Karen Read Wants Her Phones Back Again!

Karen Read is asking for her phones back again. Her lawyer says the State has all the information they need from Aidan Kearney's phones. The last time she got her murder vehicle back but not her phones. Lers go through the filing.

Get access to exclusive content & support the podcast by becoming a Patron today! https://patreon.com/robertaglasstruecrimereport
Throw a tip in the tip jar! https://buymeacoffee.com/robertaglass
Support Roberta by sending a donation via Venmo. https://venmo.com/robertaglass
Become a channnel member for custom Emojis, first looks and exclusive streams here: https://youtube.com/@robertaglass/join

Thank you Patrons!
Carol Mumumeci, Therese Tunks, JC, Lizzy D, Elizabeth Drake, Texas Mimi, Barb, Deborah Shults, Debra Ratliff, Stephanie Lamberson, Maryellen Sudol, Mona, Karen Pacini, Jen Buell, Marie Horton, ER, Rosie Grace, B. Rabbit, Sally Merrick, Amanda D, Mary B, Mrs Jones, Amy Gill, Eileen, Wesley Loves Octoberfest, Erin (Kitties1993), Anna Quint, Cici Guteriez, Sandra Loves GatsbyHannna, Christy, Jen Buell, Elle Solari, Carol Cardella, Jennifer Harmon, DoxieMama65, Carol Holderman, Joan Mahon, Marcie Denton, Rosanne Aponte, Johnny Jay, Jude Barnes, JenTheRN, Victoria Devenish, Jeri Falk, Kimberly Lovelace, Penni Miller, Jil, Janet Gardner, Jayne Wallace (JaynesWhirled), Pat Brooks, Jennifer Klearman, Judy Brown, Linda Lazzaro, Suzanne Kniffin, Susan Hicks, Jeff Meadors, D Samlam, Pat Brooks, Cythnia, Bonnie Schoeneman-Dilley, Diane Larsen, Mary, Kimberly Philipson, Cat Stewart, Cindy Pochesci, Kevin Crecy, Renee Chavez, Melba Pourteau, Julie K Thomas, Mia Wallace, Stark Stuff, Kayce Taylor, Alice, Dean, GiGi5, Jennifer Crum, Dana Natale, Bewildered Beauty, Pepper, Joan Chakonas, Blythe, Pat Dell, Lorraine Reid, T.B., Melissa, Victoria Gray Bross, Toni Woodland, Danbrit, Kenny Haines and Toni Natalie.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Okay, just to be clear, you didn't do it.

Speaker 2 (00:04):
We know who did it, Steve, we know, and we
know who spearheaded this cover up.

Speaker 3 (00:08):
You all know if John was beaten up and attacked
in that house, who did it?

Speaker 1 (00:13):
We don't know.

Speaker 4 (00:14):
We don't know. We don't know, and it's not for
us to know.

Speaker 3 (00:18):
Somebody other than Karen.

Speaker 5 (00:20):
Somebody other than Karen is responsible for that, for the
killing of John.

Speaker 4 (00:34):
You are listening to the ROBERTA. Glass True Crime report
putting the true back in true crime from New York City.

Speaker 6 (00:47):
ROBERTA.

Speaker 4 (00:47):
Glass is now on the record. Oh okay, here we go.

(01:16):
Should we do an old fashioned New York City radio
roll call? Doesn't even remember it as roll call, Miss
Lisa Texas Bratt second beach goal was first. I thought
it was just going to be us second beach goal tonight,

(01:42):
Audrey Carothers, Mari, Hi, everybody, Hi, Michelle, I ain't no
how the back gal Audrey, well you you don't know
what you got till it's gone. Is the theme for
my day today. I woke up yesterday with just like

(02:09):
incredible banging outside my window, and today and I am
they are and look and they're building scaffolding. My whole
building is being scaffolding, and with loud construction going on
every day from eight till four pm, I feel like

(02:33):
I'm a hammer. Oh my head like just beating the
hammers all day and oh so hopefully this will be
done soon, but I don't think so. Once they put
the scaffolding up, you know it's gonna it's gonna be
a while. They're gonna be working around my building, I
guess for a while. But it would have been nice

(02:54):
to get our heads up. No, it would have been
nice apartment building goes a head up, So you might
be hearing that in the back of my recordings from
now on. Thank you so much to the Divulgence Podcast
for having me on. I will be putting that up

(03:15):
shortly for my Patreon viewers. We took for a long
time about innocence fraud. I haven't actually gotten to listen
to the whole thing yet. I hope he edited it
a lot of different cases, Karen Reid among them. So

(03:35):
that's the subject of today's episode. Really just a shorty
thanks to everyone who showed up to my premiere today
for I just did a little video edited out the
profanity I had to. They actually they put me like

(03:59):
on twenty one and older, like the livestream where I
went out over that, they put it behind a They
basically made it a twenty one and over video, so
I had to take out all the profanity on it.
But the famous X spaces of Aiden Carney's total meltdown

(04:19):
that's up in the video section if you want to
check it out with some visuals. Okay, So Karen Reid
wants her phone's back. This is the second time she's
asked for her phones back. So she asked for her
murder vehicle back. She got that back really disgusting. I

(04:41):
was looking at a video about it and these lawyers,
Oh my lord, are they dark figures. She's like, you know,
someone might pay on the macab market. It's not even
a phrase, the macab market, the market for Karen Reid's

(05:03):
murder vehicle, Like, can I have the thing that that
killed Officer John O'Keefe, Can I auction that off? Can
I buy that for I don't know what you would
do with it, but I hadn't even thought of that.
I assume Karen wanted her car back just because she

(05:25):
wanted her car back, But she's got it back, and
then this lawyer said that this that in the civil
trial they have to go from scratch and develop all
their new evidence. I mean, I just assumed that they

(05:46):
could use all the things that they found in the
first criminal trial, but you know, the black box data,
et cetera. But he's like, so kind of interesting. Maybe
we'll take a look at it together. But she wants
she's complaining once again that she wants her cell phones back.

(06:09):
So this is the first time she asks for both
her murder vehicle and her cell phones. Take take a
listen to some reporting from the very killer friendly NBC
Boston ten, some of the most fawning over killers reporting.

(06:33):
You're going to find her and read.

Speaker 1 (06:34):
Is back in the news after her acquittal on murder
charges last month.

Speaker 5 (06:37):
She's looking for the return of her SUV, as well
as three cell phones, key pieces of evidence that are
still in law enforcement custody. NBC ten's John Maroni joins
Claus Live from Norfolk Superior Court with new developments.

Speaker 7 (06:50):
John Jason, an attorney for Karen Reid, says he's been
trying to get her personal items back from the DA's office.
He hasn't made much progres so now he's asking the
court to get involved.

Speaker 4 (07:04):
I could not be standing here without these amazing supporters.

Speaker 7 (07:08):
She's been found not guilty of killing John O'Keefe, and
now Karen Reid wants a black suv and three of
her cell phones returned.

Speaker 3 (07:16):
You have to formally bring a motion asking the court
to return what's been received in evidence as part of
the court record.

Speaker 7 (07:23):
An emotion filed this week, attorney Stephen Boozang said he
was negotiating with eighty eight Adam lally about getting the
items back, but.

Speaker 4 (07:34):
Adam Lallys goes to the Stephen Boozang, I mean, what
a perfect name for a lawyer for Karen Reid. Every
time I hear I hear booze Hound in my head,
every time I hear semed a.

Speaker 3 (07:48):
Response, you would want the court to approve the return
of that evidence because then it would no longer be
part of the evidentiary record.

Speaker 7 (07:56):
The forty five year old Reid was charged with hitting
and killing her Boston police officer boyfriend with their vehicle.
After two trials, she was acquitted of the most serious charges.
She's still facing a civil laws.

Speaker 4 (08:11):
Karen Reid is rich. I mean, Karen Reid loves to
play the victim. That's something that all these killers love
to do, play the victim. But she is made out
like a bandit here are supporters are talking about putting
that million dollars raised for her legal defense fund has
never been accounted for. They're talking about putting money in

(08:31):
her car. That certainly was a rumor that went around,
envelopes of money from fundraisers in her car every morning
at trial after they had their prayer vigil. But what
this brings to mind is that they're not I mean,

(08:51):
what this makes you think is that they're not done
with their phones. So she still hasn't given them the passwords.
Last time I've heard from the or we've heard anything
from the from the state is that she hasn't given
her passwords for these phones. And in this filing today

(09:13):
that was released, they're like, look, you got Aiden Carney's phones,
and you got all the messages from her from that.
I think there's significant That makes me think that they're
significantly more on Karen Reraid's phones. I mean, we heard
the short where she said, do you know, I mean,
do I have to play that again? You know what
was on those phones that they got Aiden there's a

(09:36):
lot of things she doesn't want. She wants those phones
back as soon as possible, and.

Speaker 7 (09:41):
The suv and one of the cell phones might be
needed for that trial.

Speaker 3 (09:45):
The civil suit will have to will gather its own
avidatary material.

Speaker 7 (09:51):
The black twenty twenty one Lexus XL five seventy may
be the most significant piece of evidence. It was damaged
and the focus of forensic investigators. One estimate we received
for the vehicle without any issues with sixty five thousand dollars.

Speaker 3 (10:07):
My guess is there is a market in the Macab
that this vehicle may well sell f a well in
excessive its original retail value. To have Karen read.

Speaker 4 (10:19):
Okay, isn't that sick? What a sick world do we
live in? Some sickos might want it. We might pay
you big bucks in the Macab, the Macab.

Speaker 3 (10:34):
It's Lexus in part of your showroom of cars.

Speaker 4 (10:39):
I love the Boston accent. So that's that. Then there
is also another report. You see they pull it up, Oh,
Karen Reid's cell phones. So this is this is really

(11:04):
the old reportings on she wants her cars. Now that
she's gotten her car back and complained about it, the
condition that was in This is Boston twenty five.

Speaker 8 (11:20):
For Lexus, and also her phone back and a new filing.
Read's defense team says that they requested those items in
June after her acquittal of the Norfolk DA's office has
not responded. Reid's team wants a judge to order the
state police to return her twenty twenty one Lexus suv.

Speaker 4 (11:36):
I mean, she's made money on this. She's made money
on book deals, movie deals. Karen Reid has money, and
she'll always cry poor. I mean, I'm always comparing her
to Amanda Knox, but it's a good comparison. I mean,
essentially all these killers are alike. Amandonnox made two or

(12:02):
three million on her book deal. She's making some crazy
this is years ago, like thirty thousand dollars for talking fees.
She has an agent, she's had a manager. She's never
stopped drifting off of her murder Meredith Kircher.

Speaker 8 (12:25):
And personal phone immediately. John O'Keefe's family has filed a
wrongful death lawsuit against Reid, and that trial will be.

Speaker 4 (12:32):
But I bring that up because she raised she crowdfunded
for a wedding that she had already gotten married. She said, oh,
guys and her dummy supporters gave her money for her wedding,
so I mean, they'll always cry poor.

Speaker 8 (12:50):
Me in Plymouth County. No trial date has been set
Karen Reied.

Speaker 4 (12:56):
So that is that's the porny on Karen on Karen Reid.
That but let's look at the actual legal filing. Second,

(13:18):
let me go back up to the top. Okay, so
it's Commonwealth of Massachusetts versus Aiden Carney. Now comes Karen
Reid a third party to this matter, and risks respectfully

(13:39):
quests that the Honorable commonwealths deny the commonwealths motions for
examination of the digital material sees from Karen Reid person
to search warrants issued on January twenty second, twenty twenty four.
The Commonwealth has no probable cause whatsoever to believe there

(14:04):
is any new evidence of criminal activity contained within Miss
Reed's cell phones. I have a feeling that there is.
I have a feeling that there is because any information
that the Commonwealth might hope to glean from the requested
records is duplicative of the information already contained in mister

(14:24):
Carney's cellular telephone records, which have been in the commonwealth
possessions since the start of this case. The Commonwealth has
failed to allege particularized facts that any information contained in
Missreed's cellular records beyond information that is already in the

(14:44):
commonwealth possession, is relevant in any way. This court should
return miss reads personal property immediately. Factual background, Miss Reed's
phone was searched by the Massachusetts State Police, person to
a search warrant issued on February second, twenty twenty two.

(15:06):
Four months later, on June ninth, twenty twenty two, Miss
Reed was arrested a second time for the same incident.
On January twenty fourth, twenty twenty four, Lieutenant John Fanning
sees two more of miss reed cell phones. Why does
she need two cell phones? At that time? She was

(15:26):
a murder defendant. But all these dark personalities you have
to hide what they're doing, have multiple accounts. Person into
a seizure warrant issued on the basis of witness intimidation

(15:51):
allegedly perpetrated by miss Reed. On March twenty seventh, twenty
twenty four, unbeknownst to me ms Reid, the Commonwealth convened
a grand jury to determine whether a true bill should
be issue, requiring Miss Reed to stand trial for numerous
counts of conspiring with mister Carney to engage in witness

(16:14):
intimidation or harassment against Brian Albert, Colin, Albert Chris Albert,
Jennifer McKay, Matthew McCabe, and former Troupermichael Proctor. On the
very same day, March twenty seventh, twenty twenty four, the
grand jury concluded that there was insignificant evidence when we
know that Jessica Leslie was on that grand jury and

(16:37):
she's a Karen Reid fan, so she's not going to
indict her. To find probable cause that Ms Reid committed
the acts of intention, you have to have the whole jury.
So was she the holdout or was there multiple holdouts
to find probable cause that miss Reid committed the acts

(16:58):
of intimidating or harassing witnesses? Officially rejecting the Commonwealth's allegations.
On July one, twenty twenty four, a mistrial was declared.
So Jessica Leslie's the grand juror who was convicted and
sentenced for leaking information to Aiden Carney in this case

(17:21):
from the grand jury, either via a friend or directly.
It's hard to know. I mean so much information hasn't
really come out about that. On the very same day,
I mean, Dan Carney used to talk about his source

(17:43):
that he had at Mochley court House, so that was
had to be Jessica Leslie. On the very same day,
March twenty seventh, twenty twenty four, the grand jury concluded
that there was insignificant evidence to find probable cause that
miss Reed committed did the acts of intimidating or harassing
the witnesses, officially rejecting the Commonwealth's allegations. Hey, mariy, Karen

(18:16):
Reid's lawyers are blinded by her money and are lying liars.
I agree her lying lawyers, lying lawyers who lie. On
July one, twenty twenty four, a mistrial was declared after
the jury deadlocked. Well, according to Karen Reid supporters, if

(18:38):
I get another one of these comments, or if I
had a dime for every comment I got like this
that Karen Reid was cleared by two juries, it's a draw, guys,
it's a draw. She was clear. I mean we have
I was like, if she was cleared by two juries,

(19:00):
I finally wrote to what the common section she would
be suing for double jeopardy you can't try someone twice
on a murder trial, but they think two trials, two
juries cleared her. That's the new talking points. It's John
wasn't hit by a car, two juries cleared her. It's

(19:22):
science like they just all have these little talking points.
There's nothing really behind it. They can't explain it, but
it's like the cult talking points. Miss Reid did not
learn about the grand jury's rejection of her alleged involvement
in witness intimidation until the notice of disco discovery discovery

(19:47):
produced by the Commonwealth on October tenth, twoenty twenty four.
Approximately six months later. On in April twenty second, twenty
twenty five, one year after the start of her first

(20:09):
murder trial, Miss Reid was retried for second degree murder, manslaughter,
and leaving the scene. On June eighteenth, twenty twenty five.
The three and a half year saga came to a
just end when the adjust end. An unjust end is say,
when the jury acquitted Miss Reid of all the charges
related to John O'Keeffe's death. After her quit all the

(20:32):
Commonwealth remained in possession of miss Reid's property. On July
twenty eight, twenty twenty five, Miss Reid filed two motions
for the return of her property, one for her Lexus
SUV and cell phone seized on January twenty ninth, twenty
twenty two, and a second for the two cell phones

(20:55):
seized on January twenty four, twenty four. Mss Reid's motion
to return her vehicle and cell phone that was seized
on January twenty ninth, twenty twenty two was granted without
objection on August eleven, twenty twenty five. Rather than complying

(21:18):
with Misery's motion to return her two cell phones that
were seized on January twenty fourth, twenty twenty twenty four, however,
the Commonwealth submitted the instant motion for examination of Miss
Reed's ladder, two cell phones, legal landscape and evidentiary standard.

(21:43):
So this is their argument the purpose of indictment. Oh
did you guys just hear that? I think I just
heard they're still going with this construction. You guys hear that.
Maybe not, but they're drilling going on outside. Okay, in Massachusetts,

(22:05):
what is it? It's after six o'clock in Massachusetts. Like
many other states, prosecutors may, in certain circumstances present identical
evidence to a second grand jury after failing to obtain
an indictment from a first grand jury, so they could

(22:28):
present the same evidence. However, this power is not obsolete.
Repeated submissions of identical evidence to successive grand juries, especially
in light of harassing, malicious and biased prosecution, poses a
limitation to the prosecution's ability to resubmit evidence to a
new grand jury. So you can't do it endlessly, but

(22:52):
they could resubmit it to a new grand jury. I
assume Jessica Leslie is no longer on that grand jury,
but are there more free Karen readers on it? Who knows?
And have people been touched by her innocence for ad campaign?
For example, when a governmental body, okay, they're just going through,

(23:19):
so then they go through the witness intimidation statue. So
whoever willfully, either directly or indirectly, threatens, attempts, or causes
physical injury, emotion, or economic injury or property damage. These
people can barely live in that town without harassment, conveys

(23:40):
a gift, offer a promise of anything or value, or misleads, intimidates,
or harasses another person who is a potential witness. There's
nothing for poisoning a jury pool, witness or potential witness.
Persons who is or are aware of information, records, documents, objects. Okay,

(24:03):
a person who is or was aware of information, records, documents,
or objects objects that relate to a violation of a
criminal law or a violation of conditions of probation for
roll bail or other court order. Oh, so you can't

(24:24):
harass those people, judge, grandeurors, attorneys, victims, witnesses, advocates. So
you can't impede and obstruct, delay, prevent, or otherwise in
fear with a criminal investigation, punish harm, or otherwise retaliate

(24:46):
against any such person. So it goes on and on.
The Commonwealth has no legitimate purpose for its motion and
is simply attempting to continue its its persecution of charactery
because no one likes Karen Reid. Right, No one knew
of Karen Reid before she backed into John o'keef with

(25:09):
her foot seventy five percent down on the gas pedal
speeds going up to twenty four miles an hour. The
Commonwealth lacks the necessary probable cause to support the requested
search warrant because the requested search warrant will not produce
evidence I think it will. I think it will of
the alleged offense, she protests too much. I think there's

(25:34):
a lot on our phones, she says it. Do you
know what day I add on those phones? Aiden? Do
you know what I add on those phones? This is
evidence by Trooper Tully supporting Affidavid, which only describes conclusiory
allegations of witness intimidation as occurred through Miss Reid's communications

(25:56):
with missus Kearney. Mister Kearney, but she wasn't upset when
the got his phones, just her phones. She wasn't worried
what was on his phone. She was worried what was
on her phones. So I think there may be some
differences the communications presented by Trooper Tolly between She's obviously
very aware that there's something on there. The communications presented

(26:20):
by Trooper Tully between mister Karney and miss Reid actually
showed the opposite of witness intimidation. Oh really. She is
clear that information should not be used or disclosed or disseminated.
There is absolutely no evidence of misread, ever urging, or
even suggesting to mister Kearney that any witness be contacted, approached,

(26:43):
or even discussed and mister Kearney's reporting. No, she asked
him to go up to Jennifer McCabe and asked Jennifer
mccab if she thinks she can out smart or she
thought she could outsmart Karen Reid. Further, the Commonwealth lacks
probable cause to search mis reads cell phones in accordance

(27:07):
with either of the standards in the second prong of
the easter Brook test because they're already in possession of
all the information pertain into the prospe perspective allegations. So
because the commonwealths groundless, okay, now, oh here this is
interesting here further Further, the Commonwealth lax Okay, Paragraphs seven

(27:34):
through forty one of Trooper Tolly's affidavit have nothing to
do with miss read and only concerned mister Carney. Paragraph
forty four of Trooper Tully's affidavit perfectly encapsulates the reason
why the search warrant is unnecessary and why the Commonwealth
lacks probable cause to search mis reads phones and it reads.

(27:55):
Natalie describes the arrangement as follows. Karen would send Natalie
a message on signal intended for Karney. Natalie would copy
and past the message photo video document into a text
message to Karney. On several occasions, Natalie would take screenshots
of the signal messages from Karen and send Karnie the screenshot.

(28:17):
Natalie stated she would send information to two phone numbers
used by Karney because Okay, but there's obviously other stuff,
because the commonwealths groundless allegations seek to suggest that Ms
Reid communicated some unknown things to mister Karney and he
there after engage And I have Natalie, this is Natalie

(28:41):
burn Schnard Schneider will Weak. Her police interview is up
on my We've been through it, but it's up on
the video section of my YouTube channel, and he therefore
engaged in witness intimidation. The only relevant communications would be
was actually received by mister Karney. For example, if a

(29:04):
hypothetical communication were written by miss Read on our phone
but not passed along to mister Karney, that cannot possibly
be an example of witness intimidation. Yeah, but they're overlooking
other things, her gathering information on witnesses and and things

(29:25):
that support already communications there. And I think there because
we know also signal auto deletes. I think there there
may be things that give messages more contexts. There may
be more uh searching Facebook. She's you know, we know.

(29:50):
Natalie says that she scours Facebook like no other. Therefore,
as all relevant communications would be done received by mister Karney,
and the Commonwealth is already in possession of all communications
received by mister Karney, it is impossible that a search
of miss Read's phones would produce any evidence that it's

(30:12):
not already in the Commonwealth's possession. Or she could be
there could be communications to other people telling her to
these people descended to mister Karney. The Commonwealth has other
side of the handshake if such exists. Commonwealth's overall plan

(30:32):
truly is an overbroad and persecureing fishing expedition intended to
punish and harass Miss Read. All right, I need to
take a quick break. Guys. This is a lot of reading. Thanks,
Thanks Mari. How are you all doing. There's a lot

(30:52):
of reading. All right, I'll be break back. Don't go anywhere,
just a quickie break. I'll be back. But the rest
of this don't go anywhere.

Speaker 9 (31:16):
Mike check Roberta strides through the static case True Crime Gotam,
Where the shadows play the place frauds to fold when
a spotlight beams, fact focused, queen busting propaganda schemes.

Speaker 7 (31:27):
Glass shadow, lies that.

Speaker 9 (31:29):
Goes through the streets, standing for victims, giving voice their
beasts and why see post truth Sharpest Night Roberta exposing
She's the anti frid light partast warrior, dissecting Satan's defense,

(31:53):
twisted innocense, claims, breaking pretense. Gotham's truth seeker cuts clean
with the blade facts in the forefront, No justice gets
swaying cold facts drip heavy, real talk, gunt furls, cracking
cases open like oysters with pearls in a sense, gimmicks
crumble to dust in the wind for victims, her creed
justice till the end, headphones blazing, she drops heavy artillery.

(32:27):
Now it has twisted, neat, blunt objects, civility, Roberta God
receipts that unraveled, deploy exposing the lies these frauds to
deploy glass shot, his lies that goes through the streets,
standing for victims, giving voice their beats and y s
Post truth Sharpest Night, Roberta exposes She's the anti fraud light.

Speaker 4 (33:16):
Eva. Thank you, happy to know there's sane voices here.
Thanks Roberta, applaud your continuous voice of a reason. Thanks Eva,
appreciate the support. I want to do some Thank yous, Tammy, Shep,

(33:37):
Mary sent donations. We buy me a coffee. Really appreciate it.
Susan Buckland on the Mountain, Tammy Ballet, Mom, Teresa Tunks, Susan,
Julie Robin, thank you so much you'd like to support

(34:00):
The channel links are always in the description of this
in every episode. Can send me a Venmo, buy me
a coffee, or join paetree on Okay, here we go.
So the Commonwealth's overall plan truly is an overbroad and

(34:25):
persecutory fishing expedition intended to punish and harass, and is
read in paragraphs ninety six, ninety seven, and one hundred.
Trooper Tully states as a reason for searching is Read's
cell phones that the Massachusetts State Police needs to examine

(34:45):
Misread's location data and application usage, which is literally everything
on the phone, to determine whether the phones actually belong
to her. That thinly veiled excuse to rifle through the
entirety of the two of Misread's cell phones, including all
her personal information, is absurd, true, Portully argued, expecting this

(35:07):
court to take him seriously that the police and district
Attorney need to review the entire contents of miss Read's phones,
including whatever personal, private, confidential information lies within, to prove
that the cell phones seized from miss Read's possessions in
Miss Reed's own home are in fact hers, the same

(35:30):
cell phones that Miss Reid's counsel have demanded he returned
to her as the rightful possessor. That the Commonwealth would
actually present such an argument as justification to root through
her personal data speaks volumes about the true intensions of
the prosecutor investigation guess investigator behind its motion, So she's

(35:54):
not quitting on this anti police sentiment anytime soon. The
Commonwealth's request is on timely, and therefore the information sought
cannot be admitted, so it's too late. As we learned
extremely recently in Commonwealth versus Diaz, the Commonwealth may not
seize his cell phone and indefinitely deprive its owner of

(36:15):
their possessatory interest before seeking a search warrant. The police
may retain an item seized without a warrant for the
relatively short period of time needed to obtain a search warrant,
but must release the item if a warrant is not
obtained within that period. Commonwealth versus White. If the police

(36:39):
failed to obtain a search warrant within a reasonable time,
the seizure, even if it was reasonable at its inception
because it was based upon problem cause, may become unreasonable
as a result of its duration. Okay. The Commonwealth bears

(37:02):
the burden of demonstrating that the delay was reasonable. The
DS Court held that individuals have a critical possessitory interest
in their cell phones. We first note that the defendant
had a material possessory interest in his cell phone. Okay.

(37:22):
The Massachusetts Appeal Court less than one month ago held
that a delay of one hundred and twenty three days
between the seizure of a suspect's cell phone and the
first time the Commonwealth seeks a warrant to search is unreasonable. Okay.

(37:43):
The court further upined that our courts have recognized that
some delay in obtaining search warrants may be reasonable. Okay.
Conclusion here the message okay before the conclusion says here.
The Massachusetts State Police sees Miss Read's on January twenty fourth,
twenty twenty four, and did not seek a warrant to

(38:04):
search its contents. Until August twenty eight, twenty twenty five.
This is a gap of five hundred and eighty two days,
nearly five times longer than the one hundred and twenty
three days that the DS Court held to be unreasonably
long time. The law is perfectly clear the Commonwealth's request
is well beyond untimely, and therefore the evidence sought must

(38:27):
be suppressed. Conclusion, Ms Reed's phones were seized on January
twenty eighth of twenty fourth excuse me, twenty twenty four.
No action was taken on the allegations of witness intimidation
until a year and a half later, when the Commonwealth
penned this motion. Conveniently, the motion came only to fruition

(38:51):
after miss Reed requested her personal property to be returned.
Only then did the Special prosecutor indicate an intention to
rummage through her cell phones. In the first instance, the
Commonwealth cannot claim that they were merely waiting for Miss
Reed's trial to conclude before pursuing this action, because they

(39:13):
attempted to indict her before a grand jury while her
first trial was pending. For the above reasons, and for
those argued by defense counsel at the hearing, of this motion,
Miss Reid respectfully requests that this Honorable Court denied the
Commonwealth's motion and order Miss Reed's personal property to be

(39:33):
returned for within So I think, you know, it hints
that there's something else going on, some other kind of
to me, I don't know why they would be bothering.
Why wouldn't they just be returning her cell phones. I

(39:54):
don't believe that they're just punishing or by holding these
cell phones, does anyone else? But as you know, I'm
very skeptical that the feds are going to do anything.
So it has to be some kind of I don't know,
federal investigation into I don't know. It has to be

(40:16):
some kind of I don't know. Are they going to
charge her again for witness harassment after the fact? Try
now that Jessica Leslie has been booted off the grand jury.
Certainly it was interesting that and Albert was at the

(40:41):
courthouse that day that Jessica Leslie was getting sentenced. There's
a lot of rumors going around. Who knows, but that
is what I have for today. I don't know, I
don't know what do you guys think something's brewing? Maybe
I don't know why they would keep her phones otherwise.

(41:03):
But Massachusetts odd odd state, no odd state, So I
think she's I thought they didn't even have the passwords
to get in there. I thought the last request was
the passwords to get in there. Correct me if I'm wrong.

(41:25):
So we shall see. You know, poor KK feels harassed, right, Ruth,
Poor KK feels harassed. She's always put upon. No one
likes Karen Reid. Everyone's against her. It's all a conspiracy
against this one person. We don't know why. Besides, we're

(41:47):
killing John O'Keefe. You know. She claims that started before
she did that. They all conspired to cover up their
own crimes. I mean, it's ridiculous, a fifty plus person conspiracy.
All right, that's what I have for today. Guys, Please
hit the thumbs up, subscribe to the channel. I will

(42:10):
be back tomorrow at six pm Eastern. You know, hopefully
the construction will die down. I'll be back, all right.
Have a great one everyone, Thanks for listening and hanging out.
But let me stop sharing before I end this.

Speaker 10 (42:43):
I hit my boyfriend with my car. It wasn't an accident,
but with Lion lawyers, I'll go far Lion lawyers and
willitness for res man all avoid prison.

Speaker 2 (43:02):
It was some one.

Speaker 6 (43:06):
I pushed the paintle down him hard.

Speaker 10 (43:12):
Now the legal system my clown.

Speaker 2 (43:23):
Innocence for a campaign to save my skin.

Speaker 4 (43:30):
Making money.

Speaker 2 (43:31):
Truth is my second victim, carry.

Speaker 6 (43:36):
Carry ginger like John Who were Mama? My innocence for
a campaign is my biggest too, m.

Speaker 10 (44:12):
I hid my boyfriend with my coat.

Speaker 4 (44:20):
It wasn't an a second.

Speaker 1 (44:27):
Bothlying lawyers, I'll go far, lion lawyers and witness harassment,
I'll void prison.

Speaker 2 (44:39):
It was snowing. I pushed the pedal down, hid him hard.

Speaker 4 (44:45):
Now the legal system of my clown.

Speaker 2 (44:51):
In a sense from a campaign to save my skin
making lon in truth, this is my second victim.

Speaker 1 (45:04):
Carrick carring ginger like John World Mama

Speaker 6 (45:11):
My innocence broad campaign is my biggest