All Episodes

November 17, 2025 175 mins
Tonight we talk 3I/ATLAS and why is it so weird?

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/spaced-out-radio--1657874/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Because shot, because we don't retribute show hontil.

Speaker 2 (00:30):
We prot retribute show hotel.

Speaker 3 (00:33):
We won't retripiale shot. Oh hell, I want.

Speaker 4 (00:37):
Side till we playing out of patient for your luck
with the cold right hate Hicks.

Speaker 5 (00:45):
I can feel up that patient.

Speaker 6 (00:47):
Feet in the streets.

Speaker 4 (00:48):
It's a new set, stay set.

Speaker 7 (00:51):
I wanna play face said on the pavement. I wanna
make great dans for complacent.

Speaker 1 (00:57):
I'm trying to make awake. Then I can take say.

Speaker 3 (01:00):
If we come naked, let's see.

Speaker 4 (01:29):
Welcome to Space Scout Radio. We had a late start, guys,
so we're jumping right into the show right about now.
Let's go the reading space travelers, Welcome home. You just

(01:51):
tuned your down the Space Scout Radio, the only place
where you can own the night. I am your host,
mister Rob g It. Tonight we're broadcasting on trust lit
Phillius across North America, plus digitally on digital platforms all
around the world. Don't forget you get access to archives
absolutely free, YouTube dot com, forward slash at spaced Out Radio,

(02:14):
and while you're there, please consider hitting that subscribe button. Also,
don't forget to follow us on x and Instagram. That's
spaced Out Radio and that's spaced Out Radio show. Our
website is space Stout Radio dot com with the options
are endlest you can stay up to date with the
SR news wy you can get your show some official
space Out swag. Plus you can rock out to the man.

(02:35):
You're right there, mister Ron Bubba fiotall, and oh oh
so much more. We're gonna have a fantastic show here tonight.
We're gonna be talking about three i adalysts because it's
in the news. It's all over the place right now.
And guess what, we still don't know exactly what it is.
This show will be joined by Drew Banky. We'll be

(02:55):
having a semi panel show as we talk about three
i adalysts. So let me go ahead and bring that
guy in the building. Drew Banky. What's up bra yo Yo,
semi panel Brian. I love it. I love it. I
love it. So we talked. You know, we were going
to set this up for yesterday, but we had some

(03:16):
technical difficulties pop up which didn't allow me to get it.
Actually was flooding here pretty bad. Uh So yeah, so
we're here tonight. We're gonna make sure that we go
ahead and cover three ant, Let's let's look at it
from the beginning. Let's see, you know, the steps that
we have taken so far to get to where we're at,
because I think we're almost at a climactic point where

(03:36):
either we know what it is or we won't know
what it is, or no, let me rephrase that, we
will know what it is, whether it is technological or
whether it is natural. What do you pledge in your
bed on? What do you have you in your bed on?
If you had to put it all on the line
right now? What are you thinking this is going to

(03:57):
be the outcome?

Speaker 6 (04:00):
I think it's I think it's just gonna be a
comment in the end. Man, I think it's gonna I
think I think it's opened up a lot of conversation.
But I think, Indiana, it's just gonna be a comment.
But who knows. Man, there's I'm behind that power curve
on this, Like, what's what's going on with that?

Speaker 4 (04:17):
Like I'm I'm that's exactly That's exactly what we're gonna do.
We're gonna go from the beginning and we're gonna talk
about you know, there's been you know, highlights throughout the
process you know of getting here today. First we the
announcement was made and we're like, okay, what is this?
And Ivy Low starts chiming in and says, okay, maybe
it's this. And a lot of people have been on

(04:39):
this journey with this. I think they know kind of
well wrapped. That's why I put the title here tonight
through I Atlas. Likely a comment. I agree with you, Drew,
But why so weird? Why so weird?

Speaker 2 (04:52):
You know?

Speaker 4 (04:52):
At this point, when Ivy Load was first talking about this,
and he had maybe one or two things that were anomaloust,
I think you could look at that and kind of
walk away and say, Okay, maybe that's just one or
two things you didn't recognize before, you know, with you know,
and maybe this is just a little you know, different
enough that you may see a couple of anomalies. But

(05:14):
then he started getting into anomaly three, then four, then five,
then eight, ten. Now we're at like twelve different anomalies
at this point. Things that don't line up with normal comments,
and that has here's what he says that I agree
with them. It's likely a comment. But if you're going

(05:35):
to say, if you're going to take a stance and
say you shouldn't say it's aliens. Then explain. All he's
asking for is explanations. Explain away these twelve anomalies is
literally what he's saying. If you can do that, okay,
then we can agree. But until you can do that,
it makes it very strange and very weird, and then

(05:57):
even more weird that we still haven't seen this high
result we should photo from NASA. That's that's the conspiracy
theory kicks in, right. You know, when NASA is involved
in they're they're withholding information, but they're supposed to show
us something this week. I don't know. It's all over
the place.

Speaker 6 (06:17):
Yeah, So one thing on Friday, I guess hosted on
another podcast, on a Buddies podcast, and we got really
deep into simulation theory and all that stuff. So this
the three I at list like, I'm behind the curve
had I don't know what's happened over the last few

(06:37):
days of it. You know, I don't know the latest
news on it, but my gut's telling me it's a comment.
But there's you know, looking at the chat, we call
this a semi panel. We might as well have we
might as well include the chat into it. I saw
someone mention. I think it was Shelley Montgomery's mentioned about

(06:57):
what is behind it, like what's coming NOWT So this
is if these beings like we know that they're dealing
with consciousness, like the higher conscious being, et being being,
whatever you want to call it, is dealing is on
a higher conscious level. It knows our thoughts, emotions and everything.
So this is a drip in the water to see

(07:18):
like how we we react as something came closer to
to crossing the line. I think, you know, I think
as it goes on, you know this, I think believe
this next year twenty twenty six, we're going to see
the line crossed as far as as something like this.
But I think this is I think this is getting
us close to it and acclimatizing us to the idea

(07:41):
of something like this happening. I think this is exactly
what this uh is all about, because it's all connected
to the higher consciousness. So you know, we say that
is it connected to the eaty or not? That's a
silly question, like it's it's it's all connected. So and
to add to that, like uh, you know the roorer
bo realist like lit up like all United States all

(08:04):
I seen was on media for a whole day and
a half was just uh, you know, pictures of the
roral borealists to include my own like I did, I had,
I put up a bunch of my own, but what
day didn't line up on eleven eleven?

Speaker 2 (08:20):
Like you know what?

Speaker 6 (08:21):
What synchronicity of numbers? Like, what's the possibility of that?
That's like a once in a lifetime event for many
that that that has seen that scene it that night,
you know, and I think anybody can relate that was
out there and seen it in person.

Speaker 2 (08:39):
It made you have to it.

Speaker 6 (08:41):
It gave you a deep introspection if you spent a
little while just looking at it. It ended up instead
of like imagining what was going on out there, it
in turn like gave you a deep introspection. At least
it did for me because I was just in awe
of such an event. I just started looking with inside
myself like so this is which ties back to this

(09:04):
whole consciousness event. Three. I at lists the third the
third eye, like it's talking about the third eye. It's
starting to awaken the third third eye. So I think
all these I think we're going to look back on this,
you know, a couple of years from now and be like, oh,
these are all signs that was leading up to an event.

(09:24):
But I think this is just one of the things
leading up to that event. I think ultimately it's going
to be deemed as a comment uh in the end,
and just something like I said, getting us a calumatized.
But I think it's going to be something like I
was mentioned in the chat. I think there's something gonna
be coming shortly after, within the next I would say
within the next year. That's going to be pretty amazing.

(09:48):
So who knows, or they could they could land on
December twenty ninth, still, who knows. I have no idea.

Speaker 4 (09:56):
Really, yeah, I don't know about that. I'm not with
the dates they you know. I like to take things
that we know, right. We know this object is out there,
we see it, we can almost touch it, we have
images of it, we can study it, and it's you know,
walking away from this, it's it's just, you know, I
feel like, especially with it coming now, I guess you

(10:18):
could consider closer to Earth. I think December twenty ninth
is the closest. Is the date when it'll be closest
to Earth. So you got all cameras facing that way.
I saw I was looking online. I saw some amateur
astronomers that were, you know, imaging this currently, and it's just,
you know, when you look at the twelve anomally, that's

(10:39):
really what the thing that I'm focusing in on is
the twelve anomalies. Let's look at those and try to,
you know, see who can explain these things away, because
just like I said earlier, I think that's you know,
if we're talking about science and we have a lot
of people coming out speaking against Ivylow, really dragging the
name through the mud, if you want to be real.

(11:00):
They're out there talking major mess slam dunkin on Ivy
Lobe at this point, and you know, it's all he's
really saying. And I have no stake in the Ivy
Lobe franchise, but I would just say, you know, this
is one of those, like you said, awakening moments literally
for you know, just the idea that when you're talking

(11:22):
about the vastness of space and it being infinite, let's
think about that for a moment. Infinite space doesn't end, apparently,
unless we can find the end at some point down
the line. Today, as we understand it, it does not end.
So if we're here, we're in space. Technically we're on
this ball, this rock called Earth. We're sitting in the

(11:45):
middle of space, rotating a start. There are other planets
doing the exact same thing. Billions, I think, maybe even chillions.
I don't know if I'll go that far, but at
least billions of other planets that are doing the exact
same thing that we are. So why it would be
ignorant to assume that everything you see moving or flying

(12:09):
through space is automatically going to be a rock. It
just that let's start there.

Speaker 6 (12:15):
Sure, what's we'll think about? Like listen, listen, listen, back
this up, Like let's come back from the the elder
realms of our Solar system back to our human body
for a second. We can only see a small fraction
of the light fractal, So wouldn't that wouldn't that be true?
Like if we're looking through a telescope, like you know,

(12:38):
maybe it would open up like some of those fractals
what we could see, But ultimately it's it's filtered by
by our eyes because we can only see a small
fraction of the whole light spectrum. That's that's there. You
know that's that's that's something that's scientifically proven at the moment.
So if we're looking out there and we're seeing, okay,

(13:00):
there's maybe billions or trillions of stars, just think, just
think if we could see the whole light spectrum, like
how many how many are out there that we don't
see because I can tell you like from ceremonies like uh,
when I do ayahuasca ceremonies at night, like our take
our take the crowd out. The people that can go
out like uh, you know they've after they peaked and everything,

(13:22):
go outside and and stand by a fire and look up,
like there's a lot more stars out there than you see.
When that you can see then you know, without the
ayahuasca and we're we can get into that. Also, there's
a whole other conversation that that talks about like uh
codes that I saw on a podcast and d M

(13:45):
T and all the using the laser to see it.
But it's a it's a some groundbreaking experimental stuff that
that really really breaks it down in a crazy way.
But anyways, yeah, who knows, there's there's realms that we
can't see. You know that we're just talking about the
stars that we can see with our eyes. And this

(14:07):
is you know, atari technology, when when we're talking about
you know, current day technology, you know the difference of
the ability to see. I think there's way more out there.
There's there's there's been quantum intagmine, uh, quantum wormholes that
are starting to be really documented and scientific and really

(14:30):
studied scientifically, which is an amazing, amazing statement for me
to be able to make in my lifetime that quantum
and tangline quantum wormholes is something that's really being taken
seriously right now. So what we see is just a
small fraction. So I think it's I think it's infinite, dude.
And I think what we're looking at is remnants of

(14:52):
our civilizations that's been going on through eternity.

Speaker 4 (14:56):
And there are some people out there that have been
given their opinions on it as well. And that and
then let me start by saying this, I mean by
no means are we astrophysicists or astrologers you know that
are versed in exactly what's going on. We're we're sitting
here and trying to figure this thing out with everyone else.
We lean on astrophysicists and astrologers too. And and other

(15:21):
scientists that are into this field, into this matter to
get our information or to lead us. And that's I
don't know how you feel about that, because you know,
if I guess, the perfect example of what I'm trying
to say is is that if av Lob doesn't step forward,
and we are just depending on the other scientists that

(15:42):
are just saying it's a comic, well what do we know.
We're just gonna go with that and be like, Okay,
it's a comment. He said it's a comment, so it's
a comic, right, or he says it's this, and that's
we're We're trusting in their expertise in order to get
the information that we have. Right. So you know, at
the end of the day, when you have someone giving

(16:02):
a differing opinion or a new point of view, it's responsible,
I guess to you know, be able to listen to that,
And then who do you who do you listen to?
If you're open minded, you listening to both sides of
the conversation. You're listening to av load his point of view,
You're also listening to scientists like meets you Kaku, who

(16:23):
actually I have up here because he stepped in recently
he was interviewed because I guess I don't. My feeling
is is that you know, there are astrologers, astrophysicists, scientists
out there that are tired of seeing Avy Lobe on
TV talking about this being potentially alien tech. They're they've

(16:44):
had enough. They're screaming at the screen.

Speaker 8 (16:46):
Uh.

Speaker 4 (16:47):
And finally they interviewed meets you Kaku, who used to
be a go to guy. They used to go to
him for everything, right, for anything and everything. They used
to go to meet you. So they went to him
recently within the last few days, and they were just
asking what was his opinion on this, and they attempted
to pit him against IVI Lob, but he respected avi

(17:08):
Load's point of view, and then he said, in my opinion,
which is great, A great way to start your statement
is that he states that he thinks it's like a
rock of some sort that's probably seven he said, seven
billion years old that has been traveling through interstellar space

(17:29):
for all this time and now we're just you know,
getting a chance to see this thing pass through our
solar system. That's his opinion, right, But he didn't down
iv Lobe and say no, he's wrong. He was like,
that's what he thinks it is. This is what I
think it is. Yeah, that's the conversation that needs to
be had out there. Also, I looked at h I

(17:51):
saw our guy here, Stephen, doctor Stephen Greer, and I
wrote down a couple of things that he talked about,
Doctor Stephen Greer. In his opinion, he thinks. First of all,
he says that it might be a rogue asteroid, where
I could I could see that, you know, if it
ends up being a rock rogue asteroid, that makes sense

(18:12):
essentially when Mishukaku is saying. But then also he states
that he thinks that it could be and this is
the more intriguing piece. This is I could fall into
this boat right here. He thinks that it's possibly space
junk from an old, older, distant civilization. What do you

(18:34):
think about that.

Speaker 6 (18:39):
Could be anything? I mean, who knows. That's a hard one.

Speaker 4 (18:43):
I've never I mean, does it make sense.

Speaker 6 (18:47):
Doesn't it? I don't know, Like if it's it's hard
to say because we're scaling our thoughts on like our
civilization and other civilizations and other planets. Maybe you know,
we know that other planets dwarf the size of ours

(19:07):
so you know, if this is a remnant or a
piece off of exploded civilization or exploded planet or whatever
like it could have been, you know, so much bigger
than ours that we can't even imagine it. And this
this is just a small piece off of it.

Speaker 4 (19:24):
Who knows.

Speaker 6 (19:25):
But if it's I've heard it's I heard it's like
five six miles across. I've heard it's seven hundred miles across.
Like who really, I don't know how you really even
figure it out, to be honest.

Speaker 4 (19:39):
Like, well, that that's that's the whole idea. I mean,
that's the reason why we talk about it because we
don't know what it is. Like literally, we literally don't
know what it is. So that's the reason why we
sit down and have these sort of conversations because we
want to talk through We want to talk through it.
We don't want to just immediately side with one side

(20:01):
of the conversation. We want everyone to be a part
of an open minded conversation, and we just want to
look at all the available options. So space junk for me,
And obviously we've talked before about Voyager one Voyager two
being out there. We sent those out fifty years ago.
They're just going there outside the Solar System at this point.

(20:22):
They are in interstellar space at this point, traveling to
who knows where they'll end up, whudos where. And think
about this. We have how much space junk orbiting this
planet right now? How many things that we were putting
things up? Every day? Elon Musk is putting up another
rocket with how many Starlink satellites on it? I think

(20:43):
there's thousands of them up there at this point, let
alone all the other countries that put things up there.
That's just here in our own orbit. And that's only
been done let's give it the last sixty years, okay,
of human beings putting things out into space. And we've
already put so much space junk out there that it

(21:04):
would make total sense that if you had a civilization
it was billions of years older than us doing the
exact same thing at some point, sending out pro sending
out you know, satellites or probes to monitor distant galaxies,

(21:24):
or you know, just space drunk in general. Just just
we've taken things that we've built here on Earth and
put them out there in the space. Thousands and thousands
and dollars. We had the booster rocket. They didn't even
know what that was. They thought it was some anomaloust
thing they I don't know if they thought it was
an asteroid, but they detected it and then they realized

(21:46):
that it was the booster rocket from some Space Shuttle
mission from years ago. If we have a booster floating
around space right now, they could end up who knows. Also,
Elon Musk has put up a Tesla roaster with the mannequin,
just put it out there in space so it could

(22:08):
It would make total sense to me that we have
something passing through that was sent out so long ago
that it's crazy, right.

Speaker 6 (22:20):
Yeah, Well, it took us a while to understand the
importance of like not littering into water. Like I remember
riding around at Lake Erie as a kid my dad, like,
you know, throwing out cigarette butts in the water and
cans in the water and stuff like this, and it
was not it was not that uncommon back then, you know.
And now you would never think of it doing anything

(22:40):
like that in the water. So maybe it'll take us
twenty or thirty years before we realize we can't just
start throw trash out into the space too, Like it's
all part it's all part of our ecosystem.

Speaker 4 (22:53):
Yeah, you know, And here's you know, I try my best,
you know, when we approach conversations like the to come
at it from a practical standpoint, Like y'all, I said
this on the other show. I don't think we should
go from a top down. We should go from a
bottom up. Let's start with the basics on what we
know and then kind of try to branch out from
there with more things that we will know instead OF's,

(23:16):
you know, fantastical tales. We can make up anything about
this thing if you if you wanted to go there,
you can make up a million different wacky things that
this thing could be. But you know the thing that
that even let's look at it and say it's natural. Right,
there's things like the there's supernova's out there, there's black holes,

(23:39):
there's uh, what is that the the planet nursery out there? Uh,
there's all sorts of very strange things that don't make
sense that we know of. Imagine the things we don't
know of. Maybe this is a new you know, natural
process that happens in space and natural thing. We don't

(24:00):
have a name for it yet, And this might be
one of those moments where we're discovering some new thing
that happens in space, the same way with ball lightning
here on Earth. Something that's very rare, don't We think
we know that it's a thing, but we're really not
sure and we're still in the figuring out process. This
could be something like that. But the thing that just

(24:22):
keeps troubling me about it is NASA hasn't released the images.
And here's one thing that was brought to my attention
by I was watching a news report on this, and
the news reporter was pointing out this high rise camera
on the orbiter or on Mars is sending back pictures
of Mars every day, all the way up till today,

(24:45):
sending brand new pictures of Mars every single day. And
it's been a month and a half and we still
haven't seen this thing. It was a question that was
being asked, why why are we getting those images daily
but we're not getting anything on this. And see that's
where nasaal likes to play in a conspiracy lane. And
then I don't know if they get off on this,

(25:06):
but it's kind of a situation where we have to
sit here and do what we're doing tonight it's based
out radio. After our radio show. We'll be right back
after the break and we're clear. Don't give me the

(25:38):
Drew the commercial finger Drew Baggie.

Speaker 6 (25:41):
Sometimes I just got to cut you off right there
in the bow.

Speaker 4 (25:44):
Yeah, that's just that's that's awesome. That's awesome. Uh yeah.
So we let me go ahead and say what's up
to everybody in the chat. We didn't get to do
this earlier. Kitty Kaddy Whack, who came in tonight with
the goal, appreciate you coming on in Flat six, you're
coming in with the silver medal, and then mel w
D fourty coming in with the Brons. Appreciate you guys
always coming in bright and early to the show, as

(26:05):
well as Robert Lamarth Junior saying, Hey, Rob, appreciate you
coming on in. Roger Murray always keeping us in form.
November sixteenth, nineteen seventy three, Lemon Grove UFO incident. I'm
not familiar with that one, Roger Murray, appreciate you bringing
that to my attention. I'll have to look that one up. Also,
we have what else do we have out here?

Speaker 2 (26:29):
We have.

Speaker 4 (26:34):
Excuse Dip from Sacramento. Wait a minute, Dip, from Sacramento.
Appreciate you coming on in. Long time, no seat. Thanks
for showing up here tonight.

Speaker 2 (26:47):
We have.

Speaker 4 (26:49):
Let's see Cosmic Joe Chronicles. Hey, Cosmic Joe, thanks for
showing up. We have Maggie intent, but is this a
family reunion? What's going on here? Mag In ten from
down Under. Appreciate you coming on in saying hi, mister
Robin All. Thank you for showing on up here tonight.
We got a let's see I said T Bone right,

(27:12):
We'll say it again, T Bone, Thanks coming on in.
Integrationing you to man. Miss Robbery, appreciate you coming on in.
Let's see I almost want to say that's Corey. Think
I'm right about that. Thanks coming on in, Katy Caddy Whack.
Appreciate the supersticker here tonight. Thanks for your support the
spaced out radio in the show here. T Bone as well,

(27:36):
Thank you so much. Appreciate you supporting the show. Let's
see Kathy Evans, Thanks for coming in, Kathy Evans. Let's
see here we got Kurt m Thanks for coming on
in exquisite cringe. Appreciate you coming on in. Hopefully I

(27:56):
said that right. Appreciate you showing up tomorrow. Man, greetings all,
thanks for coming on in. Tomorth Man, Let's see and yes,
put your I'm not I'm not going to for the
radio purposes during the show. I won't refer to chat

(28:18):
but chat. Please put your opinions on UH three I
Atlas in the in the chat and then I'll acknowledge
it essentially and we'll speak to it as well. Let's
see who else do we have? Cosmic Joe Chronicles, appreciate

(28:41):
the I and now was Rob g I acknowledge you
right back. You know that, Joe, Thanks for coming on in.
Let's see who else do we have out here? Will
Camp five one present? Appreciate showing on that little Camp
five one. Let's see I know Drew said, Shelley Montgomery

(29:09):
was here. I'm looking for Shelley. Where is Shelley? There
she is, Shelley Montgomery. Thank you for coming on in tonight.
Let's see who else do we have? Oh, Chris Dean,
thank you for coming on in. Appreciate showing on up.

(29:32):
And Matt Gutka, appreciate you coming on in. Matt's Yeah,
t bone those seven jets natural or mechanical, it's one
of the anomalies. What we're gonna be talking about those.

(29:54):
I'm gonna go through all the anomalies and uh put
your opinions in the chat. For sure. I'll be reading
the chat. Like I said, I may not say your
name or say it's from chat, but I'll definitely read
the message and then we'll speak to it. Andrew appreciate

(30:15):
you coming on in. FAP. Appreciate showing on up. Polly Roderman. A.
Polly missed you. Guys. We miss you too. Polly. It's
been a minute. I saw you on the podcast earlier.
Good stuff. Let's see Presidentiosadi in the building. Thanks for

(30:40):
coming on in. Yes, you are right, Polly Roderman. Alien
or not? Implications for human humankind with Atlas A huge
that is definitely right and the reason why we have
to talk about it until we know what it is

(31:00):
and even afterwards because if it ends up being I
guess either way, right tech alien tech or not? I
got your question here, t Bone. Paul DeMont is out here.
I've seen Paul DeMont. Can't find his name. We're coming

(31:23):
back in three seconds here, guys. Let's go all right, everybody,
welcome back space Stout Radio, the after hours radio show
with me Your host mister Rob g enjoining this, Drew Banking,
the man with the plan. We are talking three i
ADA lists because it's weird. That's that's good enough. And

(31:43):
I think the implications, as was said in the earlier tonight,
are huge for humanity and it's definitely something that we
should be talking about, should be on everyone's mind because
if it was alien tech, last thing you want is
to have to just show up and you weren't expecting company.
So we were talking right before break about doctor Stephen Greer,

(32:07):
who thinks that you know, potentially his opinion is, and
I'll say this again, he states maybe it's a rogueastroid.
He also said he thinks possibly space junk from an
older distance civilization. That's kind of what we left off
talking about, and made some points there as far as
all the space junk that we put out there, it's

(32:28):
gonna end up on someone's doorstep one day, maybe a
billion years from now, but it is definitely going to
end up on someone's front step, and they're going to
have their very own three I Atlas moment. Well, at
the rate we're going, will be long gone as a
civilization unfortunately, unless we change what it is. We're doing here.

(32:49):
He also stated, well, one of the things that he
pointed out, and I thought this was actually pretty important
and the reason why he was using this to back
up the space junk statement is he was stating that,
you know, when you look at three I at lists,
as we understand is it's going about one hundred thousand

(33:10):
kilometers or miles per hour, depending on where you're at
in the world. And uh, just pointing out that that's
actually slow when you're talking about galactic distances between star systems,
because you get into talking about light years and how
the distance it would take for one light year is
some astronomical distance. So when you see something coming in

(33:33):
at one hundred thousand, you know, miles per hour, that's
actually pretty slow and would more so indicate it would
less likely be related to extraterrestrial space travel and more
likely something you know, more prosaic or even alien tech
drifting through space. And that made sense to me, and

(33:56):
I'm an you know, we know, we a lot of
people have their difference is with Steven Breer, but this
stood out to me and it made sense to me,
what do you think about that.

Speaker 6 (34:06):
It could be like, it's definitely high probability. I mean,
like you know, you point out a lot of instances
that uh, you know, just just the elon stuff alone,
we've been we've been sending stuff in sense of you know,
the space race and who knows, who knows what went

(34:29):
on before that, you know, like what other times when
maybe that's not that's not the first time that we've
been to space, like when we went to the moon,
things like that, you know, the the space race with
with Russia back in the day. Maybe maybe this is
just a cycle that we keep going through. So maybe
this's you know, maybe it's out there forever. Maybe this
is uh, you know, who knows, Maybe it's from maybe

(34:52):
our future in a way like or our past. But regardless,
like I wanted to say, I want to say, we
for the break and right when we were coming back
off a break and when to get to it. But ultimately,
I think it's doing exactly what it's doing right this
moment on this show. It's bringing it's bringing up a
conversation not just with us, but like like a lot

(35:13):
of people, it's bringing up a conversation and allowing people's
minds to really, like I said, uh, not only get
used to that idea, but ultimately like expand consciously, like
because that's that's what's happening with these conversations. It's allowing
us to like daydream in a way of what is

(35:36):
and expand our consciousness. So it's sparking a lot of
different conversations and possibilities, and I think it's doing I
think that's exactly what it's supposed to do. But ultimately,
and the end, the physical part of it, I think
is going to be a common or or or space trash.
It could be like like you said, there's there's there's
a million different possibilities. It could be you know, it
could be it could be a planet killing comment might

(36:01):
take a turn right at the end hit us. Who knows.

Speaker 4 (36:04):
But it's just when we think about once again, how
the space being infinite, infinite place, and just think of
the way I think about space is I kind of
compare it to the ocean, to the open ocean, and uh,
you know, there's vast distances right that you travel across

(36:27):
the ocean, and you're gonna see a lot of different
types of things that live in the ocean. You're gonna
see you might be in an area where schools of
tuna like to hang out, right, So do you should
you think that everything swimming through the water is a tuna? Right?

Speaker 2 (36:43):
Or?

Speaker 4 (36:43):
And that's my whole point here, right, because we've if
someone pointed out recently, you know, as far as us
examining these guys, it's only been about four hundred years
when you think about it. So what I'm saying there
is is that we could within that short period of time.
There's no way that we can know everything that we

(37:04):
would come across out there, because, for one, we can't
go out there to travel at this point. We're not
space traveling civilization yet, so you can. We only get
to see things that come close to us or come
near near enough for us to see or see with
the telescope. Right, that's all we get. But we don't
know about what's what's past what we can see, you

(37:27):
know what I mean? And is this something that that
may be coming in from some point past where we
can visibly see Maybe this is a whole new class
of maybe not even a comet per se. When I
say comment, I mean comment as we know it as
a space rock. Maybe it's something we don't have a
name for yet.

Speaker 6 (37:45):
Right, Oh yeah, I mean would I would go as
far as to say, as most of what we talk
about in space is mostly theories, Like you know, there's
there's very little heart evidence. So what's actually going on
on out there? You know that it's other than like
you know, obviously the pictures of the Mars, the pictures

(38:05):
from the Mars rover and stuff like that that you
brought up in the first part, that we still don't
have pictures of this because the government shut down, which
makes no sense. Why why we still why are we
getting pictures from the Mars rover the government shut down,
but we can't get a picture of one of the
most could be the one of the most potentially impactful

(38:25):
object going through our solar system and it's just taking
a picture. Like so that's that's one of the That's
an interesting point. But but NASA, big brother, they they
said that it's nothing to worry about. Is just a comment,
and uh, you know, I think there's probably a lot
of truth in that when it comes down to it.
But it is it's waking people up. It's it's it's

(38:46):
waking people up that and this awakening is hitting on
all different levels. You know, some people get woken up
by you know, spontaneous spiritual events or or death experiences
or uh in meditation or retreats or whatever, or some
people that can't get that the spirit or the forces

(39:11):
to be that is trying to facilitate the shift and
human consciousness some of those people that they can't get
to maybe you know, I truly believe that this is
a part of it, Like, this is a part to
catch that those group of people that that that are
are looking at the stars for their awakening, you know,
or are looking at looking the space for their awakening.

(39:34):
I think this this is part of that, like and
this is the source the consciousness. The shift is very
very determined that it's going to take place in our
lifetime and very very soon, and it's doing everything it
can to reach as many people as it is possible.
And there's there's a certain group of people that need

(39:55):
something like this to start the conversation, to start that
awakening happening.

Speaker 4 (40:00):
And one thing I want before we move on to
is that another person that have some opinions. But I
also looked at what I what I wanted to do
because I want to be practical, right, I don't you
look around YouTube, for instance, and you see a lot
of clickbait videos on three oh three, I Atlas is morphine, Oh,

(40:25):
it's it's turning into this or that, just a bunch
of bs, right, And so that prompted me to look
into what are people saying within the UFO community, and
not just in the community, but in the fringes of
the community, so like the extreme part of the UFO community,

(40:45):
and I'm finding like channelers, remote viewers, I'm finding mediums,
and they're saying that it's you know, they're giving some
sort of extravagant explanation for what it is is and
I'm just like, I don't know if we should take
that approach to this, right, because if this is a

(41:07):
serious conversation, why start there? Why start with you know,
this is I can't I didn't even have an example
because I couldn't watch it. But you know, it's just
those out there sort of examples, once again coming from
the top down, saying it's the mothership with with light

(41:32):
beams aboard or like where do Okay, let's stop. We
don't know that, we don't have anything that shows us
that or tells us that, so let's not get to
that part of the conversation. Yet let's talk about kind
of normal things as far as what this might be.
And so I just wanted to say that because I
consider myself as part of the UFO community and it

(41:54):
just to see that be the approach is just I
feel like that's the wrong way to approach, not just
three eye ant lists, but really a lot of this
stuff that we're dealing with when it comes to the phenomena,
do you agree with that or disagree? How do you
look at that? Yeah, so.

Speaker 6 (42:19):
Repeat that again because I was, I was, I was
reading the chat and I had a comment to make
on that. So just just spark it back up.

Speaker 4 (42:28):
No, just having when I'm looking because I wanted to.
I'm looking at skeptics of three I ant lists. I'm
also looking at you know, a v Love and his
respective community.

Speaker 6 (42:40):
Here's here's why I wanted to say this is it
is shedding the light on a lot of people because
if you're a legitimate channeler, like if you if you
can channel, or if you can not not channel, maybe
if you can remote view, if you've been putting yourself
out there as a remote viewer, this is the time

(43:01):
to either you know, to show, to prove what to
put your words to proof, like this is the time
to prove it. Like if you're a legit remote viewer,
remote go remote view, get get on remote view yourself
to that comment like why could you not or somewhere
close to where it's passing by or something like that

(43:24):
like that, there's it's shedding the light on a lot
of people that are Charlatan's Like, Honestly, I think, and
I hate to put out there like that, but this
is the time to really prove it. Like if you can,
if you can really go out into space and look
at things in space, now is the time to prove it.
That's all I got to say. You know, And I'm

(43:45):
not saying any names or anything like that. I'm not
putting any I don't even have any names in mind
when I say that. All I'm saying like that we
knew that. All these people talking about how they have
these abilities or they can do that or that, especially channeling.
I'm not I'm not saying channel is not real because
I experienced it myself, but it's it's something that's very

(44:07):
very very hard to control, very it's it's very deep,
and I think a lot of these people that are
doing it it's it's it's some type of some type
of mental illness that's going on inside them, honestly. And
I think there are channels out there, but I think
some of the channels out there that are have severe

(44:29):
mental illness tell you truth. But but the people that
are can remote view and they and if you're talking
about remote viewing, I prove it, like, go tell us
what this thing is? And if why is there so
many people coming off with different things.

Speaker 2 (44:46):
That it is?

Speaker 4 (44:48):
And see the problem with this is is that you're
not going to be able to prove it, you know.
And if we are talking about Ivy Lobes stepping out
on a lid on a on a ledge, by just
having an opinion on it could be something other than
a comment. That's pretty basic. That's a pretty basic approach

(45:08):
to you know, the conversation. And so if he's stepping
out on a ledge, what do you think you're doing?
If you're coming in hot saying that this is something
full of light beings and making all these assumptions. When
if NASA shows us these photos this week like they're
supposed to and it turns out to be not that,

(45:30):
then how does the community look right? And I'm feeling like,
you know, as you said, Charlatan's there's a lot of
what they call grifters in this community. And I have
spoken I'm a loud voice on this. Actually, I've spoken out,
as unpopular as it might be to do that within
this community, to speak against that, but I think it's

(45:51):
our duty to kind of make sure that, you know,
we keep this conversation more grounded in not necessarily a reality,
but just grounded in more of facts, Like let's go
if we have facts, let's start with facts and then
kind of branch out from there. And that's my whole approach,

(46:13):
and that and that's just it just kind of saddened
me for a moment to kind of look around and
see how many individuals we're taking the opposite approach to
what this is. Is you can't even have a serious
conversation that way, I feel like. And that's I just
wanted to say that, because before we move on to
the next thing, go ahead, no.

Speaker 6 (46:32):
I said, like I said from the beginning, like this,
this whole thing is about it's about consciousness. It's about
what's going on inside of us or outside of us,
but it's it's about this consciousness awakening. This The UFOs
are just a small part of it. So the mention
of a of a possible alienship or a comment three
eyealysis doesn't shift my attention away from from that fact

(46:55):
that I know, that deep down fact that I know.
I'm just trying to figure out how this fits into that.
That fact that I know that and that that I
really feel deeply is the basis of this whole That
this whole story is this consciousness awakening of ourselves. I
still hold that as my truth. So I'm trying to
figure out. You know, this three atlas is not my

(47:16):
main focus. It's just I'm trying to figure out how
it connects into that. And I see very I see
that it's opening a conversation people that may not be
having a conversation because it's so it's so mainstream, so uh,
you know, it's it doesn't matter what it is, like
a comment or not. It's already sparked conversations. It's already
done what it's supposed to do. And that's that's what

(47:39):
I believe.

Speaker 4 (47:40):
It could be a big balls. It could be a
big ball of consciousness, right, it could be. Here's a
billion places you could go with trying to, you know,
assume what it is, but just I think coming from
a grounded place is the best thing to do with
all of this.

Speaker 6 (47:57):
It could it could be our second moon come in.
Who knows, like you know, how it's been going these
past few years. Nothing really would surprise me right now, like, yeah.

Speaker 4 (48:11):
It's it's just it's a learning moment, I think for
everyone involved, regardless of what side of the conversation you're on,
and it's an exciting moment either way it goes. I
think it's going. Whatever it is is going to change
the game, whether it is on to you know, further
the conversation about extraterrestrials, if it happens to be related
to that, or just you know, moving the needle on

(48:36):
realizing that we don't you know, we don't know everything
at the end of the day. So even the people
who come in assuming it to comment, all the astrophysicists,
if it turns out to be this new thing that
we never heard of, well, now look at how ignorant
a person like that would would look. Right, And I
always say science is a is more of an educated

(48:58):
guest sort of field, and I think it's still needed.
But you always find that if you look historically, science
moves the the goal line every twenty years and kind
of rewrites things. When I was a kid, you know,
Pluto is a planet, Now it's not. They didn't know
up until the mid nineties that there were all these

(49:20):
other galaxies out there. They had no clue. Right, It's
when you look at that and you realize that even
though they're so you know, staunch in how they feel
about what this is, twenty years from now they will
likely have a different opinion, being that now they have
newfound information about new discoveries and new things that they

(49:45):
are just finding out are out there. So I think
it's going to be a learning moment for everyone. So
as as much as they're getting on ivy load for this,
if it turns out to not be a comment, but
then it's still not alien technology, well guess what, everybody
he walks away with more knowledge than they walked in with.

Speaker 6 (50:05):
Just I mean, just close your eyes for a minute
and think about your grandkids when they're they're doing a
podcast interview, you know, fifty years from now. Just think
of the conversations like of you know, you know, my
grandpa started off his life and most of the world

(50:25):
didn't even believe about UFOs and they were like cohabitating
with with other other life forms on this planet, like
openly and stuff like that. Then, so it's just, uh,
you know, I think about it all the time. You know,
I got, like I said before, I got two, I
got two older kids, a twenty two year old and
twenty year old, and then I got Hawking number it's
three and two. Those two, Uh, the two older kids,

(50:49):
they they lived in a reality where UFOs weren't real,
and now they're shifting into reality where it's mainstream talked
about and accepted that UFOs consciousness and everything is and
the other and the two younger kids won't won't know
a reality where that consciousness wasn't talked about openly like
it is now. And who knows, like how fast it's

(51:09):
been going just over the past few years. Just imagine
what it's going to be like by the time we
pass on and what we'll see in our lifetime. So yeah,
it's all it's all amazing stuff, man, you know, it's
I can't say it enough that I'm in gratitude to
be living in this time and to be witnessed to

(51:30):
these times that we're in right now. And that's that's
how I truly view myself, like I don't I don't
see that we're heading towards apocalypse or anything like that.
I think we're I really see myself as so much
gratitude for living in this time right now and this,
this story Atlas is just a small part of this
amazing story that's unfolding before us.

Speaker 4 (51:52):
And I'll say this, I'm going to actually get onto
the next person here, but you know, I when twenty
twenty five started, and we started with the Jerome flap,
and you know, then we had Jake Barber, and then
it went a few months with just absolutely nothing, and
a lot of people were asking is you is disclosu

(52:13):
You're dead, and we were having these sort of conversations
about you know, they're not being a lot happening as
far as in this community. And then now it seems like,
you know, things picked up dramatically and we're gonna end
the year off. Really I can say, by the end
of this year, I'll feel pretty fulfilled with what we

(52:36):
observed here in twenty twenty five and really hoping that
we get more into twenty twenty six. But we got
like a minute left, so we're not gonna really get
into well, I guess I can tell you so. Billy
Carson was another person that came across. You know Billy.
I know Billy as well. I met Billy on a

(52:57):
show before, and his opinion us He thinks, if it's artificial,
that it could be a probe examining this part of
the galaxy. And I think that's a pretty plausible thing
when you think about that. It would make sense if you,

(53:17):
you know, once we harness the ability to space travel,
especially at the rate that we're you know, improving technologically,
I could see if we still are here as human beings.
I hope we are. A billion years from now, we
will be at the point where we will have probes
out there examining the galaxy, like far out, just examining

(53:41):
all reaches of the galaxy. So it would make total
sense that you have some civilization that put out maybe
a million probes all out in different directions in space,
and we just happen to have one coming through our
neighborhood at this point in time. Think about that idea absolutely.

Speaker 6 (54:02):
I mean, if consciousness is all connected, we're doing it
like we're sending out probes everywhere you know, there we have.
We're sending out you know, satellites and to places where
we can't get to. We supposedly we can't get to
in crafts right now, like like humans to get there.

(54:23):
So we're sending out probes everywhere through the universe through
our solar system. We've been doing it from the beginning,
so it makes total sense that if there's another civilization
and it's connected to us, that they're doing the same.
So it's another it's another possibility that has.

Speaker 4 (54:42):
There you go, there, you go, perfect, perfect way in that.
And he also has some other ideas about this, some
were kind of out there, and we'll make sure we
go over those right after the break, and then we'll
get into the twelve anomalies of ovulobe is pointed out
and listed, which is very responsible with him on why
three i adlas might not just be a comment likely

(55:03):
a comment, but why so weird. We'll be right back
after this, Great Guys Spaced Out Radio after Owls Radio
Show Conversations that Move the Need, Conversations that move the need.

Speaker 9 (55:14):
Listening to after Hours with mister Rob g on the
only place where you can own the night, spaced out
radio space.

Speaker 6 (55:25):
You've tuned your dial.

Speaker 4 (55:26):
To the right frequency, all right, see you in fire buddys.

Speaker 7 (56:22):
Instid accident accent incident accent existent, exiss.

Speaker 3 (56:59):
Is extoll.

Speaker 7 (57:33):
Exist extent et absolute, install extent at exact exactly exact

(58:40):
tact exactly take exactly exact fact to exactly exactly exact, exact,

(59:46):
exactly fact exactly to exact.

Speaker 4 (01:00:29):
Welcome back spacedout radio, afous radio show after our number two.
Joes back with your bank you here. We're gonna be
starting getting back from radio here in the next thirty seconds.
Any opinions of questions about three I Atlas, put them
in caps so I can go ahead star them and
then we will talk about those or bring them up

(01:00:51):
the last half hour, the back half of this hour,
and let me see, let me actually get myself current here.
All right, here we go, all right, everybody, Welcome back

(01:01:14):
to spaced out radio. After that was radio show. We're
on after our number two doing a semis impromptu panel
here on three I Atlas talking about likely a comment,
but why so weird? Why is it so weird? Still strange?
Still unknown? We're waiting to see these pictures NASA up
what are you doing. Let's get on it. Any part

(01:01:35):
of this conversation you can find in archives absolutely free
YouTube dot com. Forward Slash, a spaced out radio is
getting back here with Drewski And so right before the
break we were talking about Billy Carson. So Billy Carson
and we actually in the last hour going over a
few other people who you know, had given opinions on

(01:01:56):
what they think this is from their eyes, what they
think this could be. And so right before the break
we were talking about Billy Carson at stated that if artificial,
it could be a probe examining this part of the galaxy.
And I made a statement saying, Okay, yeah, that makes

(01:02:17):
a lot of sense. You know, that's really grounded, a
grounded approach to it, because if you look at what
we've already done, we put things out there, and I
could see a world where, if we're still here as
humans a billion years down the line, we will have
things out there monitoring or probing different galaxies as well,

(01:02:39):
with the sole purpose of being probes to gather information
on different galaxies out there. It's definitely a place that
we're going to go at some point in our technological future.
So it makes total sense that that's what we're seeing here,
especially if we're talking about a civilization that could tech

(01:03:00):
technically no longer be there. If you think about it,
with the time it would take, the travel with you know,
some of their probes monitoring space. It just makes sense
because you know, Loue Elzando talks about the intruder being
outside your house and muddy footprints. I know everybody remembers
him talking about that. But just think of if you

(01:03:21):
had some sort of if you just think if you
had to worry about not just natural things out there,
but also you know, things that might be biological out
there coming in, you'd want to know. You'd want to
know when something was in your vicinity, some sort of
something that detects or finding out where things are so

(01:03:43):
you can monitor and keep an eye on particular said thing.
And a lot of people out there feel like that's
kind of what the current phenomena that we're dealing with
right here on Earth is doing. And you know, that
for me kind of leans into why it would make
sense that they would have some sort of probe coming
through our solar system. So Billy did kind of, you know,

(01:04:07):
get into some more Wooie side. I'll say of this
he had a second opinion. This is what he said
he actually believed, So the first one was what he thinks,
but he believes this one, as he says right here,
he believes believes that this object may be inhabited, and

(01:04:28):
that it may be that maybe it picked up frequencies
from our nuclear testing back in the nineteen forties and
has come to see what we've done and where we're
at at this point. And that for me makes you know,
I could see that potentially. Only thing with that is

(01:04:49):
that I would if we're talking to Billy right now,
is just the speed that it's traveling at. Is we
talked about last hour, about one hundred thousand kilometers or
miles per hour, depend on where you're from in the world,
is pretty slow, even though it's the fastest thing we've
seen traveling through our solar system, if we're assuming it
to be a comment, but it's pretty slow. When you

(01:05:12):
talk about needing to be able to travel at the
speed of light, and then also seeing some of the
things here that we see in our own skies traveling,
it would it appears well, I guess it's hard to
determine really. But if it's even going that fact, I
guess that'd be something we need to look into, because
I know, as far as the craft in the sky
that we see here, they're pretty they're zipping, zipping, zipping.

(01:05:34):
They're sixty miles away at the Captain Fraver's cap point
within what one two seconds?

Speaker 6 (01:05:42):
So do the math on that's a fraction of a
fraction of a second.

Speaker 4 (01:05:47):
Yeah, so doing the math on that, and maybe it's
in the ballpark of I don't think that'd be the
speed of light obviously, so you know, maybe they don't.
I don't know. I just it makes sense that three
I atlas, you know, being that it's on a galactic scale,
going only one hundred thousand miles per hour, that it

(01:06:07):
might not be that unless it's something that's full time
inhabited and it's strictly something that travels through space and
never goes back to a home planet. Now I can
see that that would make sense. What do you think
about that?

Speaker 6 (01:06:23):
Yeah, well, aren't we are we getting ready to send
like two people to Mars? One way? Didn't we talk
about that before? There's a some some woman that's gonna
be going and she's it's a one way trip, like
she's there's no return ticket.

Speaker 4 (01:06:42):
No, I hadn't heard of that. Let's bring that up
in an hour three though, for sure we talk more
about that. I hadn't heard of that.

Speaker 10 (01:06:49):
Oh I think so someone someone google that real quick. Uh,
but uh, Jamie google that. No, I think, Uh, I
think there.

Speaker 6 (01:07:02):
I think there was talk of that somewhere where there's
there's they're getting ready, they're screening someone and getting ready
to I know at least one person that has agreed
to do like a one way trip. No, and uh,
they know that they're they're not coming back, so you
know who I know.

Speaker 4 (01:07:23):
I've heard Elon Musk wants to said he wants he'll
he wants to go there, and I guess he'll go
at the end of his life when he doesn't have
much time left. So I could. I could see that.
But as as human beings, like right now, if we
were to hop on a spaceship and say, okay, we're
just going to you know, we're gonna have generations of

(01:07:43):
humans born on this spaceship and we're just going to
travel forever essentially out in the space, and I could
you know, I don't. I guess it would depend on
the life cycle of said being if that was gonna
be a thing, if they were really if this was inhabited,
it would they would probably have to have a longer

(01:08:04):
life cycle than we have, I would assume to even
make that make sense, because even on the human aspect,
I can't see with the time frame that we have
to live as humans. It just I don't see that
we would ever leave Earth forever and just strictly be
a space traveling, you know species. I just don't see that.

(01:08:26):
But it's you know, it's fun to think about. Yeah,
it is fun to think about.

Speaker 6 (01:08:32):
There's a there's a million possibilities, but like you said,
the the reality of it, there's a very very good chance.
The only thing that we can almost be certain of
is that we will never know. We will never know
for sure what this object is. And that's that. That's
that's what's almost guaranteed. Like who knows what we may

(01:08:56):
we may get a definitive answer of this, of what
this is, but the best chance is that we will
never know exactly what it is.

Speaker 4 (01:09:08):
I beg to differ. And the only reason why I
say that is because I'm putting stock into these NASA
photos that we haven't seen yet. I'm just feeling like
it's gonna be I'm probably setting my hopes too high.

Speaker 6 (01:09:22):
Host statement.

Speaker 4 (01:09:23):
I'm setting my hopes too high, I'm telling you because
I'm assuming that we're going to get this crystal clear
visual of what this is. And I just feel like,
for some reason, when they release these photos, they're gonna
be underwhelming.

Speaker 2 (01:09:41):
You know.

Speaker 4 (01:09:41):
I just feel like it's still not going to be
super high high definition. But maybe they'll prove me wrong,
and then maybe that's the reason why they haven't released
him as of yet. I don't know, but we know
what this guy thinks, Avi Lobe, because he's all over
TV right now and he's gotten it. He's the reason
why everyone's having this conversation to begin with, and he's

(01:10:02):
the guy that has laid out these twelve anomalies, which
he's pretty much just like, hey, just explain these away
and then we can move on. So let me go
ahead and go over Actually, let's do this. Let's go
over the timeline of events thus far with three atlas,
and I think I have those rights here. Yeah, okay,

(01:10:29):
So the timeline.

Speaker 6 (01:10:30):
We had.

Speaker 4 (01:10:33):
There was actually precovery prediscovery, which is back in May.
They didn't know what they were looking at. They didn't
they were capturing the data, but hadn't necessarily, you know,
singled it out as being something that didn't happen until
July first of this year. The NASA funded Asteroid Terrestrial
Impact Last Alert System or ATLAS, which is where three

(01:10:55):
Eyealyts gets his name from. Telescope in Ria Hitaro, Chile,
spots the object as a fast moving dots. Initial designation
it was some random name and numbers. Usually they give
it some weird name and numbers at the right ascension
twelve hours, thirty four minutes fifty six seconds. Let's see

(01:11:17):
July second through the fifteenth confirmation in early spectroscopy, the
Minor Planet Center officially designates its three I ATLAS as
the third interstellar interloper. And we get to July twenty first,
we get Hubble images from NASA, which is showing high

(01:11:39):
the first high resolution images. Then we get to August fourth,
which is when James Webb Telescope jumps in. We get
to August. Let's see between August tenth and twenty second,
we had some multi syite campaigns with Grand Telescope Yo
Canarius two meter telescope and VLT detect fan shaped dust

(01:12:04):
emissions and extreme negative polarization in the COMA. We get
to September and we get three I atlas near's two
astronomical units from the Sun. The brightness climbs to magnitude
twelve point five with COMA expanding to thirty arc seconds
with faint green hues from diatomic carbon did we get

(01:12:29):
to October seconds and third, which was the Mars fly
by closest approach to Mars, which we still are waiting
for the images we had the European Space Agency actually
get some images and they show us some images also

(01:12:50):
China as well, And we get to October twenty ninth,
which is the perihelion, the solar closest approach at one
point three five seven astronomical units peak speed, and that's
astronomical units between it says Earth and Mars orbits. Global

(01:13:12):
observatories including Gemini South recorded maximum activity, extended ion tail
and multiple jets. No fragmentation observed November third, which apparently
this is the Venus approach. I didn't hear about that.
November eleventh, Italy's Virtual Telescope Project images show colimated jets

(01:13:39):
extending one million kilometers sunward and three million kilometers anti sunword,
which is one of the anomalies for AVI Lobe intricately
structured unlike diffused commentary. Sprays Lobe highlights this in his
medium Q and A. You got November fifteenth, just yesterday,

(01:14:02):
apparent magnitude eleven hits eleven point five visible to small telescopes.
The tail length ens with ongoing James Web telescope monitoring
for Dopplers shifts in jets. We get coming up here
December nineteenth, which will be closest safe passed at one
point eight astronomical units for two hundred and seventy million

(01:14:23):
kilometers with its closest approach to Earth. Then we have
March of twenty twenty six is essentially when it should
be passing Jupiter and kind of after that sort of
leaves the Solar System. So that's the timeline. But the

(01:14:44):
things that AVI Lobe has pointed out, which is the
reason why scientists should be kind of taking a step
back and at least listening to what the guy has
to say, is the ecliptic alignment of retrograde trajectory, which

(01:15:04):
would be number one. Actually let me get this off here.
That's number one. To paraphrase Einstein, his math is fine,
but his statistics are atrocious. Best takedowns let's see is
retrogratuactories aligned within five degrees with the ecliptic plane of
the planets around the Sun with the likelihood of zero

(01:15:26):
point two The second anomaly listed is during July and
August twenty twenty five, it displayed a sunword jet or
an anti tail that is not an optical illusion from
geometric perspective, unlike familiar commets. Number three was the nucleus
is about a million times more massive than a muamua

(01:15:49):
and a thousand times more massive than two I Borisov,
while moving faster than both altogether, with the likelihood of
less than zero point one percent. Anomaly four would be
its arrival time was fine tuned to bring it within
ten millions of kilometers from Mars, Venus and Jupiter and

(01:16:10):
be unobservable from Earth at perihelion with the likelihood of
zero point zero zero five percent. Number five was its
gas plume contains much more nickel than iron is found
in industrially produced nickel alloys, and a nickel to cinaide
ratio that is orders of magnitude larger than that of

(01:16:33):
all known comets, including to Iborisov, with the likelihood below
one percent. The sixth is the gas plume contains only
four percent water by mass, a primary constituent of familiar comets.
Number seven, it shows extreme negative polarization, unprecedented for all

(01:16:54):
known comets, including to Iborisov, with the likelihood below one percent.
The eighth it arrived from a direction coincid direction coinciding
with the ratio of the Wild signal, which actually, think
I have something about that here, let me bring that

(01:17:16):
up here. And so it was coming from the same
direction as the Wild signal, which was this whole big deal,
just what we're looking at here, and it arrived from
direction coinciding with the ratio Wild signal to within nine
degrees with the likelihood of zero point six percent. The

(01:17:39):
ninth was near perihelion. It brightened faster than any known
comment and was bluer than the sun. The tenth anomaly.
It exhibited non gravitational acceleration, which requires massive evaporation of
at least thirteen percent of its mass, but preliminary perihelion

(01:18:02):
images do not show evidence for it so far, so
it should have lost a lot of mass and it didn't.
And let's see. Now we are at anomaly eleven, which
is let's see, I think this is non smear jet

(01:18:23):
orient I think this is twelve non smear jet orientation.
Despite rotation one to three million kilometers, stay precisely oriented
across directions, unaffected by the sixteen point sixteen hour spend.
So it takes sixteen point six hours for it to
rotate one complete time, and the natural jets would smear,

(01:18:47):
but instead they look like this, which are unbroken. So
and I saw some things on this. I saw things
on this where, uh, someone had come up with an
idea that there could be some sort of the rotation

(01:19:08):
could be hit like so think of like a what
are right here? This is three eye atlas. We have
an image of three eye outlas up here, and these
are the jets that that we're talking about here for
the the last anomaly. And so essentially, if this thing
was rotating, if these jets are speeling out and it's rotating,

(01:19:28):
then the jets would not remain straight. They would kind
of smear you. And you can understand how that would work.
So someone someone explained it away as the way this
could work if it was considered to be technological is
that the spinning is like a nucleus on the inside,
and that there's a sort of structure around it, almost

(01:19:50):
like a dice in sphere, that that that would be
around it, and that the jets or thrusters, as Avi
Lobe has said and and other interviews, would be on
this outer shell essentially of the OYB.

Speaker 2 (01:20:06):
What is it?

Speaker 6 (01:20:07):
I've zoomed in on this because it's I'm trying to like,
what is the direction of travel of this? Is it
going like from right to left?

Speaker 2 (01:20:15):
Uh?

Speaker 4 (01:20:15):
Let me see here? It's yeah, because I can't see
that either. Let me let me bring this up a
little bit.

Speaker 9 (01:20:25):
Uh.

Speaker 4 (01:20:25):
Stacked images of three I atlas on November eighth. The
sunward direction, which is opposite to the arrow, is pointing
towards the bottom left corner, is what it states here
for this image. So, but the jets, each one of
those little lines you see there, white lines are showing
you just where these jets are shooting out from each

(01:20:47):
side of the thing. But if it's rotating, these jets
are not. They shouldn't be straight like that. They shouldn't
be solid lines like they are, and this is where
ivy Low is statium for him, he could explain that
as being like thrust from a jet coming out the
back of a ship, right, but then the spinning the

(01:21:09):
rotation part. And I don't know. I don't think ive
Lobe came up with this explanation. It was someone else,
but they stated that they thought it could be Ah,
they thought that it could be from thrusters on the
outside of the shell of an object. And let's see here.

(01:21:35):
Did you send something out?

Speaker 6 (01:21:37):
Yeah, I may have invited somebody.

Speaker 4 (01:21:40):
Okay, okay, And so we'll go ahead and bring that
person up here in just a moment. Let me see here,
So let me just make sure we get through this here.

Speaker 6 (01:21:51):
All right, so it'd be a good surprise.

Speaker 4 (01:21:54):
Yeah, yeah, good friend, good friend. This one here is
the stack deep image of three i at LEAs taken
on November ninth through a combination of five exposures, each
lasting three minutes with two telescopes. The sunwhare direction is
toward the lower left corner. And all right, and let

(01:22:25):
me see what else we have here. So we've got
the wild signal. This is the hot Mars high Rise orbiter.
So this is the craft that is in orbit around Mars.
This is what should have taken the image. Hopefully it
has a great image of it. This and you can
go to the high rise site, which is I think
it's being run by the University of Arizona. And I

(01:22:48):
think that's what Avi Love was referring to, that there's
a person from the University of Arizona working with NASA
that would have access to these photos. Like they're not
even coming through NASA, they're coming through the University of
ara Zona. So it's like, why sure haven't we seen
it because they didn't experience the shutdown.

Speaker 6 (01:23:05):
There's another point that I saw mentioned in the chat
that that brings up a good point that that I
didn't think about. You know, the the Vatican has in
I think it's an Arizona. It's a state here, it's
in one of the states. It's in the United States.
I think it's Arizona. But they have a telescope there,
like a huge telescope. It's weird that the Vatican owns

(01:23:27):
a telescope in the United States. But I'm talking about
a really really a really really big one. So I
mean that has possibility seeing it too, Like there and
there's observatories, like huge observatories in Hawaii, Like what where's
all the where's all that data? Like, where's where's the
where's this data?

Speaker 4 (01:23:47):
At This is the photo of the actual camera that
you see mounted to the road, which is right there
at the bottom there, And that's how you can tell scale.
This is that actual camera. This is what should have
taken an image of three I Atlas. This is hopefully
gonna be the camera that kind of explains what this

(01:24:08):
thing is to us once and for all. And uh, NASA,
where's the where's the photo? We can't find it? We
can't find it. So with that being said, I just
wanted to present that, and we're gonna actually get ready
to go into our last break here of the night.
But before I do, I want to make sure that
we bring h our special guest here up on the

(01:24:30):
stage to join the conversation as we get ready to
go into the last half of this hour, which is
none other than good friend augignized Augie, thanks for coming
on in. How you doing?

Speaker 2 (01:24:42):
Hey? Hey, hey, well it sounds like you guys are
having fun there.

Speaker 4 (01:24:46):
Yeah, you know, we we kind of are. You know,
it definitely felt there was you know something that we
needed to talk about, especially with the photos coming up
here supposedly released this week, which means this story might
be over with. This might be the last time we're
talking about it, So it's awesome to have you us.

Speaker 2 (01:25:03):
Oh no, it not be over, but it is fun
to talk about stuffs that makes your brain it next.

Speaker 4 (01:25:11):
That's what I'm talking. We're gonna come right back after
this break. I'll be giving give me just one moment, Ogi,
We're coming right back spaced out radio after ours radio show. Guys,
don't go anywhere. Algie Danstas joined the party. We'll be
back right here, faced out radio. All right, we are clear.

(01:25:39):
All right, we're on a five minute break here. Everyone
can still see and hear us, Drew and Augie, and
we'll come back.

Speaker 6 (01:25:47):
Thanks for thanks for popping in a.

Speaker 2 (01:25:51):
Yeah, hi there. This is kind of an enigma that
there is so many fake videos out there talking about it,
so it's really hard to know. But there are two
scientists that have the guts to come out and talk
about some of the truths behind it. That's Mitsu Kaku

(01:26:14):
and av Lower And you mentioned Alvi. I have a
high regard for that guy. He is sharp.

Speaker 4 (01:26:22):
Yeah. Yeah, we talked about Mishu as well. He had
an opinion that he his opinion was that it was
seven billion year old rock from deep space essentially is
what he said paraphrasing, and that I was talking also
argue about how it's just responsible, I think in this

(01:26:43):
conversation and pretty much all conversations that have like a
bottom up approach to let's let's let's come from a
grounded level where we can talk facts about what this
could be and then kind of branch out from there. Right.

Speaker 2 (01:27:00):
Yeah, Yeah, there we're talking about three Ie Atlas. That's
not going to be the biggest story. The biggest story
will be the next one, four I Atlas that has

(01:27:21):
just now left the Kuiper Belt and heading the same
pathway to come through and meet up with planets and
going around the Sun. That one is a hundred times
bigger than three Eye Atlas.

Speaker 4 (01:27:41):
Wow, so we go, here we go. Have they detected
this or is this something they've detected already?

Speaker 2 (01:27:50):
Yeah? I believe so. I saw something about it, and
I known about this one for a while and there's
not much out there on it yet. But it's kind
of the same thing that when the scientists see something
like this, especially now, they don't talk about it right

(01:28:13):
away because a lot of the information to get is
immediately classified. A lot of the pictures from three Iyatlas
are classified. If it is just a rock, why in
the world would they classify it, or if it is

(01:28:35):
an ice ice, you know, snowball, why would anybody classify that? No,
there's something and Mitchell Kaku talk about that when they
when they took here the blue pictures that they're taken
from three Iyatlas, it had triangular and square panels on

(01:28:58):
the outside. It looks like it was geometrics. Snowballs have
no geometrics on the outside.

Speaker 4 (01:29:12):
Who where were these images that? Who said that? Who
said they saw that?

Speaker 7 (01:29:17):
Uh?

Speaker 2 (01:29:17):
That was meet you Kaku?

Speaker 4 (01:29:20):
Oh okay, I gotta watch you know another thing I saw.
I have to find that. Here's one thing I had
to do have to say about Mishikaku and guys, this
is a warning. This is actually one of these moments
where you might want to look out because I when
I was researching and looking into things, and uh, I

(01:29:43):
was actually researching meets You Kaku looking for some some
state his's some statements from him, and I came across
probably thirty Ai meets you Kaku videos where they had
Metsu Kaku saying it was all these weird things and

(01:30:03):
it wasn't even Meshukaku, it was a I. I saw
these today and I was like, that's not me Shukaku,
that is not Meschukaku. And he was saying stuff like
he would stuff he would never say, and I was like, no,
that's definitely not uh Meetshukaku. So yeah, so guys, don't
be fooled out there by by these AI videos. They're

(01:30:26):
they're currently I verify for sure these were AI videos
and Meetschukaku.

Speaker 2 (01:30:34):
Yeah, it's really hard to see, but I personally think
I also saw I There was another scientist that talked
about when they when they scanned it, they had several
echoes coming back from this three iAtlas, so it appeared

(01:30:58):
as it was hollow. Now, I don't know if it's
possible to see that from those scams, but if it
not surprised me because it's not a snowball.

Speaker 4 (01:31:17):
Give me one second here and definite sects say we
highlighted comment tonight, Grant Carson, We're coming right back right now.
Welcome back to space. Our Radio Dowter ours radio show
with me, your host, mister Rob g. We're having a
fantastic show tonight. Just have a conversation on three I
at listeners. We don't know what it is. We're trying
to figure out. It's like everyone else. But I can

(01:31:39):
tell you this. I can tell you this likely a comic.
But why is it so weird? We're talking about that
and a lot more. Make sure if you miss any
of this conversation tonight, if you jump into archive, because
it doesn't cost anything. YouTube dot com forward slash has
faced our radio as we come back here and we
are joined in the back half of the second hour

(01:32:01):
here with our guest Augie Nass, who has decided to
come on in enjoying this conversation about three I Atlas
and you know, I'll tell you what there's and I
spoke about Stephen Greer and Billy Carson earlier tonight. And
just like with anyone else, I think out in the
UFO community, I think there are things that you can

(01:32:24):
take away from everyone. I think, you know, everyone has
things that you can draw from, even if there are
other parts of their live or personality that you may
not agree with. The like it's all about finding those
silver linings. It's all about searching for those nuggets. And

(01:32:44):
even in moments when someone says something, it's all sometimes
it's not about what they say, it's about what they
didn't say. So there's always an abstract way to kind
of look at it and take in information. And you know,
I think I can definitely say that that regardless on
how you some people out there may feel about those

(01:33:05):
individuals that I mentioned, there's definitely things, some nuggets I
could definitely point to that have added to the conversation
in the community. And I just want to give a
statement to kind of just be fair about that, because
I know there's our community often gets split within their
feelings about certain individuals that are talking heads in the community.

(01:33:26):
But yeah, go ahead, arguized.

Speaker 2 (01:33:30):
Yeah, And I feel like I want to say something
about Greer and Carlson because are you considering those two
guys to be human? I think the answer probably is yes.

Speaker 4 (01:33:45):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:33:45):
That means they are not right on absolutely everything. They're fallible.
And but Greer's he is saying that there are no
such things as bad aliens. I disagree. There are some
that doesn't have our best interest in heart. And also

(01:34:06):
with the cars. He may be wrong on something from
time to time too, but I have also heard him
say I don't know that, or I have that wrong before.
That is a sign of someone that is credible. They
say what they think and believe, and when they're wrong,

(01:34:30):
they admit it. Well have I had to do that
a few times?

Speaker 4 (01:34:36):
And that's awesome for you to make that statement, arguing
kind of add to that that that's awesome. And you know,
there's some of the same, you know, going on in
the scientific community when we talk about, you know, some
of the scientists that are out there speaking against Ivy
Low for simply having, you know, an over minded approach

(01:34:56):
to looking at what three I atlas might be. He's
opening eyes, I feel like, and I feel like if
he didn't join the conversation that the rest of the
scientists would just have us assume that this is just
a comment passing through the Solar System and nothing more.
And Avid Lobe has at least opened up the idea
that it could be something else because it's coming from

(01:35:20):
deep space for one, and for two, we know we
currently are dealing with the phenomena right here on Earth
in our own sky. So if if they're here right
now we're dealing with this, then of course you want
to you know, have an open mind about something that
might be approaching from the outer Solar system. It only
makes sense.

Speaker 2 (01:35:39):
What do you do, absolutely, Drew, what would you say
to that? Up?

Speaker 6 (01:35:47):
Yeah, I mean we got to have bothen minds to
everything because ultimately we don't know what it is, you know,
and there's a lot of speculation, a lot of ideas,
but ultimately we don't know. And really I pray, you know,
we're going to figure out what this is. Hopefully, hopefully
we get some pictures from NASA. But you know, like

(01:36:08):
we talked about earlier, even if we do get pictures
from NASA, like we're still going to question them because
there's AI out there, Like you know, you just talking
about have seeing Missu Kaku uh having having AI generated videos.
You know, there's Joe Rogan uh ai videos. That's that
hits on so many different things. It's it hits on

(01:36:30):
tribalism because you have you have like a certain tribe
that's attached to these people, like like deep followers that
that following very deeply, and then you have like authority,
so you you have like like mind control, like not techniques,
but aspects that are tied into it. So when when

(01:36:51):
someone with UH perceived authority, you know that when they
have so many when they have you know, the number
one podcast or or UH like like all these different
alcolades that miss Ukaku has and I'll be Low, you know,
you have this authoritarianism that's attached around it. So there's

(01:37:15):
it's it's just it's a different thing than if I
were to go out there and give out my opinion
on three I at lis then like stand beside Ibi
Low or Missukaku. So but you know, ultimately we probably
won't ever know exactly what it is like we're never
going to see most of us are never going to
see it face to face. So you know, that's that's

(01:37:37):
the only thing that's going to make sense. But ultimately,
you know, what's going on out here on the ground
withinside of us, the waking that's going inside, that's going
on inside of each and every one of us, is
is the main point of what's going on right now,
So let's not get distracted from that.

Speaker 2 (01:37:55):
Yeah, and I want to remind you too, there's why
I have a bumper sticker on the back of one
of my cars and it says on it NASA lies,
So you gotta remember lying about at least half of

(01:38:18):
what they're telling us.

Speaker 4 (01:38:20):
And well, here's the problem. Here's the problem I have
is that you know, for some reason, uh and as
you you said earlier, and I didn't hear this, and
I want to look into that. But the NASA classifying
this information or I don't know, I don't know. They
say that they're releasing a photo of this, uh later

(01:38:42):
this week. Now. I did have someone in the chat
that was had brought something up that was pretty on
point when it came to that, and it was Mike Jones,
who Mike Jones who basically is saying, what if the
photos are not the actual object? And that's been a
fear of mine, and that because obviously there's so much

(01:39:02):
going on out there in space, they could easily snap
a shot of something OL. But I think where that
might not work out is that you have so many
eyes on it h and so many other telescopes and
cameras looking at it that it would it would you'd
probably be able to tell that it's not the same
object if they tried to pull that. So I don't
think they'll be able to do that.

Speaker 6 (01:39:24):
But I want to I want to, I want to
speak on that.

Speaker 2 (01:39:29):
That.

Speaker 6 (01:39:30):
I did hear something about. I think that three Eye
Outlas has its own Congressional Oversight Committee or something like that. Now, uh,
I did hear some about that classification. I don't know
if it's classification, but I believe that's well I heard
and I can't remember. I can't cite it, but I
believe it is the Congressional Oversight Committee on Three Eye Outlas,

(01:39:57):
which if it's been d aimed Iraq and it's been
deemed a comment by NASA, like why why would you
know NASA is connected. It's it's a governor, it's a
it's a product of the government. You know, it's part
of the government. So why would they have a Congressional
oversight committee? And I believe that's been formed, like just recently.

Speaker 2 (01:40:20):
So yeah, I don't know. There are meetings going on
behind closed stores between both the Chinese and the Russians
and the United States in regard to these objects coming
into the solar system. They know there's something that is
abnormal at best, dangerous at worst.

Speaker 4 (01:40:45):
Yeah, I could see that. I could see that, you know,
I've when when I want to think way off and
i'm you know, I want to imagine what this might be.
You know, I put together different things that have happened
this year that made me feel like that we could
potentially look at this as something that maybe government officials

(01:41:07):
and NASA know more about that they're willing to tell us,
and the reason why we might be experiencing some of
the bad the turmoil and bad energy that's kind of
flowing around the country right now because they're setting us
up to prepare for something. Now, obviously there's not going
to be a way to validate that unless said thing happens.

(01:41:29):
But we know NASA, being that it is a government agency,
has been accused of not telling the truth pretty much
for their entire existence. If you want to go all
the way back to if the Moon landing happened or
didn't happen, which is something that I wanted to actually
talk about a little bit later, but you know, going

(01:41:50):
from that, looking at the shutting off of the space
station cameras when weird things are happening, and in in
space the shovel missions, where you had obvious objects that
were floating around out there and they tried to explain
it off as something else, and it's just I don't

(01:42:12):
They're supposed to be and they present themselves as a
transparent agency, but we I think we all know there
is no transparency when it comes to the.

Speaker 6 (01:42:21):
Government, right, Oh yeah, Well, what what year was Roswell?

Speaker 4 (01:42:27):
Nineteen forty seven?

Speaker 6 (01:42:29):
Nineteen forty seven? We just we just found out they
just admitted just within the past couple of years that
they recover biological biological bodies. Now we're starting starting to
find proof that there was EV one, ev one or
ev one, whatever it was, was a biological entity that
was still alive after that and was handled by Colonel

(01:42:53):
Corso for how for like five or six seven years
something like that, Like how they've kept that secret for
how so long? So you know, who knows what this
is like? And who knows if weever get all the
transcript all the actual photos, like and like in this
day and age with AI and everything, it's going to
be hard to believe anything. So this is this is

(01:43:16):
a show me time, like this is this is this
is a time for people witness stuff face to face.
I was just talking about it on Friday, talking people
are talking. The conversation was going towards consciousness and AI.
And I was like, that's that's why I lean more
towards the Native American practices because AI can't affect when

(01:43:37):
an eagle shows up from a dream, or when a
coyote or a bear show like like the animal spirits,
you know, show up and give you messages at certain
times when you're having certain thoughts and they connect to
in the physical. That's something AI cannot affect. So why
not have something that cannot be interfaced with that? And

(01:44:00):
that's that's why getting back to this three I Atlas
and and and this you know, contact can't contact event
that people keep talking about, It's going to be something
that people are gonna have to witness firsthand and AI.
The introduction of AI over the past couple of years
is only pushing that forward even more because it's taking

(01:44:22):
the trust out of pictures and videos.

Speaker 2 (01:44:25):
Yeah, yeah, there is a there's another thing too, There's
more and more people now starting to think that this
is all made up, there's nothing to it. They're scaring
their chocolate out of us so they can introduce Operation
blue Bean. But that is not so because about probably

(01:44:51):
three months ago, I interviewed a guy on broadcast team
Alpha mark down di'antonio. He has to tell, let's scope
at home. That is a big I could probably crawl
into it. And he said this showed us the film
that he took. He found three Eye Outlas and he

(01:45:15):
followed it, so we saw he got it. And then
again there are other amateur astronomers out there that also
is filming. So this thing is real. But then that
doesn't mean that this is an opportunity for NASA and

(01:45:35):
the UN and whoever other scores buckets out there like
to introduce operation Bluebeam, the false the fake alien invasion.
Because it's still on the table, and my friend in
two is only John Desusa, you know, the FBI agent.

(01:45:56):
He says, Operation Bluebeam is still relevant and it is imminent.
I had planning to do it very soon.

Speaker 4 (01:46:07):
See, and I thought this would have been when I
want three I Atlas, When this whole thing started coming
out and everybody's talking about it, I thought this was
going to be the perfect time for Greer to talk
about the false flags. You know, that's been a big
thing he's talked about, and I just knew that he
was going to take that angle and say it. See,
this is it's starting to happen right now. I thought

(01:46:29):
that was going to be the angles. I haven't heard
him say that recently. If if he has, let me know.
But you know, I I don't think you could even
attempt to call it a false flag though, because I
think with it coming from interstellar space, uh, it would

(01:46:49):
be it couldn't be ours essentially, like it couldn't be
our craft. If it was going to be a craft
coming in from interstellar space, that's kind of where I
would start.

Speaker 2 (01:47:03):
Well, we don't really know what they have in the
secret space program. They remember, you know, the head of
the Skunkworks Locked skunk Works, he said in nineteen seventy eight,
he said, when he retired, if you have seen it
on TV, we already know how to do it. I

(01:47:25):
mean on Star Trek he said, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:47:29):
I mean it's very interesting. I'd say to say the least.
But you know, here's the thing. Next time we see
each other and we'll be doing the show here next week,
we'll actually see what it is. But at this point,
as I was showing earlier, this is kind of this
kind of where we're at NASA, So it's like you
got to do something like we need you to update

(01:47:51):
your page and show us what this thing is because
we want to know. And I know you see all
these people out here having these conversations, and I know
you see and notice all the disinformation that is happening
as well, with all these clickbait videos that are being
posted where people are literally making up things about what
this thing is. And uh, you know, why not why

(01:48:15):
not release the photos so we can see just like
the files, release the files, release the photo. Let's get
let's do all this. Can we do all this at
the same time, Release the files, release the photoshoto. For
humanity's sake.

Speaker 6 (01:48:30):
Let's just put it all out on the table. Yeah,
shots fired, shots fired, all the files, all the files,
all the files. People would listen, Let's just be clear
what we're talking about.

Speaker 4 (01:48:48):
Yeah, I know to this videos it canceled, you know. Yeah. Hey,
I'm a humanitarian first man. I'm all about human beings
and humanity and and you know, us advancing and getting
to the answers and the truth and a can't when
we got all this bs out there. It's kind of

(01:49:09):
hard trying to for I can imagine someone who wants
to learn about this, how much trouble they're running into
sifting through all this trash that's out there, and it's
just sad man, especially with these and I'll just go
up in this time because we have a few minutes
to break. But these these AI videos, right, these AI

(01:49:32):
narrated usually they're narrated by AI, and they make some
grand claim, oh, three i at lists just blinked, or
three i at lists just made a left turn, and
then come with this whole thing. And it's like someone
who may not be able to discern whether this is
real or not, is receiving very very bad information and

(01:49:55):
then maybe recommending that to someone else and spreading this disinformation.
I think we already have too much of that in
the community, with individuals who go on shows and make
things up and say things, and we already have that problem.
We don't need AI, you know, coming into our space
and kind of compounding that problem. And it's just any

(01:50:17):
time you see it, you got to speak on it.
What I do is when it's in my recommended list,
I just say, don't recommend this ever again, and I
flag the channel and I do all that because it's
just there's no room if you are trying to get
to the truth there is no room or in the
time that we have, the short time we have here

(01:50:38):
as living beings, we don't have time to you know,
have to figure out what's fake and what's not. So
if anyone wants to add to that, we have a
couple of minutes before break here.

Speaker 2 (01:50:51):
Yeah. I think also that a couple of weeks from now,
this conversation may be totally.

Speaker 4 (01:50:57):
Different, exactly. And that's what I'm saying, you know, And
that's why I want to go too too far with it, right,
That's why I want to keep it grounded, because you know,
why step out on a ledge and say it's something
that it may turn out to absolutely not be and

(01:51:18):
then they're in there. Now, who's looking like a fool
at that point? Right? And I just there and I
talked to Drew you I think it was before is
before you came in Augie. I was talking to Drew
about different individuals who had opinions on what this was.
But then at the same time I also looked at
the UFO community, not necessarily just the UFO community, but

(01:51:39):
just you know, the phenomena community is what I'll call it.
And I found things like channelers, uh, I found remote viewers, mediums,
and they were just saying the wildest things about what
three I Atlas was. And Drew made a point where
we know that some of these channelers were more viewers

(01:52:00):
and mediums are authentic in their abilities to do what
they do. But then they're the ones that are Charlatan's
and definitely are not. You know, They're just up there
saying things or making things up, and I think those
are the people that that are gonna end up hanging themselves.

Speaker 2 (01:52:18):
Yeah, we remember too though, you know, truth is usually
stranger than fiction. So whatever they say, I kind of
still like to give them a small benefit of the doubt.

Speaker 6 (01:52:37):
Yeah, yeah, I mean, because really, who does like right now,
like any anything's on the table, to be honest, it's uh,
this is this is a time for wild things happen.

Speaker 2 (01:52:51):
You know.

Speaker 6 (01:52:51):
I see a lot of people talking about hope, prophecy
and stuff. Maybe they're foretelling what's going to be coming
up in the third uh hour of this, but uh
uh yeah, this this is the this is the time
for weird things happen. This is the time for prophecies unfold.
So you know, I don't I don't write off anybody,

(01:53:12):
but there's definitely. You know, if like I, like I
was saying before you come on, Augie, now is the
time to prove it, Like if if you can remote
view like the Joe Man, monogaal things like that, Monroe
Institute like that that has really based themselves on remote viewing,
Like let's let's let's talk to them, like go up

(01:53:34):
and go up, put put some put a couple of
guys in the trance, send them up there, and and
and and get a report from them and and see
what matches up on it. You know, like let's let's
get scientific about this. Let's let's put numbers on it.
Let's let's put let's put remote viewers that had been
bona fide remote viewers. Let's send them up there, bring

(01:53:56):
them back, get their reports and and figure figure out
what line up, and then we can start Then we
can start tracking, getting closer to what the truth is
that on that level, And that's that's I'm gonna believe that.
I'm gonna believe that more than I will ever believe
a picture at this point, because AI can make anything.

Speaker 2 (01:54:15):
Yeah that makes sense? Can I give you my theory?

Speaker 4 (01:54:20):
And I am.

Speaker 2 (01:54:23):
Ninety eight point city for six percent sure, it is true.

Speaker 4 (01:54:28):
Now you're getting pretty specific there. Hold for one second, though,
I because we got Agi, we got thirty seconds before
we go to break, So hold that thought and then
we'll give it right after the break here. Uh So,
with that being said, yeah, we're gonna go ahead and
get into some good stuff here in hour three, and
we got Aggie here. We have we have a panel

(01:54:49):
coming up next week which we'll end up talking about
for the Age of Disclosure documentary which is coming out
on Friday, So I want to make sure everybody out
there goes to see it. That way, you can participate
in the chat on that show. But we'll be right
back after this break with more conversations. Spaced out Radio come.

Speaker 9 (01:55:09):
Conversations that move the need, Conversations that move the need.
Listening to After Hours with mister Rob g on the
only place where you can own the night, spaced out radio.

Speaker 6 (01:55:21):
Spaced out radio, you've tuned your dial to the right frequency.

Speaker 4 (01:55:31):
All right, we're clear, see you guys in five.

Speaker 1 (01:55:35):
Minutes as press.

Speaker 5 (01:56:17):
Exclusier not.

Speaker 7 (01:56:42):
Externa press the act.

Speaker 8 (01:57:33):
Secret but another art the arena A singer, not.

Speaker 7 (01:57:50):
Consistant, decissistant, persistant.

Speaker 3 (01:58:36):
Past the mo.

Speaker 4 (02:00:42):
All right, welcome back toast our Radio that After Hours
the radio show as we get ready to actually we're
an hour three now, let me change that. Coming back
here in about fifteen seconds, here we go. All right, everybody,

(02:01:08):
welcome back to Face our Radio After Ours radio show.
We are in after hour number three. We've been talking
about three I at lists tonight, kind of taking a
ground up approach with it. What is it likely? A
comment from what I hear, from what I understand, but
why is it so weird? Right, let's get those questions asked,
and I know the audience had questions. We'll go ahead

(02:01:29):
and talk about those real quick here before we jump
into other things right here on Face our Radio. As
we get back into the conversation, aby Agi, you were
Aki ivy Aki. You were right in the middle of
giving a prediction. I think you stated, so go ahead
and pick up there.

Speaker 2 (02:01:49):
Well, I there's a reason why I think I am
sure I am accurate on this, and that is I
think it isn't observation. I'm speaking of three I outlos now.
I believe it is an observation platform that was sent

(02:02:11):
from another system. And there I also think there's a
reason why they flew really close to Mars first, because
the closest star system to us is about three about

(02:02:32):
three point something light years away, and that is seem
like this this thing comes from. So if it travels
through space, go by Mars and let's say it takes
maybe several hundred thousand years or maybe a million years

(02:02:55):
to get here or more. Maybe they had old information
because a million years ago there was a there was
a society living on Mars. Maybe they came by to

(02:03:15):
have a look and see how they were doing. And
then they go further, come by Earth because they also
knew there was something going on there. And then they
go around the Sun, and of course they're speeding up

(02:03:35):
and slowing down, which doesn't make sense. So we know
there's energy involved here. There is an intelligence behind it.
So when they go out, they passed by other planets
close by, and I wonder why, maybe they also think
there is intelligence on those planets. So I am totally

(02:04:02):
convinced this is an observation platform that came through to
make an observation of what's going on on Mars, what
are they doing on Earth, and what are they doing
on other planets? And they figured it out there's something
going on here so something is coming in from the

(02:04:24):
Kiper Belt. Maybe it's been out there all the time
because that's where it's coming from. In that's four I atlets,
So I wonder what is on that bond that it's
about one hundred times bigger than three I. We're going
to find out in the next few months.

Speaker 4 (02:04:47):
Yeah, I'm assuming, and I know Ivy Low will probably
jump right on that and probably going to press around
for that, which is awesome because keep the conversation out there.
But yeah, I like that idea.

Speaker 2 (02:04:58):
I like that.

Speaker 4 (02:04:59):
I like that produce and it makes it It makes
a lot of sense. And we talked about think Billy
Carson stated something like that. He stated that he believes
he thinks if it's artificial, could be a probe examining
this part of the galaxy. And then believes maybe inhabited

(02:05:21):
says says, maybe picked up frequencies from a nuclear testing
and it's come to see what we've done. Since it'll
be pretty close to along the lines of what you
were stating, And it just makes sense. As I was
telling Drew earlier, it is like with a billion years
from now, if we are blessed enough to still be
here as human beings. Our technological advancements are going to

(02:05:43):
be so out there that we will one day since
have probes monitoring, you know, as much of space as
we can. So it is definitely a likely thing for
an advanced civilization to do, to have probes out in space.
It just makes sense. So I'm with that idea, argue.
How about you, Drew, what do you think?

Speaker 6 (02:06:05):
Yeah, I mean, uh, you know when Augie mentioned the
four I Atlas and mentioned, you know it's a it's
a couple of months. You know, we're going to figure
out within this couple of months, I immediately started thinking about,
you know, my what uh what Bloodstoe talks about. There's
about there's gonna be in a uh he foreseen an
event around Easter twenty twenty six, and and that would

(02:06:29):
line up but within you know, we're only five months
away from April right now, so it's uh, it's just
something to think about. There's there's a lot of things unfolding,
and you know, there's so many people mentioned the Blue
Star Kachina. Uh, you know, I'm gonna have to look
more into that that particular prophecy, but I know there's

(02:06:51):
multiple Native American prophecies that are that are converting right
now at this very moment.

Speaker 4 (02:06:57):
And and Augie uh to to so what you were
saying here? T Bone was asking if three eye Outlas
is an observation platform, then what what is four eye Atlas?
What do you think it would be?

Speaker 2 (02:07:12):
Well, it's a lot bigger, and we have really well
we may have ideas about it that we don't know anything.
I think also that is intelligently directed because it's followed
a familiar path that does not fit with it fits

(02:07:37):
with a three, one, two, and three outlets, it fits
with that, but the path is not following gravitational trajectories.
So we're going to find out in another month or so,

(02:07:58):
because then everybody will be talking about it.

Speaker 4 (02:08:01):
Yeah, let's let's get three eye Atlas out the way.
Before we was not worrying about four eyelands. That's gonna
be a whole another can of worms, I'll tell you.
But uh exactly eleven yeah, uh, And so let me
get this here. Jose Sanchez was just asking, what is
three eye Atlas's current location? Let me see, I just

(02:08:25):
I was looking at the timeline here. I could probably
give you an idea, and.

Speaker 2 (02:08:32):
It's coming here out of the Sun.

Speaker 4 (02:08:33):
That's it says here that uh let's see that's those
I have the timeline of where it is. Okay, so
November fifteenth, Uh okay, do's to say where it's at.

(02:08:58):
But December ninth is the Earth's closest past. So it's
somewhere between Mars and Earth is probably what I can
tell you. I can't pinpoint it, but we know it's
in the sky closest to the Sun. Is where they
were talking about, Like I guess if you're in the
United States, they someone stated that if you wait right

(02:09:20):
before it, right as the sun is rising or right
before and you look right at the horizon, that this
is where those objects are located. If you had a
telescope and you wanted to look for yourself, and you
should be able to google that information as well. But
it's somewhere close to the Sun.

Speaker 6 (02:09:37):
I'm just saying, it's close to the sun. And we
just had one of the biggest Aurora borealis is ever
in the United on Earth that was visible to you know,
almost all the United States. I was outside and saw
it on November eleventh. But you know, it's it's coincidental

(02:09:58):
that it's pass and close to the Sun. If this
is like a conscious a consciousness pro let's let's just
say it's it's a non inhabited but it's a it's
a consciousness ball of energy or something like that that's
going by and waking up different things or or absorbing
energy from the Sun and then and then gonna release

(02:10:19):
it when it when it gets closer to the Earth.
Like who knows what it's I mean, what it's going
to be, But we have to look at what's actually
like what's actually happening. We know it's close to the Sun,
and we know that the Aurora borealisies are connected to
solar flares, and we've had some of the biggest solar
flares over the past thirty forty years in recorded history

(02:10:42):
that's happened over the past few days. So that that
these these things that that's what this is, things that
we know. So let's let's put these things that we
know together, you know, and you know, so who knows
what it is? But it's not coincidental that it's close
to the Sun and then the Sun has solar flares

(02:11:03):
that we've never seen in human history.

Speaker 4 (02:11:06):
And looking at this here t Bone was asking if
it's a comment, should it be getting smaller? And the
answer to that is supposed to be yes, right, if
it if it's burning off vapor and gases, shouldn't it
be getting smaller? Yeah, but it is right, And that

(02:11:28):
was one of the things that Ovulob was pointing out
as an anomaly, like it should but it isn't. And
one of the reasons why he is saying hey, and
and once again he's he's not standing on it being
something alien. What all he said is we said earlier
in the show, is that here's twelve anomalies. Explain to

(02:11:51):
me why these are so right. These don't line up
with comments. So explain to me if you're staining, if
your stance is this it's a comment, or this is
an asteroid or something some space rock. Just explain to me.
Then let's go anomaly by anominally and if you have
a great explanation for it, then okay, I'm open to it.

(02:12:12):
And that's essentially what he's saying. But it just seems
like the conversation isn't the same way coming from the
other side, right. It seems like these scientists are just
an astrophysicists. Astronomers are all just like no, it's a comment,
and we don't want to hear anything else other than
that it's a comic. And so it's like you would think,

(02:12:34):
and I think I've Lobel said this himself, you would
think that scientists should have an open minded approach to science.

Speaker 2 (02:12:42):
Yeah, I think all been a little but has I
think he's pretty open minded. He may not talk about
all the things that he is onto, but I think
kid's parently open minded.

Speaker 4 (02:12:58):
Yeah, I'm gonna say so as well. And you know,
especially because it could be considered career suicide, right because
it's like the Boy to cry Wolf essentially, after so long,
they're like, oh, you keep saying this, obvis every object
that comes in, you keep saying it's potentially alien tech,
and it's not. Every time it's not alien tech. So

(02:13:19):
we're gonna stop platforming you, and we're gonna stop doing this.
And I don't even if that did happen and they
stopped going to him, at least he got the conversation going.
At least he got people to talk about it, think
outside the box. People who might not be you know,
into aliens or into UFOs, but might be into space.

(02:13:42):
You know, they he's got a lot of people to
look at this, which I think is pretty awesome, you.

Speaker 6 (02:13:47):
Know, I think I think the greatest thing for me
about all this is happening is the more the more
as days go on, the more I realize I don't
know anything at all, like and that's that's the most
exciting thing, like, you know, because it opens up like
every day I'm learning something new. It's just like and

(02:14:07):
I feel like I'm in a new reality every day
and all the all these paradigms are changing, and that's
that's the greatest thing for me. Like the things that
I do now, I will platform, but there are few
and far between that that I fully do, like like
fall on as as hardcore truth all this other stuff
is just is so amazing because it's like, you know,

(02:14:31):
you're you're living out the you know, the best movie
you've ever like could create in your mind, and you're
actually living it out in real life. So and that's
that's how I feel about it. And it's just exciting.
And I don't want to know. I don't want to
know it all, Like I don't want to The excitement
is for me is is waking up in the morning

(02:14:52):
and wondering what's going to happen today, and that that's
not just in my own life, that's that's just in
the in the collective and everything. And that's I think,
I mean that people pray to be at that point.

Speaker 4 (02:15:07):
Now, it's the journey. It's exactly what you said. It's
the journey and uh.

Speaker 6 (02:15:12):
Fall I fall in love with the journey, I guess
is a basic way to say it.

Speaker 4 (02:15:16):
And that's what this show is built off of. The
what if the think tank that let's sit together, Let's
let's bounce ideas off the wall, let's spitball, let's come
with logic, Let's try to figure this out. Let's try
to get answers at the end of the day. That's
what this is all about. It's not necessarily just having
a conversation about a UFO or any of these things.

(02:15:37):
It's about, Okay, we know this, now, let's try to
get answers to this. And that's kind of what this
thing is. And that's the approach of this show. So
it's I think we're aligned then with uh, you know,
I think everyone should be like that, scientists as well.
I think Ivy Lope said, you know, stepping into the
situation as if you know everything is like the wrong

(02:15:59):
thing to do anyway, Assuming that you know everything, not
being open to learning or feeling like you can't be
taught something I think is the biggest problem. And there's
people out there that goes for the community as well.
When we talk about skeptics, really everybody across the globe,
like no one on this planet knows everything. Let's just

(02:16:21):
start there. So if you know that, then you should
obviously be open to learning something you would think, yeah,
you would think, but we have let me see, we
had a few other things. I know Paula Roderman had
a couple things she wanted to say here. I think
this was a two part thing here it was. So

(02:16:43):
she's stating, there are a million of opinions about everything,
but our responsibility is to look for the most accurate
sources and then decide. I am ot in my opinion,
and that's correct. She also says this should not be
a battle between versions who is right who's wrong, but
it should unite us as a human in our future.
Definitely agreed, yep, agreed, And we have t bone coming

(02:17:09):
with some controversy. Why does the Vaticans stay silent with
this telescope in Arizona. What do you think?

Speaker 2 (02:17:16):
Argue, Well, I've been at that observation. It's on top
of Month Graham in Arizona, and I've been there. And
guess what the name is?

Speaker 4 (02:17:30):
What is it?

Speaker 2 (02:17:31):
Lucifer? Whoa the Lucifer Observatory.

Speaker 4 (02:17:37):
Imagine that? Wow?

Speaker 2 (02:17:39):
Yeah, I goes right along with the popes. Oh this
is I'm losing my word when I start talking about
that guy and the religion. So I'd rather better not
go there. But there's so much stuf that's anti human.

(02:18:03):
But the observation. There's one guy that worked out there
and I asked him, have you found Nemesis? This was
way probably about nineteen ninety seven something like that, and

(02:18:24):
I think, have you found Nemesis or you know this
neighborer system that is supposed to come through? And he
didn't say anything, so I had to ask him again.
He started talking about something else and I had to
ask him again and he says, yeah, it's there. That's

(02:18:45):
all I got from him, because I am sure that
he was restricted in what he could say. So the
observation the telescope beside is huge. Huge.

Speaker 4 (02:19:02):
Let me ask you this, do you think the governments
would tell us if they if they knew something was
incoming like this, because I felt like that pretty much
this whole time, Like maybe they're you know, preparing us
for something and theirness is not saying what it is. Yeah,
do you think that they would they would inform us
that something was incoming?

Speaker 2 (02:19:22):
They would never tell us because knowledge is power. As
long as they have the knowledge and we don't, they
have the power and we don't.

Speaker 4 (02:19:30):
Yeah, what do you what do you what do you
say to that? Drew?

Speaker 6 (02:19:34):
Yeah, I mean that that's that's their perception on things.
And you know, they they don't realize that most people
like really don't look at them towards for disclosure anyways.
You know, the general public or is going to need that,
you know on the uh you know, the president stepping
up to the podium on the South Lawn and and

(02:19:55):
announcing it or something like that, something more official. But
the the people that's already in the movement and has
been in this disclosure movement and has has looked at
it at all, they're not waiting on the government, you know,
they're waiting. They're waiting to see it for themselves and
their own and or they've had their own personal experiences.

(02:20:16):
So disclosure has been happening all along, like it's it's
been happening on an individual level. Disclosure we're talking about
is more of a collective disclosure, like when when the
collective agrees to it, and uh, what makes that happen?
Because that's ultimately what it is. Disclosure is going to

(02:20:37):
be when the collective shifts and and and and believes
in something wholeheartedly on a on a DNA cellar level,
not just an idea of the UFO or aliens, but
they know it on and experiencers have already costs cross
that line. So there's this individual game going on, but
there's also a collective game going on, and disclosure we're

(02:20:59):
talking about is a collective game because the individual game
is already in process.

Speaker 2 (02:21:04):
I agree with that because I don't think the government
ever will come out and say, I'm really sorry, folks,
we've been lying to you for ninety years, but it
is for your best good. They are never going to
come and say that after the fact. Yeah, the extraterrestrials

(02:21:29):
will make themselves known first, then they cannot deny it.

Speaker 4 (02:21:36):
Well, here's our feel about the government. And I had
to laugh on that because what I'm about to say
is not shocking to a lot of people, especially with
everything going on currently with our government here. Do you
would totally believe this year if we had something incoming?

(02:21:56):
Because Philip Blair and we had just kind of address
us little bit Philip and bring that up, said, do
you think they would give us enough information to know
if we really wanted, if we really wanted to know
something was incoming? And the answer again is going to
be no for that. And this is why they have bunkers, right,
They build these bunkers. They have something called continuity of government.

(02:22:18):
So if it was an alien invasion, like if this
was a huge mothership incoming and it was looking pretty
bad the chances of invasion, they definitely wouldn't tell us.
They go in their bunkers, lock up tight, and same thing.
If this was an asteroid that may have happened to
be on a path to come to Earth as well,

(02:22:40):
it'd be the same exact thing. So they don't ever
think they would never inform us. They would just take
the casualties, take it on the chin, wait for things
to clear up, come about those bunkers, and continue on
with business and it's sad to say that that would
be the case, but that would be the case. That
would be the case.

Speaker 2 (02:23:03):
Yeah, Stone rolling is the best trait they have.

Speaker 6 (02:23:09):
Yeah, there's there's a lot of a lot of celebrities
and a lot of uh influential people.

Speaker 2 (02:23:17):
You know.

Speaker 6 (02:23:18):
That's that's you know up in a million dollars and
above range that are our building bunkers. And it's that
you know, you hear there's another story popping out all
the time, and it makes you wonder, you know, because
you know that the powers that be have known about
you know, that they've used consciousness. So the the the

(02:23:38):
truly rich and powerful really have tapped into this power
of consciousness and everything for their own personal gain long
before we've had long before we started to figure it out,
you know. And it's it's it's only until recently where
you know, the more collective has started to open up
and and it really starting to seep into all levels

(02:23:58):
of people starting to figure it out.

Speaker 4 (02:24:00):
But well, before we take this break here which is
coming up in like a minute here, I definitely wanted
to notice that we had a super chat with from
Deb from Sacramento and she wanted to kind of lighten
up the mood. She says, Three Eye Atlas is the
Robinson family from Lost in Space. They finally let the

(02:24:22):
wife ask for directions. L O L they're coming home.
So that's funny. That's that's probably the funniest you know
thought that I've heard about Three Eye Atlas and kind
of just you know, the lesson from that is to
you know, whatever this is, don't get too serious, don't
take it too serious. Just sit back, observe, learn, and

(02:24:45):
uh and don't be afraid to uh to laugh as well.

Speaker 2 (02:24:49):
Yeah, we gotta make fun of it once in a
while too.

Speaker 4 (02:24:53):
Yeah, yeah, I did.

Speaker 6 (02:24:54):
I did want to mention I seen another comment that
said Drew spitting game from underneath the closet stairwell or
something like that. I'm actually in a very sacred geodesic
like office space, so that's so I have not tucked

(02:25:16):
underneath the stairwell. I can't remember. I can't remember who
put that out as a while back, but I started
laughing when I thought.

Speaker 4 (02:25:23):
That's crazy. Yeah, Drew's not in the closet or under
the closet. He's not in the closet or under the closet.
Let's put it that way. Anyways, we'll be right back.
Here's Faced Out Radio, the after hours Radio Show. Back
for the last twenty minutes of the show. If you've
been with this so far, you might as well stay
for the rest. We'll be back with Ogi and Drew

(02:25:44):
and myself, mister robb g Half Hours Radio Shows Faced
Out Radio. See in a minute. All right, we are clear,
We are clear, and okay, let's see here. So we've

(02:26:06):
got five minutes. We're on camera still uh Tartar sauces.
Drew lives in a yurt.

Speaker 6 (02:26:13):
I live.

Speaker 4 (02:26:14):
I thought it was at first when I first saw it.

Speaker 9 (02:26:17):
I live.

Speaker 6 (02:26:18):
Well, this is this is my just my office. It's attached.
You got to walk through the greenhouse. But I live
in a twenty six hundred square foot straw Bill Adobe
home and that's this is its own dedicated little office.
If you're if anywhere, the camera's on so here I'll
give you guys a little tour to the office. Yeah,

(02:26:43):
there's the rest of the office.

Speaker 4 (02:26:45):
Sac of blurry bro Yeah, hack a blurry.

Speaker 6 (02:26:49):
Let's go.

Speaker 4 (02:26:53):
See now you lost focus, put your hand in front
of the camera and then bring it back. You might
fix it.

Speaker 6 (02:27:01):
See what's going on now? Let's see try and be funny.

Speaker 2 (02:27:06):
Yeah, you're you're kind of fuzzy.

Speaker 4 (02:27:09):
I am fuzzy.

Speaker 6 (02:27:10):
Let me take this off for a second, all right,
take me off?

Speaker 4 (02:27:13):
Yeah, I'm taking off. Yeah, definitely. Yeah, we gotta get
you off the big screen. Pal let me see going
through the chat here, so get ready, we got about
three minutes before we come back. Uh, let's see.

Speaker 2 (02:27:33):
Mmmm.

Speaker 4 (02:27:38):
If you got it, did you unplug? If it's USB,
did you una plug it and plug it back up?

Speaker 7 (02:27:44):
I'm working.

Speaker 6 (02:27:45):
Let's see it.

Speaker 4 (02:28:03):
In Mel w D four Oh Drew drop, don't he'll
be back. I'll save that message for him. Mel Nicola Parsons,
thanks for coming on in. I saw some names that
actually didn't get to get to Stephen drys deal the real,

(02:28:25):
the real. Wait a minute, Diverse, Now you got me.
You got me here. I don't know you have to
tell me how to pronounce that, but that welcome to
you is well coming. Thanks for coming on in here.
No I saw doctor Bob's Nightmare come in as well.
Thanks for showing up here, Tartar Sauce because it's an

(02:28:48):
awesome name. Thanks for showing up here, Sandra Heath, I
see you, Joe Walker, appreciate you coming on in. Why
would the Vatican name that? Who knows who?

Speaker 2 (02:28:58):
Yeah? Yeah, if that's their god?

Speaker 4 (02:29:02):
Oh my, yeah, okay that Yeah, I forget you said.
Dude's gonna go deep on that. Maybe we can do
something around that. That's strange though, we'll have to talk
behind the scenes.

Speaker 2 (02:29:12):
Argue that that's a different show.

Speaker 4 (02:29:15):
Yeah for sure. Who is this here? This is Bill
eff and Murray. Bill Eff and Murray, thanks for coming
on here. Appreciate showing on up to the show tonight.
Uh fast, hemmy, I didn't get to you earlier. Thanks
showing up fast, hemmy. And Drew. Drew Bank is back
and he's wait a minute, see and he's in focus.

Speaker 6 (02:29:40):
There's too much energy going on in the rest of
the room, so it's like, nah, I can't show you that.

Speaker 4 (02:29:45):
Yeah yeah, so yeah there you are. Keep it classy,
Keep it classy. Let me see.

Speaker 6 (02:29:52):
I guess you guess everyone is not supposed to see
the rest of the room.

Speaker 4 (02:29:56):
Apparent got come see it in person. In person, Paul Demine,
appreciate you coming on up and let's go back. We
had about a minute left. Let's see. Also, I saved

(02:30:18):
the message for you. Drew what was it? Uh, mel
W forty says he he sent you the pages on messenger.

Speaker 6 (02:30:24):
I got him, I got him, all right, thank you?
Keeping it looped up.

Speaker 4 (02:30:33):
Yep, always mel w. Which I didn't get to say earlier.
So mel Wd I think it. No, I didn't, I didn't.
We jumped right into the show, my bad mail. I
know you're getting this loud up for the show, my bad.
Let's see granola grin. Okay, all right, thanks for coming

(02:30:54):
on in ten seconds left here, mister Melted. I'll see
you out there, mister Melted. Here we go, coming back
right about now. All right, everybody, welcome back spaced Out Radio.
That after our radio show, after hour number three, back
half of the last hour we've been here talking about

(02:31:16):
three I at list because it's still strange, still unknown,
and yes it is likely a comment, but why is
it so weird? Explain the twelve anomenalies that ivy load
is listed. We'll be talking about that. We've talked about
that and a lot more if you missed it. Hopping
the archives free YouTube dot com at spaced Out Radio,

(02:31:39):
and we are jumping right back in and Avi Agi,
I know you had a thought and I had to
stop you right before we went to break. Do you
remember where you were at?

Speaker 2 (02:31:50):
Boy? Oh boy? That's uh. You see my mind works
my day browser on my computer. Are you seventy two
pages open, sixteen A frozen And I had no idea
where the news it's coming from?

Speaker 4 (02:32:05):
There it is. That sounds I like that, that sounds great,
and yeah, that's about where we're at with it. I
did want to, uh, because I had a couple works.
So I don't want to talk to this because we
have this coming up next week. I'm gonna put a
panel together and you're definitely welcome to come in. Arguing
for this conversation has to do with the upcoming documentary,

(02:32:33):
which is the let Me See you Gonna have It
Here Age of Disclosure by Dan Farrell. Everyone has been
waiting for this. This is finally up on us. It's
supposed to be a big deal. There's a lot of interviews,
a lot of congress people, a lot of people in

(02:32:54):
governments about the phenomena. And you know, there's a statement
made which is one they use for the trailer by
one uh Jay Stratton. Jay, and I think I have
Jay Stratton here. I thought I had him on here
Jay Stratton. Anyways, he makes a statements about uh, I

(02:33:17):
think I wrote it down, so I don't want to
actually missay it. So he said, Jay Stratton says this,
I have seen with my own eyes non human craft
and non human beings. This is something that he says
in the film. And my whole thing is, and I
said this when they originally released that clip, I'm like, Okay,

(02:33:40):
what does he say before that? And then what does
he say after that? Because is this clip being you know,
taken out of context and is he saying someone told
me that they have seen crafting bodies or you know?
And I want to make sure that this is the
statement that he's really making, because it would be pretty

(02:34:00):
awesome if that was If that's exactly what he's saying.
If he's saying he's seen with his own eyes crapped
and then also alien bodies, well he needs to be
in front of Congress and we need to be talking
to Jay Stratton about where the bodies are. So this
is coming out on Friday. This coming Friday on Amazon Prime,
November twenty first, twenty twenty five, is when this drops.

(02:34:24):
And I would ask for everyone out there to if
you have Amazon or if you don't go to a
friend's house, most people do, so you can go find
a friend and has Amazon Prime watch this on Friday
along with the rest of the world, and we'll be
back here on Sunday, November twenty third, seven pm Pacific time,

(02:34:45):
and we'll be doing a review show on this particular film.
So have you heard of this film, Augie? And when
you watching this on Friday?

Speaker 2 (02:34:55):
I never heard of it.

Speaker 4 (02:34:57):
Wow. Yeah, this is big. This is supposed to be.
I mean, they premiered it at south By Southwest, I
believe back in March of this year, and they were
supposed to release it then, but I guess he wanted
to avoid. My thoughts is he wanted to avoid the
whole pirating thing and was waiting to make a deal

(02:35:20):
with like a streaming service on Netflix, and he got
this deal done. So I'm just glad he did because
I've been waiting to see it for all this time.
They've raved about it. Everyone in the community is waiting
for this thing to come out. So big deal, and
we'll be doing this.

Speaker 2 (02:35:38):
I don't really understand why everybody's screaming. I want to
disclosed to many government officials, heads of state, from many
different countries has come out and said, yes, aliens are real.
You appos are real and we're talking to them. That's
how happened. My best example on that it is think

(02:36:01):
about three three four years ago, so now media which
was the president of Russia at the time, he was
interviewed and he stepped down from the podium and he
thought the microphones were dead, and the guy with a
camera he asked him, what can you tell us about

(02:36:23):
UFOs and the alien presence? And Mediev looked at him
and he said, well, when we take office, he says,
we get this dossier that is a file and it
explains about the aliens that are here and the ones
we are talking to, and also that the ships and

(02:36:43):
the UFOs that they're flying. So we get the information,
but we can't talk about it because they're afraid of panic.
Several NASA officials has come out and said, yes, they're real,
but people are standing on the rooftops and scream and

(02:37:03):
we brought disclosure. Yah, why don't.

Speaker 4 (02:37:10):
Yeah, I can. I can definitely see where you're coming
from when you say that. And you know, I think
disclosure is just a word that we kind of throw
around in the community. I think what they really mean
is like global recognition. Let's say that global recognition of

(02:37:31):
the alien presidence. Let's okay, we're we're retiring the word
disclosure here. That's the New Year's resolution, and we're going
to replace it with global recognition or even as Dave
Scott would say, global confirmation of the alien presence, just
so that that just everyone is aware, not just the community,

(02:37:53):
not just some people on the outside who kind of
know what's going on, but the world. The same way
you know that the sunrises and sets every day is
the same way the alien presence should be recognized. Because
they could be us, they could not be us. But
the problem is is they're here, and at some point

(02:38:16):
we're going to have to figure out how to take
that next step. What is your what is your idea
on that argue taking the next step? Like, okay, this
this global recognition moment, we're here, everyone is aware, and
what do you think is the next step?

Speaker 2 (02:38:35):
Well, I think that people got to get together and
listen to the information that is already here. If they
do know these things, and the information is out there,
if they look, they can find that yes, they're real.
Government has verified they're real and now of course that

(02:38:56):
the Age of Disclosure is coming out and that's going
to have millions of viewers on it, so that will
confirm to a lot of people. But there's still one
step short of what we call disclosure, because that is
mean the president of a country or somebody in government

(02:39:20):
going on TV say yes, I'm sorry, we have been
lying to you for ninety years, but it was for
your own best because we wanted to protect you. It'll
never happen, you know.

Speaker 4 (02:39:35):
I got to say this for one of the people.
You know, if there was ever let's just say there
was a leader of the Free World out there who
was going through some pretty horrible times at the moment

(02:39:56):
and needed to break glass. In case of emergency, maybe
standing on a podium and making a statement about the
UFO presence would be an option to go to. And
this is in a fictional world obviously, where we're not
talking about anyone that you may know or not know.

(02:40:18):
But what if a leader, just like in the movies
how it plays out, leader of the Free World, like
take this moment to be remembered forever, or to be
the person on the face of this global recognition and
just take it take the bull by the horns. I'm
catastrophic disclosure. And the reason why I say this, I

(02:40:40):
want it to happen now. I want that moment to
happen tomorrow or yesterday, if it could, if we could
go back, And I don't know, how do you feel
about that, Drew? How do you feel about that?

Speaker 6 (02:40:52):
Yeah? I mean, it could happen at any moment. You know,
that's the scenario you're talking about. You know, it could
happen at any moment. You know, it could happen with Trump.
You know the hell I thought you were talking about
Trump when you were when you were laying all out,
But it could happen with any world leader.

Speaker 2 (02:41:13):
You know.

Speaker 6 (02:41:13):
That's that at any given moment that someone could a
scandal could come up, like a huge scandal could come up.
And I'm not just talking about the United States as
any any leader, and there's there's a lot of leaders
around the world that know a lot, a lot more
than what they're letting on and know secrets. And I
agree with you. I agree with Augie that the basis

(02:41:35):
behind of why they keep it from us is I
think you know, the underlining that they want to put
it out there is they're protecting us, but really they're
holding pot They're trying to hold power over us because
if we understand the true connection to Et. I've said
it over and over and over and over again, if
we understand the true connection to ET and our brother

(02:41:57):
our star brothers, our star brothers, then we can They
can't control us anymore because it gets it gets into
very very deep consciousness and how we can affect consciousness,
how we can affect our reality with our own consciousness.
And this is all tied to our our relationshipship to
our star brothers, which which is laid out through Native

(02:42:20):
American that the Native Americans have been talking about this
relationship for a long long time, and they say that
they're they're not only connected to them, they they are
from they are from another planet.

Speaker 2 (02:42:34):
I think also that the excuse of panic, that's the
one that was invented by the CIA, and they've been
using it and it works so well. They will never
let that one go. They're gonna say, oh, yeah, we've

(02:42:55):
been protecting you. But the thing is that they peep
and have been way looking up in hordes over the
last several years. The whole world is ready now they
wouldn't be any panic. If they came, the extraterrestrians came
with peace in mind to help us, there wouldn't be

(02:43:15):
any panic, So that all excuse is not good anymore.
Even the ones that don't believe in aliens, once they
show up, they would accept it. Except for the fanatical
religious people. They were probably calling a hole somewhere because

(02:43:36):
you know, they're either gin or demons. But they also
would have to come around to the fact that maybe
these guys are not so bad.

Speaker 4 (02:43:50):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, you know, we have we have a
lot of work to do here as human beings on
this planet. I'm not satisfied with our fellow human being,
especially in the times that we're going through right now.
And you know, as I stated earlier, and I was
talking about Trump, uh, Drew, I just didn't want to
say the name. But since you said it, then we'll

(02:44:11):
go ahead and speak to it. You know this this
uh you know, if there was ever a moment where
we could you know, with what the world going through
and feeling what they're feeling right now. And believe me,
I feel it every day because I'm a person that
loves my fellow human being. I don't care where you're from.
I don't care what walk of life you come from.
I don't care. At the end of the day, the

(02:44:33):
thing that we share. We share more things in common
than than we don't, and we should be together. And
the way that these governments and world powers are set
up is to not allow us to stay together and
be together. They would prefer us to be separate and separated.
And you know, with that being said, I would love

(02:44:53):
nothing more at Trump or whoever to go ahead and
just press the button and and let's just get just
over with so we can move forward and come together
and unite as human beings.

Speaker 2 (02:45:06):
Man.

Speaker 4 (02:45:06):
Yeah, and go to what our destiny is. We don't
even know what our destiny is. We know we're supposed
to ascend to somewhere, we don't know where that is.
We're still trying to figure that out. But the only
way we're going to be able to take that step
is if somebody does something. Man, So I just wish
someone twenty twenty six, someone do something, please. That's the

(02:45:27):
tagline for twenty twenty six. Someone says something, someone do something.
May I come up with a better one, But essentially
that's what you're trying to say.

Speaker 6 (02:45:38):
Do something.

Speaker 4 (02:45:39):
Yeah, you know what I mean.

Speaker 6 (02:45:41):
Now, I noticed some comments about the indigenous star knowledge
and stuff like that, and I would have mentioned this before.
You know, I mentioned it. I mentioned it last time
we talked. I've been speaking with a cheap bear Cross
and we've been going through this whole process. And one
of the things that we've been talking about, he's like, man,

(02:46:02):
you need to, you know, learn to speak Lakota. And
I was like, why Lakota, Like I'm not I'm not Lakota.
Like why do I need to speak Lakota? And he
takes me back to the teachings and the sharing of
his his grandfather when he come off the vision quest
in pesh lah which is the center of of Pahasapa,

(02:46:25):
which is the Black Hills where they do their vision quest.
He come he come back from vision quests and said
he was on the third day. On the third night
of his vision quest, a circular craft landed and a
man come and walked over to him. He said, and uh.
The grandpa asked the being that come out of the craft.

(02:46:46):
He said, where do I come from? He said, inyan
tanka a, which means in taka k which means that
big rock right there. And from my own standing and
what what bear Cross says from that's that's been taught
for years is Lakota is like the Lakota language, look,

(02:47:08):
Lakota loco yape. The Lakota language is not from this planet.
It's from another planet. So, uh, one of the one
of the species of beings or one of the subset
species of beings. I bet it would be a lot
closer to put it that are visiting this Earth, that

(02:47:30):
that are have been here and they've actually originated from
another planet. And this language originates from another planet and
is still being spoken on another planet, so to so
to interface with these nature it's a nature based Uh,
subspecies of of the collective of the collective of the

(02:47:54):
collective speaks Lakota still and and they communicate through the
coda when they come. And so I was speaking about
this on what the interesting thing I was speaking about
this on Friday, and I was just putting it out
there like I was just putting out this conversation and
not claiming it was truth or not, Like I'm I'm

(02:48:15):
just saying that this is what this is what this
Lakota cheap Aircross has been telling me. And I was
on a panel on Friday this past Friday on another
on another podcast, and one of the persons on the
podcasts spoke up, He's like, I just I just read
that a few weeks ago, and he cited the book.
I wish I would remember the the book they cited,

(02:48:37):
but sod someone channeled this or something like that, and
it's in a book where so it's been that. That's
the second time. It's like a confirmation. So I'm expecting,
you know, more and more confirmations to come through. But
it's just a really interesting thing, like this far into
these teachings Native American teachings and all this stuff, and

(02:48:58):
now we're coming to this point where this is coming out,
and it's just something else that's blowing my mind. So
when when I was speaking earlier, is that you know,
every day something keeps, you know, blowing my mind. It's
it's these things like this, you know, speaking to bear
Cross and he being deeply connected to the county, and
then a cody walking right past my window in broad

(02:49:20):
daylight and things like that. So that that's why I
was talking about. AI cannot like intercede and interject this
is coming straight from nature, These these confirmations and all
this is is random and it's coming straight from nature,
and that's that's the ones that I fall back on.
So that's the little bit that I wanted to speak on.

(02:49:41):
Uh you know, I you know, I mentioned Native American
prophecy almost every time I get to speak. So there
it is for tonight.

Speaker 4 (02:49:47):
Awesome, awesome, I augie, do you want to go ahead
and leave the audience with the note real quick before
we get about here?

Speaker 2 (02:49:54):
Well, I would say, uh, become a digger, go and
read stuff that others don't read. Every night I read
foreign newspapers. Of course I can understand six languages, so
it's easier for me. But you have English versions of

(02:50:17):
Cairo today, Lemonde out of France. That's a pretty good paper.
You won't find any truth about France, but they talk
about other countries what's going on, and it's pretty accurate.
So also Russia today, Paravda and Swanskadargla. There are foreign
newspaper but you find and you read stuff that you

(02:50:39):
never see in the American media. I have found a
lot of good information from doing that, and I really
advise people to do it because you're going to have
fun with it. Even if the paper is not in English.
There some of them have a translation button that you

(02:51:01):
can do and then you can read it in English. Otherwise,
I want to highly recommend for people to go to
Amazon and have a look at the book that I
wrote about spiritual science. That book changes people's lives. I
talk about the Nobel price was given for the enzyme

(02:51:25):
that was discovered to reverse the aging process. In fact,
I'm doing that it works for me. And also a
lot about the Earth history that we've never been told,
and a lot of the secrets and making your life
better you will find in this Put my name in there,

(02:51:46):
and then just read all the different subjects that it's
written about, and you're gonna have some fun with it.

Speaker 4 (02:51:54):
Good stuff, good stuff. All right, I'm gonna let you
guys go. I appreciate you guys coming in having this
conversation here tonight, because it's important to bump ideas off
each other, and further, the conversation moved the needle. Thing
we did that tonight is definitely different than any other
three eye adalys conversation that I've heard, and it's definitely
the perspectives were pretty unique. So I do appreciate you

(02:52:16):
guys for coming in. I'm about to close this show down. Uh,
we will talk soon. I gotta get your book to AUGI,
so I'll be reaching out soon, okay.

Speaker 2 (02:52:27):
And in the words of Spark, Live long and prosper.

Speaker 4 (02:52:31):
That's what I'm talking about, all right. Appreciate you Agi
for coming in. Also, Drew Banky, talk to you soon, sir,
and take care all right, everybody that's the show. That's
the show. Kind of wanted to make sure that we
had the conversation because Wednesday will now say Wednesday. I

(02:52:54):
think Ivy Lobe said sometime this week. Uh, his sources
have said that we'll be hearing or seeing some of
these images from NASA, and this might just put it
all to bed. This might be the cap on top
of the story. We may move on to something else
Age of Disclosure, and I'm sure there's a lot of

(02:53:15):
good things in there. And obviously I want you guys
to come back and watch the Age of Disclosure review show,
because once again it's gonna be a review show, not
like the other reviews. Everyone's gonna review it, but they're
not gonna do it like we do it right here
on the After Hours Radio show. So I definitely appreciate
arganized jumping in. Also Drew Banky for holding it down

(02:53:37):
tonight as we had this conversation. You know how it goes.
I also want to thank the man you hear right there,
mister Ron bumble foot Gall. He's the man in the
rock style each and every week teaching us and telling
us to never say never again, because the phenomena is
definitely real. If three I Atlas could be an illienshit,

(02:53:58):
or it could just be a comic, but why is
it so weird? That being said, we definitely want to
thank all our viewers and listeners on terrestrial radio and
digital platforms when and whenever in the world you might
be listening from. We appreciate you tuning your frequency the
space Stout Radio. What we do when we do best.

(02:54:20):
What's that you ask? We own the night. Remember the
show's copyright Space our Radio sr Media. There's limited. It's
been a pleasure serving you once again as your hosts.
I'm mister Rob g. This is adapt ours radio show
to all your space travelers out there. It's not a goodbye,

(02:54:40):
it's not a farewell. However, you could best believe we'll
be right back here doing the same thing, same time,
So make sure you hit your notification bill, make sure
you share the show, share with a friend. We'd love
to have more come through and engage in these conversations. However,
as we go off air for the night, I just

(02:55:00):
got to say I'll see you guys later. Love you much, love,
much much love to take care.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.