"KLAYMAN AND ALAN KEYES ON THE BORDER CRISIS"

"KLAYMAN AND ALAN KEYES ON THE BORDER CRISIS"

SPECIAL GUEST: AMBASSADOR ALAN KEYES

Episode Transcript

(00:12):
This is Special Prosecutor Larry Clayman.I'm the only lawyer ever to obtain a
court ruling that a president of theUnited States committed a crime for truth for
competition. As a young lawyer,I help break up at and T.
That's why you have all your cellphones today. For sovereignty, for the
republic. I'm the guy who atJudicial Watch, which I founded, uncovered
the China Gate scandal. Millions ofdollars going to the Clinton campaign corrupting our

(00:36):
political system were the privacy of citizens. And I'm the only guy who have
enjoyed the National Security Agency from masssurveillance on hundreds of millions of Americans hearing
it. I'm the son of meatpackers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I had
a slice and dice. You're bringingit that we're going to take this country
apart and put it back together againin the way envisioned by our founding fathers.
It's not just to We're not justregurgitating stories, Larry claiman Special Prosecutor

(01:02):
is making the news, and nowhere's Larry. Welcome to this week's edition
A Special Prosecutor with Larry Klayman.It's also a very special show We have
Ambassador Alan keyes On as our guest, probably the most intelligent person to run
for president in my lifetime. Hewas also ambassador at the United Nations under

(01:25):
Ronald Reagan. And we're going tobe discussing a number of topics. But
let's get right into it with myso called monologue. Just this week,
the evil I wonder what I'm goingto call him? Sorcerer, hack criminal
James Carvill raised his head. Itangled with him during my days at Judicial

(01:46):
Watch. He actually was deposed ona number of occasions. He revealed it
along with Bill Clinton. They releasedthe Privacy Act protected files of a woman
that Bill Clinton had harassed in theOval office, Kathleen Willie, who became
my client. And now he sayshe's going to do wet work on Donald
Trump. He's come back. Ofcourse, during those days with the Clinton's,

(02:07):
he ran the war room with anotherdespicable lowlife by the name of George
Stephanopolos, who is on ABC's GoodMorning. Why he's there, one only
can fathom is because of the extremeleft wing views of ABC. But the
guy certainly has no talent in termsof being a host on that show.
But he can barely see over thedesk, that's how short he is.

(02:30):
But in any event, we're notgoing to knock him for that. We're
going to knock him for what heis along with Carville, these people are
hatchet men. And because Biden isunable really to articulate, he's unable to
function, Carville is rounding up thecrew, so to speak, the band
of criminals around him, to doa number on Trump, and he's threatening

(02:52):
to conduct wetwork on Donald Trump.Of course, we know that during these
days there is a lot of violence. We at Freedom Watch adhere to peaceful
and legal means, but we've seenit in the streets in recent years from
Antifa, Black Lives Matter, theleft. I mean, they essentially want

(03:13):
to kill us. So there's nosurprise that using the language of wetwork,
which is a CIA term which meanstaking someone out, it means killing them,
Carvio is saying that he and otherDemocrats are going to do the dirty
work for Joe Biden because he's incapablementally or physically to do it for himself,
to destroy Donald Trump. Now,if this had been anyone other than

(03:35):
Carvil, and if there hadn't beena gestapo of a Justice Department present today,
Carvel will be arrested for that.That would be construed to be a
threat against a former president of theUnited States, and the Secret Service would
go over and lock Carville up.But of course that's not going to happen,
not with this gestapo of a JusticeDepartment. But we're going to step

(03:58):
in at freedom Watch. I've dealtwith Carvill before, where I've got in
court rulings that he's lied in termsof what he said to courts. Of
course, we determined, as Isaid, that he released illegally and criminally
the Privacy Act protected file of KathleenWillie, who was a big threat to
Clinton's election in nineteen ninety two.And also he ran the war room with

(04:18):
Stephanoppos to destroy the other women theycame forward with regard to Bill Clinton and
a lot of other dirty tricks.So stay tuned your freedom Watch is not
going to turn the other cheek.We relish the fight with James Carvill.
By the way, he looks likehe's got two feet in the grade,
I mean, looks like a skeleton. He's uglier than sin and he's ugly

(04:39):
as a person. I hate toinsult this guy. But I remember one
time Judge Lambert made a comment becausehe was presiding over this case where we
got these findings in Filegate. Hesays, boy, that guy is evil.
But I'll tell you something, he'ssmart. He is smart. The
devil is smart. To take itseriously, they're coming after Trump, and

(04:59):
they're coming after you. And then, of course we've seen how they've been
coming after Trump. He's now havingto post a bond to appeal that ridiculous
illegal verdict by Judge ergen On whateverhis name is, that he should pay
four hundred and fifty plus million dollarswith regard to alleged fraudulent pricing appraisement on

(05:24):
some of his properties when he wasseeking bank loans. This is something that
is beyond the pale. It's neverbeen done before for someone to post that
kind of a bond on a bogusclaim. And the fact that the appellate
Court in New York would not stepin and allow Trump to appeal without having
to post a bond for that amount, which Trump is apparently unable to obtain,

(05:46):
tells you a lot about what theultimate decision is going to be by
the New York appellate courts. Thematter may need to go to the US
Supreme Court, although I don't thinkthe Supreme Court will take it. It's
not really a constitutional issue in anyways, or division among the states in
terms of interpreting judgments. So thisis another example of how Trump is trying

(06:08):
to be destroyed by the left,and of course by destroying him, they're
also seeking to destroy his supporters andpeople of faith, conservatives and others who
believe in the vision and creation ofour family fathers. And then we see
what's going on in the Texas border. People in hoardes running across the border,
breaking down barriers, attacking the immigrationand naturalization serve as people there Texas

(06:31):
rangers, and as such, thecountry is spinning wildly out of control.
It's on his last legs, frankly, and unless we rise up and do
something, it's not going to bearound much longer. So I want you
to go to freedom Watch USA dotorg and contribute to our cause. We
are your justice department. You haveno justice department. We meet out the
rule of law peacefully and legally.And then, of course, this week

(06:55):
the new Speaker, Mike Johnson,who could very well be removed, caved
in to the Democrats and passed anexcess of one trillion dollar spending bill,
supported mostly by Democrats, not manyRepublicans. You know, we're going to
talk about that with Alan Keys aswell. But what's really unbelievable is that

(07:15):
some were hidden in this bill orappropriations to promote transgenderism and transsexualism and all
kinds of other perverted concepts, frankly, and the fact that Republicans would be
dragged along into that and not beable to remove that tells you something about
the lack of courage of the Republicanson Capitol Hill and generally. And again,

(07:38):
that is why you need a freedomWatch, and that's why you need
to go to freedom Watch USA dotorg and contribute to our cause, because
we're unafraid. We don't roll over, we don't turn the other cheek,
as we I won't turn the othercheek with James Carbill, Frankly, I
have an experience with him, andyou can go up on our website at
freedom Watch USA dot org and seethe podcast I did last Friday as well,

(08:01):
where I attached a deposition that Itook of Carville. But Marjorie Kelly
Green filed a motion, so tospeak, to have Johnson removed. It
seems like an affable, nice guyin the surface, but frankly he should
be removed because he's a little betterthan Kevin McCarthy, the former House Speaker
at this point in time. Andon another front, you know, the

(08:22):
Freedom Watch has an trust lawsuit againstthe PGA Tour or attempted monopolization and other
trade practices in Florida. Well,it's interesting because the concept of that case
was that golf fans are being deniedthe opportunity to see golfers from the two
golf leagues. The new upstart LeagueLive lay head to head with the PGA

(08:46):
Tour, and because of the restrainof trade, this is raising the prices
for consumers to purchase tickets. Well, we now know that the ratings are
way down for the PGA Tour.Fans are getting fed up. They're not
getting the value of what they're payingfor for tickets. They're not even tuning
it in on television, and thisfurther strengthens our case. I want you

(09:07):
to go look at this case becausefreedom Watch doesn't just do political stuff.
We want to keep our economy free. We want to see competition. I'm
an innitrust lawyer, among many otherthings, and this is the type of
thing that we really need to focuson going into the future, is protecting
our economy as well. So Iwant you to stay tuned here because what

(09:30):
we've seen is a tyranny like we'venever experienced in the entire history of this
country. We've seen the country basicallytaken apart at the seams, and we've
seen the Republicans unable to stand upto the tyranny of the Democrat left.
We the American people, must riseup ourselves. We cannot sit here and

(09:50):
do nothing and justice. Freedom Watchhas a Citizens grand Juries and Citizens Trials
where we indicted Biden, where weconvicted him for coming out China bribery and
also from Ukraine and Russia and negligenthomicide in Afghanistan. J Anthony Fauci for
negligent homicide. Biden was sentenced totwenty years Fauci to life imprisonment. We

(10:13):
have Robert Muller on the chopping block. We just haven't had time to get
to it yet, but it's gettingto the point where as we said in
our show last week, that wehave to be prepared. If Donald Trump
wins the election, this country willprobably go up in flames. The left
will be out in the streets.They'll be seeking to kill Conservatives, people

(10:35):
of faith, and those who believein the vision and creation of our founding
fathers. We are peaceful and legallyfor you much but I urge you as
Americans to exercise your Second Amendment rightsif you have to, because we are
on the edge and we need todefend ourselves. And you ought to go
out right now, and you oughtto arm yourself because well, there we're
Although we're not going to start it, we will potentially have to finish it.

(11:00):
And I don't want to see thathappen. I want to see things
to be peaceful and legal. Soif the left knows that we're prepared,
were what they do, which willbe child's play compared to what we saw
with Antifa and Black Lives Matters andother groups, perhaps we can arrest it
right now. But you can seeevery effort is being made to destroy Donald
Trump, and they think by doingthat they will destroy the conservative movement.

(11:24):
But we are much more than DonaldTrump. Whether you agree with him or
not, whether you think he shouldbe president or not. We can see
what's happening in this country today.We can see the tyranny. And it
was Thomas Jefferson who said that whenthe people fear the government, there's tyranny,
but when the government fears the people, there's liberty. The government needs

(11:46):
to fear the people. We'll beback with Alan Keys. Stay tuned and
watch very carefully what we're saying,because we need your help. We need
you to rise up with us tosave this country. And in the meantime,
go to freedom Watch us a dotorg. Contribute to our cause with
tax dogical contributions. We need yourhelp. I'll be right back, Fearless

(12:37):
claiming crazy to give the democratic dangerous. I'm here the Special Prosecutor Larry Claiming.
If you'd like to support freedom Watchand this radio show, go to
FREEDOMWATCHUSA dot org. I'm back withAmbassador Alan Keyes, former presidential candidate,

(12:58):
former senate candidate. You ran againstBarack Obama. I've always said Alan is
the most intelligent person to have runfor president in my lifetime. Regrettably,
he's not president, but he's stillhelping the country with his intellect and his
prognostication as to where we may begoing so we can plan for it.
So I welcome Ambassador Allen Keys tothe show, my good friend, and

(13:20):
I want to ask him the firstquestion is the million dollar question, what's
the state of the nation and whereare we headed? Alan? Well,
I think that the question of wherewe're headed is kind of up in the
air, because we are, Ithink, in the midst of one of
the most dangerous situations the people ofthe United States have ever faced. We

(13:41):
have by the usual means, thoughI myself have serious doubts about whether the
twenty twenty election was in fact afree and fair election. I'm not a
stolen one, but leave that aside. Everybody gets to have their view of
that, I guess. But we'renow based with a situation in which I
think we have a party that haslong since abandoned its allegiance to our constitutional

(14:03):
self government, under the leadership ofsomebody who pretty much mocks the idea that
you take seriously the leadership position ofthe country. Because whatever he may have
been in his past and background,I think Bidens is showing himself to be
reasonably incompetent at the job he's supposedto be doing, which leads me to

(14:24):
believe others are actually doing it,But we'll see whether that pans out to
be the case. But I thinkit's dangerous that we now have at the
Helm people who are not committed justby the bye to the continuation of our
constitutional self government as a people.And I think the fact that they have
pretty much literally sponsored a massive invasionof the country in order to create a

(14:48):
voting base that they can rely uponis the short sign we have that we're
not headed for trouble. We're inthe midst of the most dangerous assault on
our existence as a side people.I think we've ever seen what's your assessment
about our foreign policy? Where arewe headed there? Do you think that
there's a significant risk of the nuclearholocaust given everything is going on in the

(15:13):
world today, Well, I thinkyou're always somewhat at risk, but it
kind of depends on what others areinvolved with. If I were just looking
at something like the Russian Ukrainian thing, I wouldn't think that we're in the
midst of something that's going to,from our point of view, escalate into
the Third World War or another Worldwar. But when I look at what

(15:37):
the Chinese have been up to,I feel a serious concern because I think
they have the ambition to overthrow andreplace us, and that they are also
now working in an environment where oneof the major American parties is committed to
behaving in a way that actually,I think cooperates with that, m Ambishop,

(16:00):
because I think the Democrat Party,whatever some of the rank of file
people and the regular folks may think, the leadership of the Democrat Party is
committed to the overthrow of the Republic. They don't like this form of government
and they are deeply committed, Ithink, to replacing it with a form
of government that looks awfully like thecommunist Chinese totalitarian dictatorship by an elitist party

(16:25):
that then holds others enthrall. Andthat's something we've been fighting for my whole
lifetime. But I don't think it'sat all questionable that the Democrat Party consists
of people who are deeply committed tothat future, a future that's already has
kind of a mocking instance in Trudeau'sCanada. It's interesting in terms of where

(16:52):
we stand today with regard to Israel. Not interesting is frightening, frankly,
and we see that the Democrat Partyas a band in Israel, they're going
to get very few Jewish folks,but then again, there are very few
Jewish people in the country, buttheir contributions are probably going to be cut
substantially. Let's deal with that whenwe come back from the break and talk
about that. But right now,maybe in the next minute, we can

(17:15):
discuss what's happening at the border,because that's very serious, and pick it
up when we come back. Well, if you want me to take up
that topic, I think what's happeningat the border is, as I say,
an invasion, and I think itshould be called that Biden is utterly

(17:40):
failing in his constitutional duty because thelast time I looked, it says that
he shall see to it that thelaws are faithfully executed. Well, the
laws that have requirements before people canimmigrate into the United States have been totally
flouted, and he's not just cooperatingin that his part. What are you're
sponsoring? It a good break pointout. We'll be right back with more

(18:03):
Ambassador Alan Keys. Stay tuned,and now for words that make corrupt politicians

(18:30):
make wee wee in their little pants. Transparency and the rule of law will
be the touchtones of this president.We have to pass the bill so that
you kind of find out what isin its. Special Prosecutor Larry Claiman be

(18:51):
the one who makes our country greatagain. Go to FREEDOMWATCHUSA dot org and
donate. We're back with my goodfriend Alan Keyes. You were expounding on
the border. Of course, youknow this week we saw hundreds of the
illegal aliens run across the border.Biden refuses to call them illegal aliens,
breaking through offences, attacking the Iins the ice as they were there in

(19:15):
Texas rangers. You've got drug traffickers, human traffickers, sex traffickers, terrorists
running across the border. There isno border and yet and this can be
the segue. The Republicans have basicallyjust caved in to the Democrats in the
House of Representatives and passed in excessof a one trillion dollars spending bill which

(19:36):
does nothing about immigration and the influxof people into this country. And it's
been misrepresented, and the Republicans arenot explaining that the legislation which Mitch McConnell
and senators over there in the Senateagreed to would not have stemmed the flow
of illegal immigration. It would haveallowed at least five thousand more day to
come into this country without the abilityto track them. So let's expound on

(20:00):
that alan in terms of the hypocrisyhere and frankly the ineptitude of the Republican
Party to explain to the American peoplethat that bill would accomplish little to nothing.
Well, but see, I thinkthat whether I think it's purposeful on
the Democrat side, that they're cooperatingwith what essentially amounts to an invasion of
the country. You have exceptions tothat because I don't take Texas and now

(20:25):
there's bruhaha going on, which I'msure you're more well versed in the legal
aspect of it than I am.But it seems to me that there's a
simple question, and the question isthe Constitution makes it clear that the States
are not to be doing things tomake war with other countries and so forth,

(20:47):
except they can defend themselves in thecase of an actual invasion, which
is what I think Texas has beentrying to do defend itself as in the
case of an actual invasion, there'sno doubt that this is an invasion because
they are entering the country and it'scontrary to our laws. They're not being
vetted in a way that corresponds tothe laws passed by Congress. It is

(21:10):
not the president's job to let peopleinto this country on a whim or at
his good will. He is theservant of the Constitution and the people,
and he's ignoring his duty. TheConstitution says quite plainly, he shall see
to it that the laws, nothis edicts, not his preferences, but
the laws are faithfully executed. Andby allowing a flood of immigrants across their

(21:33):
country, by trying to thwart theefforts of the states, who have,
by the way, in case ofactual invasion, the responsibility and right to
defend themselves. And I think theyneed to go back and look because they
do not have to tolerate a federalgovernment that refuses to defend the states,
because that federal official right now,Biden and his cronies are basic violating their

(22:00):
oath. They are not seeing toit that the laws are faithfully executed,
and it has to stop. Ithas to be stopped. And the states
are not required to acquiesce in theirdictators. No they're not. And I
think it's very important the governor Abbot, who I think has been slow to
act here. I mean, hewas good with the politics up front,

(22:21):
but finally he's getting some teeth.I commend him. And the Supreme Court
did say that the Texas law thatallows Texas to enforce its own laws with
regard to criminals that come into thestate is perfectly constitutional. Yet apparently a
lower court judge has stayed that implementation, and Governor Abbot of Texas has said,

(22:42):
well, I'm not following that.I mean, there's a crisis here.
We're going to do what we haveto do. So now we have
this clash between the State of Texasand the judicial branch. The State of
Texas on behalf of the people ofteep of Texas against judges who are trying
to throw a monkey wrench into enforcement. And I think it's great, frankly

(23:04):
that he is defined the courts.What do you think, though, because
I think in one respect the notionthat a governor subject to an invasion of
his state is somehow defying the courtswhen the courts are telling them stop faithfully
executing the law that allows you toin the case of actual invasion, those

(23:29):
are the words in the Constitution youcan in fact defend yourself, meaning to
say you can mobilize your police forcesand militia, or we would call it,
I guess these days, the nationalGuard, and you can enforce your
laws in order to stop that invasion. And the question is why are we

(23:49):
supposed to assume that just because eventhe president might want, Wow, we
should have more people in here comingfrom this place, in that place,
in the other place. When there'sa wall on the books that makes it
his duty to enforce the integrity ofour borders, and he not only refuses
to do it, he is actuallycooperating with the invasion. I think he's

(24:14):
already in a position where he hasessentially waved the red flag in the front
of all states to say, youmust be derelict in your duty or you
must stand against what we are imposingon And the ultimate implication of that,
if you think it all the waythrough, is civil war. Well,
I think that's where we're headed.And think about this, Allen, what
do you think is going to happenthe day after President Trump is elected,

(24:38):
hopefully being elected, What is goingto happen to this country? I think
talk about blood bath and smearing Trumpover the use of that word in the
context of building electric cars, inMexico. I think we're going to have
an actual attempted blood bath by theleft the day that President Trump is reelected.
What do you think, Well,sadly, I think that one of

(25:00):
the things. And I guess that'swhat I'm trying to do. I'm trying
to get folks to go back,look at our present situation and call things
by their right names. In termsof the actual language of the Constitution,
of the Bill of Rights, theactual language of the Constitution makes it clear
that the defense of our territory isthe purview of the federal government, the

(25:23):
national government, except in cases ofactual invasion, then it continues to be
the prerogative of the state, eachindividual state to defend itself against that invasion.
And of course, if you haveseveral states together who are suffered bring
the same plight, they can worktogether in order to exercise in common what

(25:48):
is their duty. It's especially soif you look at what is going on
with what's supposed to be the leadershipof the national government, and they're not
only not defending you from the invasion, they are in fact aiding a betting
the invasion in order to serve theirown political ends, which I think everybody's

(26:10):
finally waking up to that these peopleare trying to since they can't necessarily constantly
be out there trying to steal votesthat they don't get, they want to
invite people in the country who canthen become the voters that they can control.
Well, yeah, that's clearly thecase. The other issue is what

(26:33):
do you think will happen in ourstreets when Trump is re elected? And
what should we do about it?How should we prepare? Well, I
think that's again a question that it'shard to get into it until we're actually
into it, But I think wehave to at least be preparing ourselves for

(26:56):
the possibility that, however, theelection goes in fact, the Democrats are
going to try to make it outto be an election that they won.
And I think that's part of whythey're going through all of these machinations to
create terminal confusion, because you realizea lot of the folks who are illegal
immigrants, we see numbers coming acrossthe border, how many are coming across

(27:18):
the border and not being seen byUS, not being tracked by US or
anybody else in the United States comingacross in numbers that suggest and by the
way in things that I have beenreading, you got a lot of them.
People always had. I used tohave it, this notion that immigration
was about people coming across and tryto better themselves, and we as Americans,

(27:38):
you know, we have a softheart for people who are trying to
improve their lot and who see inAmerica a place where they could come and
you know, make a better livingand raise their children better and maybe have
better access to certain kinds of things, including education and so forth and so
on. And I think for atime that sense which we had, oh

(28:00):
you know, that's partly who weare, and we shouldn't just be trying
to stop people. There would havebeen no America if lots of folks hadn't
been eager to come over here andhelp us build this country and so forth.
But I think the Democrats have beenruthlessly taking advantage of this situation in
order to turn what could be areasonably controllable tendency of Americans to want to

(28:25):
you know, you'll come and we'lltry to make you happy, into a
situation that they are now manipulating inorder literally to destroy us as a sovereign
people, to put us under thesubjection of a party dictatorship that then essentially
puts paid to the career of theUnited States of America. Now do we

(28:45):
want this as a people, becauseI don't think most Americans even now are
thinking of it in those terms.And when they do, they're going to
wake up to the fact that you'vehad an anti American party successfully implementing an
invasion that has taken our country outof our hands. Are we ready to
just sit back and let that happen? I don't know. Well, we've

(29:07):
got, you know, the experienceof January sixth, and the way the
Justice Department is behaving the stays,and you're a great student of the law,
Allen, you know, I wouldmaintain they've been acting like a gestapo.
I mean, not the level ofa Hitler, but something short of
that. And what they're doing withpeaceful protesters, and I represent some of
them, and I've got lawsuits wherethese protesters were illegally surveiled like snowed and

(29:32):
revealed many years ago when I gota preliminary junction against Obama's NSA. Is
that they're trying to quell all thescents and they're allowing this invasion to occur,
but at the same time, they'resaying, you conservatives, people of
faith and those who believe in thevision and creation, where our family fathers,
don't even criticize us, because wewill crush you. And this is

(29:52):
the message that's being sent. Andpeople are scared, and they're scared to
rise up, and they're scared toeven defend themselves, be scared even to
use their Second Amendment rights that theyhave to look at what happens with the
police. If the policeman tries todefend himself against the criminal, he's the
one that winds up getting indicted thesedays. So give me your thoughts about
this, because I think we're livingin a dictatorship right now. The facto,

(30:15):
I think in many respects we are, but it's still a dictatorship that
is being that is continuing to existbecause it's being tolerated. Right. It's
not that people don't have the wherewithalto do something if they would do it,
But how many Americans understand the simplefacts that I've been trying to share

(30:37):
in the last five minutes or soand realize that it is not a prerogative
of the president to enforce laws contraryto the laws that are on the books,
he doesn't have that prerogative. Heis to see to it that the
laws are faithfully executed. And unlesswe are faced by and actual, you

(31:00):
know, a threat from foreign militarypower to take over this country in and
overt right, then the commander inchief, of course has to be organizing
us to fight against it. Butthat's exactly the opposite of what he's doing.
So if you have somebody who hasalready decided to join the jackals in
terms of working to overthrow our Americanself government as citizens of the United States,

(31:25):
and they're working together with who well, with foreign powers quite obviously,
including some that I can think ofone in particular, the Chinese, who
have a special interest in helping outbecause if they can get rid of the
obstacle of the United States, Ithink they're now pretty much thoroughly convinced they're
going to become the world's number onepower. And if Americans state that's going

(31:48):
to be really comfortable for us,they need to wake up. It's not.
And I don't think, by theway that once people do wake up,
we're going to go down without afight. But at that point it
will be a fight that is conductedon the worst possible grounds for the people
of the United States, because ourunited commitment to maintain our sovereignty will by

(32:10):
that time have suffered from the factthat nobody's expressing it, nobody's seeing this
every day in terms of the factthat what is being done is a sponsored
invasion filling the country with people whoare not entitled to vote. But even
now these people are talking about tryingto expedite their voting. If you've brought

(32:31):
in a lot of people and theyhaven't been vetted, and we actually haven't
been keeping track of who they are, where they went, and so forth
and so on, how are yougoing to be able to stop people from
putting their names into the pot ofcitizens who are going to vote for the
president of the United States in ournext election. Yeah, you can send

(32:54):
people out there to scurry and runaround and try to figure out who's who.
But being as how you what atleast hundreds of thousands of people,
We'll be right back with the verdict. Stay tuned, Alan Keys, and
I will give you the verdict ofwhere we are as of right now.
God bless to be right back beforehe was a trial lawyer, he sliced

(33:30):
him and diced him. People usedto ask me, Larry, what caused
you to start judicial Watch, andhow freedom watch given the powerful forces in
this country that puts you at riskin a meatpacking plan. I'm the son
of meat packers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and had a slice and dice a
very special prosecutor, Larry Krayman.If you'd like to support freedom Watch and
this radio show, go to FREEDOMWATCHUSAdot org. We're back with the verdict.

(33:57):
Hellow patriots, people of faith,those who believe in the vision and
creation of our founding fathers. AndJefferson believed. And thereat book that I
wrote, Alan, which you werekind enough to write a forward for,
was actually refreshed about a year orso ago. First it was it takes
a revolution, Wake up America.Now it takes a counter revolution. But

(34:21):
Jefferson said that every twenty years orso, we would likely have to clean
house. We would likely have towage a rebellion, saying that what's a
few thousand dead to refresh the treeof liberty? He didn't want to see
violence. Neither do I. Neitherdo you. But do you see any
scenario where the people are going tohave to fight back and do what Jefferson

(34:43):
predicted at some point we see.I think it depends on some things that
I don't know. The answer to. One is Donald Trump. Everybody thinks
he represents himself and the soufriends,and I don't think so. I think
he stirred a response because a lotof Americans are feeling uneasy in the situation

(35:07):
in which our governments, at variouslevels, but especially that seem to be
usurping our sovereignty. We are supposedto be the sovereign in this country.
We're supposed to rule the people,the sovereign body of the people, not
the sovereign body of the elites,the government that administrators and so forth and
so on. They answer to us. Have we been doing our job?

(35:28):
I'm not sure we have, becausea lot of people, I think in
America now know that their citizens havea rudimentary idea of going to vote and
stuff, but they don't understand thattheir sovereign that is to say, not
sovereign individuals, but part of asovereign body charged with the responsibility of preserving
the republic. And that's a chargethat extends to every election and shouldn't be

(35:52):
produced by all of the political goingson so that people forget and don't even
see that the country is being invadedand our form of government of buying for
the people is effectively being overthrown bythe invitation into the country of foreigners who

(36:13):
I believe will when push comes toshout. The sad part of it is
if the bad guys are still anywherenear in charge, I think that they're
going to be having invited a lotof people who when I look at them
across the burer, I said,those look like really able bodied men could
go right into a military and shootyour head off. Why are we allowing
this to happen? And I thinkthat the end result of that is going

(36:35):
to be a war. We'll fightit because we're still you know, they
haven't been able to get rid ofthe Second Amendment yet, and as a
result, a lot of people inthis country are armed. But are they
trained? Are they committed and readyto face such a thing where their country's
being taken away from them at variouslevels, piecemeal and they have to do
something about it. I think thetime to think about that is now,

(36:58):
and in that context where if peoplemobilize on that basis to remember one thing,
you must reject the Democrats because they'responsoring the evil. You must look
for somebody who isn't sponsoring the evil. And Donald Trump is volunteered. And
then once he gets into office,you must make sure he secures the office.
And then you have to move forwardto undo the deep damage that they

(37:23):
have been doing to our own senseof our role as the sovereign people of
the United States. Well, that'svery well put. You know. I
pray that we don't get to thepoint of violence. That's what I do,
what I do at Freedom Watch,That's what I did when I was
running Judicial Watch. But I'm afraidand I don't want to see it that

(37:45):
that's where we're headed. So youhit the nail on the head. We
need to prepare for that because wejust can't sit here and wait for them
to come to us. We haveto be able to defend ourselves, and
that may mean that we have toarm ourselves to get ready for that eventuality.
Because these people know no bounds,they know absolutely no constraint, and

(38:08):
we can see that now they're usingthe legal system against Donald Trump. They
will if they don't succeed with that. Plan B. Plan B is more
antif it's more black lives matters,more riots by radical Palestinian groups that are
threatening the fabric of this country,and the youth of this country is completely

(38:30):
clueless. So Alan, I wantto thank you for everything that you have
done, my very good friend,and let's continue to stay vigilant and try
to teach the other people in thiscountry what they need to do, because
if God doesn't help us, orif we don't help ourselves, God certainly
won't that's for sure. And Iknow you're a religious man, So thank
you, Alan, God bless You'rewelcome. God bless you, sir,

(38:51):
hope to see you soon. We'llbe back next week with another addition of
special Prosecutor with Larry Claim and rememberthe father and son will only help us
if we help ourselves. Thank youfor listening to this m