Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
All right, So there you go. There's the Prime Minister
of Canada. Everything's going just great. There he is. Where
else is he? He's over here too, Let's see there
he is. He's there as well. There's a Prime Minister
of Canada out in public hugging a man in a thong.
So everything's going great in Canada. But to me, it's
(00:24):
so striking. These pictures are so striking because it really
does feel very symbolic, doesn't it. See what is this
symbolic of? Well, I think these photos kind of perfectly
represent just the state of the Canadian matriarchy, because that's
what Canada has. As much as the left will scream
(00:45):
and rant and cry about the patriarchy, in Canada, we
do not have a patriarchy. We have a matriarchy. Mark
Carney is not a patriarchal figure. He is an agent
of the all consuming, smothering mother state. Right. They're all
his children. This is one of his children here, right,
(01:05):
and he's going to love them no matter what. In
the In the matriarchy, reputation management is everything. So here
he is letting us know that while life gets worse
in Canada just by literally every objective metric The abstract
is well in hand. Right, the abstract empathy and compassion
(01:27):
that he represents, the motherly empathy that he represents, that's
well in hand. That's why he does this empathy diversity, right,
Canadians are to be slaves to these, you know, unexamined
and abstract essentially calls to prayer. We have to worship it.
We have to worship diversity. Marcarny told us this, told
(01:50):
us it's very important in Canada. Whatever it means. Let's
take a look. This was during the campaign.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
There's a fever gripping America and while rages, Canadians will
remain resolute and true to our values. Well America engages
in a war on woke, Canadians will continue to value inclusiveness.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
Yes, inclusiveness. It's one of those magic words. What does
it mean exactly? It's kind of just an abstract word
that can mean whatever Mark Kearney wants it to mean.
All right, And here he is signaling to us that
Canada has a new mother figure. Mother Trudeau is gone,
Mother Carnie is here and he'll just tell you whatever
(02:36):
you want to hear so that you don't feel bad.
So he's talking about inclusiveness the things that he supports.
So let's see, let's see some of his inclusiveness. How
about this, So yes, inclusiveness doesn't include in Canada, Christian
(03:00):
singers from the United States does include this. This is
some of the inclusiveness that we've come to that we're
really appreciating in Canada. Jihad is our path. They're saying, huh, nice,
our purpose is allah. Ghad is our path. This is
some of that Cardi inclusiveness that we're all supposed to enjoy.
When he gets his way, the Jews will be destroyed.
(03:26):
So that's nice. Here's some inclusivity for us. This is
what Mark Carney has told us that he's going to
preserve some of this, blocking the streets for calls to prayer,
these demonstrations of power and dominance. Let's see, you can
have the Awakening, the Ummah and the end of Times
Canadian tour from a radical Islamist emam. This is some
(03:50):
of that Mark Carney lets us know. Let's us know
where he stands.
Speaker 2 (03:55):
These are Muslim values, these are Canadian values.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
And voila, there you have your inclusiveness. Here's this Canadian
mom on Vancouver Island who says he wants to force
women to wear his jobs. Inclusiveness, diversity, These are our values,
Mark Carti tells us, these are our values. Are what
other values do we have or what other inclusiveness do
(04:24):
we have? That's not at all insanely dysfunctional. Ontario must
pay for surgery to give trans resident both a wiener
and a beaver. So this is some of that inclusiveness.
Why the public should have to pay for this, I
guess abomination. I don't know, but it's well, I guess
(04:47):
I do know. It's because of inclusiveness, the inclusiveness that
Mark Carti tells us of. Let's see, how about this
inclusiveness is uh, it's a privilege, not a right to
know your kids identity. So this stems from Canada being
a place where teachers can just tell your kid they're
(05:07):
bored in the wrong body trans them. Nobody has to
tell you anything, because according to the Toronto Star, it's
a privilege, not a right, to know that your school
is essentially abusing your child. So this is all of
the great inclusiveness that we can enjoy so much. Now
(05:29):
I say that he's a matriarch, He's not a patriarch. Right,
he's an he's an inclusive matriarch. And you can tell
this just simply from the way that he deals with
the rest with the world around him. It's a very feminine,
it's a very feminine approach. Let's listen to this. Here
(05:50):
he is being asked by Rosemary Barton, who managed to
summon I don't know, like ten seconds of you know,
real journalist out of our self to ask Mark Carney
a question. Let's let's see his response, and it's it's
quite telling. She is asking him, she's asking him about
(06:11):
his obvious conflicts of interests. Let's hear how he deals
with it.
Speaker 3 (06:15):
Look inside yourself, Rosemary. I mean you start from a
you start from a prior of conflict, and I'll bill
Bill will.
Speaker 1 (06:28):
Look inside yourself, Rosemary. So what is this? Look inside yourself, Rosemary.
It's a fundamentally feminine appeal to just emotion and reputation.
It's not that she's wrong, factually, No, it's that the
question itself is, you know, emotionally, socially, morally wrong. She
(06:50):
shouldn't be asking that question. She has to look in
sight of herself. Is it even right to ask that question?
It doesn't matter if she's right. No, no, no, it's
about feelings. Right. This is passive aggressive, this is matriarchal.
Now let's go to Pierre Poulieff with the very famous
(07:13):
apple munching video.
Speaker 4 (07:14):
Okay, a lot of people would would say that you're
simply taking a page out of the Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Uh like which people would say that, Well.
Speaker 4 (07:23):
I'm sure a great many Canadians, but like who, I
don't know who.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
But you're the one who asks the questions.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
Yeah, you must know something.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
See, this is a very different approach. Again, it's not
an appeal to emotion or you know, some kind of
vague moralistic appeal. This is just no, I reject your premise. No,
explain yourself. No, this is very different. Right, this is
actually patriarchal, and it's good and we need more of this. So,
(07:54):
Pierre Polyef is direct and to the point. Right, you
have made a claim. What's your evidence? No appeals to empathy.
It's not that it's not that asking a question is
mean or wrong, but the substance of the question is false.
You've made a statement. He's making fact statements. This journalist
(08:17):
peer Paulvit is just rejecting the premise outright He's not
making an appeal to him to come in to the fold,
to the matriarchal fold. Right, it's just no, you're wrong,
that's it. I don't care how you feel. See, this
is actually real and constructive. Everybody knows where everybody stands here.
(08:40):
It's useful. Right. Truth matters more than feelings. Reality matters.
That's what you see from this. You know, Mark Kearney,
Mark Carney is not accomplishing anything substantive in Canada. What
he's doing is solving emotional and abstract problems. You know,
what feels good to say, what looks good, what has
(09:04):
social value? You know, that is the coin of the
realm now right, the conservative position is you know, the
conservative position is okay, So what must be done for
you know, the objective economic and societal good, societal good
of Canadians in real terms, right, like jobs, right, a
(09:25):
GDP per capita, this sort of thing. It's not just
appeals to emotion and you know, suggestions hints that well,
you may be unfashionable if you disagree with me, or
if you have too many uncomfortable questions. This is the
Liberal Party to a t for the last decade, and
it continues on heedless with Mark Kearney. Now with Mark Kearney,
(09:49):
it's what story about ourselves and the world feels best?
Have you? Has anybody seen anything else? You know, what
story about? What story can we tell ourselves that feels
the nicest, and let's just pretend that's true. Pierre Pierre,
the conservative position. These are the realities on the ground
(10:11):
right now, right They are measured in objective terms like
how much money are people making, what are rents? What
is the population? Right? Can we handle the population? How
many housing units are there? These are all real objective things.
You know, what can we realistically accomplish, actual concrete things.
(10:33):
We're not interested in emotional fairy tales about a world
that doesn't exist. Like if you want to ask yourself,
you may ask yourself. Who is more entrenched in reality
and real concrete concerns and solutions, the guy hanging out
with a guy with a dog fetish and the man
(10:54):
at the pride parade walking around in a thong or
Pierre Poliev I think we know anyway. That's all I'm
gonna say about that. Please like, share and subscribe. Subscribing
really helps me out. I thank you for that. I
will see you next time,