cousin Bobby
Woolley was second in command there.He got to play on Ross's personal tennis
(31:10):
courts. Nice anyone remember that thatwas a huge undertaking. And but he
got more than any other third partyin history, right, And if it
wasn't for the dumb things he did, like accused the bushes of ruining a
wedding or something. What was theother thing, which which in after even
Ken Paxton thinks that's really dumb.Well not anymore like as we say lew
(31:33):
An, there's anything that can happenthat anybody can charge it turns out to
be true. Yeah, yeah,he's starting to he's starting to have have
a real point with that these dayes. But that hurt him. Yes,
And if he hadn't dropped out andcome back in, that man would have
been president. And I asked mycousin Bobby, who knew him as well
as anybody in the world outside ofhis immediate family, So what do you
(31:56):
think? And he was a Bobbywhat left of center? I said,
what'd you think of Ross? Youknew him? Well, he said,
well, I'll just put it thisway. I voted for him. You
know why why he voted for himis like Trump. I don't see Trump
as a Republican. I see Trumpas a problem solver. We got a
problem with Putin wanting to go intoUkraine. How do we solve that.
(32:20):
We've got a situation in Gaza,how do we solve that Trump. Trump's
not sitting there going gosh as aconservative, how do I solve it?
He's going in there and saying,how do I fix this problem we have?
And he fixed most of them.You know. The only one that
I can think of that he reallydidn't fix, that I wish he would
have, and he might do itin a second term is the horrible amount
(32:43):
of bleeding that we have financially inthe country with a thirty three trillion dollar
debt. But we didn't have wedidn't have a border problem under Trump.
We didn't have an inflation problem,we didn't have an economy problem. We
didn't have much of a Putin problem. I mean, Russia's all ways going
to be Russia. He had Chinaat bay with the Chinese tariffs, he
(33:06):
had basically pretty much terrorism under control. He showed that a relatively non partisan
approach to government could be effective.Exactly. That's dangerous for both sides,
but it's partially why both sides hatehim, exactly. But when if you're
trying to be reasonable about this,I'm going to ask you this question.
(33:30):
If you know, I call myselfthe Secretary of Logic, whereas I think
America needs a Department of logic andwe don't have one, and I'm just
I'm serving without pay. By theway, as the Secretary of the Department
of Logic. If you start thinkingabout ways to fix things that are wrong
in this country, and you takeall the politics out of it, if
(33:52):
that were possible, and you layout the very best solution, which is
what Trump would do, ninety timesout of one hundred, or maybe not
nine times out of one hundred,that solution is going to look conservative,
yes, because that if you pickout the very best solution that would make
somebody like Elizabeth Warren or Hillary Clintonor Joe Biden happy, that's not going
(34:14):
to look like that. That's goingto look like a left wing liberal solution
based on things like color of skinor a commitment to a geological change in
class. Because it's ideological. Mustbelieve it's ideologically based, and for everyone
(34:34):
who believes in that ideology, youalso have a number of people on the
other side who don't believe that.I want to throw that out too,
because this is a phenomenon that hasjust driven me crazy for most of my
life. I understand that let's justuse the terms Republican and Democrat for this
argument, and I'll throw it outand let you comment because maybe you can
help me. I don't understand it. Uh, there are things that you
(34:58):
would expect that Republicans would rally around, less government, moderation and spending.
I don't know, maybe a certainkind of a relationship with foreign powers and
all that. That's fine, Andthere's certain things you would think Democrats so
they would would rally around. Theywant to tax the rich, actually want
(35:22):
to tax everybody. They like tospend more, they like to bring home
the bacon, and so on andso forth. But when it gets into
other issues, have you noticed howeverything lines up left or right if you're
a Republican or a conservative, typicallynot always, but typically your pro life
to at least some extent. Typicallyyou're a little leery about this whole idea
(35:45):
of man made climate change. Typicallyyou support Israel. On the left,
it's all different, everything's about skincolor. Everything you hate Israel, and
you put a Palestinian flag up onthe outside of your office like Rashida Talib
did. How is it that it'snot just political issues that left and right
(36:12):
are so separated on and it almostnever has an exception. Do they go
to a school somewhere. You're goingto be a Democrat and run for Robbins?
All right? You hate Israel wellused to. I think that your
home life, your family was probablythe greatest influence for a lot of your
(36:38):
thinking. Certainly that was the basisfor a lot of knowledge or perspective that
you had. Now there's so manyother sources of influence that are coming in
from the schools. Look how muchmore time kids spend in school these days,
(37:00):
and then when they're not in school, they're sitting here with one of
these you know, devices from hellthat their noses are in, and they're
getting all sorts of messaging from there. And we even have opened our homes,
like with TikTok and even these othersocial media companies, we've opened our
(37:21):
homes to a flow of very hateoriented content coming into our kids to a
large degree. So that's where Ithink that you have this divide that keeps
coming because there's just so many newsources of information that are coming at them.
But you know, as I know, we're watching the clock here and
(37:45):
wanting to wrap on this thing soon. For all the negativity, for all
the gloom and doom, and hey, I'm up there in the doom.
I've got my tinfoil hat. Sosome people would say, because I think
twenty twenty four is going to bea hillatious year. We're in what's called
a fourth turning. You know,if you're interested in in societal trends,
(38:09):
look up turnings. They usually come. They come in four different phases.
The fourth phase is the worst.It's the chaos, it is the the
violence, it is the major socialupheaval. And we got probably another ten
years of that's still to go.And so I think twenty twenty four is
(38:30):
going to be Is it the lastyear of us losing our country? I
don't know about that. I'm notgoing to say it's not, but it's
a big one, and I thinkthat the lead up to it is going
to be crazy. But that said, there are signs that, you know,
as Trump says, are you tiredof winning? There are some wins
that are actually out there. AndI came across a real interesting article this
(38:52):
morning, a substack called Welcome toAbsurdistan by a gal Elizabeth Nixon. And
in this article she brought brought upa guy on Instagram who his handle is,
oh gosh, where is he here? He His handle is Fernandez,
(39:17):
Yeah, Kevin Fernandez, That's Fernandezdees eighty two on Instagram and he does,
goes through and just does an aggregation, the daily aggregation of the winds
by populists across the world. Andcertainly what we see here with Trump and
with a lot on the right isof a populist nature. And that's part
(39:37):
of what that's part of the conflictthat we're in now. It's about the
globalist and the populist and it's somethingthat's happening worldwide. And this guy tracks
that and this is just like fromthe last week, ten days or so.
He goes through and has on hisInstagram he has examples of this.
And we start with Gert Wilders andhis Party for Freedom. They won a
(40:00):
groundbreaking victory in the Netherlands. We'vegot Avier Malay down in Argentina who won
and he's promising to strip government governmentof many ministries. And remember he was
going around campaigning with his chainsaws,even getting rid of a central bank.
Yes, exactly. In Spain,we've got the streets are full of people
(40:20):
calling for an end to socialism becausethey've got a leader there who is trying
to ally himself with the Socialist Partyin order to come up with the coalition
and keep control of the government.And I mean, it's basically it's it's
it's a coup of sorts, andthe people are in the streets that are
actually looking to to to to tryand stop that from happening. You know,
(40:45):
they're upset about losing their government.Too bad. Americans aren't quite as
enthusiastic. Then you've got even someother things like you know, the restaurant.
Remember when Sarah Huckabee Sanders got kickedout of that restaurant way back when.
Aren't it They're closing their doors,they're going out of business. Yeah,
(41:05):
yeah, And it goes on andon and on. You know,
we've just got a Republican that bethe Democrat from the mayoral race in Charleston,
South Carolina, first time since eighteenseventy seven. Remember in Louisiana we
just had the same thing. Yeahyeah. Farmers in France sprayed government buildings
with kalmanur to protest increases in chargesand taxes. Down in Georgia, the
(41:30):
guy that was the Black Voices forTrump, who activist who was pulled into
that whole, Fawnie willis nonsense,you know, being cited as a as
a co conspirator in those cases downthere, and they left him the only
black guy. He was the onethat spent more time in jail. They
wouldn't they wouldn't give him bail.Well, now they came after him again
(41:52):
and the judge rejected a bid tolock him up over his social media posts.
We've got things going on here.Italian court convicted two hundred and seven
people in a mafia trial. Herewe got Mike Johnson releasing the security footage
for the for the j six stuff. I mean, this just goes on
(42:15):
and on and on about the Irishriot after an Algerian migrant injures three three
children, and that now they're youknow, going hard in on their immigration.
Andrew Como was sued for sexual harassmentby a former executive assistant. We've
(42:35):
got we've got some things coming upnow on the election front. Also with
with in Georgia dominion, they're gettingready to go to court, so Lindell,
some of his people are actually gettingready to have their day in court
to adjudicate whether or not there's problemswith those machines. And a similar thing
is getting ready to happen up inNew Hampshire. And I mean, this
(42:58):
just goes on and on and onof all these different things, so believe
it or not, we actually arehaving some wins. Oh, here's when
Elon Musk is donating on ex corporaterevenue from advertising and subscriptions associated with Warren
Gaze at the hospitals in Israel andthe Red Cross Crescent in Gaza. Morning
(43:21):
Joe admits Ukraine has lost the waragainst Russia. Fauci admits COVID vaccine causes
myocarditis and young men. So we'vegot there are things, good things happening,
and this Texas secession movement is backonline up at the Waco Convention Center.
Just a couple of things will wrapthis up. But I did want
(43:42):
to mention a couple of other deceptionsthat are just too big to not mention
if we're talking about the politics ofdeception. One is, and I know
this is obvious, but men cannotmagically turn into women. We can wear
panties, but we can't turn intowomen. Not going to happen. And
this is why LG and B arenot really wanting to align much with T
(44:04):
anymore. The other one is righthere in the good old state of Texas,
where we have been told that becauseof this movement for school choice,
that our schools are not fully funded, but our schools comprise I can't remember
the percentage, but it was somethingungodly like fifty or sixty percent of the
money that the state spends in thisstate. To say the schools are not
(44:28):
fully funded is to look at thepeople of Texas and lie to them.
The schools are fully funded. Sostop peeing on our leg and telling us
it's raining. It's just never enough. No, it's never enough for them.
And I would like to see whatmy good friend Jim Cardell calls the
election the education blob. I wouldlike to see a school superintendent who maybe
(44:51):
actually teaches a class at least oneevery day, and maybe in a different
school or whatever. I would liketo see a school superintendent who does the
work of the school superintendent instead ofthe assistant superintendent's doing it. I think
that we're being deceived on so manylevels by the schools, and that we
need to open up our eyes andtake a look. Remember, they're wanting
(45:15):
control of your children. They don'twant you to have control of your children,
and they're wanting to tell your childrennot how to think, but what
to think. And that's part ofwhy we are at where we are right
now. Well, and Lynn andI, you know, over decades,
you and I have talked and oneof the things that as we talk about
the you know, regular cycles,we've gone through a bond elections, and
(45:37):
most of the bond elections that wesee, certainly here in the state of
Texas, the government's asking for moretaxpayer money. Most of the time it's
the schools that dominate those elections.But the deception there is they say,
your tax rate is not going togo up, but they have ways to
make your taxes go up without yourtax rate. Absolutely, they have ways
(46:00):
to do that through appraisals and everythingelse. So you know, the schools
are not happy with the idea thatthey now by law have to say,
yes, vote will increase your taxesexactly on the ballot. Yes. And
it's been a long haul. It'sbeen a long slog to get that on.
But let me just make this quickpoint that also with those bond elections,
(46:22):
we always hear that rallying cry thatit's for the children. And I've
got a column that I just recentlyput up, and it's like with the
school choice debate, it's now beenrevealed that public education when it comes to
school choice, they've shifted from forthe children to for the system. And
(46:43):
that's very important to look at becausewhat you have the advocacy that you see,
especially with these militant school districts,school superintendents out there moaning because oh
it's they're looking to take money awayfrom the public education and give it to
private schools and all those times things. What what you were seeing is that's
(47:04):
looking to prop up the system.And you see that it's not for the
kids, it's not for the teachers. The teachers got shafted in this most
recent bill that was torpedoed in theTexas House of Representatives. And so anyway,
I think it's important that people lookout check out my column about how
public education has shown itself it's notabout being for the children. It's totally
(47:28):
being for the system, the publiceducation system. When we talk about the
politics of deception, there is neverenough time. But I think we covered
the main points in If you've gotsome more, lew Aenn and I both
have Facebook pages, and you're certainlywelcome to email us or to post some
more of these types of things,but absolutely just remember this. Believe nothing
(47:52):
that you read in the mainstream mediaresearch it. Don't believe what I read,
what I writer Lunn writes until you'veresearched it. Make sure that you've
got multiple sources and sources that youfeel like you can trust, and only
believe about half of what you see, because that can be deceptive as well.
All Right, The show was thepolitics of deception at Planet Logic and
(48:15):
at political pursuits. The podcast,I'm Lynn Woolley for Lewyn Anderson. Thanks
for joining us, and remember courageis contagious. Let's go spread some around
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.