August 12, 2025 • 26 mins
The GENDER CULT Exposed: The COMPLICITY Of Academia And The Medical Establishment With WPATH
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/radio-baloney-the-richie-baloney-show--4036781/support.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/radio-baloney-the-richie-baloney-show--4036781/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This was posted by Francis Widowson, who is a Canadian
professor who was fired for being sane, essentially saying on
the unmarked Graves hoax in Canada, recognizing for accurately describing reality.
A Mount Royal U course teaches students that WPATH so
(00:26):
that's World Professional Association of World Professional Association of Transgender
Health boasters science based medicine, and that pushing gender diverse
children into making sure they are confident that they are
not cis gender is equivalent to pushing cisgender children into
(00:47):
being trans. So this person is basically just an avatar
for every every parasitized academic that you'll ever see. They're
all exactly the same. This person is totally immune to reason,
does not recognize any of the incoherence or hypocrisy in
(01:09):
her in this three minute clip. Right, they're incapable of
recognizing just the irony of their own statement. Of course,
there's no benefit to them to do that. So anytime
that they might start to have a question or say,
wait a second, what I just said ten seconds ago
kind of contradicts what I'm saying right now, there's no benefit.
(01:31):
There's no profit in that for them, right, they just
have to sound far left all the time. That's where
the profit is for them. Anything else is just danger
because you don't have friends when you're woke, you don't
have colleagues when you're woke. You have future denouncers, you
(01:52):
have future struggle sessioners. So there's no point questioning. Just
go with it. As long as it sounds progressive, you'll
be fine. So I highly object to this language. And
we're gonna watch this video. Don't worry, but I highly
object to this language. The manipulation of language right, cisgender children,
(02:14):
cis gender children, There is something that is just inherently
degenerate in that they're just children. Cisgender children. They're not trans,
They're just children, right, They're just children. This manipulation of
language like cisgender right is just to add a false
(02:37):
legitimacy to nonsense, too gibberish, to an infinite to the
infinite series of abstractions that gender theory is, and that
all progressive ideas are. Ultimately so let's take a look here.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
In twenty seventeen, doctor Richard Green published a legal strategy
to circumvent laws and health policies prohibiting gender conversion psychotherapies
by simply label such practices as gender identity or gender
identity exploration or development. To the opposition, the disapproval of
pushing gender diverse children into making sure they're confident they're
not cisgender is equivalent to pushing cisgender children into being trans.
Speaker 1 (03:17):
So just think about this. So here's this is the
sentence here, pushing gender diverse children. So it's going off
the assumption here that these children are gender diverse, in
other words, born in the wrong body, but pushing gender
diverse children into making sure that they are confident that
(03:40):
they are not cisgender. So that means responsible care. Right,
So saying maybe you're not born in the wrong body.
Maybe there's some other source of your discomfort. What is
happening at? What social media are you looking at? Right?
These sorts of interventions, right to say that perhaps perhaps
(04:01):
you're not this ludicrous thing, right that doesn't even make sense,
this incoherent Perhaps you're not this incoherent idea of being
born somehow born in the wrong body. Okay, but that's
equivalent So responsible care, right, saye care saying maybe you're
(04:22):
not born in the wrong body. Let's explore some alternatives. Okay,
according to this person, is equivalent to pushing cisgender children,
cisgender children, so just children, right, just children into being trans.
So this is totally incoherent. So what they're doing, So
the affirming model, the affirming model is the actual conversion therapy,
(04:47):
right because you can't disagree with it. So in Canada,
for instance, it's in the Human Rights Code. Now in Canada,
Trudeau did this, right, so all doctors, all health professionals
must immediately affirm gender identity. This is now protected in
law in Canada. So if a parent takes their ten
year old into a doctor or a counselor or any
(05:10):
other health professional and says that my son or my
daughter is born in the wrong body, the doctor must
immediately affirm that. If the child says I'm born in
the wrong body and the parent says, I don't think
so I disagree with that, the doctor must affirm it.
So anything else would be considered conversion therapy. Ironically, it's
(05:33):
tragic irony, right, tragic irony. So the actual conversion therapy
is the gender affirming treatment itself. That is how perverse
it has become. Let's let her continue here.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
The sight should have been firmer on their stance here.
Conversion therapy increases psychological distress and suicide attempts and should
be banned, plain and simple, which it is particularly around.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
So again, not immediately affirming this really just this kind
of abstraction, this idea that a child is born in
the wrong body, this redefinition of gender into this series
of infinite abstractions. None of this actually more to reality
in any way, right, but just simply not immediately affirming
(06:21):
and saying yes, five year old, yes, ten year old, yes,
thirteen year old, you're born in the wrong body, and
now we need to permanently medicalize you or to this
crazy person's mind, that's not conversion therapy, right, that's that's
let's just continue.
Speaker 2 (06:39):
Sexuality in many places in the US and Canada. That
is no conversion therapy for homosexually categorize people. The same
should be for trans people affirming interventions.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
And she's talking about children here, children, right, you could
you should not be able to counsel a child that
perhaps they're not born in the wrong body. It's hard
to believe. I have to keep restating this, but you
are not allowed to counsel a child that they might
not be born in the wrong body, and maybe there's
(07:13):
something else involved. And in many cases here there has
been abuse. A lot of them are autistic. That would
be the responsible thing to do, as opposed to permanently
medicalizing them, sterilizing them, mutilating them, et cetera.
Speaker 2 (07:28):
Prove mental health, promo well being, and mitigate anti trends stigma. Additionally,
it would have been helpful for the SoC eight to
include a discussion of the dangers of disaffirming therapy, including
gender exploratory therapy. Statement seven point five in the SEC
condemns any efforts to discourage a child's gender diverse expressions
or identity. Those in the trends health field practice gender
(07:50):
affirming informed consent care in the framework of science based medicine,
as as bolstered by the WPATH SC.
Speaker 1 (07:59):
Eight bolstered by w PATH Associate. So Standards of Care eight.
We're going to get to WPATH. Okay, we're going to
get to them. Because there was a big leak I
made a video about this o'hilio, a big leak of
their internal documents which proves everything she is saying is false.
And what did she say there?
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Affirming interventions improve mental health, promo well being, and mitigate
anti trends stigma. Additionally, it would have been helpful for
the SEC eight to include a discussion of the dangers
of disaffirming therapy, including gender exploratory therapy statement seven points.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
So disaffirming would be just like, maybe you're not born
in the wrong body. Maybe ten year olds don't actually
know that. Maybe ten year olds don't know what it's
like to develop into a healthy adult body, So therefore
they cannot possibly give informed consent on any of this,
you know, maybe maybe some saying stuff. Anyway, let's continue.
Speaker 2 (08:55):
Informed consent care in the framework of science based medicine
as bold as bolstered by the WPATH SoC.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
Eight its boltsters, as we'll find out, not bolstered so much, actually,
but let's continue.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Are the WPATH SoC eight perfect? No, they are not.
Are they intended to be rigid, immovable and followed without question.
That would be unscientific. The SoC eight are best or
promising practices meant to evolve as science evolves and new
research develops and adapts to individual clinical situations. We're learning
more about gender all the time, so they should not
(09:31):
be frozen in time yet.
Speaker 1 (09:34):
Any suggestion that any child is not born in the
wrong body is wrong. That's conversion therapy, according to her.
So which is it? You can't have both? You see
what I mean when I say it's total in coherence.
They don't notice it. They don't notice. The irony in
their own statements is that they don't notice, they don't
want to notice. Is it some combination of both? Okay,
(09:57):
so it's fluid, it's movable. So that's basically we don't
know anything. We don't actually know what we're doing. But
what we do know is that five year old is
definitely born in the wrong body, that that thirteen year
old definitely needs a double mistectomy. But it's fluid and evolving,
because that's science. Well, what it really means is you
don't know what the hell you're doing. As we'll see
(10:18):
in the w path files, the leaked files. That's what
it really means. Right, So perhaps then perhaps what would
be saying is to say, Okay, maybe the gender affirming
model is wrong, considering we don't know what we're doing.
Maybe we're making some terrible mistakes here. No, none of that.
They want the bust. They want. They want to have
(10:40):
their cake and eat it too.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Overall, the SC eight guidelines are a step in the
right direction. The endorse informed consent, gender affirming care forger.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
As we will see.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
No, they don't under incongruence, which is notable as not
every TRENS person experiences gender dysphoria.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
Just listen to that, Not every trans person experiences gender dysphoria.
Just think about that, like, this is two minutes. Okay,
in two minutes, she is fit a lifetime's worth of
lunacy of a scientific gibberish. She's fit that into just
two minutes here, right, this is only a three minute
(11:19):
long clip. Not all trans people experience gender dysphoria. How
does that even make sense? Well, it doesn't obviously. Again,
I use the word incoherent very intentionally, and.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
Dispense with arbitrary gatekeeping such as a's age based guidelines.
The Associate eight edition is at its most robust when
it's she.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Calls she calls age based guidelines arbitrary, arbitrary. Children and
adults are different. Children have not grown, they have not
grown into their fully developed human body and brain. Yet
it's not arbitrary. Any idiot, any sane person, anybody with
(12:02):
the slightest bit of decency, because I think that's what
this comes down to. Can clearly see that how many
times do I have to say incoherent.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
So why it has flexible guidelines for care? What critics
explicitly object to in the Associate eight is that this
latest edition doesn't advance efforts to keep care. That is because,
regardless of the claims otherwise, those opposed to transcre aim
to vilify trans people de legitimized.
Speaker 1 (12:28):
True. So here you go. So if you have any questions, right,
if you say, well, maybe the ten year olds actually
can't give informed consent for the medical experiments that you
want to do on them, that's vilifying trans people, right,
which this is the this is the across the board
tactic of the modern left. They're all connected. I can
guarantee you this. This woman is a Marxist, I guarantee it.
(12:51):
What are the chances ninety nine point ninety nine? Any
question is a vilification. We see this in every field,
every question, everywhere.
Speaker 2 (13:02):
Frans medicine and put a full stop to any provision
of gender affirming healthcare, not to improve gender affirming care
based on science. Okay, we're rounding in.
Speaker 1 (13:12):
On So these are the people like this is a professor. Okay,
this is a professor. This person should not be teaching anybody.
This is just a crazy person and non none too bright,
I will add, okay. W PATH files, So thousands of
files were released from w PATH, the World Professional Association
(13:32):
of Transgender Health. Now this is the authority, the health
authority that all of the other authorities appeal to. So
the AMA, the Indocrine Society, they all just have totally
abdicated their responsibility and giving it over to WPATH, Right,
so I think they fit. It kind of erases or
(13:53):
they feel that it erases their complicity, right because they
can say, well, we're just going along with the WPATH guidelines.
I mean they're the experts on it, so we just
follow that. Oh you're still complicit though, indocrin Society, AMA,
all of you, Oh you are. W PATH files from
Michael Schellenberger. Advocates of gender affirming care say it's evidence based.
(14:16):
No it's not. But now newly released internal files. But now,
newly released internal files from the World Professional Association of
Transgender Health w PATH proved that the practice of transgender
medicine is neither scientific nor medical. American Medical Association Indocrine Society,
(14:37):
the American Academy of Pediatrics, and thousands of doctors worldwide
rely on WPATH. It is considered the leading global authority
on gender medicine, and by appealing to them, they wash
themselves of any guilt. And yet w paths internal files,
which include written discussions and video, reveal that its members
(15:01):
know that they are creating victims and not getting informed consent.
Victims include a ten year old girl, a thirteen year
old developmentally delayed adolescent, individuals suffering from schizophrenia and other
serious mental illnesses. So the affirming model means that all
(15:22):
of them, regardless of the circumstances, if they say they're
born in the wrong body, you have to affirm it,
and anything else is a conversion therapy, which is insane.
The injuries described in the w PATH files include sterilization,
loss of sexual function, liver tumors, and death. W PATH
(15:44):
members indicate repeatedly that they know that many children and
their parents don't understand the effects that puberty blockers, hormones,
and surgeries will have on their bodies, and yet they
continue to perform and advocate for gender medicine. So this
is the really grotesque part, but it just simply is
(16:04):
a hallmark of modern leftism, of ideological capture, is that
even when they know what they're doing doesn't make sense,
they can't stop. They can't stop because they're in this
bubble of their own creation. And if they were to
question any of it, the people around them will immediately
(16:24):
struggle session them. They'll lose their jobs, they will be harassed.
You can't do it. You have to continue with the lie,
even if it's hurting children. The Wpath files prove that
gender medicine is comprised of unregulated and pseudo scientific experiments
on children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults that will go down
(16:46):
as one of the worst medical scandals in history. Who
would have guessed that the cure for or treatment for
childhood depression and confusion wouldn't be sterilizing and mutilating them.
That would not be a productive treatment. Who could have
guessed that? All right, let's get into it. So what
(17:09):
is this guy saying? So talking about informed consent? Right,
let's take a look.
Speaker 3 (17:14):
And I think the thing, if you remember about kids,
is that we're often explaining these sorts of things to
people who haven't even had biology in high school yet.
And and and I know I've heard others in this
kind of a in this kind of a studying and say, well,
we think adults are like really slick biologically even picked
lots of people have very little medical understanding of stuff
(17:35):
like that. We just put medical professionals and mental health
professionals take for granted. But I don't know still what
to do for the fourteen year olds. The parents have
it on their minds, but the fourteen year old, you
just it's like talking with diabetic complications with a fourteen
year old.
Speaker 1 (17:48):
They don't care.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
They're not going to die there, They're going to live forever. Right,
So I think, I think when we're doing in form consent,
I know that that's still a big lacuna. And I
think the thing if you remember.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
About they just admitting it farm consent is a big lacuna.
These are leaked. These are leaked zoom meetings from w Path.
You can see here Wpath, right, nobody was supposed to
see this, all right, Let's go down a bit further
here and you can see there's tons, there's thousands of files. Right,
(18:18):
here's another one. It's out of their developmental range. Sometimes
to understand the extent to it some of these medical
interventions are impacting them, yet they do it anyway, they
continue doing it anyway. Think of how all of these
people should be sued into oblivion and frankly, if there's
any justice sent to prison.
Speaker 4 (18:39):
I just wanted to piggyback on all of the importance
that comes up with the informed consent issues. I often
see people who because there's such a backlog of therapists
to do some of the mental health therapeutic support, I
(19:02):
often see people who have already engaged in some sort
of and this is again with youth who've already engaged
in some.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
Sort of medical.
Speaker 4 (19:11):
Intervention. And so one of the things I do is
I just kind of I'm sitting with the youth and
their parents, and I say, oh, well, so tell me
more about what you know about that medical intervention. And
kind of like what Dan was saying, you know, children
and young adolescents, we wouldn't really expect them. It's kind
of a developmental it's out of their developmental range. Sometimes
(19:33):
to understand the extent to which some of these medical
interventions are impacting them.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
We do it.
Speaker 3 (19:40):
We try to talk about it till most of the
kids are nowhere in any kind of a brain space
to really really really talk about it in a serious way.
That's always bothered me. But you know, we still want
the kids to be happy, happier in the moment, right.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
So they don't understand what's going to happen to them,
but you want That's always bothered him, by the way
he says, But he wants them to be happy in
the moment. Just think about how evil that is. Right,
this is what we're seeing here is evil. Right. They're
not putting out press releases warning people about this. Right,
they're just going ahead, blithly, going ahead with these medical
(20:16):
experiments on children. This is what's happening behind the scenes. Right,
Are they having these frank discussions with the parents. It
sounds like they're not really. It sounds like they're just
going along with it. Well, they can't really give informed consent,
that's a problem, but we're going to do it anyway.
They just keep doing it. Many parents don't understand what
(20:38):
will happen to their children. Like the first the first
leaked Zoom message here should have just put an end
to wpath right from the start, Right, there should have
immediately been huge expose a's on Like every channel, every
newspaper nothing. Why is that ideological capture? Obviously the same
(20:58):
reason that these people just keep doing what they're doing
even though they know that they know that there's serious problems,
And well, I tried, and that it's in fact an ethic,
completely obviously unethical.
Speaker 4 (21:13):
I try to kind of do whatever I can to
help them understand the best I can. But what really
disturbs me is when the parents can't tell me what
they need to know about a medical intervention that apparently
they signed off for.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Well, maybe if it disturbs you, you shouldn't do it.
How about that. Here's one that's really disturbing. So here's
another leak document, Internal communication ethical inquiry in a developmentally
delayed thirteen year old adolescent. That's where it should stop
right there, obviously right right there. But in a developmentally
(21:55):
in a developmentally delayed thirteen year old adolescent currently on
pubertal suppression, they may not reach the emotional and cognitive
development bar set by the standards of care within the
typical adolescent time frame, if at all. What is the
ethical approach to care the adolescent? This demonstrates the emotional
(22:16):
and cognitive maturity required to provide informed consent assent for
the treatment. So never never, Like you've already got a
developmentally delayed thirteen year old on puberty blockers, right, So
that means that child is never going to grow into
a fully developed, health fully developed, healthy adult body, right
(22:38):
because you don't whatever part of your puberty has been blocked,
you're never getting back. I just think about how demented
this is. Does this sound like science? Does this sound
like this is based on rigorous science to you? Or
does it sound like they're just making it up as
they go along. They're clearly just making it up as
(22:59):
they go along. There is no scientific rigor here. This
is pseudoscience. Right. These are a bunch of lunatics. How
about this one? So one of one of this doctor's
former patients is asking you about whether or not they'll
be able to start a family. Well, let's hear.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
And I think now that I follow a lot of
kids into their mid twenties, I'm always like, oh, the
dog isn't doing it for you? Right? Yeah, they're like, no,
I just found this, you know, wonderful partner, and now
we're kids, And so I think, you know, it doesn't
surprise me. And I think now that I follow a
lot of kids.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Another so the dog's not doing it for you. Obviously
a patient who didn't understand what was happening to them,
and it just it goes on and on. Right, This
is this is as hard to believe as it may be.
If you want to see more, go more in depth
on this, find my video. Just type in radio Beloney
(23:57):
Wpath You should be able to find it. But we
see how grotesque it is that American Medical Association, Endocrine Society,
the American Academy of Pediatrics, thousands of doctors worldwide appealing
to W Path as the authority above all authorities. It's
(24:19):
a clown show, right, It's it's just this chaotic U charade.
It's it's there is no scientific rigor involved in this.
Are these are ideologues making it up as they go
along and just deceiving the world. At some point, these
these associations, these medical associations, uh will just simply have
(24:43):
to I think it'll be lawsuits that makes it happen.
And again they've kind of washed responsibility from themselves by saying, well, no,
we're just doing you know, the standards of care from
W PATH and they are the experts on this, but
it'll be lawsuits that brings us all to an end.
It's always money, It's always money. And so you see,
(25:03):
like here's a professor, right, and this they're one of thousands,
one of thousands. Essentially, it's not even teaching preaching this, right.
We went through how many incoherencies? How many contradictions were
just in this three minutes? Right? Half a dozen? Like
none of it makes any sense? Does this person understand
(25:23):
that none of it makes any sense? Does this person
ever kind to catch themselves and saying, well, wait a second,
I just said something contradictory ten seconds ago. I don't know,
but this is a problem, right. This isn't just crazy
college kids with crazy commy ideas at Berkeley anymore. Now,
this is a real world. This has happened to real,
real children, right, And also too, there are vulnerable adults
(25:47):
that have been pushed into this that essentially, you know,
the the real conversion therapy, which is what this is.
So Francis Widowson, I would follow her if you're interested
in this stuff, because she's she's very good, especially if
you're interested in the Unmarked Graves hoax. Anyway, that's all
(26:09):
I'm going to say about that, please like, share, and subscribe.
Subscribing really helps me out. I thank you for that.
I will see you next time.
This was posted by Francis Widowson, who is a Canadian
professor who was fired for being sane, essentially saying on
the unmarked Graves hoax in Canada, recognizing for accurately describing reality.
A Mount Royal U course teaches students that WPATH so
(00:26):
that's World Professional Association of World Professional Association of Transgender
Health boasters science based medicine, and that pushing gender diverse
children into making sure they are confident that they are
not cis gender is equivalent to pushing cisgender children into
(00:47):
being trans. So this person is basically just an avatar
for every every parasitized academic that you'll ever see. They're
all exactly the same. This person is totally immune to reason,
does not recognize any of the incoherence or hypocrisy in
(01:09):
her in this three minute clip. Right, they're incapable of
recognizing just the irony of their own statement. Of course,
there's no benefit to them to do that. So anytime
that they might start to have a question or say,
wait a second, what I just said ten seconds ago
kind of contradicts what I'm saying right now, there's no benefit.
(01:31):
There's no profit in that for them, right, they just
have to sound far left all the time. That's where
the profit is for them. Anything else is just danger
because you don't have friends when you're woke, you don't
have colleagues when you're woke. You have future denouncers, you
(01:52):
have future struggle sessioners. So there's no point questioning. Just
go with it. As long as it sounds progressive, you'll
be fine. So I highly object to this language. And
we're gonna watch this video. Don't worry, but I highly
object to this language. The manipulation of language right, cisgender children,
(02:14):
cis gender children, There is something that is just inherently
degenerate in that they're just children. Cisgender children. They're not trans,
They're just children, right, They're just children. This manipulation of
language like cisgender right is just to add a false
(02:37):
legitimacy to nonsense, too gibberish, to an infinite to the
infinite series of abstractions that gender theory is, and that
all progressive ideas are. Ultimately so let's take a look here.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
In twenty seventeen, doctor Richard Green published a legal strategy
to circumvent laws and health policies prohibiting gender conversion psychotherapies
by simply label such practices as gender identity or gender
identity exploration or development. To the opposition, the disapproval of
pushing gender diverse children into making sure they're confident they're
not cisgender is equivalent to pushing cisgender children into being trans.
Speaker 1 (03:17):
So just think about this. So here's this is the
sentence here, pushing gender diverse children. So it's going off
the assumption here that these children are gender diverse, in
other words, born in the wrong body, but pushing gender
diverse children into making sure that they are confident that
(03:40):
they are not cisgender. So that means responsible care. Right,
So saying maybe you're not born in the wrong body.
Maybe there's some other source of your discomfort. What is
happening at? What social media are you looking at? Right?
These sorts of interventions, right to say that perhaps perhaps
(04:01):
you're not this ludicrous thing, right that doesn't even make sense,
this incoherent Perhaps you're not this incoherent idea of being
born somehow born in the wrong body. Okay, but that's
equivalent So responsible care, right, saye care saying maybe you're
(04:22):
not born in the wrong body. Let's explore some alternatives. Okay,
according to this person, is equivalent to pushing cisgender children,
cisgender children, so just children, right, just children into being trans.
So this is totally incoherent. So what they're doing, So
the affirming model, the affirming model is the actual conversion therapy,
(04:47):
right because you can't disagree with it. So in Canada,
for instance, it's in the Human Rights Code. Now in Canada,
Trudeau did this, right, so all doctors, all health professionals
must immediately affirm gender identity. This is now protected in
law in Canada. So if a parent takes their ten
year old into a doctor or a counselor or any
(05:10):
other health professional and says that my son or my
daughter is born in the wrong body, the doctor must
immediately affirm that. If the child says I'm born in
the wrong body and the parent says, I don't think
so I disagree with that, the doctor must affirm it.
So anything else would be considered conversion therapy. Ironically, it's
(05:33):
tragic irony, right, tragic irony. So the actual conversion therapy
is the gender affirming treatment itself. That is how perverse
it has become. Let's let her continue here.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
The sight should have been firmer on their stance here.
Conversion therapy increases psychological distress and suicide attempts and should
be banned, plain and simple, which it is particularly around.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
So again, not immediately affirming this really just this kind
of abstraction, this idea that a child is born in
the wrong body, this redefinition of gender into this series
of infinite abstractions. None of this actually more to reality
in any way, right, but just simply not immediately affirming
(06:21):
and saying yes, five year old, yes, ten year old, yes,
thirteen year old, you're born in the wrong body, and
now we need to permanently medicalize you or to this
crazy person's mind, that's not conversion therapy, right, that's that's
let's just continue.
Speaker 2 (06:39):
Sexuality in many places in the US and Canada. That
is no conversion therapy for homosexually categorize people. The same
should be for trans people affirming interventions.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
And she's talking about children here, children, right, you could
you should not be able to counsel a child that
perhaps they're not born in the wrong body. It's hard
to believe. I have to keep restating this, but you
are not allowed to counsel a child that they might
not be born in the wrong body, and maybe there's
(07:13):
something else involved. And in many cases here there has
been abuse. A lot of them are autistic. That would
be the responsible thing to do, as opposed to permanently
medicalizing them, sterilizing them, mutilating them, et cetera.
Speaker 2 (07:28):
Prove mental health, promo well being, and mitigate anti trends stigma. Additionally,
it would have been helpful for the SoC eight to
include a discussion of the dangers of disaffirming therapy, including
gender exploratory therapy. Statement seven point five in the SEC
condemns any efforts to discourage a child's gender diverse expressions
or identity. Those in the trends health field practice gender
(07:50):
affirming informed consent care in the framework of science based medicine,
as as bolstered by the WPATH SC.
Speaker 1 (07:59):
Eight bolstered by w PATH Associate. So Standards of Care eight.
We're going to get to WPATH. Okay, we're going to
get to them. Because there was a big leak I
made a video about this o'hilio, a big leak of
their internal documents which proves everything she is saying is false.
And what did she say there?
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Affirming interventions improve mental health, promo well being, and mitigate
anti trends stigma. Additionally, it would have been helpful for
the SEC eight to include a discussion of the dangers
of disaffirming therapy, including gender exploratory therapy statement seven points.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
So disaffirming would be just like, maybe you're not born
in the wrong body. Maybe ten year olds don't actually
know that. Maybe ten year olds don't know what it's
like to develop into a healthy adult body, So therefore
they cannot possibly give informed consent on any of this,
you know, maybe maybe some saying stuff. Anyway, let's continue.
Speaker 2 (08:55):
Informed consent care in the framework of science based medicine
as bold as bolstered by the WPATH SoC.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
Eight its boltsters, as we'll find out, not bolstered so much, actually,
but let's continue.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Are the WPATH SoC eight perfect? No, they are not.
Are they intended to be rigid, immovable and followed without question.
That would be unscientific. The SoC eight are best or
promising practices meant to evolve as science evolves and new
research develops and adapts to individual clinical situations. We're learning
more about gender all the time, so they should not
(09:31):
be frozen in time yet.
Speaker 1 (09:34):
Any suggestion that any child is not born in the
wrong body is wrong. That's conversion therapy, according to her.
So which is it? You can't have both? You see
what I mean when I say it's total in coherence.
They don't notice it. They don't notice. The irony in
their own statements is that they don't notice, they don't
want to notice. Is it some combination of both? Okay,
(09:57):
so it's fluid, it's movable. So that's basically we don't
know anything. We don't actually know what we're doing. But
what we do know is that five year old is
definitely born in the wrong body, that that thirteen year
old definitely needs a double mistectomy. But it's fluid and evolving,
because that's science. Well, what it really means is you
don't know what the hell you're doing. As we'll see
(10:18):
in the w path files, the leaked files. That's what
it really means. Right, So perhaps then perhaps what would
be saying is to say, Okay, maybe the gender affirming
model is wrong, considering we don't know what we're doing.
Maybe we're making some terrible mistakes here. No, none of that.
They want the bust. They want. They want to have
(10:40):
their cake and eat it too.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Overall, the SC eight guidelines are a step in the
right direction. The endorse informed consent, gender affirming care forger.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
As we will see.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
No, they don't under incongruence, which is notable as not
every TRENS person experiences gender dysphoria.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
Just listen to that, Not every trans person experiences gender dysphoria.
Just think about that, like, this is two minutes. Okay,
in two minutes, she is fit a lifetime's worth of
lunacy of a scientific gibberish. She's fit that into just
two minutes here, right, this is only a three minute
(11:19):
long clip. Not all trans people experience gender dysphoria. How
does that even make sense? Well, it doesn't obviously. Again,
I use the word incoherent very intentionally, and.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
Dispense with arbitrary gatekeeping such as a's age based guidelines.
The Associate eight edition is at its most robust when
it's she.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Calls she calls age based guidelines arbitrary, arbitrary. Children and
adults are different. Children have not grown, they have not
grown into their fully developed human body and brain. Yet
it's not arbitrary. Any idiot, any sane person, anybody with
(12:02):
the slightest bit of decency, because I think that's what
this comes down to. Can clearly see that how many
times do I have to say incoherent.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
So why it has flexible guidelines for care? What critics
explicitly object to in the Associate eight is that this
latest edition doesn't advance efforts to keep care. That is because,
regardless of the claims otherwise, those opposed to transcre aim
to vilify trans people de legitimized.
Speaker 1 (12:28):
True. So here you go. So if you have any questions, right,
if you say, well, maybe the ten year olds actually
can't give informed consent for the medical experiments that you
want to do on them, that's vilifying trans people, right,
which this is the this is the across the board
tactic of the modern left. They're all connected. I can
guarantee you this. This woman is a Marxist, I guarantee it.
(12:51):
What are the chances ninety nine point ninety nine? Any
question is a vilification. We see this in every field,
every question, everywhere.
Speaker 2 (13:02):
Frans medicine and put a full stop to any provision
of gender affirming healthcare, not to improve gender affirming care
based on science. Okay, we're rounding in.
Speaker 1 (13:12):
On So these are the people like this is a professor. Okay,
this is a professor. This person should not be teaching anybody.
This is just a crazy person and non none too bright,
I will add, okay. W PATH files, So thousands of
files were released from w PATH, the World Professional Association
(13:32):
of Transgender Health. Now this is the authority, the health
authority that all of the other authorities appeal to. So
the AMA, the Indocrine Society, they all just have totally
abdicated their responsibility and giving it over to WPATH, Right,
so I think they fit. It kind of erases or
(13:53):
they feel that it erases their complicity, right because they
can say, well, we're just going along with the WPATH guidelines.
I mean they're the experts on it, so we just
follow that. Oh you're still complicit though, indocrin Society, AMA,
all of you, Oh you are. W PATH files from
Michael Schellenberger. Advocates of gender affirming care say it's evidence based.
(14:16):
No it's not. But now newly released internal files. But now,
newly released internal files from the World Professional Association of
Transgender Health w PATH proved that the practice of transgender
medicine is neither scientific nor medical. American Medical Association Indocrine Society,
(14:37):
the American Academy of Pediatrics, and thousands of doctors worldwide
rely on WPATH. It is considered the leading global authority
on gender medicine, and by appealing to them, they wash
themselves of any guilt. And yet w paths internal files,
which include written discussions and video, reveal that its members
(15:01):
know that they are creating victims and not getting informed consent.
Victims include a ten year old girl, a thirteen year
old developmentally delayed adolescent, individuals suffering from schizophrenia and other
serious mental illnesses. So the affirming model means that all
(15:22):
of them, regardless of the circumstances, if they say they're
born in the wrong body, you have to affirm it,
and anything else is a conversion therapy, which is insane.
The injuries described in the w PATH files include sterilization,
loss of sexual function, liver tumors, and death. W PATH
(15:44):
members indicate repeatedly that they know that many children and
their parents don't understand the effects that puberty blockers, hormones,
and surgeries will have on their bodies, and yet they
continue to perform and advocate for gender medicine. So this
is the really grotesque part, but it just simply is
(16:04):
a hallmark of modern leftism, of ideological capture, is that
even when they know what they're doing doesn't make sense,
they can't stop. They can't stop because they're in this
bubble of their own creation. And if they were to
question any of it, the people around them will immediately
(16:24):
struggle session them. They'll lose their jobs, they will be harassed.
You can't do it. You have to continue with the lie,
even if it's hurting children. The Wpath files prove that
gender medicine is comprised of unregulated and pseudo scientific experiments
on children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults that will go down
(16:46):
as one of the worst medical scandals in history. Who
would have guessed that the cure for or treatment for
childhood depression and confusion wouldn't be sterilizing and mutilating them.
That would not be a productive treatment. Who could have
guessed that? All right, let's get into it. So what
(17:09):
is this guy saying? So talking about informed consent? Right,
let's take a look.
Speaker 3 (17:14):
And I think the thing, if you remember about kids,
is that we're often explaining these sorts of things to
people who haven't even had biology in high school yet.
And and and I know I've heard others in this
kind of a in this kind of a studying and say, well,
we think adults are like really slick biologically even picked
lots of people have very little medical understanding of stuff
(17:35):
like that. We just put medical professionals and mental health
professionals take for granted. But I don't know still what
to do for the fourteen year olds. The parents have
it on their minds, but the fourteen year old, you
just it's like talking with diabetic complications with a fourteen
year old.
Speaker 1 (17:48):
They don't care.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
They're not going to die there, They're going to live forever. Right,
So I think, I think when we're doing in form consent,
I know that that's still a big lacuna. And I
think the thing if you remember.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
About they just admitting it farm consent is a big lacuna.
These are leaked. These are leaked zoom meetings from w Path.
You can see here Wpath, right, nobody was supposed to
see this, all right, Let's go down a bit further
here and you can see there's tons, there's thousands of files. Right,
(18:18):
here's another one. It's out of their developmental range. Sometimes
to understand the extent to it some of these medical
interventions are impacting them, yet they do it anyway, they
continue doing it anyway. Think of how all of these
people should be sued into oblivion and frankly, if there's
any justice sent to prison.
Speaker 4 (18:39):
I just wanted to piggyback on all of the importance
that comes up with the informed consent issues. I often
see people who because there's such a backlog of therapists
to do some of the mental health therapeutic support, I
(19:02):
often see people who have already engaged in some sort
of and this is again with youth who've already engaged
in some.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
Sort of medical.
Speaker 4 (19:11):
Intervention. And so one of the things I do is
I just kind of I'm sitting with the youth and
their parents, and I say, oh, well, so tell me
more about what you know about that medical intervention. And
kind of like what Dan was saying, you know, children
and young adolescents, we wouldn't really expect them. It's kind
of a developmental it's out of their developmental range. Sometimes
(19:33):
to understand the extent to which some of these medical
interventions are impacting them.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
We do it.
Speaker 3 (19:40):
We try to talk about it till most of the
kids are nowhere in any kind of a brain space
to really really really talk about it in a serious way.
That's always bothered me. But you know, we still want
the kids to be happy, happier in the moment, right.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
So they don't understand what's going to happen to them,
but you want That's always bothered him, by the way
he says, But he wants them to be happy in
the moment. Just think about how evil that is. Right,
this is what we're seeing here is evil. Right. They're
not putting out press releases warning people about this. Right,
they're just going ahead, blithly, going ahead with these medical
(20:16):
experiments on children. This is what's happening behind the scenes. Right,
Are they having these frank discussions with the parents. It
sounds like they're not really. It sounds like they're just
going along with it. Well, they can't really give informed consent,
that's a problem, but we're going to do it anyway.
They just keep doing it. Many parents don't understand what
(20:38):
will happen to their children. Like the first the first
leaked Zoom message here should have just put an end
to wpath right from the start, Right, there should have
immediately been huge expose a's on Like every channel, every
newspaper nothing. Why is that ideological capture? Obviously the same
(20:58):
reason that these people just keep doing what they're doing
even though they know that they know that there's serious problems,
And well, I tried, and that it's in fact an ethic,
completely obviously unethical.
Speaker 4 (21:13):
I try to kind of do whatever I can to
help them understand the best I can. But what really
disturbs me is when the parents can't tell me what
they need to know about a medical intervention that apparently
they signed off for.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Well, maybe if it disturbs you, you shouldn't do it.
How about that. Here's one that's really disturbing. So here's
another leak document, Internal communication ethical inquiry in a developmentally
delayed thirteen year old adolescent. That's where it should stop
right there, obviously right right there. But in a developmentally
(21:55):
in a developmentally delayed thirteen year old adolescent currently on
pubertal suppression, they may not reach the emotional and cognitive
development bar set by the standards of care within the
typical adolescent time frame, if at all. What is the
ethical approach to care the adolescent? This demonstrates the emotional
(22:16):
and cognitive maturity required to provide informed consent assent for
the treatment. So never never, Like you've already got a
developmentally delayed thirteen year old on puberty blockers, right, So
that means that child is never going to grow into
a fully developed, health fully developed, healthy adult body, right
(22:38):
because you don't whatever part of your puberty has been blocked,
you're never getting back. I just think about how demented
this is. Does this sound like science? Does this sound
like this is based on rigorous science to you? Or
does it sound like they're just making it up as
they go along. They're clearly just making it up as
(22:59):
they go along. There is no scientific rigor here. This
is pseudoscience. Right. These are a bunch of lunatics. How
about this one? So one of one of this doctor's
former patients is asking you about whether or not they'll
be able to start a family. Well, let's hear.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
And I think now that I follow a lot of
kids into their mid twenties, I'm always like, oh, the
dog isn't doing it for you? Right? Yeah, they're like, no,
I just found this, you know, wonderful partner, and now
we're kids, And so I think, you know, it doesn't
surprise me. And I think now that I follow a
lot of kids.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Another so the dog's not doing it for you. Obviously
a patient who didn't understand what was happening to them,
and it just it goes on and on. Right, This
is this is as hard to believe as it may be.
If you want to see more, go more in depth
on this, find my video. Just type in radio Beloney
(23:57):
Wpath You should be able to find it. But we
see how grotesque it is that American Medical Association, Endocrine Society,
the American Academy of Pediatrics, thousands of doctors worldwide appealing
to W Path as the authority above all authorities. It's
(24:19):
a clown show, right, It's it's just this chaotic U charade.
It's it's there is no scientific rigor involved in this.
Are these are ideologues making it up as they go
along and just deceiving the world. At some point, these
these associations, these medical associations, uh will just simply have
(24:43):
to I think it'll be lawsuits that makes it happen.
And again they've kind of washed responsibility from themselves by saying, well, no,
we're just doing you know, the standards of care from
W PATH and they are the experts on this, but
it'll be lawsuits that brings us all to an end.
It's always money, It's always money. And so you see,
(25:03):
like here's a professor, right, and this they're one of thousands,
one of thousands. Essentially, it's not even teaching preaching this, right.
We went through how many incoherencies? How many contradictions were
just in this three minutes? Right? Half a dozen? Like
none of it makes any sense? Does this person understand
(25:23):
that none of it makes any sense? Does this person
ever kind to catch themselves and saying, well, wait a second,
I just said something contradictory ten seconds ago. I don't know,
but this is a problem, right. This isn't just crazy
college kids with crazy commy ideas at Berkeley anymore. Now,
this is a real world. This has happened to real,
real children, right, And also too, there are vulnerable adults
(25:47):
that have been pushed into this that essentially, you know,
the the real conversion therapy, which is what this is.
So Francis Widowson, I would follow her if you're interested
in this stuff, because she's she's very good, especially if
you're interested in the Unmarked Graves hoax. Anyway, that's all
(26:09):
I'm going to say about that, please like, share, and subscribe.
Subscribing really helps me out. I thank you for that.
I will see you next time.
Popular Podcasts
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Fudd Around And Find Out
UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!